The Significance of Timing of Patient Daily Weights and the Barriers

Similar documents
Infection Control: Reducing Hospital Acquired Central Line Bloodstream Infections

VAP Prevention in the CTICU

Improving Nurse Education on Research Informed Consent

Optimizing Electronic Healthcare Records and Improving Process in the Healthcare Clinic

The Clinical Nurse Leader as Risk Anticipator: Optimizing the Completion and Accuracy of the Code Blue Recorder Sheet

Fall Reduction with Nursing Interventions

A Roadmap for the Journey Home - A Supplemental Tool Guiding Patients from Hospital to Home

Increasing Self Care Compliance with Follow-up Appointments

IMPROVING COMMUNICATION AND SATISFACTION THROUGH HOURLY ROUNDS

REDUCTION OF PSYCHIATRIC PATIENT BOARDING IN THE ED

Prospectus Summary Brief: NICU Communication Improvement

Improving Staff Responsiveness to Patient-Initiated Call Lights

Reducing Avoidable Interruptions During the Medication Administration Process

Improving Pain Reassessment within One Hour Following the Administration of Pain Medication

Improving Patient Medication Reconciliation Participation and Compliance Through Education

Improving Nurse-patient Communication about New Medicines

A Multi-Prong Fall Awareness Program to Reduce the Occurrence of Falls in a Skilled Nursing Unit

Safe Patient Handling & No Lift Policy: Reducing The Incidence Of Work-Related Injuries Among Nursing Staff

Improving Patient Safety: Reducing Medication Errors in the Microsystem

Nurse Shift Handoff Report at the Patient's Bedside: Improving Nurse-to-Nurse Communication

Falls Program on an Acute Psychiatric Unit

Patient Satisfaction Related to Noise in the Coronary Care Unit

4/26/2017. I ll Do It My Way, Thank You Performance Improvement Strategies for Home Care. Session Objectives. Session Agenda

Educating Nurses on the Use of Bedside Mobility Assessment Tool (BMAT) through E-learning/ Online Education Module

Reducing Clostridium Difficile

INCREASED COMMUNICATION BETWEEN NURSES AND DOCTORS ON AN ACUTE MEDICAL UNIT

2017 Congestive Heart Failure. Program Evaluation. Our mission is to improve the health and quality of life of our members

Improving Early Sepsis Identification on Inpatient Units

Obstetric Triage Improvement

Improving Early Sepsis Identification on Inpatient Units

Judy Ingala, R.N. Julie Dunn, M. D. Mountain States Health Alliance Johnson City Medical Center

Discharge by 11:00 AM and the Effects on Throughput

Development and Implementation of a Patient Education Tool to Increase Fall Risk Awareness

Implementation of a Debrief Takeaway board

Barriers Encountered by Nurses and Nursing Assistants that Prevent Purposeful Rounding

Chronic Pain Management in the Inpatient Care Setting

Admission Handoff Between Emergency Department and Inpatient Units

Preventing Heart Failure Readmissions by Using a Risk Stratification Tool

Establishing a patient safety pilot program in UCSF Medical Center Benioff Children s Hospital: Principles, System Analysis, and Initial Steps

Fall Prevention Through Proactive Toileting

Reduce the Rooming Time

Communication Skills. Assignments textbook reading, pp workbook exercises, pp

Objectives 10/09/2015. Screen and Intervene: Improved Outcomes From a Nurse-Initiated Sepsis Protocol C935

Reducing IV Infiltrates in the Neonatal Population

Patient Safety: Fall Prevention. Unlicensed Assistive Personnel

Implementing Change to Decrease the Readmission Rate for Clients of a Care Transition Program

On the CUSP: Stop BSI

Increasing CLABSI Bundle Compliance in the NICU

Improving Hand Hygiene Compliance to Reduce CLABSI Rate in Oncology ICU

Telemedicine: Solving the Root Causes for Preventable 30-day Readmissions in SNF Settings

Standardized Blood Transfusion Documentation

CGS Administrators, LLC Clinical Hospice Documentation from CGS Missouri Hospice & Palliative Care Assoc. October 3, 2016

ADMISSION CARE PLAN. Orient PRN to person, place, & time

Table of Contents. Foundation: Understand the Basics 4. Tools: Put the Pieces Together 21. Solve: Learn by Example 38. Printable Tools 56

Prior Assessed Learning (PAL) Application

Patient Interview/Readmission Chart Review. Hospital Review:

The Best In Restorative Nursing

Begin Implementation. Train Your Team and Take Action

Emergency Preparedness on an Inpatient Hospital Unit

Improving Interdisciplinary Communication to Improve Patient Satisfaction

Christi McCarren, SVP, Retail Health & Community Based Care Lynnell Hornbeck, Manager, Home Health

Educating Nurses on the Use of the Bedside Mobility Assessment Tool (BMAT) to Create a Culture of Safety

Improving Pain Reassessment and Documentation Through Nurse Education

Managing Patients with Multiple Chronic Conditions

Preventing Sepsis Mortality

Performing a correct surgical time out

Chapter 2: Patient Care Settings

Educating medication aides about safe medication administration

THE DOWNFALL TEAM PRESENTS BE ON THE BALL PREVENT A FALL!

Supplemental materials for:

Increasing Patient Participation in the Medication Reconciliation Process

Conflicts of Interest Disclosure

The Development of the Oncology Symptom Management Clinic

Fall Prevention Toolkit

Peer Review Example: Clinician 4 (Meets Expectations)

Partnering with the Care Management Department. Medical Staff and Allied Health Practitioner Orientation

Structural Heart Program Staffing Considerations- Effective Models for Clinic, Procedure and Post Procedure Care

Hypertension Management Through Patient Education

A Nurse Leader s guide to a successful Restorative Nursing Program PRESENTER: AMY FRANKLIN RN, DNS MT, QCP MT, RAC MT

Rapid Response Nursing Program: Supporting Chronic Disease Management through Transitions in Care

BreakThrough Care Center: A New Care Model for High Risk Patients. Dr. Richard Krouse Dr. Paul Merrick

Solution Title: Population Health: A Paradigm Shift in how we care for Behavioral Health Patients

Cultural Transformation To Prevent Falls And Associated Injuries In A Tertiary Care Hospital p. 1

Consumer ehealth Affinity Group

2015 Congestive Heart Failure. Program Evaluation. Our mission is to improve the health and quality of life of our members

Breaking Down Silos of Care: Integration of Social Support Services with Health Care Delivery

MQii Malnutrition Knowledge and Awareness Test

The Health Care Improvement Foundation 2017 Delaware Valley Patient Safety and Quality Award Entry Form 1. Hospital Name Jefferson Health

The STAAR Initiative

Reducing Wait Time of Chemotherapy and Biotherapy Administration to Inpatients by Increasing the Numbers of Chemotherapy Providers

Educational Innovation Brief: Educating Graduate Nursing Students on Value Based Purchasing

Impacting Patient Care Experiences: Hourly Rounding

A Multi-Phased Approach to Using Clinical Data to Drive Evidence-Based EMR Redesign. Kulik, Carole Marie; Foad, Wendy; Brown, Gretchen

Patient-Centered Fall Prevention Toolkit Paper Fall TIPS Instruction Sheet for Nurses

Worker Health, Hygiene, and Training Decision Tree

5DAY = 1 AND

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES CENTERS FOR MEDICARE & MEDICAID SERVICES

Skilled Nursing Facility (SNF) Shared Best Practices to Reduce Potentially Preventable Readmissions (PPRs)

Chest Pain Accredited. Transplant Program-Heart, Kidney, Liver. Hear Transplant Program serving San Antonio area for 25 years

Complex Care Management Protocols and Procedures

Transcription:

The University of San Francisco USF Scholarship: a digital repository @ Gleeson Library Geschke Center Master's Projects and Capstones Theses, Dissertations, Capstones and Projects Fall 12-12-2014 The Significance of Timing of Patient Daily Weights and the Barriers Ann Pan University of San Francisco, apan@usfca.edu Follow this and additional works at: https://repository.usfca.edu/capstone Part of the Critical Care Nursing Commons Recommended Citation Pan, Ann, "The Significance of Timing of Patient Daily Weights and the Barriers" (2014). Master's Projects and Capstones. 8. https://repository.usfca.edu/capstone/8 This Project/Capstone is brought to you for free and open access by the Theses, Dissertations, Capstones and Projects at USF Scholarship: a digital repository @ Gleeson Library Geschke Center. It has been accepted for inclusion in Master's Projects and Capstones by an authorized administrator of USF Scholarship: a digital repository @ Gleeson Library Geschke Center. For more information, please contact repository@usfca.edu.

Running head: TIMING OF PATIENT DAILY WEIGHTS 1 The Significance of Timing of Patient Daily Weights and the Barriers Ann Pan University of San Francisco, Nursing

TIMING OF PATIENT DAILY WEIGHTS 2 Abstract Background. Current unit practice is that patient daily weights are obtained in the afternoon or evenings. However, patient weights in the afternoon and evenings are not accurate dry weights. According to evidenced based research, to obtain an accurate patient daily weight, patients should be weighed every morning, after their first void and before they eat breakfast. Purpose. The focus of the study was to compare the current practices of obtaining daily weights in the afternoon and evenings, compared to the evidenced based practice recommended in the literature. Method. Through interviews and surveys with staff, the barriers to obtaining patient weights in the mornings, rather than that of the afternoon or evenings, were evaluated. Interviews with nursing staff and nursing assistants were conducted, discussing possible implementations to overcome the barriers discussed. Results. The proposed solutions were organized and addressed with management for possible implementation.

TIMING OF PATIENT DAILY WEIGHTS 3 Statement of the Problem Currently, patient weights are obtained in the afternoon or evenings. However, patient weights in the afternoon and evenings are not accurate dry weights. According to evidenced based research, to obtain an accurate patient weight, patients should be weighed every morning, after their first void and before they eat breakfast. The focus of the study was to compare the current practices of obtaining daily weights in the afternoon and evenings, compared to the evidenced based practice recommended in the literature. The barriers to obtaining patient weights in the mornings, rather than that of the afternoon or evenings, were also evaluated. Rationale According to the current unit protocol, all patients are supposed to be weighed weekly, whereas, 1) pre- and post- heart transplants, 2) heart failure patients, 3) patients receiving diuretic therapy, and 4) patients in renal failure or receiving dialysis are to be weighed daily (Stanford Hospital & Clinics, 2012). Per the manager, in practice, all patients were being weighed daily to avoid any confusion. Also, in order to accommodate all patient daily weights, the data was obtained in the afternoon due to staffing convenience and availability. However, this was not the recommended protocol shown in the literature. The current unit practice and evidenced based practice was compared. The barriers to performing evidenced based practice were also be assessed. Literature Review Curtis et al., in the article, The importance of daily weight measurements in heart failure patients: a performance improvement project, addressed the problem of lack of accurate daily weights by 000 daily. Despite the policy and importance of daily patient weights, it was shown that accurate daily weights were still lacking. They discovered that the problem was the lack of

TIMING OF PATIENT DAILY WEIGHTS 4 availability of standing scales and lack of nursing staff support (NSS) understanding of the importance of daily patient weights. They supplied the floor with an additional standing scale and educated the nursing staff and support on the importance of daily weights. With these implementations, accurate patient daily weights increased by 90% (Curtis et al., 2012). Sherer et al., in the article, Weighing In on the facts: Best practices in daily weight monitoring for heart failure patients, noted that although daily patient weights were critical data in managing heart failure patients on diuretic therapy, only 86% of patient weights were documented. It was found that the reason why patient daily weight were not being obtained was secondary to the lack of nurses understanding the evidenced based practice of how critical accurate daily weights were to the care plan of heart failure patients. After educating the nurses about the best practices for the patients, accurate daily weights increased to 93% (Sherer et al., 2012). In the journal, Nursing Management, an article called Improving CHF Outcomes addressed issues that were vital to the care of CHF patients to improve their outcomes. The authors emphasized consistency and continuation of patient care. Not only was continuous evidenced based practice patient education imperative, but daily processes and monitoring such as daily weights, diet, activity, medications, physician follow-up, and signs and symptoms of CHF exacerbation were also required elements of care. On the hospital unit, it was shown that there were many inconsistencies among the nursing staff in regards to daily activities and patient education. The authors found and addressed the barriers of leading to inconsistent practices, which led to improved patient outcomes. The hospital readmission rate declined by 37%, while the mortality rate decreased by 2%. In addition, 9% of CHF patients received appropriate CHF

TIMING OF PATIENT DAILY WEIGHTS education and follow up within a 12 month period after implementation (Howell & Kniceley, 2007). At Naval Hospital Pensacola, Florida, a study was conducted aiming to reduce readmissions of CHF patients. The article Reducing Readmissions for Congestive Heart Failure noted that hospital readmissions for CHF were frequently preventable. Multiple disease factors and treatments, such as new medications, therapies, exercise programs, and daily health monitoring and maintenance, contributed patient readmission rates. In addition to other therapies, one aspect of patient daily care was the consistency of obtaining daily body weight. Weight gains of 1. to 2.0 kg per week with new signs or symptoms may signal a need for a change in therapy. Making sure accurate diuresis being achieved was a vital portion of CHF patients plan of care (Hoyt & Bowling, 2001). The article by Hauptman et al, The Heart Failure Clinic: A Consensus Statement of the Heart Failure Society of America, stated an important aspect of heart failure management is the physiological daily data, including body weight, blood pressure, and heart rate. This data should be tracked by the patient and shared with the heart failure management team. Being able to track weight and body mass index on a regular basis is part of the nutritional assessment component of care. With the accurate tracking and measurement of daily weights, patients and providers will be able to track if patients are suffering from access fluid volume accumulation, which a crucial part of heart failure management (Hauptman et al., 2008). In the article, Promoting Self-Care in Persons with Heart Failure, Riegel et al. started accurate morning daily weights were essential in heart failure disease maintenance. Diuretic therapies and doses vary in response to changes in body weight. Considerable weight gain is a significant problem for heart failure patients. Unintentional weight change of 3 or more pounds

TIMING OF PATIENT DAILY WEIGHTS 6 in addition to increased severity and frequency of chest pain indicate clinical deterioration of the patient s disease process (Riegel et al., 2009). Cost Analysis After discovering the RN and NA barriers to having daily morning weights on patients, the author devised a unit implementation. The specific implementation determines costs. It was unnecessary to obtain additional resources, such as additional scales. Staff used existing resources currently available on the unit to implement the change. Methodology After noticing the lack of morning weights, the author wished to first examine the reason why the weights are being obtained in the afternoon or evenings rather than that of the morning. The author wanted to compare current patient care on this intermediate ICU versus that of evidence based practice. After reviewing evidenced based practice, a survey (Appendix B) was used to evaluate the staff s understanding of patient daily weights. Barriers to obtaining patient weights in the morning were identified. Interviews were conducted to discuss potential ideas to overcome the barriers. These ideas were organized and addressed with management for possible implementation. Data Source To be able to obtain data about the barriers of obtaining morning weights, the author interviewed the RNs and NAs on the unit. Using a staff interview form, shown in Appendix B, the author addressed that major reasons as to why the weights are not being obtained in the morning. Proposed implementation addressed the barriers to increase the number of morning

TIMING OF PATIENT DAILY WEIGHTS 7 weights available for morning rounds. This was discussed with the manager to provide possible implementations. Root Cause Analysis During interviews with nurses and nursing assistances on the unit, it was noted that patient daily weights are obtained in either the afternoon or evening. A root cause analysis was performed, assessing the barriers on the unit preventing daily morning weights of all patients with various diagnoses. The root cause analysis chart is shown in Appendix A. It addressed the issues as to why patient weights are obtained in the afternoons and evenings. The themes included timing, staffing, resource availability, and patient concerns. In orange, at the end, the chart displays solutions to the barriers that are identified. Survey Results As shown in Figure 1, the survey was completed by 6% of the staff (42 out of 7). In the results, shown in Figure 2, of the 42 surveys were completed by nursing assistances. The reminder of the surveys was completed by staff RNs. 33 or 44% 42 or 6% Surveyed Non-surveyed Figure 1. Staff members surveyed vs. non-surveyed.

TIMING OF PATIENT DAILY WEIGHTS 8 40 37 Number of Staff Responses 3 30 2 20 1 10 0 RN NA Staff Position Figure 2. Staff members, RNs and NAs surveyed. Figure 3 shows that the majority of staff indicated that current weights are obtained in the evening. However, in Figure 4, they noted that the optimal time to obtain patientt weights is in the morning. Number of Staff Responses 3 30 2 20 1 10 2 8 30 6 0 Morning Afternoon Evening Night Time of Day Figure 3. Times patient weights obtained.

TIMING OF PATIENT DAILY WEIGHTS 9 Number of Staff Responses 40 3 30 2 20 1 10 0 37 Morning 3 3 1 Afternoon Evening Night Time of Day Figure 4. Staff perception of optimal time to obtain patient weight. Figure illustrates the various barriers identified by the staff. The barriers were grouped into four main categories of timing, staff, resource availability, and patient concerns. Each category was broken down into specific concerns that nurses and nursing assistants acknowledged, which is shown in the root cause analysis in Appendix A. The greatest concern that was specified was the issue of timing. It was noted that the numerous morning current morning activities, prevented the weighing of patients in the mornings. Number of Staff Responses 0 4 40 3 30 2 20 1 10 0 4 Timing 16 Staff Barriers Resource availability 14 Patient concerns Figure.Barriers to daily morning weights.

TIMING OF PATIENT DAILY WEIGHTS 10 During the staff interviews, the author discussed possible implementations to overcome the barriers that were identified, which are shown in Appendix D. Specific implementations are illustrated in orange in the root cause analysis chart in Appendix A. Expected Results After addressing the barriers to obtaining daily morning weights, the author hoped to educate the staff on the importance of daily patient weights in the morning. Afterwards, the author hoped to address the barriers identified by the staff to develop possible implementations. With several solutions in mind, the author discussed the results with the unit manager for possible implementation in the future. By the end of 201, the author hoped that all patient weights on the unit will be done in the mornings, after the patients first void and before their first intake to ensure accurate patient data. Nursing Relevance Although evidence based practice states that daily morning weights are critical for the care of heart failure patients, in reality, secondary to the lack of time and staff, it is not practiced on the unit. This project contributed on the unit by assuring that the nurses and nursing assistance understand the importance of daily weights, especially that of patients who are the following: 1) pre- and post- heart transplantation, 2) heart failure, 3) receiving diuretic therapy, and 4) in renal failure or receiving dialysis (Stanford Hospital & Clinics, 2012). This reinforced the drive for quality patient-centered care, rather than for staff convenience. It also demonstrated the importance of staff advocacy for change to occur to improve patient outcomes. When staff members notice discrepancies in current policies with evidenced based practice, it is important to update the policy to ensure up-to-date clinical practice. Conclusion

TIMING OF PATIENT DAILY WEIGHTS 11 Current unit practice is that patient daily weights are obtained in the afternoon or evenings. However, patient weights in the afternoon and evenings are not accurate dry weights. According to evidenced based research, to obtain an accurate patient daily weight, patients should be weighed every morning, after their first void and before they eat breakfast. According to the current unit protocol, all patients are supposed to be weighed weekly, whereas, 1) pre- and post- heart transplants, 2) heart failure patients, 3) patients receiving diuretic therapy, and 4) patients in renal failure or receiving dialysis are to be weighed daily (Stanford Hospital & Clinics, 2012). In the article, Promoting Self-Care in Persons with Heart Failure, Riegel et al. stated accurate morning daily weights were essential in heart failure disease maintenance (Riegel et al., 2009). After noticing the lack of morning weights, the author examined the reason why the weights were being obtained in the afternoon or evenings rather than that of the morning. Current patient care on this intermediate ICU was compared to evidence based practice. After reviewing evidenced based practice, a survey (Appendix B) was used to evaluate the staff s understanding of patient daily weights. Barriers to obtaining patient weights in the morning were identified. In addition to the questions that were asked on the survey in Appendix B, the author also interviewed the nurses and nursing assistants about the potential solutions to overcome the barriers that the staff identified. Comprehensive results are listed in Appendix D. According to the literature, morning daily weights, after the first void and before the first intake, were recommended for heart failure disease management. With the data collected, a road map for obtaining patient weights in the morning was established. This was discussed with management. However, the challenge of the inpatient environment was not set up for morning daily weights secondary to a lack of resources. Over 0% of the staff was surveyed. Per

TIMING OF PATIENT DAILY WEIGHTS 12 management, the staff indicated several barriers that were unable to be solved (i.e. more staff). After presenting to the results to the nursing counsel, the recommendation is for the counsel to use to data to devise a plan of action. There were multiple limitations to this study, which include sample size and timing. This was designed to be a pilot project for one unit in the hospital. Therefore, the sample size and interventions cannot be generalized to other hospital units. Also, due to the time constraint of three months, potential implementations of the project were not able to be applied to the unit. Therefore the impacts of the plans were not able to be evaluated. In the future, the author recommends that a larger sample size be used to conduct the study. With the results of the larger sample size and more time, the author recommends the application of the implementations to evaluate the results. In addition to this project, to enhance the long term outcomes of the future implementations, a champion was assigned. With the unit manager s approval, she will be able to carry out the implementations that were suggested in this project. She will also be able to track the progress of the implementations and patient outcomes with the implementation of morning weights.

TIMING OF PATIENT DAILY WEIGHTS 13 References Curtis, A., Wood, A., Johnson, K., Walker, J., Dornburg, S., Osser-Burgess, A., Markham, E., & Nack, J. (2012). The importance of daily weight measurements in heart failure patients: A performance improvement project. Heart & Lung, 41, 424-42. Hauptman, P., Rich, M., Heidenreich, P., Chin, J., Cummings, N., Dunlap, M., Edwards, M., Gregory, D., O Connor, C., Pezzella, S., & Philbin, E. (2008). The heart failure clinic: a consensus statement of the heart failure society of America. Journal of Cardiac Failure. 14(10), 801-81. Hoyt, R & Bowling, L. (April 2001). Reducing readmissions for congestive heart failure. American Family Physician. 63(8), 193-198. Howell, N & Kniceley, C. (November 2007). Improving CHF outcomes. Nursing Management. 38(11), 41-4. Riegel, B., Moser, D., Anker, S., Appel, L., Dunbar, S., Grady, K., Gurvitz, M., Havranek, E., Lee, C., Lindenfield, J., Peterson, P., Pressler, S., Schocken, D., & Whellan, D. (August 2009). State of science: Promoting self-care in persons with heart failure: A scientific statement from the American Heart Association. Circulation. 1141-1163. Retrieved from http://circ.ahajournals.org/content/120/12/1141. Sherer, A., Freeman, L., Owens, D., Nyako, M., Hunter, L., Buck, N., Ragan, L., Tijani, T., White, C., Hamilton, P., & Pettiford, A. (2012). Weighing in on the facts: Best practices in daily weight monitoring for heart failure patients. Heart & Lung, 41, 432-433. Stanford Hospital & Clinics (2012). Weighing standards. Stanford Hospital & Clinics.

TIMING OF PATIENT DAILY WEIGHTS 14 Appendix List Appendix A: Root Cause Analysis Appendix B: Staff Interview Appendix C: Timeline Appendix D: Interview Results Appendix E: Graphed Survey Data

TIMING OF PATIENT DAILY WEIGHTS 1 Appendix A Root Cause Analysis Policy-assigned in the evenings/afternoon Management notified Morning priorities-not part of work flow Reprioritze morning needs Timing RN change of shift report Check if weights have been taken Busy with morning activities-toileting, vital signs, feeding, medications Incorporate into morning routine MD rounding Prior to rounding Why are patient weights not obtained in the mornings? Staffing Resource availability Lack of adequate staffing No NAs from 2300 to 0700 Shift change Lack of scales Increase NA or RN staffing Management notified Done afterwards Obtain additional scale (Scales A & Scale B) Broken bed scales Report to be fixed Still sleeping Instructt patients to remind staff upon awaking Patient concerns Void and eat at different time Instructt patients to remind staff prior to eating Call lights Incorporate weights when addressing other concerns

TIMING OF PATIENT DAILY WEIGHTS 16 Appendix B Staff Interview Date: Staff Position: RN NA Other (please specify) 1. When are daily weights being obtained? Morning Afternoon Evening Night 2. When is the optimal time to obtain patient weights? Morning Afternoon Evening Night 3. Based on your answer in question #2, what are the barriers? a) b) c) d) e)

TIMING OF PATIENT DAILY WEIGHTS 17 Appendix C Timeline 9/2014-11/2014- Literature Review. 10/6/14- Shared governance meeting to get a sense of the management thinking on the unit 10/8/14- IRB approval received from Stanford Compliance Office 10/13/14- Review the literature for EBP related to daily weights. 10/20/14- Evaluate RN and CNA s understanding of the timing of daily weights. Pass out questionnaires and survey staff. 10/27/14- Identify the barriers of obtaining patient weights in the morning, using the results of the survey and interviews. 11/3/14- Educate the staff on barriers found. 11/10/14- Discuss with Myra, the manager, about the possible implementations to overcome the barriers identified. 11/16/14- Finish paper and write abstract. 11/17/14- Finish poster. 11/24/14- Project due. 12/2/14- Present to Stanford Research Council. 12/10/14- Poster session at USF.

TIMING OF PATIENT DAILY WEIGHTS 18 Appendix D Interview Results Staff Position: RN- 37 NA- Other (please specify)- 0 1. When are daily weights being obtained? [Some people chose more than one answer.] Morning- 2 Afternoon- 8 Evening- 30 Night- 6 2. When is the optimal time to obtain patient weights? [Some people chose more than one answer.] Morning- 37 Afternoon- 3 Evening- 3 Night- 1 3. Based on your answer in question #2, what are the barriers? [Some people listed more barriers than others.] Assigned in the evening Busy with patient activities (NA- bathroom, toileting, feeding, call lights) (RNmedications, getting people out of bed, vital signs, MD rounding, critical labs, call lights)- 38 Patient requests in the morning delay obtaining daily weights Patient sleeping- 10 RN shift report- 2 Timing- 1 Staff compliance Lack of staff- 6 No NAs from 2300 to 0700 Inadequate staff Staffing- NAs do weights. No NAs before 0700 to obtain weights & nurses during nights don t do it either.

TIMING OF PATIENT DAILY WEIGHTS 19 Morning priorities Shift change time, unable to determine which shift would be responsible for it- 2 Lack of MD order to modify standardized weight time- 3 High acuity Broken bed weights- 2 Patient unable to get out of bed- 2 Lack of scales (only one on the unit)- 3 Patients void and eat in the mornings at different times. Hard to coordinate with their schedules Weights are low staff priority- not part of RN or NA current morning workflow- 2 *** Additional interview question discussed with several staff members- How can these barriers by overcome? [Some people listed more solutions than others.] Hire more staff- Hire more NAs Done first thing in the morning with vital signs- routine- Communication between NAs and RNs- 2 Reprioritization of morning needs- EPIC modification to trigger a weight on specific patients, such as CHF patients Speak with RNs, NAs, and patients for ideas on how morning weights would work Take weights at 0600. After the lab draw, have the patient get up for weights- 4 Have night shift do it if the patient is awakened any time after 000-4 Have night shift take daily patient weights before AM shift comes on Explain to the patient that he/she has to wake up early for weight to be taken- Have the patient remind the nurse that he/she needs to have his/her weight taken in the morning when he/she wakes up- 2 Use the bed weight in the AM before the patient wakes up- 2 Have NAs start shifts earlier Have day NAs do weights as soon as they start their shifts Done with AM toileting- 2 Mobility assessment should be done, PT consult to see if the patient is able to get out of bed for daily weights Set a specific or standard time (not too early or late to have weights taken)- 4 2 nd scale so both NAs can take them simultaneously- 2 Education on medical necessity/improvement of patient outcomes- 2 Flexibility of team members to wait to discuss plan of care More money Need better coverage during the 0600-0800 hours for patient needs

TIMING OF PATIENT DAILY WEIGHTS 20 Appendix E Graphed Survey Data 33 or 44% 42 or 6% Surveyed Non-surveyed Figure 1. Staff members surveyed vs. non-surveyed. Number of Staff Responses 40 3 30 2 20 1 10 37 0 RN Staff Position NA Figure 2. Staff members, RNs and NAs surveyed.

TIMING OF PATIENT DAILY WEIGHTS 21 Number of Staff Responses 3 30 2 20 1 10 2 8 30 6 0 Morning Afternoon Evening Night Time of Day Figure 3. Times patient weights obtained. Number of Staff Responses 40 3 30 2 20 1 10 0 37 Morning 3 3 1 Afternoon Evening Night Time of Day Figure 4. Staff perception of optimal time to obtain patient weight.

TIMING OF PATIENT DAILY WEIGHTS 22 Number of Staff Responses 0 4 40 3 30 2 20 1 10 0 4 Timing 16 Staff Resource availability 14 Patient concerns Barriers Figure.Barriers to daily morning weights.