US Army CIO/G6 Battle Management Language (BML) Architecture Project ISSUE

Similar documents
Integrating National C2 and Simulation Systems for BML Experimentation

Adding Reports to Coalition Battle Management Language for NATO MSG-048

Evaluating the Proposed Coalition Battle Management Language Standard as a Basis for Enhanced C2 to M&S Interoperability

UNCLASSIFIED. R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE PE A: Distributive Interactive Simulations (DIS) - Eng Dev FY 2013 OCO

Battle Management Language (GeoBML) for Terrain Reasoning

21st ICCRTS C2-in a Complex Connected Battlespace. Operationalization of Standardized C2-Simulation (C2SIM) Interoperability

An Expanded C2-Simulation Experimental Environment Based on BML

Battle Management Language Transformations

Integrating National C2 and Simulation Systems for BML Experimentation

C2- Simula*on Interoperability for Opera*onal Hybrid Environments

UNCLASSIFIED. R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE PE D8Z: Net Centricity FY 2012 OCO

C2SIM Systems and in Use/Coalitions Assembled

NATO MSG-048 Coalition Battle Management Initial Demonstration Lessons Learned and Way Forward

15th ICCRTS. The Evolution of C2. C2 framework for interoperability among an air component command and multi-agency systems

ARMY RDT&E BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION (R2 Exhibit)

U.S. Army Modeling and Simulation Office. Overview

AMERICA S ARMY THE STRENGTH OF THE NATION

Net-Enabled Mission Command (NeMC) & Network Integration LandWarNet / LandISRNet

Geospatial Battle Management Language (geobml)

Department of Defense DIRECTIVE

C2SIM Systems and in Use/Coalitions Assembled

Extensible Battle Management Language

UNCLASSIFIED FY 2016 OCO. FY 2016 Base

UNCLASSIFIED. R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE PE F: Multi-Service Systems Engineering FY 2012 OCO

Joint Battle Management Language (JBML) Project (Phase 1) Dr. Stan Levine. Outline. JBML Phase 1 Description/Status

Collaborative coordination of fire support mission execution

Collaboration, Interoperability, and Secure Systems

Future Battle Command: Geospatially-Enabled

Agenda. DISDI and the NGA. The National System for Geospatial-Intelligence. Emerging DoD Standard Strategies / Challenges. Benefits.

Implementing a COI Service Joint COI Data Implementation

Joint Staff J7 / Deputy Director for Joint Training

SAF/CIO A6 Mission Brief

DoD Analysis Update: Support to T&E in a Net-Centric World

The Armed Forces Communications and Electronics Association (AFCEA)

MSG-079 C-BML Workshop Farnborough UK, Feb Coalition Battle Management Language 2009 Experimentation

Common Operating Environment, Interoperability, and Command Post Modernization (LOEs 2, 3, and 4)

UNCLASSIFIED. UNCLASSIFIED Army Page 1 of 10 R-1 Line #54

UNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE

U.S. Army Modeling and Simulation Office. Overview

UNCLASSIFIED. FY 2016 Base FY 2016 OCO

NETWORKING THE SOLDIER ARMY TACTICAL NETWORK MODERNIZATION APPROVED FOR PUBLIC RELEASE; DISTRIBUTION IS LIMITED. AUGUST 2018

Department of Defense DIRECTIVE

UNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE

Department of Defense Investment Review Board and Investment Management Process for Defense Business Systems

Future Combat Systems

GEOSPATIAL READINESS ANALYSIS CONCEPT FOR OSD PERSONNEL AND READINESS

DOD DIRECTIVE DOD SPACE ENTERPRISE GOVERNANCE AND PRINCIPAL DOD SPACE ADVISOR (PDSA)

UNCLASSIFIED FY 2016 OCO. FY 2016 Base

UNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE. FY 2014 FY 2014 OCO ## Total FY 2015 FY 2016 FY 2017 FY 2018

R-2 Exhibit RDT&E Budget Item Justification DATE FEBRUARY 1999 APPROPRIATION/BUDGET ACTIVITY RDT&E,DW/BA7

S E C R E T A R Y O F T H E A R M Y W A S H I N G T O N

Data Sharing is a Critical Capability

UNCLASSIFIED. R-1 Program Element (Number/Name) PE D8Z / International Intelligence Technology and Architectures. Prior Years FY 2013 FY 2014

Systems Approach to the Army s Evolving Role in Support of Civil Authorities

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY HEADQUARTERS UNITED STATES MARINE CORPS 3000 MARINE CORPS PENTAGON WASHINGTON D.C ` MCO 3502.

Joint Program Executive Office for Chemical and Biological Defense. JWARN Description

UNCLASSIFIED. R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE PE A: Military Engineering Advanced Technology

20th ICCRTS. C2, Cyber and Trust

UNCLASSIFIED. FY 2011 Total Estimate

United States Transportation Command (USTRANSCOM) Challenges & Opportunities

Department of Defense INSTRUCTION

COMPLIANCE WITH THIS PUBLICATION IS MANDATORY

Joint Force 2020 Training Environment

THE JOINT STAFF Research, Development, Test and Evaluation (RDT&E), Defense-Wide Fiscal Year (FY) 2009 Budget Estimates

ASN (RDA) Chief Engineer

UNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE

Warfighter IT Interoperability Standards Study

Comptroller Trends. American Society of Military Comptrollers (ASMC) Mini - PDI. 02 March 2017

Getting The Boundaries Right: The DoD Real Property Inventory Mapping Pilot Project

Department of Defense INSTRUCTION

ARMY RDT&E BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION (R2 Exhibit)

UNCLASSIFIED FY 2016 OCO. FY 2016 Base

Management of Army Modeling and Simulation

CHAIRMAN OF THE JOINT CHIEFS OF STAFF INSTRUCTION

Department of Defense INSTRUCTION

UNCLASSIFIED. R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE PE F: Requirements Analysis and Maturation. FY 2011 Total Estimate. FY 2011 OCO Estimate

UNCLASSIFIED. R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE PE D8Z: Central Test and Evaluation Investment Program (CTEIP) FY 2012 OCO

Future Force Capabilities

JCIDS: The New Language of Defense Planning, Programming and Acquisition

Fact Sheet: FY2017 National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA) DOD Reform Proposals

UNCLASSIFIED FY 2016 OCO. FY 2016 Base

MC Network Modernization Implementation Plan

NATO MSG-085 Standardisation for C2-Simulation Interoperation: Autonomous Air Operations Experiments

CHAIRMAN OF THE JOINT CHIEFS OF STAFF INSTRUCTION

Tactical Edge Command and Control On-The-Move A New Paradigm

Department of Defense INSTRUCTION

Synthetic Training Environment (STE) White Paper. Combined Arms Center - Training (CAC-T) Introduction

COMPLIANCE WITH THIS PUBLICATION IS MANDATORY

UNCLASSIFIED. J-6 CJCSI D DISTRIBUTION: A, B, C 21 August 2017 MISSION PARTNER ENVIRONMENT INFORMATION SHARING REQUIREMENTS MANAGEMENT PROCESS

CHAIRMAN OF THE JOINT CHIEFS OF STAFF INSTRUCTION

Maritime Domain Awareness Data Sharing Jay Spalding, U. S. Coast Guard Presentation to USCG MDA Day 29 October 2007

Department of Defense INSTRUCTION

UNCLASSIFIED. FY 2016 Base FY 2016 OCO

UNCLASSIFIED. UNCLASSIFIED R-1 Line Item #152 Page 1 of 15

SUBJECT: Army Directive (Implementation of Acquisition Reform Initiatives 1 and 2)

Last Revised February 2018

UNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE FY 2013 OCO

US Joint Forces Command Approach to Interoperability and Integration

STATEMENT BY LIEUTENANT GENERAL RICHARD P. FORMICA, USA

COMMANDER S HANDBOOK DISTRIBUTED COMMON GROUND SYSTEM ARMY (DCGS-A)

Transcription:

US Army CIO/G6 Battle Management Language (BML) Architecture Project Dr. Stanley H. Levine for the BML Conference 2/4/2009 ISSUE There are many Army, Joint, and Coalition BML efforts completed, ongoing, planned, or proposed. JBML, Training BML, FCS-BML, geobml, Integrated BML, NATO-MSG 048, CG JCTD, Coalition-BML, SIMCI Combined Project, Cyber BML, etc. However, there is no integrating overarching program to ensure that the Army receives maximum benefits from all of the ongoing and planned BML efforts. The US Army CIO/G6 funded a G3 sponsored FY09 BML Architecture effort to integrate and document a synchronized standard structure and set of products for BML developments. 2 1

Purpose of a BML Architecture To provide an engineered structure for technical and program analyses that will result in maximizing the benefits to the Army since there is no single overarching BML program for development and the ongoing diverse activities are becoming divergent. Army benefits will be: Significantly improved Army, Joint, Coalition interoperability among C2 Systems and between C2 and M&S systems Improved accuracy and reduced processing time during BC field operations Reduced time and cost to accomplish training Improved mission initialization 3 Use of the Architecture The architecture would be used by HQDA, users, developers, and managers to ensure: that derived requirements were best prioritized that developments were compatible that technologies were well integrated that compliance with the ANCDS was achieved That this cross-functional, cross-ma, crossdomain area was an integral part of the Army Enterprise Architecture that that the decisions on programs were aligned and in the best interest of the Army 4 2

Method Derived requirements, data exchanges, and capability structure information will be gathered from ongoing programs. The information will be analyzed and processed into one cohesive architecture including integrated views of data, capabilities, and system structures. Analyses will be performed to determine overlaps, gaps, disconnects. Results will be provided to program managers and HQDA so that they can improve implementations and usage within the Army. 5 Endstate/Deliverables Enterprise level information architecture unifying derived requirements for BML Technical Data specification of JC3IEDM based common data needed to unambiguously represent Geospatial Products, Orders, Plans, and Reports. Results of the architecture based analyses for BML employment Demonstration of operationally significant use of BML based on implementation of the architecture and the analyses results 6 3

BML Architecture - Efforts BML Reference Architecture Specification Technical Standards View (TV-1) Specification of Core BML JC3IEDM extensions, Operational View (OV-7) (Logical Data model) Systems and Services View (SV-11)(Physical Schema) OV-1, SV-1, OV-4, OV-6c / SV-10c under consideration IBML Control Board Participation Stakeholder BML Meeting Support 2009 G3 Army BML Conference Support Coordination plan for using results of on-going BML efforts NATO MSG-048 Demonstration Support Report JC3IEDM mappings to BML Schema BML Web Service Specification Specification of Engineered Knowledge for Stryker Brigade Reference script for the Scripted WS 7 IBML Projects Relationship geobml MSG-048 Knowledge Engineering JBML Geospatial Objects Grammar Joint and Coalition Aspects Contributions MSG-048+ Coalition Experimentation and Grammar feedback IBML Integrated Architecture Common Products Coordinated Participation geobml/cg JCTD Geospatial Objects Knowledge Engineering Other Efforts SIMCI JC3IEDM Transition M&S + BC Integration Script interpreter DB mapper SIMCI+ Transition BML into BC and M&S systems 8 4

Summary BML has been proven as a technology with the potential to provide cost savings and improve both training and operations. There are many Army, Joint, and Coalition efforts ongoing that cross Mission Areas and Domains. The BML Integrating Architecture effort should provide a basis for effectively and efficiently coordinating BML efforts/ products. 9 5