AMPTIAC is a DOD Information Analysis Center Administered by the Defense Information Systems Agency, Defense Technical Information Center
|
|
- Janis Mosley
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 AMPTIAC is a DOD Information Analysis Center Administered by the Defense Information Systems Agency, Defense Technical Information Center
2 The United States military has recently tackled some tremendous challenges, the most difficult of which being the global war on terrorism. Even while military operations are underway in Iraq and elsewhere, the Department of Defense (DOD) is directing some of their energies against other threats less obvious, but nonetheless harmful and insidious. By the encouragement of the Congress (through an amended federal law), the DOD is now waging war against corrosion. The DOD has embraced both the spirit and intent of the congressional action, and efforts are already underway. Editorial: New DOD Policy Will Reduce the Cost of Corrosion The Deputy Secretary of Defense has appointed a Corrosion Executive to lead this initiative, and the Office of the Secretary of Defense (OSD) has established within its organization the Office of Corrosion Policy and Oversight. A formal policy requiring all programs to develop and implement corrosion prevention and control plans is being written. This policy will apply evenly to weapon systems, support equipment, and infrastructure. OSD has chosen this special issue of the AMPTIAC Quarterly to announce the initiative. Effectively mitigating and controlling corrosion on a Department-wide basis requires a new and innovative process; one that involves all stakeholders. In the past, individual Defense programs have implemented an array of highly effective corrosion prevention and control (CPC) processes. Unfortunately, little has been done to transition the CPC technologies developed in support of a specific program (and their resulting benefits) to other applicable programs, oftentimes leaving program managers to reinvent the wheel. This way of doing business must change. If we can become proactive at transitioning technologies between programs, then the DOD will see much greater returns on their acquisition investments. Making our existing assets more impervious to corrosion s effects can ultimately reduce maintenance costs, extend life (thus reducing reprocurement costs), and increase readiness. The support of all stakeholders is needed to make this strategy a reality. Mitigating corrosion in existing systems is only part of the battle, as it only strives to manage the vulnerabilities inherent in these systems. At the same time we must also endeavor to develop new systems that are corrosion resistant. We can only achieve this through improved diligence on the part of Defense contractors. More rigorous materials selection practices that stress upfront corrosion analyses are needed to make this happen. But the burden is not the contractors alone. The DOD has a responsibility to provide them with the requirements to ensure rigor in their design practices. About ten years ago the Pentagon s Acquisition Reform initiative eliminated many standards, converted some to performance-based specifications and others to commercial equivalents. Today a team is examining various existing and rescinded corrosion-related specifications and standards to identify elements that should be emphasized in future contract requirements. DOD also must provide the tools and information needed by designers so they can employ the best available technology. Fully informed materials selection decisions are needed to ensure adequate corrosion resistance. Achieving this requires the DOD to provide technical information directly to designers so they can quickly and cost effectively select the best available technologies. DOD has already invested untold millions in CPC technologies, but the data addressing these programs are difficult to obtain and use. Providing it directly through on-line expert systems is sure to enable real reform of current design practices. Changing the current culture is a long-term proposition one that will be facilitated if we address the very root of the problem. Designers coming out of our universities do not have a fundamental understanding of corrosion processes and prevention. The Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology (ABET) must get involved and implement changes to college curricula that stress a more thorough understanding of materials selection and corrosion prevention and control. Increased sensitivity towards corrosion, coupled with improved access to DOD s corrosion knowledgebase will help ensure future success. The DOD has embraced the need to improve acquisition and sustainment practices by placing a focus on CPC, but truly solving this difficult problem requires all stakeholders to accept the need for change. We must collectively change our culture to reflect this increased CPC emphasis. There certainly are some challenging times ahead, but I have no doubt that as the DOD corrosion prevention and control program evolves, readiness of our warfighting assets will improve. As a consequence, our country will be in a better position to defend against those who would like nothing more than to destroy our way of life. David H. Rose AMPTIAC Director Editor-in-Chief Wade G. Babcock Special Issue Editor Christian E. Grethlein, P.E. Creative Director Cynthia Long Information Processing Judy E. Tallarino Patricia McQuinn Inquiry Services David J. Brumbaugh Product Sales Gina Nash The AMPTIAC Quarterly is published by the Advanced Materials and Processes Technology Information Analysis Center (AMPTIAC). AMPTIAC is a DOD sponsored Information Analysis Center, administratively managed by the Defense Information Systems Agency (DISA), Defense Technical Information Center (DTIC). The AMPTIAC Quarterly is distributed to more than 15,000 materials professionals around the world. Inquiries about AMPTIAC capabilities, products and services may be addressed to David H. Rose Director, AMPTIAC amptiac@alionscience.com URL: We welcome your input! To submit your related articles, photos, notices, or ideas for future issues, please contact: AMPTIAC ATTN: WADE G. BABCOCK 201 Mill Street Rome, New York PHONE: FAX: amptiac_news@alionscience.com
3 Robert S. Kidwell, VP/Sr. Technical Director Enterprise Integration Center, ManTech Advanced Systems International, Inc. Hinton, WV INTRODUCTION The DOD Corrosion Exchange is the heart of a state-of-theart corrosion prevention and control (CPAC) information management and distribution e-portal. The e-portal is sponsored by the Assistant Deputy Under Secretary of Defense for Maintenance Policy and has been designated as one of the cornerstones in the DOD s long-term strategy for corrosion prevention and mitigation detailed in 10 U.S.C The website (at see Figure 1) is life-cycle oriented and serves as a leader in corrosion research, industry coordination, and information dissemination to all individuals and organizations in the DOD, academia, and industry who have an interest in corrosion related to DOD weapon systems, equipment, and commercial assets. The website provides a forum for communication and cutting edge collaboration and information sharing tools, combined with a content-rich environment for technical information exchange among all sectors of the CPAC community from basic research through application. The virtual library is organized around a taxonomy with two distinct branches one application-based, geared toward the war-fighter and organized by service and weapon system, and the other research-based and populated mainly with abstracts from published papers in the corrosion field. The e-portal includes a research component that is led by a team of five multi-disciplinary doctorate-level scientists and engineers. Using state-of-the-art collaboration and information sharing tools (such as text conferencing, voting, exploder lists, special interest groups, calendars, FTP, and assorted corrosion references) members can freely collaborate and share corrosion information in an open forum or secured environment tailored to their specific needs across the CPAC community. Collaboration and information sharing are the first steps toward reducing the cost of corrosion and its impact on the readiness of DOD assets. As the primary corrosion resource for the CPAC community, the Corrosion Exchange brings together disparate websites, repositories, information sharing and collaboration tools, corrosion-related content, and users from research to field operations from both the public and private sectors who have an interest in converting corrosion problems and issues into solutions. To this end, the goals of the exchange are to 1) support and improve communication, collaboration, and coordination within the CPAC community, 2) increase the effectiveness of CPAC research and operations, 3) develop, maintain, and expand the web-based information aggregation and sharing capabilities of the website, and 4) maintain a content-rich, collaborative-enabled online environment for all members. THE MEMBERSHIP AND USER LEVELS To facilitate collaboration and help organize the website, the exchange groups members into three general areas: DOD/Government, Research, and Industry. All website functionality is available to each group; however, each group may use the website in different ways or tailor it to fit their specific needs. Membership and use is free to all, and the uses and potential benefits of the exchange broken down by group are listed in Table 1. The User Levels Besides the group affiliation, each user is assigned one of the following four user levels (as seen in Table 2). Public/Non- Member, Registered Member, Special Interest Group (SIG), and Administrator. Figure 1. The DOD Corrosion Exchange Website. THE TAXONOMY All users have access to the DOD Corrosion Exchange library and unrestricted content, as seen in Figure 2. To logically organize the website and make it easier to locate information, the The AMPTIAC Quarterly, Volume 7, Number 4 23
4 Table 1. User Groups and Potential Benefits. DOD/Government This group includes military services such as the Army, Navy, Air Force, Marines, and related organizations such as the Coast Guard and NATO. Through the e-portal, all members can access a variety of corrosion information such as policy, procedures, specifications, publications, training materials, forms, corrosion images, corrosion information on weapon systems, equipment, infrastructure, and a wealth of other information on corrosion, particularly as it relates to the DOD. All information can be shared within or between services and organizations, with members in other groups, or organized in a secure environment to limit access. Research Both public and private sector members who are actively engaged in corrosion-related research or teaching comprise the Research group. Using the website collaboration and information services and tools, researchers can identify potential corrosion research topics, or pursue research topics that piggyback or build on previous research. Other potential benefits for this group include reduced research duplication, reduced time for testing and fielding new corrosion technologies, insight into corrosion problems affecting the membership, and the ability to circulate research to the CPAC community in a timely manner. Researchers can also pose questions to the general membership, post their abstracts and papers on the website for review, or simply publicize their research. Industry The Industry group consists of companies, individuals, or organizations that provide manufactured products and/or services used in the fight against corrosion. The exchange provides industry experts a forum to not only market their products and services to the CPAC community, but also to participate in collaborative activities and share their corrosion expertise with other groups or members. library was organized around a taxonomy and document repository system currently consisting of nine top-level folders: Military Applications (Figure 3), Infrastructure, Specifications and Standards, Laws and Regulations, Policy, Training, Research and Development, and Suppliers. The Military Applications folder represents the core of the taxonomy and is geared toward the warfighter and organized by service and weapon system. Note that the existing taxonomy provides a foundation upon which folders may be added or existing content is deleted/rearranged. The library contains documents, publications, abstracts, manuals, a dictionary of corrosion terms, and a variety of other corrosion references. To add content to the library, members the file(s) to the system administrator, who in turn processes and uploads the file to the website. Once uploaded, not all documents are viewable by all users. User access to a document or resource depends on the access permission level(s) they have been granted. THE TOOLS Unlike the DOD Corrosion Exchange library, the web-centric collaboration and information sharing tools are not available Figure 2. Top-Level Page of Library Interface. Table 2. Member User Levels. Public/Non-Member This user level is available to the public and does not require a username or password for access. This level provides access to general site information, the library, and an assortment of administrative and technical support features. Registered Member This user level is username/password protected and requires the member to successfully complete the self-registration process. A registered member has all the privileges of a non-member plus access to all the tools and services the site has to offer. Special Interest The SIG level is username/password protected and is available to groups and organizations that wish to restrict access to a subset of registered members. Only members of the SIG can access the information stored and organized by the group. This functionality requires at least one member of the SIG to be designated as the administrator for the group. The SIG administrator can add/remove members, organize the SIG s information, and monitor the group s activity using SIG metrics. Administrator This service level is username/password protected and provides access to features and functions required to maintain the site and services. 24 The AMPTIAC Quarterly, Volume 7, Number 4
5 Military Applications ARMY AIR FORCE NAVY MARINES COAST GUARD Air Land Sea Munitions F-18 C-130 H-60 HEMTT HMMWV DDG CV TUG 5 in Proj Harpoon PM PE S&T Maint Purchasing Spec Wording CPAC Plan Cost Mgmt Cost Info Stnds History Current New O-Level I-Level D-Level Product/Process Costs Materials db Corrosion db Manuals Forms Instruct Prod Lists Figure 3. Partially Expanded Military Applications Folder. Processes Table 3. Collaboration and Information Exchange. Text Conferencing This web-centric tool is basically an electronic message board used to share information organized by topic (or thread). Text conferencing may be used by the general membership for discussing issues, sharing meeting agendas, minutes, and action items, or sharing information by topic. Members can also post questions and receive responses from the membership using this tool. Exploder List This service provides a list of contact information for members such as name, , phone number, organization, and expertise. Members may use the exploder list to contact any and all members. Document Manager This service allows users to view, download, and (as a SIG Administrator) administer documents stored on the website. Document and folder details and attributes are visible and editable at each level of the taxonomy. Comment Annotation Tool Using this web-centric collaboration tool, members can review and post comments on documents such as presentations, specifications, budget documents, and handbooks. Members must send a request to the System Administrator to add or remove a document for comment and can only review and add comments to documents they have access to. Voting Tool This tool allows members and administrators to post or delete a document for vote, craft a vote, cast votes on ballots, and display voting results in graphic or text form. Members may only vote on ballots they have access to. Calendar The calendar tool is accessible by all user levels and displays information such as upcoming events, meetings, travel schedule, and milestones. Calendars within SIGs are accessible only by members of that SIG. FTP The FTP tool allows users to upload large files to the website in lieu of . Search The search tool searches and indexes the website content and displays the results in an easy-to-understand format. Advanced search capabilities such as Boolean operators and wildcards are also available on the website. to the Public/Non-Member user. Only registered members, SIG members, and Administrators can use the state-of-the-art tools to freely collaborate and share corrosion information across the CPAC community in an open forum or secured environment tailored to their specific needs. Note that SIG members have access to these tools in their SIG as well as with the general membership. The collaboration and information sharing tools in Table 3 form the core of the website s functionality. CONCLUSION The aging of military systems poses a unique challenge to develop corrosion maintenance programs that will carry the various aging systems well into the 21st century. Sharing corrosion information and group collaboration will be key to this endeavor. The Exchange fulfills this requirement by providing web-based access and links to corrosion information, combined with a common collaboration suite of tools to readily share information among all members of the CPAC community. Mr. Robert S. Kidwell serves as the Vice President/Senior Technical Director of ManTech Inc. s Enterprise Integration Center (e-ic). Mr. Kidwell also serves as Technical Chair of the NATO Integrated Technical Data (ITD) task force on IETM interoperability. Mr. Kidwell s career spans some 30 years as a senior program manager with emphasis on enterprise-wide system integration, technical and cost issues, live test demonstrations, business process engineering, computer hardware evaluations, software engineering, and computer system performance and modeling. He attended American University, the University of Hawaii, and is a graduate of the senior executive program, Fuqua School of Business at Duke University. The AMPTIAC Quarterly, Volume 7, Number 4 25
UNCLASSIFIED. R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE PE D8Z: Department of Defense Corrosion Policy and Oversight FY 2013 OCO
Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2013 Office of Secretary Of Defense DATE: February 2012 COST ($ in Millions) FY 2011 FY 2012 Base OCO Total FY 2014 FY 2015 FY 2016 FY 2017 Office of Secretary
More informationUNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE
Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2014 Office of Secretary Of Defense DATE: April 2013 COST ($ in Millions) All Prior FY 2014 Years FY 2012 FY 2013 # Base FY 2014 FY 2014 OCO ## Total FY
More informationEvolutionary Acquisition an Spiral Development in Programs : Policy Issues for Congress
Order Code RS21195 Updated April 8, 2004 Summary Evolutionary Acquisition an Spiral Development in Programs : Policy Issues for Congress Gary J. Pagliano and Ronald O'Rourke Specialists in National Defense
More informationDEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE PRESENTATION TO THE COMMITTEE ON ARMED SERVICES DEFENSE ACQUISITION REFORM PANEL UNITED STATES HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE PRESENTATION TO THE COMMITTEE ON ARMED SERVICES DEFENSE ACQUISITION REFORM PANEL UNITED STATES HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES SUBJECT: MISSION OF THE AIR FORCE GLOBAL LOGISTICS SUPPORT
More informationEvolutionary Acquisition and Spiral Development in DOD Programs: Policy Issues for Congress
Order Code RS21195 Updated December 11, 2006 Summary Evolutionary Acquisition and Spiral Development in DOD Programs: Policy Issues for Congress Gary J. Pagliano and Ronald O Rourke Specialists in National
More informationTHE UNDER SECRETARY OF DEFENSE 3010 DEFENSE PENTAGON WASHINGTON, DC
THE UNDER SECRETARY OF DEFENSE 3010 DEFENSE PENTAGON WASHINGTON, DC 20301-3010 ACQUISITION, TECHNOLOGY AND LOGISTICS DEC 0 it 2009 MEMORANDUM FOR SECRETARIES OF THE MILITARY DEPARTMENTS CHAIRMAN OF THE
More informationDOD DIRECTIVE DOD SPACE ENTERPRISE GOVERNANCE AND PRINCIPAL DOD SPACE ADVISOR (PDSA)
DOD DIRECTIVE 5100.96 DOD SPACE ENTERPRISE GOVERNANCE AND PRINCIPAL DOD SPACE ADVISOR (PDSA) Originating Component: Office of the Deputy Chief Management Officer of the Department of Defense Effective:
More informationARMY G-8
ARMY G-8 Deputy Chief of Staff, G-8 703-697-8232 The Deputy Chief of Staff, G-8, is responsible for integrating resources and Army programs and with modernizing Army equipment. We accomplish this through
More informationDepartment of Defense DIRECTIVE
Department of Defense DIRECTIVE NUMBER 5230.24 March 18, 1987 USD(A) SUBJECT: Distribution Statements on Technical Documents References: (a) DoD Directive 5230.24, subject as above, November 20, 1984 (hereby
More informationThe Role of T&E in the Systems Engineering Process Keynote Address
The Role of T&E in the Systems Engineering Process Keynote Address August 17, 2004 Glenn F. Lamartin Director, Defense Systems Top Priorities 1. 1. Successfully Successfully Pursue Pursue the the Global
More informationThe Fifth Element and the Operating Forces are vitally linked providing the foundation that supports the MAGTF, from training through Operational
The Fifth Element and the Operating Forces are vitally linked providing the foundation that supports the MAGTF, from training through Operational Readiness to Deployment to Reconstitution Department of
More informationFirst Announcement/Call For Papers
AIAA Strategic and Tactical Missile Systems Conference AIAA Missile Sciences Conference Abstract Deadline 30 June 2011 SECRET/U.S. ONLY 24 26 January 2012 Naval Postgraduate School Monterey, California
More informationDevelopmental Test and Evaluation Is Back
Guest Editorial ITEA Journal 2010; 31: 309 312 Developmental Test and Evaluation Is Back Edward R. Greer Director, Developmental Test and Evaluation, Washington, D.C. W ith the Weapon Systems Acquisition
More informationDepartment of Defense DIRECTIVE
Department of Defense DIRECTIVE NUMBER 5205.16 September 30, 2014 Incorporating Change 2, August 28, 2017 USD(I) SUBJECT: The DoD Insider Threat Program References: See Enclosure 1 1. PURPOSE. In accordance
More informationDepartment of Defense INSTRUCTION. SUBJECT: Principles and Operational Parameters of the DoD Scientific and Technical Information Program
Department of Defense INSTRUCTION NUMBER 3200.14 May 13, 1997 Administrative Reissuance Incorporating Through Change 3, June 28, 2001 USD(AT&L) SUBJECT: Principles and Operational Parameters of the DoD
More informationDepartment of Defense DIRECTIVE
Department of Defense DIRECTIVE NUMBER 8320.2 December 2, 2004 ASD(NII)/DoD CIO SUBJECT: Data Sharing in a Net-Centric Department of Defense References: (a) DoD Directive 8320.1, DoD Data Administration,
More informationEXECUTIVE ORDER 12333: UNITED STATES INTELLIGENCE ACTIVITIES
EXECUTIVE ORDER 12333: UNITED STATES INTELLIGENCE ACTIVITIES (Federal Register Vol. 40, No. 235 (December 8, 1981), amended by EO 13284 (2003), EO 13355 (2004), and EO 13470 (2008)) PREAMBLE Timely, accurate,
More informationRelationship of the DOD Information Technology Standards Registry (DISR) with the Defense Standardization Program
Relationship of the DOD Information Technology Standards Registry (DISR) with the Defense Standardization Program Michael O Connor DISA, GE33 9 March 2005 Agenda Responsibilities of the DOD Executive Agent
More informationDoD Cloud Computing Strategy Needs Implementation Plan and Detailed Waiver Process
Inspector General U.S. Department of Defense Report No. DODIG-2015-045 DECEMBER 4, 2014 DoD Cloud Computing Strategy Needs Implementation Plan and Detailed Waiver Process INTEGRITY EFFICIENCY ACCOUNTABILITY
More informationTHE JOINT STAFF Research, Development, Test and Evaluation (RDT&E), Defense-Wide Fiscal Year (FY) 2009 Budget Estimates
Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification February 2008 R-1 Line Item Nomenclature: 227 0902298J Management HQ ($ IN Millions) FY 2007 FY 2008 FY 2009 FY 2010 FY 2011 FY 2012 FY 2013 Total PE 3.078
More informationDepartment of Defense INSTRUCTION
Department of Defense INSTRUCTION NUMBER 8320.02 August 5, 2013 DoD CIO SUBJECT: Sharing Data, Information, and Information Technology (IT) Services in the Department of Defense References: See Enclosure
More informationDepartment of Defense INSTRUCTION
Department of Defense INSTRUCTION NUMBER 5000.70 May 10, 2012 Incorporating Change 2, October 25, 2017 USD(AT&L) SUBJECT: Management of DoD Modeling and Simulation (M&S) Activities References: See Enclosure
More informationDepartment of Defense DIRECTIVE. SUBJECT: Electronic Warfare (EW) and Command and Control Warfare (C2W) Countermeasures
Department of Defense DIRECTIVE NUMBER 3222.4 July 31, 1992 Incorporating Through Change 2, January 28, 1994 SUBJECT: Electronic Warfare (EW) and Command and Control Warfare (C2W) Countermeasures USD(A)
More informationDoD Corrosion Prevention and Control
DoD Corrosion Prevention and Control Current Program Status Presented to the Army Corrosion Summit Daniel J. Dunmire Director, DOD Corrosion Policy and Oversight 3 February 2009 Report Documentation Page
More informationUNCLASSIFIED. R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE PE D8Z: Strategic Environmental Research and Development Program (SERDP) FY 2012 OCO
Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2012 Office of Secretary Of Defense DATE: February 2011 COST ($ in Millions) FY 2010 FY 2011 Base OCO Total FY 2013 FY 2014 FY 2015 FY 2016 Cost To Complete
More informationDEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY COUNTERINTELLIGENCE
SECNAV INSTRUCTION 3850.2E DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY 1 000 NAVY PENTAGON WASHINGTON DC 20350 1000 SECNAVINST 3850.2E DUSN (P) January 3, 2017 From: Subj: Secretary of the Navy DEPARTMENT
More informationSecretary of the Navy Richard V. Spencer USNI Defense Forum Washington Washington, DC 04 December 2017
Secretary of the Navy Richard V. Spencer USNI Defense Forum Washington Washington, DC 04 December 2017 Thank you for the introduction Vice Admiral [Pete] Daly and I would like to extend my thanks to everybody
More informationDepartment of Defense DIRECTIVE
Department of Defense DIRECTIVE NUMBER 5000.59 January 4, 1994 Certified Current as of December 1, 2003 SUBJECT: DoD Modeling and Simulation (M&S) Management Incorporating Change 1, January 20, 1998 USD(A&T)
More informationSUBJECT: Army Directive (Implementation of Acquisition Reform Initiatives 1 and 2)
S E C R E T A R Y O F T H E A R M Y W A S H I N G T O N MEMORANDUM FOR SEE DISTRIBUTION SUBJECT: Army Directive 2017-22 (Implementation of Acquisition Reform Initiatives 1 and 2) 1. References. A complete
More informationSubj: ELECTRONIC WARFARE DATA AND REPROGRAMMABLE LIBRARY SUPPORT PROGRAM
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY OFFICE OF THE CHIEF OF NAVAL OPERATIONS 2000 NAVY PENTAGON WASHINGTON, DC 20350-2000 OPNAVINST 3430.23C N2/N6 OPNAV INSTRUCTION 3430.23C From: Chief of Naval Operations Subj: ELECTRONIC
More informationDepartment of Defense DIRECTIVE
Department of Defense DIRECTIVE NUMBER 5240.01 August 27, 2007 Incorporating Change 1 and Certified Current Through August 27, 2014 USD(I) SUBJECT: DoD Intelligence Activities References: (a) DoD Directive
More informationSECRETARY OF DEFENSE 1000 DEFENSE PENTAGON WASHINGTON, DC
SECRETARY OF DEFENSE 1000 DEFENSE PENTAGON WASHINGTON, DC 20301-1000 March 16, 2018 MEMORANDUM FOR SECRETARIES OF THE MILITARY DEPARTMENTS CHAIRMAN OF THE JOINT CHIEFS OF STAFF UNDER SECRETARIES OF DEFENSE
More informationTask Force Innovation Working Groups
Task Force Innovation Working Groups Emerging Operational Capabilities Adaptive Workforce Information EMERGING OPERATIONAL CAPABILITIES (EOC) WORKING GROUP VISION Accelerate Delivery of Emerging Operational
More informationChallenge-Driven Innovation Global sustainability goals in the 2030 Agenda as a driver of innovation
Challenge-Driven Innovation Global sustainability goals in the 2030 Agenda as a driver of innovation Stage 1 Initiation 2018 (spring) Contents 1 The proposal in brief...3 2 What are the aims of this funding?...4
More informationI n t r o d u c t i o n
The President and the Congress have given me the opportunity to serve as Director, Operational Test and Evaluation for these last two and a half years. I have been honored and humbled to serve in this
More informationSupply Chain Risk Management
Supply Chain Risk Management 731 07 December 2013 A. AUTHORITY: The National Security Act of 1947, as amended; 50 USC 3329, note (formerly 50 USC 403-2, note); the Counterintelligence Enhancement Act of
More informationDOD INSTRUCTION DEPOT MAINTENANCE CORE CAPABILITIES DETERMINATION PROCESS
DOD INSTRUCTION 4151.20 DEPOT MAINTENANCE CORE CAPABILITIES DETERMINATION PROCESS Originating Component: Office of the Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition and Sustainment Effective: May 4, 2018
More informationDepartment of Defense DIRECTIVE. SUBJECT: Single Agency Manager (SAM) for Pentagon Information Technology Services
Department of Defense DIRECTIVE NUMBER 8220.1 March 1, 1995 Certified Current as of November 21, 2003 SUBJECT: Single Agency Manager (SAM) for Pentagon Information Technology Services ASD(C3I) References:
More informationDepartment of Defense
Tr OV o f t DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT A Approved for Public Release Distribution Unlimited IMPLEMENTATION OF THE DEFENSE PROPERTY ACCOUNTABILITY SYSTEM Report No. 98-135 May 18, 1998 DnC QtUALr Office of
More informationGEOINT Standards Working Group (GWG)
GEOINT Standards Working Group (GWG) General Briefing NCGIS OGMT / Office of the Chief Architect NATIONAL GEOSPATIAL-INTELLIGENCE AGENCY Problems to be Solved Uncoordinated GEOINT standards development
More informationCOMPLIANCE WITH THIS PUBLICATION IS MANDATORY
BY ORDER OF THE SECRETARY OF THE AIR FORCE AIR FORCE POLICY DIRECTIVE 90-16 31 AUGUST 2011 Special Management STUDIES AND ANALYSES, ASSESSMENTS AND LESSONS LEARNED COMPLIANCE WITH THIS PUBLICATION IS MANDATORY
More informationCOMPLIANCE WITH THIS PUBLICATION IS MANDATORY
BY ORDER OF THE SECRETARY OF THE AIR FORCE AIR FORCE POLICY DIRECTIVE 99-1 3 JUNE 2014 Test and Evaluation TEST AND EVALUATION COMPLIANCE WITH THIS PUBLICATION IS MANDATORY ACCESSIBILITY: Publications
More informationDepartment of Defense INSTRUCTION
Department of Defense INSTRUCTION NUMBER 4151.22 October 16, 2012 Incorporating Change 1, Effective January 19, 2018 SUBJECT: Condition Based Maintenance Plus (CBM + ) for Materiel Maintenance References:
More informationDIRECTIVE. SUBJECT: Unique Identification (UID) Standards for a Net-Centric Department of Defense
Department of Defense DIRECTIVE NUMBER 8320.03 March 23, 2007 USD(AT&L)/USD(P&R) SUBJECT: Unique Identification (UID) Standards for a Net-Centric Department of Defense References: (a) Strategic Planning
More informationINSIDER THREATS. DOD Should Strengthen Management and Guidance to Protect Classified Information and Systems
United States Government Accountability Office Report to Congressional Committees June 2015 INSIDER THREATS DOD Should Strengthen Management and Guidance to Protect Classified Information and Systems GAO-15-544
More informationReport No. D May 14, Selected Controls for Information Assurance at the Defense Threat Reduction Agency
Report No. D-2010-058 May 14, 2010 Selected Controls for Information Assurance at the Defense Threat Reduction Agency Report Documentation Page Form Approved OMB No. 0704-0188 Public reporting burden for
More informationASMC National 2016 PDI. June 1-3, 2016
ASMC National 2016 PDI June 1-3, 2016 Agenda Department of Defense Organization Civilian Workforce Overview New Beginnings Force of the Future (2) Department of Defense Secretary of Defense Deputy Secretary
More informationDOD SPECIFICATIONS FOR INTERACTIVE ELECTRONIC TECHNICAL MANUALS (IETM)
DOD SPECIFICATIONS FOR INTERACTIVE ELECTRONIC TECHNICAL MANUALS (IETM) Status Report on Draft Specifications and Handbooks Developed by the Tri-Service Working Group for IETMs Presented by: Eric L. Jorgensen
More informationDepartment of Defense
Department of Defense DIRECTIVE NUMBER 5144.1 May 2, 2005 DA&M SUBJECT: Assistant Secretary of Defense for Networks and Information Integration/ DoD Chief Information Officer (ASD(NII)/DoD CIO) Reference:
More informationUNCLASSIFIED. R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE PE F: Multi-Service Systems Engineering FY 2012 OCO
Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2012 Air Force DATE: February 2011 COST ($ in Millions) Total FY 2013 FY 2014 FY 2015 FY 2016 Cost To Complete Total Cost Total Program Element - 18.901
More informationchallenge the force... change the game
People Ideas Information D S T A U N I T E T E S N A V Y challenge the force... change the game CHALLENGE THE FORCE... CHANGE THE GAME As I travel across the globe to meet our talented Sailors, Marines,
More informationCHAIRMAN OF THE JOINT CHIEFS OF STAFF INSTRUCTION
CHAIRMAN OF THE JOINT CHIEFS OF STAFF INSTRUCTION J-6 CJCSI 5116.05 DISTRIBUTION: A, B, C MILITARY COMMAND, CONTROL, COMMUNICATIONS, AND COMPUTERS EXECUTIVE BOARD 1. Purpose. This instruction establishes
More informationInformation Technology
September 24, 2004 Information Technology Defense Hotline Allegations Concerning the Collaborative Force- Building, Analysis, Sustainment, and Transportation System (D-2004-117) Department of Defense Office
More informationDEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY OFFICE OF THE CHIEF OF NAVAL OPERATIONS 2000 NAVY PENTAGON WASHINGTON DC
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY OFFICE OF THE CHIEF OF NAVAL OPERATIONS 2000 NAVY PENTAGON WASHINGTON DC 20350-2000 OPNAVINST 3900.30 N4 OPNAV INSTRUCTION 3900.30 From: Chief of Naval Operations Subj: NAVY CAPABILITY
More information2016 Major Automated Information System Annual Report
2016 Major Automated Information System Annual Report Tactical Mission Command (TMC) Defense Acquisition Management Information Retrieval (DAMIR) UNCLASSIFIED Table of Contents Common Acronyms and Abbreviations
More informationJRSS Discussion Panel Joint Regional Security Stack
JRSS Discussion Panel Joint Regional Security Stack Chair COL Greg Griffin JRSS Portfolio Manager May 2018 UNITED IN IN SERVICE TO OUR NATION 1 Disclaimer The information provided in this briefing is for
More informationWe acquire the means to move forward...from the sea. The Naval Research, Development & Acquisition Team Strategic Plan
The Naval Research, Development & Acquisition Team 1999-2004 Strategic Plan Surface Ships Aircraft Submarines Marine Corps Materiel Surveillance Systems Weapon Systems Command Control & Communications
More informationEXECUTIVE ORDER
This document is scheduled to be published in the Federal Register on 10/04/2016 and available online at https://federalregister.gov/d/2016-24066, and on FDsys.gov EXECUTIVE ORDER 13741 - - - - - - - AMENDING
More informationArmy Standardization Activities and Initiatives
Army Standardization Activities and Initiatives By Wade Schubring dsp.dla.mil 33 The Army Standardization Program (ASP) is one piece of the Defense Standardization Program that was created by congressional
More informationReview Editor Guidelines
Review Editor Guidelines WELCOME TO THE FRONTIERS COMMUNITY OF EDITORS The following guidelines are meant to provide you with further practical information regarding your role as Review Editor as well
More informationDepartment of Defense INSTRUCTION
Department of Defense INSTRUCTION NUMBER 5000.55 November 1, 1991 SUBJECT: Reporting Management Information on DoD Military and Civilian Acquisition Personnel and Positions ASD(FM&P)/USD(A) References:
More informationDepartment of Defense INSTRUCTION
Department of Defense INSTRUCTION NUMBER 3305.14 December 28, 2007 Incorporating Change 1, January 28, 2011 USD(I) SUBJECT: Joint Intelligence Training (JIT) References: (a) DoD Directive 5143.01, Under
More informationUNCLASSIFIED. R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE PE K: Minimum Essential Emergency Communications Network (MEECN)
Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2014 Defense Information Systems Agency DATE: April 2013 COST ($ in Millions) Years FY 2012 FY 2013 # Base Network OCO ## FY 2015 FY 2016 FY 2017 FY 2018
More informationUNCLASSIFIED. UNCLASSIFIED Navy Page 1 of 7 R-1 Line #31
Exhibit R2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2015 Navy Date: March 2014 1319: Research, Development, Test & Evaluation, Navy / BA 4: Advanced Component Development & Prototypes (ACD&P) COST ($ in Millions)
More informationA Systems Approach to Patient Safety at the VA
BRIGHT IDEAS A Systems Approach to Patient Safety at the VA Erika Hatva The Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) operates the largest integrated healthcare system in the United States, serving 8.76 million
More informationDepartment of Defense DIRECTIVE
Department of Defense DIRECTIVE NUMBER 8100.1 September 19, 2002 Certified Current as of November 21, 2003 SUBJECT: Global Information Grid (GIG) Overarching Policy ASD(C3I) References: (a) Section 2223
More informationPRIVACY IMPACT ASSESSMENT (PIA) For the
PRIVACY IMPACT ASSESSMENT (PIA) For the Air Combat Command (ACC) Collaborative Environment (ACE) United States Air Force - Air Combat Command SECTION 1: IS A PIA REQUIRED? a. Will this Department of Defense
More informationUNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE FY 2013 OCO
Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 213 Navy DATE: February 212 COST ($ in Millions) FY 211 FY 212 Total FY 214 FY 215 FY 216 FY 217 To Complete Total Total Program Element 1.613 1.418 1.56-1.56
More informationSUBJECT: Army Directive (Implementation of the Army Human Capital Big Data Strategy)
S E C R E T A R Y O F T H E A R M Y W A S H I N G T O N MEMORANDUM FOR SEE DISTRIBUTION SUBJECT: Army Directive 2017-04 (Implementation of the Army Human Capital Big 1. Reference Department of the Army,
More informationInformation System Security
September 14, 2006 Information System Security Summary of Information Assurance Weaknesses Found in Audit Reports Issued from August 1, 2005, through July 31, 2006 (D-2006-110) Department of Defense Office
More informationDepartment of Defense DIRECTIVE
Department of Defense DIRECTIVE NUMBER 5101.14 June 11, 2007 Incorporating Change 1, July 12, 2012 Certified Current Through June 11, 2014 D, JIEDDO SUBJECT: DoD Executive Agent and Single Manager for
More informationDepartment of Defense INSTRUCTION
Department of Defense INSTRUCTION NUMBER 5000.60 July 18, 2014 USD(AT&L) SUBJECT: Defense Industrial Base Assessments References: See Enclosure 1 1. PURPOSE. This instruction reissues DoD Instruction 5000.60
More informationOpportunities to Streamline DOD s Milestone Review Process
Opportunities to Streamline DOD s Milestone Review Process Cheryl K. Andrew, Assistant Director U.S. Government Accountability Office Acquisition and Sourcing Management Team May 2015 Page 1 Report Documentation
More informationSTATEMENT OF GORDON R. ENGLAND SECRETARY OF THE NAVY BEFORE THE SENATE ARMED SERVICES COMMITTEE 10 JULY 2001
NOT FOR PUBLICATION UNTIL RELEASED BY THE SENATE ARMED SERVICES COMMITTEE STATEMENT OF GORDON R. ENGLAND SECRETARY OF THE NAVY BEFORE THE SENATE ARMED SERVICES COMMITTEE 10 JULY 2001 NOT FOR PUBLICATION
More informationTest and Evaluation of Highly Complex Systems
Guest Editorial ITEA Journal 2009; 30: 3 6 Copyright 2009 by the International Test and Evaluation Association Test and Evaluation of Highly Complex Systems James J. Streilein, Ph.D. U.S. Army Test and
More informationDepartment of Defense
Department of Defense DIRECTIVE SUBJECT: Under Secretary of Defense for Intelligence (USD(I)) NUMBER 5143.01 November 23, 2005 References: (a) Title 10, United States Code (b) Title 50, United States Code
More informationNavy Medicine. Commander s Guidance
Navy Medicine Commander s Guidance For over 240 years, our Navy and Marine Corps has been the cornerstone of American security and prosperity. Navy Medicine has been there every day as an integral part
More informationExhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification Date: February 2008 Appropriation/Budget Activity RDT&E, Dw BA 07
Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification Date: February 2008 Cost ($ in millions) FY 2007* FY 2008 FY 2009 FY 2010 FY 2011 FY 2012 FY 2013 Total PE Cost 0.000 10.560 8.210 5.089 5.176 5.258 5.338 Policy
More informationUNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE FY 2013 OCO
Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2013 Defense Information Systems Agency DATE: February 2012 COST ($ in Millions) FY 2011 FY 2012 Total FY 2014 FY 2015 FY 2016 FY 2017 To Complete Total
More informationDOD DIRECTIVE INTELLIGENCE OVERSIGHT
DOD DIRECTIVE 5148.13 INTELLIGENCE OVERSIGHT Originating Component: Office of the Deputy Chief Management Officer of the Department of Defense Effective: April 26, 2017 Releasability: Cleared for public
More informationDoD Architecture Registry System (DARS) EA Conference 2012
DoD Architecture Registry System (DARS) EA Conference 2012 30 April, 2012 https://dars1.army.mil http://dars1.apg.army.smil.mil 1 Report Documentation Page Form Approved OMB No. 0704-0188 Public reporting
More informationNumber: DI-MGMT Approval Date:
DATA ITEM DESCRIPTION Title: Technical Data Report Number: DI-MGMT-82165 Approval Date: 20171116 AMSC Number: 9871 Limitation: DTIC Applicable: No GIDEP Applicable: No Preparing Activity: CAPE Project
More informationPOLICIES CONCERNING THE NAVAL POSTGRADUATE SCHOOL
SECNAV INSTRUCTION 1524.2C DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY 1000 NAVY PENTAGO N WASHINGTON DC 20350 1 000 SECNAVINST 1524.2C ASN (M&RA) October 21, 2014 From: Subj: Ref: Encl: Secretary of
More informationSUBJECT: Directive-Type Memorandum (DTM) Law Enforcement Reporting of Suspicious Activity
THE UNDER SECRETARY OF DEFENSE 2000 DEFENSE PENTAGON WASHINGTON, D.C. 20301-2000 POLICY October 1, 2010 MEMORANDUM FOR: SEE DISTRIBUTION SUBJECT: Directive-Type Memorandum (DTM) 10-018 Law Enforcement
More informationOVERVIEW OF STATEMENT OF MICHAEL MARCHLIK VICE PRESIDENT - QUALITY ASSURANCE AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS MCKESSON TECHNOLOGY SOLUTIONS
OVERVIEW OF STATEMENT OF MICHAEL MARCHLIK VICE PRESIDENT - QUALITY ASSURANCE AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS MCKESSON TECHNOLOGY SOLUTIONS McKesson supports HR 3303, the Sensible Oversight for Technology Which
More information(Billing Code ) Defense Federal Acquisition Regulation Supplement: Defense. Contractors Performing Private Security Functions (DFARS Case
This document is scheduled to be published in the Federal Register on 12/30/2015 and available online at http://federalregister.gov/a/2015-32874, and on FDsys.gov (Billing Code 5001-06) DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
More information2011 Munitions Executive Summit. OSD Perspective
2011 Munitions Executive Summit OSD Perspective Jose M. Gonzalez OUSD (Acquisition, Technology & Logistics) Deputy Director, Portfolio Systems Acquisition, Land Warfare and Munitions Secretary of Defense
More informationDepartment of Defense INSTRUCTION
Department of Defense INSTRUCTION SUBJECT: Counterintelligence (CI) Analysis and Production References: See Enclosure 1 NUMBER 5240.18 November 17, 2009 Incorporating Change 2, Effective April 25, 2018
More informationUNCLASSIFIED. R-1 Program Element (Number/Name) PE SE / R&D in Support of DOD Enlistment, Testing and Evaluation
Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2015 DoD Human Resources Activity Date: March 2014 0400: Research, Development, Test & Evaluation, Defense-Wide / BA 6: RDT&E Management Support COST ($
More informationINTELLIGENCE COMMUNITY DIRECTIVE NUMBER 501
INTELLIGENCE COMMUNITY DIRECTIVE NUMBER 501 DISCOVERY AND DISSEMINATION OR RETRIEVAL OF INFORMATION WITHIN THE INTELLIGENCE COMMUNITY (EFFECTIVE: 21 JANUARY 2009) A. AUTHORITY: The National Security Act
More informationAir Force Enterprise Corrosion Prevention and Control Strategic Plan
2012 Air Force Enterprise Corrosion Prevention and Control Strategic Plan 5/21/2012 Table of Contents Purpose and Scope... 3 Background... 3 Purpose... 3 Scope... 4 Strategic Direction... 4 Vision... 4
More informationDepartment of the Navy Annual Review of Acquisition of Services Policy and Oversight
1.0 Component-specific Implementation of Better Buying Power (BBP) 2.0 Better Buying Power (BBP) 2.0 challenges Department of Defense (DOD) acquisition professionals to achieve greater efficiency and productivity
More informationDepartment of Defense MANUAL
Department of Defense MANUAL NUMBER 3200.14, Volume 2 January 5, 2015 Incorporating Change 1, November 21, 2017 USD(AT&L) SUBJECT: Principles and Operational Parameters of the DoD Scientific and Technical
More informationDepartment of Defense INSTRUCTION
Department of Defense INSTRUCTION NUMBER 8260.04 December 18, 2009 USD(P&R) SUBJECT: Military Health System (MHS) Support to DoD Strategic Analysis References: (a) DoD Directive 5124.02, Under Secretary
More informationTo be prepared for war is one of the most effectual means of preserving peace.
The missions of US Strategic Command are diverse, but have one important thing in common with each other: they are all critical to the security of our nation and our allies. The threats we face today are
More informationDOD DIRECTIVE E EXPLOSIVES SAFETY MANAGEMENT (ESM)
DOD DIRECTIVE 6055.09E EXPLOSIVES SAFETY MANAGEMENT (ESM) Originating Component: Office of the Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition, Technology, and Logistics Effective: November 8, 2016 Change 1
More informationSubj: DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY POLICY ON INSENSITIVE MUNITIONS
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY OFFICE OF THE CHIEF OF NAVAL OPERATIONS 2000 NAVY PENTAGON WASHINGTON, DC 20350-2000 OPNAVINST 8010.13E N96 OPNAV INSTRUCTION 8010.13E From: Chief of Naval Operations Subj: DEPARTMENT
More informationPride 2018 Digital Marketing Request for Proposals
Pride 2018 Digital Marketing Request for Proposals Point of Contact Sylvain BRUNI sbruni@bostonpride.org 617-262-9405 Up-to-date Information www.bostonpride.org/rfp Summary Boston Pride is accepting proposals
More informationDepartment of Defense DIRECTIVE
Department of Defense DIRECTIVE SUBJECT: Defense Media Activity (DMA) NUMBER 5105.74 December 18, 2007 Incorporating Change 1, August 29, 2017 DA&M DCMO References: (a) Title 10, United States Code (b)
More informationAllergy & Rhinology. Manuscript Submission Guidelines. Table of Contents:
Table of Contents: Allergy & Rhinology 1. Open Access 2. Article processing charge (APC) 3. What do we publish? 3.1 Aims & scope 3.2 Article types 3.3 Writing your paper 4. Editorial policies 4.1 Peer
More information