SANTA ROSA MEMORIAL HOSPITAL AND AFFILIATED ENTITIES ONGOING PROFESSIONAL PRACTICE EVALUATION POLICY (OPPE)

Similar documents
Minnesota Statewide Quality Reporting and Measurement System: Appendices to Minnesota Administrative Rules, Chapter 4654

Exhibit A Virginia Quantitative Measures

Patient Experience of Care Survey Results Hospital Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems (Inpatient)

Rural-Relevant Quality Measures for Critical Access Hospitals

Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) Quality Improvement Program Measures for Acute Care Hospitals - Fiscal Year (FY) 2020 Payment Update

Hospital Inpatient Quality Reporting (IQR) Program Measures (Calendar Year 2012 Discharges - Revised)

CMS Quality Program- Outcome Measures. Kathy Wonderly RN, MSEd, CPHQ Consultant Developed: December 2015 Revised: January 2018

Objectives. Integrating Performance Improvement with Publicly Reported Quality Metrics, Value-Based Purchasing Incentives and ISO 9001/9004

Minnesota Statewide Quality Reporting and Measurement System: APPENDICES TO MINNESOTA ADMINISTRATIVE RULES, CHAPTER 4654

National Patient Safety Goals & Quality Measures CY 2017

National Hospital Inpatient Quality Reporting Measures Specifications Manual

HOSPITAL QUALITY MEASURES. Overview of QM s

Hospital Outpatient Quality Measures. Kathy Wonderly RN, MSEd, CPHQ Consultant Developed: January, 2018

Outpatient Hospital Compare Preview Report Help Guide

Quality Care Amongst Clinical Commotion: Daily Challenges in the Care Environment

Star Rating Method for Single and Composite Measures

National Provider Call: Hospital Value-Based Purchasing

Improving quality of care during inpatient hospital stays

New Mexico Hospital Association

HIT Incentives: Issues of Concern to Hospitals in the CMS Proposed Meaningful Use Stage 2 Rule

Minnesota Statewide Quality Reporting and Measurement System: Appendices to Minnesota Administrative Rules, Chapter 4654

General information. Hospital type : Acute Care Hospitals. Provides emergency services : Yes. electronically between visits : Yes

Medicare Value Based Purchasing August 14, 2012

Abstraction Tricks and Tips for the Hospital Outpatient Quality Reporting (OQR) Program

Abstraction Tricks and Tips for the Hospital Outpatient Quality Reporting (OQR) Program

(202) or CMS Proposals to Improve Quality of Care during Hospital Inpatient Stays

Inpatient Hospital Compare Preview Report Help Guide

Minnesota Statewide Quality Reporting and Measurement System: Appendices to Minnesota Administrative Rules, Chapter 4654

Inpatient Hospital Compare Preview Report Help Guide

Inpatient Hospital Compare Preview Report Help Guide

Inpatient Hospital Compare Preview Report Help Guide

Accreditation, Quality, Risk & Patient Safety

Quality Health Indicators: Measure List. Clinical Quality: Monthly

KANSAS SURGERY & RECOVERY CENTER

Inpatient Hospital Compare Preview Report Help Guide

2018 Press Ganey Award Criteria

Fast Facts 2018 Clinical Integration Performance Measures

Additional Considerations for SQRMS 2018 Measure Recommendations

August 1, 2012 (202) CMS makes changes to improve quality of care during hospital inpatient stays

VALUE. Acute Care & Critical Access Hospital QUALITY REPORTING GUIDE

K-HEN Acute Care/Critical Access Hospitals Measures Alignment with PfP 40/20 Goals AEA Minimum Participation Full Participation 1, 2

Quality Health Indicators: Measure List. Clinical Quality: Monthly

Hospital Acquired Conditions: using ACS-NSQIP to drive performance. J Michael Henderson Jackie Matthews Nirav Vakharia

Quality and Health Care Reform: How Do We Proceed?

CMS in the 21 st Century

Clinical Documentation: Beyond The Financials Cheryll A. Rogers, RHIA, CDIP, CCDS, CCS Senior Inpatient Consultant 3M HIS Consulting Services

Iowa Healthcare Collaborative - HEN 2.0 Measures

Olutoyin Abitoye, MD Attending, Department of Internal Medicine Virtua Medical Group New Jersey,USA

2014 Inova Fairfax Medical Campus Quality Report

Hospital Compare Quality Measure Results for Oregon CAHs: 2015

Impacting Quality Initiatives through Documentation Improvement. Fran Jurcak, MSN, RN, CCDS Vice President of Clinical Innovation Iodine Software

Q & A with Premier: Implications for ecqms Under the CMS Update

Inpatient Hospital Compare Preview Report Help Guide

VALUE. Critical Access Hospital QUALITY REPORTING GUIDE

The Wave of the Future: Value-Based Purchasing & the Impact of Quality Reporting Within the Revenue Cycle

Hospital Outpatient Quality Reporting (OQR) Program Requirements: CY 2015 OPPS/ASC Final Rule

Troubleshooting Audio

NEW JERSEY HOSPITAL PERFORMANCE REPORT 2014 DATA PUBLISHED 2016 TECHNICAL REPORT: METHODOLOGY RECOMMENDED CARE (PROCESS OF CARE) MEASURES

FY 2014 Inpatient Prospective Payment System Proposed Rule

Meaningful Use Stage 2 Clinical Quality Measures Are You Ready?

1. Recommended Nurse Sensitive Outcome: Adult inpatients who reported how often their pain was controlled.

Proposed Meaningful Use Incentives, Criteria and Quality Measures Affecting Critical Access Hospitals

Minnesota Statewide Quality Reporting and Measurement System: Appendices to Minnesota Administrative Rules, Chapter 4654

Healthcare Reform Hospital Perspective

Value-based incentive payment percentage 3

National Priorities for Improvement:

Patient Safety Overview Muhammad H. Islam, MBBS, MS, MCH Director of Patient Safety & Patient Safety Officer SUNY Downstate Medical Center, UHB

Patient Safety Overview

MEDICARE BENEFICIARY QUALITY IMPROVEMENT PROJECT (MBQIP)

Scoring Methodology FALL 2016

The Iowa Healthcare Collaborative - HEN Measure Descriptions

Quality Reporting in the Public Domain

Table of Contents. Current and Proposed CMS Quality Measures for Reporting in 2014 through 2019 Revised 07/25/2014

NEW JERSEY HOSPITAL PERFORMANCE REPORT 2012 DATA PUBLISHED 2015 TECHNICAL REPORT: METHODOLOGY RECOMMENDED CARE (PROCESS OF CARE) MEASURES

Marin General Hospital. Performance Metrics and Core Services Report. 1st Quarter 2016

Person-Centered Care and Population Health

Inpatient Quality Reporting Program

Medicare Quality Based Payment Reform (QBPR) Program Reference Guide Fiscal Years

Analysis of Final Rule for FY 2009 Revisions to the Medicare Hospital Inpatient Prospective Payment System

OHA HEN 2.0 Partnership for Patients Letter of Commitment

Connecting the Revenue and Reimbursement Cycles

UI Health Hospital Dashboard September 7, 2017

Overall Hospital Quality Star Rating on Hospital Compare December 2017 Updates and Specifications Report. December 2017

Emergency Department Update 2009 Outpatient Payment System

SAFER Care for Critical Access Hospitals

Emergency Department Update 2010 Outpatient Payment System

Reducing Readmissions: Potential Measurements

CME Disclosure. HCAHPS- Hardwiring Your Hospital for Pay-for-Performance Success. Accreditation Statement. Designation of Credit.

Value Based Purchasing: Improving Healthcare Outcomes Using the Right Incentives

Scoring Methodology FALL 2017

SCORING METHODOLOGY APRIL 2014

Minnesota Statewide Quality Reporting and Measurement System: Annual Public Forum. Denise McCabe Health Economics Program Supervisor June 22, 2017

CMS Value Based Purchasing: The Wave of the Future

Quality Based Impacts to Medicare Inpatient Payments

UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS HOSPITAL & HEALTH SCIENCES SYSTEM HOSPITAL DASHBOARD

Duke University Health System Experience of Redesigning Care for Improved Quality and Efficiency CAITLIN DALEY, DR. GEORGE CHEELY, DR.

The Medicare Beneficiary Quality Improvement Project (MBQIP) Monthly Performance Improvement Call

Surgeon Champion: Getting Started, What You Need to Know

2016 HCPro, a division of BLR. All rights reserved. These materials may not be duplicated without express written permission.

University of Illinois Hospital and Clinics Dashboard May 2018

Transcription:

SANTA ROSA MEMORIAL HOSPITAL AND AFFILIATED ENTITIES ONGOING PROFESSIONAL PRACTICE EVALUATION POLICY (OPPE) Discussion Draft August 6, 2017 Horty, Springer & Mattern, P.C. 250979.8

ONGOING PROFESSIONAL PRACTICE EVALUATION POLICY (OPPE) TABLE OF CONTENTS PAGE 1. SCOPE OF POLICY...1 2. DEFINITIONS...1 3. OPPE DATA TO BE COLLECTED...1 3.A Service Data Elements...1 3.B Data Elements for All Practitioners...1 3.C Guidelines...2 4. OPPE REPORTS...2 4.A Reports...2 4.B Review by PPE Support Staff, Medical Staff Leader, and Service Chair...2 (1) Initial Review...2 (2) Data Within Expected Parameters of Performance/No Concerns...3 (3) Data Not Within Expected Parameters of Performance, Raises Questions, and/or Based on Low Volume...3 (4) Review by Service Chair...3 APPENDIX A: APPENDIX B: APPENDIX C: Flow Chart of OPPE Process OPPE Data Elements by Service OPPE Data Elements for All Practitioners 250979.8

ONGOING PROFESSIONAL PRACTICE EVALUATION POLICY (OPPE) 1. Scope of Policy. All Practitioners who provide patient care services at Santa Rosa Memorial Hospital (the Hospital ) are subject to ongoing professional practice evaluation ( OPPE ). 2. Definitions. (a) (b) (c) (d) Medical Staff Leader means any Medical Staff officer, service chair, or committee chair. OPPE means the ongoing review and analysis of data that helps to identify any issues or trends in Practitioners performance that may impact on quality of care and patient safety. OPPE is a significant Medical Staff responsibility. It fosters an efficient and effective evidenced-based reappointment process. It is also part of the effort to provide educational opportunities that help all Practitioners consistently provide quality, safe, and effective patient care. A flow chart of the OPPE process is attached as Appendix A. Practitioner means any individual who has been granted clinical privileges and/or membership by the Board, including, but not limited to, members of the Medical Staff and Allied Health Professionals. PPE Support Staff means the clinical and non-clinical staff who support the professional practice evaluation ( PPE ) process generally and the OPPE process described in this Policy. This may include, but is not limited to, staff from the Performance Improvement and/or Medical Staff Administration departments. 3. OPPE Data to Be Collected. 3.A Service Data Elements. Each Service, in consultation with the PPE Support Staff and Chief Medical Officer, shall determine the OPPE data to be collected for each Practitioner in the Service and, where appropriate and relevant, the expected parameters of performance for each data element. Depending on the size of the Service, data elements may be identified for Specialties within the Service. All Service data elements and parameters shall be approved by the Professional Practice Evaluation Committee ( PPEC ). Appendix B includes a list of data elements that are currently in effect for each Service. 3.B Data Elements for All Practitioners. The PPEC shall establish OPPE data elements that are relevant to all Practitioners on the Medical Staff (regardless of Service) and, where appropriate and relevant, the PPEC shall also establish the expected parameters of performance for each data element. Appendix C includes a list of data elements that are currently in effect for all Practitioners. 1 250979.8

3.C Guidelines. The following guidelines will be used in determining the OPPE data elements to be collected: 4. OPPE Reports. (1) quality and performance improvement department representatives shall be consulted to inform and support the assessment process; (2) medical informatics/information technology department representatives shall be consulted to determine the available information system capabilities; (3) for Service OPPE elements, the type of data that would reasonably be expected to reflect clinically significant issues for the specialties within the Service shall be considered; and (4) when possible, the expected parameters of performance shall be based on relevant clinical literature and nationally recognized benchmarks. 4.A Reports. An OPPE report for each Practitioner shall be prepared at least every six months. A copy shall be placed in the Practitioner s file and considered in the reappointment process and in the assessment of the Practitioner s competence to exercise the clinical privileges granted. A Practitioner s OPPE report may include: (1) the Practitioner s activity during the OPPE period (i.e., numbers of procedures, admissions, and consults); (2) clinical performance as measured by the approved Service and Medical Staff OPPE data elements listed in Appendices B and C; (3) the number of Informational Letters sent pursuant to the Professional Practice Evaluation Policy (Peer Review) (Informational Letters are a non-punitive, educational tool to help improve Practitioner performance through the use of feedback); (4) the number of cases reviewed pursuant to the Professional Practice Evaluation Policy (Peer Review) and the dispositions of those cases; and (5) the number of complaints addressed pursuant to the Medical Staff Professionalism Policy and the disposition of those matters. 4.B Review by PPE Support Staff, Medical Staff Leader, and Service Chair. (1) Initial Review. The PPE Support Staff will review each OPPE report. As needed, the PPE Support Staff will consult with the Chief Medical Officer 2 250979.8

and/or a Medical Staff Leader (e.g., the PPEC Chair, a Medical Staff Officer, or the Service Chair). (2) Data Within Expected Parameters of Performance/No Concerns. If the OPPE report reveals that the Practitioner s data is within, or better than, expected performance parameters and no other issues or concerns are noted, the PPE Support Staff shall provide a copy of the report to the Practitioner or notify the Practitioner how to access the report. The PPE Support Staff shall also indicate that the report is being provided solely for the Practitioner s information and use in his or her patient care activities and that no response and no further review are necessary at that time. The PPE Support Staff shall notify the applicable Service Chair of these determinations. (3) Data Not Within Expected Parameters of Performance, Raises Questions, and/or Based on Low Volume. If performance is not within expected parameters or raises any questions or concerns, or if the Practitioner has had insufficient volume at the Hospital to generate meaningful data, the PPE Support Staff shall: (a) (b) provide a copy of the report to the Service Chair; and provide a copy of the report to the Practitioner or notify the Practitioner how to access it and indicate that it has been forwarded to the Service Chair for review. The Practitioner will also be informed that the Service Chair will contact the Practitioner if he or she determines that any response or further review is required. (4) Review by Service Chair. (a) When an OPPE report is forwarded to the Service Chair, he or she shall make one of the following determinations: (i) (ii) The data do not reflect a pattern or issue regarding the Practitioner s performance that requires further review. In such case, the Service Chair shall document his or her findings and include them in the Practitioner s file along with the OPPE report. The data reflect a pattern or issue regarding the Practitioner s performance that requires further review. In such case, the Service Chair shall notify the PPE Support Staff and proceed in accordance with the Professional Practice Evaluation Policy (Peer Review) or the Medical Staff Professionalism Policy, as applicable. 3 250979.8

(iii) (iv) The data reflect a potential issue with the Practitioner s performance, but the issue is not so significant that further review is necessary under the Professional Practice Evaluation Policy (Peer Review) or the Medical Staff Professionalism Policy. In such case, the Service Chair shall obtain the Practitioner s input and then, if warranted, conduct a collegial intervention (as defined in Section 4.C of the Professional Practice Evaluation Policy) with the Practitioner. Any such collegial meeting should be documented via a follow-up letter to the Practitioner, with such documentation being included in the Practitioner s file along with the OPPE report. The data reflect insufficient activity at the Hospital to evaluate the Practitioner s practice, in which case the Service Chair shall document this conclusion so that the OPPE report is properly evaluated as part of any application for reappointment submitted by the Practitioner. (At reappointment, procedures set forth at 5.B.1 of the Credentialing Policy for obtaining information from Medical Staff members with minimal activity shall be followed.) (b) In making determinations pursuant to this section, the Service Chair may review the underlying cases that make up the data or other relevant information. Adopted by the Medical Executive Committee on, 2017. Approved by the Board on, 2017. 4 250979.8

APPENDIX B OPPE DATA ELEMENTS BY SERVICE This Appendix lists OPPE data to be collected for Practitioners in each Service and, where applicable, the expected parameters of performance for each data element. This Appendix may be modified by the PPEC at any time and approved by the Medical Executive Committee. Notice of any revisions shall be provided by the PPEC to the Medical Staff. Core Measure Focus Group / Population Measure - Patient Safety Indicators (AHRQ)+C2:D4 Department Specific Anesthesiology Rate associated with central line placement by Anesthesia provider Death within 48 hours of anesthesia Post op MI/Stroke within 48 hours of procedure Mort 30 CABG - 30 Day Mortality rate PSI 4 Death Rate among Surgical Inpatients with Serious Treatable Complications Post op Renal Failure MORT 30- Acute Myocardial Infarction (AMI) 30 days post discharge Rate Medication Management (i.e. Beta blockers/arbs) (STS) Mort 30 - Heart Failure (HF) 30 day mortality PSI 11Postoperative respiratory failure rate Surgical Site Infection CVMS (CARDIOVASCULAR Surgery) Readm 30 CABG - 30 Day readmission rate PSI 9 Perioperative hemorrhage or hematoma rate PSI 12 Post op pulmonary embolism or deep vein thrombosis rate Procedure volume HCAHPS - Cath lab (Physician Communication) PSI 13 Postoperative sepsis rate PSI 14 Postoperative wound rate dehiscence rate PSI 15 Accidental puncture or laceration rate AMI 1 Aspirin on Arrival Rate Median time to immediate PCI for STEMI patients (in minutes) AMI 7 a Fibrinolytic Therapy (co mins) PSI 11Postoperative respiratory failure rate Proportion of STEMI patients receiving immediate PCI w/in 90' Interventional Cardiology Time to PCI MORT 30 Acute Myocardial Infarction (AMI) 30 days post discharge PSI 9 Perioperative hemorrhage or hematoma rate PSI 12 Post op pulmonary embolism or deep vein thrombosis rate Mort 30 - Heart Failure (HF) 30 day mortality PSI 13 Postoperative sepsis rate PSI 14 Wound Dehiscence Medicine/ Family Medicine MORT 30- Acute Myocardial Infarction (AMI) 30 days post discharge Mort 30- Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary disease (COPD) 30 day mortality PSI 4 Death rate among Surgical inpatients with serious treatable complications PSI 11 Post op respiratory failure Surgical Site Infections for the practitioners with OB Privileges. Sepsis Mortality Mort 30-Pneumonia (PN) 30 day mortality PSI 12 Post op PE/VTE 1 250979.8

Mort 30 - Heart Failure (HF) 30 day mortality PC01 Elective delivery for those FMP who provide OB services VTE6 Potentially Preventable VTE/PE (this measures is outcome based but includes prophylaxis requirement too. MORT 30- Acute Myocardial Infarction (AMI) 30 days post discharge PSI 4 Death rate among Surgical inpatients with serious treatable complications Sepsis Mortality against Peer group Internal Medicine/Hospitalist Service Mort 30- Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary disease (COPD) 30 day mortality Mort 30-Pneumonia (PN) 30 day mortality associated with insertion by IM/Hospitalist provider PSI 12 Post op PE/DVT All Cause 30 Day Readmission Mort 30 - Heart Failure (HF) 30 day mortality PSI 13 Post op Sepsis Nephrology Serum phosphorus (NQF endorsed) PSI-7 Central Venous Catheter- Related Blood Stream Infection rate as pertains to DRG 585.6 (end stage renal disease) 30 Readmission for chronic hemodialysis patients Patients on Erythropoiesis Stimulating Agent (ESA) Hgb > 12.0 (NQF, AMA endorsed) Overall Mortality against external peer group Dialysis risk adjusted STK 1 VTE Prophlaxsis associated with insertion by Neurologist Stroke Readmission STK 2 Discharge on Antithrombotic Therapy Stroke Mortality STK 3 Antithrombotic Therapy for Atrial Firillation/Flutter Neurology STK4 Thrombolytic Therapy STK 5 Antithrombotic Therapy By End of Hospital Day 2 STK 6 Discharged on Statin Medication STK 8 Stroke Education STK 10 Assessed for Rehabilitation 2 250979.8

VTE 6 Potentially Preventable VTE/PE (this measures is outcome based but includes prophylaxis requirement too. PSI 4 Death rate among Surgical inpatients with serious treatable complications Postoperative Mortality STK 8 Stroke Education Surgical Site infection PSI 9 Postoperative Hemorrhage or Hematoma Neurosurgery PSI 11 Postoperative Respiratory Failure-? Aspiration Pneumonia PSI 12 Perioperative Pulmonary Embolism or Deep Vein Thrombosis PSI 13 Postoperative Sepsis PSI 15 Accidental Puncture or Laceration READM 30- Hips and Knees: 30 Day All Cause Readmission following elective Total Hip and Total Knee Arthrolplasty 30 day all Cause Readmission w/in 30 days Orthopedic Surgery VTE 6 Potentially Preventable VTE/PE (this measures is outcome based but includes prophylaxis requirement too. Mortality PSI 9 Postoperative Hemorrhage or Hematoma PSI 11 Postoperative Respiratory failure PSI 12 Perioperative Pulmonary Embolism or Deep Vein Thrombosis PSI 13 Postoperative Sepsis Surgical Site Infections Lab/ Pathology % of consultations diagnosed < 20 mins % of specimens signed out < 1 day Perinatal PC 01 Elective Delivery - < 39 weeks PC 02 Cesarean Section PC 04 Health Care Associated Bloodstream Infections in Newborns PSI 4 Death rate among surgical patients with serious treatable complications PSI 9 Post op Hemorrhage or hematoma Birth Trauma Rate Injury to Neonate PC 05 Exclusive Breast Milk Feeding PSI 18 Obstetric Trauma Rate (3-4 th degree laceration) Vaginal Delivery With Instrument PSI 19 Obstetric Trauma Rate (3-4 th degree laceration) Vaginal Delivery Without Instrument Pediatric readmission within 30 days Maternal Mortality Pediatrics CAC 2 Patients with Asthma Discharged on Steroid Inhaler CAC 3 Home Management Plan of Care Given to Patient/ Caregiver CAC 2 Patients with Asthma Discharged on Steroid Inhaler CAC 3 Home Management Plan of Care Given to Patient/ Caregiver Radiology OP 8 MRI Lumbar Spine for Low back pain PSI 9 Postoperative Hemorrhage or Hematoma Mammography reviews OP-10 Abdomen CT use of Contrast Material PSI 13 Postoperative Sepsis Imaging: Double reads completed OP 13 Cardiac Imaging for Preoperative risk assessment for Non Cardiac low risk surgery PSI 15 Accidental Puncture or Laceration 3 250979.8

OP 14 Simultaneous use of Brain CT and Sinus CT Surgery VTE 6 Potentially Preventable VTE/PE (this measures is outcome based but includes prophylaxis requirement too. PSI 4 Death Rate among Surgical Inpatients with Serious Treatable Complications Postoperative Mortality Medicine-GI OP 29 Endoscopy/Polyp surveillance: Appropriate follow up for average risk patients OP30 Endoscopy/Polyp surveillance: Colonoscopy interval for patients with a history of Adenomatous Polyps- Avoidance of inappropriate use. PSI 9 Perioperative Hemorrhage or Hematoma PSI 15 Accidental Puncture or Laceration Patient Volume for *endoscopy Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage Mortality Rate (Can be tracked through Premier) ED Throughput - Median Time from ED Arrival to ED Departure for ED patients / Admitted patients Rate ED Return within 72 hours followed by admission AMI - Aspirin at arrival PSI 15 Accidental Puncture or Laceration Rate **Sepsis Bundle Compliance - 3 hour STK - Thrombolytic Therapy Outpatient AMI / Chest Pain - Aspirin at Arrival Emergency Medicine Outpatient AMI-Median Time to Xfer to Another Facility for Acute Coronary Intervention Outpatient AMI/Chest Pain - Median Time to ECG Outpatient Stroke - Head CT/MRI Results for Stroke patients w/ Scan Interp w/in 45 min of Arrival Outpatient Pain Management - Median Time to Pain Management for Long Bone Fracture Sepsis 3 hour bundle (ABX, Lactate, IV, Blood Culture) Return to ICU within 48 hours VTE6 Potentially Preventable VTE/PE (this measures is outcome based but includes prophylaxis requirement too. Catheter Associated Urinary tract infections (CAUTI) Critical Care MORT 30- Acute Myocardial Infarction (AMI) 30 days post discharge Mort 30- Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary disease (COPD) 30 day mortality Mort 30-Pneumonia (PN) 30 day mortality Mort 30 - Heart Failure (HF) 30 day mortality Examples of Service-specific OPPE data elements to be considered include: complication rate; infection rate; unplanned return to surgery rate; nulliparous term singleton vertex ( NTSV ) C-section rate; 4 250979.8

data reported to relevant registries (for example, those operated by the Society of Thoracic Surgeons ( STS ) and the American College of Cardiology ( ACC )); compliance with evidence-based practice protocols; and compliance with core measures as defined by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services and/or the Joint Commission. 5 250979.8

APPENDIX C OPPE DATA ELEMENTS FOR ALL PRACTITIONERS This Appendix lists OPPE data to be collected for all Practitioners, regardless of specialty. Where applicable, it also lists the expected parameters of performance for each data element. This Appendix may be modified by the PPEC at any time and approved by the Medical Executive Committee. Notice of any revisions shall be provided to the Medical Staff. Data Elements Expected Performance Parameters Examples of Medical Staff-wide OPPE data elements to be considered include: risk-adjusted mortality; ALOS; use of approved abbreviations; compliance with other medical record requirements (timeliness of H&Ps, dating, timing, and signing orders); patient satisfaction scores; and pharmacy cost per case. 250979.8

SANTA ROSA MEMORIAL HOSPITAL Appendix A: Flow Chart of OPPE Process OPPE Reports Service Chair Service-generated data elements, approved by PPEC Medical Staff-wide data elements, adopted by PPEC Reports run at least every 6 months OPPE report may include: (1) activity during the OPPE period; PPE Support Staff (with CMO or Physician Leader, as necessary) Is Service Chair review required? Are data elements within defined performance parameters? Are any other concerns raised by the report? Is data based on sufficient volume? Service Chair Review Required Based on review of data, make one of the following determinations: Further review required under PPE Policy or Professionalism Policy Further review not required Further review not required, but evaluate need for collegial intervention after input from practitioner Insufficient volume to reach conclusion (address at reappointment) Further Review Required PPE Support Staff Log-in referral Proceed in accordance with PPE Policy or Professionalism Policy (2) performance as measured by the approved Service and Medical Staff data elements; (3) the number of Informational Letters sent pursuant to the PPE Policy; Service Chair Review Not Required Practitioner Send report or notify practitioner that report is available File copy of report in practitioner s quality file for use in reappointment Further Review Not Required Collegial Intervention (if necessary) Document intervention as appropriate (4) the number of cases reviewed pursuant to the PPE Policy and the dispositions of those cases; and (5) the number of complaints addressed pursuant to the Medical Staff Professionalism Policy and the dispositions of those matters. OPPE Data Reports (Reports created every six months with review completed within nine months) Use of OPPE Reports in Reappointment Process Service Chair Factor OPPE Data Reports into reappointment assessment Assessment Credentials Committee Factor OPPE Data Reports into reappointment reappraisal and recommendation Reappointment Recommendation MEC Factor OPPE Data Reports into reappointment reappraisal and recommendation HORTYSPRINGER