Greg Kilchenstein. Senior Analyst OADUSD (MR&MP)

Similar documents
REQUIREMENTS TO CAPABILITIES

Department of Defense INSTRUCTION

Depot Contributions to Weapons Readiness

NAVAIR News Release AIR-6.0 Public Affairs Patuxent River, MD

UNCLASSIFIED. R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE PE D8Z: Department of Defense Corrosion Policy and Oversight FY 2013 OCO

UNCLASSIFIED. FY 2016 Base FY 2016 OCO

RDT&E BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION SHEET (R-2 Exhibit) February 2003

Ship Maintenance: Provider Perspective. VADM Paul Sullivan Naval Sea Systems Command

Department of Defense INSTRUCTION

Guest Presenter Jay Bottelson

We acquire the means to move forward...from the sea. The Naval Research, Development & Acquisition Team Strategic Plan

DoD Automatic Test Systems Strategies and Technologies

Headquarters U.S. Air Force. Ensuring An Adequate Infrastructure To Execute Assigned Maintenance Workload

Hexavalent Chromium Reduction in the Army: Success Stories and the Path Forward

Fleet Readiness Centers

260D. Chris Giggey NAVAIR PMA260 DPM for ATS 28 Oct 2014

UNCLASSIFIED UNCLASSIFIED. EXHIBIT R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification February 2007 RESEARCH DEVELOPMENT TEST & EVALUATION, NAVY / BA-4

MEDIA CONTACTS. Mailing Address: Phone:

2016 Major Automated Information System Annual Report

COMFRC. Commander, Fleet Readiness Centers. 07 Dec Commander, Fleet Readiness Centers. Presented to: Attendees, 2016 DoD Maintenance Symposium

Enhancing Maintenance Training through Distance Support Initiatives

Small Business Opportunities with the Naval Air Systems Command

GAO ARMY WORKING CAPITAL FUND. Actions Needed to Reduce Carryover at Army Depots

Logistics Research & Engineering Directorate. Alan Galonski Chief, Future Concepts Division 1 1

NAWCWD Long Range Acquisition Forecast (LRAF) Requirements FY15 FY17

Tobyhanna Army Depot. Overview

UNCLASSIFIED FY 2016 OCO. FY 2016 Base

Fiscal Year 2011 Defense Environmental Programs Annual Report to Congress

USAF Tankers: Critical Assumptions for Comparing Competitive Dual Procurement with Sole Source Award

Fiscal Year 2009 National Defense Authorization Act, Section 322. Study of Future DoD Depot Capabilities

GAO AIR FORCE WORKING CAPITAL FUND. Budgeting and Management of Carryover Work and Funding Could Be Improved

Innovation Across Industry Panel

UNCLASSIFIED. UNCLASSIFIED Army Page 1 of 20 R-1 Line #98

Future Expeditionary Armor Force Needs

UNCLASSIFIED. FY 2016 Base FY 2016 OCO

Common Range Integrated Instrumentation System (CRIIS)

AMCOM Corrosion Program

TWV Fleet Maintenance Challenges

UNCLASSIFIED FY 2008/2009 RDT&E,N BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION SHEET DATE: February 2007 Exhibit R-2

UNCLASSIFIED. FY 2016 Base FY 2016 OCO

NAVAIR Overview. 30 November 2016 NAVAIR. PRESENTED TO: Radford University. PRESENTED BY: David DeMauro / John Ross

Report to Congress on Distribution of Department of Defense Depot Maintenance Workloads for Fiscal Years 2015 through 2017

UNCLASSIFIED. UNCLASSIFIED Navy Page 1 of 7 R-1 Line #16

Analyzing Sustainment and Maintenance Alternatives. Moderator Ms. Lisha Adams Deputy Assistant Secretary of Defense for Material Readiness

2016 Major Automated Information System Annual Report

UNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE. FY 2014 FY 2014 OCO ## Total FY 2015 FY 2016 FY 2017 FY 2018

DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE PRESENTATION TO THE COMMITTEE ON ARMED SERVICES DEFENSE ACQUISITION REFORM PANEL UNITED STATES HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

Common Range Integrated Instrumentation System (CRIIS)

Supplement 2 Department of Defense FAR Supplement (DFARS) Government Contract Provisions

Performance-Based Logistics

ARS 2004 San Diego, California, USA

Command Overview Naval Surface Warfare Center, Carderock Division

Be clearly linked to strategic and contingency planning.

Department of Defense INSTRUCTION

STATEMENT OF. MICHAEL J. McCABE, REAR ADMIRAL, U.S. NAVY DIRECTOR, AIR WARFARE DIVISION BEFORE THE SEAPOWER SUBCOMMITTEE OF THE

Department of Defense SUPPLY SYSTEM INVENTORY REPORT September 30, 2003

JUDGING CRITERIA U.S. Army Aviation and Missile Command, G-4 E-Team

GAO. DEPOT MAINTENANCE Air Force Faces Challenges in Managing to Ceiling

OPNAVINST B N8 7 Nov Subj: NAVY TEST, MEASUREMENT, AND DIAGNOSTIC EQUIPMENT, AUTOMATIC TEST SYSTEMS, AND METROLOGY AND CALIBRATION

Subj: DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY POLICY ON INSENSITIVE MUNITIONS

EXHIBIT R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification RESEARCH DEVELOPMENT TEST & EVALUATION, NAVY / BA4

DoD Corrosion Prevention and Control

UNCLASSIFIED. UNCLASSIFIED Army Page 1 of 16 R-1 Line #45

DIRECTORY OF CERTIFIED CLIENTS (Updated March 7, 2018)

NSWCCD-SSES SSES COMMAND OVERVIEW. 12 June Patricia C. Woody Department Head Machinery Research and Engineering

Rapid Innovation Fund (RIF) Program

NAVAIR Commander s Awards recognize teams for excellence

A Ready, Modern Force!

Revision of DoD Design Criteria Standard: Noise Limits (MIL-STD-1474) Award Winner: ARL Team

NAWCWD Long Range Acquisition Forecast (LRAF) Requirements. Distribution Statement A - Approved for public release, distribution is unlimited.

This is definitely another document that needs to have lots of HSI language in it!

Number: DI-MGMT Approval Date:

H-60 Seahawk Performance-Based Logistics Program (D )

Doing Business With The Marine Corps System Command (MARCORSYSCOM) 2010 APBI Conference

DEFENSE LOGISTICS. Enhanced Policy and Procedures Needed to Improve Management of Sensitive Conventional Ammunition

UNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE Defense Contract Management Agency HANDBOOK. Lead Platform Command

UNCLASSIFIED. UNCLASSIFIED Navy Page 1 of 7 R-1 Line #31

It s All about the Money!

Engaging U.S. Markets: Strategy and Programs


COMPLIANCE WITH THIS PUBLICATION IS MANDATORY

Set Up Page. America s Only Complete Vehicle Solution. dcn: 9972

NAVAL AIR SYSTEMS COMMAND RESEARCH AND ENGINEERING GROUP & NAVAL AIR WARFARE CENTER AIRCRAFT DIVISION

DoD Analysis Update: Support to T&E in a Net-Centric World

Naval VAMOSC Overview

STATEMENT OF REAR ADMIRAL MARK A. HUGEL, U.S. NAVY DEPUTY DIRECTOR, FLEET READINESS DIVISION BEFORE THE

U.S. ARMY AVIATION AND MISSILE LIFE CYCLE MANAGEMENT COMMAND

ATTACHMENT TO ADC 244 Definition for Reconciliation, Small Arms and Light Weapons and Clarification of Procedure (Supply)

The Beginning. GEN Kern s Memo, 20 Aug 02 Creating Lean A Mgmt Tool for the Future. there is potential for great progress.

VADM David C. Johnson. Principal Military Deputy to the Assistant Secretary of the Navy for Research, Development and Acquisition April 4, 2017

Implementing the Joint Battle Management Command & Control Roadmap Panel

Subj: MISSION AND FUNCTIONS OF THE BUREAU OF MEDICINE AND SURGERY. Ref: (a) SECNAV Washington DC Z Jul 2005 (ALNAV 055/05)

UNCLASSIFIED. R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE PE D8Z: Strategic Environmental Research and Development Program (SERDP) FY 2012 OCO

UNCLASSIFIED. R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE PE D8Z: Joint Fires Integration & Interoperability FY 2012 OCO

Government-to-Government (GTGS) Solutions GSA and USMC Partnerships

process since the beginning of the program and will continue that involvement throughout the life cycle of the program.

Subj: CHEMICAL, BIOLOGICAL, RADIOLOGICAL, AND NUCLEAR DEFENSE REQUIREMENTS SUPPORTING OPERATIONAL FLEET READINESS

This publication is available digitally on the AFDPO WWW site at:

Sustaining Systems Engineering: The A-10 Example

Transcription:

Sustaining Materiel Readiness Technology Insertion: A Key Enabler Greg Kilchenstein Senior Analyst OADUSD (MR&MP) 30 January 2008

DoD Maintenance Enterprise ~ 330,000 Vehicles 900 Strategic Missiles Maintained by: 654,000 DoD personnel Private sector companies 280 Ships 14,000 Aircraft/Helicopters Maintenance cost: ~ $87 billion per year + Communications/Electronics Equipment + Support Equipment + Other Systems National Defense Inventory is valued at $700B Source: LMI analysis of DoD data

DoD Maintenance Cost Trends Dollars (billion) 90 DoD Maintenance Budget 100 Maintenance costs are escalating! 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 FY 2001-06 $40 billion in FY-01 to $87 billion in FY-06 25% increase in maintenance budget from FY-01 to FY-08 (constant FY 08 dollars) DoD Budget 600 Dollars (billion) 500 400 300 200 100 Maintenance is increasing as a percentage of the total DoD budget! 14% in FY-03 to 16 % in FY-06 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 FY 2001-06 Source: LMI analysis of DoD data

Materiel Readiness Life Cycle Framework A B (Program Initiation) C Concept Refinement Concept Decision Technology Development System Development & Demonstration Design Readiness Review Production & Deployment LRIP/IOT&E FRP Decision Review Operations & Support Pre-Systems Acquisition Systems Acquisition Acquisition Sustainment 65-80% of the Life Cycle Cost Multiple Sources of Supply Transformation Sustaining the System Ready Safe Assets with 24/7 Availability Reliability & Maintainability Affordable Weapon Systems Obsolescence/Tech Refresh Reduced Footprint Logistics Chain Reliability Logistics Chain Effectiveness Logistics Chain Cycle Time Retrograde Management Production Flexibility Supply Chain Agility

OSD Strategy: Maintenance Needs to Transform! Promote End-to-End (E2E) Materiel Readiness Value Chain Perspective across DoD Balance Safety, Reliability, Maintenance and Supply Distribution activities to achieve optimal materiel readiness at best cost. Optimize TIME-ON-WING and TURN AROUND TIME TLCSM Sustain Optimal Materiel Condition & Reliability Sustain Optimal Support Cost & Cycle Time Sustainment Technology is Key

Prime Movers Requirements: JROC approved sustainment KPP for Availability 2 KSAs Life Cycle Cost, Reliability CJCSI 3170.01F, Joint Capabilities Integration and Development System (JCIDS) CJCSM 3170.01C, Operation of the JCIDS Integrated Policies: DoDI 5000.2 - Life Cycle Acquisition/Support DoDI 4151.19 - Serialized Item Management DoDI 8320.3 - Unique Identification (UID) Standards for a Net- Centric Department of Defense DAG/Supportability Guide (DAU) Governance/Oversight: g DAB, DAES, MRSSG/MRU, GAO, BTA-IRB, DLB

Materiel Readiness Sustainment Technologies AIT RFID/IUID (and associated infrastructure) On-board/Off-board diagnostics & prognostics (CBM+): Reactive to Proactive IETMS/RCM/Information Technology Advanced materials, MRO processes and technology

Sustainment Technology Insertion Best Practices Tech Insertion as CPI initiative iti Solid Sustainment Technology Requirements Enterprise buy-in include all stake holders Plan and budget for success Technology adoption vice technology development Beg Borrow Steal: Exercise ALL options Colalborate.Collaborate.Collaborate!!

Sustainment Technology OSD Funding Sources CTMA (Commercial Technology for Maintenance Activities) $6M/Yr DMEA (Defense Micro Electronics Activity) $12M/Yr RTOC (Reduction of Total Ownership Cost) $25M/Yr SERDP (Strategic Environmental R&D Program) $60M/Yr ESTCP (Environmental Security Technology Cert. Program $40M/Yr CPC Corrosion Prevention and Control $15M/Yr ACTD (Advanced Concept Technology Demonstrator Program) $160M/Yr JCTD (Joint Capability Technology Demonstrator Program) $40M/Yr SBIR (Small Business Innovative Research) $1B/Yr STTR (Small Business Technology Transfer Program) $125M/Yr IR&D (Independent Research and Development) $B&B/Yr CTTO (Commercial Technology Transition Office ONR) $UKN USMC TD (USMC Technology Development) $UKN

Proven Collaboration CTMA Unique DoD/Industry partnership to bring new technologies/practices into the DoD maintenance community to increase weapon systems readiness through: Reduced repair cycle time Improved reliability Improved maintenance and repair operations at all levelsl Reduced sustainment cost

CTMA Basics Cooperative Agreement between NCMS and the Office of the Secretary of Defense [ADUSD (MR&MP)] Industry co-funding on a 2:1 match basis In-kind and/or cost share Historical funding average - $6 million/yr. No fixed solicitation schedule Must have at least 2 DoD entities indicating strong support via a commitment letter from their base commander or the person responsible for implementation Projects generally 18 months or less in duration

Impact on DoD to Date 45 Completed Projects with 25 distinct DoD facilities participating DoD funds: $51 million Industry In-kind: $108 million Project lead by Service 16 Projects 19 projects 19 projects 8 projects Annual cost benefit to DoD: $130 million, ROI=20X Current project portfolio 21 projects Forming an additional 15 projects Current project backlog 43 projects Estimated additional annual cost benefit potential to DoD: $120 million

Reducing Costs and Cycle Time Enhanced Wiring Integrity System (USA, USAF, USN, USMC, USCG) Rapid Manufacturing and Repair (USAF, USN, USMC, NASA, DoE) $4.5 M cost avoidance 280 Weeks saved on non-availability of parts F-15 wiring faults--$49m/yr cost avoidance and 120 lost a/c days recouped Submarine Overhaul delays due to crane wiring problems - - $60K/day cost avoidance EA-6B Circuit Breaker Panel -- $842K Multi-year, multi-million dollar joint service acquisition of analyzer technology ATE Synthetic ti Instrumentation (USAF, all Avionics Applications) $49M Cost avoidance in legacy

Reducing Costs and Cycle Time Portable Large Shape Inspection System $1.5M/year savings/avoidance Significant Cycle time reduction and improved capacity Assembly Design and Documentation Reduces disassembly/assembly planning time by up to 33% promises to reduce aircraft battle damage assessment time Reduces opportunity for human error in work instruction creation and use Laser Coating Removal for Helicopter Blades Repair cost reduced from $1,188.14 per blade to $222.53 per blade. Total annual cost avoidance of $908,000 at Cherry Point alone.

Improved Maintenance and Repair Operations Laser Engineered Net Shape (LENS tm ) (USA, USN, USMC) $6.85M/year reduced maintenance cost Significant cycle time reduction for reengineering Automated Process & Inspection Guide (USAF, USA, widespread application) $8.55M/year for inspections, training, i cycle time and paperwork reduction 2 Flow days saved per aircraft 5 hours per HUMVEE No-Mask Hard Chrome Plating (USA, USN, USAF) $2.4M/year in decreased labor 200% increase in plating equipment availability 46% reduction in rework 75% reduction in component cycle time

Improved Reliability Laser Shot Peening $3.1M maintenance cost reduction to landing gear trunnion 3 year life extension; 50% increase Significantly improved flight safety LAV Sense & Respond $10M/year cost avoidance 7% increase in availability 34 additional vehicles 14% increase in MTBF 50% reduction in customer wait time Portable Handheld Oil Analyzer $828M in increased asset availability $15M/year in maintenance/shipping/disposal i /di cost avoidance Significantly reduced cycle time and greatly improved soldier safety

DoD Participants Marine Corps Maintenance Center Albany Marine Corps Maintenance Center Barstow Light Armored Vehicle PM Camp Pendleton Corpus Christi Army Depot (AD) Tobyhanna AD Red River AD Anniston AD Letterkenny AD Sierra AD Army Oil Analysis Program Oklahoma City Air Logistics Center (ALC) Ogden (ALC) Warner Robins (ALC) Elmendorf AFB B-2 Program Office Seymour Johnson AFB Wright Patterson AFB Air Force Advanced Composites Office Fleet Readiness Center East Fleet Readiness Center Southeast Fleet Readiness Center Southwest Naval Air Systems Command Norfolk Naval Shipyard (NSY) Portsmouth NSY Pearl Harbor NSY Puget Sound NSY Naval Sea Systems Command Naval Submarine Base- Kings Bay Naval Undersea Warfare Center, Keyport Naval Surface Warfare Center, Crane Naval Air Warfare Center, China Lake Defense Logistics Agency Joint Oil Analysis Program

Active CTMA Projects 1. LAV II Sense and Respond 2. Predictive Maintenance Systems CH-53E Helicopters 3. Ultrasonic Consolidation of Titanium Alloys 4. Assembly Design and Documentation ti 5. Implementing Hard Chrome Plating at CCAD 6. Heat Transfer Classification for Production Tooling and Composite Repair 7. Laser Coating Removal Systems Phase II 8. Advanced Digital Fabrication & Repair, A Rapid Manufacturing and Repair Program (RM&R) 9. Automated Test Equipment (ATE) Synthetic Instrumentation 10. Legacy Test Program Set (TPS) Migration System 11. Portable Large Shape Inspection System (PLSIS) 12. Durable Non-Skid Coating 13. OptiCAM III 14. Portable/Hand-Held Oil Analysis Device(s) 15. Legacy Lifecycle Management 16. Casting Knowledge Reuse-Based Cost Advisor 17. Smart Machine Pilot Project - Phase II (SMPP II) 18. Six Sigma for Lifecycle Data Management, Phase II 19. SED Device Detection 20. Laser Engineered Net Shaping Solutions II (LENS II) for Commercial and Defense Manufacturing Repair and Overhaul Applications - Phase II

Current Forming CTMA Projects 1. Centralized Fleet Automated Management System (CFAMS) 2. Assembly Design and Documentation, Phase II 3. Configuration Change Management 4. Sense and Respond Logistics Development of Comprehensive Secondary Repairable Legacy Platform Readiness Capability (Light Armored Vehicle), Phase III 5. Inspection and Repair Preparation Cell (IRPC) 6. Automated Process and Inspection Guide (AP & IG) 7. Oil Assessment Devices, Phase II

Current Forming CTMA Projects 8. Replacement for Hexavalent Chromium in Surface Finishing Process Phase II 9. Modernization of Nickel Electroplating at Depots 10. Enhanced Wiring Integrity System Phase II 11. Laser Projection of Camouflage and Stencil Patterns 12. Smart Machine Phase III 13. Metal Finishing Development Program 14.Erosion Corrosion Resistant Coatings for Gas Turbine Engine Compressor Airfoils 15.Conversion of 2D Raster Images into 3D CAD Models

Shameless Plug USMC Land SystemsSustainment Technology Workshop February 26-27 at Quantico Register: https://www.ncms.org/ssl/08ctma- Quantico/08-registration.htm

Online Resources UID Website http://www.acq.osd.mil/dpap/uid IUID Toolkit http://www.iuidtoolkit.com Four tracks: PMs, Suppliers, Depot, Warfighter CTMA Website http://ctma.ncms.org MR&MP (Maintenance IUID CONOPS & Depot Implementation Guide/Template, CBM+) http://www.acq.osd.mil/log/mrmp

Questions?