Washington County Nonprofits and the Economy Executive Summary

Similar documents
Weathering the Storm: Challenges and Opportunities Facing Colorado Nonprofits During Recession 2009 Update

Ohio Common Grant Form GRANT APPLICATION SHORT FORM

SWOT. SWOT for Fundraising. Internal. External. Strengths Weaknesses

Rhode Island Community Food Bank

Ascension Columbia St. Mary s Ozaukee

NORFOLK SOUTHERN S INTENT IS TO HELP ENSURE THAT:

NORFOLK SOUTHERN contributions. Annual Report

AND RECEIVED BY THE NSF OFFICE WILL NOT BE CONSIDERED.

Decatur Area Arts Council is recognized as the local arts leader and the primary resource for information about arts in Decatur/Macon County.

Winter 2018 Nonprofit Fundraising Study (NFS)

US Virgin Islands. Current situation: Facts and figures from the 2010 CF-GSR survey

Concept Paper for ANN VISTA Project for FY 2012 Submitted

Meeting the Technical Assistance and Training Needs of Iowa Nonprofits

COMPREHENSIVE COUNSELING INITIATIVE FOR INDIANA K-12 STUDENTS REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS COUNSELING INITIATIVE ROUND II OCTOBER 2017

Stewardship Principles for Corporate Grantmakers

The State of the Ohio Nonprofit Sector. September Proctor s Linking Mission to Money 471 Highgate Avenue Worthington, OH 43085

VIBRANT. Strategic Plan Executive Summary

Income/Revenue Diversification

Report to the Greater Milwaukee Business Foundation on Health

BLOOMINGTON NONPROFITS: SCOPE AND DIMENSIONS

Donor-Advised Fund Guidelines 2017

University Advancement Annual Giving. Program Review

Glossary of Nonprofit Terms

NONPROFITS: MEETING TODAY S CHALLENGES. Presented by

HERTZ GIVING APPLICATION

Philanthropy in a Turbulent Economy

Overlake Medical Center. Implementation Strategy

FY2025 Master Plan/ FY Strategic Plan Summary

LBCF Funders Collaborative Request for Proposals 2017

The Fall 2017 State of Grantseeking Report

Five-Year Strategic Plan

Five-Year Reflections on the Merger of Points of Light Foundation and Hands On Network

Community Health Needs Assessment Three Year Summary

First Fundraising Strategies for Startup Organizations

CONDUCTED IN PARTNERSHIP WITH THE INDIANA UNIVERSITY LILLY FAMILY SCHOOL OF PHILANTHROPY

ABOUT THE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION FOR GREATER ATLANTA

Implementation Strategy

An Analysis of USDA Farm Program Payments and Rural Development Funding In Low Population Growth Rural Counties

2011 NJTL Capacity Building Program

Common Application Questions

ONTARIO SENIORS SECRETARIAT SENIORS COMMUNITY GRANT PROGRAM GUIDELINES

Outer Banks Forever. Position Director, Outer Banks Forever. Location Outer Banks, North Carolina

CITY OF DAVIS COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT APPLICATION

SNC BRIEF. Safety Net Clinics of Greater Kansas City EXECUTIVE SUMMARY CHALLENGES FACING SAFETY NET PROVIDERS TOP ISSUES:

UNITED WAY LEARNING SERIES. Developing a Strategic Fund Development Plan

Grant Writing for Beginners

University Advancement

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY... 3 INTRODUCTION... 3 VISION, MISSION, GUIDING PRINCIPLES... 4 BUSINESS PLAN OUTLINE... 4 OVERVIEW OF STRATEGIC DIRECTIONS...

ENTREPRENEURSHIP & ACCELERATION

Coastal Alabama: Stronger Together Wiley Blankenship // Coastal Alabama Partnership. August 18 th, 2016

MARKET SUMMARY CHINA 1. Data snapshot. Business and economic growth. Rank Rank Rank Survey average

Must be received (not postmarked) by 4:00 p.m. LAA Preparatory Application: Monday, February 23, 2009

Phase II Transition to Scale

Program Guidelines and Preparatory Application Instructions

Legal Aid Ontario 2013/ /16 Public business plan

FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS FOR ELIGIBLE EMPLOYEES AND CAST MEMBERS

Tahoe Truckee Community Foundation (TTCF) President and CEO Position Description

Philadelphia Common Data Project Summary Report. Prepared by: Daren Nordhagen

Operating in Uncertain Times

Virginia Growth and Opportunity Fund (GO Fund) Grant Scoring Guidelines

University of Wisconsin Hospital and Clinics mission is advancing health without compromise through:

POLICY ISSUES AND ALTERNATIVES

2014 Guidelines for Submitting a Full Proposal for the Grassroots Grants Program

University Advancement

100 % of units develop and implement a quality program plan

BUILDING PARTNERSHIPS FOR Global Philanthropy

2015 Lasting Change. Organizational Effectiveness Program. Outcomes and impact of organizational effectiveness grants one year after completion

Model Community Health Needs Assessment and Implementation Strategy Summaries

United Way Funding Application Guidelines

Submission to the Standing Committee on Finance in response to the Pre-Budget Consultations in advance of the 2018 budget

appropriate. The central staff provides additional support for deans by traveling with them to meet with donors both locally and across the country.

2017 Community Grants Program

Enterprise Finance for Artistic Vibrancy in Changing Times

2016/2017 Funding Guidelines

Big Brothers Big Sisters Services, Inc.

Policies and Procedures for Funded Agencies

Become a member today at: Sponsored By:

NONPROFIT FINANCE STUDY

The New York Women s Foundation

Modeling for Success in Health Care Target Analytics Fundraising Models

ABOUT HEART OF FLORIDA UNITED WAY

Nonprofit organizations use direct mail, online

Community Grant Guidelines

Consumer Health Foundation

ABOUT THE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION FOR GREATER ATLANTA

The Board of Governors of the California Community Colleges

Can shifting sands be a solid foundation for growth?

RDA Community Grant Fall 2018

2018 Private Grants Application

THE STATE OF GRANTSEEKING FACT SHEET

2001 Rural Development Philanthropy Baseline Survey ~ Updated on June 18, 2002

What Canadian Donors Want

SUMMARY OF THE ECONOMIC IMPACT OF THE NONPROFIT SECTOR IN PINELLAS COUNTY

Development and assessment of a Patient Safety Culture Dr Alice Oborne

This memo provides an analysis of Environment Program grantmaking from 2004 through 2013, with projections for 2014 and 2015, where possible.

ANNOUNCING UNITED WAY CRITICAL HOURS ONE TIME GRANT CALL FOR PROPOSALS

State of the sector report Voluntary Community Charity

COMMUNITY IMPACT GRANTS

Funding Application Guide

Pathway to Business Model Innovation Getting to Fueling Impact

Transcription:

Washington County Nonprofits and the Economy Executive Summary Summer 2012 Prepared by: University of Wisconsin Washington County University of Wisconsin-Extension, Washington County United Way of Washington County Volunteer Center of Washington County

Washington County Nonprofits and the Economy Project Summary The Toolbox Coalition, comprised of the University of Wisconsin Washington County, University of Wisconsin-Extension, United Way of Washington County and the Volunteer Center of Washington County, completed during early summer of 2012 a survey of a cross section of nonprofit organizations in Washington County, WI to determine the financial health, trends and concerns of those organizations. Project Scope The survey project consisted of an electronic survey using the tool surveymonkey.com. The data contained within this document is a result of those responses. The survey was distributed to 91 nonprofit organizations within Washington County and 28 responses were received for a response rate of 30.8%. Responses were held in confidence and the data results in this document a summary in aggregate of those who responded. Summary Findings Although 95% of the nonprofits are confident that they will be able to meet the demand for services in 2012, their ability to meet future demands may be limited by other findings in this survey. These include: 67% indicated demand for services increased from 2010-2011 53% have not changed staffing levels from 2011 59% indicated total expenses increased from 2010-2011 43% have been financial healthy to date, but feel vulnerable in the future 43% had expenses exceed revenues in 2011 29% have three or less months of reserves on hand for operating expenses Additionally, organizations indicated that their greatest challenges are obtaining funds & recruiting new donors; enhancing their visibility & reputation; and managing workloads. Representatives from 33 organizations discussed the findings of this survey at a forum on August 16, 2012. These discussions suggested that more collaboration is needed amongst the non-profit sector in Washington County and nonprofits need to seek out new and diversified funding sources to sustain and grow services to meet demands. It is intended that this survey be conducted on an annual basis to identify trends in the financial health of nonprofit respondents within Washington County, WI. 2

Key Findings The following summarizes some of the key findings by category indicated. This document includes summaries by question in both a chart and graphical representation. Where the range of answers was significantly broad, such as vendor purchasing patterns, the data is in chart format only. Participant Demographic Characteristics Focus of organization o 46.4% human services o 21.4% environment o 17.9% community development Operating budget o 35.7% less than $100,000 o 21.4%- $101,000-$250,000 o 21.4%- $501,000-$1 million Geographic territory o 57.1% county-wide o 32.1% regional 82.1% based in Washington County 78.5% of responders were director or president of the organization Challenges faced by respondents indicating minor/major responses Programs and Services 78.6% attracting new members or clients is a challenge 57.1% collaborating with other nonprofits 57.1% evaluating outcomes or impacts of programs Communications 89.3% enhancing our visibility and reputation 71.4% communication with donors Human Resources 82.1% managing workload 71.4% volunteers, recruiting and managing Fundraising/Donations 85.7% obtaining funds 85.7% recruiting new donors 75.0% maintaining donors Operations Management 50.0% not a challenge Board Management 67.9% board recruitment 64.3% board training Technology 64.3% hardware & IT support (combined responses) 60.7 % social media & website (combined responses) 3

Greatest Challenges from Q6-12 1) Communication- 89.3% enhancing our visibility and reputation 2) Fundraising/Donations- 85.7% obtaining funds & recruiting new donors 3) Human Resources- 82.1% managing workload Major changes respondents experienced from 2010 to 2011 66.7% demand for services increased 59.3% total expenses increased Revenue from donations- 32.1% increased, 32.1% decreased & 28.6% remained the same, 7.2% unsure. Demand for Services outlook for next three years 67.9% will expand services in certain key areas 28.6% services will remain unchanged 0 responded that they will reduce key program budgets and services Description of current financial health 42.9% are financially healthy and not currently vulnerable 42.9% have been financially healthy to date but feel vulnerable in the future Annual fund development goal for current fiscal year Combined annual fund development goal from 16 responses = $3,702,200 $500, 000+ (3) $100,000-499,999 (5) $50,000-99,999 (3) $10,000-49,999 (5) Change in fund development goal from previous year 50.0% increase 42.9% no substantial change Respondents indicating they will have a capital campaign in the next 9 months 25.0% will not have a campaign in the next 9 months Respondents indicating status of endowment campaigns 82.1 % are not currently undertaking an endowment campaign Respondents who have changed their endowment strategy due to current economic conditions 14.8% yes 4

Changes indicated in funding sources between 2010 and 2011 53.8% Increase in time given by volunteers / in-kind donations 39.3% Increase in special events/fundraisers 39.3% Increase in individual donations 21.4% decrease in donations from businesses/corporate foundations and special events/fundraisers Anticipated funding source changes from 2011 to 2012 50.0% Increase in time given by volunteers/in-kind donations 42.9% Increase in special events/fundraisers Actions taken by respondents if expenses exceeded revenues 57.1% expenses did not exceed revenues 35.7% used prior year s cash reserves 28.6% greater reliance on volunteers 21.4% increased fundraising activities Waiting list for services 90.5% no Confidence in meeting demand for services in 2012 95.3% are confident Months of cash reserves respondents indicated they have on hand for operating expenses 57.1% 6 or more 14.2% 4-5 months 28.6% 3 or less months Percentage of respondents who offer direct services to clients 71.4% yes Change in demand for services compared to 2011 61.9% increase 19.0% stayed the same 14.3% decreased Change in staffing levels from 2011 52.4% no change 23.8% increased 14.3% decreased Reason for change in staffing levels 23.5% Increased demand for services 5.9% Decreased revenue 5

Organizations were asked the 3 most pressing issues facing the non-profit sector in Washington County? Their responses were clustered and appear as follows: Funding (32) Funding / Money - 12 Donors - 6 o Financial support/donations o Donor fatigue, the same people getting asked for money over and over o Limited donor base with increased demand o Accountability to the donor o Obtain corporate sponsorships/funding o Acquiring New Donors Competition - 5 o Funders belief that there are too many nonprofits in Washington County o Competition for the same funds o Competition for available funds by too many non-profit organizations o Increased competition for fund raised revenue o Overlap and copying of existing fund raising events Government - 4 o Government Funding o Government cuts etc. o Cut back in essential funding from government sources o Serious decline in federal and state grant program revenue Grants - 2 o Grant money for programs o Pullback in grant funding Other - 3 o Meeting operating budgets o Limited access to funding to build sustainability by investing in operations o Eggs all in one funding basket Public Awareness & Support (9) Awareness of programs/events Knowledge of Needs Public Awareness Community support Means to market and share what's going on are limited, especially to corporate employees Proper marketing Media support Visibility Communication with public, clients, donors 6

Economic Environment (4) Economy Economic Environment Poor economy Economy Service Demand (4) Increase in clients Increase in service demand / decrease in staffing sustainment capacity Increased need for services across the board - more programs asking the same population for support Increased needs for services Volunteers (4) Finding volunteers Getting volunteers interested and active A small number of local corporations to encourage employees to volunteers Volunteers are busy Staffing (4) Benefit costs for staff Staffing Ongoing staffing The pool of available workers lack technical/computer skills to support non-profs in today's computer savvy environment Board Development (4) Board development with strategic planning Board micro managing in areas they are not qualified to manage Operational management Lack of creativeness regarding sustainability Mergers & Competition (3) Lack of willingness by nonprofits to consider consolidation/merging The need to collaborate/merge to increase sustainability and provide adequate services Too many non-profits Change in businesses in county (2) Community based large businesses/corporations are disappearing which means smaller financial commitments A small number of local large businesses to offer financial support 7

Community Support (2) Support Community support Increasing Costs (2) Administrative costs Cost of products increased Other Uncertainty 2 time Safety Government dependency Not enough leaders Aging demographics - change in attitude about giving time/money by younger generations Program offerings (dwindling) Uninsured Health People Time commitments Conservative citizens Decreased Membership Negative political climate Homeless People Washington County Census and Economic Forum Key census data and the key findings of the Nonprofits and the Economy survey were presented to representatives from 33 organizations at a forum held on August 16, 2012. After the data was presented, participants discussed in small groups what the data means to their organization and what ideas they have to address funding trends and issues. Organizations that had representatives at the forum include: Aging and Disability Resource Center of Washington County Albrecht Free Clinic Big Brothers Big Sisters of Washington County Boys & Girls Club of Washington County Casa Guadalupe Education Center Consumer Credit Counseling Service Council on AODA of Washington County Economic Development Washington County Family Center of Washington County Family Promise of Washington County Friends of Lac Lawrann Conservancy Froedtert Health Medical Group 8

Germantown Area Chamber of Commerce Girl Scouts of WI SE, Inc Greater West Bend Area Chamber of Commerce Hartford Business Improvement District Interfaith Caregivers of Washington County Kettle Moraine YMCA Museum of Wisconsin Art Nova Services Sales Dynamix LLC Samaritan Health Center Southeastern WI Common Ground St. Joseph's Community Foundation The Threshold United Way of Washington County UW-Extension, Washington County UW-Oshkosh College of Education & Human Services UW-Washington County, School of Continuing Education Volunteer Center of Washington County Washington County Historical Society Washington County Senior Center Wellspring Education Center & Organic Farm Small group discussion notes on what ideas participants have to address funding trends and issues. Group-1 More collaboration Central fundraising events (United Way) Fundraising through social media (LinkedIn, Facebook) Research communities with more population growth Education of public on endowments and agencies establishing endowments Group-2 Better education of non-profit services Impact of non-profit shifting responsibility to government if they did not exist Group-3 Better Board selection Better communication of services Focus on differences in various community needs within Washington County Better coordination among agencies eliminate duplication More creative fundraising tactics 9

Group-4 Membership has stayed static-using consultant to reach out to potential new members who meet that same demographic-helps with increased funding, increased members and increased programming Find ways to collaborate with other agencies and build on each other s strengths Track reduction in government funding in programs over the years and the nonprofit sector filling the gap now. Evolution of government support Group-5 Change focus of groups to recruit for volunteers Do more collaboration with other non-profits Each group was then asked to share key points from their discussions with all participants. The Big Ideas that were shared include: Fee for service concept for non-profits Focus on aging population for volunteers Increase collaboration with other non-profits Increase education of community re: services offered, which raises awareness Demonstrate impact of services offered. Who would have to pick it up if nonprofits went away Help community leaders understand value of diversity Decrease overlap of services and programs offered through collaboration Better/active Board recruitment Better communications of service via community More creative fund raising Collaborative fund raising Social media use for fundraising 10