10/as/.r4. Commander. certify that the information contained herein is accurate and complete to the best of my knowledge and

Size: px
Start display at page:

Download "10/as/.r4. Commander. certify that the information contained herein is accurate and complete to the best of my knowledge and"

Transcription

1 DCN 636 certify that the information contained herein is accurate and complete to the best of my knowledge and NAME (Please NEXT ECHELON LEVEL (if applicable) Signature /,/" Title,,// Date I certify that the information belief. the best of my knowledge and NAME (Please Title /,. Signature Date. I certify that the information contained herein is accurate and complete to the best of my knowledge and belief. MAJOR CLAIMA NAME (Please type or print) - mn L ~itleb* Commander Naval Sea Systems Cornnand Activity Signature 10/as/.r4 Date I certify that the information contained herein is accurate and complete to the best of my knowledge and belief. DEPUTY CHIEF OF NAVAL OPERATIONS (LOGISTICS) DEPUTY CHIEF OF STAFF (INSTALLATIONS & LOGISTICS) W. A. EARNER NAME (Please type or print) Signature A Title Date

2 BRAC-95 CERTIFICATION Reference: SECNAV NOTE dtd 8 Dec 93 In accordance with policy set forth by the Secretary of the Navy, personnel of the Department of the Navy, uniformed and civilian, who provide information for use in the BRAC-95 process are required to provide a signed certification that states "I certify that the information contained herein is accurate and complete to the best of my knowledge and belief: The signing of this certification constitutes a representation that the certifying official has reviewed the information and either (1) personally vouches for its accuracy and completeness or (2) has possession of, and is relying upon, a certification executed by a competent subordinate. Each individual in your activity generating information for the BRAC-95 process must certify that information. Enclosure (1) is provided for individual certifications and may be duplicated as necessary. You are directed to maintain those certifications at your activity for audit purposes. For purposes of this certification sheet, the commander of the activity will begin the certification process and each reporting senior in the Chain of Command reviewing the information will also sign this certification sheet. This sheet must remain attached to this package and be forwarded up the Chain of Command. Copies must,be retained by each level in the Chain of Command for audit purposes. I certify the information contained herein is accurate and complete to the best of my knowledge and belief. ACTIVITY COEWNDER CAPT V. E. MAHAE'FEY NAME (Please type of print) COMMANDER (ACTING) Title Date NAVAL SURFACE WARFARE CENTER Activity

3 NAVY ENERGETICS PRESENTATION TO THE LABORATORY JOINT CROSS-SERVICE GROUP DR. IRA BLATSTEIN 20 OCTOBER 1994

4 Energetics "Explosives, ~ro~ellants,and Pyrotechnics including their related component application in Weapons and Space Launched Vehicles. Typically, this would include all applications through the following components:" *Conventional Rocket Motors *Tactical Missile Motors *Strategic Missile Motors *Gun Ammunition Propelling Charge *Rocket Assisted Projectile Motor *Space Propulsion Booster Orbit Transfer Vehicle Propulsion *Cruise Missile Booster *Gas Generators *CAD/PAD/AEPS *Torpedo Propulsion *Anti-Armor Warheads *High Explosive Warheads *Hard Target Warheads *Fuel Air Explosives "Underwater Explosives *Demolition Explosives *Explosive Devices (Boosters, Detonators, Explosive Trains,etc) *Ignition Devices *Incendiary Devices *Signal Devices (Light, Sound, Smoke) * Related technology associated with Explosives, Propellants, Pyrotechnics: chemical synthesis and characterization, environmental engineering of energetics, environmental engineering of energetics processes and materials, energetics manufacturing technology (MANTECH), energetic demilitarization and disposal * Denotes significant Navy capabilitylachievement Navy Energetics LJCSG

5 WHY THE NAVY MUST BE INVOLVED IN ENERGETICS F Energetics Are Primarily Military and Require In-House Knowledge Base Navy Has Unique Requirements - Insensitive munitions - HERO I RADHAZ - Underwater explosiveslwarheads - Variety of platforms Navy Has Broadest Requirements and Capability - Knowledge - Fielded systems - Workload: Preponderance of RDT&E - Facilities: Modern, state-of-the-art - Leads the development of energetics Navy Energetics LJCSG

6 IS. in CD Z 5. (D min

7 Navy Organizations Involved in Energetics r CHIEF OF NAVAL OPERATIONS NAVY ACQUISITION EXECUTIVE COMMANDANT MARINE CORPS Development and SURVEILLANCE Navy Energetics LJCSG

8

9 NAVAL ORDNANCE CENTER NAVAL EXPLOSIVE ORDNANCE DISPOSAL TECHNOLOGY DIVISION UNIQUE MISSION: - NAVY SINGLE-SERVICE MANAGED DOD EOD TECHNOLOGY AND TRAINING PROGRAM - SUPPORTS ALL JOINT SERVICE AND GOVERNMENT AGENCY PEACETIME EOD TECHNOLOGY REQUIREMENTS, NOT DUPLICATED ANYWHERE NEODTD USES CERTIFIED ENERGETIC MATERIALS AS AN ELEMENT IN THE DEVELOPMENT OF PROCEDURES AND EQUIPMENT USED BY MILITARY EXPLOSIVE ORDNANCE DISPOSAL TECHNICIANS SYNERGISTICALLY COLOCATED AT NSWC IHDlV Navy Energetics LJCSG10/20/94 7

10 NAVAL SURFACE WARFARE CENTER MISSION Operate the Navy's full spectrum research, development, test and evaluation, engineering, and fleet support center for ship hull, mechanical and electrical systems, surface ship combat systems, coastal warfare systems, and other offensive and defensive systems associated with surface warfare. I Commander, NSWC RADM Sargent Technical Director, NSWC Dr. Blatstein, CAPT Baskenrille Navy Energetics LJCSG10/20/94 8

11 Navy Energetic and Related RDT&E Responsibilities Navy Energetics LJCSG10/20/94 9

12 SAMPLE OF NAVY ENERGETICS INTELLECTUAL & TECHNICAL CAPABILITY GOVERNMENTS Navy Energetics LJCSG

13 NAVY ENERGETICS AND RELATED CONSOLIDATIONS RDT&t rropulslon RDT&E Ordnance I,..,,..,.., RDT&E RAMJET Propulsion RDT&E Fuzes Large Rocket Motor Disposal Panama Citv (627 WY) Mine Warfare * This chart denotes lead activity for indicated capabilities. Navy Energetics LJCSG1 W

14 OBSERVATIONS Navy's broad requirement for energetic material and systems requires comprehensive in-house capability Past BRACs have led to significant consolidations - From four explosive and propellant capable sites to two (Indian Head, China ~ake,, -1 - Focused warheads - Focused mine warfare - Focused missiles Navy has a proven RDT&E infrastructure including universities, university labs and the private sector NSWC and NAWC provide complementary and back up capabilities in critical DoD areas Navy has capability and capacity for additional full spectrum Joint Cross-service energetics support Navy Energetics LJCSG10120/94 12

15 Document Separator

16 Mission MILITARY VALUE DATA CALL TECHNICAL CENTER I MATERIAL I 11 Technical Center Site I NSWC Headquarters LocationIAddress I Arlington, VA I II Page 1. Mission Statement 2. Joint Service Missions Technical Functions 3. Technical Functions Resource Allocations 4. Work Breakdown Structure 5. Technical Staff Qualifications Facilities and Equipment Location 6. Special FacilitiesIEquipment Resources 7. General FacilitiesIEquipment Resources 8. Geographic Location Features and Ca~abilities 9. Computational Facilities 10. Mobilization Responsibility and Capability 1 1. Range Resources Qualitv of Life 12. Military Housing 13. MWR Facilities 14. Base Family Support Facilities 15. Metropolitan Areas 16. VHA

17 17. Off-base Housing Rental and Purchase 18. Sea Intensive Ratings 19. Commute 20. Educational Opportunities 2 1. Employment Opportunities 22. MedicalIDental 23. Crime Rate TAB A Technical Operations: Functional Support Area - Life Cycle Work Area Form TAB B Facilities and Equipment: FacilitiesIEquipment Capability Form TAB C Range Resources: Range Capability Form Appendix A Functional Support Areas - Life Cycle Work Areas List Appendix B Definitions for Functional Support Areas - Life Cycle Work Areas

18 MILITARY VALUE MEASURES MISSION 1. Mission Statement. State the officially assigned mission of this activity and cite the reference document(s) that assigns the mission. OPNAVNOTE 5450 Dated 23 Dec 1991 Operate the Navy's full spectrum research, development, test and evaluation, engineering, and fleet support center for ship hull, mechanical and electrical systems, surface ship combat systems, coastal warfare systems, and other offensive and defensive systems associated with surface warfare. NAVSEAINST Dated 8 May 92 Leadership Areas 1) Surface Warfare Modeling and Analysis 2) Surface Ship Combat and Combat Control Systems 3) Surface Ship Electronic Warfare 4) Surface Ship Electromagnetic abd Electro-optic Reconnaissance, Search and Track Systems 5) Surface Ship Weapon Systems (including shipboard missile integration) 6) Ship Vulnerability and Survivablity (includes submarine HM&E) 7) Ship Active and Passive Signatures (includes submarine HM&E) 8) Surface and Undersea Vehicle Hull, Machinery, Propulsors and Equipment 9) Platform Systems Integration 10) Strategic Targeting Support (including Fire Control, Targeting and Re-entry Systems) 11) Amphibious Warfare Systems 12) Special Warfare Systems 13) Warheads (Explosives and Engergetic Materials) 14) Mines, Mine Countermeasures and Mine Clearance Systems NAVSEA MISSION IMPERATIVES: The above NSWC Mission requires its Divisions to support the fleet through prudent management of it's assets. The NSWC supports the NAVSEA mission imperatives below in meeting the Center's Mission: a. Meet the Title 10 Statutory responsibilities. b. Retain accountability for the safety and effectiveness of all of its technical products;

19 c. Retain sufficient infrastructure and expertise to be able to respond to the changes in the National needs; d. Retain Navy-to-Navy communications between the Fleet and the shore infrastructure where the Fleet meets the beach; and e. Ensure that acquisition decisions are inherently governmental. NAVAL WARSHIPS: US Naval Warships are unique. Performance requirements of the US Navy Warships, both surface and submarines, must meet a wide range of environmental and operating conditions, including both deep and shallow waters and tropic to frigid environmental conditions. Though many of the technical design parameters for ocean going ships have common factors, the US Navy ships have the additional constraints that they must all operate under this wide range of conditions for extended periods, without the benefit of refitting, and many times during the same deployment. Additional unique performance requirements include: a. Structural members (hull, super-structure, bulkheads, etc.) integrity are sufficiently strong to sustain the ships warfighting capabilities under a damaged condition; b. Data and voice communication network within the ship's Combat Information Centeri the fire control and target sensor systems, the counter-measure systems, the propulsor support systems, and the Command remain operational and can sustain the warfighting ability of the ship under damaged conditions; c. Operate under high speeds for sustained periods, exercise maximum maneuverability and stability, and operate safely in confined waters; d. Perform its warfighting functions throughout its operational envelope while minimizing its acoustic, electromagnetic, and electro-optical signatures, thereby providing greater stealth in detecting and attacking the enemy vehicle minimizing its own target size and characteristics; e. Support a wide range of auxiliary equipments on an integrated basis over a wide range ship classes under a full range of climatic conditions for all such classes; and f. Sustain sufficiently large crews to support its warfighting mission. All of these performance characteristics are unique to the US Navy warships. The above required technical performance characteristics require a cadre of specialized personnel talents page 4 of 55 UIC: 68933

20 and support facilities with an extensive experience base. The critical design expertise required for combat weapon systems lies in the detect, control, and engage sequence, all of which have unique aspects for surface combatants. The inherently governmental functions of determining what warfighting functions get performed on which platforms and in which systems and computer programs in those platforms requires years of experience and competency in system knowledge. This competency exists within NSWC and is maintained by strong commitment to detect, control, engage capabilities. Designers of ship combat weapon systems must continually interact with platform designers to understand requirements, capabilities, and limitations and to make performance and cost trade-offs between the platforms and the combat system, thus the unique nature of U.S. warships whose mission is to place ordnance on target with repeatable destructive performance. Combat weapon systems must be designed and built to operate from combatants over the full range of potential environments. Defensive combat systems are designed and built to respond to a severe and unique threat, which can come from under the ocean, from the air, from the surface of the ocean or from the land, often skimming feet above the surface. Offensive combat systems must be designed and built to operate from a moving and vibrating platform, to fit into constrained spaces, and to be operable and employable aboard ships. A core of experienced people in NSWC perform in-service engineering and logistics support to these deployed systems as required by the NAVSEA mission imperative to retain Navy to Navv communication between the Fleet and the shore infrastructure. The NSWC provides the necessary synergism of the talent base and its wide array of specialized, unique or essential facilities in support of the inherently governmental function of acquiring technological superior integrated weapon and ship systems for the US Navy. Modem systems are so sophisticated and complex that they require technical understanding to make the required acquisition decisions. To acquire this understanding requires a combination of academic education and practical experience. The experience must include the gamut from technical feasibility to military utility. This requires close-coupling between the scientist and engineer and the warrior. In-house institutions are required to provide this experience, because they can couple with the user (warrior) with no conflict of interest. The life span of systems is long, sometimes longer than the companies that produce them. Inhouse institutions provide the technical warranty that insures the maintenance and modification of such systems over their lifetime. Thus, both in acquisition and ownership of the systems, in-house capability improves the Navy's risk management and allows the avoidance of surprise. This process is continuous and can not be effectively partitioned into pieces for individual execution. Thus, the raison d'etre of the Naval Surface Warfare Center. page 5 of 55 UIC: 68933

21 The Commander of the Naval Surface Warfare Center is currently executing his mission and responsibilities with these major initiatives: 1. Acting as the catalyst to better enable ships to be engineered as systems to develop a strategy that yields a top down, system engineered capability for combat systems, ship systems, and ship design. This means the totality of the ship as an integrated whole as opposed to a collection of interfaced systems. As the Navy addresses the ship as a system continuously throughout the entire life cycle, the Navy will have higher quality and more affordable and effective ships. 2. Developing integrated work processes to make the organization seamless in regard to life cycle support, allowing any task the benefit of the knowledge, expertise, and facilities of the Center at large. This will reduce production and maintenance costs while improving performance reliability; improve designs and maintenance by treating ships and combat systems appropriately as a system; and sustain our core technical capabilities with their specialized facilities and a critical mass of talent. 3. Innovatively developing and infusing world class science and technology (S&T) throughout the product areas and technical capabilities of the Center as well as the full life cycle of the products. Actively participate in Defense Conversion and Dual Use activities in order to maximize the effectiveness of Center capabilities first for service to the Navy, but also to serve national-priorities. It involves all elements of the Warfare Center, those that produce S&T as well as those who influence S&T through feedback from Fleet needs and its actual application in the field. This ensures the Center's vision of enabling the engineering of technologically superior ships and systems. 4. Establishing and improving processes that will result in a satisfied workforce able to meet customer needs. Critical to achieving this goal is the understanding that "recognition" must be acknowledged both internally and externally, organizationally and individually, both qualitatively and quantitatively. 5. Providing the Center with top-level policies and strategies related to business operations and promote improvements and redefinition of some existing business processes. The business processes include: Financial management, Capital Equipmentlfacilities management, Material and Procurement management, Information Resource management, and Public Relations management. This aids the Center in improving the quality, affordability and responsiveness in support of mission performance; increasing the use and sharing of best business practices between Divisions; applying of State-of-the-Art business processes, i.e. Activity-Based accounting, networking, and process reengineering; and process standardization, where appropriate. page 6 of 55 UIC: 68933

22 and 6. Identifying NSWC core capabilities that will meet requirements of today and the future. The core capability process defines and links the Center's technical operations, its work and its processes, the people that are needed to execute this work and the productslservices that are produced and delivered to the customer. This the basis for rightsizing the Center. It defines the process by which the Naval Surface Warfare Center determines core; defines the relationship between the elements that make up a technical capability, e.g. technological competencies, people and requisite facilities. NAVSEAINST May 92 cites the following COMNSWC functions. 1. Direct NSWC as the Navy's integrated, full spectrum Center for science and technology, RDT&E, engineering and Fleet support for all aspects of Naval surface warfare. 2. Establish policy and procedures to assure that work which clearly aligns within NSWC technical leadership areas is assigned and funded directly to the NSWC field component. In cases where work requirements do not clearly align within NSWC technical leadership areas, COMNSWC will exercise approval and control authority regarding acceptance of that work and funding within the Center. 3. Establish and maintain NSWC operational policies and directives, together with strategic and business plans. Assign technical roles and functional responsibilities for NSWC divisions. 4. Establish new technical leadership areas, in coordination with the Navy LaboratoryICenter Coordinating Group, when necessary to assure functional purification and focus in support of surface warfare. 5. Review and concur in Navy Integrated Program Summaries (IPS) or other appropriate program documents in so far as they require support from NSWC. Focus NSWC technical areas of expertise and maintain functional purity to best support program requirements identified in IPS and related planning documents. 6. Maintain working relationships with Navy Program Executive Officers (PEOs), Direct Reporting Program Managers (DRPMs), NAVSEA Engineering and Platform Deputy Commanders, Program Managers (PMs), Chief, Office of Naval Technology (ONT) and Chief, Office of Naval Research (ONR) to assure: a. NSWC business plans and budgets support, where possible, the annual budget submissions of these customers. b. Appropriate new or additional ongoing work is assigned to NSWC as page 7 of 55 UIC: 68933

23 directed by SECNAV. c. A proper balance of work is tasked between the private sector and NSWC to help sustain both the Navy's technical core and its mobilization/surge capability. 7. Provide executive oversight, final approval authority and resource advocacy for investment strategy, resource requirements,,military construction planning, budgets and business plan execution/operation of NSWC. 8. Discharge assigned technical management responsibilities in a manner consistent with policies and procedures established by the Navy Acquisition Executive, ASN(RD&A). We hold ourselves accountable for the above and the responsibility of ensuring the delivery of technologically superior, integrated combat, weapons and ship systems that will continue to provide for the safe and effective deployment of our Naval Forces in the years to come. 2. Joint Service Missions. State any officially assigned joint/lead service assignments missions and cite the document(s) that assigned them. Joint mission statements are noted in specific Division's submits of BRAC DATA CALL #5. page 8 of 55 UIC: 68933

24 TECHNICAL FUNCTIONS 3. Technical Functions Resource Allocations. Appendix A provides a list of numbered functional support areas that cover the spectrum of naval warfare and support operations. Additionally, Appendix A provides a list of numbered life-cycle work areas that cover the "cradle to grave" spectrum of Navy systems acquisition. Utilizing the two lists at Appendix A, each activity will break out its entire FYI993 technical program within any applicable intersections of these two defining schemes (for example, functional support area #5.2 - life cycle work area #3 will identify the activity's level of resources allocated to sensors and surveillance systems, radar systems in advanced development). Definitions for each functional support and life cycle work area are provided in Appendix B for reference. a. Use the form at Tab A of this data call to provide data on work years and expenditures for FY 1993 to support each applicable intersection of functional support areas and life cycle work areas. When necessary, estimate data to the best of your ability b. Similarly, use the Tab A forms to report separately on your detachments or sites that have not received this data call directly. This data may be consolidated when the detachments or sites perform work in the same area. When necessary, estimate data to the best of your ability. page 9 of 55 UIC: 68933

25 MANPOWER 4. Work Breakdown Structure. a. Use Table 4.1 (below) to provide data on the general support functions at your activity. Report data as of 31 March If you are collocated with one of your subordinate base keeper commands (i.e., a NAWS or NAS collocated with a NAWC Division), describe the differences in the functions of each and provide a separate Table 4. I for the subordinate command. Include this command in the Table 4.1 submission for your Activity. b. Similarly, use Table 4.2 (below) to provide general support function data for all your detachments or sites that did not receive this data call directly. Consolidate data from all of these detachments into one table (4.2). Provide a list of the detachments whose data is included in Table 4.2. For each identified detachment in this list, include its name, location, UIC, and number of civilian and military personnel onboard. In addition, if any of your detachments or separate sites not receiving an individual data call have over 50 civilian personnel or own technical facilities, provide separately a description of the site, the functions performed there, photographs showing the facilities and state the reason for that site's existence and the necessity for it to be at that location. c. Use Table 4.3 (below) to provide estimated data, for your activity only, to reflect the anticipated impact of previous BRAC decisions that have not yet been implemented. This data should provide the deltas from Table 4.1. [I] Use the following definitions when providing data for the tables below: Workyears: Consistent with those used in the preparation of inputs to the President's budget. Contract Workyears: Actual or estimated workyears performed by support contractors with workyears defined consistent with the definition used in the President's budget. Civilian Personnel Onboard: Full Time Permanent (FTP) employees. [2] Any categories of personnel that are employed to support other Activities should be noted with the name of the additional Activity supported. page 10 of 55 UIC: 68933

26 Table 4.1, General Support - - Resources for (Activity: NSWC HQ) - (UIC: ) Function Space allocated ((SF) Work Years Civilian Persnel onboard Contract Work Years Military Pers. Onboard Off Ed I Command(CO/XO/TD/etc.)** 1145 ADMMISTRATION Comptroller** Admin** Human Resources I I I I I I OPERATIONS SUPPORT I I I I I I for the purposes of this data call. Includes sharedspace with NU-wc c jstal City office. page 11 of 55 UIC: 68933

27 Table 4.2, General Support Resources for all Detachments NOT APPLICABLE Command (COI XOITDletc.) Comptroller 11 Admin 11 Human Resources II Supply Management Consolidated Computational Computer Support OPERATIONS SUPPORT 1 I I I I I I I I I I I Information Systems and Communications II Physical Security Public WorkslStaff Civil Engr Fire Protection MedicalIDental INFRASTRUCTURE I I I I I I - - Military Support AirIWaterfront Operations Other I I I I I I TECHNICAL STAFF page 12 of 55 UIC: 68933

28 Table 4.3, Previous BRAC Impact to General Support Resources for (Activity: ) (UIC: Supply Management Consolidated Computational Computer Support Information Systems and Communications Safety/OSH/Environmental Physical Security Public Worksfstaff Civil Engr Fire Protection Medical/Dental Military Support AirIWaterfront Operations Other OPERATIONS SUPPORT INFRASTRUCTURE Technical Operations I I I I I I Totals page 13 of 55 UIC: 68933

29 page 14 of 55 UIC: 68933

30 5. Technical Staff Qualifications. Not Applicable a. Use Table 5.1 (below) to provide data on the civilian personnel allocated to Technical Operations having the educational and experience levels indicated in the table for your activity. Report data as of 31 March Similarly, use Table 5.2 (below) to provide data for all your separate detachments or sites that did not receive this data call directly. Consolidate data from all of these detachments into one table (5.2). Provide a list of the detachments whose data is included in Table 5.2. Table 5.1, Technical Staff Education Level for (Activity: ) (UIC: ) - Highest Degree Attained Grade School High School B.A.1B.S M.A.1M.S Ph.D.1 M.D. Total Less than 3 Years Years of Government and/or Military Service 3-10 Years More than Years Years 20 Years Total I page 15 of 55 UIC: 68933

31 Table 5.2, Technical Staff Education Level for all Detachments Not Applicable page 16 of 55 UIC: 68933

32 b. Use Table 5.3 (below) to provide data on the number of civilian personnel allocated to Technical Operations with graduate degrees and at least three years of applicable experience that have their highest degree in the fields indicated. Report data as of 31 March Similarly, use Table 5.4 (below) to provide data for all your separate detachments or sites that did not receive this data call directly. Consolidate data from all of these detachments into one table (5.4). Provide a list of the detachments whose data is included in Table 5.4 Table 5.3, Technical Staff Academic Fields for NOT APPLICABLE \ J -,.---. Academic field Number I (1 Physics 11 Biology I Mathematics/Statistics/ Operations Research Engineering Medical 11 Dental Computer Science Social Science 11 Other Science I Non-Science I 11 Total page 17 of 55 UIC: 68933

33 Table 5.4, Technical Staff Academic Fields for all Detachments NOT APPLICABLE (Parent Activity: (UIC: c. Are there unique aspects of the activity's location that help or hinder in the hiring of qualified personnel? NJA d. List all articles written by the in-house technical staff that were published or accepted for publication in refereed journals since 1 January N/A e. List all technical books andlor chapters written by the in-house technical staff that were published or accepted for publication since 1 January NJ A f. Identify any Nobel laureates employed at this activity. NI A g. List all non-governmental awards for research or technical excellence given to members of your technical staff since 1 January NJA h. List all governmental awards for research or technical excellence given to members of your technical staff since 1 January N/A page 18 of 55 UIC: 68933

34 i. List all patents awarded to the in-house technical staff members of this activity since 1 January N/A j. List all patents a~plied for by the in-house technical staff members of this activity since 1 January N/ A k. Identify any in-house staff that are members of the National Academy of Engineering. N/A 1. Identify any in-house staff that are members of the National Academy of Sciences. N/A m. How many Cooperative Research and Development Agreements (CRDAs) have been signed by the activity since 1 January 1990? N/A n. What has been the activity's annual royalty income from CRDAs and patent licenses for each year since 1 January 1990? N/ A o. List and describe any major end item prototypes, either product or process technology, developed in-house by the activity that are currently in production and/or are currently in use by the U.S. Armed Forces or by industry. Cite a published reference that documents the work. N/ A page 19 of 55 UIC: 68933

35 FACILITIES AND EQUIPMENT 6. Special Facilities/Equipment Resources. Include a copy of the form provided at Tab B of this data call for each facility and "major" piece of equipment located at this activity. Include information on separate detachments. The following definitions will apply: Facilities - Will include such things as rocket firing bays, towing tanks, anechoic chambers, hypervelocity gun ranges, hyperbaric chambers, wind tunnels, simulation/emulation laboratories, etc. Include buildings that are integral to the facilitylequipment. Do not include major outdoor ranges or land. Also, describe modeling and simulation capabilities, hardware in-the-loop facilities and analysis or wargaming capabilities. Equipment - Resources used to support the operation of the site with a replacement value of $500,000 or greater. Do not include land or buildings in this category. In reporting equipment, provide information to indicate the degree of portability of the equipment. Class 3 Personal Property items ("plant equipment" or "equipment in place") by definition are highly portable and can be moved easily. Some Class 2 Installed Equipment, such as Main-frame computers, test stands and small hyperbaric chambers, require more extensive utilities support and assembly of components, but can be relocated without damage to the facility or equipment, and therefore are considered "moveable" assets. Other Class 2 items are so large andlor integral to the facility that houses them that major demolition and construction would be required to relocate them, and therefore are considered "fixed" assets. Where appropriate, pieces of equipment can be aggregated for the purposes of completing Tab B. 7. General Facilities. a. Is there any cash revenue generated by this activity? Example: Electricity generated at this activity and sold to the local community. If yes, describe. NO b. What MILCON projects are currently programmed to be completed by the end of FY 1995? For each project provide: NONE (1) A description of the proposed facility with title and project number. Be sure to include the trailing alpha designator for BRACs-88, 91 and 93 realignment projects, i.e., P-xxxB, P-xxxS, P-xxxT. Appendix A. (2) The functional support area(s) that the new facility will support. Refer to page 20 of 55 UIC: 68933

36 (3) Identify installed equipment to be provided based on the threshold guidance of paragraph 6, page 12, of this data call. (4) The additional square footage that this project will provide to the functional support area($. (5) The current working estimate (CWE) & planned beneficial occupancy date (BOD) of the project. c. What MILCON projects are currently programmed to be executed/completed after FY 1995? For each project provide: NONE (1) A description of the proposed facility with title and project number. (2) The functional support area(s) the new facility will support. (3) The identified installed equipment to be provided based on the threshold guidance of paragraph 6, page 12, of this data call. (4) The additional square footage this project will provide to the functional support area(s). (5) CWE & planned BOD. d. What is the distance (in miles) to the nearest military airfield and/or pier not located at your site? Describe. Assume all previous BRAC closures have been executed. Washington Navy Yard 3.5 miles Andrews Air Force Base mile e. How many certified magazines, used for the storage of explosives, does this activity own or control? What is the total explosive weight storage capacity? NONE page 2 1 of 55 UIC: 68933

37 LOCATION 8. Geographic Location. a. Is there an imperative in facility, function or synergy that requires the installation/base/facility to be in its present location? If yes, describe. The headquarters of the Naval Surface Warfare Center is and must continue to be co-located with the Naval Sea Systems Command Headquarters to provide for the continual daily interaction with COMNAVSEA, the PEOs, PMs, DRPM and key people inthe Pentagon. This provides for the opportunity for daily face to face contact to ensure clear meaningful dialogue and efficient leadership. b. What is the importance of the present location relative to customers supported? With a wide variety of customers in the NAVSEA, NAVAIR, Marine Corps, and other services, the central location of the NSWC Headquarters in close proximity to other headquarters and the Pentagon is an imperative. The daily interactions with customers and sponsors on matters of schedule, cost performance, technical and corporate decision making is required. Close proximity is mandatory when answers are required immediately. page 22 of 55 UIC: 68933

38 FEATURES AND CAPABILITIES 9. Computational Facilities. a. Describe the general and special computational capabilities at this site. Include super computing, parallel computing, distributed computing and networking. Include highspeed data transfer, fiber optic links, microwave links, network interconnectivity and video teleconferencing capabilities. Do not discuss desktops and laptops except as they relate to networking. 10. Mobilization Responsibility and Capability. a. Describe any mobilization responsibility officially assigned to this site. Cite the document assigning the responsibility. NSWC Headquarters provides the leadership for its Divisions that have mobilization requirements assigned from multiple sources such as NAVSEA Logistics Support and Mobilizaion Plan (NAVSEA letter 3060 OPR 0341B Ser 03f0158 S-664 of 8 Nov 91). (1) What functional support area(s) does this responsibility support? Refer to Appendix A for the list of functional support areas? (2) What portion of the work years and dollars, as reported in each applicable functional support area reported in Tab A, are spent solely on maintaining your activity's readiness to execute the mobilization responsibilities? (3) How many additional personnel (military & civilian) would be assigned to your activity as part of the mobilization responsibility? Include separately any contractor assets that would be added. b. Does your activity have adequate facilities to support your mobilization responsibilities? (yesfno) N/A (1) If yes, is any space assigned for the sole purpose of maintaining mobilization readiness? (yesfno) If yes, list the square footage assigned. page 23 of 55 UIC: 68933

39 adequate facilities? What is the estimated cost of this work? (3) Are there any restrictions that would prevent work (noted in paragraph lo.b.(2) above) from taking place (i.e,, AICUZ, environmental constraints, HERO, etc.)? If yes, describe. c. Describe any production facilities that would be activated in case of a future contingency. d. Is your activity used as a Reserve Unit mobilization and/or training site? 11. Range Resources. Include a copy of the form provided at Tab C of this data call for each range located at this activity or operated by this activity. Also, report ranges at detachments and sites not receiving a separate data call. The following definition of a range will apply: Range - An instrumented or non-instrumented area that utilizes air, land, and/or water space to support test and evaluation, measurements, training and data collection functions, but is not enclosed within a building. page 24 of 55 UIC: 68933

40 QUALITY OF LIFE 12. Military Housing NOT APPLICABLE (a) Family Housing: (1) Do you have mandatory assignment to on-base housing? (circle) yes no information: (2) For military family housing in your locale provide the following Type of Quarters - Number of Bedrooms Total number of units Number Adequate Number Substandard Number Inadequate Officer 4+ Officer 3 Officer 1 or 2 Enlisted 4+ Enlisted 3 Enlisted 1 or 2 Mobile Homes Mobile Home lots (3) In accordance with NAVFACINST E, an inadequate facility cannot be made adequate for its present use through "economically justifiable means". For all the categories above where inadequate facilities are identified provide the following information: Facility typelcode: What makes it inadequate? What use is being made of the facility? What is the cost to upgrade the facility to substandard? What other use could be made of the facility and at what cost? Current improvement plans and programmed funding: Has this facility condition resulted in C3 or C4 designation on your BASEREP? page 25 of 55 UIC: 68933

41 (4) Complete the following table for the military housing waiting list. r Pay Grade Number of Bedrooms Number on List' CW 'AS of 31 March page 26 of 55 UIC: 68933

42 (5) What do you consider to be the top five factors driving the demand for base housing? Does it vary by grade category? If so provide details. Top Five Factors Driving the Demand for Base Housing (6) What percent of your family housing units have all the amenities required by "The Facility Planning & Design Guide" (Military Handbook 1190 & Military Handbook 1035-Family Housing)? (7) Provide the utilization rate for family housing for FY Type of Quarters Utilization Rate Adequate Substandard 11 Inadequate I 11 (8) As of 31 March 1994, have you experienced much of a change since FY 1993? If so, why? If occupancy is under 98% ( or vacancy over 2%), is there a reason? page 27 of 55 UIC: 68933

43 @) BEO: (1) Provide the utilization rate for BEQs for FY Type of Quarters Utilization Rate Inadequate (2) As of 31 March 1994, have you experienced much of a change since FY 1993? If so, why? If occupancy is under 95 % (or vacancy over 5 %), is there a reason? (3) Calculate the Average on Board (AOB) for geographic bachelors as follows: AOB = I# Geo~ra~hic Bachelors x average number of days in barracks) 365 (4) Indicate in the following chart the percentage of geographic bachelors (GB) by category of reasons for family separation. Provide comments as necessary. Reason for Separation from Family Number of GB Percent of GB Comments Family Commitments (children in school, financial, etc.) Spouse Employment (non-military) Other TOTAL 100 (5) How many geographic bachelors do not live on base? page 28 of 55 UIC: 68933

44 (c) BOO: (1) Provide the utilization rate for BOQs for FY Type of Quarters Adequate Substandard Inadequate Utilization Rate (2) As of 31 March 1994, have you experienced much of a change since FY 1993? If so, why? If occupancy is under 95% (or vacancy over 5%), is there a reason? (3) Calculate the Average on Board (AOB) for geographic bachelors as follows: AOB = i# Geopra~hic Bachelors x averape number of davs in barracks) 365 (4) Indicate in the following chart the percentage of geographic bachelors (GB) by category of reasons for family separation. Provide comments as necessary. Reason for Separation from Family Number of GB Percent of GB Comments Family Commitments (children in school, financial, etc.) Spouse Employment (non-military) Other TOTAL 100 (5) How many geographic bachelors do not live on base? page 29 of 55 UIC: 68933

45 (d) BOOIBEO Housing and Messing. (1) Provide data on the BOQs and BEQs assigned to your current plant account. The desired unit of measure for this capacity is people housed. Use CCN to differentiate between pay grades, i.e., El-E4, E5-E6, E7-E9, CWO-02, 03 and above. (2) In accordance with NAVFACINST E, an inadequate facility cannot be made adequate for its present use through "economically justifiable means". For all the categories above where inadequate facilities are identified provide the following information: a. FACILITY TYPEICODE: b. WHAT MAKES IT INADEQUATE? c. WHAT USE IS BEING MADE OF THE FACILITY? d. WHAT IS THE COST TO UPGRADE THE FACILITY TO SUBSTANDARD? e. WHAT OTHER USE COULD BE MADE OF THE FACILITY AND AT WHAT COST? f. CURRENT IMPROVEMENT PLANS AND PROGRAMMED FUNDING: g. HAS THIS FACILITY CONDITION RESULTED IN C3 OR C4 DESIGNATION ON YOUR BASEREP? page 30 of 55 UIC: 68933

46 (3) Provide data on the BOQs and BEQs projected to be assigned to your plant account in FY The desired unit of measure for this capacity is people housed. Use CCN to differentiate between pay grades, i.e., El-E4, E5-E6, E7-E9, CWO-02, 03 and above. (4) In accordance with NAVFACINST E, an inadequate facility cannot be made adequate for its present use through "economically justifiable means". For all the categories above where inadequate facilities are identified provide the following information: a. FACILITY TYPEICODE: b. WHAT MAKES IT INADEQUATE? c. WHAT USE IS BEING MADE OF THE FACILITY? d. WHAT IS THE COST TO UPGRADE THE FACILITY TO SUBSTANDARD? e. WHAT OTHER USE COULD BE MADE OF THE FACILITY AND AT WHAT COST? f. CURRENT IMPROVEMENT PLANS AND PROGRAMMED FUNDING: g. HAS THIS FACILITY CONDITION RESULTED IN C3 OR C4 DESIGNATION ON YOUR BASEREP? page 3 1 of 55 UIC: 68933

47 (5) Provide data on the messing facilities assigned to your current plant account. (6) In accordance with NAVFACINST E, an inadequate facility cannot be made adequate for its present use through "economically justifiable means". For all the categories above where inadequate facilities are identified provide the following information: a. FACILITY TYPEICODE: b. WHAT MAKES IT INADEQUATE? c. WHAT USE IS BEING MADE OF THE FACILITY? d. WHAT IS THE COST TO UPGRADE THE FACILITY TO SUBSTANDARD? e. WHAT OTHER USE COULD BE MADE OF THE FACILITY AND AT WHAT COST? f. CURRENT IMPROVEMENT PLANS AND PROGRAMMED FUNDING: g. HAS THIS FACILITY CONDITION RESULTED IN C3 OR C4 DESIGNATION ON YOUR BASEREP? page 32 of 55 UIC: 68933

48 (7) Provide data on the messing facilities projected to be assigned to your plant account in FY Facility Type, CCN and Bldg. # Total Sq. Ft. Adequate Seats Sq Ft Substandard Seats Sq Ft Inadequate Seats Sq Ft Avg # Noon Meals Served (8) In accordance with NAVFACINST E, an inadequate facility cannot be made adequate for its present use through "economically justifiable means". For all the categories above where inadequate facilities are identified provide the following information: a. FACILITY TYPEICODE: b. WHAT MAKES IT INADEQUATE? c. WHAT USE IS BEING MADE OF THE FACILITY? d. WHAT IS THE COST TO UPGRADE THE FACILITY TO SUBSTANDARD? e. WHAT OTHER USE COULD BE MADE OF THE FACILITY AND AT WHAT COST? f. CURRENT IMPROVEMENT PLANS AND PROGRAMMED FUNDING: g. HAS THIS FACILITY CONDITION RESULTED IN C3 OR C4 DESIGNATION ON YOUR BASEREP? page 33 of 55 UIC: 68933

49 13. MWR Facilities. For on-base MWR facilities1' available, complete the following table for each separate location. For off-base government owned or leased recreation facilities indicate distance from base. If there are any facilities not listed, include them at the bottom of the table. NOT APPLICABLE LOCATION DISTANCE "Spaces designed for a particular use. A single building might contain several facilities, each of which should be listed separately. page 34 of 55 UIC: 68933

50 (a) Is your library part of a regional interlibrary loan program? page 35 of 55 UIC: 68933

51 14. Base Family Support Facilities and Programs. NOT APPLICABLE a. Complete the following table on the availability of child care in a child care center on your base. Age Category Capacity (Children ) SF Adequate Substandard Inadequate Number on Wait List Average s) 0-6 Mos 6-12 Mos Mos Mos 3-5 Yrs b. In accordance with NAVFACINST E, an inadequate facility cannot be made adequate for its present use through "economically justifiable means." For all the categories above where inadequate facilities are identified provide the following information: Facility type/code: What makes it inadequate? What use is being made of the facility? What is the cost to upgrade the facility to substandard? What other use could be made of the facility and at what cost? Current improvement plans and programmed funding: Has this facility condition resulted in C3 or C4 designation on your BASEREP? c. If you have a waiting list, describe what programs or facilities other than those sponsored by your command are available to accommodate those on the list. d. How many "certified home.care providers" are registered at your base? e. Are there other military child care facilities within 30 minutes of the base? State owner and capacity (i.e., 60 children, 0-5 yrs). page 36 of 55 UIC: 68933

52 f. Complete the following table for services available on your base. If you have any services not listed, include them at the bottom. 15. Proximity of Closest Major Metropolitan Areas (provide at least three): NOT APPLICABLE City Distance (Miles) page 37 of 55 UIC: 68933

53 16.. Standard Rate VHA Data for Cost of Living: NOT APPLICABLE page 38 of 55 UIC: 68933

54 17. Off-base Housing Rental and Purchase NOT APPLICABLE (a) Fill in the following table for average rental costs in the area for the period 1 April 1993 through 3 1 March Type Rental Average Monthly Rent s Annual Annual Low High Average Monthly Utilities Cost 7 Efficiency Apartment (1-2 Bedroom) Apartment (3 + Bedroom) Single Family Home (3 Bedroom) Single Family Home (4 + Bedroom) Town House (2 Bedroom) Town House (3+ Bedroom) Condominium (2 Bedroom) Condominium (3 + Bedroom) page 39 of 55 UIC: 68933

55 @) What was the rental occupancy rate in the community as of 31 March 1994? Efficiency Type Rental Apartment (1-2 Bedroom) Apartment (3 + Bedroom) Single Family Home (3 Bedroom) Single Family Home (4+ Bedroom) Town House (2 Bedroom) Town House (3 + Bedroom) Condominium (2 Bedroom) Condominium (3 + Bedroom) Percent Occupancy Rate (c) What are the median costs for homes in the area? b Type of Home Single Family Home (3 Bedroom) Single Family Home (4 + Bedroom) Town House (2 Bedroom) Town House (3 + Bedroom) Condominium (2 Bedroom) Condominium (3 + Bedroom) Median Cost page 40 of 55 UIC: 68933

56 (d) For calendar year 1993, from the local MLS listings provide the number of 2, 3, and 4 bedroom homes available for purchase. Use only homes for which monthly payments would be within 90 to 110 percent of the E5 BAQ and VHA for your area. (e) Describe the principle housing cost drivers in your local area. page 41 of 55 UIC: 68933

57 18. For the top five sea intensive ratings in the principle warfare community your base supports, provide the following: NOT APPLICABLE Rating Number Sea Number of Local Area in the Local L 19. Complete the following table for the average one-way commute for the five largest concentrations of military and civilian personnel living off-base. NOT APPLICABLE - Location. % Employees Distance (mi) Time(min) page 42 of 55 UIC: 68933

58 20. Complete the tables below to indicate the civilian educational opportunities available to service members stationed at the installation (to include any outlying sites) and their dependents: NOT APPLICABLE (a) List the local educational institutions which offer programs available to dependent children. Indicate the school type (e.g. DODDS, private, public, parochial, etc.), grade level (e.g. pre-school, primary, secondary, etc.), what students with special needs the institution is equipped to handle, cost of enrollment, and for high schools only, the average SAT score of the class that graduated in 1993, and the number of students in that class who enrolled in college in the fall of Institution Type Grade Level(s) Special Education Available Annual Enrollmen t Cost per Student 1993 Avg SAT/ ACT Score % HS Grad to Higher Educ Source of Info page 43 of 55 UIC: 68933

59 (b) List the educational institutions within 30 miles which offer programs off-base available to service members and their adult dependents. Indicate the extent of their programs by placing a "Yes" or "No" in all boxes as applies. Program Type(s) Institution Type Classes Adult High School Vocationall Technical Undergraduate Courses only Degree Program Graduate Day Night Day Night Day Night Day Night page 44 of 55 UIC: 68933

60 (c) List the educational institutions which offer programs on-base available to service members and their adult dependents. Indicate the extent of their programs by placing a "Yes" or "No" in all boxes as applies. page 45 of 55 UIC: 68933

61 21. Spousal Employment Opportunities. NOT APPLICABLE Provide the following data on spousal employment opportunities. Skill Level Professional Manufacturing Clerical Service Other Number of Military Spouses Serviced by Family Service Center Spouse Employment Assistance Local Community Unemploymen t Rate 22. MedicalIDental. NOT APPLICABLE a. Do your active duty personnel have any difficulty with access to medical or dental care, in either the military or civilian health care system? Develop the why of your response. b. Do your military dependents have any difficulty with access to medical or dental care, in either the military or civilian health care system? Develop the why of your response. page 46 of 55 UIC: 68933

... Location. 1. Mission Statement 2. Joint Service Missions. 4. Work Breakdown Structure 5. Technical Staff Qualifications. 8. Geographic Location

... Location. 1. Mission Statement 2. Joint Service Missions. 4. Work Breakdown Structure 5. Technical Staff Qualifications. 8. Geographic Location DCN 1415 I MILITARY VALUE DATA CALL TECHNICAL CENTERS Category Technical Center Site LocatiodAddress WEAPON SYSTEM AND MATERIAL LOGISTICS SUPPORT NAVAL AIR TECHNICAL SERVICES FACILITY NAVAL AVIATION SUPPLY

More information

Naval Support Facility. Indian Head. Supporting Our Military and Our Nation INSTALLATION OVERVIEW JULY 2010 APPROVED FOR PUBLIC RELEASE

Naval Support Facility. Indian Head. Supporting Our Military and Our Nation INSTALLATION OVERVIEW JULY 2010 APPROVED FOR PUBLIC RELEASE Naval Support Facility Indian Head Supporting Our Military and Our Nation INSTALLATION OVERVIEW JULY 2010 APPROVED FOR PUBLIC RELEASE Indian Head A Unique Naval Heritage Indian Head Naval Proving Ground

More information

NSWCCD-SSES SSES COMMAND OVERVIEW. 12 June Patricia C. Woody Department Head Machinery Research and Engineering

NSWCCD-SSES SSES COMMAND OVERVIEW. 12 June Patricia C. Woody Department Head Machinery Research and Engineering NSWCCD-SSES SSES COMMAND OVERVIEW 12 June 2009 Patricia C. Woody Department Head Machinery Research and Engineering Our Chain of Command Secretary of Defense Secretary of the Navy Navy Acquisition Executive

More information

Subj: DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY POLICY ON INSENSITIVE MUNITIONS

Subj: DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY POLICY ON INSENSITIVE MUNITIONS DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY OFFICE OF THE CHIEF OF NAVAL OPERATIONS 2000 NAVY PENTAGON WASHINGTON, DC 20350-2000 OPNAVINST 8010.13E N96 OPNAV INSTRUCTION 8010.13E From: Chief of Naval Operations Subj: DEPARTMENT

More information

Picatinny BRAC 05 Information Briefing for ICAP

Picatinny BRAC 05 Information Briefing for ICAP Picatinny BRAC 05 Information Briefing for ICAP 11 June 07 Geza Pap 1 BRAC Nov 2005 Picatinny Scenario Intent of Law Create an Integrated Weapons & Armaments Specialty Site for Guns and Ammunition Create

More information

OPNAVINST DNS-3/NAVAIR 24 Apr Subj: MISSIONS, FUNCTIONS, AND TASKS OF THE COMMANDER, NAVAL AIR SYSTEMS COMMAND

OPNAVINST DNS-3/NAVAIR 24 Apr Subj: MISSIONS, FUNCTIONS, AND TASKS OF THE COMMANDER, NAVAL AIR SYSTEMS COMMAND DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY OFFICE OF THE CHIEF OF NAVAL OPERATIONS 2000 NAVY PENTAGON WASHINGTON, DC 20350-2000 OPNAVINST 5450.350 DNS-3/NAVAIR OPNAV INSTRUCTION 5450.350 From: Chief of Naval Operations Subj:

More information

A Strategy for Naval Energetics Surface Navy Association January 2018

A Strategy for Naval Energetics Surface Navy Association January 2018 A Strategy for Naval Energetics Surface Navy Association January 2018 Ms. Amy O Donnell Deputy Technical Director NSWC Indian Head EOD Technology Division DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT A NSWC IHEODTD MISSION

More information

STRATEGIC PLAN. Naval Surface Warfare Center Indian Head EOD Technology Division. Distribution A: Approved for public release; distribution unlimited.

STRATEGIC PLAN. Naval Surface Warfare Center Indian Head EOD Technology Division. Distribution A: Approved for public release; distribution unlimited. STRATEGIC PLAN Naval Surface Warfare Center Indian Head EOD Technology Division Distribution A: Approved for public release; distribution unlimited. From the Commanding Officer and Technical Director In

More information

Command Overview Naval Surface Warfare Center, Carderock Division

Command Overview Naval Surface Warfare Center, Carderock Division Command Overview Naval Surface Warfare Center, Division CAPT Mark Vandroff Commanding Officer, NSWCCD February 2018 Dr. Paul Shang Technical Director (Acting), NSWCCD Distribution Statement A: Approved

More information

Subj: MISSION, FUNCTIONS AND TASKS OF DIRECTOR, STRATEGIC SYSTEMS PROGRAMS, WASHINGTON NAVY YARD, WASHINGTON, DC

Subj: MISSION, FUNCTIONS AND TASKS OF DIRECTOR, STRATEGIC SYSTEMS PROGRAMS, WASHINGTON NAVY YARD, WASHINGTON, DC DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY OFFICE OF THE CHIEF OF NAVAL OPERATIONS 2000 NAVY PENTAGON WASHINGTON, DC 20350-2000 IN REPLY REFER TO OPNAVINST 5450.223B N87 OPNAV INSTRUCTION 5450.223B From: Chief of Naval Operations

More information

2011 Munitions Executive Summit. OSD Perspective

2011 Munitions Executive Summit. OSD Perspective 2011 Munitions Executive Summit OSD Perspective Jose M. Gonzalez OUSD (Acquisition, Technology & Logistics) Deputy Director, Portfolio Systems Acquisition, Land Warfare and Munitions Secretary of Defense

More information

Command Overview. Dr. Joseph T. (Tim) Arcano, Jr. Technical Director, NSWCCD. CAPT Rich Blank Commanding Officer, NSWCCD

Command Overview. Dr. Joseph T. (Tim) Arcano, Jr. Technical Director, NSWCCD. CAPT Rich Blank Commanding Officer, NSWCCD CAPT Rich Blank Commanding Officer, NSWCCD Command Overview Distribution Statement A: Approved for Public Release Dr. Joseph T. (Tim) Arcano, Jr. Technical Director, NSWCCD Division We envision the future

More information

UNCLASSIFIED. UNCLASSIFIED Navy Page 1 of 7 R-1 Line #16

UNCLASSIFIED. UNCLASSIFIED Navy Page 1 of 7 R-1 Line #16 Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2015 Navy Date: March 2014 1319: Research, Development, Test & Evaluation, Navy / BA 3: Advanced Development (ATD) COST ($ in Millions) Prior Years FY 2013

More information

Subj: NUCLEAR SURVIVABILITY POLICY FOR NAVY AND MARINE CORPS SYSTEMS

Subj: NUCLEAR SURVIVABILITY POLICY FOR NAVY AND MARINE CORPS SYSTEMS DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY OFFICE OF THE CHIEF OF NAVAL OPERATIONS 2000 NAVY PENTAGON WASHINGTON, DC 20350-2000 OPNAVINST 3401.3B N9 OPNAV INSTRUCTION 3401.3B From: Chief of Naval Operations Subj: NUCLEAR

More information

REQUIREMENTS TO CAPABILITIES

REQUIREMENTS TO CAPABILITIES Chapter 3 REQUIREMENTS TO CAPABILITIES The U.S. naval services the Navy/Marine Corps Team and their Reserve components possess three characteristics that differentiate us from America s other military

More information

Subj: MISSION, FUNCTIONS, AND TASKS OF NAVAL SPECIAL WARFARE COMMAND

Subj: MISSION, FUNCTIONS, AND TASKS OF NAVAL SPECIAL WARFARE COMMAND DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY OFFICE OF THE CHIEF OF NAVAL OPERATIONS 2000 NAVY PENTAGON WASHINGTON DC 20350-2000 OPNAVINST 5450.221E N3/N5 OPNAV INSTRUCTION 5450.221E From: Chief of Naval Operations Subj: MISSION,

More information

UNCLASSIFIED FY 2008/2009 RDT&E,N BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION SHEET DATE: February 2007 Exhibit R-2

UNCLASSIFIED FY 2008/2009 RDT&E,N BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION SHEET DATE: February 2007 Exhibit R-2 Exhibit R-2 PROGRAM ELEMENT: 0603747N PROGRAM ELEMENT TITLE: UNDERSEA WARFARE ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY COST: (Dollars in Thousands) Project Number & Title FY 2006 Actual FY 2007 FY 2008 FY 2009 FY 2010 FY 2011

More information

Subj: SURFACE SHIP AND SUBMARINE SURVIVABILITY TRAINING REQUIREMENTS

Subj: SURFACE SHIP AND SUBMARINE SURVIVABILITY TRAINING REQUIREMENTS DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY OFFICE OF THE CHIEF OF NAVAL OPERATIONS 2000 NAVY PENTAGON WASHINGTON, DC 20350-2000 OPNAVINST 3541.1G N9 OPNAV INSTRUCTION 3541.1G From: Chief of Naval Operations Subj: SURFACE

More information

UNCLASSIFIED. FY 2016 Base FY 2016 OCO

UNCLASSIFIED. FY 2016 Base FY 2016 OCO Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2016 Navy Date: February 2015 1319: Research, Development, Test & Evaluation, Navy / BA 3: Advanced Development (ATD) COST ($ in Millions) Prior Years FY

More information

This Product Area Directorate encompasses the following core equities:

This Product Area Directorate encompasses the following core equities: SEAPORTe FUNCTIONAL AREAS The 22 functional areas supported by SeaPort-e are: 3.1 Research & Development Support 3.2 Engineering, System Engineering, & Process Engineering Support 3.3 Modeling, Simulation,

More information

MEDIA CONTACTS. Mailing Address: Phone:

MEDIA CONTACTS. Mailing Address: Phone: MEDIA CONTACTS Mailing Address: Defense Contract Management Agency Attn: Public Affairs Office 3901 A Avenue Bldg 10500 Fort Lee, VA 23801 Phone: Media Relations: (804) 734-1492 FOIA Requests: (804) 734-1466

More information

Subj: EXPLOSIVES SAFETY REVIEW, OVERSIGHT, AND VERIFICATION OF MUNITIONS RESPONSES

Subj: EXPLOSIVES SAFETY REVIEW, OVERSIGHT, AND VERIFICATION OF MUNITIONS RESPONSES OPNAV INSTRUCTION 8020.15A MARINE CORPS ORDER 8020.13A DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY OFFICE OF THE CHIEF OF NAVAL OPERATIONS 2000 NAVY PENTAGON WASHINGTON. D.C. 20350'2000 and HEADQUARTERS UNITED STATES MARINE

More information

UNCLASSIFIED. R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE PE N: Test & Evaluation Support FY 2012 OCO

UNCLASSIFIED. R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE PE N: Test & Evaluation Support FY 2012 OCO Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 212 Navy DATE: February 211 COST ($ in Millions) FY 21 FY 211 FY 212 Base PE 65864N: Test & Evaluation Support FY 212 OCO FY 212 Total FY 213 FY 214 FY

More information

OPNAVINST N46 24 Apr Subj: MISSION, FUNCTIONS, AND TASKS OF NAVAL FACILITIES ENGINEERING COMMAND

OPNAVINST N46 24 Apr Subj: MISSION, FUNCTIONS, AND TASKS OF NAVAL FACILITIES ENGINEERING COMMAND DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY OFFICE OF THE CHIEF OF NAVAL OPERATIONS 2000 NAVY PENTAGON WASHINGTON, DC 20350-2000 OPNAVINST 5450.348 N46 OPNAV INSTRUCTION 5450.348 From: Chief of Naval Operations Subj: MISSION,

More information

Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification

Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification PE NUMBER: 0603500F PE TITLE: MULTI-DISCIPLINARY ADV Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification BUDGET ACTIVITY PE NUMBER AND TITLE Cost ($ in Millions) FY 2006 FY 2007 FY 2008 FY 2009 FY 2010 FY 2011

More information

HQMC 7 Jul 00 E R R A T U M. MCO dtd 9 Jun 00 MARINE CORPS POLICY ON DEPOT MAINTENANCE CORE CAPABILITIES

HQMC 7 Jul 00 E R R A T U M. MCO dtd 9 Jun 00 MARINE CORPS POLICY ON DEPOT MAINTENANCE CORE CAPABILITIES HQMC 7 Jul 00 E R R A T U M TO MCO 4000.56 dtd MARINE CORPS POLICY ON DEPOT MAINTENANCE CORE CAPABILITIES 1. Please insert enclosure (1) pages 1 thru 7, pages were inadvertently left out during the printing

More information

First Announcement/Call For Papers

First Announcement/Call For Papers AIAA Strategic and Tactical Missile Systems Conference AIAA Missile Sciences Conference Abstract Deadline 30 June 2011 SECRET/U.S. ONLY 24 26 January 2012 Naval Postgraduate School Monterey, California

More information

OPNAVINST DNS 25 Apr Subj: MISSION, FUNCTIONS AND TASKS OF COMMANDER, NAVAL SUPPLY SYSTEMS COMMAND

OPNAVINST DNS 25 Apr Subj: MISSION, FUNCTIONS AND TASKS OF COMMANDER, NAVAL SUPPLY SYSTEMS COMMAND DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY OFFICE OF THE CHIEF OF NAVAL OPERATIONS 2000 NAVY PENTAGON WASHINGTON, DC 20350-2000 OPNAVINST 5450.349 DNS OPNAV INSTRUCTION 5450.349 From: Chief of Naval Operations Subj: MISSION,

More information

To THE DEFENSE ACQUISITION WORKFORCE

To THE DEFENSE ACQUISITION WORKFORCE To THE DEFENSE ACQUISITION WORKFORCE When I took over my duties as Deputy Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition and Technology, I was awed by the tremendous professionalism and ability of our acquisition

More information

TECHNICAL CAPABILITIES MANUAL

TECHNICAL CAPABILITIES MANUAL TECHNICAL CAPABILITIES MANUAL Revision 7 15 December 2017 NAVSEA Warfare Centers Technical Capabilities Manual, Rev 7 Distribution A: Approved For Release Distribution Unlimited Distribution D Government

More information

UNCLASSIFIED UNCLASSIFIED

UNCLASSIFIED UNCLASSIFIED : February Exhibit R, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 119: Research, Development, Test & Evaluation, / BA : Advanced Component Development & Prototypes (ACD&P) COST ($ in Millions) FY R1 Program Element

More information

Ammunition and Explosives related Federal Supply Classes (FSC)

Ammunition and Explosives related Federal Supply Classes (FSC) GROUP 13 Ammunition and Explosives Note-Excluded from this group are items specially designed for nuclear ordnance application. 1305 Ammunition, through 30mm Includes Components. 1310 Ammunition, over

More information

Col Alan Pratt, USMC Commander. Distribution Statement A Approved for Public Release. Mr. Matthew Craig Acting Technical Director

Col Alan Pratt, USMC Commander. Distribution Statement A Approved for Public Release. Mr. Matthew Craig Acting Technical Director 1 Col Alan Pratt, USMC Commander Mr. Matthew Craig Acting Technical Director 2 TEAM Crane 3 rd Largest Naval Installation in the World (100 Square Miles) TEAM Crane $2.24 B FY 11 Business Base 4,372+ Govt.

More information

The Fifth Element and the Operating Forces are vitally linked providing the foundation that supports the MAGTF, from training through Operational

The Fifth Element and the Operating Forces are vitally linked providing the foundation that supports the MAGTF, from training through Operational The Fifth Element and the Operating Forces are vitally linked providing the foundation that supports the MAGTF, from training through Operational Readiness to Deployment to Reconstitution Department of

More information

STATEMENT OF DR. STEPHEN YOUNGER DIRECTOR, DEFENSE THREAT REDUCTION AGENCY BEFORE THE SENATE ARMED SERVICES COMMITTEE

STATEMENT OF DR. STEPHEN YOUNGER DIRECTOR, DEFENSE THREAT REDUCTION AGENCY BEFORE THE SENATE ARMED SERVICES COMMITTEE FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY UNTIL RELEASED BY THE SENATE ARMED SERVICES COMMITTEE STATEMENT OF DR. STEPHEN YOUNGER DIRECTOR, DEFENSE THREAT REDUCTION AGENCY BEFORE THE SENATE ARMED SERVICES COMMITTEE EMERGING

More information

UNCLASSIFIED FY 2016 OCO. FY 2016 Base

UNCLASSIFIED FY 2016 OCO. FY 2016 Base Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2016 Missile Defense Agency Date: February 2015 0400: Research, Development, Test & Evaluation, Defense-Wide / BA 3: Advanced Development (ATD) COST ($

More information

SERIES 1300 DIRECTOR, DEFENSE RESEARCH AND ENGINEERING (DDR&E) DEFENSE RESEARCH AND ENGINEERING (NC )

SERIES 1300 DIRECTOR, DEFENSE RESEARCH AND ENGINEERING (DDR&E) DEFENSE RESEARCH AND ENGINEERING (NC ) SERIES 1300 DIRECTOR, DEFENSE RESEARCH AND ENGINEERING (DDR&E) 1300. DEFENSE RESEARCH AND ENGINEERING (NC1-330-77-15) These files relate to research and engineering (R&E) and pertain to: Scientific and

More information

CAPT Heide Stefanyshyn-Piper

CAPT Heide Stefanyshyn-Piper NAVSEA 05 Chief Technology Officer Perspective on Naval Engineering Needs Naval Engineering for the 21 st Century Workshop January 13-14, 2010 CAPT Heide Stefanyshyn-Piper SEA 05 Chief Technology Officer

More information

OPNAVINST A N2/N6 31 Oct Subj: NAVY ELECTRONIC CHART DISPLAY AND INFORMATION SYSTEM POLICY AND STANDARDS

OPNAVINST A N2/N6 31 Oct Subj: NAVY ELECTRONIC CHART DISPLAY AND INFORMATION SYSTEM POLICY AND STANDARDS DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY OFFICE OF THE CHIEF OF NAVAL OPERATIONS 2000 NAVY PENTAGON WASHINGTON, DC 20350-2000 OPNAVINST 9420.2A N2/N6 OPNAV INSTRUCTION 9420.2A From: Chief of Naval Operations Subj: NAVY

More information

UNCLASSIFIED. R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE PE N: Surface Ship Torpedo Defense FY 2012 OCO

UNCLASSIFIED. R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE PE N: Surface Ship Torpedo Defense FY 2012 OCO Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2012 Navy DATE: February 2011 COST ($ in Millions) FY 2010 FY 2011 Total FY 2013 FY 2014 FY 2015 FY 2016 To Complete Total Total Program Element 57.922

More information

Public Lands Committee Briefing

Public Lands Committee Briefing Hawthorne Army Depot Public Lands Committee Briefing LTC John Summers Commander DSN: 830-7001 Email: johnny.summers@us.army.mil Hawthorne Will Always Deliver EXHIBIT C - LANDS Meeting Date: 03-24-06 Document

More information

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY OFFICE OF THE ASSISTANT SECRETARY (FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT AND COMPTROLLER) 1000 NAVY PENTAGON WASHINGTON DC

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY OFFICE OF THE ASSISTANT SECRETARY (FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT AND COMPTROLLER) 1000 NAVY PENTAGON WASHINGTON DC DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY OFFICE OF THE ASSISTANT SECRETARY (FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT AND COMPTROLLER) 1000 NAVY PENTAGON WASHINGTON DC 20350-1000 SECNAVINST 7000.27A ASN(FM&C): FMB-5 SECNAV INSTRUCTION 7000.27A

More information

AMRDEC. Core Technical Competencies (CTC)

AMRDEC. Core Technical Competencies (CTC) AMRDEC Core Technical Competencies (CTC) AMRDEC PAMPHLET 10-01 15 May 2015 The Aviation and Missile Research Development and Engineering Center The U. S. Army Aviation and Missile Research Development

More information

DoD Countermine and Improvised Explosive Device Defeat Systems Contracts for the Vehicle Optics Sensor System

DoD Countermine and Improvised Explosive Device Defeat Systems Contracts for the Vehicle Optics Sensor System Report No. DODIG-2012-005 October 28, 2011 DoD Countermine and Improvised Explosive Device Defeat Systems Contracts for the Vehicle Optics Sensor System Report Documentation Page Form Approved OMB No.

More information

UNCLASSIFIED. R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE PE N: ASW Systems Development

UNCLASSIFIED. R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE PE N: ASW Systems Development Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2012 Navy DATE: February 2011 COST ($ in Millions) FY 2010 FY 2013 FY 2014 FY 2015 FY 2016 Navy Page 1 of 17 R-1 Line Item #30 To Program Element 25.144

More information

Command Brief MR. ASHLEY JOHNSON TECHNICAL DIRECTOR CAPT. SCOTT H. KRAFT COMMANDING OFFICER

Command Brief MR. ASHLEY JOHNSON TECHNICAL DIRECTOR CAPT. SCOTT H. KRAFT COMMANDING OFFICER Command Brief CAPT. SCOTT H. KRAFT COMMANDING OFFICER MR. ASHLEY JOHNSON TECHNICAL DIRECTOR Distribution A: Approved for public release; distribution unlimited. 1 MISSION Research, develop, test, evaluate

More information

OHIO Replacement. Meeting America s Enduring Requirement for Sea-Based Strategic Deterrence

OHIO Replacement. Meeting America s Enduring Requirement for Sea-Based Strategic Deterrence OHIO Replacement Meeting America s Enduring Requirement for Sea-Based Strategic Deterrence 1 Why Recapitalize Our SSBN Force? As long as these weapons exist, the United States will maintain a safe, secure,

More information

Department of Defense DIRECTIVE

Department of Defense DIRECTIVE Department of Defense DIRECTIVE NUMBER 5158.04 July 27, 2007 Incorporating Change 2, July 28, 2017 USD(AT&L) SUBJECT: United States Transportation Command (USTRANSCOM) References: (a) DoD Directive 5158.4,

More information

WARFIGHTER MODELING, SIMULATION, ANALYSIS AND INTEGRATION SUPPORT (WMSA&IS)

WARFIGHTER MODELING, SIMULATION, ANALYSIS AND INTEGRATION SUPPORT (WMSA&IS) EXCERPT FROM CONTRACTS W9113M-10-D-0002 and W9113M-10-D-0003: C-1. PERFORMANCE WORK STATEMENT SW-SMDC-08-08. 1.0 INTRODUCTION 1.1 BACKGROUND WARFIGHTER MODELING, SIMULATION, ANALYSIS AND INTEGRATION SUPPORT

More information

ACQUISITION OF THE ADVANCED TANK ARMAMENT SYSTEM. Report No. D February 28, Office of the Inspector General Department of Defense

ACQUISITION OF THE ADVANCED TANK ARMAMENT SYSTEM. Report No. D February 28, Office of the Inspector General Department of Defense ACQUISITION OF THE ADVANCED TANK ARMAMENT SYSTEM Report No. D-2001-066 February 28, 2001 Office of the Inspector General Department of Defense Form SF298 Citation Data Report Date ("DD MON YYYY") 28Feb2001

More information

UNCLASSIFIED. R-1 Program Element (Number/Name) PE D8Z / Prompt Global Strike Capability Development. Prior Years FY 2013 FY 2014 FY 2015

UNCLASSIFIED. R-1 Program Element (Number/Name) PE D8Z / Prompt Global Strike Capability Development. Prior Years FY 2013 FY 2014 FY 2015 Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2015 Office of Secretary Of Defense Date: March 2014 0400: Research, Development, Test & Evaluation, Defense-Wide / BA 5: System Development & Demonstration

More information

UNITED STATES MARINE CORPS MARINE CORPS BASE QUANTICO, VIRGINIA

UNITED STATES MARINE CORPS MARINE CORPS BASE QUANTICO, VIRGINIA UNITED STATES MARINE CORPS MARINE CORPS BASE QUANTICO, VIRGINIA 22134-5001 MCBO 8027.1A B 036 MARINE CORPS BASE ORDER 8027.1A From: Commander To: Distribution List Subj: EXPLOSIVE ORDNANCE DISPOSAL (EOD)

More information

A udit R eport. Office of the Inspector General Department of Defense. Report No. D October 31, 2001

A udit R eport. Office of the Inspector General Department of Defense. Report No. D October 31, 2001 A udit R eport ACQUISITION OF THE FIREFINDER (AN/TPQ-47) RADAR Report No. D-2002-012 October 31, 2001 Office of the Inspector General Department of Defense Report Documentation Page Report Date 31Oct2001

More information

UNCLASSIFIED FY 2016 OCO. FY 2016 Base

UNCLASSIFIED FY 2016 OCO. FY 2016 Base Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2016 United States Special Operations Command : February 2015 0400: Research, Development, Test & Evaluation, Defense-Wide / BA 7: Operational Systems Development

More information

5 th Annual EOD/IED & Countermine Symposium

5 th Annual EOD/IED & Countermine Symposium Defense Strategies Institute professional educational forum: 5 th Annual EOD/IED & Countermine Symposium Advancing Counter-IED Capabilities & Decision Support at Home and Abroad November 14-15, 2017 Mary

More information

Navy Expeditionary Combat Command Executing Navy s Maritime Strategy

Navy Expeditionary Combat Command Executing Navy s Maritime Strategy Navy Expeditionary Combat Command Executing Navy s Maritime Strategy RADM Mark Handley NDIA 15 th Annual Expeditionary Warfare Conference 6 OCT 2010 THIS BRIEF CLASSIFIED: UNCLASS Overview Riverine Maritime

More information

Be clearly linked to strategic and contingency planning.

Be clearly linked to strategic and contingency planning. DODD 4151.18. March 31, 2004 This Directive applies to the Office of the Secretary of Defense, the Military Departments, the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, the Combatant Commands, the Office of

More information

Rapid Development and Integration of Remote Weapon Systems to Meet Operational Requirements Abstract October 2009

Rapid Development and Integration of Remote Weapon Systems to Meet Operational Requirements Abstract October 2009 Small Arms Air Platform Integration Rapid Development and Integration of Remote Weapon Systems to Meet Operational Requirements Abstract 8851 28-October 2009 Joseph Burkart Crane Division, Naval Surface

More information

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE No June 27, 2001 THE ARMY BUDGET FISCAL YEAR 2002

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE No June 27, 2001 THE ARMY BUDGET FISCAL YEAR 2002 FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE No. 01-153 June 27, 2001 THE ARMY BUDGET FISCAL YEAR 2002 Today, the Army announced details of its budget for Fiscal Year 2002, which runs from October 1, 2001 through September 30,

More information

Chapter 1. Introduction

Chapter 1. Introduction MCWP -. (CD) 0 0 0 0 Chapter Introduction The Marine-Air Ground Task Force (MAGTF) is the Marine Corps principle organization for the conduct of all missions across the range of military operations. MAGTFs

More information

COMPLIANCE WITH THIS PUBLICATION IS MANDATORY

COMPLIANCE WITH THIS PUBLICATION IS MANDATORY BY ORDER OF THE SECRETARY OF THE AIR FORCE AIR FORCE POLICY DIRECTIVE 10-25 26 SEPTEMBER 2007 Operations EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT ACCESSIBILITY: COMPLIANCE WITH THIS PUBLICATION IS MANDATORY Publications and

More information

DEPARTMENT OF THE NA VY COMMANDER NAVY RESERVE FORCE 191 S FORREST AL DRIVE NORFOLK, VIRGINIA

DEPARTMENT OF THE NA VY COMMANDER NAVY RESERVE FORCE 191 S FORREST AL DRIVE NORFOLK, VIRGINIA COMNAVRESFOR INSTRUCTION 8011. 2B DEPARTMENT OF THE NA VY COMMANDER NAVY RESERVE FORCE 191 S FORREST AL DRIVE NORFOLK, VIRGINIA 23551-4615 COMNAVRESFORINST 8011.2B N3A From: Subj: Commander, Navy Reserve

More information

OPNAVINST D N96 23 Jan Subj: SHIP ANTISUBMARINE WARFARE READINESS AND EFFECTIVENESS MEASURING PROGRAM

OPNAVINST D N96 23 Jan Subj: SHIP ANTISUBMARINE WARFARE READINESS AND EFFECTIVENESS MEASURING PROGRAM DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY OFFICE OF THE CHIEF OF NAVAL OPERATIONS 2000 NAVY PENTAGON WASHINGTON DC 20350-2000 OPNAVINST 3360.30D N96 OPNAV INSTRUCTION 3360.30D From: Chief of Naval Operations Subj: SHIP ANTISUBMARINE

More information

OPNAVINST D N4 24 May (a) OPNAV M , Naval Ordnance Management Policy Manual

OPNAVINST D N4 24 May (a) OPNAV M , Naval Ordnance Management Policy Manual DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY OFFICE OF THE CHIEF OF NAVAL OPERATIONS 2000 NAVY PENTAGON WASHINGTON, DC 20350-2000 OPNAVINST 8000.16D N4 OPNAV INSTRUCTION 8000.16D From: Chief of Naval Operations Subj: NAVAL

More information

Inspector General FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY

Inspector General FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY Report No. DODIG-2017-014 Inspector General U.S. Department of Defense NOVEMBER 8, 2016 Acquisition of the Navy Surface Mine Countermeasure Unmanned Undersea Vehicle (Knifefish) Needs Improvement INTEGRITY

More information

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY OFFICE OF THE CHIEF OF NAVAL OPERATIONS 2000 NAVY PENTAGON WASHINGTON, DC

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY OFFICE OF THE CHIEF OF NAVAL OPERATIONS 2000 NAVY PENTAGON WASHINGTON, DC DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY OFFICE OF THE CHIEF OF NAVAL OPERATIONS 2000 NAVY PENTAGON WASHINGTON, DC 20350-2000 OPNAVINST 8026.2C N411 OPNAV INSTRUCTION 8026.2C From: Chief of Naval Operations Subj: NAVY MUNITIONS

More information

OPNAVINST B N96 29 Jul 2014

OPNAVINST B N96 29 Jul 2014 DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY OFFICE OF THE CHIEF OF NAVAL OPERATIONS 2000 NAVY PENTAGON WASHINGTON, DC 20350-2000 OPNAVINST 9200.3B N96 OPNAV INSTRUCTION 9200.3B From: Chief of Naval Operations Subj: OPERATING

More information

C4I System Solutions.

C4I System Solutions. www.aselsan.com.tr C4I SYSTEM SOLUTIONS Information dominance is the key enabler for the commanders for making accurate and faster decisions. C4I systems support the commander in situational awareness,

More information

The Integral TNO Approach to NAVY R&D

The Integral TNO Approach to NAVY R&D NAVAL PLATFORMS The Integral TNO Approach to NAVY R&D TNO Knowledge for Business Source: AVDKM Key elements to TNO s integral approach in support of naval platform development are operational effectiveness,

More information

DOD INSTRUCTION DEPOT MAINTENANCE CORE CAPABILITIES DETERMINATION PROCESS

DOD INSTRUCTION DEPOT MAINTENANCE CORE CAPABILITIES DETERMINATION PROCESS DOD INSTRUCTION 4151.20 DEPOT MAINTENANCE CORE CAPABILITIES DETERMINATION PROCESS Originating Component: Office of the Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition and Sustainment Effective: May 4, 2018

More information

Department of Defense DIRECTIVE. SUBJECT: Electronic Warfare (EW) and Command and Control Warfare (C2W) Countermeasures

Department of Defense DIRECTIVE. SUBJECT: Electronic Warfare (EW) and Command and Control Warfare (C2W) Countermeasures Department of Defense DIRECTIVE NUMBER 3222.4 July 31, 1992 Incorporating Through Change 2, January 28, 1994 SUBJECT: Electronic Warfare (EW) and Command and Control Warfare (C2W) Countermeasures USD(A)

More information

Chapter 13 Air and Missile Defense THE AIR THREAT AND JOINT SYNERGY

Chapter 13 Air and Missile Defense THE AIR THREAT AND JOINT SYNERGY Chapter 13 Air and Missile Defense This chapter addresses air and missile defense support at the operational level of war. It includes a brief look at the air threat to CSS complexes and addresses CSS

More information

MCO C465 AUG MARINE CORPS ORDER From: Commandant of the Marine Corps To: Distribution List

MCO C465 AUG MARINE CORPS ORDER From: Commandant of the Marine Corps To: Distribution List MARINE CORPS ORDER 3550.12 MCO 3550.12 C465 AUG 2 1 2008 From: Commandant of the Marine Corps To: Distribution List Subj: OPERATIONAL RANGE CLEARANCE PROGRAM Ref: (a) MCO P5090.2A (b) DODI 3200.16, "Operational

More information

versus the cost to procure and maintain it - will yield dramatic longterm savings for the Navy.

versus the cost to procure and maintain it - will yield dramatic longterm savings for the Navy. In January 1998, Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition and Technology (USD A&T), Dr. Jacques Gansler, signed the DD 21 program s Acquisition Decision Memorandum noting three preeminent objectives:

More information

Global EOD Symposium & Exhibition

Global EOD Symposium & Exhibition Global EOD Symposium & Exhibition Technology and Training Enablers for EOD 2025 Capt. Vincent Martinez, USN DOD Deputy Manager, EOD Technology Commanding Officer, NSWC Indian Head EOD Technology Division

More information

UNCLASSIFIED. R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE PE D8Z: Central Test and Evaluation Investment Program (CTEIP) FY 2011 Total Estimate. FY 2011 OCO Estimate

UNCLASSIFIED. R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE PE D8Z: Central Test and Evaluation Investment Program (CTEIP) FY 2011 Total Estimate. FY 2011 OCO Estimate COST ($ in Millions) FY 2009 Actual FY 2010 FY 2012 FY 2013 FY 2014 FY 2015 Cost To Complete Program Element 143.612 160.959 162.286 0.000 162.286 165.007 158.842 156.055 157.994 Continuing Continuing

More information

DEPUTY SECRETARY OF' DEF'ENSE 1010 DEFENSE PENTAGON WASHINGTON, DC NOV

DEPUTY SECRETARY OF' DEF'ENSE 1010 DEFENSE PENTAGON WASHINGTON, DC NOV ו/ DEPUTY SECRETARY OF' DEF'ENSE 1010 DEFENSE PENTAGON WASHINGTON, DC 20301-1010 NOV 30 2017 MEMORANDUM FOR SECRETARIES OF THE MILITARY DEPARTMENTS CHAIRMAN OF THE JOINT CHIEFS OF STAFF UNDER SECRETARIES

More information

UNCLASSIFIED FY 2016 OCO. FY 2016 Base

UNCLASSIFIED FY 2016 OCO. FY 2016 Base Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2016 Office of the Secretary Of Defense Date: February 2015 0400: Research, Development, Test & Evaluation, Defense-Wide / BA 3: Advanced Technology Development

More information

UNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE

UNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2013 Navy DATE: February 2012 COST ($ in Millions) FY 2011 FY 2012 Base OCO Total FY 2014 FY 2015 FY 2016 FY 2017 Cost To Complete Total Cost Total Program

More information

OPNAVINST A N Oct 2014

OPNAVINST A N Oct 2014 DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY OFFICE OF THE CHIEF OF NAVAL OPERATIONS 2000 NAVY PENTAGON WASHINGTON, DC 20350-2000 OPNAVINST 3501.360A N433 OPNAV INSTRUCTION 3501.360A From: Chief of Naval Operations Subj: DEFENSE

More information

UNCLASSIFIED FY 2009 RDT&E,N BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION SHEET DATE: February 2008 Exhibit R-2

UNCLASSIFIED FY 2009 RDT&E,N BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION SHEET DATE: February 2008 Exhibit R-2 Exhibit R-2 PROGRAM ELEMENT: 0605155N PROGRAM ELEMENT TITLE: FLEET TACTICAL DEVELOPMENT AND EVALUATION COST: (Dollars in Thousands) Project Number & Title FY 2007 Actual FY 2008 FY 2009 FY 2010 FY 2011

More information

DEFENSE LOGISTICS. Enhanced Policy and Procedures Needed to Improve Management of Sensitive Conventional Ammunition

DEFENSE LOGISTICS. Enhanced Policy and Procedures Needed to Improve Management of Sensitive Conventional Ammunition United States Government Accountability Office Report to the Committee on Armed Services, U.S. Senate February 2016 DEFENSE LOGISTICS Enhanced Policy and Procedures Needed to Improve Management of Sensitive

More information

UNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE

UNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE COST ($ in Millions) FY 2011 FY 2012 Base OCO Total FY 2014 FY 2015 FY 2016 FY 2017 Cost To Complete Total Cost Total Program Element 19.165 18.599 22.654-22.654 24.342 24.422 24.571 25.715 Continuing

More information

Environmental Impact Statement/Overseas Environmental Impact Statement (EIS/OEIS) for the Northwest Training Range Complex (NWTRC). An EIS/OEIS is con

Environmental Impact Statement/Overseas Environmental Impact Statement (EIS/OEIS) for the Northwest Training Range Complex (NWTRC). An EIS/OEIS is con Environmental Impact Statement/Overseas Environmental Impact Statement (EIS/OEIS) for the Northwest Training Range Complex (NWTRC). An EIS/OEIS is considered to be the appropriate document for this review

More information

OPNAVINST DNS-3 17 Sep Subj: MISSION, FUNCTIONS, AND TASKS OF THE OFFICE OF THE CHIEF OF NAVAL OPERATIONS

OPNAVINST DNS-3 17 Sep Subj: MISSION, FUNCTIONS, AND TASKS OF THE OFFICE OF THE CHIEF OF NAVAL OPERATIONS DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY OFFICE OF THE CHIEF OF NAVAL OPERATIONS 2000 NAVY PENTAGON WASHINGTON, DC 20350-2000 OPNAVINST 5450.338 DNS-3 OPNAV INSTRUCTION 5450.338 From: Chief of Naval Operations Subj: MISSION,

More information

DDG 1000 Class Destroyer

DDG 1000 Class Destroyer DDG 1000 Class Destroyer 10 April 2018 Sea Air Space (SAS) DDG 1000 October February 2016 2017 DDG 1001 July February 20162018 DDG 1000 Program Manager, PMS 500 DDG 1002 December October 2016 2017 CAPT

More information

UNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE

UNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 213 Navy DATE: February 212 COST ($ in Millions) FY 211 FY 212 FY 213 Base FY 213 OCO FY 213 Total FY 214 FY 215 FY 216 FY 217 Navy Page 1 of 5 R-1 Line

More information

***************************************************************** TQL

***************************************************************** TQL ---------------------------------TQL----------------------------- DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY VISION, GUIDING PRINCIPLES, AND STRATEGIC GOALS AND STRATEGIC PLAN FOR TOTAL QUALITY LEADERSHIP Published for the

More information

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY OFFICE OF THE CHIEF OF NAVAL OPERATIONS 2000 NAVY PENTAGON WASHINGTON DC

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY OFFICE OF THE CHIEF OF NAVAL OPERATIONS 2000 NAVY PENTAGON WASHINGTON DC DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY OFFICE OF THE CHIEF OF NAVAL OPERATIONS 2000 NAVY PENTAGON WASHINGTON DC 20350-2000 OPNAVINST 3900.30 N4 OPNAV INSTRUCTION 3900.30 From: Chief of Naval Operations Subj: NAVY CAPABILITY

More information

NDIA Ground Robotics Symposium

NDIA Ground Robotics Symposium NDIA Ground Robotics Symposium Mr. Tom Dee DASN ELM 703-614-4794 Pentagon 4C746 1 Agenda Context Current environment Robotics Way Ahead AAV MRAP Family of Vehicles 2 ELM Portfolio U.S. Marine Corps ground

More information

Department of Defense DIRECTIVE

Department of Defense DIRECTIVE Department of Defense DIRECTIVE NUMBER 2010.9 April 28, 2003 Certified Current as of November 24, 2003 SUBJECT: Acquisition and Cross-Servicing Agreements USD(AT&L) References: (a) DoD Directive 2010.9,

More information

ANDREW J. HIGGINS, EUGENE M. STONER, AND DONALD ROEBLING AWARDS FOR ACQUISITION INNOVATION AND EXCELLENCE

ANDREW J. HIGGINS, EUGENE M. STONER, AND DONALD ROEBLING AWARDS FOR ACQUISITION INNOVATION AND EXCELLENCE DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY HEADQUARTERS UNITED STATES MARINE CORPS 3000 MARINE CORPS PENTAGON WASHINGTON, DC 20350-3000 MCO 1650.46B MCSC (WPM) MARINE CORPS ORDER 1650.46B From: To: Subj: Ref: Encl: Commandant

More information

OPNAVINST B N8 7 Nov Subj: NAVY TEST, MEASUREMENT, AND DIAGNOSTIC EQUIPMENT, AUTOMATIC TEST SYSTEMS, AND METROLOGY AND CALIBRATION

OPNAVINST B N8 7 Nov Subj: NAVY TEST, MEASUREMENT, AND DIAGNOSTIC EQUIPMENT, AUTOMATIC TEST SYSTEMS, AND METROLOGY AND CALIBRATION DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY OFFICE OF THE CHIEF OF NAVAL OPERATIONS 2000 NAVY PENTAGON WASHINGTON DC 20350-2000 OPNAVINST 3960.16B N8 OPNAV INSTRUCTION 3960.16B From: Chief of Naval Operations Subj: NAVY TEST,

More information

Office of Executive Director for Conventional Ammunition (O/EDCA)

Office of Executive Director for Conventional Ammunition (O/EDCA) UNCLASSIFIED Office of Executive Director for Conventional Ammunition (O/EDCA) EDCA UNCLASSIFIED EDCA 2/18/2010 Integration of the O/EDCA with PEO AMMO/SMCA at Picatinny Arsenal Integrated Concept Project

More information

UNCLASSIFIED. FY 2016 Base FY 2016 OCO

UNCLASSIFIED. FY 2016 Base FY 2016 OCO Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2016 Navy Date: February 2015 1319: Research, Development, Test & Evaluation, Navy / BA 3: Advanced Development (ATD) COST ($ in Millions) Prior Years FY

More information

FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY U.S. Department of Homeland Security Washington, DC 20528

FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY U.S. Department of Homeland Security Washington, DC 20528 U.S. Department of Homeland Security Washington, DC 20528 FY 2006 Urban Areas Security Initiative (UASI) Award for the Las Vegas Area Las Vegas Area FY 2006 UASI Award $ 7,750,000 Risk: The Las Vegas Area

More information

OPNAVINST E N97 7 Nov 2017

OPNAVINST E N97 7 Nov 2017 DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY OFFICE OF THE CHIEF OF NAVAL OPERATIONS 2000 NAVY PENTAGON WASHINGTON DC 20350-2000 OPNAVINST 1540.51E N97 OPNAV INSTRUCTION 1540.51E From: Chief of Naval Operations Subj: SUBMARINE

More information

Department of Defense DIRECTIVE

Department of Defense DIRECTIVE Department of Defense DIRECTIVE NUMBER 5101.14 June 11, 2007 Incorporating Change 1, July 12, 2012 Certified Current Through June 11, 2014 D, JIEDDO SUBJECT: DoD Executive Agent and Single Manager for

More information

Subj: CHEMICAL, BIOLOGICAL, RADIOLOGICAL, AND NUCLEAR DEFENSE REQUIREMENTS SUPPORTING OPERATIONAL FLEET READINESS

Subj: CHEMICAL, BIOLOGICAL, RADIOLOGICAL, AND NUCLEAR DEFENSE REQUIREMENTS SUPPORTING OPERATIONAL FLEET READINESS DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY OFFICE OF THE CHIEF OF NAVAL OPERATIONS 2000 NAVY PENTAGON WASHINGTON, DC 20350-2000 OPNAVINST 3400.10G N9 OPNAV INSTRUCTION 3400.10G From: Chief of Naval Operations Subj: CHEMICAL,

More information

Employing Merchant Vessels for Offshore Presence and Launch of US Military Operations

Employing Merchant Vessels for Offshore Presence and Launch of US Military Operations Employing Merchant Vessels for Offshore Presence and Launch of US Military Operations LCDR Chavius G. Lewis Duke University Federal Executive Fellowship Program April 17, 2015 Agenda Purpose Historical

More information