ANNUAL SALARY AND BENEFITS REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS, 2012

ANNUAL SALARY AND BENEFITS REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS, 2012 FACULTY COMPENSATION AND BENEFITS COMMITTEE OF THE UNIVERSITY SENATE MEMBERSHIP, 2011-2012: Member College Source Term expires Eugene W. Holland, Chair HUM/ASC Faculty Council 2012 Alicia Bertone VETMED Faculty Council 2014 Alan Beyerchen, Vice Chair HUM/ASC Faculty Council 2013 Greg Davis FAES Faculty Council 2013 Michael Firstenberg MED Faculty Council 2014 Masanori Hashimoto SBS/ASC Faculty Council 2012 Ulrich Heinz MAPS/ASC Faculty Council 2012 Robert Heneman BUS Faculty Council 2012 Mike Hogan FAES Faculty Council 2012 Richard Hill OPT Retiree designee 2011 Mari Noda HUM/ASC Faculty Council 2014 Jos Raadschelders JGSPA Faculty Council 2013 Mary Ellen Wewers COPH Faculty Council 2014 Kathleen McCutcheon OHR ex officio, Human Resources Susan Williams OAA ex officio, Academic Affairs Tom Bond OHR Human Resources expert Laura Gast OHR Human Resources expert

FCBC 2012 Annual Report SUMMARY It remains the conviction of FCBC that an essential strategy for recruiting and retaining top-flight faculty in line with the University s ambition to move from excellence to eminence is to offer salary and benefits packages that are competitive with those of the best universities in the land. OSU s ranking among AAU institutions remains at 36 th (down from 34 th two years ago), no closer to the target position of 30 th (the top half of the group). OSU average salaries moved up one position to 5 th in both the Benchmark and CIC comparison groups, by moving ahead of Penn State. Dramatic changes in STRS benefits due to the recession are still pending; in addition to the implementation of short-term pricing adjustments, long-term remodeling of OSU health-plans is under consideration. The committee recommends that OSU continue to aim higher in the AAU salary ranking, and that to accomplish this, some of the revenue generated by initiatives such as the leasing of university parking services be devoted to faculty compensation as well as to new hires. BACKGROUND According to the University By-Laws (3335-5-4812), it is the responsibility of the Faculty Compensation and Benefits Committee (FCBC) to study the adequacy and other attributes of the university s policies and provisions for : (i) salaries, outside professional services and supplemental compensation; and (ii) retirement benefits, hospitalization, medical insurance, and other health benefits, life insurance, other insurance, travel reimbursement, educational benefits, recreational benefits, and other perquisites, benefits, and conditions of faculty employment. Each year, the FCBC issues a Report to the university community at large, outlining the results of its on-going examination of salaries, benefits and other conditions of faculty employment at OSU. Like its predecessors, this year's Report will start by presenting the conclusions of this year's study of salaries and benefits. It will then outline on-going issues that may be taken up again by the Committee next year. It concludes by recommending steps the University should take to meet its goals for recruiting, rewarding, and retaining top-caliber faculty at an institution with aspirations to eminence. New this year was the election of a vice-chair: Alan Beyerchen. By identifying the next chair of the Committee in the middle of the outgoing chair s last year, it is expected that a smoother transition and better leadership continuity will be achieved, as the vice-chair learns the ropes for a year before becoming chair. Ohio State continues to enjoy a stable fiscal position and significant support from the state legislature, while at the same time facing a steady long-term decline in State funding and a nearfuture comparatively abrupt decrease in federal funding. While the latter is difficult to predict and quantify (although it seems clear that the federal stimulus package due to expire in 2012 will not be renewed given the current political climate), the secular decline in the State's financial contribution to OSU's budget is clear: 1

FCBC 2012 Annual Report Comparison of State Support* to Tuition** Income: Columbus Campus State Support and Tuition Income themselves represent only two of several income sources for the University; other sources are not graphed here. Graph courtesy of the OSU Office of Business and Finance Partly in response to that combined challenge, the University embarked on a controversial plan to lease OSU assets, notably the parking operation, to acquire an infusion of capital to be invested in the endowment so as to generate a replacement revenue-stream. The Committee spent a considerable amount of time evaluating the proposed monetization of parking. Some time was also spent assessing the fairness of the University's plan to compensate 9-month faculty during the shift in the academic calendar (one month earlier) attendant on the conversion to semesters. STRS reform remained an important issue, but it appears likely that the legislature will finally vote on a reform package in the next few months (before the end of the calendar year). Lastly, short- and long-term changes to health plan benefits were considered. We start with the compensation data, before turning to the more complex set of issues concerning benefits and working conditions. COMPENSATION Ohio State measures the adequacy of its faculty salaries by three main criteria: (i) average salaries at OSU compared with those at a select group of Benchmark institutions; (ii) average salaries at OSU compared with those of other CIC (Committee on Institutional Cooperation) institutions; and (iii) average salaries at OSU compared to the level of compensation it would take to get the university to the 30 th position (the mid-point) in the annual AAU (Association of American Universities) salary rankings. In addition to these main criteria, data on continuing faculty compensation at OSU is included, to isolate and foreground actual salary increases by eliminating from consideration the salaries of new hires and retirees; also included are salary comparisons adjusted for the cost of living in the various cities in which our peers are located. 2

FCBC 2012 Annual Report New this year is the inclusion of U.S. News salary rankings. Also new this year is a discussion of OSU regional campus salaries compared with those at other Ohio regional campuses. As has been the case for the past 4 years or so, an important proviso must be kept in mind about the salary data presented here: what is reported is nominal base salaries, not the salaries actually paid out; it is not possible to take into account salary reductions due to furloughs and other costsaving measures, even though we know that such measures have been taken at a significant number of peer institutions, and considerably reduced actual take-home pay. SALARIES: THE COMPARISONS Benchmark Institutions (See Appendix A) In many respects, the most appropriate salary comparison is to be made with our Benchmark institutions, since they were selected specifically because they are most like us: they are all large public research universities. Longitudinal comparisons with this group were compromised three years ago when the group itself was redefined: ever since (but unlike before, when compared to the original Benchmark institutions), OSU average salaries have been slightly (about 1%) above the Benchmark average [see bar-graph in Appendix A, p.20]. This year, in fact, the amount by which our average salary exceeds that of the Benchmark average increased slightly (from 0.9% to 1.1%). Moreover, our overall relative position with the group moved up one, from 6 th to 5 th (because Penn State slipped from 4 th to 6 th ); while Assistant Professors remained in 5 th position, Associate Professors moved from 5 th to 4 th, and Full Professors from 6 th to 5 th. (UCLA and Michigan average salaries continue to lead the Benchmark group, with UCLA overall salaries increasing by 5.7% last year alone!) CIC Institutions (See Appendix B) Our situation with respect to the Committee on Institutional Cooperation is practically identical. OSU s overall average salary went up one position from 6 th to 5 th (again due to the decline of Penn State), with Assistant Professors remaining unchanged at 5 th, Associate Professors moving up from 5 th to 4 th, and Full Professors moving up from 6 th to 5 th (see bar-graphs in Appendix B, p.23). Of the twelve CIC institutions, two (Chicago and Northwestern) are private universities, which makes this group slightly less reliable than the Benchmark Group as a standard of comparison for OSU salaries: Chicago and Northwestern regularly top the list of average salaries in the CIC, and this year is no exception; Michigan is always third. AAU Institutions (See Appendix C) The final main comparison group is the Association of American Universities (AAU), which describes itself as an association of the 61 leading research universities in the United States. This group provides the target ranking to which OSU aspires, rather than a select group of institutions with which direct salary comparisons can fruitfully be made. For some time now, Ohio State has been committed to the goal of reaching the salary rank of 30 th among AAU institutions. As is the case for the CIC institutions, longitudinal data presenting an historical perspective on OSU s performance relative to this goal are available [see bar-graphs in Appendix C, pp.10-12]. This year s Report, like last year's, distinguishes between OSU's position relative 3

FCBC 2012 Annual Report to the subset of public AAU universities and its position relative to the entire group (publics and privates combined); both comparisons are included in the Appendix [pp.7-9]. In relation to both groups, OSU's ranking remained the same as last year: 36 th out of 61 in relation the entire group, and 15 th out of 35 in relation to public research universities alone. And so we are still shy of the goal of 30 th position, though no farther from it than we were last year, and are nowhere near the position that OSU achieved in the mid-1980s to early-1990s, when our rankings ranged from 28 th (AY1991-92) to 14 th (AY1983-84). To return to 34 th position, the highest OSU has attained in the last 15 years, would require an overall average salary increase of roughly $1,080 (or 1%) more than whatever increases are received by our closest rivals (Illinois, SUNY-Buffalo, and UC-Irvine). Looking more closely at the data-set reveals that the Associate Professor rank remains a trouble-spot at OSU: despite a marginal gain relative to our Benchmarks and the CIC group, our AAU position at this rank dropped from 36 th last year to 39 th this year, whereas at the Professor and Assistant Professor ranks our AAU position improved slightly from 39 th to 38 th and 31 st to 30 th respectively. The fact that for the Assistant Professor rank alone, OSU salaries have broken into the top half of the group (30 th position) argues for an aggressive proactive retention program of maintaining competitive salaries as these junior professors move up the ranks. Top 25 Public Institutions (See Appendix D) This data-set, new to the Report this year, compares OSU to what U.S. News & World Report considers the top public universities in the country, according to two criteria: reputation and average salary. Overall our position on average salary is slightly higher (at 14 th ) than our position on reputation (17 th ), but the disparity is greater at the Assistant Professor rank, where our salaries put it us in the 9 th position among public universities. Having attracted talent with competitive salaries to begin with, we should keep these junior faculty at OSU through the kind of aggressive proactive retention program described above, so that our reputational ranking moves closer to our salary ranking in the U.S. News & World Report lists. Salary Adjustment for Cost-of-living (See Appendix E) Relying on base salaries alone smuggles into the comparisons the mistaken presumption that the purchasing power or real value of those salaries is the same regardless of the institutions' locations. A different perspective on salary differentials emerges when the relatively low cost of living in central Ohio is taken into account. The Runzheimer Report of Living Cost Standards now makes it possible to adjust the salaries paid at various institutions in light of the living costs of their respective locations. Although no longitudinal comparisons are yet possible, adjusting for cost-of-living can change OSU's ranking in relation to all three groups but not always for the better (see Appendix E). In relation to our Benchmark institutions, OSU's living-costadjusted position improves considerably from 5 th to 3 rd (the same adjusted position as last year). (As an index of how dramatically living-cost adjustment can affect ranking, UCLA's position among the Benchmarks drops from first to last when living-costs are factored into the comparison.) In relation to the CIC, however, OSU's living-cost-adjusted position falls noticeably from 5 th to 7 th out of 12 (also the same adjusted position as last year). In relation to the whole AAU group, finally, OSU's living-cost-adjusted position rises from 36 th to 25 th (the 4

FCBC 2012 Annual Report same adjusted position we held last year). Within the Top 25 Public Institutions list, finally, the cost-of-living adjustment improves Ohio State s salary ranking from 14 th to 9 th position. Salary Increments: Total Faculty vs. Continuing Faculty Increases (See Appendix F) The final analysis of OSU faculty compensation differentiates internally between the percentage salary increase of all faculty and the percentage increase of continuing faculty, i.e. only those faculty who were employed at OSU in both fall of 2010 and fall of 2011. This difference is significant because the latter figure excludes from the salary pool the salaries of both the faculty who left the university in 2011 generally due to retirement, and at relatively high salaries and those who joined the university in 2011 generally at entry rank, and at relatively low salaries. Assuming that roughly the same number of faculty in any given year leave the University as join it, a comparison of the total salary pool in fall 2010 with the total salary pool in fall 2011 skews the rate of increase downward: in effect, the salaries of the highly-paid retirees of 2011 are replaced with those of the entry-level faculty of 2011, thereby reducing the average increase. Comparing continuing faculty alone thus provides a better indication of the actual rate of increase of salaries for the year: for AY2011-2012, while comparing all faculty salaries registers only a 2.1% gain, the average gain for continuing faculty at OSU was in fact 2.6%. Regional Campus Faculty Compensation Comparisons Although faculty salaries at the regional campuses are budgeted separately from those of the Columbus campus, regional campus faculty are nonetheless still OSU faculty, and belong to the same departments as Columbus campus faculty. Salary comparisons, however, are made not between the regional campuses and the Columbus campus (since workloads and expectations differ so greatly), but between OSU's regional campuses and the regional campuses of other University System of Ohio (USO) institutions. Inasmuch as OSU is the flagship university of the system, and our regional campuses are part of OSU, the salaries of regional campus faculty should reflect that status; but they don't. Although our regional campus salaries have improved relative to the 19 other Ohio regional campuses over the past 10-15 years, they do not top the list, as they arguably should. This is a matter that bears continuing attention. BENEFITS Benefits are far more difficult to compare quantitatively than salaries. Nevertheless, FCBC plays an important role in monitoring and sometimes advising on benefits issues. Most important among these, at the moment, is probably still the effect of the 2008 Recession on OSU pensions. The Committee also spent a great deal of time this year, however, on the issue of parking monetization. Health-plan reform is a perennial topic, and this year both minor short-term and comprehensive long-term changes were considered. The State Teachers Retirement System (STRS) Up through 2008, STRS - to which over 63% of OSU faculty belong - had sufficient assets to cover its pay-out obligations for roughly the next 40 years; State law requires that pension funds hold sufficient reserves to cover pay-outs 30 years into the future, so the System was in good 5

FCBC 2012 Annual Report shape. Once the recession hit, however, STRS assets were no longer adequate to cover pay-outs for the stipulated 30 years, so pension system reform was called for. Ex officio FCBC member Kathleen McCutcheon, OSU's Vice-President for Human Resources, sits on the state-wide Healthcare Pension Advocates group (HPA), which works with STRS and the Ohio Retirement Study Council (ORSC), the legislative body that oversees all the State retirement systems and developed reforms to propose to the State legislature. Committee member Dick Hill of the OSU Retirees Association provided an invaluable retiree s perspective. As of June 1, the Ohio Senate had passed the long-awaited pension reform bill (Sub. Senate Bill 342), which now awaits action by the House. It is not clear whether the House will take up this issue before the November elections or wait until afterward; it is also not clear whether the House will insist on changes to the Senate bill. Most observers agree that changes are unlikely, but that if they do occur, they will make the reform harsher. Major changes to STRS contained in the Senate bill include the following: Starting on July 1, 2013, member contributions to STRS (as well as to the other pension plans) will increase by 1% per year until 2016, for a total increase of 4% - so that pensions contributions that are now 10% will eventually be 14%. Also starting July 1, 2013, there will be a one-year suspension of the Cost-of-Living Adjustment (COLA) for ALL retirees, followed by a reduction of the COLA from 3% to 2% for ALL retirees. For everyone retiring after July 1, 2013, there will be a 5-year hiatus before the 2% COLA kicks in - so that someone retiring in 2016, for example, will receive no COLA until 2022. Starting on August 1, 2015, the Final Average Salary (FAS) on which pension amounts are calculated will be based on the highest 5 years earnings (rather than the highest 3 years, as is the case now). Also starting on August 1, 2015, the age and years of service requirements increase in graduated steps over the next decade, and the 35-year enhanced benefit will be eliminated. These and other proposed changes are complicated; more information is available at https://www.strsoh.org/pdfs/40-305.pdf Parking Monetization Because of all the controversy surrounding the proposed monetization of parking at OSU, the Committee spent a considerable amount of time examining the issue. We met early on with Geoff Chatas, Vice-President of Business and Finance, as well as on a separate occasion with University Treasurer Michael Papadakis (also from Business and Finance); we read Bruce Weide s analysis; and some of us attended two presentations - by a faculty member from Penn State and two faculty members from Ohio State s Fischer College of Business - about the legal and financial ramifications of monetization. Among the issues we considered were: 6

FCBC 2012 Annual Report * whether parking fees were a legitimate source of funding for the core academic mission * what the possible impact of privatizing parking on the quality of service might be * whether the projected rate-increases were fair and historically justifiable * whether the decision-making process truly included faculty input * what the likelihood was of seeing a net gain in funding for OSU from monetization * how any such funds should be used While no actions were called for from the Committee, we did reach three conclusions: * that OSU would possibly or likely perceive a net gain from leasing its parking; there was disagreement on which characterization was more accurate; the preponderance of opinion favored possibly, and * that therefore more information (in the form of actual bids) would be required to reach a reasonable decision * that should OSU lease its parking operations as proposed, some portion of the proceeds be devoted to increasing compensation for faculty already at OSU, in addition to recruiting new faculty to OSU. Health Plan Pricing Adjustments and Remodeling Consideration of the Health Plan fell into two categories. One was the usual marginal adjustment of charges (premiums, co-pays, deductibles, out-of-pocket maximums, etc.) that is required periodically (every two to three years) to keep up with the continually-increasing costs of medical care. The other was a far more ambitious and long-term project to completely remodel the health plan along the lines of the Your Plan For Health initiative. While YP4H is incentive-based - faculty get points and premium rebates for participating - the new health plan model foresees establishing two tracks, one for those who participate, and one for those who don't: the former would be cheaper and more comprehensive than the latter. Subsequent to our discussion of the remodeling plans, the Medical Center decided to put off implementation and lengthen the discussion and planning period. This is an issue FCBC will want to keep a close eye on. Already in the first round of discussions, the Committee noted an extreme imbalance in the proposed remodeling: all the attention was focused on individual patient/subscriber behaviors (such as undergoing annual biometric screenings), and no attention was focused on the other two necessary pillars of health-care reform: improvements in the delivery of care (supply-side efficiencies and savings), and changes in institutional policy to support better health (populationwide rather than individual behavior modification). In the second round of discussions, the Committee learned that the University does have plans to address these other two pillars; further consultation about all three aspects of health care remodeling will take place in the coming years as the University and the Medical Center design and implement sweeping changes. 7

FCBC 2012 Annual Report Supplemental Retirement Accounts It has become clear that the comprehensive web-based chart comparing supplemental retirement account (SRA) plans and fees which the University had tried to implement will never see the light of day. Although the University succeeded in insisting that SRA vendors provide complete and accurate information regarding their plan details and fee-structures (and dropped those vendors that refused to comply), an effective web-based comparison chart proved impossible to design, due to the hundreds--if not thousands--of variations in selections used by different vendors to tailor plans to individual faculty, and it would have been impractical to keep up to date. The OSU Retirees Association has however established a very informative web portal devoted to SRAs [specifically 403(b) and 457 (b)]; it is available at http://hr.osu.edu/osura/rr_403b457b.aspx. The Committee also examined and approved of the University's plans to provide overlapping pay for faculty on 9-month appointments, who will in effect work an extra month this year because of the transition to the semester calendar. We also heard from Associate Vice President Leslie Flesch from Business and Finance about the possibility of moving all University employees onto the bi-weekly pay schedule, which offers efficiencies (over the current system whereby some employees are paid bi-weekly while others, notably faculty, are paid monthly) and doesn't appear to severely inconvenience anyone. This issue may return to FCBC next year, if the University decides to pursue the possibility further. ISSUES OF ON-GOING CONCERN FOR NEXT YEAR The main issues probably confronting the Committee next year include * the final formulation of, vote on, and implementation of STRS reform * the transfer of parking operations to an outside agent * the projected remodeling of OSU health-plans * regional campus faculty compensation * possible move to a bi-weekly pay schedule RECOMMENDATIONS It has been customary at the end of recent FCBC reports to iterate or reiterate recommended compensation goals for the University. The goals have consistently taken two forms: 1) that the average overall faculty salary at OSU at least meet, and preferably exceed, the average overall faculty salary of our Benchmark institutions, and that reasonable efforts be made to ensure that the average OSU faculty salary at each rank also meets or exceeds the corresponding Benchmark average 2) that the ranking of OSU faculty salaries reach or exceed the 30 th position among AAU institutions (i.e., the midpoint of the group of 61) 8

FCBC 2012 Annual Report The main recommendation of the first of these goals has again been met in AY2011-2012; there was in fact an incremental advance in the amount by which we exceed the average (from 0.9% last year to 1.1% this year). It must be kept in mind, however, that this success has only been achieved by the re-selection several years ago (in FY 2010) of a new set of Benchmark institutions with whose faculty salaries our own compare favorably. The more important and reliable measure remains the AAU salary rankings, and as for the second compensation goal of reaching the midpoint of those rankings, we are still short of the target; the only positive thing that can be said is that at least we are no farther from the target than we were last year. It has been estimated that even just to return to the 34 th position (the highest attained by OSU within the last 15 years) would require an average salary increase of $1,000 more than our closest peer institutions. Compounding the problem of OSU s failure to close in on the AAU mid-point is the fact that while our Professor and Assistant Professor average salary rankings rose by one position each, our Associate Professor average salary fell three positions (from 36 th to 39 th ). This reflects the severity of salary compression at OSU, which is an important contributor to morale problems at that rank. At the Assistant Professor rank, meanwhile, the University is often unable to keep the talent that was attracted by competitive salaries in the first place making a policy of proactive retention essential for the intellectual strength of the institution. The Committee s final recommendations are therefore that the University * maintain or improve its position with Benchmark and CIC comparison groups * continue to aim for the 30th position in the AAU comparison group * and most importantly, devote a portion of any proceeds from monetization programs to continuing faculty compensation as well as new hires. Respectfully yours, Eugene W. Holland Dr. Eugene W. Holland Chair of the Faculty Compensation and Benefits Committee 451 Hagerty Hall, 1775 College Road The Ohio State University Columbus, OH 43210 614-292-2559 9

APPENDIX A The Ohio State University 2011 12 Faculty Salary Comparisons Benchmark Institutions

2011-12 Benchmark Comparison Ten Year Faculty Salary History 1 YEAR 5 YEAR 10 YEAR 11-12 10-11 09-10 08-09 07-08 06-07 05-06 04-05 03-04 02-03 01-02 % Rnk % Rnk % Rnk UCLA 162.59 153.65 148.02 144.50 141.97 133.21 128.37 123.33 122.40 117.90 115.70 5.82 1 4.07 1 3.46 2 MICHIGAN 148.78 146.93 143.97 142.09 137.03 130.44 125.62 120.17 117.80 114.80 108.90 1.26 8 2.67 3 3.17 5 ILLINOIS 137.20 133.51 130.02 129.58 125.68 120.93 116.62 111.82 107.00 101.40 100.90 2.76 3 2.56 4 3.12 7 MARYLAND 136.32 134.36 134.73 133.42 127.50 121.11 115.69 111.04 107.00 106.50 105.60 1.46 7 2.40 7 2.59 9 OHIO STATE 134.23 131.55 129.48 126.45 121.50 117.17 112.65 108.42 103.53 98.18 93.75 2.04 5 2.75 2 3.65 1 PENN STATE 132.06 133.49 130.41 131.08 125.40 120.21 116.51 112.58 108.00 102.70 98.10-1.07 11 1.90 10 3.02 8 MINNESOTA 125.71 123.22 124.82 127.44 121.27 116.60 110.31 105.36 102.00 101.30 97.60 2.02 6 1.52 11 2.56 10 WASHINGTON 122.69 118.29 121.93 121.65 116.38 108.92 102.15 98.10 93.20 91.20 90.10 3.72 2 2.41 6 3.14 6 FLORIDA 121.75 122.08 117.05 115.19 109.30 107.67 101.42 95.95 93.50 89.30 86.90-0.27 10 2.49 5 3.43 3 ARIZONA 119.89 117.49 117.26 114.48 113.11 107.13 102.27 95.88 92.50 90.60 87.70 2.05 4 2.28 8 3.18 4 WISCONSIN 114.69 113.78 111.13 109.51 106.98 103.54 100.53 97.82 96.20 96.40 92.90 0.80 9 2.07 9 2.13 11 Average excl OSU 132.17 129.68 127.93 126.89 122.46 116.98 111.95 107.21 103.96 101.21 98.44 1.92 2.47 2.99 ASSOCIATE 1 YEAR 5 YEAR 10 YEAR 11-12 10-11 09-10 08-09 07-08 06-07 05-06 04-05 03-04 02-03 01-02 % Rnk % Rnk % Rnk UCLA 107.36 100.61 95.21 92.10 90.74 84.22 81.97 78.06 77.00 74.60 73.20 6.70 1 4.97 1 3.90 1 MICHIGAN 98.21 96.11 94.34 93.09 89.06 86.55 83.73 81.57 80.90 78.90 76.30 2.18 2 2.56 5 2.56 6 MARYLAND 95.72 94.55 94.41 94.88 89.50 84.23 80.29 76.30 74.90 74.50 74.40 1.24 7 2.59 4 2.55 7 OHIO STATE 89.28 87.67 85.76 84.22 80.28 76.94 74.19 72.13 69.08 66.27 63.53 1.83 4 3.02 2 3.46 2 PENN STATE 89.16 89.03 86.72 87.68 84.99 81.35 77.75 75.42 72.40 70.30 66.50 0.15 9 1.85 7 2.98 4 WASHINGTON 88.29 86.81 88.12 87.13 83.44 77.15 72.91 70.21 66.70 65.80 65.50 1.70 5 2.73 3 3.03 3 WISCONSIN 87.37 87.28 85.80 84.47 82.48 78.11 76.52 73.44 73.30 73.70 70.20 0.11 11 2.27 6 2.21 9 ILLINOIS 86.55 84.82 83.24 83.51 82.24 79.55 77.57 75.06 72.00 69.40 69.90 2.03 3 1.70 10 2.16 11 MINNESOTA 86.01 85.06 85.43 86.22 84.34 80.56 75.63 70.68 69.90 70.90 69.20 1.11 8 1.32 11 2.20 10 ARIZONA 81.85 80.57 79.65 79.51 79.02 74.91 71.44 67.23 64.90 64.20 61.80 1.58 6 1.79 8 2.85 5 FLORIDA 80.10 79.99 75.55 75.41 73.00 73.32 71.71 69.09 65.70 63.70 62.40 0.13 10 1.78 9 2.53 8 Average excl OSU 90.06 88.48 86.85 86.40 83.88 80.00 76.95 73.70 71.77 70.60 68.94 1.78 2.40 2.71 ASSISTANT 1 YEAR 5 YEAR 10 YEAR 11-12 10-11 09-10 08-09 07-08 06-07 05-06 04-05 03-04 02-03 01-02 % Rnk % Rnk % Rnk UCLA 87.43 84.03 81.73 79.61 76.77 72.06 67.02 65.48 63.70 63.80 63.50 4.05 2 3.94 1 3.25 4 MICHIGAN 85.80 84.45 83.07 81.61 79.30 74.95 72.78 67.06 66.70 65.30 61.70 1.60 7 2.74 5 3.35 2 MARYLAND 83.88 82.45 82.58 83.43 78.80 77.39 75.86 75.19 70.00 69.20 69.20 1.73 6 1.62 10 1.94 11 ILLINOIS 83.61 80.32 76.75 76.27 73.69 71.69 69.63 68.18 64.50 61.00 60.40 4.10 1 3.12 3 3.30 3 OHIO STATE 81.46 79.44 77.99 74.99 71.68 69.38 65.78 64.77 62.25 59.08 55.20 2.54 4 3.26 2 3.97 1 WASHINGTON 79.34 77.41 77.25 78.04 73.90 70.90 67.22 64.67 63.20 60.20 58.30 2.49 5 2.27 7 3.13 5 MINNESOTA 79.15 78.53 76.46 74.96 72.33 69.43 65.39 62.53 60.60 61.90 58.20 0.78 10 2.65 6 3.12 6 PENN STATE 76.11 75.90 72.03 72.40 69.53 68.16 66.28 64.04 62.50 59.50 56.00 0.29 11 2.23 8 3.12 7 WISCONSIN 75.86 74.93 73.62 73.05 70.39 66.01 64.30 63.57 63.60 62.00 59.80 1.24 8 2.82 4 2.41 10 ARIZONA 70.77 68.38 67.95 66.64 69.68 66.87 63.54 59.75 57.60 56.30 54.20 3.50 3 1.14 11 2.70 8 FLORIDA 68.94 68.39 63.91 63.62 62.50 61.94 61.56 59.48 56.60 55.30 53.70 0.81 9 2.17 9 2.53 9 Average excl OSU 79.09 77.48 75.54 74.96 72.69 69.94 67.36 64.99 62.90 61.45 59.50 2.08 2.49 2.89 OVERALL -- ALL RANKS COMBINED 1 YEAR 5 YEAR 10 YEAR 11-12 10-11 09-10 08-09 07-08 06-07 05-06 04-05 03-04 02-03 01-02 % Rnk % Rnk % Rnk UCLA 127.76 120.79 115.68 112.27 109.85 102.65 98.98 95.22 94.15 91.44 89.56 5.77 1 4.47 1 3.62 2 MICHIGAN 118.13 116.35 113.90 111.99 107.70 102.90 99.64 95.40 94.12 91.89 87.25 1.53 6 2.80 3 3.08 5 MARYLAND 111.31 109.77 109.69 109.19 103.60 98.64 94.80 91.27 87.98 87.50 86.84 1.41 8 2.45 6 2.51 10 ILLINOIS 108.52 105.64 102.62 102.09 99.19 95.67 92.90 89.70 85.80 81.76 81.29 2.73 3 2.55 5 2.93 8 OHIO STATE 107.67 105.54 103.48 100.66 96.25 92.64 89.16 86.46 82.78 78.84 74.84 2.02 5 3.05 2 3.70 1 PENN STATE 105.52 106.10 102.86 103.26 99.05 95.15 92.18 89.28 85.96 82.33 77.93-0.55 11 2.09 9 3.08 4 MINNESOTA 102.26 100.74 100.95 101.76 97.68 93.61 88.55 84.14 82.05 82.43 79.12 1.51 7 1.78 11 2.60 9 WASHINGTON 101.73 98.88 100.72 100.22 95.60 89.48 84.45 81.25 77.61 75.83 74.61 2.89 2 2.60 4 3.15 3 WISCONSIN 97.11 96.49 94.32 92.86 90.39 86.33 84.33 82.03 81.32 81.27 77.77 0.65 9 2.38 8 2.25 11 ARIZONA 96.46 94.47 93.75 91.94 91.72 87.02 83.19 78.19 75.49 74.19 71.39 2.11 4 2.08 10 3.06 7 FLORIDA 96.31 96.33 91.40 90.19 86.40 85.58 82.47 78.82 76.00 73.24 71.13-0.03 10 2.39 7 3.08 6 Average excl OSU 106.51 104.56 102.59 101.58 98.12 93.70 90.15 86.53 84.05 82.19 79.69 1.87 2.60 2.94 Source: American Association of University Professors (AAUP) Faculty Compensation Survey 2011-12 Note: Overall salaries are a weighted average of rank salaries using Ohio State's rank distribution for the appropriate year as weights. All 12-month salaries have been converted to a 9-month basis. 14 BENCHMARK_10YR.xlsx

2011-12 Faculty Salaries (In Thousands) Ohio State Benchmark Institutions INSTITUTION OVERALL ASSOCIATE ASSISTANT 1 UCLA 127.76 162.59 107.36 87.43 1 UCLA 2 MICHIGAN 118.13 148.78 98.21 85.80 2 MICHIGAN 3 MARYLAND 111.31 136.32 95.72 83.88 3 MARYLAND 4 ILLINOIS 108.52 137.20 86.55 83.61 4 PENN STATE 5 OHIO STATE 107.67 134.23 89.28 81.46 5 ILLINOIS 6 PENN STATE 105.52 132.06 89.16 76.11 6 OHIO STATE 7 MINNESOTA 102.26 125.71 86.01 79.15 7 MINNESOTA 8 WASHINGTON 101.73 122.69 88.29 79.34 8 WASHINGTON 9 WISCONSIN 97.11 114.69 87.37 75.86 9 WISCONSIN 10 ARIZONA 96.46 119.89 81.85 70.77 10 FLORIDA 11 FLORIDA 96.31 121.75 80.10 68.94 11 ARIZONA Average Excluding OSU: 106.51 132.17 90.06 79.09 2010-11 OVERALL RANKING Source: American Association of University Professors (AAUP) Faculty Compensation Survey 2011-12 Notes: Overall salaries are a weighted average of rank salaries using Ohio State's rank distribution as weights. All 12-month salaries have been converted to a 9-month basis. CIC institutions are in bold type. 15 BENCHMARK_10YR.xlsx

2011-12 Faculty Salaries (In Thousands) Ohio State Benchmark Institutions INSTITUTION OVERALL ASSOCIATE ASSISTANT 1 UCLA 127.76 162.59 107.36 87.43 1 UCLA 2 MICHIGAN 118.13 148.78 98.21 85.80 2 MICHIGAN 3 ILLINOIS 108.52 137.20 86.55 83.61 3 MARYLAND 4 MARYLAND 111.31 136.32 95.72 83.88 4 ILLINOIS 5 OHIO STATE 107.67 134.23 89.28 81.46 5 PENN STATE 6 PENN STATE 105.52 132.06 89.16 76.11 6 OHIO STATE 7 MINNESOTA 102.26 125.71 86.01 79.15 7 MINNESOTA 8 WASHINGTON 101.73 122.69 88.29 79.34 8 FLORIDA 9 FLORIDA 96.31 121.75 80.10 68.94 9 WASHINGTON 10 ARIZONA 96.46 119.89 81.85 70.77 10 ARIZONA 11 WISCONSIN 97.11 114.69 87.37 75.86 11 WISCONSIN Average Excluding OSU: 106.51 132.17 90.06 79.09 2010-11 RANKING Source: American Association of University Professors (AAUP) Faculty Compensation Survey 2011-12 Notes: Overall salaries are a weighted average of rank salaries using Ohio State's rank distribution as weights. All 12-month salaries have been converted to a 9-month basis. CIC institutions are in bold type. 16 BENCHMARK_10YR.xlsx

2011-12 Faculty Salaries (In Thousands) Ohio State Benchmark Institutions INSTITUTION OVERALL ASSOCIATE ASSISTANT 1 UCLA 127.76 162.59 107.36 87.43 1 UCLA 2 MICHIGAN 118.13 148.78 98.21 85.80 2 MICHIGAN 3 MARYLAND 111.31 136.32 95.72 83.88 3 MARYLAND 4 OHIO STATE 107.67 134.23 89.28 81.46 4 PENN STATE 5 PENN STATE 105.52 132.06 89.16 76.11 5 OHIO STATE 6 WASHINGTON 101.73 122.69 88.29 79.34 6 WISCONSIN 7 WISCONSIN 97.11 114.69 87.37 75.86 7 WASHINGTON 8 ILLINOIS 108.52 137.20 86.55 83.61 8 MINNESOTA 9 MINNESOTA 102.26 125.71 86.01 79.15 9 ILLINOIS 10 ARIZONA 96.46 119.89 81.85 70.77 10 ARIZONA 11 FLORIDA 96.31 121.75 80.10 68.94 11 FLORIDA Average Excluding OSU: 106.51 132.17 90.06 79.09 2010-11 ASSOCIATE RANKING Source: American Association of University Professors (AAUP) Faculty Compensation Survey 2011-12 Notes: Overall salaries are a weighted average of rank salaries using Ohio State's rank distribution as weights. All 12-month salaries have been converted to a 9-month basis. CIC institutions are in bold type. 17 BENCHMARK_10YR.xlsx

2011-12 Faculty Salaries (In Thousands) Ohio State Benchmark Institutions INSTITUTION OVERALL ASSOCIATE ASSISTANT 1 UCLA 127.76 162.59 107.36 87.43 1 MICHIGAN 2 MICHIGAN 118.13 148.78 98.21 85.80 2 UCLA 3 MARYLAND 111.31 136.32 95.72 83.88 3 MARYLAND 4 ILLINOIS 108.52 137.20 86.55 83.61 4 ILLINOIS 5 OHIO STATE 107.67 134.23 89.28 81.46 5 OHIO STATE 6 WASHINGTON 101.73 122.69 88.29 79.34 6 MINNESOTA 7 MINNESOTA 102.26 125.71 86.01 79.15 7 WASHINGTON 8 PENN STATE 105.52 132.06 89.16 76.11 8 PENN STATE 9 WISCONSIN 97.11 114.69 87.37 75.86 9 WISCONSIN 10 ARIZONA 96.46 119.89 81.85 70.77 10 FLORIDA 11 FLORIDA 96.31 121.75 80.10 68.94 11 ARIZONA Average Excluding OSU: 106.51 132.17 90.06 79.09 2010-11 ASSISTANT RANKING Source: American Association of University Professors (AAUP) Faculty Compensation Survey 2011-12 Notes: Overall salaries are a weighted average of rank salaries using Ohio State's rank distribution as weights. All 12-month salaries have been converted to a 9-month basis. CIC institutions are in bold type. 18 BENCHMARK_10YR.xlsx

The Ohio State University History of Ranking in Benchmark Institutions: 2001-02 to 2011-12 Professor 7th 7th 6th 6th 6th 6th 6th 7th 6th 6th 5th 01-02 02-03 03-04 04-05 05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10 10-11 11-12 FISCAL YEAR Associate Professor 5th 4th 9th 8th 8th 7th 8th 9th 9th 8th 7th 01-02 02-03 03-04 04-05 05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10 10-11 11-12 FISCAL YEAR Assistant Professor 9th 9th 8th 5th 7th 7th 7th 6th 4th 5th 5th 01-02 02-03 03-04 04-05 05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10 10-11 11-12 FISCAL YEAR Overall -- All Ranks Combined 8th 8th 6th 6th 6th 7th 7th 7th 4th 6th 5th 01-02 02-03 03-04 04-05 05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10 10-11 11-12 FISCAL YEAR 19 BENCHMARK_10YR.xlsx

Regular Faculty Salaries FY 2001 through FY 2012 OSU Faculty Salaries Percent Difference from Benchmark Average 5% Percent Difference from Benchmark Average 0% -5% Benchmark Average Excluding OSU -0.1% -1.5% -3.0% -4.1% -6.1% -1.1% -1.1% -1.9% -0.9% 0.9% 0.9% 1.1% -10% FY 2001 FY 2002 FY 2003 FY 2004 FY 2005 FY 2006 FY 2007 FY 2008 FY 2009 FY 2010 FY 2011 FY 2012 Note: Percentage > 0 indicates average salary above benchmark average. 20

Appendix B The Ohio State University 2011 12 Faculty Salary Comparisons CIC Institutions

2011-12 CIC Ten Year Faculty Salary History 1 YEAR 5 YEAR 10 YEAR 11-12 10-11 09-10 08-09 07-08 06-07 05-06 04-05 03-04 02-03 01-02 % Rnk % Rnk % Rnk U OF CHICAGO 197.79 190.43 184.07 179.52 170.81 162.52 155.08 148.43 141.30 134.70 129.20 3.87 2 4.01 1 4.35 1 NORTHWESTERN 172.11 169.47 166.31 161.76 153.62 147.22 140.80 136.33 131.90 127.70 122.30 1.56 10 3.17 4 3.48 4 MICHIGAN 148.78 146.93 143.97 142.09 137.03 130.44 125.62 120.17 117.80 114.80 108.90 1.26 11 2.67 8 3.17 6 ILLINOIS 137.20 133.51 130.02 129.58 125.68 120.93 116.62 111.82 107.00 101.40 100.90 2.76 4 2.56 10 3.12 8 OHIO STATE 134.23 131.55 129.48 126.45 121.50 117.17 112.65 108.42 103.53 98.18 93.75 2.04 8 2.75 7 3.65 3 PENN STATE 132.06 133.49 130.41 131.08 125.40 120.21 116.51 112.58 108.00 102.70 98.10-1.07 13 1.90 12 3.02 9 IOWA 130.02 126.25 124.08 124.58 118.08 109.84 105.34 102.81 100.80 99.40 97.10 2.99 3 3.43 2 2.96 10 MICHIGAN STATE 128.56 125.22 125.03 121.89 116.02 110.23 105.89 101.85 98.30 95.00 89.70 2.67 5 3.12 5 3.66 2 INDIANA 128.39 120.90 120.66 118.41 114.01 109.05 104.92 101.77 99.10 96.80 94.20 6.19 1 3.32 3 3.14 7 MINNESOTA 125.71 123.22 124.82 127.44 121.27 116.60 110.31 105.36 102.00 101.30 97.60 2.02 9 1.52 13 2.56 12 PURDUE 125.09 122.08 115.81 114.97 111.30 107.56 104.32 100.66 97.20 93.10 90.50 2.47 6 3.07 6 3.29 5 NEBRASKA 114.79 112.33 112.03 110.12 105.20 101.12 97.50 93.93 90.90 90.70 86.60 2.19 7 2.57 9 2.86 11 WISCONSIN 114.69 113.78 111.13 109.51 106.98 103.54 100.53 97.82 96.20 96.40 92.90 0.80 12 2.07 11 2.13 13 Average excl OSU 137.93 134.80 132.36 130.91 125.45 119.94 115.29 111.13 107.54 104.50 100.67 2.32 2.84 3.20 ASSOCIATE 1 YEAR 5 YEAR 10 YEAR 11-12 10-11 09-10 08-09 07-08 06-07 05-06 04-05 03-04 02-03 01-02 % Rnk % Rnk % Rnk U OF CHICAGO 114.12 108.93 106.56 106.80 103.34 97.80 93.61 92.29 89.30 88.10 81.70 4.77 2 3.14 1 3.40 2 NORTHWESTERN 110.22 108.34 106.94 105.32 100.54 97.48 93.73 90.67 86.90 83.90 80.30 1.73 9 2.49 7 3.22 4 MICHIGAN 98.21 96.11 94.34 93.09 89.06 86.55 83.73 81.57 80.90 78.90 76.30 2.18 6 2.56 6 2.56 9 OHIO STATE 89.28 87.67 85.76 84.22 80.28 76.94 74.19 72.13 69.08 66.27 63.53 1.83 8 3.02 3 3.46 1 MICHIGAN STATE 89.24 87.01 87.30 85.90 82.78 79.16 76.45 73.72 72.40 69.90 67.60 2.57 5 2.43 8 2.82 8 PENN STATE 89.16 89.03 86.72 87.68 84.99 81.35 77.75 75.42 72.40 70.30 66.50 0.15 12 1.85 10 2.98 7 WISCONSIN 87.37 87.28 85.80 84.47 82.48 78.11 76.52 73.44 73.30 73.70 70.20 0.11 13 2.27 9 2.21 10 PURDUE 87.11 84.83 80.23 80.19 77.19 74.82 72.92 70.58 68.80 64.50 62.70 2.69 4 3.09 2 3.34 3 INDIANA 87.05 82.24 82.04 81.65 77.76 75.06 72.85 70.69 68.50 66.20 64.00 5.84 1 3.01 4 3.12 5 ILLINOIS 86.55 84.82 83.24 83.51 82.24 79.55 77.57 75.06 72.00 69.40 69.90 2.03 7 1.70 11 2.16 12 IOWA 86.37 84.10 82.54 83.09 81.01 75.35 70.88 69.07 67.50 65.80 63.70 2.70 3 2.77 5 3.09 6 MINNESOTA 86.01 85.06 85.43 86.22 84.34 80.56 75.63 70.68 69.90 70.90 69.20 1.11 11 1.32 13 2.20 11 NEBRASKA 77.64 76.73 77.24 76.70 74.40 71.66 69.85 68.12 65.40 65.10 62.80 1.18 10 1.62 12 2.14 13 Average excl OSU 91.59 89.54 88.20 87.88 85.01 81.45 78.46 75.94 73.94 72.23 69.58 2.29 2.37 2.79 ASSISTANT 1 YEAR 5 YEAR 10 YEAR 11-12 10-11 09-10 08-09 07-08 06-07 05-06 04-05 03-04 02-03 01-02 % Rnk % Rnk % Rnk U OF CHICAGO 102.57 100.55 100.07 97.70 90.68 85.34 77.75 73.43 72.30 70.30 69.60 2.01 8 3.74 1 3.95 2 NORTHWESTERN 98.93 96.84 95.31 93.48 87.88 83.50 81.21 79.26 76.80 73.40 69.10 2.16 7 3.45 2 3.65 3 MICHIGAN 85.80 84.45 83.07 81.61 79.30 74.95 72.78 67.06 66.70 65.30 61.70 1.60 9 2.74 8 3.35 6 ILLINOIS 83.61 80.32 76.75 76.27 73.69 71.69 69.63 68.18 64.50 61.00 60.40 4.10 2 3.12 6 3.30 7 OHIO STATE 81.46 79.44 77.99 74.99 71.68 69.38 65.78 64.77 62.25 59.08 55.20 2.54 4 3.26 4 3.97 1 MINNESOTA 79.15 78.53 76.46 74.96 72.33 69.43 65.39 62.53 60.60 61.90 58.20 0.78 11 2.65 9 3.12 8 PURDUE 79.07 77.39 72.65 72.30 69.23 66.80 65.26 62.95 60.50 57.10 55.70 2.17 6 3.43 3 3.57 4 INDIANA 77.38 72.82 72.38 71.07 68.37 66.01 62.63 61.27 59.60 58.80 55.30 6.26 1 3.23 5 3.42 5 PENN STATE 76.11 75.90 72.03 72.40 69.53 68.16 66.28 64.04 62.50 59.50 56.00 0.29 13 2.23 13 3.12 9 WISCONSIN 75.86 74.93 73.62 73.05 70.39 66.01 64.30 63.57 63.60 62.00 59.80 1.24 10 2.82 7 2.41 13 IOWA 74.08 72.49 71.42 72.59 69.58 65.80 63.93 61.66 59.80 59.30 56.10 2.19 5 2.40 11 2.82 11 NEBRASKA 71.62 68.89 68.88 66.32 65.10 62.88 59.98 57.57 56.20 56.30 54.20 3.95 3 2.64 10 2.83 10 MICHIGAN STATE 69.49 69.10 68.60 66.87 64.15 61.83 60.21 59.70 58.90 57.00 53.90 0.57 12 2.36 12 2.57 12 Average excl OSU 81.14 79.35 77.60 76.55 73.35 70.20 67.44 65.10 63.50 61.83 59.17 2.25 2.94 3.21 OVERALL -- ALL RANKS COMBINED 1 YEAR 5 YEAR 10 YEAR 11-12 10-11 09-10 08-09 07-08 06-07 05-06 04-05 03-04 02-03 01-02 % Rnk % Rnk % Rnk U OF CHICAGO 148.99 143.60 139.63 136.66 129.80 122.98 117.01 112.87 108.57 104.94 99.70 3.76 2 3.91 1 4.10 1 NORTHWESTERN 135.43 133.22 130.76 127.41 120.75 115.81 111.56 108.24 104.55 101.02 96.10 1.66 9 3.18 5 3.49 3 MICHIGAN 118.13 116.35 113.90 111.99 107.70 102.90 99.64 95.40 94.12 91.89 87.25 1.53 10 2.80 8 3.08 8 ILLINOIS 108.52 105.64 102.62 102.09 99.19 95.67 92.90 89.70 85.80 81.76 81.29 2.73 4 2.55 9 2.93 10 OHIO STATE 107.67 105.54 103.48 100.66 96.25 92.64 89.16 86.46 82.78 78.84 74.84 2.02 8 3.05 6 3.70 2 PENN STATE 105.52 106.10 102.86 103.26 99.05 95.15 92.18 89.28 85.96 82.33 77.93-0.55 13 2.09 12 3.08 7 INDIANA 103.43 97.52 97.06 95.38 91.39 87.70 84.63 82.30 80.07 78.15 75.22 6.07 1 3.36 2 3.24 6 IOWA 103.23 100.47 98.53 98.92 94.54 88.09 84.42 82.27 80.51 79.26 76.56 2.75 3 3.22 4 3.03 9 MICHIGAN STATE 102.58 100.26 99.86 97.37 93.01 88.62 85.76 83.06 80.94 78.28 74.17 2.31 6 2.97 7 3.30 5 PURDUE 102.35 99.90 94.36 93.66 90.22 87.16 84.97 82.13 79.53 75.57 73.25 2.45 5 3.26 3 3.40 4 MINNESOTA 102.26 100.74 100.95 101.76 97.68 93.61 88.55 84.14 82.05 82.43 79.12 1.51 11 1.78 13 2.60 12 WISCONSIN 97.11 96.49 94.32 92.86 90.39 86.33 84.33 82.03 81.32 81.27 77.77 0.65 12 2.38 11 2.25 13 NEBRASKA 92.93 90.98 90.85 89.01 85.68 82.40 79.77 77.19 74.67 74.55 71.25 2.15 7 2.43 10 2.69 11 Average excl OSU 110.04 107.61 105.48 104.20 99.95 95.53 92.14 89.05 86.51 84.29 80.80 2.26 2.87 3.14 Source: American Association of University Professors (AAUP) Faculty Compensation Survey 2011-12 Note: Overall salaries are a weighted average of rank salaries using Ohio State's rank distribution for the appropriate year as weights. All 12-month salaries have been converted to a 9-month basis. University of Nebraska - Lincoln entered the CIC in 2011, but a complete 10-year history of salary data has been included. 22 CIC_10YR.xlsx

The Ohio State University History of Ranking in CIC: 2001-02 to 2011-12 Professor 9th 8th 6th 6th 6th 6th 6th 7th 6th 6th 5th 01-02 02-03 03-04 04-05 05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10 10-11 11-12 FISCAL YEAR Associate Professor 5th 4th 11th 9th 9th 8th 9th 9th 10th 8th 7th 01-02 02-03 03-04 04-05 05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10 10-11 11-12 FISCAL YEAR Assistant Professor 11th 9th 7th 5th 6th 6th 6th 5th 4th 5th 5th 01-02 02-03 03-04 04-05 05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10 10-11 11-12 FISCAL YEAR Overall -- All Ranks Combined 10th 9th 6th 6th 6th 7th 7th 7th 4th 6th 5th 01-02 02-03 03-04 04-05 05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10 10-11 11-12 FISCAL YEAR Note: The number of CIC institutions increased to 13 in 2011 (addition of Nebraska) 23 CIC_10YR.xlsx

The Ohio State University History of Ranking in CIC: 1983-84 to 2011-12 Overall -- All Ranks Combined 2nd 3rd 4th 6th 7th 8th 6th 4th 7th 7th 9th 9th 10th 9th 6th 6th 6th 7th 7th 7th 4th 6th 5th 83-84 84-85 85-92 92-93 93-94 94-95 95-96 96-97 97-98 98-99 99-00 00-01 01-02 02-03 03-04 04-05 05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10 10-11 11-12 FISCAL YEAR Note: The number of CIC institutions increased to 13 in 2011 (addition of Nebraska) 24 CIC_10YR.xlsx

Appendix C The Ohio State University 2011 12 Faculty Salary Comparisons AAU Institutions

2011-12 Average Faculty Salaries (In Thousands) AAU Institutions INSTITUTION OVERALL ASSOCIATE ASSISTANT 2010-11 OVERALL RANKING 1 STANFORD 155.31 195.44 131.21 109.80 1 HARVARD 2 HARVARD 153.09 198.37 120.91 109.76 2 STANFORD 3 COLUMBIA 151.96 197.80 125.05 98.96 3 COLUMBIA 4 U OF CHICAGO 148.99 197.79 114.12 102.57 4 U OF CHICAGO 5 PRINCETON 148.67 193.76 123.70 94.15 5 PRINCETON 6 PENNSYLVANIA 145.09 181.60 117.78 112.32 6 PENNSYLVANIA 7 CAL TECH 143.12 174.99 121.30 111.31 7 CAL TECH 8 MIT 139.57 171.85 120.29 102.78 8 MIT 9 NEW YORK 138.76 182.37 106.07 99.71 9 NEW YORK 10 DUKE 137.69 175.31 114.47 96.03 10 NORTHWESTERN 11 YALE 136.60 180.43 108.55 89.68 11 YALE 12 NORTHWESTERN 135.43 172.11 110.22 98.93 12 CORNELL-ENDOWED 13 WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY 131.65 172.36 100.16 96.79 13 DUKE 14 CORNELL-ENDOWED 131.37 161.80 113.02 96.96 14 WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY 15 UCLA 127.76 162.59 107.36 87.43 15 RICE 16 RICE 125.74 159.55 105.96 86.59 16 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA 17 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA 125.33 155.92 105.30 93.32 17 EMORY 18 CALIFORNIA-BERKELEY 124.01 154.04 104.55 92.25 18 UCLA 19 EMORY 123.55 157.97 101.63 86.53 19 CALIFORNIA-BERKELEY 20 BROWN 121.31 156.74 99.26 82.35 20 BROWN 21 VANDERBILT 120.57 158.34 98.65 76.51 21 MICHIGAN 22 CARNEGIE-MELLON 118.59 141.98 98.88 101.13 22 VANDERBILT 23 MICHIGAN 118.13 148.78 98.21 85.80 23 CARNEGIE-MELLON 24 RUTGERS 114.97 144.98 98.40 78.64 24 RUTGERS 25 GEORGIA INSTITUTE OF TECH 113.78 141.34 94.56 86.81 25 NORTH CAROLINA-CHAPEL HILL 26 NORTH CAROLINA-CHAPEL HILL 113.63 143.98 94.61 80.47 26 GEORGIA TECH 27 SUNY-STONY BROOK 113.23 140.48 99.51 78.09 27 SUNY-STONY BROOK 28 ROCHESTER 112.74 133.81 97.20 93.46 28 MARYLAND 29 VIRGINIA 112.66 141.63 94.99 80.27 29 TEXAS 30 CALIFORNIA-SAN DIEGO 112.31 140.74 90.91 87.01 30 VIRGINIA 31 MARYLAND 111.31 136.32 95.72 83.88 31 SUNY-BUFFALO 32 TEXAS 111.30 140.73 89.90 83.90 32 CALIFORNIA-SAN DIEGO 33 CALIFORNIA-IRVINE 108.94 137.03 89.83 80.68 33 ROCHESTER 34 SUNY-BUFFALO 108.64 135.40 93.12 77.39 34 PENN STATE 35 ILLINOIS 108.52 137.20 86.55 83.61 35 ILLINOIS 36 OHIO STATE 107.67 134.23 89.28 81.46 36 OHIO STATE 37 CALIFORNIA-SANTA BARBARA 107.65 138.61 85.36 78.45 37 PITTSBURGH 38 TULANE 107.30 140.22 86.56 71.53 38 CALIFORNIA-IRVINE 39 BRANDEIS 106.84 130.05 90.51 84.36 39 TULANE 40 PITTSBURGH 106.78 134.81 89.96 74.96 40 CALIFORNIA-SANTA BARBARA 41 CALIFORNIA-DAVIS 105.94 129.37 90.63 81.35 41 CASE WESTERN RESERVE 42 PENN STATE 105.52 132.06 89.16 76.11 42 BRANDEIS 43 CASE WESTERN RESERVE 104.62 131.16 85.76 79.18 43 CALIFORNIA-DAVIS 44 INDIANA 103.43 128.39 87.05 77.38 44 MINNESOTA 45 COLORADO 103.27 125.51 90.26 77.49 45 IOWA 46 IOWA 103.23 130.02 86.37 74.08 46 MICHIGAN STATE 47 MICHIGAN STATE 102.58 128.56 89.24 69.49 47 PURDUE 48 PURDUE 102.35 125.09 87.11 79.07 48 WASHINGTON 49 MINNESOTA 102.26 125.71 86.01 79.15 49 COLORADO 50 WASHINGTON 101.73 122.69 88.29 79.34 50 INDIANA 51 TEXAS A&M 97.37 120.01 83.08 72.79 51 TEXAS A&M 52 WISCONSIN 97.11 114.69 87.37 75.86 52 WISCONSIN 53 ARIZONA 96.46 119.89 81.85 70.77 53 FLORIDA 54 FLORIDA 96.31 121.75 80.10 68.94 54 SYRACUSE 55 IOWA STATE 96.17 115.93 83.46 75.12 55 IOWA STATE 56 KANSAS 93.41 116.14 78.75 69.25 56 ARIZONA 57 OREGON 92.99 112.25 79.62 74.03 57 KANSAS 58 MISSOURI 89.85 113.89 75.94 61.74 58 NEBRASKA 59 JOHNS HOPKINS NO DATA REPORTED SINCE 2007-08 59 OREGON Source: American Association of University Professors (AAUP) Faculty Compensation Survey 2011-12 Notes: Benchmark institutions are in bold type. Canadian institutions McGill and University of Toronto are excluded. Overall salaries are a weighted average of rank salaries using Ohio State's rank distribution as weights. All 12-month salaries have been converted to a 9-month basis. Number of U.S. AAU Institutions changed from 61 to 59 in 2011-12 (removal of Nebraska, Syracuse) 60 MISSOURI 61 JOHNS HOPKINS 4 AAURANKS.xlsx

2011-12 Average Faculty Salaries (In Thousands) AAU Institutions INSTITUTION OVERALL ASSOCIATE ASSISTANT 2010-11 RANKING 1 HARVARD 153.09 198.37 120.91 109.76 1 HARVARD 2 COLUMBIA 151.96 197.80 125.05 98.96 2 COLUMBIA 3 U OF CHICAGO 148.99 197.79 114.12 102.57 3 U OF CHICAGO 4 STANFORD 155.31 195.44 131.21 109.80 4 STANFORD 5 PRINCETON 148.67 193.76 123.70 94.15 5 PRINCETON 6 NEW YORK 138.76 182.37 106.07 99.71 6 YALE 7 PENNSYLVANIA 145.09 181.60 117.78 112.32 7 NEW YORK 8 YALE 136.60 180.43 108.55 89.68 8 PENNSYLVANIA 9 DUKE 137.69 175.31 114.47 96.03 9 CAL TECH 10 CAL TECH 143.12 174.99 121.30 111.31 10 NORTHWESTERN 11 WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY 131.65 172.36 100.16 96.79 11 MIT 12 NORTHWESTERN 135.43 172.11 110.22 98.93 12 WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY 13 MIT 139.57 171.85 120.29 102.78 13 DUKE 14 UCLA 127.76 162.59 107.36 87.43 14 CORNELL-ENDOWED 15 CORNELL-ENDOWED 131.37 161.80 113.02 96.96 15 RICE 16 RICE 125.74 159.55 105.96 86.59 16 EMORY 17 VANDERBILT 120.57 158.34 98.65 76.51 17 UCLA 18 EMORY 123.55 157.97 101.63 86.53 18 VANDERBILT 19 BROWN 121.31 156.74 99.26 82.35 19 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA 20 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA 125.33 155.92 105.30 93.32 20 BROWN 21 CALIFORNIA-BERKELEY 124.01 154.04 104.55 92.25 21 CALIFORNIA-BERKELEY 22 MICHIGAN 118.13 148.78 98.21 85.80 22 MICHIGAN 23 RUTGERS 114.97 144.98 98.40 78.64 23 NORTH CAROLINA-CHAPEL HILL 24 NORTH CAROLINA-CHAPEL HILL 113.63 143.98 94.61 80.47 24 RUTGERS 25 CARNEGIE-MELLON 118.59 141.98 98.88 101.13 25 GEORGIA TECH 26 VIRGINIA 112.66 141.63 94.99 80.27 26 CARNEGIE-MELLON 27 GEORGIA INSTITUTE OF TECH 113.78 141.34 94.56 86.81 27 SUNY-STONY BROOK 28 CALIFORNIA-SAN DIEGO 112.31 140.74 90.91 87.01 28 VIRGINIA 29 TEXAS 111.30 140.73 89.90 83.90 29 TEXAS 30 SUNY-STONY BROOK 113.23 140.48 99.51 78.09 30 CALIFORNIA-SAN DIEGO 31 TULANE 107.30 140.22 86.56 71.53 31 SUNY-BUFFALO 32 CALIFORNIA-SANTA BARBARA 107.65 138.61 85.36 78.45 32 MARYLAND 33 ILLINOIS 108.52 137.20 86.55 83.61 33 TULANE 34 CALIFORNIA-IRVINE 108.94 137.03 89.83 80.68 34 ILLINOIS 35 MARYLAND 111.31 136.32 95.72 83.88 35 PENN STATE 36 SUNY-BUFFALO 108.64 135.40 93.12 77.39 36 PITTSBURGH 37 PITTSBURGH 106.78 134.81 89.96 74.96 37 CALIFORNIA-SANTA BARBARA 38 OHIO STATE 107.67 134.23 89.28 81.46 38 CALIFORNIA-IRVINE 39 ROCHESTER 112.74 133.81 97.20 93.46 39 OHIO STATE 40 PENN STATE 105.52 132.06 89.16 76.11 40 ROCHESTER 41 CASE WESTERN RESERVE 104.62 131.16 85.76 79.18 41 CASE WESTERN RESERVE 42 BRANDEIS 106.84 130.05 90.51 84.36 42 IOWA 43 IOWA 103.23 130.02 86.37 74.08 43 MICHIGAN STATE 44 CALIFORNIA-DAVIS 105.94 129.37 90.63 81.35 44 BRANDEIS 45 MICHIGAN STATE 102.58 128.56 89.24 69.49 45 CALIFORNIA-DAVIS 46 INDIANA 103.43 128.39 87.05 77.38 46 MINNESOTA 47 MINNESOTA 102.26 125.71 86.01 79.15 47 FLORIDA 48 COLORADO 103.27 125.51 90.26 77.49 48 PURDUE 49 PURDUE 102.35 125.09 87.11 79.07 49 INDIANA 50 WASHINGTON 101.73 122.69 88.29 79.34 50 TEXAS A&M 51 FLORIDA 96.31 121.75 80.10 68.94 51 COLORADO 52 TEXAS A&M 97.37 120.01 83.08 72.79 52 WASHINGTON 53 ARIZONA 96.46 119.89 81.85 70.77 53 KANSAS 54 KANSAS 93.41 116.14 78.75 69.25 54 ARIZONA 55 IOWA STATE 96.17 115.93 83.46 75.12 55 SYRACUSE 56 WISCONSIN 97.11 114.69 87.37 75.86 56 IOWA STATE 57 MISSOURI 89.85 113.89 75.94 61.74 57 WISCONSIN 58 OREGON 92.99 112.25 79.62 74.03 58 NEBRASKA 59 JOHNS HOPKINS NO DATA REPORTED SINCE 2007-08 59 MISSOURI 60 OREGON 61 JOHNS HOPKINS Source: American Association University Professors (AAUP) Faculty Compensation Survey 2011-12 Notes: Benchmark institutions are in bold type. Canadian institutions McGill and University of Toronto are excluded. Overall salaries are a weighted average of rank salaries using Ohio State's rank distribution as weights. All 12-month salaries have been converted to a 9-month basis. Number of U.S. AAU Institutions changed from 61 to 59 in 2011-12 (removal of Nebraska, Syracuse) 5 AAURANKS.xlsx

2011-12 Average Faculty Salaries (In Thousands) AAU Institutions INSTITUTION OVERALL ASSOCIATE ASSISTANT 2010-11 ASSOCIATE RANKING 1 STANFORD 155.31 195.44 131.21 109.80 1 STANFORD 2 COLUMBIA 151.96 197.80 125.05 98.96 2 COLUMBIA 3 PRINCETON 148.67 193.76 123.70 94.15 3 PRINCETON 4 CAL TECH 143.12 174.99 121.30 111.31 4 HARVARD 5 HARVARD 153.09 198.37 120.91 109.76 5 MIT 6 MIT 139.57 171.85 120.29 102.78 6 PENNSYLVANIA 7 PENNSYLVANIA 145.09 181.60 117.78 112.32 7 CAL TECH 8 DUKE 137.69 175.31 114.47 96.03 8 CORNELL-ENDOWED 9 U OF CHICAGO 148.99 197.79 114.12 102.57 9 U OF CHICAGO 10 CORNELL-ENDOWED 131.37 161.80 113.02 96.96 10 RICE 11 NORTHWESTERN 135.43 172.11 110.22 98.93 11 NORTHWESTERN 12 YALE 136.60 180.43 108.55 89.68 12 DUKE 13 UCLA 127.76 162.59 107.36 87.43 13 NEW YORK 14 NEW YORK 138.76 182.37 106.07 99.71 14 YALE 15 RICE 125.74 159.55 105.96 86.59 15 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA 16 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA 125.33 155.92 105.30 93.32 16 CALIFORNIA-BERKELEY 17 CALIFORNIA-BERKELEY 124.01 154.04 104.55 92.25 17 UCLA 18 EMORY 123.55 157.97 101.63 86.53 18 EMORY 19 WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY 131.65 172.36 100.16 96.79 19 WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY 20 SUNY-STONY BROOK 113.23 140.48 99.51 78.09 20 SUNY-STONY BROOK 21 BROWN 121.31 156.74 99.26 82.35 21 CARNEGIE-MELLON 22 CARNEGIE-MELLON 118.59 141.98 98.88 101.13 22 BROWN 23 VANDERBILT 120.57 158.34 98.65 76.51 23 RUTGERS 24 RUTGERS 114.97 144.98 98.40 78.64 24 VANDERBILT 25 MICHIGAN 118.13 148.78 98.21 85.80 25 MICHIGAN 26 ROCHESTER 112.74 133.81 97.20 93.46 26 MARYLAND 27 MARYLAND 111.31 136.32 95.72 83.88 27 GEORGIA TECH 28 VIRGINIA 112.66 141.63 94.99 80.27 28 NORTH CAROLINA-CHAPEL HILL 29 NORTH CAROLINA-CHAPEL HILL 113.63 143.98 94.61 80.47 29 SUNY-BUFFALO 30 GEORGIA INSTITUTE OF TECH 113.78 141.34 94.56 86.81 30 VIRGINIA 31 SUNY-BUFFALO 108.64 135.40 93.12 77.39 31 ROCHESTER 32 CALIFORNIA-SAN DIEGO 112.31 140.74 90.91 87.01 32 PENN STATE 33 CALIFORNIA-DAVIS 105.94 129.37 90.63 81.35 33 TEXAS 34 BRANDEIS 106.84 130.05 90.51 84.36 34 CALIFORNIA-SAN DIEGO 35 COLORADO 103.27 125.51 90.26 77.49 35 PITTSBURGH 36 PITTSBURGH 106.78 134.81 89.96 74.96 36 OHIO STATE 37 TEXAS 111.30 140.73 89.90 83.90 37 WISCONSIN 38 CALIFORNIA-IRVINE 108.94 137.03 89.83 80.68 38 MICHIGAN STATE 39 OHIO STATE 107.67 134.23 89.28 81.46 39 WASHINGTON 40 MICHIGAN STATE 102.58 128.56 89.24 69.49 40 BRANDEIS 41 PENN STATE 105.52 132.06 89.16 76.11 41 COLORADO 42 WASHINGTON 101.73 122.69 88.29 79.34 42 TULANE 43 WISCONSIN 97.11 114.69 87.37 75.86 43 MINNESOTA 44 PURDUE 102.35 125.09 87.11 79.07 44 CALIFORNIA-IRVINE 45 INDIANA 103.43 128.39 87.05 77.38 45 PURDUE 46 TULANE 107.30 140.22 86.56 71.53 46 ILLINOIS 47 ILLINOIS 108.52 137.20 86.55 83.61 47 CALIFORNIA-DAVIS 48 IOWA 103.23 130.02 86.37 74.08 48 CASE WESTERN RESERVE 49 MINNESOTA 102.26 125.71 86.01 79.15 49 IOWA 50 CASE WESTERN RESERVE 104.62 131.16 85.76 79.18 50 SYRACUSE 51 CALIFORNIA-SANTA BARBARA 107.65 138.61 85.36 78.45 51 IOWA STATE 52 IOWA STATE 96.17 115.93 83.46 75.12 52 INDIANA 53 TEXAS A&M 97.37 120.01 83.08 72.79 53 TEXAS A&M 54 ARIZONA 96.46 119.89 81.85 70.77 54 CALIFORNIA-SANTA BARBARA 55 FLORIDA 96.31 121.75 80.10 68.94 55 ARIZONA 56 OREGON 92.99 112.25 79.62 74.03 56 FLORIDA 57 KANSAS 93.41 116.14 78.75 69.25 57 KANSAS 58 MISSOURI 89.85 113.89 75.94 61.74 58 NEBRASKA 59 JOHNS HOPKINS NO DATA REPORTED SINCE 2007-08 59 OREGON Source: American Association of University Professors (AAUP) Faculty Compensation Survey 2011-12 Notes: Benchmark institutions are in bold type. Canadian institutions McGill and University of Toronto are excluded. Overall salaries are a weighted average of rank salaries using Ohio State's rank distribution as weights. All 12-month salaries have been converted to a 9-month basis. Number of U.S. AAU Institutions changed from 61 to 59 in 2011-12 (removal of Nebraska, Syracuse) 60 MISSOURI 61 JOHNS HOPKINS 6 AAURANKS.xlsx

2011-12 Average Faculty Salaries (In Thousands) AAU Institutions INSTITUTION OVERALL ASSOCIATE ASSISTANT 2010-11 ASSISTANT RANKING 1 PENNSYLVANIA 145.09 181.60 117.78 112.32 1 CAL TECH 2 CAL TECH 143.12 174.99 121.30 111.31 2 PENNSYLVANIA 3 STANFORD 155.31 195.44 131.21 109.80 3 HARVARD 4 HARVARD 153.09 198.37 120.91 109.76 4 STANFORD 5 MIT 139.57 171.85 120.29 102.78 5 U OF CHICAGO 6 U OF CHICAGO 148.99 197.79 114.12 102.57 6 MIT 7 CARNEGIE-MELLON 118.59 141.98 98.88 101.13 7 COLUMBIA 8 NEW YORK 138.76 182.37 106.07 99.71 8 NORTHWESTERN 9 COLUMBIA 151.96 197.80 125.05 98.96 9 CORNELL-ENDOWED 10 NORTHWESTERN 135.43 172.11 110.22 98.93 10 CARNEGIE-MELLON 11 CORNELL-ENDOWED 131.37 161.80 113.02 96.96 11 NEW YORK 12 WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY 131.65 172.36 100.16 96.79 12 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA 13 DUKE 137.69 175.31 114.47 96.03 13 PRINCETON 14 PRINCETON 148.67 193.76 123.70 94.15 14 WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY 15 ROCHESTER 112.74 133.81 97.20 93.46 15 ROCHESTER 16 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA 125.33 155.92 105.30 93.32 16 CALIFORNIA-BERKELEY 17 CALIFORNIA-BERKELEY 124.01 154.04 104.55 92.25 17 YALE 18 YALE 136.60 180.43 108.55 89.68 18 DUKE 19 UCLA 127.76 162.59 107.36 87.43 19 RICE 20 CALIFORNIA-SAN DIEGO 112.31 140.74 90.91 87.01 20 GEORGIA TECH 21 GEORGIA INSTITUTE OF TECH 113.78 141.34 94.56 86.81 21 EMORY 22 RICE 125.74 159.55 105.96 86.59 22 MICHIGAN 23 EMORY 123.55 157.97 101.63 86.53 23 UCLA 24 MICHIGAN 118.13 148.78 98.21 85.80 24 MARYLAND 25 BRANDEIS 106.84 130.05 90.51 84.36 25 TEXAS 26 TEXAS 111.30 140.73 89.90 83.90 26 NORTH CAROLINA-CHAPEL HILL 27 MARYLAND 111.31 136.32 95.72 83.88 27 BROWN 28 ILLINOIS 108.52 137.20 86.55 83.61 28 CALIFORNIA-SAN DIEGO 29 BROWN 121.31 156.74 99.26 82.35 29 ILLINOIS 30 OHIO STATE 107.67 134.23 89.28 81.46 30 BRANDEIS 31 CALIFORNIA-DAVIS 105.94 129.37 90.63 81.35 31 OHIO STATE 32 CALIFORNIA-IRVINE 108.94 137.03 89.83 80.68 32 RUTGERS 33 NORTH CAROLINA-CHAPEL HILL 113.63 143.98 94.61 80.47 33 CALIFORNIA-DAVIS 34 VIRGINIA 112.66 141.63 94.99 80.27 34 SUNY-STONY BROOK 35 WASHINGTON 101.73 122.69 88.29 79.34 35 MINNESOTA 36 CASE WESTERN RESERVE 104.62 131.16 85.76 79.18 36 CALIFORNIA-IRVINE 37 MINNESOTA 102.26 125.71 86.01 79.15 37 WASHINGTON 38 PURDUE 102.35 125.09 87.11 79.07 38 PURDUE 39 RUTGERS 114.97 144.98 98.40 78.64 39 SUNY-BUFFALO 40 CALIFORNIA-SANTA BARBARA 107.65 138.61 85.36 78.45 40 CALIFORNIA-SANTA BARBARA 41 SUNY-STONY BROOK 113.23 140.48 99.51 78.09 41 VIRGINIA 42 COLORADO 103.27 125.51 90.26 77.49 42 PENN STATE 43 SUNY-BUFFALO 108.64 135.40 93.12 77.39 43 WISCONSIN 44 INDIANA 103.43 128.39 87.05 77.38 44 VANDERBILT 45 VANDERBILT 120.57 158.34 98.65 76.51 45 COLORADO 46 PENN STATE 105.52 132.06 89.16 76.11 46 CASE WESTERN RESERVE 47 WISCONSIN 97.11 114.69 87.37 75.86 47 TEXAS A&M 48 IOWA STATE 96.17 115.93 83.46 75.12 48 IOWA STATE 49 PITTSBURGH 106.78 134.81 89.96 74.96 49 INDIANA 50 IOWA 103.23 130.02 86.37 74.08 50 IOWA 51 OREGON 92.99 112.25 79.62 74.03 51 PITTSBURGH 52 TEXAS A&M 97.37 120.01 83.08 72.79 52 OREGON 53 TULANE 107.30 140.22 86.56 71.53 53 SYRACUSE 54 ARIZONA 96.46 119.89 81.85 70.77 54 TULANE 55 MICHIGAN STATE 102.58 128.56 89.24 69.49 55 MICHIGAN STATE 56 KANSAS 93.41 116.14 78.75 69.25 56 NEBRASKA 57 FLORIDA 96.31 121.75 80.10 68.94 57 FLORIDA 58 MISSOURI 89.85 113.89 75.94 61.74 58 ARIZONA 59 JOHNS HOPKINS NO DATA REPORTED SINCE 2007-08 59 KANSAS Source: American Association of University Professors (AAUP) Faculty Compensation Survey 2011-12 Notes: Benchmark institutions are in bold type. Canadian institutions McGill and University of Toronto are excluded. Overall salaries are a weighted average of rank salaries using Ohio State's rank distribution as weights. All 12-month salaries have been converted to a 9-month basis. Number of U.S. AAU Institutions changed from 61 to 59 in 2011-12 (removal of Nebraska, Syracuse) 60 MISSOURI 61 JOHNS HOPKINS 7 AAURANKS.xlsx

2011-12 Average Faculty Salaries (In Thousands) Public AAU Institutions INSTITUTION OVERALL ASSOCIATE ASSISTANT 2010-11 RANKING 1 UCLA 127.76 162.59 107.36 87.43 1 UCLA 2 CALIFORNIA-BERKELEY 124.01 154.04 104.55 92.25 2 CALIFORNIA-BERKELEY 3 MICHIGAN 118.13 148.78 98.21 85.80 3 MICHIGAN 4 RUTGERS 114.97 144.98 98.40 78.64 4 RUTGERS 5 GEORGIA INSTITUTE OF TECH 113.78 141.34 94.56 86.81 5 NORTH CAROLINA-CHAPEL HILL 6 NORTH CAROLINA-CHAPEL HILL 113.63 143.98 94.61 80.47 6 GEORGIA TECH 7 SUNY-STONY BROOK 113.23 140.48 99.51 78.09 7 SUNY-STONY BROOK 8 VIRGINIA 112.66 141.63 94.99 80.27 8 MARYLAND 9 CALIFORNIA-SAN DIEGO 112.31 140.74 90.91 87.01 9 TEXAS 10 MARYLAND 111.31 136.32 95.72 83.88 10 VIRGINIA 11 TEXAS 111.30 140.73 89.90 83.90 11 SUNY-BUFFALO 12 CALIFORNIA-IRVINE 108.94 137.03 89.83 80.68 12 CALIFORNIA-SAN DIEGO 13 SUNY-BUFFALO 108.64 135.40 93.12 77.39 13 PENN STATE 14 ILLINOIS 108.52 137.20 86.55 83.61 14 ILLINOIS 15 OHIO STATE 107.67 134.23 89.28 81.46 15 OHIO STATE 16 CALIFORNIA-SANTA BARBARA 107.65 138.61 85.36 78.45 16 PITTSBURGH 17 PITTSBURGH 106.78 134.81 89.96 74.96 17 CALIFORNIA-IRVINE 18 CALIFORNIA-DAVIS 105.94 129.37 90.63 81.35 18 CALIFORNIA-SANTA BARBARA 19 PENN STATE 105.52 132.06 89.16 76.11 19 CALIFORNIA-DAVIS 20 INDIANA 103.43 128.39 87.05 77.38 20 MINNESOTA 21 COLORADO 103.27 125.51 90.26 77.49 21 IOWA 22 IOWA 103.23 130.02 86.37 74.08 22 MICHIGAN STATE 23 MICHIGAN STATE 102.58 128.56 89.24 69.49 23 PURDUE 24 PURDUE 102.35 125.09 87.11 79.07 24 WASHINGTON 25 MINNESOTA 102.26 125.71 86.01 79.15 25 COLORADO 26 WASHINGTON 101.73 122.69 88.29 79.34 26 INDIANA 27 TEXAS A&M 97.37 120.01 83.08 72.79 27 TEXAS A&M 28 WISCONSIN 97.11 114.69 87.37 75.86 28 WISCONSIN 29 ARIZONA 96.46 119.89 81.85 70.77 29 FLORIDA 30 FLORIDA 96.31 121.75 80.10 68.94 30 IOWA STATE 31 IOWA STATE 96.17 115.93 83.46 75.12 31 ARIZONA 32 KANSAS 93.41 116.14 78.75 69.25 32 KANSAS 33 OREGON 92.99 112.25 79.62 74.03 33 NEBRASKA 34 MISSOURI 89.85 113.89 75.94 61.74 34 OREGON 35 MISSOURI Source: American Association of University Professors (AAUP) Faculty Compensation Survey 2011-12 Notes: Benchmark institutions are in bold type. Canadian institution University of Toronto is excluded. Overall salaries are a weighted average of rank salaries using Ohio States rank distribution as weights. All 12-month salaries have been converted to a 9-month basis. Number of U.S. Public AAU Institutions changed from 35 to 34 in 2011-12 (removal of Nebraska) 8 AAURANKS.xlsx

2011-12 Average Faculty Salaries (In Thousands) Ohio State and Private AAU Institutions INSTITUTION OVERALL ASSOCIATE ASSISTANT 2010-11 RANKING 1 STANFORD 155.31 195.44 131.21 109.80 1 HARVARD 2 HARVARD 153.09 198.37 120.91 109.76 2 STANFORD 3 COLUMBIA 151.96 197.80 125.05 98.96 3 COLUMBIA 4 U OF CHICAGO 148.99 197.79 114.12 102.57 4 U OF CHICAGO 5 PRINCETON 148.67 193.76 123.70 94.15 5 PRINCETON 6 PENNSYLVANIA 145.09 181.60 117.78 112.32 6 PENNSYLVANIA 7 CAL TECH 143.12 174.99 121.30 111.31 7 CAL TECH 8 MIT 139.57 171.85 120.29 102.78 8 MIT 9 NEW YORK 138.76 182.37 106.07 99.71 9 NEW YORK 10 DUKE 137.69 175.31 114.47 96.03 10 NORTHWESTERN 11 YALE 136.60 180.43 108.55 89.68 11 YALE 12 NORTHWESTERN 135.43 172.11 110.22 98.93 12 CORNELL-ENDOWED 13 WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY 131.65 172.36 100.16 96.79 13 DUKE 14 CORNELL-ENDOWED 131.37 161.80 113.02 96.96 14 WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY 15 RICE 125.74 159.55 105.96 86.59 15 RICE 16 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA 125.33 155.92 105.30 93.32 16 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA 17 EMORY 123.55 157.97 101.63 86.53 17 EMORY 18 BROWN 121.31 156.74 99.26 82.35 18 BROWN 19 VANDERBILT 120.57 158.34 98.65 76.51 19 VANDERBILT 20 CARNEGIE-MELLON 118.59 141.98 98.88 101.13 20 CARNEGIE-MELLON 21 ROCHESTER 112.74 133.81 97.20 93.46 21 ROCHESTER 22 OHIO STATE 107.67 134.23 89.28 81.46 22 OHIO STATE 23 TULANE 107.30 140.22 86.56 71.53 23 TULANE 24 BRANDEIS 106.84 130.05 90.51 84.36 24 CASE WESTERN RESERVE 25 CASE WESTERN RESERVE 104.62 131.16 85.76 79.18 25 BRANDEIS 27 JOHNS HOPKINS NO DATA REPORTED SINCE 2007-08 26 SYRACUSE 27 JOHNS HOPKINS Source: American Association of University Professors (AAUP) Faculty Compensation Survey 2011-12 Notes: Canadian institution McGill is excluded. Overall salaries are a weighted average of rank salaries using Ohio State's rank distribution as weights. All 12-month salaries have been converted to a 9-month basis. Number of U.S. Private AAU institutions changed from 27 to 26 in 2011-12 (removal of Syracuse) 9 AAURANKS.xlsx

History of Ranking in AAU: 1997-98 to 2011-12 Professor 37th 38th 40th 41st 44th 44th 39th 37th 36th 36th 36th 38th 35th 39th 38th 97-98 98-99 99-00 00-01 01-02 02-03 03-04 04-05 05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10 10-11 11-12 FISCAL YEAR Associate Professor 40th 42nd 39th 40th 51st 48st 47th 41st 43rd 46th 48th 43rd 37th 36th 39th 97-98 98-99 99-00 00-01 01-02 02-03 03-04 04-05 05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10 10-11 11-12 FISCAL YEAR Assistant Professor 42nd 42nd 42nd 41st 51st 44th 34th 32nd 35th 34th 38th 35th 28th 31st 30th 97-98 98-99 99-00 00-01 01-02 02-03 03-04 04-05 05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10 10-11 11-12 FISCAL YEAR Overall -- All Ranks Combined 40th 39th 40th 42nd 46th 46th 40th 38th 38th 39th 38th 37th 34th 36th 36th 97-98 98-99 99-00 00-01 01-02 02-03 03-04 04-05 05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10 10-11 11-12 FISCAL YEAR Note: Number of U.S. AAU institutions changed in the following years: 56 to 60 in 1996-97 (addition of Cal-Davis, Cal-Irvine, Cal-Santa Barbara, Emory); 60 to 61 in 2001-02 (addition of Texas A&M, SUNY-Stony Brook; removal of Clark); 61 to 60 in 2002-03 (removal of Catholic University); 60 to 61 in 2010-11 (addition of Georgia Tech); 61 to 59 in 2011-12 (removal of Nebraska, Syracuse) 10 AAURANKS.xlsx

History of Ranking in AAU: 1983-84 to 2011-12 Overall -- All Ranks Combined 14th 17th 21st 27th26th 28th32th 37th38th 35th32nd 40th39th40th 42nd46th46th 40th 38th38th 39th38th37th 34th 36th 36th FISCAL YEAR Note: Number of U.S. AAU institutions changed in the following years: 56 to 60 in 1996-97 (addition of Cal-Davis, Cal-Irvine, Cal-Santa Barbara, Emory) 60 to 61 in 2001-02 (addition of Texas A&M, SUNY-Stony Brook; removal of Clark) 61 to 60 in 2002-03 (removal of Catholic University) 60 to 61 in 2010-11 (addition of Georgia Tech) 61 to 59 in 2011-12 (removal of Nebraska, Syracuse) 11 AAURANKS.xlsx

History of Ranking in Public AAU Institutions 1996-97 to 2010-11 Overall -- All Ranks Combined 16th 16th 18th 19th 23rd 22nd 17th 15th 15th 17th 16th 16th 13th 15th 15th 97-98 98-99 99-00 00-01 01-02 02-03 03-04 04-05 05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10 10-11 11-12 FISCAL YEAR Note: Number of U.S. Public AAU institutions changed in the following years: 32 to 34 in 2001-02 (addition of Texas A&M, SUNY-Stony Brook) 34 to 35 in 2010-11 (addition of Georgia Tech) 35 to 34 in 2011-12 (removal of Nebraska) 12 AAURANKS.xlsx

Appendix D The Ohio State University 2011 12 Faculty Salary Comparisons Top 25 Public Institutions

2011-12 Faculty Salaries (In Thousands) U.S. News Top 25 Public Institutions INSTITUTION OVERALL ASSOCIATE ASSISTANT 2012 REPUTATIONAL RANKING 1 UCLA 127.76 162.59 107.36 87.43 1 CALIFORNIA-BERKELEY 2 CALIFORNIA-BERKELEY 124.01 154.04 104.55 92.25 2 UCLA 3 MICHIGAN 118.13 148.78 98.21 85.80 VIRGINIA 4 RUTGERS 114.97 144.98 98.40 78.64 4 MICHIGAN 5 GEORGIA INSTITUTE OF TECH 113.78 141.34 94.56 86.81 5 NORTH CAROLINA-CHAPEL HILL 6 NORTH CAROLINA-CHAPEL HILL 113.63 143.98 94.61 80.47 6 WILLIAM & MARY 7 VIRGINIA 112.66 141.63 94.99 80.27 7 GEORGIA INSTITUTE OF TECH 8 CALIFORNIA-SAN DIEGO 112.31 140.74 90.91 87.01 8 CALIFORNIA-SAN DIEGO 9 MARYLAND 111.31 136.32 95.72 83.88 9 CALIFORNIA-DAVIS 10 TEXAS 111.30 140.73 89.90 83.90 10 CALIFORNIA-SANTA BARBARA 11 CONNECTICUT 109.22 139.09 92.30 73.70 WASHINGTON 12 CALIFORNIA-IRVINE 108.94 137.03 89.83 80.68 WISCONSIN 13 ILLINOIS 108.52 137.20 86.55 83.61 13 PENN STATE 14 OHIO STATE 107.67 134.23 89.28 81.46 CALIFORNIA-IRVINE 15 CALIFORNIA-SANTA BARBARA 107.65 138.61 85.36 78.45 ILLINOIS 16 PITTSBURGH 106.78 134.81 89.96 74.96 TEXAS 17 CALIFORNIA-DAVIS 105.94 129.37 90.63 81.35 17 OHIO STATE 18 PENN STATE 105.52 132.06 89.16 76.11 MARYLAND 19 PURDUE 102.35 125.09 87.11 79.07 19 TEXAS A&M 20 MINNESOTA 102.26 125.71 86.01 79.15 CONNECTICUT 21 WASHINGTON 101.73 122.69 88.29 79.34 FLORIDA 22 TEXAS A&M 97.37 120.01 83.08 72.79 PITTSBURGH 23 WISCONSIN 97.11 114.69 87.37 75.86 23 PURDUE 24 WILLIAM & MARY 96.72 117.60 87.03 68.48 GEORGIA 25 FLORIDA 96.31 121.75 80.10 68.94 25 CLEMSON 26 GEORGIA 91.12 107.81 79.15 75.33 RUTGERS 27 CLEMSON 90.08 107.98 79.04 70.25 MINNESOTA Average Excluding OSU: 107.21 133.33 90.39 79.41 Sources: American Association of University Professors (AAUP) Faculty Compensation Survey 2011-12 U.S. News 2012 Best Colleges rankings, Top Public Schools, National Universities Notes: Overall salaries are a weighted average of rank salaries using Ohio State's rank distribution as weights. All 12-month salaries have been converted to a 9-month basis. Benchmark institutions are in bold type. 26 TOP25PUBLIC.xlsx

2011-12 Faculty Salaries (In Thousands) U.S. News Top 25 Public Institutions INSTITUTION OVERALL ASSOCIATE ASSISTANT 2012 REPUTATIONAL RANKING 1 UCLA 127.76 162.59 107.36 87.43 1 CALIFORNIA-BERKELEY 2 CALIFORNIA-BERKELEY 124.01 154.04 104.55 92.25 2 UCLA 3 MICHIGAN 118.13 148.78 98.21 85.80 VIRGINIA 4 RUTGERS 114.97 144.98 98.40 78.64 4 MICHIGAN 5 NORTH CAROLINA-CHAPEL HILL 113.63 143.98 94.61 80.47 5 NORTH CAROLINA-CHAPEL HILL 6 VIRGINIA 112.66 141.63 94.99 80.27 6 WILLIAM & MARY 7 GEORGIA INSTITUTE OF TECH 113.78 141.34 94.56 86.81 7 GEORGIA INSTITUTE OF TECH 8 CALIFORNIA-SAN DIEGO 112.31 140.74 90.91 87.01 8 CALIFORNIA-SAN DIEGO 9 TEXAS 111.30 140.73 89.90 83.90 9 CALIFORNIA-DAVIS 10 CONNECTICUT 109.22 139.09 92.30 73.70 10 CALIFORNIA-SANTA BARBARA 11 CALIFORNIA-SANTA BARBARA 107.65 138.61 85.36 78.45 WASHINGTON 12 ILLINOIS 108.52 137.20 86.55 83.61 WISCONSIN 13 CALIFORNIA-IRVINE 108.94 137.03 89.83 80.68 13 PENN STATE 14 MARYLAND 111.31 136.32 95.72 83.88 CALIFORNIA-IRVINE 15 PITTSBURGH 106.78 134.81 89.96 74.96 ILLINOIS 16 OHIO STATE 107.67 134.23 89.28 81.46 TEXAS 17 PENN STATE 105.52 132.06 89.16 76.11 17 OHIO STATE 18 CALIFORNIA-DAVIS 105.94 129.37 90.63 81.35 MARYLAND 19 MINNESOTA 102.26 125.71 86.01 79.15 19 TEXAS A&M 20 PURDUE 102.35 125.09 87.11 79.07 CONNECTICUT 21 WASHINGTON 101.73 122.69 88.29 79.34 FLORIDA 22 FLORIDA 96.31 121.75 80.10 68.94 PITTSBURGH 23 TEXAS A&M 97.37 120.01 83.08 72.79 23 PURDUE 24 WILLIAM & MARY 96.72 117.60 87.03 68.48 GEORGIA 25 WISCONSIN 97.11 114.69 87.37 75.86 25 CLEMSON 26 CLEMSON 90.08 107.98 79.04 70.25 RUTGERS 27 GEORGIA 91.12 107.81 79.15 75.33 MINNESOTA Average Excluding OSU: 107.21 133.33 90.39 79.41 Sources: American Association of University Professors (AAUP) Faculty Compensation Survey 2011-12 U.S. News 2012 Best Colleges rankings, Top Public Schools, National Universities Notes: Overall salaries are a weighted average of rank salaries using Ohio State's rank distribution as weights. All 12-month salaries have been converted to a 9-month basis. Benchmark institutions are in bold type. 27 TOP25PUBLIC.xlsx

2011-12 Faculty Salaries (In Thousands) U.S. News Top 25 Public Institutions INSTITUTION OVERALL ASSOCIATE ASSISTANT 2012 REPUTATIONAL RANKING 1 UCLA 127.76 162.59 107.36 87.43 1 CALIFORNIA-BERKELEY 2 CALIFORNIA-BERKELEY 124.01 154.04 104.55 92.25 2 UCLA 3 RUTGERS 114.97 144.98 98.40 78.64 VIRGINIA 4 MICHIGAN 118.13 148.78 98.21 85.80 4 MICHIGAN 5 MARYLAND 111.31 136.32 95.72 83.88 5 NORTH CAROLINA-CHAPEL HILL 6 VIRGINIA 112.66 141.63 94.99 80.27 6 WILLIAM & MARY 7 NORTH CAROLINA-CHAPEL HILL 113.63 143.98 94.61 80.47 7 GEORGIA INSTITUTE OF TECH 8 GEORGIA INSTITUTE OF TECH 113.78 141.34 94.56 86.81 8 CALIFORNIA-SAN DIEGO 9 CONNECTICUT 109.22 139.09 92.30 73.70 9 CALIFORNIA-DAVIS 10 CALIFORNIA-SAN DIEGO 112.31 140.74 90.91 87.01 10 CALIFORNIA-SANTA BARBARA 11 CALIFORNIA-DAVIS 105.94 129.37 90.63 81.35 WASHINGTON 12 PITTSBURGH 106.78 134.81 89.96 74.96 WISCONSIN 13 TEXAS 111.30 140.73 89.90 83.90 13 PENN STATE 14 CALIFORNIA-IRVINE 108.94 137.03 89.83 80.68 CALIFORNIA-IRVINE 15 OHIO STATE 107.67 134.23 89.28 81.46 ILLINOIS 16 PENN STATE 105.52 132.06 89.16 76.11 TEXAS 17 WASHINGTON 101.73 122.69 88.29 79.34 17 OHIO STATE 18 WISCONSIN 97.11 114.69 87.37 75.86 MARYLAND 19 PURDUE 102.35 125.09 87.11 79.07 19 TEXAS A&M 20 WILLIAM & MARY 96.72 117.60 87.03 68.48 CONNECTICUT 21 ILLINOIS 108.52 137.20 86.55 83.61 FLORIDA 22 MINNESOTA 102.26 125.71 86.01 79.15 PITTSBURGH 23 CALIFORNIA-SANTA BARBARA 107.65 138.61 85.36 78.45 23 PURDUE 24 TEXAS A&M 97.37 120.01 83.08 72.79 GEORGIA 25 FLORIDA 96.31 121.75 80.10 68.94 25 CLEMSON 26 GEORGIA 91.12 107.81 79.15 75.33 RUTGERS 27 CLEMSON 90.08 107.98 79.04 70.25 MINNESOTA Average Excluding OSU: 107.21 133.33 90.39 79.41 Sources: American Association of University Professors (AAUP) Faculty Compensation Survey 2011-12 U.S. News 2012 Best Colleges rankings, Top Public Schools, National Universities Notes: Overall salaries are a weighted average of rank salaries using Ohio State's rank distribution as weights. All 12-month salaries have been converted to a 9-month basis. Benchmark institutions are in bold type. 28 TOP25PUBLIC.xlsx

2011-12 Faculty Salaries (In Thousands) U.S. News Top 25 Public Institutions INSTITUTION OVERALL ASSOCIATE ASSISTANT 2012 REPUTATIONAL RANKING 1 CALIFORNIA-BERKELEY 124.01 154.04 104.55 92.25 1 CALIFORNIA-BERKELEY 2 UCLA 127.76 162.59 107.36 87.43 2 UCLA 3 CALIFORNIA-SAN DIEGO 112.31 140.74 90.91 87.01 VIRGINIA 4 GEORGIA INSTITUTE OF TECH 113.78 141.34 94.56 86.81 4 MICHIGAN 5 MICHIGAN 118.13 148.78 98.21 85.80 5 NORTH CAROLINA-CHAPEL HILL 6 TEXAS 111.30 140.73 89.90 83.90 6 WILLIAM & MARY 7 MARYLAND 111.31 136.32 95.72 83.88 7 GEORGIA INSTITUTE OF TECH 8 ILLINOIS 108.52 137.20 86.55 83.61 8 CALIFORNIA-SAN DIEGO 9 OHIO STATE 107.67 134.23 89.28 81.46 9 CALIFORNIA-DAVIS 10 CALIFORNIA-DAVIS 105.94 129.37 90.63 81.35 10 CALIFORNIA-SANTA BARBARA 11 CALIFORNIA-IRVINE 108.94 137.03 89.83 80.68 WASHINGTON 12 NORTH CAROLINA-CHAPEL HILL 113.63 143.98 94.61 80.47 WISCONSIN 13 VIRGINIA 112.66 141.63 94.99 80.27 13 PENN STATE 14 WASHINGTON 101.73 122.69 88.29 79.34 CALIFORNIA-IRVINE 15 MINNESOTA 102.26 125.71 86.01 79.15 ILLINOIS 16 PURDUE 102.35 125.09 87.11 79.07 TEXAS 17 RUTGERS 114.97 144.98 98.40 78.64 17 OHIO STATE 18 CALIFORNIA-SANTA BARBARA 107.65 138.61 85.36 78.45 MARYLAND 19 PENN STATE 105.52 132.06 89.16 76.11 19 TEXAS A&M 20 WISCONSIN 97.11 114.69 87.37 75.86 CONNECTICUT 21 GEORGIA 91.12 107.81 79.15 75.33 FLORIDA 22 PITTSBURGH 106.78 134.81 89.96 74.96 PITTSBURGH 23 CONNECTICUT 109.22 139.09 92.30 73.70 23 PURDUE 24 TEXAS A&M 97.37 120.01 83.08 72.79 GEORGIA 25 CLEMSON 90.08 107.98 79.04 70.25 25 CLEMSON 26 FLORIDA 96.31 121.75 80.10 68.94 RUTGERS 27 WILLIAM & MARY 96.72 117.60 87.03 68.48 MINNESOTA Average Excluding OSU: 107.21 133.33 90.39 79.41 Sources: American Association of University Professors (AAUP) Faculty Compensation Survey 2011-12 U.S. News 2012 Best Colleges rankings, Top Public Schools, National Universities Notes: Overall salaries are a weighted average of rank salaries using Ohio State's rank distribution as weights. All 12-month salaries have been converted to a 9-month basis. Benchmark institutions are in bold type. 29 TOP25PUBLIC.xlsx

APPENDIX E The Ohio State University 2011 12 Faculty Salary Comparisons Living Cost Adjustments

The Ohio State University 2011-12 Average Faculty Salaries (In Thousands) AAU Institutions Living Cost Adjusted Living Cost Adjusted by Index Unadjusted 2010-11 Adjusted AAU Institution Index Overall Rank Overall Rank AAU Institution Rank DUKE 98.5 $139.78 1 $137.69 10 DUKE 1 WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY 101.4 $129.83 2 $131.65 13 WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY 2 VANDERBILT 93.4 $129.09 3 $120.57 21 RICE 3 U OF CHICAGO 115.7 $128.77 4 $148.99 4 VANDERBILT 4 CORNELL-ENDOWED 103.7 $126.68 5 $131.37 14 U OF CHICAGO 5 PENNSYLVANIA 115.1 $126.06 6 $145.09 6 CORNELL-ENDOWED 6 RICE 100.2 $125.49 7 $125.74 16 PENNSYLVANIA 7 EMORY 100.0 $123.55 8 $123.55 19 EMORY 8 PRINCETON 120.7 $123.17 9 $148.67 5 PRINCETON 9 YALE 114.3 $119.51 10 $136.60 11 YALE 10 MICHIGAN 101.1 $116.84 11 $118.13 23 MICHIGAN 11 NORTH CAROLINA-CHAPEL HILL 98.5 $115.36 12 $113.63 26 NORTH CAROLINA-CHAPEL HILL 12 COLUMBIA 131.9 $115.20 13 $151.96 3 GEORGIA TECH 13 HARVARD 133.5 $114.68 14 $153.09 2 HARVARD 14 PURDUE 89.9 $113.84 15 $102.35 48 COLUMBIA 15 GEORGIA INSTITUTE OF TECH 100.0 $113.78 16 $113.78 25 PURDUE 16 BROWN 107.1 $113.27 17 $121.31 20 BROWN 17 INDIANA 92.2 $112.18 18 $103.43 44 TEXAS A&M 18 CARNEGIE-MELLON 107.4 $110.42 19 $118.59 22 CARNEGIE-MELLON 19 ILLINOIS 98.3 $110.40 20 $108.52 35 ILLINOIS 20 ROCHESTER 102.5 $109.99 21 $112.74 28 SUNY-BUFFALO 21 TEXAS A&M 89.3 $109.03 22 $97.37 51 INDIANA 22 VIRGINIA 103.5 $108.85 23 $112.66 29 MICHIGAN STATE 23 MICHIGAN STATE 94.9 $108.09 24 $102.58 47 ROCHESTER 24 OHIO STATE 100.0 $107.67 25 $107.67 36 OHIO STATE 25 SUNY-BUFFALO 101.8 $106.71 26 $108.64 34 PENN STATE 26 TEXAS 104.8 $106.20 27 $111.30 32 VIRGINIA 27 NORTHWESTERN 128.3 $105.56 28 $135.43 12 NORTHWESTERN 28 IOWA 97.8 $105.55 29 $103.23 46 TEXAS 29 CAL TECH 135.6 $105.55 30 $143.12 7 IOWA 30 TULANE 101.8 $105.40 31 $107.30 38 TULANE 31 MIT 133.5 $104.55 32 $139.57 8 CAL TECH 32 PENN STATE 101.0 $104.48 33 $105.52 42 CASE WESTERN RESERVE 33 CASE WESTERN RESERVE 100.7 $103.89 34 $104.62 43 MIT 34 MINNESOTA 101.3 $100.95 35 $102.26 49 MINNESOTA 35 PITTSBURGH 107.4 $99.42 36 $106.78 40 FLORIDA 36 FLORIDA 97.2 $99.08 37 $96.31 54 WISCONSIN 37 STANFORD 156.9 $98.99 38 $155.31 1 PITTSBURGH 38 MISSOURI 90.9 $98.84 39 $89.85 58 KANSAS 39 WISCONSIN 98.6 $98.49 40 $97.11 52 MISSOURI 40 IOWA STATE 98.7 $97.44 41 $96.17 55 IOWA STATE 41 COLORADO 107.1 $96.42 42 $103.27 45 STANFORD 42 CALIFORNIA-SAN DIEGO 116.6 $96.32 43 $112.31 30 NEBRASKA 43 CALIFORNIA-DAVIS 110.2 $96.13 44 $105.94 41 CALIFORNIA-SAN DIEGO 44 KANSAS 97.2 $96.10 45 $93.41 56 MARYLAND 45 MARYLAND 118.5 $93.94 46 $111.31 31 SYRACUSE 46 ARIZONA 103.4 $93.29 47 $96.46 53 COLORADO 47 OREGON 101.8 $91.34 48 $92.99 57 CALIFORNIA-DAVIS 48 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA 137.3 $91.28 49 $125.33 17 ARIZONA 49 WASHINGTON 113.2 $89.87 50 $101.73 50 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA 50 UCLA 142.9 $89.41 51 $127.76 15 WASHINGTON 51 CALIFORNIA-BERKELEY 140.3 $88.39 52 $124.01 18 OREGON 52 RUTGERS 132.9 $86.51 53 $114.97 24 CALIFORNIA-BERKELEY 53 CALIFORNIA-IRVINE 133.5 $81.60 54 $108.94 33 RUTGERS 54 BRANDEIS 133.5 $80.03 55 $106.84 39 UCLA 55 SUNY-STONY BROOK 143.2 $79.07 56 $113.23 27 SUNY-STONY BROOK 56 CALIFORNIA-SANTA BARBARA 164.0 $65.64 57 $107.65 37 CALIFORNIA-IRVINE 57 NEW YORK 223.5 $62.08 58 $138.76 9 BRANDEIS 58 JOHNS HOPKINS* 102.5 N/A N/A CALIFORNIA-SANTA BARBARA 59 NEW YORK 60 Sources: American Association of University Professors (AAUP) Faculty Compensation Survey 2011-12 2010 Runzheimer Report of Living Cost Standards Notes: Benchmark institutions are in bold type. Canadian institutions McGill and University of Toronto are excluded. Number of U.S. AAU Institutions changed from 61 to 60 in 2011-12 (removals of Nebraska, Syracuse) Overall salaries are a weighted average of rank salaries using Ohio State's rank distribution as weights. All 12-month salaries have been converted to a 9-month basis. Living cost can vary from community to community within a large metropolitan area. When information was available regarding the specific location of a campus, that index was used. When information regarding the particular location was unavailable or ambiguous, the cost-of-living for the metropolitan area as a whole was used. * Data for Johns Hopkins unavailable. JOHNS HOPKINS* N/A 31 Living Cost Comparisons.xlsx

The Ohio State University 2011-12 Average Faculty Salaries (In Thousands) Benchmark and CIC Institutions Living Cost Adjusted Benchmark Institutions Living Cost Adjusted by Index Unadjusted Institution Index Overall Rank Overall Rank MICHIGAN 101.1 $116.84 1 $118.13 2 ILLINOIS 98.3 $110.40 2 $108.52 4 OHIO STATE 100.0 $107.67 3 $107.67 5 PENN STATE 101.0 $104.48 4 $105.52 6 MINNESOTA 101.3 $100.95 5 $102.26 7 FLORIDA 97.2 $99.08 6 $96.31 11 WISCONSIN 98.6 $98.49 7 $97.11 9 MARYLAND 118.5 $93.94 8 $111.31 3 ARIZONA 103.4 $93.29 9 $96.46 10 WASHINGTON 113.2 $89.87 10 $101.73 8 UCLA 142.9 $89.41 11 $127.76 1 Previous OHIO STATE Ranking (2010-11) $105.54 3 $105.54 6 CIC Institutions Living Cost Adjusted by Index Unadjusted Institution Index Overall Rank Overall Rank U OF CHICAGO 115.7 $128.77 1 $148.99 1 MICHIGAN 101.1 $116.84 2 $118.13 3 PURDUE 89.9 $113.84 3 $102.35 10 INDIANA 92.2 $112.18 4 $103.43 7 ILLINOIS 98.3 $110.40 5 $108.52 4 MICHIGAN STATE 94.9 $108.09 6 $102.58 9 OHIO STATE 100.0 $107.67 7 $107.67 5 NORTHWESTERN 128.3 $105.56 8 $135.43 2 IOWA 97.8 $105.55 9 $103.23 8 PENN STATE 101.0 $104.48 10 $105.52 6 MINNESOTA 101.3 $100.95 11 $102.26 11 WISCONSIN 98.6 $98.49 12 $97.11 12 NEBRASKA 97.6 $95.22 13 $92.93 13 Previous OHIO STATE Ranking (2010-11) $105.54 7 $105.54 6 Sources: American Association of University Professors (AAUP) Faculty Compensation Survey 2011-12 2010 Runzheimer Report of Living Cost Standards Notes: Overall salaries are a weighted average of rank salaries using Ohio State's rank distribution as weights. All 12-month salaries have been converted to a 9-month basis. Number of CIC institutions increased to 13 in 2011-12 (addition of Nebraska) Living cost can vary from community to community within a large metropolitan area. When information was available regarding the specific location of a campus, that index was used. When information regarding the particular location was unavailable or ambiguous, the cost-of-living for the metropolitan area as a whole was used. 32 Living Cost Comparisons.xlsx

The Ohio State University 2011-12 Average Faculty Salaries (In Thousands) Top 25 Public Institutions Living Cost Adjusted Living Cost Adjusted by Index Unadjusted Institution Index Overall Rank Overall Rank 2011-12 Reputiational Rankings MICHIGAN 101.1 $116.84 1 $118.13 3 1 CALIFORNIA-BERKELEY NORTH CAROLINA-CHAPEL HILL 98.5 $115.36 2 $113.63 6 2 UCLA PURDUE 89.9 $113.84 3 $102.35 19 VIRGINIA GEORGIA INSTITUTE OF TECH 100.0 $113.78 4 $113.78 5 4 MICHIGAN ILLINOIS 98.3 $110.40 5 $108.52 13 5 NORTH CAROLINA-CHAPEL HILL CONNECTICUT* 100.0 $109.22 6 $109.22 11 6 WILLIAM & MARY TEXAS A&M 89.3 $109.03 7 $97.37 22 7 GEORGIA INSTITUTE OF TECH VIRGINIA 103.5 $108.85 8 $112.66 7 8 CALIFORNIA-SAN DIEGO OHIO STATE 100.0 $107.67 9 $107.67 14 9 CALIFORNIA-DAVIS TEXAS 104.8 $106.20 10 $111.30 10 10 CALIFORNIA-SANTA BARBARA PENN STATE 101.0 $104.48 11 $105.52 18 WASHINGTON MINNESOTA 101.3 $100.95 12 $102.26 20 WISCONSIN PITTSBURGH 107.4 $99.42 13 $106.78 16 13 PENN STATE FLORIDA 97.2 $99.08 14 $96.31 25 CALIFORNIA-IRVINE WISCONSIN 98.6 $98.49 15 $97.11 23 ILLINOIS WILLIAM & MARY* 100.0 $96.72 16 $96.72 24 TEXAS CALIFORNIA-SAN DIEGO 116.6 $96.32 17 $112.31 8 17 OHIO STATE CALIFORNIA-DAVIS 110.2 $96.13 18 $105.94 17 MARYLAND MARYLAND 118.5 $93.94 19 $111.31 9 19 TEXAS A&M GEORGIA* 100.0 $91.12 20 $91.12 26 CONNECTICUT CLEMSON* 100.0 $90.08 21 $90.08 27 FLORIDA WASHINGTON 113.2 $89.87 22 $101.73 21 PITTSBURGH UCLA 142.9 $89.41 23 $127.76 1 23 PURDUE CALIFORNIA-BERKELEY 140.3 $88.39 24 $124.01 2 GEORGIA RUTGERS 132.9 $86.51 25 $114.97 4 25 CLEMSON CALIFORNIA-IRVINE 133.5 $81.60 26 $108.94 12 RUTGERS CALIFORNIA-SANTA BARBARA 164.0 $65.64 27 $107.65 15 MINNESOTA Sources: American Association of University Professors (AAUP) Faculty Compensation Survey 2011-12 U.S. News 2012 Best Colleges rankings, Top Public Schools, National Universities 2010 Runzheimer Report of Living Cost Standards Notes: Benchmark institutions are in bold type. Overall salaries are a weighted average of rank salaries using Ohio State's rank distribution as weights. All 12-month salaries have been converted to a 9-month basis. Living cost can vary from community to community within a large metropolitan area. When information was available regarding the specific location of a campus, that index was used. When information regarding the particular location was unavailable or ambiguous, the cost-of-living for the metropolitan area as a whole was used. * Living Cost adjustment factor unavailable, factor of 100 used. 33 Living Cost Comparisons.xlsx

Faculty Compensation Metrics Total University - Columbus Campus Step One: Measure Internally Step Two: Compare with Benchmarks and AAU (March 2012) National Survey Methodology Comparison of total OSU Faculty Population * Average of faculty population for 2010 National Survey as of 10/31/2010 Overall Change: 2.1% Professor: 2.0% Associate Professor: 1.8% Assistant Professor: 2.5% Average of faculty population for 2011 National Survey as of 10/31/2011 New Hires Resignations / retirements Continuing Faculty * All faculty continuously here from 10/31/2010 through 10/31/2011 (includes all increases) Overall Change: 2.6% Professor: 2.3% Associate Professor: 2.8% Assistant Professor: 3.3% * National survey population excludes Library faculty, COM clinical science faculty, and Research faculty. Autumn 2011 Faculty Compensation Metrics by Columbus Campus.pptx