SUBJECT: SENTINEL EVENTS

Similar documents
7084 MANAGEMENT OF INCIDENTS Facility Management Plan

BAY-ARENAC BEHAVIORAL HEALTH AUTHORITY POLICIES AND PROCEDURES MANUAL

Magellan Behavioral Health of Pennsylvania, Inc. Incident Reporting Form Provider Instructions and Definitions

UPMC POLICY AND PROCEDURE MANUAL

UPMC POLICY AND PROCEDURE MANUAL

Quality Improvement and Patient Safety (QPS) Ratchada Prakongsai Senior Manager

Department of Defense INSTRUCTION. SUBJECT: Military Health System (MHS) Patient Safety Program (PSP) (MHSPSP)

LifeWays Operating Procedures

Regulatory Compliance Policy No. COMP-RCC 4.60 Title:

NO TALLAHASSEE, June 15, Mental Health/Substance Abuse STATE MENTAL HEALTH TREATMENT FACILITIES MORTALITY REPORTING AND REVIEW PROCEDURE

Financial Disclosure. Learning Objectives: Preventing and Responding to Sentinel Events in Surgery 10/13/2015

Sentinel Events and S Patient Patient entinel Event Alerts Safety Act Safety Ac Revised: BW/September 2010

Sentinel Event Data. Root Causes by Event Type Copyright, The Joint Commission

POLICY NAME POLICY # Sentinel, Adverse Event and Near Miss. CSP Reporting and Investigation

POLICY/PROCEDURE PLAN GUIDELINE. SECTION: I Administrative

Overview of Root Cause Analysis

Adverse Incident Reporting Form Provider Instructions and Definitions

NIMRS Incident Reporting Changes Effective June 30 th 2013

National Health Regulatory Authority Kingdom of Bahrain

Department of Defense INSTRUCTION

NERC Improving Human Performance

STATE OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF. NO TALLAHASSEE, April 1, Safety INCIDENT REPORTING AND ANALYSIS SYSTEM (IRAS)

GUIDANCE November 26, 2007

POLICY ON INCIDENT REPORTING AND INCIDENT MANAGEMENT

Various Views on Adverse Events: a collection of definitions.

Incident Reporting. DATE: 2/17/2005; Updated 7/5/2005 Updated 10/20/05

Incident Reporting and Investigations. Mary Bolbrock, RN MSN Ann Marie McDonald, RN EdD

February New Zealand Health and Disability Services National Reportable Events Policy 2012

Abuse Reporting and Investigation

RALF Behavior Management Rules IDAPA

Root Cause Analysis A Necessary Evil? Dr Joseph Lui HA Convention 8 th May 2012

FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF JUVENILE JUSTICE PROCEDURE

New Mexico DDSD General Events Report (GER) Guide

Sierra College ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURE AP 5521

PEER I Prison Rape Elimination Act Flow Chart Resident on Resident Sexual Assault Allegation

Why Investigate Incidents? Prevention Improve Systems and Quality Correction Minimize enforcement actions Compliance. Required Investigations

DIVISION OF MENTAL HEALTH AND ADDICTION SERVICES ADMINISTRATIVE BULLETIN A.B. 5:04B

NO Tallahassee, April 5, Mental Health/Substance Abuse INCIDENT REPORTING AND PROCESSING IN STATE MENTAL HEALTH TREATMENT FACILITIES

Cleveland Police Deployment

COMPLIANCE WITH THIS PUBLICATION IS MANDATORY

Prepublication Requirements

Agency for Health Care Administration

Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation. Division of Nursing Homes

Impaired Medical Staff Policy

Serious Reportable Events in Healthcare 2011 Update

CHAPTER 12 -QUALITY MANAGEMENT AND PERFORMANCE IMPROVEMENT

ADMINISTRATIVE POLICY & PROCEDURE PATIENT SAFETY PLAN

Root Cause Analysis (Part I) event/rca_assisttool.doc

CREDENTIALING PROCEDURES MANUAL MEMORIAL HOSPITAL OF SOUTH BEND, INC. SOUTH BEND, INDIANA

Defining incident-based peer review

Healthcare Facility Regulation

Regulations. The regulations which require and govern reports to DBHDS which could be reported in the CHRIS system are:

SECTION: OPERATIONS OPR-281

MEDICAL STAFF BYLAWS

TIFT REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER MEDICAL STAFF POLICIES & PROCEDURES

Department of Community Justice Policy and Procedures

Campus and Workplace Violence Prevention. Policy and Program

Best Practice Recommendation for

Preventing Medical Errors Presented by Debra Chasanoff, MEd, OTR/L FOTA Annual Conference November 3, 2017

SUBCHAPTER 70I - MINIMUM LICENSING STANDARDS FOR RESIDENTIAL CHILD-CARE SECTION GENERAL LICENSING REQUIREMENTS

Adult Protection 101. Introduction. Introduction (continued) Categorical Vulnerable Adult

Accreditation, Quality, Risk & Patient Safety

Disclosures. assocs.com 2

SAMPLE: Peer Review Referral Policy

RCA in Healthcare 3/23/2017. Why Root Cause Analysis is Performed. Root Cause Analysis in Healthcare Part - 1. Contd. Contd.

WHO SHALL REPORT SPECIAL INCIDENTS TO SAN DIEGO REGIONAL CENTER? HOW SHALL SPECIAL INCIDENTS BE REPORTED TO SAN DIEGO REGIONAL CENTER?

PROCEDURE Client Incident Response, Reporting and Investigation

Adverse Events: Thorough Analysis

Effective Date: January 1, 2014

Adverse Incident Reporting and Quality of Care Concerns. December 22,

Cynthia M. Kirchner, MPH, Director, Quality Improvement. Emmanuel Noggoh, Director, Health Care Quality Assessment

Describe the City s requirements and desired outcomes within a written specification;

GUIDELINES FOR REPORTING AND REVIEW OF INCIDENTS IN MENTAL HEALTH SERVICES

1 of 13 DOCUMENTS. NEW JERSEY ADMINISTRATIVE CODE Copyright 2016 by the New Jersey Office of Administrative Law

Committee on Interdisciplinary Practice Policy and Procedures

Sequel Youth and Family Services POLICY AND PROCEDURE. Domain: Administration and Leadership

MEDICAL STAFF BYLAWS MCLAREN GREATER LANSING HOSPITAL

Rules of Participation, Phase 1 Review

Understanding the MUI/UI Reporting System

Forensic Pathologist. Continuous Recruitment. Stanislaus County Sheriff s Department

DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY HEADQUARTERS, 2ND INFANTRY DIVISION UNIT #15041 APO AP

Behavioral health provider overview

Revised guidance for doctors on giving advice to patients on assisted suicide

ACCOUNTABILITY: OBJECTIVES: RELATION TO MISSION: RELATION TO OPERATION: POLICY: Chief Nursing Officer

State of Alaska Department of Corrections Policies and Procedures Chapter: Special Management Prisoners Subject: Administrative Segregation

Biomedical IRB MS #

FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF JUVENILE JUSTICE PROCEDURE DRAFT. Title: Incident Operations Center and Incident Review Procedures

Mandatory Reporting Requirements: The Elderly Rhode Island

MHA Survey Manual: Chapter 8 Self-Reporting Adverse Events and Abuse and Neglect

9/8/2017. Making the Connection: Linking the Facility Assessment and QAPI Plan. Cindy Mason VP Provider Services. Final Rule. Providigm, LLC,

New Mexico DDSD General Events Report (GER) Guide

Focused Standards Assessment (FSA) Risk-Icon Standards Behavioral Health Care (January 2013 Standards Edition)

Section VII Provider Dispute/Appeal Procedures; Member Complaints, Grievances, and Fair Hearings

Review for Required Monitors

Conditions of Participation for Hospice Programs

Statutory Notifications. Guidance for registered providers and persons in charge of designated centres for children and adults with disabilities

DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY HEADQUARTERS, 2D INFANTRY DIVISIONIROK-US COMBINED DIVISION UNIT #15041 APO, AP

PERFORMANCE IMPROVEMENT REPORT

CPSM STANDARDS POLICIES For Rural Standards Committees

University of Wisconsin-Madison Policy and Procedure

Transcription:

Page 2 of 6 specifically includes loss of limb or function. The phrase or the risk thereof includes any process variation for which a recurrence would carry a significant chance of a serious adverse outcome. Such events are called sentinel because they signal the need for immediate investigation and response. The terms sentinel event and medical error are not synonymous; not all sentinel events occur because of an error, and not all errors result in sentinel events. Sentinel events that are subject to this policy. The specific subset of sentinel events that is subject to the requirements set forth in this policy includes those sentinel events subject to review by TJC. This subset includes any occurrence that meets any of the following criteria: 1. Any suicide, including suicide following elopement from the hospital or within 72 hours following discharge. 2. Any rape. Rape, as a reviewable sentinel event, is defined as unconsented sexual contact involving a patient and another patient, staff member, or unknown perpetrator while being treated or on the premises of the organization, including oral, vaginal or anal penetration or fondling of the patient's sex organ(s) by another individual's hand, sex organ, or object. One or more of the following must be present to determine reviewability: a. Any witnessed sexual contact as described above; b. Sufficient clinical evidence obtained by the organization to support allegations of unconsented sexual contact; or c. Admission by the perpetrator that sexual contact, as described above, occurred on the premises. 3. Any unanticipated (unexplained) patient death or major permanent loss of function not related to the natural course of the patient s illness or underlying condition. (A distinction is made between an adverse outcome that is primarily related to the natural course of the patient s illness or underlying condition {not reviewable under the Sentinel Event Policy} and a death or major permanent loss of function that is associated with the treatment {including recognized complications } or lack of treatment of that condition, or otherwise not clearly and primarily related to the natural course of the patient s illness or underlying condition {reviewable under the Sentinel Event Policy}). In indeterminate cases, the event will be presumed reviewable, and the hospital s response will be reviewed under the Sentinel Event Policy according to the prescribed procedures and time frames without delay for additional information such as autopsy results.

Page 3 of 6 4. Any patient death, paralysis, coma, or other major permanent loss of function associated with a seclusion or restraint. 5. Any patient death, paralysis, coma, or other major permanent loss of function associated with a medication error. 6. Any elopement (AWOL) of a patient resulting in a temporally related death (suicide or homicide) or major permanent loss of function. 7. Assault, homicide, or other crime resulting in patient death or major permanent loss of function. 8. A patient fall that results in death or major permanent loss of function as a direct result of the injuries sustained in the fall. 9. Discharge of a child to the wrong family/guardian, or abduction of any patient. Major permanent loss of function means sensory, motor, physiologic, or intellectual impairment not present on admission requiring continued treatment or lifestyle change. When a major permanent loss of functioning cannot be immediately determined, reporting is not expected until either the patient is discharged with continued major loss of function, or two weeks have elapsed with persistent major loss of function, whichever occurs first. Other serious and unusual incidents that are subject to this Policy. The Director of Hospital Operations and/or the Medical Director may also require state-operated hospitals and community programs to conduct a thorough and credible RCA for other serious and unusual incidents, near misses, or identified patterns of performance. Root Cause Analysis (RCA): RCA is a formal process for identifying the most basic or causal factors that underlie a variation in performance. It focuses on organizational systems and processes and on changes that can be made to improve performance and reduce the risk of the recurrence of a serious adverse event. The practice of RCA is predicated on the belief that problems are best solved by attempting to correct or eliminate root causes, as opposed to merely addressing the immediately obvious symptoms. By directing corrective measures at root causes, it is hoped that the likelihood of problem recurrence will be minimized. This analysis is conducted as a peer review activity by a team of hospital staff who are appointed by the RHA. At a minimum, the composition of this team must meet the requirements, under Georgia law, for a medical peer review, and must also include at least one member of the hospital s Leadership

Page 4 of 6 Team in addition to an appropriate number of staff who were involved in the event. The Director of Hospital Operations and the Medical Director are ex officio members on any RCA team. Hospitals are expected to use TJC s Sentinel Event Root Cause Analysis Tool Guide (http://www.jointcommission.org/sentinelevents/). Note Regarding the Requirements of TJC: TJC encourages each organization to report to TJC any sentinel event meeting their criteria for reviewable sentinel events, but does not require them to do so. When sentinel events that meet TJC criteria occur, the default position of is that the events will be reported to TJC. Any decision to not report a sentinel event must be vetted by the Director of Hospital Operations and the Medical Director. Whether the sentinel event is reported to TJC or not, the hospital is expected to prepare a thorough and credible RCA in accordance with this policy and TJC requirements. A hospital or community program that experiences a sentinel event that does not meet the criteria for review under TJC s Sentinel Event Policy is still expected to complete a RCA, but does not need to submit it to TJC; the RCA is maintained by the hospital following review by the Director of Hospital Operations as outlined in this policy. When a decision is made to submit a RCA and action plan to TJC, the hospital is expected to use the online RCA collection tool (accessible from the Continuous Compliance Tools section of TJC s home page, under the Sentinel Event Activities link). Sentinel Event Date: For purposes of this policy, the term sentinel event date is used to refer to the date on which a sentinel event occurred or the date on which the incident was determined to meet the definition of a sentinel event. PROCEDURES Any time an event occurs that is a potential or actual sentinel event, the procedure delineated below must be followed. A. As soon as possible, but within 24 hours (including weekends and holidays) of the occurrence or determination of a potential sentinel event, the RHA, or designee, notifies the Director of Hospital Operations first by email and then with a follow up telephone call. Sentinel Events that meet the definition of a critical incident are also reported according to the requirements of policies for incident reporting. B. If information is pending that is needed in order to determine whether the event meets the definition of a sentinel event, such as a coroner s report or toxicology report, then the hospital forwards the information to the Director of Hospital Operations and Medical Director within one business day of receipt of that information.

Page 5 of 6 C. Within three business days of the sentinel event date, the RHA determines: 1. the type of event; 2. whether the event is a reportable or non-reportable sentinel event, and 3. the subsequent procedural steps to be taken, including whether or not to report to TJC. If necessary, the RHA or designee contacts the Director of Hospital Operations to discuss the decision regarding reporting to TJC. D. If the incident WILL be voluntarily reported to TJC, then within five business days of the sentinel event date, the RHA or his/her designated staff: 1. Notifies TJC by completing the Self-Reported Sentinel Event reporting form available on TJC s website or by calling the TJC Hotline; 2. Emails an electronic copy of the completed TJC reporting form to the Director of Hospital Operations and Medical Director; AND 3. Contacts the TJC Sentinel Event Hotline within three days of the notification to TJC, to verify that the report has been received and inquire as to whether any additional information and/or clarification are needed. E. Within 30 calendar days of the sentinel event date, or the date that the Director of Hospital Operations and/or Medical Director requested a RCA, the hospital conducts a RCA and prepares a report of the findings relating to the sentinel event. The draft RCA, including all attachments, is sent to the Director of Hospital Operations and Medical Director via e-mail. (If necessary, the attachments are submitted as scanned documents in PDF format). The RCA must meet all requirements of TJC for an acceptable, thorough, and credible RCA as set forth in TJC s Sentinel Events Policy. Additionally, if the event is a death, the mortality review must be included as a part of the RCA. F. Within five calendar days of receipt of the draft report, the Director of Hospital Operations reviews the RCA and provides feedback to the hospital s RHA. This review and feedback process may include request(s) for additional information and/or clarification. G. Within five calendar days of receiving feedback about the draft report, the hospital finalizes the report and forwards a copy to the Director of Hospital Operations via same method(s) as in Section E.

Page 6 of 6 H. If any further revision is deemed necessary, the Director of Hospital Operations notifies the RHA, who makes necessary changes and forwards the completed report to the Director of Hospital Operations within the next five calendar days via same method(s) as in Section E. I. If the RCA is to be submitted to TJC, the hospital transmits it to TJC, per their guidelines (see Note Regarding The Requirements of TJC), in order to meet the required 45 day due date. J. The hospital tracks the completion of the risk reduction strategies and action steps via its monthly Performance Improvement meetings and documents this in the meeting minutes.