Landscape Conservation Action Plan

Similar documents
Revitalising Redesdale Community Heritage Fund Guidance Notes for Grant Applicants

Environment, Climate Change and Land Reform Committee. Draft Budget Written submission from Scottish Natural Heritage

Registered charity no

Third Party Grant Research Executive Summary

United Nations Development Programme. Terms of Reference

Breaking New Ground Community Grant Fund

JOB DESCRIPTION AND PERSON SPECIFICATION

Update on SNH activity on the SBS Challenge and Route Map to 2020 discussion

1.1 Introduction. 1.2 Strategic Context HES Corporate Plan

Great Place Scheme. Grants between 100,000 and 500,000 Guidance for applicants in Wales

MISSION INNOVATION ACTION PLAN

Guidelines. Ministry of Natural Resources and Forestry Land Stewardship and Habitat Restoration Program (LSHRP) Ontario.

RURAL GRANT FUNDING OVERVIEW

Welsh Peatland Action Group JOB DESCRIPTION. National Park Offices, Penrhyndeudraeth, Gwynedd. Head of Conservation, Agriculture & Woodlands (SNPA)

MAIN GRANT PROGRAMME GUIDELINES Revised: Guidelines March 2017

GRANTS SCHEME GUIDANCE NOTES

South of Scotland Golden Eagle Project. Introduction

Over a number of years the Rotorua Te Arawa Lakes Programme has explored ways to improve lake water quality for the Rotorua Te Arawa Lakes.

Heritage Community Engagement Worker - Tender Brief

Funding Bulletin February 2017

OVERVIEW OF LANDFILL COMMUNITY FUND (LCF)

Heritage Revealed : Accessing Dartington s Historic Landscape Brief for the Project Delivery Coordinator THE DARTINGTON HALL TRUST

2018 Corn Research and Education Request for Proposals

Oxfordshire Strategic Environmental Economic Investment Plan. Stakeholder Workshop, 20 th May 2015

Summary Report IUCN Regional Conservation Forum Europe, North and Central Asia 1, Helsinki, December 2015

Project Proposal guidelines

Clár Éire Ildánach The Creative Ireland Programme Scheme Guidelines

NORTH PENNINES AONB PARTNERSHIP

Heritage Grants - Receiving a grant. Mentoring and monitoring; Permission to Start; and Grant payment

County of Sonoma Agenda Item Summary Report

Graphics and Web Lead - Tender Brief

Heritage Grants. Application guidance. March Grants over 100,000

AND SCOTTISH NATURAL HERITAGE.

Contents. The Rural Development (LEADER) Programme Co. Kildare s Local Development Strategy Who can apply?...

SPECIALIST PROVISION: PROCUREMENT AND DIRECTORY

EFSA: mission and tasks, strategic perspectives and cooperation activities

GUIDANCE ON MANAGING CHURCH BUILDING PROJECTS

Cavan Local Community Development Committee. County Cavan LEADER Local Development Strategy 2016 EXTRACT. Section 4 LDS Action Plan

Brief for Fundraising Consultant/s

Methods: Commissioning through Evaluation

Expanding Visibility for Coastal San Luis RCD. Coastal San Luis Resource Conservation District (CSLRCD) 1203 Morro Bay, Suite B, Morro Bay, CA, 93442

AONB PROJECT FUND Guidelines for Applicants

South of Scotland Golden Eagle Project. Introduction

Grant Guidelines. International Programs Conservation and Sustainable Development Greater Mekong Regional Strategy

SOLWAY, BORDER AND EDEN AND NORTH PENNINE DALES LOCAL ACTION GROUPS

FUNDING NATURAL HERITAGE PROJECTS IN SCOTLAND LIFE+ NATURE AND BIODIVERISTY

Research and development case study. Climate research

CALL FOR PROPOSALS FOR THE CREATION OF UP TO 25 TRANSFER NETWORKS

Conservation Appendix C: Conservation Budget Overview

Targeted Regeneration Investment. Guidance for local authorities and delivery partners

Everyone s Environment Grants Guidelines. Cleaning up our backyards round one

Strategic Policy Environment Levy

CHARITY PROFILE. WWF-Australia ABN: Deductible Gift Recipient:

BOROUGH OF POOLE COUNCIL. 15 December 2015

Parks for People. Application guidance. Grants from 100,000 to 5million to revitalise historic public parks and cemeteries

Tackling antimicrobial resistance theme 4: Behaviour within and beyond the healthcare setting Call specification

How to raise money for your habitat project

Investing in our Oceans:

Guideline for Applicants to the Building Resilience to Climate Change Grants Program August 2014

New York s Great Lakes Basin Small Grants Program 2014 Request for Proposals

Presenter. Teal Edelen Manager, Central Partnership Office National Fish and Wildlife Foundation. Panelists:

Unlocking Vindolanda s Wooden Underworld

Heritage Lottery Fund 16 April 2013

Forward Plan

MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING ON IMPLEMENTATION OF THE SOUTH BAY SALT POND RESTORATION PROJECT

Global Challenges Research Fund: Global Engagement Networks Call Guidance

Interreg V-B Adriatic- Ionian Programme ADRION Announcement of the 2 nd call for proposals for Priority Axis 2

BIODIVERSITY COMMUNITY GRANTS

SOLICITATION FOR PROPOSALS: Website design and content creation

icrag Environmental Geosciences Postgraduate Programme Supported by Geological Survey Ireland Call Document

SUMMARY OF TRUSTEES REPORT FOR THE YEAR ENDED 31 ST MARCH 2013

MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING COOPERATIVE ECOSYSTEM STUDIES UNITS NETWORK

Úna Duffy Development Manager Heritage Lottery Fund

Inviting young students from schools across the Northeast to participate in some exciting competitions around our environment!!

Ty Cambria, 29 Newport Road, Cardiff, CF24 0TP

BARNSLEY METROPOLITAN BOROUGH COUNCIL

Darwin Initiative: Post Project Awards

Genesis Wellbeing Fund. Guidance for applications 2017/18. Genesis Wellbeing Fund Creating and sustaining thriving communities 1

LAND AT LOWER ROAD, STALBRIDGE PUBLIC CONSULTATION. Proposed Residential Development

United Kingdom-Sheffield: Urban planning and landscape architectural services 2016/S Contract notice. Services

Chesapeake Conservation Corps Host Organization Application Instructions

Our next phase of regulation A more targeted, responsive and collaborative approach

AGRICULTURAL BUSINESS DEVELOPMENT

SGP. Small Grants Programme (GEF SGP) Global Environment Facility SOUTH AFRICA. implemented by United Nations Development Programme (UNDP)

Desert Southwest Cooperative Ecosystem Studies Unit. Strategic Plan Approved November 2016

ARIZONA ASSOCIATION OF CONSERVATION DISTRICTS STRATEGIC PLAN P age 75 Years of Locally Led Conservation

Postcode Community Trust - Community Grants

Developing the Next Generation of Conservationists Grant Program

UK-Egypt Newton-Mosharafa Fund Call for Proposals: Preserving Egypt s Cultural Heritage: Mitigating Threats for a Sustainable Future

Request for Proposal Master Planning Services

International Tree Foundation. Finance and Admin Assistant. Application Pack

Developing Your Fundraising Strategy. Written and delivered by Kathy Roddy

Northern Community Rail Station Adoption Fund Application Process

Linking quality and outcome measures to payment for mental health

Answers to questions following the call for tender for a Fund Operator for the EEA and Norway Grants Global Fund for Regional Cooperation

FOREST SERVICE MANUAL NATIONAL HEADQUARTERS (WO) WASHINGTON, DC

English devolution deals

Workforce Development Fund

ANNUAL TOURISM REPORTING TEMPLATE FINLAND 2010

Local Energy Challenge Fund

Transcription:

SOUTH WEST PEAK LANDSCAPE AT A CROSSROADS South West Peak a Landscape at a Crossroads Landscape Conservation Action Plan July 2016

South West Peak a Landscape at a Crossroads Landscape Conservation Action Plan July 2016

Contents Part 1: Scheme Plan 5 Introduction 9 Scheme Area 12 Duration of Delivery 12 The Partnership 14 Organisation of the Partnership 16 Meetings 17 Financial arrangements 17 Strengths weaknesses and risks to the scheme 18 The Staff Team 19 The Ecosystem Approach 20 Involving people 23 Understanding how landscape works 24 Valuing landscape s services 24 Landscape 25 Rocks 26 Soils 26 Water 28 Landscape Character Types 28 Overall Strategy for the Landscape 28 Natural Heritage 31 Geodiversity 32 Biodiversity 33 Cultural Heritage and History 41 Archaeology 42 Industrial heritage 44 Other Built Heritage 47 Intangible Cultural Heritage 50 Dual Economy 52 People 54 Residents 55 Employment 56 Neighbours 57 Visitors 57 Non-visitors 59 Relationship with heritage 59 Infrastructure 62 Definition of the Landscape Area 67 Current Management 70 Agri-Environment Agreements 74 Estate Lands 80 Major Landowners 80 Area Management and Protection 81 Need for Training and Skills 82 Stakeholders 84 Statement of Significance 86 Scientific Significance 87 Historical Significance 87 Values 87 Heritage Priorities 94 Ecosystem Services Priorities 96 Potential Threats to the Landscape and Opportunities to Address Them 98 Broader Political Issues and Policy Changes 99 Social and Economic Changes 100 Local Issues and Attitudes 102 Plant and Animal Diseases 104 Climate Change 106 Need for Long Term Management 109 Vision for the Landscape 110 Our Vision 111 Mission statement 111 Partnership Outcomes 112 Statement of Intent 113 Legacy 114 Sources of Information 117 Summary of the Scheme 122 HLF Outcomes 25 Scheme timetable 126 Map of project locations 127 Budget summary 128 Part 2: Project Plan Summaries 131 Part 3: Full Project Plans 159

1 Scheme Plan

Introduction Reeve Edge Quarry Margaret Black

Introduction Introduction The South West Peak Landscape Partnership comprises organisations and individuals used to working together in the Peak District on earlier projects and initiatives, as part of the Biodiversity Action Plan (BAP) partnership, the Local Nature Partnership (Nature Peak District) and other projects. When the Biodiversity Action Plan for the Peak District was revised in 2011, objectives and priority actions were identified on a geographical basis using the three National Character Areas (NCAs) the White Peak (NCA 51), Dark Peak (NCA 52) and South West Peak (NCA 53) which comprise the majority of the Peak District. At this time discussions took place with partners around developing the Southern Peak and Fringe Integrated Biodiversity Delivery Area (IBDA), a concept piloted during 2010 2011 by the England Biodiversity Group and Natural England to move forward landscape-scale delivery and partnership working, and a precursor to the Nature Improvement Areas established following the Natural Environment White Paper. The Southern Peak and Fringe IBDA did not continue due to lack of clear purpose at that time. The desire to deliver on a landscape scale remained high on the agenda and when the board of Nature Peak District met in February 2013 to focus on what difference they could make within the Peak District, the South West Peak was identified as the area which was deserving of attention and a more integrated approach. With Nature Peak District championing a renewed vigour for partnership working in the South West Peak, discussions began in May 2013 when representatives of seven organisations (Peak District National Park Authority, Nature Peak District, Natural England, Environment Agency, RSPB, Staffordshire Wildlife Trust and Friends of the Peak District) met to discuss drivers for change and conservation priorities in the area. added value that could be gained by partnership working distilling this into some emerging themes; looked at existing activity in the area; discussed opportunities for activities ranging from sustainable farming to improved broadband coverage; articulated what was special about the South West Peak; identified the benefits to each organisation of working together; and plotted a timeline for taking the partnership forward. Key topics which emerged at each of these early stage meetings were ecosystem services, sustainable farming and connecting people to the place. The Peak District National Park Authority (PDNPA) agreed to take the lead for the partnership and, with support from the RSPB, set up a bid coordinators group and a steering group, both of which met regularly during the course of preparing for submission of the round one application to the Heritage Lottery Fund (HLF) in May 2014. Benefits of joint working (from July 2013 workshop) Partnership could bring value for money, the whole being greater than the sum of its parts. Wider benefits from a landscape partnership that means it is not just another environmental project. Valuing the landscape discovering what it can bring to us and our lives. Common goals shared between partners and those who might benefit from the partnership. Shared vision, communication and understanding, something new and imaginative. Recognising and rewarding good land management. Potential for capturing the value of ecosystem services and restoring and enhancing them. Engagement, support and contribution from communities. Further discussions led to a stakeholder workshop in July 2013 (Spriggs, 2013) attended by 22 people representing 17 different organisations. The workshop looked at the 11

Introduction Scheme Area The South West Peak Landscape Partnership area covers some 354km 2 (35,419 ha) of the Peak District. Not confined to the National Park, the Landscape Partnership area includes parts of Staffordshire, Cheshire and Derbyshire. The LP area is not contiguous with the South West Peak National Character Area (NCA) (Natural England, 2013), which was defined on a much coarser scale, but follows the locally defined Regional Character Area. Duration of Delivery The Landscape Partnership expects to spend five years delivering a suite of projects to enhance the landscape and our connections with it. Five years are needed due to the size and complexity of the area, the variety of projects which we will deliver and the recognised challenges in engaging effectively with hard to reach farmers in this location. The emphasis of this Scheme is on building better relationships between the different parties and increasing understanding and valuing of the landscape, both changes which take time and face-to-face contact to effect. Map of the South West Peak showing key locations South West Peak Three Counties 12 13

The Partnership The Partnership The Partnership comprises the following organisations: Lead partner: Peak District National Park Delivery partners: Cheshire Wildlife Trust RSPB Staffordshire Wildlife Trust Support Staffordshire The Farming Life Centre Supporting partners: Cheshire East Council Environment Agency Historic England Natural England Nature Peak District Severn Trent Water Staffordshire County Council United Utilities The role of the lead partner (accountable body) is to: Deliver the scheme in accordance with the mission statement and outcomes directed and agreed by the Board; Manage the financial and contractual administration of the scheme including the drawdown of funds from HLF; Support the delivery of projects by delivery partners; Act as a delivery partner for some of the projects; Keep accurate records of income and expenditure of the scheme to meet the needs of HLF; Keep accurate records of the achievements of the scheme; Ensure that the delivery partners deliver the projects and that the overall scheme meets and fulfils the grant conditions of HLF; Maintain the overall records and ensure that it complies with its contractual obligations pursuant to the Grant Agreement and the Standard Terms of Grant. The role of delivery partners is to: Implement their individual projects according to the terms of the project plans and in accordance with the Standard Terms of Grant; Ensure all claims for payment against eligible project expenditure are submitted to the accountable body by specified quarterly deadlines; Pass adequate records to the accountable body for audit and monitoring purposes; Comply with the financial requirements and conditions of grants from other Funders as appropriate in respect of the project plan; Be responsible for the provision of all the necessary personnel, insurance, accommodation and services required for the implementation of their specific project; Work collaboratively to achieve the actions set out in the Landscape Conservation Action Plan (LCAP) and properly and diligently manage its project plan in accordance with the LCAP (including any variations to the LCAP agreed by the Board); Be responsible for procuring and securing match funding for their project as set out in their project plan; Ensure safeguarding policies and procedures are in place covering good practice when working with children and vulnerable adults. The role of supporting partners is to: Sponsor or contribute towards a project and project plan within the scheme and support the scheme itself (but not act as a delivery partner); Take a place on the Board. A detailed partnership agreement comprising delivery agreements and board agreement has been agreed and signed by the appropriate partners. The partnership agreement details the management and operation of the scheme and the partnership together with the roles and responsibilities of each type of partner as set out above. Pond dipping Staffordshire Wildlife Trust 15

Organisation of the Partnership We intend to keep the structure of the partnership as simple and efficient as possible with clearly defined roles and lines of communication, keeping the number of meetings to an acceptable level. HLF: (monitoring, guidance and support) Delivery Partners: (lead delivery of projects) Staffordshire Wildlife Trust Cheshire Wildlife Trust Support Staffordshire Farming Life Centre Peak District National Park Royal Society for the Protection of Birds Partnership Board: (guide and support delivery, make decisions, set strategy, represent and influence) strategic level representatives of Delivery and Supporting Partners Accountable Body: (managing programme and support delivery) Peak District National Park Authority Delivery Staff: (deliver projects) Scheme staff Partner staff Contractors Wider Partnership: volunteers, trainees, community groups, participants, landowners, residents External Evaluator: (evaluate effectiveness of Partnership and outcomes of Scheme and Projects) Task and Finish Group: as necessary Supporting Partners: (advice, guidance, funding) Natural England Environment Agency Staffordshire County Council Nature Peak District Severn Trent Water United Utilities Cheshire East Council Historic England Meetings The Partnership Board will meet on a quarterly basis timed to take place before the submission of quarterly reports to HLF. The Chair will be present at all meetings, with a vice-chair appointed as stand-in if required. Working (task and finish) groups will be appointed by the board as required to oversee specific operational elements of the Scheme such as monitoring & evaluation, heritage projects steering group, and people & communities projects steering group. Financial arrangements The detailed financial management of the Scheme will be the responsibility of the accountable body (PDNPA). The Partnership s common fund will operate as a virtual common fund whereby the accountable body will administer a separate financial cost centre; secure, establish, and operate appropriate financial management procedures; and supervise management of audit procedures in respect of the partnership fund. Each delivery partner shall be responsible for procuring and securing match funding for their project as set out in their project plan; and confirm in writing to the accountable body that the required match funding has been secured from a funder, together with details of any conditions placed on such match funding by that funder. Each delivery partner will provide to the accountable body all receipts and paid invoices in respect of any expenses or costs incurred by them as a result of the project. The accountable body will then submit the scheme s returns to HLF for reimbursement of partnership funds. Provided that HLF agree to pay such costs, the accountable body will transfer the relevant share of the partnership fund to the relevant delivery partner. Strengths, Weaknesses and Risks to the Scheme The Landscape Partnership consists of a number of organisations who have a history of working together. A strong lead is given by the National Park Authority, which despite going through a period of change is now emerging strongly focused and has shown commitment to the Scheme, giving it corporate priority. Many of the partners have a history of success in delivering projects and large area programmes of work: the Moors for the Future Partnership, The Partnership Peak Birds Project, Stepping Stones to Nature, Dane Valley Project and the Churnet Valley Living Landscape Partnership to name a few. The projects are shared amongst six delivery partners: National Park, RSPB, Staffordshire Wildlife Trust, Cheshire Wildlife Trust, Support Staffordshire and the Farming Life Centre, all experienced at delivering successful projects. The majority of the responsibility - and with it risk - falls to the National Park as lead partner, delivering the bulk of the projects. With Defra funding for the National Park now on firmer footing, senior management and staff are confident of their ability to deliver. Whilst the partnership is strong and committed, we are aware of some weaknesses. We have not managed to secure another farming representative on the Board (other than the Farming Life Centre) and therefore we will need to continue to make efforts to do so. An individual farmer would not necessarily be the right representative, nor have the time to participate as a Board member, so alternative methods of involvement in decision-making will be tried. Two of our Board members are local residents as well as representing partner organisations, bringing local knowledge and connections to the partnership. One of our delivery partners, the Farming Life Centre, is a small charity which has been going through a period of financial uncertainty over their future viability. The Trustees have now confirmed that they are in a position to remain as delivery lead for two projects and, should circumstances change, that they will seek a substitute delivery lead with agreement of the LPS Board. We are now going through a time of uncertainty with the recent referendum on leaving the EU. It is difficult to predict exactly what impact that will have on the Scheme. Access to European funding will almost certainly now be challenging, agricultural subsidies are likely to change at some point during our delivery phase, and it is likely that the competition for grant funding will continue to increase; however, new strands could well become available. Where projects do not currently have all match funding secured, partners have agreed to underwrite this and help each other with funding bids. The size of the Scheme area and the risk of diluting the benefit have been raised as concerns by HLF; however, the partnership strongly 17

The Partnership Staff Structure Chart feels that the LPS area has been defined using strict criteria and reducing its area could not be done in any meaningful way. The projects comprising the Scheme include some very site-specific projects; species and habitat focused projects for which priority areas have been identified within which to focus efforts; community-led and influenced projects allowing the local communities to decide where work is focused; and engagement and influencing work which will be widespread across the area. We are confident that the location of the LPS and the mixture of partners will each be a draw for recruiting Scheme staff, together with flexible working arrangements. The ability to retain staff to the end of the projects/scheme is a concern; we will look to find incentives where necessary, such as completion bonuses, and will be succession planning in good time in order to try and continue the work of the partnership beyond the HLF funding. Manager, to manage two cohorts of apprentices and a team of volunteer champions with a focus on increasing skills and participation in under-represented groups. Youth Engagement Officer Part time post hosted by PDNPA and managed within the Learning and Discovery team to run a programme of secondary school projects and field studies activities. Community Engagement Officer Full time post hosted by Support Staffordshire to engage with residents, community groups and visitors to promote the Scheme, signpost people to volunteering opportunities and promote the community grants. Community Grants Officer Part time post hosted by Support Staffordshire to administer and support our community grants scheme. Peak District National Park Scheme Manager Volunteer & Vocational Training Officer FT Communication & Interpretation Officer PT Cultural Heritage Officer FT Grasslands Officer PT Farm Link Workers PT The Staff Team The LPS will be delivered by a skilled staff team comprising: Scheme Manager Full time post for the duration of the scheme hosted by the lead partner (PDNPA), overseeing the whole scheme and managing some of the scheme staff. Programme Support Officer A part time post for the duration of the scheme, managed by the Scheme Manager, to provide administrative and financial support to the partnership. Communication & Interpretation Officer A part time post for the duration of the scheme, managed by the Scheme Manager, to ensure clear messages are used throughout the partnership in engaging with our audiences and to deliver interpretation projects. Farm Link Workers Two/three part time staff for the duration of the scheme, managed by the Scheme Manager, with a key communication role working closely with the farming community to explain the work of the partnership and link farmers and landowners with project officers and projects. Volunteer & Vocational Training Officer Full time post managed by the Scheme Grasslands Officer Part time post managed by the Scheme Manager to coordinate a programme of survey, enhancement and monitoring of grasslands in three key landscapes within the landscape. Cultural Heritage Officer Full time post for the duration of the scheme managed by the Scheme Manager to manage the Barns and Buildings and Small Heritage Adoption projects and provide cultural heritage expertise to other projects as necessary. Slowing the Flow Officer Full time post for the duration of the scheme hosted by Cheshire Wildlife Trust to develop and implement a range of natural flood measures, working with farmers, land managers and local people and engaging with partner organisations and stakeholders. Wader PhD Student Full time PhD student hosted by RSPB and the University of Sheffield looking at landscape-scale management interventions for curlew and snipe. Wild Child Officer Part time post hosted by Staffordshire Wildlife Trust to deliver Wildplay and Nature Tots sessions with children and young people. Crayfish Ecologist Contract position hosted by Staffordshire Wildlife Trust to deliver the Crayfish in Crisis project, conserving this globally endangered species. Support Staffordshire Staffordshire Wildlife Trust Cheshire Wildlife Trust RSPB Farming Life Centre Learning & Discovery Team Manager Programme Support Officer PT Youth Engagement Officer PT Community Engagement Officer PT Community Grants Officer PT Wild Child Officer PT Crayfish Ecologist PT Slowing the Flow Officer FT Wader PhD Student FT Sub-contractors / partners x2 18