Air Force Research Laboratory

Similar documents
Eye and Face Protection

TABLE OF CONTENTS. iii

OPERATOR S MANUAL FOR MULTIPLE INTEGRATED LASER ENGAGEMENT SYSTEM (MILES) SIMULATOR SYSTEM, FIRING LASER: M83 (NSN ) FOR

WHEELING-OHIO COUNTY BOARD OF HEALTH WHEELING-OHIO COUNTY HEALTH DEPARTMENT

UNCLASSIFIED. FY 2016 Base FY 2016 OCO

2018 Annual Missile Defense Small Business Programs Conference

UNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE

Joint Electronics Type Designation Automated System

AIRBORNE LASER (ABL)

Control of Artificial Optical Radiation at Work Regulations 2010 Contributes to CCQ Core Outcome 12

INSTRUCTION. Department of Defense. NUMBER August 19, 2009 Incorporating Change 1, October 10, 2017 USD(AT&L)

Analysis of the Operational Effect of the Joint Chemical Agent Detector Using the Infantry Warrior Simulation (IWARS) MORS: June 2008

HOWARD G. WHITE, TIMOTHY TOBIK, RICHARD MABRY Air Force Research Laboratory Munitions Directorate AFRL/MNMF Eglin AFB, FL

Control of Artificial Optical Radiation at Work Regulations 2010 Contributes to CCQ Core Outcome 4

Thousands of workers are blinded each year from work-related eye injuries

U.S. Army Aberdeen Test Center Light Armor Range Complex

OPERATOR S MANUAL MULTIPLE INTEGRATED LASER ENGAGEMENT SYSTEM (MILES) SIMULATOR SYSTEM, FIRING, LASER: M89 (NSN ) FOR

UNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE. FY 2014 FY 2014 OCO ## Total FY 2015 FY 2016 FY 2017 FY 2018

OPERATOR S FOR MULTIPLE INTEGRATED LASER ENGAGEMENT SYSTEM (MILES) SIMULATOR SYSTEM, FIRING, LASER: M82 NSN FOR M1/M1A1 ABRAMS TANK

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY 1000 NAVY PENTAGON WASHINGTON, DC

UNCLASSIFIED. FY 2016 Base FY 2016 OCO

Sun Protection Policy and Procedures

TECHNICAL MANUAL OPERATOR S MANUAL FOR MULTIPLE INTEGRATED LASER ENGAGEMENT SYSTEM, (MILES) SIMULATOR SYSTEM, FIRING, LASER: M80

The Canadian Cancer Society s SunSense Certification

REGULATORY GUIDE 4.3 TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF STATE HEALTH SERVICES RADIATION SAFETY LICENSING BRANCH (RSLB) P.O. Box Austin, Texas

Product Manager Air Warrior Update AAAA ASE Symposium

Edited extract from: Department of the Army Historical Summary, FY 1979 (Washington, D.C.: U.S. Army Center of Military History, 1982, pp

UNCLASSIFIED. R-1 Program Element (Number/Name) PE BB / SOF Visual Augmentation, Lasers and Sensor Systems. Prior Years FY 2013 FY 2014 FY 2015

Infrared Reflectance Imaging for Environmentally Friendly Corrosion Inspection Through Organic Coatings Project Number WP-0407

UNCLASSIFIED. R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE PE BB: SOF Soldier Protection and Survival Systems

TECHNICAL MANUAL UNIT AND DIRECT SUPPORT MAINTENANCE MANUAL (INCLUDING REPAIR PARTS AND SPECIAL TOOLS LIST) FOR LONG RANGE SNIPER RIFLE (LRSR), M107

Naval Research Laboratory. The Navy and Marine Corps Corporate Laboratory

ESSENTIAL SAFETY RESOURCES

JOINT U.S. AND CANADIAN DEVELOPMENT OF TESTING PROCEDURES FOR EVALUATION OF PERSONAL BODY ARMOR PERFORMANCE AGAINST AUTOMATIC WEAPONS

The DoD T&E/S&T Program

UNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE FY 2013 OCO

UNCLASSIFIED. UNCLASSIFIED Army Page 1 of 10 R-1 Line #10

TESTING APPLICATION STANDARD (TAS) IMPACT TEST PROCEDURES

Mission Command. Lisa Heidelberg. Osie David. Chief, Mission Command Capabilities Division. Chief Engineer, Mission Command Capabilities Division

RULES AND REGULATIONS GOVERNING ARTIFICIAL TANNING DEVICES IN THE STATE OF COLORADO

UNITED STATES SPECIAL OPERATIONS COMMAND. Proposal Submission

TECHNICAL REPORT NO. T15-5 DATE April 2015 ADA

V1.2 June Color Process

UNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE

Luke AFB, Ariz., is the future home of 144 F-35A Lightning IIs. Some have already arrived.

Eye and Face Protection in Maryland Schools

Joint Service Safety Testing Study Phase II Final Presentation

805C-42A-4000 Analyze Personnel Readiness Management (PRM) Considerations Status: Approved

United States Army Special Operations Aviation Command (USASOAC)

The use of upper-room ultraviolet germicidal irradiation to. Monitoring Human Exposures to Upper-Room Germicidal Ultraviolet Irradiation

Armed Unmanned Systems

UNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE

(b) Artificial Tanning Device shall mean any equipment that as defined in Section (1), C.R.S. 1989, as amended.

Army Standardization Activities and Initiatives

Flight Controlled Mortar FCMortar

FoodTech Calibration Software for Windows 98 and up

B February 7,199O

Data Collection & Field Exercises: Lessons from History. John McCarthy

Department of Defense MANUAL

NGAUS 140th GENERAL CONFERENCE ARNG RESOLUTIONS PACKAGE

MASON COUNTY FIRE DISTRICT #4 CHAPTER: 2000 NUMBER: 2360 APPROVED:

Close Quarters Battle Pistol

United States Air Force Academy, Colorado Springs, Colorado

University of Pennsylvania Environmental Health and Radiation Safety. Diagnostic Energized Equipment Radiation Safety Manual

Update on Premarket Notification Requirements Concerning Gowns Intended for Use in Health Care

TECHNICAL MANUAL OPERATOR S MANUAL FOR MULTIPLE INTEGRATED LASER ENGAGEMENT SYSTEM (MILES) SIMULATOR SYSTEM, FIRING, LASER: M74 NSN

REPORT DOCUMENTATION PAGE

2000, SAFETY SOURCE PRODUCTIONS

Safety Process For Navy Gun and Ammunition Systems

ARMY RDT&E BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION (R2 Exhibit)

POLICY AND GLOBAL AFFAIRS The National Academies Press Washington, DC March 30, /30/2012 1

COMPLIANCE WITH THIS PUBLICATION IS MANDATORY (AFSOC)

2017 Annual Missile Defense Small Business Programs Conference

BTR-3E ARMOURED TROOP CARRIER CREW TRAINING COMPLEX

VILLAGE OF VERSAILLES An Equal Opportunity Employer POSITION DESCRIPTION. Reports To: Electric Foreman FLSA Status: Non-Exempt

ARMY TM &P MARINE CORPS TM 10291A-12&P

Product Manager Force Sustainment Systems

MANPADS. Scale & Nature of the Threat

UNCLASSIFIED TABLE OF CONTENTS

NPL Knowledge & Innovation Centre

TABLE OF CONTENTS. Page

ESATAN/FHTS, ThermXL & ESARAD Current Status

Acquisition Review Quarterly Spring 2003

NAARRI International Conference

UNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE FY 2013 OCO

Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification

PURPOSE To protect all children and staff from the harmful effects of ultraviolet (UV) radiation from the sun.

DoD Non-Lethal Weapons Program Joint Non-Lethal Weapons Directorate (JNLWD) Brief to Small Arms Systems Program 14 May 2014

Space Discovery Institute Earth Systems Science: Planetary Geology and Ecology Location TBD July 6-10, 2009

University of Rochester Laboratory for Laser Energetics. Laboratory Basic Science Experiments at the Omega Laser Facility Fiscal Year 2019

Chemical Biological Defense Materiel Reliability Program

DOT&E Initiatives from the Middle

150-LDR-5012 Conduct Troop Leading Procedures Status: Approved

Palm Beach State College. Florida s First Public Community College SAFETY MANUAL

Global EOD Symposium & Exhibition

250- PERSONAL PROTECTIVE EQUIPMENT PROGRAM

TB PREVENTION AND CONTROL: WORKING WITH THE HOMELESS

Operation DOMINIC II

1. Terms. For definition of the terms used in this instruction, see AFI , Air Force Nuclear Weapons Surety Program (formerly AFR 122-1).

ELECTRONICS TEST CENTRE

Transcription:

Air Force Research Laboratory Summary of Laser Eye Protection (LEP) Degradation Assessments DoE Laser Safety Officer Workshop, 9 May 2018 Integrity Service Excellence Major Ed Kelly 711th Human Performance Wing Airman Systems Directorate Bioeffects Division Optical Radiation Bioeffects Branch Department of Defense, or the United States Government.

Outline Canadian Study Overview Test Plan Accelerated Aging Data (1064 & 532 nm) Experimental Results Experimental Discussion Future Work USN Study Overview Purpose Test Set Up Results Follow-on Testing in 2018 Conclusions Acknowledgements Department of Defense, or the United States Government. 2

Canadian Study Overview Assessment of degradation of ballistic LEP from CAF inventory 1064nm protection [NSN: -9064, -9065 (1064 nm)] 532nm protection [NSN: -5626, -5627 (532 nm)] Department of Defense, or the United States Government. 3

Canadian Study Overview Test Plan Accelerated aging (Shelf life) Soak in controlled hot environment. Accelerated age is derived from Arrhenius equation. UV exposure Procedure ASTM G155-13: cycle 4 using the Atlas Ci4000 Xenon Weather-Ometer. Laser radiation exposure: 532nm and 1064nm Temperature shock Measurement Equipment Cary 6000i Spectrophotometer Used to measure the transmission of the LEP. 4 Department of Defense, or the United States Government. 4

Canadian Study Overview Accelerated Aging Data (1064 nm) -new test method 7.0 6.8 1064nm protection (Green LEP) 6.5 6.3 6.0 5.8 5.5 20 22 24 26 28 30 32 34 36 38 40 42 44 46 9065-4 9064-2 9065-9 9064-5 LEP accelerated years 23 to 44 9065-4 exhibits darker green in color has a noticeably different spectrum performance than the rest of the NSN group Department of Defense, or the United States Government. 5

Canadian Study Overview Accelerated Aging Data (532 nm) 532nm protection (orange LEP) 4.5 4.4 4.3 4.2 Optical Density 4.1 4.0 3.9 3.8 3.7 3.6 3.5 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 26 28 30 32 34 36 38 40 42 44 46 Time (years) 5626-2 5626-3 5627-3 5627-6 5626-2-new 5626-3-new 5627-3-new 5627-6-new Data for 532nm protection Consistently measuring ~ OD4 New test method data included from ~ 22 to 44 years No degradation up to ~ 44 years of accelerated aging Department of Defense, or the United States Government. 6

Canadian Study Overview Experimental Results Tests demonstrated color change 1064 nm Clear change in color of the dye Suspect UV actinic effects Resulting in a change in performance As received (0 hrs) OD = 5.5 After 524 hrs of exposure, equates to 196 days in field OD = 2.8 Department of Defense, or the United States Government. 7

Canadian Study Overview Experimental Results - Solar radiation degradation 1064nm protection UV degradation 7.0 6.0 1064nm OD spec 820nm 850nm 1064nm Optical Density 5.0 4.0 3.0 2.0 820nm to 850nm OD spec 1.0 0.0 450 550 650 750 850 950 1050 1150 1250 1350 Wavelength (nm) 9064-7 9065-2 9064-7 49 days 9065-2 49 days 9064-7 147 days 9065-2 147days 9065-2 196 days 9064-7 196 days Exposure (days) OD (1064nm) OD (820nm to 850nm) 0 6.2 4.3 to 5.2 49 4.5 2.8 to 3.5 147 2.8 1.7 to 2.1 196 2.2 1.4 to 1.7 8 Department of Defense, or the United States Government. 8

Canadian Study Overview Experimental Results - Solar radiation degradation - smaller steps Optical Density Ballistic LEP solar degradation 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 1064nm 0 1060 1061 1062 1063 1064 1065 1066 1067 1068 1069 1070 Wavelength (nm) 9064-4-24hrs 9065-3-24hrs 9064-4-72hrs 9064-4-120hrs 9065-3-120hrs 1064nm 9064-4-168hrs 9065-3-168hrs 9065-3-72hrs Exposure(hrs) Days in Ottawa Days in Phoenix 9064-4 (OD) 9065-3 (OD) 24 7 4 6.1 6.2 72 21 11 5.4 5.3 120 35 18 4.8 4.9 168 49 25 4.5 4.6 Taking a more frequent testing approach by lessening the solar exposure time between tests, the protective performance at 1064 nm degrades quickly & fails the OD 5 specification around the 100-hour mark (Equivalent of ~ 28 days in Ottawa or 15 days in a desert (Phoenix) type setting) Department of Defense, or the United States Government. 9

Canadian Study Overview Experimental Results Tests demonstrated color change 532 nm No visible change in color of dye Consistent with no change in the OD As received (0 hrs) OD = 4.1 After 524 hrs of exposure, equates to 196 days in field OD = 4.1 10 Department of Defense, or the United States Government. 10

Canadian Study Overview Experimental Results - Solar radiation degradation 532nm protection UV degradation Optical Density 5.0 532nm 4.5 4.07 4.0 3.5 3.0 2.5 2.0 532nm OD limit 1.5 1.0 0.5 0.0 450 550 650 750 850 950 1050 1150 1250 1350 1450 1550 1650 1750 Wavelength (nm) 4 5627-2 5627-9 5627-2 49 days 5627-9 49 days 5627-2 147 days 5627-9 147 days 5627-2 196 days 5626-9 196 days OD spec > 4 @ 532 nm Exposure (Days in Ottawa) OD (at 532 nm) 0 4.1 49 4.1 147 4.1 196 4.1 Department of Defense, or the United States Government. 11

Canadian Study Overview Experimental Discussion Solar radiation 1064 nm protection LEP are very sensitive to solar radiation After 168 hrs of radiant exposure (~ 49 days in the field) they fail their OD > 5 requirement 532 nm protective LEP don t exhibit solar radiation degradation Accelerated aging (shelf life) Up to 23 years of accelerated aging, no visible change in the OD performance Testing up to 30 years is underway Department of Defense, or the United States Government. 12

Canadian Study Overview Future Work 1064 nm laser radiation: Investigate Ground Laser Target Designator (GLTD) laser source radiation on LEP Real world solarization @ UAE Notch 1 Visor testing 532 nm laser radiation: Investigate Firing continuous wave laser source on LEP Temperature shock effects Department of Defense, or the United States Government. 13

USN Study Overview PURPOSE Previous LEP solarization and ballistic testing showed LEP visors would last ~ 200 hours NISE / 219 Solar indicators projects 2013 & 2017 Giving wearers an simple indication end of life Solar indicators color change at the end of life cycle Department of Defense, or the United States Government. 14

USN Study Overview Test Set Up Solar Chamber: Q-Sun Xenon Test Chamber Model Xe-3-H MIL-STD-810G W curve, simulating actual sun rise and set, heat rise/fall 50% humidity Spectral Region UV A (320-360 / 360-400 nm) with irradiance 62.7 W/m 2 UV B (280-320 nm) with irradiance of 5.6 W/m 2 Visible (400-800 nm) with irradiance 580.2 W/m 2 Infrared (800 3000 nm) with irradiance of 471.5 Starting at 32 C (89 F) raising in 2 hr increments peaking at 52 C (125 F) then returning in 2 hr increments to 32 C at the completion of the test of 250 hrs (200 of actual solar) Department of Defense, or the United States Government. 15

USN Study Overview Test Set Up High Velocity Impact Tester (Ballistic): Skylark Machines MIL-STD-622F.22 Cal barrel / T37 frags Air pressure and nitrogen regulated 550 560 feet per second 50% Andersen Head form for helmet mounting (Army method) Visor holder (Navy method) Department of Defense, or the United States Government. 16

USN Study Overview Test Set Up Army Method: Visor is mounted on helmet and head form Skylark Machines, High Velocity Impact Tester Navy Method: Visor mount for visors without attachments Department of Defense, or the United States Government. 17

USN Study Overview Test Set Up Neodymium HGU-55/P Full Up Assembly Neodymium MBU-12/P Mask Trim Only Neodymium JHMCS Step-In Full Up Assembly Department of Defense, or the United States Government. 18

USN Study Overview Results Trimmed only Laser Eye Protection Self Neodymium Performed as predicted - all shots were within spec 250 hrs 0 hours all passed 99 hours passed 250 hours failed Full up assemblies Laser Eye Protection Did not perform as expected - -all shots were within spec 0 hrs 198 hrs 250 hrs 0 hours failed 99 hours failed 198 hours failed 250 hours failed Department of Defense, or the United States Government. 19

UV Kills polycarbonate The blue spectrum kills dyes How much and when? USN Study Overview Follow-on Testing in 2018 More solarization and ballistics testing is needed to determine the most time a users is to expect their visor to last. The tentative plan: Consisting of solarizing three (3) Neutral Densities visors will be removed after the first cycle, then perform ballistic testing at V50. (550-560 f/s) The next three (3) will be removed remove after the second cycle then ballistic test at V50 So on until failures occur 100% of the time. Testing will continue at the failure solarization cycle but using the V0 (a lower f/s ballistic shot) Department of Defense, or the United States Government. 20

Conclusions Certain LEP degrades with exposure to UV Light Particularly @ 1064 nm May need to test LEP to ensure OD requirements acceptable Future studies to look at recommending useful life Department of Defense, or the United States Government. 21

Acknowledgements Royal Canadian Air Force See next slide US Navy Human Systems Department 4.6.5.5 See slide after next Department of Defense, or the United States Government. 22

Laser Eye Protection (LEP) Comprehensive Degradation Distribution A: Approved for public release; distribution unlimited. PA Case No: TSRL- PA-2018-0148. The opinions expressed on this document, electronic or otherwise, are solely those of the author(s). They do not represent an endorsement by or the views of the United States Air Force, the Department of Defense, or the United States Government. Assessment Mr. Andrew Jacques Dr. Gholam Yousefi Capt. David Brookes, CD MSc

Ballistic Results; Solarized Clear, Neutral Density and LEP Visors Christine Stanley Adam Carlisle Department of Defense, or the United States Government.