DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE PRESENTATION TO THE SENATE ARMED SERVICES COMMITTEE SUBCOMMITTEE ON STRATEGIC FORCES UNITED STATES SENATE

Similar documents
DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE PRESENTATION TO THE SENATE ARMED SERVICES COMMITTEE STRATEGIC FORCES SUBCOMMITTEE UNITED STATES SENATE

DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE PRESENTATION TO THE SENATE ARMED SERVICES COMMITTEE SUBCOMMITTEE ON STRATEGIC FORCES UNITED STATES SENATE

Challenges of a New Capability-Based Defense Strategy: Transforming US Strategic Forces. J.D. Crouch II March 5, 2003

Issue Briefs. Nuclear Weapons: Less Is More. Nuclear Weapons: Less Is More Published on Arms Control Association (

1.0 Executive Summary

Setting Priorities for Nuclear Modernization. By Lawrence J. Korb and Adam Mount February

COMPLIANCE WITH THIS PUBLICATION IS MANDATORY

U.S. Strategic Nuclear Forces: Background, Developments, and Issues

U.S. Strategic Nuclear Forces: Background, Developments, and Issues

Nuclear Forces: Restore the Primacy of Deterrence

The best days in this job are when I have the privilege of visiting our Soldiers, Sailors, Airmen,

U.S. Strategic Nuclear Forces: Background, Developments, and Issues

SEEKING A RESPONSIVE NUCLEAR WEAPONS INFRASTRUCTURE AND STOCKPILE TRANSFORMATION. John R. Harvey National Nuclear Security Administration

U.S. Strategic Nuclear Forces: Background, Developments, and Issues

Differences Between House and Senate FY 2019 NDAA on Major Nuclear Provisions

UNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE PE F: NUCLEAR WEAPON MODERNIZATION FY 2012 OCO

OHIO Replacement. Meeting America s Enduring Requirement for Sea-Based Strategic Deterrence

U.S. Strategic Nuclear Forces: Background, Developments, and Issues

U.S. Strategic Nuclear Forces: Background, Developments, and Issues

U.S. Strategic Nuclear Forces: Background, Developments, and Issues

U.S. Strategic Nuclear Forces: Background, Developments, and Issues

U.S. Strategic Nuclear Forces: Background, Developments, and Issues

US Nuclear Policy: A Mixed Message

DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE PRESENTATION TO THE SENATE ARMED SERVICES COMMITTEE SUBCOMMITTEE ON STRATEGIC FORCES UNITED STATES SENATE

Perspectives on the 2013 Budget Request and President Obama s Guidance on the Future of the U.S. Nuclear Weapons Program

U.S. Strategic Nuclear Forces: Background, Developments, and Issues

What if the Obama Administration Changes US Nuclear Policy? Potential Effects on the Strategic Nuclear War Plan

U.S. Strategic Nuclear Forces: Background, Developments, and Issues

STATEMENT OF DR. STEPHEN YOUNGER DIRECTOR, DEFENSE THREAT REDUCTION AGENCY BEFORE THE SENATE ARMED SERVICES COMMITTEE

Reducing the waste in nuclear weapons modernization

Ladies and gentlemen, it is a pleasure to once again six years for me now to

Prepared for Members and Committees of Congress

U.S. Nuclear Strategy After the 2010 Nuclear Posture Review

Triad, Dyad, Monad? Shaping U.S. Nuclear Forces for the Future. Presentation to the Air Force Association Mitchell Institute for Airpower Studies

NUCLEAR ARMS CONTROL: CHALLENGES AND OPPORTUNITIES IN Steven Pifer Senior Fellow Director, Arms Control Initiative October 10, 2012

U.S. Nuclear Policy and World Nuclear Situation

DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE PRESENTATION TO THE COMMITTEE ON ARMED SERVICES SUBCOMMITTEE ON OVERSIGHT AND INVESTIGATIONS

Thanks, Ray, for your introduction and for the invitation to be here today.

Issue Briefs. NNSA's '3+2' Nuclear Warhead Plan Does Not Add Up

AMERICA S ARMY: THE STRENGTH OF THE NATION AS OF: AUGUST

UNCLASSIFIED. UNCLASSIFIED Air Force Page 1 of 20 R-1 Line #37

NATO's Nuclear Forces in the New Security Environment

Also this week, we celebrate the signing of the New START Treaty, which was ratified and entered into force in 2011.

STATEMENT OF GORDON R. ENGLAND SECRETARY OF THE NAVY BEFORE THE SENATE ARMED SERVICES COMMITTEE 10 JULY 2001

RECORD VERSION STATEMENT BY THE HONORABLE MARK T. ESPER SECRETARY OF THE ARMY BEFORE THE COMMITTEE ON ARMED SERVICES UNITED STATES SENATE

An Interview with Gen John E. Hyten

Policy Responses to Nuclear Threats: Nuclear Posturing After the Cold War

FISCAL YEAR 2019 DEFENSE SPENDING REQUEST BRIEFING BOOK

This Protocol is organized into ten Parts.

Strategic Deterrence for the Future

Joint Statement for the Record

FORWARD, READY, NOW!

RECORD VERSION STATEMENT BY THE HONORABLE MARK T. ESPER SECRETARY OF THE ARMY AND GENERAL MARK A. MILLEY CHIEF OF STAFF UNITED STATES ARMY BEFORE THE

MAJ GEN PLETCHER 12 February 2018

UNCLASSIFIED FY 2016 OCO. FY 2016 Base

UNCLASSIFIED. R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE PE F: Requirements Analysis and Maturation. FY 2011 Total Estimate. FY 2011 OCO Estimate

This page left intentionally blank

STATEMENT OF. MICHAEL J. McCABE, REAR ADMIRAL, U.S. NAVY DIRECTOR, AIR WARFARE DIVISION BEFORE THE SEAPOWER SUBCOMMITTEE OF THE

To THE DEFENSE ACQUISITION WORKFORCE

To be prepared for war is one of the most effectual means of preserving peace.

SUBJECT: Army Directive (Implementation of Acquisition Reform Initiatives 1 and 2)

UNCLASSIFIED. UNCLASSIFIED Air Force Page 1 of 9 R-1 Line #79

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE No June 27, 2001 THE ARMY BUDGET FISCAL YEAR 2002

James T. Conway General, U.S. Marine Corps, Commandant of the Marine Corps

For More Information

A Ready, Modern Force!

ASSIGNMENT An element that enables a seadependent nation to project its political, economic, and military strengths seaward is known as 1-5.

Summary: FY 2019 Defense Appropriations Bill Conference Report (H.R. 6157)

Making the World Safer: reducing the threat of weapons of mass destruction

Executing our Maritime Strategy

UNCLASSIFIED. R-1 Program Element (Number/Name) PE D8Z / Prompt Global Strike Capability Development. Prior Years FY 2013 FY 2014 FY 2015

TREATY BETWEEN THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA AND THE UNION OF SOVIET SOCIALIST REPUBLICS ON THE LIMITATION OF ANTI-BALLISTIC MISSILE SYSTEMS

UNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE FY 2013 OCO

UNIDIR RESOURCES IDEAS FOR PEACE AND SECURITY. Practical Steps towards Transparency of Nuclear Arsenals January Introduction

October 2017 SWIM CALL

The Next Round: The United States and Nuclear Arms Reductions After

Assessment of Air Force Global Strike Command Organizational Structures, Roles and Responsibilities

Nuclear Weapons Status and Options Under a START Follow-On Agreement

Expeditionary Force 21 Attributes

UNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE

Department of Defense DIRECTIVE. SUBJECT: Assistant Secretary of Defense for International Security Policy (ASD(ISP))

USAF Posture Statement Fiscal Year 2019

Italy s Nuclear Anniversary: Fake Reassurance For a King s Ransom

DEPUTY INSPECTOR GENERAL FOR INTELLIGENCE

Great Decisions Paying for U.S. global engagement and the military. Aaron Karp, 13 January 2018

(111) VerDate Sep :55 Jun 27, 2017 Jkt PO Frm Fmt 6601 Sfmt 6601 E:\HR\OC\A910.XXX A910

DEPUTY SECRETARY OF' DEF'ENSE 1010 DEFENSE PENTAGON WASHINGTON, DC NOV

Analysis of Fiscal Year 2018 National Defense Authorization Bill: HR Differences Between House and Senate NDAA on Major Nuclear Provisions

Department of Defense Investment Review Board and Investment Management Process for Defense Business Systems

HOMELAND SECURITY PRESIDENTIAL DIRECTIVE-4. Subject: National Strategy to Combat Weapons of Mass Destruction

SUMMARY OF NATIONAL DEFENSE PROGRAM GUIDELINES. for FY 2011 and beyond

Issue No. 405 May 12, Summaries of the 1994, 2001, and 2010 Nuclear Posture Reviews

UNCLASSIFIED. UNCLASSIFIED Air Force Page 1 of 6 R-1 Line #62

Americ a s Strategic Posture

US-Russian Nuclear Disarmament: Current Record and Possible Further Steps 1. Russian Deputy Foreign Minister Sergei Ryabkov

AMERICA S ARMY: THE STRENGTH OF THE NATION Army G-3/5/7. AS OF: August 2010 HQDA G-35 (DAMO-SSD)

SOVIET STRATEGIC FORCE DEVELOPMENTS

The current Army operating concept is to Win in a complex

DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE PRESENTATION TO THE COMMITTEE ON ARMED SERVICES DEFENSE ACQUISITION REFORM PANEL UNITED STATES HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

Prompt Global Strike Plan

Transcription:

NOT FOR PUBLICATION UNTIL RELEASED BY SENATE ARMED SERVICES COMMITTEE SUBCOMMITTEE ON STRATEGIC FORCES UNITED STATES SENATE DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE PRESENTATION TO THE SENATE ARMED SERVICES COMMITTEE SUBCOMMITTEE ON STRATEGIC FORCES UNITED STATES SENATE SUBJECT: Fiscal Year 2012 National Defense Authorization Budget Request for Department of Energy Atomic Energy Defense Activities and Department of Defense Nuclear Forces Programs STATEMENT OF: Major General William A. Chambers Assistant Chief of Staff Strategic Deterrence and Nuclear Integration April 6, 2011 NOT FOR PUBLICATION UNTIL RELEASED BY SENATE ARMED SERVICES COMMITTEE SUBCOMMITTEE ON STRATEGIC FORCES UNITED STATES SENATE

2 Introduction Chairman Nelson, Ranking Member Sessions, distinguished Members of the Sub-Committee, thank you for the opportunity to discuss your Air Force s strategic deterrent forces. In pursuit of the President s vision as outlined in the Nuclear Posture Review to reduce U.S. nuclear weapons and their role in U.S. national security strategy, the Air Force takes to heart its responsibility to uphold the entirety of his vision and pledge, " [that] as long as nuclear weapons exist, the United States will maintain a safe, secure, and effective arsenal, both to deter potential adversaries and to assure U.S. allies and other security partners that they can count on America s security commitments. We employ that arsenal to produce strategic deterrence that remains vital at a time when our National Military Strategy notes, ongoing shifts in relative power and increasing interconnectedness in the international order indicate a strategic inflection point. Maintaining credibility of our strategic deterrent requires a long-term, visible commitment to our nuclear capabilities. Continue to Strengthen The Air Force s #1 Priority Continuing to Strengthen our nuclear enterprise remains the number one Air Force priority. A year ago, testimony before this committee recounted Air Force efforts to reinvigorate our nuclear enterprise. That focus significantly advanced our structure, processes and culture. Our focus now is on making sure those advances endure. Since last year s testimony, Air Force Global Strike Command (AFGSC), as the first major command stood up in 27 years, is the most visible structural change taken to ensure focused operational oversight and proper support to United States Strategic Command. AFGSC now has full operational command of our Intercontinental Ballistic Missile (ICBM) and nuclear-capable bomber forces and is continually focused on the Airmen and their weapon systems that produce strategic deterrence every day. Additionally, the Air Force designated Nuclear Deterrence Operations as one of twelve Service Core Functions to ensure alignment of policy and resources. These are just two of the many changes to structure, process and culture that reflect a concerted effort to institutionalize our reinvigoration initiatives and maintain safe, secure and effective nuclear capabilities. The Secretary of the Air Force (SECAF) and Chief of Staff of the Air Force (CSAF) articulated strategic guidance to ingrain the Air Forces commitment to sustained focus on the nuclear enterprise. Strengthen Positive Inventory Control of Nuclear Weapons Related Materiel Refine Inspection Processes Fulfill Human Capital Plan to Ensure Appropriate Expertise at All Levels Modernize and Recapitalize Nuclear Deterrent Capability Implement New START

3 Craft a Comprehensive Deterrence and Crisis Stability Vision that Builds on the Nuclear Posture Review The initiatives in the President s Budget Request will build on successes achieved since 2008 and enable the Air Force to Continue to Strengthen along these Strategic Steps to maintain safe, secure and effective nuclear capabilities. Strengthen Positive Inventory Control of Nuclear Weapons Related Materiel Efforts continue to tighten, assess and automate accountability for Nuclear Weapons Related Materiel through a completely revamped Positive Inventory Control process. To improve accountability, sustainment activities such as these have been consolidated under a vastly revitalized Air Force Nuclear Weapons Center. The Air Force now has improved visibility of our worldwide inventories and accountability continues to improve. Refine Inspection Processes We have seen positive results from the current inspection regime across the board. We have reinforced our long-held nuclear standards and we will continue to examine the size and scope of the inspections required to sustain excellence, focusing on effectiveness. We will continue critical self-inspection, Nuclear Surety Staff Assistance Visits, and Nuclear Surety Inspections. The goal is to bolster resolute attitudes of exacting compliance and strict adherence to prescribed standards with continual self-assessment. We now perform Root Cause Analysis on all major write-ups, track them and brief progress of corrective actions to Air Force leadership. Senior Air Force leaders continue to review inspection results and other key indicators on a frequent and recurring basis. Fulfill Human Capital plan to Ensure Appropriate Expertise at All Levels When the Air Force established reinvigoration of the Nuclear Enterprise as our top priority, we included our most precious resource.our Airmen.as an integral part of the effort. In response, the nuclear and personnel communities jointly created an analytical process resulting in a comprehensive Nuclear Enterprise Human Capital Execution Plan. This action plan focuses on synchronizing the Air Force s Continue to Strengthen objectives that relate to development of Airmen and their nuclear expertise. As a result of collaborative efforts across all nuclear specialties, we have instituted changes to improve the long-term professional fitness of our people. Over the past year, we have scrutinized our small, critical nuclear career fields, and recognized that in this era of small total force numbers and dual capability requirements, we must take innovative steps to optimally manage, grow, and retain this specialized expertise. As a result, several initiatives are now underway that will improve operational effectiveness in these critical areas. In addition, the Air Force is testing a new Enlisted Developmental Team process starting with the nuclear enterprise,

4 to ensure deliberate development of our senior non-commissioned officers to create a sustainable leadership bench. We have also moved out aggressively to retain nuclear talent, ramping up programs to target expertise and critical skills through retention incentives. Recently, my organization was designated the Functional Authority for the Human Capital performing the Nuclear Deterrent Operations. As such, we are responsible for injecting strategic perspective in the array of nuclear-related human capital programs. This broadens the perspective of the human capital policy arm to the needs of the nuclear enterprise career fields, brings attention to some unintended consequences of broader policies, and allows for refinements in leveraging our skilled dual-capable nuclear Airmen. These changes allow us to deliberately develop and manage our nuclear-capable personnel. Air Force senior leaders have energized these efforts through advocacy, continuous, focused attention and regular review of nuclear initiatives. Modernize and Recapitalize Nuclear Deterrent Capability From investing in our people to investing in our systems, every weapon system in the nuclear enterprise is undergoing some form of modernization or recapitalization. Successful deterrence requires sustaining and modernizing our force structure in a consistent and deliberate manner. This is a vital contribution to the long-term credibility of our deterrent. Air Force funding efforts maintain ongoing investment for the Minuteman III and support equipment programs to extend life expectancy through 2030, as directed by the 2010 NDAA. Ensuring consistent, adequate sustainment of MM III requires an investment strategy addressing cryptographic upgrades, ICBM fuze refurbishment, and modernizing data transfer technology. Additionally, the Air Force and the National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA) plan to start a life extension program for the W78. Although a decision on a follow-on ICBM is not needed for several years, the Nuclear Posture Review recognized the need for studies to inform a decision on Ground-Based Strategic Deterrence beyond 2030. In January 2011, AFGSC initiated study efforts appropriate to the early stages of the ICBM follow-on. Once these are complete, the study will move into a Materiel Solution Analysis (MSA) phase, which will include an Analysis of Alternatives (AoA). We plan to complete the MSA phase in fiscal year (FY) 14. Air Force modernization plans for our current B-52s and B-2 bomber fleet continue an effort to maintain a viable force. The B-2 is the only aircraft capable of long-range delivery of direct attack munitions in an anti-access environment. To ensure the B-2 can continue to operate in high threat environments, we have programs to modernize communication, offensive, and defensive systems. For the B-52, we have programs to modernize and sustain the communication, radar, and weapon delivery systems.

5 Beyond modernization of existing platforms, we recognize the changing threat environment of the future requires improved capabilities. To meet that need, the Air Force is programming for a long range, nuclear capable, penetrating bomber. This program will leverage mature technologies and follow streamlined acquisition processes and focus on affordability with unit cost targets informing design trades and ensuring sufficient inventory. The program will begin in FY12 delivering an initial capability in the mid-2020s with a planned production of 80-100 bombers. The Air Force will sustain the current Air Launched Cruise Missile (ALCM) until a follow-on advanced penetrating long range stand off (LRSO) missile capability is fielded. We have multiple service life extension programs to ensure viability of the propulsion systems, guidance and flight control systems, and warhead arming components. Preparation activity began in Nov 2010. The AoA final report is due in May 2012. The Air Force has programmed for research, development, test and evaluation over the next five years for the development of LRSO. The Air Force continues to program for a nuclear-capable F-35 to modernize the Dual-Capable Aircraft (DCA) fleet. The investment over the Future Year Defense Plan (FYDP) for F-35 DCA ensures effective transition of this capability from our legacy fleet. The B61 Life Extension Program continues to be a top priority. The Air Force is committed, with the NNSA, to improve the safety and security of the B61 and ensure the Tail Kit Assembly acquisition schedule remains on track for an FY17 First Production Unit delivery. The B61 will remain compatible with current nuclear capable platforms to maintain effectiveness against projected target sets for years to come. This will also ensure the US retains the capability to forward-deploy non-strategic nuclear weapons in support of Alliance commitments. The Air Force started the Common Vertical Lift Support Platform (CVLSP) program to address capability gap shortfalls in helicopter nuclear security support, and Continuity of Government (COG)/ Continuity of Operations (COOP) missions. The CVLSP Program seeks to replace existing UH-1N fleet with an off-the-shelf, non-developmental aircraft. We are currently evaluating acquisition strategies to best meet warfighter requirements with a goal of an FY15 Initial Operational Capability. There are many other initiatives required to maintain a safe, secure, and effective arsenal. The Air Force will spend approximately $1B over the FYDP in critical areas, such as Transporter Erector Hoists, Weapons Load Trailers, Electronic Systems Test Sets, Weapons Storage and Security System (WS3), and Reentry System Test Set cables. The Air Force also continues its commitment to maintaining its history of safe and secure resource transportation. To this end, AFGSC is actively programming to rapidly replace the current Payload-Transporter vehicle with a model with improved safety and security features.

6 Implement the Nuclear Posture Review & New Strategic Arms Reduction Treaty During the next seven years, implementation of the 2010 Nuclear Posture Review (NPR) and New START Treaty (NST) will bring a reduction in the role and numbers of nuclear weapons in our national security strategy. Under the NPR, the Air Force will remove multiple warheads from its ICBMs. Under NST, which entered into force on February 5, 2011, the United States and Russia will reduce the number of accountable strategic warheads from the current Moscow Treaty warhead limit of 2,200 to 1,550. Within the treaty s central limits on Strategic Delivery Vehicles (SDVs), the Air Force will reduce the numbers of deployed ICBMs and convert some nuclear-capable B52s to conventional-only capability. Final force structure will be based on meeting the combatant commander s requirements and maintaining overall effectiveness of the deterrent force. We are currently developing options to reach the force levels specified in the treaty and have initiated the appropriate planning, programming, logistics, engineering and environmental studies to support these decisions, inform Congress, and meet treaty obligations. For its part, the Air Force began formal data exchanges with Russia in March. Inspections and exhibitions of bombers and missiles will start this month. The Air Force will also begin actions necessary to reduce deployed bombers and missiles, convert some nuclear-capable B-52 bombers to conventional-only capability, and eliminate of other assets such as, Peacekeeper silos, 564 th Missile Squadron silos, and B-52s to comply with central treaty limits. These actions must be completed by February 2018. Global Strike Command will lead the Air Force portion of this effort. Lt Gen Kowalski and his team of dedicated professionals are finalizing implementation and compliance plans to ensure the safety and security of our nuclear force as we draw down to NST mandated levels, all the while preserving the ability to deter adversaries, and assure allies and partners. In preparing for the new verification regime, the Air Force is also working closely with the Office of the Secretary of Defense and United States Strategic Command. Craft a Comprehensive Deterrence and Crisis Stability Vision that Builds on the Nuclear Posture Review As we think about providing deterrence in the 21 st century, it s important to remember that not only is the Cold War over, the post-cold War is over. Airmen who started active duty service after the fall of the Soviet Union are now retirement eligible. A generation has passed. That does not mean that strategic deterrence and nuclear forces are anachronisms. What it does mean is that we need to hit fast-forward on how we think about Nuclear Deterrence Operations in the complex security environment of today and tomorrow. The 2010 Joint Operational Environment declared: "For the past twenty years, Americans have largely ignored issues of deterrence and nuclear warfare. We no longer have that luxury." Successful strategic deterrence in the 21 st Century requires stability-based analysis that goes beyond traditional numbers-based assessments to determine optimal deterrence force structure and posture. The Air Force is

7 revitalizing deterrence thinking to meet the challenges of our complex multi-nodal security environment. Conclusion Our ability to enable other nations to achieve their security goals, serve as a convener to cooperatively address common security challenges, or lastly, act as a security guarantor, preferably with partners and allies, but alone if necessary, rests on a foundation of U.S. nuclear capabilities and the strategic deterrence they provide. Your Air Force is Continuing to Strengthen our strategic deterrent force. This will be a long-term, systematic effort to refine and solidify earlier reinvigoration initiatives and to codify institutional changes ensuring safe, secure, and effective nuclear capabilities for the Nation. The President s Budget Request reflects the positive steps we are taking to improve this Air Force core function. Across the FYDP, Air Force investment in Nuclear Deterrence Operations totals $28 billion. The Air Force is committed to ensuring this investment results in systems and capabilities that best operationalize strategic deterrence for our Nation in the multi-nodal security environment we face. The National Military Strategy acknowledges, Our Nation s security and prosperity are inseparable and Preventing wars is as important as winning them, and far less costly. In this time of limited resources, the efficiency of Nuclear Deterrence Operations is evident in the fact that for approximately 3% of the Air Force Total Obligation Authority, your Air Force continues to deliver the bedrock of global strategic stability providing the ICBM and Bomber legs of the Triad as well as dual-capable fighter capability twenty-four hours a day, seven days a week, three hundred sixty-five days a year. Thank you for the committee s continued support of America s Air Force and particularly to its Airmen and their contributions to strategic deterrence.