Size: px
Start display at page:

Download ""

Transcription

1 Formula 1 Class

2 Welcome from the Chairman Dear F1 in Schools Team I would like to give you a warm welcome to the challenge and hope you enjoy the coming months working as a team to compete in this life changing experience. This document has been ratified and approved for release by the F1 in Schools International Rules Committee. Any approved revisions will be officially released as supplementary regulations through the F1 in Schools website. This is accessible via see rules and regulations in the downloads and resources area. Feedback is welcome and should be sent to rules@f1inschools.co.uk. Good luck for the season. Andrew Denford Founder and Chairman F1 in Schools F1 in Schools Ltd. Page 2 of July 2015

3 Amendments made on, [Insert date here], will be indicated thus (using red underlined text). CONTENTS PREFACE SUMMARY OF REVISIONS FOLLOWING 2014 REVIEW... 6 WHAT IS THE F1 IN SCHOOLS TECHNOLOGY CHALLENGE?... 7 CLASS OF ENTRY... 7 REGIONAL FINALS... 7 WORLD FINALS - WHERE COULD F1 IN SCHOOLS TAKE YOU?... 8 GETTING STARTED... 9 GETTING STARTED CONTINUED AWARDS AND SCHEMES THE DESIGN BRIEF DESIGN CONSIDERATIONS MANUFACTURING CONSIDERATIONS ARTICLE C1 DEFINITIONS C1.1 ARTICLE C1.2 PARC FERME C1.3 COMPETITION SCHEDULE C1.4 KEY PERFORMANCE INDICATORS (KPI S) C1.5 CAR RACE TIME VALUE C1.6 TOTAL RACE TIME VALUE C1.7 REACTION TIME VALUE C1.8 PROJECT ELEMENTS C1.9 ENGINEERING DRAWINGS C1.10 LAUNCH ENERGY RECOVERY SYSTEM (LERS) ARTICLE C2 GENERAL INFORMATION C2.1 COMPETING TEAMS C2.2 TEAM RESPONSIBILITIES C2.3 ROLE AND RESPONSIBILITY OF SUPERVISING TEACHER / ADULT C2.4 REGULATIONS DOCUMENTS C2.5 INTERPRETATION OF THE REGULATIONS C2.6 SUPPLEMENTARY COMPETITION REGULATIONS C2.7 DESIGN IDEAS AND REGULATION COMPLIANCE QUERIES C2.8 TEAM PARTNERSHIPS C2.9 MANDATORY PROJECT ELEMENTS REQUIRED FOR REGIONAL AND NATIONAL FINAL ENTRY C2.10 TEAM REGISTRATION AT THE EVENT C2.11 SUBMISSION OF F1 IN SCHOOLS CAR(S) C2.12 PROJECT ELEMENTS TO BE RETAINED BY F1 IN SCHOOLS ARTICLE C3 COMPETITION AND JUDGING FORMAT C3.1 COMPETITION PROGRAM C3.2 JUDGING CATEGORIES C3.3 JUDGING SCORE CARDS F1 in Schools Ltd. Page 3 of July 2015

4 C3.4 UK NATIONAL CHAMPIONS C3.5 POINT ALLOCATIONS C3.6 CRITICAL REGULATIONS ARTICLE C4 SCRUTINEERING JUDGING (170 POINTS) C4.1 WHAT WILL BE JUDGED? C4.2 TEAM PREPARATION C4.3 WHO NEEDS TO ATTEND? C4.4 JUDGING PROCESS / PROCEDURE ARTICLE C5 DESIGN & ENGINEERING JUDGING (180 POINTS) C5.1 WHAT WILL BE JUDGED? C5.2 TEAM PREPARATION C5.3 WHO NEEDS TO ATTEND? C5.4 JUDGING PROCESS / PROCEDURE C5.5 DESIGN & ENGINEERING PORTFOLIO REQUIREMENTS ARTICLE C6 ENTERPRISE JUDGING (180 POINTS) FORMULA 1 CLASS ONLY C6.1 WHAT WILL BE JUDGED? C6.2 TEAM PREPARATION C6.3 WHO NEEDS TO ATTEND? C6.4 JUDGING PROCESS / PROCEDURE C6.5 ENTERPRISE PORTFOLIO REQUIREMENTS C6.6 PIT DISPLAY SETUP AND PARAMETERS ARTICLE C7 MARKETING JUDGING (40 POINTS) C7.1 WHAT WILL BE JUDGED? C7.2 TEAM PREPARATION C7.3 JUDGING PROCESS / PROCEDURE C7.4 MARKETING & SOCIAL MEDIA STRATEGY DOCUMENT REQUIREMENTS ARTICLE C8 VERBAL PRESENTATION JUDGING (180 POINTS) C8.1 WHAT WILL BE JUDGED? C8.2 TEAM PREPARATION C8.3 WHO NEEDS TO ATTEND? C8.4 JUDGING PROCESS / PROCEDURE C8.5 VERBAL PRESENTATION JUDGING PROVISIONS C8.6 VERBAL PRESENTATION VIDEO RECORDINGS ARTICLE C9 RACING (250 POINTS) C9.1 WHAT RACES WILL BE CONDUCTED? C9.2 TEAM PREPARATION C9.3 WHO NEEDS TO ATTEND? C9.4 REACTION RACE PROCEDURE C9.5 REACTION RACE SCORING C9.6 DNF (DID NOT FINISH) RACE RESULTS C9.7 FALSE STARTS C9.8 TRACK, TETHER LINE AND TIMING SYSTEM INFORMATION C9.9 DECELERATION SYSTEM C9.10 CO2 RACE CYLINDERS F1 in Schools Ltd. Page 4 of July 2015

5 C9.11 CAR WEIGHT CHECKS C9.12 JUDGES HANDLING CARS C9.13 LAUNCH ENERGY RECOVERY SYSTEM (LERS) ARTICLE C10 CAR REPAIRS AND CAR SERVICING C10.1 CAR REPAIRS ARTICLE C11 PROTESTS C11.1 SUBMITTING A PROTEST C11.2 UNSUCCESSFUL PROTESTS ARTICLE C12 JUDGES C12.1 OVERVIEW C12.2 CHAIR OF JUDGES C12.3 THE JUDGING TEAMS C12.4 JUDGING DECISIONS ARTICLE C13 - AWARDS C13.1 AWARDS CELEBRATION C13.2 PARTICIPATION RECOGNITION C13.3 LIST OF AWARDS TO BE PRESENTED APPENDIX SCRUTINEERING JUDGING SCORE CARD DESIGN & ENGINEERING SCORE CARD ENTERPRISE SCORE CARD MARKETING & SOCIAL MEDIA STRATEGY SCORE CARD VERBAL PRESENTATION SCORE CARD SPECIFICATIONS SCORE CARD PROJECT ELEMENT SUBMISSION CHECKLIST F1 in Schools Ltd. Page 5 of July 2015

6 PREFACE SUMMARY OF REVISIONS FOLLOWING 2014 REVIEW This section provides an overview of all articles that have been revised from the 2014 Competition Regulations. C1.13 Launch Energy Recovery System (LERS) definition added C2.10 Mandatory project elements updated C2.2 Returning students criteria added C C C Portfolio definition revised Engineering drawings revised Use of a translator for verbal presentations updated C2.12 Submission of project elements revised C3.2 Judging categories updated C3.5 Point allocations updated C3.6.3 The critical Technical Regulation updated C4.1 Scrutineering what will be judged updated C4.4 Judging process / procedure updated C5.1 Design & Engineering what will be judged updated C5.4 Judging process / procedure updated C5.5 Design & Engineering Portfolio requirements added C6.1 Enterprise - What will be judged updated C6.2 Team preparation updated C6.4 Judging process / procedure updated C6.5 Enterprise Portfolio requirements updated C7.3 Judging process / procedure revised C9.4 Racing procedure and scoring updated C9.13 New deceleration system added C9.17 Launch Energy Recovery System (LERS) added C12.3 The judging teams updated C Awards revised C13.4 List of awards to be presented updated F1 in Schools Ltd. Page 6 of July 2015

7 What is the F1 in Schools Technology Challenge? The F1 in Schools Technology Challenge is a multi-disciplinary challenge open to all secondary schools, sixth form colleges, colleges of further education and other organised youth groups. Teams of 3-6 students aged 9 to 19 deploy CAD/CAM software to collaborate, design, analyse, manufacture, test and then race miniature compressed air powered model F1 cars. Teams of 3 6 students are judged on car speed, as well as supporting evidence of their design, verbal presentation and marketing display stand in the pits. Class of Entry The competition is split into 2 classes which are all judged at a Regional Final. Each team taking part in the challenge must choose the class they would like to enter before registering to compete. A school is allowed to enter a maximum of 3 teams which can be a mixture of classes. Rookie Class age group This class is a simplified version of the Formula 1 Class and is aimed at new schools taking part in the challenge for the first time. Teams and students entering the Rookie Class are only allowed to compete in the competition as a Rookie Class team for 1 year (their first year). After that, they can only compete in the Formula 1 Class for future years. Please download the Rookie Class UK Technical Regulations from to take part in this class. Formula 1 Class age group The Formula 1 Class is the original challenge with advanced regulations to the Rookie Class. Please download the Formula 1 Class UK Technical Rules and Regulations from to take part in this class. Regional Finals 10 Regional Finals will be held across the UK where student teams will compete against each other to win a place at the UK National Final to determine who will be crowned the 2015/16 UK National Champions and invited to compete at the F1 in Schools World Finals Scotland Northern Ireland North East North West Yorkshire & Humberside North Wales Central South Wales South West London & South East F1 in Schools Ltd. Page 7 of July 2015

8 World Finals - Where Could F1 in Schools Take You? National Champions from over 44 countries around the World are invited to compete at the World Finals where they will go head to head to become the F1 in Schools World Champions and lift the Bernie Ecclestone F1 in Schools World Champions Trophy. The challenge reached and exceeded all expectations, with 38 teams competing in the 2014 World Finals in Abu Dhabi and 44 teams due to compete in the 2015 World Finals in Singapore for what will be a spectacular competition! The following winning teams from the UK National Finals will be invited to compete in the 2016 World Finals Podium Winners Formula 1 Class UK National Champions representing the UK Runners Up (2 nd place overall) 3 rd Place overall Collaboration only Rookie Class UK National Champions Highest placed team if not already among the podium winners 1 st place Scottish 1 st place Welsh 1 st place Northern Irish 1 st Place English Please note that from 2015 any student that has previously taken part in a World Finals will not be eligible to take part in future World Finals, however, students who have previously attended a World Finals as a collaboration team will be allowed to compete a further time at a forthcoming World Finals. Claire Williams - Deputy Team Principal Williams Martini Racing "I am delighted to be a Patron for F1 in Schools. The tasks that all participating students have to go through to establish their own Formula One team during the Challenge not only exposes to them the type of work required for creating, producing and running a team such as Williams but also equips them with a variety of life skills. It will be fascinating for us to see first-hand what the designers, engineers and marketeers of the future come up with year after year F1 in Schools Ltd. Page 8 of July 2015

9 Getting Started F1 in Schools, the Formula 1 Technology Challenge Flowchart Rules & Regulations published on-line ( Teachers and students to read the RULES & REGULATIONS documents Teacher to enrol team(s) in 2015/16 season on-line ( Teacher to register attendance at a regional final. (T+C s can be found online) Schools sent details of their Regional Final - Information to be posted on Schools to confirm attendance at REGIONAL FINAL in January & February st, 2 nd F1 Class & 1 st place Rookie Class at Regional Finals invited to 2016 UK NATIONAL FINAL F1 in Schools WORLD FINALS F1 in Schools Ltd. Page 9 of July 2015

10 Getting Started Continued How to obtain software, hardware and consumables. If you would like to purchase any equipment for the challenge please contact: Denford Limited, F1 Sales, Armytage Road Brighouse West Yorkshire United Kingdom T: E: W: Consumables Consumables for the challenge can be purchased from CAD Software Autodesk and F1 in Schools partnered to offer design tools to help prepare next-generation designers. Students and schools participating in F1 in Schools now have access to an extensive portfolio of Autodesk 3D design software free of charge. Please request this via our website: Manufacturing Centres, Test Centres and Race Centres All details of accredited manufacturing, test and race centres are posted on the useful links page of the F1 in Schools website ( Enquiries and Questions All questions and queries about the F1 in Schools Technology Challenge should be ed to: Registration IMPORTANT - Please register your teams online at to attend a UK Regional Final as soon as you have allocated your job descriptions. ENSURE YOU READ AND CHECK THE RULES VERY THOROUGHLY BEFORE BEGINNING THE DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION OF YOUR F1 CAR F1 in Schools Ltd. Page 10 of July 2015

11 Awards and Schemes F1 in Schools acknowledges the importance of recognising the achievement of participants involved in F1 in Schools and does so by providing: All young people who attend the Regional and National Finals with a certificate supplied by EAL which outlines their work in the competition. All supporting staff who attend the Regional and National Finals with a certificate which outlines their contributions during the challenge. Further accreditation can be obtained through registering for the following awards: CREST Awards - The British Science Association offers their CREST Silver level award to all young people participating in F1 in Schools. CREST is a nationally recognised award which is also recognised by industry and employers. You can find out more about CREST on their website, The Duke of Edinburgh Scheme - Within the skills section of the scheme, the young people participating in F1 in Schools will be able to gain a Duke of Edinburgh Award. To find out more about the Duke of Edinburgh Scheme go to, Industrial Cadets - The Industrial Cadets (IC) programme aims to raise awareness of local career opportunities in the industrial and manufacturing sectors, developing employability skills and raising the aspirations of young people. Student s aged taking part in F1 in Schools will be given the opportunity to become an Industrial Cadet and gain an insight into industrial and manufacturing companies such as Nissan to raise awareness of local career opportunities in these sectors. To find out more about Industrial Cadets go to, University Scholarship University College London offer 2 bursaries to the UK National Champions team F1 in Schools Ltd. Page 11 of July 2015

12 The Design Brief You are the Formula 1 Team commissioned to design, construct and race the fastest Formula 1 car of the future, driven by compact compressed air powerplants. In order to enter the championship, you must allocate job roles to the members of your group. Ideally, one role should be allocated to each person. However, you may have to double up on your role and responsibilities, depending on the number of people you have available. The following job roles are examples of what could be covered by the members of your team: Team Manager (maximum 1 person) This person is responsible for managing the team, ensuring that the primary and back-up cars are ready for the competition. The team manager works closely with all members of the team, offering assistance where necessary. Resources Manager This person organises time, materials and equipment for designing and making the cars. They could be responsible for developing ideas regarding team marketing. The resources manager will need to liaise with all members to check tasks are progressing on time and offer additional help if needed. Manufacturing Engineer This person is responsible for advising team members on the manufacture of the car and the constraints of the machining process. Manufacturing engineers will need to liaise with the design engineers to report and help solve any problems with the construction of the car. Design Engineer This role is responsible for the styling and aerodynamic performance of the car design. Design engineers will need to liaise with the manufacturing engineers to ensure their ideas can be realised. Graphic Designer This person could be responsible for producing the colour schemes applied to the vehicle, including any special sponsorship decals, together with the final graphic renderings and any additional team marketing materials. The graphic designer will need to liaise with the design engineer to ensure any schemes will fit the shape of the vehicle and the resources manager for additional marketing development. There are so many tasks that must be mastered, in order to design, manufacture, prepare and finally, enter a car for racing. Teamwork will be vital to your success. A real F1 team succeeds because all the people learn to work together and support each other. Remember, no one person is more important than other members in the team F1 in Schools Ltd. Page 12 of July 2015

13 Design Considerations Design Preparation Before beginning to design your car, you will need: A 3D CAD solid modelling software package at your school/college. Autodesk can be obtained from our website free of charge. A design template suitable for the official F1 Model Block or balsa wood block. The dimensions of this are available in the appendix of the Technical Regulations Hopefully, an endless supply of ideas! Training CAD packages will help you draw and develop your ideas in 3D. Of course, as with most drawing packages, it takes time to learn how to use them. Your technology teacher should be able to show you how the software works, but members of your team will need to spend some time exploring the software, so you can see what it can do and how it can help you design your F1 car. A wealth of Autodesk tutorial videos specific to the F1 in Schools competition are available via our website. Research Investigate existing F1 car designs. Your teacher may be able to help you use the internet to find out the latest developments occurring in the world of F1 design. Concentrate your research on areas that could help your team, for example, aerodynamics and car body designs, then try to apply the principles to your own ideas. Testing Your team may want to consider testing a variety of car designs, or car parts, in a wind and/or smoke tunnel to evaluate their aerodynamic performance. Autodesk Flow Design, a piece of virtual wind tunnel software is available to download free of charge, please visit Manufacturing Considerations If you choose to purchase an F1 in Schools Car Kit you will receive an Official F1 Model Block, a set of 4 wheels, 2 axles and some glass paper, this is the minimum that you will need to enter the challenge. Please note that your car design template must be at least 10mm shorter at one end, compared to the actual F1 Model block (or balsa blank). You will not be able to machine to the extreme ends of the official F1 Model Block (or balsa blank) since they are sometimes used for attaching the CNC machine fixtures. Damage could occur if the cutting tool hits any of these fixtures. The fixture is used to stop the official F1 Model Block (or balsa blank) moving whilst being machined. It also allows the block to be accurately repositioned. Please note however, that some machines will process with only one cut, others may require two or more cuts and therefore you will need to take this into account when you are designing your car. Once machined, you can smooth down the official F1 Model Block (or balsa blank) design and finish with primer and paint. Note that only a limited amount of hand finishing to the body is allowed. You could also decorate the car body with any sponsorship stickers, decals, advertising or colour schemes F1 in Schools Ltd. Page 13 of July 2015

14 ARTICLE C1 DEFINITIONS C1.1 Article Each section in all documentation will be referred to as an Article which brings F1 in Schools documents in line with the Fédération Internationale de l'automobile (FIA) documentation. C1.2 Parc Ferme A secure area where all primary and back-up race cars are held to prevent unauthorised handling but to allow technical inspections to be conducted by the Judges. (Literal meaning in French of closed park ). C1.3 Competition Schedule The competition program will detail the schedule of judging activities for all teams. C1.4 Key performance indicators (KPI s) These are portions of text that feature on the scorecards within a corresponding points range. The KPI s describe the type of evidence the Judges will be looking for in order to score the team appropriately. C1.5 Car race time value A car race time value is the actual time taken for a F1 in Schools car to travel the track from start to finish, measured from the instant the launch pod fires to when the car breaks the finish line timing beam. In the case of reaction races, the car race time value is calculated as the total race time value displayed on the electronic start gate minus the reaction time value displayed for that race. C1.6 Total race time value The total race time value is displayed in the total time field on the electronic start gate at the conclusion of every race. This time is the sum of the car race time value and any reaction time value displayed on the electronic start gate. During time trial races where the automatic launch mode is used, the reaction time value is displayed as 0. C1.7 Reaction time value A reaction time value is the time recorded from the instant the five (5) start lights extinguish to the instant the start trigger is activated by the driver. This value is displayed in the reaction time field on the electronic start gate. C1.8 Project elements These are any materials and resources that the team presents as part of its entry for any judging activity. C1.9 Engineering Drawings CAD produced drawings which should be such that, along with relevant CAM programs, could theoretically be used to manufacture the fully assembled car by a third party. Such drawings include all relevant dimensions, tolerances and material information. F1 in Schools engineering drawings include detail to specifically identify and prove compliance for the virtual cargo and wing surfaces. C1.10 Launch Energy Recovery System (LERS) A Launch Energy Recovery System is formed by the addition of a device designed by the team to the launch pod within the approved LERS operating zone. These systems are optional racing aids used by teams as governed by the race rules detailed within the F1 in Schools Ltd. Page 14 of July 2015

15 Competition Regulations. A LERS is separate to the car assembly and gas canister and as such only makes contact with the launch pod. ARTICLE C2 GENERAL INFORMATION C2.1 Competing teams C2.1.1 Each team must consist of a minimum of 3 students to a maximum of 6. C2.1.2 C2.1.3 C2.1.4 A Rookie Team is defined as a team of students who are all competing in the 2015/16 season for the first time. Only members of the official competing team (maximum 6) are permitted to wear the team s uniform During the competition, only the official core team members (maximum of 6) can represent the team at registration, Pit Display set up, Scrutineering review, Verbal Presentation, Design & Engineering judging and Enterprise judging, racing, on-stage presentations and any direct communication with the Chair of Judges or Event/Competition Directors. C2.2 Team responsibilities C2.2.1 Teams must read the UK Technical Regulations carefully to ensure their cars comply with those regulations. C2.2.2 C2.2.3 C2.2.4 Teams must read the UK Competition Regulations (this document) carefully to ensure that all project elements satisfy these regulations and that they understand the requirements and procedures for all aspects of the competition and judging. During the competition it is the team s responsibility to ensure that team members are present at the correct time and location for all scheduled activities. Security of the pit display and its elements is the team s responsibility during competition. C2.3 Role and responsibility of supervising teacher / adult. C2.3.1 All supervising teachers / adults should carefully read and understand the conditions for entry to an F1 in Schools event and must have explained all relevant information to their students. C2.3.2 C2.3.3 It is the primary responsibility of any supervising teacher/adult to ensure duty of care/well-being for all their student team members. Any concerns arising during the event in relation to this should be brought to the attention of F1 in Schools immediately. The supervising teacher/adult is permitted to be present during any judging activity with their team but, must not interact in any way with the student team, judges or judging process. Any incident considered inappropriate will be brought to the attention of the Chair of Judges and penalty point may be applied. C2.4 Regulations documents C2.4.1 F1 in Schools issues the regulations, their revisions and any amendments made. C2.4.2 Competition Regulations - (this document). The Competition Regulations document is mainly concerned with regulations and procedures directly related to judging and the competition event. Competition Regulation articles have a C prefix F1 in Schools Ltd. Page 15 of July 2015

16 C2.4.3 Technical Regulations a document separate to this one which is mainly concerned with those regulations that are directly related to F1 in Schools car design and manufacture. Technical Regulation articles have a T prefix. C2.5 Interpretation of the regulations C2.5.1 The final text of these regulations is in English, should any dispute arise over their interpretation, the regulation text, diagrams and any related definitions should be considered together for the purpose of interpretation. C2.5.2 Text clarification - any frequently asked questions that are deemed by F1 in School to be related to text needing clarification will be answered. The question and the clarification will be published to all teams at the same time. C2.6 Supplementary competition regulations Other documents may be issued by F1 in Schools that provide teams with further logistic and other important event information. Any supplementary regulations will be issued to all lead teachers and team managers, where the team manager has supplied F1 in Schools with a contact address. C2.7 Design ideas and regulation compliance queries Teams are not permitted to seek a ruling from F1 in Schools or any competition official or judge before the event as to whether a design idea complies with the regulations. Rulings will only be made by the Judges at an event. Design compliance to the regulations forms part of the competition. As in Formula 1, innovation is encouraged and F1 in Schools teams may also find, sometimes controversial ways, of creating design features by pushing the boundaries in order to get an extra competitive edge. C2.8 Team partnerships C2.8.1 F1 in Schools teams are encouraged to develop mentoring partnerships with businesses, industry or higher education organisations throughout their project. C2.8.2 C2.8.3 C2.8.4 All design work, text and scripting for all project elements presented for assessment must be wholly undertaken and created by the team. This includes all CAD and CAM data, electronic portfolio and graphic content. All aspects of any partnerships should also be represented in the team s portfolio. For project elements produced utilising some outside assistance, teams should be able to demonstrate to the judges a high level of understanding of, and justification for, any of the processes used. Common sense will prevail for project elements or components that a team has purchased from a supplier. E.g. bearings, screw eye, display hardware. Teams should be able to explain and justify why a specific component was selected / purchased over other similar available components. C2.9 Mandatory project elements required for Regional and National Final entry The following is a summary of the mandatory elements required for judging: Two (2) identical F1 in Schools cars including all optional replacement components One (1) Design & Engineering Portfolio One (1) Enterprise Portfolio A Pit Display A 5 minute (Regional) / 8 Minutes (UK National Final) Verbal Presentation with laptop Project Elements Submission Checklist which must include the official F1 Model Block holographic sticker if applicable F1 in Schools Ltd. Page 16 of July 2015

17 The above list is detailed in the remainder of ARTICLE C2. C2.9.1 C2.9.2 Cars - each team must produce a minimum of one (1) race car for Regionals and two (2) identical F1 in Schools cars - a primary race car, an identical back-up for the UK National Final. Portfolios - each team must produce the following Two (2) hard copy 10 page maximum portfolios presented in an A3 (or similar) sized format for exhibition within the teams pit display. One Design & Engineering portfolio and one Enterprise portfolio - Refer to ARTICLE C5 & C6 of these regulations along with the Design & Engineering and Enterprise judging scorecard for portfolio specification and content requirements. C2.9.3 C2.9.4 C2.9.5 Pit display - each team will be provided with a dedicated exhibition style space for setup of their pit display elements. The specific style and size of this space will be announced in supplementary event competition regulations. Refer to ARTICLE C6 for further pit display specifications and content requirements. Verbal Presentation - teams will be required to deliver a Verbal Presentation in relation to their project to the Judges. The presentation must not last longer than 5 minutes (8 at the UK Nationals). Teams must bring their own laptop with any slide show or other multimedia files that need to be shown as part of their Verbal Presentation. Project Element Submission Checklist teams must complete the checklist (please refer to Appendix iii) and attached their official F1 Model Block holographic sticker (if applicable) for submission at the event. C2.10 Team registration at the event C Teams will be required to register with F1 in Schools once arriving for the event. At this registration, teams will be issued with a detailed event welcome pack. The student team manager and supervising teacher for each team should attend. C The Regional or National accreditation material issued will include the official F1 in Schools 30x15mm car decals, for teams that have not manufactured their own. These decals must be fitted to each car by the team following registration and prior to the submission of their project elements. C2.11 Submission of F1 in Schools car(s) Once cars have been submitted, they are considered as being in parc fermé. All cars submitted must be race ready! C2.12 Project elements to be retained by F1 in Schools. It is a condition of the F1 in Schools National Final entry that each team permits F1 in Schools to retain 1 x race car, usually the nominated back-up car and portfolio(s). This can be submitted electronically if the team wishes to keep the printed version F1 in Schools Ltd. Page 17 of July 2015

18 ARTICLE C3 COMPETITION AND JUDGING FORMAT C3.1 Competition program C3.1.1 Each team will be judged as per the competition program. The competition program will be formulated by F1 in Schools to best and fairly accommodate all judging and other competition activities. Teams will rotate around judging activities as per this program, with each rotation usually of 15 minutes in duration. C3.1.2 Judging Streams the competition program will normally be divided into two parallel judging streams (Stream A and Stream B), to help ensure quality judging time intervals within the event time constraints. A number of strategies are implemented within the judging process, including judge briefings and judge reviews for crossmoderation to ensure there is consistency across the judging streams. C3.2 Judging categories There are six (6) main judging categories, each with its own team of judges and specified judging activities as detailed in further articles. Scrutineering Judging Design & Engineering Judging Enterprise Judging Verbal Presentation Judging Marketing Judging Racing C3.3 Judging score cards The F1 in Schools judging score cards provide detailed information in relation to what the Judges will be looking for. They include key performance indicators which are referred to by the judges in awarding points during judging activities. The 2015/16 judging score cards can be found in the appendix of this document. READING THE SCORE CARDS CAREFULLY IS IMPORTANT. THEY PROVIDE CRITICAL INFORMATION FOR TEAMS AS TO WHAT NEEDS TO BE PRESENTED FOR EACH JUDGING CATEGORY. C3.4 UK National Champions The F1 in Schools UK National Champions trophy will be awarded to the team with the highest total score, sum of all judging categories (ARTICLE C3.5). In the case of a tied points score, the team with the highest racing score will be determined the winner. THE CHAIR OF JUDGE S DECISION IS FINAL F1 in Schools Ltd. Page 18 of July 2015

19 C3.5 Point allocations Points will be awarded to teams across six (6) categories in the Formula 1 Class with maximum possible scores as detailed in the following table; Scrutineering Judging Specifications Engineering Drawings Rendering Quality of Finish and Assembly 110 points 20 points 20 points 20 points Design & Engineering Judging Design & Engineering Portfolio 180 points Enterprise Judging Enterprise Portfolio Only Assessment Team Identity Pit Display Marketing Judging Marketing & Sponsorship Strategy Social Media Strategy 100 points 20 points 60 points 20 points 20 points Verbal Presentation Judging Technique Composition Subject Matter 80 points 40 points 60 points Racing Time Trials Reaction Racing TOTAL 110 points 110 points 970 points C3.6 Critical regulations C3.6.1 Some of the Technical Regulations have been identified as being critical regulations. If, following scrutineering and time given to rectify any infringement (Refer C4.5), a team s primary race car is judged as being NON-COMPLIANT with any critical technical regulation, they will be INELIGIBLE for the following awards: 1 st Place (National Champions) Fastest Car Best Engineered Car C3.6.2 If the back-up race car is used for any races, it must also comply with all critical Technical Regulations for the team to be eligible for these awards F1 in Schools Ltd. Page 19 of July 2015

20 ARTICLE C4 SCRUTINEERING JUDGING (170 points) C4.1 What will be judged? Scrutineering judging is a detailed inspection process where BOTH the primary and back-up (optional at The Regional Finals but compulsory at National Final) race cars plus the optional replacement components are assessed for compliance with the F1 in Schools Technical Regulations. The Engineering drawings, rendering and quality of finish & assembly will also be assessed. Refer to the scrutineering and specification judging scorecard for scoring details. C4.1.1 C4.2 Team preparation Optional replacement components must be identical to those fitted to both the primary and back-up cars and must be submitted with the car. Only the following replacement components are permitted: Rear wing/support structure maximum of three (3) Front wing/support structure and / or nose cone maximum of three (3) Wheel/wheel support system maximum of three (3) car sets Submitted replacement components that are determined by the judges to not be identical to that which is fitted to the car will not be allowed to be used. Submitted components will remain in parc fermé and only be handed back to the team if needed during racing and / or car servicing. Teams must ensure that their primary and back-up race cars and any optional replacement components are complete and ready for specification judging before they are submitted. Notice is also drawn to the critical technical regulations, refer ARTICLE C3.6. C4.3 Who needs to attend? Scrutineering is a closed activity that no team member or supervising teacher may attend. C4.4 Judging process / procedure Teams begin specification judging with a full allocation of 110 points. Any infringements of the Technical Regulation articles, on either car, will result in point s being deducted as detailed in the Technical Regulations. There are two (2) parts to the specification judging process. A. Specifications this is conducted within the confines of parc fermé, where the specification Judges will scrutineer both cars and optional replacement components for compliance to the Technical Regulations. A series of specially manufactured gauges will be used to broadly check compliance. Accurate measuring tools, such as vernier callipers will then be used to closely inspect any dimensions found to be near to dimensional limits per the initial gauge inspection. Scrutineering commences as cars and optional replacement components are submitted. B. Engineering Drawings - Rendering and Quality of Finish & Assembly - this is conducted within the confines of parc fermé, where the specification Judges will assess both cars as per Scrutineering score card. ARTICLE C5 DESIGN & ENGINEERING JUDGING (180 points) F1 in Schools Ltd. Page 20 of July 2015

21 C5.1 What will be judged? The Design & Engineering judges will examine each teams 10 page Design & Engineering portfolio so that they can assess the team s car design and use of CAD/CAM technologies along with the quality of manufacture of both the primary and back-up race cars submitted. The specific areas to be assessed are: Design Concepts 3D Modelling Application of Computer Aided Analysis Use of CAM/CNC Other Manufacturing & Assembly Research & Development Testing Design Process Evaluation Quality & Clarity Refer to the Design & Engineering judging scorecard for key performance indicator information. C5.2 Team preparation A laptop needs to be ready and taken to Design & Engineering judging along with any other items which may help the team explain any Engineering or manufacturing concepts. The Design & Engineering judges will not have access to the team pit display for judging purposes. Teams do not need to take their display (3 rd ) car to Design & Engineering judging. Preparation should include careful reading of the scorecard. The key performance indicators for the design process, application of CAD / CAM, analysis and associated data organisation, describe what the judges will be looking for. C5.3 Who needs to attend? This judging session must be attended by the team manager and team design and manufacturing engineers as a minimum. C5.4 Judging process / procedure Teams will be awarded points as per the key performance indicators shown on the Design & Engineering scorecard. Judges will review the Design & Engineering portfolio in a closed to teams session programmed before the commencement of scheduled judging sessions. The scheduled Design & Engineering judging interview session will focus on the overall Engineering and Design of the car. This is an informal interview where Judges will ask the team to demonstrate their CAD / CAM work and query teams on what they have done. The quality of car manufacture and car assembly will be judged during a separate closed to teams session. C5.5 Design & Engineering Portfolio requirements The Design & Engineering portfolio must be in a printed hard copy format of A3 or similar size. The portfolio is limited to 10 pages which include the front and back covers. This can be 10 single sided or 5 double sided sheets. If a portfolio comprises more than 10 pages, the Judges will only review the first 10 PRINTED pages for assessment purposes. There MUST be content related to the use of CAM and CNC manufacturing included in the portfolio and this will be referenced by the Engineering Judges. An orthographic drawing and 3D render must also be included in the portfolio, refer ARTICLE C2.10. Content related to the car, design ideas, design development, research, testing and evaluation are commonly presented within the portfolio. ARTICLE C6 ENTERPRISE JUDGING (180 points) Formula 1 Class only F1 in Schools Ltd. Page 21 of July 2015

22 C6.1 What will be judged? The Enterprise judges will examine each teams 10 page Enterprise Portfolio and Pit Display so that they can assess the following specific areas. Enterprise Portfolio o Project Management o Team Work o Sponsorship & Marketing Summary o F1 in Schools Project Evaluation o Quality & Clarity Team Identity Pit Display o Content o Design o Logistics & Assembly Refer to the Enterprise judging scorecard for detailed point scoring and key performance indicator information. C6.2 Team preparation Each team must prepare an Enterprise Portfolio and Pit Display as per ARTICILE C2.10. Most importantly, teams need to read the Enterprise judging scorecard carefully to ensure that all areas to be assessed are included within the context of their Enterprise Portfolio and Pit Display. It is each team s decision how and where each area is presented. Teams should be mindful of the time constraints of judging when making these decisions. C6.3 Who needs to attend? All team members must be present during the Enterprise Portfolio and Pit Display judging session. C6.4 Judging process / procedure The Enterprise judging will take place at each teams Pit Display. The Judges will usually introduce themselves then ask the team to stand clear of their display so the Judges can conduct assessments. Team members may be asked questions by Judges to help them find certain content and or seek further explanation. In addition to the scheduled judging session, the Judges will also be given time to conduct pre-judging and review of each teams Pit Display and design portfolio. This will be a closed to teams session programmed before the commencement of scheduled judging sessions. Enterprise portfolios will be returned to teams so that these can be integrated into each teams display. C6.5 Enterprise Portfolio requirements The Enterprise Portfolio must be in a printed hard copy format of A3 or similar size. The portfolio is limited to 10 pages which include the front and back covers. This can be 10 single sided or 5 double sided sheets. If a portfolio comprises more than 10 pages, the Judges will only review the first 10 PRINTED pages for assessment purposes. There MUST be content related to project management, the team, marketing achievements, F1 in Schools project evaluation and quality & clarity. C6.6 Pit Display setup and parameters C6.6.1 F1 in Schools will provide each team with a display space approximately 2m wide x 1m deep F1 in Schools Ltd. Page 22 of July 2015

23 C6.6.2 C6.6.3 No part of the teams completed Pit Display is allowed to protrude beyond the physical dimensions of their allocated pit space. This includes anything that might protrude above the pit space highest point e.g. flags. ONLY student team members are permitted to set-up their pit displays. There must be no supervising teacher / adult or other outside assistance, unless deemed by F1 in Schools to be a health and safety issue. IMPORTANT HEALTH & SAFETY: Please ensure that Health and Safety measures are considered when working on all aspects of your Pit Display. F1 in Schools reserves the right to apply a penalty of up to 50 points at the discretion of the Chair of Judges for unsafe activity. C6.6.5 C6.6.6 F1 in Schools and / or the Chair of Judges may instruct a team to take action to reduce noise or remove display inclusions deemed to be inappropriate. F1 in Schools will instruct teams to remove or alter any display inclusions considered to be a safety hazard. Any electrical appliance connected to the power supply must be safe and compatible with UK power rating. ARTICLE C7 MARKETING JUDGING (40 points) C7.1 What will be judged? The Marketing & Social Media Judges will assess each teams 4 page or 2,000 words (whichever is less) Marketing and Social Media strategy document: Marketing & Sponsorship Plan o Outline the team s marketing plan and justify marketing activities in relation to sponsorship Social Media Strategy o Explain the team s social media strategy and how the team intend to implement it C7.2 Team Preparation Each team must prepare a Marketing & Social Media document as per ARTICLE C2.11. Most importantly, teams need to read the Marketing & Social Media judging score card carefully to ensure that all areas to be assessed are included within the context of their document. C7.3 Judging process / procedure Marketing & Social Media judging will be assessed by the Enterprise judges. C7.4 Marketing & Social Media Strategy Document Requirements The Marketing & Social Media strategy document must be formatted in A4 or similar size. The document is limited to 4 pages or 2,000 words (whichever is less) and submitted digitally as per the instructions under article C The judges will only review the first 4 pages or 2,000 words for assessment purposes. There MUST be content relating to the marketing, sponsorship & social media strategies included in the document. ARTICLE C8 VERBAL PRESENTATION JUDGING (180 points) C8.1 What will be judged? The Verbal Presentation judges will assess each teams 5 minute (Regional) and 8 minutes (UK National Final) verbal presentation across the areas of technique, composition and subject matter: F1 in Schools Ltd. Page 23 of July 2015

24 Presentation technique o o o o Use of visual aids effective use of multimedia and / or other props. Team contribution effective participation by all team members. Dynamic levels of enthusiasm and energy. Engagement audience interest and excitement. Presentation composition o o o Concepts clarification clear and concise explanations where required. Use of time how effectively was the 5/8 minutes used. Presentation structure overview explained and connection between topics. Subject Matter (the topics which need to be talked about) o o o Innovation detail key innovations related to car design, project management, marketing or any other aspect of the team s project. Collaboration detail any partnerships or mentoring from outside the team and justify in terms of improving project outcomes. Learning experiences explain how the F1 in Schools project has benefited team members. Refer to the Verbal Presentation judging scorecard for detailed point scoring and key performance indicator information. C8.2 Team preparation Each team is required to prepare a Verbal Presentation as per the requirements at ARTICLE C2.10. Any multimedia content, slides etc. must be saved on and shown, using the teams own laptop. Teams need to have all presentation resources tested and ready with them for verbal presentation judging. Most importantly, teams should read the Verbal Presentation judging scorecard carefully to ensure their verbal presentation features all elements and content that the verbal presentation judges will be looking for. C8.3 Who needs to attend? All team members must be present during the Verbal Presentation judging session. C8.4 Judging process / procedure Verbal Presentation judging is scheduled for the same duration of other judging sessions, usually 15 minutes. Teams will be given an opportunity at the start of their time to set-up and test their laptop and any other presentation technologies and resources. The team will inform the judges when they are ready to begin. The judges start timing the 5/8 minute duration and will provide a discreet time warning signal when one minute of presentation time remains. The team will be asked to cease presenting when the time limit has been reached. At the conclusion of the team s presentation time, the judges may choose to provide some feedback and / or ask any clarifying questions they feel necessary. C8.5 Verbal presentation judging provisions F1 in Schools will provide a dedicated private space, such as a small meeting room, where each team will deliver their presentation to the judges. This space will include a data projector, screen and multimedia sound system. These will be in fixed positions but usually with sufficient cable length to allow teams some freedom for choosing where they wish to locate their laptop. A single table will also be made available with its use and location in the presentation space being optional. C8.6 Verbal presentation video recordings The Verbal Presentations of all teams may be video recorded by F1 in Schools for the purpose of judging review and/or post event publicity and promotional purposes by F1 in Schools F1 in Schools Ltd. Page 24 of July 2015

25 ARTICLE C9 RACING (250 points) C9.1 What races will be conducted? The F1 in Schools racing points will be awarded through the staging of three (3) types of race events. a) Time Trials automatic launch mode, two races in each lane. b) Reaction Racing manual / driver launch mode, two races in each lane. c) Knock-out Competition Races manual / driver launch mode, one race in each lane per round of competition. Time trial races will be conducted first, followed by reaction racing. The single fastest car race time value from all time trial and reaction races will determine the Fastest Car Award. The knock-out competition is the last of the scheduled races. Refer to ARTCILE 3.5 and further information following for details on how points are calculated and awarded. C9.2 Team preparation C9.2.1 Teams should be familiar with the operation of the F1 in Schools Race System. There will normally be a section demonstration track within the venue where teams can practice race starts during free time prior to their scheduled races. C9.2.2 C9.2.3 C9.2.4 Manual / driver starts - one or more team members (driver/s) must be appointed for launching of the teams car using the manual launch method. The driver must stand within the dedicated starting area. Finish line management - at least one member of the team must be appointed as responsible for managing the finish line deceleration system or teams own system (refer C9.13) and return of car along the track to the start. Start line car staging one team member may be appointed as being responsible for staging the car. This team member is only permitted to set the alignment of the car with respect to the launch pod and track under close supervision from the race track judges. This process must be completed within a time limit of 30 seconds. Appointment of this team member is optional. The race judges can assist or perform this task for the team. C9.3 Who needs to attend? All team members must be present during their scheduled racing sessions and should assemble at the track start for briefing by the race track judges at their scheduled time. C9.4 Reaction race procedure Cars are launched in manual / driver reaction mode with four (4) races total per team, two (2) races in each lane. The TOTAL RACE TIME displayed and the REACTION TIME displayed for each race is recorded. The reaction races will be conducted as follows: a) Teams race in order as shown in the competition program. To begin Judging, the lowest team number will start in lane one (1). b) Driver and team stands trackside with corresponding lane start trigger. c) One team member to track finish for deceleration system control. d) Race 1 - Judge sets cars on track / tether line, adds LERS device if applicable and inserts CO2 canister e) Judge arms launch pod - SAFETY ON makes initial launch pod adjustments. f) A team member is then allowed 30 seconds to fine tune the staging of their car. g) Judge switches launch pod - SAFETY OFF checks track is clear for racing F1 in Schools Ltd. Page 25 of July 2015

26 h) Judge presses the start system reset button car is launched. i) Judge records TOTAL RACE TIME and REACTION TIME displayed on start gate. j) Team member at finish control returns car and canister along track to the start with minimum handling. k) Race 2 conducted in same lane as above, driver can be inter-changed. l) Judges remove cars from tether line and change lanes. m) Race 3 and Race 4, driver can be inter-changed. n) Cars removed from track and returned to Parc Fermé. C9.5 Reaction race scoring All four (4) total race times recorded from the reaction races are considered. The fastest of these four (4) times is used in the following formulae to calculate the points awarded: Fastest total race time = 110 pts 2 nd fastest total race time = 105 pts Slowest total race time = 5 pts Base Time = 120% of 2 nd fastest total race time 3 rd fastest and all other teams score points using the following formula: Points = 5 + (100 / (Base Time fastest total race time )) x (Base Time teams fastest total race time ) Any team with a best total race time that is slower than the base time will score 5 points. To further discriminate between any teams scoring 5 points, a deduction of 1 point will be made for any did not finish (DNF) reaction race result. C9.6 DNF (Did not Finish) race results Damage or part separation occurring during a race, before the car crosses the finish line, (e.g. wheel or any other part of the car separating), or car not crossing the finish line at all, effects in a DNF race result. The Judges may refer to video evidence to verify a DNF result. C9.7 False starts C9.7.1 A false start (jump start) occurs when the driver presses the trigger button before the five (5) start gate lights have extinguished. This will be signalled with the outer red light above the lanes illuminating. C9.7.2 C9.7.3 C9.7.4 C9.7.5 All reaction false starts will incur a 5 point penalty and by default, forfeit that race. This penalty does not apply to knock-out racing. During knock-out racing if one team false starts (jump starts), the other team should continue to race as normal. The team who false started forfeits that race, scoring a DNF and the other team s time is recorded. If both teams false start, the race counts as one of the two (2) runs. During any manual / driver starts, if a driver false starts and distracts the other driver the race will be re-run and the driver who caused the distraction will forfeit their race. Distractions outside of the race start area will be assessed by the lead track judge and track officials to determine if the race should be re-run. Spectators must keep noise down to a minimum and not use flash photography. C9.8 Track, tether line and timing system information C9.8.1 The F1 in Schools Elevated Race Track, supplied by Denford Ltd will be used. The official length of the track, from start line to finish, is 20 metres. Please see the manufacturer s description below. A monofilament tether line of diameter 0.6mm, fixed at the star, passes down the centre of each lane. At the finish end the line passes F1 in Schools Ltd. Page 26 of July 2015

27 through 90 degrees over a single pulley then attached to a 1.0kg mass suspended above the floor. Elevated overlapping rail system with track keys that secure tightly with thumbscrews ensuring flush joints between each track section and a level and smooth track. Race track sections IMPORTANT: Teams are not permitted to add anything to the race track until 210mm after the finish line/gate. C9.8.2 Launch/Timing System The F1 in Schools F1 Race System will be used for launching cars and timing races and driver reaction times to 1/1000th of a second. Launch / Timing System Components C9.9 Deceleration system C9.9.1 The deceleration system acts to bring cars to rest once crossing the finish line. F1 in Schools will provide a standard race car deceleration system, consisting tapered brushes positioned behind the finish line of each lane F1 in Schools Ltd. Page 27 of July 2015

Welcome From the Chairman Dear F1 in School Team I would like to give you a warm welcome to the challenge and hope your enjoy the coming months working as a team to compete in this life changing experience.

More information

CONTENTS PREFACE SUMMARY OF REVISIONS FOLLOWING 2014 REVIEW... 5 ARTICLE C1 DEFINITIONS... 6

CONTENTS PREFACE SUMMARY OF REVISIONS FOLLOWING 2014 REVIEW... 5 ARTICLE C1 DEFINITIONS... 6 Amendments made on, [Insert date here], will be indicated thus (using red underlined text). CONTENTS PREFACE SUMMARY OF REVISIONS FOLLOWING 2014 REVIEW... 5 ARTICLE C1 DEFINITIONS... 6 C1.1 WORLD FINALS

More information

http://f1inschools.sae.org f1inschools.sae.org F1 in Schools - 2011/12 Season Competition Regulations This document has been ratified and approved for release by the F1 in Schools International Rules Reference

More information

SUMMARY OF MAIN REVISIONS FROM 2016 REGULATIONS... 5 ARTICLE C1 DEFINITIONS... 6 ARTICLE C2 GENERAL INFORMATION... 7

SUMMARY OF MAIN REVISIONS FROM 2016 REGULATIONS... 5 ARTICLE C1 DEFINITIONS... 6 ARTICLE C2 GENERAL INFORMATION... 7 Front Cover INFINITE Racing, Greece, 2016 World Champions CONTENTS SUMMARY OF MAIN REVISIONS FROM 2016 REGULATIONS... 5 ARTICLE C1 DEFINITIONS... 6 C1.1 WORLD FINALS EVENT... 6 C1.2 F1 IN SCHOOLS IN-COUNTRY

More information

Competition Regulations Level 2 & 4: ROV and SUB Classes

Competition Regulations Level 2 & 4: ROV and SUB Classes 2017 Competition Regulations Level 2 & 4: ROV and SUB Classes 1 AUTHORISED AGENT The SUBS in Schools Technology Challenge is managed in Australia by Re-Engineering Australia Foundation Ltd. All rights

More information

Welsh Language Scheme

Welsh Language Scheme Welsh Language Scheme 1. Introduction This scheme sets out how Big Lottery Fund will give effect to the principle established by the Welsh Language Act 1993 that, in providing services to the public in

More information

Level 2 Award in Principles of Fire Safety

Level 2 Award in Principles of Fire Safety Level 2 Award in Principles of Fire Safety Qualification specification Version 2 Regulated by the Qualifications Regulators as part of the Regulated Qualifications Framework Qualification number: 601/2318/7

More information

Guide for TAP grant applicants

Guide for TAP grant applicants Guide for TAP grant applicants 2017-18 The following pages set out the official Department for International Trade Terms and Conditions for TAP (Tradeshow Access Programme) participants. Please read through

More information

WORLDWIDE BUSINESS PLAN COMPETITION Official Rules and Guidelines

WORLDWIDE BUSINESS PLAN COMPETITION Official Rules and Guidelines WORLDWIDE BUSINESS PLAN COMPETITION Official Rules and Guidelines Updated May 2017 2017, Network of International Business Schools The following rules and guidelines for the Network of International Business

More information

QCF. Health and Social Care. Centre Handbook. Level 2 Certificate in Dementia Care Level 3 Certificate in Dementia Care Scheme codes 05920, 05922

QCF. Health and Social Care. Centre Handbook. Level 2 Certificate in Dementia Care Level 3 Certificate in Dementia Care Scheme codes 05920, 05922 QCF Health and Social Care Level 2 Certificate in Dementia Care Level 3 Certificate in Dementia Care Scheme codes 05920, 05922 Centre Handbook OCR Level 2 and 3 Certificates in Dementia Care 1 Contents

More information

CODE OF CONDUCT FOR ASSESSMENT / EXAMINATION CANDIDATES & GUIDANCE FOR INVIGILATORS

CODE OF CONDUCT FOR ASSESSMENT / EXAMINATION CANDIDATES & GUIDANCE FOR INVIGILATORS CODE OF CONDUCT FOR ASSESSMENT / EXAMINATION CANDIDATES & GUIDANCE FOR INVIGILATORS 1. Coursework: Coursework, for the purpose of this Code of Practice, is defined as all summative assessments not classified

More information

ADVISORY COMMITTEE ON CLINICAL EXCELLENCE AWARDS NHS CONSULTANTS CLINICAL EXCELLENCE AWARDS SCHEME (WALES) 2008 AWARDS ROUND

ADVISORY COMMITTEE ON CLINICAL EXCELLENCE AWARDS NHS CONSULTANTS CLINICAL EXCELLENCE AWARDS SCHEME (WALES) 2008 AWARDS ROUND ADVISORY COMMITTEE ON CLINICAL EXCELLENCE AWARDS NHS CONSULTANTS CLINICAL EXCELLENCE AWARDS SCHEME (WALES) 2008 AWARDS ROUND Guide for applicants employed by NHS organisations in Wales This guide is available

More information

9. SELECTION PROCESS FOR WORLDSKILLS SHANGHAI EXCEPTIONAL RULES RELATING TO SQUAD UK SELECTION 10

9. SELECTION PROCESS FOR WORLDSKILLS SHANGHAI EXCEPTIONAL RULES RELATING TO SQUAD UK SELECTION 10 COMPETITION RULES 2018 1. CONDITIONS OF ENTRY 4 2. OVERALL RESPONSIBILITY 5 3. CODE OF CONDUCT FOR SUPPORTERS 5 4. DURING THE COMPETITION 6 5. HEALTH AND SAFETY 7 6. AFTER THE HEAT (IF APPLICABLE) 7 7.

More information

Werrington Grade Separation Pre-Application Approach to Community Consultation

Werrington Grade Separation Pre-Application Approach to Community Consultation Werrington Grade Separation Pre-Application Approach to Community Consultation Document reference Author 140365-ARP-CON-022 Network Rail Date August 2016 Revision number 4 CONTENTS Page 1 Executive Summary

More information

Qualifications Support Pack 03. Making Claims & Results

Qualifications Support Pack 03. Making Claims & Results Qualifications Support Pack 03 Making Claims & Results August 2016 1 CONTENTS Contacting Prince s Trust Qualifications... 3 QUALIFICATION CLAIMS... 4 Centre Approval... 4 Registering Learners... 4 Making

More information

PRIDE IN THE JOB

PRIDE IN THE JOB Launch Brochure PRIDE IN THE JOB 2018-2019 NHBC s UK-wide competition dedicated to recognising the highest standards in house building PRIDE IN THE JOB NHBC s Pride in the Job is the most highly regarded

More information

Document Details Title

Document Details Title Document Details Title Quality and Equalities Impact Assessment (QEIA) Process Guidance Trust Ref No 2046-45852 Local Ref (optional) Main points the document This document explains the process for QEIA,

More information

DESIGN INSTITUTE OF AUSTRALIA GRADUATE OF THE YEAR AWARDS. Design Institute of Australia Graduate Of The Year Awards 2017 ENTRY INFORMATION

DESIGN INSTITUTE OF AUSTRALIA GRADUATE OF THE YEAR AWARDS. Design Institute of Australia Graduate Of The Year Awards 2017 ENTRY INFORMATION Design Institute of Australia Graduate Of The Year Awards 2017 ENTRY INFORMATION OVERVIEW State GOTYA Program The Graduate of the Year Award (GOTYA) is a portfolio based DIA program that rewards the highest

More information

Creative Industries Clusters Programme Programme Scope

Creative Industries Clusters Programme Programme Scope Creative Industries Clusters Programme Programme Scope Contents 1. Summary of the Programme... 2 2. Background... 3 3. Opportunities and threats facing the UK creative industries... 4 Product and service

More information

Issue date: October Guide to the multiple technology appraisal process

Issue date: October Guide to the multiple technology appraisal process Issue date: October 2009 Guide to the multiple technology appraisal process Guide to the multiple technology appraisal process Issued: October 2009 This document is one of a series describing the processes

More information

DESIGN INSTITUTE OF AUSTRALIA GRADUATE OF THE YEAR AWARDS

DESIGN INSTITUTE OF AUSTRALIA GRADUATE OF THE YEAR AWARDS 2016 ENTRY QLD INFORMATION 2016 OVERVIEW State GOTYA Program The Graduate of the Year Award (GOTYA) is a portfoliobased DIA program that rewards the highest standards of excellence in final year undergraduate

More information

COMPETITION GUIDELINES

COMPETITION GUIDELINES POWERING THE COMPETITION GUIDELINES INFORMATION FOR STUDENTS, TEACHERS AND PARENTS ABOUT HOW TO ENTER THE COMPETITION SPONSORED BY TALENT 2030 NATIONAL ENGINEERING COMPETITION FOR GIRLS 1 WHAT IS THE TALENT

More information

NHS PCA (P) (2015) 17. Dear Colleague

NHS PCA (P) (2015) 17. Dear Colleague Healthcare Quality and Strategy Directorate Pharmacy and Medicines Division Dear Colleague PHARMACEUTICAL SERVICES AMENDMENTS TO DRUG TARIFF IN RESPECT OF SPECIAL PREPARATIONS AND IMPORTED UNLICENSED MEDICINES

More information

Social Enterprise Awards 2014

Social Enterprise Awards 2014 Social Enterprise Awards 2014 Information Sheet Please read the information below before completing any award application. It provides information about the: Categories Eligibility and criteria Application

More information

2014 Fire Pit Competition

2014 Fire Pit Competition 2014 Fire Pit Competition Official Rules, Requirements, and Judging Criteria Welcome to the 2014 NSBE- Preneur Fire Pit Competition ( Fire Pit ). We appreciate your interest in participating in this year

More information

Grants for the Arts How to apply. 15,000 and under

Grants for the Arts How to apply. 15,000 and under Grants for the Arts How to apply 15,000 and under Contents Welcome... 4 Eligibility... 8 Using our online system an introduction... 17 Using our online system applicant profiles... 19 Your applicant profile...

More information

Consultation on fee rates and fee scales

Consultation on fee rates and fee scales Consultation on fee rates and fee scales 2016-17 Consultation on fee rates and fee scales 2016-17 Overview This consultation invites views and comments on the Wales Audit Office s proposals for: fee rates

More information

Rail Training Accreditation Scheme (RTAS) Rules

Rail Training Accreditation Scheme (RTAS) Rules (RTAS) Rules Purpose and Scope...1 1. The RTAS Rules...2 2. Roles and Responsibilities... 4 3. Management System Requirements...7 4. Breaches of the RTAS Rules...12 5. Investigating breaches of the RTAS

More information

UCAS. Welsh language scheme

UCAS. Welsh language scheme UCAS Welsh language scheme 2010-2013 Prepared under the Welsh Language Act 1993 Preface This is the Welsh language scheme (the scheme) presented by the Universities and Colleges Admissions Service (UCAS),

More information

THE BRADFORD TEXTILE SOCIETY DESIGN COMPETITION CONTENTS

THE BRADFORD TEXTILE SOCIETY DESIGN COMPETITION CONTENTS THE BRADFORD TEXTILE SOCIETY DESIGN COMPETITION 2017-2018 CONTENTS List of Sponsors... Page 1 Welcome Page 2 Categories for Embroidery: E1 P2, C1..... Page 3, 5, 10 Categories for Knit: K1, K2, AW1, B1.

More information

A REPORT FOR THE NATIONAL ASSEMBLY FOR WALES

A REPORT FOR THE NATIONAL ASSEMBLY FOR WALES A REPORT FOR THE NATIONAL ASSEMBLY FOR WALES Review of the Implementation and Operation of the Statutory Food Hygiene Rating Scheme in Wales and the Operation of the Appeals System FEBRUARY 2015 CONTENTS

More information

Level 2 Award in Health and Safety in the Workplace

Level 2 Award in Health and Safety in the Workplace Level 2 Award in Health and Safety in the Workplace Qualification specification 2014 For examinations in 2014 Version 1 Accredited by the Qualifications Regulators at Level 2 in the Qualifications and

More information

ESCALATOR EAST TO EDINBURGH 2014

ESCALATOR EAST TO EDINBURGH 2014 ESCALATOR EAST TO EDINBURGH 2014 APPLICATION GUIDELINES Background and Context Escalator East to Edinburgh is part of a wider Escalator Talent Development initiative that is supported by Arts Council England

More information

UNIT GC3: HEALTH AND SAFETY PRACTICAL APPLICATION. Guidance and information for accredited course providers and candidates

UNIT GC3: HEALTH AND SAFETY PRACTICAL APPLICATION. Guidance and information for accredited course providers and candidates UNIT GC3: HEALTH AND SAFETY PRACTICAL APPLICATION For NEBOSH National General Certificate in Occupational Health and Safety and NEBOSH International Certificate in Occupational Health and Safety Guidance

More information

Efficiency Research Programme

Efficiency Research Programme Efficiency Research Programme A Health Foundation call for innovative research on system efficiency and sustainability in health and social care Frequently asked questions April 2016 Table of contents

More information

SSEF, ATS & ISEF Briefing

SSEF, ATS & ISEF Briefing SSEF, ATS & ISEF Briefing 1 Mar 2013 1 Important Dates 12 Mar 13 (Tue) 2pm 5.30pm Project Set-Up 13 Mar 13 (Wed) 9am 6pm Judging Day SSEF Winners 14 Mar 13 (Thu) 12pm 5pm Public Exhibition 22 Mar 13 (Fri)

More information

Food Hygiene Rating Scheme A Report for the National Assembly of Wales

Food Hygiene Rating Scheme A Report for the National Assembly of Wales Food Hygiene Rating Scheme A Report for the National Assembly of Wales Review of the Implementation and Operation of the Statutory Food Hygiene Rating Scheme and the Operation of the Appeals System in

More information

UNISON Annual Health Conference. Exhibition Stand Booking Form

UNISON Annual Health Conference. Exhibition Stand Booking Form Health Care managers, nurses, paramedics, occupational therapists, ambulance drivers, physiotherapists, counsellors and other Health service personnel will all be represented at this Annual Event. UNISON

More information

The Royal Academy of Engineering. Enterprise Hub. Call for proposals

The Royal Academy of Engineering. Enterprise Hub. Call for proposals The Royal Academy of Engineering Enterprise Hub Call for proposals Deadline for proposals: 5 pm 1st March 2018 Please send all submissions to: enterprise@raeng.org.uk 1 The Academy is seeking a training

More information

PART 1 Introduction Purpose... 3 Aim... 3 About The Network Operator Development Program... 4 Network Definition... 5

PART 1 Introduction Purpose... 3 Aim... 3 About The Network Operator Development Program... 4 Network Definition... 5 CONTENTS PART 1 Introduction Purpose... 3 Aim... 3 About The Network Operator Development Program... 4 Network Definition... 5 PART 2 Program Program Summary... 6 Program General Overview... 7 PART 3 Application

More information

THE LEGAL INDUSTRY VIDEO AWARDS

THE LEGAL INDUSTRY VIDEO AWARDS THE LEGAL INDUSTRY VIDEO AWARDS FULL DETAILS, RULES, TERMS & CONDITIONS This is the inaugural year of the annual Legal Industry Video Awards founded and administered by Legal IT Insider, the industry s

More information

Student Welcome Pack. A unique social enterprise programme designed by students for students

Student Welcome Pack. A unique social enterprise programme designed by students for students Student Welcome Pack A unique social enterprise programme designed by students for students Contents 4 - Emails 5 - Award timeline 6 - WOHAA has 4 stages 12 - Stage 1 18 - Stage 2 21 - Stage 3 24 - Stage

More information

RESERVOIR LEGISLATION IN NORTHERN IRELAND

RESERVOIR LEGISLATION IN NORTHERN IRELAND RESERVOIR LEGISLATION IN NORTHERN IRELAND BASIC LEGAL FRAMEWORK The United Kingdom comprises four regional administrations, England, Wales, Scotland and Northern Ireland. Reservoirs in Northern Ireland

More information

GUIDE FOR APPLICANTS INTERREG VA

GUIDE FOR APPLICANTS INTERREG VA GUIDE FOR APPLICANTS INTERREG VA Cross-border Programme for Territorial Co-operation 2014-2020, Northern Ireland, Border Region of Ireland and Western Scotland & PEACE IV EU Programme for Peace and Reconciliation

More information

N E Rowe Young Persons National Lecture Competition Rules & Procedures for Award of Medals. Issue 6a October 2016

N E Rowe Young Persons National Lecture Competition Rules & Procedures for Award of Medals. Issue 6a October 2016 N E Rowe Young Persons National Lecture Competition Rules & Procedures for Award of Medals 1. Introduction Issue 6a October 2016 The N E Rowe Award was established in 1956 by the Council of the Royal Aeronautical

More information

2016 European Outsourcing Association Awards 6th October In-Country Excellence Categories Entry Pack. #RiseOfThePhoenix

2016 European Outsourcing Association Awards 6th October In-Country Excellence Categories Entry Pack. #RiseOfThePhoenix 2016 European Outsourcing Association Awards 6th October 2016 In-Country Excellence Categories Entry Pack #RiseOfThePhoenix The In-Country Excellence Categories Great news! Calling on countries from Albania

More information

CONSULTATION ONLY - NOT FOR FURTHER DISSEMINATION

CONSULTATION ONLY - NOT FOR FURTHER DISSEMINATION Home Police Pursuits Police Pursuit When a situation falls within the definition of Pursuit, officers will need to decide whether a pursuit is justified, proportionate and conforms to the principle of

More information

Welsh Government Response to the Report of the National Assembly for Wales Public Accounts Committee Report on Unscheduled Care: Committee Report

Welsh Government Response to the Report of the National Assembly for Wales Public Accounts Committee Report on Unscheduled Care: Committee Report Welsh Government Response to the Report of the National Assembly for Wales Public Accounts Committee Report on Unscheduled Care: Committee Report We welcome the findings of the report and offer the following

More information

Guide to Assessment and Rating for Regulatory Authorities

Guide to Assessment and Rating for Regulatory Authorities Guide to Assessment and Rating for Regulatory Authorities April 2012 Copyright The details of the relevant licence conditions are available on the Creative Commons website (accessible using the links provided)

More information

Regulation. Handbook for Awarding Organisations 2017

Regulation. Handbook for Awarding Organisations 2017 Regulation Handbook for Awarding Organisations 2017 2 CCEA Regulation Handbook for Awarding Organisations 2017 CCEA Regulation Handbook for Awarding Organisations Contents Section 1 Northern Ireland Policy

More information

Proposal #: 23 Proposed By: Ed Otto Type of Proposal: Bylaws School: Downingtown WEST Current Location:

Proposal #: 23 Proposed By: Ed Otto Type of Proposal: Bylaws School: Downingtown WEST Current Location: Proposal #: 23 Proposed By: Ed Otto Bylaws School: Downingtown WEST Marching Band Activities - Section 10 - Rule 10 None Eliminate the Percussion and Auxiliary judges _ There is already a formula in place

More information

UCL MAJOR INCIDENT TEAM MAJOR INCIDENT PLAN. Managing and Recovering from Major Incidents

UCL MAJOR INCIDENT TEAM MAJOR INCIDENT PLAN. Managing and Recovering from Major Incidents UCL MAJOR INCIDENT TEAM MAJOR INCIDENT PLAN Managing and Recovering from Major Incidents June 2017 MAJOR INCIDENT PLAN - June 2017 Title Primary author (name and title) UCL Major Incident Plan (public

More information

Health Sector: Improving Health and Well-being (National 5)

Health Sector: Improving Health and Well-being (National 5) Unit code: F88H 75 Superclass: PA Publication date: August 2013 Source: Scottish Qualifications Authority Version: 4 (September 2017) Unit purpose This unit has been designed as a mandatory unit of the

More information

Confirmation of Doctor of Philosophy (PhD) Candidature

Confirmation of Doctor of Philosophy (PhD) Candidature Confirmation of Doctor of Philosophy (PhD) Candidature Guidelines & Panel Report Research Services Purpose These Guidelines are intended to assist students, their supervisors, and confirmation panels to

More information

CPD for Annual Recertification of Medical Imaging and Radiation Therapy Practitioners

CPD for Annual Recertification of Medical Imaging and Radiation Therapy Practitioners CPD for Annual Recertification of Medical Imaging and Radiation Therapy Practitioners Recertification includes a number of tools used by the Board to monitor the ongoing competence of all practising medical

More information

New Investigator Grants Frequently Asked Questions

New Investigator Grants Frequently Asked Questions Last updated: April 2017 New Investigator Grants Frequently Asked Questions Proposals to the New Investigator Grants will be processed alongside our Research Grant scheme so you should also refer to the

More information

(Company name) Health and Safety Plan

(Company name) Health and Safety Plan (Company name) Health and Safety Plan 1 Index I II III IV V VI VII VIII IX Safety Policy Statement Accident/Injury Analysis Component Safety Program Record keeping Component Health and Safety Education

More information

Workforce Development Innovation Fund 2018/19

Workforce Development Innovation Fund 2018/19 Workforce Development Innovation Fund 2018/19 Application guidance Click on the link below to go to the relevant sections Contents Introduction... 2 Priorities... 2 What is innovation?... 4 Project outcomes...

More information

LOCAL AND COMMUNITY GROUPS. KEEPING SAFE AND LEGAL HEALTH, SAFETY AND WELFARE Requirements and support for Local and Community Groups

LOCAL AND COMMUNITY GROUPS. KEEPING SAFE AND LEGAL HEALTH, SAFETY AND WELFARE Requirements and support for Local and Community Groups LOCAL AND COMMUNITY GROUPS KEEPING SAFE AND LEGAL HEALTH, SAFETY AND WELFARE Requirements and support for Local and Community Groups JULY 2016 Contents Introduction to this guide 3 Health, safety and welfare

More information

JOB DESCRIPTION. Service Manager AMH Inpatient Services. Enhanced CRB with Both Barred List Check

JOB DESCRIPTION. Service Manager AMH Inpatient Services. Enhanced CRB with Both Barred List Check JOB DESCRIPTION JOB TITLE: BAND: HOURS AND: DURATION Service Manager AMH Inpatient Services Agenda for Change Band 8B As specified in the job advertisement and the Contract of Employment AGENDA FOR CHANGE

More information

Chapter 4 THE SCOUT DISTRICT

Chapter 4 THE SCOUT DISTRICT Chapter Contents Rule 4.1 Rule 4.2 Rule 4.3 Rule 4.4 Rule 4.5 Rule 4.6 Rule 4.7 Rule 4.8 Rule 4.9 Rule 4.10 Rule 4.11 Rule 4.12 Rule 4.13 Rule 4.14 Rule 4.15 Rule 4.16 Rule 4.17 Rule 4.18 Rule 4.19 Rule

More information

NES General Practice Nursing Education Supervisor (General Practice, Medical Directorate)

NES General Practice Nursing Education Supervisor (General Practice, Medical Directorate) NES General Practice Nursing Education Supervisor (General Practice, Medical Directorate) APPLICANT GUIDE BACKGROUND INFORMATION ON GENERAL PRACTICE NURSING (GPN) EDUCATION SUPERVISOR ROLE In March 2011

More information

NHS ENGLAND INVITATION TO TENDER STAGE TWO ITT NHS GENOMIC MEDICINE CENTRE SELECTION - WAVE 1

NHS ENGLAND INVITATION TO TENDER STAGE TWO ITT NHS GENOMIC MEDICINE CENTRE SELECTION - WAVE 1 NHS ENGLAND INVITATION TO TENDER STAGE TWO ITT NHS GENOMIC MEDICINE CENTRE SELECTION - WAVE 1 2 NHS England - Invitation to Tender Stage Two ITT: NHS Genomic Medicine Centre Selection - Wave 1 Version

More information

INTRODUCTION TO THE UK PUBLIC HEALTH REGISTER ROUTE TO REGISTRATION FOR PUBLIC HEALTH PRACTITIONERS

INTRODUCTION TO THE UK PUBLIC HEALTH REGISTER ROUTE TO REGISTRATION FOR PUBLIC HEALTH PRACTITIONERS INTRODUCTION TO THE UK PUBLIC HEALTH REGISTER ROUTE TO REGISTRATION FOR PUBLIC HEALTH PRACTITIONERS This introduction consists of: 1. Introduction to the UK Public Health Register 2. Process and Structures

More information

The PMO Global Awards is an annual non-profit initiative hosted by PMO Global Alliance in a partnership with Wellingtone Project Management.

The PMO Global Awards is an annual non-profit initiative hosted by PMO Global Alliance in a partnership with Wellingtone Project Management. AWARDS RULES 1 - PMO GLOBAL AWARDS OVERVIEW The PMO Global Awards is an annual non-profit initiative hosted by PMO Global Alliance in a partnership with Wellingtone Project Management. The PMO Global Awards

More information

Dance Bursary Award 2018

Dance Bursary Award 2018 Guidelines for applicants Deadline: 5.30pm, Thursday 25 January 2018 Dance Bursary Award: application checklist Use the checklists below to make sure that your application is complete. Items that are mandatory

More information

ANNEX 2 RESOLUTION MSC.216(82) (adopted on 8 December 2006)

ANNEX 2 RESOLUTION MSC.216(82) (adopted on 8 December 2006) RESOLUTION MSC.216(82) (adopted on 8 December 2006) ADOPTION OF AMENDMENTS TO THE INTERNATIONAL CONVENTION FOR THE SAFETY OF LIFE AT SEA, 1974, AS AMENDED THE MARITIME SAFETY COMMITTEE, RECALLING Article

More information

Charles de Gaulle Trust. Application Guidance Notes

Charles de Gaulle Trust. Application Guidance Notes Charles de Gaulle Trust Application Guidance Notes SECTION A: PROGRAMME INFORMATION 1. Introduction to the Charles de Gaulle Trust: aims & objectives 2. Who can apply? 3. What are the programme selection

More information

Young ICT Explorers 2015 Information Pack

Young ICT Explorers 2015 Information Pack Young ICT Explorers 2015 Information Pack General Information Pack for the Young ICT Explorers competition Table of Contents About Young ICT Explorers... 3 Divisions... 3 Subject areas... 4 Sample project

More information

Sentinel Scheme Rules

Sentinel Scheme Rules Purpose and Scope... 1 1. The... 2 2. Roles and Responsibilities... 4 3. Management System Requirements... 8 4. Breaches of the... 14 5. Investigating breaches of the... 15 6. Scheme Assurance Arrangements...

More information

Health and Safety Policy

Health and Safety Policy Document reference: 210A2015 Date: March 2015 Health and Safety Policy Index 1.0 Introduction 2 2.0 Health and safety policy statement 2 3.0 Health and safety responsibilities 3 4.0 Health and safety risks

More information

* Any work not collected by this date will be disposed of unless by prior arrangement

* Any work not collected by this date will be disposed of unless by prior arrangement 2018 Guidelines Important Dates for 2018 Entries open 19th February Word Entries close 14th May Art and Music Entries Close 16th July Shortlisted works notified 24th July People s Choice Voting 3rd to

More information

CAPACITY BUILDING FOR CULTURAL ORGANIZATIONS

CAPACITY BUILDING FOR CULTURAL ORGANIZATIONS City Enrichment Fund Communities, Culture & Heritage Program Objective To support organizations activities, programming, events, and projects that engage the public in strengthening and celebrating community

More information

INFORMATION FOR CANDIDATES

INFORMATION FOR CANDIDATES 1 INFORMATION FOR CANDIDATES Prize Rules Eligibility The Linbury Prize is open to final year students and graduates from 2016 or 2017 from Theatre Design degree or postgraduate courses recognised on the

More information

St Anne's Community Services Staff Manual

St Anne's Community Services Staff Manual 4.01 St Anne's Health and Safety Policy Title of Policy: 4.01 St. Anne s Health and Safety Policy Issue date: July 2016 Version number: V5.0 Ratified by: H&S Committee 27 th July 2016 Expiry date: July

More information

HEALTH AND SAFETY MANAGEMENT AT UWE

HEALTH AND SAFETY MANAGEMENT AT UWE HEALTH AND SAFETY MANAGEMENT AT UWE Introduction This document sets out the University s strategic approach to health and safety management. It contains the Statement of Intent that outlines the University

More information

Health and Safety Policy for Worcesters School

Health and Safety Policy for Worcesters School London Borough of Enfield Health and Safety Policy Worcesters Primary School 01.03.16 Name Signature Date Revised by: Checked and Reviewed by: Approved by: Lesley Crossman Karen Jaeggi Chair of Governors

More information

Film Skills Fund. Funding programme. Craft and Technical Bursaries for Freelancers Film Skills Levy. What training can we support?

Film Skills Fund. Funding programme. Craft and Technical Bursaries for Freelancers Film Skills Levy. What training can we support? Film Skills Fund Funding programme Creative Skillset s Film Skills Fund invests in the skills and training of the UK film industry to secure its growth and sustainability. We aim to strengthen and build

More information

2017 results (HoC library): 2

2017 results (HoC library):  2 WOMEN S VOTE CENTENARY GRANTS SCHEME LARGE GRANT FUND ROUND 2 - GUIDANCE Women s Vote Centenary Grants Scheme Background The Representation of the People Act in 1918 extended the vote to women for the

More information

RULES OF THE "NEW ARTISTS 2018" CONTEST

RULES OF THE NEW ARTISTS 2018 CONTEST RULES OF THE "NEW ARTISTS 2018" CONTEST CERVEIRA ART BIENNIAL FOUNDATION, P.F. PREAMBLE The Cerveira Biennial Art Foundation (FBAC), within the framework of the celebrations of the 40th anniversary of

More information

Learning Through Research Seed Funding Guide for Applicants

Learning Through Research Seed Funding Guide for Applicants Learning Through Research Seed Funding Guide for Applicants intranet.ucd.ie/research/seedfunding 2016 Revised 7 th November 2016 point 13, page 14. 1. PROGRAMME DESCRIPTION AND OBJECTIVES... 3 2. APPLICATIONS

More information

THE LARGEST CELEBRATION OF RURAL BUSINESS IN THE UK

THE LARGEST CELEBRATION OF RURAL BUSINESS IN THE UK THE LARGEST CELEBRATION OF RURAL BUSINESS IN THE UK ENTRY GUIDELINES 2018 BACKGROUND INFORMATION This background information will help you to understand more about the Rural Business Awards - it s ethos

More information

An invitation to tender for the contract of marketing campaign developer for the Own Art scheme.

An invitation to tender for the contract of marketing campaign developer for the Own Art scheme. An invitation to tender for the contract of marketing campaign developer for the Own Art scheme. 1. Invitation to Tender 1.1 The purpose of this document is to invite tenders to oversee and develop two

More information

SSEF, ATS & Intel ISEF Briefing

SSEF, ATS & Intel ISEF Briefing SSEF, ATS & Intel ISEF Briefing 22 Feb 2017 (Wed) @ NUS High School of Mathematics and Science 1 2 Comments from Prejudging Objective: 1. Provide students and teachers with some qualitative feedback from

More information

MESA Think Tank. Preliminary Determined by your MESA Center Regional 1 for 9 th /10 th and 1 for 11 th /12 th

MESA Think Tank. Preliminary Determined by your MESA Center Regional 1 for 9 th /10 th and 1 for 11 th /12 th MESA DAY CONTEST RULES 2018 2019 (Version 8.1.18) MESA Think Tank LEVEL: Grades 9/10 and 11/12 TYPE OF CONTEST: COMPOSITION OF TEAM: NUMBER OF TEAMS: SPONSOR: Team 2-3 Students per team Preliminary Determined

More information

The Poster Prize for Illustration 2019 London Stories - Conditions for Entry

The Poster Prize for Illustration 2019 London Stories - Conditions for Entry The Poster Prize for Illustration 2019 London Stories - Conditions for Entry Please read the conditions and terms of entry carefully. By entering this competition you agree to comply with these terms.

More information

AREA 08 REGIONAL FIELD MEET INSTRUCTION

AREA 08 REGIONAL FIELD MEET INSTRUCTION L 8 AREA 08 REGIONAL FIELD MEET INSTRUCTION 2010-2011 Table of Contents PAGE SECTION 1: OVERVIEW 3 A. AREA 08 REGIONAL FIELD MEET (A08RFM) B. EVENT MANAGEMENT AND SPONSORSHIP SECTION 2: GENERAL EVENT SPECIFICATIONS

More information

AWARDS. for Best Practice in Outsourcing. National Outsourcing Association PARK PLAZA RIVERBANK HOTEL, LONDON THURSDAY 25TH OCTOBER 2012 ENTRY PACK

AWARDS. for Best Practice in Outsourcing. National Outsourcing Association PARK PLAZA RIVERBANK HOTEL, LONDON THURSDAY 25TH OCTOBER 2012 ENTRY PACK National Outsourcing Association PARK PLAZA RIVERBANK HOTEL, LONDON THURSDAY 25TH OCTOBER 2012 ENTRY PACK National Outsourcing Association PARK PLAZA RIVERBANK HOTEL, LONDON THURSDAY 25TH OCTOBER 2012

More information

Ulster University Health and Safety Manual Student Placement Industrial Placement

Ulster University Health and Safety Manual Student Placement Industrial Placement Ulster University Health and Safety Manual Student Placement Industrial Placement 1 This document relates only to placements that are in a work place and where the student is working (rather than observing).

More information

Northumbria Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust. Charitable Funds. Staff Lottery Scheme Procedure

Northumbria Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust. Charitable Funds. Staff Lottery Scheme Procedure Northumbria Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust Charitable Funds Staff Lottery Scheme Procedure Version 1 Name of Policy Author Alison Nell Date Issued 1 st March 2017 Review Date 1 st March 2018 Target Audience

More information

Corporate Report Format. To the Mayor and Members of the Cabinet. Town Centre Wi-Fi Solution. Relevant Cabinet Wards Affected Key Decision

Corporate Report Format. To the Mayor and Members of the Cabinet. Town Centre Wi-Fi Solution. Relevant Cabinet Wards Affected Key Decision Corporate Report Format To the Mayor and Members of the Cabinet Town Centre Wi-Fi Solution Relevant Cabinet Wards Affected Key Decision Member(s) Cllr Tony Corden Town K1302 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1. This report

More information

Visual Arts Bursary Award 2018

Visual Arts Bursary Award 2018 Guidelines for applicants Deadline: 5.30pm, Thursday 25 January 2018 Visual Arts Bursary Award: application checklist Use the checklists below to make sure that your application is complete. Items that

More information

CLINICAL SUPERVISION POLICY

CLINICAL SUPERVISION POLICY CLINICAL SUPERVISION POLICY Version: 6 Ratified by: Date ratified: March 2016 Title of originator/author: Title of responsible committee/group: Date issued: March 2016 Senior Managers Operational Group

More information

Leadership and management for all doctors

Leadership and management for all doctors Leadership and management for all doctors The duties of a doctor registered with the General Medical Council Patients must be able to trust doctors with their lives and health. To justify that trust you

More information

Pre-registration. e-portfolio

Pre-registration. e-portfolio Pre-registration e-portfolio 2013 2014 Contents E-portfolio Introduction 3 Performance Standards 5 Page Appendix SWOT analysis 1 Start of training plan 2 13 week plan 3 26 week plan 4 39 week plan 5 Appraisal

More information

Chapter 3. The Scout Troop

Chapter 3. The Scout Troop Chapter 3 The Scout Group Chapter Contents Rule 3.1 Rule 3.2 Rule 3.3 Rule 3.4 Rule 3.5 Rule 3.6 Rule 3.7 Rule 3.8 Rule 3.9 Rule 3.10 Rule 3.11 Rule 3.12 Rule 3.13 Rule 3.14 Rule 3.15 Rule 3.16 Rule 3.17

More information

Teacher training incentives in Wales PGCE (FE) 2010/11

Teacher training incentives in Wales PGCE (FE) 2010/11 Teacher training incentives in Wales PGCE (FE) 2010/11 Post Graduate Certificate of Education (Further Education) Teacher Training Incentive Grant in Wales 2010/11 guidance notes Guidance Welsh Assembly

More information

IFTSA Developing Solutions for Developing Countries Competition. Rules and Regulations

IFTSA Developing Solutions for Developing Countries Competition. Rules and Regulations IFTSA Developing Solutions for Developing Countries Competition Rules and Regulations Background: The Student Association is committed to engaging student members from around the world and utilizing their

More information

AII IRELAND INSTITUTE OF HOSPICE & PALLIATIVE CARE / IRISH CANCER SOCIETY RESEARCH POSTDOCTORAL FELLOWSHIP Guidance Notes

AII IRELAND INSTITUTE OF HOSPICE & PALLIATIVE CARE / IRISH CANCER SOCIETY RESEARCH POSTDOCTORAL FELLOWSHIP Guidance Notes AII IRELAND INSTITUTE OF HOSPICE & PALLIATIVE CARE / IRISH CANCER SOCIETY RESEARCH POSTDOCTORAL FELLOWSHIP 2013 Guidance Notes Closing Date for applications: Friday 28 th February 2014 Contents Page No

More information

THANK YOU FOR YOUR INTEREST IN THE DEBATING MATTERS COMPETITION 2011/12

THANK YOU FOR YOUR INTEREST IN THE DEBATING MATTERS COMPETITION 2011/12 INSTITUTE OF IDEAS DEBATING MATTERS COMPETITION 2011/12 NORTH WEST & NORTH WALES REGION Dear Teacher, THANK YOU FOR YOUR INTEREST IN THE DEBATING MATTERS COMPETITION 2011/12 WHY COMPETE IN THE DEBATING

More information