Total Force Demand and Resourcing the Workforce Rich Robbins OUSD(P&R) January 25, 2011
Report Documentation Page Form Approved OMB No. 0704-0188 Public reporting burden for the collection of information is estimated to average 1 hour per response, including the time for reviewing instructions, searching existing data sources, gathering and maintaining the data needed, and completing and reviewing the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this collection of information, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to Washington Headquarters Services, Directorate for Information Operations and Reports, 1215 Jefferson Davis Highway, Suite 1204, Arlington VA 22202-4302. Respondents should be aware that notwithstanding any other provision of law, no person shall be subject to a penalty for failing to comply with a collection of information if it does not display a currently valid OMB control number. 1. REPORT DATE 25 JAN 2011 2. REPORT TYPE 3. DATES COVERED 00-00-2011 to 00-00-2011 4. TITLE AND SUBTITLE Total Force Demand and Resourcing the Workforce 5a. CONTRACT NUMBER 5b. GRANT NUMBER 5c. PROGRAM ELEMENT NUMBER 6. AUTHOR(S) 5d. PROJECT NUMBER 5e. TASK NUMBER 5f. WORK UNIT NUMBER 7. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION NAME(S) AND ADDRESS(ES) Department of Defense,Office of the Undersecretary of Defense for Personnel and Readiness (OUSD(P&R)),Washington,DC,20301 8. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION REPORT NUMBER 9. SPONSORING/MONITORING AGENCY NAME(S) AND ADDRESS(ES) 10. SPONSOR/MONITOR S ACRONYM(S) 12. DISTRIBUTION/AVAILABILITY STATEMENT Approved for public release; distribution unlimited 11. SPONSOR/MONITOR S REPORT NUMBER(S) 13. SUPPLEMENTARY NOTES 2011 Force Structure Workshop, TASC Heritage Conference Center, Chantilly, VA, 24-27 January 2011 14. ABSTRACT 15. SUBJECT TERMS 16. SECURITY CLASSIFICATION OF: 17. LIMITATION OF ABSTRACT a. REPORT unclassified b. ABSTRACT unclassified c. THIS PAGE unclassified Same as Report (SAR) 18. NUMBER OF PAGES 13 19a. NAME OF RESPONSIBLE PERSON Standard Form 298 (Rev. 8-98) Prescribed by ANSI Std Z39-18
IS NOT just about getting the money Unclassified Demands & Resourcing Is about promoting Department s larger objectives Delivering capabilities and readiness while Minimizing fiscal opportunity costs risk management Not getting it right puts much at risk Total Force background: mix and cost vectors Special challenge: entitlements growth Balancing manpower demands with personnel supply Moving Observed Outcomes closer to Desired Outcomes Challenge: Balance Manpower Demand AND Personnel Supply 2
Resourcing the Workforce: Not Just About Getting Money Department s larger Total Force objectives must be promoted Delivering capabilities and readiness while Minimizing fiscal opportunity costs Facts of Life: Workforce costs and associated tails increasingly unaffordable Fiscal pressures will worsen What s at risk? EVERYTHING: The AVF - fundamental enabler of all our plans Compelling recapitalization and investment Actual and perceived readiness that shapes global outcomes To Resource the Workforce you first need to know: What it really should be What it would really cost including second order costs Knowing where we have been a good start 3
Total Force Mix - Military, Civilian, Contractor Year Active Duty Military Civilians Contracts for Services ($K) FY01 1,387,076 704,783 $ 104,820,780 FY10 1,405,600 764,400 $ 248,207,148 % Change 1% 8% 137% Reduction for In sourcing. Increasingly Unaffordable Total Increase From FY09 = $6B The savings are here. This is Total Force Manpower, but its growth has been unchallenged and often we don t even know what is in the base. Per Capita Cost will not go down. We must reduce the inventory by challenging military essentiality of the growing gsupport tail covert to CIV or eliminate. $B National Defense Budget Estimates for FY2011 ( Current Dollars ) BASE and OCO $$ OUSD(P&R) Requirements and Program and Budget Coordination Directorate 4
UNCLASSIFIED Unclassified Second Order Effect: Unaffordable Health Care Risk Defined: Health care for 96Mbeneficiaries 9.6M Up from 9.1M in 2007 increasingly unaffordable share of resources At the same time, quality care to sustain the AVF, deliver readiness, and fulfill statutory obligations is imperative Total Health Care Costs $B 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 5
Total Force Strategy focus on the right mix The DoD Topline and Personnel Costs (2007 Constant Dollars*) $700 4 $600 Active Duty Military $500 DoD Topline 3 20 007$ Billions $400 $300 2 Active Duty (Millions) $200 Contracts for Services 1 $100 Military Personnel Costs Civilian Payroll $0 0 FY67 FY72 FY77 FY82 FY87 FY92 FY97 FY02 FY07 * Using the GDP Price Index from the Budget of the United States Government: Historical Tables Fiscal Year 2009 (Table 10.1) 6
Defense Spending (Percent of DoD Topline) 100% Includes RDT&E, Procurement, MilCon, and other O&M (excluding CivPay & Service Contracts) Increased GWOT Operations Non-Personnel Spending Enacted Supplementals (FY01-FY07)* 80% Regan Era Recapitalization 68% of TOA Not all available for recapitalization 60% Contracts for Services 50% of TOA 40% Military Personnel Costs 20% Civilian Payroll 0% FY67 FY72 FY77 FY82 FY87 FY92 FY97 FY02 FY07 * From FY08 GWOT Amendment, Department of Defense, October 2007 less MilPers & DHP from enacted Supplementals (PL 110-28/5; 109-234/62/13; 108-106/11; 107-20) 7
The Changing Composition of DoD Personnel FY67 Ballpark FY87 FY07 59 52 47 Manpower Mix % % % Active Duty 4 11 7% Reserve (FTE) 14 $200 % 25 5% 22 24 27 7% Civilian % % Contractors* % % % $180 3 Active Duty Military $160 $140 illions) Personnel (Mi 2 $120 $100 $80 2007$ Billio ons Civilians $60 1 $40 Reserves (FTEs) Contracts for Services $20 0 $0 FY67 FY72 FY77 FY82 FY87 FY92 FY97 FY02 FY07 * Contract Manyear Equivalent (CME) based upon $175K FY07 Dollars additionally deflated proportionately to Civilian Per Capita costs 8
Manpower Mix vs Manpower Costs Manpower (millions) FY67 FY87 FY07 0.66 0.61 11% 14% 0.67 23% Manpower Costs (2007$ billions) 1.45 25% 3.38 2.17 1.16 59% 52% 27% 0.27 0.29 5% 7% Total 5.8M Total 4.2M Total 3.0M Active Duty** 0.21 Reserve (FTE) 7% Total 5 8M Total 4 2M Total 3 0M Civilian Contractor* $47 24% $99 49% $62 25% $113 46% $49 24% $5 $56 23% $14 Total $200B 3% Total $245B 6% Total $334B 0.71 24% $116 35% $59 18% $20 6% 1.38 46% $139 41% ** Includes DHP, Retired Pay, & Family Housing (excludes O&M training & Reserve MilPers) *Contract Manyear Equivalent (CME) based upon $175K FY07 Dollars additionally deflated proportionately to Civilian Per Capita costs Takeaways include: Active Military per capita costs increasing everyone else too Service Contract costs now almost equal to Active Military costs Capabilities & Productivity hard to capture just from numbers Complicates ROI decisions 9
Entitlement Growth Driving Active Duty Costs 100% $110 90% 80% Non-Basic Pay Active Duty Per Capita*** $100 $90 l Costs Military Personne Percentage of 70% 60% 50% 40% 30% Basic Pay* Civilian Per Capita** Non-Basic Pay FY67 FY07 31% 59% $80 $70 $60 $50 $40 $30 200 07$ Thousands**** 20% Basic Pay 69% 41% $20 10% Includes: Retired pay accruals; TRICARE for Life; BAH; Subsistence; Incentive &Special pays; Allowances; Separation Pays; Social Security Tax; PCS travel; & others $10 0% $0 FY67 FY72 FY77 FY82 FY87 FY92 FY97 FY02 FY07 **** Using the GDP Price Index from the Budget of the United States Government: Historical Tables Fiscal Year 2009 (Table 10.1) *** Military Personnel Costs divided by Active Duty Endstrength; MPC include MilPers (less Reserve), DHP, Family Housing, and Retired pay; does not include training (O&M) ** Civilian Pay divided by Civilian Full-time Equivalents (FTE) * Military Pay (Active and Reserve) divided by Military Personnel Costs (including Reserve) 10
Resourcing the Workforce: in context Desired Outcomes: Deliver Readiness while Reducing Fiscal Opportunity Cost Feedback? Measured by manning rather than capability Readiness Vacant billets Desired Workforce Planning ( Requirements Determination) Resourcing Decisions Personnel Production Allocation Observed Fiscal Desired Gap Gap Observed Demand Programming Production Assignment ( Determine Needs ) ( Fund Billets ) ( Grow ) ( Faces ) Opportunity costs Unchallenged Assumptions Uncoordinated Demands Fiscally Uninformed Total Force and Technology often NOT optimized Manpower considered a free good Etc. Not Always Executable True Costs unknown Uncoordinated decisions Overhead (e.g. students) not always funded Well-reasoned policy or statues may prevent achieving personnel objectives Etc Pipelines rigid, flexibilities underutilized Long lead times Unanticipated costs Instant gratification anticipated by Programmers Fundamental substrategies uncoordinated, e.g. accession, promotion, compensation, divestiture, training, etc Billets often: - vacant - filled with the wrong person Resourcing the Workforce: cannot be separated from larger Human Capital Architecture 11
Resourcing the Workforce: Not Just About Getting Money : TAKE- AWAYS Department s larger Total Force objectives Delivering capabilities and readiness while Minimizing fiscal opportunity costs Complex problems no silver bullet Helpful l Resource-Related R Actions will span entire Human Capital Architecture Critical to understand and shape Workforce Demands --- which are often incorrectly called requirements Tools, Information, and Freedom of Action lacking examples: Inventory of Contracts for Services deficient In-sourcing constrained & Out-sourcing prohibited Medical military to civilian conversions prohibited Business rules unhelpful military manpower free Personnel rules/practices constrain choices create unnecessary cost 12
Moving Closer to Desired Outcomes No Single Solution No lack of constructive possibilities a few examples: Strategic Incentivize i leaders to make smart trade-offs by making all components of total force manpower and technology fungible (e.g. military manpower not free ) Operational Eliminate Culture of Equity in Officer Community Management DOPMA does not mandate ill-reasoned equity Tactical Increasingly educated and capable enlisted force assume some current officer requirements JUST EXAMPLES! 13