METROPOLITAN GOVERNMENT vs. WADE HALES, Appellant.
|
|
- Coral Watson
- 6 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 University of Tennessee, Knoxville Trace: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange Tennessee Department of State, Opinions from the Administrative Procedures Division Law METROPOLITAN GOVERNMENT vs. WADE HALES, Appellant. Follow this and additional works at: Part of the Administrative Law Commons This Initial Order by the Administrative Judges of the Administrative Procedures Division, Tennessee Department of State, is a public document made available by the College of Law Library, and the Tennessee Department of State, Administrative Procedures Division. For more information about this public document, please contact administrative.procedures@tn.gov
2 BEFORE THE CIVIL SERVICE COMMISSION OF THE METROPOLITAN GOVERNMENT OF NASHVILLE AND DAVIDSON COUNTY IN THE MATTER OF: METROPOLITAN GOVERNMENT v. DOCKET NO: J WADE HALES, Appellant. INITIAL ORDER This matter came to be heard on June 16, 2011, and continuing on June 17, 2011, before Mary M. Collier, Administrative Judge, assigned by the Secretary of State, Administrative Procedures Division, to sit for the Metropolitan Civil Service Commission in Nashville, Tennessee. Mr. Jon Michael, Assistant Metropolitan Attorney, represented the Metropolitan Government of Nashville and Davidson County ( Metro ). The Appellant, Wade Hales, was present and represented by legal counsel, Mr. Bob Lynch, Jr., of the Nashville bar. After the hearing, a Transcript was ordered and the parties filed proposed findings of fact and conclusions of law. The subject of this hearing was Mr. Hales appeal of his five-day suspension and demotion for conduct in violation of the Davidson County Sheriff s Office policies regarding use of force. After consideration of the RECORD in this matter, it is determined that Metro has shown by a preponderance of the evidence that Mr. Hales violated the Davidson County Sheriff s Office policies and Metro civil service rules and that the five-day suspension and demotion of Mr. Hales was appropriate discipline and is hereby UPHELD. This decision is based upon the following.
3 FINDINGS OF FACT 1. The Appellant, Wade Hales, has been an employee of the Davidson County Sheriff s Office ( DCSO ) for 19 years. 2. On July 25, 2010, the date of the incident in question, Mr. Hales was a Lieutenant, serving as the ranking officer in charge of the entire Criminal Justice Center ( CJC ) in downtown Nashville. 3. As the Lieutenant in charge of the CJC, Mr. Hales was given multiple job duties, including: supervising the correctional officers and sergeants; monitoring the attendance, personal appearance, and job performance of the correctional officers and sergeants; determining and assigning posts; reviewing officer reports/forms and making recommendations for revisions; interpreting rules, policies, and procedures for officers; counseling employees regarding problems/concerns; generating verbal and written reprimands for officers/sergeants when necessary; intervening when necessary to deescalate situations between inmates and officers; managing the security of the facility; overseeing all calculated use of force situations; and reviewing video documentation of incidents. 4. On July 25, 2010, Inmate John D. Johnson was being escorted to his cell on the Special Management Unit ( SMU ) on the 5 th Floor Alpha ( 5-A ) of the CJC. The SMU is for offenders who need to be housed by themselves because they are a threat to both staff and other offenders. While being escorted by Corporal John David Bass and Officer Lynous Wilkerson to his cell, Inmate Johnson assaulted both officers and refused to follow directives. Corporal Bass and Officer Wilkerson took Inmate Johnson to the ground. Because Inmate Johnson was still combative, Corporal Bass and Officer Wilkerson administered a chemical agent called Freeze Plus P. 2
4 5. From his position in the control room, Sergeant Christopher Allgood, the floor supervisor, observed Corporal Bass and Officer Wilkerson escorting Inmate Johnson down the hall. He left the Control Room and proceeded to the scene, where he observed the physical altercation between the inmate and the officers. In response to the emergency situation, Sergeant Allgood called a Code Red on his radio. A Code Red summons other officers to assist when an officer is in distress. 6. Sergeant Allgood assisted Corporal Bass and Officer Wilkerson in removing inmate Johnson s wrist restraints from in front of his body and replacing them behind his back to assist in deescalating the situation. Corporal Bass, Officer Wilkerson, and Sergeant Allgood carried Inmate Johnson away from the main cells to an observation room, which would minimize his disruption to other inmates and allow him to be treated by medical personnel to ensure that no physical harm had come to him as a result of the incident. 7. After Inmate Johnson was placed in the observation room, Sergeant Allgood walked down the hallway and opened a locked metal gate to allow the CJC personnel who had responded to the Code Red into the SMU. Several personnel responded to the Code Red, including Mr. Hales, Sergeant Lionel Farley, Sergeant Curtis Barnes, Officer Carrie Ball, Officer Hal Van Metre, and Nurse Kim Masters. 8. Nurse Masters went to the SMU to ensure that no officer was hurt during the Code Red. When she arrived, based upon the smell, Nurse Masters realized that a chemical spray had been used on the inmate. Nurse Masters immediately left the SMU and the 5 th Floor to retrieve her medical equipment from the nurses station on the 2 nd Floor so that she could return with this equipment to check Inmate Johnson s vital signs. A Code Green, which is called when 3
5 an inmate needs medical attention, was not called in this incident. Nurse Masters returned and completed a medical assessment of Inmate Johnson after the officers told her she could do so. 9. When Mr. Hales and the other officers arrived at the SMU observation room, Inmate Johnson was contained in the observation room alone and totally isolated from any other inmates. Inmate Johnson was still under the debilitating effects of chemical spray. The observation room door was closed and secured shut via a slide lock/latch on the outside of the door. Inmate Johnson was on the floor secured by both leg shackles and wrist restraints, which were applied behind the back. Inmate Johnson was complaining about one of his legs hurting due to the force used by Corporal Bass and Officer Wilkerson, and continued to make noise and remain non-compliant. 10. In response to the Inmate Johnson s yelling, Mr. Hales instructed the inmate to be quiet multiple times, profanely shouting at the inmate to shut up. 11. Mr. Hales observed Inmate Johnson struggling to stand up from outside the observation room. 12. While Inmate Johnson was on the floor in the observation room, Mr. Hales had someone else unlatch the door and then he entered the room alone and gave several directives to Inmate Johnson to be quiet and stop trying to stand up. Failing to comply with these orders, Inmate Johnson again attempted to stand up. 13. In the presence of other DCSO officers, Mr. Hales then administered an immediate use of force by forcefully kicking Inmate Johnson in the leg. 14. Mr. Hales is not certain whether he kicked Inmate Johnson in the same leg that Inmate Johnson had been complaining was hurt just moments before Mr. Hales kicked him. 15. After the kick, Inmate Johnson became compliant. 4
6 16. Although Corporal Bass did not mention the kick by Mr. Hales in his use of force report, which was drafted immediately following the incident, he reported this kick in a hard copy report, which he gave to Daniel Robert Weikal, the Facility Administrator of the CJC. Administrator Weikal had Jamie Johnson, Chief of Security at the CJC conduct an investigation. 17. Uses of force are governed by DCSO s USE OF FORCE POLICY # (effective date 04/06/09) (hereinafter DCSO s USE OF FORCE POLICY ), which clearly requires that the [u]se of physical force is restricted to instances of justifiable self-defense, protection of others, protection of property, and prevention of escapes, and then only when there is no other reasonable option and in accordance with appropriate statutory authority. In no event is physical force justifiable as punishment. 18. DCSO s USE OF FORCE POLICY specifically differentiates between Immediate Uses of Force and Calculated Uses of Force. 19. DCSO s USE OF FORCE POLICY defines Immediate Use of Force as: Use of force when behavior constitutes an immediate, serious threat to the inmate, staff, others, or property, or to institutional security and good order. 20. DCSO s USE OF FORCE POLICY requires an Immediate Use of Force to adhere to the following procedural guidelines: Staff may immediately use an appropriate level of response when a subject s behavior constitutes an immediate serious threat to the employee, other people, property, or institutional security and good order. Employees may respond with or without the presence or direction of a supervisor. Video documentation will start immediately. 21. DCSO s USE OF FORCE POLICY defines Calculated Use of Force as: Use of force when a subject s behavior, past or present, presents a foreseeable need for use of force, or when a subject is isolated and presents no immediate direct threat to others. 5
7 22. DCSO s USE OF FORCE POLICY requires a Calculated Use of Force to adhere to the following procedural guidelines: Use of force may be calculated (planned) when a subject s behavior (past or present) presents a foreseeable need for use of force, or when compliance is necessary and the subject is isolated and does not present a direct threat to others, property, institutional security, or good order. The supervisor must be notified and staff must first determine whether the situation can be resolved without resorting to force. All calculated uses of force will be videotaped. 23. Mr. Hales had a foreseeable need for use of force on Inmate Johnson, as specified in the DCSO s USE OF FORCE POLICY pertaining to Calculated Use of Force, because Mr. Hales has known for years that inmates in SMU are more likely to be assaultive or problematic and Mr. Hales was responding to a Code Red, with which Mr. Hales is familiar, after an officer had been assaulted by the inmate. 24. The ability to foresee the need to use force is precisely why DCSO has a policy governing such actions. 25. The incident between Mr. Hales and the Inmate Johnson in the SMU observation room met DCSO s USE OF FORCE POLICY requirements for a Calculated Use of Force, if any force was to be used by Mr. Hales at all. 26. Mr. Hales did not follow DCSO s USE OF FORCE POLICY requirements for a Calculated Use of Force when he kicked Inmate Johnson. 27. Despite the fact that the inmate was not posing any immediate threat to any officer, nurse, inmate, other person, or even himself, Mr. Hales elected to use an Immediate Use of Force instead of a Calculated Use of Force. A Calculated Use of Force should have been used by Mr. Hales pursuant to DCSO s USE OF FORCE POLICY. 6
8 28. After the DCSO investigation of the incident, Mr. Hales was charged with violations of DCSO policies and violations of the Civil Service Rules, as outlined in the Charge Letter of September 13, On September 21, 2010, DCSO held a disciplinary hearing, at which time it was determined that Mr. Hales violated DCSO s USE OF FORCE POLICY by using an immediate use of force instead of a calculated use of force. 30. DCSO determined that Mr. Hales was guilty of violating DCSO s USE OF FORCE POLICY as well as Civil Service Rule 6.7 (11) for the violation of written rules, policies or procedures of DCSO. DCSO provided Mr. Hales with notice of that determination in the Decision Letter of September 22, Mr. Hales past disciplinary history includes: A. four (4) written reprimands: (1) 12/14/09 internet abuse; (2) 10/27/09 neglect of duty; (3) 3/30/98 absenteeism and tardiness and violation of civil service rules; and (4) 1/6/97 failure to follow orders and absenteeism and tardiness; and B. three (3) suspensions: (1) 10/25/07 three-day suspension for leaving the building unattended; (2) 4/8/98 five-day suspension for conduct unbecoming of an employee and for insubordination toward a supervisor; and (3) 7/17/96 fifteen-day suspension for unnecessary/excessive use of force. 32. As a result of the violation of these policies and Mr. Hales past disciplinary history, DCSO issued Mr. Hales a five-day suspension and demotion from his position as a Lieutenant. 33. Mr. Hales appealed the decision of the DCSO disciplinary hearing to the Civil Service Commission. 7
9 34. The DCSO Use of Force Panel ( Panel ) reviewed the July 25, 2010, use of force against the Inmate Johnson based upon the reports that were prepared by Mr. Hales and other officers after the incident with Inmate Johnson subsided. The Panel reviewed the reports, which primarily focused on the initial use of immediate force by Corporal Bass, Officer Wilkerson, and Sergeant Allgood. The Panel determined that the particular use of force by Corporal Bass, Officer Wilkerson and Sergeant Allgood on Inmate Johnson was appropriate and within the guidelines of DCSO s USE OF FORCE POLICY. The kick administered by Mr. Hales was not the subject of the Panel s use of force review. 35. In reviewing the use of force reports, the Panel members failed to notice that one of the reports mentioned the kick administered by Mr. Hales. Chief of Security, Kevin Cox, who chairs the Panel, explained that if the members of the Panel had noticed the reference to Mr. Hales kick, then the panel would have requested more information regarding the kick before closing out its review of the incident. 36. The determination issued by the Panel is not the same thing as a finding from the disciplinary board after a disciplinary hearing. ANALYSIS and CONCLUSIONS OF LAW Metro argues that Mr. Hales violated the DCSO USE OF FORCE POLICY and Civil Service Rule 6.7 (11) for the violation of written rules, policies or procedures of the DCSO. The DCSO USE OF FORCE POLICY provides, in relevant part, as follows: Any and all uses for force must be reasonable and necessary. Every effort shall be made to prevent and defuse situations that might require the use of force. If force becomes necessary, only the minimum amount of force required will be used to control the situation. All security and custody personnel will be trained and certified in D.C.S.O. approved methods of self-defense and the use of force as a last resort to control inmates.... 8
10 Immediate Use of Force Staff may immediately use an appropriate level of response when a subject s behavior constitutes an immediate serious threat to the employee, other people, property, or institutional security and good order. Employees may respond with or without the presence of direction of a supervisor. Video documentation will start immediately.... Calculated Use of Force Use of force may be calculated (planned) when a subject s behavior (past or present) presents a foreseeable need for use of force, or when compliance is necessary and the subject is isolated and does not present a direct threat to others, property, institutional security, or good order. The supervisor must be notified and staff must first determine whether the situation can be resolved without resorting to force. All calculated uses of force will be videotaped. DCSO USE OF FORCE POLICY # (effective date 04/06/09) (herein DCSO s USE OF FORCE POLICY ) HRG Ex. 1. As found above, despite the fact that Inmate Johnson was not posing any immediate threat to any officer, nurse, inmate, other person, or even himself, Mr. Hales elected to use an Immediate Use of Force instead of a Calculated Use of Force when he kicked Inmate Johnson on July 25, This immediate use of force by Mr. Hales was in violation of the DCSO s USE OF FORCE POLICY. Based upon the requirements of the DCSO s USE OF FORCE POLICY and the evidence presented during the hearing, it is determined that the kick of Inmate Johnson by Mr. Hales in the SMU observation room met DCSO s USE OF FORCE POLICY requirements for a Calculated Use of Force not the requirements for an Immediate Use of Force. Although Mr. Hales argues that a kick in the form of an immediate use of force was appropriate, other DCSO officers who testified disagree with Mr. Hales interpretation of DCSO s USE OF FORCE POLICY. Chief Johnson, Mr. Hales immediate supervisor, explained that Mr. Hales violated policy by failing to handle Inmate Johnson with a Calculated Use of Force. Similarly, Administrator Weikal, the next supervisor up Mr. Hales chain of command, opined 9
11 that Mr. Hales did not even need to enter the room with the restrained and isolated inmate. Administrator Weikal further opined that Mr. Hales violated DCSO s USE OF FORCE POLICY by failing to handle Inmate Johnson with a Calculated Use of Force. Administrator Weikal explained that the basis for his opinion was the fact that the inmate posed no immediate threat, as specifically required for immediate uses of force under the DCSO USE OF FORCE POLICY. Likewise, Sgt. Farley and Officer Bass, both of whom observed Mr. Hales kick Inmate Johnson, opined that Mr. Hales violated DCSO s USE OF FORCE POLICY by failing to deploy a Calculated Use of Force. Mr. Hales self-serving testimony is found to be less credible than the testimony of Chief Johnson, Administrator Weikal, Sgt. Farley and Officer Bass. It is concluded that Mr. Hales violated the DCSO s USE OF FORCE POLICY by failing to deploy a Calculated Use of Force when he kicked Inmate Johnson. In addition, this same conduct by Mr. Hales constitutes a violation of Metro Civil Service Rule 6.7 (11) pertaining to the violation of written rules, policies or procedures. The five-day suspension and demotion are found to be appropriate discipline for Mr. Hales conduct. This level of discipline is the minimum that should be given in this situation in light of the facts that Mr. Hales had previously been given a fifteen-day suspension for unnecessary/excessive use of force and as the Lieutenant for the CJC at the time of the incident, Mr. Hales job duties included overseeing all calculated use of force situations. It is apparent from his conduct and testimony that Mr. Hales does not have a proper understanding of the DCSO USE OF FORCE POLICY. Without such an understanding, Mr. Hales should not be placed in a position to supervise others during calculated use of force situations. Accordingly, it is determined that Metro has shown by a preponderance of the evidence that Mr. Hales violated the DCSO USE OF FORCE POLICY and civil service rules. It is further 10
12 determined that the five-day suspension and demotion of Mr. Hales was appropriate discipline and it is hereby UPHELD. It is so ORDERED. This INITIAL ORDER entered and effective this the day of MARY M. COLLIER ADMINISTRATIVE JUDGE ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES DIVISION OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY OF STATE Filed in the Administrative Procedures Division, Office of the Secretary of State, this the day of THOMAS G. STOVALL, DIRECTOR ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES DIVISION OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY OF STATE 11
METRO NASHVILLE GOVERNMENT DAVIDSON CO. SHERIFF S OFFICE, Petitioner, /Department vs. DAVID TRIBBLE, Respondent/, Grievant.
University of Tennessee, Knoxville Trace: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange Tennessee Department of State, Opinions from the Administrative Procedures Division Law 12-1-2011 METRO NASHVILLE GOVERNMENT
More informationDEPARTMENT OF MENTAL HEALTH, vs. CHIBUZOR OKOLOCHA, Grievant.
University of Tennessee, Knoxville Trace: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange Tennessee Department of State, Opinions from the Administrative Procedures Division Law 3-31-2011 DEPARTMENT OF MENTAL
More informationTENNESSEE DEPARTMENT OF MENTAL HEALTH AND SUBSTANCE ABUSE SERVICES, Petitioner, vs. ANTWAN RILEY, Grievant
University of Tennessee, Knoxville Trace: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange Tennessee Department of State, Opinions from the Administrative Procedures Division Law October 2012 TENNESSEE DEPARTMENT
More informationTENNESSEE BOARD OF PROBATION AND PAROLE, Agency/, Petitioner, Vs. RICKY FRANK, Grievant/, Respondent
University of Tennessee, Knoxville Trace: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange Tennessee Department of State, Opinions from the Administrative Procedures Division Law 4-8-2008 TENNESSEE BOARD OF PROBATION
More informationDepartment of Safety vs. Lt. Clement Jarrett
University of Tennessee, Knoxville Trace: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange Tennessee Department of State, Opinions from the Administrative Procedures Division Law 1-23-2008 Department of Safety
More informationCELL AND AREA EXTRACTIONS (Critical Policy)
DESCHUTES COUNTY ADULT JAIL CD-8-12 L. Shane Nelson, Sheriff Jail Operations Approved by: January 14, 2018 POLICY. CELL AND AREA EXTRACTIONS (Critical Policy) It is the policy of the Deschutes County Sheriff
More informationUse of Restraint at the RI Training School
Use of Restraint at the RI Training School Rhode Island Department of Children, Youth and Families Division of Juvenile Correctional Services: Training School Policy: 1200.0832 Effective Date: January
More informationT.R.G. Investigative Agency/Tony R. Greer vs. Department of Commerce & Insurance
University of Tennessee, Knoxville Trace: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange Tennessee Department of State, Opinions from the Administrative Procedures Division Law 7-24-2013 T.R.G. Investigative
More informationSecond Quarter Rank Recommended
This report is based on the Department s Letters of Intent and does not reflect modifications to recommended discipline due to Grievances, Skelly Hearings, Arbitration Hearings, Civil Service Commission
More informationState of Alaska Department of Corrections Policies and Procedures Chapter: Special Management Prisoners Subject: Administrative Segregation
State of Alaska Department of Corrections Policies and Procedures Chapter: Special Management Prisoners Subject: Administrative Segregation Index #: 804.01 Page 1 of 7 Effective: 06-15-12 Reviewed: Distribution:
More informationAggravated Active Aggression Response: Use of a physical response that may cause death or serious bodily harm, as governed by Georgia State Law.
GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF JUVENILE JUSTICE Applicability: {x} All DJJ Staff {x} Administration {x} Community Services {x} Secure Facilities (RYDCs and YDCs) Transmittal # 12-11 Policy # 8.30 Related Standards
More informationPolk County Sheriff s Office Job Description 2216 Detention Deputy Position Concept: *Essential Functions: Security Operations
December 17, 2009, Revised October 5, 2011 Position Concept: The Detention Deputy monitors, controls and accounts for incarcerated inmates and civilian visitors while at the Polk County Sheriff's Office
More informationOur Lady Star of the Sea Catholic Nursery CARE & CONTROL POLICY
Mission Statement Our Lady Star of the Sea Nursery is committed to the widest and fullest education of all children in a partnership between home, nursery, parish and the community. The nursery aims to
More informationIt is the Department policy to promptly and thoroughly investigate alleged misconduct involving employees.
3.01.000 INVESTIGATION OF PERSONNEL MISCONDUCT It is the Department policy to promptly and thoroughly investigate alleged misconduct involving employees. 3.01.005 REQUIREMENT TO COOPERATE: All employees
More informationCHAPTER 18 INFORMAL HEARINGS
CHAPTER 18 INFORMAL HEARINGS I. INTRODUCTION Informal administrative hearings are one of the types of hearing authorized by the Florida Administrative Procedure Act. They are available for disciplinary
More informationFlorida Department of Corrections
Florida Department of Corrections Office of the Inspector General CRIMINAL INVESTIGATION INVESTIGATIVE ASSIST CASE # 15-25624 Table of Contents I. AUTHORITY 4 II. METHODOLOGY 4 III. ANALYSIS 4 IV. DEFINITIONS
More informationThis course should take approximately 15 minutes to complete. If you have any questions, please contact the appropriate number listed on the screen.
Slide 1 Welcome to the Violence in the Workplace course. Unfortunately, hospital staff members are sometimes exposed to unsafe situations. In fact, Healthcare workers are four times more likely to be assaulted
More informationPATIENT BILL OF RIGHTS & NOTICE OF PRIVACY PRACTICES
Helping People Perform Their Best PRIVACY, RIGHTS AND RESPONSIBILITIES NOTICE PATIENT BILL OF RIGHTS & NOTICE OF PRIVACY PRACTICES Request Additional Information or to Report a Problem If you have questions
More informationIN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA
IN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA Municipality of Bethel Park, : : Appellant : : v. : No. 788 C.D. 2013 : Argued: November 12, 2013 Bethel Park Civil Service Commission : and Kenneth Radinick :
More information) ) ) CRIMINAL COMPLAINT
Case 1:17-mj-01033-AMD Document 1 Filed 10/31/17 Page 1 of 11 PageID: 1 AO 91 (Rev. Il/Il) Criminal Complaint UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT District for the of New Jersey United States v. ) FRANKNUCERA,JR.
More informationOffice of. Champaign County, Illinois. Officer Matt Rush review
Julia R. Rietz State s Attorney Courthouse 101 East Main Street P. O. Box 785 Urbana, Illinois 61801 Phone (217) 384-3733 Fax (217) 384-3816 email: statesatty@co.champaign.il.us Office of State s Attorney
More informationTennessee Commitment Law for Psychologists. JOHN B. AVERITT, PH.D. OCTOBER 28, 2015
Tennessee Commitment Law for Psychologists http://www.lexisnexis.com/hottopics/tncode/ JOHN B. AVERITT, PH.D. OCTOBER 28, 2015 Charles Richard Franklin Treadway, M.D. Disclaimers: I am a Licensed Psychologist
More informationThird Quarter Rank Recommended. Page 1 of 6
This report is based on the Department s Letters of Intent and does not reflect modifications to recommended discipline due to Grievances, Skelly Hearings, Arbitration Hearings, Civil Service Commission
More informationPrison and Jails Standards Documentation Requirements
Prison and Jails Standards Documentation Requirements This document is meant to assist agencies and facilities in their PREA compliance efforts. The standards listed below are examples of prison and jail
More informationQUALITY OF LIFE ASSESSMENT RESIDENT INTERVIEW
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES HEALTH CARE FINANCING ADMINISTRATION QUALITY OF LIFE ASSESSMENT RESIDENT INTERVIEW Facility Name: Provider Number: Surveyor Name: Surveyor Number: Discipline: Resident
More informationVERMONT SECRETARY OF STATE OFFICE OF PROFESSIONAL REGULATION STATE BOARD OF NURSING
4. 6. 7. VERMONT SECRETARY OF STATE OFFICE OF PROFESSIONAL REGULATION STATE BOARD OF NURSING In re: Nichols, Danielle } License No. 026-0028470 } Docket No: NUl 0-0704 UNPROFESSIONAL CONDUCT CHARGE FINDINGS
More informationRULES OF DEPARTMENT OF MENTAL HEALTH AND DEVELOPMENTAL DISABILITIES DIVISION OF MENTAL HEALTH SERVICES
RULES OF DEPARTMENT OF MENTAL HEALTH AND DEVELOPMENTAL DISABILITIES DIVISION OF MENTAL HEALTH SERVICES CHAPTER 0940-3-9 USE OF ISOLATION, MECHANICAL RESTRAINT, AND PHYSICAL HOLDING RESTRAINT TABLE OF CONTENTS
More informationBoutros, Nesreen v. Amazon
University of Tennessee, Knoxville Trace: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange Tennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims and Workers' Compensation Appeals Board Law 11-9-2016 Boutros, Nesreen
More informationTHIS MATTER came on for hearing before the undersigned, Beecher Gray, Administrative Law Judge, on January 14, 2013, in Raleigh, North Carolina.
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA COUNTY OF PERSON IN THE OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS 12DHR05355 Shannon Wallace, Petitioner, v. North Carolina Department of Health and Human Services, FINAL DECISION Respondent.
More informationAND IN THE MATTER OF discipline proceedings against GEORGINA MARIE GUYETT, a current member of the College of Early Childhood Educators.
DISCIPLINE COMMITTEE OF THE COLLEGE OF EARLY CHILDHOOD EDUCATORS Citation: College of Early Childhood Educators vs Georgina Marie Guyett, 2017 ONCECE 3 Date: 2017-02-27 IN THE MATTER OF the Early Childhood
More informationPREVENTION OF VIOLENCE IN THE WORKPLACE
POLICY STATEMENT: PREVENTION OF VIOLENCE IN THE WORKPLACE The Canadian Red Cross Society (Society) is committed to providing a safe work environment and recognizes that workplace violence is a health and
More informationKern County Sheriff s Office Detentions Bureau 2016 Pretrial Staffing Plan
Kern County Sheriff s Office Detentions Bureau 2016 Pretrial Staffing Plan The purpose of this staffing plan is to establish basic security staffing protocols to ensure a safe and secure environment for
More informationSUSPECT RIGHTS. You are called in to talk to and are advised of your rights by any military or civilian police (including your chain of command).
SUSPECT RIGHTS This information paper describes your rights if you are suspected of committing a criminal offense. You should become familiar with the guidance below so you know what to expect and how
More informationSubject LESS-LETHAL MUNITIONS AND CHEMICAL AGENTS. DRAFT 31 August By Order of the Police Commissioner
Subject LESS-LETHAL MUNITIONS AND CHEMICAL AGENTS Date Published Page DRAFT 31 August 2018 1 of 9 By Order of the Police Commissioner POLICY This policy provides guidance regarding the Baltimore Police
More informationDOUGLAS COUNTY SHERIFF S OFFICE Personnel Investigations Complaint Handling / Investigative Procedures
DOUGLAS COUNTY SHERIFF S OFFICE Personnel Investigations Complaint Handling / Investigative Procedures Effective Date: 05-04-17 Supersedes: 10-25-16 References: 18-8-111 CRS, Colorado Rule of Criminal
More informationADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS COUNTY OF WARREN 11 DHR ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA IN THE OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS COUNTY OF WARREN 11 DHR 14283 Cynthia Tuck Champion, Petitioner, vs. Department of Health and Human Services, Division of Health Service
More informationPOSITION DESCRIPTION
State of Michigan Civil Service Commission Capitol Commons Center, P.O. Box 30002 Lansing, MI 48909 Position Code 1. CORSPV2A09N POSITION DESCRIPTION This position description serves as the official classification
More informationAn Introduction to The Uniform Code of Military Justice
An Introduction to The Uniform Code of Military Justice The Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ) is essentially a complete set of criminal laws. It includes many crimes punished under civilian law (e.g.,
More informationGREY NUNS COMMUNITY HOSPITAL ACTIVE ASSAILANT EMERGENCY RESPONSE PLAN
GREY NUNS COMMUNITY HOSPITAL ACTIVE ASSAILANT EMERGENCY RESPONSE PLAN ACTIVE ASSAILANT EMERGENCY RESPONSE PLAN ALGORITHM Staff Member Discovering the incident Staff in close proximity to the incident Recognizes
More informationNOT DESIGNATED FOR PUBLICATION STATE OF LOUISIANA COURT OF APPEAL FIRST CIRCUIT NUMBER 2010 CA 1875 BOBBY J LEE VERSUS
NOT DESIGNATED FOR PUBLICATION STATE OF LOUISIANA COURT OF APPEAL FIRST CIRCUIT NUMBER 2010 CA 1875 BOBBY J LEE VERSUS EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT SYSTEM OF CITY OF BATON ROUGE PARISH OF EAST BATON ROUGE THE
More informationFacility Oversight and Timeliness of Response to Complaints and Inmate Grievances State Commission of Correction
New York State Office of the State Comptroller Thomas P. DiNapoli Division of State Government Accountability Facility Oversight and Timeliness of Response to Complaints and Inmate Grievances State Commission
More informationDep't of Correction v. Reiser OATH Index No. 1890/04 (Feb. 17, 2005)
Dep't of Correction v. Reiser OATH Index No. 1890/04 (Feb. 17, 2005) Correction officer charged with failure to submit timely report following the realization that three Department portable radios were
More informationDIVISION OF MENTAL HEALTH AND ADDICTION SERVICES ADMINISTRATIVE BULLETIN A.B. 5:04B
DIVISION OF MENTAL HEALTH AND ADDICTION SERVICES ADMINISTRATIVE BULLETIN A.B. 5:04B EFFECTIVE DATE: June 4, 2012 SUBJECT: The Non-Emergent Administration of Psychotropic Medication to Non-Consenting Involuntary
More informationTHIS MATTER came on for hearing before the undersigned, J. Randall May, Administrative Law Judge, on June 13, 2013, in High Point, North Carolina.
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA COUNTY OF ROCKINGHAM IN THE OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS 12DHR07589 IRENE RENEE MCGHEE PETITIONER, V. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES RESPONDENT. FINAL DECISION THIS
More informationDouglas County Sheriff s Office Job Description
Douglas County Sheriff s Office Job Description Position: Sergeant Reports to: Chief Criminal Deputy and Sheriff via chain of command Basic Job Summary This is a fully commissioned Civil Service and Guild
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA MIAMI DIVISION
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA MIAMI DIVISION DISABILITY RIGHTS FLORIDA, INC., on Behalf of its Clients and Constituents, Plaintiff, vs. Case No. MICHAEL D. CREWS, Secretary,
More informationRank Recommended. Page 1 of 6
This report is based on the Department s Letters of Intent and does not reflect modifications to recommended discipline due to Grievances, Skelly Hearings, Arbitration Hearings, Civil Service Commission
More informationMandatory Reporting Requirements: The Elderly Rhode Island
Mandatory Reporting Requirements: The Elderly Rhode Island Question Who is required to report? When is a report required and where does it go? Answer Any person. Any physician, medical intern, registered
More informationLSU Health Sciences Center New Orleans Workplace Violence Prevention Plan
LSU Health Sciences Center New Orleans Workplace Violence Prevention Plan Effective January 1, 1998 Governor Mike J. Foster, Jr., of the State of Louisiana issued Executive Order MJF 97-15 effective March
More informationTYPE OF ORDER NUMBER/SERIES ISSUE DATE EFFECTIVE DATE General Order /17/ /19/2014
TYPE OF ORDER NUMBER/SERIES ISSUE DATE EFFECTIVE DATE General Order 390.02 10/17/2014 10/19/2014 SUBJECT TITLE PREVIOUSLY ISSUED DATES Restraint & Transport of Prisoners 11/21/2010, 9/16/2012, 7/18/2014
More informationCHILDREN S ADVOCACY CENTER, INC. CRAWFORD COUNTY PROTOCOL OF SERVICES
CHILDREN S ADVOCACY CENTER, INC. CRAWFORD COUNTY PROTOCOL OF SERVICES I. OVERVIEW A. INTRODUCTION This Protocol of Services for the Children s Advocacy Center, Inc. (CAC) was developed as a cooperative
More informationFamily Child Care Licensing Manual (November 2016)
Family Child Care Licensing Manual for use with COMAR 13A.15 Family Child Care (as amended effective 7/20/15) Table of Contents COMAR 13A.15.13 INSPECTIONS, COMPLAINTS, AND ENFORCEMENT.01 Inspections...1.02
More informationState of North Carolina Department of Correction Division of Prisons
State of North Carolina Department of Correction Division of Prisons POLICY & PROCEDURES Chapter: C Section:.1200 Title: Conditions of Confinement Issue Date: 11/01/11 Supersedes: 04/01/08.1201 CONDITIONS
More informationBEFORE THE ARBITRATOR. In the Matter of the Arbitration of a Dispute Between MILWAUKEE DEPUTY SHERIFFS ASSOCIATION. and MILWAUKEE COUNTY
BEFORE THE ARBITRATOR In the Matter of the Arbitration of a Dispute Between MILWAUKEE DEPUTY SHERIFFS ASSOCIATION and MILWAUKEE COUNTY Case 711 No. 69537 (Thomas Trettin Suspension Appeal) Appearances:
More informationINFORMED CONSENT FOR TREATMENT
INFORMED CONSENT FOR TREATMENT I (name of patient), agree and consent to participate in behavioral health care services offered and provided at/by Children s Respite Care Center, a behavioral health care
More informationRussell, Angela v. Newport Health and Rehab
University of Tennessee, Knoxville Trace: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange Tennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims and Workers' Compensation Appeals Board Law Winter 2-6-2015 Russell, Angela
More informationPrincipled Policing: The Mayor s 2016 Q3 & Q4 Police Accountability Report
Principled Policing: The Mayor s Q3 & Q4 Police Accountability Report Dear Oaklanders, This is the Principled Policing Report for the second half of. The purpose of the report is to bring greater transparency
More informationSharon Petrosino 14 Civic Center Plaza Santa Ana, CA Work: (714)
Sharon Petrosino 14 Civic Center Plaza Santa Ana, CA 92701 Work: (714) 834-5322 sharon.petrosino@pubdef.ocgov.com PROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCE Chief Deputy Public Defender Orange County Public Defender, Santa
More informationDECISION REVERSING 10-DAY SUSPENSION I. INTRODUCTION
HEARING OFFICER, CAREER SERVICE BOARD CITY AND COUNTY OF DENVER, COLORADO Appeal No. A024-17 DECISION REVERSING 10-DAY SUSPENSION JAMES JOHNSON, Appellant, v. DEPARTMENT OF SAFETY, DENVER SHERIFF S DEPARTMENT,
More informationBEFORE THE POLICE BOARD OF THE CITY OF CHICAGO
BEFORE THE POLICE BOARD OF THE CITY OF CHICAGO IN THE MATTER OF CHARGES FILED AGAINST ) POLICE OFFICER MICHAEL METTE, ) No. 16 PB 2919 STAR No. 2725, DEPARTMENT OF POLICE, ) CITY OF CHICAGO, ) ) (CR No.
More informationRevised 08/07/2014 BEHAVIORAL MANAGEMENT I-59 New 07/2013
3195 Neil Armstrong Blvd. Eagan, MN 55121 651-686-0405 204 Mississippi Ave. Red Wing, MN 55066 651-388-7108 224 Main Street Zumbrota, MN 55992 507-732-7888 1202 Beaudry Blvd Hudson, WI 54016 715-410-4216
More informationTYPE OF ORDER NUMBER/SERIES ISSUE DATE EFFECTIVE DATE General Order /25/2014 9/25/2014
TYPE OF ORDER NUMBER/SERIES ISSUE DATE EFFECTIVE DATE General Order 300.01 9/25/2014 9/25/2014 SUBJECT TITLE PREVIOUSLY ISSUED DATES Use Of Force 6/5/2014; 3/28/2014; 2/8/2009; Amends: PPD Rules & Regulations
More informationDISCIPLINE COMMITTEE OF THE COLLEGE OF NURSES OF ONTARIO
DISCIPLINE COMMITTEE OF THE COLLEGE OF NURSES OF ONTARIO PANEL: Grace Isgro-Topping Chairperson Spencer Dickson, RN Member Megan Sloan, RPN Member Angela Verrier, RPN Member John Bald Public Member BETWEEN:
More informationRules for Visitation 1. The Tulsa County Sheriff's Office may terminate a visit at any time. 2. The Tulsa County Sheriff's Office reserves the right
Rules for Visitation 1. The Tulsa County Sheriff's Office may terminate a visit at any time. 2. The Tulsa County Sheriff's Office reserves the right to deny entry to any person believed to be a threat
More informationVolunteer Policies & Procedures Manual
CASA of East Tennessee, Inc. Volunteer Policies & Procedures Manual Revised 2016 Funded Partner Agency This project is partially funded under an agreement with the State of Tennessee. Welcome The CASA
More informationCity of Claremont, New Hampshire Position Description
Position Titled: Reports to: Department: FLSA Status: Job Summary Police Corporal Police Chief Police Non-Exempt Union/Merit: AFSME Police Union Grade Level-Points: Revised/Updated: 05/03/05 Serves as
More informationSignature: Signed by GNT Date Signed: 10/28/2013
Atlanta Police Department Policy Manual Standard Operating Procedure Effective Date October 30, 2013 Applicable To: All sworn employees Approval Authority: Chief George N. Turner Signature: Signed by GNT
More informationSHERIFF S COMMANDER. 1. Plans, implements, coordinates and directs team, program, unit, division or station law enforcement operations.
County of Monterey 36A82 SHERIFF S COMMANDER DEFINITION Under general direction, manages, supervises and organizes the work of a station, division, departmental function or program; performs research and
More informationResident Rights in Nursing Facilities
Your Guide to Resident Rights in Nursing Facilities 1-800-499-0229 1 Table of Contents The Ombudsman Advocate...3 You Take Your Rights with You...4 Federal Regulations Protect You...5 Medical Assessment
More informationCommunity Outreach Services, Inc Greenbelt Road Suite 206 College Park, MD (301) Fax: (301)
Community Outreach Services, Inc. 6215 Greenbelt Road Suite 206 College Park, MD 20740 (301)345-1459 Fax: (301) 345-1305 Office Policies Form *Office Hours *Times are subject to change. Please contact
More informationBROOKLINE POLICE DEPARTMENT Brookline, Massachusetts
BROOKLINE POLICE DEPARTMENT Brookline, Massachusetts DANIEL C. O LEARY CHIEF OF POLICE May 20, 2014 Personnel Order 2014-31 Subject: Commendations Detective Julie McDonnell Detective Russell O Neill On
More informationResource Library Banque de ressources
Resource Library Banque de ressources SAMPLE POLICY: STAFF SAFETY Sample Community and Health Services Keywords: high risk, safety, home visits, staff safety, client safety, disruptive behavior, refusal
More informationBEFORE A MEMBER OF THE POLICE BOARD OF THE CITY OF CHICAGO
BEFORE A MEMBER OF THE POLICE BOARD OF THE CITY OF CHICAGO IN THE MATTER OF THE ) RECOMMENDATIONS FOR DISCIPLINE OF ) ) POLICE OFFICER RICHARD C. CARO, ) No. 18 RR 01 STAR No. 5368, DEPARTMENT OF POLICE,
More informationBedford County Deputy, Patrol Division
Bedford County Deputy, Patrol Division Common Duties and Responsibilities 1. Operate patrol vehicle in an assigned geographical area. 2. Monitor and observe vehicular traffic, detect traffic offenses and
More informationDorsey, LaToya v. Amazon.com, Inc.
University of Tennessee, Knoxville Trace: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange Tennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims and Workers' Compensation Appeals Board Law 4-17-2015 Dorsey, LaToya v.
More informationNEW LIFE COMMUNITY CHURCH EMERGENCY RESPONSE Policy and Guidelines
NEW LIFE COMMUNITY CHURCH EMERGENCY RESPONSE Policy and Guidelines POLICY Recognizing the occasional need to provide for a safe environment for the church congregation regarding Emergency Security, Medical
More informationPossession is 9/10 th of the law. Once a resident has been admitted, it is very difficult under current regulations to effect a transfer.
WORKING WITH AND MANAGING DIFFICULT FAMILIES By Kendall Watkins, J.D KenWatkins@davisbrownlaw.com Possession is 9/10 th of the law. Once a resident has been admitted, it is very difficult under current
More informationINMATE CLASSIFICATION
DESCHUTES COUNTY ADULT JAIL CD-6-4 L. Shane Nelson, Sheriff Jail Operations Approved by: February 1, 2016 INMATE CLASSIFICATION POLICY. It is the policy of the Deschutes County Adult Jail (DCAJ) and Work
More informationclassification, shall undergo at least four hours of training on the principles, procedures and instruments for classification
Chapter Title Text Comment Date Proposed Date Adopted 271.3 Training The plan shall provide that all staff jailers whose duties include classification, shall undergo at least four hours of training on
More informationCity of Claremont, New Hampshire Position Description
Position Titled: Reports to: Department: FLSA Status: Job Summary Police Attorney Prosecutor Police Chief Police Exempt Union/Merit: Merit Plan Grade Level-Points: 10 Revised/Updated: 10/06/06 The incumbent
More informationPolicy 3.19 Workplace Violence and Threat Assessment Team
Policy 3.19 Workplace Violence and Threat Assessment Team Purpose John Tyler is concerned about the safety, health and well-being of all of its students, faculty and staff. In adherence to Virginia Code
More informationEgg Harbor Fire Department and First Responders Standard Operating Policy
Egg Harbor Fire Department and First Responders Standard Operating Policy SUBJECT: PERSONAL CONDUCT SOP 1210 PURPOSE: SCOPE: The purpose of this SOP is to establish a policy defining conduct or behavior
More informationCANINE UNIT. C. Building Search: The utilization of the K-9 Unit to locate suspect(s) believed to be or known to be hiding in a building or structure.
CITY OF MARYLAND HEIGHTS OFFICE OF THE CHIEF OF POLICE Cancels: GO 498.00 Index as: March 15, 2011 Assistance to other agencies Canine Off-duty Call-ins Search, Canine 498.00 PURPOSE CANINE UNIT The purpose
More informationCHAPTER 411 DIVISION 020 ADULT PROTECTIVE SERVICES GENERAL
CHAPTER 411 DIVISION 020 ADULT PROTECTIVE SERVICES GENERAL 411-020-0000 Purpose and Scope of Program (Amended 7/1/2005) (1) Responsibility: The Department of Human Services (DHS) Seniors and People with
More informationDepartment of Defense INSTRUCTION
Department of Defense INSTRUCTION NUMBER 6495.03 September 10, 2015 Incorporating Change 1, April 7, 2017 USD(P&R) SUBJECT: Defense Sexual Assault Advocate Certification Program (D-SAACP) References: See
More informationTHIS MATTER came on for hearing before Beecher R. Gray, Administrative Law Judge, on October 4, 2012, in Morganton, North Carolina.
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA COUNTY OF BURKE IN THE OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS 12DHR05745 BRENDA TRIPLETT ANDREWS, Petitioner, v. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, DIVISION OF HEALTH SERVICE REGULATION,
More informationIN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE NINTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR ORANGE COUNTY, FLORIDA. Petitioner, WRIT NO.: 12-15
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE NINTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR ORANGE COUNTY, FLORIDA RICHARD REIS, CASE NO.: 2012-CA-003618-O Petitioner, WRIT NO.: 12-15 v. STATE OF FLORIDA, DEPARTMENT OF HIGHWAY SAFETY
More informationNORTH AYRSHIRE COUNCIL EDUCATION AND YOUTH EMPLOYMENT THE USE OF PHYSICAL INTERVENTION IN EDUCATIONAL ESTABLISHMENTS
Appendix 1 NORTH AYRSHIRE COUNCIL EDUCATION AND YOUTH EMPLOYMENT THE USE OF PHYSICAL INTERVENTION IN EDUCATIONAL ESTABLISHMENTS Contents 1 Introduction Page 3 1.1 Purpose of this Policy Page 3 1.2 Rationale
More informationACTIVE SHOOTER GUIDEBOOK
ACTIVE SHOOTER GUIDEBOOK HOW TO RESPOND WHAT IS AN ACTIVE SHOOTER? An Active Shooter is an individual actively engaged in killing or attempting to kill people in a confined and populated area; in most
More informationVOLUSIA COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE INTERNAL AFFAIRS REPORT OF INVESTIGATION REPORT NUMBER: IA
VOLUSIA COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE INTERNAL AFFAIRS REPORT OF INVESTIGATION REPORT NUMBER: IA-13-016 PERIOD COVERED: August 21 through September 13, 2013 DATE REPORTED: September 9, 2013 SUBJECT(S) NAME:
More informationMEDICAL UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY. EFFECTIVE DATE: 1 January 1999 PAGE 1 OF 10
MEDICAL UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY POLICY AND PROCEDURE # 70 SUBJECT: Searching and Transportation of Prisoners EFFECTIVE DATE: 1 January 1999 PAGE 1 OF 10 REVIEW DATE: 30
More informationDEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOAR3 FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORD 2 NAVY ANNE X WASHINGTON DC
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOAR3 FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORD 2 NAVY ANNE X WASHINGTON DC 20370.510 0 S AEG Docket No: 4591-99 20 September 2001 Dear Mr.-: This is in reference to your application for correction
More informationCRS Report for Congress
Order Code RS21850 Updated November 16, 2005 CRS Report for Congress Received through the CRS Web Summary Military Courts-Martial: An Overview Jennifer K. Elsea Legislative Attorney American Law Division
More information12.6 Domestic Violence, Protective Orders, and Peace Orders
12.6 Domestic Violence, Protective Orders, and Peace Orders 12.6.1 Definitions Domestic Violence also called battering or spouse abuse is the abusive or violent behavior by a partner in a marriage or other
More informationReport and Recommendation, April 16, 1997
Health and Hospitals Corp. v. Doxen, OATH Index No. 630/97 (Apr. 16, 1997), modified on penalty, HHC Personnel Rev. Bd. Dec. No. 903 (May 19, 1998), appended. Summary: Respondent, an associate respiratory
More informationEJ Hurst II LIMITED TO FEDERAL AND CAPITAL CRIMINAL MATTERS
EJ Hurst II LIMITED TO FEDERAL AND CAPITAL CRIMINAL MATTERS Post Office Box 1687 Telephone (859) 361 8000 Lexington, Kentucky 40588 1687 Facsimile (859) 389 9214 jayhurst@alltel.net Maryland State Bar
More informationNEW MEXICO ASSOCIATION OF COUNTIES SAMPLE POLICY AND PROCEDURE SPECIAL MANAGEMENT INMATES Approved: June 2014 Revised & Approved: June 2017
I. REFERENCES: American Correctional Association Standards for Adult Local Detention Facilities, Fourth Edition. Standards: 4- ALDF-2A-44, 4-ALDF-2A-45, 4-ALDF-2A-46, 4-ALDF-2A-47, 4-ALDF-2A-48, 4-ALDF-2A-49,
More informationCase 4:05-cv JAD Document 88-2 Filed 11/13/2007 Page 1 of 12
Case 4:05-cv-00148-JAD Document 88-2 Filed 11/13/2007 Page 1 of 12 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF MISSISSIPPI GREENVILLE DIVISION JEFFERY PRESLEY, ET AL., PLAINTIFFS V.
More informationWorkplace Violence Prevention. Sandra Williams Director of Environmental Health & Safety Alameda Health System September 6, 2017
Workplace Violence Prevention Sandra Williams Director of Environmental Health & Safety Alameda Health System September 6, 2017 Focus & Objectives Focus: Session is designed to provide an overview of the
More informationRELATIONS WITH LAW ENFORCEMENT AUTHORITIES AND SOCIAL SERVICE AGENCIES
Regulation KLG-RA Las Cruces Public Schools Related Entries: Responsible Office: JIH, JIH-R, KLG, KI, KI-R Associate Superintendent for Operations RELATIONS WITH LAW ENFORCEMENT AUTHORITIES AND SOCIAL
More information