Title: Nurses' workarounds in acute healthcare settings: a scoping review
|
|
- Edmund Blankenship
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Author's response to reviews Title: Nurses' workarounds in acute healthcare settings: a scoping review Authors: Deborah S Debono (d.debono@unsw.edu.au) David Greenfield (d.greenfield@unsw.edu.au) Joanne F Travaglia (j.travaglia@unsw.edu.au) Janet C Long (janet.long@student.unsw.edu.au) Deborah Black (deborah.black@sydney.edu.au) Julie Johnson (j.johnson@unsw.edu.au) Jeffrey Braithwaite (j.braithwaite@unsw.edu.au) Version: 4 Date: 19 April 2013 Author's response to reviews: see over
2 "Nurses' workarounds in acute healthcare settings: a scoping review" Dear Associate Editor, On behalf of my co-authors and myself please accept our revised paper entitled Nurses workarounds in acute healthcare settings: a scoping review (MS ), which we resubmit for consideration for publication in BMC Health Services Research. We have reviewed and revised the paper in line with the editor and reviewers comments. We provide the revised manuscript in which we have highlighted revisions by underlining them. We also provide a Table of our responses to the editor and reviewers comments. We have uploaded a revised Figure 1 that incorporates revisions suggested by the reviewers. We confirm that the manuscript comprises original, unpublished material which is not under consideration elsewhere. for considering our revised submission. Yours sincerely Deborah Debono 1
3 Tables of responses to Reviewers comments Associate Editor s comments The reviewers believe this paper is an important contribution, and I concur. They request some clarification and additional details, particularly Dr. Semple. The suggestions of all the reviewers will contribute to an even stronger paper. Please revise accordingly and explain the changes you have made in response to each of the reviewers' comments. Abstract needs background section which needs context info. Editorial Review: Associate Editor's comments Authors Responses for the support of our paper. We have revised the paper accordingly and explained the changes we have made in response to each of the reviewers comments in the remainder of this table. In the process of responding to the reviewers comments, we have made minor changes to clarify and improve the paper. These changes have also been underlined in the manuscript. We have added a Background section to the Abstract (first paragraph in the Abstract). The Background includes contextual information. Please format your abstract according to the guidelines for authors < Potential referees will be asked to review the manuscript having seen only the title and abstract, so it is important that these are both informative and concise. 2. Tables Please ensure that the order in which your tables are cited is the same as the order in which they are provided. Every table must be cited in the text, using Arabic numerals. Please do not use ranges when listing tables. Tables must not be subdivided, or contain tables within tables. Please note that we are unable to display vertical lines or text within tables, no display merged cells: please re-layout your table without these elements. Tables should be formatted using the Table tool in your word processor. Please ensure the table title is above the table and the legend is below the table. For more information, see the instructions for authors on the journal website. **Please note: if you are submitting an uneditable document (e.g. PDF), We have formatted the Abstract according to the guidelines for authors. The tables are cited in the same order as which they are provided. Each table has now been cited in the text using Arabic numerals. The tables have been reformatted; the vertical lines and merged cells have been removed. There is a title above each table. The files uploaded are in an editable form (.docx). 2
4 we will not be able to process this for production purposes. Please upload the editable source files (e.g..docx,.tex) as additional files. 3
5 Reviewer comments Significant contribution to the literature. I sometimes wondered if some of the methodology of the lit search process should be in a supplemental part b/c many readers don't care about that (even though we know the devil is in the details). Reviewer 1: Ross Koppel Authors Responses. We have endeavoured to conduct a rigorous and comprehensive study and we appreciate your confirmation of this. We have conformed to the journal style and papers using similar scoping literature review methods published in this journal. Well written, well organized. for your confirmation of the paper. Three substantive comments: 1. What of workarounds that are common (or not) but not known by the clinicians to be workarounds. (I've seen nurses alter the listed size of the IV bag b/c they were taught to do that...but it's a serious (and somewhat dumb workaround). But no one saw it as a workaround... just normal procedure. for raising this important point. We have amended the text accordingly. The amendments are in the third sentence of the first paragraph of the section Individual clinician factors in the Results and in the sixth sentence of the sixth paragraph of the Discussion. 2. Some (a small percent) of workarounds are just lazy. We note the reviewer s suggestion that a small percent of workarounds are lazy. Our examination of the reviewed studies identified that while one study included a participant quote in which a nurse explains working around the patient ID check when you get lazy (Dougherty et al 2012, p. 1306), another study by Tucker and Edmondson (2003, p. 63) makes a point that nurses are not uncommitted, lazy or incompetent and often work overtime without pay. To identify that laziness may account for some workarounds but not for all, we have added four sentences, following the third sentence, to the second paragraph of the section, Individual clinician factors in the Results. 3. Often dumb administrators say: "let's outlaw workarounds." OK, idiotic but it is a reaction. Now small stuff: We note the reviewer s view and point about this being merely an administrative reaction. 4
6 In the abstract, they say ":.perceived impact of nurses use of workarounds in the implementation of safe patient care in acute care settings." But I wonder if this sentence is better without the word "safe" in it. "safe" moved the discussion in a judgmental way that's not helpful here. Quote: "This review offers evidence that image management may play a role in nurses use of workarounds." Could the authors be more clear about what they mean by "Image management", please. Thanks. We have removed the word safe from this sentence in the Abstract as suggested. The final sentence in the Conclusion section of the Abstract has been reworded to clarify what we mean by image management. In addition, a sentence has been added following the second sentence in the second paragraph of the section, Proliferation of workarounds that further explains the notion of protecting one s reputation of competence or managing one s image of competence. I'd note that most of the studies are multi method (see their table). This deserves a bit more emphasis. it's important. We have emphasised this point in two ways. We have edited the first sentence of the third paragraph reporting on the data collection methods of the Results section. We have also drawn attention to most of the studies being multi method by adding a sentence (second sentence) in the second paragraph of the Discussion. Congrats to the authors on a valuable paper. We appreciate your assessment. Level of interest: An article of outstanding merit and interest in its field Quality of written English: Acceptable Statistical review: No, the manuscript does not need to be seen by a statistician. Declaration of competing interests: no competing issues. 5
7 Reviewer comments Minor Essential Revisions Reviewer 2: Laurie Rack Authors Responses for your positive comments. Level of interest: An article whose findings are important to those with closely related research interests Quality of written English: Acceptable Statistical review: No, the manuscript does not need to be seen by a statistician. Declaration of competing interests: I declare that I have no competing interests' Is the question posed original, important and well-defined? We appreciate your feedback. Research question is identifiable and understood. With that said, this is a specific area of interest as the workarounds specifically relate to nurses which are commonly cited in the literature. The fact that the workarounds are not only related to electronic health records, medication administration, etc makes it a new are of generalized workaround literature. Are the data sound and well controlled? Appropriate Is the interpretation (discussion & conclusion) well balanced and supported by the data? 6
8 Appropriate Are the methods appropriate and well described, and are sufficient details provided to allow others to evaluate replicate the work? Appropriate What are strengths/weaknesses of methods? Limitations with any research & publication timelines have to do with the timing of the end of study inclusion & new published information. The authors list that as an appropriate limitation. We appreciate the reviewer noting this point and we have added a sentence to the Limitations section of the Discussion (second sentence of the first paragraph) that reports this limitation. Enough information to replicate study. Can the writing, organization, tables and figures be improved? Page 20-1st line tensions emerged unclear of what that means here. May need reworded. See below regarding figure 1 Figure 1 that I am reviewing has several areas that need formatted for a better understanding: for highlighting the need to clarify this sentence. The third sentence in the first paragraph in the section Nurses conceptualisation and rationalisation of workarounds has been reworded to improve clarity. The figure has been reformatted to improve clarity and understanding. The split words now fit on the same line as requested. We have also reformatted the boxes containing the selection criteria. Australian needs to fit on top line; Sociological needs to fit on top line; etc or abbreviate, but should not remain split as they are 7
9 Reviewer comments This paper presents a scoping review of an important emerging area in patient safety workarounds by healthcare professionals. This review focuses on the workaround practices of nurses in the acute care setting. This is an important topic particularly because of the number of technologies now recommended to improve patient safety including medication safety such as bar coding, electronic prescribing and computerised records. This topic is important in terms of considering how these technologies operate in practice. Reviewer 3: Susan Semple Authors Responses We thank the reviewer for their succinct and comprehensive synopsis of the paper. 1.Abstract/Introduction As the authors discuss, defining the term workarounds can be difficult. However the authors have clearly stated their definition and this appears to be an acceptable one to adopt for this review. Discretionary Revisions I think it may be useful to include the definition of workarounds (in abbreviated form) in the abstract of the paper. We have included an abbreviated definition of workarounds in the first sentence of the Background section of the Abstract. 2. Methods The search strategy for this complex area is adequately described and the rationale for the search terms is explained. On the whole the methods used to select papers for inclusion (post hoc development of selection criteria) are adequately described. Major Compulsory Revisions As part of the search - were any government-funded or other patient The study s research strategy was designed to capture peer reviewed empirical 8
10 safety organisations websites or contacts used to identify reports or papers? papers. We did not contact nor examine the websites of government-funded or other patient safety organisations websites or contacts to identify reports or papers. While we had acknowledged the inclusion of only peer reviewed studies under Limitations in the Discussion section of the paper, we have revised the Abstract and Method section of the paper to emphasise this point by adding the words peer reviewed to the fifth sentence of the Background section of the Abstract and to the second sentence in the fifth paragraph of the Background section of the Introduction. In figure 1 I found the phase 2 selection process and little unclear. The Phase 1 criteria are very broad, I would find a bit more detail on the process used to narrow the inclusion at Phase 2 helpful. We appreciate the reviewer s request for clarification of the selection process and opportunity to present this more clearly. We have clarified the selection process in two ways. 1. We have reformatted and reworded the Selection Criteria boxes in Figure 1 to improve the clarity. 2. We have provided more detail that was previously incorporated in Figure 1, within the manuscript text to explain the process used to narrow the inclusion criteria at Phase 2 (pages 9-10). A standardised analysis framework was used to extract data from the included studies. It was not clear if all papers were reviewed independently by the first two authors or just 10 randomly selected papers were reviewed in duplicate. 3.Results We have added or rephrased sentences two through six in the first paragraph of the section Analysis and synthesis in the Method section to clarify this process. This provides a useful overview of the area including the types of workarounds used by nurses, factors contributing to their development and proliferation, perceived impact, conceptualisation and rationale. 9
11 Major Compulsory Revisions Specific examples of workarounds are given in Table 5. I think that for some of the examples in Table 5 it would be helpful for the reader to know what the individual study (or studies) was examining. E.g.it might be helpful to start with something like: In a study of use of CPOE, dead zones caused the computers to freeze so the nurses used paper lists of pertinent patient information. In my opinion the example in Table 5 The workaround developed as a result of too much cognitive head data is to use written and mental chunking schemas requires some clarification. Discretionary Revisions It would be useful to know if any of the studies tried to measure the impact of the workaround practices on patient safety in terms of measured outcomes e.g. actual medication errors or adverse events for this feedback. We have revised and updated Table 5 to include information about what the individual study (or studies) examined and provided additional illustrative examples. for this feedback. This example offered in Table 5 has been revised to be clearer. The reviewer highlights an issue that requires further investigation. Few studies measure the impact of workarounds in health care in terms of measured outcomes. We have acknowledged this issue and added sentences five and six to the first paragraph of the Discussion. We have also added sentence eight in the same paragraph as a suggestion of one reason why it is difficult to ascertain the impact of workaround practices on patient safety in terms of measured outcomes. We have also drawn attention to this issue by highlighting it as an area for further research in the discussion of current gaps and suggestions for future research (second sentence, seventh paragraph of the Discussion). Minor Essential Revisions In the Tables there are a number of abbreviations that should be clarified perhaps in a legend to the Table. 4. Discussion Abbreviations in Tables 5 and 6 have been included in appropriate Legends for each Table. We have revised the tables to improve clarity. The results of the review are well discussed in relation to the previous reviews in this area. 10
12 Discretionary Revisions It would be useful to have a succinct discussion of the current gaps in the literature and recommended areas for future research to focus on. Level of interest: An article of importance in its field We have adopted the reviewer s suggestion and included a succinct discussion of current gaps in the literature and areas for further research as the seventh paragraph of the Discussion. Quality of written English: Acceptable Statistical review: No, the manuscript does not need to be seen by a statistician. Declaration of competing interests: I declare that I have no competing interests 11
Title:Linking patient satisfaction with nursing care: The case of care rationing - a correlational study
Author's response to reviews Title:Linking patient satisfaction with nursing care: The case of care rationing - a correlational study Authors: Evridiki Papastavrou (e.papastavrou@cut.ac.cy) Panayiota Andreou
More informationPresentation to the Resilient Health Care Net Summer Meeting
The Resilient Health Care Net Summer Meeting, August 26-28, 2013 How everyday functioning in acute care really works: the case of nurses workarounds The Resilience of Everyday Clinical Work Tentative programme
More informationTitle:The impact of physician-nurse task-shifting in primary care on the course of disease: a systematic review
Author's response to reviews Title:The impact of physician-nurse task-shifting in primary care on the course of disease: a systematic review Authors: Nahara Anani Martínez-González (Nahara.Martinez@usz.ch)
More informationTitle:Evidence based practice beliefs and implementation among nurses: A cross-sectional study
Author's response to reviews Title:Evidence based practice beliefs and implementation among nurses: A cross-sectional study Authors: Kjersti Stokke (KST@ous-hf.no) Nina R Olsen (Nina.Rydland.Olsen@hib.no)
More informationUnlocking the potential of resilience in healthcare: using workarounds to expose what being good at their job means for nurses
Unlocking the potential of resilience in healthcare: using workarounds to expose what being good at their job means for nurses Deborah Debono, Robyn Clay-Williams, Natalie Taylor, David Greenfield, Jeffrey
More informationAuthor s response to reviews
Author s response to reviews Title: Title: Assessment of Client Satisfaction on Emergency Department Services in Hawassa University Referral Hospital, Hawassa, Southern Ethiopia. Authors: Mesfin Worku
More informationJournal of Healthcare Management
ARTICLE SUBMISSION GUIDELINES Journal of Healthcare Management JHM does not publish advertisements, announcements, promotional articles/advertorials, or outside editorials. We highly recommend consulting
More informationRe: Handbook for improving safety and providing high quality care for people with cognitive impairment in acute care: A Consultation Paper
Australian Commission on Safety and Quality in Health Care GPO Box 5480 SYDNEY NSW 2001 cognitive.impairment@safetyandquality.gov.au To whom it may concern Re: Handbook for improving safety and providing
More informationInstructions for Submission: Research Grant Applications National Multiple Sclerosis Society 2018
Instructions for Submission: Research Grant Applications National Multiple Sclerosis Society 2018 INTRODUCTION Please read these instructions and follow them carefully. Applications that are incomplete
More informationPublishing Journal Articles: Strategies for your Success
Publishing Journal Articles: Strategies for your Success Marilyn H. Oermann, PhD, RN, ANEF, FAAN Thelma M. Ingles Professor of Nursing Editor, Nurse Educator and Journal of Nursing Care Quality Duke University
More informationNurses workarounds in acute healthcare settings: a scoping review
Debono et al. BMC Health Services Research 2013, 13:175 RESEARCH ARTICLE Open Access Nurses workarounds in acute healthcare settings: a scoping review Deborah S Debono 1*, David Greenfield 1, Joanne F
More informationAbstract submission regulations and instructions
Abstract submission regulations and instructions Regular abstract submission deadline 26 September 2018, 21:00hrs CEST (CEST = Central European Summer Time / Local Swiss time) Late-breaking abstract deadline
More informationInstructions for Submission: Pilot Grant Applications National Multiple Sclerosis Society 2018
Instructions for Submission: Pilot Grant Applications National Multiple Sclerosis Society 2018 INTRODUCTION Please read these instructions and follow them carefully. Applications that are incomplete, exceed
More informationHarnessing workarounds to improve quality of care
Harnessing workarounds to improve quality of care Deborah Debono 1, Julie Johnson 2, David Greenfield 1, Deborah Black 3, Jeffrey Braithwaite 1 1 Australian Ins?tute of Health Innova?on, Macquarie University,
More informationAuthor's response to reviews
Author's response to reviews Title:BMC Geriatrics The effects of increased therapy time on cognition and mood in frail patients with a stroke who rehabilitate on rehabilitation units of nursing homes in
More informationAs of July 1, 2013, the Office of University Graduate Studies offers two types of RSEL grants. They are:
UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-LA CROSSE Office of University Graduate Studies Graduate Student Research, Service, and Educational Leadership (RSEL) Grant Program: Procedures and Guidelines (revised May 2013)
More informationTitle: Minimal improvement of nurses' motivational interviewing skills in routine diabetes care one year after training: a cluster randomized trial
Author's response to reviews Title: Minimal improvement of nurses' motivational interviewing skills in routine diabetes care one year after training: a cluster randomized trial Authors: Renate Jansink
More informationThe AOFAS Research Grants Program is funded by generous donations from individuals and corporations to the Orthopaedic Foot & Ankle Foundation.
Research Grants Program Pilot Project Grants Program Description Objective The objective of the pilot project grants program is to encourage increased participation in research, to promote the development
More information1 Abstract Calendar. 2 Submission Conditions. 3 Abstract Options. 4 Detailed Guidelines. 5 Abstract Corrections
ABSTRACT SUBMISSION 1 Abstract Calendar 2 Submission Conditions 3 Abstract Options 4 Detailed Guidelines 5 Abstract Corrections 6 Review 7 Registration of the Abstract Presenter 8 Presentation (E-posters)
More information(Draft Guidelines as of 06/03/2016)
(Draft Guidelines as of 06/03/2016) Purpose of Guidelines The intent of these policies is to facilitate the use of the PHAR data, to encourage collaboration among PHAR investigators, as well as to provide
More informationGuide on how to prepare a Green Star submission
Guide on how to prepare a Green Star submission May 2018 Introduction You ve been empowered with preparing a Green Star submission Where do you start? Where do you find the information you need? What are
More informationTel: ey.com
Ernst & Young LLP 5 Times Square New York, NY 10036 Tel: +1 212 773 3000 ey.com Ms. Susan M. Cosper Technical Director Financial Accounting Standards Board 401 Merritt 7 P.O. Box 5116 Norwalk, CT 06856-5116
More informationGuidelines for writing PDP applications
Guidelines for writing PDP applications Prepared by Associate Professor Janne Malfroy Teaching Development Unit Associate Professor Paul Wormell Chair of Academic Senate These guidelines draw on previous
More informationINSTRUCTIONS FOR COMPLETION OF THE DEVELOPMENT GRANT APPLICATION
INSTRUCTIONS FOR COMPLETION OF THE DEVELOPMENT GRANT APPLICATION Introduction In preparing your grant application, please read and follow these instructions carefully. Incomplete or improperly prepared
More informationAbstract submission regulations and instructions
8 th European Lung Cancer Congress (ELCC) 11 14 April 2018, Geneva, Switzerland Abstract submission regulations and instructions Abstract submission deadline Late-breaking abstract deadline 8 January 2018
More informationAuthor's response to reviews
Author's response to reviews Title: Mortality and loss-to-follow-up during the pre-treatment period in an antiretroviral therapy programme under normal health service conditions in Uganda. Authors: Barbara
More informationCOMMISSIONING SUPPORT PROGRAMME. Standard operating procedure
NATIONAL INSTITUTE FOR HEALTH AND CARE EXCELLENCE COMMISSIONING SUPPORT PROGRAMME Standard operating procedure April 2018 1. Introduction The Commissioning Support Programme (CSP) at NICE supports the
More informationAllergy & Rhinology. Manuscript Submission Guidelines. Table of Contents:
Table of Contents: Allergy & Rhinology 1. Open Access 2. Article processing charge (APC) 3. What do we publish? 3.1 Aims & scope 3.2 Article types 3.3 Writing your paper 4. Editorial policies 4.1 Peer
More informationUndergraduate Journals: Submission Guide
Undergraduate Journals: Submission Guide Undergraduate Journals As well as showcasing your hard work psychological studies, undergraduate publications are extremely helpful in achieving student goals of
More informationDescription of Synthesis Paper
Description of Synthesis Paper Program Outcomes: 1.1, 1.3, 2.1, 2.2, 3.1, 3.3, 4.2, 4.3, 4.4. 6.3 Nurse Practitioner students have the option of completing a Thesis (NURS 6997) or a Synthesis Paper (N6995)
More informationAuthor's response to reviews
Author's response to reviews Title:Antibiotic resistance patterns of bacteria causing urinary tract infections in the elderly living in nursing homes versus the elderly living at home: an observational
More informationAmerican Council on Consumer Interests Call for Competitive Presentations & Featured Research Sessions
American Council on Consumer Interests Call for Competitive Presentations & Featured Research Sessions Due by midnight October 31, 2017, PST Notification early January, 2018 Annual Conference Clearwater
More information4. Hospital and community pharmacies
4. Hospital and community pharmacies As FIP is the international professional organisation of pharmacists, this paper emphasises the role of the pharmacist in ensuring and increasing patient safety. The
More informationFAER RESEARCH GRANTS OVERVIEW & REQUIREMENTS
FAER RESEARCH GRANTS OVERVIEW & REQUIREMENTS APPLICATION INSTRUCTIONS updated 08/02/2018 UPCOMING APPLICATION CYCLES Fall 2018 Application Deadline: August 15, 2018 Earliest possible funding date: January
More informationSTUDENT PAPER CONTEST 2015 (Closing dates: 30 December 2015 for UG and 30 Jan 2016 for PG)
THE IEEE AUSTRALIA COUNCIL STUDENT PAPER CONTEST 2015 (Closing dates: 30 December 2015 for UG and 30 Jan 2016 for PG) The IEEE Australia Council (IEEE AC) sponsored Student Paper Contest for postgraduate
More informationTitle: Developing a response to family violence in primary health care: The New Zealand experience
Author s response to reviews Title: Developing a response to family violence in primary health care: The New Zealand experience Authors: Claire Gear (gearjc@gmail.com) Jane Koziol-McLain (jkoziolm@aut.ac.nz)
More informationSUBMISSION GUIDELINES FOR AUTHORS University of Michigan Undergraduate Research Journal
SUBMISSION GUIDELINES FOR AUTHORS University of Michigan Undergraduate Research Journal Website: http://www.umurj.org Contact Email: umurj-editorsinchief@umich.edu Last Updated August 2018 I. Overview
More informationCapacity Building Grants: Education Full Proposal
Capacity Building Grants: Education Full Proposal Full Proposal Due: April 11th, 2018, 5:00 PM ET Before the form is completed, you may click "Save & Continue" at the bottom of the page at any time to
More informationShort Report How to do a Scoping Exercise: Continuity of Care Kathryn Ehrich, Senior Researcher/Consultant, Tavistock Institute of Human Relations.
Short Report How to do a Scoping Exercise: Continuity of Care Kathryn Ehrich, Senior Researcher/Consultant, Tavistock Institute of Human Relations. short report George K Freeman, Professor of General Practice,
More informationI INTERNATIONAL NURSING CONGRESS Theme: Good practices and nursing representations in the construction of society May 9-12, 2017
CALL FOR PAPERS Nº1, MARCH 5 th, 2017 The Scientific Committee of the I International Nursing Congress, promoted by Universidade Tiradentes (UNIT), announces the Call For Papers Nº. 01, which sets the
More informationUniversity Committee on Research and Creative Activity (UCRCA) Faculty Guidelines (Full and Minigrant Proposals)
University Committee on Research and Creative Activity (UCRCA) 2017-2018 Faculty Guidelines (Full and Minigrant Proposals) The UCRCA accepts FULL PROPOSALS from faculty by November 1 st of the fall semester
More informationTerms of Reference: ALS Canada Project Grant Program 2018
Terms of Reference: ALS Canada Project Grant Program 2018 Overview The 2018 Project Grant Program encompasses applications previously designated for Discovery, Bridge or Clinical Management Grant competitions.
More informationCopies Original (signed by principal investigator and an authorized organizational official) and three (3) exact, legible, single-sided photocopies
GENERAL INSTRUCTIONS FORMAT SPECIFICATIONS Follow font and format specifications. Otherwise, application processing may be delayed, or the application may be returned to the applicant without review. Font
More informationT O G E T H E R W E M A K E A G R E A T T E A M. January 6, 2014
7272 Wisconsin Avenue Bethesda, Maryland 20814 301-657-3000 Fax: 301-664-8877 www.ashp.org Richard Kronick, Ph.D. Director, Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality Agency for Healthcare Research and
More informationEVALUATION GUIDE STIMULUS OF SCIENTIFIC EMPLOYMENT, INDIVIDUAL SUPPORT 2017 CALL
EVALUATION GUIDE STIMULUS OF SCIENTIFIC EMPLOYMENT, INDIVIDUAL SUPPORT 2017 CALL 1. INTRODUCTION This document outlines the evaluation process adopted in the 2017 call for the Stimulus of Scientific Employment
More informationGuideline for Applicants to the Building Resilience to Climate Change Grants Program August 2014
Guideline for Applicants to the Building Resilience to Climate Change Grants Program August 2014 This project has been assisted by the NSW Government through its Environmental Trust Table of contents About
More informationOil Spill Recovery Institute. Graduate Research Fellowship. Program Description and Application Information
Appendix E OSRI Grant Policy Manual Oil Spill Recovery Institute Graduate Research Fellowship Program Description and Application Information OSRI GRF Program Description Graduate Research Fellowship Program
More informationAmerican Society of PeriAnesthesia Nurses
The image cannot be displayed. American Society of PeriAnesthesia Nurses APPLICATION GUIDELINES OUTLINE A. Description of ASPAN Nursing Research Grants Program Application Guidelines B. Research Grant
More informationScottish Medicines Consortium. A Guide for Patient Group Partners
Scottish Medicines Consortium Advising on new medicines for Scotland www.scottishmedicines.org page 1 Acknowledgements Some of the information in this booklet is adapted from guidance produced by the HTAi
More informationFrom Staff Nurse to Preceptor: Keys for Success
From Staff Nurse to Preceptor: Keys for Success Jill Guilfoile, MEd, BSN, RN-BC Pam Hutchinson, DNP, RN, CPN June 14, 2017 Nursing Grand Rounds Cincinnati Children s Hospital Preceptors are the essential
More informationPART A: PROPOSAL DETAILS
PART A: PROPOSAL DETAILS Services Requested: Group Moderator Package (Work Package 3) Contact Person: Ms Maria Zollo, ARMS Chief Operating Officer Proposal Closing Date: 5 October 2015. Proposal Validity
More informationCALL FOR PAPERS The 5 th International Conference on
CALL FOR PAPERS The 5 th International Conference on Cybernetics and Information Technologies, Systems and Applications: CITSA 2008 in the context of The International Multi-Conference on Engineering and
More informationresponse to exposure draft
Exposure Draft Practice Note 11: The audit of charities in the United Kingdom response to exposure draft 24 August 2017 CIPFA, the Chartered Institute of Public Finance and Accountancy, is the professional
More informationMovember Clinician Scientist Award (CSA)
Movember Clinician Scientist Award (CSA) Part 1: Overview Information Participating Organisation(s) Funding Category Description The Movember Foundation and Prostate Cancer Foundation of Australia Movember
More informationKnowledge and Skills for. Government response to the Consultation on the Knowledge and Skills Statement for. Social Workers in Adult Services
Knowledge and Skills for Social Workers in Adult Services Government response to the Consultation on the Knowledge and Skills Statement for Social Workers in Adult Services March 2015 Title: Government
More informationHigher Degree by Research Confirmation of Candidature- Guidelines
Higher Degree by Research Confirmation of Candidature- Guidelines Introduction These Guidelines document Faculty, School or discipline specific requirements that are in addition to the information provided
More informationNHMRC - RGMS PROFILE & CV SECTION UTAS PREPARATION GUIDE
NHMRC - RGMS PROFILE & CV SECTION UTAS PREPARATION GUIDE INTRODUCTION WHAT IS THE PURPOSE OF THIS DOCUMENT? This document has been developed to assist applicants in completing the Profile and CV section
More informationSubmit to JCO Precision Oncology (JCO PO) and have your precision oncology research make an impact with the world's oncologists and their patients.
Author Center Welcome to JCO Precision Oncology s Author Center Submit to JCO Precision Oncology (JCO PO) and have your precision oncology research make an impact with the world's oncologists and their
More informationNIH Proposal Outline Twelve Page Limit For Activity Codes R01, R10, R15, R18, R21/R33, R24, R33, R34, DP3, G08, G11, G13, SC1, X01
NIH Proposal Outline Twelve Page Limit For Activity Codes R01, R10, R15, R18, R21/R33, R24, R33, R34, DP3, G08, G11, G13, SC1, X01 1. Introduction to Application (for Resubmission or Revision applications
More informationMYOCARDIAL INFARCTION NATIONAL AUDIT PROJECT v SANOFI-AVENTIS AND BRISTOL-MYERS SQUIBB
CASE AUTH/2029/7/07 and AUTH/2030/7/07 MYOCARDIAL INFARCTION NATIONAL AUDIT PROJECT v SANOFI-AVENTIS AND BRISTOL-MYERS SQUIBB Sponsored meetings The Myocardial Infarction National Audit Project (MINAP)
More informationOffshoring of Audit Work in Australia
Offshoring of Audit Work in Australia Insights from survey and interviews Prepared by: Keith Duncan and Tim Hasso Bond University Partially funded by CPA Australia under a Global Research Perspectives
More informationTHE WRITER'S HANDBOOK
THE WRITER'S HANDBOOK A V O I D I N G P L A G I A R I S M https://writing.wisc.edu/handbook/qpa_plagiarism.html How to avoid plagiarism When using sources in your papers, you can avoid plagiarism by knowing
More informationPART A: PROPOSAL DETAILS
PART A: PROPOSAL DETAILS Services Requested: Development and Delivery of Elective Modules (Work Package 2) Contact Person: Ms Maria Zollo, ARMS Chief Operating Officer Proposal Closing Date: 5 October
More informationResearch Partnerships for New Zealand Health Delivery (RPNZHD) 2016
Expression of Interest (EOI) Guidelines July 2016 Expression of Interest Application Guidelines for Research Partnerships for New Zealand Health Delivery (RPNZHD) 2016 Contents Part A: Introduction...
More informationGuidelines for Proposal Preparation and Submission
Guidelines for Proposal Preparation and Submission Login Procedures... 2 Register a New Proposal... 2 Proposal details... 3 Organisation details... 3 1a) Lead/Submitting organisation (basic details are
More informationTitle: Additional parenteral nutrition support for patients with pancreatic cancer. Results of a phase II study.
Author's response to reviews Title: Additional parenteral nutrition support for patients with pancreatic cancer. Results of a phase II study. Authors: Uwe Pelzer (uwe.pelzer@charite.de) Mehmet Goevercin
More informationNursing skill mix and staffing levels for safe patient care
EVIDENCE SERVICE Providing the best available knowledge about effective care Nursing skill mix and staffing levels for safe patient care RAPID APPRAISAL OF EVIDENCE, 19 March 2015 (Style 2, v1.0) Contents
More informationSeparate Beds: A History of Indian Hospitals in Canada, 1920s-1980s, by
Separate Beds: A History of Indian Hospitals in Canada, 1920s-1980s, by Maureen K. Lux, University of Toronto Press, 2016. Maureen K. Lux s new work, Separate Beds: A History of Indian Hospitals in Canada,
More informationSHM Scientific Abstract Competition: Research, Innovations, and Clinical Vignettes (RIV) Submission Guidelines
SHM Scientific Abstract Competition: Research, Innovations, and Clinical Vignettes (RIV) Submission Guidelines Submission Site Info and Deadline You will be able to submit your abstract at the submission
More informationGuidelines for Applicants. Updated: Irish Cancer Society Research Scholarship Programme 2017
1. General Guidelines for Applicants Updated: 09.02.17 Irish Cancer Society Research Scholarship Programme 2017 The objective of the Irish Cancer Society Research Scholarship Programme is to offer excellent
More informationAssociate Professor David Greenfield
Key findings from studies into health service accreditation programs Australian Institute of Health Innovation Associate Professor David Greenfield Sydney, Australia 10 September 2014 Presentation on behalf
More informationGuidelines for Submitting an Abstract for the APA Conference 2015
Guidelines for Submitting an Abstract for the APA Conference 2015 In 2015 we bring you the Connect Physiotherapy Conference where we will bring physiotherapy leaders together to connect and build a better
More informationProject & Development Grants Information for applicants
1 Project & Development Grants Information for applicants This package contains the following important information: An overview of Carclew Funding Programs Project and Development Grants Eligibility criteria
More informationInstructions for Application Submission National MS Society-American Brain Foundation (ABF) Clinician Scientist Development Award
Instructions for Application Submission National MS Society-American Brain Foundation (ABF) Clinician Scientist Development Award INTRODUCTION Please read these instructions and follow them carefully.
More informationInterim Australian/New Zealand Standard
A1 AS/NZS 5911(Int):2005 Expires 17 March 2009 (Incorporating Amendment No. 1) AS/NZS 5911(Int):2005 Interim Australian/New Zealand Standard General guidelines on the verification, validation and assurance
More informationTARGETED RFA IN PROSTATE CANCER RESEARCH Predictive Markers
TARGETED RFA IN PROSTATE CANCER RESEARCH Predictive Markers Revised 20180504 *see p. 3 sentence revised Part 1: Overview Information Participating Organization(s) Funding Opportunity Title Description
More informationInside a National Science Foundation (NSF) Review Panel
Inside a National Science Foundation (NSF) Review Panel Marc Rigas & Elizabeth Rockey Seidle Strategic Interdisciplinary Research Office (SIRO) Penn State University University Park, PA 16802 USA Penn
More informationTABLE OF CONTENTS. Introduction Life Membership Honorary M embership Excellence in Clinical Practice Award... 6
NANB AWARDS PROGRAM 2010 TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction... 3 Life Membership... 4 Honorary M embership... 5 Excellence in Clinical Practice Award... 6 Awards of Merit... 12 Award of Merit: Nursing Practice...
More informationOctober 2015 TEACHING STANDARDS FRAMEWORK FOR NURSING & MIDWIFERY. Final Report
October 2015 TEACHING STANDARDS FRAMEWORK FOR NURSING & MIDWIFERY Final Report Support for this activity has been provided by the Australian Government Office for Learning and Teaching. The views expressed
More informationThe Try, Test and Learn Fund: At-risk young people aged and receiving income support
THE PURPOSE OF THIS SAMPLE APPLICATION FORM IS TO PROVIDE POTENTIAL APPLICANTS THE OPPORTUNITY TO PREVIEW THE FULL CONTENTS. THE PDF SAMPLE APPLICATION FORM IS FOR DEMONSTRATION PURPOSES ONLY AND CANNOT
More informationFrequently Asked Questions from New Authors
Frequently Asked Questions from New Authors As the official journal of the Infusion Nurses Society, the Journal of Infusion Nursing is committed to advancing the specialty of infusion therapy by publishing
More informationIntroduction Remit Eligibility Online application system Project summary Objectives Project details...
Introduction... 2 Remit... 2 Eligibility... 2 Online application system... 3 Project summary... 3 Objectives... 4 Project details... 4 Additional details... 5 Ethics... 6 Lay section... 6 Main applicant...
More informationEvaluation of the WHO Patient Safety Solutions Aides Memoir
Evaluation of the WHO Patient Safety Solutions Aides Memoir Executive Summary Prepared for the Patient Safety Programme of the World Health Organization Donna O. Farley, PhD, MPH Evaluation Consultant
More informationRequest for Proposals for Faculty Research
Request for Proposals for Faculty Research RFP Title: Child Injury Prevention Research RFP Number 2013 F - 001 1 Introduction 1.1 About CChIPS The Center for Child Injury Prevention Studies (CChIPS) is
More informationAnnex A Summary of additional information about outputs
Annex A Summary of additional information about outputs 1. This annex provides a summary table of all the additional information about outputs that are required in submissions (in form REF2). It should
More informationProgram Guidelines. Please use the appropriate form when completing an application. Mail one fully completed and signed original application to:
Killam Research Fund (Social Sciences, Humanities, and Fine Arts) Program Guidelines Please use the appropriate form when completing an application Two copies of the application are required. Mail one
More informationThank you for your interest in the RDC Interdisciplinary Grant Program
EAST TENNESSEE STATE UNIVERSITY RESEARCH DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE Interdisciplinary Research Grant Application Guidelines and Instructions for Fiscal year FY2019: July 1, 2018 - June 30, 2019 Deadlines: 11:59pm,
More informationCAP18 Abstract Program Important Dates to Remember:
The CAP18 Abstract Program CAP18 THE Pathologists Meeting October 20-24, 2018 Chicago, Illinois CAP18 Abstract Program Important Dates to Remember: January 8, 2018 March 9, 2018 May 28, 2018 August 13,
More informationTitle: Hair growth-promoting activity of hot water extract of Thuja orientalis
Author's response to reviews Title: Hair growth-promoting activity of hot water extract of Thuja orientalis Authors: Nan-nan Zhang (zhangzhinan585@gmail.com) Dong Ki Park (parks@konkuk.ac.kr) Hye-Jin Park
More informationCreating and Maintaining Services on the Directory of Services
Creating and Maintaining Services on the Directory of Services A guide for Service Providers Published August 2017 Copyright 2017 Health and Social Care Information Centre. The Health and Social Care Information
More informationDear Colleague. 29 March 2018 GUIDANCE ON THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE PEER APPROVED CLINICAL SYSTEM (PACS) TIER TWO. Introduction
Directorate for Chief Medical Officer Chief Medical Officer Chief Pharmaceutical Officer Dear Colleague GUIDANCE ON THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE PEER APPROVED CLINICAL SYSTEM (PACS) TIER TWO Introduction
More informationDEMENTIA GRANTS PROGRAM ROUND 1: NEW AND EARLY CAREER RESEARCH PROJECT GRANTS
DEMENTIA GRANTS PROGRAM ROUND 1: NEW AND EARLY CAREER RESEARCH PROJECT GRANTS INFORMATION FOR APPLICANTS 2017 CONTENTS BEFORE YOU BEGIN... 3 Round 1 Key Dates... 3 INTRODUCTION... 3 ROUND 1: NEW AND EARLY
More informationALICE Policy for Publications and Presentations
ALICE Policy for Publications and Presentations The Conference Committee can be contacted at alice-cc@cern.ch. The Editorial Board can be contacted at alice-editorial-board@cern.ch. The Physics Board can
More informationSCIENCE COMMITTEE PROGRAMME FOUNDATION AWARDS OUTLINE APPLICATION GUIDELINES
SCIENCE COMMITTEE PROGRAMME FOUNDATION AWARDS OUTLINE APPLICATION GUIDELINES CONTENTS i. CHECKLIST... 2 1. INTRODUCTION... 3 1.1. Purpose of the guidelines... 3 1.2. About CRUK... 3 1.3. About the award...
More informationAMS Review Sheth Foundation 2018 Annual Doctoral Competition for Conceptual Articles (ADCCA)
AMS Review Sheth Foundation 2018 Annual Doctoral Competition for Conceptual Articles (ADCCA) (Submission instructions appear at the end of this document.) Call for Proposals: An Overview Calling Marketing
More informationInstructions for Application Submission Sylvia Lawry Physician Fellowship
Instructions for Application Submission Sylvia Lawry Physician Fellowship INTRODUCTION Please read these instructions and follow them carefully. Applications that are incomplete exceed the page limitations,
More informationGUIDELINES FOR PREPARING RESEARCH PROPOSALS
GUIDELINES FOR PREPARING RESEARCH PROPOSALS Each application should have one Principal investigator (PI). A Co-PI can be named by the PI and is someone making a major contribution to a project. The Co-Principal
More informationMaster of Public Health Program for Experienced Professionals Guidelines for the Culminating Project
Master of Public Health Program for Experienced Professionals 17-18 Guidelines for the Culminating Project Revised August 2017 TABLE OF CONTENTS GENERAL INFORMATION Page Number General Project Guidelines...
More informationTips for Writing Successful Grant Proposals During Surgical Residency. Pamela Derish Scientific Publications Office UCSF Department of Surgery
Tips for Writing Successful Grant Proposals During Surgical Residency Pamela Derish Scientific Publications Office UCSF Department of Surgery A. Getting Started If you are thinking of writing a grant proposal,
More informationFINAL YEAR PROJECT MANUAL FOR STUDENT
Document Ref No: UTAR-FEGT-FYP Issue Version: 3.0 Release Date: 1 January 2013 FINAL YEAR PROJECT MANUAL FOR STUDENT UNIVERSITI TUNKU ABDUL RAHMAN Faculty of Engineering and Green Technology (FEGT) Perak
More information