U S I N G C T O a t U H N f o r M u l t i - S i t e R e s e a r c h

Similar documents
Preliminary Questionnaire

Preparing for a Streamlined Ethics Review System. Janet Manzo, OCREB & CTO February 27, 2014

SOP : Quality Assurance Inspections SCOPE RESPONSIBILITIES. APPROVAL AUTHORITY EFFECTIVE DATE May PURPOSE 2.

Standard Operating Procedure (SOP)

SARASOTA MEMORIAL HOSPITAL CANCER RESEARCH PROGRAM POLICY

Keele Clinical Trials Unit

SOP: New Revised Reviewed Effective Date: 08 October Approved by : Supervisor/Manager Risk/Ethics Sr. Mgmt Committees Board/Councils

STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURE

Research Audits PGR. Effective: 12/04/2013 Reviewed: 12/04/2015. Name of Associated Policy: Palmetto Health Administrative Research Review

GCP: Investigator Responsibilities. Susan Tebbs Nicola Kaganson

NEWCASTLE CLINICAL TRIALS UNIT STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURES

Quality Assurance in Clinical Research at RM/ICR. GCP Compliance Team, Clinical R&D

NEWCASTLE CLINICAL TRIALS UNIT STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURES

STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURE

Version Number: 004 Controlled Document Sponsor: Controlled Document Lead:

MANAGEMENT OF PROTOCOL AND GCP DEVIATIONS AND VIOLATIONS

Standard Operating Procedure (SOP) Research and Development Office

New Investigator Research Grant Guidelines

Institutional Review Board Application for Exempt Status Determination

Document Number: 006. Version: 1. Date ratified: Name of originator/author: Heidi Saunders, Senior Portfolio Coordinator

ETHICS COMMITTEE: ROLE, RESPONSIBILITIES AND FUNCTIONS K.R.CHANDRAMOHANAN NAIR DEPARTMENT OF ANATOMY, MEDICAL COLLEGE, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM

Informed Consent SOP Number: 25 Version Number: 6.0 Effective Date: 1 st September 2017 Review Date: 1 st September 2019

Frequently Asked Questions. The CIRB is located at 168 Jalan Bukit Merah #06-08 Tower 3 Connection One Singapore

Melanoma Research Database

A Principal Investigator s Guide to Responsibilities, Qualifications, Records and Documentation of Human Research University of Kentucky

Site Closedown Checklist for UoL Sponsored CTIMP Studies

INSPIRing Changes to the IRB Process: New templates and more

Ethics Committee Composition Roles & Responsibilities. Dr Girish Dayma Dr Sanjay Juvekar KEM Hospital Research Centre Pune

10 STEPS TO IRB APPROVAL

MEDICINES FOR HUMAN USE (CLINICAL TRIALS) REGULATIONS Memorandum of understanding between MHRA, COREC and GTAC

IRBNet Instructions for Investigators

SECTION 2: REGISTER YOUR ICU

Sponsor Responsibilities. Roles and Responsibilities. EU Directives. UK Law

Standard Operating Procedure INVESTIGATOR OVERSIGHT OF RESEARCH. Chief and Principal Investigators of research sponsored and/or hosted by UHBristol

Monitoring Clinical Trials

Clinical Trials at PMH

Clinical Trial Readiness Checklist October 2014

Dr. R. Sathianathan. Role & Responsibilities of Principal Investigators in Clinical Trials. 18 August 2015

When a Single IRB Reviews for Multiple Sites:

Standard Operating Procedures

Centralized Office of Research

Training Energizer. Researcher 1: New Project Submission. RESEARCH DATAWARE Innovation in Research Management

Standard Operating Procedure (SOP) for Reporting Serious Breaches in Clinical Research

Investigator Site File Standard Operating Procedure (SOP)

Regulatory Inspections

Good Clinical Practice: A Ground Level View

Research Governance Framework 2 nd Edition, Medicine for Human Use (Clinical Trial) Regulations 2004

ACTIONS/PSOP/001 Version 1.0 Page 2 of 6

PROMPTLY REPORTABLE EVENTS

Roles of Investigators in the Managements of Clinical Trials

QUINTE HEALTH CARE PRINCIPLES OF GOVERNANCE AND BOARD ACCOUNTABILITY

I. Scope This policy defines unanticipated problems and adverse events and establishes the reporting process and timeline.

Overview of the IMB s. Good Clinical Practice. Deirdre O Regan GCP/Pharmacovigilance. GCP Seminar Dublin, 27 th January 2010.

Investigator-Initiated Studies: When you re the Sponsor. Cheri Robert & Tammy Mah-Fraser

FERCI MODEL SOPs. [The IEC members (author/s, reviewer/s) and Chairperson will sign and date the SOP on this first page]

University of South Carolina. Unanticipated Problems and Adverse Events Guidelines

University of Colorado Denver Human Research Protection Program Investigator Responsibilities for the Protection of Human Subjects

A PHIPA Update from the IPC

Local VA VA ORD CSP Other VA ORD. IRB of Record Registration Number: IRB Operated by: Local VA Non-local VA Academic Affiliate VHA Central IRB

SOP MONITORING & OVERSIGHT OF RESEARCH ACTIVITY. Contact Jess Bisset, Research Operations Manager x20227

Standard Operating Procedures

The Alfred Streamlining Ethical Review Guide. Overview Page 1. The Review Schemes - A description the two different schemes Page 2

Documenting the Story of a Clinical Trial: Concept to CAPA. Lori T. Gilmartin Gilmartin Consulting LLC

Document Title: Study Data SOP (CRFs and Source Data)

Hertfordshire Hospitals R&D Consortium Incorporating West Herts Hospitals NHS Trust and East & North Herts NHS Trust

Roles & Responsibilities University of Rochester Department Administrative Staff

Details: Approval: Distribution & Storage: Pharmacovigilance for Researchers for UoL / LTHT Sponsored CTIMPs. Standard Operating Procedure

CLOSE OUT VISIT REPORT (NO CRF TO MONITOR)

Study Monitoring Plan Template

DO I NEED TO SUBMIT FOR THIS?... & OTHER FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS. March 2015 IRB Forum

Theradex Audit 2013: Findings & Corrective Action

2014 Morrisey Technology and Educational Conference 1

Version Number: 003. On: September 2017 Review Date: September 2020 Distribution: Essential Reading for: Information for: Page 1 of 13

Document Title: Document Number:

Once the feasibility assessment has been conducted the study team will be notified via (Appendix 3) of the outcome and whether the study is;

VCU Clinical Research Quality Assurance Assessment

4.2. Clinical Trial Monitor (or Monitor): The person responsible for monitoring the data on behalf of the sponsor or contract research organization.

STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURE SOP 205

QUALITY TIPS FOR CLINICAL SITES. Athena Thomas-Visel. Clinical Quality Consultant QUALITY TIPS FOR CLINICAL SITES

Quality and Informed Consent Procedures

Study Management SM STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURE FOR Adverse Event Reporting

Snooping Rights and Responsibilities

I2S2 TRAINING Good Clinical Practice tips. Deirdre Thom Neonatal Nurse Coordinator

STUDY INFORMATION POST-IRB APPROVAL FDA DEVICE (IDE) SPONSOR AND INVESTIGATOR RESPONSIBILITY (21 CFR 812)

MARKEY CANCER CENTER CLINICAL RESEARCH ORGANIZATION STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURES SOP No.: MCCCRO-D

Safety Reporting in Clinical Research Policy Final Version 4.0

Document Title: Site Selection and Initiation for RFL Sponsored Studies Document Number: 026

Mastering Clinical Research April 19, :30 am

Document Title: File Notes. Document Number: 024

FDA Medical Device Regulations vs. ISO 14155

Audits/Inspections Be Prepared for Anything

Standard Operating Procedure (SOP) Research and Development Office

Regulatory Binder Checklist for FDA-Regulated Sponsor/Sponsor-Investigator Studies

SOP-QA-28 V2. Approver: Prof Maggie Cruickshank, R&D Director Approver: Prof Steve Heys, Head of School

This Agreement dated DD/MM/YYYY (the Effective Date ) is between

NEWCASTLE CLINICAL TRIALS UNIT STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURES

Department of Defense Human Research Protection Program DOD INSTITUTIONAL AGREEMENT FOR INSTITUTIONAL REVIEW BOARD (IRB) REVIEW (IAIR)

UTILIZATION REVIEW DECISIONS ISSUED PRIOR TO JULY 1, 2013 FOR INJURIES OCCURRING PRIOR TO JANUARY 1, 2013

Application Guide for the Aboriginal Participation Fund

"Getting Your Protocol Through the IRB"

Transcription:

U S I N G C T O a t U H N f o r M u l t i - S i t e R e s e a r c h How to get ethics approval through CTO for multi-site studies and how to obtain and maintain IA at UHN

Today s Agenda 1. What is a Research Ethics Board (REB) of Record? 2. Clinical Trials Ontario: What is CTO? How to get ethics approval via CTO Stream? 3. University Health Network (UHN): How to obtain Institutional Authorization (IA) for your study through CAPCR? How to maintain Institutional Authorization (IA) for your study through CAPCR?

1. What is a Research Ethics Board of Record? A Research Ethics Board of Record, also known as an REB of Record or Board of Record, provides research ethics review and oversight for a study with multiple participating sites. This means, only one Research Ethics Board (REB) reviews and approves the ethics of a study for more than one site. R E B O F R E C O R D

2. CTO: How to Get Ethics Approval via CTO Stream Things to Consider When You are the Provincial Applicant: 1. A Centre Initial Application (CIA) must be created and submitted for each site (including the Provincial Applicant site). 2. When the Provincial Application is created, research teams should immediately create the CIAs for any known Centre (right after creating the PIA). When the CIA is created for UHN, two things happen: i. The UHN Institution Reps and Admins will automatically be tagged to the study. ii. One of the UHN Institution Reps will reach out to the UHN Centre PI to guide them through the process of obtaining Institutional Authorization (IA) at UHN.

2. CTO: How to Get Ethics Approval via CTO Stream Things to Consider When You are the Centre Applicant: 1. As Institution Rep for UHN, Paul MacPherson will be signing off on the CIA in CTO Stream before it is submitted for review by the REB of Record. Before the Institution Rep will sign, the following has to be completed: UHN Centre PI credentials confirmed CAPCR application submitted Department Head in CIA and CAPCR must match Centre Applicant must sign in CTO Stream Note: This list might change as we fine-tune our internal processes. If you are waiting for a signature for the UHN Institution Rep, please contact boardofrecord@uhn.ca. 2. Fully executed CTO REB of Record Study Agreements are required to start study activities at the site. These are the steps for obtaining the necessarily signatures for the CTO REB of Record Study Agreement: i. CTO will send the REB of Record Study Agreement to the PI for signature. ii. The PI/delegate will send a scanned copy of the Agreement (signed by the PI and witness) to boardofrecord@uhnresearch.ca who will obtain the necessary signature from the UHN signing authority. iii. The scanned copy of the Agreement will be sent back to CTO (streamline@ctontario.ca), who will obtain the necessary signatures from the REB Host Institution. iv. Fully executed Agreements will be circulated via the correspondence feature in CTO Stream and by email after the CIA is submitted.

2. CTO: How to Get Ethics Approval via CTO Stream Things to Consider When You are the Provincial Applicant and/or Centre Applicant: 1. The Primary Institution Rep must be indicated as follows in the applications within CTO Stream: Q. 1.16 in the PIA Q. 1.13 in the CIA This information can be found on the SRERS Administration Form provided by CTO at the time of account creation or upon request.

3. CAPCR: How to obtain Institutional Authorization (IA) at UHN? When using an REB of Record model like CTO, it is important to note that each institution will have requirements, in addition to ethics approval, for an initial submission, before study activities can begin at that centre. These institutional requirements will change based on the nature of the study and structure of the organization.

3. CAPCR: How to obtain Institutional Authorization (IA) at UHN? If there is a Centre Initial Application (CIA) for UHN in CTO Stream, the UHN Centre PI is responsible for completing and submitting an application through CAPCR. 1 Study Approval REB application submitted by lead investigator, i.e. Provincial Applicant CTO Qualified REB of Record selected, application advances to REB REB of Record reviews application and resolves any issues with applicant If/when issues are resolved REB of Record approves study Sites wishing to participate are notified and given access to REB approved study in CTO system 2 Adding/ Recruiting Sites Recruiting Institution signs REB of Record Agreement, delegating ethics review and oversight to REB of Record; Local PI adopts approved consent form and submits site application focused on site specific information Site application advances to REB of Record REB of Record Host Institution signs REB of Record Agreement and REB reviews application (usually expedited) and resolves any issues with site applicant REB of Record issues approval for site to participate UHN 3 Continuing Oversight/ Approval New overall (study-level) event, e.g. amendment, Data Safety Monitoring Board report, safety update Documentation submitted by Provincial Applicant REB of Record reviews submission and resolves issues with provincial applicant Approval/ acknowledgement issued by REB of Record; sent simultaneously to all approved participating sites New site level event, e.g. continuing review, local Serious Adverse Event, protocol deviation Documentation submitted by research site REB of Record reviews submission and resolves issues with research site Approval/acknowledgement issued by REB of Record

3. CAPCR: How to obtain Institutional Authorization (IA) at UHN? You can create and submit the initial application in CAPCR at anytime so long as you understand study activities cannot begin at UHN until your receive Institutional Authorization (IA) in CAPCR. Considerations for the Current Version of CAPCR: 1. Applications are not recognized as CTO studies 2. Full CAPCR application must be completed and submitted, including REB-only sections 3. Protocol and Consents are required for submission 4. REB will be triggered as a reviewer but won t actually complete the review IMPORTANT send Institution Admin the CAPCR number upon creation so the UHN REB will flag it Considerations for the New CAPCR Release: 1. Applications are recognized as CTO studies 2. Only non-reb sections must be completed and submitted 3. Protocols and Consents are not required for submission but required for IA 4. REB of Record Approval Letter is a document required for IA 5. REB of Record Study Agreement is a document required for IA

3. CAPCR: How to obtain Institutional Authorization (IA) at UHN? So, when should you submit the CAPCR Application? ASAP.

Summary When You Can Start Study Activities at UHN There are 3 things required before you may begin study activities at UHN if you are the Provincial or Centre Applicant: CTO REB of Record (ethics) Approval for the UHN Centre Fully Executed (signed) CTO REB of Record Agreement Note: this is only required if the REB of Record is not the UHN REB Study Granted Institutional Authorization (IA) in CAPCR

3. CAPCR: How to maintain Institutional Authorization (IA) at UHN? When using an REB of Record like CTO, it is important to note that each institution will have requirements, in addition to ethics approval, for ongoing submissions, before study activities can begin at that centre. These institutional requirements will change based on the nature of the study and structure of the organization.

3. CAPCR: How to maintain Institutional Authorization (IA) at UHN? If there is an ongoing submission in CTO Stream (Amendment, Continuing Review, Reportable Events, Study Closures, etc.) the Centre PI will need to consider if a submission is required in CAPCR. 1 Study Approval REB application submitted by lead investigator, i.e. Provincial Applicant CTO Qualified REB of Record selected, application advances to REB REB of Record reviews application and resolves any issues with applicant If/when issues are resolved REB of Record approves study Sites wishing to participate are notified and given access to REB approved study in CTO system 2 Adding/ Recruiting Sites Recruiting Institution signs REB of Record Agreement, delegating ethics review and oversight to REB of Record; Local PI adopts approved consent form and submits site application focused on site specific information Site application advances to REB of Record REB of Record Host Institution signs REB of Record Agreement and REB reviews application (usually expedited) and resolves any issues with site applicant REB of Record issues approval for site to participate 3 Continuing Oversight/ Approval New overall (study-level) event, e.g. amendment, Data Safety Monitoring Board report, safety update Documentation submitted by Provincial Applicant REB of Record reviews submission and resolves issues with provincial applicant Approval/ acknowledgement issued by REB of Record; sent simultaneously to all approved participating sites New site level event, e.g. continuing review, local Serious Adverse Event, protocol deviation Documentation submitted by research site REB of Record reviews submission and resolves issues with research site Approval/acknowledgement issued by REB of Record UHN

Summary When to Submit to CAPCR After the Initial Submission? Amendments if an amendment in CTO Stream impacts a service provider or impact assessment reviewer triggered to the study Continuing Reviews submission to confirm REB of Record Continuing Review Approval Centre Closure submission to confirm REB of Record approval of closure/completion

Contact Information For more information, assistance or if you have questions, please contact: Clinical Trials Ontario streamline@ctontario.ca University Health Network (UHN) boardofrecord@uhnresearch.ca