Meaningful Use Workgroup Recommendations and Call for Public Comment Summary The Charge of the Health IT Meaningful Use Workgroup

Similar documents
2011 Measures 2013 Objectives Goal is to guide and support care processes and care coordination

Computer Provider Order Entry (CPOE)

Meaningful Use Final Rule:

Stage 1 Meaningful Use Objectives and Measures

Appendix 4 CMS Stage 1 Meaningful Use Requirements Summary Tables 4-1 APPENDIX 4 CMS STAGE 1 MEANINGFUL USE REQUIREMENTS SUMMARY

Meaningful Use: Review of Changes to Objectives and Measures in Final Rule

Measures Reporting for Eligible Hospitals

The HITECH EHR "Meaningful Use" Requirements for Hospitals and Eligible Professionals

APPENDIX 2 NCQA PCMH 2011 AND CMS STAGE 1 MEANINGFUL USE REQUIREMENTS

Eligible Professionals (EP) Meaningful Use Final Objectives and Measures for Stage 1, 2011

UPDATE ON MEANINGFUL USE. HITECH Stimulus Act of 2009: CSC Point of View

Measures Reporting for Eligible Providers

What Will Stage I Mean for Consumers and Purchasers

Stage 2 Meaningful Use Objectives and Measures

Iatric Systems Supports the Achievement of Meaningful Use

STAGE 2 PROPOSED REQUIREMENTS FOR MEETING MEANINGFUL USE OF EHRs 1

PROPOSED MEANINGFUL USE STAGE 2 REQUIREMENTS FOR ELIGIBLE PROVIDERS USING CERTIFIED EMR TECHNOLOGY

THE MEANING OF MEANINGFUL USE CHANGES IN THE STAGE 2 MU FINAL RULE. Angel L. Moore, MAEd, RHIA Eastern AHEC REC

MEANINGFUL USE STAGE FOR ELIGIBLE PROVIDERS USING CERTIFIED EMR TECHNOLOGY

HIE Implications in Meaningful Use Stage 1 Requirements

Harnessing the Power of MHS Information Systems to Achieve Meaningful Use of Health Information

Proposed Meaningful Use Incentives, Criteria and Quality Measures Affecting Critical Access Hospitals

Meaningful Use Stage 1 Guide for 2013

HITECH* Update Meaningful Use Regulations Eligible Professionals

Meaningful Use: Introduction to Meaningful Use Eligible Providers

2015 MEANINGFUL USE STAGE 2 FOR ELIGIBLE PROVIDERS USING CERTIFIED EMR TECHNOLOGY

ARRA New Opportunities for Community Mental Health

Webinar #5 Meaningful Use: Looking Ahead to Stage 2 and CPS 12

Meaningful Use Hello Health v7 Guide for Eligible Professionals. Stage 2

ecw and NextGen MEETING MU REQUIREMENTS

during the EHR reporting period.

Meaningful use glossary and requirements table

REQUIREMENTS GUIDE: How to Qualify for EHR Stimulus Funds under ARRA

The results will also be used for public reporting for MN Community Measurement on mnhealthscores.org.

Meaningful Use Hello Health v7 Guide for Eligible Professionals. Stage 1

MEANINGFUL USE STAGE 2

HIE Implications in Meaningful Use Stage 1 Requirements

CHIME Concordance Analysis of Stage 2 Meaningful Use Final Rule - Objectives & Measures

Transforming Health Care with Health IT

HITECH Act American Recovery and Reinvestment Act (ARRA) Stimulus Package. HITECH Act Meaningful Use (MU)

Go! Knowledge Activity: Meaningful Use and the Hospital EHR

Meaningful Use May, 2012

Meaningful Use Measures: Quick Reference Guide Stage 2 (2014 and Beyond)

Meaningful Use Basics and Attestation Process Guide for Medicare and Medi-Cal. Lori Hack & Val Tuerk, Object Health

Qualifying for Medicare Incentive Payments with Crystal Practice Management. Version 1.0

Russell B Leftwich, MD

The American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009, Meaningful Use and the Impact on Netsmart s Behavioral Health Clients

Meaningful Use Stages 1 & 2

If you require films or CD, kindly give us 48 hour notice or make technologist aware at the time of your study.

Roll Out of the HIT Meaningful Use Standards and Certification Criteria

in partnership with EHR Meaningful Use Guide for HITECH Attestation

9/28/2011. Learning Agenda. Meaningful Use and why it s here. Meaningful Use Rules of Participation. Categories, Objectives and Thresholds

Meaningful Use Roadmap

Meaningful Use FAQs for Public Health

Provide an understanding of what comprises "meaningful use" of EHR technology

ASCs and Meaningful Use. Patrick Doyle, Vice President Sales Jessica McBrayer, RN, Business Analyst Ron Pelletier, Vice President Market Strategy

Patient Centered Medical Home 2011

Meaningful Use: Stage 1 and Beyond

Preparing for a New Era in Health Care

Medicare & Medicaid EHR Incentive Programs HIT Policy Committee May 6, 2014

Practice Transformation: Patient Centered Medical Home Overview

Proposed Meaningful Use Content and Comment Period. What the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act Means to Medical Practices

Meaningful Use Stage 2. Physician Office October, 2012

INTERGY MEANINGFUL USE 2014 STAGE 1 USER GUIDE Spring 2014

MEANINGFUL USE BASICS

HIT Incentives: Issues of Concern to Hospitals in the CMS Proposed Meaningful Use Stage 2 Rule

Meaningful Use Audits for Medicare and Medicaid. Shay Surowiak, RN, BSN, CHTS-CP HIT Practice Advisor

Meaningful Use for 2014 Stag St e ag 1 Or Or Stag St e ag e 2 For Fo r 2014? Meaningful Meaningful Use: Stag St e ag e 1 1 Fo r Fo 2014

PPC2: Patient Tracking and Registry Functions

Part 3: NCQA PCMH 2014 Standards

Common Sense Nuts & Bolts of a Usable Robust EHR: Pointers & Pitfalls Overview of ONC Planned Efforts

Community Health Centers. May 6, 2010

A complete step by step guide on how to achieve Meaningful Use Core Set Measures in Medgen EHR.

Meaningful Use Certification Details

EHR Meaningful Use Guide

American Recovery and Reinvestment Act (ARRA) of 2009

Understanding Your Meaningful Use Report

Meaningful Use FAQs for Behavioral Health

Stage 1 Changes Tipsheet Last Updated: August, 2012

The History of Meaningful Use

Meaningful Use Participation Basics for the Small Provider

Moving HIT and Meaningful Use

AHA Survey on Hospitals Ability to Meet Meaningful Use Requirements of the Medicare and Medicaid Electronic Health Records Incentive Programs

Meaningful Use Stage 1 and 2 Your Survival Guide!

Medicare & Medicaid. William Kassler, MD Chief Medical Officer Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services Boston, MA

INTERGY MEANINGFUL USE 2014 STAGE 2 USER GUIDE Spring 2014

CMS EHR Incentive Programs Overview

MEANINGFUL USE TRAINING SCENARIOS GUIDE

HIE Data: Value Proposition for Payers and Providers

Results will be used for public reporting by MDH and MN Community Measurement on mnhealthscores.org.

Medicare & Medicaid EHR Incentive Programs

Medicare and Medicaid EHR Incentive Program. Stage 3 and Modifications to Meaningful Use in 2015 through 2017 Final Rule with Comment

Core Measure Set. Status. MU1 Increase from 30% New. Computerized Physician Order Entry Use computerized provider order. NextGen EHR Medication Module

2014 PCMH Standards: How CPCI Can Help with Transformation. CHCANYS Quality Improvement Program November 20, 2014

Meaningful Use Stage 2 Strategies. Presented by: C. Johnson, BS-HSA

Security Risk Analysis and 365 Days of Meaningful Use. Rodney Gauna & Val Tuerk, Object Health

Meaningful Use Update: Stage 3 and Beyond. Carla McCorkle, Midas+ Solutions CQM Product Lead

THE ECONOMICS OF MEDICAL PRACTICE UNDER HIPAA/HITECH

Meaningful Use Stage 2 For Eligible and Critical Access Hospitals

California Medical Association

Transcription:

Meaningful Use Workgroup Recommendations and Call for Public Comment Health Information Technology Policy Committee June 16, 2009 Hubert H. Humphrey Building, Washington DC Submitted by Jonathan French, Manager of Federal Affairs, HIMSS Summary At the June 16, 2009 Health Information Technology Policy Committee Meeting, the Health Information Technology Policy Committee Meaningful Use Workgroup presented their initial recommendations for a definition of meaningful use of health IT. Public comments on these recommendations (listed starting on page 2 of this document) are due by June 26, 2009 and can be submitted electronically to MeaningfulUse@hhs.gov All electronic communications must be submitted with Meaningful Use in the subject line. The Charge of the Health IT Meaningful Use Workgroup The Meaningful Use Workgroup has been tasked with making recommendations to the HIT Policy Committee regarding the process for defining and revising meaningful use and national goals, proposed new meaningful use definitions and national goals and standards and policy priorities to support meaningful use and national goals. The HIT Policy Committee will consider and edit the proposal, and upon approval by the committee, will submit the recommendations to National Coordinator David Blumenthal and Secretary of Health and Human Services Kathy Sebelius. Broad Summary of the Workgroup s Recommendations Data Sharing by 2011 Incorporate Data into establishing Advanced Clinical Processes by 2013 Improved outcomes through information sharing by 2015 for each level of Implementation (2011, 2013, and 2015) Improve quality, safety, and efficiency Engage patients Improve care coordination Reduce health disparities through public & population health data-sharing Ensure privacy and security What is the Relationship of health IT adoption to Health Reform? Implementation can result in direct cost reduction Implementation will provide information infrastructure for health reform

2011 Recommended and Improve Quality, Safety, and Efficiency Capture Data in coded format o Maintain current problem list o Maintain active medication list o Maintain active medication allergy list o Record vital signs (height, weight, blood pressure, etc) o Incorporate lab test results into EHR o Document key patient demographics (ethnicity, gender, insurance Document progress note for each encounter (OUTPATIENT ONLY) Use CPOE for all order types o Use electronic prescribing o Implement drug-drug, allergy, drug formulary checks Manage populations o Generate list of patients broken down by specific conditions (outpatient only) o Send patient reminders per patient preference % Labs incorporated into EHR in coded format % CPOE orders entered directly by physician Report quality measures using HIT-enabled quality measures (HIT-QM) % Diabetics with A1c under control % Hypertensives with BP under control % LDL under control % Smokers offered smoking cessation counseling % Patients with recorded BMI % Colorectal screening for 50+ % Mammograms for women 50+ % Current pneumovax status % Annual flu vaccination % Aspirin prophylaxis for patients at risk for cardiac event % Surgical patients receiving VTE prophylaxis Avoidance of high risk medications in elderly Quality reports stratified by race, ethnicity, gender, insurance type Engage Patients and Families Provide patients with electronic copy of or electronic access to clinical information (labs, medication list, allergies, medical problem list) Provide access to patient specific educational sources Provide clinical summaries for patients at each encounter

% Patients with electronic access to personal health information % Patients with access to patient-specific educational resources % Encounters where clinical summary provided Improve Care Coordination Exchange key clinical information among providers Perform medication reconciliation at relevant encounters Report 30 day readmission rate % Encounters where medication reconciliation performed Implemented ability to exchange health information with external clinical entities Problems, labs, medication lists, care summaries % Transitions in care where summary care record is shared (in 2011, could use any modality) Improve Population and Public Health Submit electronic data to immunization registries where required and can be accepted Submit electronic reportable lab results to public health agencies Submit electronic syndrome surveillance data to public health agencies according to applicable law and practice Measureables Report up-to-date status of childhood immunizations % Reportable lab results submitted electronically Ensure Privacy and Security Protections Compliance with HIPAA and state laws Compliance with data sharing practices from National Privacy and Security Framework Full compliance with HIPAA o Entity under investigation for HIPAA violation cannot achieve meaningful use until entity is cleared Conduct or update a security risk assessment and implement security updates as necessary 2013 Improve quality, safety, efficiency o Evidence based order sets

o Clinical documentation recorded (inpatient) o Clinical decision support at point of care o Manage chronic conditions using patient lists and decision support (Move to 2011?) o Report to external disease registry Engage patients and families o Offer secure patient-provider messaging o Access to patient-specific educational resources o Record patient preferences o Documentation of family medical history o Upload data from home monitoring devices Coordinate care o Medication reconciliation at each transition of care o Produce electronic summary of care at each transition o Retrieve and act on electronic prescription fill data Improve population and public health o Receive immunization histories from registries o Receive public health alerts o Electronic syndromic surveillance data sent to public health agencies Ensure privacy and security protection o Use summary or de-identified data when reporting data for population health purposes 2015 Improve quality, safety, and efficiency o Achieve minimal levels of performance on quality, safety, and efficiency measures o Implement clinical decision support for national high priority conditions o Achieve medical device interoperability o Provide multimedia support (e.g., x-rays) Engage patients and families o Provide access for all patients to PHR populated in real time with data from EHR o Provide patients with access to self-management tools o Capture electronic reporting on experience of care Coordinate care o Access comprehensive patient data from all available sources Improve population and public health o Use epidemiologic data derived from EHRs o Automate real-time surveillance o Provide clinical dashboards o Generate dynamic and ad hoc quality reports Ensure privacy and security protection

o Provide patients with accounting of treatment, payment, and health care operations disclosures o Protect sensitive health information