CEQA Basic Training What is CEQA?

Similar documents
Presented by: James Moose Remy, Thomas, Moose and Manley, LLP. With: Stephen L. Jenkins, AICP Michael Brandman Associates

CITY OF ORANGE LOCAL CEQA GUIDELINES

COUNTY OF VENTURA ADMINISTRATIVE SUPPLEMENT TO THE STATE CEQA GUIDELINES

RESOLUTION NO. -- The applicant, PPF OFF 100 West Walnut, LP ("Applicant"),

CAIS Trustee Head Conference 2014 Developing a Successful Project Entitlements Team & Strategy

1 Introduction. 1.1 Specific Plan Background

PART ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT

Guidelines for the Implementation of the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970 As Amended

Order of Business. D. Approval of the Statement of Proceedings/Minutes for the meeting of January 24, 2018.

State Clearinghouse Handbook

ATTACHMENT A. Nova Homes Residential Project. Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration City Council Resolution

AGENDA COMMITTEE ON CAMPUS PLANNING, BUILDINGS AND GROUNDS

SAFETEA-LU. Overview. Background

Board of Supervisors' Agenda Items

Board of Supervisors' Agenda Items

Subject: SRRA - DEP proposed rule to eliminate and delay mandatory timeframes inconsistent with legislative intent

TRUSTEES OF THE CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY

coordination and collaboration between St. Mary s College and the Town of Moraga

Mission Bay Master Plan File No M September 27, 1990

ENVIRONMENTAL PRACTICE FORUM:

CITY OF SAN JUAN CAPISTRANO

THE PLAIN LANGUAGE PROVIDER GUIDE TO THE UTAH ADVANCE HEALTH CARE DIRECTIVE ACT

VERIFIED COMPLAINT FOR TERMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER AND A PRELIMINARY AND PERMANENT INJUCTION AND DECLARATORY RELIEF INTRODUCTION

Existing Site Issues & Site Certification. Presented By: Jim Bush President, School Site Solutions, Inc. (916)

The City of Oxnard invites qualified consulting firms or individuals to submit qualifications for On-Call Permit Processing Services.

Case 1:15-cv Document 1 Filed 05/28/15 Page 1 of 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

Our approach to project management education offers proven, results-focused learning.

The next steps outlined at the end of this section are the key requirements as we can best envision them at this stage.

MOOSE MANLEY LLP. September 30, 2015

Institute of Medicine. Committee on Public Health Strategies to Improve Health

Master Land Use Instructions B Abutting Owner=s Notification Los Angeles City Planning Department

City of Sacramento City Council 915 I Street, Sacramento, CA,

SENATE, No. 735 STATE OF NEW JERSEY

Purpose of Developer Fees. Developer Fees: An Overview of the Law and Recent Developments. Overview. September 19, Purpose of Developer Fees

CDBG Crosscutting Issues: Environmental Review

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT

Chapter 8: Options for Hospital Bills

STATE ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW PROCESS FOR PENNSYLVANIA WASTEWATER PROJECTS. Clean Water State Revolving Fund Program

COASTAL CONSERVANCY. Staff Recommendation June 16, 2005 MALIBU ACCESS: DAN BLOCKER BEACH. File No Project Manager: Marc Beyeler

SOURCE SELECTION AND BID PROTESTS: PRE- AND POST-AWARD CONSIDERATIONS. Daniel Forman Amy O Sullivan Olivia Lynch Robert Sneckenberg

Case 1:17-cv CKK Document 73-1 Filed 12/06/17 Page 1 of 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

SPECIFIC AND MASTER PLANS

AGENDA COMMITTEE ON CAMPUS PLANNING, BUILDINGS AND GROUNDS

4.b. 6/22/2017. Local Agency Formation Commission. George J. Spiliotis, Executive Officer

Policy No Page Number 1 of 8 Effective Date: 08/12/15 MEDICAL RECORDS

I. INTRODUCTION AND BACKGROUND

Rights of Military Members

Department of Rehabilitation Services

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF FRESNO. Plaintiffs, Defendants.

2017 Grant Assurances - Comments Concerning LSC s Proposed Revisions to the 2017 Grant Assurances. (81 FR ) April 5, 2016

NOTE: The first appearance of terms in bold in the body of this document (except titles) are defined terms please refer to the Definitions section.

A Primer on Patient Safety Events Winnipeg Regional Health Authority October 2013

ORDINANCE NO

ISLE OF MAN MENTAL HEALTH REVIEW TRIBUNAL GUIDANCE

Bell, C.J. Eldridge Raker Wilner Cathell Harrell Battaglia,

Nob Hill Pipeline Improvements Project

Public-Private Private Partnership Projects (P3P) Seminar

REPORT TO MAYOR AND COUNCIL

PPEA Guidelines and Supporting Documents

Exemptions from Environmental Law for the Department of Defense: Background and Issues for Congress

Case 2:17-cv Document 1 Filed 11/09/17 Page 1 of 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE

IRVINE UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT RESPONSE TO COMMENTS FOR THE PLANNING AREA 6 NORTH ELEMENTARY SCHOOL

WESTERN SLOPE CIP AND TIM FEE UPDATE

AGENCY: Office of Postsecondary Education, Department of. SUMMARY: The Secretary adopts as final, without change, the

REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL For East Bay Community Energy Technical Energy Evaluation Services

ANALYSIS BY THE DEPARTMENT OF NATIONAL DEFENCE OMBUDSMAN IN PARTNERSHIP WITH THE VETERANS OMBUDSMAN

How Old is too Old? Completing and Updating Historic Resource Surveys

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES. Permanent Certification Program for Health Information Technology; Revisions to

Public Hearing on Draft Environmental Impact Report (DEIR) May 16, 2017

National Historic. Preservation Act. A Guidebook on Section 106 August United States marine corps

DIGNITY HEALTH GOVERNANCE POLICY AND PROCEDURE

Best Practices for Effective. Prosecution of and Intervention in Bid Protests. Paul Debolt, Partner, Venable Bill Walter, Partner, DHG

HEALTH PRACTITIONERS COMPETENCE ASSURANCE ACT 2003 COMPLAINTS INVESTIGATION PROCESS

June 8, Honorable Mayor and City Council TO: Planning & Community Development Department

Draft Community Outreach Plan for the Climate Action Plan Update

HUD Q&A. This is a compilation of Q&A provided by HUD regarding relevant issues affecting TCAP and the Tax Credit Exchange Program.

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Case 3:16-cv SI Document 1 Filed 06/02/16 Page 1 of 12 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF OREGON PORTLAND DIVISION.

Province of Alberta ALBERTA HEALTH ACT. Statutes of Alberta, 2010 Chapter A Current as of January 1, Published by Alberta Queen s Printer

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY Federal Emergency Management Agency U.S. Fire Administration

Order of Business. D. Approval of the Statement of Proceedings/Minutes for the meeting of November 15, 2017.

City of Lynwood MODIFIED REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS FOR

POLICY: Conflict of Interest

Order of Business. D. Approval of the Statement of Proceedings/Minutes for the meeting of January 10, 2018.

Agenda Item No. October 14, Honorable Mayor and City Council Attention: David J. Van Kirk, City Manager

Request for Applications to Participate In Demonstration Projects to Evaluate Direct Certification with Medicaid

Safety Net Capital Improvements Program

Metro Walk Phase II at Richmond Multi-Modal Station. City of Richmond, California March 15, 2018


National Peer Review Corporation

NOTICE OF PREPARATION OF AN ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT AND SCOPING MEETING FOR THE DOWNTOWN SPECIFIC PLAN COMMENT PERIOD

Capacity Building Grants: Education Full Proposal

Order of Business. D. Approval of the Statement of Proceedings/Minutes for the meeting of March 14, 2018.

DECISION OF THE CAPE COD COMMISSION

Planning: a Short Guide

MEMORANDUM OF AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AND THE UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

10 Government Contracting Trends To Watch This Year

SEQUOIA UNION HIGH SCHOOL DISTRICT BACKGROUND INFORMATION FOR AGENDA ITEMS FOR 7/22/15, BOARD MEETING

Board of Supervisors' Agenda Items

Order of Business. D. Approval of the Statement of Proceedings/Minutes for the meeting of August 2, 2017.

Transcription:

CEQA Basic Training What is CEQA? CEQA is the California Environmental Quality Act, Public Resource Code 21000 et seq. Regulations are in 14 CCR 15000 et seq. http://ceres.ca.gov/ceqa/index.html

CEQA The process of identifying, estimating and evaluating the environmental consequences of current and proposed actions Very lengthy document

Fundamental Principles To inform the public and agency decisions makers about the environmental impacts of their decisions before the decisions are made To avoid or mitigate environmental impact If not feasible to mitigate impacts, agency may only approve a project if there are overriding circumstances justifying approval (e.g.- jobs, affordable housing, state of emergency)

Why bother? CEQA is widely used by project opponents to delay projects they don t like Can cause delay during approval process and litigating Embarrassment If issues are not clear cut, opponents can claim more analysis or public review and comment is required

When does CEQA apply? CEQA applied to all discretionary public and private projects Those undertaken by public agency Public works projects Adoptions/amendments of ordinances General plan amendments http://www.sanjoseca.gov/planning/gp/

When does it apply? Public Agency decides whether to allow a private agency to do something (e.g. bend a zoning code rule, build a set of trails) Stanford University General Use Permit Mountain Winery Use Permit

Exemptions to CEQA For private projects, CEQA applies when a government permit or other entitlement for use is necessary Notice of exemption (NOE) with the County Clerk s office. Reduce the statute of limitations from 180 to 35 days

When must CEQA compliance occur? Rule: CEQA process must be completed before the project is approved Key Questions: When will the agency irretrievably commit itself to a course of action Awarding a contract for construction of building Issues a permit to a private developer

If CEQA applies to my project, what must I do? Determine what role the various agencies will play. Lead agency- has primary responsibility for CEQA compliance and prepares the environmental document For public projects, the agency that will carry out the project is the lead agency For private projects, the agency with more general jurisdiction (e.g., County vs air district) or that needs to act first on the project is usually the lead agency Lead agencies must consult with responsible agencies and trustee/ resources agencies

Agency Roles Responsible agencies- agencies that must issue a discretionary permit or other approval for the project (e.g., BAAQMD, CHP, CDFG) Cannot take action on the project until the Lead Agency completes and certifies the environmental documents Must make their own CEQA findings before approving the project Experts must be used from these agencies

No Significant impact Determine what types of environmental documents is required Prepare an Initial Study to identify possible impacts If there is no substantial evidence in light of the whole record that project has the potential to cause a significant environmental impact, can do a Negative Declaration (Neg Dec)

Environmental Impact Report If there is a potentially significant impact, need to either do a Mitigated Negative Declaration or an Environmental Impact Report (EIR) Mitigated Negative Declaration- appropriate where the project can be altered or mitigated to avoid all significant impact EIR must be done if a project has Potentially Significant Impact and the project proponents agrees to these changes before the document is released for public comment

Key differences between Neg. Dec. & EIR EIR s usually are much more lengthy, detailed and expensive Public comment period is 20-30 days for a Neg. Dec. vs 30-60 days for an EIR Lead agencies need not respond to comments received on Neg. Dec, but must prepare a response to each substantive comment on an EIR It is safer legally to prepare an EIR

Process Generally dictated by the type of documents to be prepared (EIR, Neg Dec.) Public notice- This is because public participation is so crucial to the process. Public hearings- sometimes required for the underlying approval.

Procedural Requirements Practice tips: Even if no public hearing is legally required, public agencies often choose to hold several public hearings, workshops and community meetings on controversial project to help identify, discussed and resolve issues early in the process. Professional facilitators may be helpful If a federal agency approval is needed for the project, NEPA may apply. Find this out early so you can coordinate processes.

Exemptions Some projects are exempt from CEQA Statutory exemptions common sense exemptions Categorical exemptions- projects the State Resource Agency has determined do not normally have significant impacts. Exception: categorical exemptions do not apply where there is a reasonable possibility that, due to unusual circumstances, the project will have a significant effect

Litigation Procedure for challenging CEQA compliance Writ of mandate (CCP 1085 or 1094.5) Standard of review Effects of lawsuits on projects No automatic stay or injunction. Normal test for preliminary injunction applies (success based on merits, balance of interim harm)

Litigation Statue of Limitations 30 days after filing a Notice of Determination for challenges to Neg Dec and EIR (failure to file NOD results in 180-days limitations period) 35 days after filling a Notice of Exemption for challenges to exemptions determination (180 days if no NOE filed) 180 days of project is undertaken without any CEQA compliance

Project Approval Make the following findings All potentially significant impacts have been mitigated or avoided OR Specific economic, legal, social or other considerations make the mitigation measures and alternatives identified in the EIR infeasible If the latter finding is made, the agency cannot approve the project unless it finds the projects specific economic, legal, social, technological or other benefits outweigh the environmental impact These findings must be supported by substantial evidence in the record, and the findings must be fairly detailed

Project Approval Adopt a mitigation monitoring and reporting program only for a Mitigated Neg. Dec and EIR File a Notice of Determination (NOD) with the County Clerk within 5 working days of final project approval. Must also file NOD with State Office of Planning and Research if state agency is Responsible Agency

Project Approval Make sure the approving body takes all required actions before approving project Before approving a project which a Mitigated Neg Dec or EIR was prepared the lead agency must: Consider the environmental documents and comments received Find the documents reflects its independent judgments Certify that the document was prepared in compliance with CEQA

Lessons from the Trenches Don t try to hide anything You will only end up delaying your project CEQA litigation often turns on whether the court felt the agency made a good faith effort to comply with the law, particularly in the areas of public disclosure and involvement You risk losing the public s interest

Lessons from the trenches Do it right the first time Try to identify issues early so you can address them in the environmental document. Failure to do so will create months or even years of delay Make sure you identify all pertinent agencies early in the process and get their input