THE REED INSTITUTE. Independent Auditors Report in Accordance with the Uniform Guidance for Federal Awards. Year ended June 30, 2016

Similar documents
THE REED INSTITUTE. Independent Auditors Report in Accordance with the Uniform Guidance for Federal Awards

THE REED INSTITUTE. Independent Auditors Report in Accordance with OMB Circular A-133. Year ended June 30, 2013

THE REED INSTITUTE. Independent Auditors Report in Accordance with OMB Circular A-133. Year ended June 30, 2012

South Carolina State University

CITY OF ANAHEIM, CALIFORNIA. Single Audit Reports. June 30, (With Independent Auditors Report Thereon)

CSU FULLERTON AUXILIARY SERVICES CORPORATION Financial Statements and Supplementary Information

University Enterprises, Inc. Sacramento, California SINGLE AUDIT REPORTS

CITY OF SCHENECTADY, NEW YORK SINGLE AUDIT DECEMBER 31, 2017

CONTENTS. Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards Note to the Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards... 13

Single Audit Reporting Package

FEDERAL SINGLE AUDIT REPORT June 30, 2012

CONTENTS. Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards Note to the Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards...14

BOARD OF EDUCATION OF CARROLL COUNTY, MARYLAND Carroll County, Maryland. REPORT ON SINGLE AUDIT June 30, 2008

Comprehensive Annual Financial Report

Pinal County Community College District (Central Arizona College)

UNIVERSITY OF RHODE ISLAND (a Component Unit of the State of Rhode Island and Providence Plantations)

HENDERSHOT, BURKHARDT & ASSOCIATES CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS

OMB CIRCULAR A-133 SUPPLEMENTAL FINANCIAL REPORT. Year Ended June 30, 2012

INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' REPORTS ON INTERNAL CONTROL AND ON COMPLIANCE

EL PASO COUNTY, COLORADO FEDERAL AWARDS REPORTS IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE SINGLE AUDIT ACT DECEMBER 31, 2016

COUNTY OF BERKS, PENNSYLVANIA. Single Audit Report December 31, 2016

To the Board of Overseers of Harvard College:

OMB CIRCULAR A-133 SUPPLEMENTAL FINANCIAL REPORT

STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA OFFICE OF THE STATE AUDITOR BETH A. WOOD, CPA BEAUFORT COUNTY COMMUNITY COLLEGE

COUNTY OF ONONDAGA, NEW YORK

SANTA ROSA COUNTY, FLORIDA

PERALTA COMMUNITY COLLEGE DISTRICT SINGLE AUDIT REPORT JUNE 30, 2010

Single Audit Entrance Conference Uniform Guidance Refresher

SOUTHEAST MISSOURI STATE UNIVERSITY OMB CIRCULAR A-133 SINGLE AUDIT REPORT JUNE 30, 2009

MECKLENBURG COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA

STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA OFFICE OF THE STATE AUDITOR BETH A. WOOD, CPA


CITY OF SANTA MONICA, CALIFORNIA. Single Audit Reports and Housing Financial Data Schedules. For the Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 2015

COUNTY OF SHASTA SINGLE AUDIT REPORT YEAR ENDED JUNE 30, 2017

STATE OF MINNESOTA Office of the State Auditor

OMB Circular A-133 Reporting Package. Saginaw Valley State University. Year ended June 30, 2009

SINGLE AUDIT REPORTS

Schedule of Expenditure

STATE OF ILLINOIS UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS. Compliance Examination. (In Accordance With the Single Audit Act and OMB Circular A-133) June 30, 2011

Government Auditing Standards Report

Navigating the New Uniform Grant Guidance. Jack Reagan, Audit Partner Grant Thornton LLP. Grant Thornton. All rights reserved.

CITY OF ORLANDO, FLORIDA

Tri-County Metropolitan Transportation District Of Oregon

NORTH CENTRAL TEXAS COUNCIL OF GOVERNMENTS

University of Minnesota

CITY OF SACRAMENTO, CALIFORNIA. Single Audit Reports. For the Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 2010

NORTH CENTRAL TEXAS COUNCIL OF GOVERNMENTS

DRAFT FOR DISCUSSION PURPOSES ONLY

Kentucky Community And Technical College System

COUNTY OF ONONDAGA, NEW YORK

COUNTY OF STANISLAUS SINGLE AUDIT REPORT JUNE 30, 2015

Uniform Guidance - Lessons Learned And To Be Learned

COUNTY OF SANTA BARBARA, CALIFORNIA SINGLE AUDIT REPORTS FOR THE YEAR ENDED JUNE 30, 2017

This page intentionally left blank

County of Kent, Michigan. Year Ended December 31, Single Audit Act Compliance

GOVERNMENT AUDITING STANDARDS

COUNTY OF SONOMA, CALIFORNIA. Single Audit Report For the Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 2016

City of Miami, Florida

Nonprofit Single Audit and Major Program Determination Worksheet

SINGLE AUDIT SECTION

Section IV. Findings

The University of Massachusetts Report on Federal Financial Assistance Programs In Accordance With OMB Circular A-133 June 30, 2002

COUNTY OF ONONDAGA, NEW YORK REPORT REQUIRED BY THE SINGLE AUDIT ACT DECEMBER 31, 2013

STATUTORY REPORT SECTION. Single Audit Reports and Schedules

Single Audit Report. State of North Carolina. For the Year Ended June 30, Office of the State Auditor Beth A. Wood, CPA State Auditor

STATE OF MINNESOTA Office of the State Auditor

CITY OF RACINE Racine, Wisconsin

Federal Grant Guidance Compliance

COUNTY OF SONOMA, CALIFORNIA. Single Audit Report (OMB Circular A-133) For the Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 2014

University of Minnesota. Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards for the Year Ended June 30, 2004 and Independent Auditors Reports

CAL POLY POMONA FOUNDATION, INC. Single Audit Reports. For the Year Ended June 30, (With Independent Auditors Report Thereon)

COUNTY OF SAN MATEO STATEMENT OF GRANT REVENUES AND EXPENDITURES. With Auditor s Reports Thereon

ALPENA COMMUNITY COLLEGE

STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA OFFICE OF THE STATE AUDITOR BETH A. WOOD, CPA DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY

STATUTORY REPORT SECTION. Single Audit Reports and Schedules

State Agencies, Independent Auditors, North Carolina Local Governments and Public Authorities, interested parties

Auditor General s Role in the Florida Single Audit Act August 12, 2016

COMMONWEALTH OF THE NORTHERN MARIANA ISLANDS INDEPENDENT AUDITORS REPORTS ON INTERNAL CONTROL AND ON COMPLIANCE YEAR ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2016

APPENDIX VII OTHER AUDIT ADVISORIES

Audit of Federal Awards Performed in Accordance with U.S. Office of Management and Budget Circular A-133. Federal Grant Programs

STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA

Department of Human Services Division of Medical Assistance and Health Services Transportation Broker Services Contract Capitation Rates

STATE OF MINNESOTA Office of the State Auditor

CITY OF STOCKTON, CALIFORNIA. Single Audit Reports (OMB Circular A-133) For the Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 2010

CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF LOS ANGELES, INC.

CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF LOS ANGELES, INC.

City and County of Denver

City and County of Denver

GRANTS AND CONTRACTS (FINANCIAL GRANTS MANAGEMENT)

Felipe Lopez, Vavrinek, Trine, Day & Co., LLP

Texas Association of County Auditors

TARRANT COUNTY, TEXAS

COUNTY OF YOLO, CALIFORNIA. Single Audit Report (OMB Circular A-133) FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED JUNE 30, 2012

Central Louisiana Business Incubator

Uniform Guidance Year Two of the Audit Requirements Now What? CACUBO

STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA

HUMBOLDT STATE UNIVERSITY SPONSORED PROGRAMS FOUNDATION

City of Miami, Florida

COUNTY OF SONOMA, CALIFORNIA. Single Audit Report. For the Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 2013

The Uniform Guidance 2 CFR 200 A Guide to Risk-Based Grants Management

Transcription:

Independent Auditors Report in Accordance with the Uniform Guidance for Federal Awards

Table of Contents Independent Auditors Report on Compliance for Each Major Program; Report on Internal Control over Compliance; and Report on Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards Required by Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations Part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards 1 Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards 4 Notes to Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards 5 Schedule of Findings and Questioned Costs 7 Page

KPMG LLP Suite 3800 1300 South West Fifth Avenue Portland, OR 97201 Independent Auditors Report on Compliance for Each Major Federal Program; Report on Internal Control Over Compliance; and Report on Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards Required by Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations Part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards The Board of Trustees The Reed Institute: Report on Compliance for Each Major Federal Program We have audited Reed Institute s (the College) compliance with the types of compliance requirements described in the OMB Compliance Supplement that could have a direct and material effect on each of the College s major federal programs for the year ended June 30, 2016. The College s major federal programs are identified in the summary of auditor s results section of the accompanying schedule of findings and questioned costs. Management s Responsibility Management is responsible for compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of its federal awards applicable to its federal programs. Auditors Responsibility Our responsibility is to express an opinion on compliance for each of the College s major federal programs based on our audit of the types of compliance requirements referred to above. We conducted our audit of compliance in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of America; the standards applicable to financial audits contained in Government Auditing Standards, issued by the Comptroller General of the United States; and the audit requirements of Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations Part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (Uniform Guidance). Those standards and the Uniform Guidance require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether noncompliance with the types of compliance requirements referred to above that could have a direct and material effect on a major federal program occurred. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence about the College s compliance with those requirements and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion on compliance for each major federal program. However, our audit does not provide a legal determination of the College s compliance. Opinion on Each Major Federal Program In our opinion, the College complied, in all material respects, with the types of compliance requirements referred to above that could have a direct and material effect on each of its major federal programs for the year ended June 30, 2016. KPMG LLP is a Delaware limited liability partnership, the U.S. member firm of KPMG International Cooperative ( KPMG International ), a Swiss entity.

Other Matters The results of our auditing procedures disclosed instances of noncompliance, which are required to be reported in accordance with the Uniform Guidance and which are described in the accompanying schedule of findings and questioned costs as item 2016-001. Our opinion on each major federal program is not modified with respect to these matters. The College s response to the noncompliance findings identified in our audit is described in the accompanying schedule of findings and questioned costs. The College s response was not subjected to the auditing procedures applied in the audit of compliance and, accordingly, we express no opinion on the response. Report on Internal Control Over Compliance Management of the College is responsible for establishing and maintaining effective internal control over compliance with the types of compliance requirements referred to above. In planning and performing our audit of compliance, we considered the College s internal control over compliance with the types of requirements that could have a direct and material effect on each major federal program to determine the auditing procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances for the purpose of expressing an opinion on compliance for each major federal program and to test and report on internal control over compliance in accordance with the Uniform Guidance, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of internal control over compliance. Accordingly, we do not express an opinion on the effectiveness of The College s internal control over compliance. A deficiency in internal control over compliance exists when the design or operation of a control over compliance does not allow management or employees, in the normal course of performing their assigned functions, to prevent, or detect and correct, noncompliance with a type of compliance requirement of a federal program on a timely basis. A material weakness in internal control over compliance is a deficiency, or combination of deficiencies, in internal control over compliance, such that there is a reasonable possibility that material noncompliance with a type of compliance requirement of a federal program will not be prevented, or detected and corrected, on a timely basis. A significant deficiency in internal control over compliance is a deficiency, or a combination of deficiencies, in internal control over compliance with a type of compliance requirement of a federal program that is less severe than a material weakness in internal control over compliance, yet important enough to merit attention by those charged with governance. Our consideration of internal control over compliance was for the limited purpose described in the first paragraph of this section and was not designed to identify all deficiencies in internal control over compliance that might be material weaknesses or significant deficiencies. We did not identify any deficiencies in internal control over compliance that we consider to be material weaknesses. Material weaknesses may exist that have not been identified. However, we identified a deficiency in internal control over compliance, as described in the accompanying schedule of findings and questioned costs as item 2016-001, that we consider to be a significant deficiency. The College s response to the internal control over compliance finding identified in our audit is described in the accompanying schedule of findings and questioned costs. The College's response was not subjected to the auditing procedures applied in the audit of compliance and, accordingly, we express no opinion on the response. The purpose of this report on internal control over compliance is solely to describe the scope of our testing of internal control over compliance and the results of that testing based on the requirements of the Uniform Guidance. Accordingly, this report is not suitable for any other purpose. 2

Report on Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards Required by the Uniform Guidance We have audited the financial statements of The College as of and for the year ended June 30, 2016, and have issued our report thereon dated October 7, 2016, which contained an unmodified opinion on those financial statements. Our audit was conducted for the purpose of forming an opinion on the financial statements as a whole. The accompanying schedule of expenditures of federal awards is presented for purposes of additional analysis as required by the Uniform Guidance and is not a required part of the financial statements. Such information is the responsibility of management and was derived from and relates directly to the underlying accounting and other records used to prepare the financial statements. The information has been subjected to the auditing procedures applied in the audit of the financial statements and certain additional procedures, including comparing and reconciling such information directly to the underlying accounting and other records used to prepare the financial statements or to the financial statements themselves, and other additional procedures in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of America. In our opinion, the schedule of expenditures of federal awards is fairly stated in all material respects in relation to the financial statements as a whole. October 7, 2016 3

Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards Federal Federal program Total CFDA identifying federal Federal Grantor/Pass-Through Grantor/Program or Cluster Title number expenditures Student Financial Assistance Cluster: Department of Education Programs: Federal Supplemental Educational Opportunity Grants 84.007 $ 209,939 Federal Work-Study Program 84.033 156,289 Federal Perkins Loan Program (note 4) 84.038 4,317,575 Federal Pell Grant Program 84.063 1,092,781 Federal Direct Student Loans 84.268 3,724,156 Total Student Financial Assistance Cluster 9,500,740 Research and Development Cluster: Department of Energy Programs Nuclear Energy Research, Development and Demonstration 81.121 NE0008249 62,994 Total Department of Energy 62,994 Department of Agriculture Programs, Pass-through Awards Pass though Virginia Tech Agriculture & Food Research Initiative 10.31 2015-67023-23001 41,047 Pass though UC Santa Cruz Agriculture & Food Research Initiative 10.31 2016-67019-25185 4,160 Total Department of Agriculture, Pass-through Awards 45,207 National Oceanic & Atmospheric Association Programs Climate and Atmospheric Research 11.431 NA130AR4310070 27,470 Total National Oceanic & Atmospheric Association 27,470 National Institute of Standards and Technology Programs Measurement and Engineering Research and Standards 11.609 70NANB13H060 9,565 Total National Institute of Standards and Technology 9,565 Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency Programs, Pass-through Awards Pass though UC San Diego Research and Technology Development 12.800 N66001-09-1-2025 73,673 Total Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency, Pass-through Awards 73,673 National Science Foundation Programs, Direct Awards Mathematical & Physical Sciences 47.049 DMS-1406327 25,770 Mathematical & Physical Sciences 47.049 1462793 2,706 Biological Sciences 47.074 IOS-0818957 1,113 Biological Sciences 47.074 DEB-1021582 23,563 Biological Sciences 47.074 MCB-1150213 47,329 Biological Sciences 47.074 IOS-1550957 75,599 Biological Sciences 47.074 IOS-1456486 57,013 Biological Sciences 47.074 IOS-1257469 179,729 Social, Behavioral, and Economic Sciences 47.075 SES-1528190 99,940 Education and Human Resources 47.076 DUE-1154004 164,870 Subtotal National Science Foundation, Direct Awards 677,632 National Science Foundation Programs, Pass-through Awards Pass-Through Cornell University Biological Sciences 47.074 DEB-1257522 32,283 Subtotal National Science Foundation, Pass-through Awards 32,283 Total National Science Foundation 709,915 Environmental Protection Agency Programs Anthropogenic Influence on Biogenic VOC Oxidation 66.509 RD-83539901-0 5,062 Total Environmental Protection Agency 5,062 National Institutes of Health Programs, Direct Awards Drug Abuse and Addiction Research Programs 93.279 1R01DA026127-01A1 31,743 Cancer Research Manpower 93.398 7K01CA163972-03 48,903 Extramural Research Programs in the Neurosciences 93.853 1R15NS091977-01 138,054 Allergy, Immunology, and Transplantation Research 93.855 2R01A1081879-05 263,218 Allergy, Immunology, and Transplantation Research 93.855 1R21AI115193-01 154,029 Vision Research 93.867 1R15EY023745-01 136,716 Subtotal National Institutes of Health, Direct Awards 772,663 National Institutes of Health Programs, Pass-Through Awards Pass-Through UC San Diego Alcohol Research Programs 93.273 2R01AA012171-11A1 248,620 Subtotal National Institutes of Health, Pass-Through Awards 248,620 Total National Institute of Health 1,021,283 Total Research and Development Cluster 1,955,169 Total expenditures of federal awards $ 11,455,909 See accompanying notes to schedule of expenditures of federal awards. 4

Notes to Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards (1) General The accompanying schedule of expenditures of federal awards (the Schedule) includes the federal award activity of Reed Institute (the College) under programs of the federal government for the year ended June 30, 2016. The information in this Schedule is presented in accordance with the requirements of Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations Part 200 (2 CFR 200), Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (Uniform Guidance). Because the Schedule presents only a selected portion of the operations of the College, it is not intended to and does not present the financial position, changes in net assets, or cash flows of the College. (2) Summary of Significant Accounting Policies Expenditures reported on the Schedule are reported on the accrual basis of accounting. Such expenditures are recognized following the cost principles contained in the Uniform Guidance, wherein certain types of expenditures are not allowable or are limited as to reimbursement. (3) Indirect Cost Rate The College has elected not to use the 10-percent de minimis indirect cost rate allowed under the Uniform Guidance. (4) Federal Student Loan Programs Perkins Loans The federal student loan programs listed subsequently are administered directly by the College, and balances and transactions relating to these programs are included in the College s basic financial statements. Loans outstanding at the beginning of the year of $3,848,094, loans made during the year of $421,168, and administrative costs of $48,313 are included in the total federal expenditures presented in the Schedule of $4,317,575. The balance of loans outstanding at June 30, 2016 consists of: Outstanding CFDA balance at number June 30, 2016 Perkins loans 84.038 $ 3,600,726 5 (Continued)

Notes to Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards (5) Federal Direct Loans During the year ended June 30, 2016, the College processed the following amount of new loans under the Federal Direct Loan program (which includes Stafford Loans and Parents Loans for undergraduate and graduate students): CFDA number Amount Direct loans 84.268 $ 2,276,718 Direct loans for graduate students 84.268 26,446 Direct parents loans for undergraduate students 84.268 1,420,992 Total $ 3,724,156 6

Schedule of Findings and Questioned Costs (1) Summary of Auditor s Results (a) Type of report issued on whether the financial statements were prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles: Unmodified (b) Internal control deficiencies over financial reporting disclosed by the audit of the financial statements: Material weaknesses: No Significant deficiencies: None Reported (c) (d) (e) (f) (g) Noncompliance material to the financial statements: No Internal control deficiencies over major programs disclosed by the audit: Material weaknesses: No Significant deficiencies: Yes Type of report issued on compliance for major programs: Unmodified Audit findings that are required to be reported in accordance with 2 CFR 200.516(a): Yes Major programs: Student Financial Assistance Cluster CFDA 84.007, 84.033, 84.038, 84.063, 84.268 Research and Development Cluster CFDA 10.310, 11.431, 11.609, 12.800, 47.049, 47.074, 47.075, 47.076, 66.509, 81.121, 93.273, 93.279, 93.398, 93.853, 93.855, 93.867 (h) Dollar threshold used to distinguish between Type A and Type B programs: $750,000 (i) Auditee qualified as a low-risk auditee: Yes (2) Findings Relating to the Financial Statements Reported in Accordance with Government Auditing Standards None (3) Findings and Questioned Costs Relating to Federal Awards Yes see finding 2016-001 on subsequent pages. 7

Schedule of Findings and Questioned Costs Finding 2016-001: Federal Program: CFDA Numbers: Award Numbers: Federal Agencies: Pass-through Entities: Student Financial Assistance Cluster 84.063 Federal Pell Grant Program None U.S. Department of Education None Federal Award Year: July 1, 2015 to June 30, 2016 Criteria: As shown in Federal Register /Vol. 81, No. 64 /Monday, April 4, 2016 /Notices, an institution must submit Pell Grant disbursement records to Common Origination and Disbursement, as applicable, no later than 15 days after making the disbursement or becoming aware of the need to adjust a previously reported disbursement. Statement of Condition: During our test work over the timeliness of reporting for Pell Grants, we noted that 24 out of 40 samples for students receiving Pell grants were submitted later than 15 days. Of the exceptions, 22 occurred related to disbursements made during August and September 2015. Cause and possible asserted effect: The employee responsible for compliance oversight left the College at the start of the fiscal year and her duties were transferred to an interim staff person. During this period of transition (August September), Pell disbursement records were not submitted to COD within the required 15-day time period. After the transition in employees and the hiring of a Banner consultant, these exceptions decreased significantly. Identification of questioned costs and how they were computed: $0 Whether the sampling was a statistically valid sample: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. 8

Schedule of Findings and Questioned Costs Identification of whether the audit finding is a repeat of a finding in the immediately prior audit and if so, the applicable prior year finding number: Recommendations: Views of responsible officials: This finding is not a repeat of a prior year reported finding. We recommend that management strengthen the organization's training and review procedures related to timeliness of reporting to ensure compliance with the reporting requirements as outlined in the Organization's policies and the Uniform Guidance. To ensure no further occurrences of exceptions, remediation has been put in place for Fiscal Year 2017. Management has implemented a change in monitoring timeliness of reporting compliance to correct the issue and has implemented the following: 1) training procedures and documentation have been created, 2) additional reports have been created to ensure Banner disbursement and COD disbursement dates are within the 15-day reporting timeframe, 3) cross-training efforts have been put in place to further ensure compliant reporting. 9