WSIB Analysis of the Utilization of Medical Consultant File Reviews
|
|
- Jonathan Small
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 WSIB Analysis of the Utilization of Medical Consultant File Reviews
2 Utilization of Medical Consultant File Reviews Executive Summary Background: On November 5 th, 2015, the Ontario Federation of Labour (OFL) with six psychologists, and injured worker advocates released a report entitled Prescription Over-ruled. They allege that the Workplace Safety and Insurance Board (WSIB) systematically ignores the advice of treating medical professionals in favour of WSIB staff opinion and/or so-called paper doctors for the purpose of rejecting and limiting otherwise legitimate injury claims. On January 29, 2016 the OFL made a submission to the Ombudsman s Office requesting that an investigation be launched into this issue. Context: The WSIB contracts with a number of firms for Medical Consultant (MC) file review services. MC file reviewers are fully licensed Ontario physicians who do not diagnose or examine workers. Their role is to provide a medical opinion based on the medical information in the case to WSIB staff. The use of medical experts to review clinical information to inform non-medical decision-making is a common practice followed by worker compensation boards and the insurance industry. WSIB staff make approximately 12,000 requests for MC reviews annually. The majority of these cases are referred within the first year of a claim (46% within first year and 11% in second year). More than 20% of referrals are for claims that are beyond 10 years since the injury or illness, often where questions on medications may be raised. To facilitate decision-making, a MC file review may be requested for issues of causation/compatibility, functional abilities/level of impairment, treatment and medications. To ensure appropriate and consistent use of MC opinions, the WSIB guides staff on the purpose and process of MC referrals as set out in an Administrative Practice Document Weighing of Medical Evidence. On the WSIB website, it explains to staff and stakeholders how WSIB uses medical information in decision-making. MC File Review Utilization: Given the serious nature of the OFL allegations, the WSIB undertook a review of the use of MC opinions in decision-making. For the purpose of the review, a stratified random sample of 376 cases from the 2014 total referrals was selected. This number was considered as statistically significant for the purpose of this review. A team reviewed each of the 376 cases to review the allegation of systemic disregard of a worker s treating health professional, and to understand the frequency of difference in opinions, and the subsequent case impact. In 97% of the cases, cases were referred appropriately for a 2
3 MC file reviewer s opinion in accordance with expectations. The WSIB s requirement of staff is to assess the MC reviewer s opinion in combination with all other relevant information in the file in order to make a decision as set out in the Administrative Practice Document Weighing of Medical Evidence. In only 8% of the cases, the claim file documentation revealed the decisionmaker did not consider and assess the MC reviewer s opinion along with all other relevant information in the file in order to make the decision. It was found that in 85% of the cases, MC reviewer s opinion did not contradict the opinion of the worker s treating health care professional. In 15% of cases, there was some level of difference between the MC file reviewer and the treating health care professional. Differing opinions in the case file lead to three case impacts: partial allowance, full allowance, and denied entitlement. Conclusion: The review did not find any evidence of systemic disregard for the opinion of a worker s medical practitioners as alleged in the OFL s report. The review found that decision-makers are using the MC reviewer service appropriately to facilitate decision-making and case management. In the small number of cases where there were differing opinions, WSIB staff appropriately used and weighed all the medical information in decision-making. The WSIB has asked the OFL to provide the 40 cases contained in their Ombudsman submission so that any misuse of this medical service can be addressed. 3
4 WSIB Analysis of the Utilization of Medical Consultant File Reviews 1 The Medical Consultant File Review Context On November 5 th, 2015, the Ontario Federation of Labour (OFL) with six psychologists, and injured worker advocates released a report entitled Prescription Over-ruled. They allege that the Workplace Safety and Insurance Board (WSIB) systematically ignores the advice of treating medical professionals in favour of WSIB staff opinion and/or so-called paper doctors for the purpose of rejecting and limiting otherwise legitimate injury claims. On January 29, 2016 the OFL made a submission to the Ombudsman s office requesting that an investigation be launched into this issue. On February 5, 2016, the WSIB was interviewed by the Ombudsman s office as they determine whether to launch an investigation. While WSIB was confident that these allegations were unfounded, given the serious nature of the allegations, the WSIB undertook a review of the use of Medical Consultant (MC) file reviews in the decision-making process using a statistically valid methodology to determine whether there was in fact systemic disregard for treating professional s opinions. Included was a review of the consistency of staff in following protocols and controls in the referral process and in the application of that information in claim decision-making. This report provides background information about the use of MC file reviews (section 2), the nature and outcome of our review of the MC process (section 3), and findings of the review (section 4) and conclusions (section 6). 2 Background Decision-making: It is the legislated responsibility of the WSIB to determine if a worker s injury arose out of and in the course of employment and, when determined to be work-related, the worker s eligibility for benefits and services under the Workplace Safety and Insurance Act (WSIA). The WSIA places the burden of proof on the WSIB decision-maker to gather all necessary information when adjudicating and managing claims to make an informed decision in a manner that is unbiased and has regard for, and incorporates, all relevant information. Medical information from a worker s treating professional is critical to the decision-making process, starting with the initial report (Form 8). It is not the responsibility of the treating professional to determine whether a worker s claim is eligible for coverage when submitting the Form 8, as the onus for determining entitlement under WSIA is on WSIB decision-makers. In claims for work-related injuries, the decision-maker monitors and assesses new information about the worker s impairment and takes actions to facilitate return to work, assist the worker s recovery, and makes adjudicative decisions as appropriate. The work-relatedness of the 4
5 worker s impairment and treatment is evaluated throughout the life of the claim to ensure continuing entitlement under WSIA. Medical information from all the medical professionals who treat or assess a worker in relation to a work-related injury is therefore key information. Health information is gathered from many sources including a family physician, specialist, physiotherapist, psychologist, or WSIB contracted medical specialists, and may contain differing information or opinions. Additionally, the medical information in a claim file may deal with complex medical issues. While decisionmakers are technically knowledgeable in the administration of the WSIA, they are not medical professionals. As such, decision-makers sometimes require assistance in understanding the medical information received to inform their decisions. In these cases, the decision-maker may request a MC file review for the clarification they require to make a fair and informed decision taking into account all the claim file information relevant to the issue being decided. An MC file review may be requested for issues of causation, mechanism of injury, pathology, or interpretation of medical information, clarification of the relationship between a diagnosis and the accident history, work environment or employment circumstances, the effects of pre-existing conditions or other non-work-related conditions on the workrelated impairment, advice when there is a need for clarification of medical opinions on file. For example, the primary health care professional s treatment plan or list of functional abilities (or precautions) that may be different or contrary to the discharge recommendations from a Program of Care or Regional Evaluation Centre, the necessity and appropriateness of treatment and medications, particularly narcotics. While the MC file reviewers provide an opinion in response to the questions posed to them, they do not make claims decisions. The decision-maker must take into account all the available claim file information, including the MC opinion, that is relevant to the issue being decided. MC File Reviews: The use of medical reviewers of clinical information to inform non-medical decision-making is not a unique WSIB practice. This is a common practice across Worker Compensation Boards and the insurance industry. At the WSIB, many operational policies reference MC opinion or clinical reviews to assist in decisions on application of the policy, (e.g , Pre-existing conditions, , Chronic Pain Disability). Individuals providing MC opinions must not have an established relationship with the employer or the worker to ensure the process of claims adjudication and case management is valid and impartial. To ensure compliance with the decision-maker s legislated responsibility to meet the burden of proof for entitlement under WSIA, the medical opinions used to assist them in claims administration must be provided by individuals with access to all information required to provide 5
6 a fully informed opinion. MC file reviewers do not diagnose or examine workers. They provide a medical opinion based on a review of the medical information on file, including the information from the treating physician. To ensure the appropriate and consistent use of MC opinions, there are two key documents for staff: Considerations for Referral to Medical Consultant for Physician Case File Review informs staff on the referral process and questions that could be asked including: Compatibility between the mechanism of injury and diagnosis; entitlement for secondary injuries/conditions; functional abilities/level of impairment; ongoing treatment; appropriate drug utilization; The Administrative Practice Document Weighing of Medical Evidence, posted on the WSIB website, explains how our staff use medical information in decision-making. These documents establish the controls on the use of this service, including how to pose their questions for the referral to avoid bias. In addition to the documented materials for staff, oversight is provided by managers through comprehensive file reviews at designated key decision points in cases to ensure decision quality and appropriate case management. MC file reviews are encompassed within the manager case reviews. Prior to 2012, MC opinions were provided by staff physicians who, by virtue of their position at the WSIB, were independent of both the employer and worker. However, they were seen as biased towards the WSIB because of their employment relationship. In 2012, the WSIB introduced a new MC model that outsourced this role enabling access to independent, expert and timely medical opinions. With the new model, the WSIB competitively procured for and entered into contracts with a number of firms for file review services. The individuals who provide MC file review services are fully licensed physicians within the Province of Ontario and almost 40% are specialists, e.g. orthopedists, respirologists. The contracts set out expectations for the MC file reviewers that include: Review of all available medical information to provide an opinion in response to the questions posed in the referral Provide an opinion with medical rationale based on a detailed review and analysis of the available medical information, with a strong emphasis on utilizing evidenced-based medical literature and recognized medical best practices Calling the treating health care professional to discuss a case prior to submitting their opinion to the WSIB. WSIB monitors MC file review utilization including reasons for referrals, volumes of referrals, and timeliness of opinions. In addition, WSIB medical staff conduct random quality reviews of up to 20% of the MC opinions received to ensure contractual requirements for the reviews are 6
7 being met. WSIB medical staff review the opinions to ensure the responses are clear, supported with medical rationale and that MC reviewers conduct telephone consultation with treating professionals where appropriate. 3 Process of the Review Quality Program Review: A team with members from the Office of the Chief Statistician and Operations Program Quality developed a plan to conduct a review of the application of our Medical Consultant process beginning in November To review the practice objectively, the Chief Statistician s team provided a stratified random sample of 376 cases from the total referrals (12,347) sent for an MC opinion in The sample included referrals from all WSIB offices. To calculate the sample size, the following considerations and assumptions were made: Stratified design by referral reason Stratified allocation with oversampling for better representativeness in strata with smaller number of referrals An apriori assumption on the proportion of contrary opinions of 0.5 (the most conservative option on sample size due to lack of prior knowledge) A 95% confidence interval with a +/- 5% error around the estimate. A review template was developed with questions that would provide information relevant to the purpose of the review. Prior to initiating the review, Quality Reviewers refreshed their understanding of the related resource documents. To ensure consistency and common understanding, a calibration session was held whereby all members of the review team independently reviewed the same case followed by debrief to resolve any disparity in the responses prior to commencing the file review. Once the file review was completed, the data analysis phase began. Internal Audit Review: To provide the WSIB further assurance as to the appropriateness and sufficiency of the MC file review process, Internal Audit (IA) conducted an additional independent examination of aspects of the MC review process. The IA review scope included the following: Review of the appropriateness of the Quality Program Review, described above, to draw conclusions regarding the integrity of the MC File Review Process Validation that the sampling methodology applied was appropriate for drawing conclusions over the MC File Review Process 7
8 Review the process followed to refer a claim to a MC in order to confirm consistency with procedural guidance Re-performance of select file reviews performed by the Quality Program team to provide greater assurance over the conclusions drawn from the review. IA s review consisted of the following activities and procedures: Obtain a high-level understanding of key governing documents, sampling methodology and interim results from the quality review; o Administrative Practice Document: Weighing of Medical Evidence; o Considerations for Referral to Medical Consultant; and o Initial Referral for Physician Case File Review. Review the method followed to select sample claims for the quality review; Perform walk-through testing of the process followed to refer, make use of and document opinions obtained from medical consultants to confirm compliance with procedural guidance; Perform sample testing of injury claims from the quality review to understand the process followed and results reported; Understand the process used to measure and report the results of the quality review; and Review the data analysis performed and final results of the quality review. Additional Work: The IA review identified some differences in documentations from the review, but the differences appeared to be minor in IA s judgement. To validate the significance of these findings, it was determined that a blind validation of the original quality review results should be conducted for additional assurance of the results. Three of the original questions were used to determine inter-rater reliability and assess the range of any human error within the original file review. The Chief Statistician s office conducted analysis of the difference in how the reviewers questions were answered. To do so, the Cohen s Kappa coefficient was applied by the Chief Statistician. This is a statistic which measures inter-rater agreement for categorical items. Items such as physical exam findings, interpretations, or other tests often rely on some degree of subjective interpretation by observers. The agreement between two observers can be measured using Cohen s Kappa coefficient. Kappa above 0.81 is considered Almost perfect agreement. Analysis of the results found the Kappa was between 0.85 ( ) and 0.87 ( ) which signifies substantial agreement to almost perfect agreement 1. 1 The interpretation of Kappa is from the research paper Understanding Interobserver Agreement: The Kappa Statistic, Anthony J. Viera, MD Joanne M. Garret, Phd. (Fam. Med 2005; 37(5):360-3) 8
9 4 Findings The total population MC referrals in 2014 involved 10,664 unique claims. The following pie chart shows the distribution of the timing of the MC referral in 2014 relative to the date of the accident for the claim. <= in the legends above means less than or equal to The following chart shows the referrals for MC File Review by reason for claims referred in 2014 (n=12,347 annual). This population is greater than the population noted above as some claims were referred for MC file review more than once in
10 The following are the key findings of the quality review: What was the experience of MC opinions differing from treating professional s opinions? For these findings, treating professional may refer to a family doctor/general practitioner, specialist (including Psychiatrist), Psychologist, sports medicine physician, pain management physician and/or contracted health care provider of the WSIB, such as the Regional Evaluation Centre. Fully or in full refers to cases where the MC agrees with all of the recommendations the treating professional(s) has made. Partially or in part refers to cases where the MC agrees with some, but not all of the treating professional s recommendations. Partially or in part examples include, but are not limited to: Agreement on the treatment proposed but a difference of opinion with respect to the duration of treatment Agreement on the prescription of opioid medication but a difference of opinion on the appropriate dosage. Here are the findings: In 65% 2 (weighted 54% 3 ) of the cases, the MC opinion was fully or partially in line with the treating professional s opinions(s) on file. In an additional 24% (weighted 36%) of the cases, there was no treating professional s opinion with respect to the issue(s) under review by the MC. In 6% (weighted 6%) of cases, the MC did not provide a medical opinion and recommended either outstanding medical reports be obtained or that further medical investigation(s) and/or consultations/exams were required. In 5% (weighted 5%) of the cases, the MCs opinion differed from the treating professional s opinion on file. Given the importance of the existence of a difference in opinions from the perspective of the OFL allegations, the percent of cases with any disagreement irrespective of its impact on benefits was examined. The percent of cases found to have some level of difference is 17% (weighted 15%) while 83% (weighted 85%) of cases had no level of difference of opinion. 2 This is the crude percentage which represents the percentage within the sampled observation only and without considering the representativeness of each sample case in the population 3 The weighted percentage represents the estimated percentage within the total population. Each sampled observation represents a total number of responses equal to its weight. The weights are based on the true proportion of the strata in the population. 10
11 Where differing opinions arise was all information consistently and appropriately reflected in decision making? Of the 63 cases reviewed where the MC opinion differed in full or in part with the treating professional(s), the decision maker allowed entitlement to benefits in full or in part in 62% (weighted 59%) of the cases, and denied entitlement in 38% (weighted 41%) of cases. Of these 63 cases with differing medical opinions, there were 24 cases which resulted in a denial of entitlement to benefits (10 of the 24 related to medications). In these cases there was evidence the decision maker considered all the relevant information in the case including, but not limited to the MC opinion, and applied key case management activities arriving at their adverse decision. The decisions involving denials mainly involved medication entitlement or dosage level approvals. A small number of denials concerned compatibility of the diagnosis related to the workplace injury. Were there any opportunities for improvement? There are opportunities for improvement, primarily with respect to communication of decisions, and these are being developed. These were not related to the two guiding documents on how and when to use MC file review services. Any other notable findings discovered? The sample contained a wide array of complexity with respect to the issues under review. In 24% of the cases reviewed there was no treating physician opinion with respect to the issue being reviewed by the MC. In some cases the MC was asked for an opinion on more than one issue and in many cases the injured worker was under the care of more than one treating physician. As a result, there were cases where the MC opinion was fully or partially in line with one treating physician but may have differed with another. 5 Conclusions Decision-makers must consider all available information relevant to the issue, including the MC opinion, when deciding on an issue. The quality review indicated that 97% (weighted 96%) of cases were referred appropriately for an MC reviewer s opinion in accordance with the documents noted earlier. In approximately 85% of the cases, the MC reviewer s opinion did not contradict the treating health care professional. The total includes cases in which the MC reviewer requested further medical investigation or where there was no original treating professional s opinion. In 15% of the cases, the MC reviewer s opinion was fully or partially different from the health care professional. Within this 15% of cases, we noted three types of decisions followed - denied entitlement (entitlement decisions included loss of earnings benefits, health care treatment and/or medication), limited entitlement and some cases being fully allowed entitlement. We also examined whether the appropriate use and weighing of the medical opinions was evident in decision-making. In only 8% of cases, the claim file documentation did not reveal the decision-maker considered and assessed the MC reviewer s opinion together with all other relevant information in the file in order to make the decision. 11
12 In conclusion, this review found that decision-makers are using the MC reviewer service appropriately to facilitate decision-making and case management. The review did not indicate a systemic practice of ignoring the opinion of medical professionals to reject or deny cases as alleged. The review did identify the opportunity to improve the written communications of decisions and options to do so are being developed. 12
Introduction to Workplace Safety and Insurance Board Claims Management
Schedule 2 Conference October 9, 2013 Introduction to Workplace Safety and Insurance Board Claims Management Maxine MacGuire Steven Latanville Session Objectives To understand : The Service Delivery Model
More informationRULES OF TENNESSEE DEPARTMENT OF LABOR AND WORKFORCE DEVELOPMENT WORKERS COMPENSATION DIVISION
RULES OF TENNESSEE DEPARTMENT OF LABOR AND WORKFORCE DEVELOPMENT WORKERS COMPENSATION DIVISION CHAPTER 0800-02-25 WORKERS COMPENSATION MEDICAL TREATMENT TABLE OF CONTENTS 0800-02-25-.01 Purpose and Scope
More informationOFL Submission to the Ontario Standing Committee on Social Policy on Bill 163, Supporting Ontario s First Responders Act
OFL Submission to the Ontario Standing Committee on Social Policy on Bill 163, Supporting Ontario s First Responders Act MARCH 2016 Post-Trauma: OFL Submission to the Ontario Standing Committee on Social
More informationHUMAN RIGHTS TRIBUNAL OF ONTARIO DECISION
HUMAN RIGHTS TRIBUNAL OF ONTARIO B E T W E E N: David Lawson Applicant -and- Workplace Safety and Insurance Board Respondent DECISION Adjudicator: Brian Cook Date: July 12, 2017 File Number: 2014-17115-I
More informationThe WSIB Chronic Mental Stress Policy What Employers Need to Know
The WSIB Chronic Mental Stress Policy What Employers Need to Know Labour, Employment and Human Rights February 6, 2018 David Marchione +1 416 868 3463 dmarchione@fasken.com Carla Oliver +1 416 868 7822
More informationIPA. IPA: Reviewed by: UM program. and makes utilization 2 N/A. Review) The IPA s UM. includes the. description. the program. 1.
IPA Delegation Oversight Annual Audit Tool 2011 IPA: Reviewed by: Review Date: NCQA UM 1: Utilization Management Structure The IPA clearly defines its structures and processes within its utilization management
More informationWSIB Specialty Programs
WSIB Specialty Programs Strategy & Procurement Information for Providers July 2017 Content Purpose Background WSIB s Current State Specialty Programs Current and Future Request for Proposal (RFP) Descriptions
More informationQuestions and Answers
Questions and Answers WORKPLACE SAFETY AND INSURANCE BOARD Program Overview 1. What is the Non-Surgical Fracture Episode of Care (EOC)? An Episode of Care (EOC) is a new WSIB payment model to bundle health
More informationProvider Frequently Asked Questions
Provider Frequently Asked Questions Strengthening Clinical Processes Training CASE MANAGEMENT: Q1: Does Optum allow Case Managers to bill for services provided when the Member is not present? A1: Optum
More informationHealth Technology Assessment (HTA) Good Practices & Principles FIFARMA, I. Government s cost containment measures: current status & issues
KeyPointsforDecisionMakers HealthTechnologyAssessment(HTA) refers to the scientific multidisciplinary field that addresses inatransparentandsystematicway theclinical,economic,organizational, social,legal,andethicalimpactsofa
More informationCOMMUNITY MENTAL HEALTH PROGRAM REFERENCE GUIDE
COMMUNITY MENTAL HEALTH PROGRAM REFERENCE GUIDE Contents Acknowledgements... 2 Community Mental Health Program Overview... 3 Introduction...4 Program Objectives...4 WSIB Community Mental Health Network...
More informationThe Town of Fort Frances
The Town of Fort Frances MODIFIED WORK PROGRAM POLICY SECTION HEALTH AND SAFETY NEW: May 2004 REVISED: November 2007 Resolution No. 406 (consent) 11/07 Supercedes Resolution No. Policy Number 5.23 PAGE
More information4.07. Infrastructure Stimulus Spending. Chapter 4 Section. Background. Follow-up to VFM Section 3.07, 2010 Annual Report. Ministry of Infrastructure
Chapter 4 Section 4.07 Ministry of Infrastructure Infrastructure Stimulus Spending Follow-up to VFM Section 3.07, 2010 Annual Report Background In January 2009, the federal government announced the Economic
More informationONTARIO NURSES ASSOCIATION
ONTARIO NURSES ASSOCIATION Submission to the 2012 Benefits Policy Review on Recurrences Work Disruptions Permanent Impairments Aggravation Basis November 13, 2012 ONTARIO NURSES ASSOCIATION 85 Grenville
More informationMixed Methods Appraisal Tool MMAT
SYSTEMATIC MIXED STUDIES REVIEWS: RELIABILITY TESTING OF THE MIXED METHODS APPRAISAL TOOL Rafaella Souto, PhD (C), University of Sao Paulo, Brazil Vladimir Khanassov, MD, MSc (C), Family Medicine, McGill
More informationMusculoskeletal Program of Care (MSK POC)
Musculoskeletal Program of Care (MSK POC) Questions and Answers Contact Information Health professionals with questions regarding the POCs may call WSIB: Customer Service Representatives at 416-344-1000
More informationPhysician FEE SCHEDULE. Table of Contents
FEE SCHEDULE Physician Table of Contents INTRODUCTION Description of Reports... 2 Functional Abilities Form for Planning Early and Safe Return to Work (2647A).... 4 In-Office Interview.... 4 Acupuncture
More informationQuality Management and Improvement 2016 Year-end Report
Quality Management and Improvement Table of Contents Introduction... 4 Scope of Activities...5 Patient Safety...6 Utilization Management Quality Activities Clinical Activities... 7 Timeliness of Utilization
More informationBeing Prepared for Ongoing CPS Safety Management
Being Prepared for Ongoing CPS Safety Management Introduction This month we start a series of safety intervention articles that will consider ongoing CPS safety management functions, roles, and responsibilities.
More informationProposed Standards Revisions Related to Pain Assessment and Management
Leadership (LD) Chapter LD.0001 Proposed Standards Revisions Related to Pain Assessment and Management 1 2 Leaders establish priorities for performance improvement. (Refer to the "Performance Improvement"
More informationShoulder program of care. reference guide OCTOBER 2012
Shoulder program PROGRAM OF CARE of care reference guide OCTOBER 2012 Reference guide Acknowledgements The WSIB acknowledges the significant contributions of the following regulatory colleges, regulated
More informationUTILIZATION MANAGEMENT AND CARE COORDINATION Section 8
Overview The focus of WellCare s Utilization Management (UM) Program is to provide members access to quality care and to monitor the appropriate utilization of services. WellCare s UM Program has five
More informationOntario Nurses Association. Submission
Ontario Nurses Association Submission Amendments to the Workplace Safety and Insurance Act ( the Act ) proposed under Schedule 33 of the Bill 127 Stronger, Healthier Ontario Act (Budget Measures), 2017
More informationAccess to Health Care Services in Canada, 2003
Access to Health Care Services in Canada, 2003 by Claudia Sanmartin, François Gendron, Jean-Marie Berthelot and Kellie Murphy Health Analysis and Measurement Group Statistics Canada Statistics Canada Health
More informationSUBJECT: Emerson Hospital Financial Assistance Policy (FAP) APPROVALS: Emerson Hospital Board of Directors. ORIGINATION DATE: September 27, 2016
SUBJECT: Emerson Hospital Financial Assistance Policy (FAP) APPROVALS: Emerson Hospital Board of Directors ORIGINATION DATE: September 27, 2016 REVIEW / REVISION DATE: September 27, 2016 POLICY Emerson
More informationA Guide to Requesting Early Intervention Services. and. Early Inter vention Services Application
A Guide to Requesting Early Intervention Services and Early Inter vention Services Application For everything you ever wanted to know about Group Benefits go to www.cooperators.ca/life/group GL1800 A Guide
More informationMONITORING ABF QUALITY THROUGH ROUTINE CLINICAL CODING AUDIT PROGRAMS
MONITORING ABF QUALITY THROUGH ROUTINE CLINICAL CODING AUDIT PROGRAMS Department of Health and Human Services Victoria Jennie Shepheard Vaughn Moore Beata Steinberg Overview: Victorian Audits of Admitted
More informationMinister s Monitoring Committee On Workers Compensation
Minister s Monitoring Committee On Workers Compensation Final Report of the Committee February 2006 Background The Minister s Monitoring Committee on Workers Compensation (the Committee) was created in
More informationSubmission of a clinical trial for access to ECRIN services Notice to the Applicant
Submission of a clinical trial for access to ECRIN services Notice to the Applicant BEFORE SUBMITTING YOUR PROTOCOL Please, contact the European Correspondent (EuCo) in your country. The list of EuCos
More informationConsensus Recommendations on Rater Training and Certification
Consensus Recommendations on Rater Training and Certification Prepared by: CNS Summit Rater Training and Certification Workgroup Authors: David Daniel, MD Mark Opler, PhD, MBA Alexandria Wise-Rankovic,
More informationINJURED WORKER EARLY AND SAFE RETURN TO WORK PROCEDURE
INJURED WORKER EARLY AND SAFE RETURN TO WORK PROCEDURE Approved by: Academic Coordinating Committee Authorizer: Director, Safety and Security Reference Code: O7_V2 Effective Date: 1/26/2011 PROCEDURE STATEMENT:
More informationSupport for Applied Research in Smart Specialisation Growth Areas. Chapter 1 General Provisions
Issuer: Minister of Education and Research Type of act: regulation Type of text: original text, consolidated text In force from: 29.08.2015 In force until: Currently in force Publication citation: RT I,
More informationQuality Improvement Plan (QIP) Narrative for Health Care Organizations in Ontario
Quality Improvement Plan (QIP) Narrative for Health Care Organizations in Ontario 3/26/2018 This document is intended to provide health care organizations in Ontario with guidance as to how they can develop
More informationHenderson, Deonya v. Staff Management/SMX
University of Tennessee, Knoxville Trace: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange Tennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims and Workers' Compensation Appeals Board Law 1-13-2017 Henderson, Deonya
More informationCommunicator. the JUST A THOUGHT. Ensuring HEDIS-Compliant Preventive Health Services. Provider Portal Features. Peer-to-Peer Review BY DR.
WINTER 2016 MHS NEWSLETTER FOR PHYSICIANS Ensuring HEDIS-Compliant Preventive Health Services Here are a few best practice strategies for raising HEDIS and EPSDT onsite review scores, as demonstrated by
More informationKing County Regional Support Network
Appendix 1 King County Regional Support Network External Quality Review Report Division of Behavioral Health and Recovery January 2016 Qualis Health prepared this report under contract with the Washington
More informationOASIS HOSPITAL GOVERNANCE POLICY AND PROCEDURE
OASIS HOSPITAL GOVERNANCE POLICY AND PROCEDURE FROM: SUBJECT: OASIS Hospital Board of Directors Financial Assistance Policy - Arizona EFFECTIVE DATE: REVISED: 7/16 REVIEWED WITH NO CHANGES: 7/16 ORIGINAL
More informationA. Lococo Wholesale Ltd. Workplace Inspection Policy
A. Lococo Wholesale Ltd. Revised by Robert Sirignano Approved by Erin Lococo Section 1.1 Workplace Date 21/06/2010 Inspection A. Lococo Wholesale Ltd. Policy Statement Regular planned workplace inspections
More informationGuidelines. Guidelines for Working with Third Party Payers
Guidelines Guidelines for Working with Third Party Payers May 2017 Introduction In many practice settings, occupational therapists (OTs) are asked to provide their professional opinions or offer clinical
More information(Signed original copy on file)
CFOP 75-8 STATE OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CF OPERATING PROCEDURE CHILDREN AND FAMILIES NO. 75-8 TALLAHASSEE, September 2, 2015 Procurement and Contract Management POLICIES AND PROCEDURES OF CONTRACT OVERSIGHT
More informationMississippi Medicaid Autism Spectrum Disorder Services for EPSDT Eligible Beneficiaries Provider Manual
Mississippi Medicaid Services for EPSDT Eligible Beneficiaries Provider Manual Effective Date: July 1, 2017 Services for Introduction: eqhealth Solutions Services (ASD) Utilization Management Program includes
More informationINFORMATION ABOUT YOUR OXFORD COVERAGE REIMBURSEMENT PART I OXFORD HEALTH PLANS OXFORD HEALTH PLANS (NJ), INC.
OXFORD HEALTH PLANS (NJ), INC. INFORMATION ABOUT YOUR OXFORD COVERAGE PART I REIMBURSEMENT Overview of Provider Reimbursement Methodologies Generally, Oxford pays Network Providers on a fee-for-service
More informationThe Florida School for the Deaf and the Blind. Minority and Women Business Participation Plan
The Florida School for the Deaf and the Blind Minority and Women Business Participation Plan TABLE OF CONTENTS SUBJECT PAGE Small Business Participation Mission Statement..1 Small Business Participation
More informationThis policy shall apply to all directly-operated and contract network providers of the MCCMH Board.
Chapter: Title: PROVIDER NETWORK MANAGEMENT Approved by: Executive Director Prior Approval Date: 7/30/02 Current Approval Date I. Abstract This policy establishes the standards and procedures of the Macomb
More informationWhat is TennCare? The state of Tennessee s Medicaid program. It is state and federally funded.
TennCare Appeals What is TennCare? The state of Tennessee s Medicaid program. It is state and federally funded. 2 TennCare Is a managed care model Has different health plans, called Managed Care Organizations
More informationState Medicaid Recovery Audit Contractor (RAC) Program
State Medicaid Recovery Audit Contractor (RAC) Program Section 6411 of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act 2010 (ACA) requires by December 31, 2010 each state Medicaid program to contract with
More informationAmerican Board of Dental Examiners (ADEX) Clinical Licensure Examinations in Dental Hygiene. Technical Report Summary
American Board of Dental Examiners (ADEX) Clinical Licensure Examinations in Dental Hygiene Technical Report Summary October 16, 2017 Introduction Clinical examination programs serve a critical role in
More informationGAO. VETERANS COMPENSATION Evidence Considered in Persian Gulf War Undiagnosed Illness Claims
GAO United States General Accounting Office Report to the Ranking Minority Member, Committee on Veterans Affairs, U.S. Senate May 1996 VETERANS COMPENSATION Evidence Considered in Persian Gulf War Undiagnosed
More informationSTANDARDS AND GUIDELINES TITLE: INFORMED CONSENT STANDARD DOC #: 10 STATUS:
STANDARDS AND GUIDELINES TITLE: INFORMED CONSENT STANDARD DOC #: 10 STATUS: Approved by Council CIRCULATION DATE: March June 2013 REVISED: June 2013 APPROVAL DATE: July 29, 2013 Note to Readers: In the
More informationInformation System Security
July 19, 2002 Information System Security DoD Web Site Administration, Policies, and Practices (D-2002-129) Department of Defense Office of the Inspector General Quality Integrity Accountability Additional
More informationAnalyzing Physician Task Allocation and Patient Flow at the Radiation Oncology Clinic. Final Report
Analyzing Physician Task Allocation and Patient Flow at the Radiation Oncology Clinic Final Report Prepared for: Kathy Lash, Director of Operations University of Michigan Health System Radiation Oncology
More informationCRITICALLY APPRAISED PAPER (CAP) FOCUSED QUESTION
CRITICALLY APPRAISED PAPER (CAP) FOCUSED QUESTION What is the effectiveness of a stress management program to address the occupational needs of caregivers for older adults? López, J., Crespo, M., & Zarit,
More informationPersonal Information Bank (PIB) Details
Title: Accounts Payable Record Type: GCR - PIB Description: Records relating to processing payments made by the hospital to suppliers of goods and services. Source documents initiating payments include
More informationBCEHS Resource Allocation Plan 2013 Review. Summary Report
BCEHS Resource Allocation Plan 2013 Review Summary Report November 2013 1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY As the legislated authority to provide emergency health services in British Columbia, BC Emergency Health Services
More informationRESEARCH PROTOCOL M MED (ANAESTHESIOLOGY) DEPARTMENT OF ANAESTHESIOLOGY, UNIVERSITY OF LIMPOPO (MEDUNSA CAMPUS)
RESEARCH PROTOCOL M MED (ANAESTHESIOLOGY) DEPARTMENT OF ANAESTHESIOLOGY, UNIVERSITY OF LIMPOPO (MEDUNSA CAMPUS) TITLE: AN AUDIT OF PREOPERATIVE EVALUATION OF GENERAL SURGERY PATIENTS AT DR GEORGE MUKHARI
More informationAudiology Waiting Times
Publication Report Audiology Waiting Times Quarter ending 30 September 2012 Publication date 27 November 2012 An Official Statistics Publication for Scotland Contents Introduction... 2 Key points... 3
More informationEvaluation of an independent, radiographer-led community diagnostic ultrasound service provided to general practitioners
Journal of Public Health VoI. 27, No. 2, pp. 176 181 doi:10.1093/pubmed/fdi006 Advance Access Publication 7 March 2005 Evaluation of an independent, radiographer-led community diagnostic ultrasound provided
More informationUnderstanding independent medical assessments a multi-jurisdictional analysis
Understanding independent medical assessments a multi-jurisdictional analysis Agnieszka Kosny, Amy Allen, Alex Collie June 3 2013 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 Introduction and literature review 3. 2 Purpose 3.
More informationMeet with preceptor monthly for 1 year. Preceptor to be approved by CPSO
This individualized education plan sample is based on the CanMEDS Physician Competency Framework, an educational framework identifying and describing seven roles that lead to optimal health and health
More informationAudiology Waiting Times
Publication Report Audiology Waiting Times Quarter ending 30 June 2012 Publication date 28 August 2012 Contents Contents... 1 Introduction... 2 Key points... 3 Results and Commentary... 4 Current waiting
More informationMinnesota Adverse Health Events Measurement Guide
Minnesota Adverse Health Events Measurement Guide Prepared for the Minnesota Department of Health Revised December 2, 2015 is a nonprofit organization that leads collaboration and innovation in health
More informationLabour Relations and Workplace Safety (LRWS), Mine Safety Unit (MSU) and
Labour Relations and Workplace Safety (LRWS), Mine Safety Unit (MSU) and The Saskatchewan Mining Association (SMA) Injury Reporting Requirements Version 3.0 Table of Contents: Table of Contents:... ii
More informationA review of the Gamma Knife Neurosurgery Program administered by Alberta Health
A review of the Gamma Knife Neurosurgery Program administered by Alberta Health CASE REPORT JUNE 2016 If you have any questions about the Alberta Ombudsman, or wish to file a complaint with our office,
More informationCLINICAL PRACTICE EVALUATION II: CLINICAL SYSTEMS REVIEW
Diplomate: CLINICAL PRACTICE EVALUATION II: CLINICAL SYSTEMS REVIEW A. INFORMATION MANAGEMENT 1. Does your practice currently use an electronic medical record system? Yes No 2. If Yes, how long has the
More informationWORKERS' COMPENSATION PROGRAM NORTH CAROLINA INDUSTRIAL COMMISSION Recommendation Follow-Up
WORKERS' COMPENSATION PROGRAM NORTH CAROLINA INDUSTRIAL COMMISSION Recommendation Follow-Up RECOMMENDATION The agency should develop a comprehensive internal policies and procedures manual as well as step-by-step
More informationSERVICE SCHEDULE FOR CLINICAL PSYCHIATRIC SERVICES CONTRACT NO: «Contract_»
SERVICE SCHEDULE FOR CLINICAL PSYCHIATRIC SERVICES CONTRACT NO: «Contract_» A. QUICK REFERENCE INFORMATION 1. TERM FOR PROVIDING CLINICAL PSYCHIATRIC SERVICES The Term for the provision of Clinical Psychiatric
More informationProviding and Documenting Medically Necessary Behavioral Health Services
Providing and Documenting Medically Necessary Behavioral Health Services Presented by: David Reed, Office Chief, Division of Behavioral Health and Recovery Marc Bollinger, LISCW, CEO, Great Rivers BHO
More informationFIRST-TIER COMPLAINTS HANDLING SURVEY 2017
FIRST-TIER COMPLAINTS HANDLING SURVEY 2017 INTRODUCTION 1. We run an annual survey to gain insight into the types of complaints made to firms and the way firms deal with them. 2. We develop learning points
More information[Cite as State ex rel. Cambridge Home Health Care, Inc. v. Indus. Comm., 124 Ohio St.3d 477, 2010-Ohio-651.]
[Cite as State ex rel. Cambridge Home Health Care, Inc. v. Indus. Comm., 124 Ohio St.3d 477, 2010-Ohio-651.] THE STATE EX REL. CAMBRIDGE HOME HEALTH CARE, INC. v. INDUSTRIAL COMMISSION OF OHIO ET AL. [Cite
More informationASSEMBLY BILL No. 214
AMENDED IN SENATE AUGUST, 00 AMENDED IN SENATE AUGUST, 00 AMENDED IN SENATE AUGUST, 00 AMENDED IN SENATE JULY, 00 AMENDED IN SENATE JUNE, 00 AMENDED IN SENATE JUNE, 00 AMENDED IN SENATE AUGUST 0, 00 california
More informationNational Multiple Sclerosis Society
National Multiple Sclerosis Society National 1 Kim, National diagnosed MS in Society 2000 > HEALTH CARE REFORM PRINCIPLES America s health care crisis prevents many people with multiple sclerosis from
More informationLabour Relations and Workplace Safety (LRWS), Mine Safety Unit (MSU) and. The Saskatchewan Mining Association (SMA) Injury Reporting Requirements
Labour Relations and Workplace Safety (LRWS), Mine Safety Unit (MSU) and The Saskatchewan Mining Association (SMA) Injury Reporting Requirements List of Revisions Revision Date Version Comments Dec 2002
More informationFinancial Assistance Finance Official (Rev: 4)
1 of 9 10/4/2018, 1:45 PM Snoqualmie Valley Hospital Policy Financial Assistance Finance 10742 Official (Rev: 4) RCW 70.170.060(5) Snoqualmie Valley Hospital is committed to ensuring our patients get the
More informationA Canadian Perspective: Implementing Tiered Licensing in the Province of Ontario
A Canadian Perspective: Implementing Tiered Licensing in the Province of Ontario NARA Licensing Seminar September 20, 2016 Ministry of Education Province of Ontario, Canada Ontario s Geography Ontario
More informationChild Care Program (Licensed Daycare)
Chapter 1 Section 1.02 Ministry of Education Child Care Program (Licensed Daycare) Follow-Up on VFM Section 3.02, 2014 Annual Report RECOMMENDATION STATUS OVERVIEW # of Status of Actions Recommended Actions
More informationMedical Provider Network (MPN) Employee Handbook
Medical Provider Network (MPN) Employee Handbook Table of Contents THE PURPOSE OF THE MEDICAL PROVIDER NETWORK (MPN) Workers' Compensation Injuries and Illnesses Page 2 HOW TO ACCESS THE MPN Page 3 Description
More informationMEDICAL ASSISTANCE BULLETIN COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA * DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WELFARE
MEDICAL ASSISTANCE BULLETIN COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA * DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WELFARE SUBJECT BY NUMBER: ISSUE DATE: September 8, 1995 EFFECTIVE DATE: September 8, 1995 Mental Health Services Provided
More informationQUALITY IMPROVEMENT. Molina Healthcare has defined the following goals for the QI Program:
QUALITY IMPROVEMENT Molina Healthcare maintains an active Quality Improvement (QI) Program. The QI program provides structure and key processes to carry out our ongoing commitment to improvement of care
More informationFrequently Asked Questions 2012 Workplace and Gender Relations Survey of Active Duty Members Defense Manpower Data Center (DMDC)
Frequently Asked Questions 2012 Workplace and Gender Relations Survey of Active Duty Members Defense Manpower Data Center (DMDC) The Defense Manpower Data Center (DMDC) Human Resources Strategic Assessment
More informationChapter 2 Provider Responsibilities Unit 6: Behavioral Health Care Specialists
Chapter 2 Provider Responsibilities Unit 6: Health Care Specialists In This Unit Unit 6: Health Care Specialists General Information 2 Highmark s Health Programs 4 Accessibility Standards For Health Providers
More informationATTACHMENT I. Outpatient Status: Solicitation of Public Comments
ATTACHMENT I The following text is a copy of the Federation of American Hospitals ( FAH ) comments in response to the solicitation of public comments on outpatient status that was contained in CMS-1589-P;
More informationTITLE III B and Title VII A: LONG-TERM CARE (LTC) OMBUDSMAN PROGRAM OUTCOMES Four-Year Planning Cycle
TITLE III B and Title VII A: LONG-TERM CARE (LTC) OMBUDSMAN PROGRAM OUTCOMES 2012 2016 Four-Year Planning Cycle As mandated by the Older Americans Act, the mission of the LTC Ombudsman Program is to seek
More informationGuide for Independent Medical Examination Reports. September 2013
Guide for Independent Medical Examination Reports September 2013 Contents 1. Introduction 1 2. Format of the Report 3 3. Content of the Report 5 4. Constituent Evidence-Based Findings & Conclusions 7 5.
More informationAssistive Devices Program
Chapter 4 Section 4.01 Ministry of Health and Long-Term Care Assistive Devices Program Follow-up on VFM Section 3.01, 2009 Annual Report Chapter 4 Follow-up Section 4.01 Background The Ministry of Health
More informationREGISTRATION FOR HOME SCHOOLING
NSW Education Standards Authority REGISTRATION FOR HOME SCHOOLING AUTHORISED PERSONS HANDBOOK April 2018 Disclaimer: The most up-to-date Authorised Persons Handbook at any time is available on the NSW
More information# December 29, 2000
#00-53-3 December 29, 2000 Minnesota Department of Human Services 444 Lafayette Rd. St. Paul, MN 55155 OF INTEREST TO! County Social Service Directors/Supervisors! County Designated LMHA for PASRR! County
More informationGuidelines for Psychiatric Practice in Public Sector Psychiatric Inpatient Facilities RESOURCE DOCUMENT
Guidelines for Psychiatric Practice in Public Sector Psychiatric Inpatient Facilities RESOURCE DOCUMENT Approved by the Board of Trustees, December 1993 The findings, opinions, and conclusions of this
More informationQuality and Outcome Related Measures: What Are We Learning from New Brunswick s Primary Health Care Survey? Primary Health Care Report Series: Part 2
Quality and Outcome Related Measures: What Are We Learning from New Brunswick s Primary Health Care Survey? Primary Health Care Report Series: Part 2 About us: Who we are: New Brunswickers have a right
More informationHealth UM Accreditation v7.4. Workers Compensation UM Accreditation v7.4. Copyright 2018 URAC All Rights Reserved
Health UM Accreditation v7.4 Workers Compensation UM Accreditation v7.4 Copyright 2018 URAC All Rights Reserved Learning Objectives Attendees at this webinar should be able to: Understand the accreditation
More informationPresented by: Arlene Maxim, RN-Founder A.D. Maxim Consulting, LLC.
Presented by: Arlene Maxim, RN-Founder A.D. Maxim Consulting, LLC. On January 24, 2013, the U. S. District Court for the District of Vermont approved a settlement agreement in the case of Jimmo v. Sebelius,
More informationPopulation and Sampling Specifications
Mat erial inside brac ket s ( [ and ] ) is new to t his Specific ati ons Manual versi on. Introduction Population Population and Sampling Specifications Defining the population is the first step to estimate
More informationPCORI s Approach to Patient Centered Outcomes Research
PCORI s Approach to Patient Centered Outcomes Research David H. Hickam, MD, MPH Director, PCORI Clinical Effectiveness and Decision Science Program Charleston, SC July 18, 2017 Goals of this Presentation
More informationQuality Management Plan
for Submitted to U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Region 6 1445 Ross Avenue, Suite 1200 Dallas, Texas 75202-2733 April 2, 2009 TABLE OF CONTENTS Section Heading Page Table of Contents Approval Page
More information2015 RADAR Adjudication Quality Evaluation
Management Report 17-06 September 2017 2015 RADAR Adjudication Quality Evaluation Leissa C. Nelson Defense Personnel and Security Research Center Office of People Analytics Donna L. Tadle Northrop Grumman
More informationTEXAS HEALTHCARE TRANSFORMATION & QUALITY IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM. Bluebonnet Trails Community Services
TEXAS HEALTHCARE TRANSFORMATION & QUALITY IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM Regional Healthcare Partnership Region 4 Bluebonnet Trails Community Services Delivery System Reform Incentive Payment (DSRIP) Projects Category
More informationQuality Improvement Work Plan
NEVADA County Behavioral Health Quality Improvement Work Plan Mental Health and Substance Use Disorder Services Fiscal Year 2017-2018 Table of Contents I. Quality Improvement Program Overview...1 A. QI
More informationE-News & Views from the Renton Center of Occupational Health & Education. In This Issue
Page 1 of 5 July 31, 2007 Volume 6, Number 2 E-News & Views from the Renton Center of Occupational Health & Education In This Issue Change in Activity Form Faxing COHE billing/coding questions New Physician
More informationLily M. Gutmann, Ph.D., CYT Licensed Psychologist 4405 East West Highway #512 Bethesda, MD (301)
Lily M. Gutmann, Ph.D., CYT Licensed Psychologist 4405 East West Highway #512 Bethesda, MD 20814 (301) 996-0165 www.littlefallscounseling.com PRACTICE POLICIES AND CONSENT TO TREATMENT WELCOME Welcome
More informationA concern means any complaint, claim or reported patient safety incident.
PUTTING THINGS RIGHT ANNUAL REPORT -2017 Introduction The Putting Things Right Annual Report provides information on the progress and performance of Powys Teaching Local Health Board (hereafter, the health
More informationPharmacy Technician Structured Practical Training Program
Pharmacy Technician Structured Practical Training Program Logbook Updated August 2016 *To be reviewed by Supervisor and Pharmacy Technician-in-Training and used in conjunction with the Pharmacy Technician
More information