Approaches to Technology Insertion in ONR s Office of Transition

Transcription

1 Approaches to Technology Insertion in ONR s Office of Transition John Carney Director, Navy ManTech ONR 03T MT 30 January 2008 public release; distribution is unlimited. 1

2 ONR s Mission... To foster, plan, facilitate, and transition scientific research in recognition of its paramount importance to enable future naval power and the preservation of national security. The Office of Naval Research s job is to enable the innovative operational concepts of the Navy and Marine Corps so that Sailors and Marines can fight today s and tomorrow s wars more effectively. public release; distribution is unlimited. 2

3 Office of Naval Research Organization Tech Dir / Chf Sci (TD/CS) Chief of Naval Research (00) (00) Chief of Naval Research Vice Chief of Naval Research (USMC) (09) Vice Chief of Naval Research (USMC)(09) AVCNR (09B) ACNR (00B) NRAC (00NR) N091 Principal Deputy for P&R Command Staff CO DOR NRL Director of Research(03R) Director of Innovation(03I) 30- Exped Warfare & Combating Terrorism 31- C4ISR 32- Ocean Battlespace Sensing 33- Sea Warfare & Weapons Director of Transition(03T) Business Operations & Services (BIZOPS) Directorate (00BD) PM Dep PM ONR SP (PMR-51) CO Chf Sci ONR Global (ONRG) 34- Warfighter Performance 35- Air Warfare & Weapons public release; distribution is unlimited. 3

4 Office of Naval Research 03T Organization Director of Transition Deputy Director of Transition FNCs JCTDs Transition Initiatives ManTech SBIR Coordination of Coordination of response Execution of Mgmt control of Coordination of FNC Process and to OSD and DON Manufacturing DON SBIR and DON JCTD Process Execution Monitoring Execution Oversight DAC/TTI/RTT/QRF/ Technology and JCTD TIPS, etc. of ONR Execution Monitoring SBIR / STTR Programs in Today s Brief public release; distribution is unlimited. 4

5 03T Program Overviews public release; distribution is unlimited.

6 FNC Program Overview The FNC Program: Composed of Enabling Capabilities (ECs) which develop and deliver quantifiable products (i.e., prototype systems, knowledge products, and technology improvements) In response to validated requirements For insertion into acquisition programs after meeting agreed upon exit criteria within five years. ECs Currently aligned with four of the pillars of Naval Power 21 (Sea Shield, Sea Strike, Sea Base, and FORCEnet) Additional group for crosscutting technology improvements (Enterprise and Platform Enablers) for operations and maintenance cost savings. Aligns requirements, acquisition, Fleet, and S&T Communities to increase impact of S&T investment public release; distribution is unlimited. 6

7 2 CVBG SAG Vignette 2 CONOP S Ph ase II 1 AF SAG FNC Overview (cont) Investment t Strategy t Process AF Mine Danger Area OPNAV Identifies Requirements/Gaps Roundtables for stakeholder input ONR Develops Proposed ECs ONR Conducts Technical Review of ECs IPT Reviews/Prioritize ECs ONR Endorsed ECs Delivered to TOG WG TOG Working Group Reviews/Recommends ECs to TOG Prioritized List of ECs Approved by TOG Investment Strategy FY Approved Gaps 37 ECs in execution FY Approved Gaps 40 ECs in execution FY Approved Gaps 48 ECs in execution FY Approved Gaps 51 ECs in execution (6 New, 3 Completed) 116 Products in execution 25 Products Transitioned TOG Oversight - $429.2M (6 New, 10 Completing) 114 Products in execution 49 Products to transition TOG Oversight - $382.5M (17 New, 11 Completing) 112 Products in execution 24 Products to transition TOG Oversight - $444.9M (14 New, 5 Completing) 118 Products in execution 14 Products to transition TOG Oversight - $435.3M N1/N00T Oversight - $48.0M N1/N00T Oversight - $49.3M N1/N00T Oversight - $50.8M N1/N00T Oversight - $51.3M public release; distribution is unlimited. 7

8 FNC Overview (cont) Keys to Transition S&T passes mature technology to acquisition into development and production programs Agreement must exist on the maturity and readiness at the stage this happens (Technology Transition Agreement or TTA) Key components agreed upon in a TTA: -- Description of Product -- Demonstration of TRL -- Completion/Transition Year -- Exit Criteria -- Level of Risk (Technology Readiness Level) Annual Transition Assessment Transition is the responsibility of all stakeholders public release; distribution is unlimited. 8

9 ManTech Program Overview Mission: 60 $59.1 Develop enabling manufacturing technology -- new processes and equipment -- for implementation on DoD weapon system production lines DoD states investments should: Transition emerging S&T results to acquisition programs Improve industrial capabilities in production, maintenance, repair and industrial base responsiveness Advance manufacturing technology to reduce cost, improve performance, and responsiveness 10 Budget: Stable at approx. $60M Execution: Nine Centers of Excellence (COEs) 8 Contracted, 1 Government M $ 60 $ $55.5 $55.4 $53.6 $59.4 $58.4 $56.4 President's Budget Appropriation FY05 FY06 FY07 FY08 public release; distribution is unlimited. 9

10 ManTech Overview (cont) Execution Navy ManTech is executed through nine Centers of Excellence (COEs): Execute projects; manage project teams Serve as corporate expertise in technological areas Collaborate with acquisition iti program offices / industry to identify and resolve mfg issues Develop and demo mfg technology solutions for identified Navy requirements Provide consulting services to Naval industrial activities and industry Facilitate transfer of developed technologies Institute for Manufacturing and Navy Metalworking Center Johnstown, PA Sustainment Technologies (IMAST) State College, PA Electro-Optics Center (EOC) Kittanning, PA Electronics Manufacturing Productivity Facility (EMPF) Philadelphia, PA Navy Joining Center (NJC) Columbus, OH Best Manufacturing Practices Center of Excellence (BMP) College Park, MD Composites Manufacturing Technology Center (CMTC) Energetics Manufacturing Technology Center (EMTC) Indian Head, MD Center for Naval Shipbuilding Technology (CNST) Charleston, SC Anderson, SC public release; distribution is unlimited. 10

11 ManTech Overview (cont) FY08 Investment Strategy Focused Initiatives Concentrate resources on few high priority naval platforms for maximum benefit Working with Program Offices and industry to select and execute projects to reduce acquisition cost Acquisition Program Office prioritizes projects for platform portfolio Platform IPTs oversee platform portfolios (ONR, COEs, Program Office, industry) Primary Emphasis - Affordability PEO (Ships) DDG 1000 PEO (Carriers) CVN 21 PEO (Ships) LCS PEO (Subs) SSN PEO (Ships) LPD 17 DDG 51 PEO (T) F-18 Family EA-18G PEO (IWS) Missiles Weapons Munitions PEO (W) N-UCAS Primary emphasis shipbuilding affordability Small program on Repair and Sustainment (REPTECH) public release; distribution is unlimited. 11

12 ManTech Overview (cont) Keys to Transition Focused initiative approach (key programs for four acquisition programs DDG 1000, CVN 21, LCS, and VIRGINIA Class Sub) ensures strong relationship with customer Program Office involved in prioritizing projects for funding within their portfolio Quarterly to semi-annual reviews with Program Office, executing COEs, etc. to review progress and ensure project still heading towards transition Industry (implementing site) involved from cradle to grave fully engaged Probability of transition criteria for funding Technology Transition Plans (TTPs) required for each project Draft (unsigned) due with proposal Signed TTP due within 90 days of project initiationiti Signed by ManTech Program Office, COE (executing center or centers), Program Office, Industrial Facility Management (implementing site), and Technical Warrant Holder, if appropriate Continual re-evaluation of transition probability for continued funding public release; distribution is unlimited. 12

13 SBIR / STTR Overview Small Business Innovation Research (SBIR) 2.5% assessment of extramural RDT&E lines Set-aside program for small business concerns to engage in federal R&D Phase 1 2/3 of effort by small business Phase 2 ½ effort by small business PI s primary employment must be with small business concern 2006 DOD SBIR budget $1.2B Small Business Technology Transfer (STTR) (companion program) 0.3% assessment of extramural RDT&E lines Set-aside program to facilitate cooperative R&D between small business concerns and U.S. research institutions 40% of effort by small business and 30% of effort by research institution PI can be from research institution or small business concern 2006 DOD STTR budget $130M public release; distribution is unlimited. 13

14 SBIR / STTR Overview (cont) Keys to Transition SBIR Program Topic Improvement Topics authored at PEO level within commands, resonate with Program of Record (PoR) technology roadmaps PEO and Prime Contractor Involvement PEOs fully engaged in SBIR process and given admin resources to support SBIR engagement Gated Process for SBIR Awards Smaller base awards a and larger options, o with decision gates, to ensure e likelihood of transition Technology Transition Agreements (TTAs) Fully descriptive of transition stream activities, costs and results; links transition players in a continuous project information network Expedited SBIR Project Contracting Redress of contracting obstacles and inefficiencies reduces time without money for SBIR awardees Standardized di d approach to Navy SBIR contracting ti improves / equalizes performance of contracting shops public release; distribution is unlimited. 14

15 SBIR / STTR Overview (cont) Transition Assistance Program The Transition Assistance Program (TAP) is: A unique Navy SBIR program offered exclusively to our SBIR and STTR Phase II award recipients An intensive i 10-month program that t provides each small business with a free business consultant focused on helping the SBIR company transition their technology. Designed to help recipients conduct strategic planning and enhance their preparation for transition to Phase III Training includes development of business plans, protection of intellectual property, license agreements, partnering, venture capital, etc TAP ends with companies briefing PEO s, Industry and VC communities at the Navy Opportunity Forum. TAP increases the commercialization success of the Navy SBIR and STTR programs public release; distribution is unlimited. 15

16 Office of Transition Best Practices public release; distribution is unlimited.

17 Office of Transition Common Transition Themes 03T Programs are not uniform Different means of funding, different objectives, different customers (acquisition program offices, depots, shipyards, industry, etc.), different transition paths / processes However,... All focused on transitioning technology to the acquisition, maintenance or fleet customers All making concerted efforts at improving transition rates Key Components for Transition Define transition what, when, where Use probability of transition as criteria for funding Ensure customer (Program Office, depot / shipyard) on board and fully engaged Ensure industry on board and actively involved in the project Employ Technology Transition Agreements (TTAs) Define path to transition Ensure relevant parties sign Gated funding approach (transition potential reevaluated at periodic intervals) public release; distribution is unlimited. 17

18 03T Office of Transition Best Practices - TTAs Key Contents for TTAs Navy need for technology developed by the project Criteria / goals that the technology must meet for implementation What program will complete with program funds Specific event that will signify program transition Where and when the results of the project will be used Add l resources / actions required for implementation (past project completion) and responsible organization Schedule Signed by program providing funding, executing agent (if applicable), Industrial Facility Management, Program Office, and, if appropriate, Technical Warrant Holder public release; distribution is unlimited. 18

19 Recent Transitions Of Interest 1. Internally Applied Corrosion Preventative Compound (CPC) - FNC 2. Single Ship Tank Coatings - FNC 3. Automated Rotorblade Paint Stripping System (ARBSS)- ManTech 4. Propulsion Shaft Composite Surface Treatment - ManTech public release; distribution is unlimited.

20 Internally Applied Corrosion Preventative Compound (CPC) (EPE FY04-02) 1 Product Description: New high performance, environmentally compliant, long lasting CPC for internal airframe applications TRL at Start: 4 TRL at Transition: 8 Payoff: NPV $70M Improved readiness Extend aircraft service life public release; distribution is unlimited.

21 Internally Applied CPC (cont) Transitions and Accomplishments 1 Numb ber of Days Completed testing of new CPC formulation, NAVGUARD, according to MIL- C spec. requirements - Salt spat testing shows NAVGUARD outperform commercial products. Three times better on Al panels Ten times better on steel panels - Review in process by the Invention Review Board for patent application Salt Spray Test Results NAVGUARD field testing in progress Aluminum - Avionic Testing, Battelle, OH Steel Control MIL-PRF EA 6B, NADEP JAX - Shipboard Test, Stennis Aircraft Oil 510 Oil Alox 2028 Corrosion X ACF 50 Ardrox 3204 toil 5068 Oct NAVGUARD Control MIL-C Carrier, NAS NI Commercial Products public release; distribution is unlimited.

22 Single Ship Tank Coatings (EPE-FY04-02) 2 Product Description Rapid cure single coating systems for enhanced corrosion control in shipboard tanks and voids to reduce application time and cost Demos / Deliverable / Transition 65+ high complexity tanks and voids (>200,000ft 2 ) preserved using rapid cure coatings technology QPL under MIL-PRF One Epoxy product fully transitioned - Two additional epoxy products and one polyurethane product on QPL process list - Expected QPL insertions 2 nd and 3 rd Qtr FY08 - Approved for surface and submarine non- nuclear tanks and for amphibious class well deck areas Importance to the warfighter NPV $250M / 40-yr service life Extension of platform service life ~35% reduction in tank and void painting cost, 40% reduction in tank/void preservation time, material cost equal to legacy systems public release; distribution is unlimited. Legacy System (Prime, Stripe, Topcoat) 216 hours to Completion Rapid Cure Single Coating System 35 hours to Completion SSBN Trim Tank Application Supported 18-day Maintenance Docking Saved 7 days of Schedule! Fleet Transition Tanks in SSBN class at Trident Refit Facility Kings Bay (TRFKB) 1 SSN tank completed at Portsmouth Naval Shipyard - Full ship demonstration planned for MBTs 1 SSN tank planned at Puget Sound (PSNS) in Jan 08 Northrop Grumman Newport News (NGNN) used on SSN-750 in MBT bulkheads as repair material Bath Ironworks Shipyard (BIW) has completed demo for DDG 1000 Full shipyard implementation ti by NAVSEA05/04 in FY08 via CWP (Cumbersome Work Practices) Task Force

23 3 Project Number: Title: A1014 Automated Rotorblade Paint Stripping System (ARBSS) Automation of Rotorblade Paint Stripping Process Performing Activities: REPTECH ARL Penn State Initial Project Lead National Center for Manufacturing Sciences Co-Funding Sponsor Sikorsky Aircraft Project Technical Assistant and Sponsor General Lasertronics Project Technical Assistant and Sponsor FRC Cherry Point Project Customer NAVAIRSYSCOM 4.0, 6.0 Project Stakeholder NUWCDIVKEYPORT Project Customer & Participant Technical Achievements (Jul-Sep 2007): Arranged briefing of qualification test results with FRC EAST local FST agents in order to seek local FST process approval. Glass transition temperature testing completed and draft report distributed to the project team for review. Functional Test Plan distributed to the project team for review. Peel test completed at Sikorsky aircraft. Report is pending. Core thickness vs. stripping efficiency evaluations completed and draft report distributed to the project team for review. public release; distribution is unlimited. Performing Activity: imast(reptech) / ARL Penn State NCMS/CTMA Team Objective: Develop, qualify, and build an Automated Rotor Blade Paint Stripping System for CH-53E rotor blades. Start/End Dates: FY04 FY09 Project Costs: $5.5M MANTECH Cost: $814K Cost Share: $4.7M total Weapon System: CH-53E Super Stallion Helicopter Implementation: System: CH-53E Super Stallion Helicopter, other rotor wing aircraft Site FRC Cherry Point, NC Schedule: FY09 CPP Purchase Status: Design and build of demo system nearing completion. Payoff:. Benefits Analysis/ROI: 2.2:1 2:1 Reduce rotor blade stripping cost by 50% or more. Technology will benefit refurbishment of more than 900 blades each year at NADEP Cherry Point Potential implementation at Sikorsky Reduce rotor blade stripping time by 66% or more. Reduced process emissions compared to conventional manual hand sanding Reduced risks to worker health and safety Reduced environmental impact

24 4 Project Number: S1012 Project Title: Propulsion Shaft Composite Surface Treatment Performing Activity: Northrop Grumman Newport News; NSWCCD; Puget Sound, Portsmouth and Norfolk Naval Shipyards Start/End Dates: 09/02 05/05 Primary Benefit: An Improved Shaft Coating System Will Help the Navy Achieve a 12-year Docking Cycle while Reducing Shaft Life Cycle Costs. Objective: Develop an Improved Composite Protection Layer for Ship Main Propulsion Shafts That Will Afford Corrosion Protection for Twelve Years. MANTECH Cost: $1,441,700 Implementation Cost: $1,000 - $2,000 Fabrication Cost Increase Per Shaft Systems Impacted: CVN 68 Class Nuclear Aircraft Carrier; CVN77 & CVNX Next Generation Nuclear Aircraft Carriers; DDG-51 Implementation: Approvals Secured From SEA 05Z12, SEA 05Z2, NSWCCD SSESDET / Code 9323, SEA 05M1, PMS 312D, CNAP N43 for the CVN-70 RCOH availability. Tech Transfer/Training to Navy Shipyards Problem: Because of the high costs associated with drydocking, a twelve year docking cycle is highly desirable for all of the Surface Fleet, especially the CVN-68 Class aircraft carriers. However, the current epoxy glass reinforced plastic (GRP) surface protection layer applied to propulsion shafts, as specified by MIL-STD- 2199(SH), does not provide reliable corrosion protection for more than six to eight years. Solution: Develop application processes for a new shaft coating system that will afford corrosion protection for more than twelve years and transition the technology to the Navy Shipyards. public release; distribution is unlimited. Benefit Analysis/ROI Benefit Analysis Assumptions Repair Cost Extrapolated From Shipyard Repair Cost Estimates for Current Shaft Covering Practices. 469 Shafts on Surface Ships Replaced or Repaired Every 7 Years (on Average). $64,000 - $192,450 Repair Cost (Relative to the Shaft Size) Per Shaft Every 7 Years $85,373,00 Repair Cost Every 7 Years) $85,373,000/7 = $12,196, per year x 50% uncertainty = $6,098,000/yr. 000/yr Benefit Analysis Results 5-Year ROI = ($6,098,000 x 5) / $1,497,817 = 20