UNCLASSIFIED UNCLASSIFIED

Size: px
Start display at page:

Download "UNCLASSIFIED UNCLASSIFIED"

Transcription

1 : February 06 Exhibit R, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 07 00: Research, Development, Test & Evaluation, / BA 5: System Development & Demonstration (SDD) COST ($ in Millions) R Program Element (Number/Name) FY 08 FY 09 FY 00 To FY 0 Program Element Continuing Continuing EB: CIRCM Continuing Continuing EE3: A/C Surv Equip Dev.7 Continuing Continuing EE: Common Missile Warning System (CMWS) Continuing Continuing Note Fiscal Year (FY) 05 funds are a restructuring of funds from FY 0 Projects 665 (A/C Surv Equip Dev), VU7 (Common Missile Warning System), and VU8 (Common Infrared Counter Measure), Program Element (PE) 06070A (EW Development) to projects EE3 (A/C Surv Equip Dev), EE (Common Missile Warning System (CMWS)), and EB (CIRCM) respectively, PE A (Common Infrared ). Funds for project EB (CIRCM) remain in PE A (Common Infrared ) in and beyond. Funds from projects EE3 (A/C Surv Equip Dev), EE (Common Missile Warning System (CMWS)), PE A (Common Infrared ) are restructured to projects ER7 (Aircraft Survivability Equipment Development) and ER8 (Common Missile Warning System (CMWS)) respectively, PE A (Aircraft Survivability Development) for and beyond for more efficient and effective program management. A. Mission Description and Budget Item Justification The Common Infrared Countermeasure (CIRCM) budget line includes CIRCM (EB), A/C Surv Equip Dev (EE3), and Common Missile Warning System (CMWS) (EE). This budget line also includes funding for Joint Urgent Operational Needs Statement (JUONS) SO000 Phase a and the Headquarters Department of the (HQDA) Directed Requirement for the Advanced Threat Warner and Common Infrared Countermeasures Quick Reaction Capability (ATW & CIRCM QRC). EB: CIRCM CIRCM is an infrared (IR) countermeasure system that interfaces with a Missile Warning System (MWS) to provide near spherical protection of the host platform in order to defeat IR threat missiles. The CIRCM will provide the sole acquisition of future laserbased IR countermeasure systems for all rotarywing, tiltrotor, and small fixedwing aircraft across the Department of Defense. The 's concept of CIRCM is part of the Suite of Integrated Infrared Countermeasures (SIIRCM). The core components of the SIIRCM concept are: a MWS, IR expendables countermeasures (flares) and a laserbased Infrared Countermeasure (IRCM). The SIIRCM detects, declares and initiates IRCM against IRguided SurfacetoAir Missiles (SAM) or AirtoAir Missiles (AAM). The CIRCM is the next generation of the laserbased IRCM component and will interface with both the 's CMWS and future missile warning systems. The AKit for CIRCM includes mounting hardware, wiring harnesses, and other components necessary to install and interface the mission kit on host aircraft. The AKit ensures the mission kit is functionally and physically operational with a specific host aircraft type. The CIRCM BKit is the mission kit (laser, pointer tracker, and controller) required to achieve near spherical coverage for an aircraft. Page of 5 R Line #7 7

2 : February 06 Exhibit R, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 07 00: Research, Development, Test & Evaluation, / BA 5: System Development & Demonstration (SDD) R Program Element (Number/Name) This program also includes funding to counter emerging technology as identified in JUONS S0000. Initially, a select number of aircraft in the threat area of responsibility will be outfitted with a Department of the Department of the Navy Large Aircraft Infrared Countermeasure (DoNLAIRCM) system. However, this approach came with a Space, Weight and Power (SWaP) penalty which is being addressed as a followon HQDA Directed Requirement with a Quick Reaction Capability (QRC) using Advanced Threat Warner (ATW) and CIRCM. EE3: Aircraft Surv Equip Dev Beginning in, funds were moved to Project ER7 (Aircraft Survivability Equipment Development), PE A (Aircraft Survivability Development). The objective of the Aircraft Survivability Equipment (ASE) Development Project is to improve Radio Frequency (RF) ASE for aviation. The APR39 Radar Warning Receiver (RWR) detects, categorizes, and prioritizes RF emitters and provides a visual / aural alert to aircrew members warning them of targeting by RFguided weapons. The Milestone Decision Authority (MDA) approved Phases and of a 3phased path forward. EE: CMWS Beginning in, funds have been moved to Project ER8 (Common Missile Warning System (CMWS)), PE A (Aircraft Survivability Development). The US operational requirements concept for Aviation IR countermeasure systems is known as the Suite of Integrated Infrared Countermeasures (SIIRCM). SIIRCM is an integrated warning and countermeasure system to enhance aircraft survivability against IRguided threat missile systems. The CMWS is a core element of the SIIRCM concept. CMWS is an integrated ultraviolet (UV) missile warning system, with an Improved Countermeasure Dispenser (ICMD) serving as a subsystem to a host aircraft. The CMWS program is a UV missile warning system that cues both flare and laserbased countermeasures to defeat incoming IRseeking missiles and will alert aircrews to the presence of certain incoming unguided munitions. The CMWS Generation 3 (Gen 3) ECU in conjunction with ongoing software development efforts will address outstanding material release conditions to achieve a Full Material Release (FMR) for CMWS and ensure protection against emerging IRguided missile threats. This program also includes funding to counter emerging technology as identified in JUONS S0000. Initially in Phase A, a select number of aircraft in the threat area of responsibility will be outfitted with a Department of the Department of the Navy Large Aircraft Infrared Countermeasure (DoNLAIRCM) system. Page of 5 R Line #7 8

3 : February 06 Exhibit R, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 07 00: Research, Development, Test & Evaluation, / BA 5: System Development & Demonstration (SDD) B. Program Change Summary ($ in Millions) Previous President's Budget Current President's Budget Adjustments Congressional General Reductions Congressional Directed Reductions Congressional Rescissions Congressional Adds Congressional Directed Transfers Reprogrammings SBIR/STTR Transfer Adjustments to Budget R Program Element (Number/Name) Change Summary Explanation funding increase was to align this Project with the approved Milestone B Position. Page 3 of 5 R Line #7 9

4 : February 06 Exhibit RA, RDT&E Project Justification: PB 07 COST ($ in Millions) R Program Element (Number/Name) EB: CIRCM Quantity of RDT&E Articles FY EB / CIRCM FY 09 FY To FY Continuing Continuing Note Funds in the program are a realignment of funds from program VU8, PE 06070A (Electronic Warfare Development) for more efficient and effective program management. A. Mission Description and Budget Item Justification The Common Infrared Countermeasure (CIRCM) is an infrared (IR) countermeasure system that interfaces with a Missile Warning System (MWS) to provide near spherical protection of the host platform in order to defeat IR threat missiles. The CIRCM will provide the sole acquisition of future laserbased IR countermeasure systems for all rotarywing, tiltrotor, and small fixedwing aircraft across the Department of Defense. The 's concept of CIRCM is part of the Suite of Integrated Infrared Countermeasures (SIIRCM). The core components of the SIIRCM concept are: a MWS, IR expendables countermeasures (flares) and a laserbased Infrared Countermeasure (IRCM). The SIIRCM detects, declares and initiates IRCM against IRguided SurfacetoAir Missiles (SAM) or AirtoAir Missiles (AAM). The CIRCM is the next generation of the laserbased IRCM component and will interface with both the 's Common Missile Warning System (CMWS) and future missile warning systems. The AKit for CIRCM includes mounting hardware, wiring harnesses, and other components necessary to install and interface the mission kit on host aircraft. The AKit ensures the mission kit is functionally and physically operational with a specific host aircraft type. The CIRCM BKit is the mission kit (laser, pointer tracker, and controller) required to achieve near spherical coverage for an aircraft. This program also includes funding to counter emerging technology as identified in JUONS S0000. Initially, a select number of aircraft in the threat area of responsibility will be outfitted with a Department of the Department of the Navy Large Aircraft Infrared Countermeasure (DoNLAIRCM) system. However, this approach came with a Space, Weight and Power (SWaP) penalty which is being addressed as a followon HQDA Directed Requirement with a Quick Reaction Capability (QRC) using Advanced Threat Warner (ATW) and CIRCM. Research, Development, Test, and Evaluation (RDTE) funding in the amount of $ million continues the Engineering and Manufacturing Development (EMD) phase to include AKit prototypes for the AH6E, MH60M, and HH60M platforms, and supports integration with other missile warning systems. Overseas Contingency Operations () funding in the amount of $0.900 million will support of efforts related to the HQDA Directed Requirement to include CIRCM QRC AKit development, integration with platforms and other ASE equipment, and initial Test and Evaluation efforts. The intent of the ATW & CIRCM QRC program is to reduce the SWaP that require operational tradeoffs that are associated with the Phase a solution. Page of 5 R Line #7 0

5 : February 06 Exhibit RA, RDT&E Project Justification: PB 07 R Program Element (Number/Name) B. Accomplishments/Planned Programs ($ in Millions) EB / CIRCM Title: CIRCM Product Development Description: CIRCM Product Development, Support s, & Management Services Accomplishments: RDTE dollars supported the CIRCM EMD phase to include nonrecurring engineering (NRE), prototype manufacturing for BKit prototypes, platform integration, and support equipment. "Other R&D" supported the analysis of emerging threats. Plans: RDTE dollars support the CIRCM EMD phase to include Critical Design Review (CDR) Risk Reduction Activities, BKit ship set prototype deliveries, AKit integration, prototype AKit Modification Work Order (MWO) development, Training Support Plan (TSP), Technical Manual (TM) development, and NRE. Plans: RDTE dollars support the CIRCM EMD phase to include continued BKit and AKit development, CDR and AKit prototype procurement/deliveries. Other RDTE activities will support systems engineering/program management (SEPM) and Logistics Activities (Core Depot Assessment, Performance d Logistics Business Case Analysis and Technical Manual updates). Title: CIRCM Test & Evaluation (T&E) Description: CIRCM Test & Evaluation (T&E) Activities Accomplishments: RDTE dollars supported the CIRCM EMD phase efforts to include initiation of government conducted test events, modeling and simulation, and lab support. "Other Testing" included funds to develop IRCM solutions to defeat newly acquired threats. Plans: RDTE dollars support the CIRCM EMD phase to include software testing, flight testing, and Reliability Growth Testing (RGT). "Other Testing" includes funds to develop IRCM solutions to defeat newly acquired threats. Plans: Page 5 of 5 R Line #7

6 : February 06 Exhibit RA, RDT&E Project Justification: PB 07 R Program Element (Number/Name) B. Accomplishments/Planned Programs ($ in Millions) Supports CIRCM developmental testing to include Akit testing for MH60M, HH60M, and AH6E. This funding also includes test efforts to provide required lab capabilities such as in a system integration lab and procure test assets. Also continues efforts to develop IRCM solutions to defeat newly acquired threats. EB / CIRCM Title: Advanced Threat Warner (ATW) & CIRCM Quick Reaction Capability (QRC) Congressional Add.000 Description: ATW & CIRCM QRC Development Plans: RDT&E dollars will support the ATW & CIRCM QRC AKit development, integration, and associated T&E efforts. This effort will integrate the ATW and CIRCM systems to reduce Space, Weight and Power (SWaP) in support of JUONS SO000. Title: ATW & CIRCM QRC Description: ATW & CIRCM QRC Integration Plans: This project only has dollars for FY7 Plans: Continue the ATW and CIRCM QRC AKit development and integration for the H60, H7, & H6 platform variants and integration and integration with other ASE systems. Accomplishments/Planned Programs Subtotals C. Other Program Funding Summary ($ in Millions) Line Item APA Funding: SSN AZ3537; BA; CIRCM Remarks None FY FY FY To FY Continuing Continuing D. Acquisition Strategy The December 8, 0 Defense Acquisition Executive (DAE) Acquisition Decision Memorandum (ADM) authorized entry into the Technology Maturation and Risk Reduction (TMRR) phase, designated the program a premajor Defense Acquisition Program (MDAP), and approved the updated exit criteria. CIRCM Engineering and Page 6 of 5 R Line #7

7 : February 06 Exhibit RA, RDT&E Project Justification: PB 07 R Program Element (Number/Name) EB / CIRCM Manufacturing Development (EMD) ADM was approved on August 5, 05. The EMD contract was awarded to Northrup Grumman Systems Corporation (NGSC) on August 8, 05. The EMD contract will include priced options for Other Platform AKit Development, AKit Engineering Support, Low Rate Initial Production (LRIP) and Prototypes (Hardware and Installs), LRIP and Engineering and Test Support, Software Technical Data Package (TDP), Navy funded requirements, and Defense Exportability Features (DEF). Upon CIRCM MS C approval planned for the second quarter of FY8, the LRIP and Engineering Support options may be exercised and the program may immediately enter the Production & Deployment phase with First Unit Equipped (FUE) planned for first quarter of FY0, and a Full Rate Production Decision Review (FRPDR) planned for the first quarter of FY0. Due to the urgency of addressing the SWaP penalty issues related to the JUONS SO000 initial DoNLAIRCM material solution, the Directed Requirement with an ATW and CIRCM QRC will be a sole source effort with Northrop Grumman being the Prime contractor. Northrop Grumman has the required technical capabilities, knowledge and special equipment needed to meet the urgent and compelling need for the ATW and CIRCM QRC efforts. E. Performance Metrics N/A Page 7 of 5 R Line #7 3

8 : February 06 Exhibit R3, RDT&E Project Analysis: PB 07 R Program Element (Number/Name) Management Services ($ in Millions) Category Item Method & Type Performing Activity & Location System Engineering Program Management : ATW & CIRCM QRC System Engineering & Program Management : Subtotal Product Development ($ in Millions) Category Item Method & Type Performing Activity & Location EB / CIRCM.00 Oct To To NonRecurring Engineering (NRE) C/CPFF : 0.0 Aug Mar 06 Prototype Manufacturing C/FPIF : 3.60 Aug Jan 06 Development Facilities : Other R&D : Data : ATW & CIRCM QRC NRE C/CPFF : 3.80 Nov ATW & CIRCM QRC Prototype Manufacturing C/CPFF :.0 Nov 06.0 ATW & CIRCM QRC AKit Development & Integration : Subtotal Support ($ in Millions) Category Item Support Equipment Performing Activity & Location : Subtotal Apr Mar Mar May May Apr 06 Method & Type Nov Continuing To Jul Jul Page 8 of 5 R Line #7

9 : February 06 Exhibit R3, RDT&E Project Analysis: PB 07 R Program Element (Number/Name) Test and Evaluation ($ in Millions) Category Item Method & Type Performing Activity & Location EB / CIRCM To Government System Test and Evaluation : Apr Apr Other Testing : May May ATW & CIRCM Government System Test & Evaluation : Subtotal Project s Apr Mar To Remarks Page 9 of 5 R Line #7 5

10 : February 06 Exhibit R, RDT&E Schedule Profile: PB 07 R Program Element (Number/Name) Page 0 of 5 EB / CIRCM R Line #7 6

11 : February 06 Exhibit R, RDT&E Schedule Profile: PB 07 R Program Element (Number/Name) Page of 5 EB / CIRCM R Line #7 7

12 : February 06 Exhibit RA, RDT&E Schedule Details: PB 07 R Program Element (Number/Name) EB / CIRCM Schedule Details Start Quarter Year 0 Quarter Year 05 MS B DAB EMD EMD /Protest EMD Phase Critical Design Review (CDR) Risk Reduction Activities CDR Developmental Test Activity Prototype Deliveries Reliability Demonstration Test (RDT) MS C MultiPlatform AKit Development and Integration LRIP Initial Operational Test and Evaluation (IOT&E) FUE FRPDR Initial Operating Capability (IOC) 0 0 Bridge Activity Events End Page of 5 R Line #7 8

13 : February 06 Exhibit RA, RDT&E Project Justification: PB 07 COST ($ in Millions) R Program Element (Number/Name) EE3: A/C Surv Equip Dev Quantity of RDT&E Articles.7 FY 08 EE3 / A/C Surv Equip Dev FY 09 FY 00 To FY 0 Continuing Continuing Note Fiscal Year (FY) 05 funds are a restructuring of funds from FY 0 Project 665 (A/C Surv Equip Dev), Program Element (PE) 06070A (EW Development) to project EE3 (A/C Surv Equip Dev), PE A (Common Infrared ). Funds from Project EE3 (A/C Surv Equip Dev), PE A (Common Infrared ) are restructured to Project ER7 (Aircraft Survivability Equipment Development), PE A (Aircraft Survivability Development) for and beyond for more efficient and effective program management. A. Mission Description and Budget Item Justification The objective of the Aircraft Survivability Equipment (ASE) Development project is to improve Radio Frequency (RF) ASE for aviation. The APR39 Radar Warning Receiver (RWR) detects, categorizes, and prioritizes RF emitters and provides a visual / aural alert to aircrew members warning them of targeting by RFguided weapons. The Milestone Decision Authority (MDA) approved Phases and of a 3phased path forward. Phase serves as an obsolescence / sustainment upgrade to the Processor Line Replaceable Unit (LRU) of the AN/APR39A(V) RWR implemented to ensure that the currently fielded system remains viable until affordable improved RF ASE capability can be pursued in Phases and 3. Phase, RWR Modernization, adopts the ongoing United States Navy Class I RWR Engineering Change Proposal (ECP), commonly referred to as the APR39D(V) system. APR39D(V) will significantly improve the RF threat coverage, automatic detection and identification of threat types, bearing, and lethality. Under Phase, the will develop enhancements to the APR39D(V) as hardware upgrades needed to keep the APR39D(V) technically relevant and address emerging Low Probability Intercept (LPI) and frequency agile threats. Phase 3 adds active Electronic Countermeasures (ECM) jamming capability for selected aircraft; Materiel Development Decision (MDD) for this ECM jamming capability phase is not expected until later in the Future Defense Program (FYDP). B. Accomplishments/Planned Programs ($ in Millions).7 Title: Phase Radio Frequency Countermeasure Description: Phase Product Development Accomplishments: Page 3 of 5 R Line #7 9

14 : February 06 Exhibit RA, RDT&E Project Justification: PB 07 R Program Element (Number/Name) B. Accomplishments/Planned Programs ($ in Millions) FY5 RDT&E funding supported AH6E AKit development, ElectroMagnetic Interference (EMI) testing, Antenna Macrocell upgrades (MaRCm), funding for the Reliability Demonstration testing, and Mission Data Set (MDS) development. Accomplishments/Planned Programs Subtotals C. Other Program Funding Summary ($ in Millions) Line Item AZ35: Radio Frequency CM (AZ35) Remarks FY EE3 / A/C Surv Equip Dev.7 FY FY To FY Continuing Continuing D. Acquisition Strategy RF ASE is managed by Project Manager ASE (PM ASE) for development, testing, procurement, integration and installation on rotary wing and small fixed wing aviation platforms. PM ASE proposed a threephased path forward commensurate with user priorities and affordability considerations. The Milestone Decision Authority (MDA) approved Phases and of a 3phased path forward. Phase addresses obsolescence/diminishing Manufacturing Sources (DMS) issues associated with the currently fielded AN/APR39A(V) RWR via sole source ECP awarded to the APR39A manufacturer. Phase adopts the ongoing United States Navy (USN) RWR Class I Correction of Deficiencies ECP commonly referred to as the APR39D(V) system, limiting serviceunique design, test, and integration expenses. Full participation throughout the remaining development, testing, procurement, fielding, and sustainment of the APR39D(V) Digital RWR will address the significant RF capability gap while avoiding additional costs associated with a singleservice solution. This multiservice approach also fields an effective and suitable material solution sooner to support the rebalance of the National Defense Strategy to the RF threatheavy AsiaPacific Region. Phase 3 will develop and integrate active Electronic Countermeasure jamming capability for select aircraft. E. Performance Metrics N/A Page of 5 R Line #7 30

15 : February 06 Exhibit R3, RDT&E Project Analysis: PB 07 R Program Element (Number/Name) Management Services ($ in Millions) Category Item Method & Type Performing Activity & Location EE3 / A/C Surv Equip Dev To Threat Management : Project Management : Subtotal Product Development ($ in Millions) Category Item Method & Type Performing Activity & Location Digital Radar Warning Receiver (RWR) Lab Demo / Study : 0.63 S/W Development OGA, : Aberdeen Proving Ground, MD MIPR : AMRDEC MIPR Tobyhanna : Tobyhanna, PA.05 SIL Updates Depot Standup Platform Integration Multiple : Subtotal Performing Activity & Location or Support : Matrix Support : Subtotal To Method & Type.686 Support ($ in Millions) Category Item To Page 5 of 5 R Line #7 3

16 : February 06 Exhibit R3, RDT&E Project Analysis: PB 07 R Program Element (Number/Name) Test and Evaluation ($ in Millions) Category Item Method & Type Performing Activity & Location EE3 / A/C Surv Equip Dev To MultiService DT/OT : Government system Test and Evaluation : Subtotal Project s To Remarks Page 6 of 5 R Line #7 3

17 : February 06 Exhibit R, RDT&E Schedule Profile: PB 07 R Program Element (Number/Name) Page 7 of 5 EE3 / A/C Surv Equip Dev R Line #7 33

18 : February 06 Exhibit RA, RDT&E Schedule Details: PB 07 R Program Element (Number/Name) EE3 / A/C Surv Equip Dev Schedule Details Start Events Phase APR39D(V) Prototype Fabrication End Quarter Year 03 Quarter Year 05 Phase APR39D(V) DT/OT Phase APR39D(V) Platform Integration Phase APR39D(V) Procurement Decision Phase Procurement / Deployment 07 0 Phase APR39D(V) FUE Emerging Threats/SIL Updates Software Development 05 0 Page 8 of 5 R Line #7 3

19 : February 06 Exhibit RA, RDT&E Project Justification: PB 07 COST ($ in Millions) R Program Element (Number/Name) EE: Common Missile Warning System (CMWS) Quantity of RDT&E Articles FY 08 EE / Common Missile Warning System (CMWS) FY 09 FY 00 To FY 0 Continuing Continuing Note Fiscal Year (FY) 05 funds are a restructuring of funds from FY 0 Project VU7 (Common Missile Warning System), Program Element (PE) 06070A (EW Development) to Project EE (Common Missile Warning System (CMWS)), PE A (Common Infrared ). Funds from Project EE (Common Missile Warning System (CMWS)), PE A (Common Infrared ) are restructured to Project ER8 (Common Missile Warning System (CMWS)), PE A (Aircraft Survivability Development) for and beyond for more efficient and effective program management. A. Mission Description and Budget Item Justification The US operational requirements concept for Aviation Infrared (IR) countermeasure systems is known as the Suite of Integrated Infrared Countermeasures (SIIRCM). SIIRCM is an integrated warning and countermeasure system to enhance aircraft survivability against IRguided threat missile systems. The Common Missile Warning System (CMWS) is a core element of the SIIRCM concept. CMWS is an integrated ultraviolet (UV) missile warning system, with an Improved Countermeasure Dispenser (ICMD) serving as a subsystem to a host aircraft. The CMWS program is a UV missile warning system that cues both flare and laserbased countermeasures to defeat incoming IRseeking missiles and will alert aircrews to the presence of certain incoming unguided munitions. The BKit consists of the components which perform the missile detection and aircrew notification, unguided munitions detection and aircrew notification, false alarm rejection, and countermeasure employment/cueing functions of the system. The CMWS Electronic Control Unit (ECU) receives UV missile detection data from ElectroOptic Missile Sensors (EOMS) and sends a missile alert signal to warn aircrews via onboard avionics. Tier threat missiles detected and tracked by the CMWS are subsequently defeated by a combination of missile seeker countermeasures, including decoy flares and IR Laser Jamming (currently Advanced Threat Infrared Countermeasures (ATIRCM)equipped CH7 platform only). In addition, the CMWS ECU receives from the EOMS unguided munitions detection data which it also passes to the aircrew through aural and visual alerts. The aircrew then applies the appropriate Tactics, Techniques and Procedures (TTPs) to break contact or engage the enemy with ownship ordnance. The CMWS Generation 3 (Gen 3) ECU in conjunction with ongoing software development efforts will address outstanding material release conditions to achieve a Full Material Release (FMR) for CMWS and ensure protection against emerging IRguided missile threats. The AKit for CMWS includes mounting hardware, wiring harnesses, cables, and other components necessary to install and interface the mission kit on host aircraft. The AKit ensures the mission kit is functionally and physically operational with a specific host aircraft type. Joint Urgent Operational Needs Statement (JUONS) SO000 will integrate the Department of the Navy Large Aircraft Infrared Countermeasure (DoN LAIRCM) system on a select number of and SM aircraft in the threat area of responsibility. The purpose of this JUONS is to detect and defeat proliferate SurfacetoAir Missiles Page 9 of 5 R Line #7 35

20 : February 06 Exhibit RA, RDT&E Project Justification: PB 07 R Program Element (Number/Name) EE / Common Missile Warning System (CMWS) (SAM) threats. HQDA has provided a follow up Directed Requirement to this JUONS to reduce Space, Weight and Power (SWaP) and accelerate delivery of Common Infrared Countermeasures (CIRCMs). The intent of the ATW & CIRCM QRC program is to reduce the SWaP that require operational tradeoffs that are associated with the Phase a solution. B. Accomplishments/Planned Programs ($ in Millions) Title: Development Effort Description: RDT&E funding supports continuing development engineering of the Threat Analysis Database (TAD), salaries, and integration with other ASE systems. Accomplishments: $3.609M FY5 RDT&E funding supported continuing development engineering of the Threat Analysis Database (TAD) by developing full spectrum compliance for Tier threat list by improving Block.0 algorithm and creating software architecture for analysis of emerging threats, program management, performed data modeling of the CMWS ASE Buss Controller to platform Interface Requirements Specification/Interface Design Document in a FACE compliant methodology, prime contractor engineering services, air worthiness support, Apache and Black Hawk aircraft integration, testing and test instrumentation, and travel. $3M FY5 RDT&E funding supported aircraft integration of the JUONS solution on US rotary wing aircraft, prime contractor engineering services, test and evaluation, and program management. Accomplishments/Planned Programs Subtotals C. Other Program Funding Summary ($ in Millions) Line Item APA: BA AZ357 Remarks FY FY FY To FY D. Acquisition Strategy The acquisition strategy includes buying CMWS BKits to support the Force Generation (ARFORGEN) model and installation of AKits on all modernized aircraft. The previous CMWS production contract was a firm fixedpriced (FFP), Indefinite Delivery, Indefinite Quantity (IDIQ) contract. A FFP bridge contract was awarded March 03 for CMWS hardware. The followon CMWS production FFP/CPFF IDIQ contract is a 3 year firm fixed price contract to procure the remaining Generation 3 ECUs and AKits and was awarded SEP 03. The Gen 3 ECU, which provides increased processing capacity and enables unguided munitions detection, became a part of the system in FY 00; First Unit Equipped (FUE) for the Gen 3 ECU was achieved in Operation Enduring Freedom (OEF) on 8 September 03. All aircraft deployed to OEF have received the new processor with hostile fire detection capability. Gen 3 ECU's will gradually replace all Gen ECU's across the Aviation fleet. Page 0 of 5 R Line #7 36

21 : February 06 Exhibit RA, RDT&E Project Justification: PB 07 R Program Element (Number/Name) EE / Common Missile Warning System (CMWS) E. Performance Metrics N/A Page of 5 R Line #7 37

22 : February 06 Exhibit R3, RDT&E Project Analysis: PB 07 R Program Element (Number/Name) Management Services ($ in Millions) Category Item CMWS Systems Engineering Program Management Method & Type Performing Activity & Location : PM ASE, HSV, AL Subtotal EE / Common Missile Warning System (CMWS) To Product Development ($ in Millions) Category Item Method & Type CMWS Tier /3 Upgrades :.000 CMWS Threat Analysis Database Design BAE : 0.55 Threat Analysis Database (TAD) BAE : CMWS Enhanced Sensor Study & Evaluation : Performing Activity & Location 0.87 Jun To CMWS Data Modeling TBD : Prime or Integration Engineering TBD TBD : TBD Aircraft Integration TBD : 9.97 Software TBD : Subtotal Test and Evaluation ($ in Millions) Category Item Test and Evaluation Method & Type TBD Performing Activity & Location TBD : Subtotal To Page of 5 R Line #7 38

23 : February 06 Exhibit R3, RDT&E Project Analysis: PB 07 R Program Element (Number/Name) Project s EE / Common Missile Warning System (CMWS) To Remarks Page 3 of 5 R Line #7 39

24 : February 06 Exhibit R, RDT&E Schedule Profile: PB 07 R Program Element (Number/Name) Page of 5 EE / Common Missile Warning System (CMWS) R Line #7 0

25 : February 06 Exhibit RA, RDT&E Schedule Details: PB 07 R Program Element (Number/Name) EE / Common Missile Warning System (CMWS) Schedule Details Start Events CMWS system Dev/Tier and 3 Upgrades (TAD Updates) CMWS Gen 3 Production Page 5 of 5 End Quarter Year 0 Quarter Year R Line #7

UNCLASSIFIED. UNCLASSIFIED Army Page 1 of 20 R-1 Line #121

UNCLASSIFIED. UNCLASSIFIED Army Page 1 of 20 R-1 Line #121 Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2015 Army : March 2014 2040: Research,, Test & Evaluation, Army / BA 5: System & Demonstration (SDD) COST ($ in Millions) # FY 2016 FY 2017 FY 2018 FY 2019

More information

UNCLASSIFIED. UNCLASSIFIED Air Force Page 1 of 8 R-1 Line #86

UNCLASSIFIED. UNCLASSIFIED Air Force Page 1 of 8 R-1 Line #86 Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2017 Air Force : February 2016 3600: Research, Development, Test & Evaluation, Air Force / BA 5: System Development & Demonstration (SDD) COST ($ in Millions)

More information

UNCLASSIFIED UNCLASSIFIED

UNCLASSIFIED UNCLASSIFIED : February 216 Exhibit R2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 217 2: Research, Development, Test & Evaluation, / BA 5: System Development & Demonstration (SDD) COST ($ in Millions) FY 215 FY 216 R1 Program

More information

UNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE

UNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2014 Air Force DATE: April 2013 COST ($ in Millions) # ## FY 2015 FY 2016 FY 2017 FY 2018 To Program Element - 16.397 1.975 1.971-1.971 1.990 1.989 2.023

More information

UNCLASSIFIED. FY 2016 Base FY 2016 OCO

UNCLASSIFIED. FY 2016 Base FY 2016 OCO Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2016 Army : February 2015 2040: Research, Development, Test & Evaluation, Army / BA 7: Operational Systems Development COST ($ in Millions) FY 2017 FY 2018

More information

UNCLASSIFIED. UNCLASSIFIED Army Page 1 of 8 R-1 Line #124

UNCLASSIFIED. UNCLASSIFIED Army Page 1 of 8 R-1 Line #124 Exhibit R2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2015 Army : March 2014 2040: Research, Development, Test & Evaluation, Army / BA 5: System Development & Demonstration (SDD) COST ($ in Millions) Years FY

More information

UNCLASSIFIED. R-1 Program Element (Number/Name) PE A / Indirect Fire Protection Capability Increment 2-Intercept (IFPC2)

UNCLASSIFIED. R-1 Program Element (Number/Name) PE A / Indirect Fire Protection Capability Increment 2-Intercept (IFPC2) Exhibit R2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2015 Army : March 2014 2040: Research, Development, Test & Evaluation, Army / BA 4: Advanced Component Development & Prototypes (ACD&P) COST ($ in Millions)

More information

UNCLASSIFIED. FY 2017 Base FY 2017 OCO

UNCLASSIFIED. FY 2017 Base FY 2017 OCO Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2017 Air Force : February 2016 COST ($ in Millions) Years FY 2018 FY 2019 FY 2020 FY 2021 To Program Element 966.537 66.374 29.083 54.838 0.000 54.838 47.369

More information

UNCLASSIFIED. Cost To Complete Total Program Element JA6: Joint Air-To-Ground Missile (JAGM)

UNCLASSIFIED. Cost To Complete Total Program Element JA6: Joint Air-To-Ground Missile (JAGM) Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2016 Army : February 2015 2040: Research, Development, Test & Evaluation, Army / BA 5: System Development & Demonstration (SDD) COST ($ in Millions) Years

More information

UNCLASSIFIED UNCLASSIFIED

UNCLASSIFIED UNCLASSIFIED : February 26 Exhibit R2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 27 2: Research, Development, Test & Evaluation, / BA 7: Operational Systems Development COST ($ in Millions) FY 25 FY 26 R Program Element

More information

UNCLASSIFIED. UNCLASSIFIED Navy Page 1 of 8 R-1 Line #77

UNCLASSIFIED. UNCLASSIFIED Navy Page 1 of 8 R-1 Line #77 Exhibit R2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2015 Navy Date: March 2014 1319: Research, Development, Test & Evaluation, Navy / BA 4: Advanced Component Development & Prototypes (ACD&P) COST ($ in Millions)

More information

UNCLASSIFIED. FY 2016 Base FY 2016 OCO

UNCLASSIFIED. FY 2016 Base FY 2016 OCO Exhibit R2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2016 Navy : February 2015 1319: Research, Development, Test & Evaluation, Navy / BA 4: Advanced Component Development & Prototypes (ACD&P) COST ($ in Millions)

More information

UNCLASSIFIED UNCLASSIFIED

UNCLASSIFIED UNCLASSIFIED : February 216 Exhibit R2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 217 24: Research, Development, Test & Evaluation, / BA 5: tem Development & Demonstration (SDD) COST ($ in Millions) FY 215 FY 216 R1 Program

More information

UNCLASSIFIED UNCLASSIFIED. EXHIBIT R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification February 2007 RESEARCH DEVELOPMENT TEST & EVALUATION, NAVY / BA-4

UNCLASSIFIED UNCLASSIFIED. EXHIBIT R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification February 2007 RESEARCH DEVELOPMENT TEST & EVALUATION, NAVY / BA-4 EXHIBIT R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification APPROPRIATION/BUDGET ACTIVITY R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE RESEARCH DEVELOPMENT TEST & EVALUATION, NAVY / BA-4 0604272N, TADIRCM COST ($ in Millions) FY 2006 FY 2007

More information

UNCLASSIFIED UNCLASSIFIED

UNCLASSIFIED UNCLASSIFIED : February 26 Exhibit R2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 27 24: Research, Development, Test & Evaluation, / BA 7: Operational Systems Development COST ($ in Millions) R Element (Number/Name) PE 6735A

More information

UNCLASSIFIED. UNCLASSIFIED Air Force Page 1 of 7 R-1 Line #91

UNCLASSIFIED. UNCLASSIFIED Air Force Page 1 of 7 R-1 Line #91 Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2015 Air Force : March 2014 3600: Research, Development, Test & Evaluation, Air Force / BA 5: Development & Demonstration (SDD) COST ($ in Millions) # FY

More information

UNCLASSIFIED FY 2016 OCO. FY 2016 Base

UNCLASSIFIED FY 2016 OCO. FY 2016 Base Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2016 Air Force Date: February 2015 3600: Research,, Test & Evaluation, Air Force / BA 6: RDT&E Management Support COST ($ in Millions) Prior Years FY 2014

More information

UNCLASSIFIED. R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE PE A: Biometrics Enabled Intelligence FY 2012 OCO

UNCLASSIFIED. R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE PE A: Biometrics Enabled Intelligence FY 2012 OCO Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2012 Army DATE: February 2011 COST ($ in Millions) FY 2010 FY 2011 FY 2013 FY 2014 FY 2015 FY 2016 To Program Element - 14.114 15.018-15.018 15.357 15.125

More information

UNCLASSIFIED. UNCLASSIFIED Air Force Page 1 of 7 R-1 Line #90

UNCLASSIFIED. UNCLASSIFIED Air Force Page 1 of 7 R-1 Line #90 Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2017 Air Force : February 2016 3600: Research, Development, Test & Evaluation, Air Force / BA 5: System Development & Demonstration (SDD) COST ($ in Millions)

More information

UNCLASSIFIED. FY 2016 Base FY 2016 OCO

UNCLASSIFIED. FY 2016 Base FY 2016 OCO Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2016 Air Force : February 2015 3600: Research, Development, Test & Evaluation, Air Force / BA 7: Operational Systems Development COST ($ in Millions) FY

More information

UNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE FY 2013 OCO

UNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE FY 2013 OCO Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2013 Air Force DATE: February 2012 COST ($ in Millions) FY 2011 FY 2014 FY 2015 FY 2016 FY 2017 To Program Element 42.067 6.509 5.000-5.000 41.500 30.000

More information

UNCLASSIFIED. FY 2016 Base FY 2016 OCO

UNCLASSIFIED. FY 2016 Base FY 2016 OCO Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2016 Air Force : February 2015 3600: Research, Development, Test & Evaluation, Air Force / BA 7: Operational Systems Development COST ($ in Millions) FY

More information

UNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE PE F: NUCLEAR WEAPON MODERNIZATION FY 2012 OCO

UNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE PE F: NUCLEAR WEAPON MODERNIZATION FY 2012 OCO Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2012 Air Force DATE: February 2011 COST ($ in Millions) FY 2010 FY 2013 FY 2014 FY 2015 FY 2016 To Program Element - - 93.867-93.867 158.218 315.238 397.880

More information

UNCLASSIFIED. UNCLASSIFIED Navy Page 1 of 10 R-1 Line #98

UNCLASSIFIED. UNCLASSIFIED Navy Page 1 of 10 R-1 Line #98 Exhibit R2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2015 Navy : March 2014 1319: Research, Development, Test & Evaluation, Navy / BA 5: System Development & Demonstration (SDD) COST ($ in Millions) Years FY

More information

UNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE. FY 2014 FY 2014 OCO ## Total FY 2015 FY 2016 FY 2017 FY 2018

UNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE. FY 2014 FY 2014 OCO ## Total FY 2015 FY 2016 FY 2017 FY 2018 Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2014 Navy DATE: April 2013 COST ($ in Millions) Years FY 2012 FY 2013 # ## FY 2015 FY 2016 FY 2017 FY 2018 To Program Element 92.713 23.188 31.064 46.007-46.007

More information

UNCLASSIFIED. Cost To Complete Total Program Element ED8: Paladin Integrated Management (PIM)

UNCLASSIFIED. Cost To Complete Total Program Element ED8: Paladin Integrated Management (PIM) Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2016 Army : February 2015 2040: Research, Development, Test & Evaluation, Army / BA 5: System Development & Demonstration (SDD) COST ($ in Millions) Years

More information

UNCLASSIFIED. FY 2017 Base FY 2017 OCO

UNCLASSIFIED. FY 2017 Base FY 2017 OCO Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2017 Air Force : February 2016 COST ($ in Millions) Years FY 2018 FY 2019 FY 2020 FY 2021 To Program Element - 4.208 2.245 5.830 0.000 5.830 17.932 35.734

More information

UNCLASSIFIED. UNCLASSIFIED Air Force Page 1 of 13 R-1 Line #68

UNCLASSIFIED. UNCLASSIFIED Air Force Page 1 of 13 R-1 Line #68 Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2017 Air Force : February 2016 3600: Research, Development, Test & Evaluation, Air Force / BA 5: System Development & Demonstration (SDD) COST ($ in Millions)

More information

UNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE FY 2013 OCO

UNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE FY 2013 OCO Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2013 Army DATE: February 2012 COST ($ in Millions) FY 2011 FY 2012 Base OCO Total FY 2014 FY 2015 FY 2016 FY 2017 Cost To Complete Total Cost Total Program

More information

UNCLASSIFIED. FY 2016 Base FY 2016 OCO. Quantity of RDT&E Articles Program MDAP/MAIS Code: 468

UNCLASSIFIED. FY 2016 Base FY 2016 OCO. Quantity of RDT&E Articles Program MDAP/MAIS Code: 468 Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2016 Air Force : February 2015 COST ($ in Millions) Years FY 2014 FY 2015 FY 2017 FY 2018 FY 2019 FY 2020 Air Force Page 1 of 9 R-1 Line #85 To Program

More information

UNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE PE A: FIREFINDER FY 2012 OCO

UNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE PE A: FIREFINDER FY 2012 OCO Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 212 Army DATE: February 211 COST ($ in Millions) FY 21 FY 211 FY 213 FY 214 FY 215 FY 216 To Program Element 19.534 24.736 1.358-1.358 3.977 41.223 37.431

More information

UNCLASSIFIED. UNCLASSIFIED Army Page 1 of 7 R-1 Line #9

UNCLASSIFIED. UNCLASSIFIED Army Page 1 of 7 R-1 Line #9 Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2015 Army Date: March 2014 2040:, Development, Test & Evaluation, Army / BA 2: Applied COST ($ in Millions) Prior Years FY 2013 FY 2014 FY 2015 Base FY

More information

UNCLASSIFIED. UNCLASSIFIED Air Force Page 1 of 9 R-1 Line #176

UNCLASSIFIED. UNCLASSIFIED Air Force Page 1 of 9 R-1 Line #176 Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2017 Air Force : February 2016 COST ($ in Millions) Years FY 2018 FY 2019 FY 2020 FY 2021 To Program Element - 24.963 76.760 30.948 0.000 30.948 20.563

More information

UNCLASSIFIED FY 2016 OCO. FY 2016 Base

UNCLASSIFIED FY 2016 OCO. FY 2016 Base Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2016 Army : February 2015 2040: Research, Development, Test & Evaluation, Army / BA 7: Operational Systems Development COST ($ in Millions) Years FY 2014

More information

UNCLASSIFIED. UNCLASSIFIED Air Force Page 1 of 11 R-1 Line #92

UNCLASSIFIED. UNCLASSIFIED Air Force Page 1 of 11 R-1 Line #92 Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2015 Air Force : March 2014 3600: Research, Development, Test & Evaluation, Air Force / BA 5: System Development & Demonstration (SDD) COST ($ in Millions)

More information

UNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE

UNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2013 Air Force DATE: February 2012 COST ($ in Millions) FY 2011 FY 2012 Base OCO Total FY 2014 FY 2015 FY 2016 FY 2017 Cost To Complete Total Cost Total

More information

UNCLASSIFIED. R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE PE BB: Special Operations Aviation Systems Advanced Development

UNCLASSIFIED. R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE PE BB: Special Operations Aviation Systems Advanced Development Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2013 United States Special Operations Command DATE: February 2012 COST ($ in Millions) FY 2011 FY 2012 Total FY 2014 FY 2015 FY 2016 FY 2017 To Complete

More information

UNCLASSIFIED. FY 2016 Base FY 2016 OCO

UNCLASSIFIED. FY 2016 Base FY 2016 OCO Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2016 Air Force Date: February 2015 3600: Research, Development, Test & Evaluation, Air Force / BA 3: Advanced Development (ATD) COST ($ in Millions) Prior

More information

UNCLASSIFIED UNCLASSIFIED. EXHIBIT R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification February 2008 RESEARCH DEVELOPMENT TEST & EVALUATION, NAVY / BA-4

UNCLASSIFIED UNCLASSIFIED. EXHIBIT R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification February 2008 RESEARCH DEVELOPMENT TEST & EVALUATION, NAVY / BA-4 EXHIBIT R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification APPROPRIATION/BUDGET ACTIVITY R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE RESEARCH DEVELOPMENT TEST & EVALUATION, NAVY / BA-4 0604272N, TADIRCM Total PE 92.490 32.552 63.244 64.668

More information

UNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE FY 2013 OCO

UNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE FY 2013 OCO Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2013 Air Force DATE: February 2012 COST ($ in Millions) FY 2011 FY 2012 FY 2014 FY 2015 FY 2016 FY 2017 To Program Element 99.992 132.881 143.000-143.000

More information

KC-46A Tanker DoD Budget FY2013-FY2017. RDT&E U.S. Air Force

KC-46A Tanker DoD Budget FY2013-FY2017. RDT&E U.S. Air Force KC-46A Tanker DoD Budget FY2013-FY2017 RDT&E U.S. Air Force Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2013 Air Force DATE: February 2012 FY 2013 FY 2013 FY 2013 Cost To COST ($ in Millions) FY 2011

More information

UNCLASSIFIED UNCLASSIFIED

UNCLASSIFIED UNCLASSIFIED : February 205 Exhibit R2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2040: Research, Development, Test & Evaluation, / BA 5: System Development & Demonstration (SDD) COST ($ in Millions) R Program Element (Number/Name)

More information

UNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE PE A: ARMY INTEGRATED AIR AND MISSILE DEFENSE (AIAMD) FY 2012 OCO

UNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE PE A: ARMY INTEGRATED AIR AND MISSILE DEFENSE (AIAMD) FY 2012 OCO Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2012 Army DATE: February 2011 COST ($ in Millions) FY 2010 FY 2011 MISSILE Total FY 2013 FY 2014 FY 2015 FY 2016 Army Page 1 of 11 R-1 Line Item #128 To

More information

UNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE FY 2013 OCO

UNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE FY 2013 OCO Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 213 Navy DATE: February 212 COST ($ in Millions) FY 211 FY 212 Total FY 214 FY 215 FY 216 FY 217 To Complete Total Total Program Element.96 8.765 21.17-21.17

More information

UNCLASSIFIED FY 2016 OCO. FY 2016 Base

UNCLASSIFIED FY 2016 OCO. FY 2016 Base Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2016 Air Force : February 2015 COST ($ in Millions) FY 2017 FY 2018 FY 2019 FY 2020 To Program Element 65.370 76.553 59.826 142.551-142.551 190.973 180.205

More information

UNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE FY 2013 OCO

UNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE FY 2013 OCO Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2013 United States Special Operations Command DATE: February 2012 COST ($ in Millions) FY 2011 FY 2012 Total FY 2014 FY 2015 FY 2016 FY 2017 To Complete

More information

UNCLASSIFIED. FY 2016 Base FY 2016 OCO

UNCLASSIFIED. FY 2016 Base FY 2016 OCO Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2016 Army : February 2015 2040: Research, Development, Test & Evaluation, Army / BA 4: Advanced Component Development & Prototypes (ACD&P) COST ($ in Millions)

More information

UNCLASSIFIED. R-1 Program Element (Number/Name) PE F / Advanced Medium Range Air-to-Air Missile (AMRAAM) Prior Years FY 2013 FY 2014 FY 2015

UNCLASSIFIED. R-1 Program Element (Number/Name) PE F / Advanced Medium Range Air-to-Air Missile (AMRAAM) Prior Years FY 2013 FY 2014 FY 2015 Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2015 Air Force : March 2014 COST ($ in Millions) Years FY 2013 FY 2014 # FY 2016 FY 2017 FY 2018 FY 2019 To Program Element 242.669 68.656 70.614 82.195-82.195

More information

UNCLASSIFIED. R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE PE F: Multi-Platform Electronics

UNCLASSIFIED. R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE PE F: Multi-Platform Electronics Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2012 Air Force DATE: February 2011 COST ($ in Millions) FY 2010 FY 2013 FY 2014 FY 2015 FY 2016 To Program Element 14.370 15.574 - - - - - - - Continuing

More information

UNCLASSIFIED. FY 2016 Base FY 2016 OCO

UNCLASSIFIED. FY 2016 Base FY 2016 OCO Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2016 Air Force : February 2015 3600: Research, Development, Test & Evaluation, Air Force / BA 5: System Development & Demonstration (SDD) COST ($ in Millions)

More information

UNCLASSIFIED. UNCLASSIFIED Army Page 1 of 20 R-1 Line #98

UNCLASSIFIED. UNCLASSIFIED Army Page 1 of 20 R-1 Line #98 Exhibit R2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2015 Army : March 2014 2040: Research,, Test & Evaluation, Army / BA 5: System & Demonstration (SDD) COST ($ in Millions) Years FY 2013 FY 2014 R1 Program

More information

UNCLASSIFIED. UNCLASSIFIED Air Force Page 1 of 9 R-1 Line #79

UNCLASSIFIED. UNCLASSIFIED Air Force Page 1 of 9 R-1 Line #79 Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2015 Air Force : March 2014 COST ($ in Millions) Years FY 2013 FY 2014 # FY 2016 FY 2017 FY 2018 FY 2019 To Program Element 49.457 65.370 118.411 59.826-59.826

More information

UNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE FY 2013 OCO

UNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE FY 2013 OCO Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2013 Army DATE: February 2012 COST ($ in Millions) FY 2011 FY 2012 Base OCO Total FY 2014 FY 2015 FY 2016 FY 2017 Cost To Complete Total Cost Total Program

More information

UNCLASSIFIED. R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE PE N: Surface Ship Torpedo Defense FY 2012 OCO

UNCLASSIFIED. R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE PE N: Surface Ship Torpedo Defense FY 2012 OCO Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2012 Navy DATE: February 2011 COST ($ in Millions) FY 2010 FY 2011 Total FY 2013 FY 2014 FY 2015 FY 2016 To Complete Total Total Program Element 57.922

More information

UNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE. FY 2014 FY 2014 OCO ## Total FY 2015 FY 2016 FY 2017 FY 2018

UNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE. FY 2014 FY 2014 OCO ## Total FY 2015 FY 2016 FY 2017 FY 2018 Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2014 Navy DATE: April 2013 COST ($ in Millions) Years FY 2012 FY 2013 # ## FY 2015 FY 2016 FY 2017 FY 2018 To Program Element 174.037 11.276 8.610 1.971-1.971

More information

UNCLASSIFIED. FY 2016 Base FY 2016 OCO

UNCLASSIFIED. FY 2016 Base FY 2016 OCO Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2016 Army : February 2015 2040: Research, Development, Test & Evaluation, Army / BA 4: Advanced Component Development & Prototypes (ACD&P) COST ($ in Millions)

More information

UNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE

UNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2013 Navy DATE: February 2012 COST ($ in Millions) FY 2011 FY 2012 FY 2014 FY 2015 FY 2016 FY 2017 To Program Element 68.421 62.044 71.300-71.300 27.600

More information

UNCLASSIFIED FY 2016 OCO. FY 2016 Base

UNCLASSIFIED FY 2016 OCO. FY 2016 Base Exhibit R2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2016 Navy : February 2015 1319: Research, Development, Test & Evaluation, Navy / BA 4: Advanced Component Development & Prototypes (ACD&P) COST ($ in Millions)

More information

UNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE FY 2013 OCO

UNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE FY 2013 OCO Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 213 Army DATE: February 212 COST ($ in Millions) FY 211 FY 212 FY 214 FY 215 FY 216 FY 217 Army Page 1 of 19 R-1 Line #165 To Program Element 187.27 36.15

More information

UNCLASSIFIED. FY 2016 Base FY 2016 OCO

UNCLASSIFIED. FY 2016 Base FY 2016 OCO Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2016 Army Date: February 2015 2040: Research, Development, Test & Evaluation, Army / BA 4: Advanced Component Development & Prototypes (ACD&P) COST ($ in

More information

UNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE PE A: RADAR DEVELOPMENT

UNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE PE A: RADAR DEVELOPMENT Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2012 Army DATE: February 2011 COST ($ in Millions) FY 2010 FY 2011 Total FY 2013 FY 2014 FY 2015 FY 2016 Army Page 1 of 10 R-1 Line Item #116 To Complete

More information

UNCLASSIFIED. FY 2016 Base FY 2016 OCO. Quantity of RDT&E Articles

UNCLASSIFIED. FY 2016 Base FY 2016 OCO. Quantity of RDT&E Articles Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2016 Air Force : February 2015 COST ($ in Millions) Years FY 2014 FY 2015 FY 2017 FY 2018 FY 2019 FY 2020 To Program Element - 13.610 13.355 12.874-12.874

More information

UNCLASSIFIED FY 2016 OCO. FY 2016 Base

UNCLASSIFIED FY 2016 OCO. FY 2016 Base Exhibit R2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2016 Navy : February 2015 1319: Research, Development, Test & Evaluation, Navy / BA 5: System Development & Demonstration (SDD) COST ($ in Millions) Prior

More information

UNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE

UNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 213 Navy DATE: February 212 COST ($ in Millions) FY 211 FY 212 FY 214 FY 215 FY 216 FY 217 To Complete Program Element 25.229.872.863 7.6 8.463.874.876.891.96

More information

UNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE

UNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2013 Navy DATE: February 2012 COST ($ in Millions) FY 2011 FY 2012 FY 2014 FY 2015 FY 2016 FY 2017 Navy Page 1 of 8 R-1 Line #82 To Program Element - -

More information

UNCLASSIFIED. R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE PE F: Joint Strike Fighter Squadrons

UNCLASSIFIED. R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE PE F: Joint Strike Fighter Squadrons Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2012 Air Force DATE: February 2011 COST ($ in Millions) FY 2010 FY 2013 FY 2014 FY 2015 FY 2016 To Program Element - 217.561 47.841-47.841 132.495 131.844

More information

UNCLASSIFIED. FY 2016 Base FY 2016 OCO

UNCLASSIFIED. FY 2016 Base FY 2016 OCO Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2016 Air Force : February 2015 3600: Research, Development, Test & Evaluation, Air Force / BA 7: Operational Systems Development COST ($ in Millions) FY

More information

UNCLASSIFIED. UNCLASSIFIED Navy Page 1 of 19 R-1 Line #71

UNCLASSIFIED. UNCLASSIFIED Navy Page 1 of 19 R-1 Line #71 Exhibit R2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2015 Navy : March 2014 1319: Research, Development, Test & Evaluation, Navy / BA 4: Advanced Component Development & Prototypes (ACD&P) COST ($ in Millions)

More information

UNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE

UNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2013 Navy DATE: February 2012 COST ($ in Millions) FY 2011 FY 2012 FY 2014 FY 2015 FY 2016 FY 2017 Navy Page 1 of 8 R-1 Line #83 To Program Element - -

More information

UNCLASSIFIED FY 2016 OCO. FY 2016 Base

UNCLASSIFIED FY 2016 OCO. FY 2016 Base Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2016 Army Date: February 2015 2040: Research, Development, Test & Evaluation, Army / BA 3: Advanced Development (ATD) COST ($ in Millions) Prior Years FY

More information

UNCLASSIFIED UNCLASSIFIED

UNCLASSIFIED UNCLASSIFIED Exhibit R2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2017 0400: Research, Development, Test & Evaluation, DefenseWide / BA 4: Advanced Component Development & Prototypes (ACD&P) COST ($ in Millions) R1 Program

More information

UNCLASSIFIED. UNCLASSIFIED Air Force Page 1 of 8 R-1 Line #90

UNCLASSIFIED. UNCLASSIFIED Air Force Page 1 of 8 R-1 Line #90 Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2015 Air Force : March 2014 3600: Research, Development, Test & Evaluation, Air Force / BA 5: System Development & Demonstration (SDD) COST ($ in Millions)

More information

UNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE

UNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2013 United States Special Operations Command DATE: February 2012 COST ($ in Millions) FY 2011 FY 2012 Preparation (MTPS) Total FY 2014 FY 2015 FY 2016

More information

UNCLASSIFIED FY 2016 OCO. FY 2016 Base

UNCLASSIFIED FY 2016 OCO. FY 2016 Base Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2016 Missile Defense Agency Date: February 2015 0400: Research, Development, Test & Evaluation, Defense-Wide / BA 3: Advanced Development (ATD) COST ($

More information

UNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE

UNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2013 Air Force DATE: February 2012 COST ($ in Millions) FY 2011 FY 2012 Base OCO Total FY 2014 FY 2015 FY 2016 FY 2017 Cost To Complete Total Cost Total

More information

UNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE

UNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2014 Air Force DATE: April 2013 COST ($ in Millions) # ## FY 2015 FY 2016 FY 2017 FY 2018 To Program Element - 6.321 5.000 0.400-0.400 66.100 69.800 11.800

More information

UNCLASSIFIED. R-1 Program Element (Number/Name) PE A / ADVANCED TANK ARMAMENT SYSTEM (ATAS)

UNCLASSIFIED. R-1 Program Element (Number/Name) PE A / ADVANCED TANK ARMAMENT SYSTEM (ATAS) Exhibit R2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2015 Army : March 2014 2040: Research, Development, Test & Evaluation, Army / BA 4: Advanced Component Development & Prototypes (ACD&P) COST ($ in Millions)

More information

UNCLASSIFIED. FY 2016 Base FY 2016 OCO

UNCLASSIFIED. FY 2016 Base FY 2016 OCO Exhibit R2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2016 Navy : February 2015 1319: Research,, Test & Evaluation, Navy / BA 5: System & Demonstration (SDD) COST ($ in Millions) Years R1 Program Element (Number/Name)

More information

UNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE FY 2013 OCO

UNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE FY 2013 OCO Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 213 Army DATE: February 212 COST ($ in Millions) FY 211 FY 212 FY 214 FY 215 FY 216 FY 217 To Complete Program Element 125.44 31.649 4.876-4.876 25.655

More information

UNCLASSIFIED. FY 2017 Base FY 2017 OCO

UNCLASSIFIED. FY 2017 Base FY 2017 OCO Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2017 Navy Date: February 2016 1319: Research, Development, Test & Evaluation, Navy / BA 3: Advanced Technology Development (ATD) COST ($ in Millions) Prior

More information

UNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE FY 2013 OCO

UNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE FY 2013 OCO Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2013 Army DATE: February 2012 COST ($ in Millions) FY 2011 FY 2012 Total FY 2014 FY 2015 FY 2016 FY 2017 To Complete Total Total Program Element - 2.885

More information

UNCLASSIFIED FY 2016 OCO. FY 2016 Base

UNCLASSIFIED FY 2016 OCO. FY 2016 Base Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2016 Army : February 2015 2040: Research, Development, Test & Evaluation, Army / BA 7: Operational Systems Development COST ($ in Millions) Years FY 2014

More information

UNCLASSIFIED. R-1 Program Element (Number/Name) PE F / Joint Air-to-Surface Standoff Missile (JASSM) Prior Years FY 2013 FY 2014 FY 2015

UNCLASSIFIED. R-1 Program Element (Number/Name) PE F / Joint Air-to-Surface Standoff Missile (JASSM) Prior Years FY 2013 FY 2014 FY 2015 Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2015 Air Force : March 2014 3600: Research, Development, Test & Evaluation, Air Force / BA 7: Operational Systems Development COST ($ in Millions) # FY

More information

UNCLASSIFIED. UNCLASSIFIED Air Force Page 1 of 7 R-1 Line #91

UNCLASSIFIED. UNCLASSIFIED Air Force Page 1 of 7 R-1 Line #91 Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2016 Air Force : February 2015 3600: Research, Development, Test & Evaluation, Air Force / BA 5: System Development & Demonstration (SDD) COST ($ in Millions)

More information

UNCLASSIFIED. FY 2016 Base FY 2016 OCO

UNCLASSIFIED. FY 2016 Base FY 2016 OCO Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2016 Air Force : February 2015 3600: Research, Development, Test & Evaluation, Air Force / BA 7: Operational Systems Development COST ($ in Millions) Years

More information

UNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE FY 2013 OCO

UNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE FY 2013 OCO Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 213 Navy DATE: February 212 COST ($ in Millions) FY 211 FY 212 FY 214 FY 215 FY 216 FY 217 To Complete Program Element 22.63 3.676 32.789-32.789 35.932

More information

UNCLASSIFIED. FY 2018 Base FY 2018 OCO

UNCLASSIFIED. FY 2018 Base FY 2018 OCO Exhibit R2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: Navy : May 2017 1319: Research, Development, Test & Evaluation, Navy / BA 7: Operational Systems Development COST ($ in Millions) Years R1 Program Element (Number/Name)

More information

UNCLASSIFIED. R-1 Program Element (Number/Name) PE A / Landmine Warfare and Barrier Advanced Technology. Prior Years FY 2013 FY 2014 FY 2015

UNCLASSIFIED. R-1 Program Element (Number/Name) PE A / Landmine Warfare and Barrier Advanced Technology. Prior Years FY 2013 FY 2014 FY 2015 Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2015 Army Date: March 2014 2040: Research, Development, Test & Evaluation, Army / BA 3: Advanced Technology Development (ATD) COST ($ in Millions) Prior

More information

UNCLASSIFIED. FY 2016 Base FY 2016 OCO

UNCLASSIFIED. FY 2016 Base FY 2016 OCO Exhibit R2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2016 Navy : February 2015 1319: Research, Development, Test & Evaluation, Navy / BA 7: Operational Systems Development COST ($ in Millions) Years R1 Program

More information

UNCLASSIFIED. UNCLASSIFIED Army Page 1 of 25 R-1 Line #165

UNCLASSIFIED. UNCLASSIFIED Army Page 1 of 25 R-1 Line #165 Exhibit R2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2015 Army : March 2014 2040: Research, Development, Test & Evaluation, Army / BA 7: Operational Systems Development COST ($ in Millions) Years FY 2013 FY

More information

UNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE

UNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 213 Navy DATE: February 212 COST ($ in Millions) FY 211 FY 212 Total FY 214 FY 215 FY 216 FY 217 To Complete Total Total Program Element - 75.7 122.481-122.481

More information

RDT&E BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION SHEET (R-2 Exhibit)

RDT&E BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION SHEET (R-2 Exhibit) PE NUMBER: 0604256F PE TITLE: Threat Simulator Development RDT&E BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION SHEET (R-2 Exhibit) COST ($ In Thousands) FY 1998 Actual FY 1999 FY 2000 FY 2001 FY 2002 FY 2003 FY 2004 FY 2005

More information

UNCLASSIFIED. FY 2016 Base FY 2016 OCO

UNCLASSIFIED. FY 2016 Base FY 2016 OCO Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2016 Navy : February 2015 1319: Research,, Test & Evaluation, Navy / BA 5: System & Demonstration (SDD) COST ($ in Millions) FY 2017 FY 2018 FY 2019 FY

More information

UNCLASSIFIED. FY 2016 Base FY 2016 OCO

UNCLASSIFIED. FY 2016 Base FY 2016 OCO Exhibit R2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2016 Navy : February 2015 1319: Research, Development, Test & Evaluation, Navy / BA 7: Operational Systems Development COST ($ in Millions) FY 2017 FY 2018

More information

UNCLASSIFIED UNCLASSIFIED

UNCLASSIFIED UNCLASSIFIED Exhibit R, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 017 1319: Research, Development, Test & Evaluation, / BA 4: Advanced Component Development & Prototypes (ACD&P) COST ($ in Millions) FY 015 FY 016 R1 Program

More information

UNCLASSIFIED. FY 2016 Base FY 2016 OCO

UNCLASSIFIED. FY 2016 Base FY 2016 OCO Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2016 Army : February 2015 2040: Research,, Test & Evaluation, Army / BA 5: System & Demonstration (SDD) COST ($ in Millions) Years FY 2014 FY 2015 FY 2017

More information

UNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE FY 2013 OCO

UNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE FY 2013 OCO Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 213 Navy DATE: February 212 COST ($ in Millions) FY 211 FY 212 PE 65866N: Navy Space & Electr Warfare FY 214 FY 215 FY 216 FY 217 Cost To Complete Cost

More information

United States Army Special Operations Aviation Command (USASOAC)

United States Army Special Operations Aviation Command (USASOAC) United States Army Special Operations Aviation Command (USASOAC) AAAA Aircraft Survivability Equipment Symposium BG John R. Evans, Jr. USASOAC Commanding General 14 November 2017 Overall Classification:

More information

Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification February 2008

Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification February 2008 PE NUMBER: 41318F PE TITLE: CV-22 Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification February 28 5 System Development and Demonstration (SDD) 41318F CV-22 ($ in Millions) 413 Total Program Element (PE) CV-22

More information

UNCLASSIFIED. UNCLASSIFIED Air Force Page 1 of 6 R-1 Line #62

UNCLASSIFIED. UNCLASSIFIED Air Force Page 1 of 6 R-1 Line #62 COST ($ in Millions) Prior Years FY 2013 FY 2014 Base OCO # Total FY 2016 FY 2017 FY 2018 FY 2019 Cost To Complete Total Program Element - 0.051-3.926-3.926 4.036 4.155 4.236 4.316 Continuing Continuing

More information