9:00 am Sign-off/Variation of Development Plans/Plats. Distribution of New Submittals and Re-Submittals

Transcription

1 + NASSAU COUNTY DEVELOPMENT REVIEW COMMITTEE REGULAR MEETING April 26, :00 am Sign-off/Variation of Development Plans/Plats Distribution of New Submittals and Re-Submittals Lighthouse Pointe, Phase Two, plat Roses Bluff Road, SP Heron Isles, Phase 1B, SP Heron Isles, Phase 2, SP Gate Food Post, SP Amelia Rental & Management, SP Blackheath Park, SP Blackheath Park, plat Shoppes at Amelia Concourse, plat Status of All Current Projects 9:30 Peter King (904) Sonic Drive-Up/ Fernandina Beach Preliminary Discussion 10:00 11:00 12:00 Additional Approvals and/or Distributions as Necessary

2 NASSAU COUNTY DEVELOPMENT REVIEW COMMITTEE STATUS REPORT Site Plans/Plats by Commissioner's District District 1 - Jim B. Higginbotham Advance Auto Parts, SP Crawford-South 14th Street, SP District 2 Ansley Acree Amelia Rental & Management, SP Heron Pointe, SP Heron Pointe, plat District 3 - Tom Branan Amelia Concourse Subdivision, plat Amelia Concourse Subdivision, SP Amelia National, PUD, Phase 1B, SP Amelia National, PUD, SP Amelia National, PUD, Phase 1C, SP Amsouth Bank, SP Bells River Estates, Phase III, plat Blackheath Park, SP Blackheath Park, plat Boys & Girls Club of N.C., SP Cartesian Pointe, Unit III, plat Gate Food Mart, SP Goodbread Shooting Range, SP Heron Isles, SP Heron Isles, Phase 1B, SP Heron Isles, Phase 2, SP Hickory Village, Phase 2, plat Hickory Village, Phase 4, plat Home Depot, SP Lighthouse Pointe, Phase Two, SP Lighthouse Pointe, Phase Two, plat Marshes at Lanceford, PUD, SP Marshes at Lanceford, PUD, plat McKendree Acres, plat McKendree Acres, SP Roses Bluff Road, SP Amelia Concourse, SP Southern Creek, SP Southern Creek, plat Walgreens Drug Store, SP Woodbridge Village I & II, plat Yulee High School, SP District 4 - Floyd Van Zant District 5 Marianne Marshall Buckhead, Phase II, plat Callahan Church of God, SP Plummers Creek, PUD, SP Timber Creek Plantation, Phase III, PUD, SP /22/05,12:04 PM 2

3 Turning Leaf, PUD, SP SITE PLANS/PLATS UPDATE ADVANCE AUTO PARTS, SP CI, 2.48 acres, 6841 square feet, 35 parking spaces, with outparcel, 8th Street, Fernandina Beach area. Developer: Submitted plans: 10 February 2005, distributed: 15 February Re-Submittal: 12 April 2005, distributed: 19 April Building: 20 April 2005: approved as submitted. Computerized Data: 15 February 2005: to be received and approved by GIS prior to DRC approval. Concurrency: 15 February 2005: awaiting developers response Engineering: 25 February 2005: 1. The plans indicate a proposed property line in the parking lot. The site being reviewed must contain all of the drainage facilities and needed improvements. A portion of the required improvement cannot be on adjoining property unless you provide an agreement. 2. The site being reviewed should be clearly labeled, preferable with distances and bearings. The out parcel should be clearly identified as not being reviewed. If it is intended to include detention for the out parcel within this site, then the area of impervious and pervious areas expected in the out parcel should be identified on the plans for future reference. 3. The driveway on 8th street must have a high point within the driveway apron so that storm water cannot flow from the site to the street and vice versa. 4. The hurricane surge category should be placed on the plans. 5. There should be a detail of the "inverted curb and gutter" on the plans. 6. The owner's address and phone number should be on the cover sheet. 7. The elevation datum should be specified. 8. If there are no wetlands within the site or out parcel, then a statement should be added stating this and identifying the party or company responsible for making the wetland (or lack thereof ) determination. 9. The exit onto Woodrow Drive should be identified as a driveway. 10. The pond as shown on Sheet 4 has four sloped sides, the pond detail on Sheet 8 indicates a wall and vertical side. Which is correct? 11. All wet detention ponds within commercial developments must be fenced. The minimum fence is a FDOT, class B, 6-foot fence. 12. If the intention is to drain the driveway to the street to the center, then a detail should be provided explaining the design. DRAINAGE: 13. Pipe segment P5 is identified as 61 foot long in the pipe table in the plans; 139 feet long in the computations and scales to be about 82 feet long. Please make the necessary corrections. 14. There are no flow computations for pipe segment P9 and they should be added. 15. The contours shown for the exiting ditch next to the bank are confusing, and do not match the large ditch that exists, please correct the contours. 16. The outfall pipe form the pond to the ditch has an invert elevation at the end of the pipe of 10.5 in the ICPR program, 11.8 in the structure table and as per the plans? Please make the necessary corrections. 17. The site has a total area of 2.48 acres in the drainage report and on Sheet 3. The sub basins shown do not add up to 2.48 acres. Sub basin DA-4 is missing and the out parcel area is shown as 0.74 acres on sheet 5, but the predevelopment sheet indicates and area of 1.23 acres. Please make the necessary corrections. 18. The drainage report indicates that the pond is designed for a 25-year tail water elevation would be correct. 19. If the site is being raised 1.5 to 2.5 feet then more contour information is needed for the present and proposed elevations. It is important that the raised site's drainage is compatible with adjacent land and sufficient information should be provided to verify this. 20. Inlet S7 has an invert of 11.0 in the ICPR program and in the structure table, which is correct? 21. The weir detail on Sheet 8 has the following errors: a. The draw down orifice is listed as 6 inches in diameter; the Drainage report indicates a 2.8 inch diameter. Please correct. b. The orifice pipe has an invert elevation of 11.0 and in the detail the normal water level is 12.0 They should have the same elevation. c. The detail indicates that the weir invert is 15.9 and the drainage report indicates an invert of 14.5 feet. 22. The outlet structure detail has no dimensions and the height, width, length and thickness of the structure should be specified. 23. ICPR summary table is not readable; the columns should be aligned with the column titles for clarity. Because of the difficulty in using the summation table program was performed in this review. Fire/Rescue: 19 April 2005: approved as submitted. 4/22/05,12:04 PM 3

4 Growth Management: 20 April 2005: 1. A minimum of 25% of the total caliper inches of all existing hardwood trees six inches (6") in caliper or over must be preserved. Section 5.5 of the off-street parking areas. Please modify the tables and landscape plan as discussed. [Section of the Nassau County Development Review Regulations]. SJRWMD: 15 February 2005: awaiting developers response. Traffic: 25 February 2005: see Engineering comments. AMELIA CONCOURSE SUBDIVISION, PLAT RS-2, 133 single family lots, acres south of North Hampton, Yulee area. Developer: Submitted plans: 16 September 2004, distributed: 21 September Re-Submittal: 16 December 2004, distributed: 4 January Re-Submittal: 4 January 2005, distributed: 11 January Re-Submittal: 3 March 2005, distributed: 8 March Building: 30 September 2004: approved as submitted. Computerized Data: 21 September 2004: to be received and approved by GIS prior to DRC approval. Concurrency: 21 September 2004: awaiting developers response Engineering: 10 March 2005: approved as submitted. Fire/Rescue: 22 September 2004: approved as submitted. Health: 11 October 2004: approved as submitted. Growth Management: 17 March 2005: approved as submitted. SJRMWD: application filed. Traffic: 10 March 2005: approved as submitted. 911: 31 January 2005: approved as submitted. AMELIA CONCOURSE SUBDIVISION, SP RS-2, 133 single family lots, acres south of North Hampton, Yulee area. Developer: Submitted plans: 16 September 2004, distributed: 21 September Re-Submittal, 28 October 2004, distributed: 2 November Re-Submittal: 6 January 2005, distributed: 11 January Re-Submittal: 15 April 2005: 19 April Building: 30 September 2004: approved as submitted. Computerized Data: 21 September 2004: to be received and approved by GIS prior to DRC approval. Concurrency: 21 September 2004: awaiting developers response Engineering: 20 April 2005: approved as submitted. Fire/Rescue: 2 November 2004: approved as submitted. Growth Management: 13 January 2005: 1. Neither the preliminary plat nor the engineering plans shall be approved separately. [Section 3.4, Nassau County Development Review Regulations]. SJRMWD: application filed. Traffic: 13 October 2004: see Engineering comments. AMELIA NATIONAL, PUD, PHASE 1B, SP PUD, modification to approved site plan, 3 lots removed, lot lines shifted, numbering of lots changed. Developer: Submitted plans: 3 March 2005, distributed: 8 March Building:. 17 March 2005: approved as submitted. Computerized Data: 8 March 2005: to be received and approved by GIS prior to DRC approval. Engineering: 24 March 2005: approved as submitted. Fire/Rescue: 14 March 2005: approved as submitted. Growth Management: 11 April 2005: approved as submitted. SJRMWD: # , issue date: 10 June Traffic: 24 March 2005: approved as submitted. AMELIA NATIONAL, PUD, PHASE 1C, SP PUD Ord. # , acres, 396 units Developer: Submitted plans: 22 September 2004, distributed: 28 September Building: 11 October 2004: approved as submitted. Computerized Data: 28 September 2004: to be received and approved by GIS prior to DRC approval. Concurrency: Concurrency granted through Developer's Agreement Engineering: 28 October 2004: 1. There are several cul de sacs with right of way radai of less than 60 feet and pavement radai of less than 50 feet. All cul de sacs should be according to County design standards. 2. All cul de sacs should have an elevation at the center of the circle and at quarter points on the edge of the pavement. 3. The center island should be removed from the cul de sac at lots 164, 165 and Street right of ways are not listed on the streets on any sheet. 5. A 60' street right of way is 4/22/05,12:04 PM 4

5 required unless there is a minimum of a 5' wide utility easement on each side of the street. No easements are shown on the plans or else they are unreadable. The easement should be added or the street widened. 6. The street detail for the 80' right of way is in error. County standards require 28 feet of pavement width. 7. There are some numbers on the detail that are unreadable. 8. There should be separate details for 50' and 60' right of ways, if more than one detail is needed. 9. Suggest that you redesign the double cul de sac. Both cul de sacs are too small and it will be difficult to install a proper driveway for lot 252. If you wish to keep the current design, provide a proposal for proper driveway access for lot On Sheet 14, the term "wetland fly over" is used in the legend. Please explain the meaning of this phrase. 11. Also on Sheet 11, remove the note referring to a variable bank easement. As commented on the plat review, all ponds and detention facilities must be located within a defined easement or tract. 12. On Sheet 14, the information for the SWMF weir table is mostly unreadable, please revise. 13. A silt fence should be installed to protect all wetland areas and shown on the plans. 14. There should be a plan and details sheet indicating the house grading plan for each lot. DRAINAGE REPORT. 15. The time of concentration of 20 minutes or a similar number cannot be assumed for computation purposes. The time of concentration for each sub basin must be computed. Most of the drainage sub basins will have a time of concentration of much less than 20 minutes. The drainage sub basin must be clearly identified on sheets of not more than a 1" to 50' scale, so that the design can be analyzed. Because the time of concentration is critical no further review was done on the storm sewer computations. 16. The storm sewer computation sheets are not identified as to the rainfall frequency. The standard design is for a 5-year rain and the table should be identified as such. Tail water elevations should be identified in the table. In addition a 25-year computation must be provided. For the five year rainfall, the hydraulic grade line must be below the sill oft each inlet and rim of each manhole. For the 25 year rain, the street may be partially flooded so long as there is one passable lane in the middle of the street. 17. The ICPR computation again uses the assumed time of concentration of 20 minutes. The actual computed time of concentration must be used for each drainage basin. Again, no further review of the design is warranted until this change is made. Fire/Rescue: 30 September 2004: 1. Provide a fire hydrant at the intersection of White Spruce Drive East and Amelia National Parkway. Growth Management: 29 September 2004: 1. The wetland buffer shown for Lots 153 and 140 do not meet the minimum 25' buffer requirement. [Section 6.5 Nassau County Development Review Guidelines] 2. Please amend the side yard minimum requirement for the 55' lot size to reflect the approved side yard requirement mentioned in F.3. (b)of the Consolidated Amelia National PUD Conditions. (Sheet 3 of 51) 3. Please provide a table showing the number of lots in each phase. 4. On Sheet 8 of 51, isolated wetlands are shown but the wetland buffer or impacted wetland shading is not applied. These same wetlands are identified on other pages as being impacted. If so, please apply the appropriate pattern to the isolated wetlands on this page. 5. A pattern that identifying "Wetland Flyover" areas has been applied to several locations in this phase. Please provide an explanation for "Wetland Flyover". SJRMWD: # issue date: 10 June Traffic: 28 October 2004: see Engineering comments. AMELIA NATIONAL, PRIVATE QUARTERS, PUD, SP Amelia National Parkway, Fernandina Beach area. Developer: Submitted plans: 6 January 2005, distributed: 11 January Re-Submittal: 3 March 2005, distributed: 8 March Building: 31 January 2005: approved as submitted. Computerized Data: 11 January 2005: to be received and approved by GIS prior to DRC approval. Concurrency: Concurrency granted through Developer's Agreement Engineering: 14 March 2005: approved as submitted. Fire/Rescue: 13 January 2005: approved as submitted. Growth Management: 18 March 2005: 1. Please include the dimensions of all structures (vertical and horizontal), type of construction as defined by the adopted Building Code, and major features including setbacks, distances between structures, floor area, and percent of lot coverage. [Section f of the Nassau County Development Review Regulations]. 2. Please include the location of any on-site lighting and signs. [Section l. of the Nassau County Development Review Guidelines] SJRWMD: issue date: 10 June Traffic: 14 March 2005: approved as submitted. AMELIA RENTAL AND MANAGEMENT, SP CN,.50 acres, 3500 square feet with 18 parking spaces, 2 story, Gerbing Road, Fernandina Beach area. Developer: Submitted plans: 21 April 2005, distributed: 26 April Building: 26 April 2005: awaiting comment. 4/22/05,12:04 PM 5

6 Computerized Data: 26 April 2005: to be received and approved by GIS prior to DRC approval. Concurrency: 26 April 2005: to be verified by Engineering. Engineering: 26 April 2005: awaiting comment. Fire/Rescue: 26 April 2005: awaiting comment. Health: 26 April 2005: awaiting comment. Growth Management: 26 April 2005: awaiting comment. SJRWMD: # , issue date: 9 November Traffic: 26 April 2005: awaiting comment. AMSOUTH BANK, SP acres, 3,820 square feet, 35 parking spaces with 4 drive thru lanes and one ATM lane, located in Shoppes at Amelia Concourse, Yulee area. Developer: Submitted plans: 22 March 2005, distributed: 29 March Building: 7 April 2005: 1. Need 12' dimension center-line to center-line on accessible parking space striping detail. Computerized Data: 29 March 2005: to be received and approved by GIS prior to DRC approval. Concurrency: awaiting developer's response. Engineering: 11 April 2005: approved as submitted. Fire/Rescue: 4 April 2005: approved as submitted. Growth Management: 29 March 2005: 1. Proof of ownership or agent authorization from the owner of subject parcel is needed. 2. The Development Review Committee must approve the preliminary plat for the Shoppe's at Amelia Concourse. 3. Approval of SP04-019, Shoppe's at Amelia Concourse by the Nassau County Development Review Committee is needed. 4. Please list on Sheet C0 in Site Data, next to the note listing the zoning category, the conditional use permit ordinance and date of approval. [Section b of the Nassau County Development Review Regulations]. SJRWMD: # , issue date: 9 November Traffic: 11 April 2005: approved as submitted. BELLS RIVER ESTATES, PHASE III, PUD, plat Lents Road, 43 lots, Lents Road, Yulee area. Developer: Submitted plans: 23 March 2004, distributed: 30 March Re-Submittal: 23 September 2004, distributed: 28 September Re-Submittal: 3 March 2005, distributed: 15 March Re- Submittal: 13 April 2005, distributed: 19 April Building: 1 October 2004: approved as submitted. Computerized Data: 30 March 2004: to be received and approved by GIS prior to DRC approval. Concurrency: Final Certificate of Concurrency with Conditions granted 22 May Engineering: 22 March 2005: 1. The plat does not have an acceptable dedication statement for the streets and drainage facilities. Enclosed is a copy of a revision to Ordinance as passed by the Board of County Commissioners. Please add a dedication statement that follows their revision. 2. The plat indicates there are Tracts A, B and C. They should be accounted for in the dedication statement. 3. The existing pond within Lots 1, 2 and 3 should have some dimensions, particularly, the distance from the front of the lot to the pond. 4. There should be a minimum first floor elevation assigned to each lot. 5. There should be an elevation reference point designated within the project with a known elevation listed for it. 6. The boundary line between flood zone "X" and "AE" should be clearly shown and identified on the plat. 7. Note #14 on Sheet 2 is partially unreadable and incomplete, please correct. 8. Note #15 on Sheet 2 should also be completed. 9. Remove the notation on Sheet 2 that refers to a match line to Sheet 3 of 3 on the left project border. Sheet 3 does not extend that far. 10. Centerline curves C1 and C2 are less than 100-foot radius and a variance is required for their use. A request for variance should be completed and submitted. 11. County ordinance requires a 60-foot right of way width for subdivisions or a 50-foot right of way on one street with a 10-foot wide utility easement on one side only. This also can be approved only with a variance. Fire/Rescue: 29 September 2004: approved as submitted. Health: 30 September 2004: approved as submitted. Growth Management: 20 April 2005: approved with conditions: 1. Staff was unable to identify the Property Tax ID Number to the Cover Sheet. Please provide evidence that the number listed on the plat is correct or modify the plat to reflect the actual parcel number. SJRWMD: # , issue date: 3 October 2003 (copy in file). Traffic: 21 October 2004: see Engineering comments above. 911: 30 September 2004: approved as submitted. 4/22/05,12:04 PM 6

7 BLACKHEATH PARK, SP RS-1, 22 lots, acres, Located on Willyoung Road of f Blackrock Road, Yulee area. Developer: Submitted plans: 21 April 2005, distributed: 26 April Building: 26 April 2005: awaiting comment. Computerized Data: 26 April 2005: to be received and approved by GIS prior to DRC approval Concurrency: awaiting developers response. Engineering: 26 April 2005: awaiting comment. Fire/Rescue: 26 April 2005: awaiting comment. Health: 26 April 2005: awaiting comment. Growth Management: 26 April 2005: awaiting comment. SJRWMD: 21 April 2005: application filed. Traffic: 26 April 2005: awaiting comment. BLACKHEATH PARK, PLAT RS-1, 22 lots, acres, Located on Willyoung Road of f Blackrock Road, Yulee area. Developer: Submitted plans: 21 April 2005, distributed: 26 April Building: 26 April 2005: awaiting comment. Computerized Data: 26 April 2005: to be received and approved by GIS prior to DRC approval Concurrency: awaiting developers response. Engineering: 26 April 2005: awaiting comment. Fire/Rescue: 26 April 2005: awaiting comment. Health: 26 April 2005: awaiting comment. Growth Management: 26 April 2005: awaiting comment. SJRWMD: 21 April 2005: application filed. Traffic: 26 April 2005: awaiting comment 911:. 26 April 2005: awaiting comment BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF NASSAU COUNTY, SP OR, acres, 22,635 sq. ft.. Located on the west side of CR107 between Christy Court and Lars Lane, Fernandina Beach area. Developer: Submitted plans: 2 December 2004, distributed: 7 December Re-Submittal: 17 February 2005, distributed: 22 February Building: 1 March 2005: approved as submitted. Computerized Data: 7 December 2004: to be received and approved by GIS prior to DRC approval Concurrency: awaiting developers response. Engineering: 4 March 2005: approved as submitted. Fire/Rescue: 24 February 2005: approved as submitted. Health: 19 January 2005: approved as submitted.. Growth Management: 4 March 2005: 1. Signage for the OR, Open Rural zoning district is limited to thirty-tow (32) square feet. Signage proposed exceeds the regulation contained in Section of the Nassau County Zoning Code. 2. Please provide a letter to explain how the wetlands are determined. SJRWMD: # , issue date: 21 March 2005 Traffic: 4 March 2005: approved as submitted. BUCKHEAD, Phase II, plat 72 lot PUD, acres, Ford Road, Bryceville Developer: Submitted plans: 23 January 2004, distributed: 27 January Re-submittal: 9December 2004, distributed: 14 December Building: 23 February 2004: approved as submitted. Computerized Data: 27 January 2004: to be received and approved by GIS prior to DRC approval Concurrency: 2 January 2003: Final Certificate of Concurrency w/ Conditions approved. Engineering: 30 December 2004: approved with condition: 1. The radaii of the two temporary Cul de Sacs be increased to 60 feet. Fire/Rescue: 28 January 2004: approved as submitted. Health: 15 December 2004: 1. Average lot width shall be 100' wide per lot. 2. Completed site plan review application with $ review fee required prior to final approval. Growth Management: 20 December 2004: approved as submitted. SJRWMD: application dated 27 January 2004, copy in file Traffic: 27 January 2004: awaiting comment 911: 30 December 2004: see Engineering comments. 4/22/05,12:04 PM 7

8 CALLAHAN CHURCH OF GOD, SP Open Rural, Final Order issued 21 July 2004, 2 Buildings (25, 096 square feet), 166 parking space, Developer: Submitted plans: 22 July 2004, distributed: 27 July Re-Submittal: 9 December 2004, distributed: 14 December Building: 28 July 2004: approved as submitted. Computerized Data: 27 July 2004: to be received and approved by GIS prior to DRC approval Concurrency: 17 August 2004: Modification to Final Certificate of Concurrency with Conditions issued. Engineering: 10 January 2005: approved with condition; NEW COMMENT#18. The plans indicate a sodded spillway for the retention/detention pond. With a maximum discharge of 6.98 cfs, there is a strong potential for erosion. This weir should have a concrete cut off wall in it or heavy riprap on the outside slope. Fire/Rescue: 15 December 2004: approved as submitted. Health: 15 December 2004: 1. Need OSTDS and well permits. 2. Please submit completed site plan review application with $ review fee. 3. Contact Jim Schoelen for annual LUWS permit and sampling. Growth Management: 20 December 2004: approved as submitted. SJRWMD: # issue date: 9 March Traffic: 10 January 2005: approved with condition (see Engineering comments) CARTESIAN POINTE, UNIT III, PLAT PUD, acres, 73 lots, William Burgess Road, Yulee area. Developer: Submitted plans: 21 January 2005, distributed: 1 February Building: 3 February 2005: approved as submitted. Computerized Data: 1 February 2005: to be submitted and approved prior to DRC approval Concurrency: 1 February 2005: awaiting developers response. Engineering: 1 February 2005: 1. All dates on the cover sheet are for 2004 and should be adjusted to the New Year. 2. The notary statement for Fairfield Financial is for a Georgia notary, is that correct? 3. Lots 58 and 59 are the only lots encumbered by wetland and they should have the net lot area identified on the lots. 4. There should be an elevation reference point within the project identified for a reference in setting the house first floor elevations. 5. Note #9 probably should be omitted for this phase. 6. Be sure and verify your elevation references, earlier phases had elevation errors that caused problems. Fire/Rescue: 2 February 2005: approved as submitted. Health: 2 February 2005: approved as submitted. Growth Management : 17 February 2005: 1. Lots One (1) and Two (2) do not meet the minimum lot area of eight thousand seven hundred (8,700) square feet for single family units. [Section VIII, PUD Special Conditions, Subsection F.(1)b. of the Cartesian Point PUD Conditions] Traffic: 1 February 2005: see Engineering comments. SJRWMD: # : issue date 27 May : 2 February 2005: approved as submitted. COLLEGE PARKWAY, SP Roadway passing through Wooten property between CR107 and Woodbridge PUD, Fernandina Beach area. Developer: Submitted plans: 3 March 2005, distributed: 8 March Computerized Data: 8 March 2005: to be submitted and approved prior to DRC approval. Engineering: 15 March 2005: 1. Both detention ponds have vertical sides and will need a fence around each pond. There should be a detail for the vertical wall. 2. The vertical wall of both ponds will be within 5 foot of adjacent homeowners. If you need to enter adjoining land during construction, there should temporary construction easement or other permission granted. 3. It would appear that the silt fence should be on the outside of the ponds instead of between the ponds and the street? 4. Silt fences are shown on only one side of the street, normally they should be on both sides to prevent erosion. Please provide an explanation as to why the second row of silt fence should not be required. 5. The structures are labeled on the plans, but the pipe numbers have been omitted in the plan view, please add the identifications numbers. 6. On Sheet 5, there is annotation to remove the existing headwall on CR107. This notation is not on Sheet 9. And the cross section at 499=20 is not clear as to the disposition of this headwall. Will it be removed and if so, what will replace it. 7. On Sheet 6, add a point elevation at the end of the pavement for each street stub, preferably in the center of the stub end. It is important that the stubs be installed so as to prevent storm either entering or leaving the street via the street stubs. 8. On Sheet 9, there are street cross 4/22/05,12:04 PM 8

9 sections referred to as A, B and C shown on the plan view. These cross sections are located on Sheet 3. Please add a notation on each of the three cross sections lines on Sheet 9 referring to the Sheet 3 for the detail. 9. On Sheet 9, the cross section "498=72"identifies a vertical object, possibly a head wall. Please explain the design and purpose and include a detail on the plans. 10. On the above-referred cross section there appears to be the top of a structure extending above the shoulder, which would be a serious traffic hazard. Please explain the design or revise it to remove the danger. 11. At cross section 499=20, it appears that there will still be flow from outside of the right of way flowing to the road right of way and there is no provision for this flow to drain anywhere. 12. On Sheet 3 at Section A-A, 5.5 inches of compacted lime rock sub base is proposed instead of the standard 8" of compacted sub grade. Please justify the substitution and the limits of the change. 13. On Sheet 5, there are two S-11's and two S-18's, please correct those in error. 14. There are no flow computations for pipes P15 to P19, P25 and P31, they should be added to the tabulation sheet. 15. There are no flow computation for the S31 to S32, which is the threee-pipe transfer pipe under the roadway, and those computations should be added. 16. There are no flows calculations for flow from S16 and "S11" to S18 and these computations should be added. 17. On Sheet 5, there are shaded areas of the roadway; however there is no entry in the legend to explain the shading and it should be added. 18. The ICPR program models the discharge from Pond 1 downstream 180 feet. The computations do not include flows from the upstream end of the highway pipe on both ends, thus the computation is not correct and should be revised. 19. The invert of the weir for Pond 2 is 12.60' in the ICPR program and 14.35' in the basin calculations in the same report. Please explain the difference. 20. The invert of the weir for Pond 1 is 11.30' in the ICPR program and 12.15' in the basin calculations in the same report. Please explain the difference. 21. There is no summary table listing the predevelopment and post development flows for the 5, 10 and 25-year events. These results should be computed and added to the report. The five-year can be omitted since the storm sewers are designed for 10-year events. 22. S- 1 asphalt is being gradually phased out; the replacement will be sp-12.5 (superwave). The County is currently revising its specifications to require Sp-12.5 instead of S-1. We request that you revise your plans to specify SP It is our understanding that FDOT will not verify batch plant standards for S-1 and you will need an independent evaluation if you prefer S-1 asphalt. 23. The drives and road on the East side of CR107 are shown only faintly, but it appears there may be some conflicts. Christy Lane will also be an entrance to the Boys and Girls Club and may significant traffic, plus the County is concerned that there might be possible safety hazards. Lars Lane also serves a few homes and is also a concern. Please add more information on these two access points and what design provisions are possible to ensure maximum safety entering the highway from each road. 24. A letter and numbers on the Sheets identify the structures, but the pipe segments were not identified and the identification letter and number should be added for each pipe. 25. All pipe segments under the pavement must be HDPE of RCP, Class V pipe. Please adjust your pipe table accordingly. 26. The Parkway splits into two lanes on the North side of the roadway as it approaches CR107. One of these lanes should be identified as left turn only or right turn only. 27. At the end of the roadway, there should be an end of road treatment unless it is certain that the subdivision streets will be completed concurrently with this road. 28. On the island near the end of the roadway add a R4-7 sign on the median nearest the end of the road. Fire/Rescue: 14 March 2005: approved as submitted. Growth Management: 18 March 2005: 1. Please include the legal description of the site on the site engineering plans. [Section b. Nassau County Development Review Regulations]. 2. Include the present zoning of the subject site on the engineering plans. [Section b Nassau County Development Review Regulations]. 3. Please indicate the adjacent land uses on the site engineering plans. [Section v Nassau County Development Review Regulations] Traffic: 8 March 2005: awaiting comment. CRAWFORD - SOUTH 14TH STREET, SP CI -.64 acres / 6,580 square feet retail/contractor shop with associated parking. Developer: Submitted plans: 30 August 2004, distributed: 7 September Re-Submittal: 18 November 2004, distributed: 23 November Re-Submittal: 21 January 2005, distributed: 1 February Building: 3 February 2005: approved as submitted. Computerized Data: 7 September 2004: to be submitted and approved prior to DRC approval Concurrency: 7 September 2004: awaiting developer's response. Engineering: 1 February 2005: approved as submitted. Fire Rescue: 23 November 2004: approved as submitted. Health: 11 October 2004: approved as submitted. Growth Management: 3 December 2004: approved as submitted. SJRWMD: 27 August 2004: application filed. 4/22/05,12:04 PM 9

10 Traffic: 1 February 2005: approved as submitted. FIRST BAPTIST CHURCH OF GRAY GABLES, SP acres, 10,000 square feet, Conditional Use application #E East side of US1, north of Church Road, Callahan area. Developer: Submitted plans: 17 February 2005, distributed: 1 March Building: 7 March 2005: approved as submitted. Computerized Data: 1 March 2005: to be received and approved by GIS prior to DRC approval Concurrency: 3 March 2005: Final Certificate of Concurrency Granted w/ Conditions Engineering: 10 March 2005: 1. The construction plans should be sealed by a Florida Professional Engineer on the cover sheet for review an on all sheets on the approved set of plans. The plans submitted were not signed and sealed on the cover sheet. They have been reviewed as a courtesy but future submittals should be sealed. 2. The location map on the cover sheet is too fuzzy to be readable and should be corrected so that it is easily readable. 3. The drainage area being detained as per the computations is 5.47 acres; the site area on the review-tracking sheet is acres. An explanation should be provided in the computations explaining why the entire area is not included in the design. 4. For clarity the area being submitted for review should be clearly outlined in the plans with dimensions as much as possible. 5. Pond 1 is located on the opposite side of a fence from the church. The church property should be identified so that it is clear that the pond is to be constructed on church property. 6. On Sheet 6 and 7 a portion of the notes shown on Sheet 4 are repeated. The partial notes on Sheets 6 and 7 should be removed so that there is no confusion with the notes on Sheets The small parking area has notations referring to both "grass parking" and "asphalt". Please identify those portions of the small parking lot that is to be asphalt or grass. 8. The plans have only two general notes, generally there are several notes referring to safety laws, as builts, contractor responsibility, elevation datum used as reference on all construction plans, etc. More notes should be added. 9. There should be a silt fences surrounded the affected area and erosion control notes and details in the plans. 10. There should be an asphalt parking lot construction detail with types of materials and thickness. 11. The striping plans, stop signs and stop bars should be more clearly identified and details added. 12. Sheet 6 identifies a new culvert under a driveway entrance. Flow computations should be provided for this pipe. DRAINAGE: 13. The detention volumes were determined using OF TREE O CENTER program based on a modified rational method. Apparently your design is based on using the drain down orifice as the primarily discharge for the pond with sump pumps pumping from the outlet structure to the discharge weir or discharge pipe, as exhibited by the fact that the discharge elevation for Pond 1 is always lower the weir elevation of feet. This small orifice is a requirement of SJRWMD and is used to return the water level to a normal water level after it rains; it is not part of the detention design. Furthermore, the design requires that this flow be pumped out of the ponds. Due to the possibility of power failure during a storm, this method would not be allowed in the design of storm water detention. The pond detention basin begins at the elevation of the outlet weir. 14. The hydrograph is used in detention computation is very steep and not similar to those commonly used in this area. Please identify the hydrograph title and why it was used for design. 15. For Pond 1, the computation indicate a weir elevation of 20.00, the notation on Sheet 7 indicate an invert elevation of 15.00? 16. Sheet 7 also indicate that there is a discharge weir detail, but none could be found in the plans. 17. County ordinances require that there be a legal positive discharge from the detention pond. Pond 2 has such a discharge, but Pond 1 appears to discharge into an open field and then drain into a depressed area. Provide information explaining how there is an acceptable discharge point from the site. 18. The outlet control structure for the ponds on Sheet 11 has no dimensions; the height, width, length, thickness, top and bottom elevations should be added. Also the outside ground elevations should be added. 19. There appear to be another storm sewer extending from S1 upstream shown on the plans. Why is it not included in the flow computations: 20. The storm Cad results should also include the pipe invert elevations on the printout. 21. The storm sewer design is based on a tail water elevation of 20.00, when the pond is redesigned, the sewer design should be recomputed with the higher tail water elevation. 22. The construction plans should indicate the normal and 25-year rain surface elevation and the surface area for both events on the plans. 23. There should be a notation on the plans that the detention basin must have a 4:1 or greater slope. 24. Pond 1 appears to be designed to allow surface water to enter the pond over the berm, this is undesirable as it encourages erosion. Is that your intention? 25. The weir elevation should be clearly identified on the structure detail for Pond 2, the diameter and invert should be identified. 27. The water levels in the pond should be also shown on the structure detail. 28. Fire/Rescue: 3 March 2005: 1. On the fire lane sign, delete the word "marshall" and replace with the word "department". 2. All drive isles, between parking spaces, shall be paved for emergency vehicle access to the automobiles so that access can be made in all weather conditions. 4/22/05,12:04 PM 10

11 Health: 15 March 2005: 1. Setbacks shall be in accordance with 64E-6, 64E-8, and 40C Septic & well permits are required with fees. 3. Floor plan showing plumbing fixtures, seating capacity and sq. ft. of building. 4. Please submit $ site plan review fee, $45.00 previously submitted with application, total fee required $ Growth Management: 7 March 2005: 1. Identify all adjacent land uses. [Section v Nassau County Development Review Committee]. Traffic: 10 March 2005: see Engineering comments. DRC: Final Order issued: 28 October GATE FOOD POST, SP IW w/ Conditional Use, 5,050 sq. ft. convenience store, 1,005 sq. ft automatic car wash, 1,280 sq. ft. express drive-thru car lube facility. Developer: Submitted plans: 19 April 2005, distributed: 26 April Building: 26 April 2005: awaiting comment. Computerized Data: 26 April 2005: to be received and approved by GIS prior to DRC approval Concurrency: 26 April 2005: to be verified by Engineering. Engineering: 26 April 2005: awaiting comment. Fire/Rescue: 26 April 2005: awaiting comment. Health: 26 April 2005: awaiting comment. Growth Management: 26 April 2005: awaiting comment. SJRWMD: # , issue date: 9 November Traffic: 26 April 2005: awaiting comment. GOODBREAD SHOOTING RANGE, SP acres, clubhouse, skeet/clay/pigeon shooting range. East side of Goodbread Road between Hamilton Street and Goodbread Lane. Developer: Submitted plans: 23 January 2004, distributed: 27 January Re-submitted plans: 8 April 2004, distributed: 13 April Re-Submittal: 23 September 2004, distributed: 28 September Building: 14 April 2004: approved as submitted. Computerized Data: 27 January 2004: to be received and approved by GIS prior to DRC approval Concurrency: 27 January 2004: to be determined through permitting. Engineering: 29 April 2004: approved as submitted. Fire/Rescue: 29 September 2004: approved as submitted. Health: 30 September 2004: 1. Need engineer OSTDS. 2. Need engineer schematic of water system. 3. Need fees and applications for water & OSTDS permits (4). Growth Management: 29 September 2004: approved as submitted. SJRWMD: # issue date: 19 May Traffic: 29 April 2004: approved as submitted. DRC: Final Order issued: 23 September HERON ISLES, PHASE 1B, SP PUD, 290 lots, acres, Chester Road, 2200' north of Pages Dairy Road, SR200/A1A, Yulee area. Developer: Submitted plans: 19 April 2005, distributed: 26 April Building: 26 April 2005: awaiting comment. Computerized Data: 26 April 2005: to be received and approved by GIS prior to DRC approval Concurrency: 26 April 2005: to be verified by Engineering Department Engineering: 26 April 2005: awaiting comment Fire/Rescue: 26 April 2005: awaiting comment Growth Management: 26 April 2005: awaiting comment SJRWMD: # issue date: 7 October Traffic: 26 April 2005: awaiting comment HERON ISLES, PHASE 2, SP PUD, acres, 348 lots, Chester Road, 2200' north of Pages Dairy Road, SR200/A1A, Yulee area. Developer: Submitted plans: 7 January 2005, distributed: 18 January Re-Submittal: 19 April 2005, distributed: 26 April Building: 3 February 2005: approved as submitted. Computerized Data: 18 January 2005: to be received and approved by GIS prior to DRC approval Concurrency: 18 January 2005: to be verified by Engineering 4/22/05,12:04 PM 11

12 Engineering: 17 January 2005: 1. The interior streets scale as 50-foot right of way. 50-foot right of ways are only allowed when there is a minimum of a five foot wide utility easement on each side of the street, otherwise, the right of way must be 60 feet wide. The street, except for the Parkway, should be identified as 50-foot wide and the utility easements shown and identified on both sides of all streets. 2. All Cul de sac radii should be identified, the minimum right of way radius is 60-feet and the minimum paved radius is 50-feet. 3. On sheet 2 and 3, the boundary of Phase 2 should be clearly outlined and identified with metes and bounds information except for wetland areas. 4. The Round-a-Bout is designed with one lane almost unaffected, how will this affect traffic when the South lane is traveling faster than the North lane. Perhaps the speed limit should be lowered on the South side at this intersection? 5. Also the turns into Graylon Drive have no transition distances in the curves. There will be a conflict between cars trying to switch lanes to enter the two segments of Graylon Drive. Perhaps there should be a separate right turn lane from the North lane onto Graylon? 6. A traffic report is needed for Starfish Drive to determine if turn lanes are required at this intersection. It should be noted that there will be a shopping center on the West side of Chester Road and on one of the main entrances will be located about 300 feet South of Starfish drive on the opposite side of the street. 7. Since the street centerline curve table is centralized on one sheet, there should be page references to this table on other sheets with the curve symbols so that the correct radaii can be easily located. 8. Breezeway Court has 29 lots and requires a two access points. An entrance with a median and a minimum of 20 feet between lanes will qualify as two access points. 9. Most centerline curves are identified but there are several that are not identified, specifically there are two curves unidentified on Bridge Way Court. 10. The Cul de sac identified as Breezeway Court will need to be renamed as it's name is identical with the adjoining street name. 11. The developers address and phone number should be shown on the cover sheet. 12. On sheet 10, under general notes, remove note #10 as the typical sections in the plans will govern the design. 13. Also in all the notes on Sheet 10 references to "County" should be replaces with "Nassau County". 14. There should be annotation that the contractors assume full responsibility for compliance with all state and/or Federal safety laws. 15. In note 31 on Sheet 10, identify the specific elevation datum to be a reference for this project. 16. There should be a grading plans and type of grading specified for each lot. 17. The gross and net area of each lot should be identified on the plans. 20. Handicap crossings should be identified on the plans. 18. The minimum first floor elevations should be identified for each lot. 19. Traffic signs are shown on the plans, but stop bars and striping omitted and should be added, also thermoplastic striping should be identified on the plans. 20. Handicap crossings should be identified on the plans. 21. Plans should reflect that sidewalks are required on both sides of all streets. 22. If the interior streets have a 50-foot right of way width, then the 60-foot typical street detail on Sheet 34 should be removed. 23. The MOT shown on Sheet 17 should have a street name added to identify its location. 24. The water main tap detail shown on Sheet 17 should specify that the water main will be bored in accordance with Nassau County standards and that a Nassau County permit is required. 25. Jurisdictional buffers should be identified and a buffer area table added to the plans. 26. The construction of the Parkway in Phase One ends at about station 24+00, the profiles in these plans begin at station The street profiles between and seem to be missing. These profiles should be added and 200 feet of the existing street in Phase One also shown in the plans. DRAINAGE: 27. The ICPR program could only be reviewed in a general manner because the pond identification system on the plans is different than the one used in the computations. Please revise the plans or computation so that he system of identifying the ponds and other structures is identical on both. Further review will be conducted when the revised data is re submitted. 28. All of the sub basins in the program used a minimum time of concentration of 20 minutes. Nassau County's drainage ordinance provides for a minimum time of concentration of 10 minutes, any larger Tc must be justified by computations of the travel time. 29. It should be noted that for the subdivision with small lots the consensus of engineers in Nassau County is to use a curve number in the high 60's or low 70's. 30. The ICPR calculations should be identified by the rain event, i.e., 5 year, 10 year, etc. The computations are not identified and the only method of determining what rain event is intended is to examine the rainfall amount used in the computations. 31. There should be a summary in the report of pre development and post development flows for the entire project. The total post development flow must be less than the pre development flow for the 5, 10 and 25 year rain events. 32. Storm sewer computations also use a minimum time of concentration of 20 minutes. Again, the County ordinance allows a minimum time of concentration of 10 minutes, any larger number must be justified by calculations. 33. Nassau's County reference for Rainfall intensity is the Zone 4 chart from FDOT's Hydrology handbook. Any intensity generating equation should produces results consistent with this chart. 34. Pond references in the storm sewer calculations should be consistent with both the ICPR program and the construction plans. 35. There is a requirement in the ordinance that the center half of all streets should not be flooded during a 25 year rain event. There should be computations for the storm sewers for a 25 year rain to verify or ensure that the streets are not flooded in excess of the ordinance. 36. All storm sewers under paved area shall be RCP, Class V or "Hardy" pipe. 37. There 4/22/05,12:04 PM 12

13 should be a culvert added under the Parkway at Blackrock Road to connect the existing road swales. There should also be a culvert on Starfish County adjacent to Chester Road to connect those swales. Fire/Rescue: 20 January 2005: 1. On Heron Isles Parkway provide a fire hydrant at the intersection of Heron Isles Parkway and Blackrock Road. 2. Provide a fire hydrant at station #59+00 on Heron Isles Parkway. 3. Provide a fire hydrant between lots #622 & # Delete the fire hydrant between lots #621 & # Provide a fire hydrant between lots #611 & # Delete the fire hydrant between lots #613 & # Provide a fire hydrant at lot #592 in the radius of the intersection. 8. Delete the fire hydrant between lots #596 & # Provide a fire hydrant at lot #448 in the radius of the intersection. 10. Delete the fire hydrant in front of lake C Provide a fire hydrant between lots #581 & # Delete the fire hydrant between lots #450 & # Provide a fire hydrant between lots #466 & # Delete the fire hydrant in front of lot # Delete the fire hydrant between lots #471 & # Provide a fire hydrant between lots #476 & # Provide a fire hydrant between lots #526 & # Delete the fire hydrant between lots #527 & # Provide a fire hydrant between lots #534 & # Delete the fire hydrant in front of lot # Delete the fire hydrant between lots #587 & # Delete the fire hydrant between lots #504 & # Delete the fire hydrant between lots #482 & # Delete the fire hydrant between lots 3488 & Provide a fire hydrant at the intersection of Chester Road and Starfish Drive in the radius of lot # Delete the fire hydrant between lots #305 & # Provide a fire hydrant between lots #302 & # Delete the fire hydrant in front of lot # Delete the fire hydrant between lots #295 & # Provide a fire hydrant between lots #293 & # Provide a fire hydrant at the intersection of Sunwood Court and Commodore Point Drive in the radius of lot # Move the fire hydrant at lot #400 to the radius of the intersection of Bass Lane and Commodore Point Dr. 33. New fire hydrant(s) shall be installed so that 4 1/2 inch port is facing roadway by which it is accessed. Hydrant(s) shall be positioned not more than 7 feet 6 inches away from curb or berm of the roadway. Growth Management: 28 January 2005: 1. Include the number of units that are proposed. [Section d Nassau County Development Review Regulations]. 2. The wetland buffer at Lot 204 at Lot 312 does not meet the minimum twenty-five (25) feet width requirement. [Section 6.5 Nassau County Development Review Regulations]. 3. Please include the location of any on-site lighting and signs. [Section l Nassau County Development Review Regulations]. 4. Please include an environmental survey prepared by an environmental professional acceptable to the County to determine the presence of threatened or endangered species. [Section p Nassau County Development Review Regulations]. SJRWMD: 7 September 2004: application filed. Traffic: 18 January 2005: see Engineering comments. HERON POINTE, SP lot subdivision with cul-de-sac, 2.32 acres. RS-1. At end of Marian Drive, Fernandina Beach area. Developer: Submitted plans: 31 October 2003, distributed: 4 November Re-Submittal: 31 December 2003, distributed: 6 January Re-Submittal: 8 April 2004, distributed: 13 April Re-Submittal: 12 July 2004, distributed: 20 July Re-Submittal: 23 September 2004, distributed: 28 September Re-Submittal: 18 November 2004, distributed: 23 November Building: 8 January 2004: approved as submitted. Computerized Data: to be received and approved by GIS prior to DRC approval Concurrency: Final Certificate of Concurrency with Conditions issued 6 January Engineering: 31 March 2004: approved as submitted. This approval does not waive any other County design requirements, unless specifically approved by the Engineering Services department. Fire/Rescue: 6 November 2003: approved as submitted. Health: exempt, will review plat Growth Management: 1 December 2004: approved as submitted. SJRWMD: application dated 30 October 2003 (copy in file) Traffic: 31 March 2004: approved as submitted. This approval does not waive any other County design requirements, unless specifically approved by the Engineering Services department. GMC: 21 January 2004: copy of letter from Engineering Services to EOR denying request for waiver from sidewalk requirements along Marian Drive. Engineering Services directs EOR to BOCC for relief from this requirement. HERON POINTE, plat 3 lot subdivision with cul-de-sac, 2.32 acres. RS-1. At end of Marian Drive, Fernandina Beach area. Developer: Submitted plans: 31 October 2003, distributed: 4 November Re-Submittal: 31 December 2003, distributed: 6 January Re-Submitted plans: 8 April 2004, distributed: 13 April 4/22/05,12:04 PM 13