STATUS OF REVIEW: ENGINEER ACKNOWLEDGED INFO COMMENT

Transcription

1 PROJECT NAME: SOUTHERN PIG AND CATTLE COMPANY PROJECT NUMBER: APPLICATION: MAJOR SITE PLAN #14999 Met with staff 12/11/14, DRC on 12/15/14 1. DEPARTMENT: ENGDRN - STORMWATER REVIEW REVIEW ITEM: C - Discharge Conditions REMARKS: Coordinate with FDOT if discharge from the proposed site is contributing to the FDOT stormwater system. 2. DEPARTMENT: ENGIN - DEVELOPMENT REVIEW REVIEW ITEM: K - List of approved waivers, their conditions, and the date of approval REMARKS: Add waivers if requested in the future. 3. DEPARTMENT: ENGIN - DEVELOPMENT REVIEW REVIEW ITEM: Additional Development Review Comments REMARKS: After approval, plans will be electronically stamped by the county. The applicant will receive an indicating that approved plans are available for download and are located in the eplans project Approved folder. For Development Review submittals, with the exception of Final Plats and Minor Site Plans, applicants are required to print, obtain required signatures, and sign and seal two 24 x 36 sets of the electronically stamped approved plan and deliver them to the Office of County Engineer, Development Review Section, located at 412 SE 25th Avenue Ocala, FL Upon receipt, a development order will be issued. Until such time as that development order is issued, the project does not have final approval and construction, if applicable, shall not commence. For plans requiring As-Builts, As-Builts and associated documentation shall be submitted on paper in accordance with current county requirements. 4. DEPARTMENT: UTIL - MARION COUNTY UTILITIES REVIEW ITEM: Project is located within other private or municipal utility service area. REMARKS: Project is within Countywide utilities service area. Please confirm water and sewer availability 5. DEPARTMENT: FRMSH - FIRE MARSHAL REVIEW REVIEW ITEM: Access Control Box REMARKS: Will need to install (FYI) 6. DEPARTMENT: FRMSH - FIRE MARSHAL REVIEW REVIEW ITEM: Additional Fire comments REMARKS: Will need to comply with NFPA 1 Chapter Building Safety Radio Enhancement System prior to CO (FYI)

2 7. DEPARTMENT: LUCURR - LAND USE CURRENT REVIEW REVIEW ITEM: / B - Comp Plan Future Thoroughfares R/W Provided (TE Map)? REMARKS: Comp Plan designates SR 200 as Urban Principal Arterial. 8. DEPARTMENT: LUCURR - LAND USE CURRENT REVIEW REVIEW ITEM: B & D/ [Cross/Parallel Access Required/Suitable?] REMARKS: Plan doesn't indicate parallel access. Has it been provided via other or prior public easements? 9. DEPARTMENT: MANAGEMENT REVIEW ITEM: Legal description matches boundary on plan REMARKS: Incorrect parcel number listed on application. Parcels and should be used for this plan. 10. DEPARTMENT: MANAGEMENT REVIEW ITEM: Additional 911 comments REMARKS: Address will be assigned to this restaurant during the permitting stage. 11. DEPARTMENT: ENGSUR - SURVEY REVIEW REVIEW ITEM: F.(2) - Surveyor and Mapper certification REMARKS: Please change 'MINIMUM TECHNICAL STANDARDS' to "STANDARDS OF PRACTICE" per Chapter Section 1. Section , Florida Statutes. 12. DEPARTMENT: ENGDRN - STORMWATER REVIEW REVIEW ITEM: Topographical Contours REMARKS: Provide topographic information on site plan (sheet 2 of 11) to better evaluate the grades. 13. DEPARTMENT: ENGDRN - STORMWATER REVIEW REVIEW ITEM: /10 - Existing Drainage Right-of-Way/Easements REMARKS: What does Benefitted Parcel for Drainage Easement Agreement: cover, please provide a copy of this agreement. 14. DEPARTMENT: ENGDRN - STORMWATER REVIEW REVIEW ITEM: /10 - Proposed Drainage Right-of-Way/Easements REMARKS: Will a drainage easement be need for conveyance system from proposed street on north side of site that discharges into the site drainage system. 15. DEPARTMENT: ENGDRN - STORMWATER REVIEW REVIEW ITEM: /14/15 - General Exhibits REMARKS: Provide a summary description of the associated soil shown on the Soil Map. Also, provide the National Wetland Inventory Map. 2

3 16. DEPARTMENT: ENGDRN - STORMWATER REVIEW REVIEW ITEM: Stormwater Maintenance Entity REMARKS: Provide statement identifying the legal body responsible for the stormwater maintenance. 17. DEPARTMENT: ENGDRN - STORMWATER REVIEW REVIEW ITEM: C - Geotechnical Investigation Report REMARKS: Provide signed & sealed Geotechnical Investigation Report. 18. DEPARTMENT: ENGDRN - STORMWATER REVIEW REVIEW ITEM: Geotechnical Criteria REMARKS: Provided soil boring results show the test were preformed to a depth of 8 feet which will be approximately 4 feet below the proposed DRA bottom, LDC requires a minimum depth of 10 feet below the proposed DRA bottom. Provide test results to a depth 10 feet below the proposed DRA or base the pond design conditions on the provided soil test results. 19. DEPARTMENT: ENGDRN - STORMWATER REVIEW REVIEW ITEM: A(1)/(2) - Contributing Basins/Tc REMARKS: Please evaluate if any off site area is contributing to the proposed drainage system, also show the time of concentration and travel path for the contributing basin. 20. DEPARTMENT: ENGDRN - STORMWATER REVIEW REVIEW ITEM: A(3) - Retention/Detention Area Design Parameters REMARKS: Provide dimensions or coordinates for the proposed DRA. Clarify the Typical Dry Retention Pond Detail on sheet 5 of 11, will all construction be within the property limits. The typical cross section must also include the design high water elevation, estimated seasonal high water elevation, and appropriate vegetative cover. 21. DEPARTMENT: ENGDRN - STORMWATER REVIEW REVIEW ITEM: Type of Stormwater Facility Criteria STATUS OF REVIEW: STAFF RECOMMENDS APPROVAL OF WAIVER FOR REDUCTION OF INTERIOR MAINTENANCE BERM FROM 5 FEET WIDE TO 2 FEET WIDE REMARKS: Provide a minimum 5 feet wide stabilized berm around the DRA Perimeter. 22. DEPARTMENT: ENGDRN - STORMWATER REVIEW REVIEW ITEM: Stormwater Quantity Criteria REMARKS: Provide the 100-year 24-hour pre and post development storm event analysis. 23. DEPARTMENT: ENGDRN - STORMWATER REVIEW REVIEW ITEM: B(6) - Freeboard REMARKS: Pending calculations for the 100-ear, 24-hour storm event. 3

4 24. DEPARTMENT: ENGDRN - STORMWATER REVIEW REVIEW ITEM: D - Recovery Analysis REMARKS: Provide calculations showing the proposed DRA recovers within 14 days following the design rainfall event (100-yr, 24-hr event). Justify input parameters (porosity, base of aquifer elevation, water table elevation, pond bottom elevation). 25. DEPARTMENT: ENGDRN - STORMWATER REVIEW REVIEW ITEM: Stormwater Conveyance Criteria REMARKS: Provide calculations demonstrating the conveyance system is designed for the 25- year, 24-hour storm event with the 25-year, 24-hour tailwater condition. 26. DEPARTMENT: ENGDRN - STORMWATER REVIEW REVIEW ITEM: B(5) - Hydraulic Analysis REMARKS: Provide hydraulic stormwater model analysis including all input parameters, supporting calculations, assumptions, documentation for design and results. 27. DEPARTMENT: ENGDRN - STORMWATER REVIEW REVIEW ITEM: B(3) - Lane Spread Calculations REMARKS: Provide lane spread calculation for proposed access road on north side of project. 28. DEPARTMENT: ENGDRN - STORMWATER REVIEW REVIEW ITEM: B(7) - Minimum Pipe Size STATUS OF REVIEW: STAFF RECOMMENDS APPROVAL OF WAIVER FOR REDUCTION OF PIPE SIZE FROM 18 INCHES DIAMETER TO 8 INCHES FOR DISCHARGE WITH ITEMS 1), 2), & 3) REMARKS: A waiver for pipes under 18 inches in diameter will be needed, Stormwater will support a waiver to an 8 diameter pipe for discharge. Please provide the following notes or information for the pipe material specified that is not RCP pipe: 1.) it shall be supplied from a producer that has an FDOT accepted quality control plan. 2.) List the class type and 3.) The service life. 29. DEPARTMENT: ENGDRN - STORMWATER REVIEW REVIEW ITEM: A(5) - Existing/Proposed Stormwater Structures REMARKS: Inlets along the proposed access road at the north are labeled with the same inlet number. The inverts on these inlets are lower than inlet #2 which they tie into and will cause water to stand in the pipe network from the access road. Please provide reference or detail for the proposed structures. 30. DEPARTMENT: ENGDRN - STORMWATER REVIEW REVIEW ITEM: A(7) - Existing/Proposed Stormwater Swales REMARKS: Provide cross section of all proposed swales. 4

5 31. DEPARTMENT: ENGDRN - STORMWATER REVIEW REVIEW ITEM: Grading Criteria REMARKS: Provide additional grade along the project boundary. 32. DEPARTMENT: ENGDRN - STORMWATER REVIEW REVIEW ITEM: A(11)(a) - Construction Entrance REMARKS: Provide construction entrance location, controls and detail or source. 33. DEPARTMENT: ENGDRN - STORMWATER REVIEW REVIEW ITEM: A(11)(b) - Erosion Control REMARKS: Provide limits of silt fence, turbidity barrier and other perimeter or intermediate controls and reference to a detail or source. 34. DEPARTMENT: ENGDRN - STORMWATER REVIEW REVIEW ITEM: B - Copy of NPDES Permit or NOI REMARKS: Provide a copy of the NPDES permit or NOI. 35. DEPARTMENT: ENGDRN - STORMWATER REVIEW REVIEW ITEM: Karst Topography and High Recharge Areas REMARKS: Are there any karst features on the project site or with 200 feet of the project boundary. Please provide a Geologic Analysis. 36. DEPARTMENT: ENGDRN - STORMWATER REVIEW REVIEW ITEM: Drainage Construction Specifications REMARKS: Provide construction specifications for at minimum the proposed access road on the north side of the project site. 37. DEPARTMENT: ENGDRN - STORMWATER REVIEW REVIEW ITEM: Operation and Maintenance REMARKS: Provide Operation and Maintenance documentation. 38. DEPARTMENT: ENGDRN - STORMWATER REVIEW REVIEW ITEM: Additional Stormwater comments REMARKS: A full review has not been completed at this time as additional information is still needed. Additional comments may be warranted. 39. DEPARTMENT: ENGTRF - TRAFFIC REVIEW REVIEW ITEM: Maintenance of improvements REMARKS: 11/19/2014: Please provide statement identifying legal body responsible for maintenance and management of common areas improvements. 5

6 40. DEPARTMENT: ENGTRF - TRAFFIC REVIEW REVIEW ITEM: B - Cross access STATUS OF REVIEW: STAFF RECOMMENDS APPROVAL OF WAIVER REMARKS: 11/19/2014: Please show cross access on the plan sheet and provide access easement, for the north/south driveway on the west side of the site and across the site, parallel with SR 200 and provide the access easement for the cross access. 41. DEPARTMENT: ENGTRF - TRAFFIC REVIEW REVIEW ITEM: Driveway access STATUS OF REVIEW: STAFF RECOMMENDS APPROVAL OF WAIVER REMARKS: 11/19/2014: Driveway spacing on SR 200 is about 220 feet. LDC code requires 660 feet so a waiver is required. Traffic will support waiver since the driveways are right in/right out, onsite traffic flow would be improved, and driveway permitting through the State is required. 42. DEPARTMENT: ENGTRF - TRAFFIC REVIEW REVIEW ITEM: B - Traffic signs REMARKS: 11/19/2014: Please install 2 Do Not Enter signs, so that cars do not exit onto SR 200 at the driveway just west of this site. 43. DEPARTMENT: ENGTRF - TRAFFIC REVIEW REVIEW ITEM: C - Pavement marking REMARKS: 11/19/2014: 1) Please label the color, width, and material of all striping shown on the plans. 2) Striping along the 2 main north/south driveways off of SR 200 need to be thermo. 3) The main driveway on the east side of this sight should be striped similar to a 2 way left turn lane, as shown in FDOT Standard Index This should include gore striping at both ends, southbound arrows not needed at this time. Please discuss with Brian from Traffic for clarification. 4) Please refresh the arrow for right in only on the west north/south SR DEPARTMENT: ENGTRF - TRAFFIC REVIEW REVIEW ITEM: Additional Traffic comments REMARKS: 11/19/2014: Please improve the driveway apron on the west side of this property by providing curb and gutter that connects to SR 200 and providing a radii of 25' on the east side of the apron. 45. DEPARTMENT: ENGIN - DEVELOPMENT REVIEW REVIEW ITEM: B - Major Site Plan application fee REMARKS: The application fee of $ ($5.00 x total site acreage) made payable to Marion County BCC is due when this plan is resubmitted. Refer to Resolution 10-R-630 for the current fee schedule. Additionally, please include a separate review fee for $40.00 made payable to the Marion County Health Department. 6

7 46. DEPARTMENT: ENGIN - DEVELOPMENT REVIEW REVIEW ITEM: Title block on all sheets denoting type of application; project name, location, county, and state; and date of original and all revisions REMARKS: Add type of application to title block on all sheets. The date in the cover sheet title block is Is this correct? 47. DEPARTMENT: ENGIN - DEVELOPMENT REVIEW REVIEW ITEM: A - Type of application on front page REMARKS: The application type is "Major Site Plan". 48. DEPARTMENT: ENGIN - DEVELOPMENT REVIEW REVIEW ITEM: C - Name, address, phone number, and signature of owner and applicant on front sheet REMARKS: Not provided. Refer to this section of code. 49. DEPARTMENT: ENGIN - DEVELOPMENT REVIEW REVIEW ITEM: D - Owner's certification on front sheet with signature prior to plan approval REMARKS: Certification not provided. Refer to this section of code. 50. DEPARTMENT: ENGIN - DEVELOPMENT REVIEW REVIEW ITEM: F - Licensed professional certification on cover sheet with signature and seal on all sheets prior to plan approval REMARKS: Certification not provided. Refer to this section of code. 51. DEPARTMENT: ENGIN - DEVELOPMENT REVIEW REVIEW ITEM: G - A key location or vicinity map, with north arrow, with reference to surrounding properties, streets, municipal boundaries, sections, ranges, and township REMARKS: Provide a map meeting all requirements of this section of code labeled "Vicinity Map". 52. DEPARTMENT: ENGIN - DEVELOPMENT REVIEW REVIEW ITEM: H - A portrait oriented minimal 3 inches 5 inches space, located 2¾ inches from the right edge of paper and ¾ inches from the top edge of paper, shall remain blank to allow for a County approval stamp REMARKS: Not provided. Refer to this section of code. 53. DEPARTMENT: LUCURR - LAND USE CURRENT REVIEW REVIEW ITEM: L(2)/ Use Consistent with FLU Designation? REMARKS: Revise plan to list site's Future Land Use Designation of "COMMERCIAL" in the data block information. 7

8 54. DEPARTMENT: LUCURR - LAND USE CURRENT REVIEW REVIEW ITEM: L(7 & 9) - Building Uses/Identifiers/Designations Provided for 911? REMARKS: Revise plan to list proposed project use in the data block. This might be addressed as: "Proposed Building=5,333 sf= 6% PROPOSED BUILDING USE= RESTAURANT" 55. DEPARTMENT: LUCURR - LAND USE CURRENT REVIEW REVIEW ITEM: /1.8.2.F - Is Concurrency Approval or Deferral Elected? REMARKS: Revise the plan to provide the following note on the plan: This proposed project has not been granted concurrency approval. Future rights to develop the property are subject to a deferred concurrency determination. The completion of concurrency review and/or approval has been deferred to later development review stages, such as, but not limited to, Building Permit review. 56. DEPARTMENT: MANAGEMENT REVIEW ITEM: Correct road names supplied REMARKS: Please change State Road No 200 to SW Hwy 200 on sheets 002 and 011. Also, please remove references to abrogated roads SW 60th Rd and SW 68th Ln on sheets 002 and DEPARTMENT: ENGSUR - SURVEY REVIEW REVIEW ITEM: A(2 & 3) - One copy of the vertical control field notes shall be submitted to the Office of the County Engineer for review REMARKS: Please provide field notes. 58. DEPARTMENT: ENGSUR - SURVEY REVIEW REVIEW ITEM: B(4) - Provide one copy of the horizontal control notes along with reduction reports shall be submitted to the Office of the County Engineer for review REMARKS: Please provide field notes. 59. DEPARTMENT: ENGSUR - SURVEY REVIEW REVIEW ITEM: Provide an aerial map of the site with a layout of the development REMARKS: Please provide. you can use a modified version of sheet 2 and overlay it on an aerial. 60. DEPARTMENT: LSCAPE - LANDSCAPE DESIGN AND IRRIGATION REVIEW ITEM: All trees 10" DBH and larger. REMARKS: Provide locations of all trees with a 10" DBH or greater. Further comments are pending receipt of information regarding existing trees. 8

9 61. DEPARTMENT: LSCAPE - LANDSCAPE DESIGN AND IRRIGATION REVIEW ITEM: Shade tree requirements. REMARKS: Provide Shade Tree calculations. 62. DEPARTMENT: LSCAPE - LANDSCAPE DESIGN AND IRRIGATION REVIEW ITEM: Landscape plan requirements. REMARKS: 1. Marion County landscape plan requirements are specifically listed in Division 6.8 of the Land Development Code. Provide a landscape plan which meets these requirements including notes regarding landscape requirements and the use of fertilizers. 2. The Landscape Notes refer to the "landscape architect" while there are no information regarding who the landscape architect is for the project. 63. DEPARTMENT: LSCAPE - LANDSCAPE DESIGN AND IRRIGATION REVIEW ITEM: Landscape design standards. REMARKS: 64. DEPARTMENT: LSCAPE - LANDSCAPE DESIGN AND IRRIGATION REVIEW ITEM: Irrigation plan requirements. REMARKS: Marion County irrigation plan requirements are specifically listed in Division 6.9 of the Land Development Code. Provide an irrigation plan which meets these requirements. 65. DEPARTMENT: LSCAPE - LANDSCAPE DESIGN AND IRRIGATION REVIEW ITEM: Outdoor lighting plan requirements. REMARKS: Provide an Outdoor Lighting plan with photometrics for the site and building fixtures. There are several tree/light pole conflicts found on the plan. 66. DEPARTMENT: ZONE - ZONING DEPARTMENT REVIEW ITEM: L(1) - Parcel number REMARKS: Please provide parcel number on cover page 67. DEPARTMENT: ZONE - ZONING DEPARTMENT REVIEW ITEM: /6.3.1.C(10) - Land use and zoning on project and on adjacent properties shown REMARKS: Please provide land use and zoning of subject property and adjacent properties. Please label on site plan. 68. DEPARTMENT: ZONE - ZONING DEPARTMENT REVIEW ITEM: L(4) - Zoning requirements: lot width, area, setbacks, coverage (floor area ratios) and parking REMARKS: Please show setback distance from structure to all property lines 9

10 69. DEPARTMENT: ZONE - ZONING DEPARTMENT REVIEW ITEM: /4.2 -Setbacks, dimensions for all improvements, and easements REMARKS: Please provide OR Book and page and/ or resolution for abrogation on survey for 68th Lane 5578/961 on survey. 70. DEPARTMENT: ZONE - ZONING DEPARTMENT REVIEW ITEM: Landscape requirements/ Buffering REMARKS: Please indicate and show the type C buffer required along SR 200. Please show parking lot buffer of 5' wide and square footage of parking lot island. They should be minimum 200sq ft. 71. DEPARTMENT: ZONE - ZONING DEPARTMENT REVIEW ITEM: / Modified environmental assessment or exemption if information is available to the county to indicate no habitat or existence of endangered species or vegetation REMARKS: Need to submit an MEAS see Section of Land Development Code, See if applicant feels they qualify for exemption. Submit letter demonstrating. 72. DEPARTMENT: ZONE - ZONING DEPARTMENT REVIEW ITEM: Show location of outside storage areas REMARKS: 73. DEPARTMENT: ZONE - ZONING DEPARTMENT REVIEW ITEM: 5.2 & Verify any overlay zones such as ESOZ, Springs Protection, or Flood Plain REMARKS: Please add note that identifies this site is within the Secondary Zone of the Springs Protection Zone 74. DEPARTMENT: ZONE - ZONING DEPARTMENT REVIEW ITEM: Additional Zoning comments REMARKS: Please provide note that owner acknowledges that outdoor lighting will comply with Section 6.19 of the LDC. 10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22