REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS

Similar documents
Request for Proposals # P12-044A. Pre-Qualification - Purchase and. Development of Bloomfield Property

ADVERTISEMENT FOR THE CITY OF WAUPACA REQUEST FOR PROPASAL (RFP) RETAIL MARKET ANALYSIS AND DEVELOPMENT PLAN

REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS

634 NORTH PARK AVENUE

BLUE HILLS MASTER PLAN RFP OUTLINE

Request for Redevelopment Proposal 102 N. Broadway, City of De Pere

REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS: RFQ PROGRAM/PROJECT MANAGEMENT SERVICES TO SUPPORT MUNICIPAL FACILITIES & CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PROJECTS

REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL DOWNTOWN RETAIL AND ENTERTAINMENT STRATEGY. For. The Redevelopment Agency of the City of Riverside. Issued: August 13, 2010

REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL PLANNING SERVICES NORTHWEST AREA SHARED VISION BUSINESS AND INDUSTRIAL PARK

CITY OF MONTEBELLO AND MONTEBELLO SUCCESSOR AGENCY REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS (RFQ)

THE ANTIOCH DEVELOPMENT AGENCY RIVERTOWN WATERFRONT DEVELOPMENT PROJECT AREA REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS. January 24, 2005

REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS FOR THE PURCHASE & DEVELOPMENT OF PROPERTY OWNED BY THE CITY OF GOOSE CREEK, SOUTH CAROLINA

CITY OF TRENTON DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING & ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT

WAYFINDING SYSTEM DESIGN & BRANDING INITIATIVE

Tulsa Development Authority. Request for Proposal

Request for Qualifications

PURPOSE Appendix A BACKGROUND

Etna Riverfront Park and Trail: Design and Engineering RFP

REQUEST FOR CONSULTANT SERVICES. Economic Development Consultant. Town of Cortlandt 1 Heady Road, Cortlandt Manor NY, 10567

Request for Proposal (RFP) for Housing Study and Needs Assessment

REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS DOWNTOWN WAYFINDING CONSULTING AND DESIGN

REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS ARCHITECTURAL SERVICES Burbank School District 111 March 2016

Wolf River Conservancy in partnership with The City of Memphis Division of Park Services. Request for Proposals

Chandler Cove Developer Request for Proposal

Request for Developer Qualifications-John Deere Commons Development Opportunity

Request for Proposals

Request for Proposals (RFP) For Restaurant Consulting Services 1657 Ocean Avenue

REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL FOR PARKING CONSULTANT TO THE LIBERTY STATION COMMUNITY ASSOCIATION SEPTEMBER 26 TH, 2017

I-195 Redevelopment District Providence, RI

REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL COMMUNITY ECONOMIC RECOVERY PLAN CITY OF JEFFERSON, WISCONSIN. Distribution: November 18, 2016

REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS

Request for Qualifications/Proposals Alameda County Redevelopment Agency Economic Development Strategic Plan

Proposals. For funding to create new affordable housing units in Westport, MA SEED HOUSING PROGRAM. 3/28/2018 Request for

REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS. Former Fire Station 47 Site - 24,400 square feet

Professional Planning Services to Complete Recreation Plan Update

Upper Harbor Terminal Phase 1 Redevelopment Request for Qualifications

Request for Proposals - Asset Management

Russell County Commission. Russell County, Alabama. Request for Proposal Comprehensive Plan Pages Notice of Intent to Respond

CSU Dominguez Hills & DH Foundation University Village-Mixed-Use Development/Market Rate Housing LETTER OF INVITATION REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS

DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY OF CLAYTON COUNTY REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS MASTER PLANNING CONSULTING SERVICES

REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL (RFP) for Feasibility Study Borough of Kennett Square New Municipal Office and Police Station Joint Facility

Transit-Oriented Development and Land Use Subarea Plan for Central Lake Forest Park

61-Acre Urban Redevelopment Opportunity Request for Qualifications The Boulevard Richmond, VA

REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS Long-Term Community Recovery Strategy Town of Union, NY

REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS

City of Bartow Community Redevelopment Agency

REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS (RFQ)

2016 Park Assessment

City of Lynwood MODIFIED REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS FOR

APA/PAW 2013 Joint Awards Program Submittal

CITY OF MADISON, ALABAMA

CITY OF LOS ANGELES INTER-DEPARTMENTAL CORRESPONDENCE

REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS

REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS PROFESSIONAL SERVICES GRANT WRITING ASSISTANCE FOR THE ACTIVE TRANSPORTATION PROGRAM

Town of Frisco, Colorado Request for Proposals 2018 Community Plan Update

CITY OF GREENVILLE, SC REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS RFP NO

Economic Development Strategic Plan Executive Summary Delta County, CO. Prepared By:

Request for Proposals

Downtown Memphis Sign Code and Design Guidelines Update

City of Edina, Minnesota GrandView Phase I Redevelopment, 5146 Eden Avenue Request for Interest for Development Partner

REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS (RFP)

Request for Proposals for Economic Development Consultant. Downtown Revitalization Initiative Durkee Street City of Plattsburgh, NY

REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS

CITY OF PORT HUENEME COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL FOR BUILDING & SAFETY SERVICES

Introduction. Proposal Submission

Responses Due: Friday, August 14, 2015, 11 a.m.

Glenview School District Greenwood Rd Glenview IL Request for Qualifications For Architect Services

Request for Proposals City of Oberlin, Ohio Branding and Cultural Wayfinding Signage Plan

MADISON AREA OPPORTUNITY ZONES

Harbor Point Mixed-Use Waterfront Development Opportunity UTICA, NY Development Request for Proposals

To create a consistent signage and wayfinding system across a range of signage mediums

Lexington Center Corporation Request for Proposal for Convention Center Naming Rights Request for Proposals

STUDY AND ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN SERVICES

Request for Qualifications and Preliminary Development Proposals (RFQ/RFP) For the Meadowbrook & Lee Site in Cleveland Heights, Ohio

District Office Building Seismic Retrofit At Contra Costa Community College District 500 Court St. Martinez, CA March 21, 2016

Request for Proposals. Housing Study Consulting Services. Proposals DUE: January 6, City of Grandview. Economic Development Department

SILVERTHORNE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN APPENDIX A - ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT ELEMENT

Request for Qualifications Wayfinding, Signage and Streetscape Design Initiative City of Mobile, AL

Request for Proposals (RFP)

Convention Hotel: Request for Qualifications

Request for Qualifications. Library and Pivot Block Development. Nampa Development Corporation

Development Solicitation Request for Interest. Spencer Creek Business Park Commercial Development Parcel. Port of Kalama, Washington

CITY OF LOS ANGELES BETHUNE OPPORTUNITY SITE 05/18/2017

Destination Discovery: UA Tech Park at The Bridges. Technology Precinct and Innovation and Technology Complex

REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL (RFP) THIS IS NOT AN ORDER

Opportunity Winona Redevelopment 60 Main Street Lot #7 Winona, MN. Issuance Date: November 3, 2016 Proposals Due: December 31, 2016

REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS

County of Alpena Website Design and Development RFP

T O W N O F M I D L A N D MIDLAND BAY LANDING A MIDLAND WATERFRONT DEVELOPMENT OPPORTUNITY

REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS Operation: Storefront

CITY OF MUNCIE, INDIANA CONVENTION CENTER HOTEL DEVELOPMENT REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS

REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL

REQUEST FOR DEVELOPER PROPOSALS (RFP)

REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS INDOOR PUBLIC MARKET FEASIBILITY STUDY

Request for Qualifications (RFQ) Consulting Planning, Design and Real Estate Development Services, on an As-Needed Basis

NORTH CENTRAL TEXAS COUNCIL OF GOVERNMENTS METROPOLITAN PLANNING ORGANIZATION REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS

Request for Letter of Interest & Qualifications Proposed Rose District Mixed Use Development

City of Elmhurst. Request for Development Proposal. 138 and 142 N. Addison Avenue. City-Owned Properties. (Executive Summary)

Request for Proposal Qualified Management Partner for Como Park Lakeside Pavilion Lexington Parkway North, Saint Paul, Minnesota 55103

REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS ATWATER BEACH MASTER TENANT FOR DETROIT RIVERFRONT CONSERVANCY 600 RENAISSANCE CENTER, SUITE 1720 DETROIT, MI

Transcription:

REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS City of Monona, Wisconsin Mixed-Use Waterfront Redevelopment Issued: April 21, 2014 Due: June 30, 2014 5:00pm Contacts: Patrick Marsh City Administrator pmarsh@ci.monona.wi.us Sonja Reichertz City Planner sreichertz@ci.monona.wi.us 5211 Schluter Road Monona, WI 53716 Phone (608) 222-2525 1

TABLE OF CONTENTS Summary... 3 Introduction.. 4 Purpose of RFQ 4 Background: Madison Metropolitan Region and City of Monona... 4 Project Area Overview. 5 Map.. 6 Project Goals. 7 Submittal Requirements.. 8 Format Requirements of Submittals.. 9 Consideration of Qualification Submittals... 9 Addendums & Clarification of Proposals.. 9 Evaluation Criteria. 10 Development Team.. 10 Experience to Successfully Undertake this Project.. 10 Project Understanding and Approach.. 10 Pre-Proposal Conference. 10 Project Schedule 10 General Information. 11 Inquiries. 11 Withdrawal or Revisions to Proposal... 11 Public Information.. 11 Process & Right to Reject.. 11 Project Schedule. 12 2

SUMMARY RFQ TITLE Monona Mixed-Use Waterfront Redevelopment DEADLINE FOR SUBMISSIONS 5:00 P.M. CDT, Monday June 30, 2014 SUBMIT TO: LABELING DIRECT ALL INQUIRIES TO: City of Monona Attn: Patrick Marsh 5211 Schluter Road Monona, WI 53716 All submissions must be packaged, sealed and clearly labeled. Proposer s Name and Address TITLE: Monona Mixed-Use Waterfront Redevelopment Patrick Marsh, City Administrator pmarsh@ci.monona.wi.us; or Sonja Reichertz, City Planner sreichertz@ci.monona.wi.us FORMAT OF SUBMITTALS Seven (7) hardcopy submissions securely bound on 8.5 by 11-inch paper and one (1) electronic copy identical to the hardcopy version. 3

INTRODUCTION Purpose of RFQ The City of Monona, WI, is seeking statements of qualifications from real estate developers / development teams to lead the redevelopment of a 7.6-acre site with 880 feet of waterfront along the Yahara River into a dynamic mixed-use project that will serve as a focal point for the community. The City has purchased or secured options on nearly all of the redevelopment parcels and intends to use an array of federal, state and local redevelopment tools as necessary to assist with project financing. Responses to this request for qualifications will be used as part of a multi-phase selection process. The RFQ is intended to pre-qualify respondents who will then be invited to submit proposals for the project development, design, construction, financing, ownership, and management. Following is information on the City of Monona s goals for the project, specifications and terms of the project, RFQ submission requirements, and evaluation and selection criteria. Background: Madison Metropolitan Region and the City of Monona The Madison metropolitan region is home to creative entrepreneurs, successful companies, an educated workforce, and highly ranked educational institutions. The region boasts an abundance of cultural attractions, natural resources and recreational opportunities, and was ranked the sixthstrongest economy among the nation s 366 metro areas. The region has been recognized by many national organizations for a variety of quality of life awards and rankings, making it an attractive choice for businesses and employees alike. The state s capital, Madison, is surrounded by small, diverse communities each with its own identity and opportunities. The City of Monona is a community of 7,500 residents that is surrounded on all sides by the City of Madison. Monona offers a small-town atmosphere and strong sense of community that is only a ten minute drive from downtown Madison and all of the employment and entertainment options it has to offer. Residents also enjoy numerous amenities within Monona s own corporate boundaries. Located on the eastern and southern shores of Lake Monona, with over four miles of Lake Monona shoreline, the City includes four square miles of residential homes, commercial properties, City buildings, and over 330 acres of park space. More than 500 large and small businesses are located on the City s major transportation corridors. The City of Monona has seen tremendous success and momentum in redevelopment activities over the past decade. As a landlocked community, redevelopment is Monona s only opportunity for growth. Monona has embraced the redevelopment process and encourages orderly and quality infill developments in the community. Developers praise the City s smooth review and approval process. Recent successes include the three-phase Monona Drive reconstruction project, which will be completed in 2014. The project has revitalized the City s main street, claiming many state and national awards and providing a catalyst for private investment. Additionally, over 200 new highend multi-family units have been approved in the last two years. Redevelopment in the City of Monona produces quality results. In a recent report by Standard & Poor s the City s bond rating was upgraded to AA+. The report announced a very strong economy, with strong incomes and per-capita market value and access to the broad and diverse Madison metropolitan area. Additionally, Monona has very strong budgetary flexibility, strong budgetary performance as demonstrated by balanced results and strong management demonstrated by good financial policies. Quality results are supported by the City s strong efforts to improve 4

sustainable practices and by the support and involvement of the public. City residents are calling for additional redevelopment that would create a place where they can gather, shop, dine, and live a place to further improve the high quality of life in Monona. Project Area Overview Within the City of Monona, the City s leadership has identified an exciting new development opportunity in the Broadway/Bridge Road neighborhood. The following points summarize the site s existing conditions as shown on the map on the following page. The next section of this document summarizes key goals for redevelopment. The project area under control is a 7.6-acre, multi-parcel site. Existing land uses to be redeveloped include a marina, two multi-tenant office buildings, a vacant restaurant, a tavern, and a former dry cleaner. Adjoining these are a new three-story bank building and a long-standing yacht club/restaurant. The yacht club and restaurant are open to discussions regarding their involvement in future site designs and project proposals. As shown on the map on the next page, the City has purchased or secured options on all of the redevelopment area except the former dry cleaner, which it is continuing to discuss with the owner and the Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources. The site is served by two interchanges and is within one half mile of (and visible from) the region s principal transportation corridor, the Beltline Highway, which carries over 100,000 vehicles per day. The site is directly adjacent to a local road carrying 14,000 vehicles per day. The Lake Loop Bike Route also passes directly by the site, which is a highly popular bicycle route connecting to Downtown Madison and also travels along a scenic route in Monona. The site is only 5 minutes from downtown Madison with potential scenic views of the Madison Isthmus, the State Capitol and Lake Monona to the north, and the Monona Wetland Conservancy, Mud Lake and Lake Waubesa to the South. The site is also less than five minutes to the region s largest convening facility, the Alliant Energy Center. The redevelopment potential of the site is driven by the Yahara River, which borders the northeast side of the site. This waterfront is currently inaccessible to the public; opening the waterfront to public access and considering appropriate adjacent land uses and public space development are key project components. The entire site is zoned Community Design District (CDD). This is a flexible district in which rational comprehensively planned development is encouraged. It is expected that the CDD zoning district will include a compatible mix of residential, commercial and open space uses that realize the goals of the Comprehensive Plan. Inclusion of the site in a Tax Increment District (TID) may coincide with the RFQ/RFP process. 5

6

PROJECT GOALS The project area represents a significant opportunity to create a destination waterfront district in the Madison metropolitan region that will add a high quality and tax generating project to the community. The City desires a mixed-use development that will serve as a significant community destination, which includes public space and waterfront access along with retail and restaurant uses, multi-family residential units, office space and/or a hotel. The project goals are: Public Space/Waterfront: Create a unique place where people will want to visit and gather, in addition to shopping, dining, working and living. Opening waterfront accessibility to all Monona residents and visitors and enhancing the waterfront space for public use is a top priority. Economic Development: Achieve private redevelopment of reuse parcels that will add to the tax base of the City and stimulate economic activity in the Broadway/Bridge Road neighborhood. Increase the existing assessed value of the area from approximately $7 million to approximately $80 million. Eliminate deteriorating buildings, blighting influences and functional deficiencies. Create a unique downtown for Monona residents and visitors. Hotel: Add hotel rooms and meeting space with easy access to the metropolitan region for guests and is easily accessible and visible upon entering the community from the Beltline Highway. Office, retail, and restaurant: Draw residents and visitors to shopping opportunities and one or more restaurants that make use of the adjacent waterfront and enhance the site as a destination gathering place. Provide additional spaces for office and/or services uses. Residential: Attract residents to increase vitality of the area and to support businesses around the site. Parking: Provide an integrated parking system that adequately serves the needs of the projects while minimizing the extent of paving and empty spaces. Quality design and density: Achieve a balance of service, office, retail, and residential development with green space, landscaping, and public space. Development will be of high architectural quality and well-planned site design for maximum efficiency of the entire 8acre site. Development considerations will include environmental remediation/brownfield redevelopment. Incorporate substantial water quality and stormwater management improvements and an increase in pervious surface and green space. 7

SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS All submittals shall address the PROJECT GOALS and include the information in the order listed below within the indicated page limits. Note that a detailed development plan is not being requested as this stage, only a general description of the types of uses and general character/function of the development that the team would explore for the site. Examples of other projects should be included but please do not include specific development plans for this site. Cover Include project name, respondent name and date Section 1 Cover Letter Introductory cover letter identifying the lead firm, contact information for the proposed project manager, and a statement that the respondent has reviewed this RFQ including a list of all specific addendums that the City may subsequently issue (2 pages max) Section 2 Development Team Organization Overview of the development team organization indicating the lead firm and lead individual for each component of the work (2 pages max) Section 3 Summary of Qualifications Statement of project understanding and summary of qualifications and approach to perform the work and meet the City s goals based on the development team s skills and experiences (do not include specific development plans for this site 4 pages max) Section 4 Relevant Experience Descriptions of no more than five projects that are comparable in terms of brownfield redevelopment, waterfront development, public spaces, mixed-use development, multi-building/multi-phase buildout, and/or other aspects relevant to this project. Each description should generally include the following (2 pages max per project): Name, location and description of the type of project including project size The members of the proposed consulting team that were involved and the services they performed Project construction budget and sources of financing Number of jobs created Increase in taxable value Project start and end dates At least one reference with contact information Section 5 Firm Descriptions Description of each participating firm such as history, services offered/general experiences, number of employees, location of offices (2 pages max per firm) Section 6 Resumes Resumes for the key project personnel shown on the chart contained in Section 2 including the location of the primary office to which they are assigned (2 page max per individual) Section 7 Financial Capabilities Lists and contact information for the following (4 page max) Private sources of financing used for recent projects Public sources of financing/incentives used for recent projects Past bankruptcies or pending financial litigation involving any team firm or principal 8

Format Requirements of Submittals Pages shall be formatted in 8 ½ x 11 with limited use of 11 x17 foldouts as may be necessary to accommodate graphics (each 11 x17 shall be counted as only one page). Proposal documents shall be bound with sections separated by labelled tab dividers. Proposals are due at the City of Monona offices by June 30, 2014 by 5:00pm. Responses and their envelopes should be clearly marked with the name and address of the respondent and the project title. Submit seven hard copies and one pdf electronic file to: City of Monona Attn: Patrick Marsh, City Administrator 5211 Schluter Road Monona, WI 53716 Email: pmarsh@ci.monona.wi.us The City reserves the right to reject submittals that fail to contain all required information or fail to follow all of the instructions contained in this RFQ. Consideration of Qualification Submittals Proposals will be reviewed by the qualifications review committee which will include the Mayor, Community Development Authority (CDA) Chair, City Administrator/Economic Development Director, City Planner/Assistant Economic Development Director, and City Consultant. The committee will make the final selection and recommendations to the CDA for those firms to receive the RFP. The CDA will then make a recommendation to Council. Depending upon the number and quality of submittals, interviews be conducted during this initial RFQ process. The qualifications review committee will assess each proposal against the criteria listed in the following section, EVALUATION CRITERIA. In making a selection under this RFQ, the City and Committee will consider responses, interviews, general qualifications, project history, and the evaluation criteria set forth in this RFQ. Addendums and Clarifications of Proposals Addendums to this RFQ will be posted on the City s website at http://www.mymonona.com/bids.aspx. All respondents are responsible for checking the website regularly for any addendums and shall acknowledge all addendums by number in the cover letter to be included in Section 1 of the submittal. Failure to receive or acknowledge an addendum may result in the rejection of the submittal. During the evaluation of proposals, the City reserves the right to contact a proposer to request additional information for purposes of clarification of RFQ responses, reject proposals which contain errors, or at its sole discretion, waive disqualifying errors or gain clarification of error or information. 9

EVALUATION CRITIERA The following criteria will be assessed by the review committee. I. Development Team a) Years and types of experience in the field b) Diversity of services provided including real estate development and marketing, design/architecture, landscape architecture, engineering, and construction c) Financial capability to complete the project d) Professional and project references II. III. Experience to successfully undertake this project a) Experience with similar riverfront redevelopment b) Successful incorporation of public space into past development projects c) Successful projects coordinated with a Department of Natural Resources and/or Army Corps of Engineers including Chapter 30 permits, contaminated sites, and innovative stormwater practices d) Capability to fulfil residential component e) Capability to fulfil hotel component f) Capability to fulfil commercial/restaurant component g) Proven capacity to deliver the project requirements on time and on budget Project understanding and approach a) Understanding of City s goals and desires for the project b) Approach to evaluating the market and determining the mix of uses c) Approach to incorporating public space d) Approach to working with the City in crafting an ultimate plan e) Approach to project financing and determining use of incentives PRE-PROPOSAL CONFERENCE The City will hold a pre-proposal conference on Wednesday, May 21 st at 10:00 am with the location to be announced on project webpage http://www.mymonona.com/bids.aspx. The conference will include a brief presentation by the City, a tour of the site and a question and answer session. Attendance is optional but strongly recommended. It would be appreciated if those planning to attend would notify the City s contact persons in advance. PROJECT SCHEDULE The following page contains a tentative schedule the City intends to follow in identifying qualified developers, soliciting proposals from them, and negotiating a specific redevelopment project. The City reserves the right to alter this schedule at any time, with or without prior notice, and will post any changes on its website. 10

GENERAL INFORMATION Inquiries All inquiries related to this RFQ are to be directed, in writing, to the contact persons at the email addresses on the front cover of this RFQ. Withdrawal or Revisions to Proposal Any proposal may be withdrawn by written notice to the City of Monona any time prior to the date and time specified for submittal. Such notice of withdrawal shall be in writing to the contact individual provided. Any proposer may modify their submittal prior to the date and time specified for submittal by email communication to the contact individual. Public Information All information submitted in response to this RFQ may be made available for public inspection according to public records laws of the State of Wisconsin. Process & Right to Reject At any phase, the City reserves the right to terminate, suspend, or modify this selection process; reject any or all submittals; and to negotiate the terms of the RFP stage with the selected proposer(s). 11

12