Appendix E: Grant Funding Sources

Similar documents
APPENDIX 5. Funding Plan

Moving Ahead for Progress in the 21 st Century (MAP-21)

Transportation Alternatives Program Application For projects in the Tulsa Urbanized Area

Citizens Advisory Committee May 23, 2012

Overview of Local Highway Safety Improvement Program (HSIP)

Navigating MAP 21. Securing Federal Funding for Community Walking & Biking Projects

Appendix B Funding Sources

Regional Transportation Plan: APPENDIX B

City of Lafayette Staff Report Circulation Commission

CITY OF LOS ANGELES INTER-DEPARTMENTAL CORRESPONDENCE


REPORT TO MAYOR AND COUNCIL

FUNDING SOURCES. Appendix I. Funding Sources

CALVERT - ST. MARY S METROPOLITAN PLANNING ORGANIZATION

Non-Motorized Transportation Funding Options

KYOVA Interstate Planning Commission

APPENDIX H: PROGRAMMING POLICY STATEMENT

Transportation Alternatives Program (TAP) Recreational Trails Program (RTP)

2017 Report for the Transportation Alternatives Program

MEMORANDUM. February 12, Interagency Transit Committee Members and Interested Parties. Anthony Zepeda, Associate Regional Planner

MAP-21 and Its Effects on Transportation Enhancements

MOVE LV. Show Us the $ + Transportation Funding May 25, 2016, 12 PM MOVE LEHIGH VALLEY

The next steps outlined at the end of this section are the key requirements as we can best envision them at this stage.

2007 Annual List of Obligated Projects

2016 Legislative Report for the Transportation Alternatives Program

TRANSPORTATION ALTERNATIVES (TA) SET ASIDE PROGRAM July 2016

2018 Regional Project Evaluation Criteria For PSRC s FHWA Funds

Funding Safe Routes to School in California

Appendix E Federal and State Funding Categories

Arkansas Transportation Alternatives Program (TAP-2015) & Recreational Trails Program (RTP-2015) Application Seminars

DCHC MPO Funding Source Overview & Guidance draft January 2015

AMERICA BIKES SIDE-BY-SIDE COMPARISON OF BICYCLE AND PEDESTRIAN PROGRAMS SAFETEA LU VS. MAP 21

Memorandum. Date: May 13, INFORMATION: Transportation Alternatives (TA) Set-Aside Implementation Guidance (Revised by the FAST Act)

9. REVENUE SOURCES FEDERAL FUNDS

LPA Programs How They Work

Summary of. Overview. existing law. to coal ash. billion in FY. funding in FY 2013 FY 2014

SUBJECT: SEE BELOW DATE: May 26, 2016

Transportation Alternatives Program Guidance & Application Packet Call for Projects: April 5 th, 2018 May 11 th, 2018

Purpose. Funding. Eligible Projects

INTRODUCTION. RTPO Model Program Guide February 27, 2007 Page 1

2018 Call for Projects Guidebook

2015 call for projects draft application package

Appendix 5 Freight Funding Programs

SMALL CITY PROGRAM. ocuments/forms/allitems.

ACTION TRANSMITTAL No

TECHNICAL ADVISORY COMMITTEE MEETING NOTICE & AGENDA

Transportation Alternatives Program Guidance

South Dakota Transportation Alternatives

PUBLIC FACILITIES FINANCING

Michigan Transportation Alternatives Program (TAP)

Annual Listing of Projects with Federal Funding for Federal Fiscal Year 2014/15

Transportation Alternatives Program Guidance & Application Packet FY 2019

2018 POLICY FRAMEWORK FOR PSRC S FEDERAL FUNDS

Peninsula Corridor Joint Powers Board Legislative Program

SAFETEA-LU. Overview. Background

NC General Statutes - Chapter 136 Article 19 1

2018 Regional Solicitation for Transportation Projects

Memorandum. Date: RE: Plans and Programs Committee

WEST OAKLAND SPECIFIC PLAN Final Plan. 11. Implementation Programs Policy and Regulatory Planning Actions 11.2 Implementation Matrix

TRANSPORTATION FUNDING PROGRAMS

INTRODUCTION... 1 OVERVIEW... 2 SECTION I: FUND LISTING AND ELIGIBILITY CHART... 5 SECTION II: FUNDING SOURCE DESCRIPTIONS... 8

FLORENCE AREA TRANSPORTATION STUDY

chapter 5 Action Plan

MAP-21: Overview of Project Delivery Provisions

THE 411 ON FEDERAL & STATE TRANSPORTATION FUNDING - FHWA

Overview of the Regional Transportation Improvement Program

Wisconsin DNR Administered Programs. Aids For The Acquisition And Development Of Local Parks (ADLP)

2018 and 2020 Regional Congestion Mitigation Air Quality Improvement Program (CMAQ) Grant Application

2018 Transportation Alternatives (TA) Program Overview Palm Beach Transportation Planning Agency

SAN JOSE CAPITAL OF SILICON VALLEY

Major in FY2013/2014 (By and ing Source) Municipal Building Acquisition and Operations Balance $1,984, Contributions from Real Estate

Please complete your phone connection now:

Megan P. Hall, P.E. Local Programs Engineer. Federal Highway Administration Washington Division. March 14, 2017

MiTIP APPLICATION PACKET

Greetings from the San Francisco Bay Area

One Bay Area Grant (OBAG): Local Program Development - Criteria ACTION ITEM

RESOLUTION FOR APPROVAL OF AMENDMENTS TO THE TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM (TIP) AND 2040 REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION PLAN (RTP)

Implementation. Implementation through Programs and Services. Capital Improvements within Cambria County

Understanding the. Program

.?-& Approved as to Fonn. R. ZIEGLER, County Counsel THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF THE COUNTY OF ALAMD~, STATE OF CALIFORNIA RESOLUTION NUMBER:

CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM I - 1

SUMMARY OF THE GROW AMERICA ACT As Submitted to Congress on April 29, 2014

A Field Guide. Local Program Opportunities

VIRGINIA SAFE ROUTES to SCHOOL. Non-Infrastructure Grant GUIDELINES

State of Nevada Department of Transportation Transportation Alternatives Program (TAP)

$5.2 Billion Transportation Funding Deal Announced, includes $1.5 Billion for Local Streets and Roads

Making the MOST. of MAP-21. A Guide to the 2012 Federal Transportation Law And How to Use it for Positive Change in Your Community

Table to accompany Insight on the Issues 39: Policy Options to Improve Specialized Transportation

Nonmotorized Transportation Pilot Program Public Workshop December 29th, 2006

Availability of Draft Amendment No. 1 to the 2019 FTIP for Interagency Consultation and Public Review

Highway Safety Improvement Program (HSIP) Fiscal Year

Arkansas Transportation Alternatives Program (TAP-2018) & Recreational Trails Program (RTP-2018) Application Seminars

Exhibit B. Plumas County Non-Motorized Transportation Plan SCOPE OF WORK

Chapter 8. Glossary and Index. Chapter 8

Contra Costa Transportation Authority STAFF REPORT October 19, 2016 Page 2 of 2 Background On July 20, 2016 the Authority approved Resolution G

Summary of Regional Smart Growth Incentive Programs

Fiscal Year 2014 TRANSPORTATION ALTERNATIVES PROGRAM (TAP) INSTRUCTIONS AND GUIDELINES

2. Transportation Alternatives Program Activities Regulations and Guidelines... 4, 5 & Eligible and Ineligible Items...

Regional Sustainable Infrastructure Planning Grant Program Cycle 1. FINAL Draft

Arkansas Transportation Alternatives Program (TAP-2017) & Recreational Trails Program (RTP-2017) Application Seminars

Transcription:

Appendix E: Grant Funding Sources Federal Programs The majority of public funds for bicycle, pedestrian, and trails projects are derived through a core group of federal and state programs. Federal funding is authorized through the Surface Transportation Program (STP). STP provides flexible funding that may be used by States and localities for projects on any Federal-aid highway. In the past this funding was authorized by the Safe, Accountable, Flexible, Efficient Transportation Equity Act: A Legacy for Users (SAFETEA-LU). Funding for STP is now authorized through MAP-21, with the same structure and goals of STP funding. The Transportation Enhancements (TE) under SAFETEA-LU is now the Transportation Alternatives Program (TAP). TAP, authorized through MAP-21, consolidates TE, Safe Routes to School, and Recreational Trails and provides funding for programs and projects defined as transportation alternatives, including on- and off-road pedestrian and bicycle facilities, transit access, mobility, and recreation trails program. TAP broadens eligibility and flexibility for state allocation of TAP funds. Safe Routes to School programs, including infrastructure, encouragement, campaigns, education, outreach and a Safe Routes coordinator, are eligible under TAP, though no funds are dedicated for this. The Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality Improvement Program (CMAQ) also authorizes federal funds, including education programs. MAP-21 maintains the existing CMAQ program and broadens eligibility for transit operations. 184

Federal funds from STP, TAP and CMAQ programs are allocated to MTC and distributed in Alameda County through Alameda CTC. Distribution is allocated either competitively or proportionally according to jurisdiction population. Other recent policies at the federal level have resulted in a series of programs that promise to provide increased funding in the coming years for bicycle projects. The HUD-DOT-EPA Interagency Partnership for Sustainable Communities has generated a series of new grant programs to-date, including Urban Circulator grants, TIGER grants, and Sustainable Communities Planning grants. The Department of Transportation recently announced a new DOT policy initiative, indicating well-connected walking and bicycling networks [are] an important component for livable communities. State Programs There are a number of state-wide funding sources and regionally administered funds. Active Transportation Program The Active Transportation Program was created by SB 99/ Assembly Bill 101 to encourage increased use of active modes of transportation such as biking and walking. The program consolidates five existing state funded programs: Transportation Alternatives Program, Recreational Trails program, Safe Routes to Schools, Environmental Enhancement and Mitigation Program and the Bicycle Transportation Account. It provides a comprehensive program that improves program planning and flexibility and is more efficient than multiple programs. Another benefit is that funds can be directed to multi-year projects to make greater long-term improvements to active transportation. The ATP mixes state and federal funds and provides approximately $130 million annually, with a focus on implementing active transportation improvements to support the goals of local SB 375 sustainable community strategies. This program is funded from a combination of federal and state funds from appropriations in the annual state budget act. Forty percent of the funding will go toward metropolitan planning organizations in urban areas. Ten percent of the funds go to small urban and rural regions. The remaining funds will go to the California Transportation Commission for statewide projects. The ATP ensures that disadvantaged communities fully share in the benefits of the program by requiring that a minimum of 25% of fund be distributed to disadvantaged communities. In order to maximize the effectiveness of program funds and to encourage the aggregation of small projects into a comprehensive bundle of projects, the minimum request for Active Transportation Program funds that will be considered is $250,000. This minimum does not apply to non-infrastructure projects, Safe Routes to Schools projects, and Recreational Trails projects. Project types allowed under the ATP include: new bikeways serving major transportation corridors, new bikeways to improve bicycle commuting options, bicycle parking at transit and employment centers, traffic control devices to improve pedestrian and bicycle safety, improving and maintaining safety on existing bikeways, recreational facilities, Safe Routes to School projects, Safe Routes To Transit projects, education programs, and other improvements to bicycle-transit connections and urban environments. 185

For a project to contribute toward the Safe Routes to School funding requirement, the project must directly increase safety and convenience for public school students to walk and/or bike to school. Safe Routes to Schools infrastructure projects must be located within two miles of a public school or within the vicinity of a public school bus stop. Other than traffic education and enforcement activities, non-infrastructure projects do not have a location restriction. Highway Safety Improvement Program Caltrans administers two funding programs for roadway safety improvements: the Highway Safety Improvement Program (HSIP) and the Highway Rural Roads Program (HR3). These programs use cost-benefit ratios as a primary factor in the awarding of applications. Because both of these programs focus on roadway safety, projects with documented collision history through frequency of collision but particularly collision severity are typically ranked higher. Roadways with documented bicycle and pedestrian collision history, as discussed in Chapter 3 of this Plan, may be well-qualified for HSIP and HR3 applications, particularly since many of the proposed projects would improve bicyclist and pedestrian safety at a lower cost than many of the highway projects also eligible under this funding source. In its most recent grant cycle (November 2013), Caltrans awarded $150 million to 231 projects. While this funding source is often used for major roadway improvement projects, installation of traffic signals, and most other costintensive projects, funding has routinely been awarded to bicycle and pedestrian projects. Successful projects have included: Median refuges and curb extensions Curb, gutter, and sidewalk Paved shoulders Upgraded traffic signals with pedestrian countdown signals and pedestrian-scale lighting Bicycle lane striping Crosswalk striping In-pavement flashers and rectangular rapid flashing beacon (RRFB) at crossings Many of these projects were applied for as standalone bicycle and pedestrian improvement projects; some bicycle and pedestrian improvements were included with a broader package of roadway improvement projects. The average programmed federal funding amount was $400,000. The next call for projects is anticipated in Spring 2015. More information is available online: http://www.dot.ca.gov/hq/localprograms/hsip.htm Other Statewide Funding Programs Caltrans Transportation Planning Grants are available to jurisdictions and can be used for planning or feasibility studies. The Division will award approximately $5.3 million in funding through three Grant Programs for Fiscal Year 2014-15. The maximum funding available per project is $300,000. 186

Limited amounts from the Local Transportation Fund (LTF), which is derived from a ¼ cent of the general sales tax collected statewide, can be used for bicycle and pedestrian facilities. The California State Parks administers the state s Recreational Trails Program (RTP). RTP provides funds annually for recreational trails and trails-related projects. Cities are eligible applicants for the approximately $5.3 million available annually. The program requires an applicant match of 12 percent of the total project cost. The National Park Service and California State Parks administer the Land and Water Conservation Fund (LWCP). The LWCF Program provides matching grants to states and local governments for the acquisition and development of public outdoor recreation areas and facilities Cities are eligible applicants. Approximately $1.74 million is available annually; grants require a 50 percent local match. Some of these programs will no longer be funded under proposed and current federal and state funding plans, and may only be short-term funding resources for the current schedule of projects. See below for proposed funding structures related to some of these programs. One Bay Area Grant One Bay Area Grant Program (OBAG) is now an umbrella for the previous MTC grant programs. It combines funding for Transportation for Livable Communities, Bicycle, Local Streets and Roads Rehabilitation, and Safe Routes to School for the FY 2012-13 through 2015-16 funding cycles. This program is administered by MTC and awards funding to counties based on progress toward achieving local land-use and housing policies. Cities and counties can still use OBAG funds for projects described under these programs. MTC OBAG program information: http://www.mtc.ca.gov/funding/onebayarea/ Surface Transportation Program The Surface Transportation Program (STP) block grant provides SAFETEA and MAP-21 funding for transportation projects, including pedestrian and bicycle projects (see above discussion about Federal programs for details). This program is administered by MTC, which can prioritize projects for RSTP funding. MTC STP program information: http://www.mtc.ca.gov/funding/stpcmaq/ Transportation Development Act, Article 3 Transportation Development Act (TDA), Article 3 funds statewide funds for planning and construction of pedestrian and bicycle facilities administered locally through MTC. TDA, Article 3 funds are allocated based on population and may be used for engineering, right of way, construction, retrofitting, route improvements, and an assortment of bicycle facilities. 187

Climate Action Program In partnership with the Bay Area Air Quality Management District (BAAQMD), Bay Conservation Development Commission and the Association of Bay Area Governments, MTC sponsors a transportation-oriented Climate Action Program, designed to reduce mobile source emissions through various strategies. The grant program provides funding for pedestrian and bicycle projects through new Safe Routes to School and Safe Routes to Transit programs, with total funding expected to be approximately $400 million. As of April 2013 state Safe Routes to School funding is not yet finalized. This funding will be in addition to the state and federal Safe Routes to School programs and MTC s existing Safe Routes to Transit program. TFCA County Program Manager Fund: http://www.baaqmd.gov/divisions/strategic-incentives/funding- Sources/TFCA/County-Program-Manager-Fund.aspx BAAQMD Transportation Fund for Clean Air (TFCA) Transportation Fund for Clean Air (TCFA) is a grant program administered by the Bay Area Air Quality Management District (BAAQMD). The purpose of the program, which is funded through a $4 surcharge on motor vehicles registered in the Bay Area, is to fund projects and programs that will reduce air pollution from motor vehicles. Grant awards are generally made on a firstcome, first-served basis to qualified projects. A portion of TFCA revenues collected in each Bay Area county is returned to that county's congestion management agency (CMA) for allocation (Alameda County Transportation Commission in Alameda County). Applications are made from local agencies directly to the CMAs, but must also be approved by the BAAQMD. 188

This page intentionally left blank 189