Dep't of Correction v. Reiser OATH Index No. 1890/04 (Feb. 17, 2005)
|
|
- Bernadette Daniel
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Dep't of Correction v. Reiser OATH Index No. 1890/04 (Feb. 17, 2005) Correction officer charged with failure to submit timely report following the realization that three Department portable radios were missing. ALJ finds that respondent failed to timely submit a report as to one of the radios. Respondent's defense that he submitted a report that was never found in Department files fails based on a presumption of regularity that submitted documents are properly processed absent evidence to the contrary. Long tenure with no prior disciplinary action and evidence that other correction officers may also have been responsible for equipment mitigates penalty. ALJ recommends reprimand. NEW YORK CITY OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATIVE TRIALS AND HEARINGS In the Matter of DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION Petitioner - against - JOHN REISER Respondent REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION DONNA R. MERRIS, Administrative Law Judge This disciplinary proceeding was referred by petitioner, the Department of Correction ("Department") pursuant to section 75 of the Civil Service Law. Respondent, Correction Officer John Reiser, is charged in one specification with failing to efficiently perform his duties in that he failed to timely notify a supervisor, failed to timely submit a report, and failed to timely submit missing equipment reports concerning three missing Department radios (ALJ Ex. 1). A hearing was commenced before me on November 9, Petitioner presented the testimony of three witnesses: Assistant Deputy Warden Mark Hughes; Correction Captain Jose Gonzalez; and, Correction Officer Efraim Hernandez and relevant documentary evidence. Respondent testified in his own behalf and presented relevant documents.
2 -2- For the reasons stated below, I find that respondent failed to timely submit a Missing Radio Report as to one radio and recommend that he be issued a reprimand. ANALYSIS Respondent has been assigned to the Bernard B. Kerik Center (Manhattan Detention Complex) ("BBKC"), second-floor control since During his tour, respondent is in charge of distributing hand-held radios, gas canisters, emergency keys and flex cuffs (Tr. 46). 1 It is undisputed that in October 2001, Deputy Warden ("DW") Miguel Western was assigned as the Security Deputy Warden of the BBKC. Upon taking the new assignment, DW Western ordered the taking of an inventory of the equipment assigned to the area. In November 2001, Security Captain German Ocasio assigned the inventory task to Correction Officer Efrain Hernandez who determined that three portable radios were unaccounted for. Radios numbered 3600 and 3669 had been assigned to the security area and radio number 3667 had been assigned to the "movement" area (Pet. Ex. 1). On November 19, 2001, DW Lionel Lorquet replaced DW Western and ordered Security Captain Jose Gonzalez to complete the physical inventory of the security equipment. By November 26, 2001, Captain Gonzalez had determined that the three radios were, in fact, unaccounted for. Petitioner maintains that the radios are valued at $3,000 each (Pet. Ex. 1). At the hearing, Captain Gonzalez testified that, in November 2001 when he was first assigned as security officer at BBKC, he was made aware that there were missing radios and that he instructed Officer Hernandez to do an inventory. Officer Hernandez reported that he had informed Captain Ocasio that the radios were missing in June 2001 (Tr ). Captain Gonzalez spoke to respondent about the radios. Respondent told Captain Gonzalez that Correction Officer Card was aware of the missing radios "several years ago" (Tr. 30). In addition, respondent told Captain Gonzalez that he had filed a Missing Radio Report. However, Captain Gonzalez was never able to locate any report in the Department files. Respondent also told Captain Gonzalez that radio no was assigned to the security captain, radio no was assigned to the security office and radio no was unaccounted for (Tr ). As to the two radios reportedly assigned to the security office, Captain 1 The transcript of the instant proceeding will be referred to as "Tr."
3 -3- Gonzalez testified that, since the time that he has been security officer, the radios have not been present in the security office (Tr. 31). Correction Officer Hernandez prepared a memorandum addressed to the facility warden on November 16, 2001 in which he stated that he was not able to locate the three radios (Tr. 45; Pet. Ex. 7). On December 3, 2001, Officer Hernandez submitted an addendum to his report in which he stated that he had informed the security captain in June 2001 that the radios were missing. In addition, Officer Hernandez stated that, from August 2001 until December 2001, he had continually informed the deputy wardens in charge of security that the radios were missing (Tr ; Pet. Ex. 6). It is respondent's testimony that in 2001, while Correction Officer Card was still employed by the Department, respondent was assigned to the second floor control post only two days of the work week. Presently, respondent is assigned to the post for four days and is responsible for dispensing gas canisters throughout the facility and accounting for the security keys used by the probe teams and is responsible for a "handful" of radios (Tr ). Prior to November 2001, respondent became aware that radio no was missing. Officer Card notified respondent that the radio, assigned to Intake A, could not be accounted for and respondent asked for documentation to the effect that the radio was missing. Respondent's testimony is that, when a radio is assigned to a fixed post such as Intake A, accountability for the equipment lies with the captain in charge of that particular area. In any event, after he was informed that the radio was missing, respondent completed a Missing Radio Form and placed it in a security box to be given to the wardens, deputy warden for security and the tour commander (Tr ). Respondent testified that, sometime around the beginning of November 2001, Officer Card reported to respondent that the three radios, including radio no. 3667, were missing from Officer Card's possession (Tr. 48). Respondent wrote a memorandum to the facility warden on November 16, 2001 in which he stated that Officer Card was aware for "several years" that the radios assigned to the security office, nos and 3669, were missing. In addition, respondent wrote that radio no had been missing since September 2001 (Tr. 52; Resp. Ex. A). Department documents indicate that radio no was assigned to the steady security captain in 1996 and, according to procedure, should have been returned to the security office each
4 -4- day. In 1996, Captain Ocasio was the security captain. Radio no was assigned to the Intake A post in 1996 and radio no was also assigned to the security office (Tr ; Resp. Ex. C). The Department inventory list as of January 2001 indicates that the three radios remained logged out to the security office and to the Intake A area as they were in 1996 (Tr. 51; Resp. Ex. D). Finally, respondent testified that he is responsible only for those radios that are assigned to his area, 2 Control. The notations on the inventory sheets indicate that, the radios assigned to certain areas, such as 2 Control, or security, or Intake, are to be returned each day to those specific areas (Tr. 53). Here, respondent is charged with violating Department rules which require correction officers to perform their duties efficiently (Rule ); which place responsibility on correction officers for the good care of Department equipment (Rule ); and, which require correction officers to submit a report concerning Department business when required (Rule ). See Department Rules (eff. 1996). In order to prevail in this administrative proceeding, petitioner must show by a preponderance of the credible evidence that respondent violated the Department rules and is, thereby, guilty of misconduct. Foran v. Murphy, 73 Misc.2d 486, 342 N.Y.S.2d 4 (Sup. Ct. N.Y.Co. 1973). Preponderance has been defined as "the burden of persuading the trier of fact that the existence of a fact is more probable than its non-existence." Richardson on Evidence, (J. Prince 11 th ed. 1995); Dep't of Correction v. McNeely, OATH Index No. 119/92 (Sept. 13, 1991), aff'd, 193 A.D.2d, 422, 598 N.Y.S.2d 946 (1 st Dep't 1993). The evidence before me preponderates in favor of a finding that respondent failed to timely submit a report concerning the missing equipment. Assistant Deputy Warden ("ADW") Mark Hughes testified that Department procedure requires a correction officer to complete a Missing Radio Report and file it with a supervisor upon learning that the equipment is missing (Tr , 18). It is not sufficient, according to ADW Hughes, to only make a notation in the log book that the equipment is missing (Tr. 13). Respondent's position required him to inventory and monitor the whereabouts of the radios and he was required to report missing items upon the realization that they were not accounted for (Tr. 22). Captain Gonzalez testified also that it is not sufficient to only make an entry in the log book, a Missing Radio Report is required to be filed with a supervisor upon learning that the equipment is missing (Tr. 24). If the log book states that the equipment is assigned to an individual or group, the
5 -5- Department, absent a Missing Radio Report, assumes that the equipment is at the assigned post (Gonzalez: Tr. 41). During the investigation conducted in November 2001, a search of Department records was made in order to determine whether or not respondent had filed a Missing Radio Report. No report was found in Department files (Gonzalez: Tr. 30; Pet. Exs. 1, 3). Respondent contends that he completed a Missing Radio Report for radio no. 3667, the one assigned to Intake A, prior to the November 2001 investigation (Tr. 48). In his report dated November 16, 2001, respondent states that radio no was missing since September Moreover, respondent states that Officer Card was aware of the other missing radios, no and no. 3669, for several years (Resp. Ex. A). Thus, for at least one of the radios, no. 3667, respondent was aware that it was missing as early as September It is well settled that a presumption of regularity attaches to official acts. The law presumes that "no official or person acting under an oath of office will do anything contrary to his official duty, or omit anything which his official duty requires to be done." Matter of Marcellus, 165 N.Y. 70, 77, 58 N.E. 796, 798 (1900). Accordingly, if respondent had completed a Missing Radio Report and submitted it, absent evidence to the contrary, it is presumed that the report would have been reviewed by the Department employees to whom it was submitted and acted upon. There has been no showing of bias toward respondent nor any showing that any of respondent's superiors would have deliberately ignored the existence of such a filing. Accordingly, I find that respondent did not file a Missing Radio Report prior to November See Dep't of Correction v. Taylor, OATH Index No. 622/91(Sept. 6, 1991) (presumption of regularity defeats officer's claim that he submitted report to control room but that it was not properly forwarded to the captain who ordered it). Respondent would argue that Officer Card had responsibility for reporting the other missing radios, no and no. 3669, and that Officer Card was aware that they were missing for some time prior to November The difficulty here is that the record is not clear as to whether or not Officer Card informed respondent of these missing radios at the same time, in September 2001, that he informed respondent that radio no was missing. In addition, Officer Hernandez seemed to be aware, as well, that the radios were missing well before November Thus, on this record,
6 -6- I cannot determine when respondent knew that radios numbered 3600 and 3669 were missing or who was responsible for reporting that they were missing. Finally, respondent argues that the instant charge indicates only that respondent failed to fill out a Missing Radio Report only on November 20, 2001, when, in fact, he completed his memorandum about the missing radios on November 16, Therefore, according to the argument, based on the language of the charge, respondent may not be found guilty of any misconduct. While the allegation is not artfully drafted, it is clear from the evidence that the charge refers to the date that the Department determined that respondent had failed to timely file a Missing Radio Report. The charge was drafted in a way that gave respondent full notice of the alleged misconduct and the allegation has been fully litigated in this proceeding. Thus, respondent has not been prejudiced. See Dep't of Correction v. Carter, OATH Index No. 171/91 (Feb. 28, 1991), aff'd on guilt, modified on penalty, NYC Civ. Serv. Comm'n Item No. CD (Mar. 13, 1993) (variance between charge and proof was minor and respondent was on full notice of the charge itself). THEREFORE: FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS Respondent failed to timely submit a Missing Radio Report upon learning in September 2001 that Department radio no was missing. Petitioner has sustained the portion of the specification that alleges that respondent failed to timely submit a written report as to the missing radio by a preponderance of the credible evidence. The remaining portion of the specification is duplicative and should be dismissed. RECOMMENDATION Upon making the above findings, I requested and received respondent's employment history in order to make an appropriate penalty recommendation. Respondent was appointed to his position as a correction officer in October 1987 and has no prior disciplinary record. For the year 1997, respondent received a certificate of perfect attendance
7 -7- and, in 1996, respondent received a Departmental certificate of appreciation. As noted, respondent has an outstanding record of attendance. Petitioner has asked that respondent be suspended without pay for twenty days for this infraction. However, respondent's record and long tenure with the Department are significant factors in considering an appropriate penalty recommendation here. Moreover, the circumstances surrounding the failure of several officers to report the missing radios as shown by undisputed evidence at the instant hearing also mitigates the penalty recommendation. Respondent was shown to have knowledge that at least one of the radios was missing at least three months before the Department requested a report from him. As a long tenured correction officer and with experience on his post, respondent should have known that a report was necessary. Thus, some penalty is demanded for this failure. The Department has a decided interest in maintaining accurate inventories of its equipment, particularly expensive equipment such as the portable radios at issue here. Accordingly, I recommend that respondent be issued a reprimand. February 17, 2005 SUBMITTED TO: MARTIN F. HORN Commissioner APPEARANCES BY: WILLIAM BRYK, ESQ. Attorney for Petitioner KOEHLER & ISAACS Attorneys for Respondent By: MARLON MARTINEZ, ESQ. Donna R. Merris Administrative Law Judge
Dep t of Correction v. Vives OATH Index Nos. 1162/14, 1163/14 & 1164/14 (Apr. 17, 2014)
Dep t of Correction v. Vives OATH Index Nos. 1162/14, 1163/14 & 1164/14 (Apr. 17, 2014) Petitioner proved that correction officer was insubordinate, inefficiently performed her duties, engaged in conduct
More informationHealth & Hospitals Corp. (Henry J. Carter Specialty Hospital & Nursing Facility) v. Johnson OATH Index No. 1415/16 (Sept.
Health & Hospitals Corp. (Henry J. Carter Specialty Hospital & Nursing Facility) v. Johnson OATH Index No. 1415/16 (Sept. 20, 2016) Petitioner did not establish that respondent, a licensed practical nurse,
More informationHealth & Hospitals Corp. (Cook Chill Plant) v. Murray OATH Index No. 1003/10 (Jan. 12, 2010)
Health & Hospitals Corp. (Cook Chill Plant) v. Murray OATH Index No. 1003/10 (Jan. 12, 2010) In default hearing, petitioner proved that respondent was absent without official leave on seven occasions from
More informationReport and Recommendation, April 16, 1997
Health and Hospitals Corp. v. Doxen, OATH Index No. 630/97 (Apr. 16, 1997), modified on penalty, HHC Personnel Rev. Bd. Dec. No. 903 (May 19, 1998), appended. Summary: Respondent, an associate respiratory
More informationPetitioner failed to prove that senior sewage treatment worker neglected his duties. ALJ recommended dismissal of the charges.
Dep t of Environmental Protection v. Segarra OATH Index No. 2730/10 (Oct. 20, 2010), adopted in part, modified in part, Comm r Dec. (Apr. 29, 2011), reversed Civ. Serv. Comm n Item No. CD 11-94-R (Dec.
More informationMETRO NASHVILLE GOVERNMENT DAVIDSON CO. SHERIFF S OFFICE, Petitioner, /Department vs. DAVID TRIBBLE, Respondent/, Grievant.
University of Tennessee, Knoxville Trace: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange Tennessee Department of State, Opinions from the Administrative Procedures Division Law 12-1-2011 METRO NASHVILLE GOVERNMENT
More informationNEW YORK CITY OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATIVE TRIALS AND HEARINGS
Admin. for Children s Services v. Diaz OATH Index No. 2743/15 (Nov. 6, 2015), aff d, NYC Civ. Serv. Comm n Index No. 2015-1410 (Mar. 3, 2016), appended Supervising special officer charged with failing
More informationHealth & Hospitals Corp. (Bellevue Hospital Ctr.) v. Belliard OATH Index No. 2088/15 (Dec. 1, 2015)
Health & Hospitals Corp. (Bellevue Hospital Ctr.) v. Belliard OATH Index No. 2088/15 (Dec. 1, 2015) Petitioner established that respondent, a community liaison worker, violated patient escort procedures
More informationDep t of Environmental Protection v. Nuccio OATH Index Nos. 2360/08 & 2361/08 (Sept. 26, 2008)
Dep t of Environmental Protection v. Nuccio OATH Index Nos. 2360/08 & 2361/08 (Sept. 26, 2008) Environmental police officers who responded to a 911 report of domestic violence reasonably believed that
More informationTHIS MATTER came on for hearing before the undersigned, J. Randall May, Administrative Law Judge, on June 13, 2013, in High Point, North Carolina.
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA COUNTY OF ROCKINGHAM IN THE OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS 12DHR07589 IRENE RENEE MCGHEE PETITIONER, V. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES RESPONDENT. FINAL DECISION THIS
More informationMatter of Cumba v Fischer 2012 NY Slip Op 31859(U) May 22, 2012 Sup Ct, Franklin County Docket Number: Judge: S.
Matter of Cumba v Fischer 2012 NY Slip Op 31859(U) May 22, 2012 Sup Ct, Franklin County Docket Number: 2011-1189 Judge: S. Peter Feldstein Republished from New York State Unified Court System's E-Courts
More informationDepartment of Safety vs. Lt. Clement Jarrett
University of Tennessee, Knoxville Trace: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange Tennessee Department of State, Opinions from the Administrative Procedures Division Law 1-23-2008 Department of Safety
More informationTENNESSEE BOARD OF PROBATION AND PAROLE, Agency/, Petitioner, Vs. RICKY FRANK, Grievant/, Respondent
University of Tennessee, Knoxville Trace: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange Tennessee Department of State, Opinions from the Administrative Procedures Division Law 4-8-2008 TENNESSEE BOARD OF PROBATION
More informationTEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN NO. 03-09-00578-CV Robert H. Osburn, P.C., Appellant v. Realty Engineering, Inc., Appellee FROM COUNTY COURT AT LAW NO. 2 OF COMAL COUNTY NO. 2007CV0590,
More informationDEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS FINAL DECISION
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS Application for the Correction of the Coast Guard Record of: XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX BCMR Docket No. 2008-087 FINAL
More informationTENNESSEE DEPARTMENT OF MENTAL HEALTH AND SUBSTANCE ABUSE SERVICES, Petitioner, vs. ANTWAN RILEY, Grievant
University of Tennessee, Knoxville Trace: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange Tennessee Department of State, Opinions from the Administrative Procedures Division Law October 2012 TENNESSEE DEPARTMENT
More informationwhich are attached. They also considered your rebuttal letter dated 18 July 2002.
DEPARTMENTOFTHE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 BJG Docket No: 6056-02 22 November 2002 SSGT## This is in reference to your application for correction of
More informationDep t of Health & Mental Hygiene v. Gad OATH Index No. 0005/17 (Aug. 3, 2016)
Dep t of Health & Mental Hygiene v. Gad OATH Index No. 0005/17 (Aug. 3, 2016) In default proceeding, holder of mobile food vendor s license found guilty of making misrepresentations on his license application,
More informationOF PROCEEDINGS CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS DOCKET NUMBER:
RECORD AIR FORCE BOARD FOR OF PROCEEDINGS CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS 3UL 2 4 1998 IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 97-01721 --..I COUNSEL : HEARING DESIRED: YES APPLICANT REUUESTS THAT: 1. He be reinstated
More informationThis is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the provisions of Title 10, United States Code, Section 1552.
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAW ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 ELP Docket No. 5272-98 2 July 1999 This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval
More informationDocket No: August 2003 Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records Secretary of the Navy RECORD 0
From: To: Subj: DEPARTMENTOFTHE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 TRG Docket No: 4176-02 28 August 2003 Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records Secretary
More informationDEPARTMENTOFTHE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVYANNEX
DEPARTMENTOFTHE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVYANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 BJG Docket No: 2766-03 22 October 2003 SSGT This is in reference to your application for correction of your
More informationDISCIPLINE COMMITTEE OF THE COLLEGE OF NURSES OF ONTARIO
DISCIPLINE COMMITTEE OF THE COLLEGE OF NURSES OF ONTARIO PANEL: Grace Isgro-Topping Chairperson Spencer Dickson, RN Member Megan Sloan, RPN Member Angela Verrier, RPN Member John Bald Public Member BETWEEN:
More informationDEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORD 2 NAVY ANNE X WASHINGTON DC 20370-510 0 S TRG Docket No: 4440-99 29 March 2001 Dear This is in reference to your application for correction of
More informationAPPEARANCES. Pro Se Golden Apple Court Charlotte, NC 28215
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA COUNTY OF MECKLENBURG James Thomas Stephens, Petitioner, v. Division of Community Corrections, Respondent. IN THE OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS 12OSP01288 FINAL DECISION This
More informationDEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOAR3 FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORD 2 NAVY ANNE X WASHINGTON DC
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOAR3 FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORD 2 NAVY ANNE X WASHINGTON DC 20370.510 0 S AEG Docket No: 4591-99 20 September 2001 Dear Mr.-: This is in reference to your application for correction
More informationIN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA
IN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA Frederick P. McLeish, : Petitioner : : v. : No. 273 C.D. 2016 : Submitted: September 2, 2016 Bureau of Professional and : Occupational Affairs, State Board : of
More informationIC Chapter 9. Court-Martial Procedures
IC 10-16-9 Chapter 9. Court-Martial Procedures IC 10-16-9-1 Uniform code of military justice; trial by civil authorities; killing and injuring during riots; governor's duties Sec. 1. (a) Except as otherwise
More informationDECISION AND ORDER. Issued: November 21,2003. Issued by: Thomas E. McElligott, Administrative Law Judge. Appearance: For the Coast Guard
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY UNITED STATES COAST GUARD UNITED STATES COAST GUARD Complainant vs. MICHAEL T. NUNEZ Respondent. Docket Number CG S&R 03-0003 CG Case No. 1705415
More informationBOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAW ANNU WASHINGTON DC
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAW ANNU WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 TJR Docket No: 4848-98 19 May 1999 Dear This is in reference to your naval record pursuant to the States
More informationUNITED STATES COAST GUARD. vs. KENNETH ROUSSELL
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY UNITED STATES COAST GUARD UNITED STATES COAST GUARD Complainant vs. KENNETH ROUSSELL Respondent. Docket Number: CO S&R 03-0365 CO Case No.: 1792700 DECISION AND ORDER
More informationDISCIPLINE COMMITTEE OF THE COLLEGE OF NURSES OF ONTARIO. PANEL: Michael Hogard, RPN Chairperson Donna Rothwell, RN
DISCIPLINE COMMITTEE OF THE COLLEGE OF NURSES OF ONTARIO PANEL: Michael Hogard, RPN Chairperson Donna Rothwell, RN Member Margaret Tuomi Public Member Chuck Williams Public Member Ingrid Wiltshire-Stoby,
More informationSTATE OF LOUISIANA COURT OF APPEAL FIRST CIRCUIT NO 2010 CA 0011 MARION TERRANCE VERSUS BATON ROUGE GENERAL MEDICAL CENTER. On Appeal from the
STATE OF LOUISIANA COURT OF APPEAL FIRST CIRCUIT NO 2010 CA 0011 MARION TERRANCE VERSUS BATON ROUGE GENERAL MEDICAL CENTER Judgment Rendered June 11 2010 s On Appeal from the 19th Judicial District Court
More informationADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS COUNTY OF WARREN 11 DHR ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA IN THE OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS COUNTY OF WARREN 11 DHR 14283 Cynthia Tuck Champion, Petitioner, vs. Department of Health and Human Services, Division of Health Service
More informationUNITED STATES OF AMERICA U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY UNITED STATES COAST GUARD. UNITED STATES COAST GUARD Complainant. vs.
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY UNITED STATES COAST GUARD UNITED STATES COAST GUARD Complainant vs. TONY H. REAMES Respondent Docket Number 2013-0159 Enforcement Activity
More informationMETROPOLITAN GOVERNMENT vs. WADE HALES, Appellant.
University of Tennessee, Knoxville Trace: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange Tennessee Department of State, Opinions from the Administrative Procedures Division Law 6-17-2011 METROPOLITAN GOVERNMENT
More informationDEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS FINAL DECISION
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS Application for Correction of the Coast Guard Record of: xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx BCMR Docket No. 2007-099 FINAL
More informationDISCIPLINE COMMITTEE OF THE COLLEGE OF NURSES OF ONTARIO
DISCIPLINE COMMITTEE OF THE COLLEGE OF NURSES OF ONTARIO PANEL: Margaret Tuomi Public Member, Chairperson Donna Rothwell, RN Member Andrea Vidovic, RN Member Mary MacMillan-Gilkinson Public Member BETWEEN:
More informationA.U.C. 202 October 12, 2005 SUBSTANCE POLICY: DRUGS / ALCOHOL 1. PRELIMINARY STATEMENT
October 12, 2005 SUBSTANCE POLICY: DRUGS / ALCOHOL 1. PRELIMINARY STATEMENT This Circular: 1.1 Sets forth Department policy concerning the use and possession of illegal drugs; use and possession of legally
More informationTHIS MATTER came on for hearing before the undersigned, Beecher Gray, Administrative Law Judge, on January 14, 2013, in Raleigh, North Carolina.
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA COUNTY OF PERSON IN THE OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS 12DHR05355 Shannon Wallace, Petitioner, v. North Carolina Department of Health and Human Services, FINAL DECISION Respondent.
More informationDEPARTMENT OF MENTAL HEALTH, vs. CHIBUZOR OKOLOCHA, Grievant.
University of Tennessee, Knoxville Trace: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange Tennessee Department of State, Opinions from the Administrative Procedures Division Law 3-31-2011 DEPARTMENT OF MENTAL
More informationChapter VIII EXPERT REVIEWER PROGRAM
Expert Reviewer Program 103 Chapter VIII EXPERT REVIEWER PROGRAM A. Overview of Function and Updated Data In a quality of care disciplinary matter against a physician, expert opinion testimony is required
More informationCHAPTER 18 INFORMAL HEARINGS
CHAPTER 18 INFORMAL HEARINGS I. INTRODUCTION Informal administrative hearings are one of the types of hearing authorized by the Florida Administrative Procedure Act. They are available for disciplinary
More informationUnited States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit 2006-3375 JOSE D. HERNANDEZ, v. Petitioner, DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE, Respondent. Mathew B. Tully, Tully, Rinckey & Associates, P.L.L.C., of Albany,
More informationDEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS FINAL DECISION
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS Application for the Correction of the Coast Guard Record of: Xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx BCMR Docket No. 2005-016 AUTHOR:
More informationIt is the Department policy to promptly and thoroughly investigate alleged misconduct involving employees.
3.01.000 INVESTIGATION OF PERSONNEL MISCONDUCT It is the Department policy to promptly and thoroughly investigate alleged misconduct involving employees. 3.01.005 REQUIREMENT TO COOPERATE: All employees
More informationMILITARY COMMISSIONS TRIAL JUDICIARY GUANTANAMO BAY, CUBA
MILITARY COMMISSIONS TRIAL JUDICIARY GUANTANAMO BAY, CUBA UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. ABD AL RAHIM HUSSAYN MUHAMMAD AL NASHIRI AE149K ORDER DEFENSE MOTION FOR APPROPRIATE RELIEF: DETERMINE THE EXTENT OF
More informationDISCIPLINE COMMITTEE OF THE COLLEGE OF NURSES OF ONTARIO
DISCIPLINE COMMITTEE OF THE COLLEGE OF NURSES OF ONTARIO PANEL: Angela Verrier, RPN Nancy Sears, RN Kim Jinkerson, RPN John Bald Abdul Patel Chairperson Member Member Public Member Public Member BETWEEN:
More informationDEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORD 2 NAVY ANNE X WASHINGTON DC 20370-510 0 BJG Docket No: 4368-01 2 August 2001 S This is in reference to your application for correction of your
More informationPawling Central School District 515 Route 22 Pawling, NY (845) (845) Fax
Pawling Central School District 515 Route 22 Pawling, NY 12564 (845) 855-2028 (845) 855-2152 Fax The Pawling Central School District is an equal opportunity school district/employer, which does not discriminate
More informationCRS Report for Congress
Order Code RS21850 Updated November 16, 2005 CRS Report for Congress Received through the CRS Web Summary Military Courts-Martial: An Overview Jennifer K. Elsea Legislative Attorney American Law Division
More informationThis summary of the Discipline Committee s Decision and Reason for Decision is published pursuant to the Discipline Committee s penalty order.
Discipline Decision Summary This summary of the Discipline Committee s Decision and Reason for Decision is published pursuant to the Discipline Committee s penalty order. By publishing this summary, the
More informationAdmin. for Children s Services v. Morales OATH Index No. 1210/13 (Aug. 5, 2013), aff d, NYC Civ. Serv. Comm n Case No (Feb. 18, 2014), appended
Admin. for Children s Services v. Morales OATH Index No. 1210/13 (Aug. 5, 2013), aff d, NYC Civ. Serv. Comm n Case No. 35547 (Feb. 18, 2014), appended Special officer disobeyed an order, engaged in unprofessional
More informationOn appeal, the Personnel Review Board dismissed the charges. NEW YORK CITY OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATIVE TRIALS AND HEARINGS
Health & Hospitals Corp. (Queens Hospital Ctr.) v. Toval OATH Index No. 500/11 (Dec. 23, 2010), rejected, Hospital s Dec. (Apr. 28, 2011), appended, aff d, HHC Personnel Review Bd. Dec. No. 1434 (Dec.
More informationLOS ANGELES COUNTY SHERIFF S DEPARTMENT
LOS ANGELES COUNTY SHERIFF S DEPARTMENT ADMINISTRATIVE INVESTIGATION TIMELINESS AUDIT 2016-5-A JIM McDONNELL SHERIFF November 15, 2016 LOS ANGELES COUNTY SHERIFF S DEPARTMENT Audit and Accountability Bureau
More informationSTATE OF CONNECTICUT LABOR DEPARTMENT CONNECTICUT STATE BOARD OF LABOR RELATIONS
STATE OF CONNECTICUT LABOR DEPARTMENT CONNECTICUT STATE BOARD OF LABOR RELATIONS IN THE MATTER OF STATE OF CONNECTICUT, DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION -AND- LOCALS 387, 391 AND 1565, COUNCIL 4, AFSCME, AFL-CIO
More informationDECISION AND REASONS
DISCIPLINE COMMITTEE OF THE COLLEGE OF NURSES OF ONTARIO PANEL: Carl Balcom, RN Chairperson Michael Hogard, RN Member Karen Laforet, RN Member Abdul Patel Public Member Gino Cucchi Public Member BETWEEN:
More informationBoutros, Nesreen v. Amazon
University of Tennessee, Knoxville Trace: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange Tennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims and Workers' Compensation Appeals Board Law 11-9-2016 Boutros, Nesreen
More informationIN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF INDIANA
FOR PUBLICATION ATTORNEYS FOR APPELLANT: HAMISH S. COHEN KYLE W. LeCLERE Barnes & Thornburg LLP Indianapolis, Indiana ATTORNEY FOR APPELLEES: ELIZABETH ZINK-PEARSON Pearson & Bernard PSC Edgewood, Kentucky
More informationSTEVEN HARDY and MARY LOUISE HARDY, husband and wife, Plaintiffs/Appellants, No. 1 CA-CV
NOTICE: NOT FOR PUBLICATION. UNDER ARIZONA RULE OF THE SUPREME COURT 111(c), THIS DECISION DOES NOT CREATE LEGAL PRECEDENT AND MAY NOT BE CITED EXCEPT AS AUTHORIZED. IN THE ARIZONA COURT OF APPEALS DIVISION
More informationIndex No. Petitioner, : -against- : VERIFIED PETITION. Petitioner Scott McConnell, by his counsel undersigned, alleges as follows:
NEW YORK STATE SUPREME COURT ONONDAGA COUNTY ------------------------------------------------------------- x SCOTT McCONNELL, : Petitioner, : -against- : LE MOYNE COLLEGE, : Index No. VERIFIED PETITION
More informationDISCIPLINE COMMITTEE OF THE COLLEGE OF PHYSICIANS AND SURGEONS OF ONTARIO COLLEGE OF PHYSICIANS AND SURGEONS OF ONTARIO. - and -
B E T W E E N: DISCIPLINE COMMITTEE OF THE COLLEGE OF PHYSICIANS AND SURGEONS OF ONTARIO COLLEGE OF PHYSICIANS AND SURGEONS OF ONTARIO - and - JAMES SCOTT BRADLEY MARTIN NOTICE OF HEARING THE INQUIRIES,
More informationDISCIPLINE COMMITTEE OF THE COLLEGE OF NURSES OF ONTARIO. PANEL: Margaret Tuomi Chairperson Zahir Hirji, RN Angela Verrier, RPN
DISCIPLINE COMMITTEE OF THE COLLEGE OF NURSES OF ONTARIO PANEL: Margaret Tuomi Chairperson Zahir Hirji, RN Member Angela Verrier, RPN Member Lindsay Hyslop, NP Public Member Gino Cucchi Public Member BETWEEN:
More informationMANDATORY DRUG TESTING OF MERCHANT MARINE PERSONNEL. By Walter J. Brudzinski INTRODUCTION
1 MANDATORY DRUG TESTING OF MERCHANT MARINE PERSONNEL By Walter J. Brudzinski INTRODUCTION The U.S. Coast Guard is charged with, among other things, promulgating and enforcing regulations for the promotion
More informationJoseph J. Bova, RPh. This program has been brought to you by PharmCon
Joseph J. Bova, RPh This program has been brought to you by PharmCon PharmCon is accredited by the Accreditation Council for Pharmacy Education as a provider of continuing pharmacy education Speaker: Joseph
More informationSTATE OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH RESPONDENT. I ADMINISTRATIVE COMPLAINT. before the Board of Medicine against Respondent, Jack Norman Gay, M.D.
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH, STATE OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH PETITIONER, v. CASE NO.: 2014-08039 JACK NORMAN GAY, M.D., RESPONDENT. I ADMINISTRATIVE COMPLAINT Petitioner Department of Health files this
More informationPROVIDENCE HOSPITAL. Washington, D.C. SAMPLE RESIDENT CONTRACT FOR FAMILY MEDICINE
PROVIDENCE HOSPITAL Washington, D.C. SAMPLE RESIDENT CONTRACT FOR FAMILY MEDICINE AGREEMENT, made and entered into this day of,, between Providence Hospital (hereinafter referred to as the Hospital) and
More informationSTATE OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH ADMINISTRATIVE COMPLAINT. COMES NOW, Petitioner, Department of Health, by and through its
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH, STATE OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH PETITIONER, v. CASE NO. 2017-09635 THERESA R. SAPITAN, R.N., RESPON DENT. I ADMINISTRATIVE COMPLAINT COMES NOW, Petitioner, Department of Health,
More informationDISCIPLINE COMMITTEE OF THE COLLEGE OF CHIROPODISTS OF ONTARIO
1 DISCIPLINE COMMITTEE OF THE COLLEGE OF CHIROPODISTS OF ONTARIO PANEL: Grace King - Public Member, Chair Jim Daley - Public Member Peter Guy Professional Member Tony Merendino Professional Member BETWEEN:
More informationUNITED STATES ARMY COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS
UNITED STATES ARMY COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS Before BURTON, HAGLER, and SCHASBERGER Appellate Military Judges UNITED STATES, Appellee v. Staff Sergeant LONNIE L. PETERKIN United States Army, Appellant
More informationNew York Law Journal. Thursday, December 30, Trial Advocacy, Medical Malpractice: Using Defendants' Evidence Against Them
New York Law Journal Thursday, December 30, 2004 HEADLINE: BYLINE: Trial Advocacy, Medical Malpractice: Using Defendants' Evidence Against Them Ben B. Rubinowitz and Evan Torgan BODY: Medical malpractice
More informationFishers Fire Department. Merit Commission
Merit Commission Table of Contents Section 1 Section 2 Section 3 Section 4 Section 5 Section 6 Section 7 Section 8 Chief and Deputy Chief(s) of Department Merit Commission Applicant Requirements Performance
More informationSTATE OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH, STATE OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH PETITIONER, v. CASE NO. 2017-21096 BRAD KELLY CANTWELL, L.P.N., RESPONDENT. ADMINISTRATIVE COMPLAINT COMES NOW, Petitioner, Department of Health,
More informationThe Inspector General Program Investigations Guide August Appendix A. Process of the IG Investigation Forms
The Inspector General Program Investigations Guide August 2009 Appendix A Process of the IG Investigation Forms Form Page Inspector General Action Request (IGAR) A-2 Privacy Act Information A-5 Subject
More informationAPPEARANCES. Smith Moore Leatherwood LLP 300 N. Greene Street, Suite 1400 Greensboro, NC 27401
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA COUNTY OF GUILFORD IN THE OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS 13DHR12691 Pamela Byrd, Petitioner, v. North Carolina Department Of Health And Human Services, Respondent. FINAL DECISION
More informationDISCIPLINE COMMITTEE OF THE COLLEGE OF NURSES OF ONTARIO
DISCIPLINE COMMITTEE OF THE COLLEGE OF NURSES OF ONTARIO PANEL: Deanne Barber, RPN Chairperson Agnese Bianchi, RN Member Sandra Trubyk, RN Member Linda Bracken Public Member Joan King Public Member BETWEEN:
More informationNidia Cortes, Virgil Dantes, AnneMarie Heslop, Index No Curtis Witters, on Behalf of Themselves and Their RJI No.: ST8123 Children,
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK APPELLATE DIVISION: THIRD DEPARTMENT In the Matter of an Article 78 Proceeding Nidia Cortes, Virgil Dantes, AnneMarie Heslop, Index No. 5102-16 Curtis Witters, on
More informationDEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 ELP Docket No. 870-01 24 January 2002 Dear Mr.- This is in reference to your application for correction
More informationCERTIFICATES OF FITNESS
CERTIFICATES OF FITNESS Statutes and Regulations May 2018 Labor Standards and Safety Division Mechanical Inspection Jobs are Alaska s Future MECHANICAL INSPECTION CUSTOMER COUNTER LOCATIONS Main Office
More informationRE: Petition to withdraw Advanced Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (ANPR), docket number USCG
Dyson College Institute for Sustainability and the Environment Pace Academy for Applied Environmental Studies Pace University 861 Bedford Road Pleasantville, New York 10570 (914) 773-3091 www.pace.edu/academy
More informationforwarded to Navy Personnel Command (NPC) for review because due to the mandatory processing status.
113. (ALL) For each Service, what is the procedure to initiate administrative separation for any member convicted of a sexual assault offense who is not punitively discharged as a result of a conviction
More informationDEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS FINAL DECISION
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS Application for the Correction of the Coast Guard Record of: XXXXXXXXXXX XXXXXXXXXXX BCMR Docket No. 2009-179 FINAL DECISION This
More informationTHIS MATTER came on for hearing before Beecher R. Gray, Administrative Law Judge, on October 4, 2012, in Morganton, North Carolina.
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA COUNTY OF BURKE IN THE OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS 12DHR05745 BRENDA TRIPLETT ANDREWS, Petitioner, v. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, DIVISION OF HEALTH SERVICE REGULATION,
More informationCOMPLIANCE WITH THIS PUBLICATION IS MANDATORY
BY ORDER OF THE SECRETARY OF THE AIR FORCE AIR FORCE INSTRUCTION 51-904 6 MARCH 2018 Law COMPLAINTS OF WRONGS UNDER ARTICLE 138, UNIFORM CODE OF MILITARY JUSTICE COMPLIANCE WITH THIS PUBLICATION IS MANDATORY
More informationIN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO Opinion Number: 2015-NMCA-083 Filing Date: May 28, 2015 Docket No. 32,413 MARGARET M.M. TRACE, v. Worker-Appellee, UNIVERSITY OF NEW MEXICO HOSPITAL,
More informationOKLAHOMA STATE UNIVERSITY PUBLIC INFRACTIONS DECISION APRIL 24, 2015
OKLAHOMA STATE UNIVERSITY PUBLIC INFRACTIONS DECISION APRIL 24, 2015 I. INTRODUCTION The NCAA Division I Committee on Infractions is an independent administrative body of the NCAA comprised of individuals
More informationDISCIPLINE COMMITTEE OF THE COLLEGE OF CHIROPODISTS OF ONTARIO
DISCIPLINE COMMITTEE OF THE COLLEGE OF CHIROPODISTS OF ONTARIO PANEL: Cesar Mendez, Chair Donna Coyne Anne Marie McLaren Grace King Professional Member Professional Member Professional Member Public Member
More informationDEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS FINAL DECISION ON RECONSIDERATION
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS Application for the Correction of the Coast Guard Record of: XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX BCMR Docket No. 2011-058 FINAL DECISION
More informationDC 37, Local 376, 6 OCB2d 18 (BCB 2013) (IP) (Docket No. BCB )
DC 37, Local 376, 6 OCB2d 18 (BCB 2013) (IP) (Docket No. BCB-3023-12) Summary of Decision: The Union alleged that the City retaliated against a member because he was elected shop steward and for making
More informationBEFORE THE ALASKA OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS ON REFERRAL FROM THE COMMISSIONER OF HEALTH AND SOCIAL SERVICES
BEFORE THE ALASKA OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS ON REFERRAL FROM THE COMMISSIONER OF HEALTH AND SOCIAL SERVICES In the Matter of: ) ) FAMILY MEDICAL CLINIC ) OAH No. 10-0095-DHS ) DECISION I. INTRODUCTION
More informationSTATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS
STATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS BUREAU OF HEALTH CARE SERVICES, Petitioner-Appellee, UNPUBLISHED May 11, 2017 v No. 332714 Board of Nursing GERARD ANTHONY EICHBAUER, R.N., C.R.N.A., Respondent-Appellant.
More informationMedical malpractice: Beyond the discovery "three step"
Advocate Magazine February 2012 Medical malpractice: Beyond the discovery "three step" Putting a case in context for the jury requires finding background information that supports your theory of liability
More informationSTATE OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH, STATE OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH PETITIONER, v. CASE NO. 2017-03945 SHARON KASTNER CLEMENTS, A.R.N.P., RESPONDENT. ADMINISTRATIVE COMPLAINT COMES NOW, Petitioner, Department
More informationUNITED STATES OF AMERICA U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY UNITED STATES COAST GUARD UNITED STATES COAST GUARD. Complainant ROBERT RYAN BOUDREAUX
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY UNITED STATES COAST GUARD UNITED STATES COAST GUARD Complainant v. ROBERT RYAN BOUDREAUX Respondent Docket No: 2016 0332 CG Enforcement Activity
More informationTEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN NO. 03-11-00543-CV Texas Board of Nursing, Appellant v. Amy Bagley Krenek, RN, Appellee FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY, 419TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT
More informationSTATE OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH, STATE OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH PETITIONER, v. CASE NO. 2011-13753 RUBEN JOSE NUNEZ, M.D., RESPONDENT. / ADMINISTRATIVE COMPLAINT Petitioner, Department of Health, files this
More informationSTATE OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH, STATE OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH PETITIONER, v. CASE NO. 2017-21655 JODI LYNN LEVINS, A.R.N.P., RESPONDENT. ADMINISTRATIVE COMPLAINT Petitioner Department of Health (Department)
More informationCase 1:17-mj KSC Document 2 Filed 10/16/17 Page 1 of 13 PageID #: 1 BY ORDER OF THE COURT UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF HAWAII
Case 1:17-mj-01200-KSC Document 2 Filed 10/16/17 Page 1 of 13 PageID #: 1 ORIGINAL BY ORDER OF THE COURT JEFFFERSON B. SESSIONS III United States Attorney General MICHAEL G. WHEAT, CRN 118598 ERIC J. BESTE,
More informationSTATE OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH, STATE OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH PETITIONER, v. CASE NO. 2017-01533 TERESA BRENNAN, R.N., RESPONDENT. ADMINISTRATIVE COMPLAINT COMES NOW, Petitioner, Department of Health, by
More informationChapter 14 COMPLAINTS AND GRIEVANCES. [24 CFR Part 966 Subpart B]
Chapter 14 COMPLAINTS AND GRIEVANCES [24 CFR Part 966 Subpart B] INTRODUCTION The informal hearing requirements defined in HUD regulations are applicable to participating families who disagree with an
More information