College Employee Satisfaction Survey (CESS) Results

Similar documents
Comparison Group: Small Colleges* Breakout by Enrollment Status: Part-Time Students [Unweighted]

Comparison Group: Small Colleges* [Weighted] Item Variable Responses Count Percent Count Percent Count Percent

Acm769 AG U.S. WATER BAPTISMS, 2017¹ Page 1

October 23, Dear Member of the United States Congress:

Comparison Group: Small Colleges* [Weighted] Item Variable Responses Count Percent Count Percent Count Percent

Acm762 AG U.S. VITAL STATISTICS BY SECTION, 2017 Page 1

THE METHODIST CHURCH (U.S.)

AMERICAN ASSOCIATION FOR AGRICULTURAL EDUCATION FACULTY SALARIES

Cooperative Program Allocation Budget Receipts Southern Baptist Convention Executive Committee March 2018

41/95/2 Student Affairs ATO Chapters Chapter Composites File,

Community College Survey of Student Engagement - Kapiolani Community College (2014 Administration) Frequency Distributions - Promising Practices (1-5)

Cooperative Program Allocation Budget Receipts Southern Baptist Convention Executive Committee August 2015

STATE AGRICULTURAL ORGANIZATIONS SUPPORTING S. 744 AS APPROVED BY THE SENATE AGRICULTURE COMMITTEE

Cooperative Program Allocation Budget Receipts Southern Baptist Convention Executive Committee January 2014

Cooperative Program Allocation Budget Receipts Southern Baptist Convention Executive Committee April 2015

Cooperative Program Allocation Budget Receipts Southern Baptist Convention Executive Committee March 2015

Cooperative Program Allocation Budget Receipts Southern Baptist Convention Executive Committee May 2016

Cooperative Program Allocation Budget Receipts Southern Baptist Convention Executive Committee December 2015

Illinois Higher Education Executive Compensation Analysis

USDA Farm to School Program FY 2013 FY 2017 Summary of Grant Awards

Sears Directors' Cup Final Standings

2018 Site Visits with Dates

PRESS RELEASE Media Contact: Joseph Stefko, Director of Public Finance, ;


All-Time College Football. Attendance. All-Time NCAA Attendance. Annual Football Bowl Subdivision (FBS) Attendance. Annual Total NCAA Attendance

Critical Access Hospitals and HCAHPS

Aaniiih Nakoda College Abilene Christian University Alabama A&M University Alcorn State University American Samoa Community College (American Samoa)

Travel Impact Report

2 All-Time College football Attendance. All-Time NCAA Attendance. Annual Football Bowl Subdivision (FBS) Attendance


Combined Federal Campaign epledge Update

Appalachian State University L500030AppStUBlkVinyl. University of Alabama L500030AlabmaBlkVinyl. Arizona State University L500030ArizStBlkVinyl

TABLE 3c: Congressional Districts with Number and Percent of Hispanics* Living in Hard-to-Count (HTC) Census Tracts**

TABLE 3b: Congressional Districts Ranked by Percent of Hispanics* Living in Hard-to- Count (HTC) Census Tracts**

Department of Defense Regional Council for Small Business Education and Advocacy Charter

Thursday, July 5 (Theme: SOCIAL DEVELOPMENT)

The American Legion NATIONAL MEMBERSHIP RECORD

2018 Site Visits with Dates

Pipeline Safety Regulations and the Effects on Operator Qualification Programs. March 28, 2017

Codes used in the report The entity has been granted reaccreditation of program for degree shown as a result of a site visit on this date.

Table 2 Overall Heterodox-Adjusted Rankings for Ph.D.-Granting Institutions in Economics

For the latest information and results go to:

Is this consistent with other jurisdictions or do you allow some mechanism to reinstate?

For the latest information and results go to:

Colleges/Universities with Exercise Science/Kinesiology-related Graduate Programs

STATE ENTREPRENEURSHIP INDEX

Agriculture Secretary Vilsack Announces Economic Development Funding To Create Jobs in Rural Communities in 26 States

Number of Graduates Continuing their Education by Institution Class of St. Cloud State University

5 x 7 Notecards $1.50 with Envelopes - MOQ - 12

Colorado River Basin. Source: U.S. Department of the Interior, Bureau of Reclamation

OPT OPTIONAL PRACTICAL TRAINING

Statutory change to name availability standard. Jurisdiction. Date: April 8, [Statutory change to name availability standard] [April 8, 2015]

ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES COURTS

College Applications & Acceptance. Rocky Mountain High School Class of 2016

Fiscal Year Tuition and Fee Comparisons for UNC Peer Institutions

Department of Defense INSTRUCTION

The Evergreen State College Evergreen New Student Survey 2012 Olympia Campus - Resident First-time, First-years

Current Medicare Advantage Enrollment Penetration: State and County-Level Tabulations

USDA FY 2010 Distance Learning and Telemedicine Grant Awards

Name: Date: Albany: Jefferson City: Annapolis: Juneau: Atlanta: Lansing: Augusta: Lincoln: Austin: Little Rock: Baton Rouge: Madison: Bismarck:

Rutgers Revenue Sources

Students Serving on Local School Boards February 2009 (39 Responding State Associations)

Thursday, July 5 (Theme: SOCIAL DEVELOPMENT)

Unemployment Rate (%) Rank State. Unemployment

Unemployment Rate (%) Rank State. Unemployment

Unemployment Rate (%) Rank State. Unemployment

Unemployment Rate (%) Rank State. Unemployment

Unemployment Rate (%) Rank State. Unemployment

Unemployment Rate (%) Rank State. Unemployment

Unemployment Rate (%) Rank State. Unemployment

Unemployment Rate (%) Rank State. Unemployment

Unemployment Rate (%) Rank State. Unemployment

Unemployment Rate (%) Rank State. Unemployment

Dr. Larry H. Kelley. Assessment Workshops & In-service Activities

NAFCC Accreditation Annual Update

HOME HEALTH AIDE TRAINING REQUIREMENTS, DECEMBER 2016

IU Bloomington Peer Retention & Graduation Rate Comparisons

Index of religiosity, by state

Decline Admission to Boston College Law School Fall 2018

2015 State Hospice Report 2013 Medicare Information 1/1/15

MAP 1: Seriously Delinquent Rate by State for Q3, 2008

Institution Division Institution Division Arkansas State DI Southern Illinois University DI Bradley University DI Southern Miss DI Central

FBI Field Offices. Louisville Division Room Martin Luther King Jr. Place Louisville, Kentucky (502)

F O R E S T R I V E R M A R I N E

Interstate Turbine Advisory Council (CESA-ITAC)

Senior American Access to Care Grant

Table 6 Medicaid Eligibility Systems for Children, Pregnant Women, Parents, and Expansion Adults, January Share of Determinations

Appendix A. Cognizant Security Information Department of Defense

STATE INDUSTRY ASSOCIATIONS $ - LISTED NEXT PAGE. TOTAL $ 88,000 * for each contribution of $500 for Board Meeting sponsorship

CSCAA NCAA Division I Scholar All-America Teams

The number of masters degrees awarded for all program areas at Land-grant institutions rose by 11,318 degrees (18%).

IOWA STATE UNIVERSITY

Voter Registration and Absentee Ballot Deadlines by State 2018 General Election: Tuesday, November 6. Saturday, Oct 27 (postal ballot)

$ ($0.3289) ($2.2368) $ $ ($ ) Navajo Refining. Lion Oil (Ergon) Murphy Oil

CPR and Annual Performance Review Recommendations. UTIA Advisory Council. October 26, 2001

University Centers for Excellence in Developmental Disabilities. Organizational Charts

Salary and Demographic Survey Results

8-Dec-14 Please see Excel or PDF file (above) for previous data. Comparison of State and Local Retail Sales Taxes, 2014

DOCTORAL/RESEARCH INSTITUTIONS RECEIVING FULBRIGHT AWARDS FOR

Introduction. Current Law Distribution of Funds. MEMORANDUM May 8, Subject:

Transcription:

College Employee Satisfaction Survey (CESS) Results Comparison of all Employee Responses to a 2-year Institution Comparison Group, and all Employee Responses Comparison of -only Responses to -only Responses ISFACTION (1 = "Not satisfied at all" 5 = "Very satisfied") Rate your overall satisfaction with your employment here so far: CG All All 3.85 3.78 3.65 3.71 3.58 CG is a comparison group of 59 other 2-year institutions who have administered the survey within the past three years. = Satisfaction

College Employee Satisfaction Survey (CESS) Results Comparison of all Employee Responses to a 2-year Institution Comparison Group, and all Employee Responses Comparison of -only Responses to -only Responses Section 1: Campus Culture and Policies important") AND ISFACTION (1 = "Not satisfied at all" CG All All This institution promotes excellent employee-student relationships 3.71 3.51 3.38 3.66 3.51 This institution treats students as its top priority 3.63 3.48 3.31 3.59 3.40 This institution does a good job of meeting the needs of students 3.57 3.37 3.24 3.53 3.36 The mission, purpose, and values of this institution are well understood by most employees 3.51 3.41 3.19 3.57 3.23 Most employees are generally supportive of the mission, purpose, and values of this institution 3.59 3.48 3.35 3.64 3.41 The goals and objectives of this institution are consistent with its mission and values 3.58 3.50 3.31 3.56 3.30 This institution involves its employees in planning for the future 3.08 3.08 2.99 3.00 2.92 This institution plans carefully 3.13 2.87 2.64 2.88 2.61 The leadership of this institution has a clear sense of purpose 3.33 3.16 3.00 3.16 2.96 This institution does a good job of meeting the needs of its faculty 3.24 3.28 3.14 2.86 2.65 This institution does a good job of meeting the needs of staff 3.13 3.14 3.02 3.19 3.09 This institution does a good job of meeting the needs of administrators This institution makes sufficient budgetary resources available to achieve important objectives This institution makes sufficient staff resources available to achieve important objectives There are effective lines of communication between departments Administrators share information regularly with faculty and staff There is good communication between the faculty and the administration at this institution There is good communication between staff and the administration at this institution 3.68 3.67 3.57 3.62 3.47 3.18 3.06 2.95 3.01 2.78 3.10 2.99 2.96 3.04 3.01 2.79 2.64 2.49 2.83 2.68 3.08 3.05 3.04 3.22 3.25 3.06 3.01 2.95 2.92 2.91 3.06 2.95 2.91 3.16 3.11

Section 1: Campus Culture and Policies important") AND ISFACTION (1 = "Not satisfied at all" CG All All take pride in their work 3.91 3.72 3.60 4.14 4.00 Staff take pride in their work 3.84 3.73 3.60 4.03 3.83 Administrators take pride in their work 3.75 3.57 3.38 3.71 3.50 There is a spirit of teamwork and cooperation at this institution 3.06 2.93 2.79 3.08 2.84 The reputation of this institution continues to improve 3.41 3.41 2.96 3.36 2.91 This institution is well-respected in the community 3.63 3.33 2.93 3.33 2.86 Efforts to improve quality are paying off at this institution 3.35 3.31 3.01 3.29 2.94 Employee suggestions are used to improve our institution 2.98 2.90 2.79 2.90 2.73 This institution consistently follows clear processes for selecting new employees This institution consistently follows clear processes for orienting and training new employees This institution consistently follows clear processes for recognizing employee achievements This institution has written procedures that clearly define who is responsible for each operation and service My immediate supervisor provides me with information about what is going on at the college This institution does an excellent job of keeping employees informed about matters affecting us 3.17 2.93 2.89 3.04 2.91 3.08 3.22 3.11 3.22 3.04 3.13 3.03 2.85 3.12 2.91 3.11 2.83 2.79 3.02 2.92 3.70 3.67 3.15 3.26 My senior administrator is held accountable for their work 3.38 3.37 This institution has high performance standards 3.17 3.31 I understand what my immediate supervisor expects from me 3.95 3.90 I am held accountable for meeting specified job performance standards and held accountable when I do not 3.92 3.90 Employees are held accountable for meeting specified job performance standards and held accountable when they do 3.05 3.31 not Systems and processes are in place to address underperforming employees 2.68 2.96 Under-performing employees are held accountable 2.47 2.80 Efforts to improve the effectiveness of the Board of Governors leadership are paying off at this institution 3.12 2.90 3.07 2.74 Efforts to improve the integrity of Human Resources operations are paying off at this institution 2.89 2.91 3.07 2.90 Efforts to improve the complaints and grievance procedures are paying off at this institution 3.15 3.14 3.19 3.10

Section 1: Campus Culture and Policies important") AND ISFACTION (1 = "Not satisfied at all" Efforts to improve the integrity of financial practices are paying off at this institution Efforts to improve the effectiveness of administrative leadership are paying off at this institution Pima Community College fosters an environment that is inclusive of diverse identities The institution does a good job involving employees in college planning Efforts to improve the college climate are paying off at the institution CG All All 3.32 3.15 3.32 2.98 3.09 2.91 3.06 2.82 3.86 3.71 3.88 3.77 3.08 3.01 3.00 2.94 3.10 2.92 3.07 2.82 CG is a comparison group of 59 other 2-year institutions who have administered the survey within the past three years. = Satisfaction

College Employee Satisfaction Survey (CESS) Results Comparison of all Employee Responses to a 2-year Institution Comparison Group, and all Employee Responses Comparison of -only Responses to -only Responses Section 4: Work environment important") AND ISFACTION (1 = "Not satisfied at all" CG All All It is easy for me to get information at this institution 3.27 3.17 3.10 3.25 3.12 I learn about important campus events in a timely manner 3.50 3.57 3.49 3.68 3.58 I am empowered to resolve problems quickly 3.37 3.31 3.11 3.32 3.13 I am comfortable answering student questions about institutional policies and procedures 3.51 3.43 3.28 3.38 3.24 I have the information I need to do my job well 3.63 3.66 3.42 3.72 3.46 My job responsibilities are communicated clearly to me 3.70 3.79 3.67 3.87 3.80 My supervisor pays attention to what I have to say 3.90 3.92 3.89 3.88 4.00 My supervisor helps me improve my job performance 3.75 3.77 3.69 3.76 3.80 My department or work unit has written, up-to-date objectives 3.58 3.50 3.37 3.58 3.60 My department meets as a team to plan and coordinate work 3.67 3.64 3.45 3.54 3.46 My department has the budget needed to do its job well 3.09 3.06 3.02 2.87 2.92 My department has the staff needed to do its job well 3.06 2.90 3.05 2.94 3.19 I am paid fairly for the work I do 3.14 3.16 3.15 2.71 2.78 The employee benefits available to me are valuable 3.85 3.78 3.61 3.15 2.97 I have adequate opportunities for advancement 3.02 2.83 2.75 2.86 2.71 I have adequate opportunities for training to improve my skills 3.40 3.48 3.40 3.53 3.43 I have adequate opportunities for professional development 3.43 3.56 3.50 3.60 3.53 The type of work I do on most days is personally rewarding 4.09 4.09 4.06 4.26 4.33 The work I do is appreciated by my supervisor 3.90 3.87 3.90 3.80 3.99 The work I do is valuable to the institution 3.98 3.89 3.96 3.78 3.91 I am proud to work at this institution 4.09 4.04 3.89 3.89 3.76 I have a clear understanding of the new academic structure of the college 3.23 3.12 The restructure of the academic area has improved processes and effectiveness in my area of 2.95 2.80 The new academic structure is an improvement over the previous structure 3.18 2.87 The new academic structure will enable to better meet the needs of students 3.22 2.98 CG is a comparison group of 59 other 2-year institutions who have administered the survey within the past three years. = Satisfaction

College Employee Satisfaction Survey (CESS) Comparison Group Aims Community College Arizona Western College Bates Technical College Beaufort County Community College Broome Community College Cascadia College Cascadia Community College Central Ohio Technical College Central Wyoming College Chandler Gilbert Community College College of the Redwoods Cowley County Community College Durham Technical Community College Eastern Gateway Community College Eastern New Mexico University-Ruidoso Georgia Military College Gogebic Community College Greenville Technical College Guttman Community College Helena College Kankakee Community College Kishwaukee College Lakeland College AB Lakeshore Technical College Laramie County Community College Laredo Community College Marion Technical College Minneapolis Community and Technical College Montcalm Community College Mountain View College Mountwest Community & Technical College Mt Hood Community College Murray State College New Mexico Junior College New Mexico State University - Carlsbad Normandale Community College North Dakota State College of Science Northeast Iowa CC Northeast State Community College Northern Oklahoma College Northwest Arkansas Community College Northwest Technical College Ogeechee Technical College Parkland College

College Employee Satisfaction Survey (CESS) Comparison Group Piedmont Technical College Prairie State College Richland College SUNY Broome Community College Santa Fe Community College Southeast_Technical_Institute Southern Crescent Technical College Southwest Wisconsin Technical College Southwestern College Tri-County Technical College Trident Technical College West Georgia Technical College Western Technical College Wisconsin Indianhead Technical College Yuba Community College Notes: All survey data has been collected within the last 3 years. Please refer to College Navigator for additional details on individual institutions: http://nces.ed.gov/collegenavigator/