OPNAVINST D N94 27 Jul 2017 OPNAV INSTRUCTION D

Similar documents
UNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE

Department of Defense DIRECTIVE

OPNAVINST D N4 24 May (a) OPNAV M , Naval Ordnance Management Policy Manual

Subj: NAVY ACCELERATED ACQUISITION FOR THE RAPID DEVELOPMENT, DEMONSTRATION, AND FIELDING OF CAPABILITIES

OPNAVINST B N98 4 Jun 2018

Subj: MISSION, FUNCTIONS, AND TASKS OF NAVAL SPECIAL WARFARE COMMAND

Department of Defense DIRECTIVE

Subj: CERTIFICATION OF THE AVIATION CAPABILITY OF SHIPS OPERATING AIRCRAFT

OPNAVINST DNS-3/NAVAIR 24 Apr Subj: MISSIONS, FUNCTIONS, AND TASKS OF THE COMMANDER, NAVAL AIR SYSTEMS COMMAND

OPNAVINST E N97 7 Nov 2017

Subj: MISSION, FUNCTIONS, AND TASKS OF THE BUREAU OF NAVAL PERSONNEL

OPNAVINST D N96 23 Jan Subj: SHIP ANTISUBMARINE WARFARE READINESS AND EFFECTIVENESS MEASURING PROGRAM

Subj: MISSION, FUNCTIONS AND TASKS OF DIRECTOR, STRATEGIC SYSTEMS PROGRAMS, WASHINGTON NAVY YARD, WASHINGTON, DC

UNCLASSIFIED. R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE PE N: Test & Evaluation Support FY 2012 OCO

Subj: ELECTRONIC WARFARE DATA AND REPROGRAMMABLE LIBRARY SUPPORT PROGRAM

OPNAVINST N9 16 Jun Subj: CHIEF OF NAVAL OPERATIONS SIMULATOR DEVELOPMENT AND TRAINING STRATEGY

DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT A: Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited.

Subj: RELEASE OF COMMUNICATIONS SECURITY MATERIAL TO U.S. INDUSTRIAL FIRMS UNDER CONTRACT TO THE DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY

Subj: MISSION, FUNCTIONS, AND TASKS OF THE NAVAL EDUCATION AND TRAINING COMMAND

PARTICIPATION IN THE GOVERNMENT-INDUSTRY DATA EXCHANGE PROGRAM (GIDEP)

OPNAVINST DNS-H 15 Aug 2014

OPNAVINST G N09P 17 Jul Subj: MISSION, FUNCTIONS, AND TASKS OF THE BOARD OF INSPECTION AND SURVEY

UNCLASSIFIED. UNCLASSIFIED Navy Page 1 of 26 R-1 Line #159

Subj: ROLE AND RESPONSIBILITIES RELATED TO MEDICAL DEPARTMENT SPECIALTY LEADERS

Subj: DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY POLICY ON INSENSITIVE MUNITIONS

Subj: MISSION AND FUNCTIONS OF THE BUREAU OF MEDICINE AND SURGERY. Ref: (a) SECNAV Washington DC Z Jul 2005 (ALNAV 055/05)

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY OFFICE OF THE CHIEF OF NAVAL OPERATIONS 2000 NAVY PENTAGON WASHINGTON DC

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY OFFICE OF THE CHIEF OF NAVAL OPERATIONS 2000 NAVY PENTAGON WASHINGTON, DC

OPNAVINST A N Jan 2015

Subj: NAVY ENTERPRISE TEST AND EVALUATION BOARD OF DIRECTORS

Subj: UNIFORM MATERIEL MOVEMENT AND ISSUE PRIORITY SYSTEM

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BUREAU OF MEDICINE AND SURGERY 7700 ARLINGTON BOULEVARD FALLS CHURCH VA 22042

Subj: DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY NUCLEAR WEAPON INCIDENT RESPONSE MANAGEMENT

3. Scope and Applicability. This instruction is applicable to BUPERS commands and subordinate activities.

OPNAVINST A N13 6 Dec Subj: LATERAL TRANSFER AND REDESIGNATION OF OFFICERS IN THE NAVY

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY OFFICE OF THE CHIEF OF NAVAL OPERATIONS 2000 NAVY PENTAGON WASHINGTON, DC

Subj: PUBLIC AFFAIRS-VISUAL INFORMATION TRAINING WITH INDUSTRY PROGRAM

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY OFFICE OF THE CHIEF OF NAVAL OPERATIONS 2000 NAVY PENTAGON WASHINGTON DC

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY OFFICE OF THE CHIEF OF NAVAL OPERATIONS 2000 NAVY PENTAGON WASHINGTON, DC

Subj: ARMED FORCES HEALTH PROFESSIONS SCHOLARSHIP PROGRAM

COMMUNICATIONS SECURITY MONITORING OF NAVY TELECOMMUNICATIONS AND INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY SYSTEMS

OPNAVINST C N4 31 May 2012

Test Resource Management Center (TRMC) Perspective

Subj: SCOPE, LIMITATIONS, CERTIFICATION, UTILIZATION, AND PHYSICIAN OVERSIGHT OF CERTIFIED ATHLETIC TRAINERS

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY OFFICE OF THE CHIEF OF NAVAL OPERATIONS 2000 NAVY PENTAGON WASHINGTON DC

Subj: PROCEDURES FOR REQUESTING PUBLIC AFFAIRS SUPPORT

OPNAVINST F N09D 2 JUL 2010

Subj: ACCEPTANCE AND USE OF VOLUNTARY SERVICES IN THE NAVY

SECNAVINST E CH-1 DUSN (M) 15 Sep 17

Department of Defense DIRECTIVE

OPNAVINST B N8 7 Nov Subj: NAVY TEST, MEASUREMENT, AND DIAGNOSTIC EQUIPMENT, AUTOMATIC TEST SYSTEMS, AND METROLOGY AND CALIBRATION

Subj: SECRETARY OF THE NAVY SAFETY EXCELLENCE AWARDS

a. To promulgate policy on cost analysis throughout the Department of the Navy (DON).

Subj: NAVY ENLISTED OCCUPATIONAL CLASSIFICATION SYSTEM

OPNAVINST N2/N6 19 Aug 2014

Subj: CHEMICAL, BIOLOGICAL, RADIOLOGICAL, AND NUCLEAR DEFENSE REQUIREMENTS SUPPORTING OPERATIONAL FLEET READINESS

OPNAVINST DNS 25 Apr Subj: MISSION, FUNCTIONS AND TASKS OF COMMANDER, NAVAL SUPPLY SYSTEMS COMMAND

SECNAVINST F DNS Dec 2005

OPNAVINST A N Oct 2014

Subj: IDENTIFICATION OF MAJOR PROGRAM MANAGER EQUIVALENT BILLETS

OPNAVINST B N Jun Ref: (a) DoD Directive of 29 January 2004 (b) SECNAVINST A

OPNAVINST N Dec Ref: (a) 37 U.S.C. 404 (b) Joint Federal Travel Regulations, Volume 1

Encl: (1) Definitions (2) Example of Fiscal Year Bed Capacity Report (3) Example of Fiscal Year Staffed and Unstaffed Beds by Category Report

OPNAVINST A N2/N6 19 Dec Subj: NAVAL OCEANOGRAPHY POLICY, RELATIONSHIPS, AND RESPONSIBILITIES

OPNAVINST H N12 3 Sep 2015

Subj: MISSION, FUNCTIONS, AND TASKS OF THE UNITED STATES NAVAL ACADEMY, ANNAPOLIS, MARYLAND

OPNAVINST E N98 29 May 2018

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY OFFICE OF THE CHIEF OF NAVAL OPERATIONS 2000 NAVY PENTAGON WASHINGTON, DC

Subj: MISSION AND FUNCTIONS OF THE NAVAL SAFETY CENTER

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY NAVAL AIR SYSTEMS COMMAND RADM WILLIAM A. MOFFETT BUILDING BUSE ROAD, BLDG 2272 PATUXENT RIVER, MARYLAND

Subj: CIVILIAN TIME AND ATTENDANCE FOR THE BUREAU OF NAVAL PERSONNEL

OPNAVINST C N43 18 Jun Subj: NAVY EXPEDITIONARY TABLE OF ALLOWANCE AND ADVANCED BASE FUNCTIONAL COMPONENT POLICY

OPNAVINST N Dec Subj: NAVY SPECIAL WARFARE OFFICER CONTINUATION PAY (SPECWAROCP) PROGRAM

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY 0HICfOI 1111 CIIIEHII "\\\ \LOI'I RAIIO'I,\ N \\ \ 1'1 'T\C:O'I, \\ASIIIM:TOI\, DC ()

DEPARTMENT OF T H E OFFICE OF THE CHI F or AVAL O PER ATIONS 2000 NAVY PENTAGON ASHING ON. D.C

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY OFFICE OF THE CHIEF OF NAVAL OPERATIONS 2000 NAVY PENTAGON WASHINGTON DC

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY 1000 NAVY PENTAGON WASHINGTON, DC

Subj: MANAGEMENT AND CONTROL OF LEATHER FLIGHT JACKETS

Subj: MORALE, WELFARE, AND RECREATION AND NAVY EXCHANGE BOARD OF DIRECTORS

CHANGES TO THE NAVY DIRECTIVES PROGRAM FOR ECHELON 2 DIRECTIVES CONTROL POINTS AND MANAGERS

a. Reference (a) and the provisions of this instruction will be implemented by OPNAV and all activities under the command of CNO.

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY 1000 NAVY PENTAGON WASHINGTON, D.C

Subj: MISSION AND FUNCTION OF FIELD SUPPORT ACTIVITY, WASHINGTON, DC

Subj: CREDIT FOR PRIOR NON-FEDERAL WORK EXPERIENCE AND CERTAIN MILITARY SERVICE FOR DETERMINING LEAVE ACCRUAL RATE

UNCLASSIFIED UNCLASSIFIED

PROCEDURES FOR NAVY PARTICIPATION IN THE DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE SPACE TEST PROGRAM

OPNAVINST A N2/N6 31 Oct Subj: NAVY ELECTRONIC CHART DISPLAY AND INFORMATION SYSTEM POLICY AND STANDARDS

OPNAVINST C N1 22 Apr Subj: NAVY JUNIOR RESERVE OFFICERS TRAINING CORPS AND NAVY NATIONAL DEFENSE CADET CORPS

Subj: DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY NUCLEAR WEAPON SYSTEM SAFETY PROGRAM

OPNAVINST L N96 30 Mar Subj: REQUIREMENTS FOR AIR CAPABLE AND AMPHIBIOUS ASSAULT SHIPS TO OPERATE AIRCRAFT

Subj: FISCAL YEAR 2016 NAVAL SHORE ACTIVITIES SAILOR OF THE YEAR PROGRAM

1. Purpose. To define and implement a comprehensive approach to the conduct of force structure assessments.

Subj: CHEMICAL, BIOLOGICAL, RADIOLOGICAL, AND NUCLEAR DEFENSE REQUIREMENTS SUPPORTING OPERATIONAL READINESS

Subj: APPOINTMENT OF OFFICERS IN THE CHAPLAIN CORPS OF THE NAVY

REQUIRED OPERATIONAL CAPABILITY LEVELS FOR NAVY INSTALLATIONS AND ACTIVITIES

Subj: NAVY HEADQUARTERS CRISIS MANAGEMENT PROCEDURES AND ORGANIZATION. a. The clarification of Navy service watch cell and conditions I and II watch.

OPNAVINST B N96 29 Jul 2014

CERTIFICATION OF THE AVIATION CAPABILITY OF SHIPS OPERATING AIRCRAFT

Subj: IMPLEMENTATION OF THE DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY SMALL BUSINESS PROGRAMS

OPNAVINST G N514 8 Jan Subj: RELEASE OF INFORMATION ON NUCLEAR WEAPONS AND ON NUCLEAR CAPABILITIES OF U.S. NAVY FORCES

Transcription:

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY OFFICE OF THE CHIEF OF NAVAL OPERATIONS 2000 NAVY PENTAGON WASHINGTON DC 20350-2000 OPNAVINST 3900.25D N94 OPNAV INSTRUCTION 3900.25D From: Chief of Naval Operations Subj: MAJOR RANGE AND TEST FACILITY BASE Ref: (a) DoD Directive 3200.11 of 27 December 2007 (b) DoD Instruction 3200.18 of 1 February 2010 (c) DoD 7000.14-R, Department of Defense Financial Management Regulations (FMR) Encl: (1) Navy Major Range and Test Facility Base 1. Purpose a. To implement references (a) and (b) which prescribe policies and responsibilities for the management and operation of specific Department of Defense (DoD) test and evaluation (T&E) facilities designated collectively as the major range and test facility base (MRTFB). Reference (c), volume 11A, chapters 12 and 13 prescribes funding policy for DoD and non-dod users. b. Major change to this revision was the addition of the responsibilities section. This is a complete revision and should be reviewed in its entirety. 2. Cancellation. OPNAVINST 3900.25C. 3. Scope. The provisions of this instruction apply to all users of the MRTFB and to all echelons responsible for management and administration of MRTFB capabilities. Current MRTFB capabilities are listed in enclosure (1) of this instruction, however the MRTFB composition is assessed bi-annually to ensure appropriate Navy T&E capabilities are included. The composition of the MRTFB can be changed when a facility or range is added to or withdrawn from the MRTFB; when a facility or range currently designated as part of the MRTFB is mothballed or closed; or when the capability of an MRTFB has significantly changed. 4. Responsibilities a. The Office of the Chief of Naval Operations (OPNAV), Director, Navy, Innovation, Technology Requirements and Test and Evaluation (OPNAV N94) has been designated the central focal point for all test capabilities of the MRTFB. In that capacity, all matters pertaining to the MRTFB must be addressed to OPNAV N94, who must: (1) Program funds for the capabilities listed in enclosure (1), as revised through future composition assessments, in a uniform manner per reference (c).

(2) Conduct an MRTFB composition assessment on a bi-annual basis, in conjunction with OPNAV program objective memorandum sponsor program proposal build. As part of the composition assessment process, OPNAV N94 must: (a) Solicit major claimant s nominations for MRTFB composition changes and specify required supporting documentation. Detailed procedures should be specified in the solicitation memo. (b) Select nominations for possible implementation and solicit additional detailed information required to fully assess and execute the proposed change(s). (c) Propose selected nominations to the Director, Test Resource Management Center, for final approval per reference (b). (3) Ensure that the categories of goods and services charged to the MRTFB customers are consistently applied across all the MRTFBs and all costs incurred by MRTFBs must be billed per reference (c). (4) Act as the Navy's interface with non-department of the Navy agencies and organizations on all matters relating to the MRTFB, including the Director, Test Resource Management Center; the Deputy Assistant Secretary of Defense, Developmental Test and Evaluation; the Director, Operational Test and Evaluation; the other Services; the Defense Information Systems Agency; and the Missile Defense Agency. b. Systems commands and fleets are major claimants for ranges and facilities which are current or potential future MRTFB members. Accordingly, these commands are responsible for: (1) Responding to OPNAV N94 requests for budget and supporting information needed to support the OPNAV N94 sponsor program proposal build for the MRTFB. (2) Responding to MRTFB composition assessment solicitations of change nominations. (3) Implementing requirements of references (b) and (c), as appropriate. c. Program executive officers and program managers are potential users of the MRTFB. Accordingly, these offices are responsible for preparing acquisition documentation, including T&E master plans, procurement requests, requests for proposal, and contracts stating acceptance specifications for hardware to be tested at a Navy facility, which may include major range and test base facilities. Accordingly, these offices must: (1) Coordinate with the major range and test facility commander to ensure that the facility commander is apprised of all known support requirements in order that a proper test environment can be established for any planned testing at the facility. 2

(2) Initiate program office and facility commander coordination for acceptance testing during the preparation of acceptance test specifications of the proposed procurement. The facility commander must agree that the facility is capable of supporting the acceptance tests on a schedule that is mutually acceptable to all concerned prior to any contractual commitment entered into by the program office. d. Naval Air Systems Command (NAVAIRSYSCOM) T&E Staff Office (NAVAIR 5.0C) is the MRTFB program element manager. As such NAVAIR 5.0C is responsible for working with each MRTFB activity to ensure the optimum mix of cost, schedule, and performance (workforce and infrastructure) required to support the acquisition programs, to include: (1) Submitting budget exhibits per reference (c). (2) Analyzing needs, developing investment roadmaps, and establishing investment and sustainment priorities across the Navy MRTFB activities to support the Navy's Planning, Programming, Budgeting, and Execution process. (3) Monitoring activity operating and investment execution to track and resolve current year issues and raise them to OPNAV N94 and acquisition programs as appropriate. 5. Records Management. Records created as a result of this instruction, regardless of media and format, must be managed per Secretary of the Navy (SECNAV) Manual 5210.1 of January 2012. 6. Review and Effective Date. Per OPNAVINST 5215.17A, OPNAV N94 will review this instruction annually on the anniversary of its effective date to ensure applicability, currency, and consistency with Federal, DoD, SECNAV, and Navy policy and statutory authority using OPNAV 5215/40 Review of Instruction. This instruction will automatically expire 5 years after effective date unless reissued or canceled prior to the 5 year anniversary date, or extension has been granted. DAVID J. HAHN Director, Innovation, Technology Requirements and Test and Evaluation Division Releasability and distribution: This instruction is cleared for public release and is available electronically only via the Department of the Navy Issuances Web site, http://doni.documentservices.dla.mil/ 3

NAVY MAJOR RANGE AND TEST FACILITY BASE OPNAVINST 3900.25D 1. The MRTFB is a national asset that exists primarily to provide T&E information for DoD decision makers and to support the needs of weapon system development programs and DoD research needs. The MRTFB composition is based on a combination of multiple user requirements, future technology drivers, and unique functional capability. The MRTFB capability can be a subset of an activity's overall T&E or mission capability. The Navy s MRTFB capabilities are listed in paragraph 2 of this enclosure. 2. Ranges and test facilities comprising the Navy MRTFB and subject to the DoD uniform funding policy are: a. Naval Air Warfare Center Aircraft Division, Patuxent River, MD (1) Propulsion Systems Evaluation Facility (2) Air Vehicle Modification and Instrumentation (3) Naval Test Wing, Atlantic (4) Atlantic test ranges (5) Air Combat Environment Test and Evaluation Facility (6) Electromagnetic environments effects facility (7) Atlantic Targets and Marine Operations b. Naval Air Warfare Center Weapons Division, China Lake, CA (1) China Lake ranges (includes Land Range and Electronic Combat Range) (2) Naval Test Wing, Pacific (3) Naval Ordnance Test Station (4) Air Vehicle Modification and Instrumentation c. Naval Air Warfare Center Weapons Division, Point Mugu, CA (1) Sea range (2) Pacific Targets and Marine Operations Enclosure (1)

(3) Air Vehicle Modification and Instrumentation d. Naval Undersea Warfare Center, Atlantic Undersea Test and Evaluation Center e. Naval Undersea Warfare Center, Keyport, WA, Nanoose and Dabob Bay Ranges f. Pacific Missile Range Facility, Kekaha, HI (1) Telemetry systems (2) Mobile at sea sensor (3) Optical systems (4) Imaging radar systems 2 Enclosure (1)