Recommendations to Improve Data Collection to Monitor, Track, and Evaluate State Approaches to Family Support Services

Transcription

1 Recommendations to Improve Data Collection to Monitor, Track, and Evaluate State Approaches to Family Support Services Introduction March 2016 Joe Caldwell National Council on Aging Katie Arnold, Evelyn Ingargiola, and Randa Abdelrahim University of Illinois at Chicago Family members provide the majority of support to people with disabilities across the life course. Families often contribute a considerable amount of their own resources to provide this care. Today, family caregivers are facing extraordinary demands that impact them financially, physically and emotionally. The number of informal, unpaid family caregivers varies based on methodological factors, however, the most widely used estimates come from the National Alliance for Caregiving Survey, Caregiving in the US. In 2015, it was estimated that there were 43.5 million unpaid caregivers in the United States who on average, spend 24.4 hours per week providing care to a loved one. The majority of these individuals receive no paid help (68%), have difficulties balancing caregiving and work responsibilities (61%) and are highly stressed (38%) i. Family support is essential to strengthening the ability of family caregivers to maintain community living and promote positive outcomes for individuals with disabilities. Flexible, individual and family-directed supports strengthen family caregivers wellbeing, enhance selfdetermination and outcomes for individuals with disabilities, and decrease undesirable, costly institutional placements. Family support services include instrumental supports (formal services such as respite, financial assistance, assistive technology); information and training supports (information about disability or supports to build caregiver skills); and emotional supports (support groups, counseling). Support for this brief was provided by the United States Department of Health and Human Services, Administration for Community Living (ACL), National Institute on Disability, Independent Living, and Rehabilitation Research (NIDILRR), Grant # 90RT The views are those of the authors and not necessarily the views of the ACL or NIDILRR.

2 In order to better meet the needs of families, we must improve methods to monitor, track and evaluate current approaches to family support across states. Currently, there is very limited nationally representative data available about family caregivers and family support services, let alone datasets that allow for state tracking and comparisons. Improvements will allow us to identify promising practices and assess how states are doing in supporting families. Environmental Scan In an effort to assess current data collection efforts for supporting families, the University of Illinois at Chicago s Family Support Research and Training Center (FSTRC) conducted an environmental scan to identify existing datasets that provide relevant information about family caregiving. Advisory committee members and FSRTC center members aided this process by providing recommendations and suggestions. Ultimately, 14 relevant datasets were analyzed, summarized and compiled. The researchers did not intend on creating an exhaustive list, but instead a useful inventory of available data that provides a snapshot of the current state of family caregiving supports within and across the United States. Findings from the environmental scan fell into three categories: 1) Datasets that provide nationally representative data; 2) Datasets that provide state-level comparison data; and 3) Scorecards which use indicators from various data sources to track state progress and make comparisons. National Datasets 1. American Time Use Survey 2. Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System 3. Caregiving in U.S. 4. Gallup Healthways 5. National Health & Aging Trends Study 6. National Survey of Children with Special Health Care Needs 7. Survey of Income and Program Participation State-Level Datasets 8. National Core Indicators 9. National Inventory Survey on Participant Direction 10. State of the States Supporting Individuals and Families Information Systems Project 12. UCSF s Survey of State HCBS Scorecards 13. AARP Scorecard on Long-Term Services and Supports 14. UCP The Case for Inclusion Summaries of the 14 datasets are contained in the Appendix, including: population, purpose, method, frequency, respondents, data collectors, funding, strengths, limitations and other relevant information. 2

3 Expert Panel Meeting On Nov 18th, 2015 the FSRTC convened a panel of aging and disability experts from across the country in Washington, DC. A list of meeting participants is contained at the end of this report. After examining the inventory of existing data sources, the panel sought to determine the best methods for creating a state family support data collection system across aging and disabilities. Two questions were posed to the panel to solicit recommendations: 1) What indicators are needed in order to monitor, track, and evaluate state approaches to family support services and family caregiver outcomes? 2) How can existing national and state level datasets be improved to enhance data on family caregivers and family support services? Recommendations Ideal Indicators to Monitor, Track, Evaluate Family Support Services In response to the first question concerning ideal indicators, responses fell into three categories: 1) Demographics of Family Caregiving Situation; 2) Impact on Families; and 3) Indicators to Assess Family Support at the State Level. Demographics of Caregiving Situation In order to better understand the nature of family caregiving and outcomes of family support services, the context of the caregiving situation is important. The panel noted that increasingly complex nature of family caregiving. There are often multiple caregivers involved; and it is not uncommon for family caregivers to be caring for more than one individual with disabilities. The panel suggested a number of important areas to consider when collecting data on the caregiving situation: Identification of all caregivers including the primary caregiver and other caregivers involved Identification of care recipient(s), level/type of disabilities, relationship Level and duration of caregiving Types of caregiving tasks Cultural perspective of caregiver Informal support networks Impact on Families The panel also suggested a number of important areas to consider when assessing the impact of caregiving on families and evaluating potential outcomes of family support services. Some areas included: Caregiver burden and stress Caregiver satisfaction 3

4 Caregiver health and wellbeing Financial impact/costs of caregiving including impacts on caregiver employment Indicators to Assess Family Support at State Level The crux of the first question was to develop a list of ideal indicators that if data were available could improve monitoring state efforts to support families. Conceptually, this is similar to the AARP and UCP scorecard efforts which use various data sources in order to assess state efforts over time and allow for comparisons across states. The AARP Scorecard on Long-Term Services and Supports currently includes a Support for Family Caregivers domain that assesses three areas: 1) Legal and system supports for family caregivers; 2) Number of health maintenance tasks able to be delegated to LTSS workers; and 3) Family caregiver health and well-being (caregivers without much worry or stress, with enough time, well rested). Similarly, the UCP scorecard, which focuses specifically on individuals with intellectual and developmental disabilities, includes a Keeping Families Together domain. This domain draws upon data from the State of the States in Developmental Disabilities and the National Core Indicators project for three indicators: 1) State expenditures on family support services; 2) Percentages of families receiving family support services; and 3) States participating in NCI family surveys. Unfortunately, current scorecard efforts are severely limited based on availability of data. The panel was charged to think about what indicators would ideally be useful to have to improve scorecard efforts across aging and disability populations. The panel suggested the following areas: State expenditures for family support services Percentage of family caregivers receiving family support services Data on respite services Waiting list for family support services Access to family support services during crises/transitions Disparities in service provision by race/ethnicity and socioeconomic status Availability of evidence based family caregiver support programs Availability of family support services through employers State requirements for caregiver assessments State policies on paid caregiving and prevalence Individual and family experience with service system Involvement of families in care coordination & decision making process Recommendations for Improvements to State and National Datasets The second question sought to solicit specific recommendations for improvements in existing state and national data collection efforts. Many recommendations were based on the 14 datasets identified through the environmental scan. However, the panel also identified opportunities to 4

5 add questions to other national datasets that currently do not include any caregiver related questions. The panel made the following recommendations: Development/Agreement on a core set of family caregiver questions that could be added to national surveys. Over the past decade the disability community has engaged in efforts to add a core set of six disability questions to many national surveys, including the American Community Survey (ACS) and Current Population Survey (CPS). This has led to greater consistency and ability to explore disability issues across issues covered by datasets. A similar effort should be undertaken to identify a core set of caregiver questions that could be added to surveys. The core set could include demographic caregiver questions to identify basic information such as caregiver status, characteristics of care recipient, level and duration of caregiving, and types of caregiving tasks performed. Some suggested that tested measures from the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS) could serve as a starting point. Others suggested that NIDLRR invest in development of this core set of questions. Add demographic caregiver question(s) to the core BRFSS survey BRFSS is the nation's premier system of health-related telephone surveys that collect state data about U.S. residents regarding their health-related risk behaviors, chronic health conditions, and use of preventive services. In 2009, the BRFSS included a question to identify caregiver status in the core BRFSS which is completed by every state. 1 This allowed researchers to explore the health and wellbeing of caregivers and make comparisons across states. Data was used in the first version of the AARP Scorecard. However, this question was not included in subsequent years. The panel recommended that CDC at a minimum add this question back to the core survey. CDC should also consider additional questions to provide context of the caregiving situation, such as amount of caregiving. Incentivize states to complete BRFSS voluntary caregiving module at least every five years A voluntary BRFSS Caregiving module has been available to states to use. However, historically very few states have included it. Due to advocacy and financial assistance form the Alzheimer s Association approximately have of states completed this module in the past year. The federal government should consider providing incentives to states to conduct this module at a minimum of every five years. Add caregiver questions to National Health Interview Survey The National Health Interview Survey (NHIS) currently does not include specific caregiving-related questions. The NHIS is a nationally representative survey providing data on the health of the civilian, non-institutionalized population of the United States. ii 1 BRFSS Caregiver Question: [Prologue: People may provide regular care or assistance to a friend or family member who has a health problem, long-term illness, or disability.] During the past month, did you provide any such care or assistance to a friend or family member? 5

6 The NHIS has been administered since 1957, and is conducted by the National Center for Health Statistics (NCHS), Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). The survey contains information on multiple aspects of health status, including activity limitations, injuries, health insurance, and access to and utilization of health care. The survey also provides information on household composition, socio-economic status, and family income and assets. However, one drawback is the design of the NHIS sample does not allow for state-level estimates. The NHIS is currently undergoing a redesign for 2018 and is open for public comment. Add caregiving supplement to American Community Survey The American Community Survey (ACS) currently does not include caregiving-related questions. The ACS is a continuous data collection effort by the U.S. Census Bureau that is used to produce annual estimates at the national, state, and local level on the characteristics of the United States population. iii Add caregiving questions to General Social Survey to explore attitudes related to caregiving The General Social Survey (GSS) gathers data on contemporary American society in order to monitor and explain trends and constants in attitudes, behaviors, and attributes. iv It is conducted by NORC at the University of Chicago, with the support of the National Science Foundation. The GSS contains a standard core of demographic, behavioral, and attitudinal questions, plus topics of special interest. The GSS could be used to potentially explore societal attitudes about caregiving or caregiving policies. Add caregiving questions to Medicare Current Beneficiary Survey The Medicare Current Beneficiary Survey (MCBS) is a continuous, multipurpose survey of a nationally representative sample of the Medicare population, conducted by the CMS The central goals of MCBS are to determine expenditures and sources of payment for all services used by Medicare beneficiaries, including co-payments, deductibles, and noncovered services; to ascertain all types of health insurance coverage and relate coverage to sources of payment; and to trace processes over time, such as changes in health status and spending down to Medicaid eligibility and the impacts of program changes, satisfaction with care, and usual source of care. v CMS should invest in development of a survey of family caregiver experience of care that could be used in assessing quality of care The federal government has invested in the development of experience of care surveys, such as Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems (CAHPS) surveys. Currently, CMS in partnership with Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) has invested in the development of a Home and Community-Based Services (HCBS) Experience survey. Additional investments are needed to develop surveys that assess the family caregiver experience of care, particularly related to HCBS. 6

7 Improve state reporting and consistency in data collection on family support services in Medicaid Currently, it is very difficult to obtain consistent Medicaid data from states on respite and other family support services. CMS should improve data collection efforts within Medicaid to allow for comparisons in delivery of family support services across states. Conduct national survey of caregivers of individuals under 65 similar to NHATS The National Study of Caregiving (NSOC) samples from The National Health and Aging Trends Study (NHATS), which is a nationally representative sample of Medicare beneficiaries ages 65 and older. NHATS is funded by the National Institute on Aging and the NSOC is supported by the Assistant Secretary for Planning and Evaluation (ASPE). The NCOC/NHATS is an excellent source for nationally representative information about the role and experiences of informal caregivers for the older population. vi Additional federal investments are needed to explore caregivers of individuals under 65. Add priority and missing questions related to caregiving National Core Indicators for people with IDD and conduct with families not receiving services The National Core Indicators (NCI) has been in use since The NCI Adult Consumer Survey is currently used by approximately 43 states. However, few states participate in the family surveys. Moreover, questions primarily focus on family member receiving services and supports versus health, wellbeing of caregiver and needs for family caregiver supports and services. Additional caregiver-related questions could be added to the NCI family surveys. In addition, the survey is currently only used with individuals with I/DD and their families receiving services and supports. The NCI, or other surveys, could be used to better explore the needs of families not receiving services and supports. The Family and Individual Needs for Disability Supports (FINDs) survey is another data collection efforts that could assist with understanding the needs of families of individuals with I/DD not receiving services and supports. Develop a family caregiver survey for the National Core Indicators-Aging and Disability survey The National Core Indicators-Aging and Disability (NCI-AD) survey currently consists of an in-person Consumer Survey tool with approximately 50 indicators of outcomes of LTSS for older adults and adults with physical and other disabilities, excluding adults with ID/DD. The NCI-AD project is currently in its first year of regular implementation ( data collection year). Fourteen states are participating in Consumer Survey data collection in As the NCI-AD continues to develop, investments should be made in piloting development of a family caregiver survey. Build on existing caregiver surveys such as Caregiving in the US, by oversampling to learn more about populations of interest Caregiving in the US provides a national portrait of family caregivers that is widely used by policymakers and advocates. It has been conducted approximately every five years since 1997, contingent upon funding. It also provides a platform for oversampling in order to explore needs and experiences of certain populations of caregivers in more 7

8 detail, which has been done in previous years. Additional investments should be made in Caregiving in the US to ensure its continuation every five years and to oversample. Add additional questions through State of the States to analyze data and promising practices in supports waivers. Supports waivers are Medicaid HCBS waivers that have increasingly been used within state I/DD service systems to provide family support. These waivers typically provide a limited amount of flexible services and supports to individuals living at home with family caregivers. The State of the States project could add some additional questions to better identify and analyze these waivers. 8

9 Meeting Participants Name Hugh Berry Greg Link Helen Lamont Sandy Magaña Tamar Heller Organization Administration for Community Living National Institute on Disability, Independent Living, and Rehabilitation Research (NIDILRR) Administration for Community Living Administration on Aging Assistant Secretary for Planning and Evaluation (ASPE) U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Department of Disability and Human Development University of Illinois at Chicago Katie Arnold Randa Abdelrahim Evelyn Ingargiola Joe Caldwell National Council on Aging (NCOA) Conor McGovern Ari Houser Jennifer Wolff Susan Parish Grace Whiting Amy Hewitt Steve Kaye Rick Hemp Mary Kay Rizzolo AARP Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Health Lurie Institute for Disability Policy Brandeis University National Alliance for Caregiving Research and Training Center on Community Living University of Minnesota RRTC on Community Living Policy University of California San Francisco State of the States in Developmental Disabilities University of Colorado 9

10 Endnotes i National Alliance for Caregiving (2015) Caregiving in the U.S., Washington, DC: National Alliance for Caregiving. ii Harris, B.H., Hendershot, G., & Stapleton, D.C. (October 2005). A Guide to Disability Statistics from the National Health Interview Survey. Employment and Disability Institute, Cornell University iii Erickson, W. (June 2012) A Guide to Disability Statistics from the American Community Survey (2008 Forward). Employment and Disability Institute, Cornell University iv General Social Survey v Current Medicare Beneficiary Survey Systems/Research/MCBS/index.html?redirect=/mcbs vi Spillman, B.C., Wolff, J., Freedman, V.A., & Kasper, J.D. (April 2014) Informal caregivers for Older Americans: An Analysis of the 2011 National Study of Caregiving. Office of Disability, Aging and Long-Term Care Policy Office of the Assistant Secretary for Planning and Evaluation U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. 10