Skill Mix in Secondary Care: A scoping exercise

Transcription

1 Skill Mix in Secondary Care: A scoping exercise Report to the National Co-ordinating Centre for NHS Service Delivery and Organisation R & D (NCCSDO) November 2003 prepared by Roy Carr-Hill, Liz Currie and Paul Dixon Centre for Health Economics, University of York Address for correspondence Roy Carr-Hill Centre for Health Economics University of York York YO10 5DD irss23@york.ac.uk NCCSDO 2003

2 Contents Executive Summary 5 Introduction 5 Literature review 5 Current local and national initiatives 9 Implications for research 11 Section 1 Background and context 13 Chapter 1 Background and methodology of scoping review Background Previous published research and commentary The literature review Other approaches to identifying initiatives Conclusion 19 Chapter 2 Policy context Introduction Recruitment and retention Relationship between spending and quality of care Policy initiatives 21 Section 2 Literature review 24 Chapter 3 Quality and mapping of literature Introduction Preliminary overview of the literature The scoping exercise and categories identified 27 Chapter 4 Brief reviews of the literature by category Health care reform and hospital restructuring Workforce issues Skill mix Role issues Interdisciplinary and multi-disciplinary teamwork and collaboration Discussion Summary of review findings Conclusions 50 NCCSDO

3 Section 3 Current local and national initiatives 51 Chapter 5 The survey of secondary care trusts A survey of workforce deployment and development initiatives Methodology Replies to the survey Summary Conclusions 85 Chapter 6 Workforce development confederation initiatives in new ways of working and training Introduction Local delivery plans: some examples Discussion Conclusion 105 Section IV Research implications 106 Chapter 7 Implications for policy relevant research Summary of main findings and knowledge gaps Implications for routine data systems and research methodology 114 References 118 Appendices 131 Appendix 1 Papers included in the literature review 131 Appendix 2 The questionnaire with covering letter 216 Appendix 3 List of trusts who returned questionnaires 219 Appendix 4 List of new nursing posts 221 Appendix 5 Follow-up letters to SHAs and WDCs 224 Appendix 6 Notes of workshop meeting 228 NCCSDO

4 Index of tables Table 1 List of keywords 25 Table 2 Papers addressing skill mix in secondary care 35 Table 3 NHS regional distribution of replies 54 Table 4 Job titles of groups with three or more respondents 55 Table 5 Percentage of replies reporting different levels of devolved responsibility for strategic planning 56 Table 6 Systems used for workforce planning 58 Table 7 Mechanisms used to vary staffing levels and skill mix 60 Table 8 Arrangements for support staff to cover/substitute 61 Table 9 Schemes to develop activities of nurses/nursing support62 Table 10 Numbers of reports of skills escalator initiatives 64 Table 11 Initiatives inspired by Changing Workforce Programme65 Table 12 Events related to Changing Workforce Programme 68 Table 13 Institutions reporting the introduction of these (new) types of nursing and related roles 70 Table14 Institutions introducing different numbers of new types of roles 70 Table 15 Most frequently mentioned grades for new types of nursing and related roles 71 Table 16 Grades associated with new types of nursing and related roles 73 Table 17 Methods used to monitor the effectiveness of staff redeployment 76 Table 18 Greatest changes in ways of deploying nurses and nursing support staff over past five years 78 Table 19 Most successful forms of flexible working 79 Table 20 Numbers of reports and publications on implementing or evaluating staff deployment 80 Table 21 Sources particularly helpful in workforce planning 81 Table 21 Descriptive summaries of included papers 131 Table 22 Trusts returning questionnaires 219 NCCSDO

5 Executive Summary Introduction This is the final report on the scoping review Skill Mix in Secondary Care. In our agreed final proposal, we said that we would: 1 Carry out a comprehensive but not systematic literature review 2 Explore grey literature and current activity through: distributing a questionnaire survey to all National Health Service (NHS) trusts (see Appendix 2) contacting the Workforce Development Confederations (WDCs) holding a seminar/workshop with leading experts in the field to obtain leads to additional material and discuss the policy context and implications. We have carried out a comprehensive literature review, completed a questionnaire survey with all trusts and interviewed or received material from nearly all the WDCs. A seminar/workshop was held at the beginning of September 2003 to discuss these findings with experts in the field (see Appendix 6). Literature review Methodology Searches were made of the following databases: MEDLINE, CINAHL, EMBASE, HMIC, SIGLE, CCTR, Sociological Abstracts, The British Nursing Index, Inside Conferences, the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews and the National Register Records. An initial research database of nearly references has been compiled from these and has been manually searched by consulting both title and abstract for material relevant to the purview of this review. Records relating to the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews and National Register Records were searched separately for details of research projects currently in progress or recently concluded which may not yet have been formally published. NCCSDO

6 References that were deemed to be potentially relevant have been assigned a series of keywords to provide a mapping or classification of the literature. Overview of the literature Apart from a large body of mainly irrelevant material in the form of articles dealing with specific medical conditions (for example, the cancers), the literature - as anticipated - is dominated by topics relevant to nursing. A large proportion of these as well as other topics take the form of editorials, commentaries and general debate over health care and hospital reform, restructuring and new staff roles or training needs. Health care reform and hospital restructuring One whole section of the identified literature broadly addressed issues of health care service reform and restructuring including significant commentary and debates over the NHS Plan (Department of Health, 2000a) and patient-centred care. A large amount of this literature took the form of editorials, commentaries and general debate over health care and hospital reform as well as restructuring, new staff roles, training needs and the implications of these. Workforce: general staffing, management and service provision issues Another broad theme to emerge concerned hospital staffing and organisation of services. This literature - as anticipated - was dominated by topics relevant to nursing which included nursing models and workforce planning and trends (for example Project an approach to pre-registration nursing education; in-house staffing agencies), collaborative nursing, nurse practitioners and leadership models, nursing roles (for example, nursing diagnoses; nurse-managed centres; nurse-led multidisciplinary care teams), nursing workload measurement systems and workload problems related to retention, nursing shortages and burnout, empowerment, job satisfaction, and professional governance. There was a certain amount concerning other clinical staffing issues such as ward staffing and ward rotas. Management issues also emerged in terms of staff planning or training for clinicians and nurses in delegation and leadership skills. There was also a moderate corpus of surveys of hospital personnel (such as nurses, junior doctors, paediatric specialists or others). NCCSDO

7 Skill mix A considerable literature on skill mix emerged. A lot of it, however, was in the nature of general debate over what was actually meant by skill mix; what constituted an acceptable staff mix or how this was influenced by cost-containment issues. There was also much discussion about what ratio of (for example) qualified nurses to health care assistants (HCAs) should be employed. Staffing roles Staffing roles in terms of role substitution, development or change emerged as another important category. Although much of this literature related to debates surrounding the increasing delegation of duties to unlicensed clinical personnel or non-professional personnel (such as HCAs), a range of different nursing (for example, modern matrons, clinical nurse consultant; clinical nurse specialists) and physicians roles were also well represented. Some debate surrounding problems with perceived structural and medical dominance was also observed including, for example, barriers to nurses' workplace satisfaction or the way in which traditional work culture, rituals, norms, and boundaries were perceived to stand in the way of the development of new working methods and roles. Multi-/interdisciplinary teamworking or collaborative activities Other important categories to emerge, particularly in the context of integrated care or critical pathways were inter- or multi-disciplinary care teams and teamwork, team building and collaboration. A great majority of these were patient group or condition-specific (for example intermediate care unit [ICU]; AIDS, cancer, diabetes, stroke management and pain management; elderly/geriatric/dementia; peri-operative and surgical care; trauma and wound care; ward rounds and record keeping.). Included within this context were papers addressing multi-skilling and cross-training initiatives. Within these are a further hierarchy of categories, which include: staffing models or innovative strategies, addressing individual experiences or experiments within secondary care institutions staff education or training issues influence of workload on staffing and patient outcomes. NCCSDO

8 Current local and national initiatives The survey of secondary care trusts The overall aim of this survey was to summarise the types of activities that have been introduced to implement the approaches set out in the Changing Workforce Programme and skills escalator strategy and, more generally, in the report on the human resources implications of the NHS Plan (National Health Service, 2002a). We wanted to hear about relevant aspects of workforce planning, local innovations and any related evaluation mechanisms; and about the details of any reports that have been produced or any literature/examples found helpful. A short questionnaire was developed around the main themes of the project, specifically related to recent English NHS workforce initiatives. The questionnaire was piloted with five potential respondents and considerable design changes were made for the final version (see Appendix 2). The sample The sampling frame was derived from Binleys NHS database and consisted of all people in England who fell into the following four job groupings on the database: directorate nurse manager head of nursing personnel medical staffing officer. These four groups comprise people with many job titles, though most had some senior management responsibility in nursing or human resources. The selection produced 1393 names at 416 institutions belonging to 247 trusts. We decided on an initial mailing to all 1393, recognising that this involved several questionnaires going to most institutions and the likelihood that individual response rates would be low if several people collaborated on a single reply. We preferred this model to the more conventional strategy of sending a single questionnaire to a senior figure, hoping that it would be forwarded appropriately. By mid-july, after follow-up phone calls, 131 completed questionnaires had been returned. As anticipated, the individual response rate was low (approximately ten per cent); however the institutional coverage was encouraging with replies from 99 (40 per cent) of the 247 trusts. NCCSDO

9 Replies to the survey The geographical base of responses is good. The 82 trusts replying, prior to reminders, were well-distributed across the English regions. Directorate nurse managers and directors of nursing were most likely to reply although respondents were not limited to those with prime responsibility for nursing. Although we encouraged people to return questionnaires even if there were no or few relevant initiatives, the replies received had a good deal to report. The questionnaire and covering letter (see Appendix 2) also encouraged people to supply job descriptions and other material relating to initiatives they felt had been particularly successful. Main findings Although the survey did not generate much additional material for the central review, there are several very interesting findings in the survey. A few of the highlights are: A majority reported a high level of devolution of responsibility to units or wards, though the extent and meaning of devolution clearly differed between institutions. Mechanisms for overseeing the devolution varied from very loose to quite formal arrangements. In addition, several respondents described how the role of modern matron fitted into devolved structures. There were few mentions of proprietary systems (amounting to no more than one or two references to the GRASP and NICSM systems). In addition, two institutions reported having developed their own paediatric dependency assessment protocols and another mentioned a similar planning tool for maternity care. Few formal mechanisms or tools were reported as aids to planning and varying staff numbers and composition to match dependency. However, the majority of respondents reported that arrangements were in place to vary staffing as necessary and identified the group of people (usually ward managers or matrons) with the relevant responsibility. Variation in staffing was, on the whole, limited to rearranging the work patterns of existing unit staff; for example, by changing shift arrangements. Indeed, flexible working in a number of forms was reported to be widespread. There was an emphasis on efforts to identify and standardise core competencies and review job descriptions. In relation to shifting job boundaries, many specific examples were cited but most involved some method of developing the nurse's role to support junior doctors, a variety of nurse practitioner models and the development of the role of HCAs into nursing areas. Many respondents referred to NCCSDO

10 the training to national vocational qualification (NVQ) Levels 2 and 3, especially Level 3, and other mechanisms for expanding the role of HCAs. Several other types of support roles were described, including: team support workers, ward housekeepers and patient liaison transfer assistants. There was consensus on what had been the greatest changes in ways of deploying nurses and nursing support staff in their local institution over the past five years. The most frequently mentioned activities were: creation of specialist posts, especially nurse consultants and nurse practitioners; the development of the HCA role; and the introduction of NVQs. A number of other posts and activities were also described, these included: ward housekeepers and support technicians. A significant minority of responses mentioned new educational and training posts for example clinical teachers, clinical education advisors and educational facilitators. Although the skills escalator initiatives were only mentioned by just over half of the respondents, they were often enthusiastic. Schemes mentioned included: IT and basic skills training; rotational programmes for new starters; Royal College of Nursing leadership training; nurse cadet programmes; schemes to encourage domestic staff into HCA roles and then undertake NVQ Level 3; training for managers; and competency-led development programmes. Most monitoring efforts related to rather general evaluation tools such as staff and patient satisfaction surveys and audits. Other reported activities included patient focus groups, risk management, incident monitoring, annual reports, local evaluation tools and a 24- hour helpline. It was not always clear whether they were being used to monitor care more widely or the specific effects of workforce deployment initiatives. Under a quarter had personally attended events relating to the Changing Workforce Programme. While opinions were generally enthusiastic, there were a few comments on the events being poorly organised and too basic. Only a limited number knew of anyone who had attended the Toolkit for Local Change workshops. In the descriptions and names of specific initiatives, the level of activity was moderate: on most topics 30 per cent or less had something to report. However, when we asked a question that could be more easily be answered from a trust or institution-wide perspective, a much higher level of activity was reported. The implication that workforce development is limited to certain units within trusts raises further questions, for example are some settings more amenable to these initiatives, or is the need greater in some areas? NCCSDO

11 Survey of WDCs The local delivery plans and other materials were obtained from the WDCs. Concordant with the last highlight in the previous sub-section, the local delivery plans and related material obtained from WDCs suggests that there is much activity taking place across the different strategic health authorities (SHAs) in terms of skill mix changes and the development of new roles at the trust level. Role redesign and development are seen by many trusts as useful strategies to address shortfalls in staff numbers. Much of the reported activity is reported to be taking place outside of a formal relationship to a Changing Workforce Programme scheme or project. In some cases the change processes are further complicated by moves towards major service redesign that may be already underway in a particular trust (see for example Surrey and Sussex SHA local delivery plan , section 5: workforce). Although many trusts and health communities appear to be engaging in the change processes with enthusiasm (or at least with resignation), other organisations have expressed their concern at the validity of the productivity and skill mix assumptions that are being used at the national level and have called for further validation work to be carried out. There is a noted lack of confidence in respect of convincing clinicians and achieving the necessary change management agenda, particularly in the short term (see for example Greater Manchester local delivery plan for 2003, workforce section). Implicit in the NHS Plan and the whole NHS Modernisation Agency s Agenda for Change policy is an emphasis on new ways of working involving the skill mix changes and role redesign or development schemes that the health care sector is now actively in the process of taking on. However, with a few exceptions, including those schemes which are being formally piloted through the Modernisation Agency s own Changing Workforce Programme (outcomes from the first phase of which are already well-summarised in their report see NHS Modernisation Agency, 2003), there remains relatively little evidence of the formal monitoring or evaluation of many of these skill mix changes and role redesigns or substitutions which would allow any serious conclusions to be drawn about their real value or long-term effectiveness. Implications for research While this has not been a comprehensive systematic literature review, it is clear that much of the evidence base for current and projected reforms is anecdotal. Both the literature review and the survey have highlighted a NCCSDO

12 large number of gaps in our knowledge especially in respect of the detailed implementation of skill mix changes, the development, acceptability and effectiveness of new roles and in cross-boundary working and team working. Some of these topics could be the subject of systematic large-scale research in the form of a randomised control trial. But many of them call for small-scale, often qualitative enquiry, because they are specific to certain settings and contexts. What is striking, however, is the under-developed nature of the research tools in this area, both for professional researchers and for reflexive practitioners. Many of the relatively few empirical researchers are still searching for appropriate ways of measuring quality and methods of evaluation. Indeed, from a service point of view, the most urgent need is to understand how to collect routine data about activity in secondary care, and what are the most appropriate approaches to monitoring the impact of any changes. Without these essential building blocks, it will often be impossible for local champions of an initiative or innovation to take advantage of research findings, however sophisticated their methods. On this level, the most important research and development (R&D) tasks are methodological: to find out how to collect reliable routine data on the wards; and to develop appropriate evaluation tools. However, in the workshop, it was clear that the service participants placed most emphasis on the use and training of HCAs and other support staff (including both housekeepers and ward clerks) and lower priority on the other three topics. While we do not suggest slavishly following demand, given the evident difficulties of carrying out research with the support of overworked staff, it would seem politic to organise research topics that, if not focused on HCAs (for example), are relevant to the most frequent activities. While it was not possible from the survey to judge the quality of current initiatives - though we did get respondents reports of what they felt to be the most notable and successful changes recently - overall, three types of activity stood out. Firstly, there were many schemes to expand the role of HCAs, usually through an NVQ programme. Secondly, there was a great diversity of activities around expanding the role of senior nurses. Finally, there were projects to make more use of non-clinical staff such as technicians, people who managed technicians, ward housekeepers, ward clerks and a variety of posts that dealt with non-clinical aspects of patient welfare and discharge. But the systematic evidence base for the enthusiasm is lacking. Perhaps research should first of all focus on these three issues, combined with one of the other issues of more general interest (for example new roles or some of the methodological issues discussed in the next section). NCCSDO

13 Section 1 Background and context Chapter 1 Background and methodology of scoping review 1.1 Background The aim of this scoping review is to advise the SDO Programme what research should be commissioned in this area. The review sets out to: 1 Map the available published and grey research literatures (theoretical and empirical) from the health care sector including both private and public (non-health sectors) where appropriate. The literature review is not intended to be a systematic literature review according to the criteria established but it is comprehensive and rigorous. It has also enabled us to identify the research which has been carried out, gaps in the field and relevant methodological issues that may be important to consider in future commissioning. 2 Analyse the current NHS context and how the findings from the scoping exercise can inform the development of workforce management within the NHS. 3 Examine the policy implications of the findings of the scoping exercise for the Department of Health and the various NHS organisations. 4 Identify areas for further research and how these might be addressed. The specific objectives are to search for evidence on: the models of staff deployment are in use and how they work new ways of working practice and any evaluations thereof the impact of training and continuing professional development on deployment current patterns of delegation from one staff group to another and any evidence of the outcomes of that the impact of substitution on quality of care including patient satisfaction and clinical effectiveness (although that is less an emphasis here than in the first scoping exercise). NCCSDO

14 While the focus is mainly on searching for relevant published and grey literature, there will be important information to be collected on current patterns of deployment and delegation and on patterns of training that will not necessarily be obtainable through databases. We have, therefore, supplemented the literature search in a number of ways including postal surveys, site visits and stakeholder interviews (see Section for methodology). 1.2 Previous published research and commentary In terms of deployment, although the vogue for using nursing workload management systems at the beginning of the 1990s has declined, both GRASP (Rapson and Halliday, 2002) and NISCM (McIntosh, 1996) and perhaps some others are still in use. The workforce literature also includes several large-scale studies of ward staffing: one example is the Audit Commission s (2001) review of staffing of 3600 wards. They found wide variation in the amounts spent on staffing even after allowing for specialty mix, ward size, London weighting and time spent on other duties. There is quite a large literature about the potential for delegation and substitution both between professional groups and across professional boundaries, but only relatively little published material relating to empirical work. Much of the literature that does exist is very small scale. For example, there is a literature on the role of nursing assistants and support workers and especially on the difficulties of their apparently intermediate role (Norman and Cowley, 1999) - both from their point of view (Thornley, 2000) and in terms of their acceptability to the established nursing staff (Hind et al., 2000) but it is usually based on the experiences of only a small number of workers. Also, much of the literature is very tangential. For example, a search carried out in June 2002 for the role of housekeepers revealed that only eight of 134 records generated mentioned domestics at all - the remainder were all about the nursing assistant/support worker. Nevertheless, as the tender specification noted, this is a rapidly evolving field. In terms of assessing the possibility of efficiency gains from redeployment and substitution, Carr-Hill and Jenkins-Clarke (2002) analysed a very large data set of activity analysis and workload data focusing mainly on nurses and support staff collected during the 1990s. They summarised the lessons from their analysis about skill-mix in seven themes that have been used as the context for this scoping review: NCCSDO

15 1 Variation between hospitals Differences in staffing levels between hospitals suggest there is potential for efficiency gains in some hospitals. It is not surprising that there is a large variation for bank staff in that one would expect to see differences in employment of this group of staff due to location of hospitals (for example whether urban/rural locations) but it is notable that there are even greater variations for nursing support staff and qualified nurses. While the potential slack in deployment could not be quantified, it is potentially substantial. 2 Ward culture/division of labour While there are some wards where there is a clearly demarcated division of labour between different grades of staff, the average pattern is that there is little difference in the types of tasks undertaken by different staff grades; suggesting that the skills of different staff are not being used very efficiently. There do not appear to be rigid divisions of labour at the ward level. Instead the assignment of staff to different types of activities appears to reflect particular ward management styles. 3 Skill mix issues There appears to be little increased specialisation between staff groups as overall staffing increases. For example, qualified nurses do not seem to spend more time on direct care when there are more staff from other groups present or when other staff groups undertake more overhead work. An additional person of any grade does more of everything. 4 Capacity Although not substantial, both qualified and support staff report an increase in the time that they are available over night shifts. 5 Flexibility While staff are deployed differentially to different specialties, there is no apparent flexibility in the deployment of nursing staff in response to variations in patient demand (level of severity). While this is to be expected among ICUs and special care baby units because levels of demand are always high, the same appear to be true among specialties which can be described as more general such as surgery, medicine and orthopaedics. 6 Economies of scale There does not appear to be a strong relationship between numbers of patients and nurse staffing levels, suggesting the possibility of economies NCCSDO

16 of scale. There is, therefore, very little mechanical relation between numbers of patients and actual working hours. This suggests that, potentially, there is ample room for economies of scale (in the sense of combining wards to economise on staff time) or reconfiguring the establishment staff. 7 Distributing the overheads Housekeepers make a substantial contribution to overall staff input. Nursing time could be saved on administration and other non-patient related care in wards where there is high demand (level of severity). There has also been a limited literature concerning the impact on outcomes of different staff groups carrying out the care required. For example, Carr-Hill et al. (1995) showed that more highly qualified nurses produced better quality care measured in terms of QUALPACs a scale for measuring the quality of nursing care (Wandelt and Ager, 1974) - and bespoke sets of outcomes. Savage (1989) showed how hospital domestics were valued by patients. There have also been a number of studies using the quality pointers questionnaire (York Health Economics Consortium, 1993). 1.3 The literature review Theoretical bases of the literature review The topic is broad and the theoretical bases for the review must, therefore, be broad. We have drawn on the following as guidelines for the literature search and trawl among hospitals: 1 the original questions in the tender summarised in our aims and objectives as deployment, training and development, delegation and patient outcomes 2 the key types of change being considered by the Changing Workforce Programme of substitution, widening and deepening roles and new roles, together with the specialisms on which their pilot sites are focusing 3 the themes identified by Carr-Hill and Jenkins-Clarke (2002) - as above - of variations between providers, ward culture, division of labour, skill mix issues, capacity, flexibility, economies of scale and distributing the overheads. NCCSDO

17 1.3.2 Methods for identifying relevant published and unpublished grey literature A range of databases to identify published and unpublished information have been searched. These include MEDLINE, CINAHL, EMBASE, BNI, HMIC, the National Research Register, REFER, Inside Conferences, SIGLE, Sociological Abstracts and the Cochrane Library. Websites of selected relevant organisations and databases of any relevant NHS organisations have also been searched. The desk based literature search has been supplemented by: 1 a postal survey of hospitals asking for any experience with deployment modalities 2 scoping the WDCs to find out about new training modalities being introduced 3 a small number of visits to the relevant pilot sites to understand how these are working 4 attending the European HealthCare Management Association Conference at Caltanissetta Sicily where the 2003 theme was The workforce in crisis. The first three produced a small amount of new grey material and unpublished studies. The conference was very fruitful in generating relevant and up-to-date papers theme A: labour markets and health professionals theme B: education and continuing professional development of the health workforce theme C: personal, organisational and interorganisational development theme D: leading and managing networks and multidisciplinary teams theme F: management forum PhD papers Methods for judging the quality of the literature available and for summarising the results As this is a scoping exercise, the review does not pretend to be systematic in the sense of carrying out a meta-analysis of the papers identified. Indeed, as anticipated in the original proposal, the comprehensive and exhaustive search has in fact turned up only a small number of empirical studies. The searches have, of themselves, identified the size and shape of the literature. Without the more detailed comprehensive review, the NCCSDO

18 judgement of scientific quality will have to be based on their description of methods and the coherence of the findings with the other literature. 1.4 Other approaches to identifying initiatives The survey The overall aim of this survey is to summarise the types of activities that have been introduced to implement the approaches set out in the Changing Workforce Programme and the skills escalator strategy and, more generally, in the report on the human resources implications of the NHS Plan. A short questionnaire was developed around the main themes of the project, specifically related to recent English NHS workforce initiatives. The sample The sampling frame was derived from Binleys NHS database and consisted of all people in England who were concerned with human resources: directorate nurse manager, head of nursing, personnel, medical staffing officer. The selection produced 1393 names at 416 institutions belonging to 247 trusts. Everyone was mailed, recognising that this involved several questionnaires going to most institutions and the likelihood that individual response rates would be low if several people collaborated on a single reply. By mid-july, after follow-up phone calls, 131 completed questionnaires had been returned. While the individual response rate was low (approximately ten per cent); the institutional coverage was encouraging and we received replies from 99 (40 per cent) of the 247 trusts. Replies to the survey The 82 trusts replying were well-distributed across the English regions. Directorate nurse managers and directors of nursing were most likely to reply although respondents were not limited to those with prime responsibility for nursing. Although we encouraged people to return questionnaires even if there were no or few relevant initiatives, the replies received had a good deal to report. The questionnaire and covering letter (see Appendix 2) also encouraged people to supply job descriptions and other material relating to initiatives they feel have been particularly successful. NCCSDO

19 Main findings Although the survey did not generate much additional material for the central review, there are several very interesting findings in the survey that are discussed in Chapter Conclusion In the original proposal, we suggested that, in addition to a thorough review of the NHS policy and guidance documents, we would: 1 hold a scoping seminar soon after the initiation of the contract 2 interview members of the Changing Workforce Programme team and the Modernisation Agency. We subsequently decided that the most useful function of the seminar/workshop and of any discussions with members of the Changing Workforce Programme and the Modernisation Agency would be to discuss the implications for policy and research of the material that we found rather than to identify additional material. For this reason, it was decided to hold the seminar in the first half of October Proposed participants, and the Modernisation Agency, were sent the draft report. NCCSDO

20 Chapter 2 Policy context 2.1 Introduction As we are all too keenly aware, the vast number of changes in health care provision in the UK in terms of strategy, policy initiatives, planning and practice are taking place in both acute and primary care sectors simultaneously and both sectors are faced with implementing change against a backdrop of reductions in workforce numbers (both nursing and medical). Much of the commentary and policy discussion is, accordingly, concerned with nurse recruitment and retention (for example Finalyson et al., 2002). However, increasing the numbers of staff will not in itself deliver the changes need to improve health care delivery and in particular to make it more patient-centred. New ways of working are seen as essential in, for example, Investment and Reform for NHS Staff: Taking forward the NHS plan (NHS, 2001). A number of innovative ways of working and delivering services addressing many of the issues of delegation, deployment, substitution and the training required have been introduced over the last few years. Examples are NHS Direct, NHS walk-in centres, nurse practitioners, nurse prescribing and nurse telephone triaging. But, although they may have positive spin-offs for secondary care in terms of reducing demand, these are all focused on primary care. Within secondary care itself, in contrast, there are only a few examples, such as the introduction of housekeepers (NHS Estates, 2001; Mayor, 2002) and modern matrons (Davis, 2002). 2.2 Recruitment and retention The crucial factor in the drive towards ambitious NHS modernisation is recruitment and, in particular, retention of the existing nursing workforce. While a new pay structure, an increase in the number of training places and exciting new roles for nurses may go some way towards ameliorating the nursing shortages that currently exist, these national initiatives may not resolve the crisis fast enough. According to the King s Fund, difficulties in recruiting and retaining the nursing workforce are obstacles to the progress towards modernisation and, indeed, workforce issues have now achieved a high profile in the recognition that progress will falter unless these issues are debated (Finalyson et al., 2003). NCCSDO

21 The problems relating to the shortage of nurses are not unique to the UK Australia, Canada, USA, as well as the UK are facing a double whammy of increasing demand for nurses as demand for health care escalates coupled with alarming demographic characteristics of ageing workforces (Buchan, 2002a). There are reports of nursing shortages and high job dissatisfaction across hospitals in the US, Canada, England, Scotland and Germany (Aiten et al., 2001). 2.3 Relationship between spending and quality of care Logic might suggest that spending more money on staffing should lead to better quality of care and, indeed, this association is frequently voiced by managers when justifying greater budget requests to employ more nursing and medical staff. However, brave attempts to assess the quality of nursing care are frequently based on professional judgements, with health care outcomes being described in terms of routinely collected data such as length of stay, mortality and adverse events such as incidence of infections. Attributing improved outcomes to changes in the mix and quality of nursing staff is fraught with difficulties and well-nigh impossible. For example in the UK, the Audit Commission reported in 2001 that the relationship between costs of nursing care provision and the quality of care was far from clear. They attempted to assess quality of care using clinical risk data and concluded that trusts cannot demonstrate a link between the amount spent on ward staffing and the quality of care delivered. Moreover, this conclusion can be linked to findings reported over a decade ago when the Audit Commission (1991) reported that there was considerable scope for improvement in the efficiency and effectiveness with which nurses were deployed. In 2001 the Audit Commission concluded that there is room for improvement in the efficiency with which some trusts deploy their staff to increase utilisation of the staff they have in post. 2.4 Policy initiatives On the other hand, there are several general policy initiatives that are currently in process as part of taking forward the NHS Plan, and some of the more significant directions of change that will inform our search for material are briefly described below. The two most important policy changes, both launched by the Department of Health, are the Changing Workforce Programme (2000b) and Agenda for Change (1999). Both of these directives raise the issue of skill mixing; the Changing Workforce Programme by helping NHS organisations develop new roles through skill mix changes, expanding the NCCSDO

22 depth and breadth of jobs and shaping tasks and skills around particular client/patient needs. The latter directive introduces a radical modernisation of the NHS pay system but also seeks to introduce new working practices and skill mixing with an emphasis on flexibility: more staff, working differently Agenda for Change Although the main thrust of this policy is the radical modernisation of the NHS pay system, it also seems to introduce new working practices and skill mixing with an emphasis on flexibility. The aims of these working practice reforms are to encourage staff to take on new responsibilities in order to improve patient care, access to services out of hours and to free up doctors and senior clinicians time. These suggested reforms will be linked to the proposed new pay system Changing Workforce Programme The Changing Workforce Programme provides the initiatives and supporting roles to help NHS organisations develop new roles through skill mix changes, expanding the depth and breadth of jobs and shaping tasks and skills around particular client needs. It covers four types of change: moving tasks up and down a uni-disciplinary ladder for example a consultant physician giving care previously covered by doctors in training widening a role for example a rehabilitation practitioner working across traditional professional divides deepening a role for example nurse and therapy consultants new roles, combining tasks in a different way. There are 13 initial pilot sites. Most of them are concerned with testing new ways of working in secondary care (senior house officer and equivalent roles in Leicester, new roles in diagnostic care in North Tees, emergency care in Warwick, technical and other support staff in Portsmouth, an anaesthetics team in Burton upon Trent, scientists/cancer specialists in Bristol, allied health professionals (AHPs) in Salford, stroke care in Bradford, generalist/specialist in Central Middlesex and Kingston). The toolkit for local change is being evaluated under a separate contract with the Policy Research Programme. All of these constitute starting points for a search European working time directive This is of immediate concern in terms of the workload of junior hospital doctors. Clearly new ways of working will have to be introduced for NCCSDO

23 example in terms of shift systems for doctors rotas or nurse substitution for part of their workload and will need to be evaluated. Indeed this was the topic where an initial crude and very preliminary MEDLINE search on substitution among highly skilled staff elicited the largest number of possibly relevant articles. NCCSDO

24 Section 2 Literature review Chapter 3 Quality and mapping of literature 3.1 Introduction At the start of this exercise, searches were made of the following databases: MEDLINE, CINAHL, EMBASE, HMIC, SIGLE, CCTR, Sociological Abstracts, The British Nursing Index, Inside Conferences, the Cochrane Database of Systematic Review and the National Register Records. An initial research database of nearly 18,000 references was compiled from these, and then manually searched by consulting both title and abstract for material relevant to the purview of this review. Records relating to the CDSR and NRR were searched separately for details of research projects currently in progress or recently concluded which may not yet have been formally published. References which were deemed to be potentially relevant were assigned an initial series of keywords to commence the first stage of mapping or classification and Table 1 lists these keywords assigned at the first selection level. All accepted references had a combination of several keywords and the list below represents this. NCCSDO

25 Table 1 List of keywords Total references Accepted Accepted Keywords assigned collaboration delegation HCAs/unlicensed practitioner HRM innovations interprof/disc managed care management matrons models multidisciplinary nursing organisation outcomes policy restructuring review roles skillmix skills survey/study service development teamwork training and education UK US workforce From the references in total, 496 were initially selected at the title stage (Accepted-1), and then a further process of selection was made by scrutinising the abstracts of these. Searches of the Cochrane Database and National Register Records produced further potentially relevant NCCSDO

26 projects and, in addition to these, other relevant documents ( grey area literature, for example WDC reports, policy papers, Department of Health publications) located were added as obtained to the database. A final total of 202 papers were requested for reading, but 17 of these were later rejected (rejected-full-paper) as not being fully relevant to the purview of this study. At the time of writing this report, six further papers or reports requested could not be obtained (Adams and Goubarev, 1995; Clifford, 1997; Kinley et al., 2001; McKenna and Hasson, 2002; Ritter-Teitel, 2001; Scholes and Vaughan, 2002). In total, therefore, this review is based upon 179 papers which were read and which are summarised in Table 22 (see Appendix 1). 3.2 Preliminary overview of the literature During the earliest stages of this scoping review, an overview of the broad themes contained within the literature was formed to facilitate the mapping exercise: Health care reform and hospital restructuring One whole section of the literature identified broadly addressed issues of health care service reform and restructuring, including significant commentary and debates over the NHS Plan and patient-centred care. A large amount of this literature took the form of editorials, commentaries and general debate over health care and hospital reform and restructuring, new staff roles and training needs; and the implications of these. Workforce: general staffing, management and service provision issues Another broad theme to emerge concerned hospital staffing and organisation of services. This literature, as anticipated, was dominated by topics relevant to nursing which included nursing models and workforce planning and trends (for example Project 2000; in-house staffing agencies), collaborative nursing, nurse practitioners and leadership models, nursing roles (for example nursing diagnoses; nurse-managed centres; nurse-led multidisciplinary care teams), nursing workload measurement systems and workload problems related to retention, nursing shortages and burnout, empowerment, job satisfaction and professional governance. There was a certain amount on other clinical staffing issues, such as ward staffing and ward rotas. Management issues also emerged in terms of staff planning or training for clinicians and nurses for delegation and leadership skills. There was a moderate corpus of surveys of hospital personnel such as nurses, junior doctors, paediatric specialists or others. NCCSDO

27 Skill mix A considerable literature on skill mix emerged. Much of it, however, was in the nature of general debate over what was actually meant by skill mix, what constituted an acceptable staff mix, how this was influenced by cost-containment issues. A lot of the literature was concerned with the discussion of what ratio of, for example, qualified nurses to HCAs should be employed. Staffing roles Staffing roles in terms of role substitution, development or change emerged as another important category. Although much of this literature related to debates surrounding the increasing delegation of duties to unlicensed clinical personnel or non-professional personnel (such as HCAs), a range of different nursing (for example modern matrons, clinical nurse consultant; clinical nurse specialists) and physicians roles were also well represented. Some debate surrounding problems with perceived structural and medical dominance was also observed including, for example, of barriers to nurses' workplace satisfaction, or of traditional work culture, rituals, norms, and boundaries perceived to stand in the way of the development of new working methods and roles. Multi-/interdisciplinary teamworking or collaborative activities Other important categories to emerge, particularly in the context of integrated care or critical pathways were inter- or multi-disciplinary care teams and teamwork, team building and collaboration - a great majority of which were patient group or condition-specific (for example ICU; AIDS, cancer, diabetes, stroke management and pain management; elderly/geriatric/dementia; peri-operative and surgical care; trauma and wound care; ward rounds and record keeping). Included within this context were papers addressing multi-skilling and cross-training initiatives. 2.3 The scoping exercise and categories identified As a fully comprehensive and systematic exercise was outside the scope of this work, a large amount of the material identified above had necessarily been excluded from further review. As the review represented principally a scoping exercise, to map the nature of the literature, rather than looking for quality of evidence per se, no serious attempt was made to grade the literature; although papers that represented empirical research in the form of surveys or studies, literature reviews or policy statements were given priority for selection. In addition to these, a range NCCSDO