The BAUS Nephrectomy Audit Data Reflections From Across the Pond

Similar documents
Evidence for Accreditation in Bariatric Surgery Hospitals

Cost Effectiveness of Physician Anesthesia J.P. Abenstein, M.S.E.E., M.D. Mayo Clinic Rochester, MN

Khurshid R. Ghani,*, Shyam Sukumar, Jesse D. Sammon, Craig G. Rogers, Quoc-Dien Trinh and Mani Menon

Risk Factor Analysis for Postoperative Unplanned Intubation and Ventilator Dependence

Jennifer A. Meddings, MD, MSc

National Provider Call: Hospital Value-Based Purchasing

Technical Notes on the Standardized Hospitalization Ratio (SHR) For the Dialysis Facility Reports

An audit of the engagement in the Time Out section of the WHO Checklist in Urology Theatres in a district general hospital.

Objectives. Integrating Performance Improvement with Publicly Reported Quality Metrics, Value-Based Purchasing Incentives and ISO 9001/9004

ORIGINAL ARTICLE. Evaluating Popular Media and Internet-Based Hospital Quality Ratings for Cancer Surgery

Over the past decade, the number of quality measurement programs has grown

Supplementary Online Content

Hub and Spoke Network

Introduction. Residency Program Structure Description. PGY-1 (General Surgery)

CALYPSO clinical & analytic learning platform for surgical outcomes

The deteriorating patient recognition and management Dave Story

NEW JERSEY HOSPITAL PERFORMANCE REPORT 2014 DATA PUBLISHED 2016 TECHNICAL REPORT: METHODOLOGY RECOMMENDED CARE (PROCESS OF CARE) MEASURES

MEDICAL ONCOLOGY SAUDI FELLOWSHIP PROGRAM FELLOWSHIP FINAL CLINICAL EXAMINATION OF MEDICAL ONCOLOGY (2016)

Surgical Care for the Underserved: US We have our own problems

Value Based Purchasing

Model VBP FY2014 Worksheet Instructions and Reference Guide

What is an evidence note? Key points. Health technology description. Number 75 January 2018

J Michael Henderson Chief Quality Officer Cleveland Clinic Health System

Improving Compliance

MEASURING POST ACUTE CARE OUTCOMES IN SNFS. David Gifford MD MPH American Health Care Association Atlantic City, NJ Mar 17 th, 2015

The Society of Thoracic Surgeons

Week 3: Ratios, Rates, and Proportions (Part I)

Value-based incentive payment percentage 3

Hospital Inpatient Quality Reporting (IQR) Program

Goals & Objectives by Rotation: U-2. U-2 (PGY-3,4) Rotation-Specific Goals & Objectives.

September 6, RE: CY 2017 Hospital Outpatient Prospective Payment and Ambulatory Surgical Center Payment Systems Proposed Rule

The dawn of hospital pay for quality has arrived. Hospitals have been reporting

INTERNAL VALIDATION REPORT (MULTI-DISCIPLINARY TEAM)

Reducing Readmissions: Potential Measurements

Hospital data to improve the quality of care and patient safety in oncology

Hospital Strength INDEX Methodology

RESIDENT GOALS AND OBJECTIVES BY ROTATION U-2 U-2 (PGY-3,4) GOALS AND OBJECTIVES BY ROTATION.

KANSAS SURGERY & RECOVERY CENTER

Preventing Heart Failure Readmissions by Using a Risk Stratification Tool

QUALITY NET REPORTING

SOReg Annual Report Norway and Sweden Published December SOReg SCANDINAVIAN OBESITY SURGERY REGISTRY

Perioperative Fluid Utilization Variability and Association With Outcomes

Our SAR Looks Great, Now What? ACS NSQIP Pediatric

Perioperative Surgical Home

Enhanced Recovery in NSQIP (ERIN): an update on the collaborative. Julie Thacker, LianeFeldman, and Julia Berian ACS NSQIP National Conference 2015

Chapter 1 INTRODUCTION TO THE ACS NSQIP PEDIATRIC. 1.1 Overview

Understanding Readmissions after Cancer Surgery in Vulnerable Hospitals

NEW JERSEY HOSPITAL PERFORMANCE REPORT 2012 DATA PUBLISHED 2015 TECHNICAL REPORT: METHODOLOGY RECOMMENDED CARE (PROCESS OF CARE) MEASURES

Total Joint Partnership Program Identifies Areas to Improve Care and Decrease Costs Joseph Tomaro, PhD

Lessons learned from VASM cases. Barry Beiles Clinical Director VASM

Quality Improvement Program (ACS NSQIP )

Patient Selection, Optimization and Disposition: Tools for Success in Orthopedic Bundles

? Prehab, immunonutrition. Safe surgical principles. Optimizing Preoperative Evaluation

Teamwork, Communication, O.R. Safety & SSI Reduction

Reliability of Evaluating Hospital Quality by Surgical Site Infection Type. ACS NSQIP Conference July 22, 2012

Quality of Care of Medicare- Medicaid Dual Eligibles with Diabetes. James X. Zhang, PhD, MS The University of Chicago

Goals & Objectives by Year in Training: U-2

Bundled Payments to Align Providers and Increase Value to Patients

Health Sciences Centre, Team C, Dr. M. Wells (Breast and Hernia) Medical Expert

Medicare Value-Based Purchasing for Hospitals: A New Era in Payment

William J. Ennis D.O.,MBA University of Illinois at Chicago Professor Clinical Surgery, Chief Section wound healing and tissue repair

AMERICAN COLLEGE OF SURGEONS Inspiring Quality: Highest Standards, Better Outcomes

Physician Executive Council. Using the Perioperative Surgical Home to Improve Joint Replacement

SCORING METHODOLOGY APRIL 2014

HIT Incentives: Issues of Concern to Hospitals in the CMS Proposed Meaningful Use Stage 2 Rule

Predicting 30-day Readmissions is THRILing

9/29/2017. Enhanced Recovery After Surgery at the University of Virginia Medical Center. Disclosures. Objectives. None

Challenges of Sustaining Momentum in Quality Improvement: Lessons from a Multidisciplinary Postoperative Pulmonary Care Program

The Nexus of Quality and Finance

IN EFFORTS to control costs, many. Pediatric Length of Stay Guidelines and Routine Practice. The Case of Milliman and Robertson ARTICLE

Incentives and Penalties

State of the State: Hospital Performance in Pennsylvania October 2015

An Overview of the. Measures. Reporting Initiative. bwinkle 11/12

Surgeon Champion: Getting Started, What You Need to Know

Improving Patient Satisfaction in the Orthopaedic Trauma Population

PRE OPERATIVE MANAGEMENT FOR PEDIATRIC HOSPITALISTS

Transitional Care Management JANET BEASY, CPC, CPCO, CMC, CMOM PRACTICE EDUCATION CONSULTANT

Northwestern University Department of Urology

African Surgical Outcomes Study (ASOS)

Creating Clinical Pathways

Volume Thresholds And Hospital Characteristics In The United States

Teamwork, Communication, Briefing, Checklists, & O.R. Safety

Inpatient Quality Reporting Program

NQF-Endorsed Measures for Surgical Procedures,

4/10/2013. Learning Objective. Quality-Based Payment Models

5/9/2015. Disclosures. Improving ICU outcomes and cost-effectiveness. Targets for improvement. A brief overview: ICU care in the United States

Electronic Surgical Scheduling Improves Patient Safety and Productivity

PA Education Worldwide

Pay-for-Performance: Approaches of Professional Societies

Troubleshooting Audio

ICU Research Using Administrative Databases: What It s Good For, How to Use It

Surgical Care Improvement Project

Managing Your Patient Population: How do you measure up?

Hip Hemi-Arthroplasty vs Total Hip Replacement for Displaced Intra-Capsular Hip Fractures: Retrospective Age and Sex Matched Cohort Study

Predicting patient survival of high- risk surgeries. Developed for The Leapfrog Group by Castlight Health

USING PATIENT REPORTED OUTCOMES: PERSPECTIVES FROM THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF SURGEONS

Radical Prostatectomy Practice in England

The Link Between Patient Experience and Patient and Family Engagement

Pricing and funding for safety and quality: the Australian approach

Looking Ahead: The Future of American Health Care. Ezekiel J. Emanuel, M.D., Ph.D.

Transcription:

The BAUS Nephrectomy Audit Data Reflections From Across the Pond Bradley C. Leibovich, MD, FACS Professor of Urology Chairman, Department of Urology Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN

Disclosure None Objective Review BAUS data and provide reflection on Volumes Complications Trends Utilizing reported national administrative data and institutional data

2013 BAUS Nephrectomy Audit Data 7591 Nephrectomies reported by 3341 consultants from 145 centers (including 168 private patients from 48 consultants) 95% of data entered by hand versus imported 24.5% have one or more follow-up Patients 59% male Median age 65 (15 93) Median cases per consultant = 16 (1 118) Median per center = 39 (1 295)

ABU cert/recertification logs from 2002 2010 1 year of logs represent ~10% of ABU 3852 non-pediatric urologists submitted logs 82% general urologists 63% private practice only 48384 RN and PN cases Did not include NU, simple Nx Median (IQR) number of cases: 8/year (4-16) 25% did fewer than 4 cases/year ABU has ~11,400 certified urologists with ~1300 listed as retired* *Personal communication from S. Nakada

Identified 48,172 patients with non-metastatic RCC treated with nephrectomy 1998-2007 from Nationwide Inpatient Sample Stratified into groups based on volume of center

56% of cases done at a teaching institution Hospital volume categorization: Low 1 5 1/3 of cases Intermediate 6 15 1/3 of cases High 16 or more 1/3 of cases Only 1.3% of cases done at a center that does more than 100/year

BAUS 2013 data

BAUS 2013 data

BAUS vs North America Case Loads Surgeon Center BAUS 2012 14 35 BAUS 2013 16 39* North America 8 ~10 It is hoped that this is the result of increasing subspecialisation Does volume translate to better care?

Practice makes perfect?

Practice makes perfect? 10,000 hours Based on Ericsson et al, 1993 Swedish psychologists asked musicians to estimate amount of time in practice

Medicare claims data 474,108 patients Examined mortality stratified by surgeon and hospital volume

Adjusted Operative Mortality among Medicare Patients According to Surgeon-Volume Stratum Birkmeyer JD et al. N Engl J Med 2003;349:2117-2127.

Adjusted Operative Mortality among Medicare Patients According to Hospital-Volume Stratum and Surgeon-Volume Stratum Birkmeyer JD et al. N Engl J Med 2003;349:2117-2127.

2012 BAUS 30 day survival data Overall 30 day mortality was 0.55%

BAUS mortality data vs US data Henderson et al BAUS mortality data: 0.1% PN 0.52% RN Sun et al NIS data, RN + PN: 0.7% in hospital mortality 0.8% low volume, 0.6% high volume

BAUS Volume and Mortality data conclusions BAUS surgeons are relatively high volume when compared with colleagues across the pond BAUS surgeons have low mortality rates Higher volume and increased specialization would likely improve metrics further

2013 BAUS complication data

2013 BAUS data, any complication PN+RN MIS+open 717 complications 207 not recorded, therefore denominator is 7,384 = 9.7% any complication

1998 2007 NIS data Any complication Low volume 17% Intermediate volume 16% High volume 14%

49,983 RCC surgeries at 2037 hospitals between 2001 2008 from NIS 26% had postoperative complication Associated with perioperative mortality and cost

1049 RN and PN for cortical renal tumors J Urol 2004 180 patients (17%) had at least 1 complication Grade III V complications in 32 patients (3%)

Complication data summary BAUS NIS MSKCC Any ~10% 14-26% 17% Grade 3-5 4%??? 3% Many confounders in reporting complications Surgeon self reporting bias Referral center patient complexity Incentives for reporting complications Disincentives for reporting complications BAUS surgeons are providing safe care

BAUS 2013 Transfusion Data

Teaching center Non-teaching center Transfusion Data RN PN Open Lap

BAUS Transfusion data vs US data 2013 BAUS Sun et al Open RN + PN 11% 9 12% RN open + lap 9% 9 12% PN open + lap 6% 8 10%

1990 2006 Mayo Nephrectomy Registry 2318 cases 825 PN 1493 RN 498 patients (21%) received transfusion Transfusion associated with Older Worse ECOG PS Larger tumors Female Symptomatic Node positive Higher grade Higher stage Higher stage

MVA controlling for clinical & pathologic features found transfusion assoc with death from any cause HR 1.23, p = 0.02

BAUS Transfusion data conclusions Transfusion rates similar to US and Mayo data Efforts to reduce transfusion should be undertaken everywhere

LOS Variability likely related to customs and health system differences Mayo mean LOS 2013 Robot PN Lap RN/NU Open PN Open RN 1.3 d 1.7 d 3.1 d 4.5 d

US NSS Utilization Miller et al, 2006 SEER review of 14,647 patients with tumor 7cm treated surgically 13,246 treated with RN 1401 (10%) treated with NSS Tumor size %NSS 2000-1 <2 cm 42% 2-4 cm 20% 4-7 cm 6%

LRN ORN OPN LPN

Initial cert Re-cert 1 Re-cert 2

1-10 >20 11-20

Group 1: Private practice, age of urologist >50, low volume Group 2: Community practice, age 41-50, moderate volume Group 3: Academic practice, surgeon 40, high volume

Mean tumor diameter (cm) Number of Patients 350 300 250 200 150 Mayo RCC procedures by year 100 50 0 1970 1972 1974 1976 1978 1980 1982 1984 1986 1988 1990 1992 1994 1996 1998 2000 2002 2004 2006 Year 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 Mayo mean tumor size by year 2 1 0 1970 1975 1980 1985 1990 1995 2000 2005 Year

Mayo RCC primary T stage by decade 100% 90% 80% 70% 60% 50% 40% 30% 20% 10% 0% 1970s 1980s 1990s 2000s Decade T3/4 T2 T1b T1a

% Mayo RCC treatment by year 100 90 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 Radical Nephrectomy Partial Neprhectomy Tumor Ablation 0 1970 1975 1980 1985 1990 1995 2000 2005 Year

OS Intent to Treat OS Eligible Pts w/ RCC

Volume data

Perioperative Outcomes of Cytoreductive Nephrectomy in the UK in 2012 Jackson BL, Fowler S, Williams ST on behalf of BAUS Section of Oncology, in press BJU 279 Cytoreductive nephrectomies 30 day mortality 1.79% 52 patients had PS of 2 or more 24% received transfusion Associated with number of metastatic sites, tumor size 22.6% had a complication Associated with performance status 2 or more 40 had preoperative targeted therapy Similar to others in tumor size, T stage, complications Greater number of tumor thrombus

17,688 Florida nephrectomies 1063 (6%) were cytoreductive In hospital mortality 2.4% Complications 26.5% Transfusion 24.3% Each metric associated with: more advanced age comorbidities number of secondary surgical procedures

Pre-surgical Targeted Rx Does Not Increase Peri-operative Complications N = 44 with median duration of Targeted Rx of 6-7 months Complication Type Odds Ratio p All complications 0.560 0.145 Re-exploration 1.100 0.993 Re-admission 1.000 0.997 Thromboembolic 1.200 0.990 Cardiovascular 1.115 0.607 Pulmonary 0.765 0.447 Gastrointestinal 1.154 1.000 Infectious 1.009 0.995 Incision related 0.955 0.880 Marguilis V et al., J Urol, 2008

25 pts with RCC + IVC VTT in situ received targeted Rx Therapy: sunitinib: 12 bevacizumab: 9 temsirolimus: 3 sorafenib: 1 VTT level: II III IV 18 5 2

Targeted Therapy and in situ VTT Cost et al, Eur Urol 2010 Number of cases with change in tumor thrombus Level Diameter Increased 1 8 Stable 21 2 Decreased 3* 11 *1 each Level IV-III, level III-II, level II-0 Regression limited to sunitinib treated patients

Data reporting USA

Data reporting USA

Data reporting USA

Data reporting USA

MCR SMH NSQUIP data

Conclusions BAUS urologists are performing renal surgery with good outcomes comparable to colleagues across the pond However, the bar in North America is too low Central data reporting on both sides of the pond will be part of normal medical care Must use caution to assure appropriate risk adjustment Great potential for ongoing improvement, quality control, and cost savings

Thank You