Advancing Care Information (ACI) and Meaningful Use (MU) in 2017

Size: px
Start display at page:

Download "Advancing Care Information (ACI) and Meaningful Use (MU) in 2017"

Transcription

1 Click to edit Master title style Advancing Care Information (ACI) and Meaningful Use (MU) in 2017 Bruce Maki, MA M-CEITA / Altarum Institute Regulatory & Incentive Program Analyst April 13, /13/

2 Disclaimer This presentation was current at the time it was performed, broadcast, published or uploaded to the web. Medicare and Medicaid policy changes frequently, so links to source documents and resources have been provided for your reference. This presentation was prepared as a service to the public and is not intended to grant rights or impose obligations. This presentation may contain references or links to statutes, regulations, or other policy materials. The information provided is only intended to be a general summary. It is not intended to take the place of either the written law or regulations. We encourage participants to review the specific statutes, regulations, and other interpretive materials for a full and accurate statement of their contents. 2

3 Agenda Overview of M-CEITA Participating in MU and ACI in 2017 Eligibility Reporting Periods Attestation Options Program Structure 2017 Objectives and Measures Resources Questions & Answers 3

4 Who is M-CEITA? Michigan Center for Effective Information Technology Adoption (M-CEITA) One of 62 ONC Regional Extension Centers (REC) providing education & technical assistance to primary care providers across the country Funded by ARRA of 2009 (Stimulus Plan) Founded as part of the HITECH Act to accelerate the adoption, implementation, and effective use of electronic health records (EHR), e.g. 90-days of Meaningful Use Purpose: support the Triple Aim by achieving 5 overall performance goals THE TRIPLE AIM Improve patient experience Improve population health 3Reduce costs Improve Engage Quality, Patients Safety & & Efficiency Families Performance Measurement Improve Care Coordination Improve Population And Public Health Meaningful Use Ensure Privacy And Security Protections Certified Technology Infrastructure 4

5 M-CEITA Services Meaningful Use Support Security Risk Assessment Audit Preparation Targeted Process Optimization (Lean) GLPTN - Great Lakes Practice Transformation Network Chronic Care Management (CCM) Quality Payment Program Resource Center MICH-EHR 5

6 ACI and MU in 2017: Dual Participation 6

7 Glossary of Acronyms Acronym Definition Acronym Definition ACI Advancing Care Information HIE Health Information Exchange APM Alternative Payment Model HIT/HEALTH IT Health Information Technology ARRA American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 HITECH ACT Health Information Technology for Economic and Clinical Health Act CDS Clinical Decision Support MACRA Medicare Access and CHIP Reauthorization Act CEHRT Certified Electronic Health Record Technology M-CEITA Michigan Center for Effective IT Adoption CHIP Children's Health Insurance Program MCIR Michigan Care Improvement Registry CMS Center for Medicare & Medicaid Services MIPS Merit-based Incentive Payment System CNS Certified Nurse Specialist MU Meaningful Use CPI/CPIA Clinical Practice Improvement Activities NP Nurse Practitioner CPOE Computerized Provider Order Entry ONC Office of the National Coordinator for Health IT CPS Composite Performance Score PA Physicians Assistant CRNA Certified Registered Nurse Anesthetist PQRS Physician Quality Reporting System EC Eligible Clinician QCDR Qualified Clinical Data Registry EHR Electronic Health Record QPP Quality Payment Program EP Eligible Professional SGR Sustainable Growth Rate ephi Electronic Protected Health Information SRA Security Risk Assessment erx Electronic Prescribing TIN Tax Identification Number GLPTN Great Lakes Practice Transformation Network VM/VBM Value Modifier/Value Based Modifier 7

8 Eligibility for MU and ACI Eligible Providers Medicaid MU EPs Doctors of Medicine (MD) Doctors of Osteopathy (DO) Doctors of Dental Surgery/Dental Medicine (DMD/DDS) Doctors of Optometry Nurse Practitioners (NP) Physician Assistants (PA) practicing in a PA-led Federally Qualified Health Center (FQHC) or a PA-led Rural Health Clinic (RHC) Certified Nurse Midwife (CNM) ACI ECs Doctors of Medicine (MD) Doctors of Osteopathy (DO) Doctors of Dental Surgery/Dental Medicine (DMD/DDS) Doctors of Optometry Nurse Practitioners (NP) Physician Assistants (PA) Chiropractors Clinical Nurse Specialists (CNS) Certified Registered Nurse Anesthetists (CRNA) Doctors of Podiatry 8

9 Eligibility for MU and ACI Additional Requirements MU A minimum 30% patient volume attributable to Michigan Medicaid patient encounters (90 day period) For pediatricians (not NPs in peds clinic), a minimum 20% patient volume attributable to Michigan Medicaid patient encounters (pays 2/3 of incentive) ACI Medicare PFS (Part B) allowable billing charges greater than $30,000 AND provides care to more than 100 Medicare patients in one year Dates used to determine 2017 eligibility: 9/1/15 to 8/31/16 In April, CMS will mail letters to ECs who meet the low volume threshold for MIPS exemption 9

10 2017 Reporting Period Meaningful Use New and Returning Participants: MU measures - Any continuous days within the Calendar Year Providers electing optional Stage 3: Any continuous 90 days within the CY (requires 2015 CEHRT) For Returning Participants (MU Only), CQMs must be reported for a full year ACI (MIPS) Test Pace: Report the 4 or 5 ACI Base Measures (based upon CEHRT Edition) Partial Year: Submit 90 days of data Full Year: Submit 365 days of data 10

11 Attestation Options MU Attestation (CHAMPS/ehrMIPP) ACI QCDR (Qualified Clinical Data Registry) Qualified Registry EHR Attestation (new CMS portal coming) Attestation Window MU: 1 st time MUers can attest as of 4/1/17; All others 1/1/18-3/1/18 ACI: 1/1/18-3/31/18 If participating in MU and MIPS, you must attest separately for each program 11

12 Program Structure Modified Stage 2 MU Structure 12

13 Program Structure Advancing Care Information Structure Base Score Performance Score Bonus Points Composite Score Makes up to 50 POINTS of the total Advancing Care Information Performance Category Score Makes up to 90 POINTS of the total Advancing Care Information Performance Category Score Earn up to an add l 15 POINTS in the total Advancing Care Information Performance Category Score Earn 100 or more points and receive the full 25 POINTS in the Advancing Care Information Category of the MIPS Composite Performance Score 13

14 Advancing Care Information Structure Base Score Makes up to 50 POINTS of the total Advancing Care Information Performance Category Score 14

15 Advancing Care Information Structure Performance Score Makes up to 90 POINTS of the total Advancing Care Information Performance Category Score 15

16 16

17 Example ACI Scoring Base Score Performance Score Bonus Points Composite Score Earn 50 Points Attest for all 5 measures (all or nothing) (4 measures if still on 2014 CEHRT) Up to 90 Points Measure points accumulated by decile 1-10% = 1 point 11-20% = 2 points Etc. Up to 15 Points 5% Additional Public Health Registry 10% CPIA Alignment Earn points and receive full 25 POINTS in the Advancing Care Information category of MIPS Composite Performance Score (CPS) 17

18 Main Differences Between MU and ACI MU still measures EPs on CDS (Clinical Decision Support) and CPOE (Computerized Provider Order Entry) while ACI does not include these measures There are no measure thresholds that must be met in ACI (with exception of base score). Each numerator/denominator or Yes/No converts to points Except for the erx measure, there are no exclusions for ACI measures; must meet Base requirements then ECs can elect on reporting for Performance and Bonus Measures The scoring is different between programs MU is pass/fail Except for the Base Score which is pass/fail, ACI uses decile scoring 18

19 Converting MU Scores to ACI Base Score Example BASE MEASURES Numerator Denominator Performance Score Threshold Score erx % Numerator YES VDT - Access % >/= YES HIE/SoC % 1 Patient YES SRA N/A N/A YES Yes/No YES TOTAL BASE SCORE 50% 19

20 Converting MU Scores to ACI Performance Score Example PERFORMANCE MEASURES Numerator Performance Denominator Score Decile Score Performance Weighting Score HIE/SoC % 3 Up to 20% 6% VDT - Access % 10 Up to 20% 20% VDT - Use % 5 Up to 10% 5% Patient Education % 10 Up to 10% 10% Medication Reconciliation % 10 Up to 10% 10% Secure Messaging % 1 Up to 10% 1% MCIR N/A N/A YES N/A 0 or 10% 10% TOTAL PERFORMANCE SCORE 62% 20

21 Converting MU Scores to ACI Bonus Score Example BONUS MEASURES MSSS or Specialized Registry Report Specific CPIA using CEHRT (See Fact Sheet for List) Numerator Denominator Performance Rate Performance Rating Score N/A N/A YES 5% 5% N/A N/A NO 10% Scoring Example Totals: Base 50% Performance 62% Bonus 5% Total ACI Score: 117%, topped at 100% TOTAL BONUS SCORE 5% EC would earn the maximum 25 ACI points towards total MIPS score 21

22 Meaningful Use (MU) and Advancing Care Information (ACI) 2017 Objectives and Measures 22

23 The ACI and MU Objectives: 1. Protect Patient Health Information (SRA) 2. Clinical Decision Support Interventions (CDS) (MU ONLY) 3. Computerized Provider Order Entry (CPOE) (MU ONLY) 4. Electronic Prescribing (erx) 5. Health Information Exchange (formerly Summary of Care) 6. Patient Specific Education 7. Medication Reconciliation 8. Patient Electronic Access (VDT/Pt Portal) 9. Secure Electronic Messaging 10. Public Health Reporting 23

24 MU Measure Objective 1: Protect Patient Health Information (SRA Security Risk Analysis) Measure Threshold Exclusion Conduct or review a security risk analysis in accordance with the requirements in 45 CFR (a)(1), including addressing the security (to include encryption) of ephi created or maintained in CEHRT in accordance with requirements under 45 CFR (a)(2)(iv) and 45 CFR (d)(3), and implement security updates as necessary and correct identified security deficiencies as part of the EP s risk management process Y/N N/A 24

25 ACI Measure Objective: Measure: Protect Patient Health Information Security Risk Analysis Conduct or review a security risk analysis (SRA) in accordance with the requirements in 45 CFR (a)(1), including addressing the security (to include encryption) of ephi data created or maintained by CEHRT in accordance with requirements in 45 CFR (a)(2)(iv) and 45 CFR (d)(3), and implement security updates as necessary and correct identified security deficiencies as part of the MIPS eligible clinician s risk management process. Reporting Requirements YES/NO To meet this measure, eligible clinicians must attest YES to conducting or reviewing a security risk analysis and implementing security updates as necessary and correcting identified security deficiencies. Scoring Information Required for Base Score: Yes Percentage of Performance Score: 0% Eligible for Bonus Score: No 25

26 MU Measure Objective 2: Clinical Decision Support (CDS)* Measure Threshold Exclusion Measure 1: Implement 5 CDS interventions related to 4 or more CQMs at a relevant point in patient care for the entire reporting period (RP). Absent 4 CQMs related to an EPs scope of practice or patient population, the CDS interventions must be related to Y/N N/A high-priority health conditions Measure 2: The EP has enabled and implemented the functionality for drug/drug and drug/allergy interaction checks for the entire RP Y/N EP who writes < 100 medication orders during the RP *No equivalent ACI measure 26

27 Objective 3: Computerized Provider Order Entry (CPOE)* Measure Threshold Exclusion Measure 1: > 60% of medication orders created by the EP during the RP are recorded using CPOE Measure 2: > 30% of laboratory orders created by the EP during the RP are recorded using CPOE Measure 3: > 30% of radiology orders created by the EP during the RP are recorded using CPOE > 60% > 30% > 30% MU Measure EP who writes < 100 medication orders during the RP EP who writes < 100 laboratory orders during the RP EP who writes < 100 radiology orders during the RP *No equivalent ACI measure 27

28 MU Measure Objective 4: Electronic Prescribing (erx) Measure Threshold Exclusion > 50% of all permissible prescriptions written by the EP are queried for a drug formulary* & transmitted electronically using CEHRT > 50% EP who writes < than 100 medication orders during the RP or does not have a pharmacy within his or her organization and there are no pharmacies that accept electronic prescriptions within 10 miles of the EP's practice location at the start of the RP * Note they must be queried against a drug formulary to count! 28

29 ACI Measure Objective: Measure: Exclusion: Reporting Requirements NUMERATOR: The number of prescriptions in the denominator generated, queried for a drug formulary, and transmitted electronically using CEHRT. DENOMINATOR: Number of prescriptions written for drugs requiring a prescription in order to be dispensed other than controlled substances during the performance period; or number of prescriptions written for drugs requiring a prescription in order to be dispensed during the performance period. Scoring Information Electronic Prescribing Electronic Prescribing The MIPS eligible clinician is in active engagement with a public health agency to submit syndromic surveillance data from a non-urgent care ambulatory setting where the jurisdiction accepts syndromic data from such settings and the standards are clearly defined. Any MIPS eligible clinician who writes fewer than 100 permissible prescriptions during the 2017 performance period. Required for Base Score: Yes Percentage of Performance Score: 0% Eligible for Bonus Score: No 29

30 MU Measure Objective 5: Health Information Exchange (HIE) Measure Threshold Exclusion EP that transitions or refers their patient to another setting of care or provider of care must (1) use CEHRT to create a summary of care (SOC) record; and (2) electronically transmit such summary to a receiving provider for > 10% of transitions of care (TOC) and referrals > 10% EP who transfers a patient to another setting or refers a patient to another provider < 100 times during the RP 30

31 ACI Measure Objective: Measure: Health Information Exchange Health Information Exchange (HIE) The MIPS eligible clinician that transitions or refers their patient to another setting of care or health care clinician (1) uses CEHRT to create a summary of care record; and (2) electronically transmits such summary to a receiving health care clinician for at least one transition of care or referral. Reporting Requirements NUMERATOR: The number of transitions of care and referrals in the denominator where a summary of care record was created using CEHRT and exchanged electronically. DENOMINATOR: Number of transitions of care and referrals during the performance period for which the EC was the transferring or referring health care clinician. Scoring Information Required for Base Score: Yes Percentage of Performance Score: Up to 20% Eligible for Bonus Score: No 31

32 MU Measure Objective 6: Patient Specific Education Measure Threshold Exclusion Patient specific education resources identified by CEHRT are provided to patients for > 10% of all unique patients with office visits seen by the EP during the RP > 10% EP who has no office visits during the RP 32

33 ACI Measure Objective: Measure: Patient Electronic Access Patient Specific Education The MIPS eligible clinician must use clinically relevant information from CEHRT to identify patient-specific educational resources and provide access to those materials to at least one unique patient seen by the MIPS eligible clinician. Reporting Requirements NUMERATOR: The number of patients in the denominator who were provided access to patient-specific educational resources using clinically relevant information identified from CEHRT during the performance period. DENOMINATOR: The number of unique patients seen by the MIPS eligible clinician during the performance period. Scoring Information Required for the Base Score: No Percentage of Performance Score: Up to 10% Eligible for Bonus Score: No 33

34 MU Measure Objective 7: Medication Reconciliation Measure Threshold Exclusion The EP performs medication reconciliation for > 50% of TOC in which the patient is transitioned into the care of the EP > 50% EP who was not the recipient of any transitions of care during the RP 34

35 ACI Measure Objective: Measure: Medication Reconciliation Medication Reconciliation The MIPS eligible clinician performs medication reconciliation for at least one transition of care in which the patient is transitioned into the care of the MIPS eligible clinician. Reporting Requirements NUMERATOR: The number of transitions of care or referrals in the denominator where the following three clinical information reconciliations were performed: medication list, medication allergy list, and current problem list. DENOMINATOR: Number of transitions of care or referrals during the performance period for which the MIPS eligible clinician was the recipient of the transition or referral or has never before encountered the patient. Scoring Information Required for the Base Score: No Percentage of Performance Score: Up to 10% Eligible for Bonus Score: No 35

36 MU Measure Objective 8: Patient Electronic Access (VDT) Measure Threshold Exclusion Measure 1: > 50% of all unique patients seen by the EP during the RP are provided timely access to view online, download, and transmit (VDT) to a third party their health information subject to the EP's discretion to withhold certain information Measure 2: > 5% of unique patients (or PARs) seen by the EP during the reporting period VDTs their health information during the reporting period > 50% > 5% EP who neither orders nor creates any of the information listed for inclusion as part of the measures except for patient name and provider s name and office contact information EP who neither orders nor creates any of the information listed for inclusion as part of the measures except for patient name and provider s name and office contact information; OR conducts 50% or more of their patient encounters in a county that does not have 50% or more of its housing units with 4Mbps broadband availability according to the latest information available from the FCC on the first day of the RP 36

37 ACI Measure Objective: Measure: Patient Electronic Access Provide Patient Access At least one patient seen by the MIPS eligible clinician during the performance period is provided timely access to view online, download, and transmit to a third party their health information subject to the MIPS eligible clinician s discretion to withhold certain information. Reporting Requirements NUMERATOR: The number of patients in the denominator (or patient authorized representative) who are provided timely access to health information to view online, download, and transmit to a third party. DENOMINATOR: The number of unique patients seen by the MIPS eligible clinician during the performance period. Scoring Information Required for the Base Score: Yes Percentage of Performance Score: Up to 20% Eligible for Bonus Score: No 37

38 ACI Measure Objective: Measure: Patient Electronic Access View, Download or Transmit At least one patient seen by the MIPS eligible clinician during the performance period (or patient-authorized representative) views, downloads or transmits their health information to a third party during the performance period. Reporting Requirements NUMERATOR: The number of unique patients (or their authorized representatives) in the denominator who have viewed online, downloaded, or transmitted to a third party the patient s health information during the performance period. DENOMINATOR: Number of unique patients seen by the MIPS eligible clinician during the performance period. Scoring Information Required for the Base Score: No Percentage of Performance Score: Up to 10% Eligible for Bonus Score: No 38

39 MU Measure Objective 9: Secure Electronic Messaging Measure Threshold Exclusion For > 5% of unique patients seen by the EP during the RP, a secure message was sent using the electronic messaging function of CEHRT to the patient (or PAR), or in response to a secure message sent by the patient (or PAR) during the RP > 5% EP who has no office visits during the RP or EP who conducts 50% or more of their patient encounters in a county that does not have 50% or more of its housing units with 4Mbps broadband availability according to the latest information available from the FCC on the first day of the RP 39

40 ACI Measure Objective: Measure: Reporting Requirements NUMERATOR: The number of patients in the denominator for whom a secure electronic message is sent to the patient (or patient-authorized representative), or in response to a secure message sent by the patient (or patient-authorized representative), during the performance period. DENOMINATOR: Number of unique patients seen by the MIPS eligible clinician during the performance period. Scoring Information Required for Base Score: No Percentage of Performance Score: Up to 10% Eligible for Bonus Score: No Secure Electronic Messaging Secure Electronic Messaging For at least one patient seen by the MIPS eligible clinician during the performance period, a secure message was sent using the electronic messaging function of CEHRT to the patient (or the patient-authorized representative), or in response to a secure message sent by the patient (or the patient authorized representative), during the performance period. 40

41 MU Measure Objective 10: Public Health Reporting (EPs must attest YES to 2 out of 3 measures) Measure Measure Option 1: Immunization Registry Reporting The EP is in active engagement with a public health agency to submit immunization data Measure Option 2: Syndromic Surveillance Reporting The EP is in active engagement with a public health agency to submit syndromic surveillance data Measure Option 3: Specialized Registry Reporting The EP is in active engagement to submit data to a qualified specialized registry Exclusion MI EPs: Does not administer any immunizations for which data is collected by the immunization registry MI EPs in Non-Urgent Care Settings: Is not in a category of providers from which ambulatory syndromic data is collected by the PHA EP (a) does not diagnose/treat any disease/condition associated with, or collect relevant data that is collected by, a specialized registry in their jurisdiction during the RP; (b) operates in a jurisdiction for which no specialized registry is capable of accepting electronic registry transactions in the specific standards required to meet the CEHRT definition at the start of the RP; or (c) operates in a jurisdiction where no specialized registry for which the EP is eligible has declared readiness to receive electronic registry transactions at the beginning of the RP 41

42 ACI Measure Objective: Measure: Public Health Reporting Immunization Registry Reporting The MIPS eligible clinician is in active engagement with a public health agency to submit immunization data. Reporting Requirements YES/NO To meet this measure, MIPS eligible clinicians must attest YES to being in active engagement with a public health agency to submit immunization data. Scoring Information Required for Base Score: No Percentage of Performance Score: 0 or 10% Eligible for Bonus Score: No 42

43 ACI Measure Objective: Measure: Public Health Reporting Syndromic Surveillance Reporting The MIPS eligible clinician is in active engagement with a public health agency to submit syndromic surveillance data. Reporting Requirements YES/NO To meet this measure, MIPS eligible clinicians must attest YES to being in active engagement with a public health agency to submit syndromic surveillance data. Scoring Information Required for Base Score: No Percentage of Performance Score: 0% Eligible for Bonus Score: Yes, up to 5% total 43

44 ACI Measure Objective: Measure: Public Health Reporting Specialized Registry Reporting The MIPS eligible clinician is in active engagement to submit data to a specialized registry. Reporting Requirements YES/NO To meet this measure, MIPS eligible clinicians must attest YES to being in active engagement to submit data to a specialized registry. Scoring Information Required for the Base Score: No Percentage of Performance Score: 0% Eligible for Bonus Score: Yes, up to 5% total 44

45 Concluding Thoughts MU and ACI (MIPS) are separate programs; participating in one does not give credit in the other Although separate, ACI and MU are still quite similar The objectives are nearly identical although with different measure scoring Meeting MU likely means a decent, if not max, ACI score (25pts) Goal should no longer be just meeting the MU threshold; with ACI every numerator/point counts and could mean an increase in Medicare reimbursements 45

46 Resources Quality Payment Program Website: MU Program Requirements: Guidance/Legislation/EHRIncentivePrograms/2017ProgramRequirements.html QPP Final Rule: MU Final Rule: MU Measure Specification Sheets: Guidance/Legislation/EHRIncentivePrograms/Downloads/TableofContents_EP_Med icaid_modifiedstage2.pdf ACI Performance Category Fact Sheet: ACI Measure Specification Sheets: ns.zip 46

47 Questions? Bruce Maki

Final Meaningful Use Objectives for 2017

Final Meaningful Use Objectives for 2017 Final Meaningful Use Objectives Modified Stage 2 All Eligible Professionals (EP) must attest to all objectives using a 2014 Edition or a combination of 2014 & 2015 CEHRT. Stage 2 Objective Protect Health

More information

EHR Incentive Programs for Eligible Professionals: What You Need to Know for 2016 Tipsheet

EHR Incentive Programs for Eligible Professionals: What You Need to Know for 2016 Tipsheet EHR Incentive Programs for Eligible Professionals: What You Need to Know for 2016 Tipsheet CMS published a final rule that specifies criteria that eligible professionals (EPs), eligible hospitals, and

More information

Final Meaningful Use Objectives for

Final Meaningful Use Objectives for Final Meaningful Use Objectives Modified Stage 2 All Eligible Professionals (EP) must attest to all objectives using a 2014 Edition CEHRT. Stage 2 Objective Protect Health Information Clinical Decision

More information

Final Meaningful Use Objectives for

Final Meaningful Use Objectives for Final Meaningful Use Objectives All Eligible Professionals (EP) must attest to all objectives using a 2014 Edition CEHRT. Stage 2 Objective Protect Health Information Clinical Decision Support Stage 2

More information

Stage 3 and ACI s Relationship to Medicaid MU Massachusetts Medicaid EHR Incentive Program

Stage 3 and ACI s Relationship to Medicaid MU Massachusetts Medicaid EHR Incentive Program Stage 3 and ACI s Relationship to Medicaid MU Massachusetts Medicaid EHR Incentive Program September 19 & 20, 2017 Today s presenters: Brendan Gallagher Thomas Bennett Agenda Stage 3 Meaningful Use (MU)

More information

EHR Incentive Programs: 2015 through 2017 (Modified Stage 2) Overview

EHR Incentive Programs: 2015 through 2017 (Modified Stage 2) Overview EHR Incentive Programs: 2015 through (Modified Stage 2) Overview CMS recently released a final rule that specifies criteria that eligible professionals (EPs), eligible hospitals, and critical access hospitals

More information

Meaningful Use CHCANYS Webinar #1

Meaningful Use CHCANYS Webinar #1 Meaningful Use 2016 CHCANYS Webinar #1 Ekem Merchant -Bleiberg, Director of Implementation Services Alliance of Chicago Wednesday February 24, 2016 Agenda 2016 Meaningful Use Guidelines Timelines & Deadlines

More information

Meaningful Use - Modified Stage Alternate Exclusions and/or Specifications

Meaningful Use - Modified Stage Alternate Exclusions and/or Specifications Objectives Measures for EPs in 2016 Objective 1: Protect Patient Health Information Measure: Conduct or review a security risk analysis in accordance with the requirements in 45 CFR 164.308(a)(1), including

More information

MEANINGFUL USE 2015 PROPOSED 2015 MEANINGFUL USE FLEXIBILITY RULE

MEANINGFUL USE 2015 PROPOSED 2015 MEANINGFUL USE FLEXIBILITY RULE MEANINGFUL USE 2015 PROPOSED 2015 MEANINGFUL USE FLEXIBILITY RULE *Please note, the below guidelines are currently proposed. ASCRS will let you know if and when they are finalized through regulatory alerts

More information

Medicare and Medicaid EHR Incentive Program. Stage 3 and Modifications to Meaningful Use in 2015 through 2017 Final Rule with Comment

Medicare and Medicaid EHR Incentive Program. Stage 3 and Modifications to Meaningful Use in 2015 through 2017 Final Rule with Comment Medicare and Medicaid EHR Incentive Program Stage 3 and Modifications to Meaningful Use in 2015 through 2017 Final Rule with Comment Measures, and Proposed Alternative Measures with Select Proposed 1 Protect

More information

Meaningful Use What You Need to Know for December 6, 2016

Meaningful Use What You Need to Know for December 6, 2016 Meaningful Use What You Need to Know for 2016-2017 December 6, 2016 Agenda Overview of Programs Eligibility Requirements Timeframes & Reporting Periods When you need to Upgrade Measures to Meet 2016 &

More information

FINAL Meaningful Use Objectives for

FINAL Meaningful Use Objectives for Meaningful Use s All Eligible Professionals (EP) and Eligible Hospitals (EH) must attest to all objectives using a 2014 Edition CEHRT. Protect Electronic Health Information Protect electronic health information

More information

2016 MEANINGFUL USE AND 2017 CHANGES to the Medicare EHR Incentive Program for EPs. September 27, 2016 Kathy Wild, Lisa Sagwitz, and Joe Pinto

2016 MEANINGFUL USE AND 2017 CHANGES to the Medicare EHR Incentive Program for EPs. September 27, 2016 Kathy Wild, Lisa Sagwitz, and Joe Pinto 2016 MEANINGFUL USE AND 2017 CHANGES to the Medicare EHR Incentive Program for EPs September 27, 2016 Kathy Wild, Lisa Sagwitz, and Joe Pinto Agenda Meaningful Use (MU) in 2016 MACRA and MIPS (high level

More information

2018 Modified Stage 3 Meaningful Use Criteria for Eligible Professionals (EPs)*

2018 Modified Stage 3 Meaningful Use Criteria for Eligible Professionals (EPs)* 2018 Modified Stage 3 Meaningful Use Criteria for Eligible Professionals (EPs)* n In order for an EP to be considered a meaningful electronic health record (EHR) user, at least 50 percent of the EP s patient

More information

MACRA and MIPS. How Medicare Meaningful Use and PQRS are Changing

MACRA and MIPS. How Medicare Meaningful Use and PQRS are Changing MACRA and MIPS How Medicare Meaningful Use and PQRS are Changing Link to recorded session: https://attendee.gotowebinar.com/recording/1305549490878052097 Presenting Today: Molly Goodhart Joined Quatris

More information

Meaningful Use - Modified Stage 2. Brett Paepke, OD David Wolfson Marni Anderson

Meaningful Use - Modified Stage 2. Brett Paepke, OD David Wolfson Marni Anderson Meaningful Use - Modified Stage 2 Brett Paepke, OD David Wolfson Marni Anderson Wait! Where did Stage 1 and Stage 2 go? Traditional stages eliminated in late 2015 in order to: 1. reduce reporting requirements

More information

2017 Transition Year Flexibility Advancing Care Information (ACI) Category Options

2017 Transition Year Flexibility Advancing Care Information (ACI) Category Options The Physicians Advocacy Institute s Medicare Quality Payment Program (QPP) Physician Education Initiative 2017 Transition Year Flexibility Advancing Care Information (ACI) Category Options Ad 1 P a g e

More information

Meaningful Use 2016 and beyond

Meaningful Use 2016 and beyond Meaningful Use 2016 and beyond Main Street Medical Consulting May 12, 2016 Meaningful use, MACRA, MIPS? Whaaaaat? 1 Reporting Period and Timeline In 2016 all providers are required to use CEHRT versions

More information

Beyond Meaningful Use: Driving Improved Quality. CHCANYS Webinar #1: December 14, 2016

Beyond Meaningful Use: Driving Improved Quality. CHCANYS Webinar #1: December 14, 2016 Beyond Meaningful Use: Driving Improved Quality CHCANYS Webinar #1: December 14, 2016 Agenda The Current State Measuring Monitoring & Reporting Quality. Meaningful Use 2018 and Beyond The New Quality Payment

More information

Meaningful Use and PCC EHR. Tim Proctor Users Conference 2017

Meaningful Use and PCC EHR. Tim Proctor Users Conference 2017 Meaningful Use and PCC EHR Tim Proctor (tim@pcc.com) Users Conference 2017 Agenda MU basics and eligibility How to participate in MU What s Next for MU? Meeting MU measures in PCC EHR Takeaways An understanding

More information

American Recovery & Reinvestment Act

American Recovery & Reinvestment Act American Recovery & Reinvestment Act Meaningful Use Dawn Ross, Clinical Informatics Director Linda Wilson, Meaningful Use Coordinator 10/26/2015 Overview American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009

More information

Medicaid EHR Incentive Program What You Need to Know about Program Year 2016

Medicaid EHR Incentive Program What You Need to Know about Program Year 2016 Medicaid EHR Incentive Program What You Need to Know about Program Year 2016 February 2017 Carrie Ortega, Health IT Project Manager Imeincentives@dhs.state.ia.us 1 Attestation Reminders 2016 Dates to Remember

More information

2015 Meaningful Use and emipp Updates (for Eligible Professionals)

2015 Meaningful Use and emipp Updates (for Eligible Professionals) 2015 Meaningful Use and emipp Updates (for Eligible Professionals) Kai-Yun Kao Department of Health and Mental Hygiene Presented to: Maryland Medicaid Providers Date: February 18, 2016 Webinar Agenda 2

More information

Meaningful Use Virtual Office Hours Webinar for Eligible Providers and Hospitals

Meaningful Use Virtual Office Hours Webinar for Eligible Providers and Hospitals Meaningful Use Virtual Office Hours Webinar for Eligible Providers and Hospitals Patti Kritzberger, RHIT, CHPS Tracey Regimbal, RHIT HIT-Quality Improvement Specialists Jane Stotts, BSN Quality Improvement

More information

Meaningful Use and Care Transitions: Managing Change and Improving Quality of Care

Meaningful Use and Care Transitions: Managing Change and Improving Quality of Care Small Rural Hospital Transition (SRHT) Project HELP Webinar Meaningful Use and Care Transitions: Managing Change and Improving Quality of Care Paul Kleeberg, MD, FAAFP, FHIMSS Aledade Medical Director

More information

MIPS Program: 2018 Advancing Care Information Category

MIPS Program: 2018 Advancing Care Information Category MIPS Program: 2018 Advancing Care Category The 2018 Quality Payment Program (QPP) Year Two final rule continues to implement the programs authorized under the Medicare and CHIP Reauthorization Act of 2015

More information

of 23 Meaningful Use 2015 PER THE CMS REVISION TO THE FINAL RULE RELEASED OCTOBER 6, 2015 CHARTMAKER MEDICAL SUITE

of 23 Meaningful Use 2015 PER THE CMS REVISION TO THE FINAL RULE RELEASED OCTOBER 6, 2015 CHARTMAKER MEDICAL SUITE 1 Meaningful Use 2015 PER THE CMS REVISION TO THE FINAL RULE RELEASED OCTOBER 6, 2015 CHARTMAKER MEDICAL SUITE WHEN WE ARE FINISHED TODAY YOU SHOULD KNOW THE FOLLOWING. 2 EHR reporting periods Amended

More information

Alaska Medicaid Program

Alaska Medicaid Program Alaska Medicaid Program ALASKA ELECTRONIC HEALTH RECORDS Incentive Program Updated January 2018 Provider Manual 1 Background... 4 2 How Do I use this manual?... 6 3 How do I get help?... 7 4 Eligible provider

More information

EHR/Meaningful Use

EHR/Meaningful Use EHR/Meaningful Use 2015-2017 The requirements for Meaningful Use attestation have changed due to the recently released Medicare and Medicaid Programs: Electronic Health Record Incentive Program Stage 3

More information

Advancing Care Information- The New Meaningful Use September 2017

Advancing Care Information- The New Meaningful Use September 2017 Advancing Care Information- The New Meaningful Use September 2017 ACO Announcements Reminders: ACO Notifications PECOS-Maintain active enrollment 2017 Patient Prospective Lists Upcoming provider/office

More information

The History of Meaningful Use

The History of Meaningful Use A Guide to Modified Meaningful Use Stage 2 for Wound Care Practitioners for 2015 The History of Meaningful Use During the first term of the Obama administration in 2009, Congress passed the Health Information

More information

Final Meaningful Use Rules Add Short-Term Flexibility

Final Meaningful Use Rules Add Short-Term Flexibility Final Meaningful Use Rules Add Short-Term Flexibility Allison W. Shuren, Vernessa T. Pollard, Jennifer B. Madsen MPH, and Alexander R. Cohen November 2015 INTRODUCTION On October 16, the Centers for Medicare

More information

Decoding the QPP Year 2 Quality Measure Benchmarks and Deciles to Maximize Performance

Decoding the QPP Year 2 Quality Measure Benchmarks and Deciles to Maximize Performance Decoding the QPP Year 2 Quality Measure Benchmarks and s to Maximize Performance Leila Volinsky, MHA, MSN, RN, PCMH CCE, CPHQ Senior Program Administrator New England Regional Lead Quality Payment Program

More information

Meaningful Use Overview for Program Year 2017 Massachusetts Medicaid EHR Incentive Program

Meaningful Use Overview for Program Year 2017 Massachusetts Medicaid EHR Incentive Program Meaningful Use Overview for Program Year 2017 Massachusetts Medicaid EHR Incentive Program October 23 & 24, 2017 Presenters: Elisabeth Renczkowski, Al Wroblewski, and Thomas Bennett Agenda 2017 Meaningful

More information

HITECH* Update Meaningful Use Regulations Eligible Professionals

HITECH* Update Meaningful Use Regulations Eligible Professionals HITECH* Update Meaningful Use Regulations Eligible Professionals October 2010 * Health Information Technology for Economic and Clinical Health, a component of the ARRA of 2009 McDowell Lecture December

More information

Meaningful Use Stage 2

Meaningful Use Stage 2 Meaningful Use Stage 2 Presented by: Deb Anderson, HTS Consultant HTS, a division of Mountain Pacific Quality Health Foundation 1 HTS Who We Are Stage 2 MU Overview Learning Objectives 2014 CEHRT Certification

More information

Michelle Brunsen & Sandy Swallow May 25, , Telligen, Inc.

Michelle Brunsen & Sandy Swallow May 25, , Telligen, Inc. MIPS Survive and Thrive: Advancing Care Information Michelle Brunsen & Sandy Swallow May 25, 2017 2016, Telligen, Inc. Objectives Quality Payment Program Updates Advancing Care Information (ACI) Category

More information

STAGE 2 PROPOSED REQUIREMENTS FOR MEETING MEANINGFUL USE OF EHRs 1

STAGE 2 PROPOSED REQUIREMENTS FOR MEETING MEANINGFUL USE OF EHRs 1 STAGE 2 PROPOSED REQUIREMENTS FOR MEETING MEANINGFUL USE OF EHRs 1 Requirement CPOE Use CPOE for medication orders directly entered by any licensed health care professional who can enter orders into the

More information

MIPS Program: 2017 Advancing Care Information Category (formerly known as Meaningful Use) Proposed Rule Guide

MIPS Program: 2017 Advancing Care Information Category (formerly known as Meaningful Use) Proposed Rule Guide MIPS Program: 2017 Advancing Care Information Category (formerly known as Meaningful Use) Proposed Rule Guide On April 27, 2016, CMS released a proposed rule on the Quality Payment Program, which includes

More information

Medicaid Provider Incentive Program

Medicaid Provider Incentive Program Medicaid Provider Incentive Program The Road to Meaningful Use Ohio Association of Community Health Centers 2013 Spring Conference March 6, 2013 Presenters: Elbony McIntyre, Project Manager Emma Esmont,

More information

during the EHR reporting period.

during the EHR reporting period. CMS Stage 2 MU Proposed Objectives and Measures for EPs Objective Measure Notes and Queries PUT YOUR COMMENTS HERE CORE SET (EP must meet all 17 Core Set objectives) Exclusion: Any EP who writes fewer

More information

CMS EHR Incentive Programs in 2015 through 2017 Overview

CMS EHR Incentive Programs in 2015 through 2017 Overview CMS EHR Incentive Programs in 2015 through 2017 Overview March 1, 2016 Elisabeth Myers, Senior Policy Advisor, Center for Clinical Standards and Quality Jayne Hammen, Director, Division of Health Information

More information

Prime Clinical Systems, Inc

Prime Clinical Systems, Inc 2.29.16 1 2015 Year Meaningful Use Checklist The attestation period for Meaningful Use Year 2015 is January 4 to March 11, 2016. Here are some helpful tips to assist you: 1. The PCM MU report card updates

More information

Meaningful Use Reporting period for 2017: Change: Any consecutive 90 days in 2017 for Medicaid customers only.

Meaningful Use Reporting period for 2017: Change: Any consecutive 90 days in 2017 for Medicaid customers only. Meaningful Use 2017 Reporting period for 2017: Change: Any consecutive 90 days in 2017 for Medicaid customers only. Who needs to report on Meaningful Use for 2017? Medicaid customers who have 30 % Medicaid

More information

Meaningful Use Hello Health v7 Guide for Eligible Professionals. Stage 2

Meaningful Use Hello Health v7 Guide for Eligible Professionals. Stage 2 Meaningful Use Hello Health v7 Guide for Eligible Professionals Stage 2 Table of Contents Introduction 3 Meaningful Use 3 Terminology 4 Computerized Provider Order Entry (CPOE) for Medication, Laboratory

More information

Sevocity v Advancing Care Information User Reference Guide

Sevocity v Advancing Care Information User Reference Guide Sevocity v.12 User Reference Guide 1 877 877-2298 support@sevocity.com Table of Contents About Advancing Care Information... 3 Setup Requirements... 3 Product Support Services... 3 About Sevocity v.12...

More information

Copyright. Last updated: September 28, 2017 MicroMD EMR Objective Measure Calculations Manual: Performance Year 2017

Copyright. Last updated: September 28, 2017 MicroMD EMR Objective Measure Calculations Manual: Performance Year 2017 Objective Measure Calculations Performance Year 2017 Trademarks Because of the nature of the material, numerous hardware and software products are mentioned by their trade names in this publication. All

More information

Agenda 2. EHR Incentive Programs 3/5/2015. Overview EHR incentive programs Meaningful Use Differences between Stage 1 and Stage 2

Agenda 2. EHR Incentive Programs 3/5/2015. Overview EHR incentive programs Meaningful Use Differences between Stage 1 and Stage 2 Meaningful Use and the Electronic Health Record Presented by: Susan Reehill CPC, CEMC, CHONC, CPMA Certified Professional Medical Auditor AHIMA Approved ICD-10 CM/PCS Trainer Overview EHR incentive programs

More information

Eligible Professional Attestation Worksheet for Modified Stage 2 Medicare Electronic Health Record (EHR) Incentive Program

Eligible Professional Attestation Worksheet for Modified Stage 2 Medicare Electronic Health Record (EHR) Incentive Program Eligible Professional Attestation Worksheet for Modified Stage 2 Medicare Electronic Health Record (EHR) ncentive Program The Eligible Professional (EP) Attestation Worksheet is for EPs in the EHR ncentive

More information

2016 Requirements for the EHR Incentive Programs: EligibleProfessionals

2016 Requirements for the EHR Incentive Programs: EligibleProfessionals 2016 Requirements for the EHR Incentive Programs: EligibleProfessionals Vidya Sellappan Division of Health Information Technology Quality Measurement & Value-based Incentives Group Center for Clinical

More information

2015 MEANINGFUL USE STAGE 2 FOR ELIGIBLE PROVIDERS USING CERTIFIED EMR TECHNOLOGY

2015 MEANINGFUL USE STAGE 2 FOR ELIGIBLE PROVIDERS USING CERTIFIED EMR TECHNOLOGY 2015 MEANINGFUL USE STAGE 2 FOR ELIGIBLE PROVIDERS USING CERTIFIED EMR TECHNOLOGY STAGE 2 REQUIREMENTS EPs must meet or qualify for an exclusion to 17 core objectives EPs must meet 3 of the 6 menu measures.

More information

PROPOSED MEANINGFUL USE STAGE 2 REQUIREMENTS FOR ELIGIBLE PROVIDERS USING CERTIFIED EMR TECHNOLOGY

PROPOSED MEANINGFUL USE STAGE 2 REQUIREMENTS FOR ELIGIBLE PROVIDERS USING CERTIFIED EMR TECHNOLOGY PROPOSED MEANINGFUL USE STAGE 2 REQUIREMENTS FOR ELIGIBLE PROVIDERS USING CERTIFIED EMR TECHNOLOGY On February 23, the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) posted the much anticipated proposed

More information

Provide an understanding of what comprises "meaningful use" of EHR technology

Provide an understanding of what comprises meaningful use of EHR technology 1 Provide background on federal electronic health record (EHR) incentives Overview of Health IT Incentives Medicare/Medicaid EHR incentives Provide an understanding of what comprises "meaningful use" of

More information

Meaningful Use Modified Stage 2 Roadmap Eligible Hospitals

Meaningful Use Modified Stage 2 Roadmap Eligible Hospitals Evident is dedicated to making your transition to Meaningful Use as seamless as possible. In an effort to assist our customers with implementation of the software conducive to meeting Meaningful Use requirements,

More information

Meaningful Use Basics and Attestation Process Guide for Medicare and Medi-Cal. Lori Hack & Val Tuerk, Object Health

Meaningful Use Basics and Attestation Process Guide for Medicare and Medi-Cal. Lori Hack & Val Tuerk, Object Health Meaningful Use Basics and Attestation Process Guide for Medicare and Medi-Cal Lori Hack & Val Tuerk, Object Health 2 3 Agenda Who Qualifies for the EHR Incentive Funds? EHR Incentive Registration Process

More information

CMS Incentive Programs: Timeline And Reporting Requirements. Webcast Association of Northern California Oncologists May 21, 2013

CMS Incentive Programs: Timeline And Reporting Requirements. Webcast Association of Northern California Oncologists May 21, 2013 CMS Incentive Programs: Timeline And Reporting Requirements Webcast Association of Northern California Oncologists May 21, 2013 Objective This webcast will address CMS s Incentive Program reporting requirements

More information

Meaningful Use: Introduction to Meaningful Use Eligible Providers

Meaningful Use: Introduction to Meaningful Use Eligible Providers Meaningful Use: Introduction to Meaningful Use Eligible Providers Introduction to Meaningful Use: Webinar Overview Define Meaningful Use Review Meaningful Use Key Dates & Program Incentives Discuss the

More information

THE MEANING OF MEANINGFUL USE CHANGES IN THE STAGE 2 MU FINAL RULE. Angel L. Moore, MAEd, RHIA Eastern AHEC REC

THE MEANING OF MEANINGFUL USE CHANGES IN THE STAGE 2 MU FINAL RULE. Angel L. Moore, MAEd, RHIA Eastern AHEC REC THE MEANING OF MEANINGFUL USE CHANGES IN THE STAGE 2 MU FINAL RULE Angel L. Moore, MAEd, RHIA Eastern AHEC REC WE WILL BRIEFLY DISCUSS Meaningful Use (MU) Incentive Programs, Eligibility & Timelines WE

More information

Stage 2 Eligible Professional Meaningful Use Core and Menu Measures. User Manual/Guide for Attestation using encompass 3.0

Stage 2 Eligible Professional Meaningful Use Core and Menu Measures. User Manual/Guide for Attestation using encompass 3.0 Stage 2 Eligible Professional Meaningful Use Core and Menu Measures User Manual/Guide for Attestation using encompass 3.0 Prepared By: Arête Healthcare Services, LLC Document Version: V1.0 9/02/2015 Eligible

More information

2017/2018. KPN Health, Inc. Quality Payment Program Solutions Guide. KPN Health, Inc. A CMS Qualified Clinical Data Registry (QCDR) KPN Health, Inc.

2017/2018. KPN Health, Inc. Quality Payment Program Solutions Guide. KPN Health, Inc. A CMS Qualified Clinical Data Registry (QCDR) KPN Health, Inc. 2017/2018 KPN Health, Inc. Quality Payment Program Solutions Guide KPN Health, Inc. A CMS Qualified Clinical Data Registry (QCDR) KPN Health, Inc. 214-591-6990 info@kpnhealth.com www.kpnhealth.com 2017/2018

More information

Eligibility. Program Structure and Process for Receiving Incentives

Eligibility. Program Structure and Process for Receiving Incentives Overview of Medicare Incentives in the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) Final Rule on Meaningful Use of Certified Electronic Health Records 1 Eligibility Medicare Eligibility: For Medicare

More information

Under the MACRAscope:

Under the MACRAscope: Under the MACRAscope: G08: Under the MACRAscope: MIPS and EHRs Robert Tennant, MA Director, HIT Policy, MGMA Government Affairs rtennant@mgma.org Learning Objectives This session will provide you with

More information

Advancing Care Information Measures Data Validation Criteria. Reporting Requirement: Yes/No or Numerator/Denominator

Advancing Care Information Measures Data Validation Criteria. Reporting Requirement: Yes/No or Numerator/Denominator Advancing Care Information (ACI) Measure ID ACI Measure Description ACI Measures - Required/Not Required for Base Score ACI_PPHI_1 Security Risk Analysis Conduct or review a security risk analysis in accordance

More information

Quality Payment Program: The future of reimbursement

Quality Payment Program: The future of reimbursement Quality Payment Program: The future of reimbursement Presented by Evan M. Gwilliam, DC MBA BS CPC CCPC NCICS CCCPC CPC-I MCS-P CPMA CMQP Executive Vice President 1 Dr. Evan Gwilliam Education Bachelor

More information

9/28/2011. Learning Agenda. Meaningful Use and why it s here. Meaningful Use Rules of Participation. Categories, Objectives and Thresholds

9/28/2011. Learning Agenda. Meaningful Use and why it s here. Meaningful Use Rules of Participation. Categories, Objectives and Thresholds Coding on the River 10/01/2011 Christina Catalano University of Florida Jacksonville Healthcare Inc. Director, EHR Compliance and Meaningful Use Learning Agenda Meaningful Use and why it s here Meaningful

More information

How to Participate Today 4/28/2015. HealthFusion.com 2015 HealthFusion, Inc. 1. Meaningful Use Stage 3: What the Future Holds

How to Participate Today 4/28/2015. HealthFusion.com 2015 HealthFusion, Inc. 1. Meaningful Use Stage 3: What the Future Holds Meaningful Use Stage 3: What the Future Holds Dr. Seth Flam CEO, HealthFusion Presented by We ll begin momentarily Meaningful Use Stage 3: What the Future Holds Dr. Seth Flam CEO, HealthFusion Presented

More information

Practice Director Modified Stage MU Guide 03/17/2016

Practice Director Modified Stage MU Guide 03/17/2016 Table of Contents General Info & Meaningful Use Report....4-7 Measures..........8-62 Objective 1: Protect Electronic Health Information 8 Conduct or Review a security risk analysis Objective 2: Clinical

More information

MEANINGFUL USE STAGE 2

MEANINGFUL USE STAGE 2 MEANINGFUL USE STAGE 2 PHASED-IN IMPLEMENTATION PROCESS DECEMBER 2014 - PREPARATION MONTH Start this process as early as possible WATCH VIDEO TRAINING SESSIONS: (Sessions available starting December 1,

More information

MACRA Implementation: A Review of the Quality Payment Program

MACRA Implementation: A Review of the Quality Payment Program MACRA Implementation: A Review of the Quality Payment Program Neal Logue, Kirk Sadur Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, Region IX, September 15, 2017 Disclaimer This presentation was prepared

More information

Ophthalmology Meaningful Use Attestation Guide 2016 Edition Updated July 2016

Ophthalmology Meaningful Use Attestation Guide 2016 Edition Updated July 2016 Ophthalmology Meaningful Use Attestation Guide 2016 Edition Updated July 2016 Provided by the American Academy of Ophthalmology and the American Academy of Ophthalmic Executives (AAOE), the Academy's practice

More information

PBSI-EHR Off the Charts Meaningful Use in 2016 The Patient Engagement Stage

PBSI-EHR Off the Charts Meaningful Use in 2016 The Patient Engagement Stage PBSI-EHR Off the Charts Meaningful Use in 2016 The Patient Engagement Stage Please note that this document is intended to supplement the information available on the CMS website for Meaningful Use for

More information

Medicaid EHR Incentive Program Health Information Exchange Objective Stage 3 Updated: February 2017

Medicaid EHR Incentive Program Health Information Exchange Objective Stage 3 Updated: February 2017 Medicaid EHR Incentive Program Health Information Exchange Objective Stage 3 Updated: February 2017 The Health Information Exchange (HIE) objective (formerly known as Summary of Care ) is required for

More information

WHITE PAPER. Taking Meaningful Use to the Next Level: What You Need to Know about the MACRA Advancing Care Information Component

WHITE PAPER. Taking Meaningful Use to the Next Level: What You Need to Know about the MACRA Advancing Care Information Component Taking Meaningful Use to the Next Level: What You Need to Know Table of Contents Introduction 1 1. ACI Versus Meaningful Use 2 EHR Certification 2 Reporting Periods 2 Reporting Methods 3 Group Reporting

More information

Texas Medicaid Electronic Health Record (EHR) Incentive Program: Federally Qualified Health Centers (FQHCs)

Texas Medicaid Electronic Health Record (EHR) Incentive Program: Federally Qualified Health Centers (FQHCs) Texas Medicaid Electronic Health Record (EHR) Incentive Program: Federally Qualified Health Centers (FQHCs) Julia Alejandre, Medicaid / CHIP Health IT Jason Phipps, Medicaid / CHIP Health IT July 20, 2012

More information

Meaningful Use Update: Stage 3 and Beyond. Carla McCorkle, Midas+ Solutions CQM Product Lead

Meaningful Use Update: Stage 3 and Beyond. Carla McCorkle, Midas+ Solutions CQM Product Lead Meaningful Use Update: Stage 3 and Beyond Carla McCorkle, Midas+ Solutions CQM Product Lead Objectives Discuss major changes to Meaningful Use program for Stage 3 and impact on hospitals Identify steps

More information

CMS Meaningful Use Proposed Rules Overview May 5, 2015

CMS Meaningful Use Proposed Rules Overview May 5, 2015 CMS Meaningful Use Proposed Rules Overview May 5, 2015 Elisabeth Myers Center for Clinical Standards and Quality Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services Disclaimer» CMS must protect the rulemaking process

More information

MEANINGFUL USE STAGE FOR ELIGIBLE PROVIDERS USING CERTIFIED EMR TECHNOLOGY

MEANINGFUL USE STAGE FOR ELIGIBLE PROVIDERS USING CERTIFIED EMR TECHNOLOGY MEANINGFUL USE STAGE 2 2014 FOR ELIGIBLE PROVIDERS USING CERTIFIED EMR TECHNOLOGY STAGE 2 REQUIREMENTS EPs must meet or qualify for an exclusion to 17 core objectives. EPs must meet 3 of the 6 menu measures.

More information

Medicare & Medicaid EHR Incentive Programs. Stage 2 Final Rule Travis Broome AMIA

Medicare & Medicaid EHR Incentive Programs. Stage 2 Final Rule Travis Broome AMIA Medicare & Medicaid EHR Incentive Programs Stage 2 Final Rule Travis Broome AMIA 9-20-2012 What is in the Rule Changes to Stage 1 of meaningful use Stage 2 of meaningful use New clinical quality measures

More information

Here is what we know. Here is what you can do. Here is what we are doing.

Here is what we know. Here is what you can do. Here is what we are doing. With the repeal of the sustainable growth rate (SGR) behind us, we are moving into a new era of Medicare physician payment under the Medicare Access and CHIP Reauthorization Act (MACRA). Introducing the

More information

CMS Quality Payment Program: Performance and Reporting Requirements

CMS Quality Payment Program: Performance and Reporting Requirements CMS Quality Payment Program: Performance and Reporting Requirements Session #QU1, February 19, 2017 Kristine Martin Anderson, Executive Vice President, Booz Allen Hamilton Colleen Bruce, Lead Associate,

More information

New Hampshire Guidelines for Program Year 2016: Meaningful Use and Clinical Quality Measure Supporting Documents

New Hampshire Guidelines for Program Year 2016: Meaningful Use and Clinical Quality Measure Supporting Documents This document provides New Hampshire Medicaid Office guidelines for Medicaid EHR Incentive Program screenshots and reports that are included as supporting documentation for Meaningful Use (MU), and Clinical

More information

MIPS Advancing Care Information: Tips, Tools and Support Q&A from Live Webinar March 29, 2017

MIPS Advancing Care Information: Tips, Tools and Support Q&A from Live Webinar March 29, 2017 MIPS Advancing Care Information: Tips, Tools and Support Q&A from Live Webinar March 29, 2017 Below are questions that were submitted during the Quality Insights Advancing Care Information webinar on March

More information

Meaningful Use and PCC EHR

Meaningful Use and PCC EHR Meaningful Use and PCC EHR (tim@pcc.com) Users Conference 2016 Agenda MU basics and eligibility How to participate in MU Meeting MU measures in PCC EHR Understanding CQM reporting in PCC EHR Takeaways

More information

Agenda. Surviving the New Program Requirements and the Financial Penalties Under MIPS 9/9/2016. Steps to take to prepare for MIPS

Agenda. Surviving the New Program Requirements and the Financial Penalties Under MIPS 9/9/2016. Steps to take to prepare for MIPS Surviving the New Program Requirements and the Financial Penalties Under MIPS September 2016 Selena Hood Agenda Steps to take to prepare for MIPS Introduction and Evaluation of the Merit-Based Incentive

More information

Meaningful Use and How it Relates to the Quality Payment Program. Erin Dormaier, CHTS-IM, PCMH CCE Transformation Support Services Manager

Meaningful Use and How it Relates to the Quality Payment Program. Erin Dormaier, CHTS-IM, PCMH CCE Transformation Support Services Manager Meaningful Use and How it Relates to the Quality Payment Program Erin Dormaier, CHTS-IM, PCMH CCE Transformation Support Services Manager 1 Timeline EPs EPs can attest for a total of six years Check at

More information

THE ECONOMICS OF MEDICAL PRACTICE UNDER HIPAA/HITECH

THE ECONOMICS OF MEDICAL PRACTICE UNDER HIPAA/HITECH THE ECONOMICS OF MEDICAL PRACTICE UNDER HIPAA/HITECH Gerald Jud E. DeLoss Serene K. Zeni (312) 985-5925 (248) 988-5894 gdeloss@ szeni@ AGENDA 1. Meaningful Use Incentives 2. HIPAA Enforcement and Compliance

More information

MACRA Quality Payment Program

MACRA Quality Payment Program The American College of Surgeons Resources for the New Medicare Physician System Table of Contents Understanding the... 3 Navigating MIPS in 2017... 4 MIPS Reporting: Individuals or Groups... 6 2017: The

More information

Welcome to the MS State Level Registry Companion Guide for

Welcome to the MS State Level Registry Companion Guide for Welcome to the MS State Level Registry Companion Guide for Step 3 Attestation of your EHR This companion guide will assist providers as they move through the MS State Level Registry (MS SLR) online attestation

More information

Meaningful Use: Today and in the Future VMGMA Spring Conference Richmond, VA March 21, 2016

Meaningful Use: Today and in the Future VMGMA Spring Conference Richmond, VA March 21, 2016 Meaningful Use: Today and in the Future VMGMA Spring Conference Richmond, VA March 21, 2016 Agenda-Three Timeframes 2015 Meaningful Use: hardship exception process 2016-2017 Challenging Requirements Made

More information

Frequently Asked Questions

Frequently Asked Questions Frequently Asked Questions Florida Medicaid Electronic Health Record Incentive Program For additional assistance, please contact the Florida EHR Incentive Program Call Center at (855) 231-5472 or email

More information

HITECH Act American Recovery and Reinvestment Act (ARRA) Stimulus Package. HITECH Act Meaningful Use (MU)

HITECH Act American Recovery and Reinvestment Act (ARRA) Stimulus Package. HITECH Act Meaningful Use (MU) Presents Presents: Speaker: Elizabeth Woodcock, MBA, FACMPE, CPC www.elizabethwoodcock.com Speaker: Elizabeth Woodcock, MBA, FACMPE, CPC www.elizabethwoodcock.com HITECH Act Meaningful Use (MU) Definition

More information

Overview of the EHR Incentive Program Stage 2 Final Rule published August, 2012

Overview of the EHR Incentive Program Stage 2 Final Rule published August, 2012 I. Executive Summary and Overview (Pre-Publication Page 12) A. Executive Summary (Page 12) 1. Purpose of Regulatory Action (Page 12) a. Need for the Regulatory Action (Page 12) b. Legal Authority for the

More information

Preparing for the 2018 EHR Medicaid Incentive Payment Program

Preparing for the 2018 EHR Medicaid Incentive Payment Program Preparing for the 2018 EHR Medicaid Incentive Payment Program 1 Illinois Health Information Technology Regional Extension Center (ILHITREC) SUPPORT PROVIDED BY ILHITREC: The Illinois Health Information

More information

Frequently Asked Questions

Frequently Asked Questions Frequently Asked Questions Florida Medicaid Electronic Health Record Incentive Program For additional assistance, please contact the Florida EHR Incentive Program Call Center at (855) 231-5472 or email

More information

Meaningful Use May, 2012

Meaningful Use May, 2012 Meaningful Use May, 2012 Shehnaz Scheyer New Jersey Institute of Technology 211 Warren Street, Newark, NJ 07103 Phone: 973-557-4571 x716 Fax: 973-846-4634 Email: sscheyer@csicorp.net www.njhitec.org Eligible

More information

Transforming Health Care with Health IT

Transforming Health Care with Health IT Transforming Health Care with Health IT Meaningful Use Stage 2 and Beyond Mat Kendall, Director of the Office of Provider Adoption Support (OPAS) March 19 th 2014 The Big Picture Better Healthcare Better

More information

Topic. Level. Meaningful Use. Monday, November 12 3:00PM to 4:15PM

Topic. Level. Meaningful Use. Monday, November 12 3:00PM to 4:15PM Topic Level Presenter(s): Catherine Magnall Dir., Prof. Services Andy Riedel Assoc. Dir., Fed. Initiatives Dr. James Lasaponara, DDS - Clinical Advisor & Consultant Meaningful Use Monday, November 12 3:00PM

More information

Here is what we know. Here is what you can do. Here is what we are doing.

Here is what we know. Here is what you can do. Here is what we are doing. With the repeal of the sustainable growth rate (SGR) behind us, we are moving into a new era of Medicare physician payment under the Medicare Access and CHIP Reauthorization Act (MACRA). Introducing the

More information

Appendix 4 CMS Stage 1 Meaningful Use Requirements Summary Tables 4-1 APPENDIX 4 CMS STAGE 1 MEANINGFUL USE REQUIREMENTS SUMMARY

Appendix 4 CMS Stage 1 Meaningful Use Requirements Summary Tables 4-1 APPENDIX 4 CMS STAGE 1 MEANINGFUL USE REQUIREMENTS SUMMARY Appendix 4 CMS Stage 1 Meaningful Use Requirements Summary Tables 4-1 APPENDIX 4 CMS STAGE 1 MEANINGFUL USE REQUIREMENTS SUMMARY 1. Use CPOE (computerized physician order entry) for medication orders directly

More information

Medicare & Medicaid EHR Incentive Programs. Stage 2 Final Rule Pennsylvania ehealth Initiative All Committee Meeting November 14, 2012

Medicare & Medicaid EHR Incentive Programs. Stage 2 Final Rule Pennsylvania ehealth Initiative All Committee Meeting November 14, 2012 Medicare & Medicaid EHR Incentive Programs Stage 2 Final Rule Pennsylvania ehealth Initiative All Committee Meeting November 14, 2012 What is in the Rule Changes to Stage 1 of meaningful use Stage 2 of

More information