EVALUATION AND RECOMMENDATION OF PHARMACOPOEIAL TEXTS FOR USE IN THE ICH REGIONS

Similar documents
ICH Topic Q4B Annex 6 Uniformity of Dosage Units General Chapter. Step 3

INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON HARMONISATION OF TECHNICAL REQUIREMENTS FOR REGISTRATION OF PHARMACEUTICALS FOR HUMAN USE

EVALUATION AND RECOMMENDATION OF PHARMACOPOEIAL TEXTS FOR USE IN THE ICH REGIONS

INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON HARMONISATION OF TECHNICAL REQUIREMENTS FOR REGISTRATION OF PHARMACEUTICALS FOR HUMAN USE

Transmission to CHMP December Adoption by CHMP for release for consultation December 2008

GCP Inspection by PMDA

Why do we need an addendum to ICH E6?

FINAL STATUS DOCUMENT

International trend on medical device regulatory convergence

Quality Risk Management ICH Q9

ICH STEERING COMMITTEE October 24-29, 2009 St. Louis, MO, USA SUMMARY

PMDA EPOCH Toward 2020

Recent Development of ICH GCG

The place of the Certification procedure in 2017 in the EU regulatory framework and beyond. Prague, 19 September 2017

...FREEDOM TO EXPLORE YOUR REGULATORY NEEDS

Role and Vision of PMDA

Q11 Development and Manufacture of Drug Substances--Questions and Answers

Update on FDA-EMA QbD Pilot

BASG / Austrian Medicines and Medical Devices Agency Institute Assessment & Analytics Traisengasse 5, A-1200 Vienna

Consideration on Global Harmonization

ICH Regulators Forum. Dr Peter Arlett EU

1 The EU Harmonised technical ectd guidance version 4.0

Guidance for applicants requesting scientific advice

Responsible medication processes ( pharmaceutical care ) and good pharmaceutical practices for improved patients quality of life and batter healthcare

Addendum to ICH E6 (R2)

Points to Consider regarding the Notification and Publication of Package Insert Language

EDQM roadmap for electronic submissions

Commission Guidelines for the implementation of the Clinical Trials Regulation NTA Ethics Oslo

Annex 2 to the HMA esubmission Roadmap: Implementation of mandatory use of ectd format for regulatory submissions

NAMIBIA MEDICINES REGULATORY COUNCIL MINISTRY OF HEALTH AND SOCIAL SERVICES

Questions and answers on the procedure of PIP compliance verification at EMA, and on paediatric rewards

INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON HARMONISATION OF TECHNICAL REQUIREMENTS FOR REGISTRATION OF PHARMACEUTICALS FOR HUMAN USE

IPEC- Americas Ongoing Projects

E14 Clinical Evaluation of QT/QTc Interval Prolongation and Proarrhythmic Potential for Non-Antiarrhythmic Drugs

International Medical Device Regulatory Harmonization. Reality or Fantasy?

Brussels, 12 June 2014 COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION 10855/14. Interinstitutional File: 2012/0266 (COD) 2012/0267 (COD)

First inspection of a Legal Representative in the EU by local authority

Market Access for Food Supplements: EHPM Country Profiles. Mr Patrick Ahern Director General EHPM

Horizon ERA-NET Cofund actions

Overview ICH GCP E6(R2) Integrated Addendum

Definitions: In this chapter, unless the context or subject matter otherwise requires:

Scientific and Regulatory Advice by the Federal Institute for Drugs and Medical Devices (BfArM) Guidance for Applicants (Revision 9 1 )

REGISTRATION OF MEDICINES IN THE EURASIAN ECONOMIC UNION

Trends in the development of regulatory systems by the example of ICH countries

Medical devices briefing for patients: Patient safety in the new Regulation

COMMISSION DIRECTIVE 2011/18/EU

esubmission roadmap v2.0: Industry viewpoint

New European Union Clinical Trial Regulations

***I DRAFT REPORT. EN United in diversity EN. European Parliament 2018/0018(COD)

Guidance on the Biocidal Products Regulation

Accelerated procedure for registration of WHO-prequalified medicines = Collaboration Procedure between the WHO Prequalification Programme and NMRAs

IVD Regulatory Update February 2015

IMDRF Project: List of international standards recognized by IMDRF management committee members

Background to CLP. Presentation Overview. Why Introduce GHS? Basic CLP requirements 8/30/2011

Version Number: 003. On: September 2017 Review Date: September 2020 Distribution: Essential Reading for: Information for: Page 1 of 13

DRAFT OPINION. EN United in diversity EN. European Parliament 2018/0018(COD) of the Committee on Industry, Research and Energy

Final Draft Agenda Sixteenth meeting of the Forum for Exchange of Information on Enforcement (Forum-16) October 2013

Guidance for the Tripartite model Clinical Investigation Agreement for Medical Technology Industry sponsored research in NHS Hospitals managed by

ECHA and the implementation of REACH,CLP and other tasks

ectd IV: It s Almost As Fun As Super Bowl XLIX DIA eregulatory and Intelligence Annual Conference Disclaimer

Understanding USP 797

Annual Work Programme 2018

Regional Update ASEAN PPWG

Study Guide for Emergency Care Clinicians. (Version /09/2014)

CHEMICALS (Classification, Labelling, Packaging of substances and mixtures -CLP) Screening Meeting EU Serbia June 2013

Regional Update ASEAN PPWG

Official Journal of the European Union. (Non-legislative acts) REGULATIONS

COMMISSION IMPLEMENTING REGULATION (EU)

Assessment of patient, consumer and healthcare professional organisations compliance with EMA eligibility criteria

Standard Operating Procedures (SOP) Research and Development Office

Questions and answers about Recycling Processes

Jean Monnet Activities within the Erasmus+ Programme Grant Management & Procedures. Seminar for on-going Erasmus+ Jean Monnet Projects

Recommendation on duplicate applications in mutual recognition and decentralised procedures

LESSON ASSIGNMENT. Professional References in Pharmacy.

Work plan for GCP Inspectors Working Group for 2018

The Pharmaceutical Risk Assessment Committee (PRAC) of the EMA

Patient Registry Initiative- Strategy and Mandate of the Cross-Committee Task Force

Ministerial Ordinance on Good Laboratory Practice for Nonclinical Safety Studies of Drugs

1. Introduction, purpose of this Standard Operating Procedure (SOP)

Partnerships to Address Global Product Safety in Public Health. Dr. Katherine Bond November 18, 2014

Legislations and Policies in Jordan/ Related to Health and Pharmaceuticals April 19, 2018

The Newcastle Upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust. Unlicensed Medicines Policy

IMDRF FINAL DOCUMENT. Title: Strategic Assessment of Electronic Submission Messaging Formats

The International Council for Harmonisation of Technical Requirements for Pharmaceuticals for Human Use. Rules of Procedure of the Assembly

TECHNICAL AND COMPLIANCE COMMITTEE

III. The provider of support is the Technology Agency of the Czech Republic (hereafter just TA CR ) seated in Prague 6, Evropska 2589/33b.

Guidance on the preparation of dossiers for harmonised classification and labelling (CLH) under Regulation (EC) No.

Call: Graduate school in energy systems

Procedure for handling applications for authorisation and review reports under REACH

Regulatory Conference: KEY TAKE- AWAYS. Engela Dedwith, Eli Lilly

Radiopharmaceuticals. Quality - Safety - GMP Requirements. 5-6 February 2014, Vienna, Austria

Standard operating procedure

STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURE

Guidance on the Biocidal Products Regulation

Republic of Latvia. Cabinet Regulation No. 50 Adopted 19 January 2016

The Dialogue Facility THE DIALOGUE FACILITY Bridging Phase Guidelines and Criteria for Support

General FAQ relating to e-submission for Veterinary Applications

Guide to Renewal of Veterinary Product Authorisations

Software Regulation and Validation

9/10/2013. Contributions of ECHA to the achievement of the REACH goals. Content of Discussion

Transcription:

INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON HARMONISATION OF TECHNICAL REQUIREMENTS FOR REGISTRATION OF PHARMACEUTICALS FOR HUMAN USE ICH HARMONISED TRIPARTITE GUIDELINE EVALUATION AND RECOMMENDATION OF PHARMACOPOEIAL TEXTS FOR USE IN THE ICH REGIONS ON UNIFORMITY OF DOSAGE UNITS GENERAL CHAPTER Q4B ANNEX 6 Current Step 4 version dated 13 November 2013 This Guideline has been developed by the appropriate ICH Expert Working Group and has been subject to consultation by the regulatory parties, in accordance with the ICH Process. At Step 4 of the Process the final draft is recommended for adoption to the regulatory bodies of the European Union, Japan and USA.

Q4B Annex 6 Document History Code History Date Q4B Annex 6 Q4B Annex 6(R1) Approval by the Steering Committee under Step 2 and release for public consultation. Integration into Step 2 of the Health Canada Interchangeability Statement under Section 4.5 after approval by the Steering Committee. 13 November 2008 27 September 2010 Q4B Annex 6 Current Step 4 version Approval by the Steering Committee under Step 4 and recommendation for adoption to the three ICH regulatory bodies. The R was removed from the name of the document as this is the first version of the Annex 6 Step 4. 13 November 2013

EVALUATION AND RECOMMENDATION OF PHARMACOPOEIAL TEXTS FOR USE IN THE ICH REGIONS ON UNIFORMITY OF DOSAGE UNITS GENERAL CHAPTER Q4B ANNEX 6 ICH Harmonised Tripartite Guideline Having reached Step 4 of the ICH Process at the ICH Steering Committee meeting on 13 November 2013, this guideline is recommended for adoption to the three regulatory parties to ICH. TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. INTRODUCTION... 1 2. Q4B OUTCOME... 1 2.1 Analytical Procedures... 1 2.2 Acceptance Criteria... 1 3. TIMING OF ANNEX IMPLEMENTATION... 1 4. CONSIDERATIONS FOR IMPLEMENTATION... 1 4.1 General Consideration... 1 4.2 FDA Consideration... 1 4.3 EU Consideration... 2 4.4 MHLW Consideration... 2 4.5 Health Canada Consideration... 2 5. REFERENCES USED FOR THE Q4B EVALUATION... 2 i

EVALUATION AND RECOMMENDATION OF PHARMACOPOEIAL TEXTS FOR USE IN THE ICH REGIONS ON UNIFORMITY OF DOSAGE UNITS GENERAL CHAPTER Q4B ANNEX 6 1. INTRODUCTION This annex is the result of the Q4B process for the Uniformity of Dosage Units General Chapter. The proposed texts were submitted by the Pharmacopoeial Discussion Group (PDG). 2. Q4B OUTCOME 2.1 Analytical Procedures The ICH Steering Committee, based on the evaluation by the Q4B Expert Working Group (EWG), recommends that the official pharmacopoeial texts, Ph. Eur. 2.9.40. Uniformity of Dosage Units, JP 6.02 Uniformity of Dosage Units, and USP General Chapter <905> Uniformity of Dosage Units, can be used as interchangeable in the ICH regions subject to the following conditions: 2.1.1 Unless the 25 milligrams (mg)/25% threshold limit is met, the use of the Mass/Weight Variation test as an alternative test for Content Uniformity is not considered interchangeable in all ICH regions. 2.1.2 For specific dosage forms that appear in local text in the pharmacopoeias by enclosing the text in black diamond symbols, application of the Uniformity of Dosage Units test is not considered interchangeable in all ICH regions. 2.1.3 If a correction factor is called for when different procedures are used for assay of the preparation and for the Content Uniformity Test, the correction factor should be specified and justified in the application dossier. 2.2 Acceptance Criteria The acceptance criteria are harmonized between the three pharmacopoeias. 3. TIMING OF ANNEX IMPLEMENTATION When this annex is implemented (incorporated into the regulatory process at ICH Step 5) in a region, it can be used in that region. Timing might differ for each region. 4. CONSIDERATIONS FOR IMPLEMENTATION 4.1 General Consideration When sponsors or manufacturers change their existing methods to the implemented Q4Bevaluated pharmacopoeial texts that are referenced in Section 2.1 of this annex, any change notification, variation, and/or prior approval procedures should be handled in accordance with established regional regulatory mechanisms pertaining to compendial changes. 4.2 FDA Consideration Based on the recommendation above, and with reference to the conditions set forth in this annex, the pharmacopoeial texts referenced in Section 2.1 of this annex can be considered 1

Uniformity of Dosage Units General Chapter interchangeable. However, FDA might request that a company demonstrate that the chosen method is acceptable and suitable for a specific material or product, irrespective of the origin of the method. FDA finds unsuitable for regulatory purposes the not more than 2% Relative Standard Deviation (RSD) exception to the 25 mg/25% threshold that appears in the JP and the Ph. Eur. Therefore, in accordance with the official text in the USP, for those items below the 25 mg/25% threshold, testing by Content Uniformity should be performed. 4.3 EU Consideration For the European Union, the monographs of the Ph. Eur. have mandatory applicability. Regulatory authorities can accept the reference in a marketing authorisation application, renewal or variation application citing the use of the corresponding text from another pharmacopoeia as referenced in Section 2.1, in accordance with the conditions set out in this annex, as fulfilling the requirements for compliance with the Ph. Eur. Chapter 2.9.40. on the basis of the declaration of interchangeability made above. 4.4 MHLW Consideration The pharmacopoeial texts referenced in Section 2.1 of this annex can be used as interchangeable in accordance with the conditions set out in this annex. Details of implementation requirements will be provided in the notification by MHLW when this annex is implemented. 4.5 Health Canada Consideration In Canada any of the pharmacopoeial texts cited in Section 2.1 of this annex and used in accordance with the conditions set out in this annex can be considered interchangeable. 5. REFERENCES USED FOR THE Q4B EVALUATION 5.1 The PDG Stage 5B sign-off document: Japanese Pharmacopoeial Forum, Volume 13, number 2 (May 2004). 5.2 The pharmacopoeial references for Uniformity of Dosage Units for this annex are: 5.2.1 European Pharmacopoeia (Ph. Eur.): Supplement 6.1 (official April 2008) Uniformity of Dosage Units (reference 04/2008:20940). Further changes to the official text were made in Supplement 7.4, official April 1, 2012. 5.2.2 Japanese Pharmacopoeia (JP): 6.02 Uniformity of Dosage Units, as it appears in the JP Fifteenth Edition (March 31, 2006, The Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare Ministerial Notification No. 285), officially updated by errata published by MHLW at http://www.pmda.go.jp/english/pharmacopoeia/pdf/ jpdata/h201105_jp15_errata.pdf on November 5, 2008. Further changes were implemented via MHLW Ministerial Notification No. 190 on May 31, 2013 (see http://www.pmda.go.jp/english/pharmacopoeia/pdf/jpdata/jp16-1en.pdf). 5.2.3 United States Pharmacopeia (USP): <905> Uniformity of Dosage Units, Pharmacopeial Forum, Volume 35, Number 3, official in USP 33-Reissue [October 2010]. USP provided notification on February 25, 2011, (see http://www.usp.org/usp-nf/harmonization/stage-6/uniformity-dosage-units) to implement requirements set forth in the 2 nd paragraph of Section 4.2 of this Annex and other changes. These changes made official on December 1, 2011, concurrent with USP 34 NF 29, 2 nd Supplement. 2