Understanding HHCAHPS Public Reporting

Similar documents
Patient-Mix Adjustment Factors for Home Health Care CAHPS Survey Results Publicly Reported on Home Health Compare in July 2017

6/7/2016. Objectives. HHCAHPS Overview. SHP HHCAHPS and Patient Survey Star Ratings

P: E: P: E:

PRC EasyView Training HCAHPS Application. By Denise Rabalais, Director Service Measurement & Improvement

Introduction to the Home Health Care CAHPS Survey Webinar Training Session. Session II. January 2018

Introduction to the Home Health Care CAHPS Survey Webinar Training Session. Session I. January 2018

Cancer Hospital Workgroup

Cancer Hospital Workgroup. Agenda. PPS-Exempt Cancer Hospital Quality Reporting Program. Roll Call PCHQR Program Updates HCAHPS Updates

Hospice CAHPS Analysis for Performance Improvement

Patient Experience & Satisfaction

Minnesota Statewide Quality Reporting and Measurement System: Quality Incentive Payment System

HHVBP Sessions. HHVBP Overview 6/7/2016. Home Health Value Based Purchasing. Session 1: Overview

QUALITY MEASURES WHAT S ON THE HORIZON

Minnesota Statewide Quality Reporting and Measurement System: Quality Incentive Payment System Framework

Minnesota Statewide Quality Reporting and Measurement System: Quality Incentive Payment System

Understand the current status of OAS CAHPS related to

2/5/2014. Patient Satisfaction. Objectives. Topics of discussion. Quality for the non-quality Manager Session 3 of 4

January 2017 A GUIDE TO HOME HEALTH VALUE-BASED PURCHASING

Overview of Home Health Star Ratings

Patient-mix Coefficients for December 2017 (2Q16 through 1Q17 Discharges) Publicly Reported HCAHPS Results

5-Star Ratings and How to Position Your Agency

Patient-mix Coefficients for July 2017 (4Q15 through 3Q16 Discharges) Publicly Reported HCAHPS Results

Home Health Value-Based Purchasing Series: HHVBP Model 101. Wednesday, February 3, 2016

Hospital Compare Preview Report Help Guide


HOSPITAL COMPARE PREVIEW REPORT HELP GUIDE

Medicare Spending and Rehospitalization for Chronically Ill Medicare Beneficiaries: Home Health Use Compared to Other Post-Acute Care Settings

Hot Off the Press! The FY2017 Final Rule & Its Implications for Hospices. Presenter. Objectives 08/31/16

Improvement in HHCAHPS

Hospital Inpatient Quality Reporting (IQR) Program

DA: November 29, Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services National PACE Association

HCAHPS: Background and Significance Evidenced Based Recommendations

Supporting Statement for the National Implementation of the Hospital CAHPS Survey A 1.0 CIRCUMSTANCES OF INFORMATION COLLECTION

HCAHPS, HSOPS, HACs and HIQRP Connecting the Dots

4/25/2017. Linking Up with Corridor. Value Proposition. STAR RATINGS Quality Reporting in the Accountable Care Marketplace

Humana At Home-Star Member Talking Points

Improving Nursing Home Compare for Consumers. Five-Star Quality Rating System

Medicare Advantage Star Ratings

September 25, Via Regulations.gov

The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) strives to make information available to all. Nevertheless, portions of our files including

3. What does Any Willing Provider (AWP) refer to in the context of MLTSS?

Minnesota Statewide Quality Reporting and Measurement System:

Accountable Care Organizations. What the Nurse Executive Needs to Know. Rebecca F. Cady, Esq., RNC, BSN, JD, CPHRM

Hospital Outpatient Quality Reporting Program

Transitioning to Electronic Clinical Quality Measures

CAHPS Hospital Survey Podcast Series Transcript

Dialysis facility characteristics and services

Summary Report of Findings and Recommendations

Troubleshooting Audio

2017 CAHPS Child Medicaid Survey Summary Report

Regulatory Advisor Volume Eight

SNF * Readmissions Bootcamp The SNF Readmission Penalty, Post-Acute Networks, and Community Collaboratives

SUMMARY OF THE MEDICARE END-STAGE RENAL DISESASE PY 2014 AND PY 2015 QUALITY INCENTIVE PROGRAM PROPOSED RULE

Disclaimer. Learning Objectives

State of Kansas Department of Social and Rehabilitation Services Department on Aging Kansas Health Policy Authority

Home Health Care CAHPS Survey Vendor Update Webinar Training Session. February 2018

Understanding Patient Choice Insights Patient Choice Insights Network

Deborah Austin, Director, Patient Relations/Accreditation John Muir Health February 19, 2014

Quality Management Report 2017 Q2

Hospital Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems (HCAHPS) MBQIP Educational Session One Phase Two, January 2013

FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS FOR HOSPITALS AND ASCS OAS CAHPS

Infection Monitoring: National Healthcare Safety Network (NHSN) Bloodstream Infection in Hemodialysis Patients Clinical Measure

SDRC Tip Sheet Public Use Files

CY 2018 Home Health PPS Proposed Rule

MEDICARE PROGRAM; FY 2014 HOSPICE WAGE INDEX AND PAYMENT RATE UPDATE; HOSPICE QUALITY REPORTING REQUIREMENTS; AND UPDATES ON PAYMENT REFORM SUMMARY

PG snapshot Nursing Special Report. The Role of Workplace Safety and Surveillance Capacity in Driving Nurse and Patient Outcomes

Home Health Value Based Purchasing. Today s Session

Medicare Skilled Nursing Facility Prospective Payment System

Medicare Home Health Prospective Payment System

An Overview of NCQA Relative Resource Use Measures. Today s Agenda

PROPOSED RULE: MEDICARE PROGRAM; HOME HEALTH PROSPECTIVE PAYMENT SYSTEM RATE UPDATE FOR CY 2013 SUMMARY. July 17, 2012


CMS Quality Program Overview

Quality Improvement: Utilization Measures

FEDERAL FUNDS ARE FLOWING: WHO'S GETTING WHAT, WHERE AND WHY?

Quality Management Report 2017 Q4

Introducing the Discharge to Community Quality Measure

Final Rule Summary. Medicare Home Health Prospective Payment System Calendar Year 2016

Succeeding in Value-Based Care CareConnect Journey

Technical Notes for HCAHPS Star Ratings (Revised for October 2017 Public Reporting)

Alternative Managed Care Reimbursement Models

PPS: The Big Picture

Quality Based Impacts to Medicare Inpatient Payments

Inpatient Quality Reporting Program

Dual eligible beneficiaries and care coordination. Mark E. Miller, Ph. D.

AHA Survey on Hospitals Ability to Meet Meaningful Use Requirements of the Medicare and Medicaid Electronic Health Records Incentive Programs

Prepared for North Gunther Hospital Medicare ID August 06, 2012

Medicare Home Health Prospective Payment System

DETAIL SPECIFICATION. Description. Numerator. Denominator. Exclusions. Minimum Data Reported to NHSN

Model VBP FY2014 Worksheet Instructions and Reference Guide

Pay-for-Performance. GNYHA Engineering Quality Improvement

Final Rule Summary. Medicare Skilled Nursing Facility Prospective Payment System Fiscal Year 2017

Prior to implementation of the episode groups for use in resource measurement under MACRA, CMS should:

12/7/2017 OVERVIEW. CPAs & ADVISORS

The Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act of 2010

New Quality Measures Will Soon Impact Nursing Home Compare and the 5-Star Rating System: What providers need to know

Medicare Home Health Prospective Payment System

QUALITY PAYMENT PROGRAM

Technical Notes for HCAHPS Star Ratings (Revised for April 2018 Public Reporting)

Halcyon Hospice and Palliative Care 4th Quarter, 2012

Transcription:

A guide to understanding HHCAHPS public reporting protocols and patient mix adjustment factors June 2012 www.deyta.com 888.893.1937 2012 Deyta LLC

A guide to understanding HHCAHPS public reporting protocols and patient mix adjustment factors June 2012 Table of Contents About HHCAHPS Survey Public Reporting.3 When HHCAHPS Survey Results are Posted.4 Patient Mix Adjustment Factors..4 How Patient Mix Adjustment Factors are Calculated 5 Example of How Patient Mix Adjustment Factors are Calculated 5 Ongoing HHCAHPS Public Reporting.7 Additional Resources 7

About HHCAHPS Survey Public Reporting The Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems (CAHPS ) Home Health Care Survey, also called the Home Health Care CAHPS Survey (HHCAHPS), is the first national, standardized, publically reported survey of patients' perspectives of home health care. While many Home Health Agencies (HHA) have collected information on patient satisfaction for their own internal use, until HHCAHPS there were no common metrics and no national standards for collecting and publically reporting information about patient experience of care. On April 19, 2012, the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) began publically reporting results from the HHCAHPS Survey allowing valid comparisons to be made across HHAs locally, regionally and nationally. The HHCAHPS Survey is designed to measure the experiences of people receiving home health care from Medicare-certified home health care agencies. The standardized survey questions and the implementation protocol produce data that allow objective and meaningful comparisons of HHAs on topics that are important to consumers. Per CMS regulations, publically reporting data on the patient s perspective of care received serves three main purposes. First, it allows consumers to make objective and meaningful comparisons between home health agencies on domains that are important. Second, reporting these metrics creates new incentives for HHAs to improve quality of care. Third, public reporting enhances accountability in health care by increasing transparency of the quality of home health care provided in return for the public investment. With these goals in mind, the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) and the HHCAHPS Survey Coordination Team have taken substantial steps to assure that the survey results are credible, useful, and practical. Five HHCAHPS measures (three composite measures and two global items) are publically reported on the Home Health Compare Website under the Patient Survey Results tab (http://www.medicare.gov/homehealthcompare/search.aspx) for each participating HHA. Each of the three composites is constructed from multiple survey questions. Combining related questions into composites allows consumers to quickly review patient experience of care data and increases the statistical reliability of these measures. The three composite measures include: 1. Percent of patients who reported that their home health team gave care in a professional way. a. Short title: Care of Patients b. Includes survey questions: Q9, Q16, Q19, Q24 2. Percent of patients who reported that their home health team communicated well with them. a. Short title: Communications Between Providers and Patients b. Includes survey questions: Q2, Q15, Q17, Q18, Q22, Q23 3. Percent of patients who reported that their home health team discussed medicines, pain, and home safety with them. a. Short title: Specific Care Issues b. Includes survey questions: Q3, Q4, Q5, Q10, Q12, Q13, Q14 2012 Deyta LLC 3

The two global item measures include: 1. Percent of patients who gave their home health agency a rating of 9 or 10 on a scale from 0 (lowest) to 10 (highest). a. Short title: Overall Rating b. This score is drawn only from survey question Q20 2. Percent of patients who reported YES, they would definitely recommend the home health agency to friends and family. a. Short title: Willingness to Recommend b. This score is drawn only from survey question Q25 c. Includes only those patients who responded definitely yes to Q25 When HHCAHPS Survey Results are Posted HHCAHPS Survey results are publically reported when a Home Health Agency (HHA) has reported 12 months of HHCAHPS Survey data. The publically reported results are based on the data from a sample of patients, collected according to the CMS data collection protocol for the HHCAHPS Survey. The results are not publically reported until six months following the patients care. For example, the first set of results was released on April 19, 2012 for data from patients who received skilled home care from October 2010 through September 2011. This time lag is necessary to allow for data analysis and posting by CMS. Dry run data is not included in the calculation of the publically reported scores. The results are refreshed quarterly, with data from the oldest quarter being replaced by data from the most recent quarter of the HHCAHPS Survey. HHCAHPS results are reported at the level of the HHA s CMS Certification Number (CCN). HHAs participating in the HHCAHPS Survey are able to preview their survey results each reporting period on the HHCAHPS Survey website about two weeks before the results are publically reported. Patient Mix Adjustment Factors To ensure that publically reported HHCAHPS scores allow fair and accurate comparisons across HHAs, it is necessary to adjust for factors that are not directly related to home health care performance but which affect how patients answer HHCAHPS Survey items. CMS applies risk or factor adjustments (a statistical methodology) to the HHCAHPS scores that are intended to eliminate any advantage or disadvantage in scores that might result from the characteristics of patients that are beyond an agency s control. Before the HHCAHPS results are publically reported, they are adjusted for patient mix differences. The HHCAHPS Survey scores are adjusted for differences between an HHA s patient composition according to the HHA s patient mix characteristics and the overall national composition of home health patients on these same characteristics. A 2010 study conducted by CMS concluded that certain patient characteristics (i.e. age, education, etc.) were shown to have an effect on the way patients respond to survey questions. Therefore, CMS makes adjustments or changes to the data before the results are publically reported. The changes allow one to look at the results across different agencies and know that they represent true differences in care perception and cannot be interpreted as a factor of differences of the patient population. 2012 Deyta LLC 4

Patient Mix Adjustment Factors continued Patient-Mix Adjustment Factors Patient age Educational attainment level Self-reported overall health status Self-reported mental health status Presence of diagnosis of schizophrenia or dementia Whether the patient lives alone Whether the survey was conducted by a proxy respondent Whether the interview was conducted in a language other than English How the Patient Mix Adjustment Factors are Calculated Patient mix factor adjustment must be applied individually to each measure and for each participating HHA. CMS recalculates patient mix adjustment factors quarterly. In order to calculate the patient mix factor adjustment, several things must be known: 1. How certain demographics or characteristics affect the likelihood of a person to give a top box rating 2. The overall national composition of patient mix for HHAs (mean score) 3. The individual HHA s composition of patient mix (mean score) 4. The individual HHA s unadjusted measure score The adjustment is made by subtracting the national mean for a given patient characteristic (#2) from the HHA s mean on this same patient characteristic (#3) and multiplying this difference to a predetermined number calculated by CMS (#1). That number is then applied to the individual HHAs unadjusted score (#4). Example of Patient Mix Adjustment Factor Calculations When an HHA s measure score is adjusted, it either goes up or down depending on how the HHA s patient mix composition compares to the national patient mix composition. Let s look at an example. For this example, we are only going to risk adjust age and mental/emotional status, but from this, one can see how it works and can be applied to any other patient mix characteristic. According to the table below, more than half of BestCare HHA s patients are less than 65 years old (60%) and most have poor mental status (60%). By looking at the adjustment factor provided in the table, we know that people less than 65 years old and people with fair/poor mental status tend to give lower ratings to the Overall Rating Measure (Q20 on the HHCAHPS). Therefore, because adjustments help make the scores fair by reducing the effect of the patient mix, we would expect that the patient mix factor adjustment would raise our mean for this measure. 2012 Deyta LLC 5

Example of Patient Mix Factor Adjustment Calculations continued A B C D Row Patient Mix Characteristic Adjustment Factor National Mean for Level (totals 100%) Age R1 18-49.071.04.30 R2 50-64.024.115.30 R3 65-74 (referent) --.237.20 R4 75-84.003.327.10 R5 Over 85.013.281.10 R6 Mental/Emotional Status R7 Excellent/Very good -.043.405.20 R8 Good (referent) --.318.20 R9 Fair/Poor.018.277.60 BestCare HHA Mean for Characteristic Level Let s also assume that our unadjusted agency mean for this measure was 84%. To do the calculation, we would first need the National Mean for each patient characteristic level (Col C) and BestCare HHA Mean for each patient characteristic level (Col D). We also need the adjustment factor (Col. B). CMS must provide both the adjustment factor and the national mean for agencies. Calculation: Step 1: Adjusted score = unadjusted agency mean +[for R1(col B)(col D col C)]+[for R2(col B)(col D col C)]+R3+R4. Adjusted score =.84+(.071)(.30-.04)+(.024)(.30-.115)+(.003)(.10-.327)+(.013)(.10-.281)+(-.043)(.20-.405)+(.018)(.60-.277) Step 2: Adjusted score =.84+(.018)+(.004)+(-.001)+(-.002)+(.01)+(.006) Step 3: Adjusted score =.84+.035 =.875 or 87.5% From this you can see that our biggest advantages (what helped raise our score the most) is the large number of patients we treated in the 18-49 category (they tend to rate lower) and the lower number of patients in the excellent mental health (they also tend to rate lower). Our score is raised by 3.5% 2012 Deyta LLC 6

Ongoing HHCAHPS Public Reporting HHCAHPS Survey results will be reported on a quarterly basis hereafter, with the results calculated from the most recently available 12 months of data. That is, data from the most recent quarter will replace data from the oldest quarter. Patient mix adjustment factors to account for HHA differences in patient mix are recalculated quarterly and applied to HHA scores for the respective quarter. The last four quarters of adjusted scores are then averaged to produce the current quarter s published scores. An HHA will only be able to approximate the effect of patient mix adjustment on its HHCAHPS Survey results. Exact replication of published HHCAHPS results is not possible because of the effects of data cleaning and small differences between the effects of quarterly patient mix adjustments and the four quarter averages provided by CMS. Additional Resources To view the publically reported scores, please visit Home Health Compare: http://www.medicare.gov/homehealthcompare/search.aspx To learn more about the HHCAHPS, please visit CMS dedicated website: https://homehealthcahps.org/ Questions may also be sent to the HHCAHPS Survey Coordination Team via e-mail at hhcahps@rti.org or call toll-free at 866.354.0985. About Deyta Deyta partners with thousands of hospice, home health, human services and other organizations, to measurably improve the quality of patient care and services, the experience of customers and employees, and the effectiveness of their operations. With 20 years of experience in survey administration and healthcare quality improvement, Deyta offers proven solutions with powerful reporting and extraordinary customer service. Our clients are providers, industry associations, regulatory agencies, vendors, and consultants who are committed to improving healthcare. 2012 Deyta LLC 7