N/SHIP SELF DEFENSE - DEM/VAL

Similar documents
EXHIBIT R-2, RDT&E BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION N/SHIP SELF DEFENSE (ENGAGE: SOFT KILL/EW)

UNCLASSIFIED FY 2016 OCO. FY 2016 Base

RDT&E BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION SHEET (R-2 Exhibit) MAY 2009 APPROPRIATION / BUDGET ACTIVITY RDT&E, DEFENSE-WIDE / 7

UNCLASSIFIED. R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE PE N: ASW Systems Development

EXHIBIT R-2, RDT&E BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION N/Space and Electronic Warfare (SEW) Support

COST (Dollars in Millions) FY07 FY08 FY09 FY10 FY11 FY12 FY12

UNCLASSIFIED UNCLASSIFIED

UNCLASSIFIED UNCLASSIFIED

RDT&E BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION SHEET (R-2 Exhibit) MAY 2009 APPROPRIATION / BUDGET ACTIVITY RDT&E, DEFENSE-WIDE / 7

UNCLASSIFIED. UNCLASSIFIED Air Force Page 1 of 8 R-1 Line #86

UNCLASSIFIED UNCLASSIFIED

CLASSIFICATION: UNCLASSIFIED. DATE February 2008 EXHIBIT R-2, RDT&E BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION N/AMPHIBIOUS TACTICAL SUPPORT UNITS

UNCLASSIFIED. FY 2016 Base FY 2016 OCO

UNCLASSIFIED UNCLASSIFIED. EXHIBIT R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification RDT&E,N/ 07

UNCLASSIFIED UNCLASSIFIED. EXHIBIT R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification February 2007 RESEARCH DEVELOPMENT TEST & EVALUATION, NAVY / BA-4

UNCLASSIFIED UNCLASSIFIED

EXHIBIT R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification RESEARCH DEVELOPMENT TEST & EVALUATION, NAVY / BA4

UNCLASSIFIED. R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE PE F: Requirements Analysis and Maturation. FY 2011 Total Estimate. FY 2011 OCO Estimate

UNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE

UNCLASSIFIED UNCLASSIFIED. EXHIBIT R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification RESEARCH DEVELOPMENT TEST & EVALUATION, NAVY / BA-7

UNCLASSIFIED UNCLASSIFIED

UNCLASSIFIED. FY 2016 Base FY 2016 OCO

UNCLASSIFIED UNCLASSIFIED. EXHIBIT R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification. June 2001 RESEARCH DEVELOPMENT TEST & EVALUATION, NAVY/BA7

RDT&E BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION SHEET (R-2 Exhibit) MAY 2009 APPROPRIATION / BUDGET ACTIVITY RDT&E, DEFENSE-WIDE / 7

RDT&E BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION SHEET (R-2 Exhibit) MAY 2009 APPROPRIATION / BUDGET ACTIVITY RDT&E, DEFENSE-WIDE / 7

UNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE

UNCLASSIFIED FY 2016 OCO. FY 2016 Base

UNCLASSIFIED. UNCLASSIFIED Air Force Page 1 of 9 R-1 Line #44

UNCLASSIFIED UNCLASSIFIED

Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification

N/JT CNTR RADIO CONTROLLED IED ELEC WAR (JCREW)

UNCLASSIFIED. FY 2016 Base FY 2016 OCO

UNCLASSIFIED. UNCLASSIFIED Navy Page 1 of 8 R-1 Line #77

UNCLASSIFIED. UNCLASSIFIED Navy Page 1 of 6 R-1 Line #162

UNCLASSIFIED. R-1 Program Element (Number/Name) PE BB / SOF Visual Augmentation, Lasers and Sensor Systems. Prior Years FY 2013 FY 2014 FY 2015

Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification February 2008

EXHIBIT R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification. February COST ($ in Millions) FY 2006 FY 2007 FY 2008 FY 2009 FY 2010 FY 2011 FY 2012 FY 2013

Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification

UNCLASSIFIED UNCLASSIFIED. EXHIBIT R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification February 2008 RESEARCH DEVELOPMENT TEST & EVALUATION, NAVY / BA-4

UNCLASSIFIED FY 2016 OCO. FY 2016 Base

UNCLASSIFIED. Cost To Complete Total Program Element : Undersea Warfare Advanced Technology

UNCLASSIFIED UNCLASSIFIED

UNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE

UNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE

UNCLASSIFIED. FY 2016 Base FY 2016 OCO

UNCLASSIFIED. UNCLASSIFIED Army Page 1 of 7 R-1 Line #9

UNCLASSIFIED FY 2009 RDT&E,N BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION SHEET DATE: February 2008 Exhibit R-2

UNCLASSIFIED. COST ($ in Millions) FY 2008 FY 2009 FY 2010 FY 2011 FY 2012 FY 2013 FY 2014 FY 2015

UNCLASSIFIED. FY 2016 Base FY 2016 OCO. Quantity of RDT&E Articles

UNCLASSIFIED FY 2008/2009 RDT&E,N BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION SHEET DATE: February 2007 Exhibit R-2

UNCLASSIFIED. FY 2016 Base FY 2016 OCO

UNCLASSIFIED CLASSIFICATION: DATE May 2009 EXHIBIT R-2, RDT&E BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION N/COMBAT SYSTEM INTEGRATION

UNCLASSIFIED. FY 2017 Base FY 2017 OCO

UNCLASSIFIED. FY 2017 Base FY 2017 OCO

UNCLASSIFIED. FY 2016 Base FY 2016 OCO

EXHIBIT R-2, RDT&E, N Budget Item Justification RDT&E / BA-5. COST ($ in Millions) FY 2007 FY 2008 FY 2009 FY 2010 FY 2011 FY 2012 FY 2013

UNCLASSIFIED. UNCLASSIFIED Navy Page 1 of 7 R-1 Line #16

UNCLASSIFIED FY 2016 OCO. FY 2016 Base

UNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE

UNCLASSIFIED FY This program develops and demonstrates advanced technologies, including Electromagnetic (EM) Rail Gun for naval weapon systems.

R-2 Exhibit RDT&E Budget Item Justification DATE FEBRUARY 1999 APPROPRIATION/BUDGET ACTIVITY RDT&E,DW/BA7

UNCLASSIFIED. UNCLASSIFIED Navy Page 1 of 12 R-1 Line #147

UNCLASSIFIED. UNCLASSIFIED Air Force Page 1 of 15 R-1 Line #222

UNCLASSIFIED. FY 2016 Base FY 2016 OCO

UNCLASSIFIED. UNCLASSIFIED United States Special Operations Command Page 1 of 6 R-1 Line #208

UNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE PE A: RADAR DEVELOPMENT

B. Program Change Summary: RDT&E BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION SHEET (R-2 Exhibit) FEBRUARY 2008 APPROPRIATION / BUDGET ACTIVITY RDT&E, DEFENSE-WIDE / 7

UNCLASSIFIED UNCLASSIFIED

UNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE FY 2013 OCO

UNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE

UNCLASSIFIED FY 2016 OCO. FY 2016 Base

UNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE

UNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE

UNCLASSIFIED. R-1 Program Element (Number/Name) PE F / Joint Air-to-Surface Standoff Missile (JASSM) Prior Years FY 2013 FY 2014 FY 2015

UNCLASSIFIED. Cost To Complete Total Program Element Continuing Continuing : Counter Narcotics Technology Program Office

UNCLASSIFIED. FY 2017 Base FY 2017 OCO

UNCLASSIFIED. UNCLASSIFIED Air Force Page 1 of 15 R-1 Line #32

UNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE. FY 2014 FY 2014 OCO ## Total FY 2015 FY 2016 FY 2017 FY 2018

Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification February 2008

UNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE FY 2013 OCO

UNCLASSIFIED UNCLASSIFIED

COST (Dollars in Millions) FY07 FY08 FY09 FY10 FY11 FY12 FY12

UNCLASSIFIED. UNCLASSIFIED Air Force Page 1 of 5 R-1 Line #169

UNCLASSIFIED. FY 2016 Base FY 2016 OCO

UNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE FY 2013 OCO

UNCLASSIFIED. UNCLASSIFIED Office of Secretary Of Defense Page 1 of 6 R-1 Line #29

UNCLASSIFIED. FY 2016 Base FY 2016 OCO

UNCLASSIFIED UNCLASSIFIED

UNCLASSIFIED. R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE PE F: Multi-Platform Electronics

UNCLASSIFIED. R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE PE N: Surface Ship Torpedo Defense FY 2012 OCO

UNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE FY 2013 OCO

UNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE FY 2013 OCO

UNCLASSIFIED. R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE PE N: RDT&E Ship & Aircraft Support

UNCLASSIFIED UNCLASSIFIED

UNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE

DATE: FY 2013 President's Budget February 2012 PRIOR YR FY 2011 FY 2012 FY 2013 FY 2014 FY 2015 FY 2016 FY 2017 TO COMP TOTAL PROG QUANTITY

Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification

UNCLASSIFIED. FY 2016 Base FY 2016 OCO

UNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE FY 2013 OCO

UNCLASSIFIED. R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE PE F: C2ISR Tactical Data Link FY 2012 OCO

Transcription:

APPROPRIATION/BUDGET ACTIVITY RDTEN/BA 4 EXHIBIT R-2, RDT&E BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE 0603755N/SHIP SELF DEFENSE - DEM/VAL COST (In Millions) Total PE Cost 2133 / QRCC 2184 / Force AAW Coordination Technology 3160 / Ocean Surveillance A. MISSION DESCRIPTION: FY 2007 FY 2008 FY 2009 FY 2010 FY 2011 FY 2012 FY 2013 11.166 10.719 11.001 10.803 10.815 10.791 10.750 4.884 3.490 3.597 3.719 3.783 3.809 3.884 1.926 7.229 7.404 7.084 7.032 6.982 6.866 4.356 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 This program incorporates efforts dedicated to the enhancement of ship defense against Anti-Air Warfare (AAW) and other evolving threats. Its primary focus is on the development of technologies, systems, and procedures necessary to defeat the evolving Anti-Ship Cruise Missile (ASCM) threat and then expands to allow for application of these technologies in other warfighting areas. These projects focus on ship defense improvements through the development of advanced concepts and capabilities that will enhance both defense in depth of ships in a force and self defense of individual ships in a littoral war-fighting environment. Project 2133 is divided into two sub-projects,requirements Analysis Working Group (RAWG) and Quick Reaction Combat Capability. Requirements Analysis Working Group (RAWG) provides independent analysis for a variety of combat system trade-offs, ship class performance studies, and force protection strategic plan development. Quick Reaction Combat Capability (QRCC), provides advanced concepts and technology developments for the multi-sensor integration of ship detection equipment, integration and coordination of ship self defense weapons, and coordination of hardkill and softkill assets to improve individual ship self defense capabilities against the ASCM threat. Force Advanced Warfare Concept Technology (FACT), Project 2184, demonstrates concepts and capabilities that will enhance the warfighting ability of ships and aircraft and enable the coupling of the Force into a single, distributed weapon system through more effective use of tactical data, and force sensors and weapons. During FY06, the Innovation Team expanded the offensive counter air (OCA) capabilities developed for the Joint Targeting Attack and Assessment Capability (JTAAC) utilizing electro-optical (EO) and infrared (IR) sensors to include other sensors. During FY07, under the Ocean Surveillance Initiative, Project 3160, the Innovation Team will continue to leverage their expertise in resolving complex warfighter issues as well as the end to end capability realized in previous products to develop a prototype focused on creating a coherent and consistent surface track picture. JTAAC brought innovative technology to offensive counter air and the Ocean Surveillance Initiative will extend those advancements to the maritime offensive counter air and surface track picture domains. FACT and Ocean Surveillence Initiative efforts will combine and continue under Project 2184 in FY08. R-1 Line Item No 66 CLASSIFICATION: EXHIBIT R-2 PAGE 1 of 12 RDT&E BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION

EXHIBIT R-2, RDT&E BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION (CONTINUATION) APPROPRIATION/BUDGET ACTIVITY R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE RDTEN/BA 4 0603755N/SHIP SELF DEFENSE - DEM/VAL B. PROGRAM CHANGE SUMMARY: Funding: FY 2007 FY 2008 FY 2009 FY 2008 President's Budget 8.863 10.954 11.010 FY 2009 President's Budget 11.166 10.719 11.001 Total Adjustments 2.303-0.235-0.009 Summary of Adjustments Undistributed/General Adjustments 2.303-0.235-0.009 R-1 Line Item No 66 CLASSIFICATION: EXHIBIT R-2 PAGE 2 of 12 RDT&E BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION

EXHIBIT R-2a, RDT&E PROJECT JUSTIFICATION RDTEN/BA 4 0603755N/SHIP SELF DEFENSE - DEM/VAL 2133/QRCC COST (In Millions) FY 2007 FY 2008 FY 2009 FY 2010 FY 2011 FY 2012 FY 2013 Project Cost RDT&E Articles Qty A. MISSION DESCRIPTION AND BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION: 4.884 3.490 3.597 3.719 3.783 3.809 3.884 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 The Requirements and Analysis Working Group (RAWG) provides independent analysis for a variety of combat system trade-offs, ship class performance studies, and force protection strategic plan development. Quick Reaction Combat Capability (QRCC) provides advanced concepts and technology developments for the multi-sensor integration of ship detection equipment, integration and coordination of ship self defense weapons, and coordination of hardkill and softkill assets to improve individual ship self defense capabilities against the Anti-Ship Cruise Missile (ASCM) threat. R-1 Line Item No 66 CLASSIFICATION: EXHIBIT R-2a PAGE 3 of 12 RDT&E PROJECT JUSTIFICATION

EXHIBIT R-2a, RDT&E PROJECT JUSTIFICATION RDTEN/BA 4 0603755N/SHIP SELF DEFENSE - DEM/VAL 2133/QRCC B. ACCOMPLISHMENTS/PLANNED PROGRAM: FY 2007 FY 2008 FY 2009 Accomplishments/Effort/Subtotal Cost 4.884 0.000 0.000 RDT&E Articles Quantity 0 0 0 The RAWG will analyze Ship Self Defense PRA capabilities. Analysis will include baseline PRA requirements, excursions based on raid size, environment, and other operational considerations. The RAWG will respond to the PEO and OPNAV sponsors emergent tasking and participate and attend PRA working group meetings. FY 2007 FY 2008 FY 2009 Accomplishments/Effort/Subtotal Cost 0.000 3.490 0.000 RDT&E Articles Quantity 0 0 0 The RAWG will continue leadership and management of the Common ASCM Threat Characterization process for PEO IWS. The RAWG will continue to analyze Ship Self Defense PRA capabilities and respond to the PEO and OPNAV sponsors emergent tasking and participate and attend PRA working group meetings. FY 2007 FY 2008 FY 2009 Accomplishments/Effort/Subtotal Cost 0.000 0.000 3.597 RDT&E Articles Quantity 0 0 0 The RAWG will continue leadership and management of the Common ASCM Threat Characterization process for PEO IWS. The RAWG will continue to analyze Ship Self Defense PRA capabilities and respond to the PEO and OPNAV sponsors emergent tasking and participate and attend PRA working group meetings. C. OTHER PROGRAM FUNDING SUMMARY: N/A D. ACQUISITION STRATEGY: N/A R-1 Line Item No 66 CLASSIFICATION: EXHIBIT R-2a PAGE 4 of 12 RDT&E PROJECT JUSTIFICATION

EXHIBIT R-3, RDT&E PROJECT COST ANALYSIS RDTEN/BA 4 0603755N/SHIP SELF DEFENSE - DEM/VAL 2133/QRCC Cost Categories Contract Performing Total PY FY 2007 FY 2007 FY 2008 FY 2008 FY 2009 FY 2009 Cost to Total Target (Tailor to WBS, or System/Item Method Activity & Cost Cost Award Cost Award Cost Award Complete Cost Value of Requirements) & Type Location ($000) ($000) Date ($000) Date ($000) Date ($000) ($000) Contract System Engineering WR Dahlgren, NSWC DD 3.487 4.884 OCT-06 3.490 OCT-07 3.597 OCT-08 CONT CONT 0.000 Subtotal Product Development 3.487 4.884 3.490 3.597 CONT CONT 0.000 Remarks: Total Cost 3.487 4.884 3.490 3.597 CONT CONT 0.000 R-1 Line Item No 66 CLASSIFICATION: EXHIBIT R-3 PAGE 5 of 12 RDT&E PROJECT COST ANALYSIS

EXHIBIT R-2a, RDT&E PROJECT JUSTIFICATION RDTEN/BA 4 0603755N/SHIP SELF DEFENSE - DEM/VAL 2184/Force AAW Coordination Technology COST (In Millions) FY 2007 FY 2008 FY 2009 FY 2010 FY 2011 FY 2012 FY 2013 Project Cost RDT&E Articles Qty A. MISSION DESCRIPTION AND BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION: 1.926 7.229 7.404 7.084 7.032 6.982 6.866 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 The Force Advanced Warfare Concept Technology (FACT) Program is an advanced development effort designed to demonstrate Advanced Force concepts and capabilities that will significantly improve our Force defense in depth, including both local area and self defense capabilities against current and future threats. FACT improvements are designed to enhance the warfighting ability of ships and aircraft and to enable coupling of the Force into a single, distributed weapon system and towards more effective use of tactical data and the cooperative use of all the force sensors and weapons. These capabilities will provide the ship defense flexibility needed to meet the threat brought about by increasing numbers of highly sophisticated weapons held by potentially hostile third world countries. FACT defines requirements and develops prototype systems or modifications to existing systems to test new concepts for the coordination of Force operations. FACT is a model Sea Enterprise effort that consistently delivers advanced war-fighting capability that addresses current Fleet shortfalls and needs quickly and cost effectively. Some examples of prototype systems now in production are AN/SPS-48C Detection Data Converter, AN/SPS-48E Environmental Control Feature, Shipboard Gridlock System Automatic Correlation (SGS/AC) and Dial-a-Track Quality (Link-11 Quality Selection). Other FACT developments nearing production stages are the Automatic Identification System (Auto-ID) and the Multi-Frequency Link-11 capability; Dual Net Multi-Frequency Link-11 (DNMFL); Force Threat Evaluation Weapons Assignment (FTEWA); and the prototype Area Air Defense Commander (AADC) and the Joint Targeting Attack and Assessment Capability (JTAAC). During FY06, the Innovation Team expanded the offensive counter air (OCA) capabilities developed for JTAAC utilizing electro-optical (EO) and infrared (IR) sensors to include other sensors. This effort will be a complement to the JTAAC, leveraging the technologies and end to end capability realized by JTAAC to inform future maritime offensive counter air efforts. In FY07, under 3160, the Ocean Surveillance Initiative (OSI), was begun to provide a persistent wide area surface track picture. This initiative is continuing in FY08 under 2184, FACT. In developing OSI, the FACT team is coordinating with other organizations to include a variety of Navy programs and Customs and Border Protection (CBP) to leverage off of experimentation opportunities and mission area expertise. R-1 Line Item No 66 CLASSIFICATION: EXHIBIT R-2a PAGE 6 of 12 RDT&E PROJECT JUSTIFICATION

EXHIBIT R-2a, RDT&E PROJECT JUSTIFICATION RDTEN/BA 4 0603755N/SHIP SELF DEFENSE - DEM/VAL 2184/Force AAW Coordination Technology B. ACCOMPLISHMENTS/PLANNED PROGRAM: Accomplishments/Effort/Subtotal Cost 1.926 7.229 7.404 RDT&E Articles Quantity 0 0 0 Conduct critical FACT initiative proof of concept experiments. Provide top level programmatic support, technical analysis and assist in the development processes, procedures and documentation that impact the execution of the FACT program requirements. FACT and Ocean Surveillence Initiative efforts will combine and continue under Project 2184 in FY08. On-going development of an Ocean Serveillance Initiative prototype which will leverage the end to end capability realized by JTAAC and have the objective goal of attaining a tactically significant probability of detection, continuous track, and correct classification of small and medium sized vessels at sea state 5. Conduct critical experiments in support of the Ocean Surveillance Initiative. Provide top level programmactic support, technical analysis and assist in the development processess, procedures and documentation that impact the execution of the Ocean Surveillance Initiative. C. OTHER PROGRAM FUNDING SUMMARY: Not Applicable D. ACQUISITION STRATEGY: Not Applicable FY 2007 FY 2008 FY 2009 R-1 Line Item No 66 CLASSIFICATION: EXHIBIT R-2a PAGE 7 of 12 RDT&E PROJECT JUSTIFICATION

EXHIBIT R-3, RDT&E PROJECT COST ANALYSIS RDTEN/BA 4 0603755N/SHIP SELF DEFENSE - DEM/VAL 2184/Force AAW Coordination Technology Cost Categories Contract Performing Total PY FY 2007 FY 2007 FY 2008 FY 2008 FY 2009 FY 2009 Cost to Total Target (Tailor to WBS, or System/Item Method Activity & Cost Cost Award Cost Award Cost Award Complete Cost Value of Requirements) & Type Location ($000) ($000) Date ($000) Date ($000) Date ($000) ($000) Contract Primary Hardware Development CPFF APL/Laurel, MD 7.285 1.526 11-06 6.829 11-07 7.004 11-08 22.644 0.000 Subtotal Product Development Remarks: 7.285 1.526 6.829 7.004 0.000 22.644 0.000 Support Costs SEAPORT DELTA/Arlington, VA 0.000 0.400 0.400 0.400 0.000 1.200 0.000 Subtotal Support Costs Remarks: 0.000 0.400 0.400 0.400 0.000 1.200 0.000 Total Cost 7.285 1.926 7.229 7.404 0.000 23.844 0.000 R-1 Line Item No 66 CLASSIFICATION: EXHIBIT R-3 PAGE 8 of 12 RDT&E PROJECT COST ANALYSIS

EXHIBIT R4, Schedule Profile: RDT&E, N / BA-4 0603755N/SHIP SELF DEFENSE 2184 Force Advanced Warfare Concept Technology (FACT) : Fiscal Year 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 Support GWOT Operations End Support Transtion of JTAAC Begin Ocean Surveillance Initiative Begin Phase 1 End Phase 2 Begin Transition End Follow-on FACT Initiative Exercise Prototype Capability Begin R-1 Line Item No 66 CLASSIFICATION: EXHIBIT R-4 PAGE 9 of 12 SCHEDULE

EXHIBIT R-4a, SCHEDULE DETAIL RDTEN/BA 4 0603755N/SHIP SELF DEFENSE - DEM/VAL 2184/Force AAW Coordination Technology Schedule Profile FY 2007 FY 2008 FY 2009 FY 2010 FY 2011 FY 2012 FY 2013 Exercise Prototype Capability Conclude OSI Begin Follow-on FACT Initiative Begin Ocean Surveillance Initiative Phase 1 Data Collection with Customs & Border Protection Phase 2 Data Collection with Customs & Border Protection Begin Transition of JTAAC Within USN Conclude Suppot of GWOT Operations Conclude Transition of JTAAC Within USN 1Q 3Q 4Q 4Q 2Q, 3Q 1Q 4Q 1Q R-1 Line Item No 66 CLASSIFICATION: EXHIBIT R-4a PAGE 10 of 12 SCHEDULE DETAIL

EXHIBIT R-2a, RDT&E PROJECT JUSTIFICATION RDTEN/BA 4 0603755N/SHIP SELF DEFENSE - DEM/VAL 3160/Ocean Surveillance COST (In Millions) FY 2007 FY 2008 FY 2009 FY 2010 FY 2011 FY 2012 FY 2013 Project Cost 4.356 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 RDT&E Articles Qty 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 A. MISSION DESCRIPTION AND BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION: The Innovation Program is an advanced development effort designed to demonstrate Force concepts and capabilities which significantly improve our Force defense in depth, including both local area and self defense capabilities against current and future threats. The Innovation Team has consistently provided the warfighter innovative products which resolve current complex warfighter issues quickly and cost effectively. The Innovation Team will begin expanding its focus to include maritime offensive counter air. Under the auspices of the Ocean Surveillance Initiative, this innovation cell plans to leverage technologies that they developed in the JTAAC to provide a prototype which will create a coherent surface track picture in a large area of operations (AO) enabling sustained situational understanding. Their focus will be optimizing sensor selection and configuration to reliably detect, track, and classify ships in the AO with an objective goal of attaining a tactically significant probability of detection, continuous track, and correct classification down to small and medium sized vessels in sea state 5. The Ocean Surveillance Initiative is a complement to JTAAC. The Ocean Surveillance Initiative is the natural progression for the USN to leverage the JTAAC offensive counter air end to end capability to the maritime domain. FACT and Ocean Surveillance Initiative efforts are combined and are continuing under Project 2184 in FY08. R-1 Line Item No 66 CLASSIFICATION: EXHIBIT R-2a PAGE 11 of 12 RDT&E PROJECT JUSTIFICATION

EXHIBIT R-2a, RDT&E PROJECT JUSTIFICATION RDTEN/BA 4 0603755N/SHIP SELF DEFENSE - DEM/VAL 3160/Ocean Surveillance B. ACCOMPLISHMENTS/PLANNED PROGRAM: FY 2007 FY 2008 FY 2009 Accomplishments/Effort/Subtotal Cost 4.356 0.000 0.000 RDT&E Articles Quantity 0 0 0 On-going development of an Ocean Serveillance Initiative prototype which will leverage the end to end capability realized by JTAAC and have the objective goal of attaining a tactically significant probability of detection, continuous track, and correct classification of small and medium sized vessels at sea state 5. Conduct critical experiments in support of the Ocean Surveillance Initiative. Provide top level programmactic support, technical analysis and assist in the development processess, procedures and documentation that impact the execution of the Ocean Surveillance Initiative. FACT and Ocean Surveillance Initiative efforts are combined and continue under Project 2184 in FY08. C. OTHER PROGRAM FUNDING SUMMARY: Not Applicable. D. ACQUISITION STRATEGY: Not Applicable. R-1 Line Item No 66 CLASSIFICATION: EXHIBIT R-2a PAGE 12 of 12 RDT&E PROJECT JUSTIFICATION