[COMMITTEE PRINT] NOTICE: This is a draft only, subject to change until approved by the full Committee

Transcription

1 U: \219REPT\2REPT\2REPT.OOO [COMMITTEE PRINT] NOTICE: This is a draft only, subject to change until approved by the full Committee Calendar No. 115TH CONGRESS } 2d Session SENATE { REPORT 115- DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE APPROPRIATIONS BILL, 219 JUNE, 218.-rdered to be printed Mr. SHELBY, from the Committee on Appropriations, submitted the following REPORT [To accompany S. ] The Committee on Appropriations reports the bill (S. ) making appropriations for the Department of Defense for the fiscal year ending September 3, 219, and for other purposes, reports favorably thereon and recommends that the bill do pass. New obligational authority Total of bill as reported to the Senate.... Amount of 218 appropriations.... Amount of 219 budget estimate.... Bill as recommended to Senate compared to- 218 appropriations budget estimate....

2 U: \219REPT\2REPT\2REPT.OOO CONTENTS Background: Purpose of the Bill.... Hearings.... Summary of the Bill.... Definition of Program, Project and Activity.... Reprogramming Guidance.... Committee Initiatives.... Title I: Military Personnel: Reprogramming Guidance for Military Personnel Accounts.... Military Personnel Special Interest s.... Military Personnel Overview.... Military Personnel, Army.... Military Personnel, Navy.... Military Personnel, Marine Corps.... Military Personnel, Air Force.... Reserve Personnel, Army.... Reserve Personnel, Navy.... Reserve Personnel, Marine Corps.... Reserve Personnel, Air Force.... National Guard Personnel, Army.... National Guard Personnel, Air Force.... Title II: Operation and Maintenance: Operation and Maintenance, Army.... Operation and Maintenance, Navy.... Operation and Maintenance, Marine Corps.... Operation and Maintenance, Air Force.... Operation and Maintenance, Defense-Wide.... Operation and Maintenance, Army Reserve.... Operation and Maintenance, Navy Reserve.... Operation and Maintenance, Marine Corps Reserve.... Operation and Maintenance, Air Force Reserve.... Operation and Maintenance, Army National Guard.... Operation and Maintenance, Air National Guard.... U.S. Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces.... Environmental Restoration, Army.... Environmental Restoration, Navy.... Environmental Restoration, Air Force.... Environmental Restoration, Defense-Wide.... Environmental Restoration, Formerly Used Defense Sites.... Overseas Humanitarian, Disaster, and Civic Aid.... Cooperative Threat Reduction Account.... Department of Defense Acquisition Workforce Development Fund Title III: Procurement: Aircraft Procurement, Army.... Missile Procurement, Army.... Procurement of Weapons and Tracked Combat Vehicles, Army.... Procurement of Ammunition, Army.... Other Procurement, Army.... Aircraft Procurement, Navy.... Weapons Procurement, Navy.... Procurement of Ammunition, Navy and Marine Corps.... Shipbuilding and Conversion, Navy.... Other Procurement, Navy.... Procurement, Marine Corps.... Aircraft Procurement, Air Force.... Missile Procurement, Air Force.... Space Procurement, Air Force.... Procurement of Ammunition, Air Force.... Other Procurement, Air Force.... Page (2)

3 U:\219REPT\2REPT\2REPT.OOO 3 Title III-Continued Procurement-Continued Procurement, Defense-Wide.... National Guard and Reserve Equipment.... Defense Production Act Purchases.... Title IV: Research, Development, Test and Evaluation: Research, Development, Test and Evaluation, Army.... Research, Development, Test and Evaluation, Navy.... Research, Development, Test and Evaluation, Air Force.... Research, Development, Test and Evaluation, Defense-Wide.... Operational Test and Evaluation, Defense.... Title V: Revolving and Management Funds: Defense Working Capital Funds.... Title VI: Other Department of Defense Programs: Defense Health Program.... Chemical Agents and Munitions Destruction, Defense.... Drug Interdiction and Counter-Drug Activities, Defense.... Joint Urgent Operational Needs Fund.... Office of the Inspector General.... Title VII: Related Agencies: Central Intelligence Agency Retirement and Disability System Fund.... Intelligence Community Management Account.... Title VIII: General Provisions.... Title IX: Overseas Contingency Operations/Global War on Terrorism: Department of Defense-Military.... Military Personnel: Military Personnel, Army.... Military Personnel, Navy.... Military Personnel, Marine Corps.... Military Personnel, Air Force.... Reserve Personnel, Army.... Reserve Personnel, Navy.... Reserve Personnel, Marine Corps.... Reserve Personnel, Air Force.... National Guard Personnel, Army.... National Guard Personnel, Air Force.... Operation and Maintenance: Operation and Maintenance, Army.... Operation and Maintenance, Navy.... Operation and Maintenance, Marine Corps.... Operation and Maintenance, Air Force.... Operation and Maintenance, Defense-Wide.... Operation and Maintenance, Army Reserve.... Operation and Maintenance, Navy Reserve.... Operation and Maintenance, Marine Corps Reserve.... Operation and Maintenance, Air Force Reserve.... Operation and Maintenance, Army National Guard.... Operation and Maintenance, Air National Guard.... Afghanistan Security Forces Fund.... Counter-ISIS Train and Equip Fund.... Procurement: Aircraft Procurement, Army.... Missile Procurement, Army.... Procurement of Weapons and Tracked Combat Vehicles, Army.... Procurement of Ammunition, Army.... Other Procurement, Army.... Aircraft Procurement, Navy.... Weapons Procurement, Navy.... Procurement of Ammunition, Navy and Marine Corps.... Other Procurement, Navy.... Procurement, Marine Corps.... Aircraft Procurement, Air Force.... Missile Procurement, Air Force....

4 U:\219REPT\2REPT\2REPT.OOO 4 Title IX-Continued Procurement-Continued Procurement of Ammunition, Air Force... Other Procurement, Air Force... Procurement, Defense-Wide... Research, Development, Test and Evaluation: Research, Development, Test and Evaluation, Army... Research, Development, Test and Evaluation, Navy... Research, Development, Test and Evaluation, Air Force... Research, Development, Test and Evaluation, Defense-Wide... Revolving and Management Funds: Defense Working Capital Funds... Other Department of Defense Programs: Defense Health Program... Drug Interdiction and Counter-Drug Activities, Defense... Office of the Inspector General... General Provisions-This Title... Compliance With Paragraph 7, Rule XVI of the Standing Rules of the Senate... Compliance With Paragraph 7(c), Rule XXVI of the Standing Rules of the Senate... Compliance With Paragraph 12, Rule XXVI of the Standing Rules of the Senate... Budgetary Impact of Bill... Comparative Statement of New Budget Authority...

5 U:\219REPT\2REPT\2REPT.1 BACKGROUND PURPOSE OF THE BILL This bill makes appropriations for the military functions of the Department of Defense for the period October 1, 218, through September 3, 219. Functional areas include the pay, allowances, and support of military personnel, operation and maintenance of the forces, procurement of equipment and systems, and research, development, test and evaluation. Appropriations for foreign military assistance, military construction, family housing, nuclear weapons programs, and civil defense are provided in other bills. HEARINGS SUMMARY OF THE BILL The Appropriations Subcommittee on Defense began hearings on April 11, 218, and concluded them on June 6, 218, after nine separate sessions. The subcommittee heard testimony from representatives of the Department of Defense and the Intelligence Community. The Committee recommendation of $667,98,36, includes funding to develop, maintain, and equip the military forces of the United States and for other purposes. The fiscal year 219 budget request for activities funded in the Department of Defense appropriations bill totals $668,49,933, in new budget authority, including $68,78,58, in overseas contingency operations funding and $514,, in mandatory spending. In fiscal year 218, the Congress appropriated $652,36,68, for activities funded in this bill. This amount includes $582,274,519, in base appropriations and $65,166,, in overseas contingency operations appropriations provided in Public Law and $4,92,89, in emergency appropriations provided in Public Laws and The Committee recommends that funds requested for Coast Guard overseas contingency operations be appropriated directly to the Department of Homeland Security. The Committee recommendation in this bill is $15,619,428, above the amount provided in fiscal year 218 and $429,897, below the amount requested for fiscal year 219. COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATIONS The following table displays the recommendations for each title: Title I-Military Personnel.. Title II-Operation and Maintenance Title Ill Procurement. Title IV-Research, development, test and evaluation.. Title V-Revolving and management funds.. Title VI-Other Department of Defense Programs.. (5) Fiscal year 218 enacted 133,367, ,245, ,868,632 88,38,133 1,685,596 36,646,6 fiscal year 219 estimate Committee recommendation 14,689,31 139,296, ,469, ,982,413 13,564, ,198,897 91,56,95 95,131,819 1,542,115 1,641,115 35,839,86 36,331,66

6 U: \219REPT\2REPT\2REPT.1 6 Fiscal year 218 Fiscal year 219 Committee enacted estimate recommendation Title VI-Related Agencies ,51,6 1,53,124 1,43,624 Title VIII-General provisions (net) ,22 115,8-2,559,935 Title IX-Overseas Contingency Operations 65,166, 68,78,58 67,913,976 Title X-Missile Defense and Defeat Enhancements (Public Law ) ,485, Other appropriations (Public Law ) , Net grand total ,36,68 668,49, ,98,36 Total discretionary (incl. scorekeeping adjustments) 655,131, ,987,23 675,557,126 The Committee has displayed recommended adjustments in tables presented under each appropriation account. These adjustments reflect the following Committee actions: elimination of funds requested for programs which are lower priority, duplicative, or not supported by firm requirements in out-year development or procurement appropriations; deletion of excess funds based on program delays or slow execution; addition of funds to reflect congressional priorities and to rectify shortfalls in the budget estimate; and implementation of recommendations in the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 219. CLASSIFIED PROGRAM ADJUSTMENTS The Committee recommends adjustments to certain classified programs, as explained in the classified annex to the Committee's report. BUDGET JUSTIFICATION MATERIALS FOR SPECIAL ACCESS PROGRAMS The Committee recommends adjustments to the budget justification materials provided in the Special Access Program Annual Report to Congress submitted in accordance with Title 1, United States Code, Section 119(a)(l), as explained in the classified annex to the Committee's report. It is expected that these adjustments will be incorporated in future budget submissions. DEFINITION OF PROGRAM, PROJECT AND ACTIVITY For the purposes of the Balanced Budget and Emergency Deficit Control Act of 1985 (Public Law ), as amended by the Balanced Budget and Emergency Deficit Control Reaffirmation Act of 1987 (Public Law 1-119), and by the Budget Enforcement Act of 199 (Public Law 11-58), the terms "program, project, and activity" for appropriations contained in this act shall be defined as the most specific level of budget items identified in the Department of Defense Appropriations Act, 219, the related classified annexes and Committee reports, and P-1 and R-1 budget justification documents as subsequently modified by congressional action. The following exception to the above definition shall apply: the military personnel and the operation and maintenance accounts, for which the term "program, project, and activity" is defined as the appropriations accounts contained in the Department of Defense Appropriations Act.

7 U:\219REPT\2REPT\2REPT.1 7 At the time the President submits the budget request for fiscal year 22, the Secretary of Defense is directed to transmit to the congressional defense committees budget justification documents to be known as the "M-1" and "-1" which shall identify, at the budget activity, activity group, and sub-activity group level, the amounts requested by the President to be appropriated to the Department of Defense for military personnel and operation and maintenance in any budget request, or amended budget request, for fiscal year 22. REPROGRAMMING GUIDANCE The Secretary of Defense is directed to continue to follow the reprogramming guidance for acquisition accounts as specified in the report accompanying the House version of the Department of Defense appropriations bill for fiscal year 28 (House Report ). The dollar threshold for reprogramming funds shall remain at $2,, for military personnel; $2,, for operation and maintenance; $2,, for procurement; and $1,, for research, development, test and evaluation. Also, the Under Secretary of Defense (Comptroller) is directed to continue to provide the congressional defense committees annual DD Form 1416 reports for titles I and II and quarterly, spreadsheet-based DD Form 1416 reports for service and defense-wide accounts in titles III and IV of this act. Reports for titles III and IV shall comply with guidance specified in the explanatory statement accompanying the Department of Defense Appropriations Act for Fiscal Year 26. The Department shall continue to follow the limitation that prior approval reprogrammings are set at either the specified dollar threshold or 2 percent of the procurement or research, development, test and evaluation line, whichever is less. These thresholds are cumulative from the base for reprogramming value as modified by any adjustments. Therefore, if the combined value of transfers into or out of a military personnel (M-1), an operation and maintenance (-1), a procurement (P-1), or a research, development, test and evaluation (R-1) line exceeds the identified threshold, the Secretary of Defense must submit a prior approval reprogramming to the congressional defense committees. In addition, guidelines on the application of prior approval reprogramming procedures for congressional special interest items are established elsewhere in this report. FUNDING INCREASES The funding increases outlined in the tables for each appropriation account shall be provided only for the specific purposes indicated in the tables. CONGRESSIONAL SPECIAL INTEREST ITEMS s for which additional funds have been recommended or items for which funding is specifically reduced as shown in the tables detailing Committee recommended adjustments or in paragraphs using the phrase "only for" or "only to" are congressional special interest items for the purpose of the Base for Reprogramming [DD Form 1414]. Each of these items must be carried on the

8 U: \219REPT\2REPT\2REPT.1 8 DD Form 1414 at the stated amount, as specifically addressed in elsewhere in this report. COMMI'ITEE INITIATIVES The Committee has included funding above the fiscal year 219 President's budget request for several programmatic initiatives in support of the 218 National Defense Strategy [NDS]. While the NDS recognizes the persistent nature of terrorist threats and the need to counter those threats, it also represents a significant shift toward long-term, strategic competition and operations in contested domains. Additionally, rapid technological advancement and the commercial availability of increasingly sophisticated capabilities presents challenges to the U.S. military advantage against state and non-state actors alike. In order to maintain overmatch against adversaries across the domain spectrum, the Committee recommends additional investment in the following areas: basic research, hypersonics, directed energy, artificial intelligence, microelectronics, missile defense, cybersecurity, and complimentary aspects including test and evaluation infrastructure. The Committee expects that the Department will sustain and support continued investments in these areas in the fiscal year 22 President's budget request. Additionally, the Committee directs the Secretary of Defense to provide a spend plan for execution of the additional fiscal year 219 resources provided for committee initiatives not later than 6 days following enactment of this act. Finally, the Committee directs that funds for these initiatives are to be competitively awarded or provided to programs that have received competitive awards in the past. MISSILE DEFENSE AGENCY The fiscal year 219 President's budget request for the Missile Defense Agency [MDA] includes $9,915,34, in the Operation and Maintenance, Defense-Wide; Procurement-Defense-Wide; Research, Development, Test and Evaluation, Defense-Wide and Military Construction appropriation accounts, a $1,65,748, decrease from amounts appropriated for the MDA in fiscal year 218 in the Department of Defense Missile Defeat and Defense Enhancements Appropriations Act, 218 (Public Law ) and in the Department of Defense Appropriations Act, 218 (Public Law ). Addressing Future Threats.-Subsequent to submission of the fiscal year 219 President's budget request, the Director, MDA provided the congressional defense committees a list of unfunded requirements for MDA in fiscal year 219. Noting that rapid technological progress has increased threat complexity, to include advanced capabilities being developed by rogue nations and emerging threats such as hypersonic glide vehicles, the Committee recommends an increase of $1,198,648, for MDA. MDA's objective is to increase missile defense capability against advanced, complex threats by integrating multi-domain systems into its battle management control system while maximizing costeffectiveness. Therefore, the Committee recommends increases to support programs that further that objective. Specifically, the Com-

9 U:\219REPT\2REPT\2REPT.1 9 mittee recommends $1,5, above the budget request to initiate a Missile Defense Tracking System [MTS], which the Director MDA identified to the Committee as MDA's top unfunded priority'. The Committee understands that a MTS operational prototype would provide a responsive, flexible capability from space to detect and track both conventional ballistic missiles and emerging threats, such as hypersonic glide vehicles. The Committee further notes that funds appropriated for MTS in fiscal year 218 are being utilized to support MTS concept designs, but MDA has not budgeted for a MTS acquisition program. Therefore, the Committee directs the Director, MDA, as the Ballistic Missile Defense Acquisition Executive, to provide the congressional defense committees a MTS acquisition strategy and MDA's associated cost estimate with the fiscal year 22 President's budget request. The MTS acquisition strategy shall include the MTS requirement, contracting approach, test plan, and identification of programmatic and technical risk. The MDA Comptroller/Chief Financial Officer is directed to certify full funding of the acquisition strategy in the fiscal year 22 President's budget request, and the Director, Cost Assessment and Program Evaluation [CAPE], is directed to provide an Independent Cost Estimate [ICE] for MTS to the congressional defense committees with the fiscal year 22 President's budget request. The Committee also recommends $46,1, above the budget request to accelerate the development of critical interceptor technology in the areas of propulsion, materials and lethality to address hypersonic threats. Additionally, the Committee notes that a boost phase kill ability could provide increased missile defense capability and that directed energy is a key technology required to ensure a boost phase kill ability. Therefore, the Committee recommends $85,, above the budget request to continue research and development of three separate laser scaling efforts with the goal of demonstrating a 5 kilowatt laser by 221, and a best of breed of 1 megawatt laser capability by 223. The Director, MDA, as the Ballistic Missile Defense Acquisition Executive, is directed to provide an acquisition strategy for a boost phase missile defense capability and the associated MDA cost estimate with the fiscal year 22 President's budget request. The acquisition strategy shall include the requirement, contracting approach, test plan, and identification of programmatic and technical risk. The MDA Comptroller/Chief Financial Officer is directed to certify full funding of the acquisition strategy in the fiscal year 22 President's budget request, and the Director, CAPE is directed to provide an ICE for a boost phase missile defense capability to the congressional defense committees with the fiscal year 22 President's budget. The Committee notes that consistent with MDA's Directed Energy Roadmap, as submitted to the Committee with the fiscal year 219 President's budget request, the Laser Scaling program is separate and distinct from MDA's Low Power Laser Demonstrator program [LPLD]. The Committee further notes that MDA has awarded three design contracts for LPLD and plans to downselect to one performer in late 218 following a Preliminary Design Review. The Committee finds this approach to be tech-

10 \ U:\219REPT\2REPT\2REPT.1 nically risky. Therefore, consistent with the Department of Defense Appropriations Act, 2()18, the Committee recommends an additional $78,,, which is the amount identified by MDA as required for LPLD to retain three performers through Critical Design Review in late 219, thereby reducing risk for a LPLD demonstration in fiscal year 223. The Committee recommends several additional increases for the Missile Defense Agency, including $1,, above the budget request to advance MDA's compliance with the Department of Defense Cybersecurity Discipline Implementation Plan to protect MDA systems in highly-contested cybersecurity threat environments; $126,, above the budget request to provide improved discrimination capabilities and high-fidelity digital modeling and simulation to counter emergent threats to the homeland, forward deployed forces and allies; $93,5, to accelerate the integration of mobile sensors; and $12,367, for MDA's test enterprise, including funds to replace obsolete airborne sensors. Aegis Ashore Poland.-The Committee understands that completion of the Aegis Ashore site in Poland will slip by at least 1 year, delaying installation of the weapon system and transition of the capability to U.S. European Command. The Committee is concerned with this delay and recommends an additional $2,, to continue combat system and combat structure adaptation, integration, installation, and testing. The Committee directs the Director, MDA, to submit to the congressional defense committees, with the fiscal year 22 President's budget request, an updated program baseline for Aegis Ashore Poland, to include revised cost estimates. The Director, CAPE, is directed to provide, with the fiscal year 22 President's budget request, an Independent Cost Estimate for Aegis Ashore Poland. MDA Acquisition Workforce and Contracts.-The Committee notes that MDA has utilized the Department of Defense Acquisition Workforce Development Fund [DAWDF] in support of hiring and developing entry level employees in critical career fields as part of its workforce pipeline strategy since 29. The Director, MDA is directed to provide to the congressional defense committees, not later than with submission of the fiscal year 22 President's budget request, a historical application of DA WDF funding by MDA, as well as identify additional requirements for MDA's acquisition workforce due to increased acquisition workload. Additionally, the Committee is concernec1_ with MDA's increasing reliance on Undefinitized Contract Actions [UCAs]. The Committee notes that UCAs are contract actions for which the contract terms, specifications, or price are not agreed upon before contractor performance commences, and that UCAs should be used only when a requirement needs to be met quickly and there is insufficient time to use normal contracting vehicles. However, the Committee notes that the MDA continues to utilize UCAs for recurring annual contracts, and that MDA struggles to definitize UCAs within the definitization schedule set forth in the Defense Federal Acquisition Regulation Supplement [DFARS]. Therefore, the Committee directs the MDA Director of Contracts to provide the congressional defense committees, not later than with submission of the fiscal year 22 President's budget request, a briefing on contract types used by 1

11 U: \219REPT\2REPT\2REPT.1 11 MDA by program, to include historic application of UCAs and rationale for each UCA (such as the untimely receipt of proposals, acquisition workforce shortfalls, schedule pressures and emerging requirements), definitization schedules, final negotiated contract values compared to initial estimates, and contract strategies for acquisition programs going forward. Finally, the Committee notes that information previously requested by the Committee regarding several acquisition programs has not yet been provided. Therefore, the Committee directs that not more than $15,, may be obligated for MDA Management Headquarters in fiscal year 219 until the information requested is provided. ARMY CROSS FUNCTIONAL TEAMS In October 217, the Army announced its intent to establish a new Army Futures Command, which is intended to synchronize efforts among the other Army Commands through Cross-Functional Teams [CFT] to advance the Army's six modernization priorities: long-range precision fires, air and missile defense, next generation combat vehicle, future vertical lift, network modernization, and soldier lethality. These eight CFTs will report directly to the Under Secretary and Vice Chief of Staff of the Army and work to compress the modernization and procurement timelines by involving the end user, defining requirements, integrating, prototyping, and validating a concept prior to low-rate initial production. While the Committee is supportive of these prioritization efforts by the Army in accordance with the April 218 Army Modernization Strategy, it is concerned with the timeliness and adequacy of the budget justification materials presented to the Committee. The Committee is still awaiting an above threshold reprogramming request from the Department to realign fiscal year 218 funding and received a request from the Army to realign science and technology funding and support additional fiscal year 219 funding for CFT priorities very late in the budget process. The fiscal year 219 President's budget request includes $2,119,871, for Army CFT priorities within the Missile Procurement; Procurement of Ammunition; Other Procurement; and Research, Development, Test and Evaluation accounts, with the Army requesting an additional $416,953, above the budget request. The Committee understands that the fiscal year 219 President's budget request was developed before CFT plans, requirements, and acquisition strategies could be finalized and that several programs under CFT purview continue to work to complete these decision points. Given this fluctuation, the Committee recommends modest reductions to the programs within the CFT budget request while also providing an additional $127,737, for CFT science and technology efforts in anticipation of the Army's need to realign funding to resource future CFT efforts. In addition, the Committee recommends $75,4, above the budget request for the Army's future vertical lift program to accelerate Capability Set One Future Attack Reconnaissance Aircraft development. The Committee looks forward to a continuing dialogue with the Army's acquisition and CFT leadership in order to provide appropriate, executable resources for Army modernization priorities.

12 U: \219REPT\2REPT\2REPT.OO 1 12 INDIRECT FIRE PROTECTION CAPABILITY The fiscal year 219 President's budget request includes advance procurement totaling $173,24, for AIM-9X interceptors, Multi Mission Launcher [MML] components, and ancillary costs. This is in addition to $5,56, of fiscal year 218 advance procurement funding that remains unexecuted. The request also includes $28,74, for continued research, development, test and evaluation of the current Indirect Fire Protection Capability [IFPC] program of record. The Committee notes that following submission of the fiscal year 219 President's budget request, the Army initiated reviews of the existing IFPC program of record and alternative courses of action [COA] prior to the upcoming milestone B decision. These include the pursuit and integration of an alternate interceptor to the currently proposed AIM-9X interceptor and modifications to the MML, as well as the analysis of at least two other distinct weapons systems. The Committee further notes that section 111 of S. 2987, the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 219, directs the Army to deploy two batteries of an interim, fixed site cruise missile defense capability by September 3, 22, in anticipation of deployment of the Army's IFPC. The Committee supports the Army's pursuit of this defensive capability, however, the Committee is concerned that the current budget request does not support any change in acquisition strategy or procurement of readily available interim defense capabilities. Therefore, the Secretary of the Army is directed to provide a report to the congressional defense committees, not later than 3 days following enactment of this act, which details the results of the Army's internal review, revised acquisition strategy, and resulting resourcing requirements. The report shall also include: (1) analysis and recommendations on the COAs under review; (2) the supporting cost estimates for each of the COAs across the Future Years Defense Program [FYDP]; (3) a program schedule for the selected COA; (4) an analysis and recommendations for interim capabilities and a proposed acquisition schedule; (5) the proposed execution of current IFPC resources by appropriation, budget line, and project across the FYDP; and (6) a plan to resource any identified shortfalls for the selected program of record COA and interim capabilities that will be pursued. \ JOINT STRIKE FIGHTER F-35 Production.-The fiscal year 219 President's budget request includes 77 F-35 Joint Strike Fighters [JSF], 13 fewer than were provided in the Department of Defense Appropriations Act, 218 (Public Law ). The Committee is encouraged that the budget request reflects planned procurement increases in the F- 35C carrier variant for the Navy but is concerned that the Air Force continues to delay its stated goal to procure 6 F-35A variants in a single fiscal year. As a result, the Committee recommends an additional $12,, in advance procurement for the F-35A in order to assist the Air Force in achieving full rate production quantities in fiscal year 22. The Committee also rec-

13 U: \219REPT\2REPT\2REPT.1 13 ommends $796,, for eight additional F-35C aircraft for the Navy and Marine Corps and $412,, for four additional F- 35B aircraft for the Marine Corps. The Committee understands the Under Secretary of Defense (Acquisition and Sustainment) is leading a comprehensive review of reducing the lifecycle costs of the F- 35 program, including the near term unit flyaway costs. Further, the Committee understands that the recent production contract awards, including Lot 9 and 1, have consistently included lower unit flyaway costs than the budgeted amounts. Therefore, the Committee recommends unit cost reductions in fiscal year 218 and 219 that are consistent with the savings negotiated in recent production contracts and the Under Secretary of Defense's (Acquisition and Sustainment) targets for future production contracts. The Department of Defense Appropriations Act, 218 (Public Law ) supported the Department's request for $66,989, in advance procurement for economic order quantities of material and equipment for 27 U.S. F-35 aircraft to be procured in fiscal years 219 and 22. According to Joint Program Office [JPO] estimates, these funds provided in fiscal year 218 would save approximately $1,2,, across U.S. and partner buys in fiscal years 218 through 22, with about half of this savings amount going toward U.S. aircraft buys. A recent analysis by the Director of the Cost Assessment and Program Evaluation [CAPE] concluded that anticipated U.S. savings from this approach would only be $3,,, about half of the prior estimates provided by the JPO. While these savings are still significant, as certified by the Under Secretary of Defense (Acquisition and Sustainment), the Committee is dismayed by the inaccuracy of the initial JPO estimates. Therefore, the F-35 Program Executive Officer is directed to provide a report to the congressional defense committees not later than 3 days after enactment of this act on an updated cost savings estimate on the economic order quantities procurement approach; an execution update on the $66,989, for advance procurement provided in the Department of Defense Appropriations Act, 218 (Public Law ); an analysis of the CAPE estimate of lesser savings, and a plan for how the unrealized savings will be resourced in fiscal years 219 and 22. F---35 Continuous Capability Development and Delivery.-The fiscal year 219 President's budget request includes $983,549, in research, development, test and evaluation for Continuous Capability Development and Delivery [C2D2], previously referred to as Follow-on Modernization, an increase of $395,328, or 67 percent, over amounts enacted in fiscal year 218. The Committee notes that the F-35 C2D2 acquisition strategy is evolving and that its approval has slipped by one year. Further, the previously requested Independent Cost Estimate, system engineering plans, test and evaluation master plan and acquisition program baselines for F-35 Follow-on Modernization elements have not yet been provided to Congress. Finally, the Committee notes that execution plans for fiscal year 218 funding provided for F-35 Follow-on Modernization have changed. Therefore, the Committee recommends adjusting the fiscal year 219 budget request for F-35 C2D2 to reflect actual fiscal year 218 execution. In addition, the Under Secretary of Defense (Acquisition and Sustainment) and F-35 Program Execu-

14 U:\219REPT\2REPT\2REPT.1 14 tive Officer are directed to provide the F-35 C2D2 information previously requested in Senate Report , as soon as practicable. ADVANCED BATTLE MANAGEMENT SYSTEM The fiscal year 219 President's budget request supports the Air Force's new approach to battle management, the Advanced Battle Management System [ABMS]. The Committee understands that the ABMS will be a decentralized network of platforms and sensors that will integrate battlefield surveillance information. The Committee is supportive of the Air Force's new approach given the changing threat environment and need for resilient and survivable networks against near peer competitors. However, the Committee is concerned with the near-term risks in cancelling the Joint Surveillance and Target Attack Radar System [JSTARS] recapitalization program and time required to operationalize these new capabilities. As a result, the Committee fully funds the budget request for ABMS and recommends an additional $375,, to address near-term risks, to include procurement funding for additional MQ-9 Reaper unmanned aerial vehicles and support of the battlefield airborne communications node mission; research, development, test and evaluation funding for radar and agile communications development; and operation and maintenance in the Air National Guard funding to continue to operate and sustain the legacy E-8 JSTARS fleet. Further, the Committee directs the Secretary of the Air Force to submit a report to the congressional defense committees not later than 9 days after enactment of this act on a revised ABMS plan and execution strategy, updated costs and schedules of each activity within the ABMS plan, and a gap and threat assessment of both the ground moving target indicator and battle management command and control mission areas. CNILIAN PAY INCREASE Section 749 of the Senate version of the Financial Services and General Government Appropriations bill (S. 317), as reported on June 21, 218, included a pay increase for civilian Federal employees of 1.9 percent in calendar year 219. The Committee supports this government-wide provision and is evaluating the impact to the Department of Defense. In order to inform this assessment, the Committee directs the Secretary of Defense to provide the estimated cost of a 1.9 percent pay increase for calendar year 219 by appropriation account to the House and Senate Appropriations Committees not later than July 31, 218.

15 U:\219REPT\2REPT\2REPT.2 TITLE I MILITARY PERSONNEL Funds appropriated under this title provide the resources required for basic pay, retired pay accrual, employers' contribution for Social Security taxes, basic allowance for subsistence, basic allowance for housing, special and incentive pays, permanent change of station travel, and other personnel costs for uniformed members of the Armed Forces. The President's fiscal year 219 budget requests a total of $14,689,31, for military personnel appropriations. This request funds an Active component end strength of 1,338,1 and a Reserve component end strength of 817,7. SUMMARY OF COMMl'ITEE ACTION The Committee recommends military personnel appropriations totaling $139,296,521, for fiscal year 219. This 1s $1,392,78, below the budget estimate. Committee recommended military personnel appropriations for fiscal year 219 are summarized below: SUMMARY OF MILITARY PERSONNEL APPROPRIATIONS Account 119 budget estimate Committee Change from recommendation budget estimate Military Personnel, Military Personnel, Army. 43,67,542 43,6,42 Military Personnel, Navy 3,426,211 3,35,481 Military Personnel, Marine Corps 13,89,968 13,799,38 Military Personnel, Air Force... 3,526,11 3,173,691 Reserve Personnel, Reserve Personnel, Army... 4,955,947 4,87,947 Reserve Personnel, Navy. 2,67,521 2,59,521 Reserve Personnel, Marine Corps 788,9 787,9 Reserve Personnel, Air Force 1,894,286 1,871,286 National Guard Personnel, National Guard Personnel, Army.. 8,744,345 8,65,645 National Guard Personnel, Air Force... 3,725,38 3,718,78 Total... 14,689,31 139,296,521-61,5-12,73-91,93-352,32-85, -8, -1, -23, - 93,7-6,6-1,392,78 Committee recommended end strengths summarized below: for fiscal year 219 are RECOMMENDED END STRENGTH budget Committee Change from authorization estimate recommendation budget estimate Active, Army ,5 487,5 485,741-1,759 Navy ,9 335,4 331,9-3,5 Marine Corps , 186,1 186,1 Air Force ,1 329,1 325,72-3,38 Subtotal 1,322,5 1,338,1 1,329,461-8,639 (15)

16 U: \219REPT\2REPT\2REPT.2 16 RECOMMENDED END STRENGTH-Continued budget Committee Change from authorization estimate recommendation budget estimate Selected Reserve, Army Reserve ,5 199,5 199, Navy Reserve , 59,1 59, -1 Marine Corps Reserve ,5 38,5 38,5 Air Force Reserve ,8 7, 69,8-2 Army National Guard ,5 343,5 343,5... Air National Guard. 16,6 17,1 16,6-5 Subtotal.. 816,9 817,7 816,9-8 Total... 2,139,4 2,155,8 2,146,361-9,439 \ \ Committee recommended end strengths for full-time support of the Reserve and Guard for fiscal year 219 are summarized below: RECOMMENDED ACTIVE GUARD AND RESERVE END STRENGTH budget Committee Change from authorization estimate recommendation budget estimate Active Guard and Reserve, Army Reserve. 16,261 16,386 16, Navy Reserve... 1,11 1,11 1,11-9 Marine Corps Reserve. 2,261 2,261 2,261 Air Force Reserve. 3,588 3,849 3, Army National Guard... 3,155 3,595 3, Air National Guard ,26 19,861 19, Total ,626 83,62 81,816-1,246

17 U:\219REPT\2REPT\2REPT.3 REPROGRAMMING 17 GUIDANCE FOR MILITARY PERSONNEL ACCOUNTS The Committee directs the Secretary of Defense to submit the Base for Reprogramming (DD Form 1414) for each of the fiscal year 219 appropriation accounts not later than 6 days after the enactment of this act. The Secretary of Defense is prohibited from executing any reprogramming or transfer of funds for any purpose other than originally appropriated until the aforementioned report is submitted to the House and Senate Appropriations Committees. The Committee directs the Secretary of Defense to use the normal prior approval reprogramming procedures to transfer funds in the services' military personnel accounts between budget activities in excess of $2,,. MILITARY PERSONNEL SPECIAL INTEREST ITEMS s for which additional funds have been provided or have been specifically reduced as shown in the project level tables or in paragraphs using the phrase "only for" or "only to" in this report are congressional special interest items for the purpose of the Base for Reprogramming (DD Form 1414). Each of these items must be carried on the DD Form 1414 at the stated amount as specifically addressed in the Committee report. Below Threshold Reprogrammings may not be used to either restore or reduce funding from congressional special interest items as identified on the DD Form \ \ MILITARY PERSONNEL OVERVIEW Reserve Component Budget Reporting.-The Committee continues its requirement for the Department to provide a semi-annual detailed report to the congressional defense committees showing transfers between subactivities within the military personnel appropriation. Reports shall be submitted not later than 3 days following the end of the second quarter and 3 days following the end of the fiscal year. Advanced Trauma Training Program for National Guard and Reserve.-The Committee recognizes the valuable support universities, hospitals, and other military partners provide by offering civilian-based emergency response trauma training and critical care training including public health, bio-environmental, and biomedical instruction to sustain medics' and medical providers' capabilities of the National Guard Enhanced Response Forces Packages [CERFP], National Guard Homeland Response Forces [NGHRF], the Army Reserve Consequence Management Response Forces [CCMRF] and other National Guard and Reserves medical conversion/readiness requirements. The Committee encourages the National Guard and Reserves to continue pursuing state-of-the-art trauma training with these civilian partners, thus maintaining unit medical readiness postures at optimum levels as military healthcare providers in CERFPs, NGHRFs, and CCMRFs maintain their individual skills to respond effectively to emergency incidents on the homeland. Furthermore, in order to minimize the civilian-military operational gaps in the event of a catastrophic incident, the Committee also encourages the development of enhanced medical and critical care preparedness medical training programs focusing on public health

18 U:\219REPT\2REPT\2REPT.3 18 curriculums and the epidemiology of public health diseases, mass casualty triage, advanced disaster life support, advanced hazardous material life support, emergency dental, and psychological health by increasing civilian-based advanced trauma expertise gained through day-to-day experiences and medical research programs. MILITARY PERSONNEL, ARMY Appropriations, $41,628,855, Budget estimate, ,67,542, Committee recommendation ,6,42, The Committee recommends an appropriation of $43,6,42,. This is $61,5, below the budget estimate. COMMITTEE RECOMMENDED PROGRAM The following table summarizes the budget estimate for this appropriation, the Committee recommendation, and the Committee recommended adjustments to the budget estimate: Line 219 budget Committee Change from estimate recommendation budget estimate MILITARY PERSONNEL, ARMY ACTIVITY I: PAY AND ALLOWANCES OF OFFICERS 5 BASIC PAY _ 1 RETIRED PAY ACCRUAL THRIFT SAVINGS PLAN MATCHING CONTRIBUTIONS _ BASIC ALLOWANCE FOR HOUSING BASIC ALLOWANCE FOR SUBSISTENCE INCENTIVE PAYS _ _ SPECIAL PAYS ALLOWANCES SEPARATION PAY SOCIAL SECURITY TAX 7,224,373 2,192, ,476 2,165, ,464 66,719 44, ,42 99,315 55,784 7,224,373 2,192, ,476 2,165, ,464 66,719 44, ,42 99,315 55,784 TOTAL, BUDGET ACTIVITY 1 _ 13,35,696 ACTIVITY 2: PAY AND ALLOWANCES OF ENLISTED PERSONNEL 6 BASIC PAY RETIRED PAY ACCRUAL THRIFT SAVINGS PLAN MATCHING CONTRIBUTIONS ,825,95 4,197, ,633 8 BASIC ALLOWANCE FOR HOUSING ,782, INCENTIVE PAYS SPECIAL PAYS 95 ALLOWANCES ,4 1,195, ,48 1 SEPARATION PAY , SOCIAL SECURITY TAX ,57,618 TOTAL, BUDGET ACTIVITY ,546,861 ACTIVITY 3: PAY AND ALLOWANCES OF CADETS 11 ACADEMY CADETS ,51 ACTIVITY 4: SUBSISTENCE OF ENLISTED PERSONNEL 115 BASIC ALLOWANCE FOR SUBSISTENCE 12 SUBSISTENCE-IN-KIND 1,264, , FAMILY SUBSISTENCE SUPPLEMENTAL ALLOWANCE TOTAL, BUDGET ACTIVITY ,9,29 ACTIVITY 5: PERMANENT CHANGE OF STATION 125 ACCESSION TRAVEL TRAINING TRAVEL 173, , OPERATIONAL TRAVEL , ROTATIONAL TRAVEL 778,697 13,35, _ 13,825, ,197, ,633 4,782,445 92,4 1,195, ,48 39,174 1,57,618 26,546,861 86,51 1,264,97 636, ,9,29 173, , , ,697

19 U: \219REPT\2REPT\2REPT.3 19 Line 119 budget Committee Change from estimate re corn mendation budget estimate 145 SEPARATION TRAVEL , , TRAVEL OF ORGANIZED UNITS ,939 4, NON-TEMPORARY STORAGE... 3,517 3, TEMPORARY LODGING EXPENSE ,723 37, TOTAL, BUDGET ACTIVITY ,784,544 1,784,544 ACTIVITY 6: OTHER MILITARY PERSONNEL COSTS 17 APPREHENSION OF MILITARY DESERTERS INTEREST ON UNIFORMED SERVICES SAVINGS DEATH GRATUITIES ,4 41, UNEMPLOYMENT BENEFITS... 19,662 19, EDUCATION BENEFITS ADOPTION EXPENSES TRANSPORTATION SUBSIDY ,41 1, PARTIAL DISLOCATION ALLOWANCE RESERVE OFFICERS TRAINING CORPS (ROTC) ,51 16,51 +4, 218 JUNIOROTC ,228 28, TOTAL, BUDGET ACTIVITY , ,16 +4,5 LESS REIMBURSABLES , ,794 UNDISTRIBUTED ADJUSTMENT , -615, TOTAL, ACTIVE FORCES, ARMY... 43,67,542 43,6,42-61,5 TOTAL, MILITARY PERSONNEL, ARMY ,67,542 43,6,42-61,5 COMMITTEE RECOMMENDED The following table details the adjustments Committee: ADJUSTMENTS recommended by the line 119 budget Committee Change from estimate recommendation budget estimate 217 Reserve Officers Training Corps (ROTC) 12,51 16,51 +4, Program increase, ROTC helicopter training program. +4, 218 Junior ROTC... 28,228 28, Program increase. +5 UNDIST Improving funds management: Revised budget estimate , -575, UNDIST Improving funds management: Rate adjustments.. -4, -4, MILITARY PERSONNEL, NA VY Appropriations, $28,772,118, Budget estimate, ,426,211, Committee recommendation... 3,35,481, The Committee recommends an appropriation of $3,35,481,. This is $12,73, below the budget estimate. COMMITTEE RECOMMENDED PROGRAM The following table summarizes the budget estimate for this appropriation, the Committee recommendation, and the Committee recommended adjustments to the budget estimate:

20 U: \219REPT\2REPT\2REPT.3 2 Line 219 budget Committee Change from estimate recommendation budget estimate MILITARY PERSONNEL, NAVY ACTIVITY L PAY AND ALLOWANCES OF OFFICERS 5 BASIC PAY.. 1 RETIRED PAY ACCRUAL THRIFT SAVINGS PLAN MATCHING CONTRIBUTIONS BASIC ALLOWANCE FOR HOUSING... 3 BASIC ALLOWANCE FOR SUBSISTENCE INCENTIVE PAYS... 4 SPECIAL PAYS. 45 ALLOWANCES SEPARATION PAY.. 55 SOCIAL SECURITY TAX... TOTAL, BUDGET ACTIVITY I... ACTIVITY 2: PAY AND ALLOWANCES OF ENLISTED PERSONNEL 6 BASIC PAY RETIRED PAY ACCRUAL.. 66 THRIFT SAVINGS PLAN MATCHING CONTRIBUTIONS... 8 BASIC ALLOWANCE FOR HOUSING INCENTIVE PAYS SPECIAL PAYS ALLOWANCES... 1 SEPARATION PAY SOCIAL SECURITY TAX.... TOTAL, BUDGET ACTIVITY 2... ACTIVITY 3: PAY AND ALLOWANCES OF MIDSHIPMEN 11 MIDSHIPMEN... ACTIVITY 4: SUBSISTENCE OF ENLISTED PERSONNEL 115 BASIC ALLOWANCE FOR SUBSISTENCE SUBSISTENCE-IN---KIND FAMILY SUBSISTENCE SUPPLEMENTAL ALLOWANCE... TOTAL, BUDGET ACTIVITY 4. ACTIVITY 5: PERMANENT CHANGE OF STATION 125 ACCESSION TRAVEL TRAINING TRAVEL OPERATIONAL TRAVEL. 14 ROTATIONAL TRAVEL SEPARATION TRAVEL TRAVEL OF ORGANIZED UNITS NON---TEMPORARY STORAGE TEMPORARY LODGING EXPENSE.... TOTAL, BUDGET ACTIVITY 5. ACTIVITY 6: OTHER MILITARY PERSONNEL COSTS 17 APPREHENSION OF MILITARY DESERTERS. 175 INTEREST ON UNIFORMED SERVICES SAVINGS DEATH GRATUITIES UNEMPLOYMENT BENEFITS EDUCATION BENEFITS. 2 ADOPTION EXPENSES. 21 TRANSPORTATION SUBSIDY PARTIAL DISLOCATION ALLOWANCE RESERVE OFFICERS TRAINING CORPS (ROTC}. 218 JUNIOROTC ,382,346 1,331,184 83,235 1,531, , ,53 46,487 12,78 41, ,535 8,617,145 9,647,68 2,933,11 182,26 4,48,75 13, , , , ,1 19,777,426 83, , , ,239,917 98,373 89, , ,813 19,21 3,763 13,156 15, , ,22 21,3 58,148 12, , ,32 14,961 4,382,346 1, ,235 1,531, , ,53 46,487 12,78 41, ,535 8,617,145 9,647,68 2,933,11 182, ,48,75 13, , , , ,1 19,777,426 83, , , ,239,917 98,373 89, , ,813 19,21 3,763 13, , , ,22 21,3 58,148 12, , ,32 15, TOTAL, BUDGET ACTIVITY ,13 133,4 +27 LESS REIMBURSABLES , ,631

21 U: \219REPT\2REPT\2REPT.3 21 Line 219 budget Committee Change from estimate recommendation budget estimate UNDISTRIBUTED ADJUSTMENT , -121, TOTAL, ACTIVE FORCES, NAVY ,426,211 3,35,481-12,73 TOTAL, MILITARY PERSONNEL, NAVY.... 3,426,211 3,35,481-12,73 COMMI'ITEE RECOMMENDED ADJUSTMENTS The following table details the adjustments Committee: recommended by the line 219 budget Committee Change from estimate recommendation budget estimate 218 Junior ROTC... 14,961 15, Program increase. +27 UNDIST Improving funds management: Rate adjustments -26, -26, UNDIST Improving funds management: Revised budget estimate , -95, MILITARY PERSONNEL, MARINE CORPS Appropriations, $13,231,114, Budget estimate, ,89,968, Committee recommendation... 13,799,38, The Committee recommends an appropriation of $13,799,38,. This is $91,93, below the budget estimate. COMMITTEE RECOMMENDED PROGRAM The following table summarizes the budget estimate for this appropriation, the Committee recommendation, and the Committee recommended adjustments to the budget estimate: line 219 budget Committee Change from estimate recommendation budget estimate MILITARY PERSONNEL, MARINE CORPS ACTIVITY l: PAY AND ALLOWANCES OF OFFICERS 5 BASIC PAY.. 1 RETIRED PAY ACCRUAL THRIFT SAVINGS PLAN MATCHING CONTRIBUTIONS 25 BASIC ALLOWANCE FOR HOUSING. 3 BASIC ALLOWANCE FOR SUBSISTENCE. 35 INCENTIVE PAYS. 4 SPECIAL PAYS ALLOWANCES. 5 SEPARATION PAY SOCIAL SECURITY TAX TOTAL, BUDGET ACTIVITY 1. ACTIVITY 2: PAY AND ALLOWANCES OF ENLISTED PERSONNEL 6 BASIC PAY RETIRED PAY ACCRUAL. 66 THRIFT SAVINGS PLAN MATCHING CONTRIBUTIONS... 8 BASIC ALLOWANCE FOR HOUSING 85 INCENTIVE PAYS... 9 SPECIAL PAYS 95 ALLOWANCES 1,641,181 1,641, ,24 498,24 31,369 31, , ,247 67,428 67,428 46,34 46,34 3,891 3,891 46,28 46,28 17,19 17,19 125,91 125, ,22,672 3,22,672 5,196,233 5,196,233 1,574,75 1,574,75 97,777 97, ,658,129 1,658, , ,171 34,996 34,996

22 U:\219REPT\2REPT\2REPT.3 22 Lme,J" budget t:stimate Committee Change from recommendation budget estimate 1 SEPARATION PAY 15 SOCIAL SECURITY TAX _ 97, ,969 97, , TOTAL, BUDGET ACTIVITY 2 _ 9,533,542 9,533,542 ACTIVITY 4, SUBSISTENCE OF ENLISTED PERSONNEL 115 BASIC ALLOWANCE FOR SUBSISTENCE 12 SUBSISTENCE-IN-KIND FAMILY SUBSISTENCE SUPPLEMENTAL ALLOWANCE 444,lll 41, ,111 41,72 1 TOTAL, BUDGET ACTIVITY ACTIVITY 5, PERMANENT CHANGE OF STATION 125 ACCESSION TRAVEL TRAINING TRAVEL OPERATIONAL TRAVEL ROTATIONAL TRAVEL _ 145 SEPARATION TRAVEL _ 15 TRAVEL OF ORGANIZED UNITS _ 155 NON-TEMPORARY STORAGE 16 TEMPORARY LODGING EXPENSE _ 165 OTHER TOTAL, BUDGET ACTIVITY 5 _ ACTIVITY 6, OTHER MILITARY PERSONNEL COSTS 17 APPREHENSION OF MILITARY DESERTERS INTEREST ON UNIFORMED SERVICES SAVINGS 18 DEATH GRATUITIES _ 185 UNEMPLOYMENT BENEFITS 195 EDUCATION BENEFITS 2 ADOPTION EXPENSES _ 21 TRANSPORTATION SUBSIDY _ 215 PARTIAL DISLOCATION ALLOWANCE _ JUNIOROTC ,841 48,992 16,56 166,94 11,869 87, ,73 5,743 2,14 448, ,1 37,114 4, , ,79 854, ,992 16,56 166,94 11,869 87, ,73 5,743 2,14 448, ,1 37,114 4, , , TOTAL, BUDGET ACTIVITY 6 _ 6,557 6, LESS REIMBURSABLES UNDISTRIBUTED ADJUSTMENT ,956-28,956-92, -92, TOTAL, ACTIVE FORCES, MARINE CORPS _ 13,89,968 13,799,38-91,93 TOTAL, MILITARY PERSONNEL, MARINE CORPS 13,89,968 13,799,38-91,93 COMMITIEE RECOMMENDED ADJUSTMENTS The following table details the adjustments recommended by the Committee: Lme 119 budget Committee Change from estimate recommendatton budget estimate 218 Junior ROTC 3,79 3, Program increase +7 UNDIST Improving funds management Rate adjustments -17, -17, UNDIST Improving funds management: Revised budget estimate _ - 75, - 75, MILITARY PERSONNEL, AIR FORCE Appropriations, $28,79,44, Budget estimate, ,526,11, Committee recommendation... 3,173,691,

23 U: \219REPT\2REPT\2REPT.3 23 The Committee recommends an appropriation of $3,173,691,. This is $352,32, below the budget estimate. COMMITTEE RECOMMENDED PROGRAM The following table summarizes the budget estimate for this appropriation, the Committee recommendation, and the Committee recommended adjustments to the budget estimate: Line 219 budget Committee Change from estimate recommendation Dudget estimate MILITARY PERSONNEL, AIR FORCE ACTIVITY!: PAY AND ALLOWANCES OF OFFICERS 5 BASIC PAY 5,28,253 5,28,253 1 RETIRED PAY ACCRUAL 1,571,933 1,571, THRIFT SAVINGS PLAN MATCHING CONTRIBUTIONS ,63 97,63 25 BASIC ALLOWANCE FOR HOUSING _ 1,573,578 1,573,578 3 BASIC ALLOWANCE FOR SUBSISTENCE _ 22,971 22, INCENTIVE PAYS _ 284, ,437 4 SPECIAL PAYS 368, , ALLOWANCES 12,547 12,547 5 SEPARATION PAY 46,11 46,11 55 SOCIAL SECURITY TAX _ 397,82 397,82 TOTAL, BUDGET ACTIVITY 1 _ 9,871,45 9,871,45 ACTIVITY 2: PAY AND ALLOWANCES OF ENLISTED PERSONNEL 6 BASIC PAY ,61,883 9,61, RETIRED PAY ACCRUAL 2,99,736 2,99, THRIFT SAVINGS PLAN MATCHING CONTRIBUTIONS _ 179, ,662 8 BASIC ALLOWANCE FOR HOUSING 3,882,466 3,882, INCENTIVE PAYS 71,294 71,294 9 SPECIAL PAYS 492, , ALLOWANCES 559,12 559,12 1 SEPARATION PAY 121,17 121,17 15 SOCIAL SECURITY TAX 734, ,544 TOTAL, BUDGET ACTIVITY 2 18,552,69 18,552,69 ACTIVITY 3: PAY AND ALLOWANCES OF CADETS 11 ACADEMY CADETS _ 79,454 79,454 ACTIVITY 4: SUBSISTENCE OF ENLISTED PERSONNEL 115 BASIC ALLOWANCE FOR SUBSISTENCE ,4,89 1,4,89 12 SUBSISTENCE-IN-KIND 146,69 146, FAMILY SUBSISTENCE SUPPLEMENTAL ALLOWANCE 6 6 TOTAL, BUDGET ACTIVITY ,187,424 1,187,424 ACTIVITY 5: PERMANENT CHANGE OF STATION 125 ACCESSION TRAVEL ,161 12, TRAINING TRAVEL... 7,36 7, OPERATIONAL TRAVEL , , ROTATIONAL TRAVEL _ 516,29 516, SEPARATION TRAVEL _ 162, , TRAVEL OF ORGANIZED UNITS 9,752 9, NON-TEMPORARY STORAGE ,3 28,3 16 TEMPORARY LODGING EXPENSE _ 34,442 34,442 TOTAL, BUDGET ACTIVITY 5 1,23,38 1,23,38 ACTIVITY 6: OTHER MILITARY PERSONNEL COSTS 17 APPREHENSION OF MILITARY DESERTERS _ INTEREST ON UNIFORMED SERVICES SAVINGS - 2,282 2, DEATH GRATUITIES 15, 15, 185 UNEMPLOYMENT BENEFITS _ 23,49 23, EDUCATION BENEFITS

24 V: \219REPT\2REPT\2REPT.3 24 line 219 budget Committee Change from estimate recommendation budget estimate 2 ADOPTION EXPENSES TRANSPORTATION SUBSIDY.. 3,61 3, PARTIAL DISLOCATION ALLOWANCE RESERVE OFFICERS TRAINING CORPS (ROTC) 47,328 47, JUNIOROTC 18,825 19, TOTAL, BUDGET ACTIVITY ,3 111, LESS REIMBURSABLES , , UNDISTRIBUTED ADJUSTMENT -376, -376, TRANSFER FROM O&M. AF ,3 + 23,3 TOTAL, ACTIVE FORCES, AIR FORCE 3,526,11 3,173, ,32 TOTAL, MILITARY PERSONNEL, AIR FORCE. 3,526,11 3,173, ,32 COMMITTEE RECOMMENDED ADJUSTMENTS The following table details the adjustments recommended by the Committee: line 219 budget Committee Change from estimate recommendation budget estimate 218 Junior ROTC. 18,825 19, Program increase UN DIST Improving funds management, Rate adjustments -26, -26, UN DIST Improving funds management: Revised budget estimate , -35, UN DIST Transfer, From Air Force-identified asset in Operation and Maintenance, Air Force SAG llc to be used for fiscal year 219 costs associated with the transition to the Operational Camouflage Pattern (OCP) uniform at the request of the Air Force. 23,3 + 23,3

25 U: \219REPT\2REPT\2REPT.4 25 RESERVE PERSONNEL, ARMY Appropriations, $4,715,68, Budget estimate, ,955,947, Committee recommendation... 4,87,947, The Committee recommends an appropriation of $4,87,947,. This is $85,, below the budget estimate. COMMITTEE RECOMMENDED PROGRAM The following table summarizes the budget estimate for this appropriation, the Committee recommendation, and the Committee recommended adjustments to the budget estimate: Line 119 budget Committee Change from estimate recommendation budget estimate RESERVE PERSONNEL, ARMY ACTIVITY l: RESERVE COMPONENT TRAINING AND SUPPORT 1 PAY GROUP A TRAINING (15 DAYS & DRILLS 24/48) 1,624,216 1,624,216 2 PAY GROUP B TRAINING (BACKFILL FOR ACTIVE DUTY)... 42,354 42,354 3 PAY GROUP F TRAINING (RECRUITS) , ,561 4 PAY GROUP TRAINING (PIPELINE RECRUITS)... 9,658 9,658 6 MOBILIZATION TRAINING... 1,121 1, SCHOOL TRAINING , , SPECIAL TRAINING 39,74 39, ADMINISTRATION AND SUPPORT ,39,323 2,39, THRIFT SAVINGS PLAN MATCHING CONTRIBUTIONS 35,494 35, EDUCATION BENEFITS... 24, HEAL TH PROFESSION SCHOLARSHIP... 64,225 24, , OTHER PROGRAMS (ADMIN& SUPPORT)... 56,33 56,33 TOTAL, BUDGET ACTIVITY ,955,947 4,955,947 UNDISTRIBUTED ADJUSTMENT , -85, TOTAL RESERVE PERSONNEL, ARMY... 4,955,947 4,87,947-85, COMMITTEE RECOMMENDED ADJUSTMENTS The following table details the adjustments Committee: recommended by the Line 119 budget Committee Change from estimate recommendation budget estimate UNDIST Improving funds management Rate adjustments. -3, -3, UNDIST Improving funds management: Revised budget estimate , -82, RESERVE PERSONNEL, NAVY Appropriations, $1,988,362, Budget estimate, ,67,521, Committee recommendation.... 2,59,521, The Committee recommends an appropriation of $2,59,521,. This is $8,, below the budget estimate.

26 U: \219REPT\2REPT\2REPT.4 26 COMMITTEE RECOMMENDED PROGRAM The following table summarizes the budget estimate for this appropriation, the Committee recommendation, and the Committee recommended adjustments to the budget estimate: Line 219 budget Committee Change from estimate recommendation budget estimate RESERVE PERSONNEL, NAVY ACTIVITY L RESERVE COMPONENT TRAINING AND SUPPORT 1 PAY GROUP A TRAINING (15 DAYS & DRILLS 24/48). 698,48 698,48 2 PAY GROUP B TRAINING (BACKFILL FOR ACTIVE DUTY). 8,364 8,364 3 PAY GROUP F TRAINING (RECRUITS)... 62,628 62, MOBILIZATION TRAINING 11,535 11,535 7 SCHOOL TRAINING ,12 55, SPECIAL TRAINING... 19,433 19, ADMINISTRATION AND SUPPORT ,52,934 1,52, THRIFT SAVINGS PLAN MATCHING CONTRIBUTIONS... 14,11 14,11 1 EDUCATION BENEFITS HEALTH PROFESSION SCHOLARSHIP... 55,46 55, TOTAL, BUDGET ACTIVITY ,67,521 2,67,521 UNDISTRIBUTED ADJUSTMENT , -8, TOTAL, RESERVE PERSONNEL, NAVY 2,67,521 2,59,521-8, COMMITTEE RECOMMENDED The following table details the adjustments Committee: line ADJUSTMENTS recommended by the 219 budget Committee Change from estimate recommendation budget estimate UN DIST Improving funds management: Rate adjustments -1, -1, UNDIST Improving funds management: Revised budget. estimate , - 7, RESERVE PERSONNEL, MARINE CORPS Appropriations, ,... $764,93, Budget estimate, ,9, Committee recommendation ,9, The Committee recommends an appropriation of $787,9,. This is $1,, below the budget estimate. COMMITTEE RECOMMENDED PROGRAM The following table summarizes the budget estimate for this appropriation, the Committee recommendation, and the Committee recommended adjustments to the budget estimate: Line 219 budget Committee Change from estimate recommendation budget estimate RESERVE PERSONNEL, MARINE CORPS ACTIVITY l: RESERVE COMPONENT TRAINING AND SUPPORT 1 PAY GROUP A TRAINING (15 DAYS & DRILLS 24/48). 284, ,427 2 PAY GROUP B TRAINING (BACKFILL FOR ACTIVE DUTY). 44,91 44,91

27 U:\219REPT\2REPT\2REPT.4 27 Line 219 budget Committee Change from estimate recommendation budget estimate 3 PAY GROUP F TRAINING (RECRUITS) 124, ,573 6 MOBILIZATION TRAINING.. 1,347 1,347 7 SCHOOL TRAINING 26,89 26,89 8 SPECIAL TRAINING. 42,78 42,78 9 ADMINISTRATION AND SUPPORT 244,54 244,54 94 THRIFT SAVINGS PLAN MATCHING CONTRIBUTIONS 4,776 4, PLATOON LEADER CLASS. 9,364 9,364 1 EDUCATION BENEFITS... 6,139 6,139 TOTAL, BUDGET ACTIVITY 1 788,9 788,9 UNDISTRIBUTED ADJUSTMENT... -1, -1, TOTAL, RESERVE PERSONNEL, MARINE CORPS. 788,9 787,9-1, COMMITTEE RECOMMENDED ADJUSTMENTS The following table details the adjustments recommended by the Committee: Line 219 budget Committee Change from estimate recommendation budget estimate UNDIST Improving funds management Rate adjustments... -1, -1,

28 U: \219REPT\2REPT\2REPT.5 28 RESERVE PERSONNEL, AIR FORCE Appropriations, Budget estimate, Committee recommendation.... $1,82,554, 1,894,286, 1,871,286, The Committee recommends an appropriation of $1,871,286,. This is $23,, below the budget estimate. COMMITTEE RECOMMENDED PROGRAM The following table summarizes the budget estimate for this appropriation, the Committee recommendation, and the Committee recommended adjustments to the budget estimate: fin thousands of dollars] line 219 budget Committee Change from estimate recommendation budget estimate RESERVE PERSONNEL, AIR FORCE ACTIVITY I: RESERVE COMPONENT TRAINING AND SUPPORT 1 PAY GROUP A TRAINING (15 DAYS & DRILLS 24/48)... 7,565 7,565 2 PAY GROUP B TRAINING (BACKFILL FOR ACTIVE DUTY). 1,488 1,488 3 PAY GROUP F TRAINING (RECRUITS)... 53,181 53,181 4 PAY GROUP TRAINING (PIPELINE RECRUITS).... 3,11 3,11 6 MOBILIZATION TRAINING SCHOOL TRAINING , ,919 8 SPECIAL TRAINING ,65 279,65 9 ADMINISTRATION AND SUPPORT , , THRIFT SAVINGS PLAN MATCHING CONTRIBUTIONS... 9,755 9,755 1 EDUCATION BENEFITS ,553 14, HEALTH PROFESSION SCHOLARSHIP... 57,363 57, OTHER PROGRAMS (ADMIN& SUPPORT). 3,113 3,113 TOTAL, BUDGET ACTIVITY I. 1,894,286 1,894,286 UNDISTRIBUTED ADJUSTMENT , TOTAL, RESERVE PERSONNEL, AIR FORCE. 1,894,286 1,871,286-23, COMMITTEE RECOMMENDED The following table details the adjustments Committee: ADJUSTMENTS recommended by the Line 219 budget Committee Chang from estimate recommendation budget estimate UNDIST Improving funds management Rate adjustments , -1, UN DIST Improving funds management: Revised budget estimate , -22, NATIONAL GUARD PERSONNEL, ARMY Appropriations, $8,264,626, Budget estimate, ,744,345, Committee recommendation ,65,645, The Committee recommends an appropriation of $8,65,645,. This is $93,7, below the budget estimate.

29 U: \219REPT\2REPT\2REPT.5 29 COMMITTEE RECOMMENDED PROGRAM The following table summarizes the budget estimate for this appropriation, the Committee recommendation, and the Committee recommended adjustments to the budget estimate: line NATIONAL GUARD PERSONNEL, ARMY 219 budget Committee Change from estimate recommendation budget estimate ACTIVITY l: RESERVE COMPONENT TRAINING AND SUPPORT 1 PAY GROUP A TRAINING (15 DAYS & DRILLS 24/48) 2,85,51 2,85,51 3 PAY GROUP F TRAINING (RECRUITS). 575,31 575,31 4 PAY GROUP TRAINING (PIPELINE RECRUITS). 43,618 43,618 7 SCHOOL TRAINING.. 554, ,644 8 SPECIAL TRAINING ,97 698,697 +3,6 9 ADMINISTRATION AND SUPPORT... 3,925,593 3,925, THRIFT SAVINGS PLAN MATCHING CONTRIBUTIONS ,53 55, EDUCATION BENEFITS... 89,52 89,52... TOTAL, BUDGET ACTIVITY I ,744,345 8,747, ,6 UNDISTRIBUTED ADJUSTMENT ,5-99,5 TRAUMA TRAINING... 1,2 + 1,2 WILDFIRE TRAINING... 1, + 1, TOTAL, NATIONAL GUARD PERSONNEL, ARMY.... 8,744,345 8,65,645-93,7 COMMITTEE RECOMMENDED The following table details the adjustments Committee: ADJUSTMENTS recommended by the line 219 budget Committee Change from estimate recommendation budget estimate 8 Special Training ,97 698,697 +3,6 Program increase: State Partnership Program ,6 UNDIST Improving funds management: Rate adjustments.. - 7, - 7, UNDIST Improving funds management: Revised budget estimate ,5-92,5 UNDIST Program increase: Advanced trauma training program... 1,2 + 1,2 UNDIST Program increase: National Guard wildfire training , + 1, National Guard Cyber Protection Teams.-The Army National Guard currently has 11 Cyber Protection Teams [CPT] with a plan to reach Full Operational Capability by fiscal year 222. The Committee recognizes the National Guard's unique authority to provide cyberspace operations support to State and local agencies for domestic operations, supports additional CPTs and encourages the Army to investigate the viability of a CPT in each State's Guard. NATIONAL GUARD PERSONNEL, AIR FORCE Appropriations, $3,48,817, Budget estimate, ,725,38, Committee recommendation... 3,718,78, The Committee recommends an appropriation of $3,718,78,. This is $6,6, below the budget estimate. \

30 U: \219REPT\2REPT\2REPT.5 3 COMMITTEE RECOMMENDED PROGRAM The following table summarizes the budget estimate for this appropriation, the Committee recommendation, and the Committee recommended adjustments to the budget estimate: line NATIONAL GUARD PERSONNEL, AIR FORCE 219 budget Committee Change from estimate recommendation budget estimate ACTIVITY L RESERVE COMPONENT TRAINING AND SUPPORT 1 PAY GROUP A TRAINING (15 DAYS & DRILLS 24/48).. 989, ,368 3 PAY GROUP F TRAINING (RECRUITS)... 85,771 85, PAY GROUP TRAINING (PIPELINE RECRUITS).... 8,113 8,113 7 SCHOOL TRAINING , ,293 8 SPECIAL TRAINING , ,11 + 3,6 9 ADMINISTRATION AND SUPPORT 2,99,45 2,99,45 94 THRIFT SAVINGS PLAN MATCHING CONTRIBUTIONS 25,177 25, EDUCATION BENEFITS... 16,22 16,22 \ \ TOTAL, BUDGET ACTIVITY 1 3,725,38 3,728,98 + 3,6 UNDISTRIBUTED ADJUSTMENT , -12, TRAUMA TRAINING 1,8 + 1,8 TOTAL, NATIONAL GUARD PERSONNEL, AIR FORCE... 3,725,38 3,718,78-6,6 COMMITTEE RECOMMENDED The following table details the adjustments Committee: ADJUSTMENTS recommended by the line 219 budget Committee Change from estimate recommendation budget estimate 8 Special Training ,411 Program increase: Stale Partnership Program ,11 + 3,6 + 3,6 UNDIST Improving funds management: Rate adjustments , -2, UNDIST Improving funds management: Revised budget estimate.. -1, -1, UN DIST Program increase: Advanced trauma training program 1,8 + 1,8

31 U: \219REPT\2REPT\2REPT.6 TITLE II OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE Funds appropriated under this title provide the resources required to prepare for and conduct combat operations and other peace time missions. These funds are used to purchase fuel and spare parts for training operations, pay supporting civilian personnel, and purchase supplies, equipment, and service contracts for the repair of weapons and facilities. The President's fiscal year 219 budget requests a total of $199,469,636, for operation and maintenance appropriations. SUMMARY OF COMMI'ITEE ACTION The Committee recommends operation and maintenance appropriations totaling $193,982,413, for fiscal year 219. This is $5,487,223, below the budget estimate. Committee recommended operation and maintenance appropriations for fiscal year 219 are summarized below: SUMMARY OF OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE APPROPRIATIONS Account 219 budget Committee Change from estimate recommendation budget estimate \ Operation and Maintenance: Operation and Maintenance, Army... 42,9,317 4,634,715 Operation and Maintenance, Navy... 49,3,633 47,296,183 Operation and Maintenance, Marine Corps... 6,832,51 6,372, Operation and Maintenance, Air Force ,6,568 4,775,374 Operation and Maintenance, Defense-Wide... 36,352,625 35,662,783 Operation and Maintenance, Army Reserve... 2,916,99 2,854,99 Operation and Maintenance, Navy Reserve... 1,27,6 1,18,6 Operation and Maintenance, Marine Corps Reserve ,57 271,57 Operation and Maintenance, Air Force Reserve.... 3,26,234 3,247,534 Operation and Maintenance, Army National Guard... 7,399,295 7,261,295 Operation and Maintenance, Air National Guard... 6,427,622 6,433,697 United States Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces... 14,662 14,662 Environmental Restoration, Army... 23, ,449 Environmental Restoration, Navy , ,253 Environmental Restoration, Air Force ,88 365,88 Environmental Restoration, Defense-Wide... 8,926 8,926 Environmental Restoration, Formerly Used Defense Sites , ,346 Overseas Humanitarian, Disaster, and Civic Aid... 17,663 17,663 Cooperative Threat Reduction Account ,24 335,24 Department of Defense Acquisition Workforce Development Fund.. 4, 552, -1,374,62-1,77,45-46,51-1,285, ,842-62, -9, -12,7-138, +6,75 +25, , , Total ,469, ,982,413-5,487,223 REPROGRAMMING GUIDANCE FOR OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE ACCOUNTS The Committee directs the Secretary of Defense to submit the Base for Reprogramming (DD Form 1414) for each of the fiscal year 219 appropriation accounts not later than 6 days after the enactment of this act. The Secretary of Defense is prohibited from executing any reprogramming or transfer of funds for any purpose other than originally appropriated until the aforementioned report is submitted to the House and Senate Appropriations Committees. (31)

32 U: \219REPT\2REPT\2REPT.6 The Committee directs the Secretary of Defense to use the normal prior approval reprogramming procedures to transfer funds in the services' operation and maintenance accounts between -1 budget activities, or between subactivity groups in the case of Operation and Maintenance, Defense-Wide, in excess of $2,,. The Committee maintains the reprogramming rules established in the Department of Defense Appropriations Act, 218 (Public Law ) for transferring funding out of readiness subactivity groups, which are defined as follows: Army: Maneuver units Modular support brigades Land forces operations support Aviation assets Force readiness operations support Land forces depot maintenance Base operations support Facilities sustainment, restoration and modernization Specialized skill training Navy: Mission and other flight operations Fleet air training Aircraft depot maintenance Mission and other ship operations Ship depot maintenance Facilities sustainment, restoration and modernization Marine Corps: Operational forces Field logistics Depot maintenance Facilities sustainment, restoration and modernization Air Force: Primary combat forces Combat enhancement forces Depot purchase equipment maintenance Facilities sustainment, restoration and modernization Contractor logistics support and system support Flying hour program Air Force Reserve: Primary combat forces Air National Guard: Aircraft operations During fiscal year 219, the Committee directs the Service Secretaries to submit written notification to the congressional defense committees not later than 3 days prior to implementing transfers in excess of $2,, out of any readiness sub-activity if the funds will be transferred into another readiness sub-activity. However, if funding is transferred out of any readiness sub-activity into a non-readiness sub-activity, the Secretary of Defense is directed to use normal prior approval reprogramming procedures. The Committee further directs the Service Secretaries to include an enclosure with each written notification that includes increases and decreases by sub-activity group, a detailed justification explaining why the sources of funding are available and why the in- 32

33 U:\219REPT\2REPT\2REPT.6 33 creases are necessary, and an explanation of the impact on resources included in the fiscal year 22 budget request for each increase and decrease. All transfers may be implemented 3 days after congressional notification unless an objection is received from one of the congressional defense committees. Additionally, the Committee directs the Secretary of Defense to use normal prior approval reprogramming procedures when implementing transfers in excess of $2,, into the following budget sub-activities: Operation and Maintenance, Army: Recruiting and advertising Operation and Maintenance, Army National Guard: Other personnel support/recruiting and advertising OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE BUDGET EXECUTION DATA The Committee directs the Secretary of Defense to continue to provide the congressional defense committees with quarterly budget execution data. Such data should be provided not later than 45 days after the close of each quarter of the fiscal year, and should be provided for each -1 budget activity, activity group, and subactivity group for each of the active, defense-wide, reserve, and National Guard components. For each -1 budget activity, activity group, and sub-activity group, these reports should include the budget request and actual obligation amount, the distribution of unallocated congressional adjustments to the budget request, all adjustments made by the Department in establishing the Base for Reprogramming (DD Form 1414) report, all adjustments resulting from below threshold reprogrammings, and all adjustments resulting from prior approval reprogramming requests. OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE SPECIAL INTEREST ITEMS s for which additional funds have been provided or have been specifically reduced as shown in the project level tables or in paragraphs using the phrase "only for" or "only to" in the Committee report are congressional special interest items for the purpose of the Base for Reprogramming (DD Form 1414). Each of these items must be carried on the DD Form 1414 at the stated amount as specifically addressed in the Committee report. Below Threshold Reprogrammings may not be used to either restore or reduce funding from congressional special interest items as identified on the DD Form OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE OVERVIEW Civilian Workforce.-The Committee expects the Department of Defense to maintain a stable, effective, right-sized civilian cadre. The Committee further expects the hiring process to be responsive and efficient in order to build the workforce needed to achieve its mission and strategic goals. The Committee recognizes the critical role that the civilian workforce plays every day in ensuring the mission success of the Armed Forces. Contract Services Spending.-The Committee is concerned that the Department of Defense does not have adequate policies, procedures, and controls in place to enforce limitations on the annual

34 U:\219REPT\2REPT\2REPT.6 34 amounts expended on contracted services. There is further concern that not all contracted services are being subjected to spending limitations because of the exclusion of contracted services involving Economy Act transfers between and within Department of Defense components. Additionally, because of the disparity between the levels of contracted services captured in the Inventory of Contracts for Services, required under section 233a of title 1, United States Code, and what the Department budgets for contracted services, it appears as though the Department does not deliberately plan for most contracted services. The Committee urges the Under Secretary of Defense (Comptroller) to review the efforts of the financial management and acquisition communities to implement effective control mechanisms for contracted services spending. Tobacco Use in the Military.-Tobacco use is the leading cause of preventable death in the United States, with more than 48, deaths attributable to cigarette smoking each year. The Department of Defense has affirmed the goal of a tobacco-free military, and has implemented a range of programs including public education campaigns, the banning of all tobacco use during basic training, and the prohibition of tobacco use by instructors in the presence of students. The Committee supports the Secretary of Defense's Policy Memorandum 16-1 from April 8, 216, directing the military services "to ensure a comprehensive tobacco policy that assists with preventing initiation of tobacco use, helping those who want to quit using tobacco succeed, and decreasing exposure to second-hand smoke for all our people." As a result, the Committee retains a provision from the Department of Defense Appropriations Act, 218 (Public Law ) directing the elimination of the price subsidy provided to tobacco products at military exchanges. Voluntary Military Education Programs-Enforcing Memorandum of Understanding.-The Committee supports the Department of Defense's commitment to enforcing the terms of the current Memorandum of Understanding [MOU] with all educational institutions providing educational programs through the Department of Defense tuition assistance program. The Committee is also supportive of the Department's efforts to increase participating institutions' understanding of their contractual obligations as MOU signatories and the procedures for enforcement as outlined in Department of Defense Instruction [DODI] The Committee urges the Department to maintain vigorous defense of these responsibilities in order to protect the integrity and quality of voluntary military education programs. Demonstration Project for Contractors Employing Persons with Disabilities.-The Committee encourages the Secretary of Defense to pursue a demonstration project for contractors employing persons with disabilities. The demonstration project is modeled after the Small Business Administration's Set Aside program, but uniquely includes an incentive for Federal contracting entities to hire people with disabilities who currently receive Social Security benefits. Such a demonstration project provides opportunities for severely disabled individuals to become gainfully employed taxpayers. Transfer of Veterans Memorial Objects to Foreign Governments. The Committee directs that the use of any funds appropriated in

35 U: \219REPT\2REPT\2REPT.6 35 \ this act to carry out authorities under section 2864 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 218 be subject to normal reprogramming procedures. Reporting Requirement on Suppliers from Bangladesh.-The annual report directed by the Department of Defense Appropriations Act, 215 regarding factories in Bangladesh that produce items sold in the commissary and exchange systems is no longer required after fiscal year 218. Drinking Water Contamination.-The Committee remains concerned about the health implications of contaminated drinking water due to perfluorinated chemicals [PFCs]. The Committee worked with the military services to assess unfunded executable requirements in fiscal year 219 due to issues associated PFCs and provided additional funding accordingly. The Committee intends to aggressively follow up with the services on procedures for timely remediation and community notification. Additionally, the Committee encourages the Secretary of Defense to evaluate the efficacy and cost-effectiveness of available remediation technologies for the removal of PFCs and other chemical contaminants from ground water and drinking water, to include granulated activated carbon systems which have already been installed at current and former Department of Defense installations. Boards for Correction of Military Records.-The Air Force Review Board Agency, Army Review Boards Agency, and the Board of Naval Corrections play a decisive role ensuring that military personnel enjoy fair, just, and equitable decisions as it pertains to their service records and benefits. However, the Committee is concerned that the Boards have failed to modernize personnel, processes, and infrastructure at the pace required for demonstrated increases in the volume and complexity of its caseloads. As a result, the Boards are significantly under-resourced. The Committee also notes that none of the Boards have current, validated needs assessments for personnel, information technology, and operations, which are critical to the budget process. The Committee has not yet received the report directed by the Department of Defense Appropriations Act, 218, and awaits receipt of the service Secretaries' plans to address these resourcing issues. Excess Department of Defense Property.-The Department of Defense's 133 program, which transfers surplus equipment to Federal, State, local, tribal and territorial law enforcement agencies, can provide substantial support for law enforcement activities. The Committee notes that current law requires consultation between the Secretary of Defense and the Attorney General, the Director of National Drug Control Policy, and the Secretary of Homeland Security, as appropriate. The Committee urges the Secretary of Defense to maintain an ongoing working group of agency representatives from the Departments of Justice and Homeland Security, the Office of National Drug Control Policy, the General Services Administration, as well as public stakeholders, to provide effective consultation regarding the 133 program, to discuss issues, concerns and opportunities regarding the 133 program, and to ensure coordination with programs that provide similar equipment to law enforcement. The Committee directs the Director of the Defense Logistics Agency to improve public transparency and ensure that all pro-

36 U:\219REPT\2REPT\2REPT.6 36 gram data is proactively published through the Law Enforcement Support Office [LESO] website. This should incl11de historic data on both items requested and all transferred items. The Committee further directs the Director of the Defense Logistics Agency to notify Congress and the public, through the LESO website, before changes are made regarding the list of items allowed for transfer, including changes to those items considered controlled items. Long-term Temporary Duty Allowance.-The Committee recognizes the importance of per diem allowances for travelers on longterm temporary duty assignments. The Committee affirms its support for Section 632 of S. 2987, the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 219, which prohibits the Department of Defense from reducing per diem rates based on the duration of a temporary duty assignment or civilian travel. Operation and Maintenance Budget Justification.-The Committee commends the Department for the improvements in the Operation and Maintenance [O&M] budget materials made over the past several years. To further inform the congressional review, the Committee directs the following actions: -The Air Force justification lacks sufficient performance criteria in a number of budget line items due to the recent consolidation of flying hour costs into a separate, single budget line item. The Air Force is directed to develop more meaningful performance metrics and. criteria for the following budget line items to be included in the budget justification for fiscal year 22: lla Primary Combat Forces, llc Combat Enhancement Forces, lld Air Operations Training, 12A Global C3I and Early Warning, 12C Other Combat Operations Support Programs, 21A Airlift Operations, 32B Flight Training, and 42G Other Servicewide Activities. -The Air Force, Air Force Reserve, and Air National Guard are directed to include average salary data in the Personnel Summary section of the OP-5 exhibits. Arctic Broadband lnfrastructure.-the Committee is concerned that broadband infrastructure in the Arctic, particularly in northern Alaska and the Aleutian Islands, is not capable of supporting current military operations. Therefore, the Committee directs the Secretary of Defense to conduct an evaluation of broadband infrastructure in the United States Arctic and provide a report to the congressional defense committees not later than 18 days after enactment of this act. The report shall list an inventory of all existing broadband and communications infrastructure in the Aleutian Island chain and Alaska's northwest and northern slope communities, as well as present limitations and needs for the future. OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE, ARMY Appropriations, $38,816,957, Budget estimate, ,9,317, Committee recommendation ,634,715, The Committee recommends an appropriation of $4,634,715,. This is $1,374,62, below the budget estimate.

37 U:\219REPT\2REPT\2REPT.6 37 COMMITTEE RECOMMENDED PROGRAM The following table summarizes the budget estimate for this appropriation, the Committee recommendation, and the Committee recommended adjustments to the budget estimate: Line 219 budget Committee Change from estimate recommendation budget estimate OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE, ARMY BUDGET ACTIVITY L OPERATING FORCES land FORCES 1 MANEUVER UNITS MODUlAR SUPPORT BRIGADES... 3 ECHELONS ABOVE BRIGADES THEATER LEVEL ASSETS... 5 land FORCES OPERATIONS SUPPORT AVIATION ASSETS... land FORCES READINESS 7 FORCE READINESS OPERATIONS SUPPORT land FORCES SYSTEMS READINESS... 9 land FORCES DEPOT MAINTENANCE... land FORCES READINESS SUPPORT 1 BASE OPERATIONS SUPPORT FACILITIES SUSTAINMENT, RESTORATION, & MODERNIZATION MANAGEMENT AND OPERATIONAL HEADQUARTERS... COMBATANT COMMAND SUPPORT 18 US AFRICA COMMAND US EUROPEAN COMMAND... 2 US SOUTHERN COMMAND US FORCES KOREA TOTAL, BUDGET ACTIVITY I.... BUDGET ACTIVITY 2, MOBILIZATION MOBILITY OPERATIONS 22 STRATEGIC MOBILITY. 23 ARMY PREPOSITIONED STOCKS 24 INDUSTRIAL PREPAREDNESS... TOTAL, BUDGET ACTIVITY BUDGET ACTIVITY l TRAINING AND RECRUITING ACCESSION TRAINING 25 OFFICER ACQUISITION RECRUIT TRAINING ONE STATION UNI TRAINING SENIORESERVE OFFICERS TRAINING CORPS... BASIC SKILL AND ADVANCED TRAINING 29 SPECIALIZED SKILL TRAINING FLIGHTRAINING PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT EDUCATION TRAINING SUPPORT RECRUITING AND OTHER TRAINING AND EDUCATION 33 RECRUITING AND ADVERTISING. 34 EXAMINING OFF-DUTY AND VOLUNTARY EDUCATION CIVILIAN EDUCATION AND TRAINING JUNIORESERVE OFFICERS TRAINING CORPS 2,76,36 1,761,36-315, 17,946 17, , , ,169,58 1,79,58-9, 1,18,46 1,18,46 1,467,5 1,417,5-5, 4,285,211 3,895,211-39, 482,21 482, ,536,851 1,236,851-3, 8,274,299 8,242,299-32, 3,516,859 3,523,69 +6,75 438, , , ,518 15, ,268-9, 195, , , 59,625 59,625 25,95,788 24,744,538-1,161,25 37, ,941-16, 573,56 562,56-11, 7,678 7, , ,179-27, 135, ,832 54,819 54,819 69,599 69, , , ,2,73 1,7,73-13, 1,82,19 1,82, ,399 22, , , , ,962-5, 162,49 162, , , , , , ,14 TOTAL, BUDGET ACTIVITY ,141,369 5,84,59-56,86

38 U:\219REPT\2REPT\2REPT.6 38 Line 119 budget Committee Change from estimate recommendation budget estimate BUDGET ACTIVITY 4: ADMIN & SERVICEWIDE ACTIVITIES LOGISTICS OPERATIONS 39 SERVICEWIDE TRANSPORTATION 588,47 588,47 4 CENTRAL SUPPLY ACTIVITIES _ 931, ,462-1, 41 LOGISTICS SUPPORT ACTIVITIES _ 696, , AMMUNITION MANAGEMENT _ , ,637 SERVICEWIDE SUPPORT 43 ADMINISTRATION , , SERVICEWIDE COMMUNICATIONS 2,69,127 2,69, MANPOWER MANAGEMENT ,21 261, OTHER PERSONNEL SUPPORT _ 379, ,541-3, 47 OTHER SERVICE SUPPORT _ 1,699,767 1,687,767-12, 48 ARMY CLAIMS ACTIVITIES 192, , REAL ESTATE MANAGEMENT _... 24,917 24, BASE OPERATIONS SUPPORT _ 291, ,569 SUPPORT OF OTHER NATIONS 51 SUPPORT OF NA TO OPERATIONS , , MISC_ SUPPORT OF OTHER NATIONS _ 48,251 48,251 OTHER PROGRAMS OTHER PROGRAMS ,259,622 1,281, ,58 TOTAL, BUDGET ACTIVITY 4 _ 1,9,981 9,979,489-3,492 OVERESTIMATION OF CIVILIAN FTE TARGETS _ -1, -1, PLl IMPLEMENTATION _ 1, +1, TOTAL, OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE, ARMY _ 42,9,317 4,634,715-1,374,62 COMMITTEE RECOMMENDED The following table details the adjustments Committee: ADJUSTMENTS recommended by the Line 119 budget estimate Committee Change from recommendation budget estimate Ill Maneuver Units ,76,36 1,761,36 Maintain program affordability, Unjustified growth... Transfer: From Title II to Title IX for OCO Operations 114 Theater Level Assets _ ,169,58 1,79,58 Maintain program affordability: Unjustified growth 116 Aviation Assets Maintain program affordability, Unjustified growth 121 Force Readiness Operations Support Program increase, Advanced combat helmets _ 1,467,5 4,285,211 1,417,5 3,895, Transfer: From Title II to Title IX for OCO Operations _ Land Forces Depot Maintenance 1,536,851 1,236,851 Transfer, From Title II to Title IX for OCO Operations _ 131 Base Operations Support 8,274,299 8,242,299 Improving funds management: Remove one-time fiscal year 218 increase _... Program increase: PFOS/PFOA treatment, sampling, site investigations Program increase: Prevention of child abuse and training on safe childcare practices _ 132 Facilities Sustainment, Restoration & Modernization Program increase, Advanced manufacturing _ Program increase, Energy resilience US European Command Improving funds management: Remove one-time fiscal year 218 increase 3,516,859 15,268 3,523,69 141,268 June 25, 218 (2:28 p.m_) -315, -15, -3, -9, -9, -5, -5, -39, + 1, -4, -3, -3, -32, -5, + 17, +1, +6,75 +4,25 + 2,5-9, - 9,

39 U: \219REPT\2REPT\2REPT.6 Line budget Committee Change from estimate recommendation budget estimate 143 US Southern Command 195, , , Program increase, Multi-mission support vessel , 211 Strategic Mobility 37, ,941-16, Maintain program affordability, Unjustified growth , 212 Army Prepositioned Stocks. 573,56 562,56-11, Maintain program affordability, Unjustified growth -11, 321 Specialized Skill Training... 1,2,73 1,7,73-13, Improving funds management, Program decrease unaccounted for. -13, 331 Recruiting and Advertising , ,962-5, Maintain program affordability, Unjustified growth. - 5, 335 Junior Reserve Officer Training Corps.. 174,43 18,57 +6,14 Program increase. +6, Security Programs.. 1,259,622 1,281, ,58 Program increase, SOUTHCOM ISR requirements ,328 Classified program adjustment... -1, Central Supply Activities 931, ,462-1, Maintain program affordability, Unjustified growth... -1, 434 Other Personnel Support.. 379, ,541-3, Maintain program affordability, Unjustified growth -3, 435 Other Service Support... 1,699,767 1,687,767-12, Improving funds management: Program decrease unaccounted for , UN DIST Maintain program affordability, Overestimation of Civilian FTE , -1, UNDIST Program increase, Public Lawll5-68 implementation Combatant Commands 1, + 1, Army Sustainment, Restoration and Modernization and Facility Reduction Funding.-The Committee supports the robust funding level requested in fiscal year 219 for facility sustainment, restoration and modernization. The Secretary of the Army is encouraged to use a portion of these funds on Army testing facilities and for the demolition of contaminated military facilities that are no longer in use. Army Mountain Warfare Capabilities.-The Committee recognizes the contemporary national security relevance of military mountaineering training and supports bolstering existing frameworks to train personnel in this field. The Committee directs the Secretary of the Army to review the Army's current mountaineering capabilities, any gaps in personnel and resources for continuing and potential missions, and any limitations that may exist to increasing training capacity should it be required. The Secretary of the Army shall provide a report detailing the results of the review to the House and Senate Appropriations Committees not later than 9 days after the enactment of this act. Mobile Small Arms Repair Team.-The Committee encourages the Secretary of the Army to conduct a pilot program to assess the feasibility and advisability of providing a mobile small arms repair team to be located near a United States Army Depot. Logistics Automation Systems Sustainment.-The Committee encourages the Secretary of the Army to leverage Condition Based Maintenance technologies and concepts to maintain logistic and equipment publications. This includes utilizing industry available software that can be integrated for specific purposes in the capture

40 U: \219REPT\2REPT\2REPT.6 4 of holistic data analytics provided by embedded sensors to update equipment and repair manuals in real time. OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE, NAVY Appropriations, $45,384,353, Budget estimate, ,3,633, Committee recommendation... 47,296,183, The Committee recommends an appropriation of $47,296,183,. This is $1,77,45, below the budget estimate. COMMITTEE RECOMMENDED PROGRAM The following table summarizes the budget estimate for this appropriation, the Committee recommendation, and the Committee recommended adjustments to the budget estimate: Line 219 budget Committee Change from estimate recommendation budget estimate OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE, NAVY BUDGET ACTIVITY l: OPERATING FORCES AIR OPERATIONS 1 MISSION AND OTHER FLIGHT OPERATIONS FLEET AIR TRAINING... 3 AVIATION TECHNICAL DATAND ENGINEERING SERVICES... 4 AIR OPERATIONS AND SAFETY SUPPORT AIR SYSTEMS SUPPORT. 6 AIRCRAFT DEPOT MAINTENANCE... 7 AIRCRAFT DEPOT OPERATIONS SUPPORT... 8 AVIATION LOGISTICS.... SHIP OPERATIONS 9 MISSION AND OTHER SHIP OPERATIONS... 1 SHIP OPERATIONS SUPPORT AND TRAINING SHIP DEPOT MAINTENANCE SHIP DEPOT OPERATIONS SUPPORT COMBAT COMMUNICATIONS/SUPPORT 13 COMBAT COMMUNICATIONS AND ELECTRONIC WARFARE. 15 SPACE SYSTEMS AND SURVEILLANCE WARFARE TACTICS OPERATIONAL METEOROLOGY AND OCEANOGRAPHY COMBAT SUPPORT FORCES EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE AND DEPOT OPERATIONS SUPPORT. 21 COMBATANT COMMANDERS CORE OPERATIONS COMBATANT COMMANDERS DIRECT MISSION SUPPORT. 23 MILITARY INFORMATION SUPPORT OPERATIONS CYBERSPACE ACTIVITIES.. WEAPONS SUPPORT 26 FLEET BALLISTIC MISSILE. 28 WEAPONS MAINTENANCE. 29 OTHER WEAPON SYSTEMS SUPPORT... BASE SUPPORT 3 ENTERPRISE INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY FACILITIES SUSTAINMENT, RESTORATION & MODERNIZATION BASE OPERATING SUPPORT. TOTAL, BUDGET ACTIVITY 1... BUDGET ACTIVITY 2: MOBILIZATION READY RESERVE AND PREPOSITIONING FORCES 33 SHIP PREPOSITIONING AND SURGE READY RESERVE FORCE. 5,372,399 2,23,351 56, ,81 682,379 1,253,756 66, ,368 4,439, ,663 8,751,526 2,168,876 1,349, , , ,46 1,452,75 153,719 63,39 89,339 8, ,88 1,361, , ,11 921,936 2,4,389 4, ,725, ,142 31,85 4,772,399 2,23,351 56, ,81 67,379 1,253,756 66, ,368 3,819, ,663 8,141,526 2,168,876 1,343, , , ,46 1,452,75 153,719 63,39 89,339 8, ,88 1,361, , ,11 921,936 2,39,389 4,418,253 4,196, ,142 31,85-6, -12, - 62, -61, -6,3-15, -2, + 35, + 3,5-1,529,8

41 U: \219REPT\2REPT\2REPT.6 41 Line 219 budget Committee Change from estimate recommendation budget estimate ACTIVATIONS/INACTIVATIONS 36 SHIP ACTIVATIONS/INACTIVATIONS.... MOBILIZATION PREPAREDNESS 37 FLEET HOSPITAL PROGRAM COAST GUARD SUPPORT... TOTAL, BUDGET ACTIVITY 2... BUDGET ACTIVITY 1 TRAINING AND RECRUITING ACCESSION TRAINING 4 OFFICER ACQUISITION RECRUIT TRAINING RESERVE OFFICERS TRAINING CORPS BASIC SKILLS AND ADVANCED TRAINING 43 SPECIALIZED SKILL TRAINING PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT EDUCATION TRAINING SUPPORT RECRUITING, AND OTHER TRAINING AND EDUCATION 47 RECRUITING AND ADVERTISING OFF-DUTY AND VOLUNTARY EDUCATION CIVILIAN EDUCATION AND TRAINING... 5 JUNIOROTC TOTAL, BUDGET ACTIVITY 3... BUDGET ACTIVITY 4c ADMIN & SERVICEWIDE ACTIVITIES SERVICEWIDE SUPPORT 51 ADMINISTRATION CIVILIAN MANPOWER AND PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT MILITARY MANPOWER AND PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT... LOGISTICS OPERATIONS AND TECHNICAL SUPPORT 58 SERVICEWIDE TRANSPORTATION... 6 PLANNING, ENGINEERING ANO PROGRAM SUPPORT.. 61 ACQUISITION, LOGISTICS ANO OVERSIGHT... SECURITY PROGRAMS 65 NAVAL INVESTIGATIVE SERVICE... OTHER PROGRAMS OTHER PROGRAMS. 161,15 161, ,338 12, ,97 24,97 1,165,532 1,165, , ,481 9,637 9, , , ,5 879, ,557-86, 184, , , , ,86 181,86 96,6 96, ,83 72, ,156 55, ,995,288 1,911,738-83,55 1,89,964 1,69,964-2, 164,74 164, ,35 418, ,16 167,16 333, , , 663,69 663,69 75,87 75,87 574,994 57,494-4,5 TOTAL, BUDGET ACTIVITY LONG TERM TEMP DUTY WAIVERS PRICING ADJUSTMENT ,116, ,95,321 1,4-75, -21,5 + 1,4-75, PL IMPLEMENTATION.... 1, + 1, TOTAL, OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE, NAVY... 49,3,633 47,296,183-1,77,45 COMMITTEE RECOMMENDED ADJUSTMENTS The following table details the adjustments Committee: recommended by the line 219 budget Committee Change from estimate recommendation budget estimate IAIA Mission and Other Flight Operations... 5,372,399 4,772,399-6, Maintain program affordability: Projected underexeculion... -1, Transfer: From Title II to Title IX for OCO Operations , 1A4N Air Systems Support ,379 67,379-12,

42 U:\219REPT\2REPT\2REPT.6 42 Line 219 budget estimate Committee Change from recommendation budget estimate Maintain program affordability: Unjustified growth!bib Mission and Other Ship Operations ,439,566 3,819,566 Maintain program affordability: Unjustified growth Transfer: From Title II to Title IX for OC Operations _ 1B4B Ship Depot Maintenance 8,751,526 8,141,526 Transfer: To Other Procurement, Navy for the USS BOISE, USS NEW YORK and USS GUNSTON HALL availabilities _ lclc Combat Communications and Electronic Warfare _ Improving funds management: Remove one-time fiscal 1,349,593 1,343,293 year 218 increases Program increase: SOUTHCOM ISR requirements 1C4C Warfare Tactics _ , ,446 Maintain program affordability: Unjustified growth 17 Other Weapon Systems Support Classified program adjustment BSMl Sustainment, Restoration and Modernization _ Program increase ,11 2,4, ,11 2,39,389 BSSl Base Operating Support ,414,753 4,418,253 Maintain program affordability: Unjustified growth Program increase: Aqueous foam disposal and replacement _ Program increase: Amphibious readiness group planning and design Program increase, Prevention of child abuse and training on safe childcare practices _ 3A3J Reserve Officers Training Corps _ Program increase: Navy ROTC K Specialized Skill Training Maintain program affordability: Ready, Relevant Learning funding ahead of need C5L Junior ROTC 149, ,557 54, , ,557 55,16 Program increase AlM Administration ,89,964 1,69,964 Improving funds management: Program decrease unaccounted for B2N Planning, Engineering and Program Support Program increase: Alternativenergy Classified Programs , , ,556 57,494 Classified program adjustment UNDIST Program increase: Public Law implementation Combatant Commands 1, UNDIST Program increase: Joint travel regulation-long term temporary duty waivers _ 1,4 UNDIST Improving funds management: Navy supply management pricing adjustment to reflect correct rates - 75, -12, -62, -12, -5, -61, -61, - 6,3-25, + 18,7-15, -15, -2, -2, + 35, +35, + 3,5-27, + 28, + 1,5 + 1, + 1,5 + 1,5-86, -86, , -2, + 3, + 3, -4,5-4,5 + 1, + 1,4-75, Chief of Naval Air Training.-The Committee understands the critical training requirement and pilot shortfall that the Department of Defense is experiencing and encourages the Secretary of the Navy to seek alternate airfields, to include in-land locations, to expand training opportunities. Naval Shipyard Apprentice Program.-The Committee directs that during fiscal year 219 the Navy shall induct classes of no fewer than 1 apprentices, respectively, at each of the naval shipyards. The Committee further directs the Navy to include the costs of the fiscal year 22 class of apprentices in its budget request. U.S. Coast Guard.-The Committee is aware that Department of Defense [DOD] regulations currently restrict DOD mission appropriated funded activities from offering reimbursable rates to non

43 U:\219REPT\2REPT\2REPT.6 43 DOD agencies. This restriction forces the Navy to charge the U.S. Coast Guard fully burdened rates for drydocking services at Navy shipyards rather than reimbursable rates. Therefore, the Committee directs that funds appropriated under Operation and Maintenance, Navy may be used to pay overhead costs incurred by a Naval Shipyard when drydocking U.S. Coast Guard ships. Advanced Skills Management Legacy System Upgrades.-The Committee is concerned that the Navy is not giving full consideration to commercial-off-the-shelf software solutions. The Secretary of the Navy is encouraged to use the best value procurement methods when upgrading legacy software systems. Civilian Hiring Delays at Public Shipyards.-The Committee is aware that the Office of Civilian Human Resources has encountered extensive delays in processing new applicants and potential hires for the Department of the Navy. The Committee urges the Secretary of the Navy to increase awareness of civilian hiring needs at public shipyards and assess current timelines for processing new applicants and hires in order to avoid an impact on shipyard operations that may result in delays in completing submarine maintenance availabilities. Fuel Depot Monitoring Enhancements.-The Committee encourages the Secretary of the Navy to work with local and State governments and willing private landowners to enhance groundwater monitoring on non-federal lands surrounding Navy fuel storage facilities and depots to improve public confidence in the Navy's stewardship of groundwater and other environmental resources. The Committee further urges the Secretary of the Navy to prioritize this enhanced groundwater monitoring at its oldest fuel storage facilities and depots that have a documented history of fuel leaks. OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE, MARINE CORPS Appropriations, $6,65,546, Budget estimate, Committee recommendation... 6,832,51, 6,372,, The Committee recommends an appropriation This is $46,51, below the budget estimate. of $6,372,,. COMMITTEE RECOMMENDED PROGRAM The following table summarizes the budget estimate for this appropriation, the Committee recommendation, and the Committee recommended adjustments to the budget estimate: \ line OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE, MARINE CORPS BUDGET ACTIVITY L OPERATING FORCES 219 budget Committee Change from estimate recommendation budget estimate EXPEDITIONARY FORCES 1 OPERATIONAL FORCES ,32 637,32-236, 2 FIELD LOGISTICS.... 1,94,187 1,94,187 3 DEPOT MAINTENANCE , , USMC PREPOSITIONING 4 MARITIME PREPOSITIONING... 98,136 98,136...

44 U:\219REPT\2REPT\2REPT.6 44 Line 219 budget Committee Change from estimate recommendation budget estimate COMBAT OPERATIONS/SUPPORT 5 CYBERSPACE ACTIVITIES BASE SUPPORT 6 FACILITIES SUSTAINMENT, RESTORATION & MODERNIZATION 7 BASE OPERATING SUPPORT _ 183, ,636 2,151,39 183, ,636 1,963,49-187,9 TOTAL, BUDGET ACTIVITY 1 _ 5,547,397 5,123, ,9 BUDGET ACTIVITY 3: TRAINING AND RECRUITING ACCESSION TRAINING 8 RECRUIT TRAINING OFFICER ACQUISITION _ 16,453 1,144 16,453 1,144 BASIC SKILLS AND ADVANCED TRAINING 1 SPECIALIZED SKILLS TRAINING _ llo PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT EDUCATION _ 12 TRAINING SUPPORT _ ,36 46,96 389,751 16,36 46,96 389,751 RECRUITING AND OTHER TRAINING EDUCATION 13 RECRUITING AND ADVERTISING _ OFF-DUTY AND VOLUNTARY EDUCATION JUNIOROTC _ ,662 32,461 24,217 21,662 32,461 24, TOTAL, BUDGET ACTIVITY 3 _ BUDGET ACTIVITY 4: ADMIN & SERVICEWIDE ACTIVITIES SERVICEWIDE SUPPORT 16 SERVICEWIDE TRANSPORTATION _ 17 ADMINISTRATION _ SECURITY PROGRAMS SECURITY PROGRAMS _ 818,144 29, ,375 5, , , _ ,375-2, 5,859 TOTAL, BUDGET ACTIVITY OVERESTIMATION OF CIVILIAN FTE TARGETS 466, ,969-17, -2, -17, TOTAL, OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE, MARINE CORPS 6,832,51 6,372, -46,51 June 25, 218 (2:28 p.m_)

45 U: \219REPT\2REPT\2REPT.7 45 COMMITTEE RECOMMENDED The following table details the adjustments Committee: ADJUSTMENTS recommended by the Line 219 budget Committee Change from estimate recommendation budget estimate lala Operational Forces. Improving funds management: Remove one-time fiscal year 218 increase. Maintain program affordability: Unjustified growth... Program increase, Marine hearing enhancement and protection... Transfer, From Title II to Title IX tor OCO Operations.. BSSl Base Operating Support Improving funds management: Program decrease unaccounted tor... Program increase, Prevention of child abuse and training on sale childcare practices... Transfer: From Title II to Title IX tor OCO Operations... 3C3F Junior ROTC... Program increase... 4A4G Administration. Maintain program affordability, Unjustified growth. UNDIST Improving funds management: Overestimation of civilian FTE 873,32 637,32-236, , , + 5, -2, 2,151,39 1,963,49-187,9-35, , -153,9 24,217 24, , ,375-2, -2, -17, -17, Marine Corps Civilian Personnel.-The Committee is aware that the Marine Corps operates under a Manage to Payroll concept that focuses on a funding level for civilian labor and adjusts the Full Time Equivalent [FTE] level to reflect the estimated number of workyears that funding level will afford. This is unlike the other military services where the civilian personnel funding estimates are built on the workload requirements. To better understand this concept, the Committee directs the Government Accountability Office to provide the congressional defense committees a report not later than 9 days after enactment of this act on the details of how the Marine Corps develops its civilian labor requirements (both FTEs and funding). The report should examine the benefits and shortfalls of this concept and make recommendations to either continue or change this approach. OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE, AIR FORCE Appropriations, $39,544,193, Budget estimate, ,6,568, Committee recommendation... 4,775,374, The Committee recommends an appropriation of $4,775,374,. This is $1,285,194, below the budget estimate. COMMITTEE RECOMMENDED PROGRAM The following table summarizes the budget estimate for this appropriation, the Committee recommendation, and the Committee recommended adjustments to the budget estimate:

46 U: \219REPT\2REPT\2REPT.7 46 Line 219 budget Committee Change from estimate recommendation budget estimate OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE, AIR FORCE BUDGET ACTIVITY L OPERATING FORCES AIR OPERATIONS 1 PRIMARY COMBAT FORCES.. _ COMBAT ENHANCEMENT FORCES _ 3 AIR OPERATIONS TRAINING DEPOT PURCHASE EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE FACILITIES SUSTAINMENT, RESTORATION & MODERNIZATION CONTRACTOR LOGISTICS SUPPORT AND SYSTEM SUPPORT 7 FLYING HOUR PROGRAM _ BASE OPERATING SUPPORT _ COMBAT RELATED OPERATIONS 9 GLOBAL C31 AND EARLY WARNING OTHER COMBAT OPERATIONS SUPPORT PROGRAMS _ 11 CYBERSPACE ACTIVITIES SPACE OPERATIONS 13 LAUNCH FACILITIES _ 14 SPACE CONTROL SYSTEMS _ COCOM 17 US NORTHCOM/NORAD US STRATCOM _ 19 US CYBERCOM _ 2 US CENTCOM _ US SOCOM US TRANSCOM _ OPERATING FORCES CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS _ 758,178 1,59,27 1,323,33 3,511,83 2,892,75 7,613,84 4,345,28 5,989, ,23 1,8, ,32 183,777 44,72 187, ,92 329, , ,164,81 758, ,227,27-282, 1,28,73-42,6 2,994,83-517, 2,917, , 7,848, , 3,685,28-66, 6,16, ,9 928,23 1,8, ,32 183,777 44,72 187, ,92 329, , ,158,41-66, - 6,4 TOTAL, BUDGET ACTIVITY _ ,797,28 32,51,18-1,287,1 BUDGET ACTIVITY 2, MOBILIZATION MOBILITY OPERATIONS 23 AIRLIFT OPERATIONS _ 24 MOBILIZATION PREPAREDNESS _ 1,37, ,417 1,157, ,417-15, TOTAL, BUDGET ACTIVITY ,452,112 1,32,112-15, BUDGET ACTIVITY 3c TRAINING AND RECRUITING ACCESSION TRAINING 28 OFFICER ACQUISITION RECRUIT TRAINING _ 3 RESERVE OFFICER TRAINING CORPS (ROTC) ,187 25,41 117, ,187 25,41 117,338 BASIC SKILLS AND ADVANCED TRAINING 33 SPECIALIZED SKILL TRAINING FLIGHT TRAINING _ 35 PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT EDUCATION _ TRAINING SUPPORT _ RECRUITING, AND OTHER TRAINING AND EDUCATION 38 RECRUITING AND ADVERTISING _ 39 EXAMINING _ OFF DUTY AND VOLUNTARY EDUCATION _ CIVILIAN EDUCATION AND TRAINING _ JUNIOROTC _ 41, ,64 276,423 95, ,53 4, ,15 29,497 59,98 41, ,64 276,423 95, ,53 4, ,15 29,497 6,98 + 1, TOTAL, BUDGET ACTIVITY 3 _ BUDGET ACTIVITY 4, ADMIN & SERVICEWIDE ACTIVITIES 2,178,214 2,179, , LOGISTICS OPERATIONS 43 LOGISTICS OPERATIONS _ 44 TECHNICAL SUPPORT ACTIVITIES _ 681, , , ,812

47 U: \219REPT\2REPT\2REPT.7 47 Line 2!9 budget Committee Change from estimate recommendation budget estimate SERVICEWIOE ACTIVITIES 48 ADMINISTRATION ,12 933,12-2, 49 SERVICEWIDE COMMUNICATIONS , , , 5 OTHER SERVICEWIOE ACTIVITIES... 1,194,862 1,195, , 51 CIVIL AIR PATROL CORPORATION ,594 33,6 + 4,6 SUPPORT TO OTHER NATIONS 53 INTERNATIONAL SUPPORT ,959 74, SECURITY PROGRAMS SECURITY PROGRAMS ,222,456 1,178,956-43,5 TOTAL, BUDGET ACTIVITY ,632,962 4,64, ,56 PL!lS-68 IMPLEMENTATION.... 1, + 1,?DAB FOR INOOPACOM , ,4 TOTAL, OPERATION ANO MAINTENANCE, AIR FORCE... 42,6,568 4,775,374-1,285,194 COMMITI'EE RECOMMENDED ADJUSTMENTS The following table details the adjustments recommended by the Committee: Line 2!9 budget Committee Change from estimate recommendation budget estimate OllC Combat Enhancement Forces... 1,59,27 1,227,27-282, Reduce duplication: Air Force-identified asset in title II for Battlefield Airborne Communications Node (BACN) due to adequate title IX funding. Partial transfer of this asset to O&M AF SAG l lz and Military Personnel, Air Force for transition to the Operational Camouflage Pattern (OCP) uniform at the request of the Air Force , OllD Air Operations Training (OJT, Maintain Skills)... Maintain program affordability: Unjustified growth.. Program increase, Training range upgrades to support 1,323,33 1,28,73-42,6-6, F-35A beddown ,4 OllM Depot Purchase Equipment Maintenance... 3,5ll,83 2,994,83-517, OllR Maintain program affordability: Unjustified growth Transfer: From Title II to Title IX for OCO Operations. Facilities Sustainment, Restoration & Modernization... 2,892,75 2,917,75-17, -5, +25, Program increase: Additional demo , OllW Contractor Logistics Support and System Support... 7,613,84 7,848, , Maintain program affordability, Unjustified growth , Program increase , Program increase: F-35 sustainmento accelerate depot component repair capability... OllY Flying Hour Program... 4,345,28 3,685, , -66, Maintain program affordability: Unjustified growth , Transfer, From Title II to Title IX for OCO Operations. OllZ Base Support ,989,215 6,16,115-5, +26,9 Maintain program affordability: Unjustified growth , Transfer, From Air Force-identified asset in SAG llc to be used for fiscal year 219 costs associated with the transition to the Operational Camouflage Pattern (OCP) uniform at the request of the Air Force... Program increase: Civil engineers equipment... 12D Cyberspace Activities. 879,32 813,32 +35,9 + 5, - 66, Transfer, Air force-requested transfer to SAG 42B for Cloud Mi ration costs ,

48 U:\219REPT\2REPT\2REPT.7 48 line 219 budget esumate Committee Change from recommendation budget estimate 999 Classified Programs Classified program adjustment 21A Airlift Operations Maintain program affordability, Unjustified growth... 33E Junior ROTC _ Program increase 42A Administration Maintain program affordability, Unjustified growth _ 428 Servicewide Communications _ Transfer, Air Forc1c---requested transfer from SAG 12 for Cloud Migration costs G Other Servicewide Activities Program increase, Prevention of child abuse and training on safe childcare practices 421 Civil Air Patrol Program increase 999 Classified Programs Classified program adjustment Maintain program affordability: Unjustified growth for security clearance investigations UNOIST Program increase, Public Law implementation Combatant Commands UNOIST Program increase, Procurement of 7 DABS for INOOPACOM 1,164, ,37,695 59,98 953, ,389 1,194,862 29,594 1,222,456 1,158, ,157,695 6,98 933, , ,195, ,6 1,178,956 1, 142,4-6,4-6,4-15, -15, +1, +1, -2, -2, + 66, + 66, + 1, + 1, + 4,6 + 4,6-43,5-3,5-4, + 1, + 142,4 Properly Budgeting for Full Requirements.-During the review of the fiscal year 218 President's budget request, the Air Force revealed to the Committee that it starts each fiscal year with nearly $1,,, in programmatic shortfalls in its operation and maintenance account for must-pay mission bills. The increases in readiness funding provided by the Bipartisan Budget Act of 218 have allowed the Air Force to close that gap; however, the Committee continues to discover examples of the Air Force not programming or budgeting for the full amount of known requirements. This is not only evident in the larger programs such as Operational Support Airlift or Base Operations Support, but also very specific smaller programs such as the operational funding for the C-13H Weapons Instructor Course and the Advanced Airlift Tactics Training Center hosted by the 139th Airlift Wing with the Missouri Air National Guard. The Committee understands that the 139th Airlift Wing requirements have historically been sourced exclusively during the year of execution at the expense of other funded programs. Failure to properly budget resources for known requirements places unnecessary burdens on smaller programs, increases the probability of reprogramming requests, and often leads to an application of a tax against mission accounts to cover under-programmed requirements. The Committee recognizes the efforts made to improve the operation and maintenance budget formulation process to match historical execution and directs the Secretary of the Air Force to continue to emphasize properly programming resources in order to fully fund known requirements for the active, guard and reserve components. Air Force Associate Units.-The Committee recognizes the importance of Total Force Integration within the Air Force and certain Air National Guard units who have a critical role in construction and engineering. This integration ensures cross-component inter- June 25, 218 (2:28 p_m_)

49 U:\219REPT\2REPT\2REPT.7 49 I! operability to fill current and future mission requirements. The Committee encourages the Air Force to continue placing an increased focus on actively managing associate units between the Air National Guard and the active duty component and to establish robust memorandum of agreements to ensure units are not left without equipment when the active component deploys. OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE, DEFENSE-WIDE Appropriations, $34,59,257, Budget estimate, ,352,625, Committee recommendation... 35,662,783, The Committee recommends an appropriation of $35,662,783,. This is $689,842, below the budget estimate. COMMITTEE RECOMMENDED PROGRAM The following table summarizes the budget estimate for this appropriation, the Committee recommendation, and the Committee recommended adjustments to the budget estimate: Line 219 budget Committee Change from estimate recommendation budget estimate 43,215 43, ,186 62, ,389,25 5,38,115-81,135 6,421,651 6,341,296-8, ,61 181, ,565 96, ,583 37, , , ,131 24, , 625, , ,465,354 1,465, ,923 91, , 2,16,93 2,46,93-6, 27,43 27, , , ,5 27, , , 13,696 13, , ,744-67, , ,816-16,359 34,951 34, , ,84-7,489 2,892,284 2,855,239-37,45 499, , ,35 7, ,519,655 1,547, ,228 97,787 99,787 +2, 456,47 454,727-1,68 15,645,192 15,14,857-54,335 TOTAL. BUDGET ACTIVITY ,282,225 28,699,78-583,147 IMPACT AID , +4,

50 U:\219REPT\2REPT\2REPT.7 5 line 219 budget Committee Change from estimate ::'olilmendation budget estimate IMPACT AID FOR CHILDREN WITH DISABILITIES... 1, + 1, HISTORICAL UNDEREXECUTION ,34-93,34 SEXUAL TRAUMA TREATMENT PILOT PROGRAM , + 2, VIETNAM DIOXIN REMEDIATION , + 15, TOTAL, OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE, DEFENSE-WIDE 36,352,625 35,662, ,842 COMMITTEE RECOMMENDED The following table details the adjustments Committee: ADJUSTMENTS recommended by the Line 219 budget estimate Committee Change from recommendation budget estimate Joint Chiefs of Staff... Program increase, Operational logistics exercise elements... Improving Funds Management: Civilian FTE pricing... Special Operations Command/Operating Forces. Maintain Program Affordability, Base support Improving Funds Management: Civilian FTE pricing... Maintain Program Affordability, Unjustified growth for contract services... Maintain Program Affordability, Unjustified growth tor TACLAN... Maintain Program Affordability, Unjustified growth for maintenance... Maintain Program Affordability: Unjustified growth tor GM/CM... Civil Military Programs... Program increase, Innovative readiness training... 43,215 5,389,25 166,131 43,995 5,38,115 24,131 Program increase, National Guard Youth Challenge Program increase, STARBASE... Defense Human Resources Activity , ,923 Program increase, Beyond the Yellow Ribbon... Program increase, Defense critical language and culture program... Program increase, Special Victims' Counsel Defense Information Systems Agency... Maintain Program Affordability, Unjustified growth for NBIS... Defense Logistics Agency... Program increase, AM-2 airfield landing matting. Program increase, Procurement technical assistance program. Defense Media Activity... Program increase, IP streaming... Defense Security Cooperation Agency Maintain Program Affordability, Maintain level of effort-regional Centers..... Maintain Program Affordability: Maintain level of effort-wales Initiative Maintain Program Affordability, FTE overestimation DSCA Headquarters.. Maintain Program Affordability: Maintain level of effort-defense Institution Reform Building Maintain Program Affordability, Maintain level of effort-security Cooperation Maintain Program Affordability: Maintain level of effort-south East Asia Maritime Security Initiative Defense Security Service 2,16,93 379, , , ,175 2,46,93 397, , , , ,5-1,72-81,135-8,4-14,785-11,8-18,15-2, -8, + 38, + 1, + 13, + 15, + 51, + 2, + 6, + 25, -6, -6, + 18,5 + 1, + 8,5 + 1, + 1, -67,967-3, -4, -4,225-5, -38, -13,742-16,359

51 U:\219REPT\2REPT\2REPT.7 51 line 219 budget estimate Committee Change from recommendation budget estimate Improving Funds Management: Civilian FTE pricing. Maintain Program Affordabilityc Unjustified growth in travel... Maintain Program Affordabilityc Unjustified growth for PSSD.. Defense Threat Reduction Agency... Improving Funds Management: Remove one-time costs Maintain Program Affordability, JIDO mission enablers unjustified growth Department of Defense Education Activity. Maintain Program Affordability, Unjustified growth for contract services... Improving Funds Management: Civilian FTE pricing Improving Funds Management: Pricing adjustment. Office of the Secretary of Defense... Program increase: Artificial Intelligence Program increase: CDC water contamination study and assessment... Program increase, Clearinghouse... Program increase: Defense Environmental International Cooperations... Program increase, Defense Fellows Program Program increase: DOD emerging contaminants. Program increase, DOD environmental resiliency Program increase: Readiness and environmental protection initiative Maintain Program Affordability, Unjustified growth for civilian personnel... Maintain Program Affordability: Unjustified growth for contract services. Special Operations Command/Admin & Svc-wide Activities. Program increase: Defense critical language and culture program Washington Headquarters Services Improving Funds Management: Other Ops-Civilian FTE Pricing Classified Programs. Classified adjustment.. UNDIST Program increase: Impact aid for children with disabilities. UNDIST Program increase, Impact aid for schools with military dependent students.. UNDIST Program increase: Sexual trauma treatment pilot program. UNDIST Program increase, Vietnam dioxin remediation UNDIST Improving Funds Management: Historical Underexecution ,329 2,892,284 1,519,655 97, ,47 15,645, ,84 2,855,239 1,547,883 99, ,727 15,14,857 1, 4, 2, 15, -93,34-5,22-1,157-1, - 7,489-3,878-3,611-37,45-17, -12,3-7, , , + 1, + 1, + 1, + 1, + 1, + 1, + 1, -3,672-8,1 + 2, + 2, -1,68-1,68-54,335-54, , +4, +2, + 15, -93,34 Special Victims' Counsel Program.-The Committee remains concerned with the level of sexual assault in the military and supports the Department's continuing efforts to strengthen its sexual assault prevention and response program. The needs of victims of sexual assault for legal advice and guidance are particularly acute. To ensure that the Department continues to make progress protecting a victim's confidentiality and ending alienation during the investigation and prosecution of their case, the Committee recommends $25,, for implementation of the Special Victims' Counsel Program across the services. Maritime Security Initiative.-The Committee supports the efforts of the Department of Defense to address Asia-Pacific security concerns and improve the maritime security of our partners and allies through the Southeast Asia Maritime Security Initiative [MSI]. MSI is a dedicated funding line that supports equipment, supplies

52 U:\219REPT\2REPT\2REPT.7 52 and services, training, and small-scale construction to support the maritime security missions of partner military and security forces. The Committee recommends $84,6, for fiscal year 219 for MSI, a 3 percent increase over the 218 enacted amount, but $13,5, less than the fiscal year 219 budget request. The Committee notes that the Department requested 2-year funding for all MSI and other security cooperation programs, but only 25 percent of such funding is appropriated as 2-year funding. As such, the reduction reflects the Committee's expectation, based on prior year execution, that the Department will not be able to execute funding, planned to be spent in 2 years, in only 1 year. Defense Finance and Accounting Service.-The Committee supports efforts to find efficiencies and reduce unnecessary costs within the Department of Defense, including both the military services and the defense agencies. However, there are concerns about efforts to close or realign Defense Finance and Accounting Services [DF AS] installations. Therefore, prior to transferring any functions or implementing civilian reductions at a DF AS installation, the Committee directs the Secretary of Defense to provide the congressional defense committees a written report on any plan to do so and the Secretary must certify to such committees that the plan would reduce costs, increase efficiencies, and maintain the timeline for auditability of financial statements.

53 V: \219REPT\2REPT\2REPT.8 53 OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE, ARMY RESERVE Appropriations, $2,877,14, Budget estimate, ,916,99, Committee recommendation... 2,854,99, The Committee recommends an appropriation of $2,854,99,. This is $62,, below the budget estimate. COMMITTEE RECOMMENDED PROGRAM The following table summarizes the budget estimate for this appropriation, the Committee recommendation, and the Committee recommended adjustments to the budget estimate: Line 219 budget Committee Change from estimate recommendation budget estimate OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE, ARMY RESERVE BUDGET ACTIVITY L OPERATING FORCES LANO FORCES 1 MODULAR SUPPORT BRIGADES... 2 ECHELONS ABOVE BRIGADES THEATER LEVEL ASSETS... 4 LANO FORCES OPERATIONS SUPPORT... 5 AVIATION ASSETS... LAND FORCES READINESS 6 FORCES READINESS OPERATIONS SUPPORT... 7 LAND FORCES SYSTEM READINESS... 8 DEPOT MAINTENANCE LAND FORCES READINESS SUPPORT 9 BASE OPERATIONS SUPPORT FACILITIES SUSTAINMENT, RESTORATION & MODERNIZATION MANAGEMENT ANO OPERATIONS HEADQUARTERS... 13,867 13, , , , , , ,141-14, 89,73 89, , ,531-17, 11,411 11, ,114 6, , ,728-16, 34,658 34, ,175 22, TOTAL, BUDGET ACTIVITY BUDGET ACTIVITY 4, AOMIN & SERVICEWIDE ACTIVITIES ADMINISTRATION AND SERVICEWIOE ACTIVITIES 12 SERVICEWIDE TRANSPORTATION ADMINISTRATION SERVICEWIOE COMMUNICATIONS PERSONNEi/FiNANCiAL ADMINISTRATION RECRUITING ANO ADVERTISING..... TOTAL, BUDGET ACTIVITY OVERESTIMATION OF CIVILIAN FTE TARGETS 2,797,361 2,75,361-47, 11,832 11, ,218 18, ,69 25,69 6,248 6, ,181 58,181.., , , , -15, TOTAL, OPERATION ANO MAINTENANCE, ARMY RESERVE 2,916,99 2,854,99-62, COMMITTEE RECOMMENDED ADJUSTMENTS The following table details the adjustments recommended by the Committee: Line 219 budget Committee Change from estimate recommendation budget estimate 115 Land Forces Operations Support , ,141-14, Maintain program affordability, Unjustified growth , 121 Force Readiness Operations Support ' , ,531-17, Maintain program affordability, Unjustified growth ,

54 U: \219REPT\ 2REPT\2REPT.8 54 Line 131 Base Operations Support Improving funds management Program decrease unaccounted for UNDIST Maintain program affordability: Overestimation of civilian FTE 219 budget Committee Change from estimate recornmendatiur. budget estimate 595, ,728-16, -16, -15, -15, OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE, NA VY RESERVE Appropriations, $1,69,77, Budget estimate, ,27,6, Committee recommendation... 1,18,6, The Committee recommends an appropriation of $1,18,6,. This is $9,, below the budget estimate. COMMITTEE RECOMMENDED PROGRAM The following table summarizes the budget estimate for this appropriation, the Committee recommendation, and the Committee recommended adjustments to the budget estimate: Line 219 budget Committee Change from estimate recommendation budget estimate OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE, NAVY RESERVE BUDGET ACTIVITY I: OPERATING FORCES RESERVE AIR OPERATIONS 1 MISSION AND OTHER FLIGHT OPERATIONS , ,584-6, 2 INTERMEDIATE MAINTENANCE... 6,92 6,92 3 AIRCRAFT DEPOT MAINTENANCE ,776 19,776 4 AIRCRAFT DEPOT OPERATIONS SUPPORT AVIATION LOGISTICS. 18,888 18,888 RESERVE SHIP OPERATIONS 6 SHIP OPERATIONAL SUPPORT AND TRAINING RESERVE COMBAT OPERATIONS SUPPORT 7 COMBAT COMMUNICATIONS... 17,561 17,561 8 COMBAT SUPPORT FORCES. 121,7 118,7-3, 9 CYBERSPACE ACTIVITIES RESERVE WEAPONS SUPPORT 1 ENTERPRISE INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY. 23,964 23,964 BASE OPERATING SUPPORT 11 FACILITIES SUSTAINMENT, RESTORATION & MODERNIZATION. 36,356 36, BASE OPERATING SUPPORT ,562 13,562 TOTAL, BUDGET ACTIVITY ,9,112 1,,112-9, BUDGET ACTIVITY 4: ADMIN & SERVICEWIDE ACTIVITIES ADMINISTRATION AND SERVICEWIDE ACTIVITIES 13 ADMINISTRATION. 1,868 1, MILITARY MANPOWER & PERSONNEL. 12,849 12, ACQUISITION AND PROGRAM MANAGEMENT. 3,177 3,177 TOTAL, BUDGET ACTIVITY 4. 17,894 17,894 TOTAL, OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE, NAVY RESERVE 1,27,6 1,18,6-9,

55 U:\219REPT\2REPT\2REPT.8 55 COMMI'ITEE RECOMMENDED ADJUSTMENTS The following table details the adjustments recommended by the Committee: Line 219 budget Committee Change from estimate recommendation budget estimate lala Mission and Other Flight Operations , ,584-6, Maintain program affordability, Unjustified growth , 1C6C Combat Support Forces ,7 118,7-3, Improving funds management: Remove one-time fiscal year 218 increase , OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE, MARINE CORPS RESERVE Appropriations, $284,837, Budget estimate, ,57, Committee recommendation ,57, The Committee recommends an appropriation This is equal to the budget estimate. of $271,57,. COMMI'ITEE RECOMMENDED PROGRAM The following table summarizes the budget estimate for this appropriation, the Committee recommendation, and the Committee recommended adjustments to the budget estimate: Line 219 budget Committee Change from estimate recommendation budget estimate OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE, MARINE CORPS RESERVE BUDGET ACTIVITY I: OPERATING FORCES EXPEDITIONARY FORCES 1 OPERATING FORCES... 99,173 2 DEPOT MAINTENANCE... 19,43 99, , FACILITIES SUSTAINMENT, RESTORATION & MODERNIZATION... 39,962 39, BASE OPERATING SUPPORT... 11,829 11, TOTAL, BUDGET ACTIVITY 1... BUDGET ACTIVITY 4: ADMIN & SERVICEWIDE ACTIVITIES ADMINISTRATION AND SERVICEWlDE ACTIVITIES 26,394 26, ADMINISTRATION... 11,176 11, TOTAL, BUDGET ACTIVITY ,176 11, TOTAL, OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, MARINE CORPS RESERVE ,57 271,57... OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE, AIR FORCE RESERVE Appropriations, $3,22,37, Budget estimate, ,26,234, Committee recommendation ,247,534, The Committee recommends an appropriation of $3,247,534,. This is $12,7, below the budget estimate.

56 U:\219REPT\2REPT\2REPT.8 56 COMMI'ITEE RECOMMENDED PROGRAM The following table summarizes the budget estimate for this appropriation, the Committee recommendation, and the Committee recommended adjustments to the budget estimate: [In thousands of dollars) Line 119 budget Committee Change from estimate recommendation budget estimate OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE, AIR FORCE RESERVE BUDGET ACTIVITY 1: OPERATING FORCES AIR OPERATIONS 1 PRIMARY COMBAT FORCES ,853,437 1,83,437-5, 2 MISSION SUPPORT OPERATIONS. 25,369 25,369 3 DEPOT PURCHASE EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE , , FACILITIES SUSTAINMENT, RESTORATION & MODERNIZATION... 12, , ,8 5 CONTRACTOR LOGISTICS SUPPORT AND SYSTEM SUPPORT , , , 6 BASE OPERATING SUPPORT. 385, , TOTAL, BUDGET ACTIVITY ,152,279 3,148,79-4,2 BUDGET ACTIVITY 4: ADMIN & SERVICEWIDE ACTIVITIES ADMINISTRATION AND SERVICEWIDE ACTIVITIES 7 ADMINISTRATION. 71,188 71, RECRUITING AND ADVERTISING... 19,429 19,429 9 MILITARY MANPOWER AND PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT ,386 9,386 1 OTHER PERSONNEL SUPPORT ,512 7, AUDIOVISUAL , TOTAL, BUDGET ACTIVITY ,955 17,955 DECREASE UNACCOUNTED FOR ,5-8,5 TOTAL, OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE, AIR FORCE RE- SERVE... 3,26,234 3,247,534-12,7

57 U: \219REPT\2REPT\2REPT.9 57 COMMITTEE RECOMMENDED ADJUSTMENTS The following table details the adjustments Committee: Line recommended by the 219 budget Committee Change from estimate recommendation budget estimate OllA Primary Combat Forces ,853,437 1,83,437-5, Maintain program affordability: Projected underexeculion , OllR Facilities Sustainment, Restoration & Modernization.. 12, ,536 +2,8 Program increase: Additional demo ,8 OllW Contractor Logistics Support and System Support , , , Improving funds management: Program decrease unaccounted for.. -9, Program increase , UNDIST Improving funds management: Program decrease unaccounted for ,5-8,5 OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE, ARMY NATIONAL GUARD Appropriations, $7,284,17, Budget estimate, ,399,295, Committee recommendation... 7,261,295, The Committee recommends an appropriation of $7,261,295,. This is $138,, below the budget estimate. COMMITTEE RECOMMENDED PROGRAM The following table summarizes the budget estimate for this appropriation, the Committee recommendation, and the Committee recommended adjustments to the budget estimate: Line 219 budget Committee Change from estimate recommendation budget estimate OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE, ARMY NATIONAL GUARD BUDGET ACTIVITY l: OPERATING FORCES LAND FORCES 1 MANEUVER UNITS MODULAR SUPPORT BRIGADES ECHELONS ABOVE BRIGADE THEATER LEVEL ASSETS... 5 LAND FORCES OPERATIONS SUPPORT... 6 AVIATION ASSETS LAND FORCES READINESS 7 FORCE READINESS OPERATIONS SUPPORT LAND FORCES SYSTEMS READINESS... 9 LAND FORCES DEPOT MAINTENANCE.... LAND FORCES READINESS SUPPORT 1 BASE OPERATIONS SUPPORT llo FACILITIES SUSTAINMENT, RESTORATION & MODERNIZATION. 12 MANAGEMENT AND OPERATIONAL HEADQUARTERS... TOTAL, BUDGET ACTIVITY I... BUDGET ACTIVITY 4: ADMIN & SERVICEWIDE ACTIVITIES ADMINISTRATION AND SERVICEWIDE ACTIVITIES 13 SERVICEWIDE TRANSPORTATION ADMINISTRATION ,269 79,269-2, 193,42 193, , , ,124 84, ,881 31, , , ,86 765,286-18,8 51,353 51, , , ,129,942 1,18,942-21, 919, ,947 1,1,524 1,1,524 6,964,85 6,95,5-59,8 1,17 1, ,746 76,546 +3,8

58 U:\219REPT\2REPT\2REPT.9 58 Line 219 budget Committee Change from estimate recommendation budget estimate 15 SERVICEWIDE COMMUNICATIONS... 83,15 83, MANPOWER MANAGEMENT... 1,678 1, RECRUITING AND ADVERTISING , , REAL ESTATE MANAGEMENT.... 3,146 3, T OT AL, BUDGET ACTIVITY , ,245 +3,8 UNJUSTIFIED GROWTH , -88, WILDFIRE TRAINING , +6, TOTAL, OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, ARMY NATIONAL GUARD... 7,399,295 7,261, , COMMITTEE RECOMMENDED ADJUSTMENTS The following table details the adjustments Committee: recommended by the Line 219 budget Committee Change from estimate recommendation budget estimate 111 Maneuver Units... 81,269 Maintain program affordability, Unjustified growth Force Readiness Operations Support ,86 Improving funds management Program decrease unaccounted for.... Program increase: Advanced trauma training program 131 Base Operations Support... 1,129,942 Improving funds management Program decrease unaccounted for.... Program increase: Army National Guard preventative mental health program Administration... 72,746 Program increase: State partnershiprogram... UNDIST Maintain program affordability: Unjustified growth... UNDIST Program increase: National Guard wildfire training... 79, ,286 1,18,942 76,546-88, 6, -2, -2, -18,8-2, + 1,2-21, -25, +4, +3,8 +3,8-88, +6, Advanced Turbine Engine Army Maintenance [ATEAMJ.-The ATEAM is a military special repair activity located on Fort Riley, Kansas. The ATEAM provides rebuilt-agt 15 engines and XllOO transmissions in support of the Army National Guard, Army Material Command, the United States Marine Corps, the Tank and Automotive Command [TACOM], as well as foreign military partners. The Committee is encouraged that the U.S. Army, National Guard Bureau, TACOM and Kansas National Guard are establishing a Memorandum of Agreement to facilitate the contracting of parts and equipment when workload obligations exceed the capacity of the Kansas National Guard. However, authorities for Title 32 Federal technicians are not well defined as it relates to work on foreign military sales contracts specifically, such as Full Up Power Pack repairs. The unclear policies have hampered the ability of the ATEAM to meet obligations and maintain workload. Therefore, the Chief, National Guard Bureau, in coordination with the Secretary of the Army, is directed to conduct a review and establish policies that clearly define ATEAM authorities to fulfill obligations. The review shall inform a report addressing the following: (1) the duties and responsibilities of the U.S. Army, Na-

59 U:\219REPT\2REPT\2REPT.9 59 tional Guard Bureau, TACOM and the Kansas National Guard for the ATEAM to meet obligations; (2) an ATEAM workforce transition plan and policies for work on foreign military sales contracts; and (3) a justification from the Chief, National Guard Bureau, in coordination with the Kansas National Guard, that certifies any change in the workforce of the ATEAM will not adversely affect the ATEAM's ability to meet existing and future obligations of the U.S. Army and foreign military sales contracts. The report and a briefing on its findings to the House and Senate Appropriations Committees shall be completed not later 6 days after the enactment of this act. OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE, AIR NATIONAL GUARD Appropriations, $6,9,798, Budget estimate, ,427,622, Committee recommendation... 6,433,697, The Committee recommends an appropriation of $6,433,697,. This is $6,75, above the budget estimate. COMMITTEE RECOMMENDED PROGRAM The following table summarizes the budget estimate for this appropriation, the Committee recommendation, and the Committee recommended adjustments to the budget estimate: Line OPERATION ANO MAINTENANCE, AIR NATIONAL GUARD 219 budget Committee Change from estimate recommendation budget estimate Committee: BUDGET ACTIVITY l: OPERATING FORCES Al R OPERATIONS 1 AIRCRAFT OPERATIONS... 2,619,94 2,533,94-86, 2 MISSION SUPPORT OPERATIONS 623, ,54 + 8,275 3 DEPOT PURCHASE EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE , ,287 4 FACILITIES SUSTAINMENT, RESTORATION & MODERNIZATION. 33,792 39, ,5 5 CONTRACTOR LOGISTICS SUPPORT ANO SYSTEM SUPPORT.. 1,61,759 1,61,759 6 BASE OPERATING SUPPORT ,333 1,23, ,3 TOTAL, BUDGET ACTIVITY I.... 6,345,376 6,38,451-36,925 BUDGET ACTIVITY 4, ADMIN & SERVICEWIDE ACTIVITIES SERVICEWIDE ACTIVITIES 7 ADMINISTRATION. 45,711 45,711 8 RECRUITING ANO ADVERTISING... 36,535 36, TOTAL, BUDGET ACTIVITY ,246 82,246 DECREASE UNACCOUNTED FOR , -18, BUYBACK 3 PMAI JSTARS AIRCRAFT... 61, +61, TOTAL, OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, AIR NATIONAL GUARD... 6,427,622 6,433, ,75 COMMITTEE RECOMMENDED The following table details the adjustments ADJUSTMENTS recommended by the

60 U:\219REPT\2REPT\2REPT.9 6 line 219 budget Committee Change from estimate recommendation budget estimate OllF Aircraft Operations... 2,619,94 2,533,94 Maintain program affordability: Projected underexecution Improving funds management: Program decrease unaccounted for OllG Mission Support Operations... Improving funds management: Program decrease unaccounted 623, ,54 for Program increase: Disasterelief mobile kitchen trailers Program increase: Air National Guard readiness training ranges Program increase: Advanced trauma training program Program increase: Air National Guard preventative mental health program Program increase: State partnershiprogram OllR Facilities Sustainment, Restoration & Modernization.... Program increase: KC-46A emergent requirements... 33,792 39, OllZ Base Support ,333 Transfer: Air National Guard-requested transfer for environmental projects from Environmental Restoration, 1,23,633 Air Force account Program increase: Cold weather aviation systems Program increase: Sec. 315 of S.2987, Senate NDAA as reported... - UNDJST Improving funds management: Program decrease unaccounted for... UNDIST Program increase: Buyback of 3 PMAI JSTARS aircraft , 61, -86, -8, -6, +8,275-15, + 7,8 +9, +1,8 +4, ,5 +5,5 +35,3 + 11, +5,3 + 19, -18, +61, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ARMED FORCES Appropriations, Budget estimate, Committee recommendation.... $14,538, 14,662, 14,662, The Committee recommends an appropriation of $14,662,. This is equal to the budget estimate. ENVIRONMENTAL RESTORATION, ARMY Appropriations, $235,89, Budget estimate, ,449, Committee recommendation ,449, The Committee recommends an appropriation of $228,449,. This is $25,, above the budget estimate to address costs associated with remediating contamination caused by perfluorinated chemicals. ENVIRONMENTAL RESTORATION, NAVY Appropriations, Budget estimate, Committee recommendation.... The Committee recommends an appropriation This is equal to the budget estimate. $365,883, 329,253, 329,253, of $329,253,.

61 U:\219REPT\2REPT\2REPT.9 ENVIRONMENTAL 61 RESTORATION, AIR FORCE Appropriations, $352,549, Budget estimate, ,88, Committee recommendation ,88, The Committee recommends an appropriation of $365,88,. This is $69,, above the budget estimate due to a decrease of $11,, which is transferred to Operation and Maintenance, Air National Guard for execution and an additional $8,, provided to address costs associated with remediating contamination caused by perfluorinated chemicals. ENVIRONMENTAL RESTORATION, DEFENSE-WIDE Appropriations, $19,2, Budget estimate, ,926, Committee recommendation.... 8,926, The Committee recommends an appropriation of $8,926,. This is equal to the budget estimate. ENVIRONMENTAL RESTORATION, FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES Appropriations, $248,673, Budget estimate, Committee recommendation ,346, 212,346, The Committee recommends an appropriation This is equal to the budget estimate. of $212,346,. OVERSEAS HUMANITARIAN, DISASTER, AND CIVIC Arn Appropriations, $129,9, Budget estimate, ,663, Committee recommendation... 17,663, The Committee recommends an appropriation of $17,663,. This is equal to the budget estimate. COOPERATIVE THREAT REDUCTION ACCOUNT Appropriations, $35,, Budget estimate, Committee recommendation ,24, 335,24, The Committee recommends an appropriation This is equal to the budget estimate. of $335,24,. COMMITTEE RECOMMENDED PROGRAM The following table summarizes the budget estimate for this appropriation, the Committee recommendation, and the Committee recommended adjustments to the budget estimate: COOPERATIVE THREAT REDUCTION Strategic Offensive Arms Elimination. Chemical Weapons Destruction Biological Threat Reduction... Other Assessments/Admin Costs 219 budget estimate 2,823 5, ,585 25,448 Commrttee Change from recommendation budget estimate 2,823 5, ,585 25,448

62 U:\219REPT\2REPT\2REPT budget Committee Change from estimate recommendation budget estimate Global Nuclear Security _ WMD Proliferation Prevention Total, Cooperative Threat Reduction _ 29,1 74, ,24 29,1 74, ,24 DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE ACQUISITION WORKFORCE DEVELOPMENT FUND Appropriations, $5,, Budget estimate, ,, Committee recommendation ,, The Committee recommends an appropriation of $552,,. This is $152,, above the budget estimate. COMMITTEE RECOMMENDED PROGRAM The following table summarizes the budget estimate for this appropriation, the Committee recommendation, and the Committee recommended adjustments to the budget estimate: Lme 219 budget Committee Change from estimate recommendation budget estimate Department of Defense Acquisition Workforce Development Fund Unfunded Requirements.-The fiscal year 219 President's budget request includes $4,, for the Department of Defense Acquisition Workforce Development Fund [DAWDF]. Subsequent to submission of the budget request, the Under Secretary of Defense (Acquisition and Sustainment) submitted, in accordance with congressional direction, to the congressional defense committees, unfunded requirements of $152,, for the acquisition workforce in fiscal year 219. The Committee supports robust funding for the acquisition workforce and recommends an increase of $152,,. Department of Defense Acquisition Workforce Development Fund [DAWDFJ Reporting Requirements.-The Committee directs the Under Secretary for Defense (Acquisition and Sustainment) to continue providing the DA WDF Annual Report to the congressional defense committees, as modified for additional congressional reporting requirements. Further, the Under Secretary of Defense (Acquisition and Sustainment) is directed to provide the congressional defense committees, with the fiscal year 22 President's budget request, additional details regarding the total budgeted acquisition workforce by funding category, per previous congressional direction. June 25, 218 (2:28 p_m.) 1 Training and Development , , ,1 Program increase for unfunded requirement _ +96,1 2 Retention and Recognition... 16,2 25,7 + 9,5 Program increase for unfunded requirement _ ,5 3 Recruiting and Hiring 153, , ,4 Program increase for unfunded requirement ,4 Total, Department of Defense Acquisition Workforce Development Fund , 552, + 152,

63 U: \219REPT\2REPT\2REPT.1 TITLE III PROCUREMENT Funds appropriated under this title provide the resources required to purchase military equipment and hardware, including aircraft, ships, missiles, combat vehicles, ammunition, weapons, electronic sensors and communications equipment, and other procurement items. The President's fiscal year 219 budget requests a total of $13,464,596, for procurement appropriations. SUMMARY OF COMMITI'EE ACTION The Committee recommends procurement appropriations totaling $135,198,897, for fiscal year 219. This is $4,734,31, above the budget estimate. Committee recommended procurement appropriations for fiscal year 219 are summarized below: SUMMARY OF PROCUREMENT APPROPRIATIONS Account 219 budget estimate Committee Change from recommendation budget estimate Procurement: Aircraft Procurement, Army... 3,782,558 Missile Procurement, Army... 3,355,777 Procurement of Weapons and Tracked Combat Vehicles, Army... 4,489,118 Procurement of Ammunition, Army... 2,234,761 Other Procurement, Army... 7,999,529 Aircraft Procurement, Navy... 19,41,799 Weapons Procurement, Navy... 3,72,393 Procurement of Ammunition, Navy and Marine Corps... 1,6,29 Shipbuilding and Conversion, Navy... 21,871,437 Other Procurement, Navy... 9,414,355 Procurement, Marine Corps... 2,86,41 Aircraft Procurement, Air Force... 16,26,937 Missile Procurement, Air Force... 2,669,454 Space Procurement, Air Force.... 2,527,542 Procurement of Ammunition, Air Force.... 1,587,34 Other Procurement, Air Force... 2,89,164 Procurement, Defense-Wide... 6,786,271 National Guard and Reserve Equipment... Defense Production Act Purchases... 38,578 4,89,658 3,16,597 4,515,29 2,283,369 7,79,78 2,83,169 3,78,572 97,454 23,992,937 1,393,562 2,8,997 15,772,473 2,614,954 2,224,142 1,564,88 2,839,366 6,663,821 9, 38, ,18,1-195, , ,68-29, ,41, ,179-35,755 +2,121,5 +979,27-59, ,464-54,5-33,4-22,424-5, ,45 +9, Total ,464, ,198,897 +4,734,31 REPROGRAMMING GUIDANCE FOR ACQUISITION ACCOUNTS The Secretary of Defense is directed to continue to follow the reprogramming guidance as specified in the report accompanying the House version of the Department of Defense appropriations bill for fiscal year 28 (House Report ). Specifically, the dollar threshold for reprogramming funds will remain at $2,, for procurement and $1,, for research, development, test and evaluation. Also, the Under Secretary of Defense (Comptroller) is directed to continue to provide the congressional defense committees quarterly, (63)

64 U: \219REPT\2REPT\2REPT.1 64 spreadsheet-based DD Form 1416 reports for service and defensewide accounts in titles III and N of this act. Reports for titles III and IV shall comply with guidance specified in the explanatory statement accompanying the Department of Defense Appropriations Act for Fiscal Year 26. The Department shall continue to follow the limitation that prior approval reprogrammings are set at either the specified dollar threshold or 2 percent of the procurement or research, development, test and evaluation line, whichever is less. These thresholds are cumulative from the base for reprogramming value as modified by any adjustments. Therefore, if the combined value of transfers into or out of a procurement (Pl), or a research, development, test and evaluation (R-1) line exceeds the identified threshold, the Secretary of Defense must submit a prior approval reprogramming to the congressional defense committees. In addition, guidelines on the application of prior approval reprogramming procedures for congressional special interest items are established elsewhere in this report. FUNDING INCREASES The funding increases outlined in the tables for each appropriation account shall be provided only for the specific purposes indicated in the tables. PROCUREMENT SPECIAL INTEREST ITEMS s for which additional funds have been recommended or items for which funding is specifically reduced as shown in the tables detailing Committee recommended adjustments or in paragraphs using the phrase "only for" or "only to" are congressional special interest items for the purpose of the Base for Reprogramming (DD Form 1414). Each of these items must be carried on the DD Form 1414 at the stated amount, as specifically addressed in elsewhere in this report. PROCUREMENT OVERVIEW Army Organic Industrial Base.-The Committee directs the Secretary of the Army to provide 45-day written notification to the congressional defense committees prior to the Secretary approving civilian reductions in force that will result in an employment loss of 5 or more full-time employees at any Army organic industrial base facility. The notification shall include the impact that the proposed reduction in force will have on the ability to maintain the organic industrial base critical manufacturing capabilities as delineated in the Army Organic Industrial Base Strategy Report, a detailed accounting of the costs of implementing the reduction in force, and an assessment of the cost of, and time necessary, to restore any lost capability to meet future organic wartime manufacturing needs. Arsenal Sustainment Initiative.-The Committee continues to support the Department of the Army's efforts to ensure that the critical manufacturing capabilities of the nation's organic industrial base are maintained, and commends the Army for issuing a definitive make-or-buy directive for the manufacturing arsenals. The new guidance ensures that the arsenals will be given fair consideration

65 U:\219REPT\2REPT\2REPT.1 65 for every Army acquisition; provides for a 3-day review of all such decisions by the Army Acquisition Executive; requires all private sector companies to consider the arsenals as a potential supplier of component parts; and provides for an annual review of this overall process. The Committee encourages the Army to implement the new directive consistently to ensure the arsenals have the workload necessary to maintain the proficiency and capacity to meet the manufacturing needs of the nation during war and peacetime. The Committee notes that it has not yet received detailed recommendations from the Secretary of Defense on how the Air Force, Navy, and Marine Corps can better use the arsenals for their manufacturing needs, or what opportunities may exist for the arsenals to assist the services and the Defense Logistics Agency to procure for our spare parts inventory, as required by Senate Report June 25, 218 (2:28 p.m.}

66 U:\219REPT\2REPT\2REPT AIRCRAFT PROCUREMENT, ARMY Appropriations, $5,535,794, Budget estimate, ,782,558, Committee recommendation... 4,89,658, The Committee recommends an appropriation of $4,89,658,. This is $1,18,1, above the budget estimate. COMMITTEE RECOMMENDED PROGRAM The following table summarizes the budget estimate for this appropriation, the Committee recommendation, and the Committee recommended adjustments to the budget estimate:

67 C ro N -[D"o'.lla:rs,,init[ho u:saon'.ds:ji--cihian:g1e:fr:om t- Line Qty AIRCRAFT PROCUREMENT, ARMY AIRCRAFT FIXED WING UTILITY FNI CARGO AIRCRAFT MQ-1 UAV RQ-11 (RAVEN) 219 estimate budget Qty. Committee recommendation ,644 43, ,226 46, , , , , ,55 284, ,4,687 58, ,6 988, , ,138 99,278 24, ,235 Qty. estimate Budget C"l i.i::i I :::::::::::::::::::::::: I... : : 18 15, ,278 o..j / l'-' '""'! / l'-' / l'-' '""' '""' TOTAL, AIRCRAFT MODIFICATION OF AIRCRAFT 18 UNIVERSAL GROUND CONTROL EQUIPMENT 19 GRAY EAGLE MODS MULTI SENSOR ABN RECON [MIPJ 21 AH-64 MODS CH-47 CARGO HELICOPTER MODS 23 GRCSEMA MODS [MIPJ 24 ARL SEMA MODS [MIPJ EMARSS SEMA MODS [MIPJ 26 UTILITY/CARGO AIRPLANE MODS UTILITY HELICOPTER MODS 28 NETWORK AND MISSION PLAN 29 COMMS, NAY SURVEILLANCE 2,726, ,784, ,58,3 27, ,114 97, ,781 52, ,274 14, ,996 7, ,87 5, ,573 7, ,522 2, ,248 17, ,719 6, , ,614..., , , ,969

68 c:... C: ::, CD,/ I\) t,.:>.1 I\) a:, t_:cj I\) il.l a:,,/ "O [Dollars in thousands] t,.:> 3 Line Qty. 219 budget estimate Qty. Committee recommendation Change from Qty. --3,/ DEGRADED VISUAL ENVIRONMENT , 3, t,.:> 31 GATM ROLLUP... 26, , t_:cj 32 RQ--7 UAV MOOS... 13, , UAS MODS... 17, , , , , SUPPORT EQUIPMENT AND FACILITIES GROUND SUPPORT AVIONICS 34 AIRCRAFT SURVIVABILITY EQUIPMENT... 57, ,17 35 SURVIVABILITY CM... 5, , CMWS... 13, , COMMON INFRARED COUNTERMEASURES...,... 36, ,839 I... CT) CXl OTHER SUPPORT 38 AVIONICS SUPPORT EQUIPMENT... 1, , COMMON GROUND EQUIPMENT , ,818 4 AIRCREW INTEGRATED SYSTEMS , , AIR TRAFFIC CONTROL... 63, , INDUSTRIAL FACILITIES... 1, , LAUNCHER, 2.75 ROCKET... 1, ,91 44 LAUNCHER GUIDED MISSILE: LONGBOW HELLFIRE XM2... : TOTAL, SUPPORT EQUIPMENT AND FACILITIES , ,378 TOTAL, AIRCRAFT PROCUREMENT, ARMY ,782, , Budget estimate d... ' t_:cj '"cl I... I... I + 1,18,1

69 U:\219REPT\2REPT\2REPT COMMITTEE RECOMMENDED ADJUSTMENTS The following table details the adjustments Committee: recommended by the line 219 budget Committee Change from estimate recommendation budget estimate Utility FNI Aircraft Program increase: EMARSS-E MQ-1 UAV Improving funds management: Contractor Management Growth AH-64 Apache Block 1118 New Build Program increase: Additional helicopters _ 11 UH-6 Blackhawk M Model [MYP]_ Program increase, Fifteen aircraft for the ARNG 13 UH-6 Black Hawk A and L Models Program increase, ARNG UH/HH-6 Black Hawk SWIR integration EMARSS SEMA Mods [MIP] Program increase: EMARSS-E Pods Utility Helicopter Mods. Program increase: Light Utility Helicopter sustainment plan , , ,81 146,138 2,448 6,443 18,644 4,226 1,4,687 1,38,31 15,138 6,248 16, ,9 + 17,9-3,1-3,1 + 72, + 72, + 319, ,5 +4, +4, + 39,8 + 39,8 + 1, + 1, AH-64 Apache Block IIIB New Build.-The Committee recommendation includes $1,184,687, for the procurement of AH- 64 Apache Block IIIB New Build aircraft, an increase of $72,, above the budget request. The Secretary of the Army is encouraged to increase readiness by addressing the shortfall of aircraft in the Army National Guard Apache battalions. UH---6 Black Hawk.-The Committee recommendation includes $1,38,31, for the procurement of 64 UH-6M Black Hawk aircraft, an increase of $319,5, and 15 aircraft above the budget request. Of the 64 aircraft funded within the fiscal year 219 President's budget request, 15 are designated only for the Army National Guard. CH--47 Cargo Helicopter.-The Committee encourages the Army to accelerate retrofit of MH/CH-4 7 aircraft with vibration control systems to reduce aircrew fatigue, improve performance and increase operational time between maintenance of certain aircraft components.

70 U:\219REPT\2REPT\2REPT.12 7 MISSILE PROCUREMENT, ARMY Appropriations, $3,196,91, Budget estimate, ,355,777, Committee recommendation... 3,16,597, The Committee recommends an appropriation of $3,16,597,. This is $195,18, below the budget estimate. COMMI'ITEE RECOMMENDED PROGRAM The following table summarizes the budget estimate for this appropriation, the Committee recommendation, and the Committee recommended adjustments to the budget estimate:

71 _,,_.- c... C: :J (1) I'\) 5-'1 I'\) s 1\3 i\:> "C [Dollars in thousands] 3 Line I Qty OTHER MISSILES MISSILE PROCUREMENT, ARMY SURFACE-TO-AIR MISSILE SYSTEM LOWER TIER AIR AND MISSILE DEFENSE [AMD]... MSE MISSILE... INDIRECT FIRE PROTECTION CAPABILITY... INDIRECT FIRE PROTECTION CAPABILITY [AP-CY] budget estimate Qty 111, , ,636 31,286 Committee recommendation 15, , ,636 27,586 Qty. Change from I I Budget estimate c:::: / t,:)...! / t,:) / t,:)... t,:) AIR-TO-SURFACE MISSILE SYSTEM JOINT AIR-TO-GROUND MSLS [JAGM] 1,46 216,462 I 1,46 I 276,462 ANTI-TANK/ASSAULT MISSILE SYSTEM 8 JAVELIN (AAWS-M) SYSTEM SUMMARY TOW 2 SYSTEM SUMMARY... 1,472 1 TOW 2 SYSTEM SUMMARY [AP-CY] 11 GUIDED MLRS ROCKET [GMLRS]... 3, MLRS REDUCED RANGE PRACTICE ROCKETS (RRPR) 2,214 33, ,14 1,472 19, ,613 3,267 2,964 2,214 I 214, ,949 I. 355,859 2,964 -L,:1Ul -:i... TOTAL, OTHER MISSILES MODIFICATION OF MISSILES MODIFICATIONS 15 PATRIOT MODS ATACMS MODS. 17 GMLRS MOD.. 18 STINGER MODS 19 AVENGER MODS... 2 ITAS/TOW MODS MLRS MODS HIMARS MODIFICATIONS TOTAL, MODIFICATION OF MISSILES... SPARES AND REPAIR PARTS 23 I SPARES AND REPAIR PARTS I ,245, , , ,756 48,67 3, , ,196 1,75, ,737 I I 2,139,65 313, , ,756 31,93 3, ,268 1, ,636 I... I - 89,525 27,737

72 c... C: :, ( I\:) _c.n I\:) =: ()) i\) "' ()) "O 3 Line SUPPORT EQUIPMENT AND FACILITIES 241 AIR DEFENSE TARGETS 25 PRODUCTION BASE SUPPORT TOTAL, SUPPORT EQUIPMENT AND FACILITIES TOTAL, MISSILE PROCUREMENT, ARMY [Dollars in thousands] Qty 219 budget estimate 6,417 1,22 7,619 3,355,777 Qty. Committee recommendation 6,417 1,22 7,619 Qty 3,16, Change from Budget estimate - 195,18 / Nl I-' (D trj / Nl gg / Nl gg I-' Nl -J Nl

73 U:\219REPT\2REPT\2REPT COMMITTEE RECOMMENDED ADJUSTMENTS The following table details the adjustments recommended by the Committee: [In thousands of dollars) Line Lower Tier Air and Missile Defense [AMD].. Improving funds management: Prior year carryover of support costs 4 INDIRECT FIRE PROTECTION CAPABILITY INC 2-1 [AP-CY] Improving funds management: Forward financing program management Javelin [Aaws-M] System Summary Improving funds management: CLU retrofits funded in Public Law Improving funds management: Forward financing support costs. Tow 2 System Summary... Insufficient budget justification: Reimbursable to direct conversions unaccounted for. 11 Guided MLRS Rocket [GMLRS] Insufficient budget justification, Reimbursable to direct conversions unaccounted for 16 ATACMS MODS Improving funds management: Munitions funded in Public Law Avenger Mods Restoring acquisition accountability, M-SHORAD ahead of need. 21 MLRS Mods Improving funds management: Obsolescence NRE previously funded. Improving funds management: Unit cost savings Insufficient budget justification: Reimbursable to direct conversions unaccounted for 219 budget estimate lll,395 31,286 33,665 15,14 359, ,656 48,67 383,216 Committee Change from recommendation budget estimate 15,395-6, -6, 27,586-3,7-3,7 214,365-89,3-86,5-2,8 12,113-2,91-2,91 355,859-3,754-3, ,656-5, - 5, 31,93-17,577-17, ,268-21,948-12,3-7,6-2,48

74 U:\219REPT\2REPT\2REPT.13 PROCUREMENT 74 OF WEAPONS AND TRACKED COMBAT VEHICLES, ARMY Appropriations, $4,391,573, Budget estimate, ,489,118, Committee recommendation... 4,515,29, The Committee recommends an appropriation of $4,515,29,. This is $26,172, above the budget estimate. COMMITTEE RECOMMENDED PROGRAM The following table summarizes the budget estimate for this appropriation, the Committee recommendation, and the Committee recommended adjustments to the budget estimate:

75 C ro / N m f,-l N c.o / t "[Doo,lla r'."sinctiho'.u'.sa n,ds:jcih;anigleitr:om 219 budget Committee Line Qty PROCUREMENT OF WEAPONS AND TRACKED COMBAT VEHICLES (W&TCV), ARMY TRACKED COMBAT VEHICLES ARMORED MULTI PURPOSE VEHICLE (AMPV) estimate ,81 287,49 21,9 625,424 26, ,82 11,5 2,12 62,47 4, , ,6 1,75,999 Qty. 131 I s2 I recommendation Qty Budget estimate 478, I -1, , , ,424 26, ,92 11,5 2,12 62,47 4,511 I... I 141,231-1 O?d 925,41 1,72,243 -:i 1 >t:i --3 / f,-l Cl.:> 4,118, , MOD OF WEAPONS AND OTHER COMBAT VEH 29 I MK-19 GRENADE MACHINE GUN MODS 1,955 23,345 7,434 22,33 12, ,236 69,36 7,929 35,968 48,251 1,684 1,684

76 Line [Dollars in thousands] I Qty. I 219 budget estimate Qty. Committee recommendation 3, ,86 31, ,575 21, ,178 3, ,924 6, ,94 2, ,747 5, ,394 3, ,965 5, ,577 Qty. Budget estimate / N) I-'! / N) / N) I-' C.:> SUPPORT EQUIPMENT AND FACILITIES 39, ITEMS LESS THAN $5.M (WOCV-WTCV) 4 PRODUCTION BASE SUPPORT (WOCV-WTCV) 41 SMALL ARMS EQUIPMENT (SOLDIER ENH PROG) 3, ,174 3, ,284 1, ,64 --.:i m TOTAL, WEAPONS AND OTHER COMBAT VEHICLES 37, ,226 +4,45 TOTAL, PROCUREMENT OF W&TCV, ARMY 4,489, ,515, , /

77 U:\219REPT\2REPT\2REPT COMMITTEE RECOMMENDED ADJUSTMENTS The following table details the adjustments recommended by the Committee: Line 219 budget estimate Committee Change from recommendation budget estimate Armored Multi Purpose Vehicle [AMPVJ... Insufficient budget justification, Reimbursable to direct conversions unaccounted for... 4 Stryker (MOD)..... Transfer, Army requested transfer to W&TCV line 5. Restoring acquisition accountabilityc Revised DVH acquisition strategy... Insufficient budget justification, Reimbursable to direct conversions unaccounted for... Stryker Upgrade... Transfer, Army requested transfer from W&TCV line 4.. Program increase, DVHAl conversions. Bradley Program (MOD). Restoring acquisition accountability, Revised A4 acquisition strategy. Paladin Integrated Management [PIM]... Insufficient budget justification, Reimbursable to direct conversions unaccounted for... Program increase, PIM production restoration. 13 Joint Assault Bridge. Insufficient budget justification, Reimbursable to direct conversions unaccounted for. 14 Ml Abrams Tank (MOD).... Insufficient budget justification, Reimbursable to direct conversions unaccounted for 15 Abrams Upgrade Program... Insufficient budget justification, Reimbursable to direct conversions unaccounted for. 18 M24 Medium Machine Gun (7.62MM)... Program increase, M24 production. 2 GUN AUTOMATIC 3MM M23... Restoring acquisition accountabilityc Ahead of need. 23 XM32 Grenade Launcher Module [GLMJ Program increase Carbine Maintain program affordabilityc Unjustified management growth Small Arms-Fire Control. Restoring acquisition accountabilityc Undefinitized requirements 32 M2 5 Cal Machine Gun Mods.. Improving funds management Prior year carryover Mll9 Modifications. Insufficient budget justification, Reimbursable to direct conversions unaccounted for ,81 478,66 287,49 127,31 21,9 265,29 625, , ,82 458,92 142, , ,6 925,41 1,75,999 1,72,243 1,955 14,455 7, ,197 69,36 67,86 7,929 21,6 14,178 5,74 4,394-1,195-1,195-16, ,39-5, -5, , ,39 +94, -16, -16, + 17,1-2,9 + 11, -1,24-1,24-2,559-2,559-3,756-3, ,5 + 12,5-7,434-7, ,5 + 17,5-1,5-1,5-7,929-7,929-7,422-7,422-1,31-1,31 Army Stryker Double-V Hull Al.-Following the submission of the fiscal year 219 President's budget request, the Chief of Staff of the Army approved an Army Requirements Oversight Counsel [AROC] decision to upgrade and pure fleet all Flat-Bottom Hull [FBH] Stryker combat vehicles to the Double V-Hull Al variant [DVHAl] in an effort to improve troop survivability and mobility. The fiscal year 219 President's budget request includes $21,9, to upgrade three FBH Stryker vehicles to DVHAl variants. Subsequent to the AROC decision, the Army requested a budget based transfer of $149,39, to fund additional conver-

78 U:\219REPT\2REPT\2REPT sions. With the transfer, the Army can resource 53 DVHAl conversions totaling $171,29,. The Committee has also included a congressional adjustment of $94,, for 29 conversion:.;. In addition, the Committee understands that the Army plans to submit a reprogramming request to the congressional defense committees with a request to repurpose fiscal year 218 congressionally directed funding totaling $285,, for 91 DVHAl conversions. If the reprogramming action is approved by the congressional defense committees, the Army will have sufficient resources to fund conversions for half the vehicles in a Stryker Brigade Combat Team [SBCTJ. The Committee supports the net-zero fiscal year 219 transfer request and additional funding for DVHAl conversions, while anticipating the fiscal year 218 reprogramming request. However, the Committee is concerned with the Army's ability to maintain this level of effort through resourcing decisions in the Future Years Defense Program profile within future Program Objective Memorandum and budgeting cycles. Therefore, the Secretary of the Army shall report to the congressional defense committees not later than 3 days after the enactment of this act, on the Army's acquisition strategy to upgrade and pure fleet the remaining FBH SBCTs to DVHAl variants. M4Al Carbine Extended Forward Rail System.-The Army's Soldier Enhancement Program study published in December 217 found that the United States Special Operations Command's extended free-float rail system is substantially more accurate than the Army's legacy M4Al rail and readily available in the supply system. While the Committee supports the Army's modernization strategy which calls for developing and fielding the Next Generation Squad Automatic Weapon before developing and fielding the Next Generation Soldier Weapon, the Committee remains concerned that the Army is not accelerating modest and readily available upgrades to the M4Al Carbine and thereby improving solider lethality in the interim. Therefore, the Committee encourages the Secretary of the Army to accelerate adapting a government provided extended free-float rail system for the M4Al carbine.

79 U: \219REPT\2REPT\2REPT PROCUREMENT OF AMMUNITION, ARMY Appropriations, Budget estimate, Committee recommendation.... $2,548,74, 2,234,761, 2,283,369, The Committee recommends an appropriation of $2,283,369,. This is $48,68, above the budget estimate. COMMITTEE RECOMMENDED PROGRAM The following table summarizes the budget estimate for this appropriation, the Committee recommendation, and the Committee recommended adjustments to the budget estimate:

80 c... C: (1) I\J CD I\) i\> CD "O [Dollars in thousands] 3..:...- Line Qty. AMMUNITION PROCUREMENT OF AMMUNITION, ARMY SMALUMEDIUM CAL AMMUNITION CTG, 5.56MM, ALL TYPES..., CTG, 7.62MM, ALL TYPES... CTG, HANDGUN, ALL TYPES... CTG,.5 CAL, ALL TYPES... CTG, 2MM, ALL TYPES... CTG, 3MM, ALL TYPES... CTG, 4MM, ALL TYPES... MORTAR AMMUNITION i I,iM3:t!t::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::... TANK AMMUNITION 12 I CTG TANK 15MM AND 12MM: ALL TYPES ARTILLERY AMMUNITION 13 CTG, ARTY, 75MM AND 15MM: ALL TYPES ARTILLERY PROJECTILE, 155MM, ALL TYPES PROJ 155MM EXTENDED RANGE XM , ARTILLERY PROPELLANTS, FUZES AND PRIMERS, ALL TYPES MINES 17 I MINES AND CLEARING CHARGES, ALL TYPES ROCKETS 181 SHOULDER LAUNCHED MUNITIONS, ALL TYPES , ROCKET, HYDRA 7, ALL TYPES , OTHER AMMUNITION 44, ,656 ii!!s:::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: i I iif 219 budget estimate 41,848 86,199 2,158 65,573 8,198 77,995 69,781 45,28 46,853 83,3 168,11 Qty I... I 39, , , ,442 1,96 1,189 1,96 236, ,677 1s,9os I... I... 1,428,..., , Committee recommendation 41,848 86,199 19,159 65,573 8,198 77,995 69,781 Qty :rn 82, ,91 15,5 4,53 229,761 8,928 39,896 Change from Budget estimate I :::::::::::::::::::::::: I so CXl / t.:l... / t.:l / t.:l...,i:... /

81 '-- C (j :::, (I) / I\J SI' I\J (, ::,j CX) t_,:j I\) "'d i-.j e-3 CX) / "O 231 SIGNALS, ALL TYPES , ,121-2, 3 24 SIMULATORS, ALL TYPES , ,464 ::,j t_,:j MISCELLANEOUS "'d 25 AMMO COMPONENTS, ALL TYPES ,224 5,224 e-3 26 NON-LETHAL AMMUNITION, ALL TYPES ,31 2,81-1,5 / 27 ITEMS LESS THAN $5 MILLION ,193 11, AMMUNITION PECULIAR EQUIPMENT... 1,5 1,5 ::,j t_,:j 29 FIRST DESTINATION TRANSPORTATION (AMMO) 18,456 18, "'d 3 CLOSEOUT LIABILITIES..... ' e-3 TOTAL, AMMUNITION AMMUNITION PRODUCTION BASE SUPPORT I... I 1,679,322 1,67,55-8, PRODUCTION BASE SUPPORT 321 PROVISION OF INDUSTRIAL FACILITIES , , , ,535 ;! ;E1%::i EMNI.Tl.. D.E.1.Llll:.. L... 3, ,771 TOTAL, AMMUNITION PRODUCTION BASE SUPPORT , , , TOTAL, PROCUREMENT OF AMMUNITION, ARMY.... 2,234,761 2,283, ,68...

82 U:\219REPT\2REPT\2REPT COMMI'ITEE RECOMMENDED ADJUSTMENTS The following table details the adjustments recommended by the Committee: Line 219 budget estimate Committee Change from recommendation budget estimate 3 CTG, Handgun, All Types... 2,158 Restoring acquisition accountabilityc requirement previously funded (CTG, 9MM High Pressure Test M95) MM Mortar, All Types... 46,853 Restoring acquisition accountability, schedule slip (81MM HE M821)... Program increase MM Mortar, All Types. 83,3 Restoring acquisition accountability, LAP unit cost growth (12MM HE M933) Cartridges, Tank, 15MM and 12MM, All Types ,11 Restoring acquisition accountability, Program delays (XM1147)... Restoring acquisition accountability, schedule slip (12MM M829A4) Artillery Cartridges, 75MM & 15MM, All Types ,341 Restoring acquisition accountability, requirement previously funded (15MM IR ILLUM Ml64) Artillery Projectile, 155MM, All Types. 211,442 Realignment M795, Army requested Realignment BONUS, Army requested. Program increase, Mll Program increase, M Artillery Propellants, Fuzes and Primers, All ,677 Restoring acquisition accountability, requirement previously funded (PGK) Mines & Clearing Charges, All Types 15,95 Restoring acquisition accountability, unit cost growth (MK7)... Restoring acquisition accountability, Production engineering growth (MK7) Rocket, Hydra 7, All Types ,211 Restoring acquisition accountability, Engineering cost growth (Guided Rockets).... Program increase, Unfunded requirement... 2 CAD/PAD, All Types.... 1,428 Improving funds management, Forward financing. 22 Grenades, All Types... 19,896 Program increase, Ml8 variants Signals, All Types ,121 Improving funds management: Forward financing Non-Lethal Ammunition, All Types.... 4,31 Improving funds management: Forward financing Industrial Facilities ,133 Program increase... 19,159 47,43 82, ,91 34, ,442 26,677 15,5 229,761 8,928 39,896 8,121 2,81 451, ,45 + 5, ,2-8,2-8, -4,668-4, , - 33, + 33, + 5, + 5, -3, -3, ,55-11,45 +3, -1,5-1,5 + 2, + 2, -2, -2, -1,5-1,5 + 57, ,425

83 U:\219REPT\2REPT\2REPT OTHER PROCUREMENT, ARMY Appropriations, Budget estimate, Committee recommendation.... $8,298,418, 7,999,529, 7,79,78, The Committee recommends an appropriation of $7,79,78,. This is $29,451, below the budget estimate. COMMITTEE RECOMMENDED PROGRAM The following table summarizes the budget estimate for this appropriation, the Committee recommendation, and the Committee recommended adjustments to the budget estimate:

84 L C m N N s m [DColOlar,s,in"tho us:a nds];:ch;angje"from Line Qty OTHER PROCUREMENT, ARMY TACTICAL AND SUPPORT VEHICLES NON-TACTICAL VEHICLES 161 HEAVY ARMORED SEDAN 17 PASSENGER CARRYING VEHICLES 18 NONTACTICAL VEHICLES, OTHER 219 budget estimate 16,512 16,951 5,123 46,988 1,319,436 6,48 132,882 14, ,15 31,892 38,128 78, ,39 15,415 Qty Committee recommendation Qty Budget estimate 16,512 16,951 17,123 46,988 1,32,473 6,48 132,882 14, ,691 28,596 I... 38,128 75,265 I - 3, ,39 15,415.,.. / N) 1--' ' ""lj >-3 / N) / N) 1--' 1 1,98,441 1,988, COMM-SATELLITE COMMUNICATIONS 271 DEFENSE ENTERPRISE WIDEBAND SATCOM SYSTEMS 28 TRANSPORTABLE TACTICAL COMMAND COMMUNICATIONS 15, ,117 62,727 13,895 4,866 18,133 56,737 86,57 43,775 62,727 13,895 4,866 18,133 69,96 /

85 c... (j C :::, (D / I\J,CJ1 I-' I\J (,D s ;:rj CX) tzj I\) "'lj i\:i e-3 CX) / "O 29 SHF TERM... 13,1 13,1 t 3 SMART-T (SPACE)... 9,16 9,16 ;:rj 31 GLOBAL BRDCST SVC-BBS. 25,647 25,647 tzj 32 ENROUTE MISSION COMMAND (EMC) 37,41 37,41 "'lj COMM-COMBAT SUPPORT COMM / COMM-C3 SYSTEM 36 I COE TACTICAL SERVER INFRASTRUCTURE (TSIJ... 2,5... 2,5 "'lj 38 HANDHELD MANPACK SMALL FORM FIT (HMS) , ,9 4 RADIO TERMINAL SET, MIDS LVT(2).. 4, : I... I-' ') H!7 41 TRACTOR DESK TRACTOR RIDE 9, SPIDER FAMILY OF NETWORKED MUNITIONS INCREASE 17, TACTICAL COMMUNICATIONS AND PROTECTIVE SYSTEM UNIFIED COMMAND SUITE... 17,87 47 COTS COMMUNICATIONS EQUIPMENT , FAMILY OF MED COMM FOR COMBAT CASUALTY CARE 2s.m I. I CJ,!// I ex, 1 COMM-INTELLIGENCE 5 Cl AUTOMATION ARCHITECTURE [MIPJ... 9,74 51 DEFENSE MILITARY DECEPTION INITIATIVE 2, tm INFORMATION SECURITY 53 FAMILY OF BIOMETRICS... 8, INFORMATION SYSTEM SECURITY PROGRAM-ISSP , 55 COMMUNICATIONS SECURITY (COMSEC)... 88, DEFENSIVE CYBER OPERATIONS. 51, INSIDER THREAT PROGRAM-UNIT ACTIVITY MONITOR PERSISTENT CYBER TRAINING ENVIRONMENT... 3, COMM-LONG HAUL COMMUNICATIONS 59 BASE SUPPORT COMMUNICATIONS I... I 34,434 COMM-BASE COMMUNICATIONS 6 INFORMATION SYSTEMS , EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT MODERNIZATION PROGRAM , HOME STATION MISSION COMMAND CENTERS (MSMCC)... 24, INSTALLATION INFO INFRASTRUCTURE MOD PROGRAM.. 216,433 e-3 e-3

86 C m N N N N [Dollars in thousands] t-----,- Line ELECT EQUIP Qty. I 219 budget I Qty estimate I Committee recommendation 1, ,954 5,434 2,623 45, Qty. Change from Budget estimate ; / I-' (. / / I-' ,165 5,875 8,497 I 1,585 5, I SRS m ELECT EQUIP-TACTICAL C2 SYSTEMS 1 I ARMY COMMAND POST INTEGRATED INFRASTRUCTURE 77, ,68 22,882 17,393 6,74 125, ,691 66,574 2,783 8,553 21, , I 2,855 /

87 '- C: ::, (I) I\J 5-11 I\J ) I\) i ) ""C ELECT EQUIP-SUPPORT 1191 PRODUCTION BASE SUPPORT [C-E] 12 BCT EMERGING TECHNOLOGIES OTHER SUPPORT EQUIPMENT BRIDGING EQUIPMENT 1251 TACTICAL BRIDGING. 126 TACTICAL BRIDGE, FLOAT-RIBBON 127 COMMON BRIDGE TRANSPORTER RECAP , + 144,5-299,649 -:i / t-:i I-' (. / t-:i "'O --3 / t-:i I-' Ol

88 '-- C ::, CD / I\:) Ni 5.n... I\:) c.o s :,:I t_:rj r'3 '"d i\, >-3 / "O [Dollars in thousands] 3 Ni :,:I Change from t_:rj Line I Qty 219 budget Qty Committee estimate recommendation '"d Qty. Budget estimate >-3 / 131 HUSKY MOUNTED DETECTION SYSTEM (HMDS)... 4, ,834 Ni 132 ROBOTIC COMBAT SUPPORT SYSTEM 4,29 4,29 :,:I 133 EOD ROBOTICS SYSTEMS RECAPITALIZATION 14, ,826 t_:rj 134 ROBOTICS AND APPLIQUE SYSTEMS 31,456 31,456 '"d 136 REMOTE DEMOLITION SYSTEMS... 1,748 1, ITEMS LESS THAN $SM, COUNTERMINE EQUIPMENT. 7,829 7, FAMILY OF BOATS AND MOTORS 5,86 5, COMBAT SERVICE SUPPORT EQUIPMENT 139 HEATERS AND ECU'S 9,852 9, SOLDIER ENHANCEMENT ,13 1, PERSONNEL RECOVERY SUPPORT SYSTEM [PRSSJ... 5,875 5, GROUND SOLDIER SYSTEM... 92,487 34, MOBILE SOLDIER POWER 3,774 3, FIELD FEEDING EQUIPMENT... 17,521 u.s21 I... I 146 CARGO AERIAL DEL & PERSONNEL PARACHUTE SYSTEM... 44,855 44, FAMILY OF ENGR COMBAT AND CONSTRUCTION SETS 17,173 15, ITEMS LESS THAN $SM (ENG SPT) 2, 2, PETROLEUM EQUIPMENT 1491 QUALITY SURVEILLANCE EQUIPMENT... 1,77 f... I 1,77 15 DISTRIBUTION SYSTEMS, PETROLEUM & WATER. 39, ,635 MEDICAL EQUIPMENT 151 COMBAT SUPPORT MEDICAL.... s1,7s2 I I 77,752 MAINTENANCE EQUIPMENT 152 MOBILE MAINTENANCE EQUIPMENT SYSTEMS. 37,722 34, ITEMS LESS THAN $5.M (MAINT EQ). 4,985 4,985 CONSTRUCTION EQUIPMENT 155 SCRAPERS, EARTHMOVING... 7,961 7, HYDRAULIC EXCAVATOR 1,355 1, ALL TERRAIN CRANES 13,31 13, HIGH MOBILITY ENGINEER EXCAVATOR [HMEEJ FOS. 46,48 46,48 16 ENHANCED RAPID AIRFIELD CONSTRUCTION CAPAP CONST EQUIP ESP 37,17 35,652 e /

89 c... C: ::, (D / I\) N) 9' I\) (X) trj "3 i\j (X) / "C 162 ITEMS LESS THAN $5.M (CONST EQUIP)... 6, , N) 3 - RAIL FLOAT CONTAINERIZATION EQUIPMENT 163 ARMY WATERCRAFT ESP... 27, , , ITEMS LESS THAN $5.M (FLOAT/RAIL)... 8, , 'ti / 1651 GENERATORS AND ASSOCIATED EQUIPMENT..., 1 133, I 133, ,... N) 166 TACTICAL ELECTRIC POWERECAPITALIZATION , , trj 167 I FAMILY OF FORKLIFTS... I 12,91 I... I 12,91 I COMBAT TRAINING CENTERS SUPPORT , ,428 I... I 169 TRAINING DEVICES, NONSYSTEM , , CLOSE COMBAT TACTICAL TRAINER... 33,8 33,8 171 AVIATION COMBINED ARMS TACTICAL TRAINER , ,7 172 GAMING TECHNOLOGY IN SUPPORT OF ARMY TRAINING , ,161 I... C: '""' ' gg I... I '""' i:.n I 4, ,21 I... I CALIBRATION SETS EQUIPMENT INTEGRATED FAMILY OF TEST EQUIPMENT [IFTE] , , , TEST EQUIPMENT MODERNIZATION [TEMOD] , , M25 STABILIZED BINOCULAR... 4, , RAPID EQUIPPING SOLDIER SUPPORT EQUIPMENT , , PHYSICAL SECURITY SYSTEMS (OPA3) , , BASE LEVEL COM'L EQUIPMENT , , MODIFICATION OF IN-SVC EQUIPMENT (OPA-3)... 49, , PRODUCTION BASE SUPPORT (TH) , , SPECIAL EQUIPMENT FOR USER TESTING , , TRACTOR YARD... 4, ,956 TOTAL, OTHER SUPPORT EQUIPMENT ,926, ,855, ,887 SPARE AND REPAIR PARTS 184 I INITIAL SPARES--C&E... 9, ,817 TOTAL, SPARE AND REPAIR PARTS , , I CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS... 4, ,51 '

90 ,.-- c... C: :; Cl) I\) _u, I\) s co 1\3 j\j co ""C i Line TOTAL, OTHER PROCUREMENT, ARMY. [Dollars in thousands] Qty 219 budget Qty estimate 7,999,529 Change lrom Committee recommendation Qty. Budget estimate 7,79,78-29,451 t.o / Nl """ t.o ttj / Nl ttj / Nl """ Ot /

91 U:\219REPT\2REPT\2REPT COMMITTEE RECOMMENDED The following table details the adjustments Committee: ADJUSTMENTS recommended by the Lme 219 budget estimate Committee Change from recommendation budget estimate Ambulance, 4 LITIER, 5/4 TON, 4x4 Program increase, HMMWV ambulances. Joint Light Tactical Vehicle... Maintain program affordabilityc Maintain test support level of effort... 1 Family of Heavy Tactical Vehicles [FHTV] Restoring acquisition accountability, CLS contract award delay. Insufficient budget justification, Reimbursable to direct conversions unaccounted for. 12 Hvy Expanded Mobile Tactical Truck Ext Serv. Improving funds management Prior year carryover. 14 Modification of In Svc Equip.. Insufficient budget justification, Reimbursable to direct conversions unaccounted for 2 Signal Modernization Program. Improving funds management SFAB equipment funded in Public Law Insufficient budget justification, Reimbursable to direct conversions unaccounted for. Restoring acquisition accountability, TROPO delays 21 Tactical Network Technology Mod In Svc Maintain program affordability, Unjustified equipment and support growth Insufficient budget justification, Reimbursable to direct conversions unaccounted for. 28 Transportable Tactical Command Communications Insufficient budget justification, Reimbursable to direct conversions unaccounted for Program increase 38 Handheld Manpack Small Form Fit [HMS] Improving funds management SFAB equipment funded in Public Law Improving funds management Site activation carryover. 47 COTS Communications Equipment. Improving funds management SFAB equipment funded in Public Law Defensive CYBER Operations Insufficient budget justification, Program discrepancies. 58 Persistent Cyber Training Environment. Restoring acquisition accountability, Ahead of need. 59 Base Support Communications Insufficient budget justification, Reimbursable to direct conversions unaccounted for 6 Information Systems... Restoring acquisition accountabilityc ARCYBER funded in excess to requirement Installation Info Infrastructure Mod Program Maintain program affordabilityc Unjustified growth. Insufficient budget justification, Reimbursable to direct conversions unaccounted for 68 DCGS-A [MIPJ... Insufficient budget justification, Reimbursable to direct conversions unaccounted for 81 Family of Persistent Surveillance Cap. [MIPJ Program increase, SOUTHCOM force protection. 82 Counterintelligence/Security Countermeasures Program increase, SOUTHCOM ISR requirements. 84 Sentinel Mods... 5,123 1,319, ,15 31,892 78,57 15, ,117 56, , ,835 51,343 3, 34,434 95, , ,863 79,629 17,123 1,32, ,691 28,596 75,265 86,57 43,775 69,96 298,475 63,835 45,343 32,557 81,69 174, ,954 1,585 5,4 77, , + 12, -16,963-16,963-16,414-15,219-1,195-3,296-3,296-3,242-3,242-64,27-41, -2,9-2,37-38,342-35, -3, ,223-4, , - 53,9-51,591-1, , -128, -6, -6, -3, -3, -1,877-1,877-13,949-13,949-41,495-2, -21,495-7,99-7,99 + 1, ,585 +5,4 + 5,4-1,877

92 U:\219REPT\2REPT\2REPT Line 219 budget estimate Committee Change from recommendation budget _-:i,..c!e Insufficient budget justification: Reimbursable to direct conversions unaccounted for Night Vision Devices Program increase: Digital night vision test devices 9 Indirect Fire Protection Family of Systems Improving funds management: Forward financing support costs Restoring acquisition accountability: ReQuirements previously funded 91 Family of Weapon Sights [FWS] Restoring acquisition accountability, FWS-S program 153,18 46,74 14, ,68 6,74 125,513 delays _ 94 Joint Battle Command-Platform [JBC-P] , ,691 Improving funds management: SFAB equipment funded in Public Law Insufficient budget justification: Reimbursable to direct conversions unaccounted for _ 12 AIR & MSL Defense Planning & Control Sys Insufficient budget justification: Reimbursable to direct conversions unaccounted for _ 14 Network Management Initialization and Service _ Insufficient budget justification: Reimbursable to direct conversions unaccounted for _ 15 Maneuver Control System [MCSJ _ Insufficient budget justification: Reimbursable to direct conversions unaccounted for _ 33,837 18,329 38,15 29,913 15,87 29, Integrated Personnel and Pay System-Army [IPPS-AJ_ Restoring acquisition accountability: Release 3_ delays _ 29, Production Base Support [C-E] _ ,56 Program increase, Advanced manufacturing _ BCT Emerging Technologies ,5 Program increase: Cyber electromagnetic activities _ 125 Tactical Bridging ,229 81,729 Restoring acquisition accountability, LOCB acquisition strategy change Common Bridge Transporter [CBT] Recap ,916 78,892 Insufficient budget justification, Reimbursable to direct conversions unaccounted for Grnd Standoff Mine Detectn Sysm [GSTAMIDS] Insufficient budget justification: Reimbursable to direct conversions unaccounted for 29,883 27, EOD Robotics Systems Recapitalization 14,28 18,826 Transfer ground robotics MTRS standardization: Army-re Quested from RDT&E line 138 _ 142 Ground Soldier System Improving funds management: SFAB equipment funded in Public Law _ Insufficient budget justification: Reimbursable to direct conversions unaccounted for _ 147 Family of Engr Combat and Construction Sets _ _ Insufficient budget justification, Reimbursable to direct conversions unaccounted for 15 Distribution Systems, Petroleum & Water _ Insufficient budget justification: Reimbursable to direct conversions unaccounted for ,487 17,173 39,73 34,781 15,978 35, Combat Support Medical 57,752 77,752 Program increase: Enhanced rotary wing medical kits _ Program increase: Enhanced vehicle medical kits _ 152 Mobile Maintenance EQuipment Systems _ Insufficient budget justification: Reimbursable to direct conversions unaccounted for 161 Const EQuip Esp _ Insufficient budget justification: Reimbursable to direct conversions unaccounted for _ 37,722 37,17 34,479 35,652 June 25, 218 (2:28 p_m,) - 1, ,5 + 2,5-4, -1, -3, -15,224-15,224-21,548-13,358-8,19-3,924-3,924-3,242-3,242-8,871-8,871-29,239-29, , + 15, + 144, ,5-16,5-16,5-1,24-1,24-2,217-2,217 +4,618 +4,618-57,76-56, -1,76-1,195-1,195-4,95-4,95 + 2, + 1, + 1, -3,243-3,243-1,365-1,365

93 U: \219REPT\2REPT\2REPT [In thousands of dollars) Line 219 budget Committee Change from estimate recommendation budget estimate 163 Army Watercraft Esp... 27,711 Insufficient budget justification, Reimbursable to direct conversions unaccounted for Combat Training Centers Support ,228 Restoring acquisition accountability: Ahead of need Integrated Family of Test Equipment UFTE] ,295 Insufficient budget justification, Reimbursable to direct conversions unaccounted for Rapid Equipping Soldier Support Equipment... 9,879 Program increase, Rapid equipping force Physical Security Systems (OPA3)... 54,43 Insufficient budget justification, Reimbursable to direct conversions unaccounted for... 25, ,428 72,542 11,879 51,484-2,48-2,48-1,8-1,8-3,753-3,753 +2, +2, -2,559-2,559 HMMWV Ambulances.-The Committee is concerned about the Army's current level of investment to modernize the active component ground ambulance fleet. To accelerate the modernization of ground ambulances, the Committee recommends an increase of $12,, over the fiscal year 219 President's budget request. Tactical Communication and Protective Systems.-The Committee is aware that hearing damage is a risk faced by warfighters both in combat and in training. The ability to hear clearly and quickly evaluate one's surroundings is essential for situational awareness and mission success. The Committee notes that technologies have been developed to allow radio operators to wear hearing protection without inhibiting situational awareness. The Committee is concerned that these technologies are not being acquired in conjunction with procurements of tactical radio. This means that many radios are issued with substandard hearing protection or are unable to be issued at all while awaiting deliveries of compliant headsets. The Committee encourages the Under Secretary of Defense for Personnel and Readiness to work in conjunction with the service acquisition executives to ensure that procurements of radios are in step with procurements of tactical hearing protection and communication devices so that a complete system with the most utility and protection available can be delivered to the warfighter. Army Network Modernization Strategy.-The Committee continues to support the Department of the Army's efforts to modernize its air-land ad-hoc, mobile tactical communications and data networks and notes that, pursuant to section 112 of the 218 National Defense Authorization Act (Public Law ), the Army provided its network modernization strategy to Congress. The Committee further notes that the Army is currently staffing architecture and standards documents in addition to multiple overarching Information System Initial Capabilities Documents in support of network modernization efforts. However, the Committee is concerned that the modernization strategy is continuing to evolve and that the justification supporting the fiscal year 219 President's budget request does not provide the requisite details to appropriately assess the resourcing requirements and acquisition objectives at the program, project, and activity level. Therefore, not later than 9 days after the enactment of,this act, the Program Executive Officer Command Control Communications

94 U:\219REPT\2REPT\2REPT Tactical [PEO C3T], in conjunction with the Director, Network Cross-Functional Team, shall submit a network acquisition roadmap to the congressional defense committees, w include detailed actions and milestones, which satisfies the following objectives: (1) describes the architecture and standards for the unified transport layer and common operating environment that will serve as integrating guidance for the development and acquisition of modernization technologies; (2) categorizes under capability sets, all current and future network acquisitions and modernization activities, to include currently funded programs and requirements that align with the Army's network strategy; (3) development and approval of requirements documents that support the Army's network strategy and serve as overarching guidance for enabling systems and technologies; (4) details the plan to develop, test with appropriate instrumentation, and field the integrated capabilities, as part of one or more programs of record or other acquisition efforts; (5) an accounting of the Army's fiscal year 219 budget request Future Year's Defense Program profile for investment appropriations that support the Army's network strategy based on the defined categories. This should include a detailed account of all programs, projects, and activities within existing budget line items, existing programs of records, and any future investments within the FYDP; and (6) a proposal to realign resources into budget line items by capability set or a plan for discernible cost elements and activities within the existing budget line items. Additionally, the PEO C3T shall submit to the congressional defense committees a test and evaluation plan for the Secure But Unclassified [SBU] components of the Integrated Tactical Network architecture prior to fielding any additional SBU systems to operational units, beyond fiscal year 219. Furthermore, the PEO C3T shall provide notification to the congressional defense committees upon completion of cyber and vulnerability test and evaluation of the enabling SBU capabilities.

95 U:\219REPT\2REPT\2REPT AIRCRAFT PROCUREMENT, NAVY Appropriations, $19,957,38, Budget estimate, ,41,799, Committee recommendation... 2,83,169, The Committee recommends an appropriation of $2,83,169,. This is $1,41,37, above the budget estimate. COMMITTEE RECOMMENDED PROGRAM The following table summarizes the budget estimate for this appropriation, the Committee recommendation, and the Committee recommended adjustments to the budget estimate:

96 '- C c:::: :::, CD / I\) N) p, f-' I\) ' (X) trj "'d i "' >--3 (X) / "O [Dollars in thousands] N) 3 Change from trj 219 budget Committee line I Qty Qty. estimate recommendation Budget "'d Qty estimate >--3 AIRCRAFT PROCUREMENT, NAVY I I --- / N) trj "'d 1,937, ,852,953 58,799 58,799 >--3 1,144, ,885, ,82 14,1 14,1... f-' 2,312, ,598,49-1- _,_ n,?n? m 228, ,492 1,113,84 8 1,22,84 161,79 161,79 9 V-22 (MEDIUM LIFT). 7 86, ,24,337 1 V-22 (MEDIUM LIFT) [AP-CY] 36,955 28,755 ll UH-lY/AH-lZ , s2.15s I P-8A POSEIDON ,83, ,755, P-8A POSEIDON [AP-CY]. 18, 18, 16 E-2D ADV HAWKEYE 4 742, ,193 +I + 161,5 17 E-2D ADV HAWKEYE [AP-CY]. 24,734 24,734. I AO A/'ln ' m 11,728,769 12,92,91 + 1,173, C-4A 2 26, 2 KC-13J. 2 16, KC-13J [AP-CY]. 11,13 22 MQ-4 TRITON , MQ-4 TRITON [AP-CY]. 58, MQ-8 UAV. 54, STUASLO UAV.. 14, VH-92A EXECUTIVE HELO ,15 TOTAL, OTHER AIRCRAFT 1,822,353 1,65, , MODIFICATION OF AIRCRAFT 27 I AEA SYSTEMS... 25,277 I I 25,277

97 <-- C: C; :::l CD / I\) 1:-v _c.n I-' I\) ' CX) t_%j I\J 'tj j,j 1--3 CX) / ""O 28 AV-8 SERIES 58,577 58,577 1:-v i 29 ADVERSARY... 14, ,66 3 F-18 SERIES 1,213,482 1,125,582 t_%j 31 H-53 SERIES 7, ,997 'tj 32 SH-6 SERIES. 13, , / 33 H-1 SERIES... 87,143 87, EP-3 SERIES 3,633 3,633 1:-v 35 P-3 SERIES t_%j 36 E-2 SERIES 88,78 8,98-7,8 'tj 37 TRAINER A/C SERIES ll,66 ll, C-2A... ll,327 8,327-3, 39 C-13 SERIES 79,75 7,575-8,5 I-' 4 FEWSG 597 <;Q7 en 41 CARGO/TRANSPORT A/C SERIES 8, E-6 SERIES. 181, EXECUTIVE HELICOPTERS SERIES 23, SPECIAL PROJECT AIRCRAFT. 7,62 45 T-45 SERIES , POWER PlANT CHANGES , JPATSERIES... 27, AVIATION LIFE SUPPORT MODS , i:4 I... I ' -:i 49 COMMON ECM EQUIPMENT 166,36 5 COMMON AVIONICS CHANGES. 117, COMMON DEFENSIVE WEAPON SYSTEM 1, ID SYSTEMS... 4, P-8 SERIES 71, MAGTF EW FOR AVIATION... 11,59 55 MQ-8 SERIES... 37,97 57 V-22 (TILT/ROTOR ACFT) OSPREY 214,82 58 NEXT GENERATION JAMMER [NGJ] F-35 STOVL SERIES... 36,618 6 F-35 CV SERIES.. 21, QUICK REACTION CAPABILITY (QRC). 11, MQ-4 SERIES... 48, RQ-21 SERIES... 6,94 TOTAL, MODIFICATION OF AIRCRAFT 3,156,663 3,41, ,952 AIRCRAFT SPARES AND REPAIR PARTS 64 I SPARES AND REPAIR PARTS.... I... I 1,792,92 I... I 1,992,92 I.... I + 2,

98 c... C: :::, <D I\).!JI I\) OJ I\J i\j OJ 'O [Dollars in thousands] t-, ,-,--, r-;::=:-;::-- line Qty. AIRCRAFT SUPPORT EQUIPMENT AND FACILITIES 65 COMMON GROUND EQUIPMENT 66 AIRCRAFT INDUSTRIAL FACILITIES 67 WAR CONSUMABLES 68 OTHER PRODUCTION CHARGES 69 SPECIAL SUPPORT EQUIPMENT 7 FIRST DESTINATION TRANSPORTATION 119 budget estimate 421,66 24,496 42,18 1,444 49,489 1,951 Qty Committee recommendation 421,66 24,496 42,18 1,444 49,489 1,951 Qty. Change from Budget estimate / t-:>... "' / t-:> / t-:>... O') TOTAL, AIRCRAFT SUPPORT EQUIPMENT & FACILITIES 541,94 541,94 TOTAL, AIRCRAFT PROCUREMENT, NAVY 19,41,799 2,83, ,41,37 "'

99 U: \219REPT\2REPT\2REPT COMMITI'EE RECOMMENDED ADJUSTMENTS The following table details the adjustments recommended by the Committee: [In thousands of dollars) Line 219 budget Committee Change from estimate recommendation budget estimate F/A-18E/F (Fighter) Hornet.... 1,937,553 1,852,953-84,6 Restoring acquisition accountability: Unit cost savings ,1 Maintain program affordability: Unjustified growth in support costs ,5 Joint Strike Fighter CV... 1,144,958 1,885, ,82 Program increase: Four aircraft for the Marine Corps , Program increase: Four aircraft for the Navy , Restoring acquisition accountability: Unit cost savings ,18 JSF STOVL.... 2,312,847 2,598, ,22 Program increase: Four aircraft , Restoring acquisition accountability: Unit cost savings ,798 CH-53K (Heavy Lilt)... 1,113,84 1,22,84-91, Maintain program affordability: Unjustified support cost growth , V-22 (Medium Lilt) ,337 1,24, , Program increase: Three aircraft for the Marine Corps , Restoring acquisition accountability: Unit cost savings , 1 V-22 (Medium Lilt)-AP... 36,955 28,755-8,2 Maintain program affordability: Excess to need ,2 14 P-8A Poseidon... 1,83,753 1,755,353-48,4 Restoring acquisition accountability: Anticipated unit cost contract award savings , Maintain program affordability: Excessupport costs ,4 16 E-2D Adv Hawkeye ,693 94, ,5 Program increase: One aircraft , Restoring acquisition accountability: Unit cost savings ,5 18 C-4A , -26, Improving funds management: Two C-4s funded in Public Law , 21 KC-13J-AP ,13 12,13-8, Maintain program affordability: Excess advance procurement , 25 STUASLO UAV ,866 11,866-3, Maintain program affordability: Excess production engineering support , 3 F-18 Series... 1,213,482 1,125,582-87,9 Program increase: EA-18G reactiv electronic attack measures technology ,9 Restoring acquisition accountability: IRST modifications early to need ,2 Maintain program affordability: Unjustified growth in nonrecurring engineering ,6 36 E-2 Series... 88,78 8,98-7,8 Restoring acquisition accountability: SIPR CHAT mods early to need ,3 Restoring acquisition accountability: Navigation warfare mods early to need ,5 38 C-2A... 11,327 8,327-3, Improving funds management: Forward financed , 39 C-13 Series ,75 7,575-8,5 Improving funds management: Forward financed ,5 42 E-6 Series , ,821-8, Maintain program affordability: Excess installation costs , 49 Common ECM Equipment ,36 191,36 +25, Program increase: F/A-18 Elf adaptive radar countermeasures , 52 ID Systems... 4,696 37,696-3, Maintain program affordability: Excess installation costs... -3, 57 V-22 (TilVRotor ACFT) Osprey ,82 194,2-2,8

100 U:\219REPT\2REPT\2REPT.16 1 Line 119 budget Committee Change from estimate recommendation budget estimate Restoring acquisition accountability: Common configuration unit cost savings , Maintain program affordability: Excessupport costs ,8 58 Next Generation Jammer [NGJ] Restoring acquisition accountability: Procurement early to need Spares and Repair Parts... 1,792,92 1,992,92 +2, Program increase ,

101 U:\219REPT\2REPT\2REPT WEAPONS PROCUREMENT, NAVY Appropriations, Budget estimate, Committee recommendation.... $3,51,59, 3,72,393, 3,78,572, The Committee recommends an appropriation of $3,78,572,. This is $78,179, above the budget estimate. COMMITTEE RECOMMENDED PROGRAM The following table summarizes the budget estimate for this appropriation, the Committee recommendation, and the Committee recommended adjustments to the budget estimate:

102 C m ro ro Line WEAPONS PROCUREMENT, NAVY BALLISTIC MISSILES MODIFICATION OF MISSILES TRIDENT II MODS SUPPORT EQUIPMENT AND FACILITIES MISSILE INDUSTRIAL FACILITIES TOTAL, BALLISTIC MISSILES OTHER MISSILES STRATEGIC MISSILES TOMAHAWK

103 c... C: C: ::, CD / I\) tv 5,11 I-' I\) (, s ::,;; ex, I\) i,;i ex, "Cl l / I SUPPORT EQUIPMENT AND FACILITIES tv 23 WEAPONS INDUSTRIAL FACILITIES... 2,6 12,6 + 1, ::,;; 24 FLEET SATELLITE COMM FOLLOW-ON... 66,779 66, trj ORDNANCE SUPPORT EQUIPMENT ""'3 25 I ORDNANCE SUPPORT EQUIPMENT 62, ,8 / tv TOTAL, OTHER MISSILES ,899, ,988, ,3 ::,;; trj TORPEDOES AND RELATED EQUIPMENT "'O TORPEDOES AND RELATED EQUIP 261 SSTD... 6,353 6,353 I-' 27 MK-48 TORPEDO , , , -.::i 28 ASW TARGETS ,324 12,324 trj "'O ""'3 "'O 291 MK-54 TORPEDO MODS... 15, , MK-48 TORPEDO ADCAP MODS... 4,5 4,5 31 QUICKSTRIKE MINE ,758 9, TORPEDO SUPPORT EQUIPMENT... 79,371 79,371 I 33 ASW RANGE SUPPORT ,872 3,872 DESTINATION TRANSPORTATION 34 FIRST DESTINATION TRANSPORTATION 3,726 3,726 I I-' e,.., TOTAL, TORPEDOES AND RELATED EQUIPMENT , ,85 I ,121 OTHER WEAPONS GUNS AND GUN MOUNTS 35 I SMALL ARMS AND WEAPONS ' ,61 I... I 15,67 MODIFICATION OF GUNS AND GUN MOUNTS 36 CIWS MODS , , COAST GUARD WEAPONS 4,823 4, GUN MOUNT MODS ,618 74, LCS MODULE WEAPONS 9 11, ,35 41 AIRBORNE MINE NEUTRALIZATION SYSTEMS... 22,249 22,249 TOTAL, OTHER WEAPONS 227, ,425

104 c... C: :l (1) I\:).CJ'1 I\:) :: CX) I\) i- CX) "'O [Dollars in thousands] t ,,-----,--,----;;;:-=:---;:::::--- Line Qty. 119 budget Qty I Committee estimate recommendation Qty 43 I SPARES AND REPAIR PARTS 135, ,688 Change from Budget estimate TOTAL, WEAPONS PROCUREMENT, NAVY 3,72,393 3,78, ,179 / NJ I-' co t,:j / NJ / NJ I-' -:i I-',j::,..

105 U: \219REPT\2REPT\2REPT COMMITTEE RECOMMENDED ADJUSTMENTS The following table details the adjustments Committee: recommended by the Line 219 budget Committee Change from estimate recommendation budget estimate \ \ Sidewinder _ Program increase: Additional munitions _ 15 Aerial Targets _ Restoring acquisition accountability: BQM-177A acquisition strategy _ 77, , , , , + 45, - 7,7-7,7 14,84 26,84 17 LRASM 2 Harpoon Mods Program increase, Additional munitions 23 Weapons Industrial Facilities Program increase, NIROP facilitization 81,19 111,19 Program increase: Additional munitions _ 27 MK-48 Torpedo _ ,6 92,616 12,6 13,616 Program increase: Additional munitions + 3, + 3, + 12, + 12, + 1, + 1, + 11, + 11, 29 MK-54 Torpedo Mods ,946 83,825-22,121 Restoring acquisition accountability: MK 54 Mod O installation ahead of need _ -4,212 Restoring acquisition accountability: MK 54 Mod 1 contract delays ,99 Next Generation Land Attack Weapon [NGLAW] and Interim Capabilities.-The fiscal year 219 President's budget request includes $16,9, to continue the Analysis of Alternatives [AoA] for the NGLAW. The Committee understands that NGLAW is intended to address the Navy's cruise missile strategy against future threats and targets in time to replace or modify existing weapons programs. The Committee notes that a capabilities based assessment conducted by the Navy deferred the NGLAW initial operating capability [IOC] requirement by several years and the Committee further notes that the AoA, which commenced in fiscal year 217, has expanded in scope and its completion is delayed. Therefore, the Committee has supported efforts to sustain the industrial base and provide incremental improvements to existing capabilities as interim solutions. This includes investments in multiple capability upgrades and the acquisition of additional Tomahawk all-up rounds [AUR], most recently by providing $12,, above the President's budget request in the Department of Defense Appropriations Act, 218 (Public Law ), pursuant to the Navy's fiscal year 218 enhancement request following enactment of the Bipartisan Budget Act of 218 (Public Law ). The fiscal year 219 President's budget request for Tomahawk does not include funding for new production AURs, reflecting the Navy's strategy to transition from new production to recertification and modernization activities. In addition, the Navy has proposed to repurpose the fiscal year 218 appropriated increase for new production missiles, in contradiction to the Navy's request. The Committee directs the Secretary of the Navy to conduct a full review of the Tomahawk program including: an analysis of the viability of new production in fiscal year 22; an analysis of the capacity for concurrent new production and recertification activities within existing facilities; revised cost and schedule projections for modifica- June 25, 218 (2:28 p_m_)

106 U:\219REPT\2REPT\2REPT tion and recertification activities, to include alternatives with and without concurrent new production; a detailed review of the execution of the fiscal year 217 and 218 new production congressional adds; certified courses of action and cost estimates for the $12,, new production funding added in fiscal year 218, to include detailed actions and milestones; and an analysis of surface and sub-surface launched land attack weapons inventory and requirements projections through the NGLAW IOC date, to include Tomahawk and other weapons systems that may provide an interim capability. The Secretary of the Navy shall provide a report detailing the results of the review to the congressional defense committees not later than 9 days after enactment of this act. In addition, the Committee is aware that a surface launched variant of the Long Range Anti-Ship Missile [LRASMJ offers the potential to increase the fleet's surface warfare capability at a relatively low cost-per-kill while leveraging existing capability. Therefore, the Committee directs the Deputy Chief of Naval Operations for Warfare Systems to provide a report to the congressional defense committees not later than 9 days after the enactment of this act identifying the capabilities the surface launched LRASM could bring to the fleet. Further, the Assistant Secretary of the Navy (Financial Management and Comptroller) is directed to identify costs to validate a surface launch LRASM and the benefits of fielding such a system.

107 U: \219REPT\2REPT\2REPT PROCUREMENT OF AMMUNITION, NAVY AND MARINE CORPS Appropriations, $84,335, Budget estimate, ,6,29, Committee recommendation... 97,454, The Committee recommends an appropriation of $97,454,. This is $35,755, below the budget estimate. COMMITTEE RECOMMENDED PROGRAM The following table summarizes the budget estimate for this appropriation, the Committee recommendation, and the Committee recommended adjustments to the budget estimate:

108 c... C :::, (1) I\:) _c.n I\:) :1 CD I\) i CD "O 3 Line PROC AMMO, NAVY PROCUREMENT OF AMMO, NAVY & MARINE CORPS [Dollars in thousands] Qty. I 1 l9 budget estimate I 79,871 87,9 151,431 11,344 49,471 56,227 66,382 2,97 72,657 33,613 42,142 49,888 1,931 1,16 Qty Committee I recommendation / ts:> I-' (, t_:rj ""lj --3 / ts:> Change from t_:rj Budget ""lj Qty estimate --3 / ts:> t_:rj ""lj - 7,5 72, ,688 87,9.. I. I-' 142, ,25 11, ,471 56,227 66,382 2,97 72,477 32, I-' 42, : ,888 1,931 1,16 715,87 698, ,266 63,664 59,295 31,577 15,1 86,297 6,239 18,516 63,664 51,2 31,577 15,1 86,297 6,239 TOTAL, PROC AMMO, MARINE CORPS TOTAL, PROCUREMENT OF AMMO, NAVY & MARINE CORPS 29,339 1,6, ,314-18,25 97,454-35,755

109 U:\219REPT\2REPT\2REPT COMMITTEE RECOMMENDED The following table details the adjustments Committee: ADJUSTMENTS recommended by the Line 119 budget estimate Committee Change from recommendation budget estimate General Purpose Bombs Improving funds management: Previously funded requirement (2181 Laser Guided Bombs).... Airborne Rockets, All Types.... Restoring acquisition accountability: Unit cost growth (MK 66). Improving funds management: Contract savings (APKWS).. Restoring acquisition accountability: Excess product improvement growth (APKWS)... 5 lnch/54 Gun Ammunition. Restoring acquisition accountability: Unit cost growth (5"/ 54 propelling charge) 1 Intermediate Caliber Gun Ammunition... Restoring acquisition accountability, Unit cost growth (57MM, HE-PD).. 19 Mortars Improving funds management: Previously funded requiremes Infantry Weapons Ammunition Improving funds management: Previously funded requirement (7.62x39mm Non-Standard).... Improving funds management: Contract delays (MK 281) 79, ,431 72,657 33,613 28,266 59,295 72,371-7,5-7,5 142,181-9,25-2,3-4,9-2,5 72, , ,516-9,75-9,75 51,2-8,275-1, - 7,275

110 U:\219REPT\2REPT\2REPT.19 SHIPBUILDING 11 AND CONVERSION, NAVY Appropriations, $23,824,738, Budget estimate, ,871,437, Committee recommendation... 23,992,937, The Committee recommends an appropriation of $23,992,937,. This is $2,121,5, above the budget estimate. COMMITTEE RECOMMENDED PROGRAM The following table summarizes the budget estimate for this appropriation, the Committee recommendation, and the Committee recommended adjustments to the budget estimate:

111 C ro N --"[D:oOlla:rs :in trho:u sa:n ds:lciha;n;gelro;m i line Qty. SHIPBUILDING & CONVERSION, NAVY FLEET BALLISTIC MISSILE SHIPS OHIO REPLACEMENT SUBMARINE (AP)... OTHER WARSHIPS 2 CARRIER REPLACEMENT PROGRAM (CVN 8) 4 VIRGINIA CLASSUBMARINE 5 VIRGINIA CLASSUBMARINE [AP-{;Y] 7 CVN REFUELING OVERHAULS [AP-CY] 8 DDG 1 9 DDG-51 1 DDG-51 [AP-{;Y] 11 LITIORAL COMBAT SHIP TOTAL, OTHER WARSHIPS AMPHIBIOUS SHIPS 121 LPD EXPEDITIONARY SEABASE LHA REPLACEMENT AP-CY 219 budget estimate 3,5,33 1,598,181 4,373,382 2,796,41 449,597 27,965 5,253, , ,244 15,78,25 Qty. Committee recommendation 3,242,33 1,573,181 4,373,382 2,796,41 449,597 27,965 5,171, ,928 1,121,244 16,398,525 5, 65, 35, Qty. Budget estimate + 237, s / I:"...! / I:" / I:"... c.o 1,5, ,14 75,46 8,517 41,52 634,38 325,375 72,62 23,321 27,99 225, 977,14 75,46 8,517 41,52 55,38 325,375 97,62 23,321 27,99

112 t... C: :::, <D I\) 9' I\) CX) N "C [Dollars in thousands] t ,,--r-----r;;;::=::-;:: Line 29 I CABLE SHIP TOTAL, AUXILIARIES, CRAFT, AND PRIOR-YEAR PROGRAM TOTAL, SHIPBUILDING & CONVERSION, NAVY... Qty. 219 budget estimate 2,436,82 21,871,437 Change from Qty. I rec%:!ion Budget Qty. estimate 25, , 2,852, , 23,992, ,121,5 / I:,:),...! / I:,:) 55 / I:,:) 55,...,...,... I:,:)

113 U:\219REPT\2REPT\2REPT COMMI'ITEE RECOMMENDED ADJUSTMENTS The following table details the adjustments Committee: recommended by the Line 219 budget estimate Committee Change from recommendation budget estimate OHIO Replacement Submarine (AP)... 3,5,33 Improving funds management: Excess incentive fees... Program increase: Submarine industrial base expansion Carrier Replacement Program (CVN 8)... 1,598,181 Transfer funding to RON, line 84: CVN 78 Full Ship Shock Trial... 9 DDG ,253,327 Restoring acquisition accountability: Excess growth in multiyear procurement program... 1 DDG-51 [AP-CY] ,928 Program increase: Advance procurement for an additional fiscal year 22 ship Littoral Combat Ship ,244 Program increase: Additional ship LPD Program increase: Advance procurement for FY 22 LPD Flight II and/or MYP EOO LHA Replacement [AP-CY]... Program increase: Advance procurement for LHA Expeditionary Fast Transport (EPF)... Program increase: Additional ship Outfitting ,38 Improving funds management: Outfitting and post delivery funding early to need Service Craft ,62 Program increase: Accelerate detail design and construction of YP-73 flight II Cable Ship... Program increase... 3,242,33 1,573,181 5,171, ,928 1,121,244 5, 35, 225, 55,38 97,62 25, + 237, -13, +25, -25, -25, -81,5-81,5 +25, +25, +475, +475, +5, +5, +35, + 35, + 225, +225, -84, -84, +25, +25, +25, +25, Submarine Industrial Base.-The fiscal year 219 President's budget request includes $3,5,33, for advance procurement to support the construction of the Ohio Replacement Submarine. The Committee supports this request and recommends an additional $25,, to enhance the submarine industrial base. Further, the Committee notes that $225,, above the President's budget request was provided by Congress in fiscal year 218 for the same purpose. The Committee supports the submarine shipbuilding supply base in light of the Navy's projected future workload, as defined in the Navy's "Annual Long-Range Plan for Construction of Naval Vessels for Fiscal Year 219" (3-year shipbuilding plan), but is concerned that the Navy is not budgeting the necessary resources to increase capacity and create multiple suppliers for critical submarine components, despite the Navy's stated concerns over the submarine industrial base. Therefore, the Assistant Secretary of the Navy (Research, Development and Acquisition) and the Assistant Secretary of the Navy (Financial Management and Comptroller) are directed to brief the congressional defense committees on the Navy's acquisition strategy and associated necessary resources to support the submarine industrial base in the President's fiscal year 22 budget. CVN 8.-The fiscal year 219 President's budget request includes $1,598,181, for the Aircraft Carrier Replacement Pro

114 U: \219REPT\2REPT\2REPT gram. The Committee supports the funding requested to maintain the aircraft carrier fleet consistent with the Navy's 3 year shipbuilding plan. However, the Committee understands that the Navy may pursue block buy authority for a two-ship-buy, to include CVN 81, and notes that the construction award for CVN 8 has slipped from March 218 to December 218 while negotiations between the Navy and the shipbuilder are ongoing. To date, the Committee has not received any documentation related to a block buy proposal. The Committee notes that an accurate independent cost estimate and Navy budget profile are required for the congressional defense committees to make an informed decision on the proposal. Therefore, the Committee designates the funding appropriated for the Carrier Replacement Program funding line be applied only to CVN 8 and directs that no funds provided in fiscal year 219 be applied to the procurement of CVN 81 components.

115 U:\219REPT\2REPT\2REPT OTHER PROCUREMENT, NAVY Appropriations, $7,941,18, Budget estimate, ,414,355, Committee recommendation... 1,393,562, The Committee recommends an appropriation of $1,393,562,. This is $979,27, above the budget estimate. COMMITTEE RECOMMENDED PROGRAM The following table summarizes the budget estimate for this appropriation, the Committee recommendation, and the Committee recommended adjustments to the budget estimate:

116 C ro N i -"--IODoOllearss:inlth ouasa n ds:1:-":--=c-hangeotro;m Line Qty OTHER PROCUREMENT, NAVY SHIPSUPPORT EQUIPMENT SHIP PROPULSION EQUIPMENT SURFACE POWER EQUIPMENT GENERATORS SURFACE COMBATANT HM&E NAVIGATION EQUIPMENT OTHER NAVIGATION EQUIPMENT PERISCOPES SUB PERISCOPES AND IMAGING SUPPORT EQUIPMENT PROGRAM 119 budget estimate 19, ,33 178, ,999 28,143 2,248 37,694 Qty Committee recommendation 19,7 23,495 Qty I..... I ]43 2,248 37,694 Budget estimate + 6, -18, O") /' tv... ' "ti e-3 /' tv /' tv tv ,694 2,883 37,155 66,328 47,241 27,987 65,33 89,7 22,254 3, ,446 3,79 78,87 126,865 2,966 37,694 2,883 37,155 66,328 47,241 25,85 65,33 57,7 22,254 3, ,446 3,79 78,87 126,865 2,966

117 c... C: :::, Cl) / N) I\) _CJ1 I\) CX) t,:j "3 "'O i >-3 CX) / "'O 24 SUBMARINE LIFE SUPPORT SYSTEM.. 11,968 6,924-5, N) i REACTOR PLANT EQUIPMENT t,:j 25 REACTOR POWER UNITS , , "'O 26 REACTOR COMPONENTS ,63 497,63... >-3 / OCEAN ENGINEERING N) 27 I DIVING AND SALVAGE EQUIPMENT... 1,76 1,76 ;:o SMALL BOATS t,:j 28 I STANDARD BOATS ,771 49,771 "'O PRODUCTION FACILITIES EQUIPMENT N) 29 I OPERATING FORCES IPE ,181 41, , OTHER SHIP SUPPORT 31 LCS COMMON MISSION MODULES EQUIPMENT 32 LCS MCM MISSION MODULES 33 LCS ASW MISSION MODULES 34 LCS SUW MISSION MODULES 35 LCS IN-SERVICE MODERNIZATION , V,JLV , v,jcu I,...,... 1 LOGISTICS SUPPORT -:i 361 LSD MIDLIFE AND MODERNIZATION XX SHIP OVERHAUL, MODERNIZATION AND REPAIR SUBTOTAL.. 4, , , TOTAL, SHIPSUPPORT EQUIPMENT ,18,536 3,823, ,58 COMMUNICATIONS AND ELECTRONICS EQUIPMENT SHIP SONARS 37 SPQ-9B RADAR... 2,39 19, AN/SQQ-89 SURF ASW COMBAT SYSTEM 115, , SSN ACOUSTICS EQUIPMENT , ,189 4 UNDERSEA WARFARE SUPPORT EQUIPMENT 1,134 1,134 ASW ELECTRONIC EQUIPMENT 41 SUBMARINE ACOUSTIC WARFARE SYSTEM 23,815 23, SSTD... 11,277 2, FIXED SURVEILLANCE SYSTEM ,78 644,68 44 SURTASS. 57,872 57,872,... (. ;:o ;:o

118 '- c ::, CD I\) p, I\) s CXl "3 i\.i CXl ""O [Dollars in thousands] 3 Line ELECTRONIC WARFARE EQUIPMENT 45 I AN/SLQ Qty 219 budget estimate -- 42,344 22,883 4, ,991 34,526 3,769 35,79 8,616 1,73 2,626 9,467 7,849 47,89 26,163 38,94 11,966 42,1 12, ,27 8,175 54,465 5,985 5,413 6,251 4, ,35 I Qty Committee recommendation 348, ,13 4,28 34,821 1,991 34,526 3,769 33,339 8,616 1,73 2,626 9,467 7,849 47,89 26,163 38,94 11,966 42,1 12, ,944 8,175 51,45 5,985 5,413 6,251 4, ,35 Qty. Change from Budget estimate - 72,78 """' """' en / """' ' / >tj 1--3 / >tj

119 c... C: :::, CD / I:..:) I\).cn I-' I\) i\':i "' / t_,::j "O SHIPBOARD COMMUNICATIONS I:..:) 3..:- 72 SHIPBOARD TACTICAL COMMUNICATIONS , , ::d 73 SHIP COMMUNICATIONS AUTOMATION... 15, , t_,::j 74 COMMUNICATIONS ITEMS UNDER $SM... 41, , ""C --3 SUBMARINE COMMUNICATIONS / 751 SUBMARINE BROADCAST SUPPORT... 3, , I:..:) 76 SUBMARINE COMMUNICATION EQUIPMENT , , ::d SATELLITE COMMUNICATIONS t_,::j 771 SATELLITE COMMUNICATIONS SYSTEMS , , ""C 78 NAVY MULTIBAND TERMINAL [NMn , , SHORE COMMUNICATIONS I:..:) 79 I JCS COMMUNICATIONS EQUIPMENT , ,292 CRYPTOGRAPHIC EQUIPMENT 8 INFO SYSTEMS SECURITY PROGRAM [ISSP] , , MIO INTEL EXPLOITATION TEAM CRYPTOLOGIC EQUIPMENT 82 CRYPTOLOGIC COMMUNICATIONS EQUIP... 14, , ,8 I-' I-' OTHER ELECTRONIC SUPPORT 861 COAST GUARD EQUIPMENT , , TOTAL, COMMUNICATIONS AND ELECTRONICS EQUIPMENT ,176, ,477, ,547 AVIATION SUPPORT EQUIPMENT SONOBUOYS 88 SONOBUOYS-ALL TYPES... m,891 I... I 216,191 I... I +38,3 AIRCRAFT SUPPORT EQUIPMENT 89 WEAPONS RANGE SUPPORT EQUIPMENT , ,864 9 AIRCRAFT SUPPORT EQUIPMENT , , ADVANCED ARRESTING GEAR (AAG) , ,54 92 METEOROLOGICAL EQUIPMENT... 21, ,72 93 OTHER PHOTOGRAPHIC EQUIPMENT (DCRS/DPL) AIRBORNE MINE COUNTERMEASURES , , LAMPS EQUIPMENT AVIATION SUPPORT EQUIPMENT... 39, ,26 97 UMCS-UNMAN CARRIER AVIATION (UCA) MISSION CONTROL , ,179 TOTAL, AVIATION SUPPORT EQUIPMENT , s31,6s9 I... I + 28,726 ' ' ::d

120 c... C :::J (1) I\) _CJ1 I\) s co f\) "' co "O t Line ORDNANCE SUPPORT EQUIPMENT SHIP GUN SYSTEM EQUIPMENT 98 J SHIP GUN SYSTEMS EQUIPMENT SHIP MISSILE SYSTEMS EQUIPMENT 991 SHIP MISSILE SUPPORT EQUIPMENT 1 TOMAHAWK SUPPORT EQUIPMENT FBM SUPPORT EQUIPMENT 11 I STRATEGIC MISSILE SYSTEMS EQUIP ASW SUPPORT EQUIPMENT [Dollars in thousands] Qty I 219 budget estimate I Qty I Committee recommendation 5,337 5, ,9 22,71 92,89 92,89 271, , ,51 129,51 19,436 19,436 14,258 14,258 I. 5,378 5,378 Qty. Change from I. Budget estimate,... tv / tv,... "' / tv "'O.-3 / tv ts:> I OTHER EXPENDABLE ORDNANCE 16 SUBMARINE TRAINING DEVICE MODS 17 SURFACE TRAINING EQUIPMENT 65,543 65,543 23, ,791 1,47,675 1,34,22 CIVIL ENGINEERING SUPPORT EQUIPMENT 18 PASSENGER CARRYING VEHICLES 19 GENERAL PURPOSE TRUCKS. 11 CONSTRUCTION & MAINTENANCE EQUIP lll FIRE FIGHTING EQUIPMENT 112 TACTICAL VEHICLES AMPHIBIOUS EQUIPMENT 114 POLLUTION CONTROL EQUIPMENT 115 ITEMS UNDER $5 MILLION 116 PHYSICAL SECURITY VEHICLES 4,867 4,867 2,674 2,674 2,994 2,994 17,189 17,189 19,916 19,916 7,4 7,4 2,713 2,713 35,54 35,54 1,155 1,155 TOTAL, CIVIL ENGINEERING SUPPORT EQUIPMENT 112, ,448

121 c:... C ::, Cl) / I\.) N) SJ' I\.) (X) t,:j N j\:, (X) "O i / SUPPLY SUPPORT EQUIPMENT N) 117 SUPPLY EQUIPMENT ,786 18, FIRST DESTINATION TRANSPORTATION 5,375 5, t,:j 119 SPECIAL PURPOSE SUPPLY SYSTEMS... 58,371 58,371 "'d t-3 / 64, ,532 N) t,:j TRAINING DEVICES "'d 12 I TRAINING SUPPORT EQUIPMENT ,4... 3,4 t TRAINING AND EDUCATION EQUIPMENT... 24,283 24, N) COMMAND SUPPORT EQUIPMENT 122 COMMAND SUPPORT EQUIPMENT... 66,681 66, MEDICAL SUPPORT EQUIPMENT ,352 3, NAVAL MIP SUPPORT EQUIPMENT 1,984 1, OPERATING FORCES SUPPORT EQUIPMENT... 15, , C41SR EQUIPMENT... 3, ' 3, ENVIRONMENTAL SUPPORT EQUIPMENT... 31, ,921 N) 129 PHYSICAL SECURITY EQUIPMENT 175, , , ENTERPRISE INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY 25,393 25, NEXT GENERATION ENTERPRISE SERVICE 96, ,269 TOTAL, PERSONNEL AND COMMAND SUPPORT EQUIPMENT ,47 467,47 I... I + 2, 1341 SPARES AND REPAIR PARTS , ,367 CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS... 15,681 15,681 TOTAL, OTHER PROCUREMENT, NAVY... 9,414,355 1,393,562 I... I + 979,27 e... '

122 U: \219REPT\2REPT\2REPT COMMITTEE RECOMMENDED ADJUSTMENTS The following table details the adjustments recommend _d by the Committee: Line 219 budget estimate Committee Change from recommendation budget estimate 4 Other Navigation Equipment ,33 69,33 Restoring acquisition accountabilityc Production engineering excess growth... Program increase, Accelerate ECDIS-N 9.4, 9.4, 9.5 implementation 6 DOG Mod , ,499 Insufficient budget justification, Aegis modernization testing Insufficient budget justification, Combat system ship qualification trials Submarine Batteries ,987 25,85 Restoring acquisition accountability, Unit cost growth DOG 1 Class Support Equipment.... Restoring acquisition accountability, DOG 12 data center ahead of need ,7 57,7 24 Submarine life Support System ,968 6,924 Restoring acquisition accountability, Low pressure electrolyzer early to need Operating Forces lpe ,181 41,181 Program increase, Shipyard investment acceleration 31 LCS Common Mission Modules Equipment... Restoring acquisition accountability, EMM mission package computing environment ahead of need. Restoring acquisition accountability, EMM training 46,732 33,237 equipment ahead of need LCS MGM Mission Modules.... Restoring acquisition accountability, AMNS unit cost growth Restoring acquisition accountability, Knifefish unit cost growth LCS ASW Mission Modules. Restoring acquisition accountability, ASW mission modules ahead of need LCS SUW Mission Modules... Restoring acquisition accouniability, Excessurface- to surface mission module ahead of test... xx Ship Overhaul, Modernization and Repair. Transfer, From Operation and Maintenance, Navy line 1848 Ship Depot Maintenance for the USS BOISE, USS NEW YORK and USS GUNSTON HALL availabilities 37 SPQ-98 Radar... Restoring acquisition accountability, Installation funding early to need SSN Acoustic Equipment. Program increase. 42 SSTD. 124,147 57,294 26,6 2,39 318,189 11, ,381 14,65 61, 19, ,189 2,977 Restoring acquisition accountability, AN/SLQ-25E delay Fixed Surveillance System. Program acceleration AN/SLQ-32. Restoring acquisition accountability, Excess Block 3 systems Restoring acquisition accountability, Excess Block 3 installation funding. 46 Shipboard IW Exploit 237,78 42,344 22, ,68 348, ,13 +6, -4, + 1, -18,5-9,5-9, -2,92-2,92-32, -32, -5,44-5, , + 176, -13,495-8,986-4,59-7,766-3,26-4,74-57,294-57,294-11,941-11, , + 61, -1,13-1, , + 14, - 8,3-8,3 + 46,9 + 46,9-72,78-6,376-11,72-2,78

123 U: \219REPT\2REPT\2REPT Line 219 budget estimate Committee Change from recommendation budget estimate Restoring acquisition accountability: Increment F kit cost growth 48 Cooperative Engagement Capability... Restoring acquisition accountability: Common array block antenna 52 Minesweeping System Replacement. Restoring acquisition accountability: Knifefish unit cost growth CANES Restoring acquisition accountability: Installations previously funded 66 CANES-lntell... Restoring acquisition accountability: Installations previously funded Cryptologic Communications Equip. Program increase: SOUTHCOM ISR requirements 88 SonobuoysAII Types. Program increase Aviation Support Equipment Improving funds management: JHMCS night vision unit cost growth UMCS-Unman Carrier Aviation (UCA) Mission Cntrl Restoring acquisition accountability: MD-SA procurement ahead of need Restoring acquisition accountability, Ship change document ahead of need Ship Missile Support Equipment. Restoring acquisition accountability: ESSM missile launcher upgrade funding unjustified. Restoring acquisition accountability: RAM ORDALTs for block 2B ahead of need.. 17 Surface Training Equipment Restoring acquisition accountabilityc BFTT upgrade kits installation funding ahead of need Physical Security Equipment Program increase: New Navy port waterborne security barriers Spares and Repair Parts Program termination: Hybrid electric drive spares... 44,173 35,79 423,27 54,465 14,29 177,891 39,374 35,45 213,9 23, , ,838 34,821 33, ,944 51,45 17,9 216,191 37,26 28,179 22,71 227, , ,367-2,78-9,352-9,352-2,37-2,37-23,83-23,83-3,6-3,6 +2,8 +2,8 + 38,3 + 38,3-2,348-2,348-7,226-3,742-3,484 - ll,19-4,619-6,4-2,634-2, , + 2,

124 U:\219REPT\2REPT\2REPT.21 PROCUREMENT, 124 MARINE CORPS Appropriations, $1,942,737, Budget estimate, ,86,41, Committee recommendation... 2,8,997, The Committee recommends an appropriation of $2,8,997,. This is $59,413, below the budget estimate. COMMITTEE RECOMMENDED PROGRAM The following table summarizes the budget estimate for this appropriation, the Committee recommendation, and the Committee recommended adjustments to the budget estimate:

125 '- c: :::J Cl) I\) _u, I\) CXl I\) N CXl "O [Dollars in thousands] 3 Line WEAPONS AND COMBAT VEHICLES PROCUREMENT, MARINE CORPS Qty 119 budget estimate 156, ,478 43,71 Qty Committee recommendation 96, ,478 43,71 Qty. Change from Budget estimate / I-' t.o / / I-' ARTILLERY AND OTHER WEAPONS 155MM LIGHTWEIGHT TOWED HOWITZER ARTILLERY WEAPONS SYSTEM.. WEAPONS AND COMBAT VEHICLES UNDER $5 MILLION... 47, ,246 4, , ,246 4,687 OTHER SUPPORT MODIFICATION KITS ,94 22,94 I-' i:.n TOTAL, WEAPONS AND COMBAT VEHICLES , , ,413 GUIDED MISSILES AND EQUIPMENT GUIDED MISSILES 9 GROUND BASED AIR DEFENSE 1 JAVELIN FOLLOW ON TO SMAW/FOAAWS 12 ANTI-ARMOR WEAPONS SYSTEM-HEAVY (AAWS-H)/TOW ,334 3,2 13,76 59, ,334 3,2 13,76 59,72 TOTAL, GUIDED MISSILES AND EQUIPMENT... 94,816 94,816 COMMUNICATIONS AND ELECTRONICS EQUIPMENT COMMAND AND CONTROL SYSTEMS 13 I COMMON AVIATION COMMAND AND CONTROL SYS..... I I 35,467 35, REPAIR AND TEST EQUIPMENT MODIFICATION KITS ::::::::I::::::::: I 46, ,81 971

126 C ro N N ro ro [Dollars in thousands] i -. Line I OTHER SUPPORT (TEL) COMMAND AND CONTROL 161 ITEMS UNDER $5 MILLION (COMM& ELEC) 17 AIR OPERATIONS C2 SYSTEMS Qty. 119 budget estimate 69,23 14,269 Qty. 6, ,969 3 Committee recommendation 69,23 14,269 6, ,969 Qty Change from Budget estimate / Nl,... co gg / Nl trj / Nl trj Nl, ,187 6,189 73,848 3,848 16,81 1,187 6,189 73,848 3, I :::::::::::I::::::,... Nl O'l , , , , ,649 83,971 87,12 68, , ,68 36,649 83,971 TOTAL, COMMUNICATIONS AND ELECTRONICS EQUIPMENT SUPPORT VEHICLES 1,233,979 1,233,979 ADMINISTRATIVE VEHICLES 36 I COMMERCIAL CARGO VEHICLES 25,441 25,441 TACTICAL VEHICLES 37 MOTOR TRANSPORT MODIFICATIONS 38 JOINT LIGHTACTICAL VEHICLE 39 FAMILY OF TACTICAL TRAILERS 4 TRAILERS 11,392 67,11 2,393 6,54 11,392 67,11 2,393 6,54

127 c... C: ::, (D / I\) 511 I\) ::: trj I\) '"O i e-3 / "O I TOTAL, SUPPORT VEHICLES , , i ENGINEER AND OTHER EQUIPMENT ::: trj ENGINEER AND OTHER EQUIPMENT '"O 41 ENVIRONMENTAL CONTROL EQUIP ASSORT e / 42 TACTICAL FUEL SYSTEMS POWER EQUIPMENT ASSORTED 21,62 21,62 ::: 44 AMPHIBIOUS SUPPORT EQUIPMENT... 5,29 5,29 trj 45 EDD SYSTEMS.. 47,854 47,854 '"O e-3 MATERIALS HANDLING EQUIPMENT 46 I PHYSICAL SECURITY EQUIPMENT... 28,36 28,36 47 FIELD MEDICAL EQUIPMENT 33,513 33, TRAINING DEVICES ,4 52,4 49 FAMILY OF CONSTRUCTION EQUIPMENT ,156 36,156 5 FAMILY OF INTERNALLY TRANSPORTABLE VEHICLE (ITV) OTHER SUPPORT 51 I ITEMS LESS THAN $5 MILLION 11,68 11,681. I. -."] 236, , I SPARES AND REPAIR PARTS 25, ,84 CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS ,626 3,626 TOTAL, PROCUREMENT, MARINE CORPS ,86, ,8.997 I... I - 59,413,...,... co,...

128 U:\219REPT\2REPT\2REPT COMMI'ITEE RECOMMENDED ADJUSTMENTS The following table details the adjustments Committee: recommended by the Line 219 budget Committee Change from estimate recommendation budget estimate I AAV7Al PIP ,249 96,836-59,413 Restoring acquisition accountability: Program delayssurvivability upgrade ,413 Assault Amphibious Vehicle-Survivability Upgrade [AA V-SUJ. The Committee notes efforts by the Marine Corps to enhance the maneuverability, survivability and combat effectiveness of the legacy AA V vehicle fleet and its Assault Amphibian Battalions while maintaining critical amphibious lift and armored personnel carrier capabilities. The Committee remains concerned with the current production schedule and unit cost estimates due to recent further delays in the delivery of required test assets and changes in the vehicle design. Therefore, the Committee provides adequate funding to maintain progress towards award of a full rate production contract, and encourages the Commandant of the Marine Corps to provide an updated program schedule and production plan to the congressional defense committees that reflects a more accurate cost assessment and an achievable production schedule.

129 U: \219REPT\2REPT\2REPT AIRCRAFT PROCUREMENT, AIR FORCE Appropriations, $18,54,556, Budget estimate, ,26,937, Committee recommendation... 15,772,473, The Committee recommends an appropriation of $15,772,473,. This is $434,464, below the budget estimate. COMMITTEE RECOMMENDED PROGRAM The following table summarizes the budget estimate for this appropriation, the Committee recommendation, and the Committee recommended adjustments to the budget estimate:

130 c... C: ::::i C CD / I\) _u, I\) I-' (X) ' ::ti l:rj I\) "'O i\l (X) >-3 / ""O [Dollars in thousands] Change from l:rj Line I I Qty. 119 budget Committee estimate Qty recommendation "'O Qty '3'Jdget -'!Stirn ate >-3 / AIRCRAFT PROCUREMENT, AIR FORCE COMBAT AIRCRAFT I I ::ti l:rj "'O 4,261, , 526, , 222, ,176 ::ti , :-' 1 TOTAL, COMBAT AIRCRAFT ,889, ,197 I I -12, AIRLIFT AIRCRAFT/TACTICAL AIRLIFT KC-46A TANKER ,559, ,415, ,42 OTHER AIRLIFT I-' C-13J... 35,858 35,858 C;:) HC-13J. A'),11::.c I 129,437 I 86,981 MC-13J 6 77, ,879 MC-13J (AP) , , I..... I - 229,198 TOTAL, AIRLIFT AIRCRAFT 3,713,47 3,484,29 OTHER AIRCRAFT HELICOPTERS II I COMBAT RESCUE HELICOPTER. 1 68,21 1-5, MISSION SUPPORT AIRCRAFT 6 13 I CIVIL AIR PATROL A/C 4 2,719 4 :::::: I I + 8,81 OTHER AIRCRAFT 14 TARGET DRONES , ,53 15 COMPASS CALL MODS. I 18,113 I 18, MQ , , , /A-X LIGHT ATTACK AIRCRAFT. 3, + 3, TOTAL, OTHER AIRCRAFT... 1,151,793 1,444, ,277

131 c:... C: :, (1) / I\:> l'..:i p, r-' I\:> co t,::j B i\j co / "O MODIFICATION OF INSERVICE AIRCRAFT 3 l'..:i STRATEGIC AIRCRAFT :,:; t,::j 19 B-2A 6,31 57,2-3, ,29 35,69-15,6 "'1: , ,23 +11,711 / l'..:i 23 A-1 98,72 92,71-6,1 :,:; 24 C-13J 1,831-1,831 t,::j 25 F ,19 456,647-91,462 "'1:1 26 F ,323 34,323-2, F-22A...,.,,,,,,,,,,,.,,,,..,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,... ''''''""''''""'''''' 25,71 25,71... l'..:i 29 F-35 MODIFICATIONS 247, ,971-9,3 l'..:i 3 F-15 EPAW. 147, INCREMENT 3.2b 9,7 33 KC-46A TANKER 8,547 AIRLIFT AIRCRAFT 34 C , C-17A I r-' 11:5161 ::::: ::::: I :: 37 C ,516 C,IJ 38 C-32A... 4, r-' 39 C-37A , , ,623 :,:; 45 U-2 MODS 48, KC-JOA [ATCA] 11,14 47 C-12 4,9 48 VC-25A MOD 36, C C-13 22,94 51 Cl3J MODS 132,45 52 C-135. ll3,76 53 OC , COMPASS CALL MODS... 49, COMBAT FLIGHT INSPECTION (CFIN) 499

132 c... C :::, CD I\) _u, I-' I\) c.o ;:ti CD t;rj I\) i\, CD "t:l t / [Dollars in thousands] I',:) ;:ti Change from t;rj Line 119 budget Committee Qty. Qty estimate recommendation '"tl Qty. Budget estimate e-3 / , ,532-3, I',:) ,96 116,865-17,41 ;:ti 58 67,858 67, t;rj 59 9,919 24, ,888 '"tl 6 57,78 57,78 e , ,283-3,1 I',:) 62 2,94 2,94 I',:) 63 55,466 55, , , ,754 37, ,1 62, , , ,416 6,416 I I I-' TOTAL, MODIFICATION OF INSERVICE AIRCRAFT... 3,697,629 3,671,9861 I - 25,643 Cl-' I',:) AIRCRAFT SPARES AND REPAIR PARTS 7 I INITIAL SPARES/REPAIR PARTS. 956,48 TOTAL, AIRCRAFT SPARES AND REPAIR PARTS 956,48 I I 778,581 I -177,9 I..... I m.so8 I ,9 AIRCRAFT SUPPORT EQUIPMENT AND FACILITIES COMMON SUPPORT EQUIPMENT 71 AIRCRAFT REPLACEMENT SUPPORT EQUIP 81,241 81,241 POST PRODUCTION SUPPORT A... 1,763 1, ,861 35, B ,819 12, C-17A 1,114 1, F-15. 2,545 2, F-16 POST PRODUCTION SUPPORT... 11,718 4, F-22A 14,489 14, OTHER AIRCRAFT 9,928 9, RQ-4 POST PRODUCTION CHARGES. 4,641 4,641 cj / I',:)

133 c... C: ::::, Cll I\:) _CJ1 I\:) CX) I\) i\:) CX) ""C i INDUSTRIAL PREPAREDNESS INDUSTRIAL PREPAREDNESS WAR CONSUMABLES WAR CONSUMABLES OTHER PRODUCTION CHARGES OTHER PRODUCTION CHARGES TOTAL, AIRCRAFT SUPPORT EQUIPMENT AND FACILITIES CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS TOTAL, AIRCRAFT PROCUREMENT, AIR FORCE 17,378 I 29,342 I. 1,52,386 1,77,225 28,278 16,26,937 17,378 I.... I 29,342 I I 1,335, ,596,225 28,278 15,772, ,8-174, - 434,464 / I-' ( :;,,, trj >-,j e-3 / :;,,, trj >-,j e-3 / :;,,, trj >-,j I-' i:.:i i:.:i

134 U: \219REPT\2REPT\2REPT COMMITTEE RECOMMENDED ADJUSTMENTS The following table details the adjustments Committee: recommended by the line 219 budget estimate Committee Change from recommendation budget estimate F ,261,21 Restoring acquisition accountability: Unit cost savings..... F-35 [AP--tY]... 46, Program increase: Advance procurement for additional FY 22 aircraft KC--46A Tanker.... 2,559,911 Restoring acquisition accountability: Unit cost savings..... Improving funds management: Interim contractor support excess to need HC-13J ,437 Restoring acquisition accountability: Unit cost growth Restoring acquisition accountability: Spares funding ahead of need MC-13J ,21 Restoring acquisition accountability: Unit cost growth Combat Rescue Helicopter... 68,21 Restoring acquisition accountability: Excess unit cost Civil Air Patrol A/C.... 2,719 Program increase MQ ,77 Program increase: Accelerate advanced battle management system Restoring acquisition accountability: Prior year unit cost savings Restoring acquisition accountability: Dual ground control station funding excess to need /A-X Light Attack Aircraft.... Program increase: Procurement of aircraft and long lead materials B-2A... 6,31 Restoring acquisition accountability: Common very low frequency terminal installations previously funded B ,29 Restoring acquisition accountability: Integrated battle station excess to need... Restoring acquisition accountability: MIDS-JTRS ahead of need... Restoring acquisition accountability: Radio crypto ahead of need Restoring acquisition accountability: ADS-B out ahead of need B ,519 Program increase: LRASM certification... Program increase: B-52 infrared threat defense UON Program increase: B-52 mission data recorder Transfer crypto modernization: Air Force-requested to RDAF line Restoring acquisition accountability: Bomber tactical data link ahead of need Restoring acquisition accountability: Airspace compliance ahead of need A ,72 Improving funds management: ADS-B out delay C-13J... 1,831 Insufficient budget justification: Unjustified request.. 25 F ,19 Program increase: ALQ Restoring acquisition accountability: APG-82 unit cost growth ,21,21-24, , 526, + 12, , 2,415, ,42-41,7-12,72 86,981-42,456-11, -31, ,879-42,322-42,322 63,21-5,... -5, 1,8 +8, ,81 255,93 +34, ,... -5,664-8,14 3, +3, , 57,2-3, ,11 35,69-15,6-9,4-3,719-1,181-1,3 117, , , , , , ,976-1,954 92,71-6,1-6,1-1, , ,647-91, , -6,311

135 U: \219REPT\2REPT\2REPT Line 219 budget estimate Committee Change from recommendation budget estimate Restoring acquisition accountability: APG-82 ICS excess growth Restoring acquisition accountability: APG-82 installation cost growth Restoring acquisition accountability, APG-63 ahead of need... Restoring acquisition accountability, APG-63 installation cost growth F-16. Restoring acquisition accountability: MIDS-JITRS excess growth 29 F-35 Modifications... Maintain program affordability: Concurrency growth... 3 F-15 EPAW Program increase, Eagle passive active warning survivability systems for F-15Cs C-5 Restoring acquisition accountability: CMG and weather radar contract delay 48 VC-25A Mod Restoring acquisition accountability: Chiller replacement terminated.. 5 C Program increase: C-13H modernization 51 C-13J Mods Restoring acquisition accountability: Block 8.1 b kit unit cost growth 52 C-135 Restoring acquisition accountability: AERO-I satcom replacement ahead of need RC-135. Restoring acquisition accountability: Combat sent install funding excess to need E-3 Restoring acquisition accountability, Electronic protection excess to need 59 E-8 Transfer common data link: Air Force requested from RDAF line Family of Beyond Line--f-Sight Terminals Restoring acquisition accountability: FAB-T unit cost growth 64 RQ-4 Mods. Program increase, Battlefield airborne communication node mission 67 MQ-9 Mods... Restoring acquisition accountability, GCS block 3 upgrades excess to need. 7 Initial Spares/Repair Parts... Improving funds management: KC-46A spares excess to requirement Improving funds management: F-15 spares excess to requirement. Improving funds management, E-3 spares excess to requirement 81 F-16 Improving funds management: Funds excess to need 89 Other Production Charges Classified adjustment ,323 34, , , , ,685 77,845 71,835 36,938 27,238 22,94 147,94 132,45 127,434 ll3,76 91,41 394, , ,96 116,865 9,919 24,87 14,293 11,283 23, , , , ,48 778,58 11,718 4,518 1,52,386 1,335,586-1, -6,535-69,13-9,486-2, -2, -9,3-9,3 + 5, + 5, -6,1-6,1-9,7-9, , + 125, -4,611-4,611-21,666-21,666-3, -3, -17,41-17, , ,888-3,1-3,1 + 1, + 1, -24,9-24,9-177,9-133, -29,5-15,4-7,2-7,2-166,8-166,8 Light Attack Aircraft.-The Committee understands that the Air Force is pursuing a new light attack aircraft using a rapid prototyping acquisition strategy in order to procure a low-cost aircraft

136 U: \219REPT\2REPT\2REPT that provides close air support capability in permissive threat environments, build capability among allies and international partnerships, and reduce operational tempo on more expensive fourth and fifth generation fighter aircraft. While the Committee is supportive of these efforts, it is disappointed that the Air Force has relied on additional funding provided by Congress in order to facilitate the ongoing experiment. The Department of Defense Appropriations Act, 218, provided $1,, to continue the experimentation program. However, the Air Force did not request any funding in the fiscal year 219 President's budget request, while programming $2,469,, for procurement of light attack aircraft in fiscal years 22 through 224. As Air Force leadership has continually stressed the importance of rapid procurement and fielding of this new capability, the Committee recommends $3,, for procurement of light attack aircraft and long lead materials. The Committee expects timely and complete communication from the Air Force on prototyping and experimentation activities. Accordingly, the Committee directs the Secretary of the Air Force, or her designee, to brief the House and Senate Appropriations Committees not fewer than 3 days prior to obligation of light attack procurement funding. This brief should clearly define objectives and requirements, transition plans, technology and manufacturing readiness levels, test activities, costs, schedules, and performance metrics. It should also include an acquisition strategy for the light attack program along with an execution plan for the fiscal year 219 procurement funding. C-135B Aircraft.-The fiscal year 219 budget request includes $222,176, for two replacement aircraft for the OC-135Bs currently performing unarmed observation flights over signatory nations to the Open Skies Treaty. While the Committee recommends fully funding this request, it is dismayed at the lack of justification materials, including an acquisition strategy, that were provided to the Committee. The Air Force is currently finalizing the detailed systems requirement document and is expected to finalize its acquisition strategy in August 218. The Committee directs the Secretary of the Air Force to provide a report to the congressional defense committees not fewer than 3 days prior to the obligation of C-135B procurement funding that details the acquisition strategy, approved requirements, schedule, and cost estimates associated with these new aircraft. Transfer of HC-13H Aircraft.-The Committee recognizes that the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 214 requirement for the Air Force to modify seven HC-13s to facilitate transfer from the U.S. Coast Guard to the U.S. Forest Service for wildfire suppression operations is predicated on a requirement that may no longer be valid. Funding provided for these modifications is currently being held by the Air Force pending an updated requirement validation from the U.S. Forest Service. The Committee strongly encourages the Secretary of the Air Force to notify the congressional defense committees before any prior year funds are obligated for this purpose.

137 U: \219REPT\2REPT\2REPT MISSILE PROCUREMENT, AIR FORCE Appropriations, $2,27,747, Budget estimate, ,669,454, Committee recommendation... 2,614,954, The Committee recommends an appropriation of $2,614,954,. This is $54,5, below the budget estimate. COMMITTEE RECOMMENDED PROGRAM The following table summarizes the budget estimate for this appropriation, the Committee recommendation, and the Committee recommended adjustments to the budget estimate:

138 c... C: ::l (!l / I\) t,:) _u, I\) I-' co co ::tj trj 1\3 ""1::1 i- co >-3 / "'C [Dollars in thousands] 3 t,:) Line I Qty. BALLISTIC MISSILES MISSILE PROCUREMENT, AIR FORCE ::tj Change from trj 219 budget Qty Committee estimate recommendation Budget ""1::1 Qty. estimate >-3 / t,:) MISSILE REPLACEMENT EQUIPMENT-BALLISTIC MISSILE REPLACEMENT Ea-BALLISTIC 36,786 18,66-18,72 OTHER MISSILES TACTICAL JOINT AIR-SURFACE STANDOFF MISSILE [JASSM] , , ,52 LONG RANGE ANTI-SHIP MISSILE (LRASM) , , ,2 SIDEWINDER (AIM-9X) , ,253 AMRAAM , ,886 PREDATOR HELLFIRE MISSILE 1, ,765 1,338 33,765 SMALL DIAMETER BOMB 2,917 15,34 2,917 35,341 :: , I-' SMALL DIAMETER BOMB II c,.:i 51 1, ,861 c,:; INDUSTRIAL FACILITIES INDUSTRIAL PREPAREDNESS/POLLUTION PREVENTION TOTAL, OTHER MISSILES 1,254,479 1,225,199 I. I - 29,28 MODIFICATION OF INSERVICE MISSILES CLASS IV 1 ICBM FUZE MOD 15,767 15, ICBM FUZE MOD (CAP-CY) 4,1 4,1 12 MM Ill MODIFICATIONS. 129, , AGM-65D MAVERICK AIR LAUNCH CRUISE MISSILE 47,632 47,632 I I -1,5 TOTAL, MODIFICATION OF INSERVICE MISSILES. 196, ,486 SPARES AND REPAIR PARTS 16 I INITIAL SPARES/REPAIR PARTS 97,481 97,481 SPECIAL PROGRAMS 18 I SPECIAL UPDATE PROGRAMS 188, ,539 I.... I - 5, ::tj trj t,:) c,.:i

139 c... C: Cl> I\J _CJ1 I\J '.:1 I\) i\:i "C 3 CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS 895,183 TOTAL, SPECIAL PROGRAMS 1,83,722 TOTAL, MISSILE PROCUREMENT, AIR FORCE 2,669, ,183 1,78,722 2,614,954-5, - 54,5 / N),... ::,:; ' ttj / N) / N) N) c,:i,... c,:i '

140 U: \219REPT\2REPT\2REPT COMMITIEE RECOMMENDED ADJUSTMENTS The following table details the adjustments recommended by the Committee: Line 219 budget estimate 1 Missile Replacement Eq-Ballistic 36,786 Restoring acquisition accountability, TERP schedule adjustments Joint Air-Surface Standoff Missile _ 43,78 Improving funds management Forward financing support costs Program increase _ 3 LRASM ,185 Program increase, Restore reduction 6 Predator Hellfire Missile ,765 Improving funds management Munitions funded in Public Law Improving funds management Prior year carryover Small Diameter Bomb 15,34 Improving funds management Munitions funded in Public Law Improving funds management Prior year carryover 12 MM Ill Modifications ,199 Maintain program affordabilitt Unjustified program management growth Special Update Programs _ ,539 Classified adjustment Committee Change from recommendation budget estimate 18,66 541,228 54,385 33,765 35,34 127, ,539-18,72-18, ,52-14, , + 1,2 + 1,2-8, - 5, -3, - 7, -5, -2, -1,5-1,5-5, - 5,

141 U:\219REPT\2REPT\2REPT SPACE PROCUREMENT, A.IR FORCE Appropriations, $3,552,175, Budget estimate, ,527,542, Committee recommendation... 2,224,142, The Committee recommends an appropriation of $2,224,142,. This is $33,4, below the budget estimate. COMMITTEE RECOMMENDED PROGRAM The following table summarizes the budget estimate for this appropriation, the Committee recommendation, and the Committee recommended adjustments to the budget estimate:

142 <- C: ::, s CD / N 1:-:).1 N CX> I\J 'ij t-3 CXl / "O [Dollars in thousands] t Line Qty. SPACE PROCUREMENT, 219 budget estimate Qty. Committee recommendation Qty. Change from Budget estimate --- / AIR FORCE 1:-:) I I I 29, , ,4... 4, , ' 1:-:) t_%j 1, , :-:) 4 FAMILY OF BEYOND LINE-OF-SIGHT TERMINALS , ,867.i:,.. 5 WIDEBAND GAPFILLER SATELLITES... 61, ,16 6 GENERAL INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY-SPACE , ,425 7 GPS Ill SPACE SEGMENT... 69, ,386 8 GLOBAL POSITIONING (SPACE)... 2, ,181 9 INTEG BROADCAST SERV... 16, ,445 1 SPACEBORNE EQUIP (COMSEC)... 31, i:,.. 12 MILSATCOM TERMINALS... 11, it:; I :::::::::::::::::::::::: 1:-:) 13 EVOLVED EXPENDABLE LAUNCH VEH CAPABILITY , ,81 14 EVOLVED EXPENDABLE LAUNCH VEH (SPACE) , , SBIR HIGH (SPACE) , , NUDET DETECTION SYSTEM SPACE... 7, ,75 18 ROCKET SYSTEM LAUNCH PROGRAM , ,69 19 SPACE FENCE... 51, ,361 2 SPACE MODSPACE , ,65 21 SPACELIFT RANGE SYSTEM SPACE , , INITIAL SPARES/REPAIR PARTS , ,812 TOTAL, SPACE PROCUREMENT, AIR FORCE ,527, ,224, ,4 I ::::::::::::::::::::::::

143 U:\219REPT\2REPT\2REPT COMMI'ITEE RECOMMENDED ADJUSTMENTS The following table details the adjustments Committee: recommended by the Line 219 budget Committee Change from estimate recommendation budget estimate AF Satellite Comm System... 35,4 4,4 Program increase: GPS cyber security.... Wideband Gapfiller Satellites (Space)... 61,66 12,16 Transfer to ROAF line 127: Pathfinder # Evolved Expendable Launch Capability , ,81 Restoring acquisition accountability: STP-4 launch early to need... Improving funds management: Historical underrun Evolved Expendable Launch Veh (Space) ,555 83,555 Restoring acquisition accountability: STP-4 launch early to need... +5, +5, -49,5-49,5-94,9-44,9-5, -164, -164, PROCUREMENT OF AMMUNITION, AIR FORCE Appropriations, $1,651,977, Budget estimate, Committee recommendation... 1,587,34, 1,564,88, The Committee recommends an appropriation This is $22,424, below the budget estimate. of $1,564,88,. COMMITTEE RECOMMENDED PROGRAM The following table summarizes the budget estimate for this appropriation, the Committee recommendation, and the Committee recommended adjustments to the budget estimate:

144 c_ C: ::J CD I\) _CJl I\) CX> I\) r CX> "O Line 1 II PROCUREMENT OF AMMUNITION, AIR FORCE PROCUREMENT OF AMMO, AIR FORCE ROCKETS BOMBS PRACTICE BOMBS GENERAL PURPOSE BOMBS MASSIVE ORDNANCE PENETRATOR (MOP) JOINT DIRECT ATIACK MUNITION B61 B61 [Dollars in thousands] Qty. I 219 budget estimate I 163,84 2, ,38 38, ,198 19,292 52,731 51,455 6, ,27 4,64 Qty j Committee I recommendation :::: :::: I / t,,:i r-' co ::,;; t::rj "'O i-3 / t,,:i ::,;; Change from t::rj I - -- Budget "'O Qty estimate i-3 / t,,:i ::,;; t::rj I -1, "'O , '.-3 2,876 ' 259,38 38,111 7, , , ,8 52, ,455 6, , ,534 r-' *"' t,,:i *"' I FLARES/FUZES 15 FLARES 16 FUZES 125,286 19, ,286 99,691-9,667 TOTAL, PROCUREMENT OF AMMO, AIR FORCE WEAPONS 17 I SMALL ARMS TOTAL, PROCUREMENT OF AMMUNITION, AIR FORCE 1,522,82 64,52 1,587,34 1,5,378-22,424 64,52 1,564,88-22,424

145 U:\219REPT\2REPT\2REPT COMMI'ITEE RECOMMENDED ADJUSTMENTS The following table details the adjustments recommended by the Committee: Line 119 budget Committee Change from estimate recommendation budget estimate Rockets Restoring acquisition accountability: Hardwarend item cost growth (2.75 Warhead WP Smoke)... B61 Restoring acquisition accountability: Support cost growth 12 Modifications Insufficient budget justification: Modifications s Less Than $5,, Insufficient budget justification: s Less Than $5,, 16 Fuzes. Restoring acquisition accountability: Unit cost discrepancy and support cost growth (FMU-139 D/B) 345, ,911-1, -1, 19,292 99,492-9,8-9,8 1, ,64 3,7-1,534-1,534 19,358 99,691-9,667-9,667

146 U: \219REPT\2REPT\2REPT OTHER PROCUREMENT, AIR FORCE Appropriations, $2,53,273, Budget estimate, ,89,164, Committee recommendation... 2,839,366, The Committee recommends an appropriation of $2,839,366,. This is $5,798, below the budget estimate. COMMITTEE RECOMMENDED PROGRAM The following table summarizes the budget estimate for this appropriation, the Committee recommendation, and the Committee recommended adjustments to the budget estimate:

147 c.. C: :::, (1) I\) ',... I\) CX) I\) i\:i CX) t "CJ / [Dollars in thousands] l'v Change from t_tj Line 219 budget Qty. Committee Qty. estimate recommendation Budget Qty estimate / OTHER PROCUREMENT, AIR FORCE l'v VEHICULAR EQUIPMENT t_tj PASSENGER CARRYING VEHICLES PASSENGER CARRYING VEHICLE... 6, , l'v 36, ,2 I I 1 1, ,7 42, ,696 SPECIAL PURPOSE VEHICLES JOINT LIGHTACTICAL VEHICLE... 3, ,142 SECURITY AND TACTICAL VEHICLES... 1, ,23 ITEMS LESS THAN $5M (SPECIAL PURPOSE VEHICLES) , , ,5,... >I>,. FIRE FIGHTING EQUIPMENT -..J FIRE FIGHTING/CRASH RESCUE VEHICLES , , ,38 MATERIALS HANDLING EQUIPMENT ITEMS LESS THAT $5M (MATERIALS HANDLING EQUIPMENT) , , ,588 BASE MAINTENANCE SUPPORT 1 I RUNWAY SNOW REMOVAL & CLEANING EQUIP , , ITEMS LESS THAN $5M (BASE MAINTENANCE SUPPORT 11 I VEHICLES)... 14, ,923 TOTAL, VEHICULAR EQUIPMENT , ,762 ELECTRONICS AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS EQUIP COMM SECURITY EQUIPMENT(COMSEC) 12 I COMSEC EQUIPMENT , INTELLIGENCE PROGRAMS 131 INTERNATIONAL INTEL TECH AND ARCHITECTURES , ,29 14 INTELLIGENCE TRAINING EQUIPMENT , ,99 15 INTELLIGENCE COMM EQUIP... 37, ,415 I... I + 36,327 I... I +4,6 / l'v : i:.o

148 c... C: (j ::, (1) / I\) t-:i _CJ1 I-' I\) t- s CXl ttj B "O N e-3 CXl / "'O [Dollars in thousands] 3 t-:i Line I Qty. I 219 budget Qty Change from Committee estimate recommendation Qty. Budget ttj "O estimate e-3 / t-:i 16 TRAFFIC CONTROULANDING 57,937 42, BA TILE CONTROL SYSTEM-FIXED. 3,12 3,12 ttj 19 THEATER AIR CONTROL SYS IMPRO 19,989 19,989 "O 2 WEATHER OBSERVATION FORECAST. 45,2 52,52 21 STRATEGIC COMMAND CONTROL.. 32,836 32,836 t-:i 22 CHEYENNE MOUNTAIN COMPLEX... 12,454 12, MISSION PLANNING SYSTEMS... 14,263 14, INTEGRATED STRAT PLAN AND ANALY NETWORK (ISPAN) 7,769 7,769 SPECIAL COMM-ELECTRONICS PROJECTS 26 GENERAL INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY 4,45 4,45 27 AF GLOBAL COMMAND & CONTROL SYSTEM 6,619 6, MOBILITY COMMAND CONTROL... 1,192 1,192 I..... I... I-' 29 AIR FORCE PHYSICAL SECURITY SYSTEM ,313 47,115 """""""""""" -112,198 3 COMBAT TRAINING RANGES , ,175 "' """"""""" MINIMUM ESSENTIAL EMERGENCY COMM N 14,875 14, WIDE AREA SURVEILLANCE (WAS). 92,14 92,14 33 C3 COUNTERMEASURES 45,152 45, GCSS-AF FOS DEFENSE ENTERPRISE ACCOUNTING AND MGMT MAINTENANCE REPAIR AND OVERHAUL INITIATIVE. 12,27 12,27 37 THEATER BATILE MGT C2 SYS 7,644 7, AIR AND SPACE OPERATIONS CTR-WPN SYSTEM. 4,66 4,66 AIR FORCE COMMUNICATIONS 41 INFORMATION TRANSPORT SYSTEMS.. 22,357 22, AFNET ,836 76, JOINT COMMUNICATIONS SUPPORT ELEMENT (JCSE). 3,145 3, USCENTCOM. 13,194 13,194 ORGANIZATION AND BASE 451 TACTICAL C-E EQUIPMENT , RADIO EQUIPMENT... 12,142 "" 12, I 48 CCTV/AUDIOVISUAL EQUIPMENT 6, ,5 49 BASE COMM INFRASTRUCTURE 169, ,44...

149 c... C: ::J CD / I\:) t-., _(]1 I\:) CXl t,:j I\J '"O i\:l t-3 CXl / "O I MODIFICATIONS t-., t 5 COMM ELECT MODS , ,654 t,:j TOTAL, ELECTRONICS AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS EQUIP 1,545, ,43,78-114,798 '"O t-3 OTHER BASE MAINTENANCE AND SUPPORT EQUIP / t-., PERSONAL SAFETY AND RESCUE EQUIP 51 [ ITEMS LESS THAN $5,, (SAFETY)... 51,96 51,96 t,:j DEPOT PLANT + MATERIALS HANDLING EQ '"O t-3 52 I MECHANIZED MATERIAL HANDLING 88,298 88, t-., BASE SUPPORT EQUIPMENT 1 53 BASE PROCURED EQUIPMENT... 17,31 17,31 54 ENGINEERING AND EOD EQUIPMENT ,635 82, MOBILITY EQUIPMENT... 9, , ITEMS LESS THAN $5M (BASE SUPPORT) ,5 29,5! SPECIAL SUPPORT PROJECTS I t:1: GR.ouN o svsre1s : ,262 26,262,.....,.. 448, ,49-69,8 61 SPECIAL UPDATE PROGRAM , ,813-13, TOTAL, OTHER BASE MAINTENANCE AND SUPPORT EQUIP 1,661, ,595,317-66,472 I SPARE AND REPAIR PARTS 63 SPARES AND REPAIR PARTS 86,365 86, UNDISTRIBUTED , IED PROGRAMS... 17,258,69 17,372,214 TOTAL, OTHER PROCUREMENT, AIR FORCE 2,89, ,366 I I - 5,798 ',... '

150 U: \219REPT\2REPT\2REPT COMMI'ITEE RECOMMENDED ADJUSTMENTS The following table details the adjustments Committee: recommended by thf line 219 budget estimate Committee Change from recommendation budget estimate Cap Vehicles... Program increase, Civil air patrol-vehicles... Joint Light Tactical Vehicle... Program increase, Procurement of 7 DABs for INDOPACOM... 1,22 3,145 1,7 34,142 Special Purpose Vehicles... 43,3 55,8 Program increase: Procurement of 7 DABs for INDOPACOM... Fire Fighting/Crash Rescue Vehicles... Program increase, Procurement of 7 DABs for 23,328 32,78 INDOPACOM... Materials Handling Vehicles.... Program increase, Procurement of 7 DABs for 11,537 21,125 INDOPACOM... 1 Runway Snow Remov And Cleaning Equ... Program increase, Procurement of 7 DABs for 37,6 38,279 INDOPACOM Comsec Equipment , ,972 Program increase, Missil electronic encryption device... Maintain Program Affordability: Unjustified growth for COMSEC equipment Air Traffic Control & Landing Sys... Maintain Program Affordability: --RAPCON... 2 Weather Observation Forecast... Program increase, Portable doppleradar Air Force Physical Security System... Program increase, Procurement of 7 DABs for 57,937 45,2 159,313 42,937 52,52 47,115 INDOPACOM... Improving Funds Management, JUON funded in Public Law Combat Training Ranges , ,175 Program increase, ANG electronic warfare range requirements-threat emitters... Program increase, Threat simulators and equipment to support F-35A beddown AFNET... 12,836 76,836 Improving Funds Management: ARAD enterprise software funded in Public Law Tactical C-E Equipment ,231 87,531 Improving Funds Management: Carryover... Improving Funds Management, Previously funded requirement CCTV/Audiovisual Equipment... Improving Funds Management: Carryover 55 Mobility Equipment... Program increase, Procurement of 7 DABs for INDOPACOM... 6,55 9,549 3,5 2, Base Maintenance and Support Equipment... Program increase, Precision approach radar... 24,5 29,5 59 DCGS-AF... Improving Funds Management: OA forward buys funded in Public Law ,29 378,49 61 Special Update Program ,813 9,813 Classified Adjustment Classified Programs , ,372,214 Classified Adjustment ,997 +3, ,5 + 12,5 +9,38 +9,38 +9,588 +9, ,6 + 12,9-8,3-15, -15, + 7,5 + 7,5-112, ,2-114,2 + 13,5 +4, +63,5-26, -26, - 73,7-1, -63,7-3,5-3,5 + 11, ,328 +5, +5, -69,8-69,8-13, -13, + 114, ,145

151 U: \219REPT\2REPT\2REPT Basic Expeditionary Airfield Resources Energy Efficiency.-The Committee notes that providing adequate living conditions ensures that deployed forces are more combat effective. Therefore, the Committee encourages the Secretary of the Air Force to leverage existing technologies, such as reusable and re-deployable insulation systems, in order to reduce logistics and sustainment costs associated with shelters in the Basic Expeditionary Airfield Resources [BEAR] program.

152 U: \219REPT\2REPT\2REPT.26 PROCUREMENT, 152 DEFENSE-WIDE Appropriations, $5,429,27, Budget estimate, ,786,271, Committee recommendation ,663,821, The Committee recommends an appropriation of $6,663,821,. This is $122,45, below the budget estimate. COMMITTEE RECOMMENDED PROGRAM The following table summarizes the budget estimate for this appropriation, the Committee recommendation, and the Committee recommended adjustments to the budget estimate:

153 c... C: :::, CD / N 9' N ' tc_j "3 isl / "O [Dollars in thousands] t Line Qty. MAJOR EQUIPMENT PROCUREMENT, DEFENSE-WIDE 219 budget estimate Qty. Committee recommendation Qty. Change from Budget estimate --- / MAJOR EQUIPMENT, DCAA MAJOR EQUIPMENT ITEMS LESS THAN $SM , , MAJOR EQUIPMENT, DCMA O') MAJOR EQUIPMENT... 3, ,873 1, ,63 7 INFORMATION SYSTEMS SECURITY... 21,59 8 TELEPORT PROGRAM... 33, ITEMS LESS THAN $SM , rm I :::::::::::::::::::::::: 1 1 NET CENTRIC ENTERPRISE SERVICES [NCES] ,17 c.:, 11 DEFENSE INFORMATION SYSTEMS NETWORK... 15, WHITE HOUSE COMMUNICATION AGENCY ,61 14 SENIOR LEADERSHIP ENTERPRISE , JOINT REGIONAL SECURITY STACKS (JRSS) , JOINT SERVICE PROVIDER... 17, I MAJOR EQUIPMENT... 5, ,225 MAJOR EQUIPMENT, DMACT 19 I A-WEAPON SYSTEM COST , ,16 MAJOR EQUIPMENT, DODEA 2 I AUTOMATION/EDUCATIONAL SUPPORT & LOGISTICS... MAJOR EQUIPMENT, DSS 21 I MAJOR EQUIPMENT... MAJOR EQUIPMENT, DEFENSE THREAT REDUCTION AGENCY I CRLAiiiii!... 1, I iii,s I ,196 I... I 598 I... I I 27.. Eiiii 1P.MENT :::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::... 5, , gg gg

154 c... C ::, (1) / I\J ts:) -c.n I\J ' CX> t_tj I\) "ti i- >-3 CX> / "O [Dollars in thousands] ts:) l Change from t_tj line 219 budget Committee Qty. Qty. estimate recommendation Budget "ti Qty estimate >-3 / ts:) SYSTEM , ,14, , 26 THAAD 27 GROUND BASED MIDCOURSE , 14 45, + 41, t_tj 28 GROUND BASED MIDCOURSE [AP-CY] 115, 115, 29 AEGIS BMD 593, , ,26 3 AEGIS BMD (AP) ,26-115,26 ts:) 31 BMDS AN/TPY-2 RADARS 13,185 13, m 32 ISRAELI PROGRAMS , 33 SHORT RANGE BALLISTIC MISSILE DEFENSE (SRBMD) 5, 34 AEGIS ASHORE PHASE Ill... 15, 35 IRON DOME SYSTEM... 7, 36 AEGIS BMD HARDWARE AND SOFTWARE ,57 42 I INFORMATION SYSTEMS SECURITY PROGRAM [ISSPJ... ' ,43 3, ,3 1 """' MAJOR EQUIPMENT, OSD 43 I MAJOR EQUIPMENT, OSD 35, ,295 MAJOR EQUIPMENT, TJS 441 MAJOR EQUIPMENT, TJS... 4,36 4,36 45 MAJOR EQUIPMENT, TJS-CE2T MAJOR EQUIPMENT, WHS 46 I MAJOR EQUIPMENT, TOTAL, MAJOR SPECIAL OPERATIONS COMMAND WHS I I ,297,5... EQUIPMENT... 3,314,45 AVIATION PROGRAMS 5 SOF ROTARY WING UPGRADES AND SUSTAINMENT. 148, , UNMANNED ISR 57,78 57,78 52 NON-STANDARD AVIATION. 18,731 18, SOF U-28 32,31 32,31 54 MH-47 CHINOOK ,33 131,33 55 CV-22 SOF MODIFICATION 32,529 32, I I + 17,4 """'

155 c... C: ::J (D / I\) 1:-,:) p, I\) s :, t_,:j "3 "ti i- >-3 :, / "O 56 MQ-9. 1:-,:) 3 UNMANNED AERIAL VEHICLE ,621 24, PRECISION STRIKE PACKAGE , ,965 t_,:j 58 AC/MC-13J 165, , ,132 "ti > ,274 8,274 / SHIPBUILDING 1:-,:) 6 I UNDERWATER SYSTEMS , ,71-13,652 t_,:j AMMUNITION PROGRAMS "ti 61 I SOF ORDNANCE ITEMS UNDER $5,, , ,42-32,7 >-3 62 SOF INTELLIGENCE SYSTEMS... 85, ,699 ' 63 DCGS-SOF. 17, , OTHER ITEMS UNDER $5,, 112,117 16,25 65 SOF COMBATANT CRAFT SYSTEMS 7, , SPECIAL PROGRAMS , ,26 67 TACTICAL VEHICLES... 88, , , 68 WARRIOR SYSTEMS UNDER $5,,... ' , :: , 1 69 COMBAT MISSION REQUIREMENTS... 19, SOF GLOBAL VIDEO SURVEILLANCE ACTIVITIES , , SOF OPERATIONAL ENHANCEMENTS INTELLIGENCE 18,59 18,59 73 SOF OPERATIONAL ENHANCEMENTS , ,333 TOTAL, SPECIAL OPERATIONS COMMAND ,588, ,465,48 I... I -123,59 CHEMICAi/BiOLOGiCAL DEFENSE 761 CHEMICAL BIOLOGICAL SITUATIONAL AWARENESS , , ,5 77 CB PROTECTION AND HAZARD MITIGATION , ,519-2, TOTAL, CHEMICAi/BiOLOGiCAL DEFENSE.. 31,937 34,437-6,5 CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS ,691 58,291-9,4 TOTAL, PROCUREMENT, DEFENSE-WIDE ,786, ,663, ,45,...,... 1:-,:) O')

156 U: \219REPT\2REPT\2REPT COMMI'ITEE RECOMMENDED ADJUSTMENTS The following table details the adjustments Committee: recommended by the Line 219 budget estimate Committee recommendation Change from budget estimate 9 s Less Than $5 Million... Maintain program affordabilityc Unjustified growth Senior Leadership Enterprise... Insufficient budget justification, Lack of supporting justification 16 Joint Service Provider.... Maintain program affordability, Unjustified growth in end user services... 2 Automation/Educational Support & Logistics Improving funds management Prior year carryover Major Equipment Improving funds management Prior year carryover. 26 THAAO Program increase, THAAD interceptors. 27 Ground Based Midcourse.... Transfer, Transfer funding for missile field components from Research, Development. Test and Evaluation, Defense-wide, line 73 for proper execution, Transferequested by Missile Defense Agency. 29 Aegis BMD Transfer, Transfer from line 3 for additional SM-3 Block IIA interceptors Aegis BMD [AP-CY] Restoring acquisition accountability, Lack of justification-transfer to line 29 for additional SM-3 Block IIA interceptors Aegis Ashore Phase Ill Program increase, AEGIS Ashore Poland Information Systems Security Program [ISSP]. Program increase, Sharkseer... 5 Rotary Wing Upgrades and Sustainment... Maintain program affordability, MPU unjustified request Restoring acquisition accountability, NGEN FUR delays AC/MC-13J. Improving funds management, RFCM ICS carryover... Maintain program affordability, MC-13J SMS unjustified growth Underwater Systems. Restoring acquisition accountability, DCS components ahead of need Ordnance s <$5M... Restoring acquisition accountability, SOPGM unit cost adjustments... Restoring acquisition accountability, 3MM and 15MM unit cost adjustments Other s <$5M.... Restoring acquisition accountability, MMP-M ahead of need. 65 Combatant Craft Systems. Program increase, Combatant craft Tactical Vehicles. Improving funds management, Requirements funded in Public Law Warrior Systems <$SM. Improving funds management, Requirements funded in Public Law Operational Enhancements. 27, ,246 17,182 1,723 l, ,68 49, 593, ,26 15, 5,43 148, , , , ,117 7,313 88,68 438,59 367,433 24, ,14,68 45, 78,694 35, 3,73 139, , ,71 325,42 16,25 15,913 85,68 415,59 332,333-3,815-3, , ,246-6,74-6, , + 14, +41, +41, + 115, ,26-115,26-115,26 + 2, + 2, + 25,3 + 25,3-8,739-6,914-1,825-1,132-2,132-8, -13,652-13,652-32,7-25, -7,7-5,867-5, ,6 + 8,6-3, -3, -23, -23, -35,1

157 U: \219REPT\2REPT\2REPT Line 219 budget estimate Committee Change from recommendation budget estimate Improving funds management: Requirements funded in Public Law _ 74 Chemical Biological Situational Awareness _ Maintain program affordability, Unjustified growth _ Program increase, CBRN dismounted reconnaissance system _ CB Protection & Hazard Mitigation _ Maintain program affordability, Unjustified growth _ Program increase, DFoS CIDAS _ 999 Classified Programs Classified adjustment 166, , , , ,519 58,291-35,1-4,5-7,5 + 3, -2, -3, + 1, -9,4-9,4 Chemical Biological Protective Shelter [CBPSJ.-The Committee recognizes the need for a highly mobile, self-contained collective protection system that can provide a contamination free working area for Echelon I and II medical treatment facilities and other selected units. CBPS satisfies that requirement and consists of a selfcontained and self-powered shelter that is modularized and integrated into a service selected prime-mover. Therefore, the Committee supports the fiscal year 219 President's budget request of $17,673, for the CBPS program. June 25, 218 (2:28 p_m.)

158 U:\219REPT\2REPT\2REPT NATIONAL GUARD AND RESERVE EQUIPMENT Appropriations, 218 _... 1 $1,3,, Budget estimate, Committee recommendation ,, 1 Provided in Public Law , title IX. The Committee recommends an appropriation of $9,,. This is $9,, above the budget estimate. The appropriation includes direction for the component commanders of the Army Reserve, Marine Forces Reserve, Air Force Reserve, Army National Guard and Air National Guard to submit to the congressional defense committees a detailed assessment of their component's modernization priorities, not later than 3 days after enactment of this act. COMMI'ITEE RECOMMENDED PROGRAM The following table details the program recommended by the Committee: 219 budget Committee Change from estimate recommendation budget estimate NATIONAL GUARD AND RESERVE EQUIPMENT RESERVE EQUIPMENT: ARMY RESERVE, Program increase, Miscellaneous equipment.. 124, ,5 NAVY RESERVE: Program increase, Miscellaneous equipment... 45, +45, MARINE CORPS RESERVE: Program increase, Miscellaneous equipment , + 9, AIR FORCE RESERVE Program increase, Miscellaneous equipment.. 138, ,5 TOTAL, RESERVE EQUIPMENT , +317, NATIONAL GUARD EQUIPMENT: ARMY NATIONAL GUARD: Program increase, Miscellaneous equipment.. 291, ,5 AIR NATIONAL GUARD: Program increase, Miscellaneous equipment , ,5 TOTAL, NATIONAL GUARD EQUIPMENT , + 583, TOTAL, NATIONAL GUARD AND RESERVE EQUIPMF,H.. 9, + 9, High-Priority s.-the Committee directs that the National Guard and Reserve Equipment account shall be executed by the Chiefs of the National Guard and reserve components with priority consideration given to the following items: Acoustic Hailing Devices, Arctic Sustainment Package, Cold Weather and Mountaineering Gear and Equipment, Commercial Off-the-Shelf Simulation Devices, Detect and Avoid Systems for MQ-9 Aircraft, Digital Radar Warning Receivers for F-16s, MQ-9 Deployable Launch & Recovery Element Mission Support Kits, Radiac Sets, and Small Unit Support Vehicles. Commercial Off-the-Shelf Simulation Devices.-The Committee commends the Army National Guard for its innovative approach to

159 U: \219REPT\2REPT\2REPT acquiring commercial off-the-shelf simulation devices. Utilizing COTS training devices enables the Guard to provide high quality, timely simulation training at an affordable cost. The Committee encourages the Guard to continue utilizing COTS simulation training devices and to consider a service and support business model for simulation training in order to maximize the benefits of modern, realistic training scenarios. DEFENSE PRODUCTION ACT PuRCHASES Appropriations, $67,41, Budget estimate, ,578, Committee recommendation... 38,578, The Committee recommends an appropriation of $38,578,. This is equal to the budget estimate.

160 U:\219REPT\2REPT\2REPT COMMI'ITEE RECOMMENDED PROGRAM The following table summarizes the budget estimate for this appropriation, the Committee recommendation, and the Committee recommended adjustments to the budget estimate:

161 c... C ::J CD I\J _a, I\J s ex, I\) N ex, " [Dollars in thousands] i,--,---, ,-,::::------;::-::: Line Qty. DEFENSE PRODUCTION ACT PURCHASES DEFENSE PRODUCTION ACT PURCHASES TOTAL, DEFENSE PRODUCTION ACT PURCHASES 219 budget estimate 38,578 38,578 Qty. Committee recommendation 38,578 38,578 Qty Change from Budget estimate / t-:>... co t_,rj / t-:> t_,rj / t-:> gg t-:>... cr:,...

162 U: \219REPT\2REPT\2REPT Defense Production Act.-The fiscal year 219 budget request includes $38,578, for the Defense Production Act [DPA] Fund. For the second consecutive year, the Committee supports the DPA Fund budget request but does not provide additional funding. The Committee remains supportive of DP A's unique mission to address single points of failure in supply chains, support emerging technology, expand Defense-centric companies into commercial sectors, and improve the manufacturing capacity of companies when there are few market incentives. However, the Committee is concerned with the management of the DPA Fund. Despite recent Congressional adds to the DPA Fund, the Committee notes the gradual decrease of debits to the DPA Fund for projects since fiscal year 215. Therefore, the Committee directs the Secretary of Defense to report to the congressional defense committees not later than 3 days after enactment of this act on the management of the DPA Fund, to include an update on the status and plan to accelerate the execution of funds, the way forward on the Executive Agent issue, and explanations on the differences between the projects requested in the budget request and subsequent funding profiles provided during the year of execution. JOINT URGENT OPERATIONAL NEEDS FUND Appropriations, Budget estimate, $1,25, Committee recommendation The Committee recommends no funding for the Joint Urgent Operational Needs Fund.

163 U: \219REPT\2REPT\2REPT.29 TITLE IV RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, TEST AND EVALUATION Funds appropriated under this title provide the resources required to conduct a program of research, development, test and evaluation, including research in basic science, applied research, advanced technology development, demonstration and validation, engineering and manufacturing development, and operational systems development. The President's fiscal year 219 budget requests a total of $91,56,95, for research, development, test and evaluation appropriations. SUMMARY OF COMMITTEE ACTION The Committee recommends research, development, test and evaluation appropriations totaling $95,131,819, for fiscal year 219. This is $4,74,869, above the budget estimate. Committee recommended research, development, test and evaluation appropriations for fiscal year 219 are summarized below: SUMMARY OF RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, TEST AND EVALUATION APPROPRIATIONS Account 219 budget Committee Change from estimate recommendation budget estimate Research, Development, Test and Evaluation: Research, Development, Test and Evaluation, Army... 1,159,379 1,812, ,79 Research, Development, Test and Evaluation, Navy... 18,481,666 18,992, ,398 Research, Development, Test and Evaluation, Air Force.... 4,178,343 4,896, ,324 Research, Development, Test and Evaluation, Defense-Wide 22,16,553 24,49, ,33,68 Operational Test and Evaluation, Defense ,9 381,9 + 16, Total ,56,95 95,131, ,74,869 REPROGRAMMING GUIDANCE FOR ACQUISITION ACCOUNTS The Secretary of Defense is directed to continue to follow the reprogramming guidance as specified in the report accompanying the House version of the Department of Defense appropriations bill for fiscal year 28 (House Report ). Specifically, the dollar threshold for reprogramming funds will remain at $2,, for procurement and $1,, for research, development, test and evaluation. Also, the Under Secretary of Defense (Comptroller) is directed to continue to provide the congressional defense committees quarterly, spreadsheet-based DD Form 1416 reports for service and defensewide accounts in titles III and IV of this act. Reports for titles III and IV shall comply with guidance specified in the explanatory statement accompanying the Department of Defense Appropriations Act for Fiscal Year 26. The Department shall continue to follow the limitation that prior approval reprogrammings are set at either the specified dollar threshold or 2 percent of the procurement or research, development, test and evaluation line, whichever is less. These thresholds are cumulative from the base for re- (163)

164 U: \219REPT\2REPT\2REPT programming value as modified by any adjustments. Therefore, if the combined value of transfers into or out of a procurement (Pl), or a research, development, test and evaluation (R-1) line exceeds the identified threshold, the Secretary of Defense must submit a prior approval reprogramming to the congressional defense committees. In addition, guidelines on the application of prior approval reprogramming procedures for congressional special interest items are established elsewhere in this report. FUNDING INCREASES The funding increases outlined in the tables for each appropriation account shall be provided only for the specific purposes indicated in the tables. RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, TEST AND EVALUATION SPECIAL INTEREST ITEMS s for which additional funds have been recommended or items for which funding is specifically reduced as shown in the tables detailing Committee recommended adjustments or in paragraphs using the phrase "only for" or "only to" are congressional special interest items for the purpose of the Base for Reprogramming [DD Form 1414]. Each of these items must be carried on the DD Form 1414 at the stated amount, as specifically addressed in elsewhere in this report. RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, TEST AND EVALUATION OVERVIEW Basic Research.-The Committee understands that basic research is the foundation for Department of Defense innovation and future technologies. As the Under Secretary of Defense (Research and Engineering) recently testified before the Committee: "The Department of Defense has the third largest investment among Federal agencies in basic research at U.S. universities, who have, through years of continued investments, been the source of many of today's transformational technologies. Traditionally, the Department has viewed the role of universities as producing the research innovation, the Department of Defense labs as the mechanism to nurture these findings and to render them defense-applicable, and the defense industrial base to integrate these new technologies into acquisition programs." Accordingly, the Committee recommends a total basic research investment of $2,798,456,, an increase of $529,28, above the fiscal year 219 budget request. This includes an additional $125,, in Research, Development, Test and Evaluation, Army; $125,, in Research, Development, Test and Evaluation, Navy; $125,, in Research, Development, Test and Evaluation, Air Force; and $1,, in Research, Development, Test and Evaluation, Defense-Wide. Directed Energy.-The 218 National Defense Strategy describes a changing security environment due to rapid technological advancements and the changing character of war. The Committee understands that directed energy, a family of emerging non-kinetic capabilities, will play a key role in shaping the air, maritime, and ground battlefield environments. The Committee has been supportive of the Department's directed energy activities to date to en-

165 U: \219REPT\2REPT\2REPT.29 sure that these capabilities are an operational advantage for the U.S. military. The Committee supports additional investments to further develop directed energy technology and transition these activities to both offensive and defensive capabilities in the future. As a result, the Committee recommends an additional $316,5, above the President's budget request for directed energy activities. Specifically, the Committee recommends an additional $15,, for Air Force prototyping activities to support the application of directed energy technology for air base air defense, precision attack, and aircraft self-protection. These investments are intended to support the Air Force Directed Energy Weapon Flight Plan and the continued development of high energy lasers and high-power microwave weapons. Additional investments to advance the development of directed energy capabilities by the Missile Defense Agency are addressed separately. Hypersonics.-The 218 National Defense Strategy identifies hypersonics as a key technology to ensure that the United States maintains its technology superiority and ability to fight and win the wars in the future. The fiscal year 219 President's budget request invests in both offensive and defensive hypersonics capabilities. The Committee understands that the Department of Defense is accelerating existing efforts in hypersonics to counter the progress made by near peer threats. To support and accelerate several of the Department's current activities, the Committee recommends an increase of $928,6, over the President's budget request to support hypersonics research and prototyping efforts. Specifically, the Committee recommends an additional $345,, for the Office of the Secretary of Defense to accelerate prompt global strike capability development as well as an additional $5,, for the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency to develop offensive hypersonic weapons. Further, the recommendation includes an additional $3,, to support the Air Force's decision to accelerate prototyping efforts for the air launched rapid response weapon and hypersonic conventional strike weapon. Finally, the Committee recommends an additional $113,, for the Navy and the Strategic Capabilities Office to design, fabricate, and test an advanced rail gun mount and continue development of associated hypervelocity projectile. Additional investments to advance the development of hypersonic capabilities by the Missile Defense Agency are addressed separately. Department of Defense Test and Evaluation lnfrastructure.-the 218 National Defense Strategy addresses the increasingly complex global threat environment driven in part by rapid technological advancements. The fiscal year 219 President's budget request proposes investments in several programs that support a more capable and lethal force to prepare for this threat environment, including directed energy, hypersonics, advanced computing, big data analytics, artificial intelligence, autonomy, and robotics programs; the Committee recommends targeted increases in these high priority areas to further accelerate U.S. technological innovation. The Committee believes that concurrent with investments in leap-ahead technological advancements, an investment in the Department of Defense test and evaluation infrastructure is required to increase testing range space and availability and to ensure con- 165

166 U:\219REPT\2REPT\2REPT tinued independent and objective assessments of weapon system capabilities. Therefore, after consultation with the Under Secretary of Defense (Research and Engineering) and Director, Operational Test and Evaluation, the Committee recommends an increase of $846,, above the President's budget request for the Anny, Navy, Air Force and Office, Director, Operational Test and Evaluation to modernize the Department of Defense test and evaluation infrastructure in areas such as hypersonics, directed energy, augmented intelligence, machine learning and robotics. The Committee directs the Under Secretary of Defense (Research and Engineering), in conjunction with the Director, Operational Test and Evaluation, and the Secretaries of the Anny, Navy and Air Force, to conduct an in-depth assessment of the Department of Defense test and evaluation infrastructure and to identify improvements required to address future warfighting capabilities. The assessment shall be provided to the congressional defense committees not later than with the submission of the fiscal year 22 President's budget request and shall include proposed coordinated investments by warfighting area in priority order and with associated cost estimates.

167 U:\219REPT\2REPT\2REPT RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, TEST AND EVALUATION, ARMY Appropriations, $1,647,426, Budget estimate, ,159,379, Committee recommendation... 1,812,458, The Committee recommends an appropriation of $1,812,458,. This is $653,79, above the budget estimate. COMMITTEE RECOMMENDED PROGRAM The following table summarizes the budget estimate for this appropriation, the Committee recommendation, and the Committee recommended adjustments to the budget estimate: line 219 budget Committee Change from estimate recommendation budget estimate RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, TEST & EVAL, ARMY BASIC RESEARCH I IN-HOUSE LABORATORY INDEPENDENT RESEARCH... 2 DEFENSE RESEARCH SCIENCES UNIVERSITY RESEARCH INITIATIVES... 4 UNIVERSITY AND INDUSTRY RESEARCH CENTERS , ,912 65,283 92,115 11, ,912 65, , , + 35,75 TOTAL, BASIC RESEARCH... APPLIED RESEARCH 5 MATERIALS TECHNOLOGY SENSORS AND ELECTRONIC SURVIVABILITY... 7 TRACTOR HIP TRACTOR JACK AVIATION TECHNOLOGY..... IO ELECTRONIC WARFARE TECHNOLOGY... II MISSILE TECHNOLOGY ADVANCED WEAPONS TECHNOLOGY ADVANCED CONCEPTS AND SIMULATION COMBAT VEHICLE AND AUTOMOTIVE TECHNOLOGY.. 15 BALLISTICS TECHNOLOGY CHEMICAL, SMOKE AND EQUIPMENT DEFEATING TECHNOLOGY. 17 JOINT SERVICE SMALL ARMS PROGRAM.. 18 WEAPONS AND MUNITIONS TECHNOLOGY ELECTRONICS AND ELECTRONIC DEVICES... 2 NIGHT VISION TECHNOLOGY.. 21 COUNTERMINE SYSTEMS HUMAN FACTORS ENGINEERING TECHNOLOGY. 23 ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY TECHNOLOGY COMMAND, CONTROL, COMMUNICATIONS TECHNOLOGY. 25 COMPUTER AND SOFTWARE TECHNOLOGY 26 MILITARY ENGINEERING TECHNOLOGY MANPOWER/PERSONNEL!rRAINING TECHNOLOGY WARFIGHTER TECHNOLOGY MEDICAL TECHNOLOGY TOTAL, APPLIED RESEARCH... ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT 3 WARFIGHTER ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY MEDICAL ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY AVIATION ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY WEAPONS AND MUNITIONS ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY COMBAT VEHICLE AND AUTOMOTIVE ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY. 35 SPACE APPLICATION ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY MANPOWER, PERSONNEL AND TRAINING ADVANCED TECH- NOLOGY TRACTOR HIKE NEXT GENERATION TRAINING & SIMULATION SYSTEMS ,895 28,6 32,366 8, ,847 25,571 5,183 29,52 28,5 7,45 75,541 5,32 12,394 4,444 58,283 29,582 21,244 24,131 13,242 55,3 14,958 78,159 21,862 4,566 9,75 919,69 39,338 62, ,958 12, ,739 13, 8,44 22,631 25, , ,75 58,6 + 3, 85, ,5 8, , , 25,571 75, , 34,52 +5, 28,5 95,45 +25, 75, ,32 12,394 65, ,5 83, , 29,582 27,244 +6, 26,631 +2,5 21,242 +8, 55,3 14,958 98, , 21,862 49, , 9,75 1,166, ,5 39, , , 133, , 244, , , ,5 51, + 38, 8,44 22,631 25,682

168 U:\219REPT\2REPT\2REPT Line 219 budget Committee Change from estimate recommendation budget estrmate 4 COMBATING TERRORISM, TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT TRACTOR NAIL TRACTOR EGGS. 43 ELECTRONIC WARFARE TECHNOLOGY MISSILE AND ROCKET ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY TRACTOR CAGE HIGH PERFORMANCE COMPUTING MODERNIZATION PROGRAM. 47 LANDMINE WARFARE AND BARRIER ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY.. 48 JOINT SERVICE SMALL ARMS PROGRAM NIGHT VISION ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY TECHNOLOGY DEMONSTRATIONS. 51 MILITARY ENGINEERING ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY ADVANCED TACTICAL COMPUTER SCIENCE & SENSOR TECH- NOLOGY COMMAND, CONTROL, COMMUNICATIONS ADVANCED TECH- NOLOGY. 3,762 4,896 6,41 31,491 61,132 16, ,322 11,14 5,885 61,376 9,136 25,864 34,883 52,387 36,762 4,896 6,41 41,491 86,132 16, ,322 17,14 22,85 61,376 29,136 95,464 43,883 52, , + 1, + 25, + 35, + 6, + 16,92 + 2, + 69,6 + 9, TOTAL, ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT. 1,26,698 1,494, ,837 DEMONSTRATION & VALIDATION 54 ARMY MISSILE DEFENSE SYSTEMS INTEGRATION AIR AND MISSILE DEFENSE SYSTEMS ENGINEERING LANDMINE WARFARE AND BARRIER-ADV DEV SMOKE, OBSCURANT AND TARGET DEFEATING SYS-ADV DEV. 59 TANK AND MEDIUM CALIBER AMMUNITION... 6 ARMORED SYSTEMODERNIZATION-ADV DEV. 61 SOLDIER SUPPORT AND SURVIVABILITY TACTICAL ELECTRONIC SURVEILLANCE SYSTEM-AD.. 63 NIGHT VISION SYSTEMS ADVANCED DEVELOPMENT. 64 ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY TECHNOLOGY NATO RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT AVIATION-ADV DEV.. 67 LOGISTICS AND ENGINEER EQUIPMENT-ADV DEV MEDICAL SYSTEMS-ADV DEV SOLDIER SYSTEMS-ADVANCED DEVELOPMENT... 7 ROBOTICS DEVELOPMENT CROSS FUNCTIONAL TEAM (CFT) ADVANCED DEVELOPMENT ANALYSIS OF ALTERNATIVES FUTURE TACTICAL UNMANNED AIRCRAFT SYSTEM (FTUAS).. 74 LOWER TIER AIR MISSILE DEFENSE (LTAMID) SENSOR TECHNOLOGY MATURATION INITIATIVES MANEUVER-SHORT RANGE AIR DEFENSE (M-SHORAD). 77 TRACTOR BEAM. 1,777 42,82 45,254 22,7 41, ,395 8,746 35,667 7,35 14,749 3,687 1,793 14,248 34,284 18,44 95,66 38, 9,765 12,393 12,374 95,347 95,85 52,894 55,477 49,62 45,254 22,7 41,974 63,585 8,746 35,667 7,35 14,749 3,687 86,193 17,248 37,284 18,44 72,26 25, 9,765 12,393 87,874 95,347 56,85 52, ,7 + 6,8-55, ,4 + 3, + 3, - 23,4-13, -32,5-39, SYNTHETIC TRAINING ENVIRONMENT REFINEMENT AND 79 PROTOTYPING INDIRECT FIRE PROTECTION CAPABILITY INCREMENT 2-INTERC 81 CYBERSPACE OPERATIONS FORCES AND FORCE SUPPORT.. 82 ASSURED POSITIONING, NAVIGATION AND TIMING (PNT). 83 ARMY SPACE SYSTEMS INTEGRATION ,939 51,3 65, ,3 38,319 77,939 51,3 47, ,3 38,319-18,4-35, TOTAL, DEMONSTRATION & VALIDATION.. 1,329,393 1,245,183-84,21 ENGINEERING & MANUFACTURING DEVELOPMENT 84 AIRCRAFT AVIONICS ELECTRONIC WARFARE DEVELOPMENT. 88 TRACTOR CAGE INFANTRY SUPPORT WEAPONS.. 9 MEDIUM TACTICAL VEHICLES.. 85 JAVELIN. 92 FAMILY OF HEAVY TACTICAL VEHICLES. 93 AIR TRAFFIC CONTROL. 95 LIGHTACTICAL WHEELED VEHICLES. 96 ARMORED SYSTEMS MODERNIZATION (ASM)-ENG DEV. 97 NIGHT VISION SYSTEMS-SOD ,293 78,699 17,5 83,155 3,74 1,623 11,95 12,347 8, , ,614 32,293 58,699 17,5 57,355 3,74 5,623 11,95 12,347 1, , ,614-2, -25,8-5, -6,934-1,

169 U: \219REPT\2REPT\2REPT Line 219 budget Committee Change from estimate recommendation budget estimate 98 COMBAT FEEDING, CLOTHING, AND EQUIPMENT.... 4,57 7,57 +3, 99 NON-SYSTEM TRAINING DEVICES-SOD... 49,436 44,436-5, 1 AIR DEFENSE COMMAND, CONTROL AND INTELLIGENCE-SOD... 95,172 88,172-7, 11 CONSTRUCTIVE SIMULATION SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT ,628 22, AUTOMATIC TEST EQUIPMENT DEVELOPMENT... 13,297 1,697-2,6 13 DISTRIBUTIVE INTERACTIVE SIMULATIONS (DIS)-SDD... 9,145 9, BRILLIANT ANTI-ARMOR SUBMUNITION (BAT).... 9,894 6,894-3, 15 COMBINED ARMS TACTICAL TRAINER (CATT) CORE... 21,964 21, BRIGADE ANALYSIS, INTEGRATION AND EVALUATION... 49,288 49, WEAPONS AND MUNITIONS-SOD ,1 184, , LOGISTICS AND ENGINEER EQUIPMENT-SOD... 79,76 79,76 19 COMMAND, CONTROL, COMMUNICATIONS SYSTEMS-SOD... 15,97 15, MEDICAL MATERIEUMEDICAL BIOLOGICAL DEFENSE EQUIPMENT 44,542 44, LANDMINE WARFARE/BARRIER-SOD... 5,817 45,117-5,7 112 ARMY TACTICAL COMMAND & CONTROL HARDWARE & SOFT- WARE , ,693-15, 113 RADAR DEVELOPMENT... 39,338 39, GENERAL FUND ENTERPRISE BUSINESS SYSTEM [GFEBS]... 37,851 37, FIREFINDER... 45,473 45, SOLDIER SYSTEMS-WARRIOR DEMNAL... 1,395 1, SUITE OF SURVIVABILITY ENHANCEMENT SYSTEMS -EMO... 69,24 52,94-16,3 118 ARTILLERY SYSTEMS.... 1,781 1, INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT ,758 8,376-33, INTEGRATED PERSONNEL AND PAY SYSTEM-ARMY (IPPs-A) ,63 155,13-11,5 121 ARMORED MULTI-PURPOSE VEHICLE , , INTEGRATED GROUND SECURITY SURVEILLANCE RESPONSE 122 CAPABILITY (IGSSR-C)... 3,211 3, JOINTACTICAL NETWORK CENTER (JTNC)... 15,889 15, JOINTACTICAL NETWORK (JTN)... 41,972 41, TRACTOR TIRE... 41,166 41, GROUND-BASED OPERATIONAL SURVEILLANCE SYSTEM- EXPENDITIONARY (GBOSS-E)... 5,175 5, TACTICAL SECURITY SYSTEM (TSS)... 4,496 4, COMMON INFRARED COUNTERMEASURES (CIRCM)... 51,178 25,178-26, 129 COMBATING WEAPONS OF MASS DESTRUCTION (CWMD)... 11,311 11, NUCLEAR BIOLOGICAL CHEMICAL RECONNAISSANCE VEHICLE ,154 13,54-4,1 132 DEFENSIVE CYBER TOOL DEVELOPMENT... 36,626 3,126-6,5 133 TACTICAL NETWORK RADIO SYSTEMS (LOW-TIER)... 3,829 3, CONTRACT WRITING SYSTEM... 41,928 41, MISSILE WARNING SYSTEMODERNIZATION (MWSM) ,276 6,276-22, 136 AIRCRAFT SURVIVABILITY DEVELOPMENT... 21,965 21, INDIRECT FIRE PROTECTION CAPABILITY INC 2-BLOCK ,71 145,71-12, 138 GROUND ROBOTICS... 86,167 61,549-24, EMERGING TECHNOLOGY INITIATIVES... 42,866 68, ,4 14 AMF JOINTACTICAL RADIO SYSSTEM... 15, JOINT AIR-TO-GROUND MISSILE [JAGMJ... 11,773 15,984 11, ARMY INTEGRATED AIR AND MISSILE DEFENSE [AIAMD] ,67 322,67 +45, 143 NATIONAL CAPABILITIES INTEGRATION... 12,34 12, JOINT LIGHTACTICAL VEHICLE ENG AND MANUFACTURING... 2,686-2, AVIATION GROUND SUPPORT EQUIPMENT... 2,76 7,76 +5, 147 TROJAN-RH ,521 4, ELECTRONIC WARFARE DEVELOPMENT... 8,922 8, TRACTOR BEARS... 23,17 23,17... TOTAL, ENGINEERING & MANUFACTURING DEVELOP- MENT... 3,192,689 3,16, ,861 RDT&E MANAGEMENT SUPPORT 152 THREAT SIMULATOR DEVELOPMENT... 12,835 28, , 153 TARGET SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT... 12,135 32,135 +2, 154 MAJOR T&E INVESTMENT... 82, , , 155 RAND ARROYO CENTER... 19,821 19, ARMY KWAJALEIN ATOLL , , CONCEPTS EXPERIMENTATION PROGRAM... 3,43 3,43...

170 U: \219REPT\2REPT\2REPT.3 17 Line 219 budget Committee Change from estimate recommendation budget estimate 159 ARMY TEST RANGES AND FACILITIES... 35,759 43, , 16 ARMY TECHNICAL TEST INSTRUMENTATION AND TARGETS... 62,379 84, ,5 161 SURVIVABILITY/LETHALITY ANALYSIS... 4,496 4, AIRCRAFT CERTIFICATION... 3,941 3, METEOROLOGICAL SUPPORT TO RDT&E ACTIVITIES... 9,767 9, MATERIEL SYSTEMS ANALYSIS ,226 21, EXPLOITATION OF FOREIGN ITEMS... 13,26 13, SUPPORT OF OPERATIONAL TESTING... 52,718 52, ARMY EVALUATION CENTER... 57,49 57, ARMY MODELING AND SIMULATION X-CMD COLLABORATION AND INTEG... 2,81 2, PROGRAMWIDE ACTIVITIES... 6,942 6, TECHNICAL INFORMATION ACTIVITIES... 29,5 29, MUNITIONS STANDARDIZATION, EFFECTIVENESS AND SAFETY... 42,332 56, , 172 ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY TECHNOLOGY MGMT SUPPORT... 3,216 3, MANAGEMENT HEADQUARTERS (RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT) 54,145 54, MILITARY GROUND-BASED CREW TECHNOLOGY.... 4,896 4, RONALD REAGAN BALLISTIC MISSILE DEFENSE TEST SITE... 63,11 63, COUNTERINTEL AND HUMAN INTEL MODERNIZATION... 2,636 2, ASSESSMENTS AND EVALUATIONS CYBER VULNERABILITIES... 88,3 f ,3... TO TA L, RDT&E MANAGEMENT SUPPORT.... 1,322,481 1,619, ,5 OPERATIONAL SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT 181 MLRS PRODUCT IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM... 8,886 6,886-2, 182 TRACTOR PULL.... 4,67 4, ANTI-TAMPER TECHNOLOGY SUPPORT... 4,254 4, WEAPONS AND MUNITIONS PRODUCT IMPROVEMENT PROGRAMS 16,22 16, TRACTOR SMOKE... 4,577 4, LONG RANGE PRECISION FIRES (LRPF) , ,475-27, 187 APACHE PRODUCT IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM ,49 24,49-7, 188 BLACKHAWK RECAP/MODERNIZATION... 35,24 35, CHINOOK HELICOPTER PRODUCT IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM , ,822-4, 19 FIXED WING AIRCRAFT... 4,189 4, IMPROVED TURBINE ENGINE PROGRAM , ,137-3,5 194 AVIATION ROCKET SYSTEM PRODUCT IMPROVEMENT AND DE- VELOPMENT.... 6,86 41,86-19, 195 UNMANNED AIRCRAFT SYSTEM UNIVERSAL PRODUCTS... 52,19 38,519-13,5 196 FAMILY OF BIOMETRICS... 2,4 2, PATRIOT PRODUCT IMPROVEMENT... 65,369 75, , 198 AEROSTAT JOINT PROJECT OFFICE... I JOINT AUTOMATED DEEP OPERATION COORDINATION SYSTEM... 3,954 3, COMBAT VEHICLE IMPROVEMENT PROGRAMS , ,427-75, MM SELF-PROPELLED HOWITZER IMPROVEMENTS.... 4,676 3,676-1, 23 AIRCRAFT MODIFICATIONS/PRODUCT IMPROVEMENT PROGRAMS 17,76 17,76 24 AIRCRAFT ENGINE COMPONENT IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM DIGITIZATION... 6,316 6, MISSILE/AIR DEFENSE PRODUCT IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM... 1,643 1, OTHER MISSILE PRODUCT IMPROVEMENT PROGRAMS.... 4,947 4, TRACTOR CARD... 34,5 34, MATERIALS HANDLING EQUIPMENT... 1,464 1, ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY TECHNOLOGY-OPERATIONAL SYSTEM LOWER TIER AIR AND MISSILE DEFENSE [AMO) SYSTEM ,283 78, GUIDED MULTIPLE-LAUNCH ROCKET SYSTEM [GMLRSJ ,12 89,12-65, 216 SECURITY AND INTELLIGENCE ACTIVITIES ,28 12, INFORMATION SYSTEMS SECURITY PROGRAM ,533 46,17-22, GLOBAL COMBAT SUPPORT SYSTEM... 68,619 48,884-19, WWMCCS/GLOBAL COMMAND CONTROL SYSTEM , COMBINED ADVANCED APPLICATIONS... 1,5 1,5 224 INTEGRATED BROADCAST SERVICE (IBS) TACTICAL UNMANNED AERIAL VEHICLES... 6, 6, AIRBORNE RECONNAISSANCE SYSTEMS... 12,416 12, DISTRIBUTED COMMON GROUND/SURFACE SYSTEMS ,667 27,667-11, 229 RQ.-11 UAV.... 6,18 6,18...

171 U: \219REPT\2REPT\2REPT Line 219 budget Committee Change from estimate recommendation budget estimate 23 RQ-7 UAV ,863 12, BIOMETRICS ENABLED INTELLIGENCE... 4,31 4, END ITEM INDUSTRIAL PREPAREDNESS ACTIVITIES.. 53,958 88, ,8 234 SATCOM GROUND ENVIRONMENT (SPACE)... 12,119 12, JOINTACTICAL GROUND SYSTEM. 7,4 7,4... TOTAL, OPERATIONAL SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT 1,916,659 1,681, , CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS... 5,955 5,955 TOTAL, RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, TEST & EVAL, ARMY 1,159,379 1,812, ,79 COMMITTEE RECOMMENDED The following table details the adjustments Committee: ADJUSTMENTS recommended by the line 219 budget estimate Committee recommendation Change from budget estimate Defense Research Sciences. Basic research program increase. Program increase: UAV fuel systems enhancements. University and Industry Research Centers. Basic research program increase... Program increase: Materials in extreme dynamic environments... Program increase: University assisted hypervelocity testing... Materials Technology... Program increase: Advanced polymers. Program increase: Highly durable advanced polymers for lightweight armor. Program increase: Materials research for affordability, performance, and environmental sustainability... Program increase: Advanced materials processing... Sensors and Electronic Survivability... Program increase. Program increase: Advanced space data exploitation and integration program... Program increase: Agile manufacturing materials processing... Program increase: Open campus initiative. Program increase: Small satellite technology development Aviation Technology Program increase: Adaptive flight controls... Program increase: Aviation and missile technology transfer and innovation. 11 Missile Technology. Program increase: Air vehicle development and sustainment... Program increase: Enterprise science and technology prototyping Advanced Weapons Technology... Program increase: COE in high-,rnergy laser and optical technology Combat Vehicle and Automotive Technology Program increase, Advanced materials development for survivability... Program increase, Highly electrified vehicles and infrastructure connectivity 276,912 92,115 28,6 32,366 64,847 5,183 29,52 7,45 377, ,865 58,6 85,866 76,847 75,183 34,52 95, , + 1, + 1, +35, , +8,75 + 2, + 3, + 5, + 5, + 1, + 1, + 53,5 + 5, + 9,5 + 15, +4, + 2, + 12, + 7, + 5, + 25, + 15, + 1, + 5, + 5, + 25, + 15, +4,

172 U:\219REPT\2REPT\2REPT Line 219 budget estimate Committee Change from recommendation budget estimate Program increase: Structural thermoplastics for vehicles Weapons and Munitions Technology... 4,444 Program increase: Advanced warheads technology... Program increase: Medium caliber lightweight composite barrels... Program increase: Novel printed armaments components Electronics and Electronic Devices... 58,283 Program increase: Silicon carbide research... Program increase: Tactical power generation and storage systems Countermine Systems ,244 Program increase: Developing and improving counter-led sensors... Program increase: Development of soil parameters Human Factors Engineering Technology... 24,131 Program increase Environmental Quality Technology... 13,242 Program increase: Mobil environmental containment sensors Military Engineering Technology... 78,159 Program increase: Cellulose nanocomposites research... Program increase: Innovative construction materials for cold regions... Program increase: Vehicle-born IED screening Warfighter Technology... 4,566 Program increase: Expeditionary mobile base camp technology Medical Advanced Technology ,496 Program increase: Peer-reviewed military burn research program Aviation Advanced Technology ,958 Program increase: Stretch broken composite material forms... Program increase: Surface tolerant adhesives Weapons and Munitions Advanced Technology... 12,686 Program increase: Accelerate ERCA gun... Program increase: High energy laser.... Program increase: Long range precision fires Combat Vehicle and Automotive Advanced Technology ,739 Program increase: Airless tire technology demonstration... Program increase: HMMWV automotivenhancements Program increase: HMMWV autonomy... Program increase: HMMWV power system... Program increase: HMMWV torque monitoring... Program increase, Modular scalable powertrain.... Program increase: Next gen combat vehicle... Program increase: Combat vehicle weight reduction initiative... Program increase: Multi-sensor augmented reality system for tactical land vehicles Space Application Advanced Technology... 13, Program increase: Network... Program increase: Assured positioning, navigation, and timing for space and missile defense assets Program increase, Global communications research.. Program increase: Tactical small launch... 4 Combating Terrorism-Technology Development... 3,762 Program increase, Artificial intelligencenabled sensor networks... 65,944 83,283 27,244 26,631 21,242 98,159 49,566 7, , ,53 166,239 51, 36,762 +6, +25,5 +2,5 + 1, + 13, +25, +2, +5, +6, +3, +3, +2,5 +2,5 +8, +8, +2, + 15, +4, + 1, +9, +9, +8, +8, +9, +4, +5, + 141,817 +2, +2, + 11, ,5 +4, + 1, +3, +2, +3, +2,5 + 7, + 1, + 5, +38, +2, +6, + 1, + 2, + 33, +8,

173 U:\219REPT\2REPT\2REPT Line 219 budget estimate Committee Change from recommendation budget estimate Program increase: Enhanced propulsion systems for UAS Program increase: Lightweight, low poweradar systems.... Program increase, Long endurance UAV research. Program increase: Open source ISR research. 43 Electronic Warfare Technology... Program increase: Tactical cyber---blectronic warfare readiness initiative 44 Missile and Rocket Advanced Technology Program increase: Cyber security... Program increase: Tactically mobile, shoot--n-themove SHORAD demonstration 46 High Performance Computing Modernization Program... Program increase 47 Landmine Warfare and Barrier Advanced Technology Program increase: Multi-sensor drone swarms for explosive hazard detection 48 Joint Service Small Arms Program. Program increase: Soldier lethality 5 Environmental Quality Technology Demonstrations Program increase: Autonomous transport innovation Program increase, Environmental sensors for explosives... Program increase, Rapid safe advanced carbon nanotechnology materials... Program increase: Smart bases Military Engineering Advanced Technology... Program increase: Additive manu!acturing/3-d printing... Program increase: Advanced polymer development... Program increase: Bathymetric-topographic LiDAR research... Program increase: Centrifugenabled research Program increase: Energy technology research in cold and artic regions... Program increase: ERDC collaboration... Program increase: Extreme terrain research Program Increase: Natural gas technology... Program increase: Reliable distributed energy in auster environments.... Program Increase: Research facility modernization... Program increase: Research in the permafrost environment. Program increase: Resilient energy systems... Program increase: Secure and resilient power generation in cold region environments Program Increase: Silicon anode technology Program increase: Transportation infrastructurevaluation system. 52 Advanced Tactical Computer Science and Sensor Technology Program increase: Assured position, navigation, and timing.. 54 Army Missile Defense Systems Integration.... Program increase: Counter-UAS mission capabilities Program increase: Electromagnetic attack and protect Program increase: Inertial measurement unit hardware-in-the-loop... Program increase, Integrated environmental control and power. 56 Air and Missile Defense Systems Engineering... 31, ,322 11,14 25,864 34,883 1,777 42,82 41,491 86, ,322 17,14 22, ,464 43, ,62 + 6, + 8, + 8, + 3, + 1, + 1, + 25, + 15, + 1, + 35, + 35, + 6, + 6, + 16, ,92 + 2, + 5, +2, +8, + 5, + 69,6 +2, + 2, +8,2 + 2,5 +4, + 2, +4, +4, +3, + 2, +4, + 1, +5, +4, + 3,9 + 9, + 9, , + 11, + 15, +6,8

174 U: \219REPT\2REPT\2REPT Line I 219 budget estimatr Committee Change from recommendation budget estimate Program increase: Interoperability of integrated air and missile defense.... Restoring acquisition accountability: ALPS lack of directed requirement 6 Armored System Modernization-Adv Dev Program increase: Armored advanced fuel cell prototypes Restoring acquisition accountability: MFV prototyping acceleration ahead of need Aviation-Adv Dev Program increase: Future verticalift. 67 Logistics and Engineer Equipment-Adv Dev. Program increase, Tactical electric program research for remote and forward operating bases 68 Medical Systems-Adv Dev Program increase: Transport telemedicine program. 7 Robotics Development Restoring acquisition accountability: RCV Phase funding ahead of need Cross Functional Team (CFT) Advanced Development & Prototyping Program increase: Early long range precision fires hypersonic capability Restoring acquisition accountability: Lack of strategy 74 Lower Tier Air Missile Defense (LTAMD) Sensor... Restoring acquisition accountability, TMRR contract excess funding... Restoring acquisition accountability: Test funding ahead of need 76 Maneuver-Short Range Air Defense (M-SHORAD) Restoring acquisition accountability: Program growth ahead of acquisition strategy.. 81 Cyberspace Operations Forces and Force Support Restoring acquisition accountability: Funding ahead of requirements finalization Reduce duplication: CORA-P funded in line Assured Positioning, Navigation and Timing (PNT) Improving funds management: Prior year carryover due to program delay 85 Electronic Warfare Development... Restoring acquisition accountability: Funding excess to need 89 Infantry Support Weapons Program increase: Soldier enhancement program... Restoring acquisition accountability: NGSAR EMO funding ahead of need... Restoring acquisition accountability: Small arms fire control funding ahead of requirement 91 JAVELIN Restoring acquisition accountability: Lightweight CLU development delay 95 Light Tactical Wheeled Vehicles. Restoring acquisition accountability: Excess GMV test funding Restoring acquisition accountability: JLTV-RV test funding ahead of need 97 Night Vision Systems-Eng Dev. Restoring acquisition accountability: ENVG-B followon test funding ahead of need 98 Combat Feeding, Clothing, and Equipment. Program increase: Modular glove system 99 Non-System Training Devices-Eng Dev Insufficient budget justification: Unjustified request 1 Air Defense Command, Control and Intelligence-Eng Dev 119,395 1,793 14,248 34,284 95,66 38, 12,374 95,85 65, ,3 78,699 83,155 1,623 8, ,614 4,57 49,436 95,172 63,585 86,193 17,248 37,284 72,26 25, 87,874 56,85 47,417 lll,3 58,699 57,355 5,623 1, ,614 7,57 44,436 88, , -13,2-55,81 + 5, -6, ,4 + 75,4 + 3, + 3, + 3, +3, - 23,4-23,4-13, + 25, -38, - 32,5-24, -8,5-39, - 39, -18,4-5,4-13, - 35, -35, -2, -2, -25,8 + 6,2-22, -1, -5, -5, -6,934-2,75-4,229-1, -1, + 3, + 3, -5, -5, - 7,

175 U:\219REPT\2REPT\2REPT Line 119 budget estimate Committee Change from recommendation budget estimate Program increase: All digital radar Improving funds management: Prior year carryover. 12 Automatic Test Equipment Development Improving funds management: Prior year carryover. 14 Brilliant Anti-Armor Submunition (BAT)... Improving funds management: Prior year carryover. 17 Weapons and Munitions-Eng Dev... Program increase: Test and evaluation of M mm Restoring acquisition accountability: NGSW ammo EMD funding ahead of need Improving funds management: AMP fuze risk reduction excess to need 111 Landmine Warfare/Barrier-Eng Dev Improving funds management: Prior year carryover. 112 Army Tactical Command & Control Hardware & Software. Restoring acquisition accountability: TNOM funding ahead of need. Restoring acquisition accountability, CPl2 program delay Suite of Survivability Enhancement Systems-EMO. Restoring acquisition accountability: Army revised Stryker test requirement Information Technology Development... Insufficient budget justification, AcqBiz unjustified request Improving funds management: Prior year carryover Integrated Personnel and Pay System-Army (IPPS-A) Restoring acquisition accountability, Excess funding due to test delays... Restoring acquisition accountability: Program management growth Common Infrared Countermeasures (CIRCM) Improving funds management: Prior year carryover due to program delay Nuclear Biological Chemical Reconnaissance Vehicle (NBCRV) Sensor Suite Improving funds management: Excess test funding due to program delay Defensive CYBER Tool Development Improving funds management: Prior year carryover. 135 Missile Warning System Modernization (MWSM). Restoring acquisition accountability: Funding early to need Indirect Fire Protection Capability Inc 2-Block 1 Insufficient budget justification, Unjustified request 138 Ground Robotics... Transfer ground robotics MTRS standardization: Army-requested to OPA line 133 Restoring acquisition accountability: CRS-1 contract delay Improving funds management: SMET contract delay 139 Emerging Technology Initiatives Program increase: ISR quick reaction capability. 142 Army Integrated Air and Missile Defense [AIAMDJ Program increase: Accelerated integration to counter emerging threats Program increase, Cyber security research 144 Joint Light Tactical Vehicle (JLTV) ED. Restoring acquisition accountability: Funds excess to need 145 Aviation Ground Support Equipment. Program increase: Next generation health monitoring system... 13,297 9, ,1 5, ,693 69,24 113, ,63 51,178 17,154 36,626 28, ,71 86,167 42, ,67 2,686 2,76 1,697 6, ,959 45, ,693 52,94 8, ,13 25,178 13,54 3,126 6, ,71 61,549 68, ,67 7,76 + 8, -15, -2,6-2,6-3, -3, + 1, , -4,25-5,891-5,7-5,7-15, -5, -1, -16,3-16,3-33,382-14,382-19, -11,5-1, -1,5-26, -26, -4,1-4,1-6,5-6,5-22, -22, -12, -12, -24,618-4,618-12, -8, + 25,4 + 25,4 +45, + 3, + 15, -2,686-2, , + 5,

176 U:\219REPT\2REPT\2REPT line 119 budget estimate Committee Change from recommendation budget estimate 152 Threat Simulator Development Program increase: Integrated threat force cyber 12,835 28,835 threat simulators Program increase, Threat cyberspace operations 153 Target Systems Development Program increase: Cyber virtualization center Major T&E Investment Program increase _ 12,135 82,996 32, , Army Test Ranges and Facilities ,759 43,759 Program increase _ Program increase: Distributed environment for system---!-system cyber security testing Program increase, Directed energy workloads management 16 Army Technical Test Instrumentation and Targets Program increase: Cyber security of space and missile 62,379 84,879 defense assets 171 Munitions Standardization, Effectiveness and Safety _ Program increase: Lile cycle pilot process _ Program increase, Polymer cased small arms ammu- nition MLRS Product Improvement Program Improving funds management: Prior year carryover _ 42,332 8,886 56,332 6, Long Range Precision Fires (LRPF) , ,475 Improving funds management: TMRR excess growth Restoring acquisition accountability, Program management excess growth 187 Apache Product Improvement Program Restoring acquisition accountability, Product development previously funded Restoring acquisition accountability, Testing previously funded Chinook Product Improvement Program Restoring acquisition accountability: Program management 31,49 157,822 24,49 153,822 excess Improved Turbine Engine Program _ 192, ,137 Restoring acquisition accountability: Test funding ahead of need _ 194 Aviation Rocket System Product Improvement and Development Improving funds management: Lightweight precision 6,86 41,86 munition lack of strategy Unmanned Aircraft System Universal Products _ 52,19 38,519 Improving funds management: Prior year carryover due to program delay _ Patriot Product Improvement ,369 75,369 Program increase 198 Aerostat Joint Project---COCOM Exercise Program termination _ 2 Combat Vehicle Improvement Programs Program increase, Advanced Abrams thermal management system and integration _ Program increase: Certification of wireless intercom capabilities _ Program increase, Improved recovery vehicle (M88A2 Hercules) Program increase: Stryker power system _ Improving funds management: Hercules prior year carryover Improving funds management: Abrams ECP V3 excess funding due to test delay Restoring acquisition accountability: Abrams ECP V4 excess growth _ 1 411, , , +6, + 1, + 2, + 2, + 1, + 1, + 125, + 1, + 1, + 15, + 22,5 + 22,5 + 14, + 1, +4, -2, -2, -27, -25, -2, - 7, -6, -1, -4, -4, -3,5-3,5-19, -19, -13,5-13,5 + 1, + 1, ,5 + 16, + 5, + 18, + 3, -6, -5, -1

177 U: \219REPT\2REPT\2REPT Line 219 budget estimate Committee Change from recommendation budget estimate Restoring acquisition accountability: Bradley ECP A5 excess... Restoring acquisition accountability: Stryker 3mm ECP delay mm Self-Propelled Howitzer Improvements... Improving funds management: Prior year carryover Lower Tier Air and Missile Defense [AMD] System Insufficient budget justification: Unjustified request 213 Guided Multiple-Launch Rocket System [GMLRS]... Restoring acquisition accountability, Extended range development contract delay Improving funds management: Test funding ahead of need Information Systems Security Program Program increase: Cyber security operations center. Restoring acquisition accountability: Program delay 218 Global Combat Support System... Restoring acquisition accountability, Business intelligence/business warehouse funding ahead of need. Restoring acquisition accountability, Army pre-positioned stock funding ahead of need. 227 Distributed Common Ground/Surface Systems Restoring acquisition accountability: CD2 funding excess to need Improving funds management: Test funding excess to need... Restoring acquisition accountability, CD3 funding ahead of need. 233 End Industrial Preparedness Activities Program increase: Engineering data synchronization software pilot program Program increase: Nanoscale and microscale materials.... Program increase, Power take off hybridization... 4,676 79, ,12 68,533 68,619 38,667 53,958 3,676 78,798 89,12 46,17 48,884 27,667 88,758-8, -16,5-1, -1, , -5, -15, -22, ,5-41,16-19,735-8,584-11,151-11, -5, -5, -1, + 34,8 +9,8 + 2, + 5, Soldier Fitness Program and Suicide Prevention Program.-The fiscal year 219 budget request includes $5,639, for the Soldier Fitness Program and Suicide Prevention Program. While the Committee is fully supportive of these programs, it is dismayed that, for the second year in a row, the budget justification materials for them lacked sufficient detail and substance. The Committee directs the Army to provide full justification for these programs with the fiscal year 22 budget submission. Manufacturing Technologies for Unmanned Aerial Systems [UAS}.-The Committee encourages the Secretary of the Army to invest in technologies that vastly improve the mechanical durability of unmanned aerial propulsion systems and utilize multi-fuel capable, hybrid electric propulsion. Such technologies should focus on reducing the wear of components and lowering component weights through innovative computational design while also employing directed energy deposition processes based on rapid and predictive simulation tools. Life Cycle Pilot Process.-The Committee commends the Army for its continuing work in Transformative Manufacturing Technology and strongly encourages the Secretary of the Army to dedicate resources to further the development and equipping of the na-

178 U:\219REPT\2REPT\2REPT tional technical industrial base with these new and emerging transformative manufacturing and ammunition technologies. Strategic Materials Research.-The Committee continues to recognize the importance of the Army Research Laboratory [ARL] in expanding research, education, and technology development efforts in materials and metals processing science and engineering, aiming to transform the affordability, performance and environmental sustainability of strategic materials. The Committee further notes that ARL's Open Campus concept benefits the Army, the academic community, and industry through collaboration involving ARL's research staff and facilities, leading to continued technological superiority for the U.S. warfighter. The Committee encourages the Army to consider accelerating expansion of its Open Campus approach to its Materials and Manufacturing Science laboratories in order to benefit strategic materials research. Mobile Camoufiage Systems.-The Committee notes that mobile camouflage systems may provide enhanced signature management protection, reduce heat and temperature inside and around combat vehicles, and yield fuel savings without interfering with the operation of the vehicles. The Committee is aware of the Army's ongoing operational testing of mobile camouflage systems at the National Training Center and elsewhere and encourages further acceleration of those efforts. Next Generation Body Armor.-The Committee commends the Army's efforts in advanced research in next generation body armor and the use of cutting-edge material to improve individual protection, mobility, and survivability on the battlefield. The Committee understands that industry is also investing in this technology and encourages the Army to continue partnering with industry to lighten soldier load, increase individual protection, and enhance soldier survivability. Material Development, Characterization, and Computational Modeling.-The Committee recognizes the importance of evaluating materials and technologies as well as designing and developing methodologies and models to enable enhanced lethality and survivability. Methods such as computational research allow for the development of models that predict the mechanical properties of materials that are used in research and development at the U.S. Army Research Laboratory [ARL]. These models and simulations, which are based on quantum mechanics, statistical mechanics principles and thermodynamic simulations, and are tested via cold spray synthesis and mechanical testing, provide a cost savings to the Department of Defense by simulating materials prior to testing them to ensure mechanical properties will work together. Additionally, these methodologies allow for the enhanced development of technologies such as lightweight armors, protective structures, kinetic energy active protection, ballistic shock and mine blast protection, helmet tech,nologies to prevent traumatic brain injury, and numerous other uses. The Committee encourages ARL to continue the utilization of computational modeling and simulations research to achieve greater cost savings. Adaptive Red Team Support.-The Committee supports the work of the Army's Adaptive Red Team Technical Support and Operational Analysis program and understands it provides vital feed

179 U: \219REPT\2REPT\2REPT back on information technology system vulnerabilities and limitations. Highlighting these vulnerabilities has translated into more secure and resilient systems as well as increased production cost savings in the acquisition process. Therefore, the Committee encourages the Secretary of the Army to continue to invest in Adaptive Red Team programs.

180 U: \219REPT\2REPT\2REPT RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, TEST AND EVALUATION, NAVY Appropriations, $18,1,754, Budget estimate, ,481,666, Committee recommendation ,992,64, The Committee recommends an appropriation of $18,992,64,. This is $51,398, above the budget estimate. COMMITTEE RECOMMENDED PROGRAM The following table summarizes the budget estimate for this appropriation, the Committee recommendation, and the Committee recommended adjustments to the budget estimate: Line 219 budget Committee Change from estimate recommendation budget estimate RESEARCH. DEVELOPMENT, TEST & EVAL, NAVY BASIC RESEARCH 1 UNIVERSITY RESEARCH INITIATIVES IN-HOUSE LABORATORY INDEPENDENT RESEARCH.. 3 DEFENSE RESEARCH SCIENCES , ,78 154,433 19, , , + 15,5 TOTAL, BASIC RESEARCH. APPLIED RESEARCH 4 POWER PROJECTION APPLIED RESEARCH. 5 FORCE PROTECTION APPLIED RESEARCH MARINE CORPS LANDING FORCE TECHNOLOGY COMMON PICTURE APPLIED RESEARCH.. 8 WARFIGHTER SUSTAINMENT APPLIED RESEARCH. 9 ELECTROMAGNETIC SYSTEMS APPLIED RESEARCH... 1 OCEAN WARFIGHTING ENVIRONMENT APPLIED RESEARCH JOINT NON-LETHAL WEAPONS APPLIED RESEARCH UNDERSEA WARFARE APPLIED RESEARCH. 13 FUTURE NAVAL CAPABILITIES APPLIED RESEARCH MINE AND EXPEDITIONARY WARFARE APPLIED RESEARCH INNOVATIVE NAVAL PROTOTYPES (INP) APPLIED RESEARCH. 16 SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY MANAGEMENT-ONR HEAD- QUARTERS ,378 14, ,49 59,67 36,348 56,197 83,8 42,998 6,349 58,49 147,771 37, , ,878 27, ,549 66,67 36,348 61,282 83,8 79, , 6, ,49 + 2, 147,771 37, , ,5 + 13, + 53,5 + 7, + 5,85 TOTAL, APPLIED RESEARCH ,471 1,27, ,585 ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT 19 FORCE PROTECTION ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY ELECTROMAGNETIC SYSTEMS ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY. 21 MARINE CORPS ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY DEMONSTRATION [ATD] 22 JOINT NON-LETHAL WEAPONS TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT. 23 NAVY ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT [ATD] FUTURE NAVAL CAPABILITIES ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY DEV 25 MANUFACTURING TECHNOLOGY PROGRAM WARFIGHTER PROTECTION ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY NAVY WARFIGHTING EXPERIMENTS AND DEMONSTRATIONS 29 MINE AND EXPEDITIONARY WARFARE ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY. 3 INNOVATIVE NAVAL PROTOTYPES (INP) ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY 2,423 15,245 13, ,52 232,996 58, ,859 36,557 8, , ,657 9,877 67,83 13, , , , , -131,52 + 7,5 + 9, , , , TOTAL, ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT. DEMONSTRATION & VALIDATION 31 AIR/OCEAN TACTICAL APPLICATIONS AVIATION SURVIVABILITY.. 33 AIRCRAFT SYSTEMS.. 34 ASW SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT. 35 TACTICAL AIRBORNE RECONNAISSANCE. 36 ADVANCED COMBAT SYSTEMS TECHNOLOGY SURFACE AND SHALLOWATER MINE COUNTERMEASURES. 75,995 29, ,58 3,54 59,741 62,727 91,81 29,747 7, ,58 3,54 56, , ,815-2,91 +6,1

181 U: \219REPT\2REPT\2REPT Line 219 budget Committee Change from estimate recommendation budget estimate 38 SURFACE SHIP TORPEDO DEFENSE... 8,57 8,57 39 CARRIER SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT.... 5,44 5,44 4 PILOT FISH , ,722-23,5 41 RETRACT LARCH ,745 11, RETRACT JUNIPER , , RADIOLOGICAL CONTROL SURFACE ASW... 1,122 1, ADVANCED SUBMARINE SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT. 19,86 13,999-5,87 46 SUBMARINE TACTICAL WARFARE SYSTEMS... 9,374 12, SHIP CONCEPT ADVANCED DESIGN 89, , , + 27, 48 SHIP PRELIMINARY DESIGN & FEASIBILITY STUDIES... 13,348 13, ADVANCED NUCLEAR POWER SYSTEMS , ,137 5 ADVANCED SURFACE MACHINERY SYSTEMS... 22,19 27,19 + 5, 51 CHALK EAGLE ,744 29, LITIORAL COMBAT SHIP [LCS] ,997 27, COMBAT SYSTEM INTEGRATION... 16,351 27,51 + 1,7 54 OHIO REPLACEMENT PROGRAM , , , 55 LITIORAL COMBAT SHIP [LCS] MISSION MODULES... 13,633 13, AUTOMATED TEST AND RE-TEST. 7,931 7, FRIGATE DEVELOPMENT , , CONVENTIONAL MUNITIONS.... 9,37 9,37 6 MARINE CORPS GROUND COMBAT/SUPPORT SYSTEM... 1,828 1, JOINT SERVICE EXPLOSIVE ORDNANCE DEVELOPMENT... 43,148 43, OCEAN ENGINEERING TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT. 5,915 5, ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION... 19,811 19, NAVY ENERGY PROGRAM ,656 32, , 65 FACILITIES IMPROVEMENT ,31 5, CHALK CORAL , , NAVY LOGISTIC PRODUCTIVITY ,59 4,59 68 RETRACT MAPLE , ,878-59, 69 LINK PLUMERIA ,77 381, RETRACT ELM... 6,535 6, NATO RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT... 9,652 9, LAND ATIACK TECHNOLOGY... 15,529 5,7-9, JOINT NONLETHAL WEAPONS TESTING... 27,581 27, JOINT PRECISION APPROACH AND LANDING SYSTEMS ,566 11, DIRECTED ENERGY AND ELECTRIC WEAPON SYSTEMS , ,914-91,43 78 F/A-18 INFRARED SEARCH AND TRACK (IRST) ,7 18, DIGITAL WARFARE OFFICE ,691 26, SMALL AND MEDIUM UNMANNED UNDERSEA VEHICLES. 16,717 16, UNMANNED UNDERSEA VEHICLE CORE TECHNOLOGIES... 3,187 3, RAPID PROTOTYPING, EXPERIMENTATION AND DEMONSTRATION 48,796 33,796-15, 83 LARGE UNMANNED UNDERSEA VEHICLES ,613 45,613-47, 84 GERALD R. FORD CLASS NUCLEAR AIRCRAFT CARRIER 58,121 83, , 86 LITIORAL AIRBORNE MGM ,622 17, SURFACE MINE COUNTERMEASURES... 18,154 18, TACTICAL AIR DIRECTIONAL INFRARED COUNTERMEASURES.. 47,278 47, NEXT GENERATION LOGISTICS... 11,81 6,135-4, RAPID TECHNOLOGY CAPABILITY PROTOTYPE 7,17 7, LX (R)... 5,549 5, ADVANCED UNDERSEA PROTOTYPING... 87, , , 95 PRECISION STRIKE WEAPONS DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM , ,918-12,9 96 SPACE & ELECTRONIC WARFARE [SEW] ARCHITECTURE/ENGINE 7,23 7,23 97 OFFENSIVE ANTI-SURFACE WARFARE WEAPON DEVELOPMENT 143,62 143, ASW SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENTMIP... 8,889 8,889 1 ADVANCED TACTICAL UNMANNED AIRCRAFT SYSTEM... 25,291 11,291-14, IOI ADVANCED TACTICAL UNMANNED AIRCRAFT SYSTEM 9,3 9,3. 12 ELECTRONIC WARFARE DEVELOPMENTMIP TOTAL, DEMONSTRATION & VALIDATION... 4,293,713 4,198,911-94,82 ENGINEERING & MANUFACTURING DEVELOPMENT 13 TRAINING SYSTEM AIRCRAFT... 12,798 12, OTHER HELO DEVELOPMENT... 32,128 32,128

182 U:\219REPT\2REPT\2REPT Line 219 budget Committee Change from estimate recommendatmn budget estimate 15 AV-88 AIRCRAFT-ENG DEV STANDARDS DEVELOPMENT MULTI-MISSION HELICOPTER UPGRADE DEVELOPMENT. 19 AIR/OCEAN EQUIPMENT ENGINEERING.. 11 P-3 MODERNIZATION PROGRAM WARFARE SUPPORT SYSTEM TACTICAL COMMAND SYSTEM ADVANCED HAWKEYE H-1 UPGRADES ACOUSTIC SEARCH SENSORS. 117 V-22A AIR CREW SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT. 119 EA ELECTRONIC WARFARE DEVELOPMENT. 121 EXECUTIVE HELO DEVELOPMENT. 123 NEXT GENERATION JAMMER [NGJ] JOINTACTICAL RADIO SYSTEM-NAVY [JTRS-Navy] NEXT GENERATION JAMMER [NGJJ INCREMENT II. 126 SURFACE COMBATANT COMBAT SYSTEM ENGINEERING LPD-17 CLASSYSTEMS INTEGRATION SMALL DIAMETER BOMB [SDBJ STANDARD MISSILE IMPROVEMENTS. 13 AIRBORNE MCM. 131 NAVAL INTEGRATED FIRE CONTROL-COUNTER AIR SYSTEMS ENG 132 ADVANCED ABOVE WATER SENSORS SSN-688 AND TRIDENT MODERNIZATION Al R CONTROL. 135 SHIPBOARD AVIATION SYSTEMS COMBAT INFORMATION CENTER CONVERSION AIR AND MISSILE DEFENSE RADAR (AMOR) SYSTEM ADVANCED ARRESTING GEAR (AAG) NEW DESIGN SSN SUBMARINE TACTICAL WARFARE SYSTEM SHIP CONTRACT DESIGN/LIVE FIRE T&E NAVY TACTICAL COMPUTER RESOURCES. 144 MINE DEVELOPMENT LIGHTWEIGHT TORPEDO DEVELOPMENT JOINT SERVICE EXPLOSIVE ORDNANCE DEVELOPMENT PERSONNEL, TRAINING, SIMULATION, AND HUMAN FACTORS. 148 JOINT STANDOFF WEAPON SYSTEMS. 149 SHIP SELF DEFENSE (DETECT & CONTROL) SHIP SELF DEFENSE (ENGAGE: HARD KILL) SHIP SELF DEFENSE (ENGAGE: SOFT KILUEW) INTELLIGENCE ENGINEERING. 153 MEDICAL DEVELOPMENT NAVIGATION/ID SYSTEM JOINT STRIKE FIGHTER (JSF)-EMD. 156 JOINT STRIKE FIGHTER (JSF) INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT. 16 INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT. 161 ANTI-TAMPER TECHNOLOGY SUPPORT. 162 CH-53K. 164 MISSION PLANNING COMMON AVIONICS. 166 SHIP TO SHORE CONNECTOR (SSC). 167 T-AO (X) UNMANNED CARRIER AVIATION. 169 JOINT AIR-TO-GROUND MISSILE [JAGMJ MULTI-MISSION MARITIME AIRCRAFT [MMAJ. 172 MULTI-MISSION MARITIME AIRCRAFT [MMAJ INCREMENT MARINE CORPS ASSAULT VEHICLES SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT AND DEMO JOINT LIGH TACTICAL VEHICLE (JLTV) SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT AND DEMO. 46,363 3,771 16,611 17, , ,565 58,97 42, ,79 2,98 147,419 89, ,64 459,529 3, , , , ,881 1,831 33,429 35, ,932 62, ,33 27, ,233 6,824 6,62 4, , , , ,538 12, ,95 121,26 66,566 65,494 14,5 268,567 5, ,945 32,714 51,486 1,444 1, , ,296 16,389 98,223 2,26 46, ,771 16,611 17, , , ,5 58,97 42, , ,98 + 1, 242) ,3 115, ,4 245,64 459,529 3,272 99,253-16, , , 1,831 33,429 35, ,932 62, , 19,33 27, , , 65,824 +5, 71, , 4, ,147-32, 7,17 6, , , , 12,57 29,715 8,95 121,26 66,566 65,49d 14,5 218,567-5, 5, ,945 +5, 32) ,444 1, ,942-5, 16, ,8 37,296 16,389 48,923-49,3-2,26

183 U:\219REPT\2REPT\2REPT line 219 budget estimate Committee Change from recommendation budget estimate 175 DDG TACTICAL CRYPTOLOGIC SYSTEMS. 182 CYBER OPERATIONS TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT ,264 44,98 6,88 14,264 52,998 6,88-21, + 8,9 TOTAL, ENGINEERING & MANUFACTURING DEVELOP- MOO RDT&E MANAGEMENT SUPPORT 183 THREAT SIMULATOR DEVELOPMENT TARGET SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT MAJOR T&E INVESTMENT JOINTHEATER AIR AND MISSILE DEFENSE ORGANIZATION STUDIES AND ANALYSIS SUPPORT-NAVY CENTER FOR NAVAL ANALYSES NEXT GENERATION FIGHTER TECHNICAL INFORMATION SERVICES MANAGEMENT, TECHNICAL & INTERNATIONAL SUPPORT STRATEGIC TECHNICAL SUPPORT RDT&E SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY MANAGEMENT RDT&E SHIP AND AIRCRAFT SUPPORT TEST AND EVALUATION SUPPORT OPERATIONAL TEST AND EVALUATION CAPABILITY NAVY SPACE AND ELECTRONIC WARFARE [SEW] SUPPORT. 2 MARINE CORPS PROGRAM WIDE SUPPORT.. 21 MANAGEMENT HEADQUARTERS-R&D. 22 WARFARE INNOVATION MANAGEMENT ASSESSMENTS AND EVALUATIONS CYBER VULNERABILITIES. 24 ASSESSMENTS ANO EVALUATIONS CYBER VULNERABILITIES INSIDER THREAT MANAGEMENT HEADQUARTERS (DEPARTMENTAL SUPPORT AC- TIVITIES) SEW SURVEILLANCE/RECONNAISSANCE SUPPORT.... TOTAL, RDT&E MANAGEMENT SUPPORT... OPERATIONAL SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT 21 HARPOON MODIFICATIONS F-35 C2D F-35 C2D COOPERATIVE ENGAGEMENT CAPABILITY (CEC). 214 DEPLOYABLE JOINT COMMAND AND CONTROL STRATEGIC SUB & WEAPONS SYSTEM SUPPORT SSBN SECURITY TECHNOLOGY PROGRAM SUBMARINE ACOUSTIC WARFARE DEVELOPMENT NAVY STRATEGIC COMMUNICATIONS F/A-18 SQUADRONS FLEETACTICAL DEVELOPMENT SURFACE SUPPORT TOMAHAWK AND TOMAHAWK MISSION PLANNING CENTER (TMPC) 223 INTEGRATED SURVEILLANCE SYSTEM SHIP-TOWED ARRAY SURVEILLANCE SYSTEMS AMPHIBIOUS TACTICAL SUPPORT UNITS GROUND/AIR TASK ORIENTED RADAR CONSOLIDATED TRAINING SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT. 228 CRYPTOLOGIC DIRECT SUPPORT ELECTRONIC WARFARE [EWJ READINESS SUPPORT HARM IMPROVEMENT TACTICAL DATA LINKS SURFACE ASW COMBAT SYSTEM INTEGRATION MK-48 ADCAP AVIATION IMPROVEMENTS OPERATIONAL NUCLEAR POWER SYSTEMS MARINE CORPS COMMUNICATIONS SYSTEMS COMMON AVIATION COMMAND AND CONTROL SYSTEM MARINE CORPS GROUND COMBAT/SUPPORTING ARM SYSTEMS 6,42,48 94,576 1,981 77, ,942 48,797 5, 1,29 87,565 4,231 1,72 97, ,834 21,554 16,227 24,33 43,262 41,918 7, 48,8 1,682 1,579 8,684 1,2,569 5, , ,36 13,515 3, ,679 43,198 11,311 39, ,86 25,14 11, ,395 36,959 15,454 6,73 45,29 14,93 4,544 66,889 12,762 14,696 28,421 94, ,85 117,28 174,779 4,826 97,152 6,5,82 +8,34 94,576 1, , , ,942 48,797 5, 1,29 87, ,231 1,72 97, , , 21,554 16,227 24,33 43,262 41,918 7, 48,8 1,682 1,579 8, ,226,569 5, ,56 194,352 13,515 3, ,879 43,198 11,311 39,313 22,886 1,344 11, ,395 71, , -59,562-58,8 + 1,2 + 9,8-23, , 15, ,73 45,29 14,93 4, , , , , 28,421 68,255-25,9 138, , 117,28 174,779 4,826 97,152

184 U: \219REPT\2REPT\2REPT Line 219 budget estimate Committee Change from recommendation budget estimate 239 MARINE CORPS COMBAT SERVICES SUPPORT USMC INTELLIGENCE/ELECTRONIC WARFARE SYSTEMS [MIPJ. 241 AMPHIBIOUS ASSAULT VEHICLE TACTICAL AIM MISSILES ADVANCED MEDIUM RANGE AIR-TO-AIR MISSILE (AMRAAM) CONSOLIDATED AFLOAT NETWORK ENTERPRISE SERVICES. 25 INFORMATION SYSTEMS SECURITY PROGRAM JOINT MILITARY INTELLIGENCE PROGRAMS. 253 TACTICAL UNMANNED AERIAL VEHICLES UAS INTEGRATION AND INTEROPERABILITY DISTRIBUTED COMMON GROUND SYSTEMS/SURFACE SYSTEMS. 256 DISTRIBUTED COMMON GROUND SYSTEMS/SURFACE SYSTEMS. 257 MQ-4C TRITON. 258 MQ-8 UAV RQ-11 UAV SMALL (LEVEL ) TACTICAL UAS (STUASLO). 261 RQ-21A. 262 MULTI-INTELLIGENCE SENSOR DEVELOPMENT. 263 UNMANNED AERIAL SYSTEMS (UAS) PAYLOADS [MIPJ. 264 RQ--4 MODERNIZATION MODELING AND SIMULATION SUPPORT. 266 DEPOT MAINTENANCE (NON-IF) MARITIME TECHNOLOGY (MARITECH) 268 SATELLITE COMMUNICATIONS (SPACE). 3,156 39,976 22,637 4,121 32,473 23,697 44,228 6,81 8,529 41,212 7,687 42,846 14,395 9, ,36 1,914 81,231 5, ,894 7,97 36,56 7,284 39,174 3,156 39,976 22,637 4,121 27,473 23,697 44,228 6,81 8,529 41,212 7,687 42,846 14,395 24, ,36 1,914 81,231 5, ,894 7,97 46,56 27,284 39,174-5, + 14,3 + 1, + 2, TOTAL, OPERATIONAL SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT... 3,335,557 3,291,717-43, CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS ,549,53 1,557,33 + 7,8 TOTAL, RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, TEST & EVAL, NAVY 18,481,666 18,992, ,398 COMMITTEE RECOMMENDED The following table details the adjustments Committee: ADJUSTMENTS recommended by the Line 219 budget Committee Change from estimate recommendation budget estimate 1 University Research Initiatives. 119, , , Basic research program increase + 25, Program increase, Aircraft fleet readiness and sustainment + 1, 3 Defense Research Sciences ,78 564, ,5 Basic research program increase. + 1, Program increase, Navy ROTC cybersecurity training program ,5 4 Power Projection Applied Research ,643 27, , Program increase, Directed energy , Program increase, High performance microwave systems for counter-uas defense , 5 Force Protection Applied Research ,49 177, ,5 Program increase, Advanced energetics research + 7,5 Program increase, Advanced hull form development and demonstration , Program increase, Hybrid composite structures research for enhanced mobility , Program increase, Navy alternativenergy research + 25, Program increase, Power generation and storage research. + 5, Program increase, Standoff detection of buried hazards and munitions. + 3, 6 Marine Corps Landing Force Technology. 59,67 66,67 + 7,

185 U:\219REPT\2REPT\2REPT Line 219 budget estimate Committee Change from recommendation budget estimate Program increase: Interdisciplinary expeditionary cybersecurity research..... Program increase, Marine Corps asset life--tycle management Warfighter Sustainment Applied Research... Transfer from line 23: Retain previous budget structure Program increase... 1 Ocean Warfighting Environment Applied Research Program increase, Acoustics research... Program increase: Multi-modal detection research. Program increase, Naval Special Warfare superiority in underseand maritime environments... Program increase: Persistent maritime surveillance Undersea Warfare Applied Research Program increase Force Protection Advanced Technology Transfer from line 23: Retain previous budget structure 2 Electromagnetic Systems Advanced Technology... Transfer from line 23: Retain previous budget structure 21 USMC Advanced Technology Demonstration [ATD] Program increase, Common unmanned aerial vehicle simulation system.... Program increase, Flight motion simulator and testing of UAVs... Program increase, Modular advanced armed robotic system Program increase: UAS air-delivered extended range munitions demo Navy Advanced Technology Development [ATD]... Transfer to line 19: Retain previous budget structure. Transfer to line 2: Retain previous budget structure. Transfer to line 26: Retain previous budget structure. Transfer to line 28: Retain previous budget structure. Transfer to line 29: Retain previous budget structure. Transfer to line 8, Retain previous budget structure Future Naval Capabilities Advanced Technology Development Program increase, Advancedevelopment of high yield conventional energetics Warfighter Protection Advanced Technology... Transfer from line 23: Retain previous budget structure Program increase, Novel therapeutic interventions research Navy Warfighting Experiments and Demonstrations... Transfer from line 23: Retain previous budget structure 29 Mine and Expeditionary Warfare Advanced Technology. Transfer from line 23: Retain previous budget structure 3 Innovative Naval Prototypes (INP) Advanced Technology Devel Program increase: Electromagnetic railgun... Program increase, Rail gun with hypervelocity projectile 36 Advanced Combat Systems Technology Maintaing program affordability, Project 3422 unjustified program growth Surface and Shallow Water Mine Countermeasures. Program increase: Medium displacement unmanned surface vehicle Program increase, Navy identified MCM USV requirement Program increase: Navy identified UISS requirement... 4 PILOT FISH... Program adjustment Advanced Submarine System Development... Project 296: SL-UKAS program termination 46 Submarine Tactical Warfare Systems ,197 42,998 58,49 2,423 15, ,52 232, ,859 59,741 62, ,222 19,86 9,374 61,282 79,998 78,49 36,557 8,84 177,245 24,496 9,877 67,83 13, ,859 56, , ,722 13,999 12, , + 2, + 5,85 + 2, ,4 + 37, + 2, + 1, + 1, + 15, + 2, + 2, + 34, ,134 +8,84 +8, , + 1, + 6, + 4, + 7, -131,52-34,134-8,84-4,877-67,83-13,172-2, ,5 + 7,5 +9,877 +4,877 +5, + 67, , , , , + 15, + 99, -2,91-2,91 + 6,1 + 42, + 14,1 +4, -23,5-23,5-5,87-5,87 + 3,

186 U:\219REPT\2REPT\2REPT [In thousands of dollars) Line 219 budget estimate Committee Change from recommendation budget estimate Program increase: Advanced submarin electronic warfare systems _ _ 47 Ship Concept Advanced Design 89,419 Program increase, CHAMP acceleration Program increase, Cyber Boundary Defense--CPSD cyber security cap devel Advanced Surface Machinery Systems 22,19 Program increase: Silicon carbide power electronics _ 53 Combat System Integration _ 16,351 Program increase: Cyber Boundary Defense-Strike Force Interoperability _ 54 Ohio Replacement _ 514,846 Program increase, Advanced materials propeller program Program increase: Naval Propulsion Foundry Center facility power upgrades Navy Energy Program ,656 Program increase: Marine hydrokinetic energy _ 68 RETRACT MAPLE 377,878 Program adjustment Land Attack Technology _ 15,529 Restoring acquisition accountability, Project 341 lack of program funding Program increase, Guided projectile _ Directed Energy and Electric Weapon Systems ,344 Restoring acquisition accountability, Project 342 additional prototypes Program increase: Electromagnetic railgun 82 Rapid Prototyping, Experimentation and Demonstration _ ,796 Insufficient budget justification: TBD initiatives program adjustment 83 Large Unmanned Undersea Vehicles 92,613 Transfer funding to XLUUV: Transfer to line 94 for updated acquisition strategy Restoring acquisition accountability, Change in acquisition strategy to accelerate delta design 84 Gerald R_ Ford Class Nuclear Aircraft Carrier (CVN 78-8) 58,121 Transfer funding from SCN: CVN 78 Full Ship Shock Trial 9 Expeditionary Logistics _ 11,81 Program termination: Project 2743 _ Advanced Undersea Prototyping ,669 Transfer funding from LDUUV, Updated acquisition strategy Precision Strike Weapons Development Program ,818 Restoring acquisition accountability: Project 3378 schedule delays Offensive Anti-Surface Warfare Weapon Development _ ,62 Restoring acquisition accountability, Additional capabilities program adjustment -transfer to fully fund operational test requirements for additional capabilities _ Restoring acquisition accountability: Transfer from additional capabitlities to fully fund operational test requirements for additional capabilities _ 1 Advanced Tactical Unmanned Aircraft System... 25,291 Restoring acquisition accountaiblity, Project 3135 program adjustment Advanced Hawkeye 223,565 Improving funds management: Excess carryover Program increase, Cyber Boundary Defense--E-2D AHE Program increase, E-2 Hawkeye advanced radar _ Air Crew Systems Development 2,98 Program increase, Advance aircrew physiological monitoring _ ,419 27,19 27,51 542, , ,878 5,7 131,914 33,796 45,613 83,121 6, , , ,62 11, ,65 3,98 + 3, + 27, + 18, + 9, + 5, + 5, + 1,7 + 1,7 +28, + 15, + 13, + 7, + 7, -59, - 59, -9,829-14, , -91,43-16, , -15, -15, -47, -25, -22, + 25, + 25, -4,946-4, , + 25, -12,9-12,9 r-2.1 r + 2,1-14, -14, + 14,5-25, + 27,5 + 12, + 1, + 1,

187 U:\219REPT\2REPT\2REPT Line 219 budget estimate Committee Change from recommendation budget estimate 119 EA-18 Program increase: EA-18G reactive electronic attack measures research. 12 Electronic Warfare Development... Program termination: UAS EW Payload. Program increase: EA-18G offensive airborne electronic attack special mission pod 125 Next Generation Jammer [NGJ] Increment II Restoring acquisition accountability, Technology demonstration contracts award delays 126 Surface Combatant Combat System Engineering... Restoring acquisition accountability, Far Term Interoperability Improvement Plan unjustified growth... AEGIS force-level interoperability definition and analysis 129 Standard Missile Improvements. Program increase, SM-6 electronics unit. 135 Shipboard Aviation Systems. Program increase, Improving aircraft carrier readiness New Design SSN Program increase: New design SSN Submarine Tactical Warfare System... Program increase: Submarine tactical warfare system. 141 Ship Contract Design/ Live Fire T&E Program increase: DDG 51 advance degaussing mine protection system retrofit... Program increase: Planning to support FY 221 award of LHA Lightweight Torpedo Development Restoring acquisition accountability: Project 3418 postsystem design and engineering funds early to need.. 15 Ship Self Defense (Engage: Hard Kill). Program increase: Condition based maintenance 16 Information Technology Development... Improving funds management: Project 295 excess program growth. Improving funds management: Project 3432 excess program growth and concurrency... Program increase: Advanced radar condition based maintenance 162 CH-53K RDTE. Program increase: Common lightweight cargo system Unmanned Carrier Aviation (UCA). Improving funds management: Test equipment early to need. 169 Joint Air-to-Ground Missile [JAGM]. Program increase: Marine Corps joint air-to-ground missile for fixed wing aircraft Marine Corps Assault Vehicles System Development & Demonstration Restoring acquisition accountability: Project 26 excess concurrency Joint Light Tactical Vehicle (JLTV) System Development & Demonstration Improving funds management: Funds excess to need. 175 DDG-1... Restoring acquisition accountability: Program adjustment due to lack of acquisition and test strategies 18 Tactical Cr;ptologic Systems... Program increase: Integrated fires acceleration Major T&E Investment Program increase. Program increase, Ground based sense-and-avoid 196 Test and Evaluation Support. Program increase. 147,419 89, , ,43 165,881 9,71 148,233 6,824 6,62 95, , , , ,942 6,759 98,223 2,26 161,264 44,98 77,14 373, , ,224 99, ,43 19,881 13,71 16,233 65,824 71,62 63, , , , ,942 16,559 48,923 14,264 52, ,14 473, ,3 + 95,3 + 25,4-6,2 + 31,6-16, -16, -1, -11, + 1, +25, + 25, +4, +4, + 12, + 12, + 5, +5, + 11, + 5, + 6, -32, -32, + 4, + 4, -5, -35, -25, + 1, +5, + 5, -5, -5, +9,8 +9,8-49,3-49,3-2,26-2,26-21, -21, + 8,9 +8,9 + 16, + 1, + 6, + 1, + 1,

188 U:\219REPT\2REPT\2REPT line 219 budget estimate Committee Change from recommendation budget estimate 211 Operational F-35 C2D2.... Restoring acquisition accountability: C2D2 Phase 2 contract award delays. Restoring acquisition accountability: C2D2 flight test contract award delays... Improving funds management: ECASE excess growth... Improving funds management: Developmental Foundation excess growth... Improving funds management: Fixed JPO costs excess growth Operational F-35 C2D2... Restoring acquisition accountability: C2D2 Phase 2 contract award delays. Restoring acquisition accountability: C2D2 flight test contract award delays... Improving funds management: ECASE excess growth Improving funds management: Developmental Foundation excess growth Improving funds management: Fixed JPO costs excess growth Strategic Sub & Weapons System Support... Program increase: Autonomous strategic force protection sensor network Program increase: Model based engineering for strategic weapons programs F/A-18 Squadrons Program increase: Navy joint air-to-ground missile for fixed wing aircraft Fleet Telecommunications (Tactical). Program termination: High frequency over-the-horizon robust enterprise Integrated Surveillance System... Program increase: Additional TRAPS units. 231 Tactical Data Links Program increase: Tactical targeting network technology acceleration MK-48 ADCAP..... Improving funds management: Tl-I phasing Aviation Improvements. Program increase: Cyber Boundary Defense-portable electronic maintenance aids.... Program increase: F/A-18E/F engine enhancements 243 Advanced Medium Range Air-to-Air Missile (AMRAAM)... Restoring acquisition accountability: Systems improvement program acceleration and growth MQ-8 UAV.... Program increase: Radar integration... Program increase: Weapons capability integration 266 Depot Maintenance (Non-IF) Program increase: MH-6 SLAP. 267 Maritime Technology (MARITECH).... Program increase: Advanced additive technologies for sustainment of Navy assets... XXX Classified Programs Classified adjustment 259, ,36 157, ,86 25,14 36,959 14,696 94, ,85 32,473 9,843 36,56 7,284 1,549,53 199,56 194, ,879 22,886 1,344 71, ,696 68, ,85 27,473 24, ,284 1,557,33-59,562-18,384-5,335-7,94-24,554-3,385-58,8-17,94-5,196-7,697-23,913-3, ,2 + 2,7 + 7,5 + 9,8 + 9,8-23,67-23, , + 35, + 12, + 12, -25,9-25,9 +17, + 2, + 15, - 5, - 5, + 14,3 + 5.!oOO + F,8 + 1, + 1, + 2, + 2, + 7,8 + 7,8 Accelerated Acquisitions.-The fiscal year 219 President's budget request includes $1,42,333,, an increase of 15 percent over amounts enacted in fiscal year 218, for programs designated as accelerated acquisitions in accordance with Chief of Na val Operations and Secretary of the Navy Instructions 5.53 and 5.42, respectively. The Committee supports efforts to rapidly deliver ca-

189 U:\219REPT\2REPT\2REPT pability to the Warfighter in a responsible manner and recommends $1,24,93, for these programs in fiscal year 219. The Committee notes ongoing efforts by the Navy to reorganize its internal processes as it relates to the alignment of requirements, acquisition strategies and budgets for accelerated acquisition programs and expects this will lead to improved coordination among all stakeholders. The Committee is concerned by repeated instances in which the designation as an accelerated acquisition program has apparently led to imprudent program management decisions affecting contracting actions and funding execution. Therefore, the Committee directs the Assistant Secretary of the Navy (Research, Development and Acquisition) and the Assistant Secretary of the Navy (Financial Management and Comptroller) to report to the congressional defense committees, not later than 3 days after enactment of this Act, on acquisition strategy management and fiscal controls in place to ensure the appropriate management of resources for Navy accelerated acquisition programs. Further, the Assistant Secretary of the Navy (Research, Development and Acquisition) is directed to provide, with submission of the fiscal year 22 President's budget request, to the congressional defense committees the acquisition strategy for each designated accelerated acquisition program, and the Assistant Secretary of the Navy (Financial Management and Comptroller) is directed to certify that the fiscal year 22 President's budget fully funds such acquisition strategies, to include the associated test requirements identified in the test plan for each program, as agreed to by the Chief of Naval Operations, the Assistant Secretary of the Navy (Research, Development and Acquisition) and the Director, Operational Test and Evaluation per previous congressional direction. Finally, the Assistant Secretary of the Navy (Research, Development and Acquisition) is directed to identify to the congressional defense committees any additional training requirements levied on the acquisition workforce associated with the execution of accelerated acquisition programs. Office of Naval Research Budget Structure.-The fiscal year 219 President's budget request includes $2,239,844, for science and technology research. The Committee recognizes the criticality of investing in Navy foundational research to ensure U.S. technical superiority in the coming decades and recommends $2,666,744, for Navy science and technology research, an increase of $426,9, over the budget request. The Committee notes that the budget request proposes the consolidation of several program elements into a single, larger program element that would provide unprecedented programmatic and fiscal flexibility for advanced technology development. The Committee notes its support for the consolidation of multiple program elements and the increased flexibility associated with that realignment in previous years; however, the Committee is concerned that a further realignment of program elements would erode programmatic and fiscal transparency, and reorient foundational longterm science and technology research to near-term priorities. Therefore, the Committee rejects the proposal to consolidate multiple program elements and establish a single new program element in fiscal year 219 and recommends retaining the existing

190 U:\219REPT\2REPT\2REPT.31 program element budget structure for naval research. The Assistant Secretary of the Navy (Financial Management and Comptroller) is directed to follow this budget structure in future budget submissions. Solid State Laser-Technology Maturation.-The Committee notes and supports the Navy's increased investment in several directed energy programs, to include the Solid State-Technology Maturation [SSL-TM] program, which is intended to accelerate the evaluation of the military utility of laser weapons across a range of Navy mission applications by fielding initial capabilities on surface ships. The Committee notes that since its inception, the SSL TM program scope has expanded and development costs have tripled. Further, cost overruns have occurred at multiple program levels, and significant concurrency between the development and fielding efforts are creating further risk to cost and schedule. Therefore, the Committee directs the Government Accountability Office [GAO] to provide to the congressional defense committees, not later than 9 days after enactment of this Act, a report reviewing the SSL TM program. At a minimum, the report should review: (1) program requirements, including changes thereto; (2) technology readiness levels including maturity relative to requirements; (3) the current acquisition strategy and program baseline(s); (4) the SSL-TM test strategy and associated resourcing; (5) contract strategy, and (6) the program management structure. Common Hull Auxiliary Multi-Mission Platform [CHAMPJ.-The fiscal year 219 President's budget request includes $18,, to initiate industry studies on common hull concepts and acquisition approaches to replace aging mission-specific sealift and auxiliary ships that provide hospital services, aviation support, submarine tending, command and control, or sealift. The Committee understands that CHAMP is intended to reduce life cycle costs, leverage reconfigurable force packages and stabilize the industrial base. Based on information provided by the Navy, the Committee further understands that current Navy plans for the acquisition of CHAMP could be accelerated by as much as 5 years, and therefore recommends an additional $18,, for industry studies and requirements definition. The Assistant Secretary of the Navy (Research, Development and Acquisition) is directed to provide to the congressional defense committees, with the fiscal year 22 President's budget, an updated acquisition strategy for CHAMP, to include requirements, acquisition milestones and cost estimates, as informed by industry studies. Future Surface Combatant.-The fiscal year 219 President's budget request includes $37,267, in fiscal year 219, and $35,23, in fiscal year 22 for the development of future surface combatants [FSC] requirements and an Analysis of Alternatives [AoA]. The Committee notes the extensive scope of the FSC AoA and directs the Director, Surface Warfare to submit with the fiscal year 22 President's budget request an updated Surface Capability Evolution Plan [SCEP] to the congressional defense committees. Further, the Assistant Secretary of the Navy (Research, Development and Acquisition) is directed to provide with the fiscal year 22 President's budget request the acquisition strategies for each element of the SCEP, and the Assistant Secretary of the Navy 19

191 U:\219REPT\2REPT\2REPT.31 (Financial Management and Comptroller) is directed to provide the cost estimate for each element of the SCEP and to identify the funds included in the budget request in support of these acquisition strategies. F/A-18 and EA-18G Research and Development Efforts.-The fiscal year 219 President's budget includes $578,65, for various efforts to modernize and upgrade the F/A-18 and EA-18G, including F/A-18 Block III development which consists of 5 distinct efforts, Infrared Search and Track systems, EA-18G systems development, Multi-System Integration, physiological episode mitigation, F/A-18 radar upgrades, and F/A-18E/F service life assessment and extension programs. The Committee notes the improved briefing materials provided in support of the budget request, as requested by the Committee, but believes that further improvement, to include timeliness in providing requested materials, could be achieved. Therefore, the Program Manager, PMA-265, is directed to provide supplemental budget materials, as previously requested by the Committee, with the budget briefing materials in support of future budget requests. Large Displacement Unmanned Undersea Vehicle [LDUUVJ. The fiscal year 219 President's budget includes $92,613, to initiate the fabrication of two Phase I prototype LDUUVs. Subsequent to the budget submission, the Navy informed the Committee of plans to revise its LDUUV acquisition strategy and accelerate the LDUUV program by removing Phase II from the acquisition strategy and transitioning the Phase I design to industry 5 years earlier than previously planned, which eliminates the need for Phase II funding. The Committee supports the proposed acceleration of the program; however is concerned that the revised program schedule may be unaffordable. Therefore, the Committee recommends reducing the scope of the Phase I effort and further accelerating the transition of the LDUUV design to industry. The Assistant Secretary of the Navy (Research, Development and Acquisition) is directed to provide the congressional defense committees, with the fiscal year 22 President's budget request, an updated LDUUV acquisition strategy, and the Assistant Secretary of the Navy (Financial Management and Comptroller) is directed to provide updated cost estimates for the LDUUV program and to certify full funding in the budget request for the revised acquisition strategy. CVN 78 Full Ship Shock Trials.-The fiscal year 219 President's budget request includes no funds to conduct Full Ship Shock Trials [FSST] on CVN 78. The Committee notes that full-scale ship shock trials on CVN 78 were included in the original CVN 78 test plans and that the need for FSST was subsequently reaffirmed by the Director, Operational Test and Evaluation, the then-under Secretary of Defense (Acquisition, Technology and Logistics) and Congress. The Committee notes that subsequent to the fiscal year 219 President's budget submission, the Secretary of Defense denied a request by the Navy to waive CVN 78 FSST in accordance with section 121(b) of the Fiscal Year 218 National Defense Authorization Act, and that the Navy now plans to conduct FSST on CVN 78, as directed. The Committee understands that this requires $25,, in fiscal year 219 and recommends transferring those funds from other CVN programs, as delineated in the tables for 191

192 U:\219REPT\2REPT\2REPT.31 Committee Recommended Adjustments for the Research, Development, Test and Evaluation, Navy and Shipbuilding and Conversion, Navy accounts. The Committee further understands that the Navy will fully budget for additional CVN 78 FSST requirements in the fiscal year 22 President's budget request. CVN 78 Sortie Generation Rate.-The Committee notes that the sortie generation rate [SGR] is a significant driver of the CVN 78 design. The Committee understands that the reliability of key systems may impact SGR and that the SGR demonstration schedule and execution are under review. The Program Executive Officer, Aircraft Carriers, in coordination with the Director, Operational Test and Evaluation is directed to provide, with the fiscal year 22 President's budget request, to the congressional defense committees an updated plan for the SGR demonstration schedule and test requirements. The Assistant Secretary of the Navy (Financial Management and Comptroller) is directed to certify SGR demonstration full funding with the fiscal year 22 President's budget request. Extra Large Unmanned Underwater Vehicle.-The fiscal year 219 President's budget request includes $117,856, in various program elements for the development of Extra Large Unmanned Underwater Vehicles [XLUUV] and associated payloads in response to a Joint Emergent Operational Need [JEON] from U.S. Pacific Command. The Committee notes that two competitive design contracts were awarded by the Navy for Phase 1 of the program and that the Navy had planned to conduct a competitive selection for Phase 2 in 218. Subsequent to the submission of the fiscal year 219 President's budget request, the Navy revised its acquisition strategy and informed the Committee that the Navy now plans to award Phase 2 fabrication contracts to both vendors. The Committee understands that this requires $25,, in fiscal year 219 above the budget request and that additional funds will be required in fiscal years , which the Navy will include in the fiscal year 22 President's budget request. The Committee agrees with the revised acquisition strategy to allow for greater competition and recommends $25,, above the budget request in fiscal year 219, as required. The Assistant Secretary of the Navy (Financial Management and Comptroller) is directed to certify, with the fiscal year 22 President's budget request, full funding for the Navy's revised acquisition strategy. Offensive Anti-Surface Warfare Increment I I Long Range Anti Ship Missile Operational Test.-The Offensive Anti-Surface Warfare [OASuW] Increment I/Long Range Anti-Ship Missile [LRASM] will provide an early operational capability in 218 in support of an Urgent Operational Needs Statement [UONS] from US. Pacific Fleet. The Committee notes that in the fiscal year 219 President's budget request, the Navy has included $129,4, in fiscal years 219 and 22 for OASuW Increment I/LRASM capability improvements, which the Committee fully supports. However, the Committee is concerned that the Navy has not agreed to a test plan for these capability improvements with the Director, Operational Test and Evaluation, ments. nor budgeted for any operational test require June 25, 218 (2:28 p.rn.) 192

193 U: \219REPT\2REPT\2REPT.31 The Committee does not agree with this approach and directs that of the funds requested in fiscal year 219 for OASuW Increment VLRASM capability improvements, no less than $2,, be applied toward operational test. Further, the Committee directs the Director, Operational Test and Evaluation, in coordination with the Deputy Chief of Naval Operations for Warfare Systems to provide to the congressional defense committees, with the fiscal year 22 President's budget request, a plan for OASu W Increment I/ LRASM full independent operational test [IOT&E]; the Assistant Secretary of the Navy (Research, Development and Acquisition) is directed to submit an acquisition strategy that supports that test strategy; and the Assistant Secretary of the Navy (Financial Management and Comptroller) is directed to certify that the fiscal year 22 President's budget request for OASu W Increment VLRASM fully funds the development of capability improvements and the associated operational test strategy. Finally, the Committee directs that not more than $25,, may be obligated for OASu W Increment I/LRASM capability improvements in fiscal year 219 until the Deputy Chief of Naval Operations for Warfare Systems certifies the requirements for capability improvements to the congressional defense committees. Next Generation Jammer Low Band.-The fiscal year 219 President's budget request includes $99,253, for the Next Generation Jammer Low Band program to continue the execution of up to three Demonstration of Existing Technology [DET] contracts, which the Navy plans to award in 218. The Committee understands that the DET contracts will inform the acquisition strategy for the program and that the Navy is considering applying certain acceleration acquisition authorities. The Assistant Secretary of the Navy (Research, Development and Acquisition) is directed to provide to the congressional defense committees, with the fiscal year 22 President's budget request, the acquisition strategies under consideration for further development of Next Generation Jammer Low Band. AEGIS Modernization.-The fiscal year 219 President's budget request includes $396,43, to develop modifications to the AEGIS Weapon system and integrate combat capabilities developed by the Navy and the Missile Defense Agency into the AEGIS Combat System, an increase of $44,874, over amounts appropriated in fiscal year 218. The Committee notes the improved joint briefing materials provided by the Navy and the Missile Defense Agency in support of the budget request and directs the Program Executive Officer, Integrated Warfare Systems, and the Director, Missile Defense Agency to continue to provide these materials, as subsequently modified per congressional request, in future budget briefings. Manpower, Personnel, Training and Education Transformation Program.-The fiscal year 219 President's budget request includes $99,3, for Manpower, Personnel, Training and Education [MPT&E] transformation, an increase of $73,2, over amounts appropriated for fiscal year 218. The Committee notes progress made by the Navy in managing this program; however, the Committee also notes that the MPT&E transformation requirements, acquisition strategy and a holistic cost estimate remain to be com- 193

194 U:\219REPT\2REPT\2REPT pleted. The Committee recommends $64,3,, an increase of $4,1, over amounts appropriated in fiscal year 218, to allow for continued program progress and directs the Assistant Secretary of the Navy (Research, Development and Acquisition) to provide with the fiscal year 22 President's request the MPT&E acquisition strategy and the Assistant Secretary of the Navy (Financial Management and Comptroller) to provide the associated cost estimate. Amphibious Combat Vehicle 1.2.-The fiscal year 219 President's budget request includes $55,8, for the Amphibious Combat Vehicle [ACV] 1.2 program, an increase of $26,4, over amounts previously programmed for that effort for fiscal year 219. The Committee notes the significant ACV 1.2 program concurrency with the ACV 1.1 development and production program, to include the modification of ACV 1.1 test vehicles for ACV 1.2 developmental test. Noting the Marine Corps' historical struggles with replacing its amphibious assault vehicle fleet, the Committee is concerned with the programmatic and cost risk this strategy brings to both the ACV 1.1 and 1.2 programs. The Committee directs the Assistant Secretary of the Navy (Research, Development, and Acquisition) to submit, not later than 3 days after Milestone C for ACV 1.1, an updated cost and schedule estimate for ACV 1.2. DDG 1 Mission Change.-The fiscal year 219 President's request includes $4,852, in fiscal year 219 and $396,194, over the next 5 years in research, development, test and evaluation for development efforts in support of new DDG 1 mission requirements. The Committee notes that the requirements, schedules and revised Test and Evaluation Master Plan in support of the new DDG 1 mission are not yet complete and therefore recommends a reduction of $21,,. Hydrographic Survey System Upgrade for Diver Propulsion Devices.-The Committee understands the Marine Corps is seeking to upgrade existing diver propulsion devices [DPD] assets to enable precise navigation and autonomous hydrographic survey. The Committee encourages the Secretary of the Navy to develop an autonomous hydrographic survey capability for the DPD which provides other advanced capabilities through retrofitting of existing DPD units, and supports autonomous hydrographic survey for inspection and analysis of critical littoral waterways. Aircrafi Fleet Readiness and Sustainment.-The Committee remains concerned with the challenges faced by the Navy and Marine Corps to maintain the readiness of their air vehicle fleets, and extend the useful life of aging aircraft. The Committee notes the valuable role university research institutions can provide in conducting research and development that translates into technological capabilities to address these readiness gaps. Therefore, the Committee recommends $1,, for aircraft fleet readiness and sustainment research conducted at universities with state-of-theart capabilities in structures and materials to support these efforts. Advanced Hull Form Development and Demonstration.-The Committee has supported the Navy's investment in sophisticated computer hydrodynamic modeling and simulation tools for the design, testing, and analysis of high-performance and high-efficiency hull forms of small planing boats. The Committee recommends

195 U:\219REPT\2REPT\2REPT.31 $8,, for an advanced hull form development and prototype demonstration and at-sea testing initiative to accelerate the development and transition of advanced hull designs, particularly hull forms that reduce injury to craft operators and warfighters. Power Generation and Storage Research.-The Committee continues to support Navy investments in power generation and energy storage research, and recommends an increase of $5,, for that purpose. The Committee understands that development and deployment of lithium-ion batteries are critical to Department of Defense missions, but that safety incidents restrict their operational use. Therefore, the Committee believes that the development and qualification of materials technologies, including nonflammable electrolytes, to reduce the risk of thermal runaway and improve safety in lithium-ion batteries should be a research priority. Marine Corps Asset Life-Cycle Management.-The Committee supports the Marine Corps' efforts to substantially reduce costs associated with routine maintenance and recommends $2,, for further research and development in the areas of remanufacturing and vehicle behavior monitoring. Maritime Robotics Technology.-The Committee notes the Department of the Navy investments to develop autonomous systems and capabilities in support of future naval capabilities. The Committee encourages the Navy to continue its support for the cost-effective development of maritime robotic systems, including research, testing, and demonstration of unmanned underwater vehicle security and surveillance systems, robotic inspection and survey tools for vessels and port facilities, munition retrieval, environmental monitoring, including acoustic and non-acoustic detection capability improvements, shared autonomy, adaptive decisionmaking, docking, 3-D imaging, power and data transfer. The Committee believes that university-based research and innovation centered on the development of maritime robotic technology could be essential in maintaining competitive advantage in the future. Silicon Carbide Power Electronics.-The Committee supports the Navy's investment to develop advanced power and energy technology to meet requirements for higher electric power loads through efficient means. The Committee understands that use of silicon carbide power modules may reduce the size and weight of power conversion modules and other electronic systems necessary for advanced sensors and weapon systems. The Committee recommends $5,, for silicon carbide power electronics research and encourages the Secretary of the Navy to continue to invest in advanced power and energy technology and accelerate the qualification of silicon carbide power modules to be used on highpower, mission critical Navy platforms. Improving Performance of Military Platforms.-Turbulent boundary layers form in the air or in water along the surfaces of all aircraft and marine platforms, and produce a force that opposes the motion of the vehicle. The Committee understands that mitigating such drag is central to the goals of reducing fuel consumption and optimizing performance of military platforms, such as ships, submarines, and transport and fighter aircraft. However, the Committee notes that there exists only limited domestic capability to 195

196 U: \219REPT\2REPT\2REPT experimentally study these phenomena. Therefore, the Committee encourages the Chief of Naval Research to examine the Navy's infrastructure and technical capabilities to experimentally quantify aircraft and marine platforms relevant turbulent boundary layers at high spatial and temporal resolution, and to address any identified gaps in experimental and modeling capabilities. E2-D Hawkeye Advanced Radar.-The Committee recognizes the importance for the Navy to improve the airborne surveillance and battle management command and control systems of the E-2D Hawkeye to protect against sophisticated adversaries with antiship cruise and ballistic missiles. Therefore, the Committee recommends $12,, to continue improving the radar capability of the E-2D Hawkeye. Further, to stay ahead of the evolving threat, the Committee directs the Deputy Chief of Naval Operations for Warfare Systems to complete a comprehensive review of the E-2D radar to determine if there are unmet requirements for an Advanced Radar that could improve airborne surveillance and battle management command and control systems of the E-2D Hawkeye, and to report to the congressional defense committees not later ti:tan 9 days after enactment of this act on the findings of such review. Advanced Additive Technologies For Sustainment of Navy Assets.-The Committee recognizes the need to accelerate the delivery of technical capabilities to support the warfighter and to advance technologies that will modernize and sustain military systems in an efficient, cost-effective manner. The Committee recommends $2,, to support the development of advanced additive technologies for sustainment of Navy assets, including cold spray.

197 U: \219REPT\2REPT\2REPT RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, TEST AND EVALUATION, AIR FORCE Appropriations, $37,428,78, Budget estimate, ,178,343, Committee recommendation... 4,896,667, The Committee recommends an appropriation of $4,896,667,. This is $718,324, above the budget estimate. COMMITTEE RECOMMENDED PROGRAM The following table summarizes the budget estimate for this appropriation, the Committee recommendation, and the Committee recommended adjustments to the budget estimate: Line 219 budget Committee Change from estimate recommendation budget estimate RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, TEST & EVAL, AIR FORCE BASIC RESEARCH 1 DEFENSE RESEARCH SCIENCES.. 348, , , 2 UNIVERSITY RESEARCH INITIATIVES. 154, , , 3 HIGH ENERGY LASERESEARCH INITIATIVES. 14,56 14,56... TOTAL, BASIC RESEARCH , , , APPLIED RESEARCH 4 MATERIALS , , , 5 AEROSPACE VEHICLE TECHNOLOGIES... 13, , ,5 6 HUMAN EFFECTIVENESS APPLIED RESEARCH. 112, ,18 + 1,5 7 AEROSPACE PROPULSION. 19,919 23, ,5 8 AEROSPACE SENSORS , , , 9 SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY MANAGEMENT-MAJOR HEAD- QUARTERS... 8,288 8, CONVENTIONAL MUNITIONS , , DIRECTED ENERGY TECHNOLOGY , , DOMINANT INFORMATION SCIENCES AND METHODS ,42 175, , 14 HIGH ENERGY LASERESEARCH... 43,359 45, ,5 15 SPACE TECHNOLOGY , ,645 +4, TOTAL, APPLIED RESEARCH. 1,312,342 1,43, , ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT 16 ADVANCED MATERIALS FOR WEAPON SYSTEMS... 34,426 42,926 +8,5 17 SUSTAINMENT SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY (S&T). 15,15 15,15 18 ADVANCED AEROSPACE SENSORS ,968 44, , 19 AEROSPACE TECHNOLOGY DEV/DEMO ,2 126,2 + 5, 2 AEROSPACE PROPULSION AND POWER TECHNOLOGY. 115, , , 21 ELECTRONIC COMBAT TECHNOLOGY.. 55,319 55, ADVANCED SPACECRAFT TECHNOLOGY... 54,895 7, , 23 MAUI SPACE SURVEILLANCE SYSTEM [MSSSJ.... 1,674 1, HUMAN EFFECTIVENESS ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT 36,463 36, CONVENTIONAL WEAPONS TECHNOLOGY ,981 24, , 26 ADVANCED WEAPONS TECHNOLOGY. 43,368 53, , 27 MANUFACTURING TECHNOLOGY PROGRAM... 42,25 65, ,8 28 BATILESPACE KNOWLEDGE DEVELOPMENT & DEMONSTRATION. 51,64 51,64 TOTAL, ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT , , ,3 ADVANCED COMPONENT DEVELOPMENT 3 INTELLIGENCE ADVANCED DEVELOPMENT... 5,568 5, COMBAT IDENTIFICATION TECHNOLOGY... 18,194 18, NATO RESEARCH ANO DEVELOPMENT ,35 2, INTERCONTINENTAL BALLISTIC MISSILE ,856 41, POLLUTION PREVENTION-DEMNAL LONG RANGE STRIKE ,314,196 2,276,496-37,7 38 INTEGRATED AVIONICS PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT... 14,894 81, ,377

198 U: \219REPT\2REPT\2REPT line 219 budget Committee Change f,om estim:ite recommendation budget estimate 39 ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY AND SENSORS... 4 NATIONAL AIRBORNE OPS CENTER [NAOC] RECAP. 41 TECHNOLOGY TRANSFER HARD AND DEEPLY BURIED TARGET DEFEAT SYSTEM. 43 CYBERESILIENCY OF WEAPON SYSTEMS-ACS. 46 DEPLOYMENT AND DISTRIBUTION ENTERPRISE R&D TECH TRANSITION PROGRAM. 48A ADVANCED ENGINE DEVELOPMENT. 48B HYPERSONICS PROTOTYPING C DIRECTED ENERGY PROTOTYPING GROUND BASED STRATEGIC DETERRENT... 5 NEXT GENERATION AIR DOMINANCE. 51 THREE DIMENSIONAL LONG-RANGE RADAR. 52 UNIFIED PLATFORM (UP). 54 COMMON DATA LINK EXECUTIVE AGENT (CDL EA). 55 MISSION PARTNER ENVIRONMENTS. 56 CYBER OPERATIONS TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT.. 57 ENABLED CYBER ACTIVITIES CONTRACTING INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY SYSTEM. 6 NAVSTAR GLOBAL POSITIONING SYSTEM (USER EQUIPMENT) (SPACE). 61 EO/IR WEATHER SYSTEMS. 62 WEATHER SYSTEM FOLLOW-ON.. 63 SPACE SITUATION AWARENESS SYSTEMS. 64 MIDTERM POLAR MILSATCOM SYSTEM. 65 SPACE CONTROL TECHNOLOGY.. 66 SPACE SECURITY AND DEFENSE PROGRAM PROTECTED TACTICAL ENTERPRISE SERVICE (PTES). 68 PROTECTED TACTICAL SERVICE (PTS) PROTECTED SATCOM SERVICES (PSCS)-AGGREGATED. 7 OPERATIONALLY RESPONSIVE SPACE ,585 9,74 12,96 71,51 62,618 28,35 1,186,75 345,41 53,997 4,326 29,8 41,88 1,74 253,825 16,325 17, ,629 7,94 138,52 39, ,113 91,18 45,542 51,419 29,776 29, ,5 34,585 7,44 16,96 32,51 62,618 28,35 195, , ,58 15, 345,41 392,997 25,426 29,8 41,88 1,74 253,825 16, , ,3 +4, -39, -99, , , , -111, -14,9 256,629-3, 7,94 138,52 29,338-1, 383, ,18-15, 45,542 46,419-5, 29,776 29, ,5 + 5, TOTAL, ADVANCED COMPONENT DEVELOPMENT... ENGINEERING & MANUFACTURING DEVELOPMENT 71 FUTURE ADVANCED WEAPON ANALYSIS & PROGRAMS INTEGRATED AVIONICS PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT. 73 NUCLEAR WEAPONS SUPPORT ELECTRONIC WARFARE DEVELOPMENT. 75 TACTICAL DATA NETWORKS ENTERPRISE.. 76 PHYSICAL SECURITY EQUIPMENT SMALL DIAMETER BOMB [SDB]. 81 AIRBORNE ELECTRONIC ATTACK. 83 ARMAMENT/ORDNANCE DEVELOPMENT.. 84 SUBMUNITIONS AGILE COMBAT SUPPORT JOINT DIRECT ATTACK MUNITION LIFE SUPPORT SYSTEMS. 88 COMBAT TRAINING RANGES. 89 F-35-EMD LONG RANGE STANDOFF WEAPON.. 92 ICBM FUZE MODERNIZATION KC ADVANCED PILOTRAINING COMBAT RESCUE HELICOPTER ACQUISITION WORKFORCE-GLOBAL BATTLE MANAGEMENT. 16 B-2 DEFENSIVE MANAGEMENT SYSTEM. 17 NUCLEAR WEAPONS MODERNIZATION. 18 F-15 EPAWSS STAND IN ATTACK WEAPON. 11 ADVANCED COMMUNICATIONS SYSTEMS. 111 FULL COMBAT MISSION TRAINING. 112 NEXTGEN JSTARS. 116 C-32 EXECUTIVE TRANSPORT RECAPITALIZATION. 6,529,943 39,62 58,531 4,468 1,99 27,746 14,421 73,158 7,153 58,59 2,99 2,28 15,787 8,919 35,895 69,1 614,92 172,92 88,17 265, ,652 3, ,758 91,97 137,95 43,175 14,888 1,15 7,943 6,79,42 39,62 58,531 4,468 1,99 257,746 14,421 78,158 7,153 58,59 2,99 23,528 8,919 43,895 69,1 624,92 172,92 8,17 265, ,652 3, ,758 84,97 137,95 14,975 14,888 1,15 3, 7, , , + 5, +3,5-15,787 +8, + 1, -8, - 73, - 7, -28,2 +3,

199 U: \219REPT\2REPT\2REPT Line 219 budget estimate Committee Change from recommendation budget estimate 117 PRESIDENTIAL AIRCRAFT REPLACEMENT AUTOMATED TEST SYSTEMS COMBAT SURVIVOR EVADER LOCATOR GPS IIIC SPACE SITUATION AWARENESS OPERATIONS COUNTERSPACE SYSTEMS SPACE SITUATION AWARENESS SYSTEMS SPACE FENCE ADVANCED EHF MILSATCOM (SPACE) POLAR MILSATCOM (SPACE) WIDEBAND GLOBAL SATCOM (SPACE) SPACE BASED INFRARED SYSTEM [SBIRSJ HIGH EMO. 129 NEXT-GEN OPIR EVOLVED EXPENDABLE LAUNCH VEHICLE PROGRAM (SPACE)- EMD ,32 13, ,889 46,668 2, ,463 2, ,56 27,337 3,97 6, , , ,372 13, ,889 46,668 2, ,463 2, ,56 27,337 53,47 6, , ,447-56,66-5, +49,5 + 1, + 2, TOTAL, ENGINEERING & MANUFACTURING DEVELOP MENT. 5,272,191 RDT&E MANAGEMENT SUPPORT 131 THREAT SIMULATOR DEVELOPMENT.. 34, MAJOR T&E INVESTMENT. 91, RAND PROJECT AIR FORCE... 34, INITIAL OPERATIONAL TEST & EVALUATION , TEST AND EVALUATION SUPPORT. 692, AGO WORKFORCE-GLOBAL POWER.. 233, ACQ WORKFORCE-GLOBAL VIG & COMBAT SYS. 263, ACQ WORKFORCE-GLOBAL REACH , ACQ WORKFORCE-CYBER, NETWORK, & BUS SYS , ACQ WORKFORCE-GLOBAL BATILE MGMT , ACQ WORKFORCE-CAPABILITY INTEGRATION. 226, ACQ WORKFORCE-ADVANCED PRGM TECHNOLOGY. 38,4 144 ACQ WORKFORCE-NUCLEAR SYSTEMS , MANAGEMENT HQ-R&D... 1, FACILITIES RESTORATION & MODERNIZATION-TEST & EVAL. 162, FACILITIES SUSTAINMENT-TEST AND EVALUATION SUPPORT. 28, REQUIREMENTS ANALYSIS AND MATURATION. 35, ENTERPRISE INFORMATION SERVICES (EIS). 2, ACQUISITION AND MANAGEMENT SUPPORT... 12, GENERAL SKILL TRAINING.... 1, INTERNATIONAL ACTIVITIES... 3, SPACE TEST AND TRAINING RANGE DEVELOPMENT. 23, SPACE AND MISSILE CENTER (SMC) CIVILIAN WORKFORCE. 169, SPACE & MISSILE SYSTEMS CENTER-MHA... 1, ROCKET SYSTEMS LAUNCH PROGRAM (SPACE)... 19, SPACE TEST PROGRAM (STP) ,62 5,489,544 34, ,844 34,614 18,43 697, ,75 243, ,23 217,9 157, ,126 32, ,175 9, ,216 28,888 48,285 2,545 12,367 1,448 3,998 23, ,912 1,58 19,721 25, , , + 5, - 7,849-19,635-8,361-14,415-12,396-5,93-5,64-2, , + 13, TOTAL, RDT&E MANAGEMENT SUPPORT... 2,839,511 3,55, ,234 OPERATIONAL SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT 165 SPECIALIZED UNDERGRADUATE FLIGHTRAINING. 167 AIR FORCE INTEGRATED MILITARY HUMAN RESOURCES SYSTEM 168 ANTI-TAMPER TECHNOLOGY EXECUTIVE AGENCY FOREIGN MATERIEL ACQUISITION AND EXPLOITATION. 17 HC/MC-13 RECAP RDT&E NC3 INTEGRATION ASSESSMENTS AND EVALUATIONS CYBER VULNERABILITIES. 173 B-52 SQUADRONS AIR-LAUNCHED CRUISE MISSILE [ALCMJ B-18 SQUADRONS B-2 SQUADRONS MINUTEMAN SQUADRONS WORLDWIDE JOINT STRATEGIC COMMUNICATIONS. 18 INTEGRATED STRATEGIC PLANNING & ANALYSIS NETWORK ICBM REENTRY VEHICLES... 11,344 47,287 32,77 68,368 32,574 26,112 99,1 28,414 5,955 76,3 15, ,47 1,442 22,833 18,412 11,344 41,12 32,77 68,368 32,574 19,312 75,95 329,173 5,955 63,23 15, ,47 18,442 22,833 18,412-6,185-6,8-23, ,759-12,8 +8,

200 U: \219REPT\2REPT\2REPT.32 2 Un thousands of dollars] Line 119 budget Committee Change from estimate recommendation budget estimate 183 UH-IN REPLACEMENT PROGRAM REGION/SECTOR OPERATION CONTROL CENTER MODERNIZATION 186 MQ-9 UAV A-1 SQUADRONS F-16 SQUADRONS.. 19 F-15E SQUADRONS MANNEDESTRUCTIVE SUPPRESSION. 192 F-22 SQUADRONS F-35 SQUADRONS TACTICAL AIM MISSILES ADVANCED MEDIUM RANGE AIR-TO-AIR MISSILE (AMRMM). 196 COMBAT RESCUE-PARARESCUE PRECISION ATIACK SYSTEMS PROCUREMENT. 199 COMPASS CALL... 2 AIRCRAFT ENGINE COMPONENT IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM. 22 JOINT AIR-TO-SURFACE STANDOFF MISSILE [JASSM] AIR AND SPACE OPERATIONS CENTER [AOC]. 24 CONTROL AND REPORTING CENTER [CRCJ. 25 AIRBORNE WARNING AND CONTROL SYSTEM [AWACS]. 26 TACTICAL AIRBORNE CONTROL SYSTEMS. 28 COMBAT AIR INTELLIGENCE SYSTEM ACTIVITIES TACTICAL AIR CONTROL PARTY-MOD C21SR TACTICAL DATA LINK DCAPES NATIONAL TECHNICAL NUCLEAR FORENSICS JOINT SURVEILLANCE/TARGETATIACK RADAR SYSTEM [JSTARSJ SEEK EAGLE USAF MODELING AND SIMULATION. 216 WARGAMING AND SIMULATION CENTERS DISTRIBUTED TRAINING AND EXERCISES MISSION PLANNING SYSTEMS.. 22 TACTICAL DECEPTION. 221 AF OFFENSIVE CYBERSPACE OPERATIONS AF DEFENSIVE CYBERSPACE OPERATIONS JOINT CYBER COMMAND CONTROL (JCC2) UNIFIED PLATFORM (UP) GLOBAL SENSOR INTEGRATED ON NETWORK (GSIN). 23 NUCLEAR PLANNING AND EXECUTION SYSTEM (NPES) AIR FORCE SPACE AND CYBER NON-TRADITIONAL ISR FOR BATILESPACE AWARENESS E-4B NATIONAL AIRBORNE OPERATIONS CENTER [NAOC].. 24 MINIMUM ESSENTIAL EMERGENCY COMMUNICATIONS NETWORK 241 HIGH FREQUENCY RADIO SYSTEMS. 242 INFORMATION SYSTEMS SECURITY PROGRAM GLOBAL FORCE MANAGEMENT-DATA INITIATIVE. 246 AIRBORNE SIGINT ENTERPRISE COMMERCIAL ECONOMIC ANALYSIS. 25 C2 AIR OPERATIONS SUITE-----{;2 INFO SERVICES. 251 CCMD INTELLIGENCE INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY. 252 GLOBAL AIR TRAFFIC MANAGEMENT (GATM) WEATHER SERVICE AIR TRAFFIC CONTROL, APPROACH, & LANDING SYSTEM (ATC) AERIAL TARGETS SECURITY AND INVESTIGATIVE ACTIVITIES DEFENSE JOINT COUNTERINTELLIGENCE ACTIVITIES DRAGON U ENDURANCE UNMANNED AERIAL VEHICLES. 27 AIRBORNE RECONNAISSANCE SYSTEMS. 271 MANNED RECONNAISSANCE SYSTEMS. 272 DISTRIBUTED COMMON GROUND/SURFACE SYSTEMS R-4 UAV NETWORK-CENTRIC COLLABORATIVE TARGET [TIARA]. 275 NATO AGS.. 288,22 9, ,345 26, , ,883 15,238 63, ,51 37,23 61, ,891 13,91 121,23 6,62 16,12 6,413 12,664 2,659 1,316 6,149 1,738 13,297 1,788 14,888 24,699 17,78 6,141 4,225 63,653 6,949 4,526 24,166 13, 28,759 3,579 29,62 6,633 57,758 99,88 51,612 34,612 2,17 16,873 3,472 8,68 1,586 4,492 26,942 6,271 8, ,845 48, ,334 14,223 24, ,69 14,288 51, ,22 9, ,345 26, , ,483 15, , ,315 37,23 51, ,891 13,91 121,23 42,472 16,12 1,413 13,664 2,659 1, , ,738 13,297 1,788 24,699 17,78 6,141 4, ,653 6, ,526 39,166 13, 21,559 3,579 29,62 6,633 57,758 67,88 51,612 34,612 2,17 19,873 3,472 8,68 1,586 4,492 31,942 11,271 8, ,845 58,518 15, 175,334 14,223 24, ,69 14,288 51,527-5,7-16,4-15,1-121,186-1,1-17,59 +4, + 1, -14, , - 7,2-32, +3, + 5, + 5, + 1, + 15,

201 U:\219REPT\2REPT\2REPT line 219 budget Committee Change from estimate recommendation budget estimate 276 SUPPORT TO DCGS ENTERPRISE... 26,579 26, INTERNATIONAL INTELLIGENCE TECHNOLOGY AND ARCHITEC- TUR... _ ,464 8, RAPID CYBER ACQUISITION... 4,33 4, PERSONNEL RECOVERY COMMAND & CTRL (PRC2) 2,466 2, INTELLIGENCE MISSION DATA (IMO).. 4,117 4, C-13 AIRLIFT SQUADRON 15,988 15, C-5 AIRLIFT SQUADRONS... 25,71 25, C-17 AIRCRAFT ,299 48, C-13J PROGRAM... 15,49 15, LARGE AIRCRAFT COUNTERMEASURES [LAIRCM] ,334 4, KC-135S... 3,493 3, KC-lOS.... 6,569 6, OPERATIONAL SUPPORT AIRLIFT... 3,172 3, CV ,52 18, AMC COMMAND CONTROL SYSTEM... 1,688 1, SPECIAL TACTICS I COMBAT CONTROL... 2,541 2, DEPOT MAINTENANCE (NON-IF)... 1,897 1, MAINTENANCE, REPAIR & OVERHAUL SYSTEM ,933 5,933 3 LOGISTICS INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY [LOGIT]... 13,787 13, SUPPORT SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT... 4,497 4, OTHER FLIGHTRAINING.. 2,22 2, OTHER PERSONNEL ACTIVITIES JOINT PERSONNEL RECOVERY AGENCY... 2,23 2,23 35 CIVILIAN COMPENSATION PROGRAM. 3,772 3, PERSONNEL ADMINISTRATION. 6,358 6, AIR FORCE STUDIES AND ANALYSIS AGENCY... 1,418 1, FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT 99,734 93,834-5,9 39 SERVICE SUPPORT TO STRATCOM-SPACE ACTIVITIES... 14,161 14, AF TENCAP... 26,986 26, FAMILY OF ADVANCED BLOS TERMINALS (FAB-T) 8,168 6,168-2, 312 SATELLITE CONTROL NETWORK (SPACE) 17,88 27,88 + 1, 314 NAVSTAR GLOBAL POSITIONING SYSTEM (SPACE AND CONTROL SEGMENTS). 8,937 8, SPACE AND MISSILE TEST AND EVALUATION CENTER... 59,935 59, SPACE INNOVATION, INTEGRATION AND RAPID TECHNOLOGY DE- VELOPMENT... 21,19 21, INTEGRATED BROADCAST SERVICE (IBS)... 8,568 8, SPACELIFT RANGE SYSTEM (SPACE). 1,641 2, , 319 GPS Ill SPACE SEGMENT , , SPACE SUPERIORITY INTELLIGENCE 16,278 16, JSPOC MISSION SYSTEM. 72,256 72, NATIONAL SPACE DEFENSE CENTER.. 42,29 42, NUDET DETECTION SYSTEM (SPACE). 19,778 19, SPACE SITUATION AWARENESS OPERATIONS. 19,572 19, GLOBAL POSITIONING SYSTEM PERATIONAL CONTROL SEG- MENT 513, ,235 TOTAL, OPERATIONAL SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT.. 6,357,616 6,186, , CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS... 16,534,124 16,463,324-7,8 TOTAL, RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, TEST & EVAL, AIR FOE ,178,343 4,896, ,324 COMMITTEE RECOMMENDED ADJUSTMENTS The following table details the adjustments recommended by the Committee:

202 U: \219REPT\2REPT\2REPT Line 219 budget estimate Committee Change from recommendation budget estimate Defense Research Sciences ,322 Basic research program increase... University Research Initiatives ,991 Basic research program increase... 4 Materials ,373 Program increase: Certification of advanced composites... Program increase: Coating technologies... Program increase: High performance materials... Program increase: Turbine airfoil demonstration... Aerospace Vehicle Technologies... 13,547 Program increase: Human-machine teaming... Program increase: Hypersonic wind tunnels.... Program increase: Hypersonic vehicle structures... Human Effectiveness Applied Research ,518 Program increase: Warfighter physiology program... Aerospace Propulsion... 19,919 Program increase: Thermal management technologies... Program increase: Centers of excellence... Program increase: Next generation hall thrusters... Program increase: Next generation heat exchangers Program Increase: MADDIE-modular arrays for energy... Aerospace Sensors ,534 Program increase: Air Force Minority Leaders Program Dominant Information Sciences and Methods ,42 Program increase: Cyber testbed for unidentified c- UAS... Program increase: Quantum computing CoE High Energy Laser Research... 43,359 Program increase: Directed energy research Space Technology ,645 Program increase: Advanced materials and process for magnetic graphene memory systems Advanced Materials for Weapon Systems... 34,426 Program increase: Metals affordability research Advanced Aerospace Sensors... 39,968 Program increase: Sensor integration Aerospace Technology Dev/Demo ,2 Program increase: Aircraft winglets and drag reduction devices... 2 Aerospace Propulsion and Power Technology ,462 Program increase: Chemical apogeengines... Program increase: Upper stage engine maturation.. Program increase: Silicon carbide research Advanced Spacecraft Technology... 54,895 Program increase: Radiation hardened microelectronic processors... Program increase: Space laser communications systems Conventional Weapons Technology ,981 Program increase: Rotary launcher development Advanced Weapons Technology... 43,368 Program increase: Demonstrator laser weapon system Manufacturing Technology Program... 42,25 Program increase: F-35 battery technology... Program increase: Materials development research Program increase: Modeling technology for small turbine engines Pollution Prevention-DemNal... Program increase: Alternativenergy aircraftugs.. 448, , , ,47 114,18 23, , ,42 45, ,645 42,926 44, ,2 141,462 7,895 24,981 53,368 65, , + 1, 25, +25, 36, + 15, + 1, +8, +3, 16,5 +4, +5, + 7,5 1,5 +1,5 39,5 +6, +5, + 1, +6,5 + 12, 5, +5, 13, +5,5 + 7,5 2,5 +2,5 4, +4, 8,5 +8,5 5, +5, 5, +5, 26, +2,5 +8,5 + 15, 16, +6, + 1, 1, + 1, 1, + 1, 23,8 +9,8 + 1, +4, 2 +2

203 U:\219REPT\2REPT\2REPT.32 line budget estimate 37 Long Range Strike-Bomber... 2,314,196 Classified adjustment Integrated Avionics Planning and Development... 14,894 Transfer: Air Force requested from ROTE lines 42, 86, and National Airborne Ops Center [NAOC] Recap... 9,74 Restoring acquisition accountability: Materiel solution analysis funding early to need Technology Transfer... 12,96 Program increase: Technology partnerships Hard and Deeply Buried Target Defeat System (HDBTDS) Program... 71,51 Transfer: Air Force requested to ROTE line Restoring acquisition accountability, Advanced 5, pound penetrator test and evaluation funding early to need Tech Transition Program... 1,186,75 Transfer to lines 48a and 48b... Program increase: Alternativenergy research.... Program increase: Rapid sustainment initiative... Program increase: Technology transition initiatives 48a Advanced Engine Development... Transfer from line Maintain program affordability: Unjustified growth in Adaptive Engine Transition Program... 48b Hypersonics Prototyping.... Transfer from line Program increase: Air-launched rapid response weapon... Program increase: Hypersonic conventional strike weapon... 48c Directed Energy Prototyping... Program increase: Directed energy prototyping Next Generation Air Dominance... 53,997 Classified adjustment Three Dimensional Long-Range Radar (3DELRR).... 4,326 Maintain program affordability: EMD unit funding excess to need NAVSTAR Global Positioning System (User Equipment) (SPACE) ,629 Improving funds management: Increment 2 development funded in Public Law Space Situation Awareness Systems... 39,338 Contradiction in justification books/briefs Space Control Technology... 91,18 Improving funds management: Space defense force packaging funded in Public Law Protected Tactical Enterprise Service (PTES)... 51,419 Restoring acquisition accountability: Schedule slip 7 Operationally Responsive Space ,5 Restoring acquisition accountability, Phasing- Solar Power Project Air Demonstration.... Program increase: Blackjack Tactical Data Networks Enterprise... 27,746 Program increase: Accelerate 21st Century battle banagement command and control Small Diameter Bomb [SDB] -EMD... 73,158 Program increase: Precise navigation Agile Combat Support... 2,28 Program increase: Explosion resistant window technology Joint Direct Attack Munition... 15,787 Transfer: Air Force requested to ROTE line Combat Training Ranges... 35,895 Committee Change from recommendation budget estimate 2,276,496-37,7-37,7 81,271 66,377 7,44 16,96 32,51 195, , ,58 15, 392,997 25, ,629 29,338 76,18 46, ,5 257,746 78,158 23,528 43, ,377-2,3-2,3 4, +4, -39, -33, -6, -99,613-1,48,413 +5, +42,8 + 1, +651, , , 558, , ,7 + 22,3 + 15, + 15, -111, -111, -14,9-14,9-3, -3, -1, -1, -15, -15, -5, -5, 5, -15, + 11, 5, +5, 5, +5, 3,5 +3,5-15,787-15,787 8,

204 U:\219REPT\2REPT\2REPT Line 219 budget estimate Committee recommendation Change from budget estimate Program increase, F-35 advanced threat simulator Long Range Standoff Weapon... Program increase KC , Improving funds management Forward financed Com bat Rescue Helicopter , ,652 Maintain program affordability, Development funding excess to need. 17 Nuclear Weapons Modernization... Maintain program affordability, Test support excess to need Stand In Attack Weapon. Restoring acquisition accountability, Unclear acquisition 91,97 43,175 84,97 14,975 strategy JSTARS Recap... Program increase, Continue JSTARS recap GMTI... 3, radar development Presidential Aircraft Recapitalization (PAR) Restoring acquisition accountability, EMO Hot Start unjustified... Maintain program affordability, EMO funding unjustified GPS IIIC. Restoring acquisition accountability, Acquisition 673,32 451, ,372 41,889 strategy undefined Wideband Global SATCOM (SPACE).... Transfer, Pathfinder #5 from SPAF Line Next-Generation OPIR... Program increase, Accelerate sensor development. 13 Evolved Expendable Launch Vehicle Program (SPACE)- EMD Program increase Major T&E Investment.... Program increase... Program increase, Eastern Gulf test and training range. Program increase, Instrumentation technology. Program increase, UAV electronic warfare capabilities 3, , ,447 91, ,47 743, , , Test and Evaluation Support. Program increase, Avionics cyberange Acq Workforce- Global Power. Maintain program affordability, Unjustified growth 138 Acq Workforce- Global Vig & Combat Sys... Maintain program affordability, Unjustified growth 139 Acq Workforce- Global Reach. Maintain program affordability, Unjustified growth 14 Acq Workforce- Cyber, Network, & Bus Sys , , , , , , , , , ,9 Maintain program affordability, Unjustified growth Acq Workforce- Global Battle Mgmt... Maintain program affordability, Unjustified growth 142 Acq Workforce- Capability Integration... Maintain program affordability, Unjustified growth 143 Acq Workforce- Advanced Prgm Technology , ,219 38,4 157, ,126 32,796 Maintain program affordability, Unjustified growth 144 Acq Workforce- Nuclear Systems. Maintain program affordability, Unjustified growth 147 Management HQ-R&D. Maintain program affordability, Unjustified growth 148 Facilities Restoration and Modernization-Test and Evaluation ,761 1, ,175 9,815 Support , ,216 Program increase Requirements Analysis and Maturation. Program increase, Nuclear modernization analytics 35,285 48,285 +8, 1, + 1, -8, -8, - 73, - 73, - 7, - 7, - 28,2-28,2 3, + 3, -56,66-5,1-51,56-5, -5, 49,5 +49,5 1, + 1, 2, + 2, 175, + 15, + 1, + 1, + 5, 5, + 5, - 7,849-7,849-19,635-19,635-8,361-8,361-14,415-14,415-12,396-12,396-5,93-5,93-5,64-5,64-2,586-2, , + 1, 13, + 8,

205 U: \219REPT\2REPT\2REPT Line 219 budget estimate Committee Change from recommendation budget estimate Program increase: Nuclear deterrence research. 167 AF Integrated Personnel and Pay System (AF-IPPS).... Maintain program affordability: Management services excess to need 171 NC3 Integration Maintain program affordability: Unjustified growth in direct mission support 172 Assessments and Evaluations Cyber Vulnerabilities. Maintain program affordability: Unjustified growth in infrastructure pilot programs B-52 Squadrons Transfer crypto modernization: Air Force-requested from APAF line Program increase: B-52 infrared threat defense UON... Program increase: B-52 mission data recorder. 175 B-IB Squadrons..... Maintain program affordability: Fully integrated targeting pod funding excess to need 179 Worldwide Joint Strategic Communications. Program increase: NC3 architecture F-16 Squadrons... Restoring acquisition accountability: Communications suite upgradearly to need 19 F-15E Squadrons... Maintain program affordability: Operational flight plan funding excess to need Program increase: Electronic warfare receiver upgrades 192 F-22A Squadrons Restoring acquisiton accountability: Navigation systems program delay F-35 Squadrons... Restoring acquisition accountability: C22 Phase 2 contract award delays Restoring acquisition accountability: C2D2 flight test contract award delays. Improving funds management: ECASE excess growth... Improving funds management: Developmental Foundation excess growth... Improving funds management: Fixed JPO costs excess growth Improving funds management: DCA excess growth 195 Advanced Medium Range Air-to-Air Missile (AMRAAM). Restoring acquisition accountability: SIP 4 early to need Joint Air-to-Surface Standoff Missile [JASSM]... Transfer: Air Force requested to ROTE line Control and Reporting Center [CRC]... Program increase: Fund CRC Mode 5 implementation Airborne Warning and Control System [AWACS]. Program increase: Accelerate 21st Century battle management command and control. 213 Joint Surveillanceffarget Attack Radar System [JSTARS]. Transfer common data link program: Air Force-requested to APAF line AF Defensive Cyberspace Operations. Program increase: Internet of Things protective technologies Program increasec: Transportation cyberesearch 224 Unified Platform (UP)... 47,287 26,112 99,1 28,414 76,3 1, , ,883 63, ,51 61,393 6,62 6,413 12,664 14,888 24,166 28,759 41,12 19,312 75,95 329,173 63,23 18, , , , ,315 51,293 42,472 1,413 13,664 39,166 21, , -6,185-6,185-6,8-6,8-23,15-23,15 48, , , + 1, -12,8-12,8 8, +8, - 5,7-5,7-16,4-41,4 + 25, -15,1-15,1-121,186-33,492-9,719-14,399-44,733-6,168-12,675-1,1-1,1-17,59-17,59 4, +4, 1, + 1, -14,888-14,888 15, + 7,5 + 7,5-7,2

206 U: \219REPT\2REPT\2REPT [In thousands of dollars) line 219 budget estimate Committee Change from recommendation budget estimate Restoring acquisition accountabilityc Lack of justification on foundational efforts 24 Minimum Essential Emergency Communications Network (MEECN)... Maintain program affordabilityc Unjustified growth in Global Aircrew Strategic Network Terminal Inc Airborne SIGINT Enterprise Program increase: SIGINT sensor development Weather Service..... Program increase, Commercial weather system follow--n 255 Air Traffic Control, Approach, and Landing System (ATCALS) Program increase, Air traffic management of UAS operations Dragon U-2... Program increase: Sensor development. 269 Endurance Unmanned Aerial Vehicles Program increase: Ultra-long endurance aircraft. 38 Financial Management Information Systems Development Maintain program affordability: Increment 2 excess to need Family of Advanced BLoS Terminals (FAB-TJ. Restoring acquisition accountability: FET terminals early to need Satellite Control Network (SPACE)... Program increase: Commercial augmentation service Spacelift Range System (SPACE)... Program increase: Space launch range services and capability Classified Programs Classified adjustment ,88 16,873 26,942 6,271 48,518 99,734 8,168 17,88 1,641 16,534,124 67,88 19,873 31,942 11,271 58,518 15, 93,834 6,168 27,88 2,641 16,463,324-7,2-32, -32, 3, + 3, 5, + 5, 5, + 5, 1, + 1, 15, + 15, -5,9-5,9-2, -2, 1, + 1, 1, + 1, - 7,8-7,8 Advanced Composites.-The Committee recognizes the unique role of the Air Force in developing advanced composites for next generation air and space vehicles. The Committee also recognizes the contribution of university research institutions to the Air Force in understanding the technology, processes, and materials used in advanced composites manufacturing as well as addressing shortages of qualified scientists and engineers. The Committee recommends additional funding in applied research and encourages the Air Force to continue to support the test, evaluation, and certification of advanced composites at academic institutions with proven capabilities in aviation and aerospace. Technology Transfer.-The Committee recognizes the importance of technology transfer between the Federal Government and non Federal entities, such as academia, nonprofit organizations, and State and local governments. Technology transfer lowers the cost of new defense-related technology development and ensures that taxpayer investments in research and development benefit the economy and the industrial base. The Committee encourages the Department of Defense to continue placing an increased focus on technology transfer programs by allocating sufficient funding and leveraging the work being performed by Federal laboratories. Prototyping and Experimentation.-The fiscal year 219 President's budget request includes $1,186,75, in the Technology

207 U:\219REPT\2REPT\2REPT Transition Program to demonstrate, prototype, and experiment with innovative technologies and concepts to accelerate their transition to acquisition programs and eventual operational use. Specifically, the Technology Transition Program includes the Adaptive Engine Transition Program [AETP], hypersonics prototyping, smaller lifecycle developmental prototyping efforts, and experimentation campaigns. The Committee remains supportive of these activities, but is concerned about the amount of transparency and budget documentation provided in the budget request. Therefore, the Committee recommendation includes separate budget lines and program elements for the larger activities within the Technology Transition Program, to include AETP, hypersonics prototyping, and directed energy prototyping. The Committee recommends keeping the shorter-term prototyping and experimentation activities in the Technology Transition Program for greater flexibility to explore new ideas, concepts, and technologies. The Committee continues to expect timely and complete communication from the Air Force on prototyping and experimentation activities to include objectives and requirements, transition plans, technology and manufacturing readiness levels, test activities, costs, schedules, and performance metrics. Air Force Alternative Energy Research.-The Committee is concerned that the Air Force is under-emphasizing the transition of alternative energy research into Air Force enterprise requirements. Therefore, the Committee directs the Secretary of the Air Force to report to the congressional defense committees not later than 9 days after enactment of this act detailing how the Air Force aligns its alternative energy research agenda with enterprise requirements. The report should include the metrics used to evaluate how the expenditure of funds serve the goals identified in its Energy Flight Plan: and how the Air Force plans to transition existing alternative energy research, development, test and evaluation projects to meet Air Force energy requirements. Advanced Pilot Training Program.-The fiscal year 219 President's budget request includes $265,465, to develop the Advanced Pilot Trainer, a modern system to train 4th and 5th generation pilots. The Committee understands that the Air Force plans to complete source selection and award the engineering, manufacturing, and development [EMD] contract in the summer of 218. Given the age and the cost of sustaining the legacy T-38C pilot training system as well as the Air Force's growing pilot shortage, the Committee encourages the Air Force to not further delay the award of the EMD contract and subsequently consider options to accelerate the program after contract award. SPACE PROGRAMS Space Acquisition Strategy.-The Committee supports the Air Force's plans to develop more capable and defendable satellites and appreciates the intention to be faster, more agile, and more innovative. The Committee also understands that there will be risks and tradeoffs with such a shift in strategy that will mean less predictability and possibly failures. The Committee's concerns, articulated in the Department of Defense Appropriations Act, 218 (Public Law ), are not about the risks involved with innovation or

208 U:\219REPT\2REPT\2REPT speed, but rather the risks involved with redeveloping nearly every major space system simultaneously. As noted last year, the Air Force is beginning development efforts for space situation awareness; position, navigation, and timing; weather; overhead persistent infrared; wide-band communications; and protected communications, with major changes to the program of record planned in nearly every case. The Committee remains concerned that the decision to accept less predictability and the possibility of failure in all of these programs simultaneously may pose unacceptable risks to constellation sustainment. These risks may be compounded in an environment where the acquisition workforce, rooted in contemplation and caution, is asked to shift its culture toward speed and agility for so many efforts. Moreover, the Committee is concerned that the funding peaks and troughs that will likely result from simultaneous architecture recapitalization may not take into account budget realities and may risk sustainment of the industrial base at levels adequate for future program needs. The Committee looks forward to receiving the report directed last year that will provide an assessment of these issues and looks forward to working with the Department to achieve the best way forward for the future of these space programs. Next-Generation Overhead Persistent lnfrared.-the fiscal year 219 President's budget request includes $643,126, for Next Generation Overhead Persistent Infrared [OPIR], the successor to the Space Based Infrared System [SBIRS]. This is in addition to the $327,2, appropriated in the Department of Defense Appropriations Act, 218 (Public Law ) for the start of Next Gen OPIR, following a shift in the Air Force strategy away from a prior plan to purchase additional SBIRS space vehicles. The Committee is supportive of the Air Force's efforts to provide improved missile warning capabilities that are more survivable against emerging threats. However, the Committee has concerns about several shifts in the program plans over the past year, delays in providing a spend plan for the program, and requests for additional funds so soon after the program's start. The Committee is hopeful that these initial hiccups do not signal challenges ahead in meeting the aggressive timelines laid out by the Department. The Committee agrees with Air Force and Department leadership that Next-Gen OPIR will be a pacesetter for rapid acquisition of space programs. Therefore, despite these concerns, the Committee recommends fully funding the Air Force budget request. In addition, the Committee recommends an additional $1,, for advanced sensor development. The Committee reiterates guidance from last year that OPIR is designated as a congressional special interest item and continues to direct the Secretary of the Air Force to provide quarterly briefings to the congressional defense committees detailing progress against cost and schedule milestones.

209 U: \219REPT\2REPT\2REPT RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, TEST AND EVALUATION, DEFENSE-WIDE Appropriations, $22,1,975, Budget estimate, ,16,553, Committee recommendation... 24,49,621, The Committee recommends an appropriation of $24,49,621,. This is $2,33,68, above the budget estimate. COMMITTEE RECOMMENDED PROGRAM The following table summarizes the budget estimate for this appropriation, the Committee recommendation, and the Committee recommended adjustments to the budget estimate: Line 219 budget Committee Change from estimate recommendation budget estimate RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, TEST & EVAL, DEFENSE-WIDE BASIC RESEARCH 1 DTRA UNIVERSITY STRATEGIC PARTNERSHIP BASIC RESEARCH. 2 DEFENSE RESEARCH SCIENCES... 3 BASIC RESEARCH INITIATIVES... 4 BASIC OPERATIONAL MEDICAL RESEARCH SCIENCE... 5 NATIONAL DEFENSE EDUCATION PROGRAM... 6 HISTORICALLY BLACK COLLEGES & UNIV (HBCU)... 7 CHEMICAL AND BIOLOGICAL DEFENSE PROGRAM..... TOTAL, BASIC RESEARCH. APPLIED RESEARCH 8 JOINT MUNITIONS TECHNOLOGY.. 9 BIOMEDICAL TECHNOLOGY.. 11 LINCOLN LABORATORY RESEARCH PROGRAM APPLIED RESEARCH FOR ADVANCEMENT S&T PRIORITIES INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATIONS TECHNOLOGY. 14 BIOLOGICAL WARFARE DEFENSE CHEMICAL AND BIOLOGICAL DEFENSE PROGRAM CYBER SECURITY RESEARCH TACTICAL TECHNOLOGY. 18 MATERIALS AND BIOLOGICAL TECHNOLOGY ELECTRONICS TECHNOLOGY... 2 WEAPONS OF MASS DESTRUCTION DEFEAT TECHNOLOGIES. 21 SOFTWARE ENGINEERING INSTITUTE.. 22 SPECIAL OPERATIONS TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT. 37,23 422,13 42,72 47,825 85,919 3,412 42,13 78,114 19,17 11,3 51,596 6, ,317 38,64 192,674 14, , , , ,151 9,3 35,921 37, ,68 54,72 45,275 2,919 32,412 42,13 835,114 21,67 86,7 51,596 6, , -2, , + 2, + 127, +2,5-14,6 379,817-15,5 38, ,674 14, , , , ,151 9,3 35,921-13,5-8, + 3, -4, TOTAL, APPLIED RESEARCH... ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT 23 JOINT MUNITIONS ADVANCED TECH INSENSITIVE MUNITIONS AD 24 COMBATING TERRORISM TECHNOLOGY SUPPORT. 25 FOREIGN COMPARATIVE TESTING COUNTERPROLIFERATION INITIATIVES-PROLIF PREY & DEFEAT 28 ADVANCED CONCEPTS AND PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT WEAPONS TECHNOLOGY ADVANCED RESEARCH. 32 JOINT DOD-DOE MUNITIONS TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT ADVANCED AEROSPACE SYSTEMS SPACE PROGRAMS AND TECHNOLOGY ANALYTIC ASSESSMENTS ADVANCED INNOVATIVE ANALYSIS AND CONCEPTS. 38 ADVANCED INNOVATIVE ANALYSIS AND CONCEPTS-MHA COMMON KILL VEHICLE TECHNOLOGY... 4 DEFENSE INNOVATION UNIT EXPERIMENTAL (DIUX) TECHNOLOGY INNOVATION. 42 CHEMICAL AND BIOLOGICAL DEFENSE PROGRAM-ADVANCED D ,976,937 25, ,271 24, ,858 13,17 2,365 18, ,63 254,671 19,472 37,263 13, ,753 29, ,826 1,953,837 25,598 12,271 22,332 27,858 13,17 13,4 42,565 18, ,63 249,671 18,472 37,263 13,621 56,753-23,1-5, -2,2-29, + 13,4 + 22,2 + 5, - 5, -1, -133, 29, ,826

210 U:\219REPT\2REPT\2REPT line 219 budget Committee Change from estimate recommendation budget estimate 43 RETRACT LARCH JOINT ELECTRONIC ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY JOINT CAPABILITY TECHNOLOGY DEMONSTRATIONS _ 46 NETWORKED COMMUNICATIONS CAPABILITIES DEFENSE-WIDE MANUFACTURING SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY PROG _ MANUFACTURING TECHNOLOGY PROGRAM 49 EMERGING CAPABILITIES TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT GENERIC LOGISTICS R&D TECHNOLOGY DEMONSTRATIONS STRATEGIC ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH PROGRAM _ MICROELECTRONIC TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT AND SUPPORT 54 JOINT WARFIGHTING PROGRAM ADVANCED ELECTRONICS TECHNOLOGIES COMMAND, CONTROL AND COMMUNICATIONS SYSTEMS _ 57 NETWORK-CENTRIC WARFARE TECHNOLOGY _ 58 SENSOR TECHNOLOGY DISTRIBUTED LEARNING ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT 6 SOFTWARE ENGINEERING INSTITUTE 61 QUICK REACTION SPECIAL PROJECTS _ ENGINEERING SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY HIGH ENERGY LASER ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY PROGRAM 64 TEST & EVALUATION SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY 65 OPERATIONAL ENERGY CAPABILITY IMPROVEMENT _ 66 CWMD SYSTEMS _ _ 67 SPECIAL OPERATIONS ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT _ 161,128 12,918 16,49 12, ,637 49,667 48,338 11,778 76, ,931 5, ,99 185, ,569 19,128 13,564 15,5 69,626 19,415 69,533 96,389 4,582 26,644 79,38 161,128 12,918 93,49 12, ,887 67,167 6,838 19,778 86,514 23,931 5, , , ,69 173,61 11,564 15,5 59,626 19,415 69, ,389 4,582 26,644 79,38-13, + 45, ,5 + 12,5 +8, + 1, + 35, + 7,5-4,5-16,527-2, -1, + 36, TOTAL, ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT _ DEMONSTRATION & VALIDATION 68 NUCLEAR AND CONVENTIONAL PHYSICAL SECURITY EQUIPMENT 69 WALKOFF _ ACQUISITION ENTERPRISE DATAND INFORMATION SERVICES _ 71 ENVIRONMENTAL SECURITY TECHNICAL CERTIFICATION PRO- GRAM _ BALLISTIC MISSILE DEFENSE TERMINAL DEFENSE SEGMENT 73 BALLISTIC MISSILE DEFENSE MIDCOURSE DEFENSE SEGMENT _ 74 CHEMICAL AND BIOLOGICAL DEFENSE PROGRAM _ 75 BALLISTIC MISSILE DEFENSE SENSORS _ 76 BALLISTIC MISSILE DEFENSE ENABLING PROGRAMS 77 SPECIAL PROGRAMS-MDA _ AEGIS BMD _ BALLISTIC MISSILE DEFENSE COMMAND AND CONTROL, BAITLE 81 MANAGEMENT BALLISTIC MISSILE DEFENSE JOINT WARFIGHTER SUPPORT _ 83 BALLISTIC MISSILE DEFENSE INTERGRATION AND OPERATIONS_ 83 CENTER (MDIOC) _ REGARDING TRENCH _ SEA BASED X-BAND RADAR [SBXJ ISRAELI COOPERATIVE PROGRAMS BALLISTIC MISSILE DEFENSE TEST BALLISTIC MISSILE DEFENSE TARGETS _ 89 HUMANITARIAN DEMINING COALITION WARFARE DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE CORROSION PROGRAM TECHNOLOGY MATURATION INITIATIVES MISSILE DEFEAT PROJECT COUNTER IMPROVISED-THREAT DEMONSTRATION, PROTOTYPE 94 DEVELOPMENT, ANO TESTING _ 95 HYPERSONIC DEFENSE ADVANCED INNOVATIVE TECHNOLOGIES _ A JOINT ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE CENTER _ 97 TRUSTED AND ASSURED MICROELECTRONICS _ 98 RAPID PROTOTYPING PROGRAM _ 3,699,612 28,14 92,222 2,56 4,16 214, , ,886 22,876 54, , , ,168 48,767 54,925 16, ,715 3, 365, ,852 11,347 8,528 3, ,822 58,67 12,993 12,444 1,431,72 233,142 99,333 3,735,735 28,14 92,222 2,56 42,16 398,273 83, , , , , , , , + 184,1-123, -16, ,3 + 97,5 +5, , ,2 48,767 54,925 16, ,715 3, 518, ,352 11, ,528 8, ,822 43,67 13,944 1,496,336 83, 595,642 99,333-13, + 153, ,5 + 5, + 168, -15, -12, ,5 + 64, , + 362,5

211 U: \219REPT\2REPT\2REPT Line 219 budget Committee Change from estimate recommendation budget estimate 99 DOD UNMANNED AIRCRAFT SYSTEM (UAS) COMMON DEVELOP- MENT... 3,781 7,781 +4, 1 PACIFIC DISCRIMINATING RADAR... 95,765 73,147-22, WARGAMING AND SUPPORT FOR STRATEGIC ANALYSIS (SSA)... 3,768 3, JOINT C5 CAPABILITY DEVELOPMENT, INTEGRATION AND INTER- OPERABILITY... 22,435 22, LONG RANGE DISCRIMINATION RADAR , , IMPROVED HOMELAND DEFENSE INTERCEPTORS ,22 421,82-139,4 16 BMD TERMINAL DEFENSE SEGMENT TEST... 61,17 61, AEGIS BMO TEST ,756 95, BALLISTIC MISSILE DEFENSE SENSOR TEST... 81,1 81, LAND-BASED SM-3 [LBSM3]... 27,692 27,692 lll BALLISTIC MISSILE DEFENSE MIDCOURSE DEFENSE SEGMENT TEST ,934 72,634-9,3 112 MULTI-OBJECT KILL VEHICLE... 8,256 3,256-5, 113 ENTERPRISE INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY SYSTEMS.... 2,6 2,6 114 JOINT ELECTROMAGNETIC TECHNOLOGY [Jm PROGRAM.... 3,14 3, CYBER SECURITY INITIATIVE SPACE TRACKING AND SURVEILLANCE SYSTEM... 36,955 36, BALLISTIC MISSILE DEFENSE SYSEM SPACE PROGRAMS... 16, , ,5 TOTAL, DEMONSTRATION & VALIDATION... 8,79,725 9,87,96 + 1,161,181. 3,173 3, ENGINEERING & MANUFACTURING DEVELOPMENT 118 NUCLEAR AND CONVENTIONAL PHYSICAL SECURITY EQUIPMENT 8,333 8, PROMPT GLOBAL STRIKE CAPABILITY DEVELOPMENT , , ,5 12 CHEMICAL AND BIOLOGICAL DEFENSE PROGRAM ,71 329,99-58, JOINTACTICAL INFORMATION DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM [JTIDSJ... 19,53 29,53 + 1, 122 WEAPONS OF MASS DESTRUCTION DEFEAT CAPABILITIES... 6,163 6, INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT... 11,988 11, HOMELAND PERSONNEL SECURITY INITIATIVE DEFENSE EXPORTABILITY PROGRAM.... 1,489 1, OUSD(C) IT DEVELOPMENT INITIATIVES... 9,59 9, DOD ENTERPRISE SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT AND DEMONSTRA- TION DCMO POLICY AND INTEGRATION.... 2,15 2, DEFENSE AGENCY INITIATIVES FINANCIAL SYSTEM... 21,156 21, DEFENSE RETIRED AND ANNUITANT PAY SYSTEM (ORAS)... 1,731 1, DEFENSE-WIDE ELECTRONIC PROCUREMENT CAPABILITIES... 6,374 6, TRUSTED & ASSURED MICROELECTRONICS... 56,178 98, ,5 134 GLOBAL COMBAT SUPPORT SYSTEM... 2,512 2, DOD ENTERPRISE ENERGY INFORMATION MANAGEMENT (EEIM) 2,435 2, CWMD SYSTEMS: SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT AND DEMONSTRATION 17,48 17,48 TOTAL, ENGINEERING & MANUFACTURING DEVELOP- MENT ,189 1,177, ,28 RDT&E MANAGEMENT SUPPORT 137 DEFENSE READINESS REPORTING SYSTEM [DRRS]... 6,661 6, JOINT SYSTEMS ARCHITECTURE DEVELOPMENT... 4,88 4, CENTRAL TEST AND EVALUATION INVESTMENT DEVELOPMENT , , ,3 14 ASSESSMENTS AND EVALUATIONS ,356 31, MISSION SUPPORT ,646 65, JOINT MISSION ENVIRONMENT TEST CAPABILITY [JMETC]... 84,184 89,184 +5, 143 TECHNICAL STUDIES, SUPPORT AND ANALYSIS... 22,576 22, JOINT INTEGRATED AIR AND MISSILE DEFENSE ORGANIZATION... 52,565 52, CLASSIFIED PROGRAM USD(P) , + 1, 146 SYSTEMS ENGINEERING... 38,872 38, STUDIES AND ANALYSIS SUPPORT... 3,534 3, NUCLEAR MATIERS--1'HYSICAL SECURITY... 5,5 5, SUPPORT TO NETWORKS AND INFORMATION INTEGRATION... 11,45 11, GENERAL SUPPORT TO USO (INTELLIGENCE).... 1,693 5,693 +4, 151 CHEMICAL AND BIOLOGICAL DEFENSE PROGRAM... 12,883 12, SMALL BUSINESS INNOVATION RESEARCH/TECHNOLOGY TRANS- FER.... 2,545 2,545...

212 U:\219REPT\2REPT\2REPT.33 Line budget Committee Change from estimate rpcommendation budget estimate 16 DEFENSE TECHNOLOGY ANALYSIS... 24,487 27,487 +3, 161 DEFENSE TECHNICAL INFORMATION CENTER [DTIC]... 56,853 56, R&D IN SUPPORT OF DOD ENLISTMENT, TESTING & EVALUATION 24,914 24, DEVELOPMENT TEST AND EVALUATION.... 2,179 25,179 +5, 164 MANAGEMENT HEADQUARTERS (RESEARCH & DEVELOPMENT}... 13,643 13, MANAGEMENT HEADQUARTERS DEFENSE TECHNICAL INFORMA- TION CENTER [DTIC]... 4,124 4, BUDGET AND PROGRAM ASSESSMENTS... 5,768 5, OONA TECHNOLOGY AND RESOURCE ANALYSIS.... 1,3 1, DEFENSE DIGITAL SERVICE (DDS) DEVELOPMENT SUPPORT.... 1, 1, 169 ASSESSMENTS AND EVALUATIONS CYBER VULNERABILITIES... 3,4 3, ASSESSMENTS AND EVALUATIONS CYBER VULNERABILITIES... 4, 4, DEFENSE OPERATIONS SECURITY [OPSEC]... 3,8 1,8 + 7, 172 JOINT STAFF ANALYTICAL SUPPORT... 6,658 6, SUPPORT TO INFORMATION OPERATIONS [1] CAPABILITIES DEFENSE MILITARY DECEPTION PROGRAM OFFICE.... 1,5 1,5 177 COMBINED ADVANCED APPLICATIONS... 21,363 16,363-5, 18 INTELLIGENCE CAPABILITIES AND INNOVATION INVESTMENTS... 19, , , 181 GWMD SYSTEMS: RDT&E MANAGEMENT SUPPORT... 1,244 1, GOGOM EXERCISENGAGEMENT AND TRAINING TRANS- FORMATION... 42,94 42, MANAGEMENT HEADQUARTERS--MDA... 28,626 28, JOINT SERVICE PROVIDER ()SP)... 5,14 5, CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS ,64 45,64 TOTAL, RDT&E MANAGEMENT SUPPORT.... 1,117,3 1,45, ,3 OPERATIONAL SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT 189 ENTERPRISE SECURITY SYSTEM (ESS)... 9,75 9, REGIONAL INTERNATIONAL OUTREACH & PARTNERSHIP FOR PEAG... 1,855 1, OVERSEAS HUMANITARIAN ASSISTANCE SHARED INFORMATION SY INDUSTRIAL BASE ANALYSIS AND SUSTAINMENT SUPPORT... 1,376 63, ,5 193 OPERATIONAL SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT... 5,915 5, GLOBAL THEATER SECURITY COOPERATION MANAGEMENT... 5,869 5, CHEMICAL AND BIOLOGICAL DEFENSE (OPERATIONAL SYSTEMS D 48,741 42,385-6, PLANNING AND DECISION AID SYSTEM.... 3,37 3, G41 INTEROPERABILITY... 62,814 62, DEFENSE INFO INFRASTRUCTURE ENGINEERING & INTEGRATION 16,561 16, LONG HAUL COMMUNICATIONS [DGS]... 14,769 14, MINIMUM ESSENTIAL EMERGENCY COMMUNICATIONS NETWORK 17,579 17, KEY MANAGEMENT INFRASTRUCTURE [KMI]... 31,737 31, INFORMATION SYSTEMS SECURITY PROGRAM... 7,94 7, INFORMATION SYSTEMS SECURITY PROGRAM , , INFORMATION SYSTEMS SECURITY PROGRAM... 19,611 19, GLOBAL COMMAND CONTROL SYSTEM... 46,9 46, JOINT SPECTRUM GENTER (DEFENSE SPECTRUM ORGANIZATION) 7,57 7, JOINT INFORMATION ENVIRONMENT (JIE)... 7,947 7, FEDERAL INVESTIGATIVE SERVICES INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY 39,4 39, POLICY R&D PROGRAMS... 6,262 6, NET GENTRIGITY... 16,78 16, DISTRIBUTED COMMON GROUND/SURFACE SYSTEMS... 6,286 6, DISTRIBUTED COMMON GROUND/SURFACE SYSTEMS... 2,97 2, INSIDER THREAT... 5,954 5, HOMELAND DEFENSE TECHNOLOGY TRANSFER PROGRAM ,198-1, 24 INTELLIGENCE MISSION DATA (IMD)... 6,889 6, LOGISTICS SUPPORT ACTIVITIES... 1,317 1, PACIFIC DISASTER CENTERS ,77 1, DEFENSE PROPERTY ACCOUNTABILITY SYSTEM.... 1,85 1, MQ--9 UAV ,43 18, AVIATION SYSTEMS , ,862-2, SPECIAL OPERATIONS INTELLIGENCE SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT... 1,625 1,625...

213 U:\219REPT\2REPT\2REPT Line 219 budget Committee Change from estimate recommendation budget estimate 25 SOF OPERATIONAL ENHANCEMENTS... 12,37 12, WARRIOR SYSTEMS ,942 55, ,7 252 SPECIAL PROGRAMS... 2,479 2, UNMANNED ISR ,27 33,27 + 6, 254 SOF TACTICAL VEHICLES.... 1,121 1, SOF MARITIME SYSTEMS ,471 42, SOF GLOBAL VIDEO SURVEILLANCE ACTIVITIES ,78 4, SOF OPERATIONAL ENHANCEMENTS INTELLIGENCE... 12,176 12, TELEPORT PROGRAM 2, ,6 3 NATIONAL SECURITY INNOVATION ACTIVITIES , + 75, TOTAL, OPERATIONAL SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT.... 1,96,48 1,228, , CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS ,877,898 3,843,141-34,757 TOTAL, RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, TEST & EVAL, DEF- WIDE... 22,16,553 24,49, ,33,68

214 U: \219REPT\2REPT\2REPT COMMITTEE RECOMMENDED ADJUSTMENTS The following table details the Rc.ustments recommended by the Committee: Line 219 budget estimate 2 Defense Research Sciences ,13 Program increase, DARPA foundational and applied artificial intelligence... Improving Funds Management Program delays... 3 Basic Research Initiatives Program increase, DEPSCOR Basic Operational Medical Research Science. 47,825 Improving Funds Management Program delays. Program increase, TBI Treatment for blast injuries 5 National Defense Education Program Basic research program increase Program increase, Manufacturing engineering education program Historically Black Colleges and Universities/Minority Institutions 3,412 Program increase Joint Munitions Technology ,17 Program increase, Insensitive munitions Biomedical Technology... 11,3 Improving Funds Management Program delays Information & Communications Technology. 395,317 Program increase, DARPA foundational and applied artificial intelligence.... Improving Funds Management Program delays. 17 Tactical Technology ,466 Improving Funds Management Program delays. Program increase. 18 Materials and Biological Technology. 226,898 Improving Funds Management Program delays Electronics Technology. 333,847 Program increase, DARPA electronics resurgence initiative 2 Counter Weapons of Mass Destruction Applied Research. 161,151 JIDO unjustified base budget request Combating Terrorism Technology Support ,271 Improving funds management Unjustified growth Transfer funding from RDDW OCO Line 24, Anti-Tunneling 25 Foreign Comparative Testing... 24,532 Improving funds management Prior year carryover. 27 Counter Weapons of Mass Destruction Advanced Technology Development ,858 JIDO unjustified base budget request Weapons Technology.... Program increase, Hypersonic Defense Advanced Research.... 2,365 Program increase, Hypersonic Defense Advanced Aerospace Systems 277,63 Program increase, Hypersonics weapons programs development and transition 35 Space Programs and Technology ,671 Insufficient budget justification, RASR. 36 Analytic Assessments... 19,472 Improving funds management Prior year carryover. 39 Common Kill Vehicle Technology. Transfer to line 92 for low power laser demonstrator prototypes post-pdr risk reduction through CDR only. Restoring acquisition accountability, program adjustment 45 Joint Capability Technology Demonstrations. 16,49 Improving funds management Prior year carryover. 47 Defense-Wide Manufacturing Science and Technology Program 114,637 Program increase, Manufacturing engineering programs Committee Change from recommendation budget estimate 422, ,275 2,919 32,412 21, , , , , ,151 12,271 22,332 27, , ,63 249,671 18, ,49 159, , -14, , + 12, -2,55-12,55 + 1, + 115, + 1, + 15, + 2, + 2, + 2,5 + 2,5-14,6-14,6-15,5 + 35, -5,5-13,5-16, + 2,5-8, -8, +3, + 3, -4, -4, -5, -3, + 25, -2,2-2,2-29, -29, + 13,4 + 13,4 + 22,2 + 22,2 + 5, + 5, - 5, - 5, -1, -1, - 133, - 78, - 55, -13, -13, + 45,25 + 5,

215 U: \219REPT\2REPT\2REPT Line 219 budget estimate Committee Change from recommendation budget estimate Program increase, Manufacturing innovation institutes Program increase, Advanced manufacturing Manufacturing Technology Program... Program increase Program increase, All solid-state ballerj development... Program increase, Digital innovative design for reliable casting performance. 49 Emerging Capabilities Technology Development Improving funds management Prior year carryover Program increase, Disruptive technology and operational concept for air and missile defense Program increase, High-altitude optical reconnaissance unit and sensors 5 Generic Logistics R&D Technology Demonstrations. Program increase, Liquid hydrocarbon fuels Program increase Strategic Environmental Research Program Readiness Increase Microelectronics Technology Development and Support Program increase, Trusted foundf'/... Program increase, Tunable filter, support for microelectronics development. 55 Advanced Electronics Technologies. Program increase, Support for the electronics resurgence rnitiative Network-Centric Warfare Technology.. Improving Funds Management Program delays Sensor Technology.... Improving Funds Management Program delays... Program increase, Sensors and processing systems technology. 59 Distributed Learning Advanced Technology Development.. Improving funds management Prior year carf'jover Quick Reaction Special Projects.... Improving funds management Prior year carf'jover Test & Evaluation Science & Technology... Program Increase, Additive manufacturing for hypersonic affordability.... Program Increase, Advanced technology development... Program increase, Hypersonics and directed energy test Program increase, Workforce development 65 Operational Energy Capability Improvement... Improving funds management Prior year carf'jover. Program increase Environmental Security Technical Certification Program... Program increase, Technology demonstration program. 72 Ballistic Missile Defense Terminal Defense Segment Program increase, USFK JEON. 73 Ballistic Missile Defense Midcourse Defense Segment Improving funds management Boosters with RKVs funded in Public Law Improving funds management NRE funded in Public Law Transfer funding for missile field components to Procurement, Defense-wide, line 27 for proper execution, Transferequested by Missile Defense Agency. Program increase, Cybersecurity Program increase, Discrimination capabilities 74 Chemical and Biological Defense Program-DemNal... Improving Funds Management Program delays.. 75 Ballistic Missile Defense Sensors... Program increase, Cybersecurity. Program increase, Discrimination capabilities Program increase, Systems engineering... 49,667 67,167 48,338 6,838 11,778 19,778 76,514 86, ,931 23, ,99 118, , ,69 19, ,61 13,564 11,564 69,626 59,626 96, ,389 4,582 4,582 4,16 42,16 214, , ,359 83, , ,496 22, , ,25 + 3, + 17,5 + 2,5 + 1, + 5, + 12,5-5, + 7,5 + 1, +8, + 7, +1, + 1, + 1, + 35, + 3, + 5, + 7,5 + 7,5-4,5-4,5-16,527-18,27 + 1,5-2, -2, -1, -1, + 36, + 5, + 16, + 1, + 5, -5, + 5, + 2, +2, + 184, ,1-123, -52, -65, -41, + 1, + 25, -16,39-16, ,3 + 5, + 93, + 16,3

216 U: \219REPT\2REPT\2REPT Line 219 budget estimate Committee Change from recommendation budget estimate Program increase: USFK JEON BMD Enabling Programs... Program increase: Cyber assessment.. Program increase: Cybersecurity. Program increase: Discrimination capabilities... Program increase: Facilities, sustainment, restoration and modernization... Program increase: Systems engineering AEGIS BMD Program increase: Discrimination capabilities. Program increase: Facilities, sustainment, restoration and modernization Ballistic Missile Defense Command and Control, Battle Management and Communication... Restoring acquisition accountability: Spiral scope audme Restoring acquisition accountability: BMDS Increment 8 early to need... Program increase: Cybersecurity..... Program increase: Mobile sensor integration 85 Sea Based X-Band Radar [SBX]... Improving funds management: Software upgrades funded in Public Law Ballistic Missile Defense Test Program increase: Cybersecurity... Program increase: Facilities, sustainment, restoration and modernization... Program increase: HALO... Program increase: USFK JEON Ballistic Missile Defense Targets... Improving funds management: Boosters with RKVs funded in Public Law Program increase: Cybersecurity.... Program increase: Special programs target... Program increase: USFK JEON Department of Defense Corrosion Program. Program increase Technology Maturation Initiatives... Transfer from line 39 for low power laser demonstrator prototypes post-pdr risk reduction through PDR only.. Program increase: Cybersecurity... Program increase: Laser scaling for boost phase intercept 93 Missile Defeat Project... Classified Adjustment 94 Counter Improvised-Threat Demonstration, Prototype Development, and Testing. JIDO unjustified base budget request Hypersonic Defense.... Program increase: Hypersonic Defense. 96 Advanced Innovative Technologies. Classified Adjustment Program increase: Machine learning and advanced manufacturing Program increase: Rail gun with hypervelocity projectile Program increase: Quartermaster Pathfinder 96A Joint Artificial Intelligence Center..... Program increase, Artificial intelligence. 97 Trusted & Assured Microelectronics. Program increase: Next generation microelectronics... Program increase: Joint federated assurance center Program increase: New trust approach development. 99 Department of Defense (DoD) Unmanned System Common Development. Program increase, Unmanned traffic management.. 54, , , , , ,852 3, ,822 58,67 12,993 12,444 1,431,72 233,142 3, , ,52 565, , , ,352 8, ,822 43,67 13,944 1,496,336 83, 595,642 7, , + 97,5 + 16,2 +4, +4, + 3,2 + 34,1 + 5, , + 1,981 +9,2-6,2-7,1 + 1, + 93,5-13, -13, + 153, , +29, +32, ,9 + 43,5-36, + 5, + 7, +4,5 + 5, + 5, + 168, + 78, + 5, +85, -15, -15, -12,993-12, ,5 + 1,5 + 64,634-24, , + 14, + 5, + 83, + 83, + 362, , + 1, + 5,5 + 4, + 4,

217 U: \219REPT\2REPT\2REPT [In thousands of dollars) line 219 budget estimate Committee Change from recommendation budget estimate 1 Pacific Discriminating Radar Restoring acquisition accountabilityc MD51 early to need 15 Improved Homeland Defense Interceptors... Improving funds management: Boosters with RKVs funded in Public Law lll Ballistic Missile Defense Midcourse Segment Test... Improving funds management Boosters with RKVs funded in Public Law Multi-Object Kill Vehicle... Restoring acquisition accountability: Program adjustment 117 Ballistic Missile Defense System Space Programs... Program increase: Cybersecurity... Program increase, Missile Defense Tracking System 119 Prompt Global Strike Capability Development... Program increase: Program acceleration... Program increase 12 Chemical and Biological Defense Program-EMO. Improving Funds Management: Program delays Joint Tactical Information Distribution System [JTIDS]... Program increase, Integrated kinetic and non-kinetic nodal analysis. 133 Trusted & Assured Microelectronics Program increase: Next generation microelectronics... Program increase, New trust approach development Central Test and Evaluation Investment Development (CTEIP)... Program increase: Advanced hypersonic wind tunnel experimentation. Program increase: Defense threat center of excellence Joint Mission Environment Test Capability [JMETC]. Program Increase, Cyberange capacity and development 145 Classified Program USD(P) Classified adjustment 15 General Support to USO (Intelligence). Program increase: Academic support Defense Technology Analysis Program increase: Defense lab transfer and transition manufacturing Development Test and Evaluation... Program increase: Improve software testing capabilities. 171 Defense Operations Security Initiative (DOSI)... Program increase: Defense operationsecurity initiative 177 Combined Advanced Applications... Improving funds management: Requirement previously funded Intelligence Capabilities and Innovation Investments. Program increase: Artificial intelligence-project Maven. 192 Industrial Base Analysis and Sustainment Support Program increase. Program Increase: Expand manufacturing capability for cold rolled aluminum... Program increase: National security technology accelerator Program Increase, Large scale classified electron beam welding.... Program increase: Risk reduction for tungsten defense products 195 Chemical and Biological Defense (Operational Systems Development)... Improving Funds Management Program delays Homeland Defense Technology Transfer Program... Improving funds management: Prior year carryover Aviation Systems Improving Funds Management: TFTA Training System Development early to need 95, ,22 81,934 8,256 16, , ,71 19,53 56, ,796 84,184 1,693 24,487 2,179 3,8 21,363 19,529 1,376 48,741 2, ,993 73, ,82 72,634 3, , , ,99 29,53 98, ,96 89,184 1, 5,693 27,487 25,179 1,8 16, ,529 63,876 42,385 1, ,618-22, ,4-139,4-9,3-9,3-5, -5, + 15,5 + 5, + 1, , , + 7,5-58,792-58, , + 1, +42,5 +4, + 2,5 + 19,3 + 1, +9,3 +5, +5, + 1, + 1, +4, +4, + 3, + 3, + 5, + 5, + 7, + 7, - 5, - 5, + 15, + 15, + 53,5 + 3,5 + 1, + 15, + 15, + 1, -6,356-6,356-1, -1, ,879

218 U:\219REPT\2REPT\2REPT Line 219 budget Committee Change from 23t1mate recommendation budget estimate Insufficient budget justification, EC-13J risk reduction. -1,252 Program increase, VTOL UAS research , 251 Warrior Systems ,942 55, ,7 Improving Funds Management Ordnance s DTE excess growth , Improving Funds Management CUAS Test and Evaluation excess growth ,8 Program Increase, Rotary wing aviation helmet ,5 Program increase, Small glide munition UAS integration. + 15, 253 Unmanned ISR ,27 33,27 + 6, Program increase, UAS anti-icing , 258 Teleport Program 2, ,6 Improving funds management Unjustified growth... -1,6 3 National Security Innovation Activities , + 75, Program increase, Capital investment-section 217 of Senate NOAA , 999 Classified Programs ,877,898 3,843,141-34,757 Classified adjustment ,757 Trusted Microelectronics.-In the fiscal year 219 budget submission, the Department requested $587,32, for trusted and assured microelectronics and DARPA's Electronics Resurgence Initiative. The Committee is pleased to see the Department prioritize programs that will ensure access to trusted microelectronics and develop manufacturing processes for next generation chips. However, the Committee notes that additional funds are needed in fiscal year 219 for the United States to maintain global microelectronics leadership and added $447,, above the President's budget request to accelerate multiple efforts. Therefore, the Committee directs the Under Secretary of Defense (Research and Engineering) to provide a report to the congressional defense committees not later than 18 days after enactment of this act which details a plan for using increased resources to accelerate the trusted microelectronics strategy and roadmap. The report shall also include a definition of the scope of the microelectronics problem; an update on domestic manufacturing capability and infrastructure needed to provide legacy and future chips for our weapons systems; and testing protocols that the Department is utilizing to ensure current microelectronics have achieved security assurance. Artificial Intelligence.-The Committee understands the importance of investing in high priority advanced technology areas such as artificial intelligence [AIJ and machine learning in order to maintain the United States' military superiority and technological edge over near-peer adversaries. Accordingly, the Committee adds $38,, in addition to amounts requested in the fiscal year 219 budget submission to achieve dominant AI capabilities, including an additional $15,, for the algorithmic warfare cross function team also known as Project Maven and $83,, to establish a Joint Artificial Intelligence Center. The Committee believes these critical investments will accelerate the pursuit of state of the art AI systems that can be rapidly adapted to the warfighting mission needs of the Department. Therefore, the Committee directs the Under Secretary of Defense (Research and Engineering) to brief the congressional defense committees with a com-

219 U: \219REPT\2REPT\2REPT.34 prehensive plan to execute additional funding provided for AI and machine learning not later than 18 days after enactment of this act and strongly encourages the Department to establish long-term, strategic partnerships with non-traditional defense contractors that operate outside of the traditional defense industrial base. Short-Wave Infrared Cameras.-The Committee is aware of recent advances in ultra-fast short-wave infrared camera technology that rapidly capture images and detect threats with extreme sensitivity and precision. New advances in machine vision, powered by rapidly growing artificial intelligence and neuromorphic technologies can absorb and process data at much higher rates. The Committee encourages the Secretary of Defense to increase its research investments into these areas with the goal of creating new threat identification systems. Manufacturing Technology Program.-The Committee understands that metal castings play a significant role in ensuring warfighter preparedness and that investment is needed in castings technology to maintain technological superiority in the advanced manufacturing industry. Therefore, the Committee provides an additional $5,, for the Manufacturing Technology Program and encourages the Secretary of Defense to invest in metal castings technology. All Solid-State Battery Technology.-The Committee recognizes that development of all solid-state battery technology could dramatically increase the energy density of current batteries while providing a safer power system by eliminating the need for a flammable electrolyte and reducing the complexity of the battery management system. Batteries with higher energy densities would improve a soldier's warfighting capability by reducing the weight of multiple batteries required for combat operations. The Committee encourages the Secretary of Defense to continue investments that improve battery densities thereby reducing the weight carried by soldiers in the field. Strategic and Critical Minerals.-The Committee understands that the United States is reliant on the importation of strategic and critical minerals that are essential to national defense and believes that the Department of Defense should be integrated into the comprehensive Federal strategy as directed by Executive Order Therefore, the Committee directs the Under Secretary of Defense (Research and Engineering) and the Director of the Defense Logistics Agency to produce a joint report to the congressional defense committees not later than 18 days after enactment of this act which details Department of Defense acquisition programs that require strategic and critical minerals, foreign sources of these minerals, and current supply levels of critical minerals in US stockpiles available for Department usage. In addition, the report should describe Department agencies that are capable of performing topographic, geologic, and geophysical mapping of the United States and a list of strategic and critical minerals that should be prioritized for mapping in order to enhance supply chain security. Manufacturing Engineering Programs.-The Committee recognizes that the United States must maintain a technically trained workforce to meet the defense industrial base requirements of the 219

220 U: \219REPT\2REPT\2REPT Department of Defense. Therefore, the Committee recommends an additional $5,, above the fiscal year 219 President's budget request for manufacturing engineering grants and encourages the Secretary of Defense to prioritize funding under this program to support community colleges and technical schools. National Defense Education Program.-The Committee understands that the Nation's global economic competitiveness and national security are dependent on a strong foundation in science, technology, engineering and math and believes that increased investment is needed by the Department in these fields. Therefore, the Committee provides an increase in basic research funds for the National Defense Education Program and encourages the Department to partner with the Goldwater Foundation for additional education scholarships.

221 U: \219REPT\2REPT\2REPT OPERATIONAL TEST AND EVALUATION, DEFENSE Appropriations, $21,9, Budget estimate, ,9, Committee recommendation ,9, The Committee recommends an appropriation of $381,9,. This is $16,, above the budget estimate. COMMITTEE RECOMMENDED The following table details the adjustments Committee: ADJUSTMENTS recommended by the Line 119 budget Committee Change from estimate recommendation budget estimate I Operational Test and Evaluation ,685 85,685 2 Live Fire Test and Evaluation... 64,332 64,332 3 Operational Test Activities and Analyses.... 7,992 23, , Program increase for T&E infrastructure , Program increase, Advanced satellite navigation receiver , Total, Operational Test and Evaluation, Defense 221,9 381,9 + 16, Cyber Red Team Testing.-The Committee recognizes the Department's efforts to enhance and develop cyber threat emulation capabilities through the use of cyber Red Teams. The Committee is concerned with the volume of cyber intrusions that threaten our weapons systems and remains concerned with the inability of the Department of Defense to get ahead of this constant evolving threat. Therefore, the Committee directs the Director, Office of Operational Test and Evaluation, in consultation with the Secretary of Defense, to provide a report to the congressional defense committees not later than 9 days of enactment of this act on the cyber vulnerabilities of the nation's critical weapons systems. The classified report should outline the identified threats along with the resources required to mitigate such threats. Further, in cases where vulnerabilities were determined for a weapons system, the Director shall provide an explanation of what actions haven been taken to date to address such deficiencies.

222 U: \219REPT\2REPT\2REPT.36 TITLE V REVOLVING AND MANAGEMENT FUNDS DEFENSE WORKING CAPITAL FUNDS Appropriations, $1,685,596, Budget estimate, ,542,115, Committee recommendation... 1,641,115, The Committee recommends an appropriation of $1,641,115,. This is $99,, above the budget estimate. COMMITTEE RECOMMENDED PROGRAM The following table summarizes the budget estimate for this appropriation, the Committee recommendation, and the Committee recommended adjustments to the budget estimate: 219 budget Committee Change from estimate recommendation budget estimate Arsenals Initiative... Program increase... Supply Management 59,2 99, ,2 99, , + 99, Total, Defense Working Capital Fund, Army.. 158, , , Supplies and Materials 69,54 69,54 Total, Defense Working Capital Fund, Air Force... 69,54 69,54 Defense Logistics Agency. 48,96 48,96 Total, Defense Working Capital Fund, Defense-wide.. 48,96 48,96 Commissary Operations. 1,266,2 1,266,2 Total, Defense Working Capital Fund, Defense-wide, DECA... 1,266,2 1,266,2 Grand Total, Defense Working Capital Funds 1,542,115 1,641, , Meals Ready-to-Eat.-The Committee recommends full funding for the Defense Logistics Agency's request of 2.5 million cases of Meals Ready to Eat and reaffirms its support for the War Reserve stock objective of 5. million cases and the minimum sustainment rate for the industrial base. Defense Commissary Agency.-The Department of Defense recently announced its intention to begin the sale of beer and wine in defense commissaries. The Committee supports this decision as a measure to increase customer convenience and satisfaction. However, the Committee notes that the sale of distilled spirits is not included in the new policy. Since military commissary stores are intended to be similar to commercial grocery stores and roughly half of States legally sell distilled spirits in grocery stores, the Committee believes that the Department should have explored this option to further improve customer convenience at all military commissaries. The Committee directs the Undersecretary of Defense (Personnel and Readiness) to review the policy for sale of alcohol (222)

223 U: \219REPT\2REPT\2REPT at military commissaries and submit a report to the House and Senate Appropriations Committees not later than 9 days after the enactment of this act on the decisions which led to the exclusion of distilled spirits and whether the Department will reconsider its decision to restrict the sale of distilled spirits in military commissaries.

224 U: \219REPT\2REPT\2REPT.38 TITLE VI OTHER DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE PROGRAMS DEFENSE HEALTH PROGRAM Appropriations, $34,428,167, Budget estimate, ,729,192, Committee recommendation... 34,135,992, The Committee recommends an appropriation of $34,135,992,. This is $46,8, above the budget estimate. COMMITTEE RECOMMENDED PROGRAM The following table summarizes the budget estimate for this appropriation, the Committee recommendation, and the Committee recommended adjustments to the budget estimate: Line DEFENSE HEALTH PROGRAM 219 budget Committee Change from estimate recommendation budget estimate OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE 1 IN-HOUSE CARE... 2 PRIVATE SECTOR CARE CONSOLIDATED HEALTH SUPPORT... 4 INFORMATION MANAGEMENT MANAGEMENT ACTIVITIES... 6 EDUCATION AND TRAINING BASE OPERATIONS/COMMUNICATIONS. SUBTOTAL, OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE.. PROCUREMENT 15 INITIAL OUTFITIING REPLACEMENT AND MODERNIZATION. 18 DOD HEALTH MANAGEMENT SYSTEMODERNIZATION. SUBTOTAL, PROCUREMENT.. RESEARCH DEVELOPMENT TEST AND EVALUATION 8 RESEARCH EXPLORATORY DEVELOPMENT ADVANCED DEVELOPMENT DEMONSTRATIONNALIDATION ENGINEERING DEVELOPMENT MANAGEMENT AND SUPPORT CAPABILITIES ENHANCEMENT UNDISTRIBUTED MEDICAL RESEARCH SUBTOTAL, RESEARCH DEVELOPMENT TEST AND EVAL- UATION.... TOTAL, DEFENSE HEALTH PROGRAM ,569 9,499, ,4 15,13,735 14,875, , 2,17, ,961-53, 2,39,878 2,29,878-1, 37,629 37, , ,278-19,5 2,9,845 2,84,345-6,5 32,145,395 31,588, ,4 33,56 33,56 343, , ,68 496,68 873,16 873,16 11,386 ll,386 75,1 75,1 275, , , , , , ,755 15,714 15, ,2 +963,2 71,637 1,673, ,2 33,729,192 34,135, ,8 COMMITTEE RECOMMENDED ADJUSTMENTS The following table details the adjustments recommended by the Committee: (224)

225 U: \219REPT\2REPT\2REPT Operation and Maintenance _ 32,145,395 In-House Care 9,738,569 Improving funds management: Travel excess growth _ Improving funds management: Printing and reproduction excess growth Improving funds management: Pharmaceutical drugs excess growth _ Improving funds management: Medical care contracts excess growth _ Private Sector Care _ 15,13,735 Improving funds management: Pharmaceutical drugs excess growth Improving funds management: Historical underexecution Consolidated Health Support ,17,961 Improving funds management: Medical care contracts excess growth _ Information Management/IT ,39,878 Program increase: Med-tOI infrastructure Improving funds management: GENESIS deployment delay Improving funds management: TMIP-J funds excess to need Improving funds management: JOMIS funds excess to nnd Management Activities _ 37,629 Education and Training 756,778 Program increase, Specialized medical pilot program Improving funds management: Historical underexecution Base Operations and Communications ,9,845 Improving funds management: Visual information systems underexecution Improving funds management: Defense Health Headquarters protection excess growth _ Procurement ,16 Research and Development ,637 Restore core funding reduction _ Peer-reviewed ALS research _ Peer-reviewed breast canceresearch _ Peer-reviewed canceresearch _ Peer-reviewed epilepsy research _ Peer-reviewed medical research Peer-reviewed melanoma research Peer-reviewed ovarian canceresearch Peer-reviewed prostate canceresearch Peer-reviewed traumatic brain injury and psychological health research Chronic pain management _ Joint warfighter medical research Orthotics and prosthetics outcomes research Total 219 budget estimate 33,729,192 Committee Change from recommendation budget estimate 31,588,995 9,499,169 14,875,735 2,54,961 2,29,878 37, ,278 2,84, ,16 1,673,837 34,135, ,4-239,4-5,3-4,1-14, -9, -228, -93, -135, - 53, - 53, -1, + 7, -55, -2, -5, -19,5 +2,5-22, -6,5-3, -3, ,2 + 21,7 + 1, + 12, + 8, + 7,5 +33, + 1, + 1, +64, + 6, + 1, + 5, + 1, +46,8 Defense Health Program Reprogramming Procedures.-The Committee remains concerned regarding the transfer of funds from the In-House Care budget sub-activity to pay for contractor-provided medical care. To limit such transfers and improve oversight within the Defense Health Program operation and maintenance account, the Committee includes a provision which caps the funds available for Private Sector Care under the TRICARE program subject to prior approval reprogramming procedures. The provision and accompanying report language should not be interpreted by the De- June 25, 218 (2:28 p_m_)

226 U: \219REPT\2REPT\2REPT.38 partment as limiting the amount of funds that may be transferred to the Direct Care System from other budget activities within the Defense Health Program. In addition, funding for the In-House Care and Private Sector Care budget sub-activities are designated as congressional special interest items. Any transfer of funds in excess of $15,, into or out of these sub-activities requires the Secretary of Defense to follow prior approval reprogramming procedures. The Committee directs the Secretary of Defense to provide written notification to the congressional defense committees of cumulative transfers in excess of $1,, out of the Private Sector Care budget sub-activity not later than fifteen days after such a transfer. The Committee further directs the Assistant Secretary of Defense (Health Affairs) to provide quarterly reports to the congressional defense committees on budget execution data for all of the Defense Health Program budget activities and to adequately reflect changes to the budget activities requested by the Services in future budget submissions. Carryover.-For fiscal year 219, the Committee recommends 1 percent carryover authority for the operation and maintenance account of the Defense Health Program. The Committee directs the Assistant Secretary of Defense (Health Affairs) to submit a detailed spend plan for any fiscal year 218 designated carryover funds to the congressional defense committees not less than 3 days prior to executing the carryover funds. Resolution of Payments to State Vaccine Programs.-The Department of Defense Appropriations Act, 218 (Public Law ) directed the Assistant Secretary of Defense (Health Affairs) to prioritize the payment of arrears to state vaccine programs in expenditure of fiscal year 218 carryover funds. The Committee directs the Assistant Secretary of Defense (Health Affairs) to provide a report to the congressional defense committees not later than 45 days after enactment of this act on how the Department plans to make final payment of arrears to state vaccine programs. Operation and Maintenance Reductions.-The fiscal year 219 President's budget request includes Department-initiated reductions in most Operation and Maintenance sub-activities to account for the Government Accountability Office's analysis of prior year execution. The Committee commends the Department for taking this step and expects future budget requests to align with recent execution trends. The Committee notes that the budget justification materials for the Defense Health Program do not delineate operation and maintenance funding between the Defense Health Agency, Army, Navy, Air Force, Uniformed Services University of Health Sciences, and National Capital Region Medical Directorate. Given this lack of granular visibility, the Department is expected to implement operation and maintenance reductions among the various components in accordance with their historical underexecution. Electronic Health Record.-The Committee remains supportive of the goal of the Departments of Defense and Veterans Affairs to develop fully interoperable electronic health records that can exchange data in a meaningful way and be used in a dynamic environment to improve patient care and facilitate smoother transitions 226

227 U:\219REPT\2REPT\2REPT.38 for servicemembers from military service to veteran status. After achieving initial operating capability in November 217 with completion of deployment to four sites in the Pacific Northwest, the Department decided to undertake an eight week Stabilization and Adoption period in order to evaluate the initial deployments. This evaluation included an analysis of roles, workflows, and training activities and further collection of user feedback irr order to implement changes prior to continuing the wave deployment schedule to more military treatment facilities, with a decision on further deployments scheduled for January 219. Given this delay in the deployment of the Military Health System [MHS] GENESIS program, the Committee recommends a reduction of $8,, to the fiscal year 219 President's budget request and a rescission of $215,, of fiscal year 218 procurement funds in order to properly realign resources to a revised deployment plan. The Committee also recommends $7,, above the budget request for the Medical Community of Interest [Med COI], the IT infrastructure backbone of the new electronic health record, as the Department has acknowledged that Med-COI deployment should precede MHS GENESIS deployment by 6 months at each site. The Committee expects that execution information for these additional funds will be clearly laid out in the fiscal year 22 budget justification materials. The Committee understands that the next 6 months will be an important time for MHS GEN ESIS with upcoming program decisions on a plan for expanding Med-COI in July 218, an updated Life Cycle Cost Estimate in Fall 218, and a decision on further wave deployments in January 219. The Committee anticipates timely updates as these program decisions are made. The Program Executive Officer, Defense Healthcare Management Systems [PEO DHMS], in conjunction with the Director of the Interagency Program Office [IPO], is directed to provide quarterly reports to the congressional defense committees on the cost and schedule of the program, to include milestones, knowledge points, and acquisition timelines, as well as quarterly obligation reports. These reports should also include the following: (1) any changes to the deployment timeline, including benchmarks, for full operating capability; (2) any refinements to the cost estimate for full operating capability and the total life cycle cost of the project; and (3) the progress toward developing, implementing, and fielding the interoperable electronic health record throughout the two Departments' medical facilities. The Committee further directs the PEO DHMS to continue briefing the House and Senate Defense Appropriations Subcommittees on a quarterly basis, coinciding with the report submission. Finally, the Committee directs the IPO to continue to provide quarterly reports to the House and Senate Subcommittees on Appropriations for Defense and Military Construction, Veterans Affairs, and Related Agencies on the progress of interoperability between the two Departments. Traumatic Brain Injury [TBIJ I Psychological Health.-The Committee recommends $6,, above the fiscal year 219 President's budget request for continued research into treatment, prevention, and detection of TBI and improved psychological health. 227

228 U: \219REPT\2REPT\2REPT.38 The Committee directs the Assistant Secretary of Defense (Health Affairs) to submit a report to the congressional defense committees not later than 18 days of enactment oi this act on expenditure and obligation data of additional funding added by Congress for psychological health and TBI. This report should include information on agreements made with other government agencies. Additionally, the Committee is aware of recent medical advances in drug development for neurodegenerative diseases and encourages the Department to further its research into developing drugs that reverse, halt, or slow the neurodegenerative process associated with TBI including opportunities through public-private partnerships, such as the Medical Technology Consortium. The Committee is also aware of efforts to establish a brain donor network to better understand mild traumatic brain injury and identify biomarkers for diagnosis and monitoring. The Committee supports expansion of this network and inclusion of states with high populations of veterans and suicide incidence into this research. Finally, the Committee is encouraged by the advancement of expeditionary, noninvasive medical devices for analyzing the full spectrum of TBI that have received clearance by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration. These devices provide clinicians with a comprehensive and objective clinical picture to help them identify the full spectrum of brain injuries shortly after injury, and the Committee encourages continued test and evaluation of such devices. Peer-Reviewed Medical Research Program.-The Committee recommends $33,, for the Peer-Reviewed Medical Research Program. The Committee directs the Secretary of Defense, in conjunction with the Service Surgeons General, to select medical research projects of clear scientific merit and direct relevance to military health. Research areas considered under this funding are restricted to: acute lung injury, antimicrobial resistance, arthritis, autism, burn pit exposure, cardiomyopathy, chronic migraine and post-traumatic headache, congenital heart disease, constrictive bronchiolitis, diabetes, dystonia, eating disorders, emerging infectious diseases, epidermolysis bullosa, focal segmental glomerulosclerosis, frontotemporal degeneration, Guillain-Barre Syndrome, gulf war illness, hearing regeneration and restoration, hemorrhage control, hepatitis B, hereditary angioedema, hydrocephalus, immunomonitoring of intestinal transplants, inflammatory bowel diseases, interstitial cystitis, lung injury, lupus, metals toxicology, mitochondrial disease, multiple sclerosis, musculoskeletal conditions, myotonic dystrophy, nanomaterials for bone regeneration, neurofibromatosis, nutrition optimization, orthopedics, pancreatitis, Parkinson's, pathogen-inactivated blood products, polycystic kidney disease, post-traumatic osteoarthritis, pressure ulcers, pulmonary fibrosis, reconstructive transplantation, resilience training, respiratory health, Rett syndrome, rheumatoid arthritis, scleroderma, sleep disorders, spinal muscular atrophy, tinnitus, tissue regeneration, tuberculosis, tuberous sclerosis complex, vascular malformations, vision, and women's heart disease. The Committee emphasizes that the additional funding provided under the Peer- Reviewed Medical Research Program shall be devoted only to the purposes listed above. 228

229 U:\219REPT\2REPT\2REPT Joint Warfighter Medical Research Program.-The Committee recommends $5,, for the Joint Warfighter Medical Research Program. Funds shall be used to augment and accelerate high priority Department of Defense and Service medical requirements and to continue both core and congressionally-directed prior year initiatives that are close to achieving their objectives and yielding a benefit to military medicine. These funds shall not be used for new projects or basic research, and they shall be awarded at the discretion of the Secretary of Defense following a review of medical research and development gaps, as well as unfinanced medical requirements of the Services. Further, the Committee directs the Assistant Secretary of Defense (Health Affairs) to provide a report not later than 18 days after the enactment of this act to the congressional defense committees, which lists the projects that receive funding. The report should include the funding amount awarded to each project, a thorough description of each project's research, and the benefit the research will provide to the Department of Defense. Peer-Reviewed Cancer Research Programs.-The Committee recommends $12,, for the peer-reviewed breast cancer research program, $64,, for the peer-reviewed prostate cancer research program, $1,, for the peer-reviewed ovarian cancer research program, $1,, for a peer-reviewed melanoma research program, and $8,, for the peer-reviewed cancer research program that would research cancers not addressed in the aforementioned programs currently executed by the Department of Defense. The funds provided in the peer-reviewed cancer research program are directed to be used to conduct research in the following areas: bladder cancer, blood cancers, brain cancer, colorectal cancer, immunotherapy, kidney cancer, liver cancer, mesothelioma, neuroblastoma, pancreatic cancer, pediatric brain tumors, rare cancers, and stomach cancer. The funds provided under the peer-reviewed cancer research program shall be used only for the purposes listed above. The Committee directs the Assistant Secretary of Defense (Health Affairs) to provide a report not later than 18 days after the enactment of this act to the congressional defense committees on the status of the peer-reviewed cancer research program. For each research area, the report should include the funding amount awarded, the progress of the research, and the relevance of the research to servicemembers. Orthotics and Prosthetics Outcomes Research.-The Committee recommends $1,, in support of orthotics and prosthetics outcomes research. The focus of this research should be on outcomes-based best practices through analysis of the merits of clinical options currently available, not on the development or improvement of new and existing technology. The Committee directs the Assistant Secretary of Defense (Health Affairs) to provide a report not later than 18 days after the enactment of this act to the congressional defense committees on the peer-reviewed projects that receive funding. The report should include the funding amount awarded to each project and the anticipated effect on patient care.

230 U: \219REPT\2REPT\2REPT Advanced Orthopedic Surgical Training.-The Committee understands that servicemembers and their families regularly undergo orthopedic procedures a:.:1d that these types of musculoskeletal injuries account for a significant amount of medical separations or retirements from military service. Delivery of direct training based on best practices related to orthopedic procedures for injuries to the knee, shoulder, and other extremities has become an increasingly important readiness issue. The Committee strongly encourages the Assistant Secretary of Defense (Health Affairs) to provide military orthopedic health professionals advanced surgical training in arthroscopic techniques and do so in partnership with medical professional societies that maintain best practices related to arthroscopic surgery and techniques. Mental Health Professionals.-The Committee recognizes that servicemembers and their families face unique stresses beyond those of everyday life. After over 15 years of war, the need for mental health professionals in the Department is at an all-time high, and the Committee believes that every beneficiary of the Military Health System should have timely access to mental health services. However, the Committee is concerned with the Department's inability to recruit and retain enough psychiatrists, psychologists, social workers, nurse practitioners, and registered nurses to provide adequate mental healthcare. The Government Accountability Office review of this issue found that progress is being made regarding the annual reporting of mental health professional staffing needs. However, GAO also noted that the Services need to accurately report any additional measures used to supplement the Psychological Health Risk-Adjusted Model for Staffing [PHRAMS] as well as report their PHRAMS-generated estimates in the requirements fields of the Defense Health Agency's quarterly mental health staffing reports. The Committee encourages the Assistant Secretary of Defense (Health Affairs), the Director of the Defense Health Agency, and the Service Surgeons General to continue to work together to ensure annual estimates of mental health professionals meet the needs of all beneficiaries in the military health system. In addition, the Assistant Secretary of Defense (Health Affairs) is directed to prepare as part of DHA's fiscal year 22 budget submission a review of these estimates as well as an outline of current challenges in recruiting and retaining mental health professionals by the Department of Defense. Chronic Pain Management Research.-The Committee recommends $1,, for a chronic pain management research program to research opioid-alternative or non-addictive methods to treat and manage chronic pain. Chronic pain is defined as a pain that occurs on at least half the days for 6 months or more, and which can be caused by issues including, but not limited to: combat- and training-related physical or mental stress and trauma, migraines and chronic headaches, traumatic brain injury, arthritis, muscular-skeletal conditions, neurological disease, tick and vectorborne disease, other insect-transmitted or tropical disease, and cancer. The funds provided in the chronic pain management research program shall be used to conduct research on the effects of using prescription opioids to manage chronic pain and for researching al-

231 U: \219REPT\2REPT\2REPT.38 ternatives, namely non-opioid or non-addictive methods to treat and manage chronic pain, with a focus on issues related to military populations. The Committee encourages the Department to collaborate with non-military research institutions, such as the institutions of the National Institutes of Health Pain Consortium, and the institutions represented in the Interagency Pain Research Coordinating Committee, to address the efforts outlined in the 216 National Pain Strategy. Warfighter Respiratory Health.-The Committee remains concerned about respiratory ailments among deployed and returning servicemembers and their deleterious effects on combat and personnel readiness. It is estimated that respiratory diseases affect more than 1, servicemembers each year and result in almost 27, lost workdays per year. The Committee has included respiratory health as part of the Peer-Reviewed Medical Research Program and believes that further development of a comprehensive, broad-based warfighter respiratory research program is necessary to support overall readiness. The Assistant Secretary of Defense (Health Affairs) is directed to provide a report to the congressional defense committees not later than 12 days after the enactment of this act detailing the scope and impact of respiratory illness on military personnel-particularly on deployed troops-dating from the first Gulf War to the present. Epilepsy Research.-The Committee is concerned about the large number of service men and women returning from combat zones who have sustained traumatic brain injuries [TBI] and the long term consequences of TBI. These wounded warriors are at high risk for developing post-traumatic epilepsy, depression, cognitive difficulties, and post-traumatic stress disorder, which may be interconnected. As current TBI longitudinal studies have not included epilepsy, the Committee encourages the Department to place greater priority and invest more funding in longitudinal epidemiological research, including epilepsy surveillance, to better understand the magnitude of the problem and improve patient care and outcomes. To assist in these efforts, the Committee recommends $7,5, in support of epilepsy research. Additionally, the Committee urges the Department to expand research into the mechanisms by which brain injury produces epilepsy and research directed at the prevention of epilepsy and concomitant comorbidities in those known to be at high risk. Melanoma Research.-The Committee understands that melanoma diagnoses are increasing among active duty servicemembers and that melanoma is the fifth most common cancer among veterans. Recent research suggests that exposure to high levels of solar radiation in young adulthood is associated with a higher risk of melanoma mortality. Given the extreme and harsh conditions servicemembers face in theater and the rise of this aggressive and frequently deadly form of cancer, the Committee encourages the Department to continue its investments in melanoma research and recommends $1,, for a peer-reviewed melanoma research program. Sleep Disorder Research.-The Committee recognizes that sleep disorders are increasingly prevalent among servicemembers and that such disruptions have been associated with diverse mental 231

232 U: \219REPT\2REPT\2REPT and physical disorders, including traumatic brain injury and posttraumatic stress. The Committee applauds the Army for acknowledging the importance of sleep in achieving optimal physical, mental, and emotional health and including sleep as a focus in the Performance Triad. In support of this effort, the Committee urges the Department to support basic, translational, and clinical research on how the disruption of normal sleep and circadian biological rhythms adversely affects the health, safety, performance, and productivity of military and civilian populations. National Trauma Research Action Plan.-The Committee notes that the U.S. military continues to be a leader in trauma research with its core investments in combat casualty care. A 216 report by the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine estimated that 25 percent of battlefield deaths and 2 percent of civilian deaths after injury could have been prevented by appropriate and timely medical care. This same report recommended creation of a National Trauma Research Action Plan [NTRAP] in order to coordinate research between the military and civilian sectors and work towards achieving zero preventable trauma deaths. NTRAP may provide the framework for a coordinated research program that would be able to unify and focus research efforts across Federal agencies and identify critical gaps in trauma research. The Committee recommends $21,7, for core Defense Health Program research and encourages the Department to continue its investments in trauma care and creation of NTRAP. Inclusion of Women and Minorities in the Congressionally-Directed Medical Research Program.-The Committee recognizes that the Congressionally-Directed Medical Research Program supports essential research to respond to the healthcare needs of servicemembers, their dependents, and retirees. In a series of laws, including the 21st Century Cures Act, Congress directed the National Institutes of Health to update relevant policies and implement accountability mechanisms to ensure that research supported by the agency included and conducted the appropriate analysis to identify the differential impact of research interventions on populations that are often underrepresented in clinical research, including women, and racial and ethnic minorities. To continue improving the inclusion of women and minorities in federally funded research, the Committee directs the Department of Defense to develop a plan to ensure the appropriate representation of women and minorities in its extramural research. Specifically, this plan shall include mechanisms to measure, enforce, assess the adequacy of, and improve the: (1) representation of women and minorities in each clinical trial, as well as the data on the specific challenges researchers face in seeking to include women and minorities in their studies; (2) examination of biological variables, including the appropriate analysis of differential outcomes by sex, in clinical research; (3) practice of making clinical findings, subgroup analyses, and data publicly available, as appropriate and applicable; and ( 4) requirements (including, but not limited to, programmatic controls) and updated guidelines to ensure the appropriate representation of women in clinical research. Outcomes should also be analyzed for potential sex differences. This plan should be developed in coordination with the National Institutes of

233 U: \219REPT\2REPT\2REPT Health and submitted to the congressional defense committees not later than 18 days after the enactment of this act. Behavioral and Mental Health Care for National Guard and Reserve.-The Committee recognizes that the men and women of the National Guard and Reserve components need greater access to care if they are to maintain a high state of medical readiness to support regularly occurring deployments. It also recognizes that the suicide rate in the reserve components is consistently higher than the suicide rate for both the active duty military and the civilian population. Therefore, the Committee encourages the Department to better ensure that periodic health assessments are followed by medical treatment to address any behavioral or mental health conditions that could impact a servicemember's ability to deploy, even if such care falls outside of the pre-deployment window. This practice would allow for a more medically ready, deployable force and would expand access to behavioral and mental healthcare for reserve component servicemembers. Cell-Based Flu Vaccine Research.-Given the negative impacts on servicemember health and military readiness posed by regular seasonal influenza, the Committee is concerned by a potential pandemic and the Department's capacity and preparedness to address it. The Committee notes that the current flu vaccine may only be 6 percent effective, with some estimates placing this year's vaccine at 1 percent effective, and believes that the current, antiquated egg-based vaccine production process may contribute to that inefficacy. Therefore, the Committee encourages the Department to emphasize cell-based influenza vaccine research as part of its infectious diseases research. Armed Forces Institute of Regenerative Medicine.-The Armed Forces Institute of Regenerative Medicine [AFIRM] is a multi-institutional, interdisciplinary network of universities, military laboratories and investigators that is designed to promote a seamless integration of development, from basic science research through translational and clinical research, as the best means of bringing regenerative medicine therapies to practice. It is dedicated to repairing battlefield injuries through the use of regenerative medicine technology and has supported several clinical trials and treated hundreds of patients with novel therapeutic strategies in wound repair and tissue replacement. The Committee understands that fiscal year 219 is the final year of funding for AFIRM II and strongly encourages the Department to build upon the successes of both AFIRM I and II by renewing the program for another five year period of performance beginning in the fiscal year 22 budget request.