Next national HAI initiative What should it be? CAUTI (of course)

Transcription

1 Next national HAI initiative What should it be? CAUTI (of course) Associate Professor Brett G Mitchell Avondale College of Higher Education brett.mitchell@avondale.edu.au

2 Disclosures Chair ACICP Scientific Committee Editor-in-Chief, Infection Disease and Health Competitive research funding from NHMRC, Ian Potter Foundation, Covidien, Medtronics, ACICP For those that use Twitter, tweeting information and links during #ACIPC16

3 Pre-poll

4 Who would like a UTI / CAUTI? As a healthcare professional / ICP High quality care provide Avoid wherever possible preventable infections Don t want high rates of infection As a patient/consumer Physical Frequency (n=8), very painful (n=7), bleeding (n=6), cold/flu like (n=4), stinging (n=3). Emotional Generally unwell (n=6), normal duties disrupted (n=3) n=27 (Leydon et al(2010). BMJ, 340, c279)

5 Why should a CAUTI prevention program be the next national HAI 1.Frequency initiative? 2. Antimicrobial resistance Its as easy as 1, 2, 3 (4) CAUTI 4. Largely preventable 3. Impact

6 Why CAUTI? 1. Frequency

7 Why CAUTI? 1. Frequency

8 CAUTI: Frequency Country/Region` Author, date Rank (HA-UTI) Argentina Durlach et al, Belgium Vrijens et al, Gordts, Canada Taylor et al, Gravel et al, Egypt See et al, Finland Kanerva et al, 2009 Lyytikainen et al, France Thiolet et al, Floret et al, Sartor et al, French PPS Group, Country Author Rank Kritsotakis et al, 2 Greece / Cyprus 2008 Gikas et al, Ireland/Northern Fitzpatrick et al, 1 Ireland 2008 Hungary Caine et al, 2013 Iran Lahsaeizadeh et 2 al, 2008 Lanini et al, Italy Durando et al, (Courtesy Jan Gralton)

9 CAUTI: Frequency Australia - Gardner et al(2014) - 6 hospitals - HAUTI 1.4% PP, CAUTI (0.9%) - Mitchell et al (2016) acute care facilities - HAUTI 1.4% PP - Mitchell et al (2016) - 8 hospital, 162,000+ admissions - 1.7% incidence Extrapolate: 95,000 patient / year acquire HAUTI in Australian hospitals

10 Why CAUTI? 2. Antimicrobial resistance

11 CAUTI: Antimicrobial resistance E. coli is the predominant pathogen isolated in patients (Nicolle, 2013) E.coli listed a national priority organism Organisms with high public health importance and/or common pathogens where the impact of resistance is substantial in both the hospital and community settings (AURA, 2016). Antimicrobial resistance may also prolong the duration of illness and increase mortality in patients (World Health Organisation, 2014). Antimicrobial resistance has been identified as a predictor of treatment failure especially in patients with hospital-acquired UTI (Koningstein et al., 2014) As AMR increases, UTIs will become more difficult to treat

12 Why CAUTI? 3. Impact

13 Vote CAUTI! CAUTI: Impact Morality complex probably not at present (but with AMR...) Length of stay 8 hospitals, 162K admissions Multi-state modelling HAUTI associated with extra 4 days in hospital (95%CI ) 380,000 extra bed days in Australia

14 Why CAUTI? 4.Largely preventable

15 Vote CAUTI! CAUTI: Largely preventable CAUTIs are by their nature associated with urinary catheters Large number of catheters are inserted/used catheters 26% of patients admitted to hospitals have urinary catheter inserted (Gardner et al, 2016). Catheter use is largely inappropriate Reduction in catheter use..> reduction in CAUTI Evidence to suggest that CAUTI initiatives work

16 CAUTI: Largely preventable Unnecessary catheter use and other strategies (e.g. reminder system, stop order etc) work

17 Can be sustained CAUTI: Largely preventable

18 CAUTI: Largely preventable Among non-icus catheter use decreased from 20.1% to 18.8% (P<0.001) catheter-associated UTI rates decreased from 2.28 to 1.54 infections per 1000 catheter-days (P<0.001)

19 What could a CAUTI initiative look like? Look to other models. NSW, Scotland, US Multifaceted programs Reduce catheter use Correct and standardised insertion Early removal Surveillance and feedback (you are right Phil, vote for me is a vote for Phil)

20 One nation, many States (& Territories) But is possible

21 Vote CAUTI! Conclusion 1.Frequency 2. Antimicrobial resistance CAUTI 4. Largely preventable 3. Impact

22 Who would like a UTI / CAUTI?

23 Thank you

24 What should the next national HAI initiative be? Discussion and time to vote via app. Go to program, find this session and vote Professor Marilyn Cruickshank (Chair) Professor Lindsay Grayson, Dr Phil Russo, A/Prof Brett Mitchell

25 References Fasugba, O., Mitchell, B. G., Mnatzaganian, G., Das, A., Collignon, P., & Gardner, A. (2016). Five-Year Antimicrobial Resistance Patterns of Urinary Escherichia coli at an Australian Tertiary Hospital: Time Series Analyses of Prevalence Data. PloS one, 11(10), e Meddings, J., Rogers, M. A., Krein, S. L., Fakih, M. G., Olmsted, R. N., & Saint, S. (2013). Reducing unnecessary urinary catheter use and other strategies to prevent catheter-associated urinary tract infection: an integrative review. BMJ quality & safety, bmjqs Mitchell, B. G., Fasugba, O., Beckingham, W., Bennett, N., & Gardner, A. (2016). A point prevalence study of healthcare associated urinary tract infections in Australian acute and aged care facilities. Infection, Disease & Health, 21(1), Mitchell, B. G., & Ferguson, J. K. (2016). The use of clinical coding data for the surveillance of healthcare-associated urinary tract infections in Australia. Infection, Disease & Health, 21(1), Mitchell, B. G., Ferguson, J. K., Anderson, M., Sear, J., & Barnett, A. (2016). Length of stay and mortality associated with healthcare-associated urinary tract infections: a multi-state model. Journal of Hospital Infection, 93(1), Mitchell, B., Gardner, A., Beckingham, W., & Fasugba, O. (2014). Healthcare associated urinary tract infections: a protocol for a national point prevalence study. Healthcare Infection, 19(1), Regagnin, D. A., da Silva Alves, D. S., Cavalheiro, A. M., Camargo, T. Z. S., Marra, A. R., da Silva Victor, E., & Edmond, M. B. (2016). Sustainability of a program for continuous reduction of catheter-associated urinary tract infection. American journal of infection control, 44(6), Saint, S., Greene, M. T., Kowalski, C. P., Watson, S. R., Hofer, T. P., & Krein, S. L. (2013). Preventing catheter-associated urinary tract infection in the United States: a national comparative study. JAMA internal medicine, 173(10), Saint, S., Greene, M. T., Krein, S. L., Rogers, M. A., Ratz, D., Fowler, K. E.,... & Faulkner, K. (2016). A Program to Prevent Catheter-Associated Urinary Tract Infection in Acute Care. New England Journal of Medicine, 374(22),