Nursing Home Compare Five-Star Ratings of Nursing Homes Provider Rating Report

Similar documents
Nursing Home Compare Five-Star Ratings of Nursing Homes Provider Rating Report

Session Objectives. Long Term Care Luncheon: The CMS Five-Star Quality Rating System. Quality Ratings of U.S. Nursing Homes on Nursing Home Compare

Design for Nursing Home Compare Five-Star Quality Rating System: Technical Users Guide

New York State Department of Health 2016 Nursing Home Quality Initiative Methodology

Understanding the Five Star Quality Rating System Design For Nursing Home Compare

FH16 - Developed by Polaris Group Page 1 of 140

Why is the Five Star Rating Important in Today s LTPAC Reimbursement World?

Design for Nursing Home Compare Five-Star Quality Rating System: Technical Users Guide

Leveraging Your Facility s 5 Star Analysis to Improve Quality

Design for Nursing Home Compare Five-Star Quality Rating System: Technical Users Guide

QIES Help Desk. Objectives. Nursing Home Quality Initiatives and Five-Star Quality Rating System

QM, 5 Star, VBP: Taking the Confusion Out of All the Reports and the Impact of QMs on Reimbursement Presented for WHCA

Disclaimer. Learning Objectives

Improving Nursing Home Compare for Consumers. Five-Star Quality Rating System

LSSCC Action Period 1: Composite Score Reports June 25, 2015

Quality Outcomes and Data Collection

Design for Nursing Home Compare Five-Star Quality Rating System: Technical Users Guide. February 2015

Methodology Report U.S. News & World Report Nursing Home Finder

Quality Measures and the Five-Star Rating

Quality Measures (QM) & Five Star Rating System. Objectives 4/18/2016 MDS CODING FOR QUALITY MEASURES

Understanding Your Quality Measures. Craig Bettles Data Visualization Manager Consonus Healthcare

11/23/2011. Proactive vs. Reactive Relationship

HSAG the QIN-QIO NHQCC II and CDI Initiative Kick-off

AHCA NURSING HOME PROSPECTIVE PAYMENT SYSTEM STUDY

WHAT S IN THE STARS FOR YOUR FACILITY

What s Happening in the Nursing Home? Cherry Meier, RN, MSN, NHA Vice President of Public Affairs

LTC Five-Star Rating System

MDS Coding. Antipsychotic Quality Measure

Design for Nursing Home Compare 5-Star Rating System: Users Guide

Design for Nursing Home Compare Five-Star Quality Rating System: Technical Users Guide

Maggie Turner RN RAC-CT Kara Schilling RN RAC-CT Lisa Gourley RN RAC-CT

Nursing Home Quality Initiative (NHQI) HMM, CPAs LLP HMM Consulting, A Division of HMM, CPAs LLP February 17, 2016

Understanding the New MDS 3.0 Quality Measures. Updated May 2017

Quality Metrics in Post-Acute Care: FIVE-STAR QUALITY RATING SYSTEM

Nursing Home Walk of Fame Visiting What Really Works. Call in Number

Session #: R14. Robin L. Hillier. Agenda 4/9/2014. Simply Quality Measures. (330) RLH Consulting.

UNDERSTANDING THE NEW MDS 3.0 QUALITY MEASURES

UNDERSTANDING THE NEW MDS 3.0 QUALITY MEASURES

US Health Health Policy

The CMS Five Star Nursing Home Rating System An incomplete and inaccurate consumer tool

MEASURING POST ACUTE CARE OUTCOMES IN SNFS. David Gifford MD MPH American Health Care Association Atlantic City, NJ Mar 17 th, 2015

QAPI: Driving Quality or Just Driving You Crazy

Center for Clinical Standards and Quality/Survey & Certification Group. Fiscal Year (FY) 2016 to FY 2017 Nursing Home Action Plan. Memorandum Summary

How Does Payroll-Based Journal Reporting Impact Your Five Star? Don Feige, ezpbj

Restorative Nursing: The NHA s Role and Organizational Outcomes

MDS 3.0/RUG IV OVERVIEW

Navigating the New CMS Quality Measures

CMS Announced Changes On Feb 12 th CMS s Open Door Forum conference call

CMS Staffing Data Requirements

Changes to CMS Five-Star: What Investors and Operators Need to Know

6/29/2015. Focused Survey for MDS Assessment. Objectives: Review the results of the MDS pilot study.

The Center based its evaluation on the SFF list that was released by CMS on May 16, The list includes five categories of 191 SFFs:

February 17, Main Street, Suite 1200 Buffalo, NY T: (716) F: (716)

Journal of Business Case Studies November, 2008 Volume 4, Number 11

Quality Measures Are My Friends

Agenda: Noon Overview of the regulatory sections affected by the Reform of RoP in Phase 2

Will PBJ erase your star rating?

LTCH Lay of the Land: Reporting the LTCH CARE Data Set. July 30, 2012

CLINICAL REIMBURSEMENT ESSENTIALS FOR LEADERS Using your SNF data. David Rokes, RN C.E.O. Post Acute Consulting, LLC

CMS RAI MANUAL ERRATA DOCUMENT

New Quality Measures Will Soon Impact Nursing Home Compare and the 5-Star Rating System: What providers need to know

CMS s RAI Version 3.0 Manual October 2016

Policy Brief. Nurse Staffing Levels and Quality of Care in Rural Nursing Homes. rhrc.umn.edu. January 2015

HOW HOME HEALTH COMPARE ITEMS ARE CALCULATED

HOW PROCESS MEASURES ARE CALCULATED

FLORIDA NURSING HOME PROSPECTIVE PAYMENT Working Group Recommendations

QUALITY INCENTIVE POINTS OHIO. Mandy Smith Regulatory Director Ohio Health Care Association

Introducing the Discharge to Community Quality Measure

The Inpatient Rehabilitation Facility Quality Reporting Program. Overview. Legislative Mandate. Anne Deutsch, RN, PhD, CRRN

SUMMARY OF THE CHANGES TO FIVE STAR ANNOUNCED BY CMS. Mark Parkinson AHCA/NCAL President & CEO All member call February 13 th, 2015

RYTES COMPANY 2016 YEAR IN REVIEW

AHCA Requests to CMS

Quality Measurement in Skilled Nursing Facilities Five Star Rating System

2017 Long-Term Care Quality Improvement Program (QIP) Program Description & Measurement Specifications

JudyWilhide.com (c) 1

Maximizing the Power of Your Data. Peggy Connorton, MS, LNFA AHCA Director, Quality and LTC Trend Tracker

Value Based Care in LTC: The Quality Connection- Phase 2

Center for Clinical Standards and Quality/Survey & Certification Group

Final Rule Summary. Medicare Skilled Nursing Facility Prospective Payment System Fiscal Year 2017

Any Willing Qualified Provider Appeal Request and Quality Performance Plan (QPP) Report Webinar

MDS 3.0: What Leadership Needs to Know

What to Expect on Your Next Survey

How I Plan on Succeeding with the Payroll Based Journal

NEW JERSEY HOSPITAL PERFORMANCE REPORT 2012 DATA PUBLISHED 2015 TECHNICAL REPORT: METHODOLOGY RECOMMENDED CARE (PROCESS OF CARE) MEASURES

Electronic Staffing Data Submission Payroll-Based Journal

Selected Measures United States, 2011

Data Stewardship: Essential Skills for Long Term Care Facility Managers

Goodbye Grace Period. What will be expected from your Facility Assessment in the Coming Year. Ellen Kuebrich Chief Strategy Officer, Providigm

Five-Star Quality Rating System Technical Users Guide

What Story Is Your SNF Data Telling?

FACT SHEET A CONSUMER GUIDE TO CHOOSING A NURSING HOME DO YOUR HOMEWORK FIRST, EXPLORE ALTERNATIVES

MDS 3.0/RUG IV Distance Learning Series January - May 2016

2018 Press Ganey Award Criteria

Proposed fy17 LTCH PPS: New rules for Quality & Referrals

Hospital Compare Preview Report Help Guide

DATA ACCURACY A KEY FACTOR FOR SUCCESSFUL OPERATIONS

FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS

New Survey Focus MDS Accuracy and Staffing -Compliance Risk Alert-

5/26/2016. What's New? What's Changed? Urgent Updates QM Manual v10. Faculty Disclosure. Requirements for Successful Completion

Nurse Staffing and Quality in Rural Nursing Homes

Transcription:

Overall Quality Nursing Home Compare Five-Star Ratings of Nursing Homes Provider Rating Report Incorporating data reported through 03/31/2018 Ratings for Saint Anthony Rehab And Nursing Center (155604) Lafayette, Indiana Health Inspection Quality Measures Staffing RN Staffing The April 2018 Five-Star ratings provided above will be displayed for your nursing home on the Nursing Home Compare (NHC) website on April 25, 2018. The Quality Measure (QM) Rating that will be posted is based on MDS 3.0 quality measures using data from the first, second, third and fourth quarters of 2017, and claims-based quality measures using data from 7/1/2015 through 06/30/2016. The Five-Star Helpline will operate Monday - Friday, for two weeks from April 23, 2018 - May 4, 2018. Hours of operation will be from 9 am - 5 pm ET, 8 am - 4 pm CT, 7 am - 3 pm MT, and 6 am - 2 pm PT. The Helpline number is 1-800-839-9290. The Helpline will be available again May 21 - May 25, 2018. During other times, direct inquiries to BetterCare@cms.hhs.gov, as Helpline staff will respond to e-mail inquiries when the telephone Helpline is not operational. **NEW** PBJ Staffing Data are Now Being Used to Calculate the Staffing Rating Beginning this month, the PBJ staffing data for October 1, 2017 to December 31, 2017 (submitted by the February 14, 2018 deadline) are being utilized to calculate the Five-Star overall staffing rating shown above. Prior to this month, the overall staffing rating was based on the reported staffing hours provided on the CMS-671 form from the most recent standard survey and expected staffing hours based on the acuity of the residents using RUG-III data. The April 2018 expected staffing values are based on resident acuity levels using RUG-IV data. A revised Five-Star Rating Technical Users' Guide containing a detailed explanation of the changes to the staffing rating and the updated case-mix adjustment methodology will be available with the April 2018 Nursing Home Compare website update. Please see the link to the updated Technical Users' Guide located later in this report. If your facility did not submit PBJ data by the February 14, 2018 deadline, then both the overall staffing and RN staffing ratings will be set to one star until the next quarterly update, pending on-time and accurate PBJ data submission by the next deadline of May 15, 2018. The PBJ data for January 1, 2018 to March 31, 2018 (submitted and accepted by the May 15, 2018 deadline) will be used to calculate the staffing ratings in July 2018.

The data listed below include the reported, expected and case-mix adjusted scores for your facility utilizing the PBJ data for October 1, 2017 to December 31, 2017 (submitted by the February 14, 2018 deadline) and the average MDS-based resident census. PBJ Nurse Staffing Information for October 1, 2017 to December 31, 2017 for Provider Number 155604 Reported Hours per Resident per Day (HRD) All licensed nurse staff 1 hour and 51 Expected HRD Case-Mix Adjusted HRD RN 29 24 28 1 LPN/LVN 1 hour and 21 Nurse aide 2 hours and 35 Total nurse staff (RN, LPN/LVN, and Nurse Aide) 4 hours and 25 Physical therapist 2 0 47 1 hour and 19 2 hours and 3 3 hours and 15 2 hours and 37 4 hours and 24 1 1 Please see the staffing tables located in the Technical Users' Guide (link provided below) for the specific cut points utilized with the bold case-mix adjusted values. 2 Physical therapist staffing is not included in the staffing rating calculation. The average number of residents for your facility (based on the MDS census) is 80.0. Some providers may see 'Not Available' for the reported hours per resident per day in the table above and a staffing rating will not be calculated for these facilities. There are six reasons this could occur: 1. No MDS census data were available for the facility 2. No on-time PBJ nurse staffing data were submitted for the facility. As a result, the staffing ratings will be set to one star (unless the facility is listed as 'Too New to Rate') 3. The facility had 5 or more days with no nurse staffing (on days when there were residents in the facility) 4. The total reported staffing hours per resident per day (HRD) were excessively low (<1.5 HRD) 5. The total reported staffing HRD were excessively high (>12.0 HRD) 6. The total reported nurse aide HRD were excessively high (>5.25 HRD) Additionally, if RUG-IV data are not available for your facility then the expected and case-mix adjusted values will show as Not Available above and your facility will not receive a staffing rating or RN staffing rating. Beginning in April 2018, a gray icon will appear on the Nursing Home Compare website for facilities that submitted staffing data with seven or more days with no RN staffing data (on days there were residents in the facility) for the period of October 1, 2017 to December 31, 2017. Beginning in July 2018, facilities that report seven or more days without RN staffing (on days when there were residents in the facility) will receive a one star overall staffing rating and a one star RN staffing rating, regardless of the staffing hours submitted for the quarter.

For more detailed information about the changes to the staffing rating calculation, please see the April 2018 Five-Star Quality Rating Technical Users' Guide that will be available at: https://www.cms.gov/medicare/provider-enrollment-and-certification/certificationandcomplianc/downloads/usersguide.pdf Additionally, please see the Quality, Safety and Oversight memorandum, QSO-18-17-NH, at the following link for more information about the use of the PBJ staffing data: https://www.cms.gov/medicare/provider-enrollment-and-certification/surveycertificationgeninfo/policy-and-memos-to-states-and-regions-items/qso18-17-nh.html?dlpage=1&dlentries=10&dlsort=2&dlsortdir= descending Please email NHStaffing@cms.hhs.gov for questions about the PBJ staffing data or for reported staffing hours displaying 'Not Available.' Information about staffing data submission is available on the CMS website. Go to: https://www.cms.gov/medicare/quality-initiatives-patient-assessment-instruments/nursinghomequalityinits/staffing-data-submission-pbj.html For additional assistance with or questions related to the PBJ registration process, please contact the QTSO Help Desk at 877-201-4721 or via email at help@qtso.com. A public use file (PUF) with staffing data submitted through the PBJ system for the October 1, 2017 to December 31, 2017 reporting period is now available. These quarterly data files have daily staff hours for each of the nursing job categories as well as the daily resident census derived from the MDS. The files and detailed documentation about their contents and structure are available for viewing and downloading from data.cms.gov. More information on the PUF can be found in a CMS survey and certification memo at the following link: https://www.cms.gov/medicare/provider-enrollment-and-certification/surveycertificationgeninfo/downloads/survey-and-cert-letter-17-45.pdf Important Information about the Health Inspection Rating As of February 2018, the Five-Star health inspection rating listed above is based on two cycles of survey data. Cycle 1 (weighted 60%) includes the most recent standard survey that occurred before November 28, 2017 and complaint surveys from November 28, 2016 through November 27, 2017. Cycle 2 (weighted 40%) includes the previous standard survey and complaint surveys from November 28, 2015 through November 27, 2016. Surveys that occurred on or after November 28, 2017 (under the new survey process) will be published on NHC, but will not be incorporated into the calculation of the Five-Star ratings for 12 months. Facilities with only one standard survey prior to November 28, 2017 will be listed as "Too New to Rate" on the Nursing Home Compare website. For more detailed information on the health inspection rating calculation, please visit the updated Five-Star Quality Rating Technical Users' Guide located at: https://www.cms.gov/medicare/provider-enrollment-and-certification/certificationandcomplianc/downloads/usersguide.pdf For more information about the changes to Nursing Home Compare and Phase 2 of the Requirements for Participation please see S&C memorandum 18-04-NH available at: https://www.cms.gov/medicare/provider-enrollment-and-certification/surveycertificationgeninfo/policy-and-memos-to-states-and-regions.html

Your Health Inspection Rating Provided below are the survey dates included in the calculation of the Five-Star health inspection rating for your facility. For more detailed information about the deficiencies cited on each survey, please visit: https://data.medicare.gov/data/nursing-home-compare Health Inspection Rating Cycle 1 Survey Dates: February 28, 2017 Health Inspection Rating Cycle 2 Survey Dates: December 18, 2015 Total weighted health inspection score for your facility (based on 2 cycles of data): 19.2 State-level Health Inspection Cut Points for Indiana 1 Star 2 Stars 3 Stars 4 Stars 5 Stars >78.40 42.41-78.40 25.61-42.40 12.01-25.60 0.00-12.00 Please note, the state level cut points may vary, but the total weighted health inspection score for your facility is only compared to the cut points if there is a change. For most facilities, the last change occurred in February 2018 when the health inspection rating methodology began using only two cycles of survey data.

MDS 3.0 Long-Stay Measures Lower percentages are better. Percentage of residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury Quality Measures that are Included in the QM Rating Provider 155604 State National 2017Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017Q4 4Q avg Rating Points 1 4Q avg 4Q avg 4.9% 6.0% 5.6% 8.8% 6.4% 20.00 3.7% 3.4% Percentage of residents who self-report 3.0% 3.5% 2.2% 6.6% 3.8% 80.00 5.1% 5.6% moderate to severe pain 2 Percentage of high-risk residents with pressure ulcers Percentage of residents with a urinary tract infection 0.0% 4.0% 1.9% 2.1% 2.0% 100.00 5.6% 5.6% 6.9% 4.5% 5.6% 9.0% 6.5% 40.00 2.8% 3.4% Percentage of residents with a catheter 3.1% 2.9% 0.0% 0.0% 1.4% 80.00 1.5% 1.8% inserted and left in their bladder 2 Percentage of residents who were physically restrained Percentage of residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased Percentage of residents who received an antipsychotic medication 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 100.00 0.3% 0.4% 11.3% 8.9% 19.7% 12.3% 13.2% 80.00 16.2% 15.0% 13.3% 10.6% 10.1% 10.6% 11.1% 80.00 15.3% 15.5% Percentage of residents whose ability to 25.8% 17.2% 27.4% 11.8% 20.6% 40.00 17.2% 18.3% move independently worsened 2,3 MDS 3.0 Short-Stay Measures Higher percentages are better. Percentage of residents who made 89.5% 90.1% 90.0% 88.6% 89.6% 100.00 66.8% 67.6% improvements in function 2,3 Lower percentages are better. Percentage of residents who self-report moderate to severe pain 21.3% 23.0% 30.9% 26.8% 25.0% 40.00 12.9% 13.1% Percentage of residents with pressure 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 100.00 1.1% 0.8% ulcers that are new or worsened 2 Percentage of residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication 1.3% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.3% 80.00 2.1% 2.0% Time period for data used in reporting is 7/1/2015 through 06/30/2016 Provider 155604 State National Claims-Based Measures A higher percentage is better. Observed Rate 4 Expected Rate 5 Risk- Adjusted Rate 6 Rating Points 1 Risk- Adjusted Rate Risk- Adjusted Rate Percentage of residents who were successfully 69.5% 64.6% 64.0% 80.00 55.6% 56.1% discharged to the community 2,3 Lower percentages are better. Percentage of residents who were re-hospitalized after a nursing home admission 2,3 19.8% 19.7% 21.6% 60.00 19.8% 21.1% Percentage of residents who had an outpatient 9.9% 10.7% 10.4% 60.00 11.6% 11.9% emergency department visit 2,3 Total Quality Measure Points Total QM points with new quality measures fully weighted for Provider 155604 1140.00

MDS3.0 Quality Measures that are Not Included in the QM Rating Note: For the following long-stay MDS measures, higher percentages are better. Percentage of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine Percentage of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine Note: for the following long-stay MDS measures, lower percentages are better. Percentage of low-risk long-stay residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder Percentage of long-stay residents who lose too much weight Percentage of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antianxiety or hypnotic medication Note: For the following short-stay MDS measures, higher percentages are better. Percentage of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine Percentage of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine Provider 155604 State National 2017Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017Q4 4Q avg 4Q avg 4Q avg 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 94.5% 95.1% 98.4% 100% 100% 100% 99.6% 92.6% 94.1% 58.5% 48.8% 56.8% 47.8% 52.9% 52.0% 47.9% 13.8% 13.4% 4.2% 3.0% 8.4% 7.7% 7.1% 0.0% 1.6% 0.0% 0.0% 0.4% 7.8% 4.8% 20.8% 15.8% 16.4% 17.5% 17.5% 21.9% 22.4% 94.6% 94.6% 94.6% 94.6% 94.6% 80.7% 81.5% 96.4% 96.2% 94.1% 95.8% 95.7% 81.8% 83.3% The claims-based QMs will typically update every six months, while the MDS based QMs continue to update on a quarterly basis. For individual quarters for the MDS-based QMs, d<20 means the denominator for the measure (the number of eligible resident assessments) is too small to report. When d<20 is listed for individual quarters, a four quarter average may be displayed if there are at least 20 eligible resident assessments summed across the four quarters. Quality measures are reported as NA if: for measures not included in the QM rating, no data are available, or the total number of eligible resident assessments summed across the four quarters is less than 20; for measures included in the QM rating, data on this measure for your facility are not used in the calculation of your QM rating. This will happen if your facility does not have enough short-stay or long-stay measures upon which to base your rating and may occur even though your facility's data for this measure may be reported on Nursing Home Compare. 1 If the four quarter average for your facility is NA for a given QM, but rating points are provided for the QM, then there were insufficient data to compute a four-quarter average, and the points provided are based on the average points from other measures for which data are available according to the scoring rules described in detail in the Technical Users Guide. Go to: http://www.cms.gov/medicare/provider-enrollment-and-certification/certificationandcomplianc/fsqrs.html 2 These measures are risk adjusted. 3 This is one of the new QMs, first reported on Nursing Home Compare in April 2016. As of January 2017 the new QMs that are included in the QM rating contribute the same number of points (20-100 points for each individual QM) as the other QMs included in the QM rating. 4 The observed rate is the actual rate observed for the facility without any risk-adjustment. 5 The expected rate is the rate that would be expected for the facility given the risk-adjustment profile of the facility. 6 Risk-adjusted rate is adjusted for the expected rate of the outcome and is calculated as (observed rate for facility / expected rate for facility) * national average of observed rate. Only the risk-adjusted rate will appear on Nursing Home Compare. 7 This measure includes some imputed data because there are fewer than 20 resident assessments or stays across the four quarters. This value is used in calculating the QM points and used in the QM rating calculation but will not be displayed on Nursing Home Compare.

Nursing Home Statement(s) of Deficiencies (CMS 2567) for your nursing home will be posted for surveys that took place on the following date(s). This includes both standard surveys and complaints and includes surveys both before and after 11/28/2017. Dates of surveys without deficiencies are not listed. November 18, 2014 February 28, 2017