Case 1:05-cv CKK Document 291 Filed 10/10/12 Page 1 of 13 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA. v. : 05-cv-1244 (CKK)
|
|
- Rosamund Clarke
- 6 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Case 1:05-cv CKK Document 291 Filed 10/10/12 Page 1 of 13 TARIQ MAHMOUD ALSAWAM, : UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA Petitioner, : v. : 05-cv-1244 (CKK) BARACK OBAMA, et al., : Respondents. : EMERGENCY MOTION FOR INTERIM RELIEF AND MEMORANDUM OF POINTS AND AUTHORITIES IN SUPPORT THEREOF 1 Petitioner Tarek Mahmoud El Sawah respectfully moves this Honorable Court to issue the attached proposed order directing the government to release him and return him to his native country of Egypt, pending a hearing before the Periodic Review Board or the resolution of his 2 habeas petition. Due to the overwhelming evidence that continued law of war detention is not necessary, there is a substantial likelihood that Mr. El Sawah will succeed before both the Periodic Review Board and at the merits hearing before this Court. Absent interim relief, Mr. El Sawah will continue to suffer the irreparable harm of continued unwarranted detention. Therefore, Mr. El Sawah requests interim relief of release pending the resolution of these matters. 1 This matter is captioned Tariq Mahmoud Alsawam due to a clerical error that occurred when Mr. El Sawah s pro se habeas petition was docketed. 2 As required by Local Civil Rule 7(m), undersigned counsel contacted counsel for the Respondents before filing this motion, who represented that the Respondents will oppose this motion.
2 Case 1:05-cv CKK Document 291 Filed 10/10/12 Page 2 of 13 In support of this motion, undersigned counsel submits the following. In addition, counsel has submitted, via the Court Security Officer and under seal, a supplement containing classified and protected information. Procedural and Factual Background In late 2001, members of the Northern Alliance in Afghanistan arrested Mr. El Sawah and turned him over to the custody of the United States. The U.S. military held him for a period of time in Afghanistan and then transferred him to the U.S. Naval Station in Guantanamo Bay, Cuba. On June 22, 2005, Mr. El Sawah filed a petition for writ of habeas corpus in this matter. On November 18, 2008, the government filed Respondents Statement of Legal Justification for Detention, asserting that Mr. El Sawah is detained pursuant to the President s power to detain enemy combatants under the Authorization for Use of Military Force (herein after AUMF ), Pub. L. No , 115 Stat. 224 (2001). On October 20, 2008, the government filed a Classified Factual Return, and on December 12, 2008, the government filed an unclassified version of the factual return. On July 30, 2010, Mr. El Sawah filed a Traverse, denying the government s allegations. On December 16, 2008, the Department of Defense preferred charges against Mr. El Sawah. Although the charges were pending for more than three years, the government did not pursue the charges or refer them to a military commission. On March 1, 2012, the charges were dismissed. See Attachment A (Order of Convening Authority for Military Commissions). Although the charges were dismissed without prejudice, the Office of Military Commissions Prosecutions does not intend to pursue charges against Mr. El Sawah. See Attachment B (Letter 2
3 Case 1:05-cv CKK Document 291 Filed 10/10/12 Page 3 of 13 from Convening Authority for Military Commissions). Thus, Mr. El Sawah is not being held for the purpose of prosecution. The AUMF authorizes detention for the purpose of preventing a detainee from serving the enemy. See Hamdi v. Rumsfeld, 542 U.S. 507, 518 (2004). On March 7, 2011, the President issued an Executive Order, directing that the Secretary of Defense shall coordinate a process of periodic review of continued law of war detention for Guantanamo Bay detainees. Exec. Order No , 76 Fed. Reg. 13,277 (Mar. 7, 2011) (attached hereto as Attachment J). The Order directs that [c]ontinued law of war detention is warranted... if it is necessary to protect against a significant threat to the security of the United States. Id. at 13,277. The Order provides that [f]or each detainee, an initial review shall commence as soon as possible but no later than 1 year from the date of this order. Id. The Deputy Secretary of Defense, however, did not issue guidelines implementing the Executive Order until May 9, The guidelines establish a Periodic Review Board and provide for a process of review to begin 60 days from the issuance of the guidelines. Despite this requirement, to date, no detainee s case has been reviewed and no date has been set for the review process to begin. Mr. El Sawah is not held for the purpose of preventing him from returning to the battlefield or serving the enemy. His continued detention is not necessary to protect against any threat to the security of the United States. As numerous current and former, high-ranking U.S. military officials have certified, it is highly unlikely that Mr. El Sawah would establish ties with al-qa ida, the Taliban, or other associated forces if released. See Attachment C (Letter from Major General Jay W. Hood), Attachment D (Letter from Rear Admiral D. M. Thomas, Jr.), Attachment E (Letter from Vice Admiral T. H. Copeman), Attachment F (Letter from 3
4 Case 1:05-cv CKK Document 291 Filed 10/10/12 Page 4 of 13 Intelligence Officer). In fact, Mr. El Sawah could not join enemy forces. See Supplemental Classified and Protected Information in Support of Motion for Interim Relief. Throughout his nearly eleven years of detention, Mr. El Sawah has been compliant with the detaining authorities and has affirmatively demonstrated to the satisfaction of every individual who has had direct interaction with him that he is not a threat to the United States and should be released. United States Army (Retired) Major General Jay W. Hood was the Commander of the Joint Task Force in Guantanamo Bay from March 2004 to March See Attachment C. During this time period, he became very familiar with Mr. El Sawah through personal interactions and observations and through briefings. Id. It is his opinion that: (1) there is little to no chance that [Mr. El Sawah] would return to any violent Islamic organization; (2) Mr. El Sawah poses no significant threat to the security of the United States, our friends or allies; and (3) Mr. El Sawah s continued law of war detention by the United States Government is no longer necessary. Id. United States Navy Rear Admiral D. M. Thomas, Jr., who was the Commander of the Joint Task Force at Guantanamo Bay from May 2008 to June 2009 and is the current Commander of the Naval Surface Force Atlantic, similarly is thoroughly familiar with Mr. El Sawah and is of the opinion that he no longer poses a significant threat to the security of the United States and his continued law of war detention is not necessary. See Attachment D. Rear Admiral Thomas, like Major General Hood, strongly encourages Mr. El Sawah s release. Id. United States Navy Vice Admiral T. H. Copeman, the Commander at Guantanamo from June 2009 to June 2010 and current Commander of the Naval Surface Force, Pacific Fleet, shares the opinion that Mr. El Sawah s detention is unnecessary and also has submitted a letter in 4
5 Case 1:05-cv CKK Document 291 Filed 10/10/12 Page 5 of 13 support of his release. See Attachment E. The opinions of these previous Guantanamo Commanders will be submitted to the Periodic Review Board and to the Court at the merits hearing in this matter, and there will be no contrary opinion from any military official who has personally interacted with Mr. El Sawah and is familiar with his case. In fact, the military officer who spoke to Mr. El Sawah for several hours every week for eighteen months between 2002 and 2004 and knows more about Mr. El Sawah than any other U.S. government official, strongly encourages Mr. El Sawah s release. See Attachment F. This former intelligence officer has submitted a letter directed to the Periodic Review Board, affirming that Mr. El Sawah is a good and decent man who should be released. Id. The officer notes that he is familiar with everything about [Mr. El Sawah s] background, the circumstances of his capture and detention, and his nature as a human being and states that Mr. El Sawah had a very different mindset from the radical Islamists who formed the vast majority of the detainee population, and it was clear to [the officer] that [Mr. El Sawah] had no desire to harm United States personnel. Id. Again, this view of Mr. El Sawah will be presented to the Periodic Review Board and at the merits hearing and will not be contradicted. In addition to having the support of military officials, the current state of Mr. El Sawah s health demonstrates that Mr. El Sawah would not be a danger to the United States if released. See Attachment G (Letter from Dr. Sondra Crosby). Mr. El Sawah now weighs over 420 pounds and has multiple serious -- life threatening -- medical conditions. Id. His health has so deteriorated over the last ten years that he has trouble performing even the most basic daily tasks. Id. 5
6 Case 1:05-cv CKK Document 291 Filed 10/10/12 Page 6 of 13 Finally, in addition to there being no purpose for his detention, Mr. El Sawah s home country not only is willing to accept his return, but has affirmatively requested his return. See Attachment H (Letter from Minister of Foreign Affairs, The Arab Republic of Egypt). On July 26, 2012, Mohamed Amr, the Minister of Foreign Affairs of Egypt sent a letter to Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton, requesting the release and return of Mr. El Sawah to Egypt. Id. Argument When reviewing a request for interim relief, the Court must consider four factors: (1) the moving party s likelihood of success on the merits; (2) irreparable injury to the moving party if an injunction is denied; (3) substantial injury to the opposing party if an injunction is granted; and (4) the public interest. Kiyemba v. Obama, 561 F.3d 509, 513 (D.C. Cir. 2009) (finding issue of potential transfer of Guantanamo detainees a proper subject for interim habeas relief, but rejecting request on merits). Here, each of these factors weighs in favor of granting Mr. El Sawah the interim relief of release pending a final hearing before the Periodic Review Board or this Court. I. SUBSTANTIAL LIKELIHOOD OF SUCCESS. A. Periodic Review Board. The President has directed the Department of Defense to establish a review process for detainees. See Exec. Order No In response, the Department of Defense has established the Periodic Review Board and guidelines for determining whether or not continued detention is necessary for each detainee. The Executive Order directs that [c]ontinued law of war detention is warranted... if it is necessary to protect against a significant threat to the security of the United States, id. at 13,277, and the guidelines provide a process for making this determination. 6
7 Case 1:05-cv CKK Document 291 Filed 10/10/12 Page 7 of 13 When making this determination, the Periodic Review Board may consider numerous factors, including: (1) The detainee s involvement in terrorist activities; (2) The detainee s conduct when acting as part of, or substantially supporting, Taliban or al-qa ida forces or associated forces that are engaged in hostilities against the United States or its coalition partners; (3) The detainee s knowledge, training and skills used for terrorist purposes; (4) The nature and extent of the detainee s ties with individual terrorists, terrorist organizations, terrorist support networks, or other extremists; (5) Information pertaining to the likelihood that the detainee intends to or is likely to engage in terrorist activities upon his transfer or release; (6) Information pertaining to the likelihood that the detainee will reestablish ties with al-qa ida, the Taliban, or associated forces that are engaged in hostilities against the United States or its coalition partners, and information pertaining to whether the group the detainee was part of at the time of capture is now defunct; (7) The potential destination country for the detainee, including family support within that country; (8) The likelihood the detainee may be subject to trial by military commission, or any other law enforcement interest in the detainee; (9) The detainee s conduct in custody, including behavior, habits, traits, rehabilitation efforts, and whether the detainee was considered a danger to other detainees or other individuals; (10) The detainee s physical and psychological condition; and 7
8 Case 1:05-cv CKK Document 291 Filed 10/10/12 Page 8 of 13 (11) Any other relevant information bearing on the national security and foreign policy interests of the United States or the interests of justice. See Attachment I (Guidelines) at 6-8. Even if, prior to his capture, Mr. El Sawah engaged in all of the activities alleged against 3 him and has all of the skills he is alleged to have, the remaining factors weigh heavily in support of his release. As described above and in Mr. El Sawah s supplemental filing, top military officials have concluded that it is highly unlikely that Mr. El Sawah would participate in terrorist activities or reestablish ties with terrorists if released. Mr. El Sawah was never ideologically committed to violent Islamic extremism. Attachment C (Letter from Major General Jay W. Hood); see also Attachment F (Letter from Intelligence Officer) (Mr. El Sawah had a very different mindset from the radical Islamists who formed the vast majority of the detainee population ). Mr. El Sawah s potential destination country is Egypt, and the Egyptian government has requested his return. Egypt has been a friend to the United States, and the United States no doubt has national security and foreign policy interests in maintaining that friendship and honoring the request for Mr. El Sawah s return (particularly when there is no basis for continuing to detain him). Mr. El Sawah has many family members in Egypt who are willing and able to provide support for him upon his release. See Attachment K (Declaration of Jamal El Sawah). Other factors also support release. The military commissions prosecutors have affirmed that they do not currently intend to prosecute Mr. El Sawah. Mr. El Sawah s conduct while 3 As the Court may recall, undersigned counsel has previously submitted substantial evidence to the Court demonstrating that the allegations are not true. 8
9 Case 1:05-cv CKK Document 291 Filed 10/10/12 Page 9 of 13 detained -- as the military officers cited above have attested -- has been commendable, and he is not a danger to anyone. His physical and psychological condition have deteriorated while detained, and this deterioration further reduces any possible likelihood of engaging in future bad acts. For all of these reasons, there is more than a substantial likelihood -- in fact there is no reasonable doubt -- that the Periodic Review Board will find that he should be released. B. Habeas Petition. The Supreme Court has held that [t]he habeas court must have sufficient authority to conduct a meaningful review of both the cause for detention and the Executive s power to detain, and that detainees must have an opportunity to present reasonably available evidence 4 demonstrating there is no basis for his continued detention. Boumediene v. Bush, 553 U.S. 723, 783, 790 (2008) (emphasis added). By its plain terms, the AUMF does not grant unlimited power to detain. The AUMF permits necessary and appropriate force, and therefore detention, only for the limited purpose of preventing future acts of international terrorism by detainees. Basardh v. Obama, 612 F. Supp. 2d 30, 34 (D.D.C. 2009) ( [T]he AUMF... cannot be read to authorize detention where its purpose can no longer be attained. ); see also Hamdi v. Rumsfeld, 542 U.S. 507, (2004) ( It is now recognized that [c]aptivity is neither a punishment nor an act of vengeance, but merely a temporary detention which is devoid of all penal character.... A prisoner of war is no convict; his imprisonment is a simple war measure. ). It follows that the continued detention of a person who no longer poses a threat to the United States is not 4 The government, in fact, has recognized a detainee s right to challenge not only the legality, but the duration of his detention. See Kiyemba v. Obama, 561 F.3d 509, 512 (D.C. Cir. 2009) (noting government s position that detainees could raise claims only within core of habeas rights, such as a challenge to the petitioner s detention or the duration thereof. ); see also Kiyemba v. Bush, Supplemental Brief for Appellants, 2008 WL , at *9-15 (same). 9
10 Case 1:05-cv CKK Document 291 Filed 10/10/12 Page 10 of 13 5 authorized by the AUMF. Basardh, 612 F. Supp. 2d at 35. When a detainee has demonstrated that he not only would not, but could not serve the enemy, the government can no longer lawfully detain him. Even if the AUMF could be interpreted to authorized detention when the purposes of detention are no longer served, such an interpretation would violate due process as guaranteed by the Constitution. Cf. Zadvydas v. Davis, 533 U.S. 678, 690 (2001) (continued detention pending deportation requires determination of current likelihood of repatriation, and if removal not reasonably foreseeable, release required because purposes of detention no longer served by detention); Ngo v. I.N.S., 192 F.3d 390, 398 (3d Cir. 1999) (immigration confinement may not continue beyond the time when original justifications for custody are no longer tenable); see also Kansas v. Hendricks, 521 U.S. 346, 35 (1997) (civil commitment requires finding of current danger to community); Foucha v. Louisiana, 504 U.S. 71, 80 (1992) (if individual subject to civil commitment judged safe to be at large, immediate release required). 5 The Executive has repeatedly recognized that the purposes of detention under the AUMF is limited to prevent future harm and that the determination to detain or continue detention must be based on an individual s current status. See Order Establishing Combatant Status Review Tribunals issued by Deputy Secretary of Defense Wolfowitz (July 7, 2004) (providing for the release of individuals who are no longer enemy combatants, recognizing that current status of a detainee determines authority to detain); Order, Administrative Review Procedures for Enemy Combatants in the control of the Department of Defense at Guantanamo Bay Naval Base, Cuba, 1 (May 11, 2004) (recognizing that law of war permits detention for practical purposes of preventing the enemy from rejoining the conflict ); Final Report of the Guantanamo Review Task Force (January 22, 2010) at 8, available at (recognizing that the purpose of detention under AUMF is to prevent detainees from returning to the field of battle and taking up arms once again. ); Exec. Order No (continued detention warranted only if necessary to protect against a significant threat to the security of the United States ). 10
11 Case 1:05-cv CKK Document 291 Filed 10/10/12 Page 11 of 13 Here, the record overwhelmingly demonstrates that Mr. El Sawah would not rejoin any conflict and would not be a danger to the United States if released. Even if every allegation the government has ever made with regard to Mr. El Sawah s actions prior to his detention were true, Mr. El Sawah would not be a danger to the United States if released at this time. As in Basardh, the government has no rational basis upon which to support continued detention. While Mr. El Sawah s alleged previous participation with extremist groups certainly has some probative value with respect to whether he currently poses a threat to the United States, any such evidence is rebutted by the resounding evidence that he is not a threat. II. IRREPARABLE HARM OF CONTINUED UNLAWFUL DETENTION. Mr. El Sawah filed his habeas petition in this matter in The resolution of the petition, however, has been repeatedly delayed. Initially, delay related to the resolution of legal issues by the Supreme Court. After the Supreme Court issued its decision in Boumediene on June 12, 2008, the delay related to the resolution of procedural issues. Subsequently, the delay related to the government s suggestion that it may prosecute Mr. El Sawah before a military commission -- a plan which now appears has been aborted. Most recently, the delay has related to the resolution of discovery issues -- which is primarily attributable to the government s decision to slowly trickle out exculpatory evidence to Mr. El Sawah s counsel, resulting in the need for additional discovery requests and motions to compel. Only recently did the government agree to a motions schedule. The resolution of motions is likely to take months, and the merits hearing is not likely to occur until next year. The Periodic Review Board process similarly has been repeatedly delayed. Although the President directed that the reviews must begin within one year of March 7, 2011 Executive 11
12 Case 1:05-cv CKK Document 291 Filed 10/10/12 Page 12 of 13 Order, the Department of Defense did not issue guidelines for the review process until May of 2012, and has yet to begin the reviews. Each day that passes, Mr. El Sawah suffers irreparable harm. Each day is one more day of detention, one more day of lost freedom, and one more day of lost time spent with his family. Given his deteriorating health condition, Mr. El Sawah may not survive the time that it is likely to take to resolve his habeas petition or obtain a Periodic Review Board hearing. See Attachment G. Given the indisputable evidence that Mr. El Sawah presents no threat to the security of the United States, associated forces, or anyone else, there is a the substantial likelihood that the Periodic Review Board and/or this Court will order Mr. El Sawah s release. The Court should not permit the government to irreparably harm Mr. El Sawah through continued unnecessary and unlawful detention. Instead, the Court should order Mr. El Sawah s immediate release. III. NO SUBSTANTIAL INJURY TO THE GOVERNMENT. Detaining Mr. El Sawah is not necessary to preserve the government s interest in pursuing a ruling from the Periodic Review Board, this Court or a military commission, and releasing Mr. El Sawah would cause no substantial injury to the government. As set forth above, Mr. El Sawah would present no danger to the United States if released. Additionally, the government does not intend to prosecute Mr. El Sawah for alleged war crimes at this time or in the near future. See Attachment B. If the government s position changes in the distant future, and Mr. El Sawah has not passed away from old age by that time, he can be extradited under the current extradition treaty with Egypt. See 18 U.S.C. 3181; 19 Stat 572, 1875 WL (U.S. Treaty); see also United States v. Levy, 25 F.3d 146 (2d Cir. 1994) (rejecting claim that 12
13 Case 1:05-cv CKK Document 291 Filed 10/10/12 Page 13 of 13 government s conduct regarding extradition from Egypt barred prosecution). Thus, there would be no injury to the government if the Court grants the interim relief Mr. El Sawah seeks. IV. PUBLIC INTEREST. Finally, because Mr. El Sawah would present no danger if released, the public has no interest in detaining him. In fact, the public interest supports releasing a detainee where there is no basis for detention. Conclusion For the foregoing reasons, the Court should issue the attached proposed order, directing the government to release Mr. El Sawah. Respectfully submitted, A. J. KRAMER FEDERAL PUBLIC DEFENDER /s/ MARY MANNING PETRAS Assistant Federal Public Defender 625 Indiana Avenue, N.W. Suite 550 Washington, D.C (202)
14 Case 1:05-cv CKK Document Filed 10/10/12 Page 1 of 51
15 Case 1:05-cv CKK Document Filed 10/10/12 Page 2 of 51
16 Case 1:05-cv CKK Document Filed 10/10/12 Page 3 of 51
17 Case 1:05-cv CKK Document Filed 10/10/12 Page 4 of 51
18 Case 1:05-cv CKK Document Filed 10/10/12 Page 5 of 51
19 Case 1:05-cv CKK Document Filed 10/10/12 Page 6 of 51
20 Case 1:05-cv CKK Document Filed 10/10/12 Page 7 of 51
21 Case 1:05-cv CKK Document Filed 10/10/12 Page 8 of 51
22 Case 1:05-cv CKK Document Filed 10/10/12 Page 9 of 51
23 Case 1:05-cv CKK Document Filed 10/10/12 Page 10 of 51
24 Case 1:05-cv CKK Document Filed 10/10/12 Page 11 of 51
25 Case 1:05-cv CKK Document Filed 10/10/12 Page 12 of 51
26 Case 1:05-cv CKK Document Filed 10/10/12 Page 13 of 51
27 Case 1:05-cv CKK Document Filed 10/10/12 Page 14 of 51
28 Case 1:05-cv CKK Document Filed 10/10/12 Page 15 of 51
29 Case 1:05-cv CKK Document Filed 10/10/12 Page 16 of 51
30 Case 1:05-cv CKK Document Filed 10/10/12 Page 17 of 51
31 Case 1:05-cv CKK Document Filed 10/10/12 Page 18 of 51
32 Case 1:05-cv CKK Document Filed 10/10/12 Page 19 of 51
33 Case 1:05-cv CKK Document Filed 10/10/12 Page 20 of 51
34 Case 1:05-cv CKK Document Filed 10/10/12 Page 21 of 51
35 Case 1:05-cv CKK Document Filed 10/10/12 Page 22 of 51
36 Case 1:05-cv CKK Document Filed 10/10/12 Page 23 of 51
37 Case 1:05-cv CKK Document Filed 10/10/12 Page 24 of 51
38 Case 1:05-cv CKK Document Filed 10/10/12 Page 25 of 51
39 Case 1:05-cv CKK Document Filed 10/10/12 Page 26 of 51
40 Case 1:05-cv CKK Document Filed 10/10/12 Page 27 of 51
41 Case 1:05-cv CKK Document Filed 10/10/12 Page 28 of 51
42 Case 1:05-cv CKK Document Filed 10/10/12 Page 29 of 51
43 Case 1:05-cv CKK Document Filed 10/10/12 Page 30 of 51
44 Case 1:05-cv CKK Document Filed 10/10/12 Page 31 of 51
45 Case 1:05-cv CKK Document Filed 10/10/12 Page 32 of 51
46 Case 1:05-cv CKK Document Filed 10/10/12 Page 33 of 51
47 Case 1:05-cv CKK Document Filed 10/10/12 Page 34 of 51
48 Case 1:05-cv CKK Document Filed 10/10/12 Page 35 of 51
49 Case 1:05-cv CKK Document Filed 10/10/12 Page 36 of 51
50 Case 1:05-cv CKK Document Filed 10/10/12 Page 37 of 51
51 Case 1:05-cv CKK Document Filed 10/10/12 Page 38 of 51
52 Case 1:05-cv CKK Document Filed 10/10/12 Page 39 of 51
53 Case 1:05-cv CKK Document Filed 10/10/12 Page 40 of 51
54 Case 1:05-cv CKK Document Filed 10/10/12 Page 41 of 51
55 Case 1:05-cv CKK Document Filed 10/10/12 Page 42 of 51
56 Case 1:05-cv CKK Document Filed 10/10/12 Page 43 of 51
57 Case 1:05-cv CKK Document Filed 10/10/12 Page 44 of 51
58 Case 1:05-cv CKK Document Filed 10/10/12 Page 45 of 51
59 Case 1:05-cv CKK Document Filed 10/10/12 Page 46 of 51
60 Case 1:05-cv CKK Document Filed 10/10/12 Page 47 of 51
61 Case 1:05-cv CKK Document Filed 10/10/12 Page 48 of 51
62 Case 1:05-cv CKK Document Filed 10/10/12 Page 49 of 51
63 Case 1:05-cv CKK Document Filed 10/10/12 Page 50 of 51
64 Case 1:05-cv CKK Document Filed 10/10/12 Page 51 of 51
Case 1:05-cv CKK Document 262 Filed 01/19/17 Page 1 of 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
Case 1:05-cv-00764-CKK Document 262 Filed 01/19/17 Page 1 of 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ABDULLATIF NASSER, Petitioner, v. BARACK OBAMA, et al., Respondents. Civil Action
More informationDEPUTY SECRETARY OF DEFENSE 1010 DEFENSE PENTAGON WASHINGTON, DC
DEPUTY SECRETARY OF DEFENSE 1010 DEFENSE PENTAGON WASHINGTON, DC 2030-1010 May 9, 2012 MEMORANDUM FOR SECRETARIES OF THE MILITARY DEPARTMENTS CHAIRMAN OF THE JOINT CHIEFS OF STAFF UNDER SECRETARIES OF
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES. No YASER ESAM HAMDI AND ESAM FOUAD HAMDI, AS NEXT FRIEND OF YASER ESAM HAMDI, PETITIONERS
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES No. 03-6696 YASER ESAM HAMDI AND ESAM FOUAD HAMDI, AS NEXT FRIEND OF YASER ESAM HAMDI, PETITIONERS v. DONALD RUMSFELD, SECRETARY OF DEFENSE, ET AL. ON PETITION
More informationCase 1:05-cv JDB Document 151 Filed 02/09/2009 Page 1 of 5 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
Case 1:05-cv-00763-JDB Document 151 Filed 02/09/2009 Page 1 of 5 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ADEL HAMLILY, Petitioner, v. Civil Action No. 05-0763 (JDB BARACK OBAMA,
More informationCase 1:05-cv UNA Document 364 Filed 07/21/14 Page 1 of 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
Case 1:05-cv-00392-UNA Document 364 Filed 07/21/14 Page 1 of 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA DJAMEL AMEZIANE, Petitioner, v. Civil Action No. 05-392 (ESH BARACK OBAMA, et al.,
More informationCase 1:05-cv RJL Document Filed 12/03/2008 Page 1 of 13 EXHIBIT A
Case 1:05-cv-00429-RJL Document 163-2 Filed 12/03/2008 Page 1 of 13 J I EXHIBIT A Case 1:05-cv-00429-RJL Document 163-2 Filed 12/03/2008 Page 2 of 13 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT
More informationCase 1:13-cv Document 1 Filed 09/18/13 Page 1 of 16 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
Case 1:13-cv-01420 Document 1 Filed 09/18/13 Page 1 of 16 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA FAWZI KHALID ABDULLAH FAHAD AL ODAH, ) Detainee, Camp Delta ) Guantánamo Bay Naval
More informationTHE WHITE HOUSE. Office of the Press Secretary. For Immediate Release January 22, 2009 EXECUTIVE ORDER
THE WHITE HOUSE Office of the Press Secretary For Immediate Release January 22, 2009 EXECUTIVE ORDER - - - - - - - REVIEW AND DISPOSITION OF INDIVIDUALS DETAINED AT THE GUANTÁNAMO BAY NAVAL BASE AND CLOSURE
More information[NOT YET SCHEDULED FOR ORAL ARGUMENT] No IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT
Case: 09-5051 Document: 1244617 Filed: 05/13/2010 Page: 1 [NOT YET SCHEDULED FOR ORAL ARGUMENT] No. 09-5051 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT GHALEB NASSAR AL BIHANI,
More information[1] Executive Order Ensuring Lawful Interrogations
9.7 Laws of War Post-9-11 U.S. Applications (subsection F. Post-2008 About Face) This webpage contains edited versions of President Barack Obama s orders dated 22 Jan. 2009: [1] Executive Order Ensuring
More informationSEC UNIFORM STANDARDS FOR THE INTERROGATION OF PERSONS UNDER THE DETENTION OF THE DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE.
109TH CONGRESS Report HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 1st Session 109-359 --MAKING APPROPRIATIONS FOR THE DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDING SEPTEMBER 30, 2006, AND FOR OTHER PURPOSES December 18,
More informationUse of Military Force Authorization Language in the 2001 AUMF
MEMORANDUM May 11, 2016 Subject: Presidential References to the 2001 Authorization for Use of Military Force in Publicly Available Executive Actions and Reports to Congress From: Matthew Weed, Specialist
More information[ORAL ARGUMENT NOT SCHEDULED] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT
[ORAL ARGUMENT NOT SCHEDULED] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT In re MUSTAFA AHMED AL HAWSAWI, Petitioner ) ) No. 12-1004 ) ) THE GOVERNMENT S OPPOSITION TO MOTION
More informationJanuary 12, President-elect Barack Obama Obama-Biden Transition Project Washington, DC Dear President-elect Obama:
January 12, 2009 President-elect Barack Obama Obama-Biden Transition Project Washington, DC 20720 Dear President-elect Obama: We write to you regarding Omar Khadr, the 22-year-old Canadian national slated
More informationCase 1:17-cv CKK Document 73 Filed 12/06/17 Page 1 of 11 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
Case 1:17-cv-01597-CKK Document 73 Filed 12/06/17 Page 1 of 11 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA JANE DOE 1, et al., Plaintiffs, v. Civil Action No. 17-cv-1597 (CKK) DONALD J. TRUMP,
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA GRANT F. SMITH, Plaintiff, v. Case No. 15-cv-01431 (TSC CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE AGENCY, Defendant. MEMORANDUM OPINION Plaintiff Grant F. Smith, proceeding
More informationSAYING WHAT THE LAW SHOULD BE: JUDICIAL USURPATION IN Al-Marri v. Wright, 487 F.3d 160 (4th Cir. 2007)
SAYING WHAT THE LAW SHOULD BE: JUDICIAL USURPATION IN Al-Marri v. Wright, 487 F.3d 160 (4th Cir. 2007) Al-Marri v. Wright 1 is the most recent case in the struggle to define who qualifies as an enemy combatant
More informationCHIEF PROSECUTOR MARK MARTINS REMARKS AT GUANTANAMO BAY 16 MAY 2016
CHIEF PROSECUTOR MARK MARTINS REMARKS AT GUANTANAMO BAY 16 MAY 2016 Good evening. Tomorrow the Military Commission convened to try the charges against Abd al Hadi al-iraqi will hold its seventh pre-trial
More informationDirective on United States Nationals Taken Hostage Abroad and Personnel Recovery Efforts June 24, 2015
Administration of Barack Obama, 2015 Directive on United States Nationals Taken Hostage Abroad and Personnel Recovery Efforts June 24, 2015 Presidential Policy Directive/PPD 30 Subject: U.S. Nationals
More informationCase 1:04-cv UNA Document 1106 Filed 10/11/17 Page 1 of 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
Case 1:04-cv-01194-UNA Document 1106 Filed 10/11/17 Page 1 of 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA IN RE: GUANTANAMO BAY DETAINEE LITIGATION Misc. No. 08-442 (TFH) Civil Action Nos.
More informationUNCLASSIFED Approved for Public Release. This periodic review board is being conduct ed at 0915 hours
CA : This periodic review board is being conduct ed at 0915 hours on 22 January 2015, at t h e Periodic Revi ew Secretariat Headquarters, with regard to the followi ng detainee : Tariq Mahmoud Ahmed Al
More informationUnited States Court of Appeals
USCA Case #10-5172 Document #1310289 Filed: 05/27/2011 Page 1 of 12 United States Court of Appeals FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT Argued March 10, 2011 Decided May 27, 2011 No. 10-5172 MASAAB OMAR
More informationThis filing is timely pursuant to Military Commissions Trial Judiciary Rule of Coutt,
MILITARY COMMISSIONS TRIAL JUDICIARY GUANTANAMO BAY, CUBA UNITED STATES OF AMERICA V. KHALID SHAIKH MOHAMMAD; W ALID MUHAMMAD SALIH MUBARAK BIN 'ATTASH; RAMZI BIN AL SHIBH; ALI ABDUL AZIZ ALI; MUSTAFA
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ELECTRONIC FRONTIER FOUNDATION, ) ) Plaintiff, ) Civil No. 07-00403 (TFH) ) v. ) ) DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, ) ) Defendant. ) ) DEFENDANT S
More informationThe President. Part V. Tuesday, January 27, 2009
Tuesday, January 27, 2009 Part V The President Executive Order 13491 Ensuring Lawful Interrogations Executive Order 13492 Review and Disposition of Individuals Detained at the Guantánamo Bay Naval Base
More informationCRS Report for Congress
Order Code RS21850 Updated November 16, 2005 CRS Report for Congress Received through the CRS Web Summary Military Courts-Martial: An Overview Jennifer K. Elsea Legislative Attorney American Law Division
More informationCase 1:16-cv JEB Document 304 Filed 12/04/17 Page 1 of 8
Case 1:16-cv-01534-JEB Document 304 Filed 12/04/17 Page 1 of 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA STANDING ROCK SIOUX TRIBE, Plaintiff, and CHEYENNE RIVER SIOUX TRIBE, Plaintiff-Intervenor,
More informationSyllabus Law 654 Counterterrorism Law Seminar. George Mason University Antonin Scalia Law School Spring 2018
Brief Course Description: Syllabus Law 654 Counterterrorism Law Seminar George Mason University Antonin Scalia Law School Spring 2018 This seminar course will provide students with exposure to the laws
More informationCase 1:14-cr CRC Document 11 Filed 07/01/14 Page 1 of 11 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
Case 1:14-cr-00141-CRC Document 11 Filed 07/01/14 Page 1 of 11 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA UNITED STATES OF AMERICA : : v. : Criminal No.: 14-141 (CRC) : Ahmed Abu Khatallah,
More information[ORAL ARGUMENT NOT YET SCHEDULED] No IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT
[ORAL ARGUMENT NOT YET SCHEDULED] No. 09-5328 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT OBAYDULLAH et al., Petitioners-Appellants, v. BARACK OBAMA et al., Respondents-Appellees.
More informationMODULE: RULE OF LAW AND FAIR TRIAL ACTIVITY: GUANTANAMO BAY
MODULE: RULE OF LAW AND FAIR TRIAL ACTIVITY: GUANTANAMO BAY Source: : BBC, http://www.bbc.co.uk/worldservice/people/features/ihavearightto/index.shtml 1 INTRODUCTION Following the military campaign in
More informationMILITARY COMMISSIONS TRIAL JUDICIARY GUANTANAMO BAY
MILITARY COMMISSIONS TRIAL JUDICIARY GUANTANAMO BAY United States of America v. Noor Uthman Muhammed D- Defense Motion to Exclude Evidence and Testimony - Jurisdictional Hearing 18 August 2010 1. Timeliness:
More informationCase 3:14-cv JWD-RLB Document 1 08/22/14 Page 1 of 10 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA
Case 3:14-cv-00525-JWD-RLB Document 1 08/22/14 Page 1 of 10 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA JUNE MEDICAL SERVICES LLC d/b/a HOPE MEDICAL GROUP FOR WOMEN, on behalf
More informationTHE WHITE HOUSE. Office of the Press Secretary. For Immediate Release December 5, 2016
THE WHITE HOUSE Office of the Press Secretary For Immediate Release December 5, 2016 TEXT OF A LETTER FROM THE PRESIDENT TO THE SPEAKER OF THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES AND THE PRESIDENT PRO TEMPORE OF
More information1. I am an attorney with the Department of the Army. I am currently the Chief of the Law
Associated Press v. United States Department of Defense Doc. 11 Case 1:06-cv-01939-JSR Document 11 Filed 05/11/2006 Page 1 of 7 MICHAEL J. GARCIA United States Attorney for the Southern District of New
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
Case: 18-30257 Document: 00514388428 Page: 1 Date Filed: 03/15/2018 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT No. 18-30257 ATCHAFALAYA BASINKEEPER; LOUISIANA CRAWFISH PRODUCERS ASSOCIATION-WEST;
More informationCase 3:06-cv DAK Document 24 Filed 04/06/2007 Page 1 of 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION
Case 3:06-cv-01431-DAK Document 24 Filed 04/06/2007 Page 1 of 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION HOWARD A. MICHEL, -vs- AMERICAN FAMILY LIFE ASSURANCE
More informationCase 1:15-cv Document 1 Filed 05/28/15 Page 1 of 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
Case 1:15-cv-00785 Document 1 Filed 05/28/15 Page 1 of 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA JUDICIAL WATCH, INC., ) 425 Third Street, S.W., Suite 800 ) Washington, DC 20024,
More informationCase 1:04-cv UNA Document 1126 Filed 02/16/18 Page 1 of 54 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
Case 1:04-cv-01194-UNA Document 1126 Filed 02/16/18 Page 1 of 54 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA TOFIQ NASSER AWAD AL-BIHANI (ISN 893, Case Nos. ABDU LATIF NASSER (ISN
More informationThis is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the provisions of Title 10, United States Code, Section 1552.
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAW ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 ELP Docket No. 5272-98 2 July 1999 This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval
More informationCase 1:13-cv PLF Document 21 Filed 09/04/14 Page 1 of 13 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
Case 1:13-cv-01758-PLF Document 21 Filed 09/04/14 Page 1 of 13 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ) JAYSHAWN DOUGLAS, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) Civil Action No. 13-1758 (PLF) ) DISTRICT
More informationCase 1:12-cv ABJ Document 11 Filed 07/23/12 Page 1 of 11 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
Case 1:12-cv-00327-ABJ Document 11 Filed 07/23/12 Page 1 of 11 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ELECTRONIC PRIVACY INFORMATION ) CENTER, et al., ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) v. ) Civil
More informationGuantanamo Detainee Transfers
Guantanamo Detainee Transfers How are Guantanamo detainees approved for transfer out of the prison, and what does that process involve? This brief outlines how the current mechanisms work and how they
More informationCase 1:04-cv RJL Document 222 Filed 10/20/2008 Page 1 of 23 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
Case 1:04-cv-01166-RJL Document 222 Filed 10/20/2008 Page 1 of 23 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA LAKHDAR BOUMEDIENE, et al. Petitioners, Civil Action No. 04-cv-1166 (RJL)
More informationCase 1:04-cv PLF-AK Document 126 Filed 11/17/2006 Page 1 of 20 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
Case 1:04-cv-02022-PLF-AK Document 126 Filed 11/17/2006 Page 1 of 20 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ) SAIFULLAH PARACHA, ) ) Petitioner, ) ) v. ) Civil Action No. 04-CV-2022
More informationCase 1:17-cv APM Document 29 Filed 11/13/17 Page 1 of 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
Case 1:17-cv-00144-APM Document 29 Filed 11/13/17 Page 1 of 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA JAMES MADISON PROJECT, et al., Plaintiffs, v. No. 1:17-cv-00144-APM DEPARTMENT OF
More informationDetainee Provisions in the National Defense Authorization Bills
Detainee Provisions in the National Defense Authorization Bills Jennifer K. Elsea Legislative Attorney Michael John Garcia Legislative Attorney November 18, 2011 CRS Report for Congress Prepared for Members
More informationCase 1:17-cv CKK Document 39 Filed 01/09/18 Page 1 of 2 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
Case 1:17-cv-02361-CKK Document 39 Filed 01/09/18 Page 1 of 2 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA MATTHEW DUNLAP, Plaintiff, v. Civil Docket No. 17-cv-2361 (CKK) PRESIDENTIAL
More informationSolving the Due Process Problem with Military Commissions
Yale Law Journal Volume 114 Issue 4 Yale Law Journal Article 6 2005 Solving the Due Process Problem with Military Commissions Nicholas Stephanopoulos Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.law.yale.edu/ylj
More information2013] 151 NOTE. Amy M. Shepard*
2013] 151 NOTE HINGING ON HABEAS? THE GUANTANAMO MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING AND THE DETAINEES CONTINUED RIGHT TO COUNSEL Amy M. Shepard* I. INTRODUCTION Eleven years ago, in the wake of the terrorist
More informationThe US Judicial Response to Post-9/11 Executive Temerity and Congressional Acquiescence
Courts and the Making of Public Policy The US Judicial Response to Post-9/11 Executive Temerity and Congressional Acquiescence David E. Graham Bridging the gap between academia and policymakers The Foundation
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK JOSE PADILLA, : DONNA R. NEWMAN, : as Next Friend of Jose Padilla, : : Petitioners, : : v. : 02 Civ. 4445 (MBM) : GEORGE W. BUSH,
More informationUnited States Court of Appeals FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT
United States Court of Appeals FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT Argued November 6, 2015 Decided January 21, 2016 No. 14-5230 JEFFERSON MORLEY, APPELLANT v. CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE AGENCY, APPELLEE Appeal
More informationDefense Legal Services Agency Operation Enduring Freedom/Operation New Dawn Operation and Maintenance, Defense-Wide
I. Description of Operations Financed: The Defense Legal Service Agency (DLSA) maintains two separate efforts involving detainees at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba (GTMO), the Office of Military Commissions (OMC)
More informationAPPELLANT S MOTION TO VACATE DECISION, DISMISS APPEAL AS MOOT, AND REMAND CASE
[ARGUED NOVEMBER 21, 2017; DECIDED DECEMBER 26, 2017] No. 17-5171 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT ELECTRONIC PRIVACY INFORMATION CENTER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. PRESIDENTIAL
More informationChapter 4 The Iranian Threat
Chapter 4 The Iranian Threat From supporting terrorism and the Assad regime in Syria to its pursuit of nuclear arms, Iran poses the greatest threat to American interests in the Middle East. Through a policy
More informationDetainee Provisions in the National Defense Authorization Bills
Detainee Provisions in the National Defense Authorization Bills Jennifer K. Elsea Legislative Attorney Michael John Garcia Legislative Attorney July 18, 2011 Congressional Research Service CRS Report for
More informationDepartment of Defense DIRECTIVE
Department of Defense DIRECTIVE NUMBER 5525.1 August 7, 1979 Certified Current as of November 21, 2003 SUBJECT: Status of Forces Policy and Information Incorporating Through Change 2, July 2, 1997 GC,
More informationORAL ARGUMENT NOT YET SCHEDULED. No UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT
USCA Case #12-5017 Document #1414389 Filed: 01/09/2013 Page 1 of 88 ORAL ARGUMENT NOT YET SCHEDULED No. 12-5017 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT ABDUL RAHIM ABDUL RAZAK
More informationDEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS FINAL DECISION
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS Application for the Correction of the Coast Guard Record of: Xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx BCMR Docket No. 2012-098
More informationCase 1:17-cv JEB Document 41 Filed 12/21/17 Page 1 of 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
Case 1:17-cv-01167-JEB Document 41 Filed 12/21/17 Page 1 of 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CABLE NEWS NETWORK, INC., Plaintiff, v. Civil Action No. 17-1167-JEB FEDERAL
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION MARK WOODALL, MICHAEL P. McMAHON, PAULl MADSON, Individually and on behalf of a class of all similarly situated persons,
More informationNYSBA Health Law Section Annual Meeting. January 27, Developments in Behavioral Health Law
1111 Marcus Avenue - Suite 107 Lake Success, New York 11042 Telephone: (516) 328-2300 Fax: (516) 328-6638 www.abramslaw.com NYSBA Health Law Section Annual Meeting January 27, 2016 Developments in Behavioral
More informationCase 1:15-cv ABJ Document 19 Filed 07/29/15 Page 1 of 3 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
Case 1:15-cv-01015-ABJ Document 19 Filed 07/29/15 Page 1 of 3 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA AMERICAN FEDERATION OF GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES, AFL-CIO, 80 F Street, NW Washington,
More informationDepartment of Defense INSTRUCTION
Department of Defense INSTRUCTION NUMBER 5525.07 June 18, 2007 GC, DoD/IG DoD SUBJECT: Implementation of the Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) Between the Departments of Justice (DoJ) and Defense Relating
More informationBoumediene v. Bush: Legal Realism and the War on Terror
Boumediene v. Bush: Legal Realism and the War on Terror Megan Gaffney* I. INTRODUCTION On June 12, 2008, in Boumediene v. Bush, the United States Supreme Court ruled 5-4 that prisoners in Guantanamo Bay
More informationCase 1:13-cv BJR Document 83-1 Filed 09/20/13 Page 1 of 53 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
Case 1:13-cv-01021-BJR Document 83-1 Filed 09/20/13 Page 1 of 53 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION, Plaintiff, ARDAGH GROUP, S.A., COMPAGNIE DE SAINT-GOBAIN,
More information2486
2485 2486 2487 2488 2489 2490 2491 2492 2493 2494 2495 2496 2497 2498 2499 2500 2501 2502 2503 2504 2505 2506 2507 2508 2509 2510 2511 2512 2513 2514 2515 2516 2517 2518 2519 2520 2521 2522 2523 2524 2525
More informationHearing Before the House Committee on Armed Services
Hearing Before the House Committee on Armed Services Re: The Strengths and Weaknesses of the Military Commissions Act of 2006 and the Future of the Detention and Interrogation Facilities at the U.S. Naval
More informationNO TALLAHASSEE, July 17, Mental Health/Substance Abuse
CFOP 155-22 STATE OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CF OPERATING PROCEDURE CHILDREN AND FAMILIES NO. 155-22 TALLAHASSEE, July 17, 2017 Mental Health/Substance Abuse LEAVE OF ABSENCE AND DISCHARGE OF RESIDENTS COMMITTED
More informationCase 1:05-cv RMC Document 369 Filed 08/08/17 Page 1 of 20 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
Case 1:05-cv-01971-RMC Document 369 Filed 08/08/17 Page 1 of 20 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA MOHAMMED AL-QAHTANI, Petitioner, v. Case No. 05-CV-1971 (RMC) DONALD J.
More informationStanding Rock Sioux Tribe v. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
Public Land and Resources Law Review Volume 0 Case Summaries 2017-2018 Standing Rock Sioux Tribe v. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Oliver Wood Alexander Blewett III School of Law at the University of Montana,
More informationUnprivileged Belligerents, Preventive Detention, and Fundamental Fairness: Rethinking the Review Tribunal Representation Model
Unprivileged Belligerents, Preventive Detention, and Fundamental Fairness: Rethinking the Review Tribunal Representation Model Geoffrey S. Corn Peter Chickris ** Presidential Research Professor of Law,
More informationCase 1:17-cv TSC Document 15 Filed 11/09/17 Page 1 of 23 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
Case 1:17-cv-02069-TSC Document 15 Filed 11/09/17 Page 1 of 23 ) JOHN DOE, ) and the AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES ) UNION FOUNDATION, as Next Friend, ) ) Petitioners, v. ) ) GEN. JAMES N. MATTIS, ) in his
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION
2:17-cv-11910-MAG-DRG Doc # 184 Filed 12/22/17 Pg 1 of 5 Pg ID 5062 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION USAMA JAMIL HAMAMA, et al., Petitioners/Plaintiffs, v. REBECCA
More informationTerrorism, War and Justice: The Concept of the Unlawful Enemy Combatant
Loyola Marymount University and Loyola Law School Digital Commons at Loyola Marymount University and Loyola Law School Loyola of Los Angeles International and Comparative Law Review Law Reviews 9-1-2003
More informationNo February Criminal Justice Information Reporting
Military Justice Branch PRACTICE DIRECTIVE No. 1-18 9 February 2018 Background Criminal Justice Information Reporting On November 5, 2017, a former service member shot and killed 26 people at a church
More informationVERIFIED COMPLAINT FOR TERMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER AND A PRELIMINARY AND PERMANENT INJUCTION AND DECLARATORY RELIEF INTRODUCTION
HEARING DATE: STATE OF RHODE ISLAND PROVIDENCE, SC. SUPERIOR COURT CHRISTINE L. EGAN; : RICK RICHARDS; and : EDWARD BENSON; : Plaintiffs : : vs. : C.A. No.: : RHODE ISLAND BOARD OF EDUCATION : and EVA-MARIE
More informationThis Periodic Review Board is being conducted at 0917 hours. on 9 June 2016, with regards to the following detainee : Abdul Sahir,
CA: This Periodic Review Board is being conducted at 0917 hours on 9 June 2016, with regards to the following detainee : Abdul Sahir, ISN 753. As a reminder, the unclassified portions of these proceedings
More informationCase 1:15-cv CRC Document 28 Filed 08/21/17 Page 1 of 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA OPINION AND ORDER
Case 1:15-cv-02088-CRC Document 28 Filed 08/21/17 Page 1 of 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA JUDICIAL WATCH, INC., Plaintiff, v. Case No. 15-cv-2088 (CRC) U.S. DEPARTMENT OF
More informationChapter 5 Evidentiary Presumptions
Chapter 5 Evidentiary Presumptions As noted above, the plurality opinion in Hamdi recognized that difficult evidentiary issues may arise when courts conduct habeas review in the militarydetention setting.
More informationINTRODUCTION. 1. This is an action for injunctive relief, seeking an order that would require President
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK CENTER FOR CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS, TINA M. FOSTER, GITANJALI S. GUTIERREZ, SEEMA AHMAD, MARIA LAHOOD, RACHEL MEEROPOL, Plaintiffs, v. COMPLAINT
More informationMILITARY COMMISSIONS TRIAL JUDICIARY GUANTANAMO BAY, CUBA
MILITARY COMMISSIONS TRIAL JUDICIARY GUANTANAMO BAY, CUBA UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. ABD AL RAHIM HUSSAYN MUHAMMAD AL NASHIRI AE149K ORDER DEFENSE MOTION FOR APPROPRIATE RELIEF: DETERMINE THE EXTENT OF
More informationDEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS FINAL DECISION
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS Application for the Correction of the Coast Guard Record of: XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX BCMR Docket No. 2008-087 FINAL
More informationCase 1:17-cv CKK Document 73-1 Filed 12/06/17 Page 1 of 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
Case 1:17-cv-01597-CKK Document 73-1 Filed 12/06/17 Page 1 of 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA JANE DOE 1, et al., Plaintiffs, v. Civil Action No. 17-cv-1597 (CKK) DONALD J.
More informationBOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAW ANNU WASHINGTON DC
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAW ANNU WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 TJR Docket No: 4848-98 19 May 1999 Dear This is in reference to your naval record pursuant to the States
More informationCase 1:17-cv WHP Document 99 Filed 11/27/17 Page 1 of 9 : : : : : : : : : : :
Case 117-cv-07232-WHP Document 99 Filed 11/27/17 Page 1 of 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK MICHAEL B. DONOHUE, et al., Plaintiffs, -against- CBS CORPORATION, et al. Defendants.
More informationDepartment of Defense DIRECTIVE. SUBJECT: Release of Official Information in Litigation and Testimony by DoD Personnel as Witnesses
Department of Defense DIRECTIVE NUMBER 5405.2 July 23, 1985 Certified Current as of November 21, 2003 SUBJECT: Release of Official Information in Litigation and Testimony by DoD Personnel as Witnesses
More informationCase 1:15-cv NMG Document 21 Filed 05/15/15 Page 1 of 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS
Case 1:15-cv-11583-NMG Document 21 Filed 05/15/15 Page 1 of 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS NATIONAL IMMIGRATION PROJECT OF THE NATIONAL LAWYERS GUILD and AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES
More informationDepartment of Defense DIRECTIVE. SUBJECT: Mental Health Evaluations of Members of the Armed Forces
Department of Defense DIRECTIVE NUMBER 6490.1 October 1, 1997 Certified Current as of November 24, 2003 SUBJECT: Mental Health Evaluations of Members of the Armed Forces ASD(HA) References: (a) DoD Directive
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA. DECLARATION OF,lAMES R. CRISFIELD,][R.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ) Abdullah Saleh Ati AI Ajmi, et al. ) ) Petitioners, ) ) v. ) Civil Action No. 02-CV-0828 (CKK) ) UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, et al. ) )
More informationChapter 2 Burden of Proof
Chapter 2 Burden of Proof We begin our survey with an issue that may appear, at first glance, to be a matter of strong consensus among the judges: the allocation and calibration of the burden of proof.
More informationDIVISION E UNIFORM CODE OF MILITARY JUSTICE REFORM. This division may be cited as the Military Justice Act of TITLE LI GENERAL PROVISIONS
DIVISION E UNIFORM CODE OF MILITARY JUSTICE REFORM SEC. 5001. SHORT TITLE. This division may be cited as the Military Justice Act of 2016. TITLE LI GENERAL PROVISIONS Sec. 5101. Definitions. Sec. 5102.
More informationCase 1:18-cv TJK Document 7 Filed 09/07/18 Page 1 of 25 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
Case 1:18-cv-01729-TJK Document 7 Filed 09/07/18 Page 1 of 25 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ) PUBLIC CITIZEN HEALTH, ) RESEARCH GROUP, et al., ) ) Plaintiffs, ) Civil
More informationCase 1:15-cv EGS Document 50 Filed 12/22/15 Page 1 of 21 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
Case 1:15-cv-02115-EGS Document 50 Filed 12/22/15 Page 1 of 21 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION, et al., Plaintiffs, Civil Action No. 1:15-cv-02115
More informationDepartment of Defense INSTRUCTION
Department of Defense INSTRUCTION SUBJECT: Law Enforcement Defense Data Exchange (LE D-DEx) References: See Enclosure 1 NUMBER 5525.16 August 29, 2013 Incorporating Change 1, Effective June 29, 2018 USD(P&R)USD(I)
More informationIllinois Association of Defense Trial Counsel P.O. Box 7288, Springfield, IL IDC Quarterly Vol. 14, No. 2 ( ) Medical Malpractice
Medical Malpractice By: Edward J. Aucoin, Jr. Hall, Prangle & Schoonveld, LLC Chicago The Future of Expert Physician Testimony on Nursing Standard of Care When the Illinois Supreme Court announced in June
More informationChapter 3 The Scope of the Government s Detention Authority
Chapter 3 The Scope of the Government s Detention Authority The early operative consensus among district court judges concerning the burden of proof a consensus the D.C. Circuit has now destabilized is
More informationDEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS FINAL DECISION
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS Application for the Correction of the Coast Guard Record of: BCMR Docket No. 1998-116 ANDREWS, Attorney-Advisor: FINAL DECISION This
More informationCOUNCIL OF EUROPE COMMITTEE OF MINISTERS
COUNCIL OF EUROPE COMMITTEE OF MINISTERS Recommendation Rec(2003)23 of the Committee of Ministers to member states on the management by prison administrations of life sentence and other long-term prisoners
More information