23 May 07 1 Headquarters U.S. Air Force I n t e g r i t y - S e r v i c e - E x c e l l e n c e 4094 Integrating ESOH Risk Management into Acquisition Systems Engineering Mr. Sherman Forbes Office of the Deputy Assistant Secretary (Science, Technology and Engineering)
23 May 07 2 Overview Why? Basic policy approach Recent policy and guidance initiatives Benchmarking a Success Story
23 May 07 3 Environment Integrated ESOH Risk Management (RM) Safety Integrated ESOH Risk Assessment Systems Engineering Occupational Health E, S, and OH inputs need to be optimized across the disciplines and into Systems Engineering
23 May 07 4 F-16 Emergency Power Unit (EPU) Turbine Power Unit Location (internal) Turbine Exhaust (underside) Hydrazine Tank Location (internal)
23 May 07 5
23 May 07 6 Overview Why? Basic policy approach Recent policy and guidance initiatives Benchmarking a Success Story
23 May 07 7 Integrated ESOH RM Since 1996, DoD has focused on integrating ESOH into Systems Engineering (SE) Objective to imbed ESOH into core Acquisition process -- SE Utilize the System Safety process -- already part of SE DoD Acquisition ESOH IPT providing DoD Acquisition ESOH policy and guidance
23 May 07 8 MIL-STD-882D ESOH RM MIL-STD-882D, DoD Standard Practice for System Safety, eight elements Document strategy for SE integration Identify ESOH hazards Assess risks Identify mitigation measures Reduce risks to acceptable levels Verify risk reductions Formally accept residual risks Track and report ESOH hazards
23 May 07 9 MIL-STD-882D ESOH RM Mishap = "accident" as used by DoD MIL-STD-882D definition of mishap: "An unplanned event or series of events resulting in death, injury, occupational illness, damage to or loss of equipment or property, or damage to the environment"
23 May 07 10 Overview Why? Basic policy approach Recent policy and guidance initiatives Benchmarking a Success Story
Defense Safety Oversight Council ( DSOC) Governance Role I n t e g r i t y - S e r v i c e - E x c e l l e n c e 23 May 07 11 Ensure personal involvement of OSD and Services' senior leadership in SECDEF directed effort to reduce mishaps Promote the 75% mishap reduction effort to all levels of military and civilian leadership Execute the specific initiatives to reduce mishaps and time lost due to injuries Garner the resources to support the initiatives Manage progress toward 75% reduction goal Provide periodic updates to the SECDEF DSOC Membership Principal Members - Under Secretary of Defense for Personnel and Readiness (as Chair) - Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition, Technology, and Logistics - Under Secretary of Defense (Comptroller)/Chief Financial Officer - Vice Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff - Assistant Secretary of Defense for Health Affairs - Under Secretary of the Army - Under Secretary of the Navy - Under Secretary of the Air Force Associate members - Deputy Under Secretary of Defense (Acquisition and Technology) - Deputy Under Secretary of Defense (Installations and Environment) - Deputy Under Secretary of Defense (Readiness) - Deputy Under Secretary (Civilian Personnel Policy) - Deputy Inspector General of the Department of Defense - Deputy Assistant Secretary of Defense (Clinical and Program Policy) - Deputy Director (Administration & Management), OSD Executive Secretary - Director, Readiness Programming & Assessment 7
DSOC Membership = Principal Member = Associate Member Exec Sec SecDef DepSecDef White House Liaison Protocol Department of Defense USD (Policy) USD (P&R) USD (C)/DoD CFO USD (I) Dir A&M GC IG ASD (LA) Dir (PA&E) ASD (PA) ASD (NII)/DoD CIO ATSD (IO) USD (AT&L) Dir (OT&E) ASD (ISA) ASD (SOLIC) PDUSD (P&R) DCAA DIA PFPA DLSA Dir NA Dir FT AFIS DISA DUSD (A&T) DUSD (L&MR) DDR&E DSCA ASD (HD) DeCA DFAS DSS WHS DCMA DLA DARPA DPMO ASD (ISP) DoDEA NGIA ATSD (NCB) DTIC ASD (HA) NSA/ CSS DTRA DUSD (I&E) TMA ASD (RA) DUSD (R) DoD CIFA JCS Army Navy Air Force VJCS Under Secretaries MDA OEA DTRMC DUSD (PI) 23 May 07 DoD (CPP) 12
23 May 07 13 Nine DSOC Task Forces Private Motor Vehicle Aviation Safety Improvements Deployment and Operations Enterprise Information System Installation/Industrial Operations Military Training Sports Injury Prevention Workers Injury Compensation Acquisition and Technology Programs Chair: Mr. Schaeffer, DUSD (A&T)/SSE Principal Members: DoD Acquisition ESOH IPT
23 May 07 14 Purpose Acquisition and Technology Programs (ATP) Task Force Recommend or implement changes to policies, procedures, initiatives, education and training, and investments to ensure programs address System Safety throughout the life cycle Goals Work closely with the DoD Acquisition ESOH IPT to provide Senior Leadership support and advocacy for their efforts Ensure acquisition policies and procedures require all systems to address System Safety requirements Recommend ways to ensure acquisition program office decisions consider system ESOH hazards Recommend ways to ensure milestone decision reviews and interim progress reviews address safety Effectively link the System Safety and Systems Engineering communities
23 May 07 15 Key ATP Task Force Initiatives 23 Sep 04 USD (AT&L) policy memo, Defense Acquisition System Safety, that directs all Program Managers to Integrate System Safety risk management into their overall Systems Engineering processes Use MIL-STD-882D, in all developmental and sustaining engineering activities Ensure the ESOH risk management strategy is incorporated in the Systems Engineering Plan Identify ESOH hazards, assess the risks, mitigate the risks to acceptable levels, and report status of residual risk decisions at technical and program reviews
23 May 07 16 Key ATP Task Force Initiatives (cont'd) Apr 05 Defense Acquisition University (DAU) course, "System Safety in Systems Engineering" (CLE009) Continuous Learning Course computer based Piloted with Systems Engineering, System Safety, Environmental Engineering, and Health professionals Based on use of MIL-STD-882D First formal training on use of MIL-STD-882D Maps System Safety tasks into SE V-Model for each phase of the life cycle
DAU COURSE CLE009 System Safety in SE Process Technology Development Phase SE Process Inputs Initial Capabilities Document (ICD) and Draft Capability Development Document (CDD) Preferred System Concept Exit Criteria Test and Evaluation (T&E) Strategy Support and Maintenance Concepts and Technologies Analysis of Alternatives (AoA) Systems Engineering Plan (SEP) Technology Development Strategy (TDS) System Safety Should: Develop system safety criteria and requirements Evaluate system concept against identified system safety criteria Provide the following exit criteria: 1. Update Preliminary Hazard List (PHL) 2. Update strategy for integrating Environment, Safety, and Occupational Health (ESOH) risk management into systems engineering (SE) 1. Incorporate hazard risk mitigation test and verification methodologies 2. Provide approach toward obtaining safety release(s) Provide inputs as requested Characterize ESOH footprints or risks for AoA development Update strategy for integrating ESOH risk management into SE 1. Include strategy to identify hazards 2. Identify needed ESOH technology development I n t e g r i t y - S e r v i c e - E x c e l l e n c e 23 May 07 17
23 May 07 18 Key ATP Task Force Initiatives (cont'd) Sep 06 System Safety-ESOH Management Evaluation Criteria for DoD Acquisition Tool to assess implementation of the 23 Sep 04 "Defense Acquisition System Safety" memo Guide identified four key areas for evaluation Planning Requirements Analysis System Safety-ESOH Hazard analysis Resources One metric with assessment criteria for each area for each life cycle phase Weighted summation of four ratings to overall rating for each life cycle phase
23 May 07 19 Key ATP Task Force Initiatives (cont'd) 21 Nov 06 USD (AT&L) policy memo on Reducing Preventable Accidents, influences entire life cycle of systems by requiring ATP TF to develop process to provide the JCIDS process with inputs to cost effectively prevent accidents All Acquisition Program Reviews and fielding decisions, regardless of ACAT, to address Each High and Serious ESOH risk (IAW MIL-STD-882D) Applicable safety technology requirements, e.g., Insensitive Munitions or MFOQA All system-related Class A and B mishap investigations must include System Program Office analysis of hazards that contributed to the accident and recommendations for materiel risk mitigation measures
23 May 07 20 Key ATP Task Force Initiatives (cont'd) 7 Mar 07 USD (AT&L) policy memo "Defense Acquisition System Safety Environment, Safety, and Occupational Health (ESOH) Risk Acceptance" Clarifies existing risk acceptance policy Increases emphasis on System Safety and ESOH risk management Requires formal risk acceptance prior to exposing people, equipment, or the environment to known system-related ESOH hazards User representative must be part of process and provide formal concurrence prior to all High and Serious risk acceptance decisions
23 May 07 21 Key ATP Task Force Initiatives (cont'd) Work Outside ATP TF Being Funded examples Integration of ESOH into DAU Curricula (DoD Acquisition ESOH IPT) Tool for Evaluation of Noise Exposure Life Cycle Cost in Acquisition (Navy lead) Tool to Quantify Economic, Productivity, and Injury Issues for Human Factors in Acquisition (Navy lead) ESOH Programmatic Risk Tool (Air Force lead) Jet Engine Noise Reduction (Navy NAVAIR lead funding TBD)
23 May 07 22 Overview Why? Basic policy approach Recent policy and guidance initiatives Benchmarking a Success Story
23 May 07 23 GD Electric Boat Charts Following charts from the August 2006 International System Safety Conference presentation by Don DiGenova and Ricky Milnarik of the General Dynamics Electric Boat corporation
23 May 07 24 GD Electric Boat Background Electric Boat has been building submarines for the U.S. Navy for over 100 years. In 1900 Electric Boat delivered the U.S. Navy s first submarine, the USS HOLLAND.
23 May 07 25 VIRGINIA Class Submarine Environmental & Safety Environmental engineers and System Safety engineers were each integrated into DBTs, but... Environmental Engineering System Safety Engineering D/B Environmental Analyses MIL-STD-882D SEPARATE PARALLEL PROCESSES
23 May 07 26 VIRGINIA Class Submarine Environmental & Safety Environmental Engineering developed a Programmatic ESOH Evaluation (PESHE). System Safety Engineering developed a System Safety Description Document (SSDD). Environmental Engineering identified and mitigated environmental impacts. System Safety Engineering identified and mitigated safety hazards. SEPARATE PARALLEL PROCESSES
23 May 07 27 VIRGINIA Class Submarine Environmental & Safety Environmental Engineering tracked environmental impacts in a DBEA database and Hazardous Material Map. System Safety Engineering tracked hazards in a Hazard Tracking List database. SEPARATE PARALLEL PROCESSES
23 May 07 28 SSGN Conversion ESOH Program Environmental Engineering System Safety Engineering ESOH Shipbuilding Specification Section 9310-3 Environmental and System Safety were integrated into a DODI 5000.2 compliant ESOH Program.
23 May 07 29 SSGN Conversion ESOH Program Key ESOH Program Plan features included: Making ESOH the responsibility of the DBT Integrating experienced Safety & Environmental engineers into DBTs Defining applicable ESOH hazard analyses for designated systems Establishing an audit trail of ESOH issues (safety hazards/environmental impacts) in single hazard tracking system
Questions? I n t e g r i t y - S e r v i c e - E x c e l l e n c e 23 May 07 30