An overview of the content of the FEIR is provided in Section 1.C (Content and Organization of the FEIR) of Volume I of this document.

Similar documents
RESOLUTION NO. -- The applicant, PPF OFF 100 West Walnut, LP ("Applicant"),

Presented by: James Moose Remy, Thomas, Moose and Manley, LLP. With: Stephen L. Jenkins, AICP Michael Brandman Associates

Guidelines for the Implementation of the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970 As Amended

Kaiser Riverside-Cirby Medical Office Building Project

Nob Hill Pipeline Improvements Project

CEDARS-SINAI MEDICAL CENTER WEST TOWER PROJECT

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT

1 Introduction. 1.1 Specific Plan Background

UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SANTA CRUZ

CITY OF ORANGE LOCAL CEQA GUIDELINES

NOTICE OF PREPARATION OF AN ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT AND SCOPING MEETING FOR THE DOWNTOWN SPECIFIC PLAN COMMENT PERIOD

Final Environmental Impact Report Transit Oriented Development Plan for Downtown Inglewood and Fairview Heights

ADAMS BROADWELL JOSEPH & CARDOZO. September 14, 2010

APPENDIX B.3 SCOPING SUMMARY REPORT

CITY OF SACRAMENTO COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CALIFORNIA 300 Richards Blvd. DEPARTMENT

500 Turk Street Project

ATTACHMENT A: DRAFT PROPOSED SCOPE OF WORK

CITY OF LOMPOC REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE UPDATE STUDY

Mission Bay Master Plan File No M September 27, 1990

Exposure Draft of. Amendments to Ind AS 20, Accounting for Government Grants and Disclosure of Government Assistance

CITY OF DANA POINT AGENDA REPORT KYLE BUTTERWICK, DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BRAD FOWLER, DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT

Order of Business. D. Approval of the Statement of Proceedings/Minutes for the meeting of January 24, 2018.

CITY OF MERCED Planning & Permitting Division

AGENDA COMMITTEE ON CAMPUS PLANNING, BUILDINGS AND GROUNDS

IRVINE UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT RESPONSE TO COMMENTS FOR THE PLANNING AREA 6 NORTH ELEMENTARY SCHOOL

State Clearinghouse Handbook

COUNTY OF VENTURA ADMINISTRATIVE SUPPLEMENT TO THE STATE CEQA GUIDELINES

Common Rule Overview (Final Rule)

ATTACHMENT A. Nova Homes Residential Project. Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration City Council Resolution

TO MEMBERS OF THE FINANCE AND CAPITAL STRATEGIES COMMITTEE: ACTION ITEM 1

Work of Internal Auditors

Ascon Landfill Site Announcement of Scoping Meetings and Public Comment Period for Notice of Preparation for Draft Environmental Impact Report

Request for Proposal (RFP)

Public and Agency Involvement. 8.1 Scoping Meetings and Noticing. Chapter 8

WESTERN SLOPE CIP AND TIM FEE UPDATE

Instructions to Reviewers

Biomedical IRB MS #

OVERVIEW OF UNSOLICITED PROPOSALS

2.0 COMMENTS AND RESPONSES TO COMMENTS

Crystal M. Craig, Local Government Analyst II LAFCO ANNEXATION 21 TO COUNTY SERVICE AREA 134. (SPECIFIC PLAN 327)

I. Rationale, Definition & Use of Professional Practice Standards

dhammakaya international meditation center

Public Hearing on Draft Environmental Impact Report (DEIR) May 16, 2017

City of Lynwood MODIFIED REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS FOR

Draft Community Outreach Plan for the Climate Action Plan Update

Best-Value Procurement Manual. MnDOT Office of Construction and Innovative Contracting (OCIC)

REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS

REPORT. To the Honorable Mayor and City Council From the City Manager. May 9, 2016

M E M O R A N D U M. The Project and the items that the Commission will be considering at the June 15 th, 2010 meeting are summarized below.

Quincy Riley Assessment Manager, HUD-REAC. Brian Edwards Auditor/Financial Analyst, HUD-REAC

Approved by WQGIT July 14, 2014

Board of Supervisors' Agenda Items

PPEA Guidelines and Supporting Documents

Tourism Marketing Strategy

ENVIRONMENTAL PRACTICE FORUM:

Amalgamation Study Consultant

Name Change from the Office of Solid Waste and Emergency Response (OSWER) to the

Design-Build Procurement Overview Manual. Alternative Project Delivery

SEQUOIA UNION HIGH SCHOOL DISTRICT BACKGROUND INFORMATION FOR AGENDA ITEMS FOR 7/22/15, BOARD MEETING

DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION Policy Office. Upon publication of notice as final in the Pennsylvania Bulletin

CEQA Basic Training What is CEQA?

Public Scoping Meeting for the Environmental Impact Report

SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, SANTA BARBARA COUNTY REGARDING:

ASSE International Seal Control Board Procedures

MONTEREY BAY UNIFIED AIR POLLUTION CONTROL DISTRICT

EIA/VER-2/2008 EIA Consultant Registration Scheme Guidance Document

SANTA CLARA COUNTY LOCAL FIRE SERVICE AND RESCUE MUTUAL AID PLAN

CHATHAM COUNTY EMERGENCY OPERATIONS PLAN

APPENDIX 1 BROWARD COUNTY PLANNING COUNCIL PLAN AMENDMENT REQUIREMENTS AND PROCEDURES

PPA 520 / Group Activity Worksheets

Re: Docket No. FDA 2013-N-0500 Proposed Rule: Supplemental Applications Proposing Labeling Changes for Approved Drugs and Biological Products

Request for Proposals To Provide Engineering Services for the Wastewater Treatment Facility Improvements Project

Your Development Project and the Public Works Department Part

Lyndon Township Broadband Implementation Committee Lyndon Township, Michigan

U.S. Department of Energy Office of Inspector General Office of Audit Services. Audit Report

AmeriCorps State Formula Grant Competition. Operating and Planning Grants REQUEST FOR APPLICATIONS

Regional Greenhouse Gas Initiative, Inc. Request for Proposals #18-01 RGGI Auction Services Contractor. June 18, 2018

NEW YORK CITY DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND MENTAL HYGIENE. Notice of Public Hearing and Opportunity to Comment on Proposed Rule

Colonias Infrastructure Board Resolution

Our approach to project management education offers proven, results-focused learning.

Points to Consider regarding the Notification and Publication of Package Insert Language

Town of Orange Park, Florida. Financial Auditing Services

Subject: Request for Proposal Route 99 Interchanges at Hammett Road and Kiernan Avenue

130 FERC 61,211 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION

REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN UPDATE FOR LOWNDES COUNTY, GEORGIA

REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS

DOD INSTRUCTION ROLE AND RESPONSIBILITIES OF THE JOINT SERVICE COMMITTEE ON MILITARY JUSTICE (JSC)

ICANN Complaints Office Semi-Annual Report

PROGRAM OPPORTUNITY NOTICE EFFICIENCY MAINE TRUST CUSTOM INCENTIVE PROGRAM FOR ELECTRIC EFFICIENCY PROJECTS PON EM

Cal Poly EXECUTIVE SUMMARY. Cal Poly Master Plan. In Fall 1999, the average GPA and SAT scores for incoming freshmen were 3.64 and 1162.

Central Bedfordshire Council. Determination of Proposal to Commission New Middle School Places in Leighton Buzzard

TOWN OF BRECKENRIDGE BLUE 52 TOWNHOMES HOA MANAGEMENT SERVICES REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS. Issued August 1, 2017

INDIAN GAMING LOCAL COMMUNITY BENEFIT COMMITTEE

The next steps outlined at the end of this section are the key requirements as we can best envision them at this stage.

REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS

DRAFT REGULATORY GUIDE

Contains Nonbinding Recommendations. Draft Not for Implementation

HAZARDOUS SUBSTANCES POLICY Page 1 of 5 Reviewed: May 2017

REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS PROFESSIONAL SERVICES FOR THE MARCH LANE/EAST BAY MUD BICYCLE AND PEDESTRIAN PATH CONNECTIVITY IMPROVEMENTS.

LOCAL GOVERNMENT COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENTS HENDRY COUNTY

Transcription:

Introduction

1.0 INTRODUCTION 1.1 CEQA Requirements For this Project, CEQA requires that the City prepare and certify a Final Environmental Impact Report (FEIR). The contents of a FEIR are identified in CEQA Guidelines 15132 and include: (a) The Draft EIR (DEIR) or a revision of the DEIR. (b) Comments and recommendations received on the DEIR either verbatim or in summary. (c) A list of persons, organizations, and public agencies commenting on the DEIR. (d) The responses of the Lead Agency to significant environmental points raised in the review and consultation process. (e) Any other information added by the Lead Agency. An overview of the content of the FEIR is provided in Section 1.C (Content and Organization of the FEIR) of Volume I of this document. The Lead Agency must provide each public agency that commented on the DEIR with a copy of the Lead Agency s response to the public agency s comments at least ten days before certifying the FEIR. In addition, the Lead Agency may also provide an opportunity for members of the public to review the FEIR prior to certification, although this is not a CEQA requirement. 1.2 Public Review Process The DEIR was distributed to various public agencies, citizen groups, and interested individuals for a 60-day public review period that ended on February 03, 2014. The DEIR was circulated to State agencies for review through the State Clearinghouse, Office of Planning and Research (OPR). During the review period, the public was provided with the opportunity to submit written comments on the DEIR. In addition, oral testimony was considered at a City-sponsored public hearing held on January 23, 2014. 1.3 Contents and Organization of the Final EIR The FEIR is composed of documents consisting of several distinct volumes: Volume I Response to Comments and Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program: Volume I contains the following, by Section: Section P Section 1.0 Section 2.0 Section 3.0 Preface, providing a brief outline of the form of this FEIR. Introduction, providing an explanation of the format and content of the FEIR. A complete list of all persons, organizations, and public agencies that commented on the DEIR, copies of all comments received, and the Lead Agency s responses to those comments. The Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program. SCH# 2011111001 1-1 June 2, 2014

Volume II DEIR: This volume describes the existing environmental resources on and in the vicinity of the Project site; analyzes potential impacts on identified environmental resources due to the proposed Project; identifies mitigation measures that could avoid or reduce the magnitude of significant impacts; evaluates cumulative impacts to which the Project could contribute in combination with other future projects or in light of regional growth; analyzes growth-inducing impacts; and provides a full evaluation of the Alternatives to the proposed Project that could eliminate, reduce, or avoid Project-related impacts. Refer to the Table of Contents provided in Part 1 of this FEIR for a complete list of Appendix titles. Any text revisions due to corrections of errors, or resulting for comments received on the Draft EIR from the City, other public agencies, citizen groups, and individuals are indicated as follows: Addition of language is indicated by a double underline Deletion of language is indicated by a strike out line Revisions to the DEIR may include reorganization of certain sections or mitigation measures in certain sections due to comments or errors. In the case of Section 4.4, Cultural Resources, substantial revisions were made to clarify the nature of potential impacts and the mitigation measures imposed based on receipt of additional information, including studies not previously available. However, the Section conclusions have not changed and the Section revision is considered a clarification under the Guidelines. Reference sheets for the reports relied upon for the clarification and expansion of the discussion in Section 4.4 have been added to the Technical Appendices of the DEIR. In the case of Section 4.3, Biological Resources, revisions were made to clarify or expand on potential impacts in response to comments received from citizen groups and to correct organizational errors pointed out in comments received from others. The Section conclusions have not changed. Certain mitigation measures have been expanded or clarified in response to comments. The Section revision is considered a clarification under the Guidelines. In the case of Section 4.2, Air Quality, revisions were made in response to comments received from the Santa Barbara County Air Pollution Control District. The District requested modeling updates for the Project utilizing a more current CalEEMod program and reflecting the revised dates for start and conclusion of construction, which were contained in the circulated DEIR. The conclusions of the Section did not change, although Tables were updated. The additional technical studies and responses requested by the District have been added to the Technical Appendices. Volume III-IV Technical Appendices are provided in separately numbered volumes of the EIR together with any updates or additional reports prepared in response to comments received and used to update EIR Sections. SCH# 2011111001 1-2 June 2, 2014

1.4 Use of the The FEIR allows the public and the City of Goleta an opportunity to review revisions to the DEIR, the response to comments, and other components of the FEIR, such as the MMRP, before the City Council considers approving the Project. The FEIR serves as the environmental document used to support approval of the proposed Project and its conditions of approval, either in whole or in part. Certifications After completing the FEIR, and before approving the Project, the Lead Agency must make the following certifications required by CEQA Guidelines 15090: 1. That the FEIR has been completed in compliance with CEQA; 2. That the FEIR was presented to the decision-making body of the Lead Agency, and that the decision making body reviewed and considered the information presented in the FEIR prior to taking action on the Project; and 3. That the FEIR reflects the Lead Agency s independent judgment and analysis. These certifications, together with the Findings of Facts and any Statement of Overriding Considerations, if required, are included in a separate Findings document, prepared by the Lead Agency. Both the FEIR and the Findings are submitted to the City of Goleta for consideration of the proposed Project. Findings Pursuant to CEQA Guidelines 15091(a), if an EIR certified for a project identifies one or more significant environmental effect, the public agency must adopt Findings of Fact. For each significant impact, the Lead Agency must make one of the following findings: 1. Changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into the Project, which avoid or substantially reduce the significant environmental effects identified in the EIR; 2. Such changes or alterations are within the responsibility and jurisdiction of another public agency and not the agency making the finding, and that such changes have been adopted by such other agency or can and should be adopted by such other agency; or 3. Specific economic, legal, social, technological, or other considerations, such as the provision of employment opportunities for highly trained workers, make infeasible the mitigation measures or project alternatives identified in the FEIR. This finding must state the specific reasons for rejecting identified mitigation measures or Project alternatives. Each finding must be accompanied by a brief explanation of the rationale for the finding. Mitigation, Monitoring, and Reporting Program Further, pursuant to CEQA Guidelines 15091(d), the Lead Agency must adopt, in conjunction with the Findings, a program for reporting on and/or monitoring the changes that it has either required in the Project or made a condition of approval to avoid or substantially lessen environmental effects. This program is commonly referred to as the Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program, or MMRP. SCH# 2011111001 1-3 June 2, 2014

Statement of Overriding Considerations When a Lead Agency considers approving a project that would result in significant and unavoidable impacts that are disclosed in the FEIR, the Lead Agency must state in writing its reasons for supporting the approving actions in order to comply with the requirements of CEQA Guidelines 15093(b). This is called a Statement of Overriding Considerations, which must be supported by substantial information in the Administrative Record of the Project, including the FEIR. Since the proposed Project would result in two significant and unavoidable impacts, the City Council would ordinarily be required to adopt a Statement of Overriding Considerations before approving the proposed Project for both impacts. However, one of the significant and unavoidable impacts associated with the proposed Project is identical to a significant and unavoidable impact identified in the City s General Plan/Coastal Land Use Plan FEIR as regards the risk of upset for projects located in proximity to the Union Pacific Railroad/U.S. Highway 101 transportation corridor. Accordingly, in the Section of the EIR dealing with this impact (Section 4.8 Hazards and Hazardous Materials), the EIR incorporates the GP/CLUP FEIR and the previously adopted Statement of Overriding Consideration for this significant and unavoidable impact into the document by reference. A Statement of Overriding Consideration will need to be adopted for the significant and unavoidable impact associated with solid waste. The Statement of Overriding Considerations is not, in any way, a substitute for the Findings of Fact described above. SCH# 2011111001 1-4 June 2, 2014