CSA Mobile Application Security Testing (MAST) Initiative

Transcription

1 CSA Mobile Application Security Testing (MAST) Initiative Charter 16 February, 2015

2 INITIATIVE EXECUTIVE OVERVIEW Mobile Applications are becoming an integral part of not just modern enterprises but also of human existence and a huge part of this shift is due to the emergence of cloud computing. Cloud computing has allowed for the instantaneous utilization of applications which imparts tremendous agility to the enterprise. Accompanying such convenience are risk management challenges due to a lack of transparency, leading to security concerns that include applications. The initiative will aim to create a safer cloud eco system for mobile applications by creating systematic approaches to application testing and vetting that helps integrate and introduce quality control and compliance to mobile application development and management. The initiative hopes that more research into mobile application security vetting and testing will help reduce the risk and security threats that organizations and individuals expose themselves to by using mobile applications. Initiative objectives Specific fields of action of the initiative could include: To develop a whitepaper for vetting and certification scheme based off the NIST Special Publication : Vetting the Security of Mobile Applications ; To develop a certification scheme for mobile application security with a maturity model; To develop a vetting scheme (i.e. approval rejection basis) for mobile applications; To develop resources for addressing potential security issues or an incident during certification period. Scope The app security testing and vetting process uses both static and dynamic analysis to analyse the application. The testing and vetting process covers permissions, exposed communications, potentially dangerous functionality, application collusion, obfuscation, excessive power consumption and traditional software vulnerabilities. The testing covers the internal communications such as debug flag and activities and external communication such as GPS, NFC access as well as checking the links that is written in the source code. In addition to security testing and vetting, the project will also develop processes and procedures for security incidence response. Copyright 2015 Cloud Security Alliance. All rights reserved. 1

3 Initiative Membership Structure and Responsibilities The MAST Initiative is structured as follows: two co chairs (and their alternates) working group members a representative of the CSA / subject matter expert a representative of the CSA / OCF Secretariat Only CSA Corporate Members are eligible for the role of co chairs. If a corporate member is not available for nomination or an individual with a unique skill set is required, an exception can be filed for non member nominees by contacting exec@cloudsecurityalliance.org. The role of MAST co chairs entails the following responsibilities: Define the work plan for each year (e.g., meetings and expected deliverables) Ensure progress of work according to the work plan Report to the CSA Executive Team on execution risks and suggest possible solutions Convene meetings when necessary and act as Chairperson of MAST Initiative. Lead the preparation of draft deliverables, or identify a suitable person within the MAST Initiative who will take the role of main editor/rapporteur of the deliverable Ensure that guidance provided in the current MAST Initiative charter is followed Ensure that relevant documents are circulated to MAST Initiative members The role of CSA Subject Matter Expert(s) entails the following responsibilities: Can be either a CSA Staff member or an expert nominated by the CSA Provide subject matter expertise, in the forms of contribution to deliverables and advice to the MAST Initiative co chairs The role of CSA Secretariat entails the following responsibilities: Will be a CSA Staff member Provide secretariat and project management support to the co chairs (e.g. create the virtual shared workspace, manage the mailing list, collect input from members, assist the preparation of the work plan, arrange for logistics of both virtual and physical meetings, support meeting minutes preparation, etc.) Copyright 2015 Cloud Security Alliance. All rights reserved. 2

4 The role of MAST Initiative Members entails the following responsibilities: Contribute to the definition of the work plan Contribute to the definition of the FSSP deliverables Sub-Work Groups Ad hoc sub work groups comprised of subject matter experts may be formed to plan or execute any related outreach, awareness or research opportunities. Such sub working groups shall report directly to the main working group. The initiative may also choose to allow resource sharing between cloud communities and other CSA working groups to assist in the timely completion of projects, programs and other activities needed to support/enable the initiative s defined body of work. Communications Methods Infrastructure & Resource Requirements The initiative will be composed of CSA volunteers; it will have a steering committee and co chairs. The initiative will require typical project management, online workspace and technical writing assistance. Work Group Conference Calls and In-person Meetings Th e initiative w ill hold conference calls no less than bi monthly. Attendance by the Principal or Alternate is required. The Alternate must have full authority to act on behalf of the Principal if the Principal is absent. In person meetings will happen once a year in a location to be determined. Decision-making Procedures Definition of a majority 1) A majority shall consist of more than half of the members present and voting. 2) In computing a majority, members abstaining shall not be taken into account. 3) In case of a tie, a proposal or amendment shall be considered rejected. 4) For the purpose under this Charter, a member present and voting shall be a member voting for or against a proposal, including proxy representative. Proxy where authority is delegated through a written statement or non repudiated should be declared and inspected for validity by the chair before voting starts. Abstentions of more than fifty percent Copyright 2015 Cloud Security Alliance. All rights reserved. 3

5 1) When the number of abstentions exceeds half the number of votes cast (for, against, abstentions), consideration of the matter under discussion shall be postponed to a later meeting, at which time abstentions shall not be taken into account. Voting procedures 1) The voting procedures are as follows: a) By a show of hands as a general rule unless a secret ballot has been requested; if at least two members, present and entitled to vote, so request before the beginning of the vote and if a secret ballot under b) has not been requested, or if the procedure under a) shows no clear majority b) By a secret ballot, if at least five of the members present and entitled to vote so request before the beginning of the vote (online voting is applicable) 2) The Chair(s) shall, before commencing a vote, observe any request as to the manner in which the voting shall be conducted, and then shall formally announce the voting procedure to be applied and the issue to be submitted to the vote. The Chair(s) shall then declare the beginning of the vote and, when the vote has been taken, shall announce the results. 3) In the case of a secret ballot, the secretariat shall at once take steps to ensure the secrecy of the vote. Operations Advisory The CSA Working Group will be advised by the CSA Subject Matter Expert (SME) Advisory Council, International Standardization Council (ISC), and CSA Executive Team to ensure that the research under this initiative is within the scope of the CSA and aligns with other industry partner research. The research will remain unique to industry and make reference to any redundant or replicated works. Research Lifecycle The CSA Working Group will follow the development of the CSA research lifecycle for all projects and initiatives: Peer Review / We will seek CSA s help in reaching out to peers for reviewing our charter and other documented activities of the initiative. Deliverables/Activities Q o Deliverables: Charter Copyright 2015 Cloud Security Alliance. All rights reserved. 4

6 Q o Deliverables: Project plan Q Q o Deliverables: MAST Whitepaper Draft 1.0 o Activities: MAST Whitepaper Open Peer Review Q o Deliverables: MAST Whitepaper Draft 2.0, STAR Mobile Certification Framework Charter o Activities: MAST Whitepaper Open Peer Review Q o Deliverable: MAST pilot kick off, STAR Mobile Certification Framework Draft 1.0 Q Q o Deliverables: End of MAST pilot, STAR Mobile Certification Framework Draft 2.0 Q o Activities: STAR Mobile Certification Framework Open Peer Review Q o Deliverables: Release of STAR Mobile Certification Framework Duration The initiative will operate until Q for its chartered deliverables, and at that time consider charter renewal. Charter Revision History Feb 2015 Mar 2016 Copyright 2015 Cloud Security Alliance. All rights reserved. 5