SUBJECT: NHSL CORPORATE RISK REGISTER. For approval For endorsement X To note. Prepared Reviewed X Endorsed

Transcription

1 Meeting of Lanarkshire NHS Board 31st August 2016 Lanarkshire NHS Board Kirklands Fallside Road Bothwell G71 8BB Telephone: PURPOSE SUBJECT: NHSL CORPORATE RISK REGISTER This paper is coming to the Board: For approval For endorsement X To note 2. ROUTE TO BOARD This paper has been: Prepared Reviewed X Endorsed By the Corporate Management Team at its meeting of 22 nd August SUMMARY OF KEY ISSUES The Corporate Risk Register was previously presented to NHS Board in May Since then, the Corporate Management Team have considered the corporate risk register in June, July and August, discussing in detail emerging new risks; very high graded risks and risks exceeding the assessed level of tolerance. As a result, risk descriptions, assessed level of risk, and /or controls have been updated accordingly to reflect progress of mitigating actions and impact. For this reporting period, (June to August 2016) 3 risk has been closed, with 4 new risks identified, assessed and agreed. Through continuous review, 8 risks have been subject to material change to either the assessed level of risk, the assessed level of tolerance, or changes to the mitigating controls. The NHS Lanarkshire Corporate Risk Register outlining the current 35 risks is attached as appendix 1, with material changes for the reporting period summarised below: New Corporate Risks Identified Risk ID There is a risk that NHS Lanarkshire does not deliver on its legal duties from 31 August to provide a Named Person for every child from 0-school age as defined in the Children and Young Peoples (Scotland) Act The reasons for this include capacity within the health visiting workforce, availability of electronic systems to support the named person service and appropriate information sharing systems to meet the requirement of the Act. This is further complicated by the multi-agency nature of processes required. Risk Assessed as and owned by

2 Risk ID There is a risk to NHSL, that there is insufficient GP capacity to enable sustainable delivery of clinical services to the Community Hospitals that are dependent on the GP medical model of care. This results from less available GP s caused by the increased rate of retiral and decreased recruitment into GP training. Issues include, a change in portfolio career arrangements, age profile of existing workforce, increased part time working and less medical students choosing GP practice as a career. For NHSL, this has already resulted in closure for admissions of one community hospital, with the potential to recur in other areas, and the potential for GP practices to face significant challenges over time. Risk assessed High and owned by Mr Calum Campbell Risk ID 1413 There is a risk that NHSL will not meet the agreed locally adjusted unscheduled care performance targets as profiled over the year. Risk assessed as High and owned by Mrs Heather Knox. Risk ID There is a risk that NHSL cannot continue to provide the trauma and orthopaedic services across the three acute sites, resulting from insufficient senior clinical decision-makers. There is also the potential that this will worsen towards winter 2016 and could lead to a service collapse, impacting on patient care. Failure to redesign the service is likely to result in the Post Graduate Dean removing training accreditation and prevent a number of the Consultants being able to perform the recommended number of complex cases to sustain optimum clinical competence and outcomes. The proposed 2 site, phase one of the redesign will enable additional resilience to the service, but implementation of this will be both complex and challenging. Risk assessed as High and owned by Mr Calum Campbell Closed Risks Risk ID 1011 There is a risk that NHSL does not meet the 4 hour emergency care target that 95% of patients will wait less than 4 hours from arrival to admission, discharge or transfer for accident and emergency treatment because of the increasing emergency admissions and acuity of unwell patients, a consequence of this is the significant clinical risk/patient safety issues this presents, with patients waiting beyond 4, 8 and 12 hours and an increase in the number of 'boarders'. This risk was assessed as a very high risk, however, has been closed but will be replaced with the new risk described, taking into consideration Risk ID 1405, regarding adjustment to the LDP for NHSL specific unscheduled care performance targets Risk ID There is a risk that when the Emergency Department at the Victoria Infirmary, Glasgow is closed and relocated at the new South Glasgow Hospital, the Scottish Ambulance flow for Category A patients will result in an increase attendance at Hairmyres Hospital, requiring increased financial, bed and human resource to meet the anticipated demand. The anticipated number of Category A patients and the data set /types of admissions agreed with Glasgow did not materialise and is no longer a risk for NHSL

3 Risk ID 1390 There is a risk that by undertaking an essential Patient Notification exercise for a cohort of patients who were treated in NHSL, there is the potential that the reputation of NHSL will be adversely impacted on, as will the potential for an increase in claims and complaints. Notification exercise stepped down with report prepared reflecting communications and management of exercise. Changes of Note for Specific Risks Risk Description of the Risk & ID 1385 In order to deliver a balanced budget, there is a risk that NHSL will not be able to realise the required savings for 2016/17, with the potential to impact adversely on current and subsequent years financial planning. Additional control regarding CMT monitoring of outputs from CRES and the new ideas workshop. Noted engagement regarding national initiatives with some suggested changes to be concluded. 572 There is a risk that HAI will not be adequately prevented and subsequently controlled, within NHSL, resulting from inconsistency in compliance with guidelines, Policies & Procedures. This has the potential to adversely affect patients, staff, the public and the Corporate Objectives. The assessed level of tolerance has been reviewed and reduced from to, commensurate with the NHSL risk appetite statement in that NHSL has a low appetite for risktaking in pursuit of its principal objectives 1295 There is a risk that NMC registrants fail to meet the enhanced requirements of revalidation as set out in the provisional NMC Guidance (2015). This could result due to a lack of individual awareness and failure to take appropriate actions in preparation to meet the new requirements, resulting in the inability to revalidate successfully on time. Risk to sustainability of clinical services due to potential shortages of key clinical staff. The assessed level of tolerance has been reviewed and reduced from to commensurate with the NHSL risk appetite statement in that NHSL has a low appetite for risktaking in pursuit of its principal objectives 980 There is the risk that with the implementation of the new national eees (electronic employee support system) to replace the SWISS system, there will be a loss of reliable information with a potential impact on recruitment, payroll, workforce monitoring. Risk Owner Mrs Laura Ace Mr Kenny Small 3

4 The current assessed level of risk has increased from to, (recognising the national project, this is based on the impact for NHSL) 1128 There is a risk that NHSL will be unable to maintain and sustain the provision of safe clinical services resulting from the available medical resource, including training and non-training grades, and recruitment and retention of medical staff. Full review of controls and new actions for mitigation There is a risk that NHSL does not adequately protect patients from a range of harm / injury through inconsistent application of safe systems that could be detrimental to patient outcomes and patient safety. Full review of controls and new actions for mitigation. 982 There is a risk that there will not be enough National Education for Scotland (NES) trained appraisers to meet the demand for medical appraisal with the potential to adversely impact on revalidation, and subsequent employment of medical staff. Full review of controls and new actions for mitigation There is a risk that NHS Lanarkshire does not deliver on its legal duties from 31 August to provide a Named Person for every child from 0-school age as defined in the Children and Young Peoples (Scotland) Act The reasons for this include capacity within the health visiting workforce, availability of electronic systems to support the named person service and appropriate information sharing systems to meet the requirement of the Act. This is further complicated by the multi-agency nature of processes required. Dr I Wallace Dr I Wallace Dr I Wallace In light of the recent Supreme Court ruling, and delay in the commencement of provisions within Parts 4 and 5 of the Act, the assessed level of risk has been reduced from to at present and will be subject to further review when the new timescales are advised. 4

5 NHSL Corporate Risk Profile September 2015 August 2016 The following demonstrates the risk profile for NHSL over an annual period. NHSL Corporate Risk Profile as at 22 nd August 2016 From the 35 live corporate risks, the profile, plotted by likelihood x impact = assessed level of risk, is shown in the heat map below: LIKELIHOOD IMPACT Minor Moderate Major Extreme Score Almost Certain 5 1 Likely 4 1 Possible Unlikely Rare *Directional Arrows denote change in level of assessment for the overall risk profile, full risk register can be viewed in Appendix 1. Corporate Objectives All corporate risks are aligned to the 3 primary corporate objectives agreed as Effective, Person Centred and Safe : High Very High Totals Effective Person - Centred Safe Totals

6 Risk Types The 35 risks have been further described and set out as risk types below: High Very High Totals Business Clinical Reputation Staff Totals Very High Graded Risks The 2 very high business risks within this period will potentially have the highest impact on effectiveness for NHSL and are subject to review on a monthly basis: Risk ID Risk Title 1385 Financial Balance for Year 2016/ Cost Effective Primary Care Prescribing Risk Type Primary Risk Owner Corporate Objective Business Effective Mrs Laura Ace Business Effective Dr Iain Wallace Corporate Risks Exceeding Tolerance The following demonstrates the change in the risk tolerance profile over an annual period, both in numbers and further expressed as a percentage of the total number of corporate risks. 6

7 From the 35 risks, there are 20 (57%) where the current assessed level of risk is higher than the tolerance set, with the detail set out below: ID Opened Date Title Risk Owner Risk level (current) Risk level (Tolerance) Key Actions /01/2016 NHSL Ability to realise the required savings within year 2016/17 Mrs Laura Ace /02/2010 Cost Effective Prescribing Dr Iain Wallace /02/2013 Reconfiguration of beds Mr C for Older Peoples Services Campbell, Mr H Stevenson, Ms J Hewitt /03/2014 Sustainability of Safe and Effective Medical Input to Clinical Services /05/2016 Delivery of the Local Delivery Plan (LDP) /06/2016 GP ability to sustain current GP medical model of care to community hospital and, overtime, sustain delivery of GP Services /07/2015 Provision of Clinical Services Required Dr Iain Wallace Mr C Campbell, Mr C Sloey Mr Calum Campbell Mr Calum Campbell Very High Very High High High High High High Schemes from new ideas workshop to be confirmed by October 2016 CRES schemes to be subject to risk assessment for impact on service delivery Consideration for nationally mandated initiatives and policy changes that facilitate the realisation of the balance of the total efficiency savings requirement Project Management and Improvement Approach to Change, linked to Transforming Primary care objectives Nominated project lead, sponsor, project board with infrastructure and improvement support Bed Modelling Plan developing Detailed Investment Plans for Integrated Care Fund Review of continuing care eligibility and associated bed requirements NHSL wide Health Care Strategy Trauma & Orthopaedic Service Review Deanery action plans in response to GMC / Deanery Visits Board discussion Review of LDP targets and NHSL targets for highest achievement and least impact Transforming Primary Care Programme Board Scope non-medical led clinical service model NHSL Healthcare Strategy Communication Plan /11/2015 Increasing Reliance on IM&T Mr Colin Sloey High Undertake planned workbench exercise to test disaster recovery plans for core systems /08 /2016 Sustaining a safe Trauma Mr Calum and Orthopaedic Service Campbell for Patients across NHSL. High Appointment of Service Manager and Clinical Lead Implementation and Monitoring of Impact of Interim move to a 2 site service 7

8 /06/2016 Unscheduled Care Performance Mrs Heather Knox High Continuous review of performance WGH Action Plan /03/2015 Maintaining quality of care and prevention of harm and injury to patients Dr Iain Wallace /10/2015 Child Protection Revised and refreshed Patient Safety Strategic plan for endorsement by HQAIC August 16 Review of all Child Protection Policies To set-up a CP Cat 1 Group /10/2009 Minimising the risk of HAI across NHSL Infection Control and Prevention Team (ICPT) Annual Workplan 16/ /02/2010 Adult Support and Protection Strategic Enhancement Plan through Public Protection Group /06/2015 NMC Revalidation of Nurses and Midwives Revalidation Steering Group overseeing implementation and monitoring progress, with reporting to HQAIC /06/2015 Nursing - Availability of Specialist Practitioners Workforce and workload planning process underway /08/2012 Insufficient number of trained NES Appraisers for Medical Staff Dr Iain Wallace Sourcing appraisers from outwith NHSL to address short-term gaps /05/2016 Engagement and consultation for the NHSL Healthcare Strategy Mr C Campbell, Mrs K Hamilton Communication Plan in place to coincide with timelines for Healthcare Strategy /11/2015 Risk of cyber attack in respect of stored NHSL data /09/2012 National Change of HR / Workforce electronic Systems from SWISS to EEES Mr Colin Sloey Mr Kenny Small Undertake assessment through the new National Information Governance Improvement Measurement Framework : gap analysis of security systems. Negotiation with Scottish Government to release expected funding to deliver national programme, and NHSL as the exemplar site 4. STRATEGIC CONTEXT This paper links to the following: Corporate Objectives X LDP Government Policy Government Directive Statutory Requirement AHF/Local Policy Urgent Operational Issue Other X : Corporate Governance 8

9 5. CONTRIBUTION TO QUALITY This paper aligns to the following elements of safety and quality improvement: Three Quality Ambitions: Safe X Effective X Person Centred X Six Quality Outcomes: Everyone has the best start in life and is able to live longer healthier lives; (Effective) People are able to live well at home or in the community; (Person Centred) Everyone has a positive experience of healthcare; (Person Centred) Staff feel supported and engaged; (Effective) Healthcare is safe for every person, every time; (Safe) Best use is made of available resources. (Effective) X X 6. MEASURES FOR IMPROVEMENT The risk register process is subject to monitoring and review monthly through the Corporate Management Team, and quarterly through the Risk Management Process Compliance Reporting, with onwards reporting to the Audit Committee. 7. FINANCIAL IMPLICATIONS There are no financial implications to consider with this paper at the meeting, although individual risks may have specific financial implication. 8. RISK ASSESSMENT/MANAGEMENT IMPLICATIONS No further risk analysis is required. 9. FIT WITH BEST VALUE CRITERIA This paper aligns to the following best value criteria: Vision and leadership X Effective partnerships Governance and accountability Use of resources X Performance management X Equality Sustainability X 10. EQUALITY AND DIVERSITY IMPACT ASSESSMENT An Equality and Diversity Impact Assessment is not required for this paper as the risks apply equally. 9

10 11. CONSULTATION AND ENGAGEMENT The risks expressed and quantified within the register are subject to discussion and review regularly in a number of forums. 12. ACTIONS FOR THE BOARD Board members are asked to: Approval Endorsement X Identify further actions Note Accept the risk identified Ask for a further report Approve the attached corporate risk register; Endorse the recent amendments, current NHSL risk profile, very high graded risks and key actions for those risks where the assessed level of risk exceeds the tolerance, as outlined within the paper; Note that all risks have an identified assurance committee, which has delegated responsibility for oversight of the relevant risks at every meeting Accept the level of risk and tolerance identified 13. FURTHER INFORMATION For further information about any aspect of this paper, please contact: Dr Iain Wallace Mrs C McGhee Medical Director Corporate Risk Manager