Final. Capital Facilities Plan Amendments. November Ordinance No s Adopted November 15, 2016 Effective January 1, 2017

Transcription

1 Final November 2016 Capital Facilities Plan 2017 Amendments Ordinance No s Adopted November 15, 2016 Effective January 1, 2017 Exhibit A to Ordinance No s,Page 1 of 318

2 Table of Contents Capital Facilities Plan Capital Facilities Plan Summary... 3 Capital Improvement Programs Airports... 9 District Court Emergency Management Ferry System General Administration Buildings Juvenile Court Parks and Recreation Road Facilities Sewer Utility Sheriff Sheriff s Corrections and Detention Center Solid Waste Superior Court Surface Water Management and River Improvement Districts Bethel School District Carbonado School District Dieringer School District Eatonville School District Fife School District Franklin Pierce School District Orting School District Peninsula School District Puyallup School District Steilacoom School District Sumner School White River School District Yelm School District Pierce County Library Pierce Transit Funding Partnerships Appendices Glossary of Acronyms Exhibit A to Ordinance No s,Page 2 of 318

3 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN SUMMARY INTRODUCTION The Capital Improvement Program (CIP) is the operational implementation of the Capital Facilities Plan (CFP). The CFP is one of the elements of Pierce County's comprehensive plan that is required by Washington's Growth Management Act (GMA). The GMA requires the CFP to identify public facilities that will be needed to address development expected to occur during the next six years. The CFP must identify the location and cost of the facilities and the sources of revenue that will be used to fund the facilities needed to support development. The CFP must be financially feasible; in other words, dependable revenue sources must equal or exceed anticipated costs. If the costs exceed the revenue, the County must reduce its level of service (LOS), reduce costs by implementing non-capital alternatives or other methods, or modify the land use element to bring development into balance with available or affordable facilities. Other requirements of the GMA mandate forecasts of future needs for capital facilities and the use of standards for levels of service of facility capacity as the basis for public facilities contained in the CFP. As a result, public facilities in the CFP must be based on quantifiable, objective measures of capacity, such as traffic volume capacity per mile of road or acres of park per capita. One of the goals of the GMA is to: "Ensure that those public facilities and services necessary to support development shall be adequate to serve the development at the time the development is available for occupancy and use...". In Pierce County, concurrency is required for sanitary sewer, septic and community systems, water, surface water, County roads, transit, and ferries. For these facilities, the following is required: 1) facilities serving the development to be in place at the time of development (or, for some types of facilities, that a financial commitment is made to provide the facilities within a specified period of time), and 2) such facilities have sufficient capacity to serve development without decreasing LOS below minimum standards adopted in the CFP. The GMA requires concurrency for transportation facilities. For transportation facilities, concurrent with development means "improvements or strategies are in place at the time of development, or that a financial commitment is in place to complete the improvements or strategies within six years." GMA also requires public facilities and services to be "adequate." These public facilities and services include: streets, roads, highways, sidewalks, street and road lighting systems, traffic signals, domestic water systems, storm and sanitary sewer systems, parks and recreational facilities, schools, fire protection and suppression, law enforcement, public health, education, recreation, environmental protection, and other governmental services. The County's development regulations, adopted July 1995, implement the plan and provide detailed regulations and procedures for implementing the requirements of the plan. Why Plan for Capital Facilities? The purpose of the CFP is to use sound fiscal policies to provide adequate public facilities consistent with the Land Use Element on a schedule concurrent with, or prior to, the impacts of development in order to achieve and maintain adopted standards for level of service, and to exceed the adopted standards, when possible. Exhibit A to Ordinance No s,Page 3 of 318

4 Summary There are at least three reasons to plan for capital facilities: 1) growth management, 2) financial management, and 3) eligibility for grants and loans. Recurring and Non-Recurring Capital Improvements Recurring capital improvements are non-major repairs and maintenance, and minor upgrades. Pursuant to the Washington Budgeting, Accounting, and Reporting System (BARS), these expenditures are generally coded in ledger account 5035XX (minor equipment) or ledger account 5048XX (repairs and maintenance). These expenditures are excluded from the Capital Facilities Plan. A non-recurring capital improvement for the CFP expenditure must be for the acquisition of a physical asset which has a useful life of at least 10 years. Excluded from the definition are such items as vehicles, office and data processing equipment, other equipment items (unless they are an integral part of the larger physical improvement), and normal repairs and maintenance. Also, projects with a total expenditure of less than $150,000 are excluded from the CFP, but are included here in order to maintain consistency with the adopted budget. Projects funded by Real Estate Excise Tax (REET) or the General Fund are usually budgeted and managed by the Facilities Management Department. PROCESS The CFP is updated annually to reflect a new six-year timeframe, current population projections, and changes to proposed capital improvement projects. In 2009, the schedule for adopting amendments to the CFP was adjusted to improve coordination between the CFP and preparation of the annual budget. The County uses population estimates prepared annually by the State's Office of Financial Management (OFM) and extrapolated (straight line) for out years. The first year of the CFP is based on the Council authorized capital program expenditures for the current fiscal year. The subsequent five years of the CFP are a projection of capital facility needs and funding based upon population projections, available funding, and other factors. The CFP projects are prepared and submitted by the Departments. Budget and Finance and the Planning and Land Services Departments coordinate preparation and publication of the plan. The County Executive approves the draft plan and forwards it to the Planning Commission. The Planning Commission reviews the draft, holds hearings in which some departments may be asked to provide additional explanation and detail, and then forwards the plan to the County Council with recommendations. After conducting public hearings, the County Council adopts the CFP by ordinance. PRIORITIZATION The County Executive and County Council establish policies and priorities to meet service and public policy goals. Generally, preservation and maintenance of existing, essential public facilities are the highest priority followed by upgrades and expansion to meet level of service and concurrency goals. Some projects must be undertaken to meet external mandates (such as National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System-NPDES) or to take advantage of grant opportunities. Each applicable department prepares six-year (14 in the case of the Ferry System) project plans and budgets to meet these goals. The Executive, Council, and Departments are also guided by specific long range plans such as the Park, Recreation and Open Space Plan, and other long range and community plans. Current and anticipated revenues often fall short of identified capital needs. Consequently, projects are often prioritized based upon greatest need and funding availability. Projects that are identified as being needed but have no funding currently available are listed separately in the CFP in order to inform future deliberations. Exhibit A to Ordinance No s,Page 4 of 318

5 Summary State law also requires each City and County to annually adopt a six-year (14 years for ferry systems), comprehensive Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) and file the program with State Secretary of Transportation. The CFP incorporates the TIP by reference. EXPENDITURE SUMMARY Total Capital Facilities Plan (Excluding Transportation Improvement Program) 176, , ,579 (x$1,000) 52,283 54,157 85,040 87,873 54, Surface Water Management has a large number of river projects in 2017 and General Administration has a number of building improvements. The following departments have capital expenditures budgeted for 2017 through Capital Improvement Project Summary Airports $ 1,817,870 $ 846,710 $ 541,000 $ 518,000 $ 2,331,000 $ 9,687,600 District Court Emergency Management 2,294,170 5,000,000 Ferry System 2,772,000 1,126,000 1,000 General Admin Buildings 8,084,000 59,562,000 22,200, , , ,000 Juvenile Court 743,500 Parks and Recreation 6,441,500 4,108,800 10,784,810 2,994,650 3,790,000 2,400,000 Roads Bldgs and Facilities 735,400 5,790,000 3,650, ,000 Sewer Utility 11,653,800 6,028,700 19,332,200 35,300,100 19,038,000 25,456,100 Sheriff 1,326,000 Sheriff's Corrections and 148,410 1,490,000 Detention Center Solid Waste 1,950,600 70,400 1,118, , ,300 Superior Court 395, ,000 Surface Water & River 18,181,590 28,448,950 12,916,650 14,037,290 15,029,170 12,735,000 Total $ 54,079,340 $ 114,936,060 $ 70,742,760 $ 53,717,040 $ 40,564,470 $ 50,528,700 Exhibit A to Ordinance No s,Page 5 of 318

6 Summary CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS SOURCES OF FUNDS The sources of funds for capital improvement projects have been grouped into five major categories. Taxes/Fees. This source of revenue includes non-dedicated taxes and fees such as sales tax, property tax, court fines, licenses, and permits. This category also includes dedicated taxes and fees such as park impact fees, park sales tax, and gas taxes. Service Fees. These fees are for specific services provided. Examples are E 9-1-1, golf course fees, sewer fees, and surface water management fees. Grants & Contributions. This source of revenue includes federal, state, and city contributions for specific projects or purposes. Examples include road funds, parks donations and grants, mental health and human services grants, and the City of Tacoma portion of the County-City Building. Bonds. This is interest bearing debt issued by the County. Intergovernmental Loans. This category is used for loans from one department to another, or from a tax or fee fund to a user fee (enterprise) fund. Fund Balance. This source of funds is from a prior year revenue source Capital Improvement Projects Source of Funds Grants & Contributions 33% Service Fees 18% Intergovernmental Loan 7% Fund Balance 18% Taxes/Fees 24% Capital Improvement Source of Funds Taxes/Fees $ 13,209,850 $ 61,907,780 $ 40,059,810 $ 7,741,680 $ 8,906,000 $ 7,235,850 Service Fees 9,685,670 8,362,370 17,418,750 21,062,660 22,837,470 29,916,100 Grants and Contributions 17,670,790 29,510,910 4,765,000 2,167,500 3,485,000 9,476,750 Bonds 14,600,000 Intergovemental Loans 3,650,000 Fund Balance 9,863, ,000 8,499,200 22,745,200 5,336,000 3,900,000 Total $ 54,079,340 $ 114,936,060 $ 70,742,760 $ 53,717,040 $ 40,564,470 $ 50,528,700 IMPACT ON THE OPERATING BUDGET Each subsection provides a forecast of the future maintenance and operating costs of capital improvement projects. The impacts of each project are presumed to begin in the year after the year in which the project is completed. Since it is not possible to forecast the completion date of each project, no attempt has been made to identify impacts for any portion of the year in which the project is completed. The forecast of operating impacts is included because the substantial cost impacts of some facilities may be a factor in the County's decision to construct the project (and to adopt the level of service (LOS) that causes the project to be needed). No financing plan is offered for the operating costs, and the County will be obliged to find revenue to pay for such costs. (Some of the revenue may come from increases to the tax base that Exhibit A to Ordinance No s,Page 6 of 318

7 Summary accompanies the new development that created the need for the capital facility. There is no assurance, however, that the increased tax revenue from new development will be sufficient to pay for the cost of operating the new facilities.) The operating impact costs reflect the amount by which each future year's operating budget will increase compared to the current operating budget. The same project is shown to have the same annual impact on each succeeding year's operating budget. Sometimes, the completion of a capital improvement project will result in savings in operating costs rather than incur new costs. In other instances such as maintenance projects, there will be no impact on operating costs. In these cases, zeroes are entered. For some projects the operating impact of the capital improvement projects cannot be calculated because of too many unknown factors such as final configuration and type of facility, realignment of staffing, or the amount of shared infrastructure with current facilities. Capital Improvement Impact on the Operating Budget Airports $ $ (27,525) $ (25,025) $ (25,025) $ (25,025) $ (25,025) District Court Emergency Management 425, , , , ,000 Ferry System General Admin Buildings 88, , , , , ,195 Juvenile Court Parks and Recreation 243, , , , , ,600 Roads Bldgs and Facilities Sewer Utility 2,002,000 2,006,050 2,111,200 2,216,600 2,337,600 2,496,220 Sheriff Sheriff's Corrections and Detention Center Solid Waste 2,500 2,550 2,610 2,670 2,730 2,790 Superior Court Surface Water & River Total $ 2,336,485 $ 2,769,630 $ 2,862,445 $ 2,979,446 $ 3,114,184 $ 3,281,780 Exhibit A to Ordinance No s,Page 7 of 318

8 Summary FUTURE NEEDS NO FUNDING CURRENTLY AVAILABLE The following table summarizes future capital facility needs but where a funding source has not been determined. Airports and Parks are dependent on awarding of grants and General Administration, Juvenile Court, Sheriff, and Sheriff s Corrections are dependent on Real Estate Excise Tax (REET) revenue and prioritization of projects against this revenue source. Unfunded Future Needs Airports $ $ $ $ $ $ District Court Emergency Management 94,170 Ferry System General Admin Buildings 59,562,000 22,200, , , ,000 Juvenile Court 743,500 Parks and Recreation 8,144,810 Roads Bldgs and Facilities Sewer Utility Sheriff 1,326,000 Sheriff's Corrections and 1,490,000 Detention Center Solid Waste Superior Court 395, ,000 Surface Water & River CFP Total Unfunded $ 94,170 $ 63,516,500 $ 30,544,810 $ 250,000 $ 250,000 $ 250,000 Exhibit A to Ordinance No s,Page 8 of 318

9 AIRPORTS The two County airports provide general and corporate aviation access to the east and extreme western parts of Pierce County. Airports are to remain open 24 hours a day, 365 days a week and be available for day to day service and emergency response/search and rescue support as needed. Above: Tacoma Narrows Airport Adequate Public Facilities: It is the intent of the County CFP that adequate Department of Public Works facilities be available no later than occupancy of each new development. However, no development permit should be denied based on the County's inability to maintain level of service standards for the Department of Public Works facilities. Below: Pierce County Airport Thun Field CURRENT FACILITY INVENTORY Facility Hangar Units Percent Occupied Tie- Downs Percent Occupied Annual Operations Pierce County Airport-Thun Field, Puyallup Tacoma Narrows Airport, Gig Harbor 50 86% % 62, % 38 57% 71,000 PRIOR YEAR MAJOR ACCOMPLISHMENTS Several major maintenance projects were completed at Tacoma Narrows Airport in Work continued on pavement maintenance on the apron and aircraft movement areas. A new Opticon sensor was installed on the North Gate which allows the Fire Department to trigger gate opening automatically, making it quicker and easier for them to enter airport property in case of emergency. Additionally, the team worked on landside lighting improvements, stormwater facility maintenance, and removing trees that were interfering with critical aviation instruments used by pilots. Exhibit A to Ordinance No s,Page 9 of 318

10 Airports At Thun Field, scoping work began on the Airport Master Plan. This project will span two to three years and will set the stage for infrastructure, planning, and other critical improvements at the airport over the next 20 years. Runway lighting was also upgraded with the installation of all new wiring along the full length of the runway as well as installing new Runway End Identifier Lights or REILs and new Constant Current Regulators (CCRs). Other work completed at Thun Field includes the renovation of Building in partnership with the Pierce County Noxious Weed Board, problem tree removal, ongoing airside pavement maintenance, and landside lighting upgrades. NON-CAPITAL ALTERNATIVES The Airport and Ferry division continues to implement the Airport Communication Plan, which now includes a Pierce County Airports Facebook page. A quarterly newsletter, Sounds Skies, is distributed as well. The airport website continues to be instrumental in providing specific information to pilots and stakeholders. The airports also provides an active speakers bureau and actively seek opportunities to present information about the Pierce County airports to local community groups and neighborhoods. MAP OF LOCATIONS Exhibit A to Ordinance No s,Page 10 of 318

11 Airports Capital Projects Location Links to Other Projects Facilities Description Need Notes Runway/Taxiway/Apron Pavement Maintenance Thun Field Pierce County Airport - Thun Field (PLU), Puyallup Repair pavement and repave as needed on the runway, taxiway, and apron areas Pavement is the airport's biggest investment and needs to be maintained. Capital Cost Prior Expend Year Total Grand Total Land Acquisition Design Engineering Construction 94, , , ,400 Total Cost 94, , , ,400 Funding Sources FAA Grant $ 85,000 $ $ $ 180,000 $ $ $ $ 180,000 $ 265,000 WSDOT Grant 4,700 10,000 10,000 14,700 State Grant Homeland Security Local Funds REET 4,700 10,000 10,000 14,700 Unfunded Fund Balance Total Funds 94, , , ,400 Annual M&O Total Annual M&O Exhibit A to Ordinance No s,Page 11 of 318

12 Location Links to Other Projects Facilities Description Need Notes Airports PE & Environmental for Obstruction Removal, Taxiway Lighting, and Runway Widening Thun Field Pierce County Airport - Thun Field (PLU), Puyallup Capital Cost Prior Expend Year Total Grand Total Land Acquisition Design Engineering 330, , ,000 Construction Total Cost 330, , ,000 Funding Sources FAA Grant $ $ $ 300,000 $ $ $ $ $ 300,000 $ 300,000 WSDOT Grant 15,000 15,000 15,000 State Grant Homeland Security Local Funds REET 15,000 15,000 15,000 Unfunded Fund Balance Total Funds 330, , ,000 Annual M&O Total Annual M&O Exhibit A to Ordinance No s,Page 12 of 318

13 Airports Location Links to Other Projects Facilities Description Need Notes Runway Widening Thun Field Pierce County Airport - Thun Field (PLU), Puyallup Widen runway from 60' to 75' Widen runway to meet NextGen standards Capital Cost Prior Expend Year Total Grand Total Land Acquisition Design Engineering 300, , ,000 Construction 3,796,600 3,796,600 3,796,600 Total Cost 300,000 3,796,600 4,096,600 4,096,600 Funding Sources FAA Grant $ $ $ $ $ $ 270,000 $ 3,416,900 $ 3,686,900 $ 3,686,900 WSDOT Grant 15, , , ,850 State Grant Homeland Security Local Funds REET 15, , , ,850 Unfunded Fund Balance Total Funds 300,000 3,796,600 4,096,600 4,096,600 Annual M&O Total Annual M&O Exhibit A to Ordinance No s,Page 13 of 318

14 Airports Location Links to Other Projects Facilities Description Need Notes Taxiway Lighting Thun Field Pierce County Airport - Thun Field (PLU), Puyallup Final design and installation of taxiway lighting Capital Cost Prior Expend Year Total Grand Total Land Acquisition Design Engineering Construction 100, , , , , ,000 Total Cost 100, , , ,000 Funding Sources FAA Grant $ $ $ $ $ 90,000 $ $ 600,000 $ 690,000 $ 690,000 WSDOT Grant 5,000 30,000 35,000 35,000 State Grant Homeland Security Local Funds REET 5,000 30,000 35,000 35,000 Unfunded Fund Balance Total Funds 100, , , ,000 Annual M&O Total Annual M&O Exhibit A to Ordinance No s,Page 14 of 318

15 Airports Location Links to Other Projects Facilities Description Need Notes Airport Master Plan Update and Obstruction Survey Thun Field Pierce County Airport, Thun Field (PLU), Puyallup All Update Airport Master Plan to reflect current conditions and future development plans and conduct an obstruction survey FAA-required and practical planning document for airport development. Obsturction survey will identify obstructions to increase safety and efficiency of the airport and airspace. Project number 6701, future expenditures will be capital costs. Capital Cost Prior Expend Year Total Grand Total Land Acquisition Design Engineering Construction 96, , , , , , ,000 Total Cost 96, , , , ,000 Funding Sources FAA Grant $ 86,400 $ 270,000 $ $ $ 100,000 $ $ $ 370,000 $ 456,400 WSDOT Grant 4,800 15,000 5,500 20,500 25,300 State Grant Homeland Security Local Funds REET 4,800 15,000 5,500 20,500 25,300 Unfunded Fund Balance Total Funds 96, , , , ,000 Annual M&O Total Annual M&O Exhibit A to Ordinance No s,Page 15 of 318

16 Airports Location Links to Other Projects Facilities Description Need Notes Preservation-Hangars Thun Field Pierce County Airport - Thun Field (PLU), Puyallup Hangar renovation Project number 4381 Capital Cost Prior Expend Year Total Grand Total Land Acquisition Design Engineering Construction 504, , , , ,650 1,314,975 Total Cost 1,157, , ,650 1,819,802 Funding Sources FAA Grant WSDOT Grant State Grant Homeland Security Local Funds 1,157, , ,650 1,819,802 REET Unfunded Fund Balance Total Funds 1,157, , ,650 1,819,802 Annual M&O Total Annual M&O $ $ $ 25,000 $ 25,000 $ 25,000 $ 25,000 $ 25,000 $ 125,000 $ 125,000 Exhibit A to Ordinance No s,Page 16 of 318

17 Airports Location Links to Other Projects Facilities Description Need Notes Preservation-Other Buildings Thun Field Pierce County Airport - Thun Field (PLU), Puyallup South end property clean-up and building upgrades and facility maintenance South end property clean-up: $8,000, project number: 6707, Cost Center: PLU Operations PLU Building Roof Repair: $25,000, project number: 6513, Cost Center: PLU Operations Capital Cost Prior Expend Year Total Grand Total Land Acquisition Design Engineering Construction 4,000 33,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 38,000 42,000 Total Cost 4,000 33,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 38,000 42,000 Funding Sources FAA Grant WSDOT Grant State Grant Homeland Security Local Funds REET 4,000 33,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 38,000 42,000 Unfunded Fund Balance Total Funds 4,000 33,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 38,000 42,000 Annual M&O Total Annual M&O $ $ $ 175 $ 175 $ 175 $ 175 $ 175 $ 875 $ 875 Exhibit A to Ordinance No s,Page 17 of 318

18 Airports Location Links to Other Projects Facilities Description Need Notes Preservation-Pavement Thun Field Pierce County Airport - Thun Field (PLU), Puyallup Regrade and repave main parking area Capital Cost Prior Expend Year Total Grand Total Land Acquisition Design Engineering Construction 84,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 88,000 88,000 Total Cost 84,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 88,000 88,000 Funding Sources FAA Grant WSDOT Grant State Grant Homeland Security Local Funds REET 84,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 88,000 88,000 Unfunded Fund Balance Total Funds 84,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 88,000 88,000 Annual M&O Total Annual M&O Exhibit A to Ordinance No s,Page 18 of 318

19 Airports Location Links to Other Projects Facilities Description Need Notes Preservation-Security Thun Field Pierce County Airport - Thun Field (PLU), Puyallup Capital Cost Prior Expend Year Total Grand Total Land Acquisition Design Engineering Construction 1,000 1,000 1,000 Total Cost 1,000 1,000 1,000 Funding Sources FAA Grant WSDOT Grant State Grant Homeland Security Local Funds REET 1,000 1,000 1,000 Unfunded Fund Balance Total Funds 1,000 1,000 1,000 Annual M&O Total Annual M&O Exhibit A to Ordinance No s,Page 19 of 318

20 Airports Location Links to Other Projects Facilities Description Need Notes Preservation-Miscellaneous Thun Field Pierce County Airport - Thun Field (PLU), Puyallup Capital Cost Prior Expend Year Total Grand Total Land Acquisition Design Engineering Construction 1,000 1,000 1,000 Total Cost 1,000 1,000 1,000 Funding Sources FAA Grant WSDOT Grant State Grant Homeland Security Local Funds REET 1,000 1,000 1,000 Unfunded Fund Balance Total Funds 1,000 1,000 1,000 Annual M&O Total Annual M&O Exhibit A to Ordinance No s,Page 20 of 318

21 Airports Location Links to Other Projects Facilities Description Need Notes Water System Improvements Tacoma Narrows Tacoma Narrows Airport (TIW), Gig Harbor Replace the fire pumps motor controls Capital Cost Prior Expend Year Total Grand Total Land Acquisition Design Engineering Construction 10,000 10,000 10,000 Total Cost 10,000 10,000 10,000 Funding Sources FAA Grant WSDOT Grant State Grant Homeland Security Local Funds REET 10,000 10,000 10,000 Unfunded Fund Balance Total Funds 10,000 10,000 10,000 Annual M&O Total Annual M&O $ $ $ 500 $ 500 $ 500 $ 500 $ 500 $ 2,500 $ 2,500 Exhibit A to Ordinance No s,Page 21 of 318

22 Airports Location Links to Other Projects Facilities Description Need Notes Pump House Back-up Generator Tacoma Narrows Tacoma Narrows Airport (TIW), Gig Harbor Capital Cost Prior Expend Year Total Grand Total Land Acquisition Design Engineering Construction 18,850 18,850 18,850 Total Cost 18,850 18,850 18,850 Funding Sources FAA Grant WSDOT Grant State Grant 15,080 15,080 15,080 Homeland Security Local Funds REET 3,770 3,770 3,770 Unfunded Fund Balance Total Funds 18,850 18,850 18,850 Annual M&O Total Annual M&O $ $ $ 1,000 $ 1,000 $ 1,000 $ 1,000 $ 1,000 $ 5,000 $ 5,000 Exhibit A to Ordinance No s,Page 22 of 318

23 Airports Location Links to Other Projects Facilities Description Need Notes New Bathroom Facility Tacoma Narrows Tacoma Narrows Airport (TIW), Gig Harbor Install a new public restroom facility Increased capacity Capital Cost Prior Expend Year Total Grand Total Land Acquisition Design Engineering Construction 7,600 7,600 7,600 68,400 68,400 68,400 Total Cost 76,000 76,000 76,000 Funding Sources FAA Grant WSDOT Grant State Grant Homeland Security Local Funds 76,000 76,000 76,000 REET Unfunded Fund Balance Total Funds 76,000 76,000 76,000 Annual M&O Total Annual M&O Exhibit A to Ordinance No s,Page 23 of 318

24 Airports Location Links to Other Projects Facilities Description Need Notes Entry Signage and Gateway Tacoma Narrows Tacoma Narrows Airport (TIW), Gig Harbor New airport entry signage Enhance airport gateway esthetic Capital Cost Prior Expend Year Total Grand Total Land Acquisition Design Engineering 15,000 15,000 15,000 Construction 135, , ,000 Total Cost 150, , ,000 Funding Sources FAA Grant WSDOT Grant State Grant Homeland Security Local Funds 124, , ,000 REET 26,000 26,000 26,000 Unfunded Fund Balance Total Funds 150, , ,000 Annual M&O Total Annual M&O Exhibit A to Ordinance No s,Page 24 of 318

25 Airports Location Links to Other Projects Facilities Description Need Notes Obstruction Removal Tacoma Narrows Tacoma Narrows Airport (TIW), Gig Harbor Remove obstructions to increase the safety and efficiency of the airport and airspace Meet FAA requirements Project number 6804 Capital Cost Prior Expend Year Total Grand Total Land Acquisition Design Engineering Construction 110, , ,000 Total Cost 110, , ,000 Funding Sources FAA Grant $ $ $ $ 100,000 $ $ $ $ 100,000 $ 100,000 WSDOT Grant 5,000 5,000 5,000 State Grant Homeland Security Local Funds REET 5,000 5,000 5,000 Unfunded Fund Balance Total Funds 110, , ,000 Annual M&O Total Annual M&O Exhibit A to Ordinance No s,Page 25 of 318

26 Airports Location Links to Other Projects Facilities Description Need Notes Wildlife Hazard Assessment Tacoma Narrows Tacoma Narrows Airport (TIW), Gig Harbor Wildlife hazard assessment FAA required Project number 6841 Capital Cost Prior Expend Year Total Grand Total Land Acquisition Design Engineering 49,500 10,000 10,000 59,500 Construction Total Cost 49,500 10,000 10,000 59,500 Funding Sources FAA Grant $ 44,500 $ 9,000 $ $ $ $ $ $ 9,000 $ 53,500 WSDOT Grant 2, ,000 State Grant Homeland Security Local Funds REET 2, ,000 Unfunded Fund Balance Total Funds 49,500 10,000 10,000 59,500 Annual M&O Total Annual M&O $ $ $ 5,000 $ 5,000 $ 5,000 $ 5,000 $ 5,000 $ 25,000 $ 25,000 Exhibit A to Ordinance No s,Page 26 of 318

27 Airports Location Links to Other Projects Facilities Description Need Notes Runway/Taxiway/Apron Pavement Maintenance Tacoma Narrows Tacoma Narrows Airport (TIW), Gig Harbor Repair pavement and repave as needed on the runway, taxiway, and apron areas Pavement is the airport's biggest investment and needs to be maintained. Capital Cost Prior Expend Year Total Grand Total Land Acquisition Design Engineering Construction 200, , ,000 Total Cost 200, , ,000 Funding Sources FAA Grant $ $ $ $ 180,000 $ $ $ $ 180,000 $ 180,000 WSDOT Grant 10,000 10,000 10,000 State Grant Homeland Security Local Funds REET 10,000 10,000 10,000 Unfunded Fund Balance Total Funds 200, , ,000 Annual M&O Total Annual M&O Exhibit A to Ordinance No s,Page 27 of 318

28 Location Links to Other Projects Facilities Description Need Notes Airports PE & Environmental for Obstruction Removal, Pond Relocation, & Taxiway Realignment Project Tacoma Narrows Tacoma Narrows Airport (TIW), Gig Harbor Compliance with NextGen standards Project 6510 does not result in savings or additional costs Capital Cost Prior Expend Year Total Grand Total Land Acquisition Design Engineering 550, , ,000 Construction Total Cost 550, , ,000 Funding Sources FAA Grant $ $ 495,000 $ $ $ $ $ $ 495,000 $ 495,000 WSDOT Grant 27,500 27,500 27,500 State Grant Homeland Security Local Funds REET 27,500 27,500 27,500 Unfunded Fund Balance Total Funds 550, , ,000 Annual M&O Total Annual M&O Exhibit A to Ordinance No s,Page 28 of 318

29 Airports Location Links to Other Projects Facilities Description Need Notes Pond Relocation and Taxiway Realignment Tacoma Narrows Tacoma Narrows Airport (TIW), Gig Harbor Compliance with NextGen standards Capital Cost Prior Expend Year Total Grand Total Land Acquisition Design Engineering 200, , ,000 Construction 2,000,000 5,200,000 7,200,000 7,200,000 Total Cost 200,000 2,000,000 5,200,000 7,400,000 7,400,000 Funding Sources FAA Grant $ $ $ $ $ 180,000 $ 1,800,000 $ 4,680,000 $ 6,660,000 $ 6,660,000 WSDOT 10, , , , ,000 Grant State Grant Homeland Security Local Funds REET 10, , , , ,000 Unfunded Fund Balance Total Funds 200,000 2,000,000 5,200,000 7,400,000 7,400,000 Annual M&O Total Annual M&O Exhibit A to Ordinance No s,Page 29 of 318

30 Airports Location Links to Other Projects Facilities Description Need Notes Stormwater Vault Cartidge Replacement Tacoma Narrows Tacoma Narrows Airport (TIW), Gig Harbor Capital Cost Prior Expend Year Total Grand Total Land Acquisition Design Engineering Construction 20,000 20,000 20,000 Total Cost 20,000 20,000 20,000 Funding Sources FAA Grant WSDOT Grant State Grant Homeland Security Local Funds REET 20,000 20,000 20,000 Unfunded Fund Balance Total Funds 20,000 20,000 20,000 Annual M&O Total Annual M&O Exhibit A to Ordinance No s,Page 30 of 318

31 Airports Location Links to Other Projects Facilities Description Need Notes Building 1208 Roof Replacement Tacoma Narrows Tacoma Narrows Airport (TIW), Gig Harbor Capital Cost Prior Expend Year Total Grand Total Land Acquisition Design Engineering Construction 128, , ,650 Total Cost 128, , ,650 Funding Sources FAA Grant WSDOT Grant State Grant Homeland Security Local Funds REET 128, , ,650 Unfunded Fund Balance Total Funds 128, , ,650 Annual M&O Total Annual M&O $ $ $ (3,000) $ (3,000) $ (3,000) $ (3,000) $ (3,000) $ (15,000) $ (15,000) Exhibit A to Ordinance No s,Page 31 of 318

32 Airports Location Links to Other Projects Facilities Description Need Notes South-End Lighting Upgrades Tacoma Narrows Tacoma Narrows Airport (TIW), Gig Harbor Capital Cost Prior Expend Year Total Grand Total Land Acquisition Design Engineering Construction 14,000 14,000 14,000 Total Cost 14,000 14,000 14,000 Funding Sources FAA Grant WSDOT Grant State Grant Homeland Security Local Funds REET 14,000 14,000 14,000 Unfunded Fund Balance Total Funds 14,000 14,000 14,000 Annual M&O Total Annual M&O $ $ $ (5,000) $ (5,000) $ (5,000) $ (5,000) $ (5,000) $ (25,000) $ (25,000) Exhibit A to Ordinance No s,Page 32 of 318

33 Airports Location Links to Other Projects Facilities Description Need Notes West Side Fencing Tacoma Narrows Tacoma Narrows Airport (TIW), Gig Harbor Capital Cost Prior Expend Year Total Grand Total Land Acquisition Design Engineering Construction 52, , , ,710 Total Cost 52, , , ,710 Funding Sources FAA Grant WSDOT Grant State Grant Homeland Security 39, , , ,030 Local Funds REET 13,000 57,680 70,680 70,680 Unfunded Fund Balance Total Funds 52, , , ,710 Annual M&O Total Annual M&O $ $ $ $ 2,500 $ 2,500 $ 2,500 $ 2,500 $ 10,000 $ 10,000 Exhibit A to Ordinance No s,Page 33 of 318

34 Airports Location Links to Other Projects Facilities Description Need Notes Preservation-Hangars Tacoma Narrows Tacoma Narrows Airport (TIW), Gig Harbor Replace and repair doors on county-owned hangars Service life has been reached Cost Center: TIW Operations Capital Cost Prior Expend Year Total Grand Total Land Acquisition Design Engineering Construction 25,000 25,000 25,000 25,000 25,000 25, , ,000 Total Cost 25,000 25,000 25,000 25,000 25,000 25, , ,000 Funding Sources FAA Grant WSDOT Grant State Grant Homeland Security Local Funds REET 25,000 25,000 25,000 25,000 25,000 25, , ,000 Unfunded Fund Balance Total Funds 25,000 25,000 25,000 25,000 25,000 25, , ,000 Annual M&O Total Annual M&O $ $ $ (50,000) $ (50,000) $ (50,000) $ (50,000) $ (50,000) $ (250,000) $ (250,000) Exhibit A to Ordinance No s,Page 34 of 318

35 Airports Location Links to Other Projects Facilities Description Need Notes Preservation-Other Buildings Tacoma Narrows Tacoma Narrows Airport (TIW), Gig Harbor Building 1620 roof repair, Facility Maintenance Capital Cost Prior Expend Year Total Grand Total Land Acquisition Design Engineering Construction 10,840 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 15,840 15,840 Total Cost 10,840 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 15,840 15,840 Funding Sources FAA Grant WSDOT Grant State Grant Homeland Security Local Funds REET 10,840 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 15,840 15,840 Unfunded Fund Balance Total Funds 10,840 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 15,840 15,840 Annual M&O Total Annual M&O $ $ $ (1,500) $ (1,500) $ (1,500) $ (1,500) $ (1,500) $ (7,500) $ (7,500) Exhibit A to Ordinance No s,Page 35 of 318

36 Airports Location Links to Other Projects Facilities Description Need Notes Preservation-Pavement Tacoma Narrows Tacoma Narrows Airport (TIW), Gig Harbor Capital Cost Prior Expend Year Total Grand Total Land Acquisition Design Engineering Construction 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 5,000 5,000 Total Cost 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 5,000 5,000 Funding Sources FAA Grant WSDOT Grant State Grant Homeland Security Local Funds REET 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 5,000 5,000 Unfunded Fund Balance Total Funds 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 5,000 5,000 Annual M&O Total Annual M&O Exhibit A to Ordinance No s,Page 36 of 318

37 Airports Location Links to Other Projects Facilities Description Need Notes Preservation-Security Tacoma Narrows Tacoma Narrows Airport (TIW), Gig Harbor Fence around back-up generator Capital Cost Prior Expend Year Total Grand Total Land Acquisition Design Engineering Construction 2,880 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 7,880 7,880 Total Cost 2,880 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 7,880 7,880 Funding Sources FAA Grant WSDOT Grant State Grant Homeland Security Local Funds REET 2,880 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 7,880 7,880 Unfunded Fund Balance Total Funds 2,880 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 7,880 7,880 Annual M&O Total Annual M&O $ $ $ 300 $ 300 $ 300 $ 300 $ 300 $ 1,500 $ 1,500 Exhibit A to Ordinance No s,Page 37 of 318

38 Airports Location Links to Other Projects Facilities Description Need Notes Preservation-Miscellaneous Tacoma Narrows Tacoma Narrows Airport (TIW), Gig Harbor Capital Cost Prior Expend Year Total Grand Total Land Acquisition Design Engineering Construction 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 5,000 5,000 Total Cost 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 5,000 5,000 Funding Sources FAA Grant WSDOT Grant State Grant Homeland Security Local Funds REET 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 5,000 5,000 Unfunded Fund Balance Total Funds 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 5,000 5,000 Annual M&O Total Annual M&O Exhibit A to Ordinance No s,Page 38 of 318

39 Airports Total of Capital Projects Prior Expend Year Total Grand Total Land Acquisition Design Engineering 650, , , , ,000 1,822,600 2,472,927 Construction 750, , , , ,400 2,031,000 9,687,600 13,919,580 14,670,305 Total Cost 1,401,052 1,817, , , ,000 2,331,000 9,687,600 15,742,180 17,143,232 Source of Funds FAA Grant $ 774,000 $ 300,000 $ 460,000 $ 370,000 $ 2,070,000 $ 8,696,900 WSDOT Grant 43,000 15,000 25,000 20, , ,850 State Grant 15,080 Homeland Security 39, ,030 Local Funds 662, ,000 76,000 REET 284, ,680 56,000 51, , ,850 Unfunded Fund Balance Total Sources $ 1,817,870 $ 846,710 $ 541,000 $ 518,000 $ 2,331,000 $ 9,687,600 Total Annual M&O Total Cost $ $ (27,525) $ (25,025) $ (25,025) $ (25,025) $ (25,025) FUTURE NEEDS NO FUNDING CURRENTLY AVAILABLE Capital Cost Total Unfunded $ $ $ $ $ $ $ Relation to Growth Management Act The GMA recognizes general aviation airports as essential public facilities and requires that the capital needs of these facilities being considered within the Comprehensive Plan and Capital Facilities Plan. The airports capital plans through 2017 are exclusive to maintenance, improvements, and preservation of current capital assets. These projects will not increase the level of service but will improve safety and longevity of the current infrastructure. Exhibit A to Ordinance No s,Page 39 of 318

40 Airports Airports Level of Service Aircraft Operations Demand Aircraft Operations Capacity Net Reserve or (Deficiency) Thun Field 2016 Estimated 72, ,000 78, : Growth 6,000 Total as of , ,000 72, : Growth 6,000 Total as of , ,000 66,000 Tacoma Narrows 2016 Estimated 70, , , : Growth 5,000 Total as of , , , : Growth 5,000 Total as of , , ,000 Exhibit A to Ordinance No s,Page 40 of 318

41 DISTRICT COURT The mission of Pierce County District Court, as an independent and impartial branch of government, is to promote respect for law, society, and individual rights; provide open, accessible, and effective forums for dispute resolution; resolve legal matters in a just, efficient, and timely manner; and assure the dignified and fair treatment of all parties. Pierce County District Court is a court of limited jurisdiction over the following cases: traffic infractions; criminal and traffic misdemeanors and gross misdemeanors; civil matters for damages for injury to individuals or personal property, penalties and contract disputes no greater than $100,000; civil claims, known as small claims, for recovery of money only where the amount claimed does not exceed $5,000; name changes; and anti-harassment protection orders. Adequate Public Facilities: It is the intent of the County CFP that adequate District Court facilities be available no later than occupancy of each new development. However, no development permit should be denied based on the County's inability to maintain level of service for District Court facilities. CURRENT FACILITY INVENTORY Facility Current Capacity Location County-City Building 8 courtrooms 930 Tacoma Ave S, Tacoma Hess Building Probation Offices 901 Tacoma Ave S, Tacoma PRIOR YEAR MAJOR ACCOMPLISHMENTS Self-Scheduling Citizens who receive an infraction citation and wish to either schedule a hearing or challenge the citation in writing can do so online using District Court s web-based Infraction Self-Scheduling application. The application allows customers to schedule their infraction hearing or submit a Hearing by Mail written statement directly via the court s website. The web-based application is expected to reduce substantial traffic both at the court s public counter and on the telephones, as well as the amount of mail the court receives. In 2015, 2,213 customers scheduled their hearings online. District Court is the first court of limited jurisdiction in Washington State, and one of the only courts of limited jurisdiction in the country, to introduce this unique service. Exhibit A to Ordinance No s,Page 41 of 318

42 District Court Live Chat District Court became the first court in Washington State to provide online customer support for court services. Litigants are now able to reach the court s customer service staff via online Live Chat as an alternative to telephone or appearing in person at the court s public counter. The Court served 9,809 Live Chat customers in In the first half of 2016, the Court served 5,879 customers. In 2016, the Court implemented a program allowing litigants to receive faster service at the counter by reserving their counter appearance online. NON-CAPITAL ALTERNATIVES The following non-capital alternatives discuss strategies, programs, technologies, and other alternatives that do not require capital improvement projects to achieve and maintain level of standards for court facilities. Alternative 1 Coordination Superior Court, District Court, and Tacoma Municipal Court have formed a Trial Court Coordination Council (TCCC) to consider several potential areas of collaboration. Alternative 2 Technology District Court continues to utilize technology to create efficiencies for court processes, especially those that provide alternatives that allow citizens to initiate/complete selected court processes through internet based applications. The Court has implemented online name change, anti-harassment and small claim filings. The court has partnered with the law library to provide kiosk interfaces for litigants who do not have internet availability. Alternative 3 Outsourcing In recent years, District Court has moved towards outsourcing some court functions in order to: 1) diminish public traffic to our locations; 2) expand customer service, and 3) efficiently manage the court s resources. The court is currently outsourcing some or all of the work for the following functions: payment processing collections management CAPITAL PROJECTS There are no projects funded for years. Projects that may impact the Pierce County District Court can be found in the General Administration Buildings section of the Capital Facilities Plan. MAP OF LOCATIONS Not applicable Exhibit A to Ordinance No s,Page 42 of 318

43 District Court FUTURE NEEDS NO FUNDING CURRENTLY AVAILABLE To meet the level of service required, the Court has identified the following goals: Elimination of judicial rotation by utilizing the 5 th floor of the County City Building for courtrooms, the court can eliminate the inefficiencies caused by judicial rotation. This will increase public service by adding consistency in judicial hearings and flexibility in the calendaring of court cases. This will increase employee satisfaction by removing an unproductive 2-3 day process that is required for each rotation because of the current facility limitations. Move Probation to the County City Building eliminate sending defendants back and forth between the courtroom and probation. Upgrade the 2 nd floor counter area expanding the seating area and adding a kiosk will eliminate sending people back to the law library to correct documents. RELATION TO GROWTH MANAGEMENT ACT The Level of Service (LOS) for District Court is one courtroom per judicial position. Court Case Per Year District Court Level of Service Courtrooms Required at 1 Per Judicial Officer Current Courtrooms Available Net Reserve 2016 Estimated :Growth Total as of , , (1) Exhibit A to Ordinance No s,Page 43 of 318

44 District Court This page is intentionally left blank. Exhibit A to Ordinance No s,Page 44 of 318

45 The mission of the Department of Emergency Management (DEM) is the preparation of Pierce County for disaster through public education, training, and planning; the support of a system of emergency medical and trauma care; the prevention of fires through inspection, plan review, education, and investigation; and the administration of radio communication needs and the Enhanced 911 program. EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT Pierce County and Pierce Transit, through joint operation, operate the emergency radio communications system as the Combined Communications Network (CCN). Adequate Public Facilities: It is the intent of the County CFP that adequate DEM facilities be available no later than occupancy of each new development. However, no development permit should be denied based on the County's inability to maintain level of service standards for DEM facilities. CURRENT FACILITY INVENTORY Facility Current Capacity Location 2501 Administrative/Radio Communications Network 9,542 Sq. Ft. Tacoma 2501 US&R Task Force 9,909 Sq. Ft. Tacoma 2501 Emergency Operations Center (EOC) 9,906 Sq. Ft. Tacoma Radio Communications 3,990 Sq. Ft. Tacoma (leased from PC Public Works) PCNET, FPB, EM HLS, and Radio Communications Storage 1,737 Sq. Ft. Lakewood (leased) Fire Prevention Bureau 1,946 Sq. Ft. Tacoma Total Sq. Ft. 37,030 Sq. Ft. Exhibit A to Ordinance No s,Page 45 of 318

46 PRIOR YEAR MAJOR ACCOMPLISHMENTS Emergency Management DEM has completed its update of the radio emergency communications network. NON-CAPITAL ALTERNATIVES The following non-capital alternatives discuss strategies, programs, technologies, and other alternatives that do not require capital improvement projects to achieve and maintain the standard level of service for DEM facilities. Alternative 1 - Lease additional storage space. Lease additional storage space to maintain equipment and other program supplies in closely surrounding area to DEM facilities. Alternative 2 - Sharing Facilities Sharing of facilities with other County agencies as well as other government agencies.. Exhibit A to Ordinance No s,Page 46 of 318

47 CAPITAL PROJECTS Location Links to Other Projects Facilities Description Need Notes Tacoma Emergency Management VHF Overlay (Combined Communications Network) Pierce County s current VHF radio frequency that is not interoperable with radio systems in Tacoma, Puyallup, Lakewood, Steilacoom, Bonney Lake, and King and Snohomish Counties. Thurston County is also in the process of transitioning to a different radio system. Pierce County DEM and the Sheriff s Department have been jointly working together with King and Snohomish Counties in a tri-county emergency communications group to evaluate the feasibility of a next generation interoperable communications system that could link all three counties. The current VHF radio system is obsolete and does not provide enough frequencies for our current operations and there is a lack of additional VHF frequencies available. Further, the VHF band is not utilized by other law enforcement and fire agencies that we need to communicate on a daily basis or during larger scale regional operations and emergencies. Lastly the current VHF technology does not provide the latest features able to identify officers by a keying of their microphones, and other modern features. These features will provide dramatic safety improvements for the deputies in the field. Capital Cost Prior Expend Year Total Grand Total Land Acquisition Design Engineering 1,000,000 1,000,000 1,000,000 Construction 5,589,700 5,000,000 5,000,000 10,589,700 Total Cost 5,589,700 1,000,000 5,000,000 6,000,000 11,589,700 Funding Sources Local-County Federal Grant 4,589,700 4,589,700 Local-Other 1,000,000 1,000,000 5,000,000 6,000,000 7,000,000 Unfunded Fund Balance Total Funds 5,589,700 1,000,000 5,000,000 6,000,000 11,589,700 Annual M&O Total Annual M&O $ $ $ 300,000 $ 300,000 $ 300,000 $ 300,000 $ 300,000 $ 1,500,000 $ 1,500,000. Exhibit A to Ordinance No s,Page 47 of 318

48 Emergency Management Location Other Description Need Tacoma DAS (Radio Communication) Pierce County s 700 MHz Single County-Wide Communications System (SCWCS) has been implemented as the primary communications network to unify radio communication among law enforcement agencies and other first responders in the South Sound. However, there is limited coverage for the Jail and Pierce County City Building (CCB).To ensure that the Jail and the CCB have undisrupted coverage to the 700 MHz SCWCS, it is necessary to implement a Distributed Antenna System (DAS). This system will be designed to provide coverage from the Pierce County SCWCS inside to the Jail and CCB. The DAS will include the design and implementation of the donor equipment, head end equipment, and distribution system for a complete in-building solution that provides coverage for 97% of each floor for both mobile and portable on-hip radios. Connectivity to the upgraded 700 MHz SCWCS for the Jail and CCB has been limited due to the infrastructure of the county building; concrete walls, steel materials, and bullet-proof glass are a few barriers that prevent a strong connection. The current system is obsolete and does not provide the signal needed overcome the barriers and achieve communication. The DAS is necessary to provide sufficient coverage from the SCWCS. The DAS installation will resolve the situation with the separately installed antenna nodes connected to a common source through coaxial cable. Additionally, splitting transmitted power among several antenna elements to cover the same area as a single antenna will reduce the total power required and will increase the reliability of the signal. Notes Capital Cost Prior Expend Year Total Grand Total Land Acquisition Design Engineering 1,300,000 1,000,000 1,000,000 2,300,000 Construction Total Cost 1,300,000 1,000,000 1,000,000 2,300,000 Funding Sources Local-County Federal Grant $ 1,300,000 $ 1,000,000 $ $ $ $ $ $ 1,000,000 $ 2,300,000 Local-Other Unfunded Fund Balance Total Funds 1,300,000 1,000,000 1,000,000 2,300,000 Annual M&O Total Annual M&O $ $ $ 125,000 $ 125,000 $ 125,000 $ 125,000 $ 125,000 $ 625,000 $ 625,000. Exhibit A to Ordinance No s,Page 48 of 318

49 Emergency Management Location Links to Other Projects Facilities Description Need Notes 112th Street Site MCMF (Radio Communication) The Radio Communications Division has moved several times in recent years. Finding a permanent, centrally located facility to house the program operations; including the public safety vehicle installation program, repairs and maintenance for subscriber equipment, radar repairs and maintenance and infrastructure repairs and maintenance is essential for sustainability and continuity of operations. Radio has been leasing the Mid County Maintenance Facility for several years from Public Works. By purchasing this property, DEM is able to meet the operational needs of Radio and potentially co locate other county departments on the property. The MCMF has all the building and infrastructure necessary for the long term business operation of the Pierce County Radio Shop. Additionally, this creates a long term facility solution for the Pierce County Radio Shop. This creates an adequate covered storage for PC owned equipment assets e.g. DEM generators, equipment trailers, vehicles, portable lighting systems just to list a few. The move of these assets to this existing covered storage facilities creates additional space/parking space at the Pierce County facilities where these assets will be moved from. This will reduce the weight load on the back parking lot and destabilized hill at DEM. Capital Cost Prior Expend Year Total Grand Total Land Acquisition Design Engineering Construction 880, , ,170 1,174,170 Total Cost 880, , ,170 1,174,170 Funding Sources Local-County Federal Grant $ 840,000 $ 200,000 $ $ $ $ $ $ 200,000 $ 1,040,000 Local-Other Unfunded 94,170 94,170 94,170 Fund Balance 40,000 40,000 Total Funds 880, , ,170 1,174,170 Annual M&O Total Annual M&O. Exhibit A to Ordinance No s,Page 49 of 318

50 Land Acquisition Design Engineering Emergency Management Total of Capital Projects Prior Expend Year Total Grand Total 1,300,000 2,000,000 $ 2,000,000 $ 3,300,000 Construction 6,469, ,170 5,000,000 $ 5,294,170 $ 11,763,870 Total Cost 7,769,700 2,294,170 5,000,000 7,294,170 15,063,870 Source of Funds Local-County $ 1,200,000 $ $ $ $ $ Federal Grant Local-Other 1,000,000 5,000,000 Unfunded 94,170 Fund Balance Total Sources $ 2,294,170 $ 5,000,000 $ $ $ $ Total Annual M&O Total Cost $ $ 425,000 $ 425,000 $ 425,000 $ 425,000 $ 425,000. Exhibit A to Ordinance No s,Page 50 of 318

51 Emergency Management MAP OF LOCATIONS The following map shows the DEM Offices and Communications Infrastructure: DEM Administrative and US&R and EOC, Fire Prevention Bureau and South Sound 911 Radio Tower/Building. Exhibit A to Ordinance No s,Page 51 of 318

52 FUTURE NEEDS Emergency Management The MCMF on 112 th Street project will only be completed as funding becomes available. The project will be moved into subsequent years pending revenue collections. Capital Cost Total Unfunded $ 94,170 $ $ $ $ $ $ 94,170 Relation to Growth Management Act The Department of Emergency Management (DEM) provides a variety of services to both unincorporated and incorporated areas within Pierce County. Those services consist of emergency preparedness training, hazard mitigation, fire prevention activities, County radio communications, and administration of emergency medical services. DEM operates the Emergency Operations Center (EOC) during incidents and events, such as major flooding, windstorms, earthquakes, and other emergency incidents. Additionally, DEM provides contract services for emergency management activities to cities and towns within Pierce County which require additional administrative and programmatic support. The Urban Search and Rescue warehouse houses the logistical support staff and the full cache of the Pierce County-sponsored Task Force. The Fire Prevention Bureau is in the Public Services Building (Annex). The Bureau is responsible for conducting fire inspections, inspections of business, issuance of permits, reviews of plans, and providing a public education program on fire safety and prevention for the benefit of all in the County. The 2017 Proposed LOS of.054 Sq. Ft. per capita, results in a reserve of 5,732 Sq. Ft. of building capacity. This LOS allows for the capacity required for equipment and program supply storage, this LOS accurately reflects the true need of the Department to provide on-going service to residents of Pierce County. Population-Pierce County 844,490 Population-City of Tacoma (206,100) Population-City of Lakewood (58,800) Net Population 579,590 Square Footage 37,030 LOS per capita.064 Proposed LOS per capita.054 Reserve Sq. Ft. 5,732. Exhibit A to Ordinance No s,Page 52 of 318

53 FERRY SYSTEM The Pierce County ferry system provides sole, essential public ferry transportation between the town of Steilacoom, Anderson Island, and Ketron Island utilizing two ferry vessels and three landing facilities. Ferry performance goals are to provide a 90-plus percent on time ferry service during scheduled ferry runs and to be prepared to provide emergency service whenever requested, always considering safety as a top priority. Additionally, over the next two years, Pierce County will work to implement recommendations from the Waterborne Transportation Study that was completed in 2015 to increase revenues and optimize services. Adequate Public Facilities: It is the intent of the County Capital Facilities Plan (CFP) that adequate Department of Public Works facilities be available no later than occupancy of each new development. However, no development permit should be denied based on the County's inability to maintain level of service standards for Department of Public Works facilities. Additional details about capital project for the system are provided in the 6-Year Transportation Improvement Program (TIP). The TIP also includes the 14-Year Ferry Plan which outlines future operational and capital expenditures and revenue. Capital projects are also referenced in this document below. CURRENT FACILITY INVENTORY Facility Current Capacity Location Steilacoom, Anderson Island, and Ketron Island ferry terminals/landings Between 17 and 21 runs per day based on a published schedule. Two boat service is offered Fridays and Sundays during peak season and on holiday weekends. Capacity could be increased using the second vessel for more runs with no impact to facilities, but significant impact to operating costs. Pierce County Ferry Landing 56 Union St Steilacoom, WA PRIOR YEAR MAJOR ACCOMPLISHMENTS The M/V Christine Anderson was accepted into the US Coast Guard s Under Water Inspection In Lieu of Dry Dock or UWILD program in This program allows the vessel to undergo an underwater inspection every second year instead of going to dry dock, creating a significant savings for the system. The M/V Steilacoom II was accepted into this program in At the Anderson Island ferry landing, 4 dolphins were replaced, an additional 4 dolphins were removed, and engineering was completed for the replacement of wing walls and dolphins at the Steilacoom Ferry Landing in the layberth. Exhibit A to Ordinance No s,Page 53 of 318

54 Ferry System A new ferry ticketing system was implemented in July The new system will improve the customer experience by upgrading the online ticket portal as well as adding a mobile app for ticket purchase and scanning and account management. The new ticket system will also improve system reliability and the boarding process for ferry riders. NON-CAPITAL ALTERNATIVES The Sound Waves quarterly newsletter has continued to provide passengers and stakeholders with information about the ferry system. The website continues to be instrumental in public outreach activities and served an important communications role during the rollout of the new ferry schedule. Pierce County Airport and Ferry Division is actively working with the Pierce County Ferry Committee in two important arenas. Service options and fare changes are under consideration to ensure a cost effective ferry system that meets the needs of its customers. Exhibit A to Ordinance No s,Page 54 of 318

55 Ferry System MAP OF LOCATION Exhibit A to Ordinance No s,Page 55 of 318

56 Ferry System Capital Projects Location Links to Other Projects Facilities Description Need Notes Anderson Island Landing Replace ferry landing dolphins Project number 6947 Dolphins Capital Cost Prior Expend Year Total Grand Total Land Acquisition Design Engineering 110, ,000 Construction 1,295,000 2,000 2,000 1,297,000 Total Cost. 2,000 2,000 1,407,000 Funding Sources County Road Fund Ferry Boat Discretionary $ 1,405,000 $ 2,000 $ $ $ $ $ $ 2,000 $ 1,407,000 Traffic Impact Fee Unidentified Surface Transportation Program (Urban) Forest Highway Funds Unfunded Fund balance Total Funds 1,405,000 2,000 2,000 1,407,000 Annual M&O Total Annual M&O Exhibit A to Ordinance No s,Page 56 of 318

57 Location Links to Other Projects Facilities Description Need Notes Steilacoom Ferry Landing Replace Wing Walls and Dolphins Project number 6959 Ferry System Wing Walls and Dolphins Capital Cost Prior Expend Year Total Grand Total Land Acquisition Design Engineering 268, , , ,000 Construction 2,620,000 1,126,000 3,746,000 3,746,000 Total Cost 268,000 2,770,000 1,126,000 3,896,000 4,164,000 Funding Sources County Road Fund Ferry Boat Discretionary $ 268,000 $ 621,000 $ 539,000 $ $ $ $ $ 1,160,000 $ 1,428,000 1,786,000 1,786,000 1,786,000 Traffic Impact Fee Unidentified Surface Transportation 363, , , ,000 Program (Urban) Forest Highway Funds Unfunded Fund balance Total Funds 268,000 2,770,000 1,126,000 3,896,000 4,164,000 Annual M&O Total Annual M&O Exhibit A to Ordinance No s,Page 57 of 318

58 Location Links to Other Projects Facilities Description Need Notes Ferry System Preservation Hydraulics Systems Ketron Island Ferry Landing Overhal of the transfer span hydraulic lift system Capital Cost Prior Expend Year Total Grand Total Land Acquisition Design Engineering 1,000 1,000 1,000 Construction Total Cost. 1,000 1,000 1,000 Funding Sources County Road Fund Ferry Boat Discretionary $ $ $ $ $ $ 1,000 $ $ 1,000 $ 1,000 Traffic Impact Fee Unidentified Surface Transportation Program (Urban) Forest Highway Funds Unfunded Fund balance Total Funds 1,000 1,000 1,000 Annual M&O Total Annual M&O Exhibit A to Ordinance No s,Page 58 of 318

59 Land Acquisition Design Engineering Ferry System Prior Expend Year Total Grand Total 378, ,000 1, , ,000 Construction 1,295,000 2,622,000 1,126,000 3,748,000 5,043,000 Total Cost Total of Capital Projects 1,673,000 2,772,000 1,126,000 1,000 3,899,000 5,572,000 Source of Funds County Road Fund $ 623,000 $ 539,000 $ $ $ 1,000 $ Ferry Boat 1,786,000 Discretionary Traffic Impact Fee Unidentified Surface 363, ,000 Transportation Program (Urban) Forest Highway Funds Unfunded Fund balance Total Sources $ 2,772,000 $ 1,126,000 $ $ $ 1,000 $ Total Annual M&O Total Cost $ $ $ $ $ $ Exhibit A to Ordinance No s,Page 59 of 318

60 FUTURE NEEDS Ferry System The Ferry Systems capital plans through 2021 are exclusive to maintenance, improvements and preservation of current capital assets. These projects will not increase the level of service but will improve safety and longevity of the current infrastructure. Capital Cost Total Unfunded $ $ $ $ $ $ $ RELATION TO GROWTH MANAGEMENT ACT The Ferry System is a component of Pierce County s transportation system and a required capital facilities component pursuant to the Growth Management Act. The Level of Service (LOS) established for the Ferry System is to maintain ferry capacity at 100% peak winter weekday demand. Ferry System Level of Service* Capacity Demand Capacity Available Net Reserve 2016 Actual * to 2022: Growth** 40 (40) Total as of *Based on one 54-car capacity boat at 90 runs per week. **Based on two vessels and 1.0 percent annual growth rate. Exhibit A to Ordinance No s,Page 60 of 318

61 GENERAL ADMINISTRATION BUILDINGS General Administration Buildings house several Pierce County departments in a ANNEX variety of leased and owned space throughout the County. The majority of General Administration departments are located around the County-City Building campus in downtown Tacoma and the Annex campus located at 2401 S 35th St. Other General Administration facilities are located at various locations around the County, from the County-owned Public Works Environmental Services Building in University Place, to the County-owned Soundview Building at 3611 D St. The majority of Public Works administration services are housed in leased facilities around the Tacoma Mall. Analysis continues, addressing the feasibility of consolidating and co-locating justice programs onto the downtown County campus on Tacoma Avenue. Included in this analysis is the juvenile division of Superior Court, currently housed at Remann Hall Juvenile Detention on 6th Avenue. The Justice Center Planning Committee presented their recommendations to the Executive early As the concept of converting the County City Building into a Justice Center is further developed, it will have an impact that will be more fully addressed and described in future Capital Facility Plans. General Administration departments include the following: Assessor-Treasurer Auditor Communications County Council Economic Development Facilities Management Human Resources South Sound 911 Parks Administration Prosecuting Attorney Assigned Counsel Budget and Finance/Fleet Garage Community Connections County Executive Emergency Management Health Department Information Technology Medical Examiner Planning and Land Services Public Works and Utilities Administration a Exhibit A to Ordinance No s,Page 61 of 318

62 General Administration Buildings CURRENT FACILITY INVENTORY The County s inventory of General Administration Buildings totals 484,060 square feet as indicated in the following table. Departments occupy both County-owned facilities as well as leased office buildings. Facility Current Capacity Location County-City Bldg 46, Tacoma Ave S, Tacoma Hess (901) Bldg 4, Tacoma Ave S, Tacoma 945 Tacoma Ave Bldg 9, Tacoma Ave S, Tacoma 950 Fawcett Bldg 17, Fawcett Ave, Tacoma Fleet Garage 6, Pacific Ave, Tacoma Medical Examiner Bldg 13, Pacific Ave, Tacoma County Health Bldg 48, S D St, Tacoma Annex 65, S 35th St, Tacoma Annex West 25, S 35th St, Tacoma Lakewood Community Ctr 2, Lakewood Dr, Lakewood South Sound 911 Com Ctr 7, S 35th St, Tacoma Soundview 14, Pacific Avenue, Tacoma Environmental Services Bldg 40, th St, University Place Exhibit A to Ordinance No s,Page 62 of 318

63 General Administration Buildings Leased Facilities Current Capacity Location 955 Tacoma Bldg. Prosecuting Attorney Risk Management 1305 Tacoma Bldg. Community Connections Merit Bldg. Budget and Finance Human Resources Information Technology Washington State Bldg. Assigned Counsel 1102 Broadway Bldg Facilities Management Information Technology Rust Bldg. Economic Development Tacoma Mall Office Bldg. Public Works Tacoma Mall Plaza Public Works 12, Tacoma Ave S, Tacoma (leased-4 leases; expire in 2019) 24, Tacoma Ave S, Tacoma (leased-expires 12/31/2016; to be renegotiated) S 9th St, Tacoma (leasedbuilding vacated December 2016) 21, Market St, Tacoma (leasedexpires 6/30/2016) 23, Broadway, Tacoma (leased-expire in 2021) 2, Pacific Ave, Tacoma (leasedexpires 4/30/2021) 22, S Pine St, Tacoma (leasedexpires 9/30/2021) 25, S 42nd St, Tacoma (leasedexpires 7/31/202) Total (Net Sq. Ft.) 435,650 Add 10% for Common Space 48,410 PRIOR YEAR ACCOMPLISHMENTS With the failure of the New Administration Building at the 2015 November ballot, extensive work was completed, with some still underway, to delve more deeply into assessing current practices accommodating General Administration office space needs, and assessing capital needs related to aging and obsolete building systems in current County-owned General Administration facilities. Capital accomplishments related to this activity include: County-City Building code compliance study 2016 Deferred Maintenance & Repairs Report submitted to Pierce County Council at their request Assessment and feasibility analysis of leased facilities resulting in termination of a long-standing lease and relocation of tenants into county-owned space and less expensive lease Repurposing of Public Works 112 th Street facility to accommodate Department of Emergency Management needs in lieu of purchasing property and building new Exhibit A to Ordinance No s,Page 63 of 318

64 General Administration Buildings Potential utilization of County-owned real property as the site for SS911 Public Safety Communication Center Other capital projects for general administration buildings include: Medical Examiner walk-in freezer and refrigeration replacement Grounds maintenance gas pump replacement Replacement of five County-City Building heat pumps NON-CAPITAL ALTERNATIVES The following non-capital alternatives discuss strategies, programs, technologies, and other alternatives that do not require capital improvement projects to achieve and maintain level of service standards for general administration facilities. Several recommendations are designed to relieve pressure on the general administration facilities by expanding or adding non-capital alternatives. Alternative 1 Telecommuting Identify jobs that can be performed at remote locations (i.e., employee residences or hoteling). Alternative 2 Flextime Institute radical flex schedules wherein some employees work shifts other than 8:00-5:00 on weekdays. Workstations can be shared. Exhibit A to Ordinance No s,Page 64 of 318

65 General Administration Buildings CAPITAL PROJECTS Location Links to Other Projects Facilities County-City Building County City Building - Courtroom Remodels Description Revisit and address District and Superior Court needs for additional, appropriate courtrooms The Justice Center Planning Committee affirmed the need for appropriate courtroom and justice center program spaces in response to population increases. Recommendation was made to convert the County-City Building to a Justice Center. Plans are underway to revisit Need and address District and Superior Court needs for additional, appropriate courtrooms. Notes Capital Cost Prior Expend Year Total Grand Total Land Acquisition Design Engineering Construction 75,000 75,000 9,700,000 9,700,000 9,700,000 Total Cost 75,000 9,700,000 9,700,000 9,775,000 Funding Sources REET $ 75,000 $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ 75,000 Bond 9,700,000 9,700,000 9,700,000 Unfunded Fund Balance Total Funds 75,000 9,700,000 9,700,000 9,775,000 Annual M&O Total Annual M&O Exhibit A to Ordinance No s,Page 65 of 318

66 General Administration Buildings Location Links to Other Projects Facilities Description Need Notes County City Building Court Room Door Security Enhancement Install doors, access control, hardware at courtrooms to establish lockdown capability and safe zones Courtroom security is the highest risk area within the County. Providing the ability to lockdown/instantly secure and control courtrooms, wings and floors for a critical incident response is critical to the safeguarding of those in attendance, employees and judicial staff. This project will bring the County in line with the Federal Courtroom Security Guidelines, Washington State Courtroom Security Guidelines, and best practice recommendations as it pertains to security in the courtrooms. Capital Cost Prior Expend Year Total Grand Total Land Acquisition Design Engineering Construction 634, , ,000 Total Cost 634, , ,000 Funding Sources REET $ $ 634,000 $ $ $ $ $ $ 634,000 $ 634,000 Bond Unfunded Fund Balance Total Funds 634, , ,000 Annual M&O Total Annual M&O Exhibit A to Ordinance No s,Page 66 of 318

67 General Administration Buildings Location Links to Other Projects Facilities Description Need Notes County City Building / Jail Emergency Generator County City Building and Main Jail Install new generator supporting CCB and Jail emergency functions Existing generator and distribution panel are inefficient, failing, and require extensive annual maintenance Capital Cost Prior Expend Year Total Grand Total Land Acquisition Design Engineering Construction 1,455,000 1,455,000 1,455,000 Total Cost 1,455,000 1,455,000 1,455,000 Funding Sources REET $ $ 1,455,000 $ $ $ $ $ $ 1,455,000 $ 1,455,000 Bond Unfunded Fund Balance Total Funds 1,455,000 1,455,000 1,455,000 Annual M&O Total Annual M&O Exhibit A to Ordinance No s,Page 67 of 318

68 General Administration Buildings Location Links to Other Projects Facilities Description Need Notes Medical Examiner (M.E.) HVAC Roof Top Unit Medical Examiner Building Replaces HVAC System (Air Handlers 1 & 2) on the building along with the needed re-roofing and structural improvements HVAC units and roofing have reached end of life and are failing Capital Cost Prior Expend Year Total Grand Total Land Acquisition Design Engineering Construction 2,106,000 2,106,000 2,106,000 Total Cost 2,106,000 2,106,000 2,106,000 Funding Sources REET $ $ 2,106,000 $ $ $ $ $ $ 2,106,000 $ 2,106,000 Bond Unfunded Fund Balance Total Funds 2,106,000 2,106,000 2,106,000 Annual M&O Total Annual M&O $ $ $ 14,500 $ 14,500 $ 14,500 $ 14,500 $ 14,500 $ 72,500 $ 72,500 Exhibit A to Ordinance No s,Page 68 of 318

69 General Administration Buildings Location Links to Other Projects Facilities Description Need Notes 950 Bldg HVAC Replacement 950 Building Replace HVAC system in 950 Building, all floors System is leaking throughout and is inadequate with major components at or beyond end of life. Capital Cost Prior Expend Year Total Grand Total Land Acquisition Design Engineering Construction 1,567,000 1,567,000 1,567,000 Total Cost 1,567,000 1,567,000 1,567,000 Funding Sources REET Bond Unfunded 1,567,000 1,567,000 1,567,000 Fund Balance Total Funds 1,567,000 1,567,000 1,567,000 Annual M&O Total Annual M&O Exhibit A to Ordinance No s,Page 69 of 318

70 General Administration Buildings Location Links to Other Projects Facilities Description Need Notes Multiple county-owned buildings Integrated Building Controls Study Study: To determine integrated building controls standardized systems for HVAC, Lighting, Fire and Energy for: Annex, Annex West, CCB, Jail, Jail Addition, M.E. & Remann Hall Increased efficiencies across all digital control systems by standardization. Capital Cost Prior Expend Year Total Grand Total Land Acquisition Design Engineering 150, , ,000 Construction Total Cost 150, , ,000 Funding Sources REET Bond Unfunded 150, , ,000 Fund Balance Total Funds 150, , ,000 Annual M&O Total Annual M&O Exhibit A to Ordinance No s,Page 70 of 318

71 General Administration Buildings Location Links to Other Projects Facilities Description Need Notes County City Building County City Building Pump Replacements Replacement of EOL equipment: B-45 Custodial Area Condensate Return 3&4; Boiler room Feed Water Pump 1 and Condensate Return 1&2 Replace old inefficient equipment with current technology Capital Cost Prior Expend Year Total Grand Total Land Acquisition Design Engineering Construction 20,000 20,000 20,000 Total Cost 20,000 20,000 20,000 Funding Sources REET Bond Unfunded 20,000 20,000 20,000 Fund Balance Total Funds 20,000 20,000 20,000 Annual M&O Total Annual M&O Exhibit A to Ordinance No s,Page 71 of 318

72 General Administration Buildings Location Links to Other Projects Facilities Description Need Notes Thun Field Hangar Lighting Project Thun Field Lighting replace for: interior hangar high-bay, exterior hangar, and L-Bldg wall mounted lighting Reduce energy costs and improve lighting Capital Cost Prior Expend Year Total Grand Total Land Acquisition Design Engineering Construction 75,000 75,000 75,000 Total Cost 75,000 75,000 75,000 Funding Sources REET Bond Unfunded 75,000 75,000 75,000 Fund Balance Total Funds 75,000 75,000 75,000 Annual M&O Total Annual M&O Exhibit A to Ordinance No s,Page 72 of 318

73 General Administration Buildings Location Links to Other Projects Facilities Description Need Notes Lenel Integration with Alarm System Multiple County Owned Buildings Integration of Lenel with alarm systems in multiple buildings not yet integrated Bring the remaining Pierce County Building alarm systems into a single, integrated platform. This will provide cost reductions, enhanced customer service and increased security response for outlying buildings. Capital Cost Prior Expend Year Total Grand Total Land Acquisition Design Engineering Construction 39,000 39,000 39,000 Total Cost 39,000 39,000 39,000 Funding Sources REET Bond Unfunded Fund Balance 39,000 39,000 39,000 Total Funds 39,000 39,000 39,000 Annual M&O Total Annual M&O Exhibit A to Ordinance No s,Page 73 of 318

74 General Administration Buildings Location Links to Other Projects Facilities Description Need Notes Security Camera Replacements Ph1 Multiple County-owned buildings Replace end of life camera's (240 of the 400 are no longer serviceable) Phase 1 Risk of failure is increasing and will have direct overall impact on the operating budget if a comprehensive replacement cycle is not introduced to address the potential for failure. Capital Cost Prior Expend Year Total Grand Total Land Acquisition Design Engineering Construction 125, , ,000 Total Cost 125, , ,000 Funding Sources REET Bond Unfunded 125, , ,000 Fund Balance Total Funds 125, , ,000 Annual M&O Total Annual M&O Exhibit A to Ordinance No s,Page 74 of 318

75 General Administration Buildings Location Links to Other Projects Facilities Description Need Notes Security Camera Replacements Ph2 Multiple County-owned buildings Security Camera Replacements Ph1 Replace end of life camera's Ph 2 Risk of failure is increasing and will have direct overall impact on the operating budget if a comprehensive replacement cycle is not introduced to address the potential for failure. Capital Cost Prior Expend Year Total Grand Total Land Acquisition Design Engineering Construction 125, , ,000 Total Cost 125, , ,000 Funding Sources REET Bond Unfunded 125, , ,000 Fund Balance Total Funds 125, , ,000 Annual M&O Total Annual M&O Exhibit A to Ordinance No s,Page 75 of 318

76 General Administration Buildings Location Links to Other Projects Facilities Description Need Notes SS 911 Comm Center Automatic Transfer Switch SS 911 Communications Center at Annex Campus Replace end of life automatic transfer switch Automatic Transfer Switch is worn and needs replacement, end of life. Capital Cost Prior Expend Year Total Grand Total Land Acquisition Design Engineering Construction 30,000 30,000 30,000 Total Cost 30,000 30,000 30,000 Funding Sources REET Bond Unfunded 30,000 30,000 30,000 Fund Balance Total Funds 30,000 30,000 30,000 Annual M&O Total Annual M&O Exhibit A to Ordinance No s,Page 76 of 318

77 General Administration Buildings Location Links to Other Projects Facilities Description Need Notes County City Building County City Building SOC Relocation CCB Main Data Frame (MDF) Relocation Relocate the MDF from the 7th floor to the basement Security Operations Center (SOC) location in the County City Building This will locate the MDF in a more secure area in the County-City Building and create space on the 7th Fl needed for tenant relocations. This is essential for phasing of the Justice Center work. Capital Cost Prior Expend Year Total Grand Total Land Acquisition Design Engineering Construction 200, , ,000 Total Cost 200, , ,000 Funding Sources REET Bond Unfunded 200, , ,000 Fund Balance Total Funds 200, , ,000 Annual M&O Total Annual M&O Exhibit A to Ordinance No s,Page 77 of 318

78 General Administration Buildings Location Links to Other Projects Facilities Description Need Notes Various GA Tenant Improvements Various County facilities County-wide tenant improvement work for various departments Existing tenant spaces are worn out and need to be updated Capital Cost Prior Expend Year Total Grand Total Land Acquisition Design Engineering Construction 100, , , , , , ,000 Total Cost 100, , , , , , ,000 Funding Sources REET Bond Unfunded 100, , , , , , ,000 Fund Balance Total Funds 100, , , , , , ,000 Annual M&O Total Annual M&O Exhibit A to Ordinance No s,Page 78 of 318

79 General Administration Buildings Location Links to Other Projects Facilities Description Need Notes Various County facilities Feasibility Studies Conduct various feasibility studies for improvements to county facilities to include items such as ADA upgrades and tenant improvement work Capital Cost Prior Expend Year Total Grand Total Land Acquisition Design Engineering 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 50, , ,000 Construction Total Cost 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 50, , ,000 Funding Sources REET Bond Unfunded 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 50, , ,000 Fund Balance Total Funds 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 50, , ,000 Annual M&O Total Annual M&O Exhibit A to Ordinance No s,Page 79 of 318

80 General Administration Buildings Location Links to Other Projects Facilities Description Need Notes Data Cable Tray Installations Various County facilities Install data cable trays This will eliminate old cabling and ensure all new cabling follows correct pathways Capital Cost Prior Expend Year Total Grand Total Land Acquisition Design Engineering Construction 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 50, , ,000 Total Cost 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 50, , ,000 Funding Sources REET Bond Unfunded 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 50, , ,000 Fund Balance Total Funds 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 50, , ,000 Annual M&O Total Annual M&O Exhibit A to Ordinance No s,Page 80 of 318

81 General Administration Buildings Location Links to Other Projects Facilities Description Need Notes County City Building Landscaping County City Building Downtown Campus Landscaping Master Plan Implement master plan of campus and landscaping of areas on all sides of the CCB campus Update landscaping with a focus on improved security of building and tenants Capital Cost Prior Expend Year Total Grand Total Land Acquisition Design Engineering Construction 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 50, , ,000 Total Cost 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 50, , ,000 Funding Sources REET Bond Unfunded 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 50, , ,000 Fund Balance Total Funds 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 50, , ,000 Annual M&O Total Annual M&O Exhibit A to Ordinance No s,Page 81 of 318

82 General Administration Buildings Location Links to Other Projects Facilities Description Need Notes 911 Tacoma Ave Parking Lot 911 Building Site 911 Bldg Demolition Create a parking lot at the site of the building that was previously demolished Capital Cost Prior Expend Year Total Grand Total Land Acquisition Design Engineering Construction 200, , ,000 Total Cost 200, , ,000 Funding Sources REET Bond Unfunded 200, , ,000 Fund Balance Total Funds 200, , ,000 Annual M&O Total Annual M&O Exhibit A to Ordinance No s,Page 82 of 318

83 General Administration Buildings Location Links to Other Projects Facilities Description Need Notes CCB - Armory Alley Existing area poses a safety hazard Armory Alley Engineering Study - Ph 1 & Ph 2 Conduct an engineering study including a Phase 1 and 2 Environmental study that identifies the environmental needs, followed by the a project to repair the alley adjacent to the Armory by removing the deteriorated storage areas underground and resurfacing over new fill material Capital Cost Prior Expend Year Total Grand Total Land Acquisition Design Engineering 50,000 50,000 50,000 Construction 300, , ,000 Total Cost 50, , , ,000 Funding Sources REET Bond Unfunded 50, , , ,000 Fund Balance Total Funds 50, , , ,000 Annual M&O Total Annual M&O Exhibit A to Ordinance No s,Page 83 of 318

84 General Administration Buildings Location Links to Other Projects Facilities Description Need Notes County City Building Lobby - 1st Floor County City Building Open up the portal openings off the lobby This project will improve pedestrian access and flow within the CCB Capital Cost Prior Expend Year Total Grand Total Land Acquisition Design Engineering Construction 75,000 75,000 75,000 Total Cost 75,000 75,000 75,000 Funding Sources REET Bond Unfunded 75,000 75,000 75,000 Fund Balance Total Funds 75,000 75,000 75,000 Annual M&O Total Annual M&O Exhibit A to Ordinance No s,Page 84 of 318

85 General Administration Buildings Location Links to Other Projects Facilities Description Need Notes County City Building Fire Sprinkler Sys Installation Ph 1 County City Building - A Wing CCB Fire Sprinkler Sys Installation Ph 2 Install a fire sprinkler system in the original A Wing space which is one of two areas that have never had any sprinkler system A Wing space is one of two areas that has never had any sprinkler system Capital Cost Prior Expend Year Total Grand Total Land Acquisition Design Engineering Construction 250, , ,000 Total Cost 250, , ,000 Funding Sources REET Bond Unfunded 250, , ,000 Fund Balance Total Funds 250, , ,000 Annual M&O Total Annual M&O Exhibit A to Ordinance No s,Page 85 of 318

86 General Administration Buildings Location Links to Other Projects Facilities Description Need Notes County City Building Fire Sprinkler Sys Installation Ph 2 County City Building - A Wing CCB Fire Sprinkler Sys Installation Ph 1 Install a fire sprinkler system in the original A Wing space which is one of two areas that have never had any sprinkler system This space currently has no sprinkler system Capital Cost Prior Expend Year Total Grand Total Land Acquisition Design Engineering Construction 420, , ,000 Total Cost 420, , ,000 Funding Sources REET Bond Unfunded 420, , ,000 Fund Balance Total Funds 420, , ,000 Annual M&O Total Annual M&O Exhibit A to Ordinance No s,Page 86 of 318

87 General Administration Buildings Location Links to Other Projects Facilities Description Need Notes County City Building Seismic Upgrades County City Building Complete seismic upgrades for the building based on a previous engineering report Building does not meet current seismic code Capital Cost Prior Expend Year Total Grand Total Land Acquisition Design Engineering 1,600,000 1,600,000 1,600,000 Construction 6,400,000 8,000,000 14,400,000 14,400,000 Total Cost 8,000,000 8,000,000 16,000,000 16,000,000 Funding Sources REET Bond Unfunded 8,000,000 8,000,000 16,000,000 16,000,000 Fund Balance Total Funds 8,000,000 8,000,000 16,000,000 16,000,000 Annual M&O Total Annual M&O Exhibit A to Ordinance No s,Page 87 of 318

88 General Administration Buildings Location Links to Other Projects Facilities Description Need Notes County City Building Deputies Memorial County City Building - West Entry Create Sheriff Fallen Deputies Memorial in the lawn by the West Entry to the CCB Capital Cost Prior Expend Year Total Grand Total Land Acquisition Design Engineering Construction 75,000 75,000 75,000 Total Cost 75,000 75,000 75,000 Funding Sources REET Bond Unfunded 75,000 75,000 75,000 Fund Balance Total Funds 75,000 75,000 75,000 Annual M&O Total Annual M&O Exhibit A to Ordinance No s,Page 88 of 318

89 General Administration Buildings Location Links to Other Projects Facilities Description Need Notes County City Building Roof Patio/Plaza County City Building - B Wing Design and construct a rooftop patio on B-Wing Improve aesthetic of building and provide break space for building tenants Capital Cost Prior Expend Year Total Grand Total Land Acquisition Design Engineering 13,000 13,000 13,000 Construction 167, , ,000 Total Cost 180, , ,000 Funding Sources REET Bond Unfunded 180, , ,000 Fund Balance Total Funds 180, , ,000 Annual M&O Total Annual M&O Exhibit A to Ordinance No s,Page 89 of 318

90 General Administration Buildings Location Links to Other Projects Facilities Description Need Notes Medical Examiner (M.E.) Exterior Caulking Medical Examiner Building Seal exterior with new caulking and sealants around windows and other openings The existing building envelope is beginning to leak and needs to be re-sealed Capital Cost Prior Expend Year Total Grand Total Land Acquisition Design Engineering Construction 75,000 75, , ,000 Total Cost 75,000 75, , ,000 Funding Sources REET Bond Unfunded 75,000 75, , ,000 Fund Balance Total Funds 75,000 75, , ,000 Annual M&O Total Annual M&O Exhibit A to Ordinance No s,Page 90 of 318

91 General Administration Buildings Location Links to Other Projects Facilities Description Need Notes Soundview Seismic Upgrades Soundview Complete seismic upgrades for the building based on a previous engineering report Existing building does not meet current seismic code Capital Cost Prior Expend Year Total Grand Total Land Acquisition Design Engineering 25,000 25,000 25,000 Construction 100, , ,000 Total Cost 125, , ,000 Funding Sources REET Bond Unfunded 125, , ,000 Fund Balance Total Funds 125, , ,000 Annual M&O Total Annual M&O Exhibit A to Ordinance No s,Page 91 of 318

92 General Administration Buildings Location Links to Other Projects Facilities Description Need Notes Soundview Fire Suppression Improvements Soundview Install fire sprinkler system throughout facility Existing building does not have fire sprinklers and will be brought up to standard with the addition of an automatic fire sprinkler system Capital Cost Prior Expend Year Total Grand Total Land Acquisition Design Engineering Construction 350, , ,000 Total Cost 350, , ,000 Funding Sources REET Bond Unfunded 350, , ,000 Fund Balance Total Funds 350, , ,000 Annual M&O Total Annual M&O Exhibit A to Ordinance No s,Page 92 of 318

93 General Administration Buildings Location Links to Other Projects Facilities Description Need Notes County City Building Feeder Cable and Switchgear Replacement Ph 1 County City Building CCB Feeder Cable and Switchgear Replacement Ph 2 Replace electrical feeder cables that are at end of life along with the switchgear Replace equipment based on previous engineering study Capital Cost Prior Expend Year Total Grand Total Land Acquisition Design Engineering Construction 540, , ,000 Total Cost 540, , ,000 Funding Sources REET Bond Unfunded 540, , ,000 Fund Balance Total Funds 540, , ,000 Annual M&O Total Annual M&O Exhibit A to Ordinance No s,Page 93 of 318

94 General Administration Buildings Location Links to Other Projects Facilities Description Need Notes County City Building Feeder Cable and Switchgear Replacement Ph 2 County City Building CCB Feeder Cable and Switchgear Replacement Ph 1 Replace electrical feeder cables that are at end of life along with the switchgear Replace old inefficient equipment with current technology Capital Cost Prior Expend Year Total Grand Total Land Acquisition Design Engineering Construction 465, , ,000 Total Cost 465, , ,000 Funding Sources REET Bond Unfunded 465, , ,000 Fund Balance Total Funds 465, , ,000 Annual M&O Total Annual M&O Exhibit A to Ordinance No s,Page 94 of 318

95 General Administration Buildings Location Links to Other Projects Facilities Description Need Notes County City Building Boiler Replacement County City Building Implement solution based on prior study results Replace old inefficient equipment with current technology Capital Cost Prior Expend Year Total Grand Total Land Acquisition Design Engineering Construction 2,000,000 2,000,000 2,000,000 Total Cost 2,000,000 2,000,000 2,000,000 Funding Sources REET Bond Unfunded 2,000,000 2,000,000 2,000,000 Fund Balance Total Funds 2,000,000 2,000,000 2,000,000 Annual M&O Total Annual M&O Exhibit A to Ordinance No s,Page 95 of 318

96 General Administration Buildings Location Links to Other Projects Facilities Description Need Notes County City Building Mechanical & Electrical System Replacement County City Building Backfill Studies Replace mechanical, electrical, and other systems throughout entire building System replacements are necessary for the continued functionality and long term use of building Capital Cost Prior Expend Year Total Grand Total Land Acquisition Design Engineering 1,560,000 1,560,000 1,560,000 Construction 12,185,000 12,185,000 24,370,000 24,370,000 Total Cost 13,745,000 12,185,000 25,930,000 25,930,000 Funding Sources REET Bond Unfunded 13,745,000 12,185,000 25,930,000 25,930,000 Fund Balance Total Funds 13,745,000 12,185,000 25,930,000 25,930,000 Annual M&O Total Annual M&O Exhibit A to Ordinance No s,Page 96 of 318

97 General Administration Buildings Location Links to Other Projects Facilities Description Need Notes County City Building Freight Elevator Refurbishment County City Building Replace aging controls, door controls, tracks, and refurbish car for Elevator #5 Existing equipment is at end of life and must be updated Capital Cost Prior Expend Year Total Grand Total Land Acquisition Design Engineering Construction 200, , ,000 Total Cost 200, , ,000 Funding Sources REET Bond Unfunded 200, , ,000 Fund Balance Total Funds 200, , ,000 Annual M&O Total Annual M&O Exhibit A to Ordinance No s,Page 97 of 318

98 General Administration Buildings Location Links to Other Projects Facilities Description Need Notes Medical Examiner (M.E.) Emergency Generator Replacement Medical Examiner Building Replace existing emergency generator with one having larger capacity per prior engineering study Current generator does not meet programmatic needs of building Capital Cost Prior Expend Year Total Grand Total Land Acquisition Design Engineering Construction 70,000 70,000 70,000 Total Cost 70,000 70,000 70,000 Funding Sources REET Bond Unfunded 70,000 70,000 70,000 Fund Balance Total Funds 70,000 70,000 70,000 Annual M&O Total Annual M&O Exhibit A to Ordinance No s,Page 98 of 318

99 General Administration Buildings Location Links to Other Projects Facilities Description Need Notes 901 (Hess) Building Repair of sidewalk per City assessment Current surfaces are uneven 901 Building Sidewalk Repair Capital Cost Prior Expend Year Total Grand Total Land Acquisition Design Engineering Construction 95,000 95,000 95,000 Total Cost 95,000 95,000 95,000 Funding Sources REET Bond Unfunded 95,000 95,000 95,000 Fund Balance Total Funds 95,000 95,000 95,000 Annual M&O Total Annual M&O Exhibit A to Ordinance No s,Page 99 of 318

100 General Administration Buildings Location Links to Other Projects Facilities Description Need Notes Annex Complete remodel of the Annex facility and building systems Current building is inefficient and outdated Annex Remodel Capital Cost Prior Expend Year Total Grand Total Land Acquisition Design Engineering 1,800,000 1,800,000 1,800,000 Construction 14,200,000 14,200,000 14,200,000 Total Cost 16,000,000 16,000,000 16,000,000 Funding Sources REET Bond Unfunded 16,000,000 16,000,000 16,000,000 Fund Balance Total Funds 16,000,000 16,000,000 16,000,000 Annual M&O Total Annual M&O Exhibit A to Ordinance No s,Page 100 of 318

101 General Administration Buildings Location Links to Other Projects Facilities Description Need Notes 901 Building 901 (Hess) Building Demolition Demolish antiquated building that no longer meets programmatic or structural needs Capital Cost Prior Expend Year Total Grand Total Land Acquisition Design Engineering Construction 800, , ,000 Total Cost 800, , ,000 Funding Sources REET Bond Unfunded 800, , ,000 Fund Balance Total Funds 800, , ,000 Annual M&O Total Annual M&O Exhibit A to Ordinance No s,Page 101 of 318

102 General Administration Buildings Location Links to Other Projects Facilities Description Need Notes County City Building District Court Probation Move to CCB Move probation to the CCB including day reporting and alternative services Increase customer service by centralizing the court In 2015, a combined total of 9,798 days were completed by defendants for work crew and day reporting. After hearings at the CCB, the defendant reports to the 6th floor counter, then to the Hess building to meet with their probation officer and then back to the CCB 2nd floor for accounting services. Capital Cost Prior Expend Year Total Grand Total Land Acquisition Design Engineering 30,000 30,000 Construction 4,900,000 4,900,000 4,900,000 Total Cost 30,000 4,900,000 4,900,000 4,930,000 Funding Sources REET $ 30,000 $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ 30,000 Bond 4,900,000 4,900,000 4,900,000 Unfunded Fund Balance Total Funds 30,000 4,900,000 4,900,000 4,930,000 Annual M&O Total Annual M&O Exhibit A to Ordinance No s,Page 102 of 318

103 General Administration Buildings Location Links to Other Projects Facilities Description Need Notes Various Buildings Building Remodel, Renovation, and Studies Address deferred remodeling, renovation, and studies of County owned facilities as the needs arise in Activities may include studies to determne scope of work for future projects. Examples are studies related to boiler systems, building controls, master planning, HVAC systems, etc. Capital Cost Prior Expend Year Total Grand Total Land Acquisition Design Engineering Construction 1,200,000 1,200,000 1,200,000 Total Cost 1,200,000 1,200,000 1,200,000 Funding Sources REET Bond Unfunded Fund Balance 1,200,000 1,200,000 1,200,000 Total Funds 1,200,000 1,200,000 1,200,000 Annual M&O Total Annual M&O Exhibit A to Ordinance No s,Page 103 of 318

104 General Administration Buildings Location Links to Other Projects Facilities Description Need Notes Human Services Buildings Human Services Cold Shutter Demolish the buildings and infrastructure Buildings are empty and deteriorating HS: Building Demolition Capital Cost Prior Expend Year Total Grand Total Land Acquisition Design Engineering Construction 50,000 2,650,000 2,650,000 2,700,000 Total Cost 50,000 2,650,000 2,650,000 2,700,000 Funding Sources REET Intergovernm ental 50,000 2,650,000 2,700,000 2,700,000 Unfunded Fund Balance Total Funds 50,000 2,650,000 2,700,000 2,700,000 Annual M&O Total Annual M&O $ $ 88,485 $ 90,255 $ 92,060 $ 93,901 $ 95,779 $ 97,695 $ 558,174 $ 558,174 Exhibit A to Ordinance No s,Page 104 of 318

105 General Administration Buildings Total of Capital Projects Prior Expend Year Total Grand Total Land Acquisition Design $ 105,000 $ $ 5,248,000 $ 50,000 $ 50,000 $ 50,000 $ 50,000 5,448,000 5,553,000 Engineering Construction $ 50,000 $ 8,084,000 $ 54,314,000 $ 22,150,000 $ 200,000 $ 200,000 $ 200,000 85,148,000 85,198,000 Total Cost 155,000 8,084,000 59,562,000 22,200, , , ,000 90,596,000 90,751,000 Source of Funds REET $ 4,195,000 $ $ $ $ $ Bond 14,600,000 Unfunded 44,962,000 22,200, , , ,000 Intergovernmental 2,650,000 Fund Balance 1,239,000 Total Sources $ 8,084,000 $ 59,562,000 $ 22,200,000 $ 250,000 $ 250,000 $ 250,000 Total Annual M&O Total Cost $ 88,485 $ 104,755 $ 106,560 $ 108,401 $ 110,279 $ 112,195 FUTURE NEEDS NO FUNDING CURRENTLY AVAILABLE Projects with funding from have been identified as necessary to meet the desired service levels. However, the Real Estate Excise Tax funding source is limited. Projects will be prioritized to match the available funding. Capital Cost Total Unfunded $ $ 59,562,000 $ 22,200,000 $ 250,000 $ 250,000 $ 250,000 $ 82,512,000 RELATION TO GROWTH MANAGEMENT ACT In years past, the level of service for General Administration Buildings was calculated using the most currently available population growth for incorporated and unincorporated Pierce County to calculate the project future office space needs for the general administrative function of the County. Given the dynamic nature of today s and the future s workforce and the variety of work space utilization such as hoteling, job sharing, teleconferencing, telecommuting, and remote computer connectivity, an LOS calculation based on population growth is not relevant. Instead extensive planning and analysis of General Administration operations and public services continues within the organization, assessing program needs and the associated office space in determining overall office space utilization and needs for the County. Exhibit A to Ordinance No s,Page 105 of 318

106 General Administration Buildings This page is intentionally left blank. Exhibit A to Ordinance No s,Page 106 of 318

107 JUVENILE COURT The Pierce County Juvenile Court has exclusive jurisdiction over those juveniles within Pierce County who violate the criminal laws of this state or who are in need of protection and/or advocacy as a result of abuse, neglect, or abandonment. The Juvenile Court Department is responsible for the provision of probation, court, detention, adoption, and support services. To facilitate the operation of these statutory mandates, the agency is organized into specific departments: Administrative Services, Probation, Detention, and Court Services. All programs for the Pierce County Juvenile Court are currently housed in facilities located at th Ave., Tacoma, also known as Remann Hall. These facilities are in poor condition and are not well suited for the program delivery. The Justice Center Planning Committee has analyzed the feasibility of consolidating and co-locating justice programs onto the downtown County campus on Tacoma Avenue. Adequate Public Facilities: It is the intent of the County CFP that adequate Court facilities and detention facilities be available no later than occupancy of each new development. However, no development permit should be denied based on the County s inability to maintain level of service standards for court and detention facilities. CURRENT FACILITY INVENTORY Facility Current Capacity Location Juvenile Court 4 courtrooms th Ave, Tacoma Juvenile Court 5 pods; 65 person capacity th Ave, Tacoma PRIOR YEAR MAJOR ACCOMPLISHMENTS Over the past year we have repaired and replaced carpet and other flooring in various areas throughout the Remann Hall facility. This is an ongoing issue and will continue in future years. Throughout the facility, several phases of lighting projects have been completed. These projects replace outdated, inefficient lighting fixtures with new efficient fluorescent lighting fixtures that lower maintenance and operating costs. Additionally, the projects were completed in coordination with the utility company and resulted in the County receiving rebates which helped pay for the project. NON-CAPITAL ALTERNATIVES The following non-capital alternatives listed are strategies, programs, technologies, and other alternatives that do not require capital improvement projects to achieve and maintain level of service standards for juvenile court facilities. These alternatives to detention are programs intended to ensure public safety and hold youth accountable but in a non-secure detention environment. Curfew Monitoring Program Youth are court ordered into non-secure detention and monitored to ensure they comply with the ordered curfew. Exhibit A to Ordinance No s,Page 107 of 318

108 Juvenile Court Alternative Weekend Detention/Work Crew Youth who violate their court orders are ordered to report to the juvenile court on Saturday and Sunday to complete a two-day skill building curriculum or participate on the work crew. They report at 8:00 am and are dismissed at 5:00 pm. Youth who are not successful may be detained. Evening Center In partnership with the YMCA, youth participate in this alternative to detention at the YMCA on the UW-T campus. Youth learn goal setting, independent life skills, consequential thinking, work and education competency, and a variety of other life skills. Tacoma Community Boat Builders Youth are given the opportunity to learn more about woodworking by building boats as well as other individual projects. Youth learn practical math skills, patience in wood working, water safety, and are given the opportunity to build their own toolbox. ARTS Connect A team of adults, including professional artists and a probation officer, lead these weekly classes for female youth. Hands on projects (glassblowing, bead making, etc.) are generated from group discussions and writing activities about identity, society, and healthy lifestyles. Day Reporting School Youth who are unsuccessful in school are court ordered into our Day Reporting School where they can earn school credits with the intent of being integrated back into their home school whenever possible. Electronic Home Monitoring Youth needing more accountability because they may be a flight risk are court ordered to wear an electronic ankle bracelet that tracks their movements and ensures they are home when they are supposed to be. Probation Services Through a standardized and validated statewide risk assessment, probation staff identify risk factors that lead youth to commit crimes. Case management is focused on engaging and motivating the youth and families to change those behaviors that lead to offending. Consistent with the research, we provide evidenced based programs to reduce recidivism. Exhibit A to Ordinance No s,Page 108 of 318

109 CAPITAL PROJECTS Location Links to Other Projects Facilities Description Need Notes Remann Hall Juvenile Court Remann Hall HVAC Study Study to determine best replacement options for HVAC and duct fire dampers Multiple HVAC components need replacement. Need to replace and/or reconnect duct fire dampers to work with recently installed Fire Alarm system. Capital Cost Prior Expend Year Total Grand Total Land Acquisition Design Engineering 25,000 25,000 25,000 Construction Total Cost 25,000 25,000 25,000 Funding Sources REET Bond Unfunded 25,000 25,000 25,000 Fund Balance Total Funds 25,000 25,000 25,000 Annual M&O Total Annual M&O Exhibit A to Ordinance No s,Page 109 of 318

110 Juvenile Court Location Links to Other Projects Facilities Description Remann Hall VAV Reheater Coil Replacements Remann Hall, B-Building Units were installed in 1968 and replacement parts are no longer available. Singe Duct VAV Reheater coils: B Bldg 1st & 2nd floors Need Notes Capital Cost Prior Expend Year Total Grand Total Land Acquisition Design Engineering Construction 48,500 48,500 48,500 Total Cost 48,500 48,500 48,500 Funding Sources REET Bond Unfunded 48,500 48,500 48,500 Fund Balance Total Funds 48,500 48,500 48,500 Annual M&O Total Annual M&O Exhibit A to Ordinance No s,Page 110 of 318

111 Juvenile Court Location Links to Other Projects Facilities Description Need Notes Remann Hall Remann Hall Zone 10 HVAC Project Replacement parts no longer available from manufacturer - RH AC-1, Zone 10 HVAC Ph2 Capital Cost Prior Expend Year Total Grand Total Land Acquisition Design Engineering Construction 50,000 50,000 50,000 Total Cost 50,000 50,000 50,000 Funding Sources REET Bond Unfunded 50,000 50,000 50,000 Fund Balance Total Funds 50,000 50,000 50,000 Annual M&O Total Annual M&O Exhibit A to Ordinance No s,Page 111 of 318

112 Juvenile Court Location Links to Other Projects Facilities Description Need Notes Remann Hall Roofing Project Remann Hall, Roof #3 Roof Repair Courtroom 4 area Courtroom 4 roof area reoccurring roof leak through expansion joints on Roof 3. Roof needs to be reattached. Capital Cost Prior Expend Year Total Grand Total Land Acquisition Design Engineering Construction 30,000 30,000 30,000 Total Cost 30,000 30,000 30,000 Funding Sources REET Bond Unfunded 30,000 30,000 30,000 Fund Balance Total Funds 30,000 30,000 30,000 Annual M&O Total Annual M&O Exhibit A to Ordinance No s,Page 112 of 318

113 Juvenile Court Location Links to Other Projects Facilities Description Need Notes Remann Hall HVAC Project Remann Hall Remann Hall AC6 (Roof VAV) and AC8 (PKG Rooftop - constant volume HVAC) at end of serviceable life System is at end of life and has frequent failures. Capital Cost Prior Expend Year Total Grand Total Land Acquisition Design Engineering Construction 35,000 35,000 35,000 Total Cost 35,000 35,000 35,000 Funding Sources REET Bond Unfunded 35,000 35,000 35,000 Fund Balance Total Funds 35,000 35,000 35,000 Annual M&O Total Annual M&O Exhibit A to Ordinance No s,Page 113 of 318

114 Juvenile Court Location Links to Other Projects Facilities Description Need Notes Remann Hall Remann Hall Detention Wall Repairs Repair infiltration areas at top of wall, remove and repair Exterior Insulation and Finish System (EIFS) in areas where water has infiltrated behind insulation Water is infiltrating walls and causing damage to interior surfaces (walls and floors) Capital Cost Prior Expend Year Total Grand Total Land Acquisition Design Engineering Construction 25,000 25,000 25,000 Total Cost 25,000 25,000 25,000 Funding Sources REET Bond Unfunded 25,000 25,000 25,000 Fund Balance Total Funds 25,000 25,000 25,000 Annual M&O Total Annual M&O Exhibit A to Ordinance No s,Page 114 of 318

115 Juvenile Court Location Links to Other Projects Facilities Description Need Notes Remann Hall Entry Security Project Remann Hall, A Wing Lobby A Wing Lobby Entry: Install gun locker - state law requirement (GC), and build a space for a deputy Gap Analysis identified need for public weapon storage as required by state case law decisions. Also identified was the need for proper storage of Sheriff Department equipment to all for instant access to equipment during critical incidents. Capital Cost Prior Expend Year Total Grand Total Land Acquisition Design Engineering Construction 55,000 55,000 55,000 Total Cost 55,000 55,000 55,000 Funding Sources REET Bond Unfunded 55,000 55,000 55,000 Fund Balance Total Funds 55,000 55,000 55,000 Annual M&O Total Annual M&O Exhibit A to Ordinance No s,Page 115 of 318

116 Juvenile Court Location Links to Other Projects Facilities Description Need Notes Remann Hall Main Sewer Line Replacement Remann Hall Need to replace B-building's main sewer line Existing sewer line lacks adequate fall causing blockage Capital Cost Prior Expend Year Total Grand Total Land Acquisition Design Engineering Construction 275, , ,000 Total Cost 275, , ,000 Funding Sources REET Bond Unfunded 275, , ,000 Fund Balance Total Funds 275, , ,000 Annual M&O Total Annual M&O Exhibit A to Ordinance No s,Page 116 of 318

117 Juvenile Court Location Links to Other Projects Facilities Description Need Notes Remann Hall Carpet Replacement C Building Phase 1 Remann Hall Replace carpet in classrooms and offices Carpets are aged, worn and discolored Capital Cost Prior Expend Year Total Grand Total Land Acquisition Design Engineering Construction 100, , ,000 Total Cost 100, , ,000 Funding Sources REET $ $ $ 100,000 $ $ $ $ $ 100,000 $ 100,000 Bond Unfunded Fund Balance Total Funds 100, , ,000 Annual M&O Total Annual M&O Exhibit A to Ordinance No s,Page 117 of 318

118 Location Links to Other Projects Facilities Remann Hall Juvenile Court Remann Hall B-Lobby Security Project Description Need Notes Remove and install a new service counter for security and safety of service staff and creating a secure access to area The current service desk uses plexi-glass and does not prevent a person from reaching through the window or throwing something through the window Capital Cost Prior Expend Year Total Grand Total Land Acquisition Design Engineering Construction 100, , ,000 Total Cost 100, , ,000 Funding Sources REET $ $ $ 100,000 $ $ $ $ $ 100,000 $ 100,000 Bond Unfunded Fund Balance Total Funds 100, , ,000 Annual M&O Total Annual M&O Exhibit A to Ordinance No s,Page 118 of 318

119 Juvenile Court Total of Capital Projects Prior Expend Year Total Grand Total Land Acquisition Design Engineering 25,000 25,000 25,000 Construction 718, , ,500 Total Cost 743, , ,500 Source of Funds REET $ $ 200,000 $ $ $ $ Bond Unfunded 543,500 Fund Balance Total Sources $ $ 743,500 $ $ $ $ Total Annual M&O Total Cost $ $ $ $ $ $ Additional projects that may impact Juvenile are listed in the General Administrative section. The projects effect multiple locations and are identified as various. MAP OF LOCATIONS No map available FUTURE NEEDS NO FUNDING CURRENTLY AVAILABLE Projects with funding from have been identified as necessary to meet the desired service levels. However, the Real Estate Excise Tax funding source is limited. Projects will be prioritized to match the available funding. Capital Cost Total Unfunded $ $ 743,500 $ $ $ $ $ 743,500 RELATION TO GROWTH MANAGEMENT ACT The 2017 proposed level of service is beds per 1,000 population. This was derived from 65 beds per 2016 countywide estimated population of 844,490. Exhibit A to Ordinance No s,Page 119 of 318

120 Juvenile Court This page is intentionally left blank. Exhibit A to Ordinance No s,Page 120 of 318

121 PARKS AND RECREATION Created in 1958, Pierce County Parks and Recreation Services (PCP&RS) provides park and recreation services to the residents of Pierce County, focusing on the unmet needs of residents living in unincorporated areas. The Department is divided into four divisions: Resource Stewardship, Parks, Recreation, and Administrative Services. Pierce County owns and manages 5,101 park-land acres that are the subject of level of service (LOS) under the Growth Management Act (GMA). Golf Course and Bridge to the Beach at Chambers Creek Regional Park Adequate Public Facilities: It is the intent of the County CFP that adequate recreation opportunities, parks, trails, and open space facilities be available no later than occupancy of each new development. CURRENT FACILITY INVENTORY Regional Parks Facility Name and Acres Capacity in Acres Location Chambers Creek Regional Park Chambers Bay Golf Course Chambers Creek Canyon Chamber Creek Properties Spanaway Regional Park Bresemann Forest Lake Spanaway Golf Course Spanaway Park Sprinker Recreation Center Subtotal 1, Grandview Dr W, University Place Bresemann Blvd S, Spanaway Regional/Resource Conservancy Carbon River Valley SR 165 E, Carbonado Regional Parks Subtotal 1, Exhibit A to Ordinance No s,Page 121 of 318

122 Parks and Recreation County Parks Developed County Parks Ashford County Park SR 706 Ashford Frontier Park Meridian Ave E, Graham Heritage Recreation Center th Ave E, Puyallup Lake Tapps Park th Ave E, Lake Tapps Meridian Habitat Park and Community Center Meridian Ave E, Puyallup Undeveloped County Park Buckley-Bonney Lake Park Developed Subtotal th Ave E & 128th St E, Bonney Lake Cross Park Military Road E, Frederickson Orangegate Park th St E, Tacoma Rimrock Park th Ave E at 401st St E, Eatonville Undeveloped Subtotal County Parks Subtotal Local Parks Facility Name Capacity in Acres Location Dawson Playfield th St E, Tacoma Gonyea Playfield th Ave S, Tacoma Hopp Farm (undeveloped) nd Ave E, Puyallup Lidford Playfield th St & 44th Ave E, Tacoma Mayfair Playfield th Ave Ct E, Tacoma South Hill Community Park th Ave E & 144th St E, Puyallup Local Parks Subtotal Exhibit A to Ordinance No s,Page 122 of 318

123 Parks and Recreation Special Use Facilities Fort Steilacoom Golf Course th Ave SW, Lakewood Herron Point (undeveloped) 0.34 Isted Rd KPN at N Herron Rd, KPN Gig Harbor Lakewood Community Center Lakewood Dr SW, Lakewood Purdy Sand Spit Goodrich Dr NW & SR 302, Purdy Riverside Park Riverside Rd E & 78th St E, Sumner Special Use Subtotal Resource Conservancy Parks Buckley Forestland Preserve th & 288th Ave E, Buckley Devils Head Key Peninsula Hwy S, Longbranch Fairfax Properties 1, [ ] Kolisch Rd E, Buckley Fairfax Town Site Kolisch Rd E, Buckley Lake Tapps Habitat [ ] 218th Ave E, Lake Tapps Nisqually River Interpretive Center SR 507 S, Roy Parkland Habitat and Nature Preserve 4.88 Tule Lake Rd S & Yakima Ave S, Tacoma Puget Creek Beach N Ruston Way, Tacoma Seeley Lake Park Lakewood Drive SW, Lakewood South Pierce Wetland th Ave S & 1500 SR 702 S, Roy Swan Creek Park Pioneer Way E, Puyallup Resource Conservancy Parks Subtotal 1, Linear Park/Trails Developed Linear Park/Trails Foothills Trail Puyallup to Buckley and Carbonado Nathan Chapman Memorial Trail th St E, Puyallup.. Exhibit A to Ordinance No s,Page 123 of 318

124 Parks and Recreation Puyallup River Levee Trail 1.51 Parallel to Hwy 167 Puyallup Developed Subtotal Undeveloped Linear Park/Trails Half Dollar Park th Ave E At 120th St E, Puyallup Ohop Trail Extension Orville Rd E, Orting Undeveloped Subtotal Linear Park/Trail Subtotal Unclassified Sites Milton Freeway Tracts th St E, Milton Wales Property SE 309th Pl & Entwistle County Rd E, Buckley Subtotal Cemeteries Facility Name Capacity in Acres Location 265th Avenue Cemetery th Ave E, Buckley Dieringer Cemetery th St E, Buckley Old Settler's Cemetery Washington Blvd SW, Lakewood Roy Cemetery th St S & 80th Ave Ct E, Roy Subtotal Inventory Total Total All Park Acres 5, Exhibit A to Ordinance No s,Page 124 of 318

125 Parks and Recreation PRIOR YEAR MAJOR ACCOMPLISHMENTS The following is a brief summary of Pierce County Parks and Recreation (PCParks) 2015 project accomplishments: Foothills National Recreation Trail, Buckley to South Prairie Section The department completed the design work on the remaining undeveloped sections of the trail between Buckley and South Prairie. Other activities included acquisition of remaining trail corridor and work on environmental permitting. Parks and Public Works submitted a Rural Town Centers and Corridors grant through the Puget Sound Regional Council for construction funding. The application was successful and the County will receive a grant award for $378,000. Conservation Futures-Program Conservation Futures Acquisitions The department completed 4 high priority acquisitions from the Council approved list. The acquisitions include: o the 154 acre Matlock Farm o The 52 acre Middle Ohop Creek property o The 202 acre Upper Ohop Creek property o The 36 acre Shelstad Farm Lakewood Community Center The department replaced the HVAC system at the Community Center s gym. Lake Tapps Park The department acquired a 55 acre property adjacent to the northern boundary of the park with Conservation Futures Funds. The acquisition increases the total park acreage to 135 acres and provides room to increase on-site parking at this heavily used waterfront park. Frontier Park The department expanded the park through the acquisition of an undeveloped 7 acre parcel on the northern park boundary. Sprinker Recreation Center Tennis Court Renewal - The department resurfaced 6 outdoor courts at Sprinker Recreation Center. The project included removal and rebuilding of the tennis court surface, along with new nets, standards, striping and fencing. Elevator Replacement The department completed the design work and bid process for replacement of the aging elevator at the indoor Ice arena and tennis center. Construction to be completed in Meridian Habitat Park Playground The department worked with a design consultant to complete a design for a playground and plaza at the park. Construction is planned for Exhibit A to Ordinance No s,Page 125 of 318

126 Parks and Recreation NON-CAPITAL ALTERNATIVES The 2008 Park Recreation Open Space Plan (PROS Plan) provides a number of suggestions for level of service (LOS) and priorities that, although each requiring funds to accomplish, may change the amount of funding requirements. During the planning period these suggestions will continue to be explored within the limits of available funds. These include looking for sponsorships for recreation programs, working with other County Departments, and transferring parklands and recreation programs to local entities that share a recreation mission... Exhibit A to Ordinance No s,Page 126 of 318

127 Capital Projects Location South Prairie to Buckley Links Description Construct 2.3 miles of trail between Puyallup and Buckley Need Per County Regional Trail Plan Notes Parks and Recreation Foothills Trail South Prairie to Buckley Costs Prior Expend Year Total Grand Total Land $ 2,293,750 $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ 2,293,750 Design 7,236, , ,000 7,336,140 Construction 5,460,360 2,290,000 2,290,000 7,750,360 Total Cost 14,990,250 2,390,000 2,390,000 17,380,250 Funding Sources Federal/State Grants $ 2,122,790 $ 1,234,000 $ $ $ $ $ $ 1,234,000 $ 3,356,790 Donations 61,000 61,000 Interfund Loan 1,332,110 1,000,000 1,000,000 2,332,110 Path and Trails Fund 5,177,700 5,177,700 Parks Impact Fees 3,811,750 3,811,750 Parks Sales Tax 2,284,900 2,284,900 Parks REET 200, ,000 Metro Parks Tacoma Unfunded Fund Balance 156, , ,000 Total Funds 14,990,250 2,390,000 2,390,000 17,380,250 Annual O&M Total Annual O&M $ 239,600 $ 246,900 $ 254,200 $ 261,900 $ 269,700 $ 269,700 $ 269,700 $ 1,572,100 $ 1,811,700.. Exhibit A to Ordinance No s,Page 127 of 318

128 Parks and Recreation Location Links Description Need Notes Sprinker Recreation Center SRC Roof Replacement Replace roof over tennis center and community rooms Roof is 40 years old and leaking causing damage to other parts of the building Costs Prior Expend Year Total Grand Total Land Design 815, ,000 Construction 362,080 25,000 25, ,080 Total Cost 1,177,080 25,000 25,000 1,202,080 Funding Sources Federal/State Grants Donations Interfund Loan Path and Trails Fund Parks Impact Fees Parks Sales Tax 215,000 25,000 25, ,000 Parks REET 962, ,080 Metro Parks Tacoma Unfunded Fund Balance Total Funds 1,177,080 25,000 25,000 1,202,080 Annual O&M Total Annual O&M $ 1,000 $ 1,000 $ 1,000 $ 1,000 $ 1,000 $ 1,000 $ 1,000 $ 6,000 $ 7,000.. Exhibit A to Ordinance No s,Page 128 of 318

129 Parks and Recreation Location Links Description Need Notes Swan Creek Park Swan Creek Bridge Replacement Replace existing pedestrian bridge over Swan Creek with new structure Existing bridge is at end of its useful life and needs replacement Working with Metro Parks Tacoma to partially fund construction Costs Prior Expend Year Total Grand Total Land Design 90,000 90,000 Construction 163, , ,000 Total Cost 90, , , ,000 Funding Sources Federal/State Grants Donations Interfund Loan Path and Trails Fund Parks Impact Fees Parks Sales Tax 90,000 50,000 50, ,000 Parks REET Metro Parks Tacoma 50,000 50,000 50,000 Unfunded Fund Balance 63,000 63,000 63,000 Total Funds 90, , , ,000 Annual O&M Total Annual O&M $ 300 $ 300 $ 300 $ 300 $ 300 $ 300 $ 300 $ 1,800 $ 2,100.. Exhibit A to Ordinance No s,Page 129 of 318

130 Parks and Recreation Location Links Description Need Notes Cross Park Cross Park Preliminary Engineering for Phase 1 park development Preliminary engineering will provide accurate cost estimates for grant applications and private fundraising efforts to develop the park Costs Prior Expend Year Total Grand Total Land Design 328, , , ,000 Construction 1,500,000 4,500,000 6,000,000 6,000,000 Total Cost 328, ,000 1,500,000 4,500,000 6,328,000 6,656,000 Funding Sources Federal/State Grants $ 328,000 $ 328,000 $ 1,500,000 $ $ $ $ $ 1,828,000 $ 2,156,000 Donations Interfund Loan Path and Trails Fund Parks Impact Fees Parks Sales Tax Parks REET Metro Parks Tacoma Unfunded 4,500,000 4,500,000 4,500,000 Fund Balance Total Funds 328, ,000 1,500,000 4,500,000 6,328,000 6,656,000 Annual O&M Total Annual O&M $ $ $ $ 30,000 $ 60,000 $ 61,800 $ 63,654 $ 215,454 $ 215,454.. Exhibit A to Ordinance No s,Page 130 of 318

131 Parks and Recreation Location Links Description Need Notes SRC HVAC System - Main Building Sprinker Recreation Center Replace heatpumps and hydronic piping and to provide dedicated outside air system to meet code Existing system is 40 years old and past useful life Costs Prior Expend Year Total Grand Total Land $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ Design 50,000 50,000 50,000 Construction 1,828,500 1,828,500 1,828,500 Total Cost 50,000 1,828,500 1,878,500 1,878,500 Funding Sources Federal/State Grants $ $ $ $ $ $ $ Donations Interfund Loan Path and Trails Fund Parks Impact Fees Parks Sales Tax Parks REET 43,030 43,030 43,030 Metro Parks Tacoma Unfunded 1,828,500 1,828,500 1,828,500 Fund Balance 6,970 6,970 6,970 Total Funds 50,000 1,828,500 1,878,500 1,878,500 Annual O&M Total Annual O&M $ $ $ $ $ (25,000) $ (25,000) $ (25,000) $ (75,000) $ (75,000).. Exhibit A to Ordinance No s,Page 131 of 318

132 Parks and Recreation Location Links Description Need Notes SRC Tennis Court HVAC System Sprinker Recreation Center Replace radiant heaters with recirculating gas heaters and turnover air fans Existing radiant heaters are dangerous and past useful life. Costs Prior Expend Year Total Grand Total Land $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ Design Construction 208, , ,000 Total Cost 208, , ,000 Funding Sources Federal/State Grants Donations Interfund Loan Path and Trails Fund Parks Impact Fees Parks Sales Tax Parks REET Metro Parks Tacoma Unfunded Fund Balance 208, , ,000 Total Funds 208, , ,000 Annual O&M Total Annual O&M $ $ $ $ (3,000) $ (3,000) $ (3,000) $ (3,000) $ (12,000) $ (12,000).. Exhibit A to Ordinance No s,Page 132 of 318

133 Location Links Description Need Notes Lakewood Community Center Parks and Recreation LCC HVAC Replacement Replace building HVAC system with new natural gas fired variable refrigeration flow system Existing system is non-functional and past useful life. Costs Prior Expend Year Total Grand Total Land Design 20,000 20,000 20,000 Construction 1,816,310 1,816,310 1,816,310 Total Cost 20,000 1,816,310 1,836,310 1,836,310 Funding Sources Federal/State Grants Donations Interfund Loan Path and Trails Fund Parks Impact Fees Parks Sales Tax 20,000 20,000 20,000 Parks REET Metro Parks Tacoma Unfunded 1,816,310 1,816,310 1,816,310 Fund Balance Total Funds 20,000 1,816,310 1,836,310 1,836,310 Annual O&M Total Annual O&M $ $ $ $ $ (21,000) $ (21,000) $ (21,000) $ (63,000) $ (63,000).. Exhibit A to Ordinance No s,Page 133 of 318

134 Location Links Description Need Notes East Puyallup Parks and Recreation Foothills Trail - East Puyallup Trail Head Expansion Provide additional parking spaces Existing trailhead parking is inadequate to support trail parking demands Will expand parking lot to adjacent Parks Department property. Costs Prior Expend Year Total Grand Total Land Design Construction 426, , ,650 Total Cost 426, , ,650 Funding Sources Federal/State Grants Donations Interfund Loan Path and Trails Fund Parks Impact Fees Parks Sales Tax 426, , ,650 Parks REET Metro Parks Tacoma Unfunded Fund Balance Total Funds 426, , ,650 Annual O&M Total Annual O&M $ $ $ $ $ 2,000 $ 2,000 $ 2,000 $ 6,000 $ 6,000.. Exhibit A to Ordinance No s,Page 134 of 318

135 Parks and Recreation Location Links Description Need Notes Heritage Recreation Center Replace field turf on field 5 Asset is at the end of its useful life. Heritage Baseball Field Turf Replacement Costs Prior Expend Year Total Grand Total Land Design Construction 360, , ,000 Total Cost 360, , ,000 Funding Sources Federal/State Grants Donations 180, , ,000 Interfund Loan Path and Trails Fund Parks Impact Fees Parks Sales Tax 180, , ,000 Parks REET Metro Parks Tacoma Unfunded Fund Balance Total Funds 360, , ,000 Annual O&M Total Annual O&M.. Exhibit A to Ordinance No s,Page 135 of 318

136 Parks and Recreation Location Links Description Need Notes Lake Tapps Restroom Replacement Lake Tapps Park Replace east restroom with prepackaged unit Existing restroom has lost functionality and is at the end of its useful life. Costs Prior Expend Year Total Grand Total Land Design Construction 175, , ,000 Total Cost 175, , ,000 Funding Sources Federal/State Grants Donations Interfund Loan Path and Trails Fund Parks Impact Fees Parks Sales Tax 75,000 75,000 75,000 Parks REET 100, , ,000 Metro Parks Tacoma Unfunded Fund Balance Total Funds 175, , ,000 Annual O&M Total Annual O&M $ $ $ 500 $ 500 $ 500 $ 500 $ 500 $ 2,500 $ 2,500.. Exhibit A to Ordinance No s,Page 136 of 318

137 Parks and Recreation Location Links Description Need Notes Fantasy Lights Storage Shed Spanaway Park Construct storage shed for equipment storage Inadequate space to store Fantasy Lights displays is prematurely wearing out displays causing increased maintenance expenditures. Costs Prior Expend Year Total Grand Total Land $ $ $ $ $ $ $ Design 50,000 50,000 50,000 Construction 250, , ,800 Total Cost 50, , , ,800 Funding Sources Federal/State Grants $ $ $ $ $ $ $ Donations Interfund Loan Path and Trails Fund Parks Impact Fees Parks Sales Tax 50,000 50,000 50,000 Parks REET 250, , ,800 Metro Parks Tacoma Unfunded Fund Balance Total Funds 50, , , ,800 Annual O&M Total Annual O&M $ $ $ 500 $ 500 $ 500 $ 500 $ 500 $ 2,500 $ 2,500.. Exhibit A to Ordinance No s,Page 137 of 318

138 Parks and Recreation Location Links Description Need Notes Spanaway Park Replace existing roof on shop buildings Existing roof is rusting and beyond its useful life. Spanaway Shop Roof Costs Prior Expend Year Total Grand Total Land Design Construction 300, , ,000 Total Cost 300, , ,000 Funding Sources Federal/State Grants Donations Interfund Loan Path and Trails Fund Parks Impact Fees Parks Sales Tax Parks REET 231, , ,000 Metro Parks Tacoma Unfunded Fund Balance 69,000 69,000 69,000 Total Funds 300, , ,000 Annual O&M Total Annual O&M $ $ 1,000 $ 1,000 $ 1,000 $ 1,000 $ 1,000 $ 1,000 $ 6,000 $ 6,000.. Exhibit A to Ordinance No s,Page 138 of 318

139 Parks and Recreation Location Links Description Need Notes Dawson Park Replace tennis court surface and nets on two tennis courts Existing surface is severely cracked and requires replacement. Dawson Tennis Court Refurbish Costs Prior Expend Year Total Grand Total Land Design Construction 100, , ,000 Total Cost 100, , ,000 Funding Sources Federal/State Grants Donations Interfund Loan Path and Trails Fund Parks Impact Fees Parks Sales Tax 100, , ,000 Parks REET Metro Parks Tacoma Unfunded Fund Balance Total Funds 100, , ,000 Annual O&M Total Annual O&M $ $ 500 $ 500 $ 500 $ 500 $ 500 $ 500 $ 3,000 $ 3,000.. Exhibit A to Ordinance No s,Page 139 of 318

140 Parks and Recreation Location Links Description Need Notes Sprinker 2nd Floor Restroom Sprinker Recreation Center Add restroom on 2nd floor building Building has no restroom on the second floor serving the Rainier Room, tennis center and ice rink seating. Costs Prior Expend Year Total Grand Total Land Design Construction 300, , ,000 Total Cost 300, , ,000 Funding Sources Federal/State Grants Donations Interfund Loan Path and Trails Fund Parks Impact Fees Parks Sales Tax 300, , ,000 Parks REET Metro Parks Tacoma Unfunded Fund Balance Total Funds 300, , ,000 Annual O&M Total Annual O&M $ $ $ 1,000 $ 1,000 $ 1,000 $ 1,000 $ 1,000 $ 5,000 $ 5,000.. Exhibit A to Ordinance No s,Page 140 of 318

141 Parks and Recreation Location Links Description Need Notes Bresemann Forest Spire Rock Restroom/Bresemann Forest Improvements Add new exterior restroom to serve Spire Rock and Breseman Forest Trail, improve trail system and add amenities and activities to Bresemann Forest No restroom serving this area of park. Bresemann Forest is underutilized and needs to be better intergrated with Sprinker Recreation Center. Costs Prior Expend Year Total Grand Total Land Design 75,000 75,000 75,000 Construction 200, ,000 1,000,000 1,000,000 Total Cost 75, , ,000 1,075,000 1,075,000 Funding Sources Federal/State Grants $ $ $ $ 100,000 $ 400,000 $ $ $ 500,000 $ 500,000 Donations Interfund Loan Path and Trails Fund Parks Impact Fees Parks Sales Tax 100, , , ,000 Parks REET 75, , , ,000 Metro Parks Tacoma Unfunded Fund Balance Total Funds 75, , ,000 1,075,000 1,075,000 Annual O&M Total Annual O&M $ $ $ 10,000 $ 10,000 $ 10,000 $ 10,000 $ 10,000 $ 50,000 $ 50,000.. Exhibit A to Ordinance No s,Page 141 of 318

142 Parks and Recreation Location Links Description Need Notes Heritage Soccer Field Turf Replacement Heritage Recreation Center Convert existing soccer field (field A) from grass to field turf and provide lines for football, soccer and lacrosse Conversion of field will increase field usage, particularly in inclement weather conditions Partnership with Puyallup School District Costs Prior Expend Year Total Grand Total Land Design Construction 1,080,000 1,080,000 1,080,000 Total Cost 1,080,000 1,080,000 1,080,000 Funding Sources Federal/State Grants $ $ 242,500 $ $ $ $ $ $ 242,500 $ 242,500 Donations Interfund Loan Path and Trails Fund Parks Impact Fees 400, , ,000 Parks Sales Tax Parks REET 437, , ,500 Metro Parks Tacoma Unfunded Fund Balance Total Funds 1,080,000 1,080,000 1,080,000 Annual O&M Total Annual O&M.. Exhibit A to Ordinance No s,Page 142 of 318

143 Parks and Recreation Location Links Description Need Notes Spanaway Park Upgrade storm drainage and repave storage yard Existing pavement is beyond its useful life Spanaway Shop Yard Refurbish Costs Prior Expend Year Total Grand Total Land Design Construction 250, , ,000 Total Cost 250, , ,000 Funding Sources Federal/State Grants Donations Interfund Loan Path and Trails Fund Parks Impact Fees Parks Sales Tax 250, , ,000 Parks REET Metro Parks Tacoma Unfunded Fund Balance Total Funds 250, , ,000 Annual O&M Total Annual O&M $ $ $ $ $ 500 $ 500 $ 500 $ 1,500 $ 1,500.. Exhibit A to Ordinance No s,Page 143 of 318

144 Parks and Recreation Location Links Description Need Notes Frontier Park Campground Frontier Park Addition of group campground sites and walking trails at Frontier Park Group camping sites are needed for participants of multi-day special events held at Frontier Park Costs Prior Expend Year Total Grand Total Land Design 78,000 78,000 78,000 Construction 500, , ,000 Total Cost 78, , , ,000 Funding Sources Federal/State Grants $ $ $ $ $ $ 500,000 $ $ 500,000 $ 500,000 Donations Interfund Loan Path and Trails Fund Parks Impact Fees Parks Sales Tax Parks REET Metro Parks Tacoma Unfunded Fund Balance 78,000 78,000 78,000 Total Funds 78, , , ,000 Annual O&M Total Annual O&M $ $ $ $ $ $ 5,000 $ 5,000 $ 10,000 $ 10,000.. Exhibit A to Ordinance No s,Page 144 of 318

145 Parks and Recreation Location Links Description Need Notes Lake Tapps Park Construct new parking areas, playground, and walking trails Current parking areas are inadequate to meet demand. Lake Tapps Parking & Playground Costs Prior Expend Year Total Grand Total Land Design 100, , ,000 Construction 1,000,000 1,000,000 1,000,000 Total Cost 100,000 1,000,000 1,100,000 1,100,000 Funding Sources Federal/State Grants $ $ $ $ $ $ 500,000 $ $ 500,000 $ 500,000 Donations Interfund Loan Path and Trails Fund Parks Impact Fees 300, , ,000 Parks Sales Tax 40,000 40,000 40,000 Parks REET 120, , ,000 Metro Parks Tacoma Unfunded Fund Balance 100,000 40, , ,000 Total Funds 100,000 1,000,000 1,100,000 1,100,000 Annual O&M Total Annual O&M $ $ $ $ $ $ 3,000 $ 3,000 $ 6,000 $ 6,000.. Exhibit A to Ordinance No s,Page 145 of 318

146 Parks and Recreation Location Links Description Need Notes Lake Tapps Park Replacement of aging bulkhead Maintain public access of waterfront Lake Tapps Bulkhead Replacement Costs Prior Expend Year Total Grand Total Land Design 100, , ,000 Construction 1,000,000 1,000,000 1,000,000 Total Cost 100,000 1,000,000 1,100,000 1,100,000 Funding Sources Federal/State Grants Donations Interfund Loan Path and Trails Fund Parks Impact Fees Parks Sales Tax 100, , ,000 Parks REET 1,000,000 1,000,000 1,000,000 Metro Parks Tacoma Unfunded Fund Balance Total Funds 100,000 1,000,000 1,100,000 1,100,000 Annual O&M Total Annual O&M.. Exhibit A to Ordinance No s,Page 146 of 318

147 Location Links Description Need Notes System-wide Parks and Recreation ADA Plan Implementation Repairs and improvements to parks sites as identified in ADA Compliance Plan Compliance with Federal and State laws Costs Prior Expend Year Total Grand Total Land Design 75,000 75,000 75,000 Construction 200, , , , ,000 1,000,000 1,000,000 Total Cost 75, , , , , ,000 1,075,000 1,075,000 Funding Sources Federal/State Grants Donations Interfund Loan Path and Trails Fund Parks Impact Fees Parks Sales Tax 75, , , , , ,000 1,075,000 1,075,000 Parks REET Metro Parks Tacoma Unfunded Fund Balance Total Funds 75, , , , , ,000 1,075,000 1,075,000 Annual O&M Total Annual O&M $ $ 1,000 $ 1,000 $ 1,000 $ 1,000 $ 1,000 $ 1,000 $ 6,000 $ 6,000.. Exhibit A to Ordinance No s,Page 147 of 318

148 Location Links Description Need Notes Sprinker Recreation Center Develop spray park and parking improvements Parks and Recreation SRC Spray Park Costs Prior Expend Year Total Grand Total Land Design 100, , ,000 Construction 850, , ,000 Total Cost 100, , , ,000 Funding Sources Federal/State Grants Donations Interfund Loan Path and Trails Fund Parks Impact Fees Parks Sales Tax 100, , ,000 Parks REET 100, , , ,000 Metro Parks Tacoma Unfunded Fund Balance Total Funds 100, , , ,000 Annual O&M Total Annual O&M $ $ $ $ $ $ 5,000 $ 5,000 $ 10,000 $ 10,000.. Exhibit A to Ordinance No s,Page 148 of 318

149 Parks and Recreation Location Links Description Need Notes Meridian habitat Park Meridian Courtyard and Restroom Construct paved courtyard adjacent to playground area and install new ouside restroom Costs Prior Expend Year Total Grand Total Land Design Construction 275, , ,000 Total Cost 275, , ,000 Funding Sources Federal/State Grants Donations Interfund Loan Path and Trails Fund Parks Impact Fees 125, , ,000 Parks Sales Tax Parks REET Metro Parks Tacoma Unfunded Fund Balance 150, , ,000 Total Funds 275, , ,000 Annual O&M Total Annual O&M $ $ $ 3,000 $ 3,090 $ 3,183 $ 3,278 $ 3,377 $ 15,927 $ 15,927.. Exhibit A to Ordinance No s,Page 149 of 318

150 Parks and Recreation Location Links Description Need Notes System-wide Picnic Shelters Install new picnic shelters and other family activity areas in existing parks as identified in park master plans User surveys have identified a need for more picnic shelters and family activity areas in the ocunty park system. Costs Prior Expend Year Total Grand Total Land Design 50,000 50,000 50, , ,000 Construction 234, , , , , ,000 Total Cost 284, , , ,000 1,104,000 1,104,000 Funding Sources Federal/State Grants Donations Interfund Loan Path and Trails Fund Parks Impact Fees Parks Sales Tax 180, , ,000 Parks REET 284, , , , , ,000 Metro Parks Tacoma Unfunded Fund Balance Total Funds 284, , , ,000 1,104,000 1,104,000 Annual O&M Total Annual O&M $ $ $ 2,000 $ 4,000 $ 6,000 $ 8,000 $ $ 20,000 $ 20,000.. Exhibit A to Ordinance No s,Page 150 of 318

151 Parks and Recreation Location Links Description Need Notes System-wide Develop high priority multi-use paved trails As identified in the Adopted County Trail plan Multi-use Trail Development Costs Prior Expend Year Total Grand Total Land Design 50, , , , ,000 Construction 900, , ,000 2,600,000 2,600,000 Total Cost 50,000 1,000,000 1,000, ,000 2,850,000 2,850,000 Funding Sources Federal/State Grants Donations Interfund Loan Path and Trails Fund Parks Impact Fees 400, , , , ,000 Parks Sales Tax 50, , , ,000 1,250,000 1,250,000 Parks REET 500, , , ,000 Metro Parks Tacoma Unfunded Fund Balance 300, , ,000 Total Funds 50,000 1,000,000 1,000, ,000 2,850,000 2,850,000 Annual O&M Total Annual O&M $ $ $ $ $ 50,000 $ 51,500 $ 53,045 $ 154,545 $ 154,545.. Exhibit A to Ordinance No s,Page 151 of 318

152 Parks and Recreation Location Links Description Need Notes Foothills Trail Switchback Bridge Replacement Foothills Trail Replace bridge damaged by falling trees Bridge replacement needed to allow continued use of trail Costs Prior Expend Year Total Grand Total Land Design 100, ,000 Construction 600, , , ,000 Total Cost 100, , , , ,000 Funding Sources Federal/State Grants Donations Interfund Loan Path and Trails Fund Parks Impact Fees Parks Sales Tax 166, , ,530 Parks REET 133, , , ,470 Metro Parks Tacoma Unfunded Fund Balance 100, , , ,000 Total Funds 100, , , , ,000 Annual O&M Total Annual O&M.. Exhibit A to Ordinance No s,Page 152 of 318

153 Parks and Recreation Location Links Description Need Notes System-wide Park Signage System Implementation of new standards for exterior signage for parks including entrance signs, way finding signs, amenity signs and park rules signs Costs Prior Expend Year Total Grand Total Land Design Construction 75,000 50, , ,000 Total Cost 75,000 50, , ,000 Funding Sources Federal/State Grants Donations Interfund Loan Path and Trails Fund Parks Impact Fees Parks Sales Tax 50,000 50, , ,000 Parks REET Metro Parks Tacoma Unfunded Fund Balance 25,000 25,000 25,000 Total Funds 75,000 50, , ,000 Annual O&M Total Annual O&M $ $ $ $ 300 $ 300 $ 300 $ 300 $ 1,200 $ 1,200.. Exhibit A to Ordinance No s,Page 153 of 318

154 Parks and Recreation Location Links Description Need Notes Sprinker Recreation Center Replace dehumidifer system Failing units, poor design, and replace parts are not available SRC Dehumidifier System Costs Prior Expend Year Total Grand Total Land Design 320, , ,000 Construction Total Cost 320, , ,000 Funding Sources Federal/State Grants Donations Interfund Loan Path and Trails Fund Parks Impact Fees Parks Sales Tax Parks REET 275, , ,000 Metro Parks Tacoma Unfunded Fund Balance 45,000 45,000 45,000 Total Funds 320, , ,000 Annual O&M Total Annual O&M.. Exhibit A to Ordinance No s,Page 154 of 318

155 Parks and Recreation Location Links Description Need Notes Cross County Commuter Connector Trail Pipeline corridor from South Tacoma to South Prairie Multi-use trail design and development Per County Regional Trail Plan Costs Prior Expend Year Total Grand Total Land Design 75, , , ,000 Construction 200, , , ,000 Total Cost 75, , ,000 1,175,000 1,175,000 Funding Sources Federal/State Grants Donations Interfund Loan Path and Trails Fund Parks Impact Fees 75, , , , ,000 Parks Sales Tax 200, , ,000 Parks REET Metro Parks Tacoma Unfunded Fund Balance 100, , ,000 Total Funds 75, , ,000 1,175,000 1,175,000 Annual O&M Total Annual O&M $ $ $ $ 1,000 $ 1,000 $ 1,000 $ 1,000 $ 4,000 $ 4,000.. Exhibit A to Ordinance No s,Page 155 of 318

156 Parks and Recreation Location Links Description Need Notes High Cedars Entrance Trail Realignment Foothills Trail Redesign approach to street crossing in front of High Cedars development Slow bikers down before crossing Costs Prior Expend Year Total Grand Total Land Design Construction 80,500 80,500 80,500 Total Cost 80,500 80,500 80,500 Funding Sources Federal/State Grants Donations Interfund Loan Path and Trails Fund Parks Impact Fees Parks Sales Tax 80,500 80,500 80,500 Parks REET Metro Parks Tacoma Unfunded Fund Balance Total Funds 80,500 80,500 80,500 Annual O&M Total Annual O&M.. Exhibit A to Ordinance No s,Page 156 of 318

157 Parks and Recreation Location Links Description Need Notes Park, Recreation, and Open Space Plan Update System-wide Update of Department's 20-year plan Required 6-year update of plan to remain eligible for state grants Costs Prior Expend Year Total Grand Total Land Design 75, , , ,000 Construction Total Cost 75, , , ,000 Funding Sources Federal/State Grants Donations Interfund Loan Path and Trails Fund Parks Impact Fees 75,000 75,000 75,000 Parks Sales Tax 150, , ,000 Parks REET Metro Parks Tacoma Unfunded Fund Balance Total Funds 75, , , ,000 Annual O&M Total Annual O&M.. Exhibit A to Ordinance No s,Page 157 of 318

158 Parks and Recreation Location Links Description Need Notes Field Improvements System-wide Convert existing fields from grass to field turf and provide lines for multiple sports Conversion of fields will increase field usage, particularly in inclement weather conditions Costs Prior Expend Year Total Grand Total Land Design 100, , ,000 Construction 600, , ,000 Total Cost 700, , ,000 Funding Sources Federal/State Grants Donations Interfund Loan Path and Trails Fund Parks Impact Fees 200, , ,000 Parks Sales Tax Parks REET 500, , ,000 Metro Parks Tacoma Unfunded Fund Balance Total Funds 700, , ,000 Annual O&M Total Annual O&M.. Exhibit A to Ordinance No s,Page 158 of 318

159 Parks and Recreation Location Links Description Need Notes Parking Lot Improvements System-wide Resurface existing parking areas and add new parking capacity. Aging facilities are past their useful lifecycle and are in need of replacement and expansion to meet current demand. Costs Prior Expend Year Total Grand Total Land Design Construction 700, , ,000 Total Cost 700, , ,000 Funding Sources Federal/State Grants Donations Interfund Loan Path and Trails Fund Parks Impact Fees Parks Sales Tax 200, , ,000 Parks REET 500, , ,000 Metro Parks Tacoma Unfunded Fund Balance Total Funds 700, , ,000 Annual O&M Total Annual O&M.. Exhibit A to Ordinance No s,Page 159 of 318

160 Parks and Recreation Location Links Description Need Notes Foothills Trail - White River Bridge Project Buckley Construction of a pedestrian bridge over the White River connecting the Foothills Trail with the Enumclaw Plateau Trail Per County Regional Trail Plan Costs Prior Expend Year Total Grand Total Land Design Construction 266, , ,000 Total Cost 266, , ,000 Funding Sources Federal/State Grants Donations Interfund Loan Path and Trails Fund Parks Impact Fees Parks Sales Tax Parks REET 266, , ,000 Metro Parks Tacoma Unfunded Fund Balance Total Funds 266, , ,000 Annual O&M Total Annual O&M.. Exhibit A to Ordinance No s,Page 160 of 318

161 Land Acquisition Design Engineering Parks and Recreation Total of Capital Projects Prior Expend Year Total Grand Total $ 2,293,750 $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ 2,293,750 $ 8,569,140 $ 1,093,000 $ 625,000 $ 250,000 $ 428,000 $ 100,000 $ 100,000 $ 2,596,000 11,165,140 $ 5,822,440 $ 5,348,500 $ 3,483,800 $ 10,534,810 $ 2,566,650 $ 3,690,000 $ 2,300,000 27,923,760 33,746,200 Construction Total Cost 16,685,330 6,441,500 4,108,800 10,784,810 2,994,650 3,790,000 2,400,000 30,519,760 47,205,090 Source of Funds Federal State Grants $ 1,804,500 $ 1,500,000 $ 100,000 $ 400,000 $ 1,000,000 $ Donations 180,000 Interfund Loan 1,000,000 Path and Trails Fund Parks Impact Fees 675, , , , , ,000 Parks Sales Tax 797, , , , , ,000 Parks REET 1,120,000 1,075,800 1,110,000 1,090,000 1,110,000 1,100,000 Metro Parks Tacoma 50,000 Unfunded 8,144,810 Fund Balance 814, , , , ,000 Total Sources $ 6,441,500 $ 4,108,800 $ 10,784,810 $ 2,994,650 $ 3,790,000 $ 2,400,000 Total Annual M&O Total Cost $ 250,700 $ 275,000 $ 313,090 $ 359,483 $ 377,878 $ 373,376.. Exhibit A to Ordinance No s,Page 161 of 318

162 Parks and Recreation MAP OF LOCATIONS Exhibit A to Ordinance No s,Page 162 of 318

163 Parks and Recreation Exhibit A to Ordinance No s,Page 163 of 318

164 Parks and Recreation Exhibit A to Ordinance No s,Page 164 of 318

165 Parks and Recreation Exhibit A to Ordinance No s,Page 165 of 318

166 Parks and Recreation Exhibit A to Ordinance No s,Page 166 of 318

167 Parks and Recreation Exhibit A to Ordinance No s,Page 167 of 318

168 Parks and Recreation Exhibit A to Ordinance No s,Page 168 of 318

169 Parks and Recreation Exhibit A to Ordinance No s,Page 169 of 318

170 Parks and Recreation FUTURE NEEDS Capital Cost Total Unfunded $ $ $ 8,144,810 $ $ $ $ 8,144,810 No additional acres are needed to meet Growth Management Act requirements for growth. RELATION TO GROWTH MANAGEMENT ACT The Pierce County Council adopted an update to the Park, Recreation and Open Space Plan (PROS Plan) in This plan is part of the County s Land Use Plan under Growth Management. The updated PROS Plan restates the regional emphases of the County park system. The PROS Plan provides Capital Improvement and Capital Facilities selection criteria that implements section 19A D29 (a) of the County Land Use Plan. The PROS Plan establishes a level of service (LOS) standard for Parks at 5.6 Acres-Per-1,000 in population for 2013 and 5.2 Acres-Per-1,000 for 2019, with a target of 6.6 Acres-Per-1,000 for For the six-year planning period 2013 to 2018 no additional land is needed to accommodate new growth. In fact, at the conclusion of the planning period. Exhibit A to Ordinance No s,Page 170 of 318

171 ROAD FACILITIES Pierce County government, in accordance with Title 36 RCW, plans, constructs, operates, preserves, and maintains over 1,500 miles of roads and bridges within Pierce County, Washington. These public roads fall under the authority of the Pierce County Engineer and are supported by a myriad of funding combinations comprised of federal, state, and local taxes and private capital. Adequate Public Facilities: It is the desire of the County that adequate arterial road facilities be available no later than occupancy of each new development. However, the State Growth Management Act (GMA), as found in Chapter 36.70A RCW, and the Pierce County Code, as found in PCC 19A C recognize that the development of arterial road facilities is a complex and time consuming task, and therefore provide a six-year grace period after a road has failed concurrency to bring the road back within concurrency standards. For an arterial road to fail the road concurrency standards, the Service Standard (V/S) ratio for a road segment must be greater than the adopted Service Standard. In its most basic form, the Service Standard is a measure that attempts to quantify a public s acceptance of a certain level of traffic congestion. If the Service Standard is exceeded on an arterial road segment, the arterial road segment has failed or violated the concurrency standards. This is also known simply as a road segment has failed concurrency. If the concurrency standards have been violated on an arterial road segment, mitigation must be implemented within six years of the failed concurrency date in order for development permits to continue to be approved in areas that are contributing to the traffic impact upon the failed arterial road segment. The concurrency system for arterial roads within Pierce County is used as a management tool. In accordance with the State GMA, it is the intent of Pierce County that an arterial road system be constructed in a manner that accommodates growth and development in the County in accordance with its Comprehensive Plan. The monitoring of both current V/S ratios and projected V/S ratios (for the following 6 year period) provides the County with a management tool to measure the adequacy of the County's arterial roads and aids in the decision making of where to focus future arterial road improvements. The use of traffic volumes (V), Service Thresholds (S), and an adopted Service Standard (V/S ratio) provides a consistent method for monitoring concurrency levels of all arterial road segments. Site-specific transportation impacts will be monitored and mitigated through the State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) review process. To gauge the performance of the County arterial road system in relation to its ability to accommodate growth and development, Service Thresholds and a Service Standard are adopted by the Pierce County Council as part of this Capital Facilities Plan. The Service Thresholds are found in the following table: Exhibit A to Ordinance No s,Page 171 of 318

172 Travel Lanes (both directions) Road Facilities Service Thresholds (S) Without Turn Channelization With Turn Channelization Urban 2 17,600 22, ,400 33, ,200 44, ,800 66,000 Rural 2 15,800 19, ,600 39,600 The Service Standard reflects the maximum acceptable level of congestion for a specific arterial road segment. The Service Standard for all County arterial road segments is set at 1.0. A Service Standard set at 1.0 roughly equates to a level of service "E" in urban areas and "D" in rural areas. As noted above, when the allowable Service Standard has been exceeded on an arterial road segment, mitigation must be implemented within six years of the failed concurrency date in order for development permits to continue to be approved in areas that are contributing to the traffic impact upon the failed arterial road segment. The mitigation may consist of roadway capacity improvements, traffic reduction measures, or adjusting the Service Standard. Roadway capacity improvements may include widening, channelization, traffic signal improvements, and other measures on the affected road or on other roads that bring the V/S ratio below the allowable Service Standard. In reference to meeting concurrency standards, "implementation within six years" as noted above, means that a contract for construction of the road improvement that will bring the failed concurrency road segment back within the allowable Service Standard must have been executed by the County within six years of the time that the concurrency violation occurred. Concurrency violations within a year become effective the date each year's Capital Facilities Plan is approved by the County Council. Concurrency violations are found on the following maps and are specifically documented in the Department of Public Works annual "Transportation Concurrency Management System" Report Exhibit A to Ordinance No s,Page 172 of 318

173 Road Facilities Exhibit A to Ordinance No s,Page 173 of 318

174 Road Facilities Exhibit A to Ordinance No s,Page 174 of 318

175 Road Facilities If a road segment that has failed concurrency has not been mitigated within the six year period, as described herein, the County Council, as part of this Capital Facilities Plan, must specifically list the road segment(s) and identify the remedy to be taken concerning the failed road segment. Remedies may include development moratoria; identification of a specific financial commitment and time schedule for an improvement that will eliminate the concurrency violation; increasing the Service Standard; declaration of the County Council that a road segment has been built to its ultimate configuration and that the road segment is therefore exempt from concurrency requirements; provision of non-capital alternatives; and/or other unidentified measures. The following table lists any road segments that have failed concurrency and have not been fully mitigated during the six-year grace period. Concurrency Segments with Daily V/S Equal To or Larger Than 1.00 Segment Name Segment Limits Daily Count Daily Threshold Daily V/S Year V/S >= 1.00* 122ND AV E 136 ST E TO 144 ST E 18,250 17, ND AV E 144 ST E TO 145 ST E 17,850 17, ND AV E 145 ST E TO 152 ST E 18,380 17, SPANAWAY LOOP RD S 174 ST S TO 154 ST S 26,020 22, *First year of 6 year obligation period. CURRENT FACILITY INVENTORY Current Facility Inventory The voluminous inventory of current Road facilities is on file electronically in the County's Department of Public Works, Traffic Section, in the Mobility database. The Mobility database is a requirement of the Washington State County Road Administration Board (CRAB). PRIOR YEAR MAJOR ACCOMPLISHMENTS Accomplishments in 2015 include: $8,093,220 million of grant funds were acquired from State and Federal agencies 13 new projects went through the project initiation process 48 projects were active in the preliminary/final engineering phase 99 right-of-way negotiations were underway $183 thousand was spent on land acquisitions 10 projects were advertised for construction 9 projects were substantially completed $7.8 million was spent on payments to contractors Exhibit A to Ordinance No s,Page 175 of 318

176 NON-CAPITAL ALTERNATIVES Road Facilities The following non-capital alternatives include strategies, programs, technologies, and other alternatives that do not require capital improvement projects to achieve the level of service standards for Roads capital facilities. Non-capital traffic reduction measures may include Transportation Demand Management (TDM) programs including Commute Trip Reduction (CTR) programs; Transportation System Management (TSM) programs; improved transit services; and other measures to reduce the V/S ratio below the Service Standard. CAPITAL PROJECTS The projects found in the County s Six-Year Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) represent concurrency-related Capacity Projects, other Capacity Projects, Non-Capacity road and bridge projects, and Miscellaneous Programs. These projects represent the County's best estimate of construction-related investment (including preliminary, final engineering, right-of-way acquisition, and construction) in its road system over the next six years. The total estimated cost for this effort is $95,221,000. The County budgets, administers, and delivers the road and bridge projects through the Public Works Construction Fund. The Construction Fund includes federal funding programs, state funding programs, county road funds, traffic impact fees, SEPA-based developer mitigation fund, and other miscellaneous funds. Road Facility Projects and Financing Plan Since the County s Six-Year Transportation Improvement Program provides the County s best estimate of road facility related projects, revenues, and expenditures over the next six year period, the Six-Year Transportation Improvement Program, as adopted or amended by the Pierce County Council, is hereby incorporated into this Capital Facilities Plan. Exhibit A to Ordinance No s,Page 176 of 318

177 Capital Projects Location Links to Other Projects Facilities Description Need Notes Road Facilities Road Operations Salt Sheds Poleline Pit and Rhodes Lake Pit Salt Shed and foundations for County wide salt storage Salt material supply requires protection from weather elements. A permanent structure will reduce the risk of pollution to the environment and streamline operations when working with the salt material for snow and ice response. Strategically placing salt material supplies throughout the County assists with streamlined processes and access during emergency snow and ice response efforts. This type of permanent storage with proper foundation will meet Pierce County's National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit requirements. Capital Cost Land Acquisition Design Engineering Prior Expend Year Total Grand Total 10,000 10,000 10,000 Construction 475, , ,400 Total Cost 485, , ,400 Funding Sources County Road Fund $ $ 485,400 $ $ $ $ $ $ 485,400 $ 485,400 Land Sales $ $ Unfunded Fund Balance Total Funds 485, , ,400 Annual M&O Total Annual M&O Exhibit A to Ordinance No s,Page 177 of 318

178 Road Facilities Location Links to Other Projects Facilities Description Need Notes Capital Cost Land Acquisition Design Engineering West County Maintenance Facility (New Purdy Shop) Wauna area of Key Peninsula Eventual surplus of existing Purdy Road Maintenance facility West County Maintenance Facility (New Purdy Shop) A facilities plan was developed in 2002 with the goal to optimize the delivery of road maintenance, operations, and preservation services for the anticipated future of Pierce County. This cost benefit plan included solutions for immediate needs and incorporated strategies to meet the needs of Pierce County's expanding road network. This plan outlined the East County Maintenance Facility (completed in August 2007), the Centeral Maintenance Facility (completed in May 2008), and the West County Maintenance Facility. Pierce County Road Operations owns the existing land where this new site is planned. Prior Expend Year Total Grand Total 10, , , , ,000 Construction 5,090,000 3,650, ,000 9,240,000 9,240,000 Total Cost 10, ,000 5,790,000 3,650, ,000 10,190,000 10,200,000 Funding Sources County Road Fund $ 10,000 $ 250,000 $ 5,790,000 $ 2,646,000 $ $ $ $ 8,686,000 $ 8,696,000 Land Sales 1,004, ,000 $ 1,504,000 $ 1,504,000 Unfunded Fund Balance Total Funds 10, ,000 5,790,000 3,650, ,000 10,190,000 10,200,000 Annual M&O Total Annual M&O Exhibit A to Ordinance No s,Page 178 of 318

179 Road Facilities Land Acquisition Design Engineering Construction Total Cost Total of Capital Projects Prior Expend Year Total Grand Total 10, , , , , ,400 5,090,000 3,650, ,000 9,715,400 9,715,400 10, ,400 5,790,000 3,650, ,000 10,675,400 10,685,400 Source of Funds County Road Fund $ 735,400 $ 5,790,000 $ 2,646,000 $ $ $ Land Sales 1,004, ,000 Unfunded Fund Balance Total Sources $ 735,400 $ 5,790,000 $ 3,650,000 $ 500,000 $ $ Total Annual M&O Total Cost $ $ $ $ $ $ FUTURE NEEDS Projects found in the following table are those capital facility requirements for roads and intersections planned to accommodate new growth through the year These road and intersection projects are system improvements that are reasonably related to new development and are based on an analysis of present and future traffic volumes associated with new growth through the year The estimate for these projects is $777,140,000. The projects found in the following table are from and provide the basis for traffic impact fees. Some of these projects are also found in the Six-Year Transportation Improvement Program. New Growth Related Capital Facility Requirements 2007 to 2018 Roads (x $1,000) Use of Funds Time Period Facility Location Estimated Costs ROAD PROJECTS Ave E 176 St E to 152 St E 0 Exhibit A to Ordinance No s,Page 179 of 318

180 Road Facilities New Growth Related Capital Facility Requirements 2007 to 2018 Roads (x $1,000) Use of Funds Time Period Facility Location Estimated Costs Ave E 204 St E to 192 St E Ave E 136 St E to 116 St E 15, Ave E 144 St E to 136 St E Ave E 152 St E to 144 St E St E 300' E/O Woodland Ave E to 86 Ave E 12, St E to Military Rd E Shaw Rd E to SR St E 86 Ave E to 90 Ave E St E 94 Ave E to SR St E 94 Ave E to SR St E 78 Ave E to SR St E Canyon Rd E to Woodland Ave E St E Woodland Ave E to 78 Ave E St E 14 Ave E to Waller Rd E 12, St E 1000' E/O Canyon Rd E to Gem Heights Dr E 17, St E B St E to 14 Ave E 13, St E Gem Heights Dr E to SR 161 2, St E Waller Rd E to 500' W/O 51 Ave E 12, St E Extension BR #31195-A Calistoga Ave E to Urban Growth Area (UGA) Boundary St E Extension Urban Growth Area (UGA) Boundary to 130 Ave E St E 70 Ave E to 74 Ave E St E 78 Ave E to Gem Heights Dr E 5, Ave E 120 St E to Rhodes Lk Rd Ave E to 199 Ave Ct E Rhodes Lk Rd E to 112 St E and Bonney Lk C/L to 104 St E 0 ROAD PROJECTS St E SR 7 to SR Brookdale Rd E 152 St E to Canyon Rd E Canyon Rd E 131 St Ct E to 116 St E 12, Canyon Rd E 144 St E to 131 St Ct E 12, Canyon Rd E 160 St E to 144 St E 8, Canyon Rd E 172 St E to 160 St E 9, Canyon Rd E 192 St E to 1000' S/O 176 St E Canyon Rd E 72 St E to Pioneer Way E Canyon Rd E 96 St E to 72 St E 18, Canyon Rd E 106 St E to 96 St E Canyon Rd E Northerly Ext Pioneer Way E to 70 Ave E 30,000 Exhibit A to Ordinance No s,Page 180 of 318

181 Road Facilities New Growth Related Capital Facility Requirements 2007 to 2018 Roads (x $1,000) Use of Funds Time Period Facility Location Estimated Costs Canyon Rd E Southerly Ext 224 St E to 192 St E 13, Military Rd E to 122 Ave E Sunrise Pkwy E to Reservoir Rd E 2, Pioneer Way E Waller Rd E to Canyon Rd E Portland Ave E 112 St E to SR 512 EB on to off ramps Rhodes Lake Road Corridor SR 162 to 198 Ave E 10, Shaw Rd E to Military Rd E Reservoir Rd E to 39 Ave SE Spanaway Loop Rd S Military Rd S to 116 St S Spanaway Loop Rd S 174 St S to Military Rd S Steilacoom Ferry Lane Modification Steilacoom Landing Loading Lanes Wollochet Dr NW 40 St NW to Dr East Bay NW 11, Wollochet Dr NW East Bay Dr NW to Fillmore Dr NW 5, SUBTOTAL ROAD PROJECTS 226,280 New Growth Related Capital Facility Requirements 2007 to 2018 Roads (x $1,000) Use of Funds Time Period Facility Location Estimated Costs SIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS St NW to 70 Ave NW St E to Waller Rd E St E to Portland Ave E St E to Portland Ave E St E to Portland Ave E St E to Waller Rd E St E to Golden Given Rd E St E to Vickery Ave E St E to Waller Rd E St S (Lkwd) to Steele St S St S to Ainsworth Ave S St S to C St S St S to Park Ave S St E to 214 Ave E Ave E to Sunrise Blvd E St E to Waller Rd E St E to B St E St E to 108 Ave E 0 Exhibit A to Ordinance No s,Page 181 of 318

182 Road Facilities New Growth Related Capital Facility Requirements 2007 to 2018 Roads (x $1,000) Use of Funds Time Period Facility Location Estimated Costs St E to Orting Kapowsin Hwy E Forest Canyon Rd E to Sumner Tapps Hwy E Park Ave S to 108 St S Pioneer Wy E to Woodland Ave E Sales Rd S to Steele St S South Tapps Dr E to Sumner Tapps Hwy E Sumner Buckley Hwy E to 214 Ave E Sumner Tapps Hwy E to 16 St E Sunrise Blvd E to 110 Ave E Valley Ave E to Milwaukee Ave E SUBTOTAL SIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS Exhibit A to Ordinance No s,Page 182 of 318

183 Road Facilities New Growth Related Capital Facility Requirements 2007 to 2018 Roads (x $1,000) Use of Funds Time Period Facility Location Estimated Costs UNSIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS St E to 68 Ave E St NW to 70 Ave NW St E to 218 Ave E St E to Waller Rd E St E to Waller Rd E Ave E to Mathias Rd E St E to 44 Ave E St E to 50 Ave E St E to Vickery Ave E St E to Golden Given Rd E St E to Portland Ave E St E to Waller Rd E St E to Fruitland Ave E St E to Waller Rd E St E to Golden Given Rd E St E to 214 Ave E St E to Fruitland Ave E St E to Golden Given Rd E St E to McCutcheon Rd E St E to Waller Rd E St E to Woodland Ave E St E to Portland Ave E St E to Golden Given Rd E St S to Steele St S St E to Fruitland Ave E St E to Golden Given Rd E St E to Woodland Ave E St S to Ainsworth Ave S St E to 24 Ave E St E to 34 Ave E St E to Bingham Ave E St S to A St S 2, St S to Sheridan Ave S St S to Yakima Ave S St S to C St S St E to Waller Rd E 0 Exhibit A to Ordinance No s,Page 183 of 318

184 Road Facilities New Growth Related Capital Facility Requirements 2007 to 2018 Roads (x $1,000) Use of Funds Time Period Facility Location Estimated Costs UNSIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS St E to Golden Given Rd E St E to 111 Ave E St S to C St S St E to 34 Ave E St E to 74 Ave E St E to 78 Ave E St E to 111 Ave E St E to 62 Ave E St E to Bingham Ave E St E to Golden Given Rd E St E to Vickery Ave E St E to Waller Rd E 2, St E to Woodland Ave E St S to A St S St S to C St S St E to 86 Ave E St E to 22 Ave E 1, St E to 38 Ave E St E to 70 Ave E St E to 110 Ave E St E to 22 Ave E St E to 22 Ave E Ave E to 9 St E St E to 8 Ave E St E to 13 Ave CT E St E to 22 Ave E St E to B St E St E to Orting Kapowsin Hwy E St E to 22 Ave E St E to Wright Rd E Ave E to Edwards Rd E St E to 126 Ave E St E to 218 Ave E St E to Golden Given Rd E Aqueduct Dr E to 128 St E Aqueduct Dr E to Golden Given Rd E Brookdale Rd E to 38 Ave E 0 Exhibit A to Ordinance No s,Page 184 of 318

185 Road Facilities New Growth Related Capital Facility Requirements 2007 to 2018 Roads (x $1,000) Use of Funds Time Period Facility Location Estimated Costs Brookdale Rd E to 8 Ave E Brookdale Rd E to Golden Given Rd E Brookdale Rd E to Waller Rd E Burnham Dr NW to Sehmel Dr NW C St S to Park Ave S Connells Prairie Rd E to 214 Ave E Cramer Rd KPN to Key Pen. Hwy KPN 2, Kelley Lake Rd E to 214 Ave E Key Pen. Hwy KPN to 134 Ave KPN Key Pen. Hwy KPN to Herron Rd KPN Military Rd E to 22 Ave E Military Rd E to 152 St E Military Rd E to Waller Rd E Myers Rd E to South Tapps Dr E Orting Kapowsin Hwy E to 150 Ave E Orting Kapowsin Hwy E to 196 St Ct E Park Ave S to 102 St S Pioneer Wy E to Stewart Ave E Pioneer Wy E to Waller Rd E 3, Rhodes Lake Rd E to McCutcheon Rd E Riverside Dr E to 78 St E Sehmel Dr NW to Bujacich Rd NW South Prairie Rd E to 120 St E South Prairie Rd E to 234 Ave E Stone Dr NW to Jahn Ave NW Stone Dr NW to Point Fosdick Dr NW 2, Stone Dr NW to 26 Ave NW Sumner Tapps Hwy E to Driftwood Dr E Tule Lake Rd S to C St S Tule Lake Rd S to Park Ave S Vernhardson St to Crescent Valley Dr NW Warren Dr NW to Ford Dr NW Warren Dr NW to Fox Isld Bridge Rd FI Woodhill Dr NW to Burnham Dr NW SUBTOTAL UNSIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS 16,550 Exhibit A to Ordinance No s,Page 185 of 318

186 Road Facilities New Growth Related Capital Facility Requirements 2007 to 2018 Roads (x $1,000) Use of Funds Time Period Facility Location Estimated Costs SUBTOTAL EXPENDITURE 243,080 New Growth Related Capital Facility Requirements 2019 to 2025 Roads (x $1,000) Time Period Facility Location Estimated Costs ROAD PROJECTS Ave E 176 St E to 152 St E 14, Ave E 204 St E to 192 St E 8, Ave E 136 St E to 116 St E Ave E 144 St E to 136 St E 7, Ave E 152 St E to 144 St E 3, St E 300' e/o Woodland Ave E to 86 Ave E St E to Military Rd E Shaw Rd E to SR , St E 86 Ave E to 90 Ave E 1, St E 94 Ave E to SR 161 2, St E 94 Ave E to SR 161 4, St E 78 Ave E to SR , St E Canyon Rd E to Woodland Ave E 14, St E Woodland Ave E to 78 Ave E 10, St E 14 Ave E to Waller Rd E St E 1000' e/o Canyon Rd E to Gem Heights Dr E St E B St E to 14 Ave E St E Gem Heights Dr E to SR St E Waller Rd E to 500' W/O 51 Ave E St E Extension BR #31195-A Calistoga Ave E to Urban Growth Area (UGA) Boundary 30, St E Extension Urban Growth Area (UGA) Boundary to 130 Ave E 30, St E 70 Ave E to 74 Ave E 1, St E 78 Ave E to Gem Heights Dr E Ave E 120 St E to Rhodes Lk Rd 2, Ave E to 199 Ave Ct E Rhodes Lk Rd E to 112 St E and Bonney Lk C/O104 St E 4, St E SR 7 to SR , Brookdale Rd E 152 St E to Canyon Rd E 7,100 Exhibit A to Ordinance No s,Page 186 of 318

187 Road Facilities New Growth Related Capital Facility Requirements 2019 to 2025 Roads (x $1,000) Time Period Facility Location Estimated Costs ROAD PROJECTS Canyon Rd E 131 St Ct E to 116 St E Canyon Rd E 144 St E to 131 St Ct E Canyon Rd E 160 St E to 144 St E Canyon Rd E 172 St E to 160 St E Canyon Rd E 192 St E to 1000' S/O 176 St E 6, Canyon Rd E 72 St E to Pioneer Way E 13, Canyon Rd E 96 St E to 72 St E 17, Canyon Rd E 106 St E to 96 St E 7, Canyon Rd E Northerly Ext Pioneer Way E to 70 Ave E 35, Canyon Rd E Southerly Ext 224 St E to 192 St E 7, Military Rd E to 122 Ave E Sunrise Pkwy E to Reservoir Rd E 8, Pioneer Way E Waller Rd E to Canyon Rd E 22, Portland Ave E 112 St E to SR 512 EB on to off ramps 2, Rhodes Lake Road Corridor SR 162 to 198 Ave E 50, Shaw Rd E to Military Rd E Reservoir Rd E to 39 Ave SE 8, Spanaway Loop Rd S Military Rd S to 116 St S 14, Spanaway Loop Rd S 174 St S to Military Rd S 2, Wollochet Dr NW 40 St NW to Dr East Bay NW Wollochet Dr NW East Bay Dr NW to Fillmore Dr NW SUBTOTAL ROAD PROJECTS 392,300 Exhibit A to Ordinance No s,Page 187 of 318

188 Road Facilities New Growth Related Capital Facility Requirements 2019 to 2025 Roads (x $1,000) Time Period Facility Location Estimated Costs SIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS St NW to 70 Ave NW St E to Waller Rd E 1, St E to Portland Ave E St E to Portland Ave E 1, St E to Portland Ave E 1, St E to Waller Rd E St E to Golden Given Rd E 1, St E to Vickery Ave E St E to Waller Rd E 1, St S (Lkwd) to Steele St S 3, St S to Ainsworth Ave S 1, St S to C St S St S to Park Ave S St E to 214 Ave E Ave E to Sunrise Blvd E 1, St E to Waller Rd E 1, St E to B St E 1, St E to 108 Ave E St E to Orting Kapowsin Hwy E 2, Forest Canyon Rd E to Sumner Tapps Hwy E 1, Park Ave S to 108 St S 1, Pioneer Wy E to Woodland Ave E 1, Sales Rd S to Steele St S 1, South Tapps Dr E to Sumner Tapps Hwy E 2, Sumner Buckley Hwy E to 214 Ave E 1, Sumner Tapps Hwy E to 16 St E Sunrise Blvd E to 110 Ave E Valley Ave E to Milwaukee Ave E 1, SUBTOTAL SIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS 37,310 Exhibit A to Ordinance No s,Page 188 of 318

189 Road Facilities New Growth Related Capital Facility Requirements 2019 to 2025 Roads (x $1,000) Time Period Facility Location Estimated Costs UNSIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS St E to 68 Ave E St NW to 70 Ave NW St E to 218 Ave E St E to Waller Rd E St E to Waller Rd E Ave E to Mathias Rd E St E to 44 Ave E 1, St E to 50 Ave E St E to Vickery Ave E 1, St E to Golden Given Rd E St E to Portland Ave E 1, St E to Waller Rd E St E to Fruitland Ave E St E to Waller Rd E St E to Golden Given Rd E 1, St E to 214 Ave E St E to Fruitland Ave E St E to Golden Given Rd E 1, St E to McCuthchen Rd E St E to Waller Rd E St E to Woodland Ave E St E to Portland Ave E 1, St E to Golden Given Rd E 1, St S to Steele St S St E to Fruitland Ave E St E to Golden Given Rd E St E to Woodland Ave E 1, St S to Ainsworth Ave S St E to 24 Ave E St E to 34 Ave E St E to Bingham Ave E St S to A St S St S to Sheridan Ave S St S to Yakima Ave S St S to C St S St E to Waller Rd E 900 Exhibit A to Ordinance No s,Page 189 of 318

190 Road Facilities New Growth Related Capital Facility Requirements 2019 to 2025 Roads (x $1,000) Time Period Facility Location Estimated Costs UNSIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS St E to Golden Given Rd E 1, St E to 111 Ave E 2, St S to C St S St E to 34 Ave E St E to 74 Ave E St E to 78 Ave E St E to 111 Ave E 2, St E to 62 Ave E 1, St E to Bingham Ave E 1, St E to Golden Given Rd E 1, St E to Vickery Ave E 1, St E to Waller Rd E St E to Woodland Ave E 1, St S to A St S St S to C St S St E to 86 Ave E 1, St E to 22 Ave E 1, St E to 38 Ave E St E to 70 Ave E St E to 110 Ave E St E to 22 Ave E 1, St E to 22 Ave E Ave E to 9 St E St E to 8 Ave E St E to 13 Ave CT E St E to 22 Ave E 1, St E to B St E St E to Orting Kapowsin Hwy E 1, St E to 22 Ave E 1, St E to Wright Rd E Ave E to Edwards Rd E St E to 126 Ave E St E to 218 Ave E St E to Golden Given Rd E Aqueduct Dr E to 128 St E 550 Exhibit A to Ordinance No s,Page 190 of 318

191 Road Facilities New Growth Related Capital Facility Requirements 2019 to 2025 Roads (x $1,000) Time Period Facility Location Estimated Costs UNSIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS Aqueduct Dr E to Golden Given Rd E 1, Brookdale Rd E to 38 Ave E 1, Brookdale Rd E to 8 Ave E Brookdale Rd E to Golden Given Rd E Brookdale Rd E to Waller Rd E 3, Burnham Dr NW to Sehmel Dr NW C St S to Park Ave S Connells Prairie Rd E to 214 Ave E Cramer Rd KPN to Key Peninsula Hwy KPN Kelley Lake Rd E to 214 Ave E 1, Key Peninsula Hwy KPN to 134 Ave KPN Key Peninsula Hwy KPN to Herron Rd KPN Military Rd E to 22 Ave E 1, Military Rd E to 152 St E 1, Military Rd E to Waller Rd E 1, Myers Rd E to South Tapps Dr E Orting Kapowsin Hwy E to 150 Ave E Orting Kapowsin Hwy E to 196 St Ct E Park Ave S to 102 St S Pioneer Wy E to Stewart Ave E Pioneer Wy E to Waller Rd E Rhodes Lake Rd E to McCutcheon Rd E 1, Riverside Dr E to 78 St E Sehmel Dr NW to Bujacich Rd NW South Prairie Rd E to 120 St E South Prairie Rd E to 234 Ave E Stone Dr NW to Jahn Ave NW Stone Dr NW to Point Fosdick Dr NW Stone Dr NW to 26 Ave NW Sumner Tapps Hwy E to Driftwood Dr E 1, Tule Lake Rd S to C St S Tule Lake Rd S to Park Ave S Vernhardson St to Crescent Valley Dr NW Warren Dr NW to Ford Dr NW Warren Dr NW to Fox Island Bridge Rd FI Woodhill Dr NW to Burnham Dr NW SUBTOTAL UNSIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS 104,450 Exhibit A to Ordinance No s,Page 191 of 318

192 Road Facilities New Growth Related Capital Facility Requirements 2019 to 2025 Roads (x $1,000) Time Period Facility Location Estimated Costs SUBTOTAL EXPENDITURE 534, TOTAL EXPENDITURE 777,140 Relation to Growth Management Act The level of service (LOS) for County Roads is based on transportation concurrency and is detailed in the Transportation Improvement Plan (TIP), the Transportation Element of the Comprehensive Plan, and this document. The Revised Code of Washington (RCW) requires that the TIP be published separately from the annual budget and capital improvement plan. There is no LOS specific to roads, buildings, and facilities. Exhibit A to Ordinance No s,Page 192 of 318

193 SEWER DIVISION OF PUBLIC WORKS The mission of the Sewer Division is to provide customers with high quality, cost effective, sanitary sewer services by collecting and treating all wastewater generated from County service areas in accordance with applicable local, state, and federal permit requirements. Much of Pierce County s urban growth area is located above a sole source aquifer. Sewering the urban zoned and urban growth areas of the County meets a 1969 compliance order issued by the US EPA to mitigate impacts to the aquifer Chambers Creek Regional Wastewater Treatment Plant and Expansion Mid 2016 posed by on-site septic systems. Pierce County s 2015 Comprehensive Plan, Section 13 - Utilities Element - Sanitary Sewer and Wastewater Treatment - states that utilities: Provide urban level facilities and services only within the designated Urban Growth Areas prior to or concurrent with development, and provide sanitary sewers within the Urban Area. It is the intent of the Pierce County Comprehensive Plan that adequate wastewater collection and treatment facilities are made available no later than occupancy of each new development. Expansion of the sewer collection system is primarily accomplished through new development paying for the construction and extension of new lines and connections to the existing collection system to carry wastewater to the Chambers Creek Regional Wastewater Treatment Plant, the City of Tacoma s Central Wastewater Plant, or the Cascadia LOSS. The Sewer Division is also responsible for managing the Chambers Creek Properties water rights and water systems infrastructure. At this time there are available, 2.62 million gallons per day (MGD) of identified municipal ground and surface water rights held within the Properties. The current primary water source is a production well that draws groundwater from a deep aquifer. Water drawn from this aquifer is currently being utilized for limited on-site irrigation and dust control for construction projects. The Sewer Division continues to investigate wholesale water opportunities with local retail water companies. The Division is also in the process of reviewing reclaimed water facility opportunities as part of the Chambers Creek Regional Wastewater Treatment Plant Expansion project and anticipates that, once in production of reclaimed water, this resource would be used for irrigation of the park features of the Chambers Creek Regional Park and possibly serve the irrigation needs of the Chambers Bay Golf Course. Utilization of reclaimed water would free up existing potable groundwater sources for potential wholesale distribution. Exhibit A to Ordinance No s,Page 193 of 318

194 Sewer Division of Public Works and Utilities Customers Customers are located in portions of unincorporated Pierce County within designated Urban Growth Areas including Parkland, Spanaway, Midland, Frederickson, Graham, South Hill, Brown s and Dash Points, Fife Heights, Tehaleh (Cascadia), and all or portions of the following towns and cities: City of DuPont City of Lakewood Town of Steilacoom City of University Place City of Tacoma (the Western Slopes Service Area) City of Milton (flows to the City of Tacoma's Central Wastewater Treatment Plant) City of Fife - Fife Heights (flows to the City of Tacoma's Central Wastewater Treatment Plant) City of Edgewood (flows to the City of Tacoma's Central Wastewater Treatment Plant, and to the Lakehaven Wastewater Treatment Plant located in Federal Way) PLANNING AND ENGINEERING The Sewer Division employs an asset management approach and just-in-time forecasting to identify needs and costs for collection and treatment improvements. The Division also produces an expanded format of the annual Capital Facilities Plan known as the Sewer Improvement Program (SIP). The SIP is primarily an in-house document utilized for long range planning, engineering, and construction of the County s wastewater treatment and collection systems over a twenty-year span. The SIP is instrumental in securing long term funding and providing an active platform for adjustment and revision to the Capital Facilities Plan to best take advantage of new technologies and favorable construction opportunities. The current SIP covers the years from 2017 through 2037 inclusive and is available for review on the Sewer Division website in Plans, Reports, and Publications. LEVEL OF SERVICE The current LOS of 220 gallons per day per residential equivalent plus 15% reserve capacity meets current LOS requirements as required in the Pierce County Comprehensive Plan. This includes Chambers Creek Regional Wastewater Treatment Plant average daily treatment demand in 2014/2015 of 20.1MGD and also represents growth-related reserves of 4.3MGD for a total available operational capacity of 24.4MGD. As shown in Table 1, the total available treatment capacity, including the 15% held in reserve, remains today at 28.7MGD. With substantial completion of Phase 1 of the Chambers Creek Regional Wastewater Treatment Plant Expansion project in December 2016, a re-rating of the treatment capacities will be done in early to mid At that time the maximum operational capacity and the capacity held in reserve will be revised to reflect these improvements. The Sewer Division also owns 2.56MGD of capacity and treatment at the Tacoma Central Wastewater Treatment Plant located in the Port of Tacoma. Flows from the cities of Milton and Edgewood and the unincorporated Brown s Point and Fife Heights areas are sent to this facility. Total available capacity from all locations including reserves within the Pierce County Sewer Service Area is 31.34MGD. Table 1 summarizes the current capacities for all Sewer Division treatment facility locations. The two large on-site septic or LOSS systems, listed in Table 1 below, are stand-alone installations for a specific single or multi-customer use. These systems are the Cascadia LOSS at the Tehaleh Master Planned Development and the Etloh LOSS located on Fox Island. Exhibit A to Ordinance No s,Page 194 of 318

195 Sewer Division of Public Works and Utilities The Cascadia LOSS system is currently rated at 0.1MGD. An interim wastewater treatment plant (WWTP) is under review that will allow expansion over time to become the Cascadia WWTP, a 4.3MGD rated facility that will meet the wastewater treatment demands of the Tehaleh Master Planned Development through project build-out. The Etloh LOSS is a closed system that serves a small planned development on the south end of Fox Island. No new connections are anticipated to this system. Should additional connections be proposed, additional capacity would be required, and constructed, prior to any new connections. TABLE 1 FACILITIES, CAPACITIES, AND LOCATIONS Facility Capacity Location Chambers Creek Regional Wastewater Treatment Plant 28.7MGD City of University Place Tacoma Central Wastewater Treatment Plant 2.54 MGD City of Tacoma Cascadia Wastewater Treatment Plant at Tehaleh (LOSS) 0.1MGD Eastern Pierce County Etloh Large On-Site System (LOSS) 0.001MGD Fox Island, Key Peninsula Total Capacity all Facilities MGD* *Millions of Gallons per Day LEVEL OF SERVICE (LOS) - CHAMBERS CREEK PROPERTIES POTABLE WATER RIGHTS The Sewer Division also owns surface and groundwater rights on the Chambers Creek Properties but does not currently provide potable water services to any retail customers, therefore levels of service outside of the Properties have not yet been established. PRIOR YEAR S MAJOR ACCOMPLISHMENTS Many of the following division accomplishments and ongoing projects and programs can be found at the Pierce County Sewer Division Website, Chambers Creek Regional Wastewater Treatment Plant The Chambers Creek Regional Wastewater Treatment Plant Expansion continues on budget with an estimated project wide substantial completion date of December During 2015 work progressed on Construction Packages 3 and 4. As of December 2015, approximately 83% of the proposed improvements for Construction Package 3 have been completed at a cost of $111.3M. For Construction Package 4, approximately 35% of the improvements have been completed at a cost of $17.9M. Significant accomplishments included the following: o o Commissioning of the new Solids Thickening Facility. Demolition of the old Gravity Belt Thickeners. Exhibit A to Ordinance No s,Page 195 of 318

196 o Sewer Division of Public Works and Utilities Completed the majority of all mechanical, electrical, and plumbing work for the new Aeration Basin on Trains 1 and 2. o Started component testing of the new Aeration Basins, Trains 1 and 2. o Enclosed Digester Control Building No. 2 and began plumbing work. o Completed construction of Digesters 4 and 5. o o o Completed the majority of the systems and operational testing of new Secondary Clarifier No. 7. Enclosed the Reclaimed Water Building and completed the electrical service to the facility. Completed mechanical, electrical, and piping work for the new Biological Process Building. In 2015, a total of 414,459 man hours were worked by all trade contractors. In this period, there were no employee time losses reported to/for Labor and Industries claims due to on the job injury. Additional information pertaining to the Expansion Project is available on the Sewer Division s website - Sewer Engineering Projects Engineering staff continued to manage capital project design and construction, development review and permitting, regulatory compliance and code enforcement, and construction project inspection and completion. Lakewood Generators This preservation project addressed the replacement of 28 Pump Station emergency generators that had come to the end of their useful life. All of the installations were located within the Lakewood ULID 73 1 service area. Completion of this project in 2016 will provide the collection system adequate emergency power to keep sewer flows on-line during a power outage or other emergency event. Manhole Rehabilitation This continuing preservation project, in conjunction with Pierce County and other jurisdiction s road improvement projects, oversees the renovation and upgrading of existing manhole rims located in road improvement projects. Miscellaneous Sewer Line Connections An operations and improvement project that will construct gravity collector sewer line extensions. This includes sewer improvements in conjunction with other jurisdiction s road improvement projects. Construction Project Review and Project Completion Processed final inspections for 1,412 sewer services and permits in Closed out 22 Developer constructed sewer line extension projects. Issued final approvals for the Chambers Creek Regional Park Beach Debris Removal and North Meadows Parking Lot projects, issued approvals for the A Street Pond Remediation, Lakewood Generator 5, and BNSF Rail Road Siding projects. Completed preliminary and/or final design work for Warner Pump Station Installation, Manhole Rehabilitation Design/Build Award, and the Lakewood Generator Project Phase 6. Grants, Loans, Bonds, and Appropriations Exhibit A to Ordinance No s,Page 196 of 318

197 Sewer Division of Public Works and Utilities The Sewer Division completed drawing on the $60,000,000 Centennial Loan from the Washington State Department of Ecology s Centennial Clean Water Program, the Clean Water Act Section Nonpoint Source Fund, and the Washington State Water Pollution Control Revolving Fund. These dollars were used for expansion of the Chambers Creek Regional Wastewater Treatment Plant. Repayment on this loan is projected to begin in the latter part of Quarter 2, The Sewer Division continues negotiations with the Department Ecology to utilize the remaining $567,000 in funds from the $2.5 million state budget appropriation for the Chambers Creek Properties Beach Debris Removal project. Currently the funds are on hold pending legislative review effectively freezing funding for Once released, these funds will be used to continue the removal of toxic materials remaining from past mining operations along the Chambers Creek Properties shoreline or in projects that reduce toxics in the wastewater treatment process. The Sewer Division has fully expended the proceeds from the following bonds: Sewer Revenue Bonds 2010, 2012, 2014, 2015 CAPITAL PROJECTS LOCATION KEY AND MAPS The following is a list of projects for the Sewer Division and Chambers Creek Properties for the Capital Facilities Plan cycle. Numbered locations for each project can be found on the following maps. 1. Wastewater Treatment Plant Expansion Phase 1 - Expansion Project An improvement project to expand the treatment capacity of the Plant, modernize the treatment process, and rehabilitate existing systems. It is the first of five phases approved by the City of University Place in February 2010 through Conditional Use Permit CUP The CUP consolidated all previous land use approvals for the WWTP into one new Conditional Use Permit using a Chambers Creek WWTP Overlay in what is now zoned as residential two or R2 zone classification. Completion of all five phases is not anticipated until Wastewater Treatment Plant - Reclaimed Water Pump Station An improvement project consisting of building a pump station, storage pond, and constructing piping to distribute reclaimed water to the irrigation system of the Chambers Creek Properties to irrigate the park features of the Chambers Creek Regional Park with the future intention of also irrigating the Chambers Bay Golf Course. Peak demands of up to 1-2MGD in potable water savings may be realized with the availability of reclaimed water. 3. Wastewater Treatment Plant - Solids Handling Expansion The solids handling system will have insufficient capacity by This planning project will begin looking at options for the next phase of the solids handling process. 4. Wastewater Treatment Plant - Digester Rehabilitation With the completion of Phase 1 of the WWTP Expansion Project, two new digesters will come on-line. Once the new digesters are fully operational the three existing units will be put on a regular maintenance schedule, with the all units on a five-year rotation to undertake cleaning, inspection, and spot repairs. The three existing units will be used as storage for treated wastewater when not in use as digesters. 5. Wastewater Treatment Plant - Fertilizer Manufacturing Facility Furnace Replacement The furnace is an essential component in the FMF, without which it cannot operate. If inoperable, the Division is unable to produce Class A Exceptional Quality biosolids and would be required to haul and then land apply Class B biosolids using a contracted vendor, with Exhibit A to Ordinance No s,Page 197 of 318

198 Sewer Division of Public Works and Utilities anticipated costs of $20,000-$25,000 per week. The recommended scope of work is to replace the furnace with a new, stainless steel furnace which will be less susceptible to corrosion than the existing steel unit. The balance of the work, estimated at $347,000, would be completed in Wastewater Treatment Plant - Fertilizer Manufacturing Facility Gas Delivery The Fertilizer Manufacturing Facility (FMF) was designed to utilize up to 60% digester gas that is readily available onsite through the digestion process. Utilizing this energy source has been hampered by inadequate system pressure, piping, and condensate removal, to allow the gas from the digestion system to be delivered properly. This project will install a new pressure boosting blower, install a new condensate removal system, and provide adjustments from the digesters to the FMF to allow digester gas use. This project is anticipated to save an estimated $100,000 annually on natural gas usage. 7. Collections Improvement - B Street Interceptor Phase 3 This project was created by the split of the B Street Interceptor Phase 2 project as identified in the 2011 Capital Facilities Plan and budget into two phases. This improvement project includes the installation of approximately 5,900 feet of 30 diameter gravity pipeline along B Street East and Mountain Highway from 192nd Street East to 204th Street East. 8. Collections Improvement - Miscellaneous Sewer Line Connections This operations and improvement project will construct gravity collector sewer line extensions. This includes sewer improvements in conjunction with other jurisdiction s road improvement projects. This also includes the cost of raising existing manhole rims located in road improvement projects. 9. Collections Improvement - Upper Leach Creek Interceptor This project will install 2,400 feet of 30-inch interceptor line in Upper Leach Creek. The interceptor will serve areas of University Place and provide sewer access to the City of Fircrest should they wish to contribute to the project. 10. Collections Improvement - Woodland Pump Station and Temporary Force Main This project will construction a new regional pump station and temporary force main connecting into the 112th Street East sewer line extension. The temporary force main will be replaced in 2030, when the Brookdale Interceptor is installed from Woodland Avenue to Waller Road. 11. Collections Improvement - 122nd Avenue East Interceptor This project will install 3,000 feet of 15-inch sanitary sewer mainline east on 136th Street East to the intersection of 136th Street East and 122nd Avenue East and then south along 122nd Avenue East to the intersection of 122nd Avenue East and 144th Street East. 12. Collections Improvement - Thun Field Employment Center Sewer Line Extension This project will install 1,925 feet of 8-inch sanitary sewer mainline southerly from the intersection of 158 th Street East on 110th Avenue East to provide sewer collection services for the approximately 914 acres of underdeveloped Employment Center parcels along the eastern side of Thun Field. These are the last EC zoned parcels available for development in Pierce County. Existing and new residential and commercial developments can also be accommodated should they wish to connect. 13. Collections Improvement - Fife Heights Trunk The project, a 12 7,255 lf line, starts at Pacific Highway and Porter Way, goes east to 70 th Avenue East, South along 70 th to 10 th Street East, than west along 10 th Street East to 66 th Avenue East and then north to the intersection of 66 th Avenue East and 4 th Street East. The Exhibit A to Ordinance No s,Page 198 of 318

199 Sewer Division of Public Works and Utilities line provides sewer service to the urban area of Fife Heights and will discharge to the existing Interceptor in Pacific Highway. 14. Collections Renovation/Rehabilitation - Collections Manhole Rehabilitation. This is a preservation project to continue the rehabilitation/repair and replacement of existing manhole installations throughout the County s sewer service area due to changing road and field conditions such as repaving, and normal wear and tear. 15. Collections Renovation/Rehabilitation - Parkland/Brookdale Interceptor Phase 3 The project, a 72 diameter 12,121 lf interceptor, will provide future capacity relief for the interceptor located between the Brookdale Interceptor (Brookdale Sub-basin) and the Spanaway Loop Bypass and will serve the East, Rainier Terrace, Frederickson, and Brookdale/Golden Given Sub-basins, as well as the Parkland Sub-basin. 16. Collections Renovation/Rehabilitation - Brown s Point Generators Replacement This is a preservation project that will replace emergency generators that have come to the end of their useful life at two pump station sites in Brown s Point. 17. Collections Renovation/Rehabilitation - Collections Sewer Line Rehabilitation This is a preservation project to rehabilitate/repair and replacement of existing pipe throughout the County s service area damaged by hydrogen sulfide gases within the collection system. 18. Collections Renovation/Rehabilitation - Hidden Hills Pump Station Rehabilitation This is a preservation project to rehabilitate an existing pump station in the City of University Place within the County s service area. 19. Collections Renovation/Rehabilitation - Lakewood Generators Replacement This is the final year of a eight year preservation project to replace emergency generators at 28 pump station sites in the City of Lakewood within Utility Local Improvement District 73-1 service area that have come to the end of their useful life. 20. Collections Renovation/Rehabilitation - Philips/Alard Pump Station Rehabilitation This is a preservation project to rehabilitate an existing pump station in the City of Lakewood within the County s service area. 21. Miscellaneous Scoping and Feasibility Studies Funds miscellaneous studies to determine scope and budget for future Sewer Division projects. These are separate from Major Studies as were completed for the JBLM Proposal. 22. Wastewater Treatment Plant and Collection System Repair and Replacement Funds miscellaneous rehabilitation and replacement projects in the Collection System. As projects are identified, monies will be reallocated from this project to fund identified projects. 23. Operations and Maintenance Projects Funds miscellaneous operations, maintenance, and efficiency/optimization projects throughout the Chambers Creek Regional Wastewater Treatment Plant. 24. Chambers Creek Properties Pier and Moorage (Funded through State Appropriation) An improvement project to continue the construction of Phase 3 of the Pier and Moorage project on the Chambers Creek Properties. The project is currently funded through a 2015 State budget appropriation of $1.7 million that will complete Phase 3. Additional grant and loan opportunities are currently being investigated to secure funding for the final phase of construction. 25. Chambers Creek Properties Remedial Beach Clean-up (Funded through State Appropriation) A maintenance project to continue the ongoing clean-up of the Chambers Creek Properties shoreline, or to pursue additional toxics removals from the Chambers Creek Properties Exhibit A to Ordinance No s,Page 199 of 318

200 Sewer Division of Public Works and Utilities Regional Wastewater Treatment Plant. Currently this project is funded through the remaining $567,000 of a 2015 State budget appropriation of $2.5 million used for the removal of derelict structures including two docks, a concrete pump house and boat ramp, and an operator s shack on the Properties shoreline. The funds are currently on hold by the state legislature. 26. Environmental Services Building Roof Rehabilitation An improvement project that will provide for the rehabilitation of the roof of the Environmental Services Building. 27. Environmental Services Building Boiler Replacement An improvement project that will provide for the replacement of the main boilers in the Environmental Services Building. NON-CAPITAL ALTERNATIVES The Sewer Division has no projects in this category. Exhibit A to Ordinance No s,Page 200 of 318

201 Sewer Division of Public Works and Utilities Exhibit A to Ordinance No s,Page 201 of 318

202 Sewer Division of Public Works and Utilities Exhibit A to Ordinance No s,Page 202 of 318

203 Sewer Division of Public Works and Utilities Exhibit A to Ordinance No s,Page 203 of 318

204 Sewer Division of Public Works and Utilities TABLE CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN SPENDING TOTALS Project Name WWTP Expansion Phase 1 - WWTP Expansion Project $5,452,000 $5,000 2 WWTP Expansion Phase 1 - Reclaimed Water Pump Station $466,200 $2,175,000 $3,963,500 $5,000 3 WWTP Solids Handling Expansion Project $225,000 $3,120,000 $11,173,300 $10,372,300 $5,000 4 Facilities Renovation and Rehab - Digester Rehabilitation $350,000 $255,000 $265,000 $275,000 $286,000 $297,400 5 Facilities Renovation and Rehab - FMF Furnace Replacement Project $217,000 $5,000 6 Facilities Improvement - FMF Digester Gas Delivery Project $173,300 $5,000 7 Collections Improvements - B Street Interceptor Phase 3 $225,000 $225,000 $9,695,600 $4,083,800 $5,000 8 Collections Improvements - Miscellaneous Sewer Line Connections $150,000 $150,000 $150,000 $150,000 $150,000 $150,000 9 Collections Improvements - Upper Leach Creek Interceptor $526,700 $3,963,500 $2,766,000 $5, Collections Improvements - Woodland PS and Temporary Force Main $354,100 $2,833, Collections Improvements - 122nd Avenue East Interceptor $310,800 $1,065,100 $5, Collections Improvements - Thun Field EC Sewer Line Extension $5, Collections Improvement - Fife Heights Trunk $333, Collections Renovation and Rehab - Manhole Rehabilitation $234,000 $243,200 $253,000 $263,300 $273,700 $284, Collections Renovation and Rehab - Parkland/Brookdale Phase 3 $560,400 $1,300,000 $12,321, Collections Renovation and Rehab - Brown s Point Generators $130,000 $5, Collections Renovation and Rehab - Sewer Line Rehabilitation $492,500 $512,300 $531,600 $554,100 $576,300 $599, Collections Renovation and Rehab - Hidden Hills Pump Station $1,035,000 $5, Collections Renovation and Rehab - Lakewood Generators Replacement $525,000 $5, Collections Renovation and Rehab - Philips/Alard Pump Station Rehab $300,000 $5, Miscellaneous Scoping and Feasibility Studies $50,000 $50,000 $50,000 $50,000 $50,000 $50, WWTP and Collection System Rehabilitation and Replacement Projects $200,000 $3,777,600 $4,941,600 $7,923,000 $8,371, Operational and Maintenance Projects $200,000 $200,000 $200,000 $200,000 $200, CCP Pier and Moorage (Funded through State Budget Appropriation) $1,445,000 $5, CCP Remedial Clean-up (Funded through State Budget Appropriation) $562,000 $5, ESB Roof Rehabilitation $865,000 $5, ESB Boiler Replacement $5, Spending Totals $11,653,800 $6,028,700 $19,332,200 $35,300,100 $19,038,000 $25,456,100 Exhibit A to Ordinance No s,Page 204 of 318

205 Sewer Division of Public Works and Utilities TABLE CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN PROJECTED OPERATING COSTS Project Name WWTP Expansion Phase 1 - WWTP Expansion Project $2,000,000 $2,100,000* $2,205,000 $2,315,250 $2,431,100 $2,552,560 2 WWTP Expansion Phase 1 - Reclaimed Water Pump Station Replacement project, no increase in operational costs are anticipated. 3 WWTP Solids Handling Expansion Project An increase or decrease in operational costs is unknown at this time. 4 Facilities Renovation and Rehab - Digester Rehabilitation Normal maintenance project, no change to operational costs. 5 Facilities Renovation and Rehab - FMF Furnace Replacement Project Normal maintenance project, no change to operational costs. 6 Facilities Improvement - FMF Digester Gas Delivery Project -$100,000** -$100,000 -$100,000 -$100,000 -$100,000 7 Collections Improvements - B Street Interceptor Phase 3 $18,000 8 Collections Improvements - Miscellaneous Sewer Line Connections $1,000 $1,025 $1,050 $1,075 $1,100 $1,130 9 Collections Improvements - Upper Leach Creek Interceptor $12, Collections Improvements - Woodland PS and Temporary Force Main Project is anticipated to increase operational costs by $12,000 annually beginning Collections Improvements - 122nd Avenue East Interceptor $7, Collections Improvements - Thun Field EC Sewer Line Extension $4,000 $4,100 $4,200 $4,300 $4, Collections Improvement - Fife Heights Trunk Project is anticipated to increase operational costs by $8,000 annually in Collections Renovation and Rehab - Manhole Rehabilitation Normal maintenance project, no change to operational costs. 15 Collections Renovation and Rehab - Parkland/Brookdale Phase 3 Replacement project, no increase in operational costs are anticipated. 16 Collections Renovation and Rehab - Brown s Point Generators Normal maintenance project, no change to operational costs. 17 Collections Renovation and Rehab - Sewer Line Rehabilitation Normal maintenance project, no change to operational costs. 18 Collections Renovation and Rehab - Hidden Hills Pump Station Normal maintenance project, no change to operational costs. 19 Collections Renovation and Rehab - Lakewood Generators Replacement Normal maintenance project, no change to operational costs. 20 Collections Renovation and Rehab - Philips/Alard Pump Station Rehab Normal maintenance project, no change to operational costs. 21 Miscellaneous Scoping and Feasibility Studies Non-construction project, no change to operational costs. 22 WWTP and Collection System Repair and Replacement Projects Normal maintenance project, no change to operational costs. 23 Operational and Maintenance Projects Normal maintenance project, no change to operational costs. 24 CCP Pier and Moorage (Funded through State Budget Appropriation) $1,000 $1,025 $1,050 $1,075 $1,100 $1, CCP Remedial Clean-up (Funded through State Budget Appropriation) Clean-up project, no long term operational costs expected. 26 ESB Roof Rehabilitation Normal maintenance project, no change to operational costs. 27 ESB Boiler Replacement Normal maintenance project, no change to operational costs Projected Operating Costs $2,002,000 $2,006,050 $2,111,200 $2,216,600 $2,337,600 $2,496,220 * Annual percentage increase of 5% for WWTP Expansion, beginning in 2018, all others 2.5% annual adjustment. ** Projected savings using on-site digester gas in lieu of off-site natural gas delivery Exhibit A to Ordinance No s,Page 205 of 318

206 Sewer Division of Public Works and Utilities Source of Funds Service Fees $ 2,667,320 $ 5,461,700 $ 14,000,000 $ 18,300,000 $ 19,038,000 $ 25,456,100 Grants 1,495, ,000 5,000 Bonds Loans Fund Balance 7,491,480 5,327,200 16,963,600 Total Sources $ 11,653,800 $ 6,028,700 $ 19,332,200 $ 35,263,600 $ 19,038,000 $ 25,456,100 Total Annual M&O Total Cost $ 2,002,000 $ 2,006,050 $ 2,111,200 $ 2,216,600 $ 2,337,600 $ 2,496,220 FUTURE NEEDS NON-FUNDED PROJECTS The Sewer Division has identified projects to meet future needs through the year These projects are detailed in the Sewer Improvement Program (SIP). The SIP serves as a 20-year central review document for the Sewer Division, County Council, their staff members, and the public to review the scope, cost, funding, and status of planned sewer improvement projects proposed to be undertaken by the Division outside of the Capital Facilities 6-year budget planning cycle. Additional information and a link to the SIP is available on the Sewer Division s website - FUTURE NEEDS - NON-FUNDED CHAMBERS CREEK PROPERTIES PROJECTS The continuing development of the Chambers Creek Properties is identified within the Chambers Creek Properties Master Site Plan. The Plan was completed in 1997, revised in 2007, with a second revision underway and slated for completion in The Plan focuses on infrastructure development and a range of possible uses and improvements for the areas of the Properties outside of the Sewer Division s 200 acre campus. The Plan is also used as mitigation for future expansion projects of the Chambers Creek Regional Wastewater Treatment Plant. At this time funding sources have not been determined for future improvement projects. The Division currently is pursuing funding through grants, state budget appropriations and donations. When funding becomes available, those projects will be included in future CFP and SIP documents. Additional information pertaining to the Chambers Creek Properties Master Site Plan and 2017 Update process are available on the Public Works website - and the Parks and Recreation Website - RELATION TO WASHINGTON STATE GROWTH MANAGEMENT ACT AND PIERCE COUNTY COMPREHENSIVE PLAN Exhibit A to Ordinance No s,Page 206 of 318

207 Sewer Division of Public Works and Utilities State Growth Management Act RCW 36.70A Planning Goals In compliance with the Growth Management Act of the State of Washington: (12) Public facilities and services. Ensure that those public facilities and services necessary to support development shall be adequate to serve the development at the time the development is available for occupancy and use without decreasing current service levels below locally established minimum standards. The Sewer Division is dedicated to meeting this goal, and the goals of the 2015 Pierce County Comprehensive Plan for the Division, to meet demand from residential, commercial, manufacturing, and industrial users throughout the service basin. The Division strives to provide reliable and cost effective service through development-driven expansion for residential and commercial construction, and selected interceptor improvements to allow optimal business and residential expansion throughout the 117 square mile sewer service area and the unincorporated urban growth areas within Pierce County. The Division also supports Washington State growth management goals, in addition to the goals of the 2015 Pierce County Comprehensive Plan for the potable water rights on the Chambers Creek Properties, through the effective management of those rights to serve current uses and to provide for future regional potable water supply needs Pierce County Comprehensive Plan - Utilities Element The 2015 (effective date June 2016) Pierce County Comprehensive Plan Section 13 - Utilities Element - Introduction - states the following goals for utilities within the County: Goal U-1 Provide for the location of utility facilities. Goal U-2 Provide urban level facilities and services only within the designated Urban Growth Areas prior to or concurrent with development. Goal U-3 Ensure adequate utility capacity for future growth. Utilities Element - Sanitary Sewer and Wastewater Treatment The 2015 (effective date June 2016) Pierce County Comprehensive Plan Section 13 - Utilities Element - Sanitary Sewer and Wastewater Treatment - states the following goals for sewer utilities within the County: Goal U-15 - Provide sanitary sewers within the Urban Area. Goal U-16 - Utilize best construction methods and practices and innovative techniques in the design and construction of sewer utilities. Utilities Element - Domestic Water Systems The 2015 Pierce County Comprehensive Plan Code Section 13 - Utilities Element - Domestic Water Systems - states the following goals for water utilities in the County: Goal U-20 - Ensure adequate water supply for all uses that support growth. Goal U-21 - Coordinate water resource planning. Goal U-22 - Preserve the high quality and supply of groundwater resources. Goal U-23 - Encourage metering or measuring all public water withdrawals or diversions. Goal U-24 - Protect the quality of groundwater used for domestic water supplies. Exhibit A to Ordinance No s,Page 207 of 318

208 Sewer Division of Public Works and Utilities Goal U-25 - Prior to development, take into account the availability of potable water. Goal U-26 - Promote reliable water service. Goal U-27 - Prohibit new wells on sites that are at high risk for saltwater intrusion, unless it can be demonstrated that additional groundwater withdrawal will not worsen the problem. Goal U-28 - Support and educate about water conservation measures. Goal U-29 - Purveyors interested in regional supply network development should participate in the planning and construction of transmission, source, storage, and other facilities within their service area which could be jointly used by adjacent purveyors. Goal U-30 - Implement the satellite management program for new or failing water systems. Exhibit A to Ordinance No s,Page 208 of 318

209 SHERIFF The mission of the Pierce County Sheriff s Department is to protect life and property, to uphold rights, and to help build stronger, more livable communities. The Sheriff s Department is a full service law enforcement agency which provides a variety of services throughout the County to include patrol, traffic, and investigative services in unincorporated Pierce County. The following services are provided to both incorporated and unincorporated areas: jail, property room, and civil process services. Additional specialty services of Forensics Investigations, Search and Rescue, Marine Patrol, Dive Rescue, Air Support, Special Weapons and Tactics, Narcotics, and Meth Lab Teams are provided throughout the County. Further, the Sheriff s Department provides contract law enforcement services around the County. The Sheriff s Department is headquartered in the County-City Building (CCB) and personnel are deployed around the County from a South Hill Precinct, four substations and four contract agency offices. A new Parkland precinct opened in Adequate Public Facilities: It is the intent of the County CFP that adequate Sheriff s facilities be available no later than occupancy of each new development. However, no development permit should be denied based on the County's inability to maintain level of service (LOS) standards for Sheriff s facilities. Exhibit A to Ordinance No s,Page 209 of 318

210 Sheriff CURRENT FACILITIES INVENTORY Facility Current Capacity Location Sheriff s Headquarters 44,050 Sq. Ft. CCB Tacoma Ave S, Tacoma Sheriff s Training, Warrants, IA, Background, IT Units 10,155 Sq. Ft. Sound View Office 3602 Pacific Avenue, Tacoma South Hill Precinct 31,039 Sq. Ft. 271 John Bananola Way E, South Hill Parkland/Spanaway Precinct 14,900 Sq. Ft Pacific Avenue, Parkland (to be occupied November 2013) Thun Facility 12,000 Sq. Ft John Bananola Way E, South Hill (property lease PW Thun) Firearms Training Center 2,606 Sq. Ft th Ave S, Roy Property Warehouse 25,988 Sq. Ft S 35th Street, Suite A, Tacoma D-10 Mountain Substation 1,300 Sq. Ft. 201 Center St, Eatonville (leased from City of Eatonville) D-12 Foothills Substation 1,920 Sq. Ft th Ave E, Bonney Lake D-14 Peninsula Substation 3,801 Sq. Ft rd St NW, Gig Harbor (property PW) Thun Airfield Hangars 1,920 Sq. Ft Meridian E, South Hill (leased PW Thun Field) TOTAL: 149,579 Sq. Ft. The Sheriff s Department calculates that a Square footage deficit of 43,446 Sq. Ft. exists. Exhibit A to Ordinance No s,Page 210 of 318

211 PRIOR YEAR MAJOR ACCOMPLISHMENTS Sheriff A perimeter security fence and gates were installed at the Parkland-Spanaway Sheriff s Precinct. Sheriff s employees now have a secure area to park their patrol cars. Phase one of a bullet retention concrete wall berm system was completed at the pistol range. This will enhance the safety at the range and surrounding area by preventing the possibility of stray bullets going in unintended directions. CAPITAL PROJECTS Location Links to Other Projects Facilities Description Need Notes Sheriff Range Sheriff's Range Bullet Containment Berms Ph2 Rifle and pistol ranges berms are inadequate in providing area safety zone for containment of bullets shot on ranges based on study conducted in Build walls/berms for the pistol range and rifle range to address issues report. Phase 2 Will provide safety zone around live ammunition firing ranges as required by accepted range controlling authorities. Public safety Capital Cost Prior Expend Year Total Grand Total Land Acquisition Design Engineering Construction 500, , ,000 Total Cost 500, , ,000 Funding Sources REET Bond Unfunded 500, , ,000 Fund Balance Total Funds 500, , ,000 Annual M&O Total Annual M&O Exhibit A to Ordinance No s,Page 211 of 318

212 Sheriff Location Links to Other Projects Facilities Description Need Notes Sheriff Range Sheriff Range Alarm System Upgrade Alarm system upgrade for Sheriff Range Due to the remote nature of this site, an alarm system enhancement is needed to increase the monitoring, observation and alarm capabilities. This provides for integration into the county wide platform of Lenel while providing additional monitoring points for coverage. Capital Cost Prior Expend Year Total Grand Total Land Acquisition Design Engineering Construction 11,000 11,000 11,000 Total Cost 11,000 11,000 11,000 Funding Sources REET Bond Unfunded 11,000 11,000 11,000 Fund Balance Total Funds 11,000 11,000 11,000 Annual M&O Total Annual M&O Exhibit A to Ordinance No s,Page 212 of 318

213 Sheriff Location Links to Other Projects Facilities Description Need Notes East Precinct (South Hill) Roofing Project Sheriff's East Precinct (South Hill) Replace roofing as needed for proper drainage, repair flashings. Repair roofing at skylights to resolve leaks and/or remove skylights Stop internal water damage being caused by roof leaks Capital Cost Prior Expend Year Total Grand Total Land Acquisition Design Engineering Construction 161, , ,000 Total Cost 161, , ,000 Funding Sources REET Bond Unfunded 161, , ,000 Fund Balance Total Funds 161, , ,000 Annual M&O Total Annual M&O Exhibit A to Ordinance No s,Page 213 of 318

214 Sheriff Location Links to Other Projects Facilities Description Need Notes County City Building Sheriff Property Rm Security Project County City Building, Sheriff Property Room Lenel and camera installations to meet requirements These changes will meet the baseline standards to maintain and operate the property room in a safe and effective manner, and reduce workload impacts by facilitating an increase in operational workflow Capital Cost Prior Expend Year Total Grand Total Land Acquisition Design Engineering Construction 185, , ,000 Total Cost 185, , ,000 Funding Sources REET Bond Unfunded 185, , ,000 Fund Balance Total Funds 185, , ,000 Annual M&O Total Annual M&O Exhibit A to Ordinance No s,Page 214 of 318

215 Sheriff Location Links to Other Projects Facilities Description Need Notes East Precinct (South Hill) Security Project Sheriff's East Precinct (South Hill) Integrate gates to Lenel, secure processing building with Lenel and secure impound lot with motion detector and camera Gap analysis has identified security vulnerabilities. The impound yard has been burglarized several times with potential evidence tampering; doors that lead to sensitive areas are not adequately controlled as currently configured. Capital Cost Prior Expend Year Total Grand Total Land Acquisition Design Engineering Construction 95,000 95,000 95,000 Total Cost 95,000 95,000 95,000 Funding Sources REET Bond Unfunded 95,000 95,000 95,000 Fund Balance Total Funds 95,000 95,000 95,000 Annual M&O Total Annual M&O Exhibit A to Ordinance No s,Page 215 of 318

216 Sheriff Location Links to Other Projects Facilities Description Need Notes Sheriff Range Electrical Upgrade Project Sheriff Range Upgrade panels and wiring throughout all three buildings Antiquated equipment, wiring is not to current code Capital Cost Prior Expend Year Total Grand Total Land Acquisition Design Engineering Construction 184, , ,000 Total Cost 184, , ,000 Funding Sources REET Bond Unfunded 184, , ,000 Fund Balance Total Funds 184, , ,000 Annual M&O Total Annual M&O Exhibit A to Ordinance No s,Page 216 of 318

217 Sheriff Location Links to Other Projects Facilities Description Need Notes East Precinct (South Hill) Retaining Wall Sheriff's East Precinct (South Hill) Stabilize existing rock retaining wall supporting fence line adjacent to mobile home park Existing rock retaining wall is bulging at various locations. Back-fill material is migrating through wall as evidenced by sand and gravel fan deposits at base. Capital Cost Prior Expend Year Total Grand Total Land Acquisition Design Engineering Construction 190, , ,000 Total Cost 190, , ,000 Funding Sources REET Bond Unfunded 190, , ,000 Fund Balance Total Funds 190, , ,000 Annual M&O Total Annual M&O Exhibit A to Ordinance No s,Page 217 of 318

218 Sheriff Total of Capital Projects Prior Expend Year Total Grand Total Land Acquisition Design Engineering Construction 1,326,000 1,326,000 1,326,000 Total Cost 1,326,000 1,326,000 1,326,000 Source of Funds REET $ $ $ $ $ $ Bond Unfunded 1,326,000 Fund Balance Total Sources $ $ 1,326,000 $ $ $ $ Total Annual M&O Total Cost $ $ $ $ $ $ Additional projects that may impact the Pierce County Sheriff are listed in the General Administrative section. The projects effect multiple locations and are identified as various. MAP OF LOCATIONS Not applicable. FUTURE NEEDS NO FUNDING CURRENTLY AVAILABLE Projects with funding from have been identified as necessary to meet the desired service levels. However, the Real Estate Excise Tax funding source is limited. Projects will be prioritized to match the available funding. Capital Cost Total Unfunded $ $ 1,326,000 $ $ $ $ $ 1,326,000 Exhibit A to Ordinance No s,Page 218 of 318

219 Sheriff RELATION TO GROWTH MANAGEMENT ACT Sheriff Level of Service Sq. Ft./Population 1993 Baseline The level of service (LOS) was carefully examined in 2004 and adjusted to a more realistic Square footage need. The reduction in 2008 occurred as a result of the Department of Emergency Management being separated from the Sheriff s Department CFP. The Sheriff is discussing an Officers per Thousand Population LOS. Until an additional or a new LOS is adopted, the current level of 0.5 Square feet per capita will remain in effect. Expanding upon the table above: Un-incorporated County Population 0.5 Sq. Ft., per thousand Current Sq. Ft., available Net Reserve or (Deficiency) , , ,579 (46,551) , , ,579 (50,753) , , ,579 (59,437) Exhibit A to Ordinance No s,Page 219 of 318

220 Sheriff This page is intentionally left blank. Exhibit A to Ordinance No s,Page 220 of 318

221 SHERIFF S CORRECTIONS BUREAU AND DETENTION CENTER The mission of the Pierce County Detention and Corrections Center is the management, in a safe and secure manner, of persons who have been charged with or convicted of offenses. It recognizes that, for sentenced prisoners, confinement in itself is punishment. For pre-trial prisoners, confinement is to ensure the safety of the public and the individual. The Center serves the entire criminal justice system. The Center shall confine persons in a responsible and humane manner that maintains self dignity. It is hoped that prisoners can expect to leave the facility in no worse condition, physically or psychologically, than when they entered. With the belief that change is always possible, the Pierce County Detention and Corrections Center shall make available opportunities for prisoners to become involved in community-based programs which strive to promote change, self-esteem, and a positive approach to a law-abiding lifestyle. The Center s operations shall be fiscally responsible and shall provide a safe and positive work environment for staff. It shall operate in accordance with the statutes and ordinances of Pierce County and the State of Washington. The Sheriff s Corrections Bureau is responsible for operating two large jail facilities with a total budgeted bed count of 1,296. The Corrections Center houses both pre-trial misdemeanor and felony defendants, those sentenced to jail, and also rents bed space for offenders from the federal and state Departments of Corrections and other agencies. Adequate Public Facilities: It is the intent of the County CFP that adequate Sheriff s Correctional facilities be available no later than occupancy of each new development. However, no development permit should be denied based on the County's inability to maintain level of service standards for Corrections facilities. CURRENT FACILITY INVENTORY Facility Current Bed Capacity Notes: Location Tacoma Avenue (Main) Jail Tacoma Ave S, Tacoma Yakima Avenue (New) Jail 1, Nollmeyer Ln, Tacoma TOTAL: 1,718 Beds Available: 1,296 (Bed availability is limited to the expected utilization and costs to maintain a safe and secure jail.) Notes: 1) Main Jail 4T remodel proposed will add 70 beds for a total of 779 in the Main Jail if funded. 2) New Jail was built to house 1,008 beds; however, due to staffing levels, only seven 84-bed units are funded for a total of 588 beds. The Sheriff continues to work with the Jail Facility Master Plan Committee. Exhibit A to Ordinance No s,Page 221 of 318

222 Sheriff s Corrections and Detention Center The Sheriff s Department has spent the last several years working with the Criminal Justice Task Force and Prosecutor s Office to address the backlog of cases within the jail. This has improved our current case backlog, but does not address future population levels. PRIOR YEAR MAJOR ACCOMPLISHMENTS The Main Jail underwent a major upgrade with the redesign and upgrade of the central domestic hot water plant to a high efficiency water heating system. The new water heating system is designed to optimize hot water distribution making it highly efficient and reliable. The project received a $36,933 utility rebate and is expected to save $10,000 annually in energy costs. The Jail also became the first Corrections facility in Washington State to have a state-of-the-art graywater Aqua-Recycle system installed. This system filters, sanitizes and reuses roughly 80% of the water from the laundry. The project received approximately $45,800 utility rebate and is expected to save $42,000 annually in utility costs. NON-CAPITAL ALTERNATIVES The Pierce County Jail is working with public and private organizations to establish educational and treatment programs that will help our offenders smoothly reintegrate back into our community. Our goal is to reduce recidivism. A significant portion of recidivism is due to the lack of effective community treatment and supports for chronic offenders coping with addictions, mental health, and homelessness. (Special Note: With the exception of the Offender Work Crew, the Jail is not presently involved with any community service program that is coordinated, monitored and supervised by District Court Probation, DOC Community Corrections Division or other private agencies.) The following non-capital alternatives discuss strategies, programs, technologies, and other alternatives that do not require capital improvements. Several recommendations are designed to relieve pressure on the jail and the courts by expanding or adding non-capital alternatives. Increase the Electronic Home Monitoring Programs Expand the Work Release Program Expand the District Court Day Reporting Program to other courts within Pierce County Expand offender education and programs within the jail and assist with job placement. Such programs should include socialization and reintegration into society, and the understanding of values, family, and anger management. Finance the Chronic Minor Offender Program that would assist in transition to the community, housing, counseling, healthcare, and services to the offender by non-profit organizations. Expand evening programs and community centers for constructive activity after hours. Expand Avoidance Programs both within the jail and the community to educate, counsel, or provide alternatives to unacceptable behaviors. Such groups include A.A., N.A., veteran groups, etc. Expand the Pre-Trial Screening Unit to release and monitor felons. Continue the alternatives to incarceration with deputy involvement. Continue the DWI Program-24 hour confinement in lieu of jail time. Partner with other jails to provide unduplicated jail services and programs Exhibit A to Ordinance No s,Page 222 of 318

223 CAPITAL PROJECTS Location Links to Other Projects Facilities Description Need Notes Sheriff s Corrections and Detention Center Corrections Capital Equipment Corrections - Main and 2002 Addition Jails Various capital equipment needs at the Main and 2002 Jail facilities Equipment has reached end of life, experiencing frequent breakdowns and lack of replacement parts Capital Cost Prior Expend Year Total Grand Total Land Acquisition Design Engineering Construction 148, , ,410 Total Cost 148, , ,410 Funding Sources REET Bond Unfunded Fund Balance 148, , ,410 Total Funds 148, , ,410 Annual M&O Total Annual M&O $ $ $ 12,550 $ 12,550 $ 12,550 $ 12,550 $ 12,550 $ 62,750 $ 62,750 Exhibit A to Ordinance No s,Page 223 of 318

224 Sheriff s Corrections and Detention Center Location Links to Other Projects Facilities Description Need Notes Corrections - Main Jail Boiler Study Main Jail Study to determine scope and cost for replacement of AJAX boilers and Heat Recovery system Replace old inefficient equipment with current technology Capital Cost Prior Expend Year Total Grand Total Land Acquisition Design Engineering 30,000 30,000 30,000 Construction Total Cost 30,000 30,000 30,000 Funding Sources REET Bond Unfunded 30,000 30,000 30,000 Fund Balance Total Funds 30,000 30,000 30,000 Annual M&O Total Annual M&O Exhibit A to Ordinance No s,Page 224 of 318

225 Sheriff s Corrections and Detention Center Location Links to Other Projects Facilities Description Need Notes Corrections Master Plan Development Study Corrections - Main and 2002 Addition Jails Development of a master plan for jail system refurbishments Develop master plan for jail facility systems so refurbishments and system upgrades are sequenced in the least impactful and most cost effective manner. Capital Cost Prior Expend Year Total Grand Total Land Acquisition Design Engineering 100, , ,000 Construction Total Cost 100, , ,000 Funding Sources REET Bond Unfunded 100, , ,000 Fund Balance Total Funds 100, , ,000 Annual M&O Total Annual M&O Exhibit A to Ordinance No s,Page 225 of 318

226 Sheriff s Corrections and Detention Center Corrections 2002 Addition Dry Sprinkler Head Replacement - Parking Garage Location Links to Other Projects Facilities Description Need Notes Corrections 2002 Addition Replace dry sprinkler heads parking garage Washington fire safety code requirement Capital Cost Prior Expend Year Total Grand Total Land Acquisition Design Engineering Construction 159, , ,000 Total Cost 159, , ,000 Funding Sources REET Bond Unfunded 159, , ,000 Fund Balance Total Funds 159, , ,000 Annual M&O Total Annual M&O Exhibit A to Ordinance No s,Page 226 of 318

227 Sheriff s Corrections and Detention Center Location Links to Other Projects Facilities Description Need Notes Main Jail Exterior Painting Project Main Jail Clean, prep, caulk windows and paint exterior of Main Jail Current paint system is fading out; numerous window leaks Capital Cost Prior Expend Year Total Grand Total Land Acquisition Design Engineering Construction 210, , ,000 Total Cost 210, , ,000 Funding Sources REET Bond Unfunded 210, , ,000 Fund Balance Total Funds 210, , ,000 Annual M&O Total Annual M&O Exhibit A to Ordinance No s,Page 227 of 318

228 Location Links to Other Projects Facilities Description Need Notes Sheriff s Corrections and Detention Center Corrections 2002 Addition Dry Sprinkler Head Replacement Project - Freezers and Courtyard Corrections 2002 Addition Replace dry sprinkler heads in freezers and courtyards of 2002 Jail Washington fire safety code requirement Capital Cost Prior Expend Year Total Grand Total Land Acquisition Design Engineering Construction 36,000 36,000 36,000 Total Cost 36,000 36,000 36,000 Funding Sources REET Bond Unfunded 36,000 36,000 36,000 Fund Balance Total Funds 36,000 36,000 36,000 Annual M&O Total Annual M&O Exhibit A to Ordinance No s,Page 228 of 318

229 Sheriff s Corrections and Detention Center Location Links to Other Projects Facilities Description Need Notes Corrections 2002 Addition Exterior Wall Project Corrections 2002 Addition Pressure wash and apply sealer/protectant to exterior masonry walls (N, S, E) Brick requires sealing to prevent water intrusion into building Capital Cost Prior Expend Year Total Grand Total Land Acquisition Design Engineering Construction 95,000 95,000 95,000 Total Cost 95,000 95,000 95,000 Funding Sources REET Bond Unfunded 95,000 95,000 95,000 Fund Balance Total Funds 95,000 95,000 95,000 Annual M&O Total Annual M&O Exhibit A to Ordinance No s,Page 229 of 318

230 Sheriff s Corrections and Detention Center Location Links to Other Projects Facilities Description Need Notes Corrections - Main Jail Shower Rooms Refurbishment Main Jail - all floors Repair damage to tiles and replace ceiling tiles Excessive moisture in shower areas has damaged shower rooms Costs include Corrections' overtime Capital Cost Prior Expend Year Total Grand Total Land Acquisition Design Engineering Construction 750, , ,000 Total Cost 750, , ,000 Funding Sources REET Bond Unfunded 750, , ,000 Fund Balance Total Funds 750, , ,000 Annual M&O Total Annual M&O Exhibit A to Ordinance No s,Page 230 of 318

231 Sheriff s Corrections and Detention Center Location Links to Other Projects Facilities Description Need Notes Corrections 2002 Jail Addition Shower Controls Study Corrections 2002 Addition Install shower controls on six (6) units as a study Water conservation efforts are needed in this area Capital Cost Prior Expend Year Total Grand Total Land Acquisition Design Engineering Construction 50,000 50,000 50,000 Total Cost 50,000 50,000 50,000 Funding Sources REET Bond Unfunded 50,000 50,000 50,000 Fund Balance Total Funds 50,000 50,000 50,000 Annual M&O Total Annual M&O Exhibit A to Ordinance No s,Page 231 of 318

232 Location Links to Other Projects Facilities Main Jail Sheriff s Corrections and Detention Center Corrections Secure Yard Security Project Description Need Notes Install security system for secure yard surveillance and allows for two way communication to surveilled area with security Improve security for yard area near loading dock RoboGuard by Senstar; Capital Cost Prior Expend Year Total Grand Total Land Acquisition Design Engineering Construction 60,000 60,000 60,000 Total Cost 60,000 60,000 60,000 Funding Sources REET Bond Unfunded 60,000 60,000 60,000 Fund Balance Total Funds 60,000 60,000 60,000 Annual M&O Total Annual M&O Exhibit A to Ordinance No s,Page 232 of 318

233 Sheriff s Corrections and Detention Center Total of Capital Projects Prior Expend Year Total Grand Total Land Acquisition Design Engineering 130, , ,000 Construction 148,410 1,360,000 1,508,410 1,508,410 Total Cost 148,410 1,490,000 1,638,410 1,638,410 Source of Funds REET $ $ $ $ $ $ Bond Unfunded 1,490,000 Fund Balance 148,410 Total Sources $ 148,410 $ 1,490,000 $ $ $ $ Total Annual M&O Total Cost $ $ $ $ $ $ Additional projects that may impact the Pierce County Jail and Detention Center are listed in the General Administrative section. The projects effect multiple locations and are identified as various. FUTURE NEEDS NO FUNDING CURRENTLY AVAILABLE Projects with funding from have been identified as necessary to meet the desired service levels. However, the Real Estate Excise Tax funding source is limited. Projects will be prioritized to match the available funding. Capital Cost Total Unfunded $ $ 1,490,000 $ $ $ $ $ 1,490,000 Exhibit A to Ordinance No s,Page 233 of 318

234 RELATION TO GROWTH MANAGEMENT ACT Sheriff s Corrections and Detention Center From 2004 to 2014 the number of prisoners per thousand County residents decreased by 20.8%. The Average Daily Population (ADP) includes all incarcerate inmates in County facilities. The ten year average is Corrections Level of Service Average Daily Persons- Beds/1,000 Population The below table expands on the LOS table per 1000 population. County-wide Population 2.0 beds per thousand Current Beds Available Net Reserve or (Deficiency) ,490 1,689 1,298 (391) ,691 1,718 1,298 (420) ,911 1,792 1,298 (494) Note: If staffing were available three additional 84-bed pods could be utilized, or 252 beds. This would reduce the deficit. Additionally, once the 4T remodel is complete this will reduce the deficit an additional 70 beds for a total of 322 beds. Exhibit A to Ordinance No s,Page 234 of 318

235 SUSTAINABLE RESOURCES (SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT FUND) In Pierce County, people, businesses and agencies work together to reuse resources and waste little, so says the vision statement in the 2016 Supplement to the Tacoma-Pierce County Solid Waste Management Plan (2016 SWMP) which is scheduled for adoption in late Supporting that vision, the Public Works Department empowers residents and businesses to reduce wasteful consumption, conserve natural resources, save money, and build a more livable community. The Solid Waste Management Fund finances capital improvements necessary for sustaining the comprehensive solid waste system that serves unincorporated Pierce County and 19 cities and towns. Associated programs include waste reduction and recycling, environmental education, and code enforcement. CURRENT FACILITY INVENTORY Pierce County contracts with private companies to operate five County-owned solid waste facilities, and to gain access and capacity at an additional four facilities. Existing facilities provide sufficient capacity to handle both garbage requiring disposal and organic materials suitable for composting throughout the six years covered by this CFP. Transfer and Disposal All non-recycled municipal solid waste from the Pierce County waste management system is disposed under contract by Pierce County Recycling, Composting, and Disposal, LLC (d/b/a LRI). The privatelyowned/operated LRI Landfill is located southeast of the intersection of 304th Street East and Meridian East. For the year ending December 31, 2015 LRI disposed 360,000 tons of waste compared to 344,000 in the previous year. On a per capita basis, disposal increased from 3.18 pounds per person per day in 2014 to 3.29 in Even with the increase of 4.7% in gross tons and 3.4% on a per capita basis, the system is handling less waste than the targeted level of service. Composting LRI operates two facilities for the composting of yard and garden debris, the Pierce County Composting Facility in Purdy and the LRI Compost Factory at Hidden Valley. For the year ending December 31, 2015, LRI composted 137,000 tons of yard and garden debris, a 3% increase from the previous year. Current projections indicate slight annual increases in the amount of yard waste requiring composting, recognizing that yard waste generation is heavily weather dependent. Exhibit A to Ordinance No s,Page 235 of 318

236 Current Facility Capacity - Disposal Sustainable Resources (Solid Waste Management Fund) Facility Current Capacity Location Anderson Island Residential Drop Box 1,170 tons per year 9607 Steffenson Rd, Anderson Island Key Center Residential Drop Box 2,925 tons per year 5900 Blk Key Peninsula Hwy N, Lakebay Prairie Ridge Residential Drop Box 12,285 tons per year Prairie Ridge Dr E, South Prairie Purdy Transfer Station 82,125 tons per year th Ave NW, Gig Harbor For 2017 to 2022, available In-County Disposal Capacity (at the privately owned landfill) averages 525,000 tons per year, based on providing disposal for 4.5 pounds of waste per capita per day. This represents a worst case scenario and is indicative of the maximum amount of local landfill space available to the County during this planning period. If Pierce County residents and businesses as well as other users of the landfill disposed of waste at that pace, the LRI Landfill would close in 2030 under the landfill s full build-out plan. Under the level of service described in the Solid Waste Management Plan, the County s need for in-county Disposal Capacity will average 367,000 tons per year between 2017 and The long-term impact of the LOS Scenario, combined with similar reductions by the County s planning partners, will extend the life of the landfill to The 2016 SWMP and the 2008 Waste Handling Agreement allow for the long-haul of up to 25% of the County s waste to supplement and further extend the longevity of local capacity. Waste from the Prairie Ridge Residential Drop Box and the Purdy, Hidden Valley, Lakewood, and Murrey s Transfer Stations (the last three are owned and operated by Waste Connections, the county s system operator) could be long-hauled to replace or supplement in-county Disposal Capacity. Current Facility Capacity - Composting Facility Current Capacity Location Pierce County Yard waste Composting Facility 29,200 tons per year th Ave NW, Gig Harbor The County-owned facility handles less than a quarter of the County s needs for composting capacity. Per the County s Waste Handling Agreement, LRI provides composting capacity at company-owned facilities in Pierce and Thurston Counties and contracts for additional capacity, when needed, at a private facility in Mason County. PRIOR YEAR MAJOR ACCOMPLISHMENTS In 2016, the Department and the Solid Waste Advisory Committee concluded the formal public review of the 2016 SWMP which, as noted above, includes a clear vision in support of waste minimization. Late in the year, the Department will launch work on three objectives associated with the 2016 SWMP: developing a tool to Exhibit A to Ordinance No s,Page 236 of 318

237 Sustainable Resources (Solid Waste Management Fund) evaluate existing practices for economic, social and environmental sustainability; creating consistent language and key messages for all public and private sector interaction with solid waste and recycling customers and stakeholders; and evaluating the feasibility of standardizing recycling, yardwaste and garbage collection services across the County. Partnering with LRI, the Department developed a plan of action reflected in this CFP to enhance recycling services at the Purdy and Prairie Ridge Transfer Stations and improve compost facility operations at Purdy. Work continues on the planning necessary to site a build a new, privately-owned, facility designed to capture and divert a larger percentage of recyclable construction debris. NON-CAPITAL ALTERNATIVES The following non-capital alternatives discuss strategies, programs, technologies and other alternatives that do not require capital improvement projects to achieve and maintain level of service standards for Solid Waste facilities. At present there does not appear to be a need to investigate any of the alternatives in greater detail. Accelerated Implementation of Solid Waste Management Plan Goals If transfer station or disposal capacity were depleted, the County could accelerate programs to assist residents and businesses in the adoption of waste reduction measures and add materials to recycling programs. In the fall of 2016, the Pierce County Council in partnership with city and town councils will be asked to review and approve a new supplement to the Tacoma-Pierce County SWMP which may provide additional specific noncapital alternatives. Initial work by the citizens on the Pierce County Solid Waste Advisory Committee is focusing on efforts to minimizing waste before it is generated and, once generated, reusing resources rather than disposing them. Mandatory Garbage Collection Subscription to garbage collection and recycling programs is currently voluntary for households and businesses in unincorporated Pierce County. Eliminating self-haul as an alternative to garbage collection would translate into increased capacity at the drop boxes and transfer stations as proportionally more waste could be handled as garbage trucks tip loads in areas now reserved for the general public. Self-haul would remain available for residents and businesses to dispose wastes that would not fit in a standard garbage can. Mandatory Recycling Mandatory participation in recycling programs (implemented through bans on the collection and disposal of recyclable materials or imposition of severe fees for non-participation in collection) could also reduce disposal capacity pressures. Exhibit A to Ordinance No s,Page 237 of 318

238 CAPITAL PROJECT Location Links to Other Projects Facilities Description Sustainable Resources (Solid Waste Management Fund) Purdy Landfill Storm Water Conveyance System Improvements Purdy Landfill, th Avenue NW, Gig Harbor Customer Service, Asset Management, and System Sustainability Plan - PWD Sustainable Resources Redirect stormwater discharge along south perimeter to main filtration pond, improve bioswale and construct sediment vault Need Notes Ensure that all stormwater is propertly conveyed to filtration pond and minimize sediment impacts. As part of its ownership and post-closure obligations, Pierce County is directly billed M&O costs at this site. Capital Cost Prior Expend Year Total Grand Total Land Acquisition Design Engineering 12,500 12,500 12,500 Construction 62,500 62,500 62,500 Total Cost 75,000 75,000 75,000 Funding Sources County Program Cost Revenue (Paid to County by System Operator) Waste Reduction Program Revenue (Collected and Retained by System Operator) Purdy Landfill Post- Closure Account 75,000 75,000 75,000 Utility Rebate System Operator M&O Rebate Unfunded Fund Balance Total Funds 75,000 75,000 75,000 Annual M&O Total Annual M&O $ $ 2,500 $ 2,550 $ 2,610 $ 2,670 $ 2,730 $ 2,790 $ 15,850 $ 15,850 Exhibit A to Ordinance No s,Page 238 of 318

239 Location Links to Other Projects Facilities Description Need Sustainable Resources (Solid Waste Management Fund) Purdy Transfer Station And Recycling Facility Capacity Improvements Purdy Transfer Station, th Avenue NW, Gig Harbor Customer Service, Asset Management, and System Sustainability Plan - PWD Sustainable Resources Extend transfer station roof on residential and commercial customer sides, replace asphalt area with concrete and instal LED lighting. Improve recycling drop-off including adding ADA accessibility Expansion of facility is necessary to provide additional opportunities to divert materials to recycling. Notes PWD does not provide M&O services nor pay M&O costs at solid waste facilities. M&O work is covered by the System Operator from System Tipping Fees. Capital Cost Prior Expend Year Total Grand Total Land Acquisition Design Engineering Construction 1,015,400 1,015,400 1,015,400 Total Cost 1,015,400 1,015,400 1,015,400 Funding Sources County Program Cost Revenue (Paid to County by System Operator) Waste Reduction Program Revenue (Collected and 1,015,400 1,015,400 1,015,400 Retained by System Operator) Purdy Landfill Post- Closure Account Utility Rebate System Operator M&O Rebate Unfunded Fund Balance Total Funds 1,015,400 1,015,400 1,015,400 Annual M&O Total Annual M&O Exhibit A to Ordinance No s,Page 239 of 318

240 Sustainable Resources (Solid Waste Management Fund) Location Links to Other Projects Facilities Description Need Notes Purdy Composting - Preservation and Improvements Purdy Compost Facility, th Avenue NW, Gig Harbor Customer Service, Asset Management, and System Sustainability Plan - PWD Sustainable Resources Repair and resurface operating floor, air lines, remove and secure decommissioned equipment and replace lights with LED Ensure continuing opeation of county-owned yardwaste composting facility and maintain compliance with stormwater regulations PWD does not provide M&O services nor pay M&O costs at solid waste facilities. M&O work is covered by the System Operator from System Tipping Fees. Capital Cost Prior Expend Year Total Grand Total Land Acquisition Design Engineering Construction 70, , , , , ,400 Total Cost 70, , , , , ,400 Funding Sources County Program Cost Revenue (Paid to County by System Operator) Waste Reduction Program Revenue (Collected and Retained by System Operator) Purdy Landfill Post- Closure Account $ $ $ 44,880 $ $ $ $ $ 44,880 $ 44,880 25, , , , , ,520 Utility Rebate System Operator M&O Rebate Unfunded Fund Balance Total Funds 70, , , , , ,400 Annual M&O Total Annual M&O Exhibit A to Ordinance No s,Page 240 of 318

241 Location Links to Other Projects Facilities Description Sustainable Resources (Solid Waste Management Fund) Prairie RidgeTransfer Station And Recycling Facility Capacity Improvements Prairie Ridge Drive East Customer Service, Asset Management, and System Sustainability Plan - PWD Sustainable Resources Relocate recycling center and construct additional load-out opportunities for waste and recyclables Need Notes Provide adequate capacity to serve customers, relieve queuing onto county roads, move recycling "before the scales" and add diversion opportunities 1. PWD does not provide M&O services nor pay M&O costs at solid waste facilities. M&O work is covered by the System Operator from System Tipping Fees. 2. For this project, a portion of avoided M&O costs will contribute to facility improvement costs. Capital Cost Prior Expend Year Total Grand Total Land Acquisition Design Engineering 15,000 15,000 15,000 Construction 1,860,600 1,860,600 1,860,600 Total Cost 1,875,600 1,875,600 1,875,600 Funding Sources County Program Cost Revenue (Paid to County by System Operator) Waste Reduction Program Revenue (Collected and Retained by System Operator) Purdy Landfill Post- Closure Account $ $ 15,000 $ $ $ $ $ $ 15,000 $ 15,000 1,603,200 1,603,200 1,603,200 Utility Rebate System Operator M&O Rebate 257, , ,400 Unfunded Fund Balance Total Funds 1,875,600 1,875,600 1,875,600 Annual M&O Total Annual M&O Exhibit A to Ordinance No s,Page 241 of 318

242 Land Acquisition Sustainable Resources (Solid Waste Management Fund) Total of Capital Projects Prior Expend Year Total Grand Total Design Engineering 27,500 27,500 27,500 Construction 1,923,100 70,400 1,118, , ,300 3,353,900 3,353,900 Total Cost 1,950,600 70,400 1,118, , ,300 3,381,400 3,381,400 County Program Cost Revenue (Paid to County by System Operator) Waste Reduction Program Revenue (Collected and Retained by System Operator) Purdy Landfill Post-Closure Account Source of Funds $ 15,000 $ 44,880 $ $ $ $ 1,603,200 25,520 1,118, , ,300 75,000 Utility Rebate System Operator M&O Rebate 257,400 Unfunded Fund Balance Total Sources $ 1,950,600 $ 70,400 $ 1,118,100 $ 117,000 $ 125,300 $ Total Annual M&O Total Cost $ 2,500 $ 2,550 $ 2,610 $ 2,670 $ 2,730 $ 2,790 FUTURE NEEDS NO FUNDING CURRENTLY AVAILABLE The following projects have been identified as necessary to meet desired service levels. Capital Cost Total Unfunded $ $ $ $ $ $ $ Exhibit A to Ordinance No s,Page 242 of 318

243 RELATION TO GROWTH MANAGEMENT ACT Sustainable Resources (Solid Waste Management Fund) The level of service (LOS) for Solid Waste Disposal Capacity was established in Appendix F of the 2008 Supplement to the Tacoma-Pierce County SWMP and updated in Appendix E of the 2016 Supplement. The 2016 SWMP reaffirms waste reduction as the County s highest priority and renewed the goal to reduce per capita waste disposal needs from 4.5 pounds per day (2007 level) to less than 1.1 pounds per day by The Planned LOS and Actuals for (shown in the next chart) relate to the 2008 Supplement, with future years LOS as reported in the 2016 SWMP. Solid Waste Level of Service Year Planned LOS Actual / Projected (Trend Scenario) Disposal Per Capita (actual disposal 17% less than plan) (actual disposal 11% less than plan) (projected disposal need 4% less than plan) The Department will review progress and establish revised trends after accomplishing some work implementing the 2016 SWMP Exhibit A to Ordinance No s,Page 243 of 318

244 Sustainable Resources (Solid Waste Management Fund) This page is intentionally left blank. Exhibit A to Ordinance No s,Page 244 of 318

245 SUPERIOR COURT Under the Constitutional doctrine of separation of powers, government consists of executive, legislative, and judicial branches. The Superior Court is the highest level trial court in state government and the only trial court of general jurisdiction in Pierce County. Any civil suit may be filed in Superior Court and all suits in excess of District Court s limited jurisdiction must be filed in Superior Court. The Superior Court is also an appellate court for District and Municipal Courts. There are 22 superior court judges and seven court commissioners in Pierce County. Many of the Court s responsibilities are mandated by law and must be provided. For example, all felony criminal proceedings must be filed in Superior Court. The services provided by Superior Court are many and varied. The Court is constantly investigating programs, which would maximize the use of its resources as well as exploring methods to reduce court congestion and delay, ensure courtroom security, and maintain the dignity of the judicial system without sacrificing individual justice. Adequate Public Facilities: It is the intent of the County CFP that adequate Superior Court facilities be available no later than occupancy of each new development. However, no development permit should be denied based on the County's inability to maintain level of service (LOS) standards for Superior Court facilities. CURRENT FACILITY INVENTORY Facility Current Capacity Location Superior Court 20 courtrooms and 5 hearing rooms* County-City Bldg, 930 Tacoma Ave S, Tacoma Mental Health Facilities 1 hearing room* Western State Hospital, Lakewood 925 Building 600 Sq. Ft. 925 Tacoma Ave S, Tacoma *Hearing rooms have no jury room. PRIOR YEAR ACCOMPLISHMENTS None in 2015 NON-CAPITAL ALTERNATIVES The following non-capital alternatives discuss strategies, programs, technologies, and other alternatives that do not require capital improvement projects to achieve and maintain the standard level of service for court facilities. Several recommendations are designed to relieve pressure on the jail and the courts by expanding or adding non-capital alternatives. Exhibit A to Ordinance No s,Page 245 of 318

246 Superior Court Case Management Case management is an attempt to move cases through the system in a court-controlled environment. The anticipated result is a reduction in the active caseload due to the close supervision of cases and timelines by individual superior court judges. The Superior Court has and continues to explore and implement changes in case management and case processing. Pro Tem Judge Program Superior Court has requested funding in 2017 to continue the pro tem judge program. The program uses retired judges, sitting judges from other jurisdictions, and attorneys who act as judges, with the parties' statutory consent, in civil, non-jury trials. The pro tem judges may substitute for a judge presiding in the Criminal Division Courts so the judge may take a trial. The objective of the program is to reduce the number of civil and criminal cases awaiting trials. The pro tem judges use existing courtrooms that are vacant during judicial recess. The attorneys in the program also conduct settlement conferences in an attempt to avoid trial. Court Public Services The Superior Court uses statutorily-authorized arbitration for civil cases under $50,000. The Court requires mandatory settlement conferences conducted by superior court judges and commissioners in dissolution cases. Both methods reduce the number of cases proceeding to trial. Court Pretrial Services In 2015, Superior Court initiated the Criminal Pretrial Services Program. As of the submission of this document, the Superior Court Clerk s Office houses the pretrial services monitoring portion. Private Court Services Private court services include Judicial Arbitration and Mediation (JAMS) as well as the Dispute Resolution Center, all of which are available outside the court system at a cost to the litigants. Therapeutic Courts Judges, prosecutors, and department of assigned counsel review individuals involved in drug crimes and mental health issues to determine whether the individual may benefit from community treatment with close court supervision. Therapeutic courts reduce the number of trials conducted and detention services used. In 2016 there were three separate courts: adult drug court including a veteran s track and family drug court. In 2016 the court continues the mental health track as part of its therapeutic court services. Education--Improving people's education increases their opportunities for jobs and self-esteem, thus reducing the probability that they will come in contact with the law enforcement, judicial, and detention systems. Avoidance Programs--Programs that educate, counsel, or provide alternatives to unacceptable behavior (i.e. A.A., etc.) reduce the number of contacts with the law enforcement, judicial, and detention systems. Family/Domestic Emphasis Judicial panel assignments include two judges who focus on complex family/domestic cases. Superior Court mandates parents involved in dissolution with children and other parenting custody matters attend a court approved four-hour seminar regarding the impact dissolution has on children. The Court continues Exhibit A to Ordinance No s,Page 246 of 318

247 Superior Court developing ways to handle complex family law cases more effectively. In 2016 the Family Law Case Technician continues to assist the court by helping self-represented parties prepare final orders. Technology Superior Court continues investigating new applications of technology to its processes. The Electronic Court Order Project began in 2010, which introduced computers into the courtrooms for use to complete electronic forms in the Criminal Division Courts. Through new electronic forms were added. Elected Pro Tem Judge Program With the passage of the constitutional amendment in 2002, the court has implemented the elected pro tem judge program. Superior Court is permitted to use, without the requirement of stipulation, four elected judges from other jurisdictions to handle cases filed after February 1, Exhibit A to Ordinance No s,Page 247 of 318

248 Superior Court Capital Projects Additional projects that may impact the Pierce County Superior Court can be found in the General Administration section. Location Links to Other Projects Facilities Description Need Notes Study for Lenel Installations for Courtroom Chambers/Offices County City Building Study to determine lenel installations for door security within courts internal offices, chambers Capital Cost Prior Expend Year Total Grand Total Land Acquisition Design Engineering 50,000 50,000 50,000 Construction Total Cost 50,000 50,000 50,000 Funding Sources REET $ $ $ 50,000 $ $ $ $ $ 50,000 $ 50,000 Bond Unfunded Fund Balance Total Funds 50,000 50,000 50,000 Annual M&O Total Annual M&O Exhibit A to Ordinance No s,Page 248 of 318

249 Superior Court Location Links to Other Projects Facilities Description Need Notes Judges Bench Exit Study County City Building 2nd Floor courtrooms Study to determine best methold to allow for judge's exit from the bench on the side away from witness and jury. Safety and security need to allow judge to depart bench directly to an exit without having to go towards a potential threat Capital Cost Prior Expend Year Total Grand Total Land Acquisition Design Engineering 50,000 50,000 50,000 Construction Total Cost 50,000 50,000 50,000 Funding Sources REET $ $ $ 50,000 $ $ $ $ $ 50,000 $ 50,000 Bond Unfunded Fund Balance Total Funds 50,000 50,000 50,000 Annual M&O Total Annual M&O Exhibit A to Ordinance No s,Page 249 of 318

250 Superior Court Location Links to Other Projects Facilities Description Need Notes Sound Mitigation for Ex Parte Courtroom (CR105) County City Building 1st Floor Study and design to renovate courtroom to maintain privacy of hearings Currently sound/voices carry through to external spaces around the courtroom Capital Cost Prior Expend Year Total Grand Total Land Acquisition Design Engineering 50,000 50,000 50,000 Construction 100, , ,000 Total Cost 50, , , ,000 Funding Sources REET $ $ $ 50,000 $ 100,000 $ $ $ $ 150,000 $ 150,000 Bond Unfunded Fund Balance Total Funds 50, , , ,000 Annual M&O Total Annual M&O Exhibit A to Ordinance No s,Page 250 of 318

251 Superior Court Courtroom and Chambers Carpet Replacement Superior Courtrooms Ph 1 Location Links to Other Projects Facilities Description Need Notes County City Building Remove and replace old carpeting with asbestos abatement included as needed Carpet in these courtrooms is worn and difficult to clean due to age 100,105,117, 211A, 207,210 Capital Cost Prior Expend Year Total Grand Total Land Acquisition Design Engineering Construction 100, , , ,000 Total Cost 100, , , ,000 Funding Sources REET $ $ $ 100,000 $ 100,000 $ $ $ $ 200,000 $ 200,000 Bond Unfunded Fund Balance Total Funds 100, , , ,000 Annual M&O Total Annual M&O Exhibit A to Ordinance No s,Page 251 of 318

252 Superior Court Location Links to Other Projects Facilities Description Need Notes County City Building Superior Courts History Project Installation of the Judges photos in courtroom 100 creating an almost museum-like quality display about the Superior Court in Pierce County and add to CCB aesthetics Capital Cost Prior Expend Year Total Grand Total Land Acquisition Design Engineering Construction 15,000 70,000 70,000 85,000 Total Cost 15,000 70,000 70,000 85,000 Funding Sources REET $ 15,000 $ $ 70,000 $ $ $ $ $ 70,000 $ 85,000 Bond Unfunded Fund Balance Total Funds 15,000 70,000 70,000 85,000 Annual M&O Total Annual M&O Exhibit A to Ordinance No s,Page 252 of 318

253 Superior Court Location Links to Other Projects Facilities Description Need Notes Superior Courts Admin Office Remodel Room 140 County City Building Remodel to improve security for office staff, provide an appropriate waiting area, service counter and office support area Capital Cost Prior Expend Year Total Grand Total Land Acquisition Design Engineering Construction 75,000 75,000 75,000 Total Cost 75,000 75,000 75,000 Funding Sources REET $ $ $ 75,000 $ $ $ $ $ 75,000 $ 75,000 Bond Unfunded Fund Balance Total Funds 75,000 75,000 75,000 Annual M&O Total Annual M&O Exhibit A to Ordinance No s,Page 253 of 318

254 Land Acquisition Design Engineering Superior Court Prior Expend Year Total Grand Total 150, , ,000 Construction 15, , , , ,000 Total Cost Total of Capital Projects 15, , , , ,000 Source of Funds REET $ $ 395,000 $ 200,000 $ $ $ Bond Unfunded Fund Balance Total Sources $ $ 395,000 $ 200,000 $ $ $ Total Annual M&O Total Cost $ $ $ $ $ $ MAP OF LOCATIONS Not applicable FUTURE NEEDS - NO FUNDING CURRENTLY AVAILABLE Superior Court Level of Service Rooms Superior Court Judges 22 Superior Court Commissioners 8 Exhibit A to Ordinance No s,Page 254 of 318

255 Superior Court Capital Cost Total Unfunded $ $ 395,000 $ 200,000 $ $ $ $ 595,000 Future projects funding source is the Real Estate Excise Tax. All future projects with this funding source are identified as unfunded as the funding source is expected to cover 25-30% of total need. All projects will need to be prioritized based on available funding. The Administrative Office of the Washington Courts has adopted the Input-Output Model as one estimate of judicial need. Currently the court is short the recommended number of judicial officers Superior Court has 22 judges and eight commissioners. In 1997, the state legislature authorized up to a maximum of 24 judges. Two positions (23 and 24) remain unfilled due to budget and facility constraints. Year Case Filings 34,831 36,089 36,505 35,415 35,612 33,638 33,800 32,798 32,958 Proceedings Held 144, , , , , , , , ,602 RELATION TO GROWTH MANAGEMENT ACT The LOS for Superior Court is one permanent courtroom in the County-City Building for each Superior Court judge; one hearing room per criminal division; one hearing room per commissioner assigned to the County- City Building; and one courtroom/hearing room per judicial officer when serving at locations away from the County-City Building. Exhibit A to Ordinance No s,Page 255 of 318

256 Superior Court This page is intentionally left blank. Exhibit A to Ordinance No s,Page 256 of 318

257 SURFACE WATER MANAGEMENT AND RIVER IMPROVEMENT The mission of the Surface Water Management (SWM) Division is to deliver excellent services that reduce flood damage, and protect and improve water quality and natural resources for the benefit of our communities. Adequate Public Facilities: It is the intent of the County CFP that adequate stormwater facilities be available no later than occupancy of each new development. However, no development permit should be denied based on the County's inability to maintain level of service (LOS) standards for Public Works facilities. Figure Flooding on the Upper Puyallup River CURRENT FACILITY INVENTORY Storm System Facilities are located throughout the County and currently there are over 600 publicly-owned stormwater facilities in the system and two pump stations. SWM maintains over 69 miles of levees/revetments along the Puyallup, White, Carbon, and Nisqually rivers as of the 2013 Rivers Flood Hazard Management Plan (RFHMP). Facilities are shown within the County GIS system under the Utility layers. PRIOR YEAR MAJOR ACCOMPLISHMENTS 2016 Completed Projects (Or Completed Phases of Projects) Engineered Log Jam Emergency Reconstruction near Neadham Road Fennel Creek Floodplain Reconnection Orville Road Revetment (Phase 1) Wetland Mitigation Construction Projects in Design Phase Initial design and cost estimates were developed for six projects to address the Clarks Creek Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL). Initial scoping for a feasibility study began on the Carbon River Bank Stabilization project to look at alternatives and the extent to which this project will reconnect floodplain and improve flood protection for the foothills trails and the City of Orting. Design alternatives are being explored with the farming community in the Clear Creek Acquisition and Levee project to preserve farming in the lower Clear Creek basin while reducing flood risk and increasing the diversity of habitat associated with the creek. Final design was completed for the Orville Road (Phase 2) project. Continuing technical and environmental analysis for the Sediment Management as a Risk Reduction Tool (SMRRT) pilot project. Final design was completed for the Upper Nisqually Revetment project. The US Army Corps of Engineers (Corps) released the draft Tentatively Selected Plan (TSP) for the Puyallup River General Investigation... Exhibit A to Ordinance No s,Page 257 of 318

258 Projects in Property Acquisition Phase Surface Water Management and River Improvement Acquisition of properties accelerated in 2016 due to grant awards by Floodplain by Design (WA State Dept of Ecology), Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA), and WA State Salmon Recovery Funding Board (SRFB). This has accelerated the progress on several of the Floodplain Reconnection projects outlined in the 2013 Pierce County Rivers Flood Hazard Management Plan. Grants Alward Road Acquisition and Setback Levee Five properties are anticipated to be purchased in Clear Creek Acquisition and Levee A projected ten to fifteen properties are anticipated to be purchased in 2016 with an additional six to eight properties anticipated to be purchased in Neadham Road Acquisition and Revetment Up to six properties are anticipated to be purchased in Orville Road Revetment (Phase 2) Three properties (68 acres) are anticipated to be purchased in Orville Road at Kapowsin Creek One property is anticipated to be purchased in Woodland Creek 104th St E Stormwater Treatment System Property will be purchased to construct a stormwater pond. Floodplain by Design (WA State Dept of Ecology) Awarded $11.5 million to implement multi-benefit projects (flood/water quality/agriculture/habitat) along the Puyallup and Carbon rivers (Clear Creek, Neadham Road, Alward Road, Orville Road and Kapowsin Creek). Spanaway Lake Park (WA State Dept of Ecology) Awarded $1.3 million to construct phase 3 of the project which is installing Low Impact Development (LID) techniques in the park such as, permeable pavement, bioretention areas and filters. Purdy Creek Culvert Replacement (WA State Salmon Recovery Funding Board (SRFB) Awarded $125,000 to conduct a project feasibility study to improve fish habitat and improve water quality. Neadham Road Acquisition and Revetment (WA State SRFB) Awarded $1.04 million to purchase property. FEMA FMA 2015 Clear Creek Repetitive Loss Property Acquisition Awarded $265k for purchase of repetitive flood loss property in the Clear Creek Area. SWM has applied for, or is in the process of applying for, eight additional grants for capital projects. Projects Budgeted in SWM Construction Fund for 2017 Non-River Projects Brookdale Road and N Fork Clover Creek Retrofit (D442) Continue project scoping and design; residential neighborhood south of Brookdale and east of Hwy 7. Diru Creek Bank Stabilization (D812) Design in-stream restoration project to address Clarks Creek TMDL; project scheduled for 2018 construction; near 72nd St E Diru Creek Water Quality Retrofit (D810) Design project to address Clarks Creek TMDL; project scheduled for construction in 2018; on 67th Ave E Huge Creek Culvert Replacement (D441) If a SRFB grant is awarded in 2016, project design will continue; 160th St crossing of Huge Creek between Pierce and Kitsap counties. Purdy Creek Culvert Replacement (D192) Continuing project feasibility study; if a second SRFB grant is awarded in 2016, project design will continue; 144th St NW crossing of Purdy Creek east of SR 302. Exhibit A to Ordinance No s,Page 258 of 318

259 River Projects Surface Water Management and River Improvement Purdy Creek Culvert Replacement (D199) If a SRFB grant is awarded in 2016, project design will continue; 160th St NW crossing of Purdy Creek east of SR 302. Rody Creek Channel Stabilization (D190) Design in-stream restoration project to address Clarks Creek TMDL; Construction scheduled for 2020; Rody Creek near 80th St E South Prairie Creek Floodplain and Off Channel Restoration (D225) SWM contribution to project design and construction with other project partners; west of the Town of South Prairie. Spanaway Lake Park Stormwater Retrofits (D418) Phase 3 construction of LID techniques; parking lots east of the lake in the park. Sprinker Parking Lot LID retrofit (D047) Continue project design; parking lot at Sprinker Recreation Center at corner of Military Rd S and G St S Woodland Creek Stormwater Treatment System (D411) Continue project design to address Clarks Creek TMDL; construction scheduled for 2019; 104th St E and Woodland Ave E Woodland Creek Water Quality Retrofit (D419) Construct project in 2017 to address the Clarks Creek TMDL; 84th St E & 72 Ave Chambers/Clover USGS Groundwater Monitoring (1707) Contribute funding for on-going groundwater monitoring to develop a model to better understand the water resources in the Chambers/Clover watershed. Puyallup River General Investigation (1361) Continue work with the US Army Corps of Engineers to finalize the TSP. Sediment Management at a Risk Reduction Tool (1379) Continue technical and environmental analysis of preferred reach selection for pilot project; Puyallup River near Sumner and Puyallup. Floodplain Acquisitions (1349) Purchase flood prone property needed for future capital projects. Floodplains by Design Grant (1703) Awarded in Continue property acquisitions and construction on projects identified for grant funds; Clear Creek, Orville Road, Alward Road, and others. Clear Creek Acquisition and Levee (1416) Continue property acquisition and project design; also includes grants for Clear Creek - Puget Sound Acquisition and Restoration (PSAR) and Estuary and Salmon Restoration Program (ESRP) which may be awarded in 2017 and spent in 2017; lower Puyallup River near City of Tacoma. North Levee Road Setback Levee (1417) Continue project scoping; north side of lower Puyallup River. Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) Grants (1416 & 1419) If awarded in 2016, funds will be used to purchase property in Clear Creek (1416) and Clarks Creek (1419) project areas. Jones Setback Levee Acquisition (1385) Acquire property for future setback levee; Puyallup River near the City of Orting. South Fork Road Floodplain Restoration (1720) Construct Phase 2b of the project; left bank of the Puyallup River north of the City of Orting. FEMA Grant for McCutcheon Rd. Setback Levee If awarded, will be used to purchase property for a future setback project; 128th St E on the Puyallup River. FEMA Grant for Kapowsin Creek (1418) If awarded, will be used to purchase property; upper Puyallup River south of the City of Orting. Orville Road at Kapowsin Creek (1418) Continue project design; left bank upper Puyallup River south of the City of Orting. Exhibit A to Ordinance No s,Page 259 of 318

260 Surface Water Management and River Improvement Neadham Road Acquisition and Revetment (1700) Continue property acquisition and project design; right bank upper Puyallup River south of the City of Orting. Orville Road Revetment Phase 1 (1400) Continue required project monitoring; left bank upper Puyallup River south of the City of Orting. Orville Road Revetment Phase 2 (1413) Continue property acquisition and begin construction; left bank upper Puyallup River south of the City of Orting. SRFB Grant for Bridge St Setback Levee (1702) If awarded, conduct feasibility study for setback levee on Carbon River in partnership with the City of Orting. Alward Acquisition and Setback Levee (1705) Continue property acquisition; left back Carbon River SE of the City of Orting. SRFB Grant for Alward Road Project (1705) If awarded, funds will be used to purchase property for the Alward Road project. Upper Nisqually Revetment Retrofit (1411) Continue project design and obtain permits; construction scheduled for 2018; right bank Upper Nisqually River near entrance to Mt. Rainier National Park. NON-CAPITAL ALTERNATIVES The following non-capital alternatives discuss strategies, programs, technologies, and other alternatives that may lessen the need for structural capital improvements projects to achieve and maintain the LOS. Surface Water: Alternative 1 Privatization Alternative 2 Private developers can build stormwater facilities with excess capacity that can be sold to other developers to reduce on-site stormwater facilities for new developments. This alternative s main challenge is the conveyance system between the new development site and the privately built regional pond is inadequate for increased capacity. It is typically prohibitively expensive to construct larger conveyance systems. Most new developments build on-site stormwater systems due to increased costs associated with using existing private systems. Flood Plain Acquisition Floodplain acquisition can be the most effective method to preserve floodplain beneficial functions, such as stormwater storage, water quality treatment, and habitat. Acquiring flood prone property and removing the structures eliminates the flood risk to the property owner and structures. By either removing the levee or revetment, or setting it further away from the river, the County s cost to maintain these facilities are significantly reduced. The past years has shown it is cheaper to purchase these properties rather than continue on-going, costly levee and revetment repair after flood events. Exhibit A to Ordinance No s,Page 260 of 318

261 Surface Water Management and River Improvement Alternative 3 Elevation of Structures Structures can be elevated to reduce damage from flood waters. Pierce County Flood Hazard Code requires the finished flood to be elevated a minimum of two feet above the base flood elevation (100-year flood event). Elevating a structure will not prevent the surrounding area from flooding which may prevent access to and from the structure during flood events. Elevating structures is not suitable when the risk is channel migration due to erosion forces. Alternative 4 Flood Plain and Stormwater Management Regulations Pierce County s flood hazard and stormwater regulations are the basic regulatory tool to practice sound floodplain and stormwater management related to new development and redevelopment. Current stormwater regulations require new developments to match post development runoff to pre-european forested site conditions which reduce off-site runoff. Significant redevelopment also triggers newer regulations. Illegal activities, such as unpermitted discharges, fill or conveyance channel changes, can impact both upstream and downstream by restricting flows or limiting flood storage. The cumulative effect of many land use changes can have a significant impact on water quality and flooding. Ensuring flood hazard and stormwater regulations are enforced will reduce future impacts. Alternative 5 Source Control Pierce County s National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit requires source control to prevent water pollution. County staff perform regular inspections of businesses in unincorporated Pierce County to ensure proper source control techniques are utilized. These inspections do not address other pollutants such as debris, litter, and road runoff without treatment. Most runoff entering the County s storm drainage system is not treated before entering streams, rivers, lakes and Puget Sound which makes source control one method to reduce water pollution. Alternative 6 Shared Use of County-Owned Property Figure 2 Elevated Home As SWM plans for and constructs capital projects, there is often a need to acquire property for the construction of facilities. Some project areas allow for uses such as passive recreation, agriculture, or utilities. Some stormwater facilities are designed to have sufficient capacity to share with other divisions such as Public Works Transportation. Exhibit A to Ordinance No s,Page 261 of 318

262 Surface Water Management and River Improvement Incorporating other uses typically results in increased costs and a higher level of maintenance. Passive recreation may require trails, parking, signage, and garbage collection. If shared use of stormwater and flood control facilities is desired by policy makers, County Code should be changed to explicitly allow SWM Utility fees on such uses. Alternative 7 Private Stormwater Facilities Maintenance and Inspections Pierce County staff inspect and provide technical assistance for more than 2,200 private and public stormwater facilities. The County inspectors ensure the facilities are being maintained and functioning properly. If not, improvements are required. Alternative 8 Retrofit Existing Facilities Increased runoff from older developments with undersized or no stormwater facilities causes flooding and water quality problems downstream. In addition, development in the floodplain and channel modifications (many unpermitted) impact the creeks and stormwater systems ability to convey water. Requiring older developments to retrofit inadequate facilities would significantly reduce the need to use SWM Utility funds to address these problems. Currently older systems are only brought up to current standards when significant redevelopment is proposed. Alternative 9 Figure 3 Retrofitted Stormwater Drain Facility Flood Warning Programs Pierce County has a comprehensive flood warning system that includes monitoring river flows and weather stations, forecasting flood events, alerting residents and businesses, and coordination between SWM, Emergency Management, and other departments and agencies. Exhibit A to Ordinance No s,Page 262 of 318

263 Surface Water Management and River Improvement Alternative 10 Public Outreach and Communication Program Pierce County SWM and Emergency Management provide education and outreach to better inform and prepare citizens for flooding. Public meetings, outreach events, printed materials, emergency preparedness and flood insurance training, videos, media interviews, and other methods are utilized. Pierce County has a Program for Public Information (PPI) that was approved by the Surface Water Advisory Board (SWAB) in The PPI was developed as part of the county s participation in the National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP) Community Rating System (CRS). The county sends out annual notifications to property owners in the floodplain and in areas of known urban, river and coastal flooding. The notifications direct residents to a county website with information about preparing for a flood, actions to take during a flood event and steps following a flood. There is also information about buying federal flood insurance. Additionally, Pierce County s Winterwise program includes information about the importance of flood preparation. In the fall, the county also advises residents to clean storm drains of leaves and debris to reduce the risk of localized/neighborhood flooding. Alternative 11 Revise Existing Floodplain Regulations Stricter floodplain management regulations could reduce new atrisk structures and infrastructure from being built. New owners are often unaware of the property s risk from flood or channel migration and often build new homes just outside the 100-year floodplain. The 100-year floodplain can change due to development runoff, climate change, or river channel migration. Regulating development beyond the currently mapped 100-year floodplain could reduce new homes from being at risk due to floodplain changes beyond their control. Alternative 12 Mud Mountain Dam Operations and Modifications This alternative would modify, through Congressional action, the operations of Mud Mountain Dam by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (Corps), thereby reducing the floodplain limits and flood related losses. SWM currently works with the Corps to maximize flood storage behinds Mud Mountain Dam. Figure 4 Road Closed Due to Flooding Exhibit A to Ordinance No s,Page 263 of 318

264 Surface Water Management and River Improvement Capital Projects Project Fund Non-River Stormwater Projects Cumulative Prior Expenditures Year Total 1 D442 Brookdale Road & N Fork Clover Outfall Retrofit $23,982 $60,000 $470,000 $530,000 2 D812 Diru Creek Bank Stabilization at 72nd St E 165, , ,920 3 D810 Diru Creek Water Quality Retrofit at 67th Ave Ct E 117, , ,170 4 D811 Diru Creek Water Quality Retrofit at 64th Ave Ct E 117, , ,170 5 D073 Floodplain Acquisition Non-Rivers 2,620, , , , , ,000 1,300,000 6 D441 Huge Creek Culvert Replacement at 160th St NW. - 81,596 50,000 1,000,000 1,050,000 7 D813 Pierce County Pond #160 Retrofit 180, , ,000 8 D815 Pierce County Pond #161 Retrofit 225, , ,000 9 D192 Purdy Creek Culvert Replacement at 144th St NW 294,583 50,000 12,500 1,725,000 1,600,000 3,387, D199 Purdy Creek Culvert Replacement at 160th St NW. 89,500 89, D191 Rody Creek Improvements at Pioneer Way. 686,686 40, ,000 1,100,000 1,280, D190 Rody Creek Channel Stabilization near 80th St E 30,000 67,000 30,000 1,334,660 1,461, D225 South Prairie Creek Floodplain and Off Channel Restoration 24, , , D418 Spanaway Lake Park Stormwater Retrofits Phase 3 1,208,346 1,320,000 1,320, D047 Sprinker Parking Lot LID Retrofit Phase 3 1,369,707 60, , , D460 Swan Creek 64th Street East Culvert Outfall Repair and Streambank Stabilization 50,000 50, ,000 1,500,000 2,100, D411 Woodland Creek 104th St E Stormwater Treatment System 610, , ,500 1,780,650 2,009, D419 Woodland Creek Water Quality Retrofit at 84th St E & 72nd Ave E 120, , , Chambers/Clover USGS Groundwater Modeling 15,000 15,000 15,000 Total $7,054,302 $2,815,310 $3,637,950 $2,300,650 $2,569,660 $3,674,170 $4,460,000 $19,457,740 Exhibit A to Ordinance No s,Page 264 of 318

265 Surface Water Management and River Improvement Project Cumulative Prior Expenditures Fund River Projects Year Total Puyallup River General Investigation $ 2,989,573 $540,000 $ $ $ $ $ $540, Sediment Management as a Risk Reduction Tool 1,714, , ,000 1,200, Floodplain Acquisition along Rivers 2,525, , , , , , ,000 1,500, Floodplains By Design Grant Round 2 - Awarded July , , , Floodplains By Design Grant Round 3 17,276,000 17,276, Clear Creek Acquisition and Floodplain Reconnection 7,810,741 1,030,000 60,000 1,000,000 1,000,000 1,000,000 1,000,000 5,090, PSAR Large Cap Grant for Clear Creek 100,000 4,400,000 3,500,000 8,000, Clear Creek Acquisition - ESRP Grant 1,500,000 1,500, North Levee Road Setback Levee- GI Project Feasibility 214,451 30,000 30, FEMA FMA 2015 Clear Creek Repetitive Loss Property Acquisition 265, , FEMA HMGP DR Clear Creek Wheel Inn Mobile Home Park Property Acquisition 1,500,000 1,500, FEMA FMA (Flood Mitigation Assistance) 2016 Clark's Cr 359, , Fennel Creek Restoration Phase 3 20,000 81,000 1,342,630 1,443, McCutcheon Rd. Setback Levee at 128th St E 40,000 2,210,000 2,210,000 4,040,000 4,000,000 12,500, Jones Setback Levee - Acquisition 125, , South Fork Road Floodplain Restoration Phase 2b 6,157,910 1,721,660 1,721,660 Exhibit A to Ordinance No s,Page 265 of 318

266 Surface Water Management and River Improvement Project Cumulative Prior Expenditures Fund River Projects Year Total FEMA HMGP for DR-4188 acq near Kapowsin Cr 575, , Kapowsin Creek 1,544, , , ,000 3,000,000 2,000,000 5,480, Neadham Road Acquisition & Channel Migration Protection 9,265, , ,000 3,400,000 4,200, Orville Road Revetment - Phase 1 1,728,499 25,000 25,000 25,000 25,000 25,000 25, , Orville Road Revetment Phase 2 872,530 1,704,000 20,000 2,400,000 1,600,000 5,724, Carbon River Levee Bank Stabilization - Bridge St Setback 22 Levee 60,000 90,000 50, ,000 2,040,000 2,820, SRFB Grant for Bridge St Setback on Carbon River- 350, , Alward Road Acquisition & Setback Levee 5,556, ,000 1,000,000 1,000,000 1,000,000 1,000,000 1,000,000 5,975, SRFB grant for Alward Road Acquisition 1,725,000 1,725, Upper Nisqually Revetment Retrofit 197, ,000 1,130,000 1,250,000 Total 42,199,098 15,366,280 24,811,000 10,616,000 11,467,630 11,355,000 8,275,000 81,890,910 Total of Capital Projects Prior Expend Year Total Grand Total Land Acquisition $ $ 9,929,100 $ 21,545,000 $ 8,000,000 $ 5,000,000 $ 4,345,000 $ 2,500,000 $ 51,319,100 $ 51,319,100 Design Engineering 3,586,660 2,620, , , ,000 35,000 8,129,660 8,129,660 Construction 4,665,830 4,283,950 4,180,650 8,220,290 10,349,170 10,200,000 41,899,890 41,899,890 Total Cost 49,253,400 18,181,590 28,448,950 12,916,650 14,037,290 15,029,170 12,735, ,348, ,348,650 Exhibit A to Ordinance No s,Page 266 of 318

267 Surface Water Management and River Improvement Fund 323 only identifies a total for prior year expenditures. Source of Funds SWM Fees 1,494,100 2,706,270 2,300,650 2,569,660 3,674,170 4,460,000 Donations 1,877,150 3,236,400 1,200,000 1,377, , ,000 Grants 10,030,060 18,132,480 2,975,000 Flood Control Zone 2,444,000 2,479,900 3,060,000 3,743,000 4,020,000 2,500,000 District REET 2,336,280 1,546,900 1,313,000 1,280,530 2,039,000 1,575,000 Unfunded Fund Balance 347,000 2,068,000 5,067,100 4,996,000 3,900,000 Total Sources $ 18,181,590 $ 28,448,950 $ 12,916,650 $ 14,037,290 $ 15,029,170 $ 12,735,000 FUTURE NEEDS Future needs for the SWM Fund include the capital projects identified in each of the nine adopted basin plans. These projects are identified due to some deficiency in the existing stormwater infrastructure causing the system to operate below the intended LOS. The projects have been prioritized into high, medium, and low categories. Increasingly, funding, mandatory legal and regulatory obligations, and partnerships are driving project selection and inclusion in the capital facilities plan. Future needs for the River Improvement Fund include projects that bring the flood protection level up to the adopted LOS. The Pierce County Rivers Flood Hazard Management Plan (RFHMP), an update to the 1991 Comprehensive Flood Hazard Management Plan, was adopted February 19, The Plan recommended 32 capital improvement projects and a variety of policies, programmatic and non-structural actions to reduce the associated risks of flooding and channel migration problems along major rivers and streams in Pierce County. RELATION TO GROWTH MANAGEMENT ACT The baseline LOS for the County stormwater facilities is to provide conveyance facilities to accommodate a 4% annual chance flood (25-year, 24-hour design storm) and holding facilities to accommodate a 1% annual chance flood (100-year, 24-hour design storm). Infiltration facilities must be designed to accommodate the 100-year, 24-hour design storm or the 100-year, 7-day design storm, whichever results in a larger facility. Water quality treatment is provided for the volume of runoff from 91st percentile, 24-hour runoff volume (or 91% of surface water runoff). The LOS for the Flood Management facilities along the rivers was established in the RFHMP and varies with the adopted river reach management strategy as described in section 3.2 Project Policies in the RFHMP. The specific LOS (level of protection) for each river reach is described in Appendix F and varies from 200-year to maintaining the existing levee prisms in levee reaches. There are also erosion protection levels for revetments to reduce the risk from channel migration. The consideration of which level of protection to apply to a given reach involves the infrastructure (roads and buildings) either currently present or planned in the future that is at risk. Design of levees for a level of protection also includes three feet of freeboard above the Storm Recurrence Year flood elevation. A 200-year LOS is the flood elevation for a storm with a 0.5% chance of occurring any given year (plus three feet freeboard). Exhibit A to Ordinance No s,Page 267 of 318

268 Surface Water Management and River Improvement The RFHMP can be viewed at Exhibit A to Ordinance No s,Page 268 of 318

269 BETHEL SCHOOL DISTRICT The Bethel School District is a dynamic district that covers over 215 square miles in southeast Pierce County. Currently, Bethel is the 16th largest district in the state with an estimated enrollment of 18,700 students in In the 2013 school year, Bethel completed its two year implementation program of grade reconfiguration at the high schools and middle schools. High schools transitioned from tenth twelfth grade to ninth twelfth senior highs, and middle schools transitioned from seventh ninth grades to sixth eighth grade middle schools. Bethel has 16 elementary schools, 1 K-8 school, 6 middle schools, 3 comprehensive senior high schools, an alternative school (eighth-twelfth), a Technical Skills Center and a Learning Center. In April 2015, the Pierce County Skills Center completed its campus expansion with the construction of a 26,000 Sq. Ft. building supporting the culinary arts and hospitality curriculum offered to multi-district students. School capacity is based on the district standard of service and the existing inventory. Existing October 2015/2016 inventory includes both permanent and modular (portable) classrooms. The District currently has permanent capacity to house 8,309 elementary students, 5,873 middle school students and 4,437 high school students. Enrollment is projected to increase to 22,306 by Over the next six to ten years, with the passage of a successful bond measure the District plans to add an addition to Graham-Kapowsin High School, replace Challenger Secondary School, modernize and expand Bethel High School, build a new elementary school, purchase modular classrooms, acquire land for future school needs and perform a variety of small capital projects. In 2014, a Long Range Facilities Planning Committee studied future needs and developed a list of facility improvements and/or additions to be included in the next bond issue. The list of those improvements can be found in Table 9, Year Building Program. Timing of the next bond issue is anticipated to be in Final selection of projects for the bond will be made by the school board. The current Bethel Public Schools Capital Facilities Plan was adopted by the Bethel School Board in October 2016 and is adopted in the Pierce County CFP by reference. Exhibit A to Ordinance No s,Page 269 of 318

270 Bethel School District This page is intentionally left blank. Exhibit A to Ordinance No s,Page 270 of 318

271 CARBONADO HISTORICAL SCHOOL DISTRICT Winding up the tree-lined mountain road which is 10 miles north of the Rainier National Forest entrance on Hwy. 165, is the beautifully situated town of Carbonado, Washington. Once a booming coal mining town which was founded in 1880, our town grew in population to over 1,000 people by Today Carbonado is a small bedroom community of approximately 600 people. Carbonado is rich in history through the lives of family members who echo the steps of their forefathers who lived here, raised their families in and about these same streets, and mined the hills of Carbonado. One is amazed that once there were stores, a hospital, a dance hall, and a hotel that supported the day in and day out existence of a hard working, deep loving people who worked out their living by laboring far down into the earth in coal tunnels that yet remain under our present town. In 1889, many Carbonado men, young and old, were killed in a mine explosion leaving families without father or brother, husband and child. Only 2% of the coal in this area was claimed during the 80 years of coal mining in Carbonado. The coal was used to drive pig iron mills in Tacoma. During the 1930's, oil became more of an energy resource and the use of coal began to diminish. In 1974, mining regulations required phone lines to be installed and because of the costs involved, the mines were closed. Though Carbonado is a small community, within its borders is the Carbonado Historical School (founded: 1881) for grades kindergarten-eighth grade, a post office, community church, town hall, cemetery, and an active volunteer Fire Department. The Carbonado Historical School District does not anticipate the need for any impact fees. The Carbonado School District passed a Bond measure in February 2016 to modernize the historic brick building. No impact fees will be collected for this project. In addition, there are no changes to the Carbonado Historical School District Capital Facilities Plan (CFP) adopted in May 2009 by reference in the 2010 Pierce County CFP, as the District is modernizing the building, not replacing it. a Exhibit A to Ordinance No s,Page 271 of 318

272 Carbonado Historical School District This page is intentionally left blank. Exhibit A to Ordinance No s,Page 272 of 318

273 DIERINGER SCHOOL DISTRICT Established in 1890, Dieringer School District consolidated with Lake Tapps School District in The District s three schools, Lake Tapps Elementary School, Dieringer Heights Elementary School, and North Tapps Middle School, provide kindergarten through eighth grade education, and serve as hubs for community activities as well. Dieringer School District #343 is located in unincorporated Pierce County, bounded on the east by the White River, on the west by the Stuck River, on the north by the City of Auburn, and on the south by the cities of Bonney Lake and Sumner. The District surrounds the northern twothirds of Lake Tapps and covers approximately 5.5 square miles. Lake Tapps Elementary The current student enrollment is 1,542 students in grades kindergarten through eighth grade. Students in grades first through third grade are housed at Lake Tapps Elementary, constructed in 2005 as a replacement project. Dieringer Heights Elementary opened in fall 2000 and is home to students in kindergarten, fourth and fifth grade. An addition was just completed in Originally constructed in 1992 and added to in 1998 and 2009, North Tapps Middle School houses students in grades sixth through eighth. The District supports an additional 570 high school students who may elect to attend any public high school. The majority chose to attend Auburn Riverside and Sumner, and Bonney Lake High Schools. The current Dieringer Public Schools Capital Facilities Plan was adopted by the Dieringer School Board in July 2016 and is adopted in the Pierce County Capital Facilities Plan by reference. Exhibit A to Ordinance No s,Page 273 of 318

274 Dieringer School District This page is intentionally left blank. Exhibit A to Ordinance No s,Page 274 of 318

275 The Town of Eatonville is located in the shadow of Mt. Rainier, within 40 minutes driving time from Tacoma and within an hour s driving time from Seattle and Olympia. Its population is approaching 2,700. The Eatonville School District is located in the southern portion of Pierce County to the west of Mount Rainier National Park. The district is expansive and mostly rural in nature. EATONVILLE SCHOOL DISTRICT Eatonville School District s enrollment is approximately 1,950 students and consists of six schools, Eatonville High School (grades 9-12), Eatonville Middle School (grades 6-8), Eatonville Elementary School (K-5), Columbia Crest A-STEM Academy (K-8), Weyerhaeuser Elementary School (K-5), and Mt. Rainier Parent Partnership (MRPP) (K-8). The current Eatonville Public Schools Capital Facilities Plan was adopted by the Eatonville School Board in June 2009 and is adopted in the Pierce County CFP by reference. a Exhibit A to Ordinance No s,Page 275 of 318

276 Eatonville School District This page is intentionally left blank. a Exhibit A to Ordinance No s,Page 276 of 318

277 Fife School District is located east of the City of Tacoma in the Puyallup Valley in Washington State. The district includes three cities - Fife with a population of 2,860, Milton with a population of 5,000, and a portion of Edgewood. The district also includes the unincorporated areas of Trout Lake, Jovita, and Fife Heights. A part of the Port of Tacoma is included in the district. The district enrollment is approximately 3,550 students. The district has six schools: Fife High School, grades Columbia Junior High School, grades 8-9 Surprise Lake Middle School, grades 6-7 Endeavour Intermediate School, grades 2-5 Hedden Elementary School, grades 2-5 Discovery Primary School, grades pre K-1 FIFE SCHOOL DISTRICT Because of its attractive location and extensive single and multiple dwelling units, many residents live in the district but work in surrounding neighborhoods, towns, and cities. There is a large suburban community, a smaller but important rural element, and a growing commercial center. The patrons of the district approved a four-year maintenance and operations levy in February of 2014 with a 72.73% yes vote. This is indicative of the community support for our district. In February 2000, the patrons of the district approved a $35,000,000 bond for the construction of Alice V. Hedden Elementary School that opened in September 2001, and Columbia Junior High School that opened in the fall of The current Fife Public Schools Capital Facilities Plan was adopted by the Fife School Board in June 2016 and is adopted in the Pierce County CFP by reference. Exhibit A to Ordinance No s,Page 277 of 318

278 Fife School District This page is intentionally left blank. Exhibit A to Ordinance No s,Page 278 of 318

279 FRANKLIN PIERCE SCHOOL DISTRICT The Franklin Pierce School District is located south of Tacoma and west of Puyallup in central Pierce County and includes the areas of Midland, Summit and Parkland. A portion of the District is situated along Highway 512. To the north of the District is Tacoma School District, to the south is Bethel School District; Puyallup School District is to the east and Clover Park School District lies west of the District. The Franklin Pierce School District currently has eight (8) elementary schools, two middle schools, two senior high schools and one alternative high school. The current Franklin Pierce Schools Capital Facilities Plan was adopted by the Franklin Pierce School Board in September 2016 and is adopted in the Pierce County Capital Facilities Plan by reference. A Exhibit A to Ordinance No s,Page 279 of 318

280 Franklin Pierce School District This page is intentionally left blank. Exhibit A to Ordinance No s,Page 280 of 318

281 Facilities include Orting High School, Orting Middle School, Orting Elementary School, Ptarmigan Ridge Elementary School, Administration Building and Bus Shop, as well as approximately 23 acres of undeveloped land south of Orting (known as the Orville Road property). County ordinances make Orville Road property unsuitable for a school facility due to zoning regulations, unless incorporated into the City of Orting. ORTING SCHOOL DISTRICT Currently the School District owns a 2.14 acre site in the center of town located at 120 Washington Avenue N and one block south of the main campus site (high, primary schools, and former middle school site). The original 1951 school is on this site and is used primarily for non-educational purposes. School Support Services, School Maintenance, and a Community Center share this facility. Also on this site are several other buildings used for storage, maintenance, and bus transportation. Currently the School District s bus fleet parks on this site. The current Orting Public Schools Capital Facilities Plan was adopted by the Orting School Board in 2015 and is adopted in the Pierce County CFP by reference. a Exhibit A to Ordinance No s,Page 281 of 318

282 Orting School District This page is intentionally left blank. a Exhibit A to Ordinance No s,Page 282 of 318

283 The Peninsula School District is located on the Puget Sound across the Narrows Bridge from Tacoma. It extends throughout the Gig Harbor and Key Peninsulas covering approximately one hundred twenty square miles with over one hundred miles of waterfront. PENINSULA SCHOOL DISTRICT The district currently serves a population of 8,825 students with fifteen schools consisting of two comprehensive four-year high schools, one smaller high school, four middle schools, and eight elementary schools. Elementary schools provide educational programs for students in preschool through grade five. Middle schools serve students in grades six through eight and high schools serve students in grades nine through twelve. The Community Transition Program, an individualized secondary program serving students age 18 21, and the Peninsula Internet Academy program are offered in an off-campus facility owned by the district. The current Peninsula School District Capital Facilities Plan was adopted by the Peninsula School District Board of Directors in September 2016 and is adopted in the Pierce County CFP by reference. a Exhibit A to Ordinance No s,Page 283 of 318

284 Peninsula School District This page is intentionally left blank. a Exhibit A to Ordinance No s,Page 284 of 318

285 Puyallup School District The Puyallup School District is located within eastern Pierce County and incorporates approximately 54 square miles within its boundaries. It is situated along the intersection of Highways 512 and 167. To the north, the District is bordered by the Fife School District and to the east by the Sumner and Orting school districts. To the south, the District is bordered by the Bethel School District and to the west by the Franklin Pierce and Tacoma school districts. Puyallup School District employs approximately 1,350 certificated staff, 1,412 classified staff, and 706 substitue personnel. The Puyallup School District is currently the eighth largest school district in Washington and the second largest school district in Pierce County with more than 22,250 students. It has twenty-one elementary schools, seven junior high schools, three comprehensive senior high schools, and one alternative high school. It maintains over two million square feet of building space and owns over 600 acres of property. Voters supported a $292.5 million bond measure on the November 3, 2015 General Election ballot with a 69% approval rate. The capital bond program will address overcrowding and continued enrollment growth at the district s elementary schools. The proposed projects include: Firgrove Elementary Replacement and expansion. Northwood Elementary Replacement and expansion. Sunrise Elementary Replacement and expansion. Pope Elementary Remodel and expansion. New Elementary construction in south west region of the district at approx. the 80 th block of 144 th Street East. District-wide life cycle projects that were approved as part of the approved 2014 Capital levy program. In October 2015 the Puyallup School Board adopted a six-year Capital Facilities Plan and is adopted by reference in the Pierce County CFP. The most recent update to the Puyallup School District Capital Facilities Plan is available at: a Exhibit A to Ordinance No s,Page 285 of 318

286 Puyallup School District This page is intentionally left blank. a Exhibit A to Ordinance No s,Page 286 of 318

287 STEILACOOM HISTORICAL SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 1 Established in 1855, Steilacoom Historical School District No. 1 is the oldest organized school district in Pierce County. The district serves the communities of Steilacoom, DuPont, Anderson Island, plus portions of Lakewood and unincorporated Pierce County. Historically, the school communities have supported the district through the passage of bond issues for new facilities and local levies to enhance basic education. Just over 3,000 students are currently enrolled in the district's Pre K-12 programs at six facilities; a remote and necessary K-5 on Anderson Island, and five mainland schools, including Cherrydale Primary School (Pre K-3), Chloe Clark Elementary (Pre K-3), Saltar's Point Elementary (4-5), Pioneer Middle School (6-8), and Steilacoom High School (9-12). The district employs approximately 300 certificated and classified staff. Demographic projections indicate that the district's enrollment will remain level until 2024 when the DuPont Gravel Pit project is available for residential housing development. The Steilacoom Schools Capital Facilities Plan was adopted by the Steilacoom School Board in November 2015, is updated annually, and is adopted in the Pierce County CFP by reference. Exhibit A to Ordinance No s,Page 287 of 318

288 Steilacoom Historical School District This page is intentionally left blank. a Exhibit A to Ordinance No s,Page 288 of 318

289 SUMNER SCHOOL DISTRICT The Sumner School District encompasses the cities of Bonney Lake, Sumner, Edgewood, Pacific, and unincorporated areas of Pierce County. With 13 schools, a performing arts center, community swimming pool, public gymnasium, and a recreation department, the District serves approximately 8,800 students. In May of 2007, the voters approved a $114 million capital projects bond which funded several school modernization projects including Lakeridge Middle School replacement, Bonney Lake, Maple Lawn and Victor Falls elementary modernizations, and the modernization of Sumner Middle School. These modernizations brought aging buildings up to current energy, seismic, fire, and life safety building codes. Sumner School District has experienced growth in the southeastern area of the district for several years. While construction slowed for a couple of years when the economy slowed, new homes are now being built in this area, including the Tehaleh (formerly Cascadia) community and the District is experiencing substantial growth. The current Sumner Public Schools Capital Facilities Plan was adopted by the Sumner School Board in September 2015 and is adopted in the Pierce County CFP by reference. a Exhibit A to Ordinance No s,Page 289 of 318

290 Sumner School District This page is intentionally left blank. a Exhibit A to Ordinance No s,Page 290 of 318

291 WHITE RIVER SCHOOL DISTRICT The White River School District is located in the northeast portion of Pierce County to the north of Mount Rainier National Park. The district is expansive and mostly rural in nature. The majority of the population is located in the very western portion of the district between the City of Buckley and the portion of the City of Bonney Lake that is within White River School District. White River School District also includes the Towns of South Prairie and Wilkeson. White River School District is the high school district serving Carbonado School District that includes the Town of Carbonado. There are currently four elementary schools, one middle school, and one comprehensive high school in the district. The current White River Public Schools Capital Facilities Plan was adopted by the White River School Board in September 2015 and is adopted in the Pierce County CFP by reference. The White River School Board adopted a study and survey of the Capital Facilities Plan updates and changes in January a Exhibit A to Ordinance No s,Page 291 of 318

292 White River School District This page is intentionally left blank. a Exhibit A to Ordinance No s,Page 292 of 318

293 YELM SCHOOL DISTRICT Located in southeast Thurston County, Yelm boasts spectacular views of Mt. Rainier. Yelm is a growing and thriving rural community with easy access to mountains, rivers, beaches, as well as urban and cultural events. Yelm is the fourth largest district in Thurston County serving the communities of Yelm, McKenna, the Bald Hills (Clear Lake), the Lawrence Lake area, the Nisqually Indian Reservation, and parts of the Lacey suburbs. A portion of the district's 192 square miles extends into Pierce County. Continued growth has made the Yelm District one of the fastest growing in the state. Current enrollment is 5,600 students in six elementary schools, two junior high schools, one high school, and one alternative school. A voter-approved $46 million construction bond resulted in two new schools and remodeled facilities throughout the district. New facilities at Yelm High School include a beautiful, state-of-the-art Performing Arts Center. The current Yelm Public Schools CFP was adopted by the Yelm School Board in August 2015 and is adopted in the Pierce County CFP by reference. a Exhibit A to Ordinance No s,Page 293 of 318

294 Yelm School District This page is intentionally left blank. a Exhibit A to Ordinance No s,Page 294 of 318

295 PIERCE COUNTY LIBRARY SYSTEM The Pierce County Rural Library District is a public corporation established under Revised Code of Washington 27.12, serving all unincorporated areas within Pierce County as well as annexed cities and towns. As a junior taxing district, all operations and capital improvements are funded by a dedicated property tax levy with a maximum mill rate of 50 cents per $1000 of assessed property value. Property tax provides 96% of the Library s revenue. Pierce County Library currently serves 589,540 people within its service area. Regional Planners project that by 2030 the Library will serve 718,000 residents. In 2016, Pierce County Library facilities provide 0.37 square feet per person countywide. Library services include access to books, movies, music and audio-books, downloadable books, movies, and music and streaming music and movies; help and resources for finding answers and information or building skills; homework and reading support and other services to youth and teens; adult and youth programs and classes; support and resources for job seekers and for soldiers and military families; access to computers and technology such as 3D printing; individual and group study space; and community meeting rooms. The Library also provides services beyond the Library s physical facilities both in the community and online. Strategic Documents: In 2016, the Library conducted a strategic planning process that involved nearly 11,500 residents, stakeholders and partners. When completed, in fall 2016, it will provide strategic direction, guiding the Library in making choices and prioritizing its activities and services. It ensures the Library focuses on services valued and needed by the community. In 2017, the Library will develop a clear plan to implement service responses based on the strategic direction. Pierce County Library 2030, the Library s facilities master plan, was completed in January 2010 with the input and participation of over 5,000 community residents. Travel patterns, community activity centers, and anticipated population growth and use patterns were used to determine where facilities are needed for easy, convenient and cost effective access to library services. Pierce County Library Technology Plan was developed by a multi-departmental staff team, with input from more than 3,600 community residents, and will guide the library in transforming its technology to support the needs of 21st century library customers and employees. Exhibit A to Ordinance No s,Page 295 of 318

296 Pierce County Library Level of Service Pierce County Library 2030 established a service level target of 0.61 to 0.71 square feet per district resident. This service level target will increase the materials, service, seating, technology, and meeting space available within communities. The desired service level is based on best planning practices in 2010 for library design and space both nationally and within the West Coast region. The plan identifies the need to regularly evaluate and revise target service levels to reflect changing technology and service directions. In light of the changing landscape, for example, significant changes in customer use patterns, service expectations and technology, it is necessary for the Library to revisit Pierce County Library 2030 in the near future to reassess service level targets to ensure it accurately reflects the needs of the community. Level of service targets will be reevaluated in support of the 2016 strategic plan. Along with building space, Pierce County Library 2030 established the following service level targets: Seating: 3.77 seats per 1,000 population Parking: 4 stalls per 1,000 square feet of building space Computers: 1.93 computers per 1,000 population Additionally, the technology plan establishes bandwidth standards at 1200Mb for our larger branches (burstable to 2000Mb) and 300Mb (burstable to 1100Mb) for our smaller branches. Our internet service will be increased to 3000Mb. Adequate Public Facilities The Pierce County Library currently operates 20 facilities throughout the County and serves a district population of 589,540. With a current facility inventory of 218,635 square feet or 0.37 square feet per capita, the Library needs an additional 140,984 square feet to meet the 0.61 square feet per capita level of service. This target will be reevaluated as part of the implementation of the new strategic plan and revisions of the Facilities Master Plan. Current Facility Inventory The Pierce County Library operates 20 facilities throughout unincorporated Pierce County and the 15 cities and towns that have annexed into the District. Residents may use any of the facilities in the District for access to Pierce County Library materials and services, as well as its online branch. In addition, cardholders are able to request material from any location through the library catalog and have it delivered to their preferred library location for pick up. Exhibit A to Ordinance No s,Page 296 of 318

297 Facility Pierce County Library Current (2016) Capacity (square feet) Location Administrative Center and Library 50, th Street E, Summit Anderson Island Yoman Road, Anderson Island Bonney Lake 6, th Street E, Bonney Lake Buckley 4, S River Avenue, Buckley DuPont 3, Wilmington Drive, DuPont Eatonville 4, Center Street W, Eatonville Fife 6, th Street E, Fife Gig Harbor 15, Point Fosdick Drive NW, Gig Harbor Graham 7, th Street E, Graham Key Center 4, Key Peninsula Highway, Key Center Lakewood 32, Wildaire Road, SW, Lakewood Milton/Edgewood 6, Meridian Avenue E, Suite 29, Milton Online Branch 0 Orting 2, Washington Avenue S, Orting Parkland/Spanaway 15, Pacific Avenue S, Parkland South Hill 20, Meridian Avenue E, South Hill Steilacoom 4, Steilacoom Boulevard, Steilacoom Summit 7, th Street E, Summit Sumner 10, Fryar Avenue, Sumner Tillicum 2, Washington Avenue SW, Tillicum University Place 15, Market Place W, University Place Total 218,635 Non-Capital Alternatives The Library seeks to provide convenient and accessible services in innovative ways that take its services outside of physical facilities. Non-capital alternatives are critical for serving residents in isolated or remote locations. Exhibit A to Ordinance No s,Page 297 of 318

298 Pierce County Library Community Locations The Pierce County Library District provides services outside library facilities, including service to daycares, home-based child cares, adult care facility residents and the homebound; school visits; summer mobile service to children, and staff providing programs, classes and services at local community locations and events, and in local schools. Digital Services The Library provides a wide variety of online services that allow residents to access library resources remotely 24/7 or at library locations during open hours. Resources available electronically include: downloadable books, movies, music and magazines electronic reference resources, research databases portals for specific audiences such as military families, job seekers and small businesses electronic language learning programs online homework help online technology classes (lynda.com, Microsoft Imagine Academy, Universal class) online teen summer reading program Reciprocal Borrowing Pierce County Library provides its residents with free, convenient access to libraries outside the Pierce County Library service area. Service in Partner Spaces A book drop is located at the Pierce 23 Fire and Rescue Station located at State Route 706 East in Ashford to provide Ashford and Elbe residents with a convenient, local location to return library materials. The Eatonville Library is the closest library facility for these residents. Exhibit A to Ordinance No s,Page 298 of 318

299 Pierce County Library Capital Projects The 2017 Capital budget is in development. This section does not reflect all projects or final decisions. Funding for capital projects, large projects or equipment purchases that may cross fiscal years, comes from three sources: 1. Fund balance of the Capital Improvement Fund 2. Funds transferred from the General Fund 3. New revenues (e.g., fund raising, investment) Capital Project Categories ACTUAL ESTIMATED ESTIMATED Commitments... $ 427, $ 120, $ 120,000 Service improvement projects , , ,000 Major maintenance , , ,000 Vehicles , , ,000 Technology Plan... 1,746, , ,000 Other Capital Projects , ,000 SUBTOTAL... 2,923, ,377, ,113,000 Contingency (by exec approval)...11, , ,000 TOTAL CAPITAL BUDGET... $ 2,934, $ 1,405, $ 1,138,000 Notes: A line item breakdown of the Capital Projects does not occur until the projects are planned. Each project s funding is a general estimate made for purposes of budgeting. The Library s capital improvement strategies are used to determine projects and priorities. Current strategies are: Preserve our facilities as an asset (stewardship) Efficiency: Spend to save (efficient operations) Stay relevant and up-to-date (customer focus) Build critical infrastructure to support responsive services Prior Year Major Accomplishments (2016) Gigabit Wi-Fi for significantly increased speed and capacity Network and server infrastructure upgrade Re-key facilities for improved security HVAC, lighting and kitchen remodel at Key Center Library Elevator upgrades at Lakewood Library Replacement of carpet and fresh paint at Tillicum Library Restroom upgrade and new entry tile at Buckley Library Non-skid entry decking at Fife Library Relocation of Help Desk at University Place Library Sealcoating at Gig Harbor and Administrative Center Libraries Exhibit A to Ordinance No s,Page 299 of 318

300 Pierce County Library 2017 Commitments Annual payment to City of University Place to purchase additional 5000 square feet for future library expansion (Year 7 of 10 year agreement) 2017 Major Maintenance Routine maintenance on buildings is planned for Technology New server technology to dramatically increase speed of applications, system administration, and future application possibilities Replace HRIS System 2016 Vehicles Replace a delivery van Future Anticipated Major Projects ( ) During 2017, we will begin to consider implications related to the new strategic plan. This will guide future capital projects. Exhibit A to Ordinance No s,Page 300 of 318

301 Pierce County Library MAP OF LOCATIONS PIERCE COUNTY LIBRARY LOCATIONS FUTURE NEEDS NO FUNDING CURRENTLY AVAILABLE Pierce County Library s existing operating levy supports ongoing operations and capital maintenance. In 2016, the Library s Board of Trustees created a Special Purpose fund to begin setting aside funds for future land and facilities needs. Additional funds will be required to support the costs of new or expanded facilities. The Library will continue to work with communities to determine when the timing is best to begin plans to approach voters or seek other funds for the improvements recommended in the Pierce County Library 2030 facilities master plan. Exhibit A to Ordinance No s,Page 301 of 318

302 Pierce County Library RELATION TO GMA The level of service target for Pierce County libraries is 0.61 to 0.71 square feet per capita by 2030, which was the planning horizon for the Pierce County Library 2030: Facilities Master Plan. The desired service level is based on best planning practices for library design and space in 2010, and must be evaluated and revised to reflect changing technology and service directions. The Pierce County Library plans to purchase 5,000 square feet for future use at the University Place branch. No added space is planned for The Library s 2022 projection estimates a service population of 619,000. The 2030 population projection for the Library s service area is between 653,000 and 721,000 (representing a 10% range from the PSRC forecasts). By 2030, the Library anticipates needing to provide between 420,200 and 488,300 square feet. In fall 2016, the Library will complete a strategic planning process. Its facilities master plan will be revised to support resulting service directions. Exhibit A to Ordinance No s,Page 302 of 318

303 Pierce County Library Pierce County Library: Current Level of Service and Deficit by Library Service Areas Level of Service 0.61 Square Feet per Capita Library Service Area 2017 Square Feet Administrative Center and Library 50,107 Anderson Island Population* Included in Summit Included in Steilacoom 2017 SF/Capita Included in Summit Included in Steilacoom 2017 Deficit (in SF) Included in Summit Included in Steilacoom Bonney Lake 6,480 46, (22,065) Buckley 4,100 13, (4,230) DuPont 3,610 8, (1,855) Eatonville 4,100 10, (2,543) Fife 6,100 13, (2,293) Gig Harbor 15,500 48, (13,862) Graham 7,152 39, (17,243) Key Center 4,066 18, (7,330) Lakewood 32,592 79, (16,166) Milton/Edgewood 6,649 19, (5,312) Online Branch Orting 2,700 11, (4,527) Parkland/Spanaway 15,576 85, (36,833) South Hill 20,100 81, (29,466) Steilacoom 4,039 12, (3,490) Summit 7,424 39, (16,547) Sumner 10,600 19, (1,291) Tillicum 2,100 5, (1,059) University Place 15,000 33, (5,620) Totals 218, , (140,984) Populations based on Library Service Area geographies and OFM Population Estimates Exhibit A to Ordinance No s,Page 303 of 318

304 Pierce County Library This page is intentionally left blank. Exhibit A to Ordinance No s,Page 304 of 318

305 PIERCE TRANSIT Pierce Transit currently operates an active fleet of 160 fixed route buses, 366 Vanpool vehicles, and 97 SHUTTLE (paratransit) vehicles. Revenue vehicles are replaced on a regular cycle. The replacement schedule meets or exceeds Federal Transit Administration (FTA) requirements that a vehicle not be removed from service prior to the completion of its useful life. Pierce Transit has a fixed route fleet with an average age of 10.1 years. The actual replacement of vehicles will be on an as-needed basis and the Agency continues to extend the useful life of vehicles wherever possible. Fixed Route Buses: Pierce Transit operates a fleet of 160 buses (excluding Sound Transit vehicles). At present, the fleet consists of 25-foot, 30-foot, and 40-foot buses. The 25-foot and 30-foot buses are deployed on routes appropriate to their size and maneuverability. Routine replacement occurs when the vehicles reach their 16-year lifespan, per agency policy. No additional expansion of the fixed route bus fleet is planned beyond 2016 at this time. Table 8-1 Planned Bus Orders Replacement Buses Expansion Buses Delivery expected to be in the year after funds are encumbered SHUTTLE Vehicles: Pierce Transit s SHUTTLE program provides Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) paratransit service to individuals who are not able to utilize Pierce Transit s regular fixed route services. Using lift equipped vehicles; SHUTTLE provides a door-to-door service that is comparable to fixed route service in a geographic area and hours of service within each area. The current fleet consists of 97 vehicles. Routine replacement occurs on the basis of seven years or 150,000 miles. No expansion of the paratransit fleet is planned at this time. 1. Note that all charts and tables are taken from the Draft Transit Development Plan available for viewing at Exhibit A to Ordinance No s,Page 305 of 318

306 Pierce Transit Table 8-2 Planned Shuttle Vehicle Purchases Replacement Vans Expansion Vans Delivery expected to be in the year after funds are encumbered Vanpool Vehicles: The Vanpool program complements Pierce Transit s network of local and express services, providing commute alternatives to many destinations that cannot be effectively served by fixed route services. A vanpool is a group of 5 to 15 people sharing a ride in a 7-, 12-, or 15-foot passenger van. The Vanpool program also administers a special use van program which provides vehicles to local communities and organizations as a way of meeting their specialized transportation needs. The current fleet consists of 366 vans. Routine replacement occurs on the basis of seven years or 150,000 miles, per agency policy. Table 8-3 Planned Vanpool Vehicle Purchases Replacement Vans Expansion Vans Delivery expected to be in same year as funds are encumbered Passenger Facilities: Funds are budgeted for necessary repairs and refurbishments at several locations, including Tacoma Dome Station mid-life repairs, SR 512 Park-and-Ride lot resealing, 72nd Street Transit Center lot resealing, as well as Transit Oriented Development at the Air Spares property near the Tacoma Dome Station. Base Facilities: The agency headquarters facility is located at th Street SW in Lakewood, Washington The main site, identified internally as North Base or Main Base, is a 20-acre site completed in 1987 that houses most of the agency s maintenance, operations, and administrative functions. It includes a 42,000 square-foot administrative building that houses the majority of Pierce Transit s office functions and the operations dispatch function. The maintenance buildings on the west and north end of the site provide bus and automotive maintenance space, office space, and a fuel and wash facility. South Base is an 11.5-acre site located across the street from the Main Base. Approximately five acres of the 11.5-acre site are developed. Constructed in 2005, it currently functions as an employee and fleet parking area and includes a 26,500 square-foot Training/Administration building. The southern undeveloped portion of the site contains a pond which currently receives storm water from the developed portion of the site. This portion of the site may become developable when a storm water treatment and infiltration facility is constructed. Pierce Transit also leases two properties and owns additional property located directly west of the Main Base. This is referred to as West Base and is currently used for storage. It provides potential expansion capabilities for future agency growth. Exhibit A to Ordinance No s,Page 306 of 318

307 Pierce Transit Funds are budgeted for necessary repairs and refurbishments to base facilities and systems, as well as an update to the Base Master Plan in which includes an updated facility needs assessment for future expansion needs, replacement of the emergency warning system, and the acquisition of additional property for the base headquarters. Pierce Transit relies on a variety of advanced technological systems to operate on a daily basis. Core Business Systems such as Human Resources/Payroll, Finance, Regional Fare Integration (ORCA), Fleet Maintenance, bus and paratransit scheduling, and telecommunication systems allow staff to effectively meet operational requirements. The agency also has a complex Radio/Computer Assisted Dispatch System consisting of 20 radio servers, 24 CAD servers and 16 radio tower sites that it shares with its radio system partner, Pierce County, to provide voice and data communications to staff and vehicles. This 700 MHz Radio System connects Pierce Transit and Pierce County with other regional government and Public Safety Agencies as they join the system as subscribers. There are over 350 Agency computer users; an Agency Wide-Area-Network consisting of 153 servers (70 of which are virtual); numerous firewalls, switches and routers; printers; and onboard vehicle and desktop computers. These systems operate 24 hours a day, 7 days a week. Capital projects that have a significant technical component or require integration with existing technology systems are included in this category. The 2016 Capital Budget includes funds for maintenance and upgrade of several critical systems, as well as replacement of infrastructure that has reached the end of its useful life. Some of these projects include the financial management system replacement, radio site fixed video, and the next generation of ORCA, the regional fare system. Routine Technology Infrastructure Replacement: Information Technology maintains a six-year replacement plan for replacing technology infrastructure as it reaches the end of its useful life. This includes items such as desktop computers, servers, printers/plotters, network infrastructure equipment (e.g., firewalls, switches, and routers), and Core Business System upgrades. Other capital projects include replacement of non-revenue support vehicles (e.g., trucks, forklifts, automobiles), and maintenance and administrative equipment. Pierce Transit s financial plan plays a role in determining the outlook for transit services over the six-year plan period. It is based on the agency s adopted financial policies, which mandate that Pierce Transit maintain reserves for operating contingencies, capital replacement, and insurance. Overall, the financial plan provides a realistic estimate of the agency s future capital and service capabilities. Operating Revenues: Income that supports Pierce Transit s day-to-day services and capital improvements primarily comes from sales taxes, reimbursements from Sound Transit, fares, and grants. Annual operating revenues are expected to grow from $134.9 million in 2015 to $178.5 million in The graphics below illustrate the various revenue sources Pierce Transit utilized during 2015 and for the Six-Year Financial Plan. Exhibit A to Ordinance No s,Page 307 of 318

308 Pierce Transit Table 9-1 Pierce Transit Operating Income Revenue Sources 2015 Year-End Estimate (Millions $) Sales Tax $70.5 Sound Transit 38.5 Fares 12.8 Other Revenues 6.5 Operating Assistance/Special Needs Program 1.5 Preventive Maintenance 5.1 Total Throughout the next six years, Pierce Transit s largest source of operating revenue will remain the 0.6% sales tax. Annual proceeds are expected to increase from $70.5 million in 2015 to $97.8 million in 2021, a 39 percent increase. Fare revenues are projected to provide about $103 million in revenue over the next six years. Fare increases are planned every two years in 2018 and Sound Transit reimburses Pierce Transit for the actual costs of operating regional express services. These reimbursements will total $278 million over six years. While primarily utilized to fund current operating expenses, operating revenues also finance a number of nonoperating expenses including capital projects, and funding an insurance reserve account. The size of these transfers varies from year to year based upon capital and insurance expenditure levels. During 2016, a total of $9.3 million was transferred from the Operating Fund to the Capital and Insurance funds. Operating Expenditures: Table 8-2 summarizes estimated expenditures by type for This information is graphically presented in Figure 8-2. Total operating expenses, excluding capital transfers and insurance, for 2015 were $117.4 million. Wages and benefits will account for almost 70 percent of this total. While operating expenses, excluding fuel costs, remain fairly constant from year to year, transfers to other funds, especially to the capital fund, have historically varied substantially depending upon the number and size of capital projects being undertaken each year. Exhibit A to Ordinance No s,Page 308 of 318

309 Pierce Transit Table 9-2 Figure 9-2 Pierce Transit Operating Expenditures Pierce Transit Operating Expenditures 2015 Year-End Estimate (Millions $) 2014 Year-End Estimate Wages 57.3 Benefits 23.2 Maintenance and 18.5 Operations Fuel 6.2 Parts 4.7 Purchased 7.5 Transportation Total Parts, 4% Fuel, 6% M&O, 16% Purchased Transportation, 6% Wages, 49% Benefits, 20% Six-year expenditures for 2016 through 2021 are $899.1 million to support operating expenses, $121.4 million for capital investments, $18.3 million for self-insurance costs, and $4.7 million for non-operating costs. This financial plan assumes that costs per unit of service provided may be higher than inflation because costs associated with contributions to the Public Employees Retirement System (PERS) will increase faster than inflation. Overall, operating costs are expected to increase from $131.7 million in 2016 to $168.7 million in Pierce Transit recognizes that its heavy reliance on sales tax revenues makes it more susceptible to economic fluctuations than most government agencies. A reserve policy is maintained to assist with the changes. The reserve policy is equal to two months of operating expenses and is reviewed annually. The policy sets the appropriate level of operating reserves to be equal to two months operating expenses. This amounts to about $21.8 million in 2016 and will increase in rough proportion to the increase in operating expenses. Capital Fund: Over the six-year life of this plan, the capital projects included are estimated to cost about $121.4 million. Projected 2016 funding includes projects that were funded in prior years with activity continuing into the 2016 budget year. A capital reserve has been established in order to meet capital expenditure requirements programmed in Pierce Transit s Six-Year Financial Plan. This reserve helps provide a long-range approach to financial management and assure funds are available for planned capital acquisition. The minimum amount of the Capital Reserve is set at a level equal to 10 percent of the six-year average annual capital expenditures and 50 percent of the average annual grant funding programmed in the Six-Year Financial Plan. This reserve has been set at this level to enable Pierce Transit to respond to urgent unanticipated capital expenditure requirements, as well as to protect Pierce Transit from the uncertainty of federal and state grant funding. The plan assumes that federal funding assistance will continue at a stable level throughout the six-year plan. During the next six years, Pierce Transit expects to receive about $33.7 million in federal formula funds plus $17 million in federal flexible funding. Exhibit A to Ordinance No s,Page 309 of 318