U.S. Army John F. Kennedy Special Warfare Center and School The U.S. Army s Special Operations Center of Excellence (SOCoE)

Size: px

Start display at page:

Download "U.S. Army John F. Kennedy Special Warfare Center and School The U.S. Army s Special Operations Center of Excellence (SOCoE)"

Beatrice Lester
5 years ago
Views:

U.S. Army John F. Kennedy Special Warfare Center and School The U.S. Army s Special Operations Center of Excellence (SOCoE) Special Warfare Education Group (Airborne)

1 U.S. Army John F. Kennedy Special Warfare Center and School The U.S. Army s Special Operations Center of Excellence (SOCoE) Special Warfare Education Group (Airborne) Human Dynamics & (HDP) Briefer: Type of Brief: Date: Version: The overall classification of this brief is: UNCLASSIFIED/FOUO LTC Phillip Thomas Information 10JUN17 V1_PWT

2 Purpose To provide a high-level overview of the U.S. Army John F. Kennedy Special Warfare Center and School Human Dynamics & (HDP) Program. Our HDP is NOT Special One Army HDP can be leveraged as an existing Research & Practice Hub The HDP concept can be scaled

$INTERDISCIPLINARY HUMAN PERFORMANCE MODEL System noun sys tem \ˈsis-təm\ 1: a regularly interacting or interdependent group of items forming a unified whole 2: an organized set of doctrines, ideas,$

3 INTERDISCIPLINARY HUMAN PERFORMANCE MODEL System noun sys tem \ˈsis-təm\ 1: a regularly interacting or interdependent group of items forming a unified whole 2: an organized set of doctrines, ideas, or principles usually intended to explain the arrangement or working of a systematic whole 3: an organized or established procedure Systematic = coherent body of ideas or principles marked by thoroughness and regularity

4 INTERDISCIPLINARY HUMAN PERFORMANCE MODEL System: Key Factors Adaptable Sustainable Able to adjust to new conditions Modifiable as needed for specific tasks Able to be maintained at a certain rate or level, upheld or defended Evidence-based, steeped in clinical reasoning, pragmatic Representative Representation from all bodies of opinion All interests and concerns are considered

The Human Is the Platform Mental, Physical, and Interpersonal Adaptability

Conditioning Physical Therapy Nutrition Interpersonal Optimum Cognitive

& Empathetic Planning Purposeful Action EMVP Spiritual Enhancement

5 The Human Is the Platform Mental, Physical, and Interpersonal Adaptability Team Adaptability Negotiations and Mediation Physiological Strength and Conditioning Physical Therapy Nutrition Interpersonal Optimum Cognitive Learning Enhancement Ethics, Morals, & Values Critical Thinking, Ethical DM & Empathetic Planning Purposeful Action EMVP Spiritual Enhancement Psycho-physiological Enhancement Mutually Supporting Efforts For a Mutually Supportive System.

Learning & Operational Environment Context Matters SOCoE HDP System Interpersonal Enhancement Strength & Conditioning Learning & Enhancement Physical

6 Learning & Operational Environment Context Matters SOCoE HDP System Interpersonal Enhancement Strength & Conditioning Learning & Enhancement Physical Therapy Optimized Human Platform Athletic Training Psychophysiological Enhancement Nutrition Individual & Team Adaptability Optimum Agile & Adaptive Thinking!

7 Truth or Myth? If we we believe That Humans are more important than hardware The Human is the Platform that delivers Capabilities All Platforms are or should be developed Holistically The Human is our most fundamental Warfighting System and is the Critical Component of all other Warfighting Platforms Then we must address requirements accordingly Are our Program Executive Office s (PEO) addressing? Project Managers (PM)? PEO SoldieràPM Soldier Warrior Supports Soldiers through the acquisition of integrated Soldier systems. Think Shoot Move--Communicate

8 Inception-Service-Life beyond HDP Programs are a viable and cost effective means to increase force Capability and Readiness: ENHANCE for better performance SUSTAIN through reducing Stress & increasing Multiple touch-points Reduces Stigma à getting help is routine CREATE self-aware, self-regulating, & self-replicating Soldiers with increased adaptability PRESERVE already invested resources through higher probability of success & reducing potential medical issues Enhanced adaptability, performance, self-awareness & ability to self-regulate increases robustness which will Improve Resiliency Enhancement Time Baseline Restoration Time Baseline

9 SOCOE HUMAN PERFORMANCE SYSTEM PROFICIENCY PHYSICAL ABILITY TECHNICAL KNOWLEDGE TIME

10 SOCOE HUMAN PERFORMANCE SYSTEM Enhancement Screen Rehabilitation (Human Continuum) Strength & Conditioning Cognitive Metrics Nutrition Foundational Training Intermediate Training Advanced Training Specific Training

11 SOCOE HUMAN PERFORMANCE SYSTEM Metrics Body Composition Lower Body Power Agility Strength Anaerobic Endurance

12 THOR 3 Physical Therapy Reduced Recovery Time Return to Duty Rates FY15: 81.6% FY16: 84.5% Return to Duty Days FY15: 44.3 days FY16: 34.5 days Access to Care Time to Treatment FY15: 2.5 days FY16: 1.22 days

13 THOR 3 Nutrition DFAC Study Purpose: Test the effectiveness of nutrition intervention and whether changes were sustained over time (N=688) Results Higher sodium-adjusted health eating index (HEI) vs. Control DFAC Increased consumption of fruit, red/orange vegetables, whole grains, protein based legumes, and protein Reduction in consumption of refined grains, starchy vegetables, milk (although increase in yogurt, oil, and solid fat Introduction of healthy food options and revised cooking practices are effective interventions for improved Warfighter meal quality and eating practices

THOR 3 Impact on Operational Force One of the tenants of the program is improved operational readiness Injured Soldier = NON-OPERATIONAL SOLDIER The Functional Movement Screen (FMS) is a predictor of

14 THOR 3 Impact on Operational Force One of the tenants of the program is improved operational readiness Injured Soldier = NON-OPERATIONAL SOLDIER The Functional Movement Screen (FMS) is a predictor of future injury Scores <15 = +274% risk of sustaining an injury (Bonazza et al., 2016) NO : ~5 out of 10 show up to unit WITH ELEVATED RISK for Injury % % Impact on Risk of Injury on 18 Series Students 80.00% 52.20% 31.1% Reduction in Injury POST : ~2 out of 10 show up to unit WITH ELEVATED RISK for Injury 21.10% SF Language students average FMS Scores: Pre- Training = 14 (52.2%) Post- Training = 16 (21.1%) 31.1% ( 100 new SOF Operators) improved operational readiness Statistically significant improvement with >99% confidence that improvement was a result of the program 60.00% 40.00% 20.00% 0.00% 47.80% Pre- Training 78.90% Post- Training Bonazza, N. A., Smuin, D., Onks, C. A., Silvis, M. L., & Dhawan, A. (April 29, 2016). Reliability, Validity, and Injury Predictive Value of the Functional Movement Screen: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. The American Journal of Sports Medicine. FMS Score >14 FMS Score <15

15 HDP Support - Qualification Courses Civil Affairs Qualification Course Selection and PCS to FBNC A&S SOF CCC Intro to CA Language Regionals MOS SLUSS- TILLER Psychological Operations Qualification Selection and PCS to FBNC A&S SOF CCC Intro to PSYOP Language MOS BLACK KNIGHT Regionals IAPeX Special Forces Qualification Course Selection and PCS to FBNC A&S SOF CCC SFOC SUT/SERE MOS ROBIN SAGE Language

16 Community of Practice

17 Discussion Point of Contact for HDP: LTC Phillip Thomas or by phone (O) or (C)

UNCLASSIFIED FY 2016 OCO. FY 2016 Base

UNCLASSIFIED FY 2016 OCO. FY 2016 Base Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2016 Army Date: February 2015 2040: Research, Development, Test & Evaluation, Army / BA 3: Advanced Technology Development (ATD) COST ($ in Millions) Prior