WELCOME. Presented by: October 6, Supported by: Bree Dority, PhD. Daniel Chaffin, PhD.

Similar documents
BUSINESS INCUBATION COMMUNITY READINESS ASSESSMENT Dalton-Whitfield County. October 17, 2012 Erin Rosintoski

How Technology-Based-Startups Support U.S. Economic Growth

Kenneth E. Poole, PhD. National Conference of State Legislators August 11, 2012

Higher Education Employment Report

See footnotes at end of table.

Small business and entrepreneurship in Nebraska is roughly comparable to the small business sector

State Profile on Job Creation and Economic Growth. Colorado

Estimated Economic Impacts of the Small Business Jobs and Tax Relief Act National Report

LOCATION QUOTIENTS. Berks, Chester, Lebanon, Lancaster, Lehigh, Montgomery, Schuylkill counties

Health Care Sector Profile for the Lake Charles RLMA. Employment and Wage Trends 4th Quarter 2015 for the Health Care Sector by Parish

Employment and Wage Trends 3 rd Quarter 2015 for the Healthcare Sector by Parish

Oakland Workforce Development Board (OWDB) Confirming Local & Regional Priority Industry Sectors

Southeast Region Labor Market Analysis

Small Business and Entrepreneurship in Nebraska

STATE ENTREPRENEURSHIP INDEX

Dashboard. Campaign for Action. Welcome to the Future of Nursing:

Economic Impact of the proposed The Medical University of South Carolina

2017 Competitiveness REDBOOK. Key Indicators of North Carolina s Business Climate

50 STATE COMPARISONS

2010 Agribusiness Job Report

Testimonials. ~ Karissa Kersey, Benefits and Compensation Manager, Trihydro, Corporation

September 14, 2009 Nashville, Tennessee

BUSINESS REGISTRATION POLICY. The County of Northern Lights believes in assisting and promoting local business developments.

Figure 10: Total State Spending Growth, ,

The Power of Entrepreneurship

SBA s Size Standards Analysis: An Overview on Methodology and Comprehensive Size Standards Review

MONTHLY JOB VACANCY STUDY 2016 YEAR IN REVIEW NIPISSING DISTRICT MONTHLY JOB VACANCY STUDY YEAR IN REVIEW

Area. Market. Average Establishments. Monroe Region. makes up. o 14.77% in Madison

Issues and Strategies Shaping Brampton s Economic Base. Presented by Dennis Cutajar, EcD (F), MSc Brampton Economic Development February 10, 2006

DECEMBER Senate Bill 602 sponsored by. Sen. Rockefeller WV

Its Effect on Public Entities. Disaster Aid Resources for Public Entities

Seven Dimensions of Oregon s Employment Situation

Building Blocks to Health Workforce Planning: Data Collection and Analysis

CONNECTICUT: ECONOMIC FUTURE WITH EDUCATIONAL REFORM

ECONOMIC IMPACT OF LOCAL PARKS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

Economic Development Strategic Plan Executive Summary Delta County, CO. Prepared By:

The Economic Impacts of Idaho s Nonprofit Organizations

Kentucky Education and Workforce Development Cabinet releases April 2018 unemployment report

APPENDIX c WEIGHTS AND MEASURES OFFICES OF THE UNITED STATES

ASA Survey Results for Commercial Fees Paid for Anesthesia Services payment and practice management

The Legacy of Sidney Katz: Setting the Stage for Systematic Research in Long Term Care. Vincent Mor, Ph.D. Brown University

MONTHLY JOB VACANCY STUDY 2016 YEAR IN REVIEW PARRY SOUND DISTRICT MONTHLY JOB VACANCY STUDY YEAR IN REVIEW - PARRY SOUND DISTRICT

Home Health Agency (HHA) Medicare Margins: 2007 to 2011 Issue Brief July 7, 2009

Snohomish County Labor Area Summary April 2017

PCA Index Survey Responses First Quarter 2012

Policies for TANF Families Served Under the CCDF Child Care Subsidy Program

NYC Quarterly Labor Market Brief

Labour Market Information Monthly

NYC Quarterly Labor Market Brief

2014 was yet another great year!

GREATER PHOENIX ECONOMIC SNAPSHOT Chris Camacho, President & CEO

Economic Development Element

Arizona State Funding Project: Addressing the Teacher Labor Market Challenge Executive Summary. Research conducted by Education Resource Strategies

CITY OF PROVIDENCE: ECONOMIC CLUSTER STRATEGY. Presentation to City Council Final Analysis November 18 th, 2015

Maine s Economic Outlook: 2009 and Beyond

Alaska (AK) Arizona (AZ) Arkansas (AR) California-RN (CA-RN) Colorado (CO)

E c o n o m i c D e v e l o p m e n t P r o b l e m s a n d O p p o r t u n i t i e s

Nevada s Unemployment Rate Remains Unchanged in March

Why Entrepreneurship? A Vision and Policy Pointers for Maine Brian Dabson, RUPRI

NYC Quarterly Labor Market Brief

ASA Survey Results for Commercial Fees Paid for Anesthesia Services payment and practice manaement

Practice Advancement Initiative (PAI) Using the ASHP PAI Ambulatory Care Self-Assessment Survey

SEASON FINAL REGISTRATION REPORTS

New Hampshire Competitiveness: Creating a State Economic Strategy

College Profiles - Navy/Marine ROTC

National Association For Regulatory Administration

Upgrading Voter Registration in Florida

REGIONS BRIDGING THE DIVIDE: THE ROLE OF TRADABLE SECTORS AND WELL FUNCTIONING CITIES

2014 Giving Report. A Look at Fidelity Charitable Donors and How They Give. REPORT SPOTLIGHT How Donors Approach Philanthropy as a Family

NCCP. National Continued Competency Program Overview

Executive Summary. Top 25 Jobs in Demand

Recipes for Creating Entrepreneurial Growth: It s more than the Ingredients

The Journey to Meaningful Use: Where we were, where we are, and where we may be going

ASA Survey Results for Commercial Fees Paid for Anesthesia Services practice management

Nevada s Metro Areas Show Improvement Since Height of Recession

DEVELOPMENT STRATEGIES

MapInfo Routing J Server. United States Data Information

How Technology-Based Start-Ups Support U.S. Economic Growth

Vermont Competitiveness: Creating a State Economic Strategy

REPORT ON THE STATUS OF FACULTY SALARIES AT KANSAS STATE UNIVERSITY

2018 SOX & Internal Controls Professionals Group State of the SOX/Internal Controls Market Survey

North Dakota Competitiveness: Creating a State Economic Strategy

Driving wealth creation & social development in Ontario

Labour Market Information Monthly

Report to Congressional Defense Committees

What Kind of Entrepreneurial Future?

Summary of 2010 National Radon Action Month Results

An Analysis of USDA Farm Program Payments and Rural Development Funding In Low Population Growth Rural Counties

Higher Education and the Future of Oregon

Job Vacancies in the Portland Tri-County Area Lynn Wallis, Workforce Analyst, (971)

Washington Area Economy and Housing Market: Performance and Outlook NVAR Economic Summit

Innovation, Entrepreneurship and Rural Development: Some Key Themes

New Jersey Competitiveness

Measuring the Gig Economy: Inside the New Paradigm of Contingent Work

Higher Higher in the Tree

Beyond Collisions: How to Build Your Entrepreneurial Infrastructure

STATE EXPORT REPORT US-CHINA BUSINESS COUNCIL GOODS AND SERVICES EXPORTS BY US STATES TO CHINA OVER THE PAST DECADE APRIL 2018

The MetLife Market Survey of Nursing Home & Home Care Costs September 2004

Rhode Island Competitiveness: Creating a State Economic Strategy

Federal Highway Administration Future of Highway Funding

Transcription:

WELCOME October 6, 2017 Presented by: Bree Dority, PhD. Daniel Chaffin, PhD. Supported by:

Tri-City Area Economy Overview State Indicators Tri-City Area Tri-City Area Employment Tri-City Area Entrepreneurship University of Nebraska Kearney 2

$ Billions $ Billions State Economy Real GDP: Nebraska vs. U.S. 17,000 105.0 16,500 16,000 100.0 15,500 95.0 15,000 14,500 90.0 14,000 85.0 13,500 13,000 80.0 US NE Source: Bureau of Economic Analysis University of Nebraska Kearney 3

Service Goods State Economy Contribution to Nebraska Real GDP Growth by Industry NE Industry Contribution to Real GDP Growth Industry Composition 2010-2017 2013-2017 Manufacturing 11.2% -0.09% -1.49% Agriculture, forestry, fishing, and hunting 5.1% -0.20% -1.17% Construction 3.4% -0.38% 0.11% Mining 0.1% -0.05% -0.11% Real estate and rental and leasing 10.2% 1.87% 0.87% Finance and insurance 9.5% 2.77% 2.16% Health care and social assistance 7.7% 1.44% 0.74% Transportation and warehousing 7.1% 0.11% -0.02% Wholesale trade 7.1% 1.72% 1.37% Retail trade 5.8% 0.78% 0.26% Professional, scientific, and technical services 4.3% 0.22% 0.12% Information 3.2% 0.81% 0.61% Administrative and waste management services 3.0% 1.05% 0.58% Management of companies and enterprises 2.8% 0.96% 0.36% Utilities 2.1% 0.37% 0.07% Accommodation and food services 2.0% 0.22% 0.14% Other services, except government 2.0% 0.05% 0.03% Educational services 0.6% -0.14% -0.05% Arts, entertainment, and recreation 0.5% 0.10% 0.02% Government 12.3% -0.02% 0.47% Total, All Industries 100.0% 11.6% 5.1% Note: Contribution to Nebraska real GDP calculation 100 Real GDP i,t 1 Source: Bureau of Economic Analysis σ i Real GDP i,t 1 Real GDP i,t Real GDP i,t 1 1. Percentage of total real GDP by industry is in parentheses. University of Nebraska Kearney 4

Billion ($2017) Billions ($2017) State Economy Real Net Farm Income, 2010-2017F 140.0 9.0 120.0 8.0 7.0 100.0 6.0 80.0 5.0 60.0 4.0 40.0 20.0 3.0 2.0 1.0 0.0 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017F 0.0 US NE Source: USDA, Economic Research Service, Farm Income and Wealth Statistics University of Nebraska Kearney 5

Tri-City Area Economy Overview State Indicators Tri-City Area Tri-City Area Employment Tri-City Area Entrepreneurship University of Nebraska Kearney 6

Tri-City Area Economy Tri-City Area Population Growth 60% of Nebraskans live in Lincoln-Omaha Area Note: Figure was created by Paul Burger, Geography Department, University of Nebraska at Kearney Source: U.S. Census Bureau 10% of Nebraskans live in Tri-City Area University of Nebraska Kearney 7

Tri-City Area Economy Overview State Indicators Tri-City Area Tri-City Area Employment Tri-City Area Entrepreneurship University of Nebraska Kearney 8

Tri-City Area Employment Employment: Tri-City Area vs. Nebraska 110 108 106 104 102 100 98 96 94 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 NE Tri-City Area Note: Index of Growth since 2005 (2005 = 100) Source: Nebraska Department of Labor University of Nebraska Kearney 9

Tri-City Area Employment Contribution to Employment Growth: Top 4 Industries Industry Tri-City Area Industry Composition Tri-City Area 2010-2016 2014-2016 2010-2016 Nebraska 2014-2016 Manufacturing 16% 1.3% -0.2% 0.6% -0.1% Health Care and Social Assistance 15% 1.2% -0.1% 1.7% 0.4% Retail Trade 13% 0.3% -0.2% 0.7% 0.2% Accommodation and Food Services 9% 0.8% 0.3% 0.9% 0.3% Total, All Industries 5.9% -0.1% 8.0% 2.4% Source: Nebraska Department of Labor University of Nebraska Kearney 10

Tri-City Area Employment Composition of Employment by Education, All Industries 2016 Change since 2010 Workers aged 24 or younger Less than high school High school or equivalent, no college Some college or Associate degree Bachelor's degree or advanced degree 0.0% 5.0% 10.0% 15.0% 20.0% 25.0% 30.0% -1.5% -1.0% -0.5% 0.0% 0.5% 1.0% 1.5% 2.0% 2.5% NE Tri-City Area NE Tri-City Area Source: Longitudinal Employer-Household Dynamics (LEHD) Program Quarterly Workforce Indicators (QWI) University of Nebraska Kearney 11

Tri-City Area Employment 150 Employment by Educational Attainment, All Industries 140 130 120 110 100 90 80 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Less than high school High school or equivalent, no college Some college or Associate degree Bachelor's degree or advanced degree Workers aged 24 or younger Note: Index of Growth since 2005 (2005 = 100) Source: Nebraska Department of Labor University of Nebraska Kearney 12

Tri-City Area Employment 120 Employment by Educational Attainment, Manufacturing 110 100 90 80 70 60 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Note: Index of Growth since 2005 (2005 = 100) Source: Nebraska Department of Labor Less than high school High school or equivalent, no college Some college or Associate degree Bachelor's degree or advanced degree Workers aged 24 or younger University of Nebraska Kearney 13

Tri-City Area Employment 200 Employment by Educational Attainment, Health Care 180 160 140 120 100 80 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Note: Index of Growth since 2005 (2005 = 100) Source: Nebraska Department of Labor Less than high school High school or equivalent, no college Some college or Associate degree Bachelor's degree or advanced degree Workers aged 24 or younger University of Nebraska Kearney 14

Tri-City Area Employment 130 125 120 115 110 105 100 95 90 85 Employment by Educational Attainment, Retail Trade 80 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Less than high school High school or equivalent, no college Some college or Associate degree Bachelor's degree or advanced degree Workers aged 24 or younger Note: Index of Growth since 2005 (2005 = 100) Source: Nebraska Department of Labor University of Nebraska Kearney 15

Tri-City Area Employment 160 Employment by Educational Attainment, Accommodations & Food Services 150 140 130 120 110 100 90 80 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Note: Index of Growth since 2005 (2005 = 100) Source: Nebraska Department of Labor Less than high school High school or equivalent, no college Some college or Associate degree Bachelor's degree or advanced degree Workers aged 24 or younger University of Nebraska Kearney 16

Openings Rate Tri-City Area Employment Hires & Job Openings by Education, 2016 High Openings, Low Hires High Openings, High Hires Less than high school High school or equivalent, no college All Education Categories of 25+ Bachelor's degree or advanced degree Some college or Associate degree Low Openings, Low Hires Low Openings, High Hires Hire Rate Source: Nebraska Department of Labor; Longitudinal Employer-Household Dynamics (LEHD) Program Quarterly Workforce Indicators (QWI) University of Nebraska Kearney 17

Tri-City Area Employment $3,500 Average Monthly Earnings of New Hires, 2016 $3,000 $2,924 $2,500 $2,164 $2,255 $2,345 $2,000 $1,500 $1,302 $1,000 $500 $0 Workers aged 24 or younger Less than high school High school or equivalent, no college Some college or Associate degree Bachelor's degree or advanced degree Source: Longitudinal Employer-Household Dynamics (LEHD) Program Quarterly Workforce Indicators (QWI) University of Nebraska Kearney 18

Tri-City Area Employment 125 Real Average Monthly Earnings of New Hires 120 115 110 105 100 95 90 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Less than high school High school or equivalent, no college Some college or Associate degree Bachelor's degree or advanced degree Workers aged 24 or younger Note: Index of Growth since 2005 (2005 = 100) Source: Longitudinal Employer-Household Dynamics (LEHD) Program Quarterly Workforce Indicators (QWI) University of Nebraska Kearney 19

Tri-City Area Employment Labor Force Participation Rates, 2010-2017 72.0 70.0 68.0 66.0 64.0 62.0 60.0 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 NE Tri-City Area Source: Nebraska Department of Labor; U.S. Census University of Nebraska Kearney 20

Tri-City Area Employment Challenges Sluggish employment growth in Top 3 industries Composition of workers by education level has shifted Employment growth driven by workers with less than a high school degree, particularly in Health Care and Social Assistance Declining participation has downside implications for the long-run size of the economy University of Nebraska Kearney 21

Tri-City Area Economy Overview State Indicators Tri-City Area Tri-City Area Employment Tri-City Area Entrepreneurship University of Nebraska Kearney 22

Making the case for entrepreneurship University of Nebraska Kearney 23

2015 Entrepreneurship Class: Focus on effectuation, resources at hand and innovation. University of Nebraska Kearney 24

I have no idea how to actually start a business -2015 Entrepreneurship student evaluation comment University of Nebraska Kearney 25

Question University of Nebraska Kearney 26

Entrepreneurship Entrepreneurship Project at UNK University of Nebraska Kearney 27

Entrepreneurship Entrepreneurship The Upside It is new businesses (and not small businesses) that fuel U.S. job creation (Haltiwanger, Jarmin & Miranda 2013) Companies less than one year old with 1-4 employees have created more than 1 million jobs per year over the past 3 decades Those with 5-9 employees have added 500,000 jobs per year Young firms exhibit up or out dynamic (http://www.nber.org/papers/w16300. pdf) University of Nebraska Kearney 28

Entrepreneurship Entrepreneurship The Downside New establishment entry rates are highly correlated with exit rates, Resources must be freed up to be utilized in new ventures, Process of creative destruction Source: Business Dynamics Survey at https://www.census.gov/ces/dataproducts/bds/data_firm.html University of Nebraska Kearney 29

Where we stand University of Nebraska Kearney 30

Entrepreneurship Kauffman Start-Up Activity Index 6 4 2 NV OK WY MT 0 ID AK ND UT VT SD MS NM OR HI KS NE AR -2 CT KY DE ME IA WV NH RI -4-6 -8 Start-up Activity Index Change in Rank The Kauffman startup activity index is a broad index measure of business startup activity in the United States. It is an equally weighted index of three normalized measures of startup activity including: The Rate of New Entrepreneurs in the economy, calculated as the percentage of adults becoming entrepreneurs in a given month. The Opportunity Share of New Entrepreneurs, calculated as the percentage of new entrepreneurs driven primarily by "opportunity" vs. "necessity. The Startup Density of a region, measured as the number of new employer businesses normalized by total business population. The index is ranked across the 50 most and least populated states. Kauffman Index http://www.kauffman.org/kauffmanindex/reporting/startup-activity University of Nebraska Kearney 31

Entrepreneurship Rate of New Entrepreneurs Starting a Business Per Month Per 100,000 Adults 450 400 350 300 310 317 250 250 200 150 100 50 0 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Nebraska 7 State Surrounding US Source: The Kauffman Index at http://www.kauffman.org/kauffman-index/reporting/startup-activity. Gray bars indicate recessions. University of Nebraska Kearney 32

Entrepreneurship Opportunity Share of New Entrepreneurs Percent Coming from Employment 10 9.5 9 8.5 8.63 9.14 8.70 8 7.5 7 6.5 6 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Nebraska 7 State Surrounding US Source: The Kauffman Index at http://www.kauffman.org/kauffman-index/reporting/startup-activity. Gray bars indicate recessions. University of Nebraska Kearney 33

Entrepreneurship Number of Startups per 1,000 Employer Businesses 120 100 80 85 74 60 62 40 20 0 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Nebraska 7 State Surrounding US Source: The Kauffman Index at http://www.kauffman.org/kauffman-index/reporting/startup-activity. Gray bars indicate recessions. University of Nebraska Kearney 34

Entry Rates Entrepreneurship Entry Rates and Exit Rates (Non) Metro Nebraska 0.016 0.014 1982 0.012 1991 1987 1985 1979 1980 1988 1981 0.01 0.008 0.006 2003 2004 2005 2007 2012 2008 2011 2013 2009 2014 2010 1992 1994 1990 1995 1993 1996 1997 1998 2002 2006 2001 1999 2000 0.004 0.004 0.006 0.008 0.01 0.012 0.014 0.016 1989 Exit Rates 1983 1986 Non-Metro Series2 Metro Linear (Series2) Source: Business Dynamics Survey at https://www.census.gov/ces/dataproducts/bds/data_firm.html University of Nebraska Kearney 35

Fragmenting Concentrating Entrepreneurship Sector Fragmentation/Concentration Fragmented Concentrated Manuf Arts & Enter Admin Trans & Ware Whole Trade Const Prof & Tech Serv Real Estate Fin & Ins Ag Mgmt Comp Inform Utilities Accom & Food Retail Public Admin Health Care Educ Source: Bureau of Labor Statistics comparing employer based businesses from 2011-2016. An index was created based on the share of number of firms compared to the share of employees within the Tri-City Area. Share of employees was divided by share of firms. When share of employees is larger than the share of firms (index is >1) the sector is classified as concentrated (converse for when the share of employees is smaller than share of firms (index is <1) the sector is classified as fragmented. University of Nebraska Kearney 36

What might be holding us back University of Nebraska Kearney 37

Entrepreneurship Reallocation Pivots Creative Destruction University of Nebraska Kearney 38

Entrepreneurship 0.4 Nebraska Reallocation rate for Metro Non-Metro 0.35 0.3 0.25 0.2 0.15 0.1 0.05 0 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 US Metro 7-State Metro Neb Metro 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 US Non-Metro 7-State Non-Metro Neb Non-Metro Source: Business Dynamics Survey at https://www.census.gov/ces/dataproducts/bds/data_firm.html University of Nebraska Kearney 39

Entrepreneurship Networks and Reallocation University of Nebraska Kearney 40

Entrepreneurship Comparing Nebraska and Nevada Labor Flows Nebraska Nevada Labor flows represent the ease with which employees can move between sectors of the economy. Tight, well connected networks ensure efficient reallocation of labor across sectors. Source: Census job-to-job flows at https://j2jexplorer.ces.census.gov/ for Nevada and Nebraska for 2016-Q1 2017. The natural logorithm was taken of all data to reduce the impact of population differences between states. Graphs were built using Stata version 14 nwplot function with multidimensional scaling for the placement of nodes for shortest distance. The edge width represents the volume of employee flows between sectors. Measures were dropped for Utilities and Mining due to very few data points. University of Nebraska Kearney 41

Entrepreneurship Case Study: St Louis St Louis was not without entrepreneurial activity in the past It existed in disconnected pockets These pockets inhibited entrepreneurial genealogy when successful entrepreneurs mentor and fund the next generation It s faddish in economic development circles today to talk about collisions. If you create lots of bars and coffee shops and parks, serendipitous unexpected connections will occur: The strategy is premised on people running into each other. St Louis intentionally and deliberately built connections and networks. RoverTown example: Arch Grant 2013 Moves to nonprofit co-working space Accelerator program Mock Angel program Secures $1,000,000 in venture capital funding Named fastest-growing tech startup in St Louis 90.00% 80.00% 70.00% 60.00% 50.00% 40.00% 30.00% 20.00% 10.00% 0.00% 77.39% 70.83% 96.7 66.51% 86.3 73.4 0.16% 0.22% 0.23% 2014 2015 2016 120 100 80 60 40 20 0 Rate of Entrepreneurs Opportunity Share Startup Density St Louis Post Dispatch June 10, 2016 How did St. Louis become an Entrepreneurial Boomtown? by Dane Stangler and Colin Tomkins-Bergh http://www.stltoday.com/business/local/how-did-st-louisbecome-an-entrepreneurial-boomtown/article_c40240aa-9f49-5fd9-83bf-db7228bcbfd2.html Data from Kauffman Index University of Nebraska Kearney 42

Entrepreneurship Possible Barriers to ENT Source: The Platte Institute at http://www.platteinstitute.org/research/detail/strong-jobs-nebraska-the-2017-occupational-licensing-review University of Nebraska Kearney 43

Entrepreneurship Massage Therapist Licensing Requirements State Fee Education CEUs Year law Enacted Nebraska $110 1000 hours 24 1958 Colorado $90 500 hours none 2008 Iowa $120 600 hours 24 1992 Kansas - - - - Missouri $200 500 hours 12 1998 South Dakota $120 500 hours 8 2005 Wyoming - - - - Source: The Platte Institute at http://www.platteinstitute.org/research/detail/strong-jobs-nebraska-the-2017-occupational-licensing-review University of Nebraska Kearney 44

Entrepreneurship Opportunities and Challenges Opportunities Creating and strengthening networks across sectors Leveraging existing approaches to revisit regulation that inhibits creative destruction Recognizing that resources must be freed to be reallocated Challenges Geographic distance Lower population Infrastructure University of Nebraska Kearney 45

Summary Summary Nebraska Economy Weak, driven by Manufacturing and Agriculture Net farm income forecast indicates signs of stability Tri-City Area Employment Sluggish employment growth in Top 3 industries Composition of workers by education level has shifted Employment growth driven by workers with less than a high school degree Entrepreneurship Declining start-up rates Increased concentration among major economic sectors indicating less competition (except Health Care) Opportunity to increase cross-sector labor flows Opportunity to reconsider regulatory basis to enhance new venturing University of Nebraska Kearney 46

Questions? University of Nebraska Kearney 47

Average Number of New Entrepreneurs per 100,000 Adults 2013-2017 Percent Change in Rate of New Entrepreneurs 2013-2017 Entrepreneurship Number of New Entrepreneurs per 100,000 Adults 400 368 30% 350 300 291 292 26% 308 318 330 20% 250 246 250 262 10% 200 150 200-6% 2% -1% 3% -2% 2% -6% 0% -10% 100 50-20% 0-24% -24% Iowa United States Nebraska Kansas 7 - State North Dakota Missouri South Dakota Wyoming Colorado -30% The Rate of New Entrepreneurs in the economy, calculated as the percentage of adults becoming entrepreneurs in a given month the change represents the percentage change in the number of entrepreneurs comparing 2013 and 2017. http://www.kauffman.org/kauffman-index/reporting/startup-activity University of Nebraska Kearney 48

Average Percent of New Entrepreneurs Coming from Employment 2013-2017 Percent Change in Opportunity Share 2013-2017 Entrepreneurship Opportunity Share: % of Entrepreneurs Coming from Employment 10.0 9.0 8.0 8.1 7% 8.3 8% 8.6 8.6 8.7 8.7 8.7 8.8 8.9 3% 3% 3% 9% 10% 5% 7.0 6.0 6.6-1% 0% 0% 0% 5.0-5% 4.0 3.0-10% 2.0 1.0-14% -15% 0.0 United States Missouri Colorado South Dakota 7 - State Kansas Wyoming Iowa Nebraska North Dakota -20% Serves as a proxy indicator of the percent of new entrepreneurs starting businesses because they saw market opportunities. Measures the percentage of new entrepreneurs who were not unemployed before starting their businesses (e.g., new entrepreneurs who were previously working for another organization or in school). Acts as a broad proxy for business growth prospects. Entrepreneurs who were previously unemployed may be acting out of necessity and, therefore, may be more likely to start businesses with lower growth potential. http://www.kauffman.org/kauffman-index/reporting/startup-activity University of Nebraska Kearney 49

Average Number of Startups per 1,000 Employer Businesses 2013-2017 Change in Startup Density 2013-2017 Entrepreneurship Startup Density New Firms per 1,000 Employer Firms 100 6% 10% 90 80 70 60 57 62 63 63 65 71 73 80 83 87 5% 0% -5% 50-9% -10% 40-15% 30 20 10-22% -18% -20% -23% -21% -17% -24% -20% -20% -25% 0 Iowa Nebraska Kansas South Dakota United States 7 - State Wyoming North Dakota Missouri Colorado 2013-2017 Change -30% Estimates the number of startup firms by total employer population. Measures the number of new employer startup businesses normalized by the employer firm population of an area. Because companies captured by this indicator have employees, they tend to be at a more advanced stage than are the companies in the rate of new entrepreneurs measure. Defines startup businesses as employer firms less than one year old that employ at least one person besides the owner. This measure includes all industries. Uses data based on the U.S. Census s Business Dynamics Statistics. http://www.kauffman.org/kauffman-index/reporting/startup-activity University of Nebraska Kearney 50

Entrepreneurship Percent Change in Establishment Count 2011-2016 Mining, Quarrying, and Oil and Gas Extraction Information Public Administration Arts, Entertainment, and Recreation Educational Services Manufacturing Utilities Professional and Technical Services Wholesale Trade Retail Trade Real Estate and Rental and Leasing Accommodation and Food Services Other Services, Ex. Public Admin Finance and Insurance Administrative and Waste Services Construction Transportation and Warehousing Total, All Industries Management of Companies and Enterprises Agriculture, Forestry, Fishing & Hunting Health Care and Social Assistance -0.40-0.20 0.00 0.20 0.40 0.60 0.80 1.00 1.20 1.40 1.60 Tri-Cities Area Nebraska Source: Bureau of Labor Statistics comparing employer based businesses from 2011-2016 University of Nebraska Kearney 51