Dean Medical Center Dean Health Plan

Similar documents
SMARTCare Site Job Descriptions Site Physician Lead (Champion)

The Heart and Vascular Disease Management Program

CASE STUDY. An HIE-populated personal health record for cardiac revascularization patients

A. DIABETES AND HEART/STROKE Data Detail

Move the Needle on Difficult Quality Measures: How Health Plans Can Control High Blood Pressure

ATTACHMENT 3b REVISED DATA COLLECTION TOOL #1. Million Hearts Hypertension Control Champion Application Form

QUALITY IMPROVEMENT. Molina Healthcare has defined the following goals for the QI Program:

Chapter 7. Unit 2: Quality Performance Measures

Bundled Payments to Align Providers and Increase Value to Patients

STEMI RECEIVING CENTER

CMS AMI and CABG Bundled Payment Initiative AMGA HF Collaborative December 13, 2016

diabetes care and quality improvement in our practice

Medicare Physician Group Practice Demonstration

Transforming Care Delivery by Moving from Episodic to Coordinated Payment

Catholic Medical Partners

Disclosures. Platforms for Performance: Clinical Dashboards to Improve Quality and Safety. Learning Objectives

Data Quality Improvement Plan

PURPOSE: The purpose of this policy is to establish requirements for designation as a STEMI Receiving Center (SRC) in San Joaquin County.

National Priorities for Improvement:

Asthma Disease Management Program

Collaboration of the Hybrid AF Patient: Role of Advanced Practice Providers. Jennifer Walker, RN, MSN, ANP-BC UNC Center for Heart and Vascular Care

Reducing Hospital Admissions Through the Use of IT. Steven Milligan MD Medical Director of ACO Management Colorado Health Neighborhoods

PPC2: Patient Tracking and Registry Functions

October 3, Dear Dr. Conway:

PCMH: Recognition to Impact

Risk Adjustment Methods in Value-Based Reimbursement Strategies

Complex Patient Care Redesign: ThedaCare Innovation. Gregory Long, MD Chief Medical Officer

Using Data to Yield High Impact Business Intelligence Wednesday, July 25, 2012

Objective Measurement

Next Generation Physician Compensation Design in a Schizophrenic Payer Environment

CVD Prevention Takes a Team. Ed Havranek, MD Denver Health University of Colorado

COMPASS Workflow & Core Elements

Medical Record Review Tool Standards with Definitions

Southwest Cardiology Physician Preferences

Assessment of Primary Care Resources and Supports for Chronic Disease Self management (PCRS) Quality Levels

HIMSS Davies Enterprise Application --- COVER PAGE ---

FY 2014 Inpatient Prospective Payment System Proposed Rule

Bundled Payments. AMGA September 25, 2013 AGENDA. Who Are We. Our Business Challenge. Episode Process. Experience

Part 2: PCMH 2014 Standards

N.E.W.T. Level Measurement:

Enhancing Outcomes with Quality Improvement (QI) October 29, 2015

Targeted technology and data management solutions for observational studies

Accelerating the Impact of Performance Measures: Role of Core Measures

Managing Congestive Heart Failure as a Business September 13, 2010 Session M30 Society for Healthcare Strategy and Market Development annual meeting

Implementing AHA Quality Improvement Programs: Get With the Guidelines

Patient-Centered Medical Home

AETNA BETTER HEALTH OF VIRGINIA Provider Newsletter

Quality Measures for HMO s: Understanding HEDIS

SIMPLE SOLUTIONS. BIG IMPACT.

Accountable Care and the Laboratory Value Proposition. Les Duncan Director of Operations Highmark Health - Home and Community Services

AirStrip ONE Cardiology

Background Paper For the Cardiology Audit and Registration Data Standards (CARDS) Conference during Ireland s Presidency of the European Union

The Role of Analytics in the Development of a Successful Readmissions Program

Resuscitation Centers of Excellence: Designation Process Rev January 2010

Outpatient Hospital Facilities

We do all of IT to help you do all of Healthcare

Building & Strengthening Patient Centered Medical Homes in the Safety Net

Retrospective Bundles

MOC Part IV: Your Guide to Making it Happen.

Requirements Document for the Blue Quality Physician Program sm Criteria Effective 08/03/2015

Care Management Policies

Quality Based Impacts to Medicare Inpatient Payments

A Practical Approach Toward Accountable Care and Risk-Based Contracting: Design to Implementation

Visit to download this and other modules and to access dozens of helpful tools and resources.

Florida Blue Clinical Documentation Improvement Program (CDI)

2017 Quality Rewards Program

Reducing Readmissions for Myocardial Infarctions with Early Access to Clinic: An Innovative Approach

PGY-1 Pharmacy Practice

Healthcare Effectiveness Data and Information Set (HEDIS)

Innovating Predictive Analytics Strengthening Data and Transfer Information at Point of Care to Improve Care Coordination

Country report Bosnia and Herzegovina December 2015

Outpatient Quality Reporting Program

American College of Cardiology Patient Navigator Program Focus MI National PROGRAM REQUIREMENTS

BCBSM Pay-for-Performance Measure Technical Document (Version 2.0)

Arkansas Blue Cross and Blue Shield Patient Centered Medical Home Provider Manual

ACC State Chapters Best Practice Guide. Working with States on Clinical Data Requests

Heart Failure Clinic a Multidisciplinary approach. Amy Benson, PA-C, MSPAS Presbyterian Heart Group Albuquerque, NM

BCBSTX Bridges to Excellence Cardiac Care Program Guide

Cultural Transformation and the Road to an ACO Lee Sacks, M.D. CEO Mark Shields, M.D., MBA Senior Medical Director

Keenan Pharmacy Care Management (KPCM)

2) The percentage of discharges for which the patient received follow-up within 7 days after

Pragmatic Trial Designs Capturing Endpoints and Integrating Data from Non-Linked Sources

An overview of Wisconsin Medicaid quality

Presbyterian Healthcare Services Care Management

Patient Centered Medical Home. History of PCMH concept. What does a PCMH look like? 10/1/2013. What is a Patient Centered Medical Home (PCMH)?

PSI-15 Lafayette General Health 2017 Nicholas E. Davies Enterprise Award of Excellence

Identifying and Defining Improvement Measures

2017 Congestive Heart Failure. Program Evaluation. Our mission is to improve the health and quality of life of our members

STEMI SYSTEM RECEIVING CENTER STANDARDS AND DESIGNATION

Member Satisfaction: Moving the Needle

Can Improvement Cause Harm: Ethical Issues in QI. William Nelson, PhD Greg Ogrinc, MD, MS Daisy Goodman, CNM. DNP, MPH

RescueNet Dispatch, epcr, Care Exchange. HL7 v2. Ellkay LK EMR-Archive Smart on FHIR SAML Ellkay to Epic

Code Sepsis: Wake Forest Baptist Medical Center Experience

Quality ID #348: HRS-3 Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillator (ICD) Complications Rate National Quality Strategy Domain: Patient Safety

Presenter Disclosure Information

Medical Management. G.2 At a Glance. G.2 Procedures Requiring Prior Authorization. G.3 How to Contact or Notify Medical Management

Medical Management. G.2 At a Glance. G.3 Procedures Requiring Prior Authorization. G.5 How to Contact or Notify Medical Management

Quality Improvement Efforts San Diego s Experience

INTEGRATED DATA ANALYTICS AND CARE WORKFLOW OPTIMIZATION

Blueprint Integrated Pilot Programs

Transcription:

Dean Medical Center Dean Health Plan

Improving LDL Screening Following an Acute Coronary Event

Project Team Jennifer Close-Goedjen, MS Dean Health Plan William Koller, Jr., MD Dean Health Plan, Dean Medical Center Albert Musa, MD Dean Medical Center Daniel Staddler, MD Dean Medical Center Penny Bogrand Dean Health Plan Jack Bowhan Dean Health System Leslie Gruendel Dean Health Plan Jill Hanson Dean Health Plan Mark Kaufman, MD Dean Health Plan Timothy Lechmaier, MD Dean Medical Center Francis Pagel Dean Health Plan

ABBREVIATED ORGANIZATION CHART DHS, Inc. Physician Shareholders SSM SSM Health Care Care Corporation Dean Health Systems, Inc. SSM Health Care of Wisconsin, Inc. Inc. Dean Physician St. St. Marys Practice Association Dean Health Plan Hospital Medical Medical Center Center Dean Medical Center Clinical Practice Committee St. Marys Dean Venture, Inc. Multiple other health care facilities

Lipid Testing after an Acute Coronary Event: The Importance Total cost of cardiovascular disease in US estimated to be $329.2 billion (American Heart Association, 2002) Increasing prevalence of cardiovascular disease in DHP population (DHP Population Analysis, 2004) Scientific evidence supporting importance of routine lipid testing and active lipid control in prevention of subsequent coronary events (e.g., Cannon, et al. 2004, Nissen, et al., 2004)

Lipid Testing after an Acute Coronary Event: The History 2000 HEDIS results in 25 th percentile 2001 -- Quality Improvement Medical Management Committee (QIMMC) identified as system-wide clinical opportunity for improvement 2002 Member intervention implemented as part of IHC-ATP project (Dr. Mark Kaufman) LDL screening reminder mailed to member LDL educational brochure included

Why remind members at 270 days post-event? LDL Testing 60-365 Days Percent Tested 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 Year LDL Testing 60-365 days post-event LDL Testing 60-270 days post-event

Aim Statement In the next 12 months, we will improve the 60-300 day post-acute coronary event (i.e., AMI, PTCA, CABG) LDL screening rate by 10%.

Primary Customers Patients/Members Clinicians (PCPs and Cardiologists) Employers (Purchasers) NCQA

Project Process Flowchart Identify population Agree to clinical recommendation Develop baseline (post-pilot intervention) measure and goal Develop enhanced intervention retrospective prospective Use HEDIS criteria Identification at SMH by Cardiac Rehab. Staff 1st year: LDL test between 60 and 365 days post event HEDIS 2004 data: LDL test 83.03% LDL control 69.97% Barriers analysis; Cause and Effect Diagram Build patient registry; 12/31/99 and forward Develop data collection tool Subsequent years: annual LDL testing Goals (by 2005) LDL test: 90% LDL < 100: 75% Discuss potential interventions and change ideas Implement monthly registry update process Enter data into laptop LDL order prior to discharge Implement pilot intervention Select enhanced intervention Identify enhanced intervention population

Cause and Effect Diagram Information systems no central database lack of system EMR Patient unaware of need for LDL medication compliance no master member index medication cost Coordination of care multiple providers variable clinical follow-up primary care cardiology cardiac surgery physician extender HIPAA concerns no patient registry HEDIS LDL value is 130 revenue codes no follow-up protocol no performance data no clinical consensus no standard follow-up doesn t believe LDL needed who is in charge? financial system QI structure lack of dedicated staff Lack of follow-up LDL after AMI, PTCA, or CABG Follow-up LDL control not < 100 Data Physician System resources

Improvement Opportunity Actively engaging practitioner in improvement Practitioner letter Practitioner alert Copy of member materials Request assistance Why focus on practitioners? 2002-2004 addressed member, data, and information systems causes Implemented member registry Implemented member intervention Resolved revenue code issues

Data Specifications Identify members with an acute coronary event HEDIS Technical Specifications for Cholesterol Management after an Acute Coronary Event Measure Administrative Medical Claims Member Identification Number Member Name ICD-9 Code (410.x1, 36.01, 36.02, 36.09, 36.1, 36.2) or DRG Code (105, 107, 109, 112, 121, 122, 516) Event date Determine if LDL Test received in 60-270 days following event date HEDIS Technical Specifications for Cholesterol Management after an Acute Coronary Event Measure Administrative Medical Claims Member Identification Number Member Name CPT code (80061, 83715, 83716, 83721) Date of Service Identify assigned primary care practitioner for members without an LDL screening Imputation Algorithm Quarterly Imputation File Member identification Number PCP Code Primary Care Practitioner Name/Clinic Location

Data Sources Administrative Medical Claims Member Number (11 digits) Member Name (Last Name, First Name, Middle Initial) ICD-9 code or 410.x1, 36.01, 36.02, 36.09, 36.1, 36.2) DRG Code(105, 107, 109, 112, 121, 122, 516) Date of Acute Coronary Event (mm/dd/yyyy) CPT Code (80061, 83715, 83716, 83721) Date of LDL Screening (mm/dd/yyyy) Quarterly Imputation File (internally generated SAS database) PCP Code Primary Practitioner Code (xxxxx) Primary Care Site Code (xxx)

80.00% 70.00% 60.00% 50.00% 40.00% 30.00% 20.00% LDL Test Following an Acute Coronary Event (60-300 Days) Member Letter Clinician Letter 11/00 12/00 01/01 02/01 03/01 04/01 05/01 06/01 07/01 08/01 09/01 10/01 11/01 12/01 01/02 02/02 03/02 04/02 05/02 06/02 07/02 08/02 09/02 10/02 11/02 12/02 01/03 02/03 03/03 04/03 05/03 06/03 07/03 08/03 09/03 10/03 11/03 12/03 Event Date Percent of Members

Next steps Evaluate effectiveness of practitioner intervention Collaborate with CPC task force to improve system-wide screening rates Implement automated reminders and lab orders through EMR Compare performance to local competitors using HEDIS 2005 data