Anchorage Police Department Anchorage: Performance. Value. Results.

Similar documents
Performance and Cost Data. police services

ANNUAL CRIME REPORT 2017

For detailed information regarding the programs and services, as well as information about the Department itself, please visit

For detailed information regarding the programs and services, as well as information about the Department itself, please visit

Cleveland Police Deployment

Evansville Police Department 2017 Annual Web Report

Anchorage Police Department Study Final Report

Background Memo. FROM: Erica Haft DATE: September 16, 2011

Anchorage Police Department

YEAR END REPORT Department Workload

Grand Forks Police Department

UC POLICE DEPARTMENT REPORTS DASHBOARD

UC POLICE DEPARTMENT REPORTS DASHBOARD

UC POLICE DEPARTMENT REPORTS DASHBOARD

UC POLICE DEPARTMENT REPORTS DASHBOARD

UC POLICE DEPARTMENT REPORTS DASHBOARD

UC POLICE DEPARTMENT REPORTS DASHBOARD

City of St. Peters Police Department. Chief of Police Jeff Finkelstein 2014 ANNUAL REPORT

Argyle Police Department Annual Report 2014

Austin Independent School District Police Department Policy and Procedure Manual

Clarksville Police Department. Fiscal Year 2017 Budget Presentation

Grand Forks. Police Department

CRIME FIGHTING BLUEPRINT

DEPARTMENT S 2009 ANNUAL REPORT

FORT PIERCE POLICE DEPARTMENT CITYWIDE 2016 BI-ANNUAL REPORT

Applicable To: Central Records Unit employees, Records Section Communications, and SSD commander. Signature: Signed by GNT Date Signed: 11/18/13

Police Department. Organization. Mission Statement. Police Department Function & Structure

Police - Departmental Performance Report. Police. Community

Maricopa County Sheriff s Office

SHREWSBURY POLICE DEPARTMENT

Eugene Police Department

Virginia Beach Police Department General Order Chapter 8 - Criminal Investigations

BEVERLY HILLS POLICE DEPARTMENT MONTHLY REPORT APRIL 2017

For more information about the University of California, Irvine Police Department, visit our website at edu.

City of Concord Police Department PUBLIC SAFETY STUDY SESSION 2015

Report Contents. Maricopa County Sheriff s Office District 6 Queen Creek Division S. Ellsworth Road Queen Creek, AZ 85142

CALIFORNIA CAMPUS SAFETY PLAN CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY, CHICO 2018

La Mesa Police Department Quarterly Operations Report 2nd Quarter

Maricopa County Sheriff s Office

DES MOINES POLICE DEPARTMENT

Argyle Police Department 2017 Annual Report

Subject CASINO ENTERTAINMENT DISTRICT. 1 July By Order of the Police Commissioner

AGENDA FOR THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE PUBLIC SAFETY TASK FORCE FOR THE CITY OF SAN CLEMENTE, CALIFORNIA. Wednesday, March :00 p.m. 6 p.m.

GREENVILLE POLICE DEPARTMENT POLICY AND PROCEDURES MANUAL. By the Order Of: Mark Holtzman, Chief of Police Date Reissued: 11/28/17 Page 1 of 8

ST. PETERS POLICE Department Annual Report. Chief of Police Thomas A. Bishop. PHOTO: The new St. Peters Justice Center.

SHERIFF UNDERSHERIFF. INTERNAL AFFAIRS Lieutenant. PUBLIC RELATIONS Administrator GENERAL COUNSEL. Executive Assistant. Public Information Officer

EDWARD BYRNE MEMORIAL (JAG) GRANT

CRIMINAL JUSTICE TRENDS

Annual Security Report and Crime Statistics

Annual Budget Report FY LAREDO POLICE DEPARTMENT

Staffing Study of the Fort Worth Police Department. Presented to the City Council by Jeffrey W. Halstead, Chief of Police

POSITION ANNOUNCEMENT

North Palm Beach Police Department

LOMBARD POLICE DEPARTMENT

Oakley Police Department

For detailed information about UCPD and programs offered by our Department, please go to html.

2012 Annual Report. Corcoran Police Department. Chief of Police Reuben P. Shortnacy

GRAND PRAIRIE POLICE ANNUAL REPORT GRANDPRAIRIEPOLICE.ORG 1525 ARKANSAS LANE GRAND PRAIRIE, TX

FUND/ACTIVITY ACTUAL ADOPTED AMENDED RECOMM.

CITY OF SHELTON JOB POSTING JOB TITLE: POLICE OFFICER ENTRY LEVEL YEARLY WAGE: $60,190

CRIMINAL JUSTICE TRENDS

Signature: Signed by GNT Date Signed: 3/11/13

Public Safety Organizational Chart. Public Safety

Delaware Police Department

Administration Division Municipal Attorney s Office Anchorage: Performance. Value. Results.

City and Borough Sitka, Alaska

2011 MAR 31 AM 10: 5-' CIT Y SEC RE TA t< 'r DALLAS. TE XAS

MODESTO POLICE DEPARTMENT Annual Report


Sarnia Police Service Directory of General Records and Personal Information Banks

2009 Annual Report Lacey Police Department

The Black Hawk County Sheriff s Office

Appendix E Checklist for Campus Safety and Security Compliance

CITY OF OAKLAND ^JL?&

Department of Public Safety. Monthly Report

Pomona Police Department, California CRIME FIGHTING BLUEPRINT

TOP ACCOMPLISHMENTS. Unidos Program. GrandPrairiePolice.org

UCR CHECKLIST- UNVERIFIED DATA FOR REVIEW& VERIFICATION. Agency Name: Population: Year: N/ A. Crime Rate:

FUND/ACTIVITY ACTUAL ADOPTED AMENDED ADOPTED Personnel Chief of Police Des Moines Police Airport Security Section

Laramie. Police Department 2016 Annual Report

CHAPTER 26 BODY WORN CAMERAS

La Mesa Police Department Quarterly Operations Report 1st Quarter

BODY WORN CAMERA - POLICY Denver Police Department

Criminal Investigations for Patrol and CID

Police Department Consolidation Feasibility Study MONTVALE, PARK RIDGE AND WOODCLIFF LAKE, NEW JERSEY

COOLIDGE POLICE DEPARTMENT. Monthly Activity Report

Employee of the Year Officer Bev Reinhold Annual Report Lacey Police Department

Chief Linda J. Stump

Information in State statutes and regulations relevant to the National Background Check Program: Louisiana

New Smyrna Beach Police Department Organizational Chart

Campus Crime & Security Report Harrisburg Campus

GLENDALE POLICE DEPARTMENT 2017 ANNUAL REVIEW. Glendale Police Department 5909 N. Milwaukee River Pky Glendale, WI 53209

University of the Pacific

$1.7 million grant award for mobile communications center and portable radio tower

RALEIGH FIREARM VIOLENCE REDUCTION STRATEGY

POLICE OFFICER POLICE OFFICER TRAINEE

ONLINE BENCHMARKING AND DATA VISUALIZATION TOOL

MONROE COUNTY SHERIFF S OFFICE Annual Report

CARRBORO POLICE DEPARTMENT

Staffing Study for the Sheriff s Office and Communications Section COUNTY OF SHENANDOAH, VIRGINIA

Transcription:

Anchorage: Performance. Value. Results. Mission Protect and serve our community in the most professional and compassionate manner possible Core Services Protection of Life Protection of Property Maintenance of Order Accomplishment Goals Maintain the rate of Uniform Crime Report (UCR) Part I crimes in Anchorage at or below the national average for comparable size communities Reduce the rate of adult sexual assault in Anchorage The number of drivers Operating Under the Influence (OUI) decreases Performance Measures Progress in achieving goals shall be measured by: Maintain the rate of Uniform Crime Report (UCR) Part I crimes in Anchorage at or below the national average for comparable size communities o : Annual Uniform Crime Report Part I crime rate (per 100,000 population) for Anchorage, as compared to communities nationwide in population 250,000-499,999 o Efficiency: Average total cost per officer in Anchorage Reduce the rate of adult sexual assault in Anchorage o : Rate of adult sexual assault (under the State of Alaska definition, per 100,000 population) for Anchorage o : Rate of adult sexual assault arrests (percent of adult sexual assault cases resulting in arrest) The number of drivers Operating Under the Influence (OUI) decreases o : Number of arrests for non-collision-related OUI o : Number of deaths associated with OUI-related collisions

Measure #1: Annual Uniform Crime Report Part I crime rate (per 100,000 population) for Anchorage, as compared to communities nationwide in population 250,000-499,999 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 Anch Group Anch Group Anch Group Anch Group Anch Group Anch Group 4,784 6,600 5,112 6,210 4,826 5,740 4,235 5,451 4,524 5,119 4,361 4,974 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 Anch Group Anch Group Anch Group Anch Group Anch Group Anch Group 3,948 5,116 4,355 5,056 4,831 4,803 8,552 NA 4988 4402 Note: Data are derived from FBI UCR Table 8 and Table 16. Data for will not be released by the FBI until the fourth quarter of. 2012 Table 8 (Alaska): http://www.fbi.gov/about-us/cjis/ucr/crime-in-the-u.s/2012/crime-in-the-u.s.-2012/tables/8tabledatadecpdf/table-8- state-cuts/table_8_offenses_known_to_law_enforcement_by_alaska_by_city_2012.xls 2012 Table 16: http://www.fbi.gov/about-us/cjis/ucr/crime-in-the-u.s/2012/crime-in-the-u.s.- 2012/tables/16tabledatadecpdf/table_16_rate_by_population_group_2012.xls 9000 8000 7000 UCR Part I Crimes Per 100,000 Population Crime Rate 6000 5000 4000 3000 2000 1000 0 Anchorage Group I Year

Measure #2: Average total cost per officer in Anchorage 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 no no no data data data $131,795 $127,364 $133,925 $144,268 $155,949 $164,436 2014 2015 $ 174,654 178,913 167,215 Actual Cost Computed at year end. Measure #3: Rate of adult sexual assault (under the State of Alaska definition, per 100,000 population) for Anchorage 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 94.1 100.3 108.4 103.7 108.7 111.0 117.2 122.0 126.0 2014 2015 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 116.5 116 Measure #4: Rate of adult sexual assault arrests (percent of adult sexual assault cases resulting in arrest) 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 9.5% 10.2% 14.7% 6.9% 13.6% 12.3% 9.8% 10.8% 11.0% 15.4% 11.3% 1 st Qtr 2 nd Qtr 3 rd Qtr 4 th Qtr 10.8% 12.9% 5.8% 5% 8.63%!rst Qu 2 nd Qu 3rd Qu 4 th Qu 6.3% 6.3% Measure #5: Number of arrests for non-collision-related OUI 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 1202 1121 1545 2327 2261 1951 1732 1426 1389 1160 1075 1 st Qtr 2 nd Qtr 3 rd Qtr 4 th Qtr 248 321 237 350 1156 1rst Qu 2nd Qu 3 rd Qu 4 th Qu 255 255 Measure #6: Number of deaths associated with OUI-related collisions 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 no no no data data data 6 3 3 4 1 6 4 7*** 1 st Qtr 2 nd Qtr 3 rd Qtr 4 th Qtr.67 3*** 1*** 1*** 5.67*** 4 th 1rst Qu 2 nd Qu 3 rd Qu Qu 1 1 Note: *** Toxicology pending on 5 subjects

Administration Division Anchorage: Performance. Value. Results. Purpose Provide technical and administrative police service to the community and employees of the Division Direct Services Answer and dispatch 911 calls for assistance Property management Records management Citation processing IT management Budget management Facilities management Grant management Accomplishment Goals Answer 911 calls within national standard time range, under National Emergency Number Association (NENA) standards Performance Measures Progress in achieving goals shall be measured by: Answer 911 calls within national standard time range, under National Emergency Number Association (NENA) standards o : Average time (in seconds) required for call takers to answer 911 calls Measure #7: Average time (in seconds) required for call takers to answer 911 calls 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 no no no no 10 8 8 9 10 10.5 11.4 data data data data seconds seconds seconds seconds seconds seconds seconds 1 st Qtr 12 seconds 2 nd Qtr 13 seconds 3 rd Qtr 14 seconds 4 th Qtr 12 Seconds 12.5 seconds 1 st Qtr 8.3 seconds 2 nd Qtr 3 rd Qtr 4 th Qtr 8.3 seconds

Crime Suppression Division Anchorage: Performance. Value. Results. Purpose Prevent and deter crime and promote safe neighborhoods by utilizing proactive community policing methods Direct Services Proactive, problem-oriented community policing Traffic law enforcement Selective enforcement of high-risk offenders and crimes Accomplishment Goals Reduce the rate of fatality vehicle collisions in Anchorage Performance Measures Progress in achieving goals shall be measured by: Reduce the rate of fatality vehicle collisions in Anchorage o : Rate of fatality vehicle collisions (per 100,000 population) for Anchorage Measure #8: Rate of fatality vehicle collisions (per 100,000 population) for Anchorage 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015.4 5.4 5.4 4.6 7.1 2.8 1.3 4.7 4.3 7.7 7.7 1 st Qtr 2 nd Qtr 3 rd Qtr 4 th Qtr 2 1.3 1.67 2.3 7.27 1 st Qtr 2 nd Qtr 3 rd Qtr 4 th Qtr 1 1

Detective Division Anchorage: Performance. Value. Results. Purpose Follow up on felony crimes reported to or detected by the and to provide specialized law enforcement to interdict selected crimes Direct Services Investigation Law Enforcement Service Referrals Accomplishment Goals Increase clearance rate in homicide cases Performance Measures Progress in achieving goals shall be measured by: Increase clearance rate in homicide cases o : Clearance rate in homicide cases in Anchorage Measure #9: Clearance rate in homicide cases in Anchorage Year 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 Cases 17 21 25 12 17 19 18 18 19 14 Closed 14 17 23 10 15 16 17 17 16 11 Percentage 82% 81% 92% 83% 88% 84% 94% 94% 84% 79% Year 2015 1 st Qtr 2015 2 nd Qtr 2015 3 rd Qtr 2015 4 th Qtr 2015 Cases 10 8 3 6 27 Closed 7 4 2 6 19 Percentage 70% 50% 66.3% 100% 70.37% Year 1 st Qtr 2 nd Qtr 3 rd Qtr 4 th Qtr Cases 9 3 18 8 38 Closed 6 3 12 7 28 Percentage 67% 100% 67% 87.5% 73.7% Year 1 st Qtr 2 nd Qtr 3 rd Qtr 4 th Qtr Cases 10 10 Closed 6 6 Percentage 60% 60%

Patrol Division Anchorage: Performance. Value. Results. Purpose Respond to citizen calls for service and proactively initiate contacts, thereby deterring and solving crime as well as providing service referrals to create a secure and livable community Direct Services Law Enforcement Crime Prevention Investigation Service Referrals Response to Emergencies and Disasters Accomplishment Goals Maintain an average response time for Priority 1 calls for service under eight minutes The number of drivers involved in motor vehicle collisions who were Operating Under the Influence (OUI) at the time of the collision decreases Performance Measures Maintain an average response time for Priority 1 calls for service under eight minutes o : Average response time for all Priority 1 calls for service The number of drivers involved in motor vehicle collisions who were Operating Under the Influence (OUI) at the time of the collision decreases o : Number of arrests for collision-related OUI made by Patrol Measure #10: Average time from dispatch to first officer on scene for all Priority 1 calls for service 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 3.4 3.5 3.4 3.6 3.9 4.2 4.2 4.37 minutes minutes minutes minutes minutes minutes minutes minutes 1 st Qtr 4.7 minutes 2 nd Qtr 4.5 minutes 3 rd Qtr 4.65 minutes 4 th Qtr 4.82 minutes 4.67 minutes 1 st Qtr 5.33 minutes 2 nd Qtr 3 rd Qtr 4 th Qtr 5.33 minutes Measure #11: Number of arrests for collision-related OUI made by Patrol 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 342 352 427 449 344 463 283 287 296 279 341 1 st Qtr 2 nd Qtr 3 rd Qtr 4 th Qtr 77 75 73 91 316 1 st Qtr 2 nd Qtr 3 rd Qtr 4 th Qtr 68 68

Measure #1: Annual Uniform Crime Report Part I crime rate (per 100,000 population) for Anchorage, as compared to communities nationwide in population 250,000-499,999 Maintain the rate of Uniform Crime Report (UCR) Part I crimes in Anchorage at or below the national average for comparable size communities This measure reports the rate of Part I crimes on the annual FBI Uniform Crime Report (murder, forcible rape, robbery, aggravated assault, burglary, larceny-theft, motor vehicle theft) per 100,000 population in Anchorage and compares it to the national average rate per 100,000 for cities ranging from 250,000 to 499,999 in population (drawing specifically from Tables 8 and 16 from the FBI s Crime in the United States on-line reports). Crime statistics are captured on an on-going basis, then aggregated and reported periodically to the FBI. The aggregated, official crime statistics for Anchorage and the rest of the country are released by the FBI on an annual basis. Personnel assigned to the department s Records Section are specifically designated as Classifiers with the duty of classifying reported crimes into appropriate categories and collating them into a report for submission to the FBI. The department s Crime Analyst will report the department s UCR Part I crime rate annually with the department s annual crime report. As part of the annual crime reporting process, the Crime Analyst will also populate this measure with the current data. The department s Command Staff will use this information to assist in making decisions regarding staffing and deployment together with policing strategies.

Measure #2: Average total cost per officer in Anchorage Efficiency Maintain the rate of Uniform Crime Report (UCR) Part I crimes in Anchorage at or below the national average for comparable size communities This measure reports the average total annual cost to put a police officer on the street in Anchorage. The total cost includes salary, benefits, equipment and vehicle cost. The department s Fiscal Section tracks the budgetary costs for all department personnel and functions. This measure will be reported annually, upon the budget for a new fiscal year becoming final. The department s Fiscal Manager. The department s Fiscal Manager will report this measure. The department s Command Staff will use this information to monitor the costs of fielding its sworn personnel, with the potential to consider adjustments as necessary.

Measure #3: Rate of adult sexual assault (under the State of Alaska definition, per 100,000 population) for Anchorage Reduce the rate of adult sexual assault in Anchorage This measure displays the rate of reported sexual assaults to adult victims (under State of Alaska definitions) per 100,000 population in Anchorage in a given year. Crime statistics are captured on an on-going basis. This measure will be reported annually, consistent with the finalization of the annual crime statistics for a given year. Personnel assigned to the department s Records Section are specifically designated as Classifiers with the duty of classifying reported crimes into appropriate categories and collating them into a report. The department s Crime Analyst will report this measure annually, simultaneously with the department s annual crime report. The department s Command Staff will use this information to assist in making decisions regarding staffing and deployment together with policing strategies specifically addressing adult sexual assault.

Measure #4: Rate of adult sexual assault arrests (percent of adult sexual assault cases resulting in arrest) Reduce the rate of adult sexual assault in Anchorage This measure reports the rate of arrest in adult sexual assault cases (under State of Alaska definitions), as a percent of all such cases investigated by the department. Crime statistics are captured on an on-going basis. This measure will be reported quarterly and annually. The Special Victims Unit Commander reviews, collates, and reports data regarding adult sexual assaults to the department s chain of command. Personnel assigned to the department s Records Section are specifically designated as Classifiers with the duty of classifying reported crimes into appropriate categories and collating them into a report. Initial reports of sexual assault are subject to classifying to determine their ultimate classification. The department s Detective Captain will report this measure. The department s Command Staff will use this information to assist in making decisions regarding staffing and deployment together with policing strategies specifically addressing adult sexual assault.

Measure #5: Number of arrests for non-collision-related OUI The number of drivers Operating Under the Influence (OUI) decreases This measure reports the number of arrests for Operating Under the Influence (sometimes called Driving Under the Influence/DUI or Driving While Intoxicated/DWI) made by any officer in the department in circumstances not involving motor vehicle collisions. Crime statistics are captured on an on-going basis. This measure will be reported quarterly and annually. Crime statistics are subject to being classified by the department s Records Section to place crimes into appropriate categories. The Crime Analyst will report this measure. The department s Command Staff will use this information to assess the level of effort being extended by the department in mitigating the occurrence of Operating Under the Influence in Anchorage.

Measure #6: Number of deaths associated with OUI-related collisions The number of drivers Operating Under the Influence (OUI) decreases This measure reports the number of deaths associated with motor vehicle collisions involving drivers Operating Under the Influence (sometimes called Driving Under the Influence/DUI or Driving While Intoxicated/DWI). Crime statistics are captured on an on-going basis. This measure will be reported quarterly and annually. Crime statistics are subject to being classified by the department s Records Section to place crimes into appropriate categories. The Crime Analyst will report this measure. The department s Command Staff will use this information to assess the level of effort being extended by the department in mitigating the occurrence of Operating Under the Influence in Anchorage.

Administration Division Measure #7: Average time (in seconds) required for call takers to answer 911 calls Answer 911 calls within national standard time range, under National Emergency Number Association (NENA) standards This measure reports the time required to answer a 911 call as measured against the national standard time range under National Emergency Number Association (NENA) standards; 90 percent of calls answered within 10 seconds during busiest hour of the day and 95 percent of calls answered within 20 seconds (NENA Document 56-005, Section 3.1). Time required for call takers to answer 911 calls is continuously captured by the department Dispatch Center s answering point software. This measure will be reported quarterly and annually. The department s Administration Captain will coordinate with the Communications Clerk Supervisors to retrieve this data. The department s Administration Captain will post this measure quarterly and annually. The department s Command Staff will use this information to maintain a high standard of public safety through proper staffing and deployment in the Dispatch Center.

Crime Suppression Division Measure #8: Rate of fatality vehicle collisions (per 100,000 population) for Anchorage Reduce the rate of fatality vehicle collisions in Anchorage This measure reports the rate of fatality vehicle collisions per 100,000 population in Anchorage in a given year. The department s Traffic Unit maintains statistics on the number of fatality vehicle collisions in Anchorage. This measure will be reported quarterly and annually. The department s Traffic Commander will retrieve information on fatality vehicle collisions, perform the calculation to convert to a rate, and report that information to the Crime Suppression Captain. The department s Crime Suppression Captain will report this measure. The department s Command Staff will use this information to assist in making decisions regarding the effectiveness of traffic safety efforts in Anchorage.

Detective Division Measure #9: Clearance rate for homicide cases in Anchorage Increase clearance rate in homicide cases This measure reports the clearance rate of homicide cases. A clearance is defined as a case that is closed by arrest or by exceptional means (i.e. suspect dies before charges are brought, District Attorney declines prosecution, etc.). Crime statistics are captured on an on-going basis. The status of homicide cases is tracked continuously by the department s Homicide Unit Supervisor. This measure will be reported quarterly and annually. The Homicide Unit Supervisor will report the status of all homicide cases to the Detective Captain through the chain of command and maintain a report. The department s Detective Captain will report this measure. The department s Command Staff will use this information to assess the effectiveness of the department s homicide investigations, and in making decisions regarding staffing and deployment in homicide investigations.

Patrol Division Measure #10: Average time from dispatch to first office on scene for all Priority 1 calls for service Maintain an average response time for Priority 1 calls for service under eight minutes This measure reports the average period of time between the time a Priority 1 call for service is dispatched and the time the first officer arrives on scene. Response time data is continuously captured by the department Dispatch Center s answering point and computer aided dispatch software. This measure will be reported quarterly and annually. The department s Administration Captain will coordinate with the Communications Clerk Supervisors to retrieve this data. The Administration Captain will supply the data to the Patrol Captain for reporting purposes. The department s Patrol Captain will report this measure. The department s Command Staff will use this information to assess the effectiveness of the department s Patrol deployment, performance and procedures.

Patrol Division Measure #11: Number of arrests for collision-related OUI made by Patrol The number of drivers involved in motor vehicle collisions who were Operating Under the Influence (OUI) at the time of the collision decreases This measure reports the number of arrests for Operating Under the Influence (sometimes called Driving Under the Influence/DUI or Driving While Intoxicated/DWI) for persons involved in motor vehicle collisions made by the Patrol Division. Crime statistics are captured on an on-going basis. This measure will be reported quarterly and annually. The department s Patrol Captain will coordinate with the department s Crime Analyst to retrieve this information. Crime statistics are subject to being classified by the department s Records Section to place crimes into appropriate categories. The Patrol Captain will report this measure. The department s Command Staff will use this information to assess the level of effort being extended by the Patrol Division in mitigating the occurrence of Operating Under the Influence in Anchorage.

PVR Measure WC: Managing Workers' Compensation Claims Reducing job-related injuries is a priority for the Administration by ensuring safe work conditions and safe practices. By instilling safe work practices we ensure not only the safety of our employees but reduce the potential for injuries and property damage to the public. The Municipality is self-insured and every injury poses a financial burden on the public and the injured worker's family. It just makes good sense to WORK SAFE. Results are tracked by monitoring monthly reports issued by the Risk Management Division. Workers' Compensation Claims Police Department (in Dollars) 800,000 700,000 600,000 500,000 400,000 300,000 200,000 100,000 0 738,617 739,683 542,579 184,083 12/31/2014 12/31/2015 12/31/ 3/31/17